Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, September 2003, p. 9823-9830, Vol. 77, No. 18
0022-538X/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.77.18.9823-9830.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322,1 Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 770302
Received 6 March 2003/ Accepted 16 June 2003
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
A major problem in mucosal immunization is the low efficiency of antigen uptake. In addition, mucosally administered antigens are frequently not immunogenic and may induce immune tolerance. Previous studies demonstrated that it is advantageous to increase the immunogenicity of vaccine antigens by coadministration of an appropriate adjuvant. Cholera toxin (CT) is a well-known mucosal adjuvant, stimulating antigen-specific secretory IgA and systemic IgG antibody responses to unrelated antigens when coadministered via the oral, nasal, or genital route (14, 32, 47). The CT holotoxin consists of two subunits: a toxigenic A subunit (CTA), which activates the adenylate cyclase system, and a pentameric B subunit (CTB), which is responsible for CT binding to GM1 gangliosides on the cell membrane. Unfortunately, in humans, oral ingestion of microgram quantities of CT can induce toxic effects (23). Because of the association of toxicity with CTA, several investigators have analyzed the potential of CTB to act as a mucosal adjuvant. Purified natural CTB, as well as recombinant CTB, has a mucosal adjuvant effect when used together with bovine serum albumin as a model antigen (9, 44). Other reports indicate that the immunogenicities of protein antigens can be enhanced when they are conjugated to CTB rather than simply mixed with it (3, 11, 35). However, the precise mechanism of CTB adjuvanticity for many antigens of interest, including virus-like particles (VLPs), needs to be further studied.
When the gag and env genes of HIV or SIV are coexpressed in cells using a baculovirus (10, 50, 51) or vaccinia virus (18, 45) expression system or in cell lines (28), these proteins are able to assemble to form VLPs containing viral core and Env proteins. VLPs derived from several viruses (hepatitis B virus, papillomavirus, Norwalk virus, and HIV) have been shown to induce neutralizing antibodies and CTL responses (5, 26, 40, 46). Most of these studies using VLP antigens were performed through systemic immunizations, which do not induce immune responses at mucosal surfaces. Moldoveanu et al. reported the induction of humoral immune responses using SIV VLPs by mucosal routes after priming with vaccinia virus expressing the SIV Env protein (37). A recent study demonstrated that intranasal immunization with SIV VLPs plus CT induced both humoral and cellular immune responses (52).
In the present study, taking advantage of the ability of nontoxic CTB to bind with high affinity to GM1 gangliosides on epithelial surfaces, we examined the effects on immune responses of targeting VLPs to mucosal surfaces. Using SIV VLPs produced from a baculovirus expression system, we conjugated CTB to SIV VLPs and determined whether the CTB conjugation enhanced cellular and/or humoral immune responses.
|
|
|---|
Production of SIV VLPs. Spodoptera frugiperda insect (Sf9) cells (Invitrogen) were maintained in serum-free SF900 II medium (GIBCO-BRL) at 28°C. The construction and characterization of SIVmac239 VLPs using the recombinant-baculovirus expression system were previously described in detail (50). For VLP production, Sf9 cells were coinfected with two independent recombinant baculoviruses expressing SIV Gag and SIV Env at multiplicities of infection of 2 and 5, respectively. On day 3 postinfection, the culture medium was collected and centrifuged at 1,500 x g for 20 min. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.45-µm-pore-size filter, and the VLPs were pelleted at 120,000 x g for 2 h at 4°C. The pelleted VLPs were resuspended in a small volume of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) buffer. The total protein concentration of the VLPs was determined by a Bio-Rad (Hercules, Calif.) protein assay. The incorporation of SIV Env protein into VLPs was determined by Western blot analysis using monkey anti-SIV sera as described previously (50).
