Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, January 2003, p. 150-158, Vol. 77, No. 1
0022-538X/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.77.1.150-158.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Extent of Measles Virus Spread and Immune Suppression Differentiates between Wild-Type and Vaccine Strains in the Cotton Rat Model (Sigmodon hispidus)
Joanna Pfeuffer, Karen Püschel, Volker ter Meulen, Jürgen Schneider-Schaulies, and Stefan Niewiesk*
Institute of Virology and Immunobiology, University of Wuerzburg, 97078 Wuerzburg, Germany
Received 10 June 2002/
Accepted 18 September 2002

ABSTRACT
Infection of humans with wild-type measles virus leads to strong
immune suppression and secondary infections, whereas immunization
with an attenuated vaccine strain does not. Using the cotton
rat model (
Sigmodon hispidus), we investigated whether vaccine
and wild-type viruses differ in viral spread and whether this
is correlated with inhibition of of proliferation of spleen
cells ex vivo after mitogen stimulation. After intranasal infection
of cotton rats with wild-type and vaccine strains, it was found
that wild-type virus replicates better in lung tissue, spreads
to the mediastinal lymph nodes, and induces a more pronounced
and longer-lasting inhibition of proliferation of spleen cells
ex vivo after mitogen stimulation than does vaccine virus. To
induce the same degree of proliferation inhibition, 1,000-fold
less wild-type virus was required than vaccine virus. With this
system, the virulence of various measles virus isolates and
recombinant viruses was tested. Four (in humans and/or monkeys)
highly pathogenic virus strains were immunosuppressive, whereas
viruses of vaccine virus genotype A were not. Using virus pairs
which, due to passage on fibroblasts versus lymphoid cells or
due to a point mutation in the hemagglutinin (N481

Y), differed
in their usage of the two receptor molecules CD46 and CD150
on human cells, it was found that viruses using exclusively
CD150 in vitro spread to mediastinal lymph nodes and induced
strong immune suppression. These data demonstrate that important
parameters of virulence seen in humans, such as viral spread
and immune suppression, are reflected in the cotton rat model.

INTRODUCTION
Infection with wild-type measles virus (MV) induces a severe
immune suppression in humans, which is thought to be responsible
for the occurence of secondary infections (
11). In contrast,
live attenuated vaccine virus induces no overt clinical disease.
By laboratory diagnosis, an ex vivo inhibiton of mitogen-stimulated
proliferation of peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) is seen
for 2 to 4 weeks (
8). An in vitro correlate for the immunosuppressive
capacity of MV is the inhibition of mitogen-stimulated proliferation
of PBL by MV-infected cells. In this system it was found that
the fusion and hemagglutinin proteins are necessary and sufficient
to induce proliferation inhibition (
24) by disturbing the Akt
kinase pathway in T cells (
4). However, no difference in the
inhibitory capacity was found between wild-type and vaccine
virus in tissue culture. In investigations of MV-induced immune
suppression in vivo, the cotton rat (
Sigmodon hispidus) has
proven to be a useful animal model (
16). After infection with
a high titer of vaccine virus, inhibition of mitogen-induced
proliferation of spleen cells was seen ex vivo. As in tissue
culture, the fusion (F) and hemagglutinin (H) protein were necessary
and sufficient to induce proliferation inhibition (
16) and disturb
the Akt kinase pathway (
4) in cotton rats. However, the ability
of vaccine versus wild-type virus to inhibit the proliferation
of spleen cells ex vivo was not investigated. Using the lymphoid
B95-8 cell line as indicator cells (
12), Wyde et al. were able
to recover clinical isolates of MV efficiently from a lung tissue
homogenate of infected cotton rats (
33). One clinical isolate
(MO2) was tested for viral spread and was found (apart from
the lungs) sometimes in mediastinal lymph node cells (9 of 16
animals) and spleen (2 of 16 animals) but not in other organs.
