Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, January 2003, p. 291-300, Vol. 77, No. 1
0022-538X/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.77.1.291-300.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Y. Ding,1 J. Cao,1 J. Lee,1 C. Galloway,1 A. Yuen,2 K. R. Jerome,2,3 and M. J. McElrath1,2,3*
Departments of Medicine,1 Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington,3 Program in Infectious Diseases, Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 981092
Received 26 June 2002/ Accepted 16 September 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The importance of understanding mechanisms to control infection locally is underscored by recent attention to the distinct properties of HIV-1 within the mucosa. Investigators comparing HIV-1 in blood and mucosal secretions (cervix and semen) have highlighted significant differences in viral phenotypes and genotypes as well as clearance following combination antiretroviral therapy (7, 12, 20, 32, 41, 43, 44). However, although mucosal antibody responses can differ from systemic responses (26), such discrepancies pertaining to HIV-1-specific T cells have not been elucidated. We previously demonstrated that most T cells in the female lower reproductive tract express T-cell receptor
ß (TCR
ß) (15, 28), similar to cells in the circulation and lymph nodes. Nevertheless, it is unclear whether HIV-1-specific CTL in the genital and gastrointestinal tracts emerge distinct from their systemic counterparts. Additionally, it is not known if mucosal CTL, similar to systemic CTL, preferentially utilize the perforin-dependent pathway to lyse infected cells (17, 23, 42).
Here we explore the functional properties of HIV-1-specific CTL in mucosal tissues of infected individuals through a detailed analysis of optimal epitope recognition and mechanisms of target cell lysis. The investigation also contrasts TCR usage and clonotypes between systemic and mucosal HIV-1-specific CTL, thus providing new information concerning the evolution and trafficking of the CD8+ memory response within the two compartments. We demonstrate that HIV-1-specific memory CTL are present in both blood and the mucosa, and that their ontogeny, epitope specificities, and function can be identical. These findings have utmost relevance in designing strategies to induce mucosal T cells by vaccination, since such effector activities may facilitate rapid viral clearance on sexual exposure to HIV-1.
|
|
|---|
Virological and T-cell subset analyses. Blood plasma, seminal plasma, and cervical fluid HIV-1 RNA levels were determined by quantitative branched-DNA (bDNA) (Chiron, Emeryville, Calif.) and ultrasensitive reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR), (Roche Molecular Systems, Branchburg, N.J.) assays (9, 27). Seminal plasma was pretreated with silica gel before being subjected to RT-PCR. Endocervical fluid was obtained using Sno-Strip wicks (36). Blood CD4+ T-cell counts were enumerated by standard consensus flow cytometry.
Isolation of blood and mucosal effector cells. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were isolated by density centrifugation using a Ficoll-Hypaque gradient. CD8+ T cells were positively selected using anti-CD8 monoclonal antibody (MAb)-coated microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, Calif.). Cervical T cells were isolated from endocervical cytobrush specimens (28); those with blood contamination were discarded. Males collected semen by masturbation; the semen was diluted 1:1 with phosphate-buffered saline and centrifuged (2,500 x g for 10 min). CD3+ T cells from the washed seminal cell pellet were positively selected using anti-CD3 MAb-coated microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec).
Three 3-mm punch rectal biopsy specimens, obtained 10 cm proximal to the anal verge, were placed in RPMI 1640 supplemented with penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), and Fungizone (2.5 µg/ml), repeatedly washed, and minced. Mononuclear cells were passed through a 140-µm screen to further purify lymphocytes from tissue debris and epithelial cells.
