Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, January 2003, p. 1069-1074, Vol. 77, No. 2
0022-538X/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.77.2.1069-1074.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Division of Virology, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo, Tokyo 108-8639,1 CREST, Japan Science and Technology Corporation, Saitama 332-0012,2 Department of Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Agriculture, Tottori University, Tottori 680-8553, Japan,7 Special Pathogens Program, National Microbiology Laboratory, Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3E 3R2, Canada,3 Institute for Virology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany,4 Division of Virology and Pathology, U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, Fort Detrick, Frederick, Maryland 21702-5011,5 Department of Pathobiological Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 537066
Received 13 June 2002/ Accepted 10 October 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Since GP is the only viral surface protein responsible for virus entry (16, 22), it must be an important target of neutralizing antibodies. However, DNA immunization of mice with the GP of the Zaire species of Ebola virus produced infectivity-enhancing antibodies, as well as neutralizing antibodies, raising issues about the development of passive prophylaxis or treatment with Ebola virus GP antibodies (17). The passive transfer of hyperimmune animal sera has been evaluated in mice, guinea pigs, and monkeys (5, 6, 8, 10) with inconsistent results. Although whole-blood transfusion from convalescent patients was also tested in patients during the Kikwit outbreak of Ebola hemorrhagic fever in 1995 (9), reliable conclusions could not be drawn from these studies owing to the inevitable lack of controls. Serum from mice subcutaneously infected with live Ebola virus protected recipient mice from a lethal challenge (3). However, it is unclear whether virus-induced immune factors other than antibodies (e.g., cytokines) may have affected the efficacy of such treatment. Although the protective efficacy of immune sera varies, as described above, passive transfer of neutralizing MAbs completely protected mice from a lethal Ebola virus infection (21).
B-cell epitopes are not well defined on Ebola virus GP. Thus, it is important not only to analyze the antigenic structure of the proteins but also to understand the mechanisms by which the antibodies interfere with the protein's function (e.g., inhibition of viral receptor binding and fusion). By using synthetic peptides derived from amino acid sequences of Ebola virus species Zaire GP, Wilson et al. (21) identified three epitopes recognized by neutralizing antibodies. However, it is generally believed that the use of synthetic peptides provides limited information about the B-cell epitopes of heavily glycosylated proteins such as Ebola virus GP (11). Since sugar chains are often important in the tertiary structure of these proteins, small synthetic peptides are not usually identical to those of the corresponding regions in the actual glycoprotein. Finally, synthetic peptides do not provide an optimal means of identifying conformational epitopes.
An alternative approach to the identification of B-cell epitopes, including conformational epitopes, is to determine the amino acid changes in antigenic variants that escape antibody neutralization. Thus, we generated a recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) containing the GP-encoding gene instead of the VSV G protein-encoding gene and used it to select mutants that escape from neutralization by MAbs. This system allowed us to identify four different amino acid residues involved in the neutralizing activity of the antibodies that protected mice from a lethal Ebola virus infection.
|
|
|---|
G*-EbolaGP) expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) was generated as previously described (16) (Fig. 1A). Human embryonic kidney 293 cells were grown in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium complemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, L-glutamine, and antibiotics. VSV genomic plasmid pVSV-XN2 and plasmids for nucleoprotein, polymerase, and phosphoprotein expression were kindly provided by J. Rose, Yale University, New Haven, Conn. A recombinant VSV containing the Ebola virus GP-encoding gene instead of the VSV G protein-encoding gene (chimeric VSV-EbolaGP) (Fig. 1B) was generated as follows. The open reading frame of the Ebola virus GP-encoding gene was cloned into plasmid pVSV-XN2 lacking the VSV G protein-encoding gene (VSV-
G) at the site where the VSV G protein-encoding gene was deleted. The recombinant VSV expressing Ebola virus GP instead of VSV G protein (chimeric VSV-EbolaGP) was then generated as previously described (14). The virus was propagated in Vero E6 cells, and its titer was determined by plaque assay (107 PFU/ml). A characterization of the recombinant virus will be published elsewhere. All infectious materials involving chimeric VSV-EbolaGP were handled in a biosafety level 4 facility at the Canadian Science Centre for Human and Animal Health.
