Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, June 2003, p. 6753-6760, Vol. 77, No. 12
0022-538X/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.77.12.6753-6760.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Virology, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Wallingford, Connecticut 06492
Received 17 December 2002/ Accepted 27 March 2003
|
|
|---|
2.2 µM, with a therapeutic index of 60, and it is not active against a panel of RNA and DNA viruses. A time-of-addition experiment suggested that compound-1453 targets a stage of the viral life cycle after viral entry. To determine the target of compound-1453, resistant virus was generated. Resistant variants grew efficiently in the presence or absence of 33 µM compound-1453 and exhibited replication efficiency in the presence of compound-1453 approximately 1,000-fold higher than that of the wild-type (wt) virus. Functional mapping and sequence analysis of resistant cDNAs revealed a single amino acid substitution (Glu to Gly) at residue 291 in the NS5B polymerase in all eight independently generated cDNA clones. Recombinant virus containing this single mutation retained the resistance phenotype and a replication efficiency similar to that of the original isolated resistant virus. Since compound-1453 did not inhibit BVDV polymerase activity in vitro (50% inhibitory concentration > 300 µM), we developed a membrane-based assay that consisted of a BVDV RNA replicase complex isolated from virus-infected cells. Compound-1453 inhibited the activity of the wt, but not the drug-resistant, replicase in the membrane assay at concentrations similar to those observed in the viral infection assay. This work presents a novel inhibitor of a viral RNA-dependent RNA replicase. |
|
|---|
Flavivirus RNA synthesis is localized to endoplasmic reticular membranes in the perinuclear site of infected cells (25). Little is known about the regulation and components of flavivirus replication complexes during RNA replication. Many efforts, including the use of cell-free systems (1, 3, 8, 9, 53) and subcellular fractionation methods (8, 10), have been made to identify viral and cellular proteins required for viral replication. Although the nonstructural proteins are believed to function in viral RNA replication, little is known about the specific functions of the individual proteins. The N-terminal domain of NS3 contains a serine PR activity responsible for processing the nonstructural proteins at cleavage sites downstream of NS3 (49, 50). NS4A is believed to function as a cofactor for NS3 processing at two of these sites, 4B/5A and 5A/5B (44, 51). The C-terminal domain of NS3 contains both helicase and ATPase activities believed to be essential for RNA replication (43, 46). NS5B is thought to function as the viral RNA polymerase, as it contains conserved motifs found in all positive-strand viral RNA polymerases (21) and it has recently been shown to possess an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity (55). The exact function(s) of NS4B and NS5A is unknown. The results of a cross-linking experiment with BVDV-infected cells suggested that NS3, NS4B, and NS5A are associated as components of a multiprotein complex (31). In addition, NS4B has been implicated as an important modulator of BVDV cytopathogenicity, since a mutation in NS4B can attenuate BVDV cytopathogenicity despite NS3 production (31) which correlated invariantly with BVDV cytopathogenicity (14). NS5A has been shown to be a serine phosphoprotein that is tightly associated with one or more cellular kinases (32) as well as to interact with the
subunit of translation elongation factor 1 (20). The finding that defects in BVDV NS5A can be complemented in trans suggests a unique role for NS5A in viral RNA replication (4, 17). Recently, infectious cDNA clones for BVDV have been generated, providing a useful tool to examine the role of individual proteins in the viral RNA replication cycle (4, 26, 45).
In this study, we identified a compound, compound-1453, that selectively inhibited the growth of BVDV and appeared to target a protein involved in viral RNA replication. To determine whether a viral protein is targeted by compound-1453, we have isolated resistant viruses and demonstrated that the causal mutation resides in NS5B, the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). In addition, we showed that compound-1453 inhibits BVDV RdRp activity in a membrane-based assay, but not in an in vitro enzymatic assay, indicating that this compound affects the function of the viral RNA replication complex.
|
|
|---|
Multicycle BVDV growth assay. Cell culture plates (96 well) were seeded with 104 MDBK cells per well in MEM supplemented with 5% FCS. At 24 h later, 500 PFU of BVDV was adsorbed to cells for 1 h and then 100 µl of MEM containing compound, 0.75% dimethyl sulfoxide, and 2% FCS was added. Each dilution was tested in triplicate. Uninfected cells and infected cells without compound were included as controls in each assay plate. After 4 days at 37°C, living cells were stained using MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) (36, 42). The optical density of the wells was read at 540 nm in a microplate reader. Antiviral activity was measured as MTT conversion relative to the differential between compound-added cells and controls. The 50% effective concentration (EC50) is defined as the concentration of compound resulting in 50% protection from virus-induced cytopathic effect, and the 50% cytotoxic concentration (CC50) is defined as the concentration of the compound which kills 50% of the cells in the absence of virus. The therapeutic index (TI) of the compound was then determined according to the equation TI = CC50/EC50.