Using a different wild-type virus (WTFb) and molecularly cloned
viruses, we found that the wild-type H determines viral spread
to mediastinal lymph nodes (
17). Although it has not been proven
formally, this difference in viral spread might be related to
receptor usage. The two known receptors for MV are the human
CD46 (
5,
14) and CD150 (
7,
9,
30) molecules. Wild-type viruses
bind to CD150 and retain this receptor usage after passage on
lymphoid cells (
18). If passaged on fibroblasts (like Vero cells),
they acquire the capacity to bind to both CD46 and CD150. This
appears to be part of an attenuation process since the currently
known vaccine strains were produced this way. Although no structural
or functional homologues for human CD46 or CD150 have yet been
described in cotton rats, it is reasonable, in light of the
above data to assume the presence of such homologues. In this
study we focused on the question whether viral spread and proliferation
inhibition are related in vivo and may differ between wild-type
and vaccine MV viruses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS
Animals.
Cotton rats (inbred strain COTTON/NIco) were obtained from Iffa
Credo (Lyon, France). Female animals 6 to 10 weeks of age were
used. The animals were specific pathogen free according to the
breeders specifications and were maintained in a barrier
system. They were kept under controlled environmental conditions
of 22 ± 1°C, 55 to 60% humidity, and a 12-h light
cycle.
Cells and viruses.
Vero (African green monkey) cells were grown in minimal essential medium with 5% fetal calf serum (FCS), and BJAB and B95a cells were grown in RPMI 1640 containing 10% FCS, 1% nonessential amino acids, 1% sodium pyruvate, 2 mmol of glutamine per ml, 50 IU of penicillin, and 50 µg of streptomycin per liter (referred to as RPMI/10). To obtain CR-T2 cells, cotton rat spleen cells were stimulated for 3 days with concanavalin A (2.5 µg/ml) and subsequently fused with the mouse thymoma BW5147 using polyethyleneglycol 1500 (Boehringer). The resulting hybridoma cells were cloned in RPMI/10 supplemented with 100 IU of interleukin-2 per ml and 1% hypoxanthine-aminopterin-thymidine (HAT). One of the stable clones designated CR-T2 was shown to be infectable with MV (data not shown).
MV strains used in this study, their designations, and the cell line in which they were grown are listed in Table 1. The Bilthoven and ICB strains were isolated from patients with measles and induce measles in rhesus and cynomolgus macaques, respectively (3, 13). ICB was kindly provided by H. Okada and M. Tashiro, Tokyo, Japan, and was passaged once through cotton rats and subsequently on BJAB cells. The HU2 strain was isolated from a child with measles-induced encephalitis after vaccination with Schwarz vaccine (31). Wü5404 is a clinical isolate from a recent outbreak (6). A low-passage stock of the Edmonston strain [Edm(wt)] was obtained from Lee Martin, Zurich, Switzerland. This stock had been passaged seven times in primary human kidney (HK) cells and six times in Vero cells after the original isolation by J. F. Enders in 1954 (23). Cotton rats were infected from the original aliquot. Vaccine-like viruses were grown on Vero cells, and wild-type viruses were grown on BJAB cells. Both were subjected to titer determination on B95 cells, with the exception of a previously published Edm (16) stock, for which Vero cells were used. The titers of Edm and Ed-NSE, in a plaque formation assay on Vero cells and a 50% tissue culture infective dose (TCID50) assay on B95 cells, differed by not more than 0.5 log10. Generally, Ed-NSE was used as vaccine virus since it is the basis for the recombinant viruses used in this study. No difference in the induction of proliferation inhibition was found between Ed-NSE and Edm (data not shown).
Infection of cotton rats and virus titer determination.
For intranasal (i.n.) infection, MV was given in phosphate-buffered
saline to ether anesthezised cotton rats. i.n. inoculations
of virus were administered in a volume of not more then 100
µl. At different times after infection, the animals were
asphyxiated using CO
2 and their lungs were removed and weighed.