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Schematic diagram of the two recombinant VSVs used in this study. (A) VSV G*-EbolaGP is a VSV pseudotyped with Ebola virus GP that contains the GFP-encoding gene instead of the VSV G protein-encoding gene and thus is not infectious unless a receptor binding/fusion protein (e.g., Ebola virus GP) is provided in trans. (B) Chimeric VSV-EbolaGP contains the Ebola virus GP-encoding gene in place of the VSV G protein-encoding gene and therefore can undergo multiple cycles of replication without complementation.
|
Virus neutralization tests of VSV pseudotyped with Ebola virus GP and Ebola virus.
VSV
G*-EbolaGP or Ebola virus species Zaire was incubated with MAbs for 1 h at room temperature and inoculated onto monolayers of 293 cells. Infectivities of the viruses were determined by counting the fluorescent cells as described previously (16). The relative percentage of infected cells was determined by setting the number of infected cells in the presence of normal mouse IgG or ascites (approximately 50 to 100 fluorescent cells per microscopic field) to 100.
Immunofluorescence assay. 293 cells infected with Ebola virus were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde 1 day after infection and treated with 0.1% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline. To detect virus-infected cells, we used rabbit antiserum to VP40 of Ebola virus (7) as the primary antibody. Goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate was purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, Mo.).
Selection of escape mutants. Tenfold dilutions of chimeric VSV-EbolaGP were incubated with appropriately diluted mouse ascites (250 to 500 µg of specific antibodies/ml) at room temperature for 1 h, and the mixtures were inoculated onto Vero E6 cells. Mutant viruses that grew in the presence of the MAbs were harvested from the highest dilution of the virus. This procedure was repeated. After confirming the growth of the virus in the presence of the antibodies, we extracted the viral RNA and determined the nucleotide sequences of the GP-encoding genes by standard procedures.
Passive immunization and protection tests with mice. Five-week-old female BALB/c mice (Charles River) were given 100 µl of appropriately diluted ascites (250 µg of specific antibodies/mouse) intraperitoneally on days -1 and 2. On day 0, all mice were intraperitoneally infected with 30 50% lethal doses of the mouse-adapted Ebola virus strain. The mice were monitored for clinical signs of infection for 24 days after the challenge.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Neutralizing activity of MAbs to Zaire GP. VSV pseudotyped with GP of Ebola virus species Zaire or authentic Ebola virus species Zaire was incubated with purified antibodies (10 µg/ml) and inoculated onto 293 cells. Infectivity was determined by counting fluorescent cells. The relative percentage of infectivity was determined by setting the number of infected cells in the presence of normal mouse ascites (approximately 50 to 100 GFP-positive cells per microscopic field) at 100.
|
![]() View larger version (53K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Cross-neutralizing activities of MAbs. VSV pseudotyped with GP of Ebola virus species Zaire, Sudan, Ivory Coast, or Reston was incubated with the indicated concentrations of the purified antibodies and inoculated onto 293 cells. The other experimental conditions were the same as those described in the legend to Fig. 2.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Protection conferred by passive immunization of mice with neutralizing antibodiesa
|
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Identification of GP regions containing B-cell epitopes by use of VSV pseudotyped with chimeric GPs. The numbers inside the bars are the amino acid positions of GP of Ebola virus species Zaire and Reston. All of the chimeric GPs were functional and complemented infectivity of VSV G*. For neutralization tests, viruses were incubated with appropriately diluted mouse ascites (50 µg of specific antibodies/ml) and inoculated onto 293 cells. The relative percentage of infected cells was determined by setting the number of infected cells in the presence of normal mouse ascites (approximately 50 to 100 GFP-positive cells per microscopic field) at 100. Experiments were done three times, and representative data are shown.
|
Chimeric VSV-EbolaGP was grown in the presence of either MAb 133/3.16 or 226/8.1, and antigenic variants that escaped from neutralization were isolated 3 days after infection. We biologically cloned three variants for each antibody as described in Materials and Methods. The frequencies of isolation of the antigenic variants from the parent virus were 10-5.25 and 10-4.75 with MAbs 133/16.3 and 226/8.1, respectively.