Generation and characterization of HIV-1-specific CTL clones. Blood and mucosal HIV-specific T-cell clones were established as previously described (28). Briefly, adherent blood monocytes were infected overnight at a multiplicity of infection of 5 with a vaccinia virus recombinant virus vector expressing HIV-1 Env, Gag, and protease (vP1291) (kindly provided by J. Tartaglia, Virogenetics, Troy, N.Y.) and used as antigen-presenting cells. Blood and mucosal effector cells were plated by limiting dilution at 1 to 100 cells per well into 96-well round-bottom microtiter plates. The cells were provided with gamma-irradiated (3,300 rads) autologous antigen-presenting cells (3 x 103 infected adherent monocytes per well) and irradiated autologous feeder cells (5 x 104 per well). Human recombinant interleukin-2 (final concentration, 50 U/ml) was added after 48 h. After 14 to 21 days of culture, wells demonstrating cell growth were tested for cytolysis of autologous Epstein-Barr virus-transformed B lymphoblastoid cell lines (B-LCL) pulsed with rVV expressing HIV antigens (6) in a conventional CTL assay (28). Cells from wells with detectable HIV-specific cytolytic activity were further expanded to clones by stimulation with anti-CD3/4b (final concentration, 0.5 µg/ml) (kindly provided by Johnson T. Wong, Boston, Mass.) and 2 x 106 irradiated allogeneic PBMC per well as feeder cells. Expanded clones were further characterized for class I MHC restriction and fine epitope mapping by the chromium release assay (28). Peptides 20 amino acids (aa) in length and overlapping by 10 aa spanning the HIV-1MN env, HIV-1HXB-2 gag, and HIV-1IIIB pol genes (NIH AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, Bethesda, Md.) and 9 to 10-mers (Mimotopes, Clayton, Australia) were used for epitope mapping.
To determine the efficiency of cytolysis, autologous B-LCL were pulsed with serial dilutions of HIV-1 peptide and labeled with 100 µCi of 51Cr overnight at 37°C. Optimal effector TCR-MHC/peptide recognition was defined by the peptide concentration at which 50% maximal lysis was observed in a 4-h chromium release assay.
Mechanisms of cytolysis.
Prior to the CTL assay, effectors were pretreated with various concentrations of concanamycin A (CMA) (Wako Chemicals, Richmond, Va.), which blocks perforin-mediated lysis of target cells by CTLs, antagonistic anti-FasL MAb, and antagonistic anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-
) MAb, alone or together (3). Anti-FasL MAb (CD95L; clone AHU-0212) and anti-TNF
MAb (clone B-C7) were purchased from Biosource International (Camarillo, Calif.). The susceptibility of B-LCL to apoptosis was determined after cell treatment with agonistic anti-Fas MAb (CD95; clone APO-1 [Biosource International]). The proportion of targets undergoing apoptosis was determined by measuring the uptake of acridine orange and ethidium bromide (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.) under fluorescence microscopy at x100 magnification (16).
TCR analysis of HIV-1-specific CTL clones. Total RNA was extracted from 106 CTL clones by using a commercial kit (Qiagen Inc., Chatsworth, Calif.). cDNA was synthesized, and multiplex PCR amplifications were performed to identify variable genes (1). Amplified DNA fragments were separated on 2% agarose gels, excised, purified, and then sequenced using TCRBC primers (1) and ThermoSequenase (Amersham, Cleveland, Ohio). Sequences were aligned and compared with sequences published in GenBank to determine TCRB VDJ rearrangements. To identify mucosal clonotypes from archival PBMC specimens, clonal-specific TCRB VDJ rearrangements were analyzed from their cDNA by PCR using TCRBV6-specific and TCRBC-specific primers (1) followed by nested PCR using the TCRBV6 primer and clonal-specific primers for the cervical clone C20 (5' TCATTGAGGCTGTCTGGG). The TCR Vß family usage of HIV-specific CTL clones was also determined by flow cytometry using a FACScan flow cytometer and CELLQuest software (Becton Dickinson).