Conjugation of CTB to VLPs. For CTB conjugation to VLPs, both VLPs and CTB (Sigma) were biotinylated using sulfo-NHS-biotin (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.) by following the manufacturer's manual. The biotinylated VLPs (1 mg) were mixed with 0.25 mg of biotinylated CTB for 30 min at 4°C. Streptavidin (0.25 mg) was added to the mixture of biotinylated VLPs and CTB, and the mixture was incubated for 1 h at 4°C. The efficiency of conjugation of CTB to VLPs was assessed by ELISA plates coated with GM1 ganglioside (Calbiochem) and by determining the bound SIV-VLPs with monkey anti-SIV serum. After all steps of CTB conjugation to VLPs, the CTB-conjugated VLPs were precipitated by ultracentrifugation and the supernatants were analyzed to determine unbound CTB or dissociated SIV Env proteins. SIV Env proteins were found in the precipitates and not in the supernatants. Most biotinylated CTB was found to be bound to biotinylated VLPs via streptavidin at a 1 (CTB)-to-4 (VLPs) ratio, conjugated VLPs, after extensive dialysis, were used for immunization without further purification.
Immunizations and sample collection. Female BALB/c mice (Charles River) aged 6 to 8 weeks were used. Each group consisted of six mice. The mice were immunized intranasally in both nares at 0, 2, 4, and 6 weeks with 40 µg of VLPs, VLPs (40 µg) plus CTB (10 µg) or CT (10 µg), or VLPs (40 µg) conjugated with 10 µg of CTB. All immunizing reagents were suspended in 45 µl of PBS buffer, and individual mice received 15 µl (7.5 µl in each naris) three times with a 3-h rest interval between injections. The mice were slightly anesthetized with isoflurane and held inverted with nose down until the droplets of vaccine that were applied to both external nares were completely inhaled.
Samples were collected before immunization and 2 weeks after every immunization. All samples were stored at -20°C prior to antibody titration. Blood samples were collected by retro-orbital plexus puncture. Saliva was collected after intraperitoneal injection of 2 µg of carbamylcholine chloride to stimulate flow, and vaginal lavage fluids were collected by washing the vagina with 200 µl of PBS buffer. Lungs and large intestines with feces were collected at 8 weeks (2 weeks after the final immunization), and a perfusion-extraction method was employed for IgA determination (24). Lung tissue was washed in a large volume of PBS to wash out any contaminating blood. Lung and intestine tissues were weighed, cut into small pieces (2 to 3 mm diameter), suspended in extraction buffer (2% saponin, 0.1% NaN3), and rocked overnight (100 mg of lung in 400 µl of extraction buffer and 100 mg of intestine in 200 µl of extraction buffer). The supernatants were collected for antibody assay.
ELISA. For the analysis of CTB conjugation to VLPs, ELISA plates (Costar) were coated with ganglioside GM1 (Calbiochem) at a concentration of 5 µg/ml of PBS overnight at 4°C. In all washing steps, PBS with 0.05% Tween 20 was used. After being washed, the coated plate was blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 2 h at 37°C. CTB-conjugated VLPs were diluted with PBS and added to both uncoated and GM1-coated wells. The numbers of bound VLPs were determined using monkey anti-SIV sera following horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies. The efficiency of conjugation was represented as the percentage of VLPs in GM1-coated wells compared to that in uncoated wells (total VLPs). HRP substrate, ABTS [2,2'-azinobis(3-ethylbenzthiazolinesulfonic acid)] containing H2O2 (Sigma), was used to develop color, and the optical density at 405 nm was read by ELISA reader (MTX Lab Systems). For determination of antibodies specific for the SIV Env or Gag protein, ELISA plates were coated with purified SIV Env at 3 µg/ml of PBS or Gag p55 protein at 2.5 µg/ml of PBS and blocked with 2% BSA. Samples diluted in PBS with 1% BSA were added to SIV Env- or Gag pp55-coated ELISA plates and incubated overnight at 4°C or for 4 h at room temperature. After being washed, HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG, IgG1, and IgG2a antibodies (Southern Biotechnology) were used for serum samples and goat anti-mouse IgA antibody was used for mucosal samples (vaginal wash, saliva, lung, and intestine), and color was developed as described above. Antibody concentrations were determined by comparing the readings for experimental samples with the standard curves for purified mouse IgG, IgG1, IgG2a, and IgA antibodies and are represented as the arithmetic mean ± 1 standard error. The statistical significance was calculated by Student's two-tailed t test for two groups.
