Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, January 2003, p. 1578-1583, Vol. 77, No. 2
0022-538X/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.77.2.1578-1583.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90033-1054
Received 5 September 2002/ Accepted 17 October 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In addition to the above 10 gene products, a new HCV protein named F protein was also recently reported (24, 25, 28). This protein is apparently expressed during natural HCV infection, since its reactive antibodies were detected in HCV patients. The F protein is encoded by a reading frame that overlaps the core protein coding sequence (Fig. 1A). This F protein is expressed by a -2/+1 ribosomal frameshift during translation (24, 28). Based on the radiosequencing of the F protein synthesized in vitro, the ribosomal frameshift site for the synthesis of the F protein is located in the A-rich sequence at codons 10 to 12 of the core protein sequence (28). Thus, the F protein and the core protein have the same amino-terminal sequence. Their sequences diverge after 10 amino acids. The length of the F protein varies depending on the genotypes. For genotype 1a such as the HCV-1 isolate, the F protein is 161 amino acids long.
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Expression of the HA-F protein in Huh7 hepatoma cells. (A) Illustrations of the 5' end of the HCV-1 genome (top) and the HA-F cDNA construct (bottom). The HCV genome shown contains the 5' noncoding region and the coding regions of the core protein and the F protein. The F protein coding sequence is shaded. A10, the stretch of 10 adenosines at codons 8 to 11 of the core protein coding sequence. This sequence contains the ribosomal frameshift signal for the synthesis of the F protein (28). The HCV-1 genome was used for the construction of the plasmid pCDEF-HAF. In this construct, one adenosine was deleted from A10 to generate A9. This deletion fused the first 10 codons of the core protein to the F protein coding sequence. The HA tag, indicated by a stippled box, was fused to the 5' end of the coding sequence. The location of the nt 57 C-to-T mutation is indicated by an asterisk. This mutation created a TAG termination codon in the core protein sequence. (B) Immunoprecipitation of the HA-F protein. pCDEF-HAF (lane 2) or the control vector pCDEF (lane 3) was transfected into Huh7 cells by using CaPO4 precipitation procedures (13). Cells were starved for methionine for 3 h at 2 days after transfection and then radiolabeled with [35S]methionine for 1 h, followed by immunoprecipitation with anti-HA antibody (13). The [35S]methionine-labeled HA-F protein synthesized in vitro with rabbit reticulocyte lysates (28) was shown in lane 1 to serve as a marker (M).
|
gene (28). The resulting DNA plasmid, pCDEF-HAF, was then transfected into Huh7 cells for the expression studies. The HA-tagged F protein was metabolically labeled with [35S]methionine, followed by immunoprecipitation with the anti-HA antibody. As shown in Fig. 1B, the HA-tagged F protein could be detected in cells transfected with pCDEF-HAF but not in cells transfected with the control vector pCDEF. Similar results were obtained when HepG2 cells, a human hepatoblastoma cell line, were used for the expression studies (data not shown). In our expression studies, we noticed that the F protein was unstable and degraded rapidly after its synthesis. For that reason, we have performed the pulse-chase labeling experiment to determine the half-life of the F protein. In this experiment, the HA-tagged F (HA-F) protein was pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine for 10 min and chased with unlabeled methionine for various lengths of time. As shown in Fig. 2A, the amount of the HA-F protein decreased significantly during the chase and became undetectable after 60 min of chase. Its half-life was determined to be ca. 8 to 10 min based on densitometry (Fig. 2B). In contrast, the amount of the HA-tagged core (HA-core) protein was not apparently reduced by the chase in a similar pulse-chase labeling experiment (Fig. 2C), a finding in agreement with a previous report that the core protein is a stable protein unless it is truncated (22).