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Characteristics of the 12 HIV-1-infected study participants and the CD8+ CTL clones derived from blood and mucosa
|
5:1) were detected in a chromium release assay in approximately 30% of wells with cell growth. These cell lines were further expanded, and 481 class I MHC-restricted CD8+ CTL clones were generated from blood and 169 were generated from the mucosa (cervix, semen, or rectum) of our 12 study volunteers (Table 1). We refer to these CTL as clones, particularly since most emerged following prolonged expansion from wells plated with one cell and exhibited single specificities. However, we did not validate the single use of one TCR in every case of the 650 distinct populations, and we therefore recognize that a small proportion of these may be cell lines rather than clones. Of note, HIV-1-specific mucosal CD8+ CTL were established in all patients, including the five patients in whom mucosal HIV-1 RNA levels were below detection (Table 1). These findings indicate that local HIV-1-specific T-cell immunity is commonly induced in the genital and lower gastrointestinal tracts, sites of HIV-1 acquisition, and that CD8+ CTL may be present in the absence of detectable HIV-1 RNA. Systemic and mucosal clones have similar HIV-1 epitope specificities. Recognition of HIV-1-expressing targets was remarkably similar in frequency between the two compartments. Gag-specific clones accounted for approximately two-thirds of the responses from both compartments (Table 1). Moreover, mucosal and blood CTL from five individuals had the same class I MHC restricting allele, regardless of the HIV-1 gene product recognized (data not shown). To compare the specificities of the blood and mucosal CD8+ T cells, we performed fine epitope mapping for samples from nine donors, focusing on Gag-specific CTL clones because of the higher proportion isolated in both compartments (309 of 481 [64%] in blood and 116 of 169 [69%] in mucosa) (Table 1). A representative example is depicted for donor NP014 (Fig. 1A), whose 12 clones from blood and semen were all B57 restricted and recognized the same Gag epitope within aa 147 to 155 (ISPRTLNAW).
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. HIV-1 Gag-specific cytolysis and functional avidity of blood and mucosal clones. (A) The optimal epitope of NP014 semen CTL clone is the Gag 9-mer (aa 147 to 155). Autologous B-LCL were pulsed with the 20-mer (aa 141 to 160), 10-mer (aa 147 to 156), and 9-mer (aa 147 to 155) at the peptide concentrations indicated, and specific lysis depicted was performed at an E:T ratio of 5:1. (B) Comparison of cytolysis of semen and blood clones from NP014 at different peptide concentrations of the optimal 9-mer (aa 147 to 155) expressed by autologous B-LCL. (C) Similar comparison of cytolysis by cervical and blood clones from NS0909 at an E:T ratio of 5:1.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Epitope mappinga and class I MHC restriction analysis of HIV-1 Gag-specific CD8+ CTL clones
|
Lysis pathways of HIV-1-specific mucosal CTL.
To determine if mucosal effectors lyse targets by the perforin-dependent granule exocytosis pathway, similar to blood-derived CTL (40), three mechanisms of lymphocyte cytotoxicity were evaluated. CD8+ CTL clones were pretreated with CMA, antagonistic non-cross-linking anti-FasL MAb, and antagonistic anti-TNF-
MAb, to selectively block perforin, Fas-FasL interactions, and TNF-
-induced cytotoxicity, respectively. In all cases, significant dose-dependent inhibition of target lysis occurred when effectors were pretreated with CMA (Fig. 2, representative examples). Even the lowest concentration of CMA (1 nM) reduced the lysis of autologous Gag-expressing targets by 63 to 83%. By contrast, the addition of the antagonistic antibodies for Fas and TNF activities had little impact on the efficiency of cytolysis (Fig. 2). When CTL were pretreated with all three inhibitors, reduction in lysis was similar to that observed with CMA alone (Fig. 2). An additional 12 pairs of blood, rectal, and cervical clones from volunteers NP002, CC0710, and NS0909 were tested for perforin-dependent lysis, and similar findings were observed (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Selective inhibition of HIV-1-specific cytolytic activity by CMA but not anti-FasL or anti-TNF- antagonistic antibodies. Blood and mucosal CD8+ clones were pretreated with CMA (1 to 100 nM), anti-FasL MAb (12 to 50 µg/ml), anti-TNF- MAb (5 to 20 µg/ml), or control mouse immunoglobulin G for 2 h. In some experiments, a combination of two or three blocking agents at the highest (experiment 1) or lowest (experiment 2) concentrations was used. The figure depicts cytolysis of CD8+ clones isolated from patients CC0710 (blood and cervix), NP002 (rectum), and NP014 (semen). Blood and cervical clones from patient CC0710 recognized HIV-1 Gag within aa 264 to 272. Blood (data not shown) and semen HIV-specific CTL clones from patient NP014 recognized HIV-1 Gag within aa 164 to 172. Blood (data not shown) and rectal T-cell clones from patient NP002 recognized HIV-1 Gag within aa 269 to 277. Ab, antibody.