Cell preparations. The spleen, cervical and mesenteric lymph nodes, and Peyer's patches were obtained from individual mice and minced between the frosted ends of glass slides. To remove erythrocytes, the spleen cells were treated with 0.1 M ammonium chloride buffer at pH 7.4 for 2 min at room temperature, and the remaining cells were then washed in RPMI media with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). The cells, suspended in medium, were filtered through fine metal screens or nylon membranes (Fisher) to remove cellular debris. After being stained with trypan blue, live cells were counted by light microscopy and used for enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT), cell proliferation, and CTL analyses.
ELISPOT and proliferation assays.
All antibodies against mouse cytokines used in ELISPOT assays were purchased from PharMingen (San Diego, Calif.). Anti-mouse gamma interferon (IFN-
) (R4-6A2) and interleukin-4 (IL-4) (BVD4-1D11) antibodies (4 µg/ml in PBS) were used to coat Multiscreen 96-well filtration plates (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.) at 4°C overnight. After the cytokine-coated plates were blocked with 10% FBS in RPMI 1640, freshly isolated splenocytes (1 x 106 to 2 x 106) were added to each well. SIV Gag peptide (amino acids [aa] 186 to 205; INQMLNCVGDHQAAMQIIRD) or a mixture of SIV Env peptides (aa 211 to 230, CNTSVIQESCDKHYWDAIRF, and aa 231 to 250, RYCAPPGYALLRCNDTNYSG) (29, 31, 52) was added at a concentration of 5 µg/ml, and the plates were incubated for 36 h at 37°C. After the plates were washed with PBS with 0.05% Tween 20 six times, biotinylated anti-mouse IFN-
(XMG1.2) and IL-4 (BVD6-24G2) antibodies (1 µg/ml) were added to the plates. After the plates were washed, spots in the plates were developed with stable DAB (Research Genetics) for 3 to 5 min and counted in an ImmunoSpot ELISPOT reader (Cellular Technology, Ltd.). Splenocytes from naive mice were used as a negative control. For proliferation assays, 50 µl containing 5 x 105 cells was mixed with 50 µl of CD4 T-cell epitope peptide (RQIINTWHKVGKNVYL; 20 µg/ml) (53) and incubated for 3 days, and live cells were determined by using a CellTiter96 nonradioactive cell proliferation assay (Promega, Madison, Wis.). This method has been widely used to measure the proliferation of various cell types, including lymphocytes (17, 39, 43). The degree of cell proliferation is presented as the ratio of the optical density at 570 nm for cells from immunized mice to that for control cells from nonimmunized mice.
CTL analysis. P815 target cells (major histocompatibility complex class I; H-2d) were prepared by infecting them with rVV expressing SIVmac239 Env protein at a multiplicity of infection of 1. Infected P815 cells (104) were harvested 5 to 7 h postinfection and incubated with freshly isolated lymphocytes from immunized or naïve mice at different effector-to-target-cell ratios. The amount of cell lysis was measured using the CytoTox96 nonradioactive cytotoxicity assay (Promega). This assay measures lactate dehydrogenase, a stable cytosolic enzyme that is released upon cell lysis in the same way that 51Cr is released in radioactive assays. The results from these two assays were shown to be almost identical (8, 27), and several studies have used the nonradioactive cytotoxic assay for CTL analysis (2, 6, 36). The percentage of specific target cell lysis was represented based on total cell lysis with 0.1% Triton X-100.