Lung tissue was minced with scissors and dounced with a glass
homogenizer. Serial 10-fold dilutions of virus containing supernatant
were assessed for the presence and levels of infectious virus
in a 48-well microassay using Vero cells and B95a cells with
cytopathic effect (CPE) as an end point. Plates were scored
for CPE microscopically after 7 days. The amount of virus in
inocula was expressed as the quantity of virus that could infect
50% of inoculated tissue culture monolayers (TCID
50). The TCID
50 was calculated by the method of Reed and Muench (
20). Lymph
nodes from infected animals were pooled from a group of animals,
nicked with a scapel blade, and passaged through a steel sieve.
In a 96-well plate, 10
5 B95a cells were plated per well and
coincubated with lymph node cells starting at 10
6 cells per
well in 10-fold dilutions. Scoring for CPE after 7 days and
titer calculations were done as above.
Proliferation assay.
Spleen cells from infected and mock-infected animals were plated in triplicate at 5 x 105 cells/well in a 96-well plate containing RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS and were left untreated (medium) or treated with concanavalin A (2.5 µg/ml). After 40 h, 0.5 µCi of [3H] thymidine/well was added, and 16 to 20 h later the cells were harvested onto glass filters and counted with a Betaplate counter (Wallac). Variation between wells usually did not exceed 10%. The stimulation index was calculated as the mean of proliferation of mitogen-stimulated cells (cpm)/proliferation of cells in medium (cpm). The percent proliferation inhibition was expressed by comparing the stimulation indices of a group of infected cells to to those of mock-infected animals. If proliferation of spleen cells from infected animals was identical to or higher than that of proliferation of spleen cells from mock-infected animals (
100%), proliferation was given as 100%.
For the proliferation assay with infected CR-T2 cells, CR-T2 cells were infected at a multiplicity of infection of 0.01 for 3 days with MV. The expression of both MV glycoproteins (H and F proteins) was tested with antibody L77 (for H) or A504 (for F) by flow cytometry. CR-T2 cells were UV- irradiated at 1 J/cm2 and plated at different ratios with spleen cells (5 x 105/well) from naive cotton rats and concanavalin A (2.5 µg/ml). Otherwise, the proliferation assay was performed as above.

RESULTS
No difference in proliferation inhibition between MV wild-type (WTFb) and vaccine (Edm) strains in vitro.
In vitro, mitogen-stimulated proliferation of human PBL is inhibited
after contact or infection with MV. To test whether the same
is true for cotton rat spleen cells, an in vitro assay for proliferation
inhibition was developed. Concanavalin A-stimulated spleen cells
from cotton rats were fused with mouse thymoma BW 5147 cells,
and hybridomas were selected with HAT medium. Growing T-cell
hybridomas were cloned, and a line designated CR-T2 was used
for these assays. CR-T2 cells were infected with either wild-type
virus (WTFb) or molecularly cloned vaccine virus (Ed-NSE). After
2 days, CR-T2 cells infected with either virus demonstrated
equivalent levels of glcoproteins at the cell surface as determined
by flow cytometry (data not shown). After UV irradiation, CR-T2
cells were mixed with spleen cells from naive animals at different
ratios and stimulated with concanavalin A. Contact with non-infected
CR-T2 cells did not inhibit the proliferation of spleen cells
(Fig.
1). In contrast, contact with MV-infected CR-T2 cells
inhibited mitogen-stimulated proliferation of spleen cells in
a dose-dependent manner. However, no difference in the inhibitory
capacity between CR-T2 cells infected with wild-type virus (WTFb)
or vaccine (Edm) virus was observed. Thus, as reported for human
cells, in vitro proliferation of cotton rat spleen cells is
inhibited by wild-type and vaccine MV strains to the same degree.
Differences between WTFb and Edm infection in vivo.
To test whether differences in proliferation inhibition after
infection with wild-type and vaccine virus might be found in
vivo, cotton rats were infected i.n. with 10
5 TCID
50 of WTFb
or Ed-NSE. Infection with WTFb induced a pronounced ex vivo
proliferation inhibition of spleen cells from days 2 to 20 (Fig.