|
HIV-1-specific blood and mucosal CTL clones can be derived from the same progenitor cell. We have demonstrated that systemic and mucosal CD8+ CTL from an individual donor can recognize the identical class I-restricted HIV-1 epitope and can do so with the same efficiency and lytic function. This raises the possibility that such clones may originate from the same progenitor cell. To address this, the expressed TCRß chains were analyzed and the VDJ segments within the CDR3 loops were sequenced in representative clones from blood and the mucosa in three donors.
In subject NP002, HLA-B62-restricted CD8+ CTL clones derived from blood, semen, and rectal tissue recognized Gag peptide (aa 269 to 277) (Fig. 3A; Table 3). cDNAs from the clones were amplified by PCR with primers (tested in pools or alone) specific for each of the 23 TCR Vß families. Amplification revealed usage of Vß21 to Vß25, specifically Vß22, by the mucosal and blood clones (Fig. 3B). Expression of Vß22 on each CTL clone was confirmed by flow cytometry (Fig. 3C). Next, the amplified TCR Vß22 DNA PCR product was sequenced to precisely define rearrangements in the TCRß VDJ region. All five clones (B18, B21, B22, S18, and R9) displayed the same TCRß VDJ sequence, defined as Vß22S1DJ1.2 (Table 3), whose amino acid sequence is specified in Fig. 3B. Thus, identification of the same sequence within the TCRß rearrangement of the clones from NP002 indicates that virus-specific T cells found in the three distinct anatomical sites (blood, rectum, and semen) represent expansion from the same precursor.
![]() View larger version (49K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Blood and mucosal Gag-specific CTL clones recognize the same epitope and display the same TCR ß VDJ rearrangement. (A to C) Blood, rectal, and seminal CTL clones, established from volunteer NP002 from the same visit. (A) CTL clones derived from blood (B22), semen (S18), and rectum (R9) recognized the same HIV-1 Gag epitope within aa 269 to 277. (B) The four CTL clones (blood-derived B18 and B22, semen-derived S18, and rectum-derived R9) utilize TCR Vß22 and present identical rearrangements of their TCR ß VDJ segments. The four left lanes contain PCR products from the clonal cDNA amplified with pooled Vß21 to Vß25 primers. The four right lanes contain the PCR products from the clonal cDNA amplified with the Vß22-specific primers. The coding and amino acid sequence of the five clones (including B21) TCR BVDJ region is presented to the right. (C) TCR Vß22 usage was confirmed by flow cytometry. Expression of Vß22 fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated MAb by the CTL clone B22 (solid peak) is shown in comparison to the isotype control (open peak). (D) PBMC from volunteer NS0909 were probed for the presence of TCR Vß6 and C20 clone-specific VDJ segment. A positive response was detected with Vß6 specific primers (lane 2) and C20 clone-specific primers (lane 3). Negative and positive control PCR assays were performed in the absence of Vß6-specific primers (lane 1) or with the cDNA product from cervical clone C20 (lane 5).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. TCRß VDJ rearrangements of class I MHC-restricted Gag-specific CTL clones in three subjects
|
Similarly, we examined three blood and two cervical CTL clones from volunteer NS0909. All clones showed distinct TCRß rearrangements (Table 3). We then designed clone-specific primers based on the TCR VDJ region of cervical CTL clone C20 to investigate whether T cells with similar TCR VDJ rearrangements were present in blood at the same time that the cervical clone was identified. We performed nested PCR using Vß6-specific primers followed by clone-specific primers. By this strategy, we demonstrated that cells with a TCRß rearrangement similar to cervical clone C20 were present in PBMC (Fig. 3D). Taken together, these results provide the first evidence that virus-specific memory CTL circulate in vivo within peripheral blood and the mucosa, where they are primed to control HIV-1 at sites of sexual contact.