Sequence analysis of these variants' GPs revealed that each variant had a single amino acid change in the GP (Fig. 5). All three variants selected with MAb 133/3.16 had the same His-to-Arg substitution at position 549 in GP2, which is adjacent to the fusion domain (10 amino acids downstream) of GP2 (Fig. 5A). By contrast, MAb 226/8.1 selected three variants with different amino acid substitutions: Leu at position 199, Phe at position 194, or Arg at position 134 in GP1 was replaced with Ser, Ser, or Gln, respectively, suggesting that MAb 226/8.1 recognized a conformational epitope on the GP molecule. Consistent with this finding, this antibody did not react to GP in an immunoblot assay (data not shown). All amino acid substitutions were located in the regions predicted by the use of VSV pseudotyped with chimeric proteins (Fig. 4). However, neither antibody bound to synthetic peptides containing the GP regions identified by the neutralization assay.
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. (A) Schematic diagram of Ebola virus GP. Ebola virus GP is proteolytically cleaved into GP1 and GP2 subunits (20). The fusion domain, a highly conserved hydrophobic region (amino acids 524 to 539), is located 24 amino acids downstream of the N terminus of the GP2 subunit. Stars represent the positions of amino acid substitutions. (B) Amino acid substitutions found in escape mutants selected by MAbs 133/3.16 (133 variants 1 to 3) and 226/8.1 (226 variants 1 to 3). Substituted amino acids are underlined.
|
|
|
|---|
Since GP and sGP share approximately 300 N-terminal amino acids, they possess several epitopes in common (12, 18). In fact, sGP adsorbs neutralizing antibodies in anti-Zaire GP serum (4). Since sGP is detected at a high concentration in the blood of acutely infected patients (11, 12), neutralizing antibodies that do not react to sGP would be more effective for treatment of Ebola virus infection than those reacting to this molecule. In accord with this concept, neutralizing antibodies reacting with GP but not with sGP were reported to protect mice from lethal Ebola virus infection (21). We have identified single amino acid residues in two other neutralizing epitopes, and neither of the antibodies used in this study bound to sGP in an ELISA (data not shown). Interestingly, MAb 226/8.1 did not bind to sGP even though Leu at position 199, Phe at position 194, and Arg at position 134 are shared by GP and sGP. Since Ebola virus GP and sGP are composed of trimers of GP1-GP2 and antiparallel-orientated homodimers, respectively (13, 19), different oligomerization forms likely affect the tertiary structure of the conformational epitope. It is also conceivable that this epitope is not present on sGP monomers or may reside inside sGP dimers.
Including the two identified in this study, five different neutralizing epitopes on GP of Ebola virus species Zaire have been reported so far. Neither of the MAbs used in this study neutralized the infectivity of VSV pseudotyped with GPs from the Sudan, Ivory Coast, and Reston species. It seems that there are few cross-neutralizing epitopes among Ebola virus species (15). This antigenic difference must be considered for both passive prophylaxis and vaccination for Ebola virus infection. The use of neutralizing antibody cocktails, ideally cross-reactive among different Ebola virus species, should increase the protective effects of the treatments and reduce the possibility of the emergence of antigenic variants in the infected individuals.
This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas from the Ministries of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, Japan, to A.T., in part by a Japan Health Sciences Foundation grant to A.T., by National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Public Health Service research grants to Y.K., by CREST (Japan Science and Technology Corporation) (A.T. and Y.K.), and by a research grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research to H.F. (MOP-43921).
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»