2). In contrast, infection with 10
5 TCID
50 of Ed-NSE did not
result in proliferation inhibition. However, it has been shown
previously (
16) that a high-dose inoculum (

2
x 10
6 PFU of Edm)
resulted in inhibition of proliferation of of spleen cells after
mitogen stimulation ex vivo. In comparison to proliferation
inhibition induced by a high-dose inoculum of Edm, proliferation
inhibition after infection with 10
5 TCID
50 of WTFb was noted
1 day earlier and lasted at least 4 days longer (Figure
2).
One possible explanation for the differences beteen wild-type
and vaccine virus strains is a difference in viral burden and
spread in cotton rats. To test this possibility, cotton rats
were tested for the presence of virus in the lungs, the lung-draining
mediastinal lymph nodes (MDLN), PBL, or spleen after i.n. inoculation
with 10
5 TCID
50 of WTFb or Ed-NSE or 4
x 10
6 PFU of Edm. From
PBL or spleen, the virus could not be reisolated irrespective
of the virus strain used. WTFb was found in MDLN on days 2,
3, and 4 after i.n. inoculation (Fig.
3A). After inculation
of 4
x 10
6 PFU, of Edm, virus was found in MDLN on day 2 only;
no virus was detected after inoculation with 10
5 TCID50 of Ed-NSE
(Fig.
3A). The presence of virus in MDLN correlated with the
virus titer in lung tissue on day 4 (Fig.
3B) and proliferation
inhibition ex vivo on day 4 (Fig.
3C).
To investigate the inhibitory capacity of WTFb in more detail,
cotton rats were infected with 10
5, 10
4, and 10
3 TCID
50 and
tested for the presence of virus in MDLN and inhibition of proliferation
of spleen cells ex vivo. The extent of proliferation inhibition
(Fig.
4A) and the presence of virus in MDLN (Fig.
4B) correlated
with the titer of the inoculum. WTFb still had some inhibitory
effect at a titer of 10
3 TCID
50 and was therefore approximately
1,000-fold more effective than Edm in inducing proliferation
inhibition in spleen cells.
Comparison of wild-type and vaccine MV strains in cotton rats.
To determine whether the results obtained with WTFb were representative,
cotton rats were inoculated with other MV strains such as BIL,
ICB, and Wü5404, which were isolated from patients with
clinical measles. In addition, BIL and ICB induce measles in
rhesus (
3) and cynomologus (
13) macaques. Groups of cotton rats
were infected with 10
5 TCID
50 of each virus, and on day 4 the
virus was isolated from lung tissue and MDLN and proliferation
was assessed in spleen cells. Titers in lung tissue of animals
infected with vaccine viruses (Edm and Ed-NSE) were <10
3 TCID
50/g of lung, whereas titers in lung tissue of animals infected
with wild-type viruses were >10
4 TCID
50/g of lung (data not
shown). Edm and Ed-NSE did not induce proliferation inhibition
(Fig.
5A) and no or little virus was found in draining lymph
nodes (Fig.
5B). In contrast, the wild-type strains BIL and
ICB (like WTFb) induced proliferation inhibition and virus was
present in draining lymph nodes. The same was true for Wü5405,
which could be tested only at an inoculum of 10
4 TCID
50 (Fig.
5). These data indicate that vaccine-like and wild-type viruses
can be differentiated in cotton rats by virus titer in lung
tissue, spread to MDLN, and proliferation inhibition in spleen
cells.
Testing of MV strains with uncertain pathogenic potential.