|
|
|---|
Numerous studies have emphasized the fundamental role of mucosal immunity in controlling HIV-1 infection, yet few have actually examined T cells from the human genital and rectal mucosa. This is due in part to recovery of insufficient viable T cells by routine, noninvasive procedures. We circumvented this problem for women by obtaining endocervical cytobrushes from the transitional zone where T cells are more abundant (28) and for men by obtaining semen and small punch biopsy specimens from the rectum. The memory TCR
ß+ CD8+ CTL identified in the cervix and rectum likely represent a subpopulation of intraepithelial lymphocytes as well as T cells within submucosal lymphoid follicles (14). The origin of the seminal CTL is unidentified, but likely sources include the testis and prostate (20, 22, 24, 25, 33). We clearly demonstrate that despite continuous exposure to local antigens, memory CTL present in the genital and rectal mucosa are easily capable of antigen-specific clonal expansion in vitro. Thus, mucosal memory T cells become activated and proliferate similar to their systemic counterparts in persons with HIV-1 infection.
In numerous cases, HIV-1 epitope specificities and MHC restriction patterns were identical in peripheral blood and mucosal CTL, which suggests that a subset of lymphocytes involved in the immunological memory against HIV-1 at the genital and rectal mucosa evolves in concert with, rather than separately from, systemic responses. Of note, the mucosal and systemic CTL clones frequently recognized immunodominant Gag epitopes lying within more highly conserved regions of HIV-1. However, it is possible that recognition of subdominant epitopes or those falling within more variable regions of other gene products may differ among CTL within the two compartments. Such differences were perhaps less obvious in this study, with the use of vectors and peptides representing HIV-1 consensus strains rather than autologous viruses to express HIV-1 epitopes, as well as our cloning strategies and focus on Gag-specific responses in untreated donors who were predominantly long-term nonprogressors. There is also the possibility, although it was not examined in this study, that the HIV-1-specific T cells recruited to the mucosa may be present in response to continuing viral challenge following high-risk exposures. It is indeed possible that the clones generated in vitro may not be truly representative of those present within the initial specimen. However, we have noted persistence of many of these clones in subsequent time points in our longitudinal assessments (J. Cao, unpublished data). Also, discrepancies may emerge in persons infected with more than one HIV-1 strain within the same or different subtype. Nonetheless, the similarities in CTL responses derived from the blood and mucosa are striking.
Likewise, we observed similar CTL functional avidity for MHC-peptide complexes between the two compartments. These findings indicate that HIV-specific mucosal CTL, similar to those from blood, are capable of efficient target cell lysis. This may be particularly important in settings where the levels of viral replication and antigen expression are low, such as within days of infection in the genital tract and with use of antiretroviral therapy. Our in vitro studies also indicate that mucosal CTL, similar to blood CTL (3, 13, 18, 40, 42), utilize the granule exocytosis pathway to destroy HIV-1-expressing target cells. Inhibition of target lysis by CMA provides confirmation that killing is mediated primarily by direct contact between effectors and targets rather than through secretion of soluble factors (e.g., alpha interferon, gamma interferon, and chemokines). Conceivably, the culture conditions, the use of CTL clones rather than primary cells, and the use of the chromium release assay to evaluate cytolysis favored the detection of the perforin pathway (13). This concern led us to explore more carefully the expression of Fas on targets and FasL on effectors and the susceptibility of targets to lysis through the Fas receptor. In short, most target cells (>85%) expressed Fas and were lysed on cross-linking this receptor, but <10% of CTL expressed FasL and their cytolytic activities were maintained on blocking the Fas-FasL interaction. Thus, a role for Fas-FasL interactions in triggering cytolysis by mucosal memory CD8+ effectors cannot be entirely excluded, but its contribution to class I MHC-restricted CTL is probably minor (8). In addition, it remains unclear if mucosal CTL contain relatively low levels of perforin, as has been recently demonstrated for peripheral blood and lymphoid tissue (2, 8). Although the local environment may influence the efficiency of eliminating infected mucosal cells (4, 10), our results suggest that mucosal CTL have the capacity to respond as competently as those circulating in peripheral blood.