Isolation of compound-1453-resistant BVDV. Compound-1453-resistant virus was generated by passaging wild-type (wt) BVDV in MDBK cells in the presence of increasing concentrations of compound. Initially virus was grown in the presence of 1.2 µM compound. Subsequently, virus was grown in 3.6, 7.2, and 15 µM compound-1453, with the final passage being in 33 µM compound. Both wt and resistant virus stocks were plaque purified four times in the presence or absence of 33 µM compound and amplified on MDBK monolayers at 37°C.
cDNA cloning and rescue of mutant phenotype. Full-length infectious BVDV cDNA was generated by in vitro ligation of two BVDV clones, 153E-2 and 192F-1 (S. M. Levine, R. E. Rose, and R. J. Colonno, unpublished data). Plasmid 153E-2 contains the entire BVDV genome except for a deletion of nucleotides (nt) 253 to 1868 flanked by SphI and PinAI sites. 192F-1 contains nt 1 to 3160 of the BVDV genome. 153E-2 was digested with SphI and PinAI and ligated with the gel-purified SphI-to-PinAI fragment from 192F-1. The ligation mixtures were then linearized with XbaI, cleaned up by phenol extraction and ethanol precipitation, and used for in vitro transcription.
To generate compound-1453-resistant BVDV cDNA, total RNA was isolated from MDBK cells infected at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 3 with the resistant BVDV, using an RNeasy Total RNA kit (Qiagen). As a control, RNA was isolated in parallel from cells infected with wt BVDV and used for cDNA synthesis. All cDNAs were then cloned into vector 153E-2dl
. 153E-2dl
contains a 1,906-nt SpeI deletion within the NsiI-XbaI region and is used to eliminate wt background during subcloning. This recombinant plasmid, along with 192F-1, was used to generate infectious RNA transcripts to confirm the resistance phenotype.
To separate clustered mutations, subcloning was performed by replacing the PstI fragment of 153E-2 with the corresponding region of 1453r-3.1, creating 1453r-E>G. The PstI region of 1453r-E>G was sequenced to confirm that only the single A-to-G mutation at nt 11064 was present.
DNA sequence analysis.
The entire DNA sequence of the BVDV cDNA clones 153E2, 153E-2dl
, and 192F-1 was determined using an ABI PRISM dye terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit and analyzed on an Applied Biosystems 377 automated DNA sequencer. The DNA sequence of the entire region between the NsiI (nt 6330) and XbaI (nt 12602) sites was also determined for eight independent cDNA clones from compound-1453-resistant viral RNA and one clone from the wt BVDV RNA.
Metabolic labeling of RNA by [5-3H]uridine. To inhibit cellular RNA synthesis, 0.5 µg of actinomycin D (Act. D)/ml was added to BVDV-infected MDBK cells at 7 h p.i. At 9 h p.i., compound-1453 at a final concentration of 33 µM and 5 mCi of [5-3H]uridine (NEN Life Science)/ml were added, and 5 h later the RNA was harvested using an RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen). RNA amounts were determined by UV absorption, and the results are expressed as specific radioactivity (counts per minute/milligram of RNA).
Membrane preparation and viral RNA replicase assay.
BVDV-infected MDBK cells were suspended in ice-cold hypotonic buffer A (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4; 10 mM KCl; 1.5 mM MgCl2; 2x PR inhibitor cocktail [Roche]), allowed to swell for 30 min on ice, and then broken by 20 strokes with a Dounce homogenizer. The disrupted cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 1,000 x g for 5 min. The supernatant fraction containing cytoplasmic material and plasma membranes was concentrated by high-speed centrifugation at 200,000 x g for 30 min, resuspended in a small volume (100 µl per 108 cell equivalents) of fresh buffer B (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0; 10 mM NaCl; 1x PR inhibitor cocktail), and used for an RNA polymerase assay. Replicase reactions were carried out in a total volume of 40 µl in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)-10 mM MgCl2-5 mM dithiothreitol-500 µM each ATP, GTP, and UTP-10 µCi of [
-33P]CTP (3,000 mCi/mmol)-1.5 U of RNasin (Promega)-0.5 µg of Act. D-1 µg of tRNA-5 to 10 µg (total protein) of the membrane preparation. After incubation at 25°C for 3 h, the reaction mixtures were adjusted to 200 µl with water and extracted twice with phenol-chloroform and the RNA products were precipitated in ethanol and analyzed on a 1% native agarose gel (40). For some experiments, nuclease S1 digestion was applied to examine double-stranded RNA products from the polymerase assay. The RNA products were resuspended in 20 µl of S1 digestion buffer (Invitrogen) and then incubated with 5 U of nuclease S1 (Invitrogen) for 30 min at 37°C. After digestion, the nuclease was removed by phenol extraction and the RNAs were precipitated in ethanol and analyzed on the native agarose gel. Radioactivity incorporated into virus-specific RNA was quantitated using ImageQuant software for the PhosphorImager.