With this system, we tried to investigate viruses of more uncertain
pathogenic potential. Edm(wt) was derived from a patient with
measles and has been passaged for 13 passages on human and monkey
fibroblasts (summarized in reference
19). By serial passage,
all vaccine strains of the Edmonston lineage were derived from
this isolate. Edm(wt) did not induce acute measles in rhesus
macaques (
3), but at high titers induced encephalitis in marmosets
(
1). Chi-1 was derived from a patient with measles and passaged
afterwards on Vero cells. It did not induce acute measles in
rhesus macaques (
3). The HU2 strain was isolated from a child
with MV encephalitis after MV immunization and belongs to genotype
A of the vaccine strains (
31). After infection of cotton rats
with Edm(wt) and HU2, no or little virus was found in MDLN and
no proliferation inhibition was observed (Fig.
6). With Chi-1,
a slight proliferation inhibition was observed, although no
virus was found in MDLN. After infection with a 10-fold-higher
dose, virus was found in MDLN (100 TCID
50/10
7 lymph node cells),
correlating with 50% proliferation inhibition (data not shown).
It appears that the passage on Vero cells correlates with a
loss of virulence in cotton rats when proliferation inhibition
and spread of virus to MDLN are used as parameters.
Comparison of MV pairs with CD150 versus CD46/CD150 receptor usage.
After passage on Vero cells, wild-type viruses acquire the ability
to use CD46 as receptor molecule, and this was supposed to be
crucial for attenuation (
15,
21,
25-
27). To investigate whether
the in vitro receptor usage reflects virulence in vivo, cotton
rats were infected with two MV pairs with different receptor
usage and minimal amino acid exchanges. WTFb was propagated
on BJAB lymphoid cells, whereas WTFv was propagated on Vero
cells (
21). This propagation resulted in defined changes in
the H protein (at positions 192 and 546), and whereas WTFb uses
CD150 as the receptor, WTFv is able to interact with both (
6).
After i.n. infection with 10
5 TCID
50 of WTFb, mitogen-stimulated
proliferation was inhibited whereas infection with WTFv had
nearly no effect (Fig.
7A). This correlated well with the presence
or absence of virus in draining lymph nodes (Fig.
7B). The second
virus pair investigated was MV (WTF-H)Ed and (WTF-H481N-Y)Ed.
In the molecularly cloned (WTF-H)Ed, the H gene (Edm-H) is replaced
by WTF-H, resulting in the exclusive utilization of CD150 (
6).
In (WTF-H481N-Y)Ed, a single point mutation at amino acid 481
is introduced into WTF-H which changes receptor usage to both
CD46 and CD150 (
6). After i.n. infection, (WTF-H)Ed induced
proliferation inhibition and virus was found in MDLN (Fig.
7).
In contrast, after infection with (WTF-H481N-Y)Ed, proliferation
was not impaired and no virus was found in MDLN (Fig.
7).

DISCUSSION
In humans, wild-type MV infection causes immune suppression,
which often leads to secondary infections. In contrast, vaccine
virus does not induce a clinically relevant immune suppression
but causes only a slight reduction in the proliferation of PBL
after stimulation with mitogen ex vivo. The difference in virulence
between wild-type and vaccine strains seen in humans is not
reflected in vitro in a contact- inhibition assay of mitogen-stimulated
proliferation of human cells (
24). When a similar assay was
applied to cotton rat cells in vitro, no difference in proliferation
inhibition was found between vaccine and wild-type strains.
A likely explanation for the in vivo differences is a difference
in viral replication and spread. In monkeys, wild-type strains
disseminate more widely than vaccine strains, leading to higher
titers (
32) and acute measles (
3,
13). Viral spread in humans
has not been studied comparatively between wild-type and vaccine
strains in detail. However, the appearance of rash after a wild-type
infection that is not seen after vaccination also indicates
the growth of wild-type virus to higher titers and enhanced
virus spread after infection. In cotton rats, both viral titers
in lung tissue and the presence of virus in MDLN after wild-type
virus infection correlate well with proliferation inhibition
ex vivo. Using the presence of virus in draining lymph nodes
and proliferation inhibition as parameters, it is possible to
distinguish between vaccine and wild-type virus strains in cotton
rats.