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Pulse-chase labeling experiment of the HCV proteins expressed in Huh7 cells. (A) Pulse-chase labeling experiment of the HA-F protein. Huh7 cells transfected with pCDEF-HAF by CaPO4 precipitation were pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine for 10 min and chased with unlabeled methionine for 0, 10, 20, 30, and 60 min (lanes 2 to 6). Cells were then lysed for immunoprecipitation with the anti-HA antibody by our previous procedures (14). Lane 1 is the [35S]methionine-labeled HA-F protein marker, which was synthesized in vitro by using the rabbit reticulocyte lysates. (B) Determination of the half-life of the HA-F protein. The autoradiogram shown in panel A was analyzed with SigmaScan. The results represented the average of three independent experiments. The HA-F protein level at the zero time point of chase was defined as 100%. (C) Pulse-chase labeling experiment of the HA-core protein. Huh7 cells transfected with pCDEF-HA-core (13) were pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine for 10 min and chased with unlabeled methionine for 0, 15, 45, 60, and 90 min (lanes 1 to 5). Lane 6 was Huh7 cells transfected with the control pCDEF vector. The asterisk marks the location of a nonspecific protein band. The arrow denotes the core protein band.
|
![]() View larger version (41K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Pulse-chase labeling experiments of the HA-F protein synthesized in vitro. (A) Autoradiograms of the pulse-chase experiments. The HA-F coding sequence was inserted into pRc/CMV (Invitrogen). The HA-F RNA was then synthesized by using the T7 RNA polymerase and translated with the rabbit reticulocyte lysates. Details of these experimental procedures had been described (28). The HA-F protein was pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine for 10 min. The translation reaction was then stopped by the addition of cycloheximide to a final concentration of 400 µM. The HA-F protein was then chased for 0, 10, 30, 60, or 120 min (lanes 1 to 5). (B) Half-life of the HA-F protein in vitro. The results shown in panel A were quantified with SigmaScan. The results represented the average of three independent experiments. The HA-F protein level at the zero time point was defined as 100%.
|
![]() View larger version (53K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Stabilization of the HA-F protein by proteasome inhibitors. (A) Pulse-chase labeling experiments of HA-F synthesized in vitro. The HA-F protein was pulse-labeled with [35S]methionine for 10 min as described in the legend to Fig. 3. The translation reactions were then stopped with cycloheximide. MG132 (lower panel) or its control solvent DMSO (upper panel) was then added to a final concentration of 100 µg/ml. The reaction mixtures were chased for 0, 10, 30, 60, or 120 min (lanes 1 to 5). (B) Stabilization of HA-F by proteasome inhibitors in Huh7 cells. pCDEF-HAF (lanes 1 to 3), its control vector pCDEF (lanes 4, 5, and 8), or pCDEF-9aCore (lanes 6 and 7) was transfected into Huh7 cells. pCDEF-9aCore is identical to pCDEF-HAF with the exception that it does not have the C-to-T mutation at nt 57 (28). At 48 h after transfection, cells were treated with DMSO (lane 1), 1 µg of MG132/ml (lanes 2 and 4), or 20 µM of lactacystin (LC) (lanes 3 and 5) for 6 h. Cells were then lysed for Western blot analysis with the anti-HA antibody by using our previous procedures (13). The protein signals were analyzed by the enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Pierce). The expression level of HAF was low in DMSO-treated cells. Hence, lanes 6 to 8 were purposely overexposed on the film to reveal the HAF protein in DMSO-treated cells (lane 6). The asterisk marks the location of the HA-core protein. The identity of this protein was confirmed by Western blotting with the anti-core antibody (data not shown).