Reverse RNase protection assay. For generation of a protective RNA used in the reverse RNase protection assay, DNA fragments corresponding to the BVDV genome sequences of nt 8895 to 10401 and nt 10401 to 12372 were excised from a BVDV cDNA (192F-1) and subcloned into pBluescript II (Stratagene), where the fragment was flanked by T7 and T3 promoters. These plasmids were then linearized with the proper restriction enzymes and used for in vitro transcription to generate the protective RNAs complementary to the positive or negative sense of BVDV RNA. A gel-isolated radiolabeled RNA product from the RNA polymerase assay was mixed with an excess amount of unlabeled protective RNA (as described above), and the RNA mixture was dried in a savant speed vacuum. The dried RNA mixture was suspended in hybridization buffer (Ambion) and heated to 92°C and then slowly cooled down and maintained at 55°C overnight. The hybridized RNAs were digested by a mixture of RNase A and RNase T1 (Ambion). Fragments were resolved on a 1% agarose gel by electrophoresis.
Indirect immunofluorescence. Indirect immunofluorescence was performed as described previously (15). Antibodies employed were anti-NS3 monoclonal antibody (MAb) 20.10.6 (1:50 dilution; purchased from Ed J. Dubovi, Cornell University) and rhodamine-conjugated goat anti-mouse antibody (1:100 dilution).
|
|
|---|
90 to 210 µM, which provides a therapeutic index of
60 (Fig. 1B). The activity of compound-1453 against BVDV was also determined using a plaque reduction assay, yielding an EC50 of
0.6 µM (results not shown).
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Inhibition of BVDV replication by compound-1453. (A) Structure of compound-1453. (B) Plates (96-well) of MDBK cells were infected with BVDV (500 PFU/well) or mock infected in the presence of various concentrations of compound-1453; 4 days later, percentages of protection (closed circles) and cytotoxicity (open circles) were calculated through the MTT-based colorimetric assay.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Specificity and cytoxicity of compound-1453a
|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Effect of compound-1453 on BVDV growth. (A) One-step growth curve of BVDV. MDBK cells were infected with BVDV at an MOI of 3; at the indicated times (1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, or 23 h p.i.), infected cells were harvested and titers of progeny virus were determined by plaque assay. (B) Effect of time of compound-1453 addition on inhibition of BVDV growth. Cells were infected with BVDV at an MOI of 3, and compound-1453 was added at 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, or 13 h p.i. at a final concentration of 33 µM. At 23 h p.i., infected cells were harvested and titers of progeny virus were determined in the absence of compound.
|
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Effect of compound-1453 on BVDV RNA synthesis. (A) Flowchart of the experiment. (B) Effect of Act. D (0.5 µg/ml) and compound-1453 (33 µM) on cellular RNA synthesis. (C) Effect of compound-1453 on [3H]uridine incorporation into viral RNA. Data represent the mean of three repeats for each sample.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Growth of 1453r virusa
|
![]() View larger version (116K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Effect of time of compound-1453 addition on BVDV NS3 protein expression. MDBK cells were mock infected (A) or infected with wt (B, E, F, G, H, and I) or 1453r (C and D) virus at an MOI of 3. Compound-1453 was added at 0 (D and E), 2 (F), 5 (G), 7 (H), and 9 (I) h p.i., and using anti-NS3 MAb 20.10.6, cells were processed for indirect immunofluorescence at 23 h p.i.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Mapping of compound-1453 resistance
|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Effect of compound-1453 on viral growth. A one-step growth curve was performed in MDBK cells. Cells were infected with virus at an MOI of 3 and incubated in the absence (A) or presence (B) of 33 µM compound-1453. Virus samples were collected at the indicated times, and titers were determined by plaque assay.