Neutralization assay. For neutralization assays, we used sMAGI cells (7) and SIVmac1A11 grown in HUT78 cells (American Type Culture Collection). In brief, sMAGI cells (3.5 x 103 per well) were added to a 96-well plate 1 day before infection. Serum samples were heat inactivated (56°C; 30 min) and serially twofold diluted in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) containing 10% FBS, and a final volume of 25 µl was mixed with 25 µl of diluted virus stock containing 100 infectious particles. The virus-serum mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 1 h and then added to sMAGI cells with DEAE-Dextran at a final concentration of 15 µg/ml. After a 2-h incubation, 150 µl of DMEM was added. After 1 day of incubation, the medium was replaced with 10% FBS DMEM containing 10 µM zidovudine (Sigma). On day 3 postinfection, the medium was removed and the cells were fixed and stained as described previously (7). The blue cells in the wells without antisera indicated the total number of infectious virus particles. Neutralization titers are presented as the dilutions giving a 50% reduction in the number of blue cells. Vaginal-wash samples from three mice were pooled, and the resulting two pools from each group (six mice per group) were analyzed for neutralization activities.
|
|
|---|
50%, as determined using GM1-coated (conjugated VLPs) and uncoated (total VLPs) wells in ELISA plates (data not shown). For comparison, groups immunized with VLPs alone, or VLPs plus CTB or CT, were included. To examine the effects of CTB conjugation on immune responses to VLPs, serum samples were collected 2 weeks after intranasal immunizations, and SIV Env-specific total IgG antibody was determined as shown in Fig. 1. The levels of anti-SIV Env were greatly increased in all groups after the second boost (6 weeks), which is consistent with studies of hepatitis virus surface B antigen together with recombinant CTB adjuvant (21). Mice immunized with SIV VLPs in the absence of any adjuvant showed a relatively high level of serum IgG specific to the SIV Env protein. CTB conjugation to SIV VLPs induced a twofold-enhanced level of SIV Env-specific IgG antibody (P < 0.02), and a similar increase was induced by VLPs mixed with unconjugated CTB (P < 0.02). Mice immunized with VLPs plus CT showed the highest level of SIV Env-specific antibodies, but the difference between the groups of mice which received CTB or conjugated CTB as the adjuvant and the group of mice which received CT was not significant (P = 0.237 for CTB and P = 0.286 for conjugated CTB). Gag-specific serum IgG antibody responses were also found to be significantly higher in the VLP-plus-CTB and VLP-CTB (conjugated) groups compared to the VLP group (Fig. 1B), although the Gag-specific antibody concentrations were lower than those of Env-specific antibody. These results indicate that both conjugated CTB and free CTB have an adjuvant effect on inducing antibody responses to VLPs.
![]() View larger version (33K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Humoral immune responses after SIV-VLP intranasal immunizations. (A) Anti-SIV Env-specific IgG. Serum samples were collected before immunization (0 weeks [shaded bars]) and at 2 weeks after the second (4 weeks [cross-hatched bars]), third (6 weeks [checked bars]), and fourth (8 weeks [solid bars]) immunizations and analyzed using ELISA plates coated with purified SIV Env gp160 protein. (B) Anti-SIV Gag protein-specific IgG. Serum samples were collected after the fourth (8 weeks) immunizations and analyzed using ELISA plates coated with purified SIV p55 Gag protein. Standard error bars are indicated for six mice per group. Pre, preimmune samples; VLP, SIV VLPs only; V+CTB, SIV VLPs plus CTB (mixture); V-CTB, SIV VLP-CTB (conjugated); V+CT, SIV VLPs plus CT (mixture). *, P < 0.02 (calculated by Student's two-tailed t test compared to VLP alone).
|
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Isotypes of IgG1 and IgG2a in sera after the third immunization (6 weeks). (A) SIV Env-specific IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies were determined. (B) CTB-specific IgG1 and IgG2a were determined using ELISA plates coated with purified CTB protein. The relative ratios of IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies in the serum were maintained at similar levels following the fourth immunization (data not shown). Standard error bars are indicated for six mice per group. VLP, SIV VLPs only; V+CTB, SIV VLP plus CTB; V-CTB, SIV VLP-CTB (conjugated); V+CT, SIV VLPs plus CT.