All vaccine-related viruses (genotype A) did not spread well and did not induce proliferation inhibition. This includes also HU2, a virus derived from a vaccine-induced encephalitis case (31). This indicates that the aforementioned parameters do not correlate with neurovirulence of a virus. As in monkeys (3, 13), the Bilthoven and ICB strains were virulent, as were the clinical isolates WTFb and Wü5404 grown on lymphoid cells (BJAB). In contrast, clinical isolates grown on Vero cells were attenuated in cotton rats [Edm(wt), Chi-1, and WTFv]. This correlates well with data from rhesus macaques, in which both Edm (wt) and Chi-1 did not induce acute measles (3). It is known that MV strains grown on fibroblasts adapt to the usage of CD46 although they retain the ability to bind to CD150 (7, 30). The change in receptor usage is correlated with mutations in the H protein (6, 9, 27). Our data using the two virus pairs of closely related (WTFv and WTFb) or the molecularly cloned viruses [(WTF-H)Ed and (WTF-H481Y-N)Ed] differing in one amino acid indicate the importance of receptor usage in vivo. Viruses which use human CD46 and CD150 in vitro [WTFv and (WTF-H481Y-N)Ed] (6) did not spread well in cotton rats and induced no proliferation inhibition. In contrast, viruses using only human CD150 in vitro [WTFb and (WTF-H)Ed] spread well and induced proliferation inhibition. The results using virus pair MV (WTF-H)Ed and (WTF-H481Y-N)Ed confirm in vitro data that amino acid position 481 is important for receptor usage and biological activity. They also indicate that although both F and H are required for the induction of proliferation inhibition, H is the more important determinant in vivo. Not only do mutations in the H protein seem to be important for attenuation of MV strains, but also virulence is determined by mutations in other genes. After passage of ICB on Vero cells, a mutation resulting in a loss of expression of the C protein occurred (29). Although no effect was seen in vitro, this mutant was not able to induce acute measles in cynomolgus macaques. Genotypic analysis has suggested a number of changes important to the virulence of MV strains, and due to the reverse genetic system available, many mutants can be generated. Because in cotton rats vaccine and wild-type strains can be differentiated on the basis of viral spread and proliferation inhibition, it appears to be an excellent in vivo model to further investigate parameters of MV virulence.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Measles virus strain ICB was kindly provided by H. Okada and
M. Tashiro, Tokyo, Japan; Edm(wt) was obtained from L. Martin,
Zurich, Switzerland.
This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institut für Virologie and Immunbiologie, Versbacher Str. 7, 97078 Würzburg, Germany. Phone: 49 931 201 49896. Fax: 49 931 201 49553. E-mail:
niewiesk{at}vim.uni-wuerzburg.de.


REFERENCES
1 - Albrecht, P., D. Lorenz, and M. J. Klutch. 1981. Encephalitogenicity of measles virus in marmosets. Infect. Immun. 2:581-587.
2 - Alkhatib, G., and D. J. Briedis. 1986. The predicted primary structure of the measles virus hemagglutinin. Virology 150:479-490.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Auwaerter, P. G., P. A. Rota, W. R. Elkins, R. J. Adams, T. DeLozier, Y. Shi, W. J. Bellini, B. R. Murphy, and D. E. Griffin. 1999. Measles virus infection in rhesus macaques: altered immune responses and comparison of the virulence of six different virus strains. J. Infect. Dis. 180:950-958.[CrossRef][Medline]
4 - Avota, E., A. Avots, S. Niewiesk, L. P. Kane, U. Bommhardt, V. ter Meulen, and S. Schneider-Schaulies. 2001. Disruption of Akt kinase activation is important for immunosuppression induced by measles virus. Nat. Med. 6:725-731.