Perhaps the most compelling evidence for the importance of mucosal CTL in providing a local defense against HIV-1 is the demonstration, for the first time to our knowledge, that identical antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell clones reside in the peripheral blood, rectum, and genital tract of the same HIV-1-infected individual. This observation clearly establishes that T cells from these distinct compartments can have a common origin. Moreover, these results suggest that memory CD8+ T cells circulate between the mucosal and systemic compartments. Taken together, these results indicate that both common and distinct CTL clonal populations emerge mucosally and systemically following infection, and they are consistent with the results of previous murine studies examining TCR usage of gut T cells (35).
The question remains of where the priming of mucosal HIV-1-specific CTL occurs and how effectors track back to the mucosal tissue. Dendritic cells and other professional APCs present viral antigens to T cells in the regional lymph nodes. This heralds the transition from the early innate response to the onset of acquired immunity, and it is at this point that virus-specific T-cell memory is first established (31). Thus, mucosal CTL induced by HIV-1 infection are probably primed in the mucosa-associated lymphoid tissues (MALT) and regional nodes rather than from random stimulation within the mucosal tissue. However, others have observed that mutant mice lacking Peyer's patches or other lymphoid tissue displayed normal number of T cells in mucosal epithelium (5, 30), suggesting that T-cell priming by professional antigen-presenting cells can occur anywhere between the mucosal epithelium, the MALT, the regional lymph nodes, the blood, and the spleen. Antigen-specific T cells subsequently reach the blood to seed at different mucosal surfaces and MALT (11). For HIV-1-specific memory responses, we presume that CTL with common clonotypes were primed in the MALT and then circulate through blood and home back to the genital and rectal tissue. Because of the small number of cells isolated from the different mucosal tissues, we were limited in our effort to identify potent and selective adhesion molecules and chemoattractant receptors on the CD8+ CTL that may regulate the regional trafficking of mucosal lymphocytes in humans. Studies are in progress to identify phenotypes and homing markers that can better elucidate the induction and trafficking of the mucosal memory cells, but at least in the lower gastrointestinal tract the HIV-1-specific CTL will presumably express the
4ß7 integrin (44). Since identical clonotypes were found in the blood, semen, and rectum, this suggests that mucosal lymphocytes can circulate between the reproductive and lower gastrointestinal tracts. However, less is known about the specialized trafficking mechanisms within the human genital mucosa, including the epithelial chemokines and adhesion molecules expressed by mucosal lymphocytes, as well as the differentiation state and homing properties of the CTL. With knowledge of the antigen-specific cells emerging from sexually exposed HIV-1-infected individuals, we can now more accurately define the characteristics of the local immune response ex vivo.
In conclusion, we demonstrate that HIV-1-specific memory CTL are present in both blood and mucosa and that their ontogeny, epitope specificities, and function may be identical. This has fundamental relevance to vaccine strategies, since it is possible that memory CTL identified in the circulation may home to the mucosa, where rapid responses are needed to contain HIV-1 infection. It is therefore possible that candidate HIV-1 vaccines can induce virus-specific cell-mediated immunity in different compartments and that the route of vaccine immunization can influence the level of immune responses present in different compartments or tissues. In future studies, it will be important to define factors required for the maintenance of virus-specific CTL at mucosal surfaces in infected patients as well as their potential efficiency in limiting HIV-1 transmission.
This work was supported by NIH grants R37 AI35605 and P30A27757 and the Burroughs Wellcome Clinical Scientist Award in Translational Research (M.J.M.).
Present address: Merck Research Laboratories, Blue Bell, PA 19422. ![]()
|
|
|---|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»