|
Mucosal IgA responses to intranasally administered VLPs. To determine mucosal immune responses after intranasal immunization with VLPs, SIV Env-specific IgA antibody induction was analyzed in mucosal secretions of vaginal washes and saliva collected after the third immunization (at week 6), as shown in Fig. 3. Intranasal immunization with VLPs without any adjuvant elicited SIV-specific IgA antibody responses in saliva, vaginal-wash samples, and lung lavage fluid and a low level of IgA in the large intestine. CTB conjugation to VLPs showed enhanced levels of SIV-specific IgA in vaginal-wash samples and saliva (both P < 0.05) and in extracts of lung (P < 0.02) and large intestines (P < 0.05). Importantly, free CTB included in VLPs elicited levels of SIV-specific mucosal IgA production similar to those elicited by VLPs with CT as an adjuvant. Analysis of mucosal IgA immune responses indicated that groups of mice intranasally immunized with CTB-conjugated VLPs, VLPs plus CTB, or VLPs plus CT were similarly effective in enhancing the levels of mucosal IgA antibody responses against VLPs.
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Mucosal IgA responses to SIV Env after intranasal immunization with VLPs. For vaginal-wash samples and saliva, preimmune samples (Pre) were used as controls. For intestine and lung extracts, samples from naive (unimmunized) mice (Naive) were used as controls. (A) IgA in vaginal-wash samples after the third immunization (6 weeks). (B) IgA in saliva after the third immunization (6 weeks). The SIV Env-specific IgA antibodies in vaginal-wash samples and saliva after the fourth immunization were similar to those observed after the third immunization (data not shown). (C) IgA in large-intestine extracts after the fourth immunization (8 weeks). (D) IgA in lung extracts after the fourth immunization (8 weeks). Standard error bars are indicated for six mice per group. VLP, SIV VLPs only; V+CTB, SIV VLP plus CTB; V-CTB, SIV VLP-CTB (conjugated); V+CT, SIV VLPs plus CT. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.02 (calculated by Student's two-tailed t test compared to VLP alone).
|
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. SIV neutralizing titers in sera and in secretions of mice immunized with VLPs. The results represent averages (plus standard errors) from three independent experiments. The data are 50% neutralization titers. (A) Serum neutralizing titers. Individual serum samples (six samples per group) collected after the fourth immunization (at 8 weeks) were serially diluted and incubated with SIVmac1A11 prior to being added to sMAGI cells. (B) Neutralizing titers in vaginal secretions. Vaginal-wash samples (collected in weeks 6 and 8) were pooled (two pools per group), and serially diluted samples were incubated with SIVmac1A11 prior to being added to sMAGI cells. The titer of V-CTB did not show variation in three independent experiments. Cont, control (preimmune samples); VLP, SIV VLPs only; V+CTB, SIV VLP plus CTB; V-CTB, SIV VLP-CTB (conjugated); V+CT, SIV VLPs plus CT. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.02 (calculated by Student's two-tailed t test compared to VLP alone).
|
Cellular immune responses after intranasal immunization with VLPs.
The mechanism of induction of cellular immune responses after mucosal immunization with VLPs is not well understood. Determining the cytokine production profile by ELISPOT assay is one of the approaches to assess the cellular immune responses. Two weeks after the final immunization, the splenocytes were freshly isolated and used to determine SIV Env- or Gag-specific IFN-
-producing cells as an indicator for Th1-type cellular immune responses (Fig. 5A). In all groups of mice immunized with VLPs intranasally, IFN-
-producing spots were easily detected and the numbers of Gag-specific IFN-
-producing spots were found to be higher than those of Env-specific IFN-
-producing spots. Conjugation of CTB to VLPs or coimmunization of VLPs with CT greatly increased the number of IFN-
spots (threefold) compared to the group of mice immunized with VLPs only (P < 0.02). However, the addition of free CTB to VLPs did not increase the number of IFN-
spots significantly, in contrast to its effect on humoral immune responses.