|
We therefore developed an assay system to measure BVDV replicase activity in the context of an authentic replication complex. It has been reported that the RNA replicase complex of many positive-strand viruses is associated with membrane structures within the cytoplasm of infected cells and that its replicase activity can be measured in the isolated membrane fraction (1, 7, 18, 35, 37, 41, 48). To further investigate the inhibition effect of compound-1453 on the BVDV replicase, we developed a membrane assay to quantify the activity of the BVDV replicase complex. All of the experiments described below were performed in the presence of Act. D. First, as shown in Fig. 6A, a radiolabeled RNA band of
12.5 kb (close to the genome size of BVDV) was found in an assay which used membrane isolated from BVDV-infected cells but not from mock-infected cells (Fig. 6, lanes 3 and 4 and lanes 1 and 2, respectively). A radiolabeled RNA of the same size was also present after S1 digestion (Fig. 6A, lane 6). These results suggest that the activity observed here was most likely derived from the BVDV RNA replicase and that the newly synthesized RNA is, at least in part, a double-stranded RNA. To confirm that this was BVDV RNA and to determine the polarity of the synthesized RNA product, an RNase protection experiment was performed (Fig. 6B and C). The radiolabeled 12.5-kb RNA product from the membrane assay was hybridized to each of four BVDV RNA fragments (including two positive- and two negative-sense BVDV RNA transcripts [Fig. 6B]), digested with RNase, and analyzed by gel electrophoresis. Results are summarized in Fig. 6C. No protection was observed when positive-sense protective RNAs were used (Fig. 6C, lanes 4 and 6). However, protected RNA fragments 2 kb and 1.5 kb in size were detected when negative-sense protective RNAs were used (Fig. 6C, lanes 3 and 5), suggesting that this is BVDV-specific RNA and that the majority (if not all) of the RNA synthesized in the membrane assay was of plus-strand polarity. Taken together, these results show that we have isolated membrane-bound BVDV RNA replicase activity.
![]() View larger version (68K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Analysis of RNA products in the membrane-based BVDV polymerase assay. (A) [33P]CTP-labeled RNA products from mock-infected (lanes 1, 2, and 5) or virus-infected (lanes 3, 4, and 6) cell membranes were phenol-chloroform extracted and ethanol precipitated and then either directly loaded (lanes 1 to 4) or treated with S1 nuclease (lanes 5 and 6) before loading on a 1% agarose gel. Positions of the RNA size marker are indicated on the left. A position (12K) indicated by an arrow on the right was extrapolated on the basis of the positions of the RNA size markers. (B) RNA fragments used in a reverse RNase protection assay. + and - refer to positive- and negative-sense polarities of RNA relative to the BVDV genome. Numbers refer to nucleotide positions in the BVDV genome. (C) RNA products after RNase digestion. Lane 1, the RNA product from the membrane assay (no RNase digestion); lane 2, the RNA product from the membrane digested with RNase; lanes 3, 4, 5, and 6, RNA products after hybridization with the protective RNAs indicated in panel B and digestion with RNase. The positions of protective RNA (according to the results of toluidine blue staining) are indicated by arrows.
|
![]() View larger version (74K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Effect of compound-1453 on the membrane-based BVDV wt (A) and 1453r (B) replicase activities. The same amount of protein (5 µg) from each membrane preparation was used for the assay. Each concentration of compound-1453 was run in duplicate as indicated above the autoradiogram. RNA products from these reactions were analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1% agarose gel. Sizes of RNA markers are indicated on the right.
|
|
|
|---|
Four pieces of experimental evidence support our conclusion that compound-1453 specifically targets the virus and blocks BVDV replication. First, this inhibitor did not inhibit the panel of RNA and DNA viruses listed in Table 2 as well as failing to inhibit a brome mosaic virus RNA polymerase complex in a similar membrane assay previously described (references 39 and 38 and results not shown). Second, we observed that compound-1453 was active only when it was added at an early time in the virus growth cycle and that it inhibited uridine incorporation into viral RNA. Thirdly, a specific mutation was mapped to the NS5B polymerase of resistant virus and this single E291G mutation in the replicase gene conferred the resistance phenotype. We also observed direct inhibition by compound-1453 of BVDV RNA polymerase activity in a membrane-based assay that included other viral and cellular proteins. Therefore, taking these findings together, we conclude that compound-1453 targets the NS5B replicase and affects the activity of the RNA polymerase complex.