5 - Doerig, R. E., A. Marcil, A. Chopra, and C. D. Richardson. 1993. The human CD46 molecule is a receptor for measles virus (Edmonston strain). Cell 75:295-305.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Erlenhoefer, C., W. P. Duprex, B. K. Rima, V. ter Meulen, and J. Schneider-Schaulies. 2002. Analysis of receptor (CD46, CD150) usage by measles virus. J. Gen. Virol. 83:1431-1436.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7 - Erlenhoefer, C., W. J. Wurzer, S. Loffler, S. Schneider-Schaulies, V. ter Meulen, and J. Schneider-Schaulies. 2001. CD150 (SLAM) is a receptor for measles virus but is not involved in viral contact-mediated proliferation inhibition. J. Virol. 10:4499-4505.
8 - Griffin, D. E. 1995. Immune responses during measles virus infection. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 191:117-134.[Medline]
9 - Hsu, E. C., C. Iorio, F. Sarangi, A. A. Khine, and C. D. Richardson. 2001. CDw150 (SLAM) is a receptor for a lymphotropic strain of measles virus and may account for the immunosuppressive properties of this virus. Virology 279:9-21.[CrossRef][Medline]
10 - Johnston, I. C. D., V. ter Meulen, J. Schneider-Schaulies, and S. Schneider-Schaulies. 1999. A recombinant measles vaccine virus expressing wild-type glycoproteins: consequences for viral spread and cell tropism. J. Virol. 73:6903-6915.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11 - Katz, M. 1995. Clinical spectrum of measles. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 191:1-12.[Medline]
12 - Kobune, F., H. Sakata, and A. Sugiura. 1990. Marmoset lymphoblastoid cells as a sensitive host for isolation of measles virus. J. Virol. 64:700-705.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13 - Kobune, F., H. Takahashi, K. Terao, T. Ohkawa, Y. Ami, Y. Suzaki, N. Nagata, H. Sakata, K. Yamanouchi, and C. Kai. 1996. Nonhuman primate models of measles. Lab. Anim. Sci. 46:315-320.[Medline]
14 - Naniche, D., G. Varior-Krishnan, G. Cervoni, T. F. Wild, B. Rossi, C. Rabourdin-Combe, and D. Gerlier. 1993. Human membrane cofactor protein (CD46) acts as cellular receptor for measles virus. J. Virol. 67:6025-6032.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15 - Nielsen, L., M. Blixenkrone-Moller, M. Thylstrup, N. J. Hansen, and G. Bolt. 2001. Adaptation of wild-type measles virus to CD46 receptor usage. Arch. Virol. 146:197-208.[CrossRef][Medline]
16 - Niewiesk, S., I. Eisenhuth, A. Fooks, J. C. S. Clegg, J.-J. Schnorr, S. Schneider-Schaulies, and V. ter Meulen. 1997. Measles virus-induced immune suppression in the cotton rat (Sigmodon hispidus) model depends on viral glycoproteins. J. Virol. 71:7214-7219.[Abstract]
17 - Ohgimoto, S., K. Ohgimoto, S. Niewiesk, I. M. Klagge, J. Pfeuffer, I. C. Johnston, J. W. Schneider-Schaulies, V. ter Meulen, and S. Schneider-Schaulies. 2001. The haemagglutinin protein is an important determinant of measles virus tropism for dendritic cells in vitro. J. Gen. Virol. 82:1835-1844.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18 - Ono, N., H. Tatsuo, Y. Hidaka, T. Aoki, H. Minagawa, and Y. Yanagi. 2001. Measles viruses on throat swabs from measles patients use signaling lymphocytic activation molecule (CDw150) but not CD46 as a cellular receptor. J. Virol. 75:4399-4401.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19 - Parks, C. L., R. A. Lerch, P. Walpita, H. P. Wang, M. S. Sidhu, and S. A. Udem. 2001. Comparison of predicted amino acid sequences of measles virus strains in the Edmonston vaccine lineage. J. Virol. 75:910-920.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20 - Reed, L. J., and H. Muench. 1938. A simple method of estimating fifty per cent endpoints. Am. J. Hyg. 27:493-497.
21 - Rima, B., J. Earle, K. Baczko, V. ter Meulen, U. Liebert, C. Carstens, J. Carabana, M. Caballero, M