|
![]() View larger version (63K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Immunofluorescence double-staining analysis for the subcellular localization of the HA-F protein. (A and B) Huh7 cells transfected with pCDEF-HAF were double stained with rabbit anti-calreticulin and mouse anti-HA primary antibodies and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit and rhodamine (RITC)-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies. (C and D) Huh7 cells cotransfected with pCDEF-HAF and pCDEF-core (13) were double stained with rabbit anti-HCV core and mouse anti-HA primary antibodies and FITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit and RITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies. (E and F) Huh7 cells containing the HCV subgenomic RNA replicon (unpublished data) were transfected with pCDEF-HAF and double stained with mouse anti-NS5A and rat anti-HA primary antibodies and FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse and RITC-conjugated goat anti-rat secondary antibodies. In all cases, cells were fixed in 3.7% formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at 48 h after transfection for staining by using our previous procedures (14). The HA-F protein was stained in red, whereas all of the other proteins were stained in green. The images were captured with a Nikon confocal microscope at the USC Liver Center.
|
![]() View larger version (65K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Membrane fractionation experiments for the analysis of the subcellular localization of HA-F. Huh7 cells transfected with pCDEF-HAF were rinsed with PBS and scraped off the plates into PBS. After a brief centrifugation at 1,500 x g, cells were homogenized with a Dounce homogenizer in a 0.25 M sucrose solution containing 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4), 1 mM EDTA, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride. After a brief centrifugation at 15,000 x g, the postnuclear supernatant was loaded on a discontinuous sucrose gradient containing 0.6, 1.0, 1.3, and 2.0 M sucrose in 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4). The gradient was centrifuged at 40,000 rpm by using a Beckman SW40 Ti rotor for 2 h at 4°C as previously described (26). Lane 1, cells transfected with the control vector pCDEF; lanes 2 to 5, cells transfected with pCDEF-HAF; lanes 1 and 2, the postnuclear supernatant prior to fractionation; lane 3, the rough ER (RER) fraction isolated from the 1.3-2.0 M sucrose interface; lane 4, the smooth ER (SER) fraction isolated from the 1.0-1.3 M sucrose interface; lane 5, the Golgi fraction isolated from the 0.6-1.0 M sucrose interface. (Top panel) Western blot analysis with anti-HA antibody; (middle panel) Western blot analysis with anti-GRP78 antibody; (bottom panel) Western blot analysis with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated wheat germ agglutinin (WGA). The asterisk denotes a nonspecific protein band. This protein band did not cofractionate with GRP78 into the ER membrane fractions. Wheat germ agglutinin reacted with multiple protein bands.
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Hydrophilicity plot of the F protein. The HCV-1 F protein coding sequence with 1 nt deletion in the 10-A stretch was analyzed by the MacVector program. The two thick lines highlight the two major hydrophobic domains.
|
It is not unprecedented for an underproduced viral protein to be also a labile protein. The Sindbis virus nsP4 polymerase is expressed by readthrough of an opal codon, followed by proteolytic cleavage, and thus is underproduced compared to other nonstructural proteins (12). This protein is also short-lived and degraded rapidly by the ubiquitin-proteasome N-end rule pathway (6). It has been suggested that the instability of nsP4 may be important for the cessation of minus-strand RNA synthesis during viral replication (6, 21).
The replication of HCV occurs on the membrane structures in the cells, and all of the HCV proteins derived from the polyprotein have been found to associate with the ER membranes either directly or indirectly (4, 5, 7, 15, 18, 27, 29). The finding that the HCV F protein is associated with ER membranes with a subcellular localization similar to those of the HCV core protein and NS5A raises the possibility that the F protein may also be a component of the HCV replication complex. The F protein does not appear to bind directly to the core protein and NS5A. Thus, if it is indeed a component of the HCV replication complex, it will likely interact with this complex through other HCV proteins or indirectly through cellular proteins. The F protein is not needed for HCV RNA replication, because its absence did not impede the replication of the HCV subgenomic RNA replicons (1, 8, 9, 11). However, it remains to be determined whether the F protein may regulate HCV RNA replication or participate in viral morphogenesis. Our finding that the F protein is a short-lived, ER-associated protein will now allow us to further explore its biological functions.
This work was supported by an American Cancer Society postdoctoral fellowship (PF-01-037-01-MBC) to J.C. and by a research grant from the National Institutes of Health (to J.O.).
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»