The causal mutation for the resistance phenotype maps to E3560G of the BVDV NS5B replicase. This region of NS5B is highly conserved among the pestiviruses, suggesting that this site plays an important role in the function of the polymerase. In addition to previously described polymerase motifs (29), sequence alignments between BVDV NS5B and other flavivirus replicases have revealed two additional highly conserved motifs (23). One of these motifs, designated nc, consists of the residues KRPRVIQYPEAKTR and includes the glutamate residue involved in compound-1453 activity at position 3560. Mutational analysis of this region abolished RNA synthesis in vitro, suggesting that this sequence is important for replicase activity. Because this motif is rich in lysine and arginine residues, Lai et al. speculate that this region plays a role in interacting with RNA template, primers, or nucleotides (23). However, further studies are required to determine exactly what role this domain has in RNA replication. More recently, structural studies have shown that this region in the hepatitis C virus RNA replicase lies in the finger domain and functions as a nucleotide binding site (6). Recently, Baginski et al. identified an inhibitor of BVDV, VP32947, that also targets the NS5B replicase (2). However, the mutation conferring resistance to this compound involves a phenylalanine-to-serine substitution at residue 224, a region which shows very little conservation between hepatitis C virus and BVDV.
The simplest explanation for the inhibition by compound-1453 of BVDV polymerase activity in a membrane-based assay, but not in the in vitro purified enzyme assay, is that the compound only recognizes the replicase when it is in a complex. Results from the RNase protection experiments suggest that the elongation step of viral RNA synthesis, rather than the entire viral RNA replication cycle, was measured in the BVDV membrane assay, since no newly synthesized minus-strand RNA was detected in the absence of the compound. In general, in comparison to the initiation step, the elongation step is considered to be a relatively simple process during viral RNA replication. Little is known about how the BVDV replicase interacts with other viral proteins, the template RNA, and possible cellular proteins to form a functional complex during the elongation step of RNA synthesis. Although some BVDV replication proteins, such as NS3, were detected in our membrane fraction (results not shown), whether the helicase activity of NS3 is required for the polymerase activity in our assay needs to be further investigated. Our preliminary results suggest that in the membrane assay, the BVDV polymerase is tightly associated with minus-strand RNA templates, since plus-strand RNA synthesis was not affected by the addition of large amounts of excess exogenous RNA, including BVDV replicon RNA, in competition experiments (results not shown). These results indicated that the integrity of the BVDV replication complex might be dependent on its interaction with membranes. The poliovirus replication complex has been shown to be membrane associated, and this association has been postulated to be important for the function of the complex (41). In contrast, the Qß bacteriophage replication complex is not dependent on membrane association; the complex is held by strong protein-protein interactions (54). It is conceivable that compound-1453 binds to a specific pocket of the BVDV polymerase and inhibits its activity in a replicase complex consisting of other viral and/or cellular proteins. In the in vitro enzyme assay, such a binding pocket of the polymerase for compound-1453 may be folded differently or may not even exist.
Whether other viral replication proteins or cellular proteins are required for BVDV replicase activity in the membrane fraction is not clear. In general, it is believed that replication of positive-strand RNA viruses requires the involvement of host cellular factors (12, 22). It is clear, however, that the BVDV replicase activity we measured in the membrane assay more closely mimics that in the infected cells than that in the in vitro enzyme assay, since similar inhibitory concentrations of compound-1453 were observed in the cell culture and membrane assays. In the presence of a large excess of cellular proteins, the compound could selectively inhibit BVDV polymerase activity of the wt but not the drug-resistant complex, suggesting that the inhibitor is highly specific. A reconstitution experiment with membrane preparations subjected to further fractionation might provide more detailed information on the requirement of other BVDV replication proteins, and compound-1453 would certainly provide a useful tool for examination of their functional requirement(s) for effects on polymerase activity.
Specific inhibitors provide a powerful tool for the study of viral replication and pathogenesis. They can specifically block a certain stage of the viral life cycle and increase our understanding of viral biochemistry and its difference from host cells. In some sense, inhibitors can generate "mutants" without mutations. For many active site inhibitors, such as inhibitors of HIV reverse transcriptase and PR, they can usually be cocrystallized with the enzymes and provide a more detailed structure-activity relation for the study of the rational design of specific inhibitors. In the present work, we provide strong biologic and genetic evidence to support the conclusion that compound-1453 specifically inhibits the BVDV replicase, although we have not demonstrated its exact mechanism of action. Further work with this compound should allow us to determine the precise role of compound-1453 in the inhibition of BVDV RNA synthesis and provide insight into the mechanism of BVDV replication.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»