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Cytokine-producing lymphocytes determined by an ELISPOT assay. Splenocytes were isolated 2 weeks after the final (fourth) immunization and stimulated for 2 days with SIV Env or SIV Gag peptide. (A) The spots for IFN- -producing cells from the spleen were counted and expressed based on 106 cells. (B) The spots for IL-4-producing cells from the spleen were expressed based on 106 cells. Standard error bars are indicated for six mice per group. Naïve, unimmunized control; VLP, SIV VLPs only; V+CTB, SIV VLP plus CTB; V-CTB, SIV VLP-CTB (conjugated); V+CT, SIV VLPs plus CT. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.02 (calculated by Student's two-tailed t test compared to VLP alone).
|
was employed, using an IL-4-detecting ELISPOT assay. The numbers of IL-4 spot-producing spleen cells were relatively high in all mice immunized with VLPs compared to those of IFN-
-producing cells. The number of Gag-specific but not Env-specific IL-4-producing cells was increased by the addition of free CTB or by conjugating CTB to VLPs (Fig. 5B).
To directly determine the activity of CTL, cytolysis of target cells by lymphocytes from immunized or naïve mice was analyzed using a nonradioactive CTL assay (2, 6, 36). P815 cells infected with rVV expressing SIV Env were used as target cells. Since the unfractionated lymphocytes used in this study were heterogeneous cell types containing both T and B cells, higher ratios of effector to target cells are required for CTL activity. Spleen cells from mice immunized with VLPs alone could achieve
20% lysis of target cells at the effector-to-target-cell ratio of 50, whereas cells from naïve mice showed <10% CTL activity (Fig. 6A). Conjugation of CTB to VLPs increased CTL activity up to 55% in splenocytes (P < 0.05), as well as in lymph node cells (data not shown). The addition of CTB or CT to VLPs for intranasal immunization produced CTL activity higher than that in the group immunized with VLPs alone but consistently lower than that in the group immunized with VLPs conjugated to CTB.
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. (A) CTL activities of spleen cells. P815 cells (major histocompatibility complex class I; H-2d) infected with rVV expressing SIVmac239 Env protein were used as target cells. Target cell lysis was determined using a nonradioactive CTL assay. CTL activities are represented as percentages of target cell lysis. The results are shown with standard error bars for six mice per group. The ratio on the x axis is the effector-to-target-cell ratio. (B) Assessment of T-cell proliferation. Splenocytes isolated from naïve and immune mice were incubated for 3 days in media containing T helper cell epitope peptide. Proliferation of cells was determined using a nonradioactive proliferation assay. The proliferation index is presented as the factor of increase in absorbance (570 nm) compared with lymphocytes from nonimmunized-mouse controls. Standard error bars are indicated for six mice per group. Naïve, unimmunized control; VLP, SIV VLPs only; V+CTB, SIV VLP plus CTB; V-CTB, SIV VLP-CTB (conjugated); V+CT, SIV VLPs plus CT. *, P < 0.05 (calculated by Student's two-tailed t test compared to VLP alone).
|
These results indicate that intranasal immunization with VLPs, even at low levels, can induce cellular immune responses. Conjugation of CTB to VLPs greatly increased the number of SIV Env-specific IFN-
-producing spleen and lymph node cells, CTL activities, and proliferation of splenocytes. In these assays, conjugated CTB was found to be superior to uncoupled CTB in enhancing cellular immune responses.
|
|
|---|
In contrast to toxic CT, CTB is an attractive mucosal adjuvant, because it can be safely administered to humans (22, 23). CTB binds to cell membrane GM1 gangliosides, thus enhancing its uptake by mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue. It is likely that conjugating CTB to an antigen would enhance the immune responses to the antigen, as shown in previous studies (4, 11, 35, 42). However, most of these studies focused on comparing the induction of binding antibodies after immunization with conjugated or free antigen. By conjugating CTB to the VLPs, it was expected that the same cells taking up CTB would capture VLPs, thus enhancing mucosal uptake of VLPs. However, we found that both approaches similarly enhanced the humoral immune responses to SIV Env in blood, intestine, and lung. Consistent with our results, using streptococcal surface antigen or ovalbumin as a model antigen, it was reported that free or coupled CTB had similar adjuvant effects on inducing humoral immune responses (9, 41, 49).
The detection of neutralizing antibodies in mucosal secretions has significant implications for AIDS vaccine-induced mucosal protection. In contrast to serum neutralizing activities, we observed enhanced neutralizing activities in vaginal-wash pools from mice immunized with CTB-conjugated VLPs. The vaginal-wash pools from mice coimmunized with VLPs and free CTB or CT showed the highest levels of neutralizing activities to SIV. Conjugation of CTB to VLPs did not enhance the serum neutralization titers, although higher levels of binding antibodies against SIV Env protein were induced. The structural integrity of envelope antigens on VLPs should not be affected after CTB conjugation, since conjugation was carried out under very mild conditions. However, we cannot rule out the possibility that some epitopes of SIV Env on VLPs might be blocked on the CTB-conjugated particles. This might have resulted in apparently lower conjugation efficiency due to the lower binding reactivities of monkey antisera (used to evaluate conjugation efficiency) to the conjugated VLPs compared to the unconjugated VLPs. The potential to induce neutralizing antibody may be greater if CTB is incorporated into VLPs during the budding process at the cell surface rather than by in vitro conjugation.
In contrast to humoral immune responses, our results indicate that the VLP-CTB conjugate was superior to free CTB mixed with VLPs in inducing cellular immune responses. Most previous studies of CTB conjugation to protein antigens focused on analyzing humoral immune responses. We observed that IFN-
-producing lymphocytes, CTL activities in the spleen, and lymphocyte proliferation responses were higher in mice immunized with the VLP-CTB conjugate than in mice immunized with VLPs plus free CTB. It has also been reported that conjugating CTB to influenza virus hemagglutinin or ovalbumin increased the CD40 and CD86 expression of antigen-presenting cells, T-cell proliferation, and IFN-
secretion (16). Thus, enhancing cell-mediated immune responses would provide an advantage in developing CTB-conjugated VLP-based vaccines.
Our results provide two lines of evidence that, as a particulate antigen, VLPs may interact with mucosal immune cells differently from soluble protein antigens in inducing immune responses. First, most protein antigens, when administered intranasally in the absence of adjuvant, induce low or undetectable levels of immune responses (20, 34, 38, 44). In contrast, VLPs alone administered intranasally induced both systemic and mucosal immune responses at relatively high levels. Second, VLPs elicited higher IgG2a isotype antibody responses specific to SIV Env than IgG1 isotype antibody responses. This is quite interesting, considering that soluble protein antigens with CT or CTB adjuvant are reported to preferentially induce IgG1 rather than IgG2a (30, 44). In another recent study consistent with our results, HIV Env in lipid vesicles conjugated with CTB induced both IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies (30). Our results indicate that intranasal immunization with CTB-conjugated VLPs can induce both Th1- and Th2-type responses, as determined by antigen-specific IgG1 and IgG2a production; production of cytokines, such as IFN-
- and IL-4-producing lymphocytes; and CTL activities in spleen cells.
In summary, VLPs produced from a baculovirus expression system are immunogenic and can induce systemic, as well as mucosal, immune responses by intranasal immunization. CTB, in the context of VLPs, is effective as a mucosal adjuvant, and CTB conjugation to VLPs enhances both humoral and cellular immune responses. Considering the practical advantages and the capacity to stimulate mucosal as well as systemic immunity, intranasal immunization protocols have considerable promise for the design of vaccines inducing protective responses against HIV. The present results support the feasibility of further efforts to develop such immunization strategies.
This work has been supported by NIH/NIAID grants AI28147 and AI43045. SIV Gag p55 protein, SIV Env, and Gag peptides were obtained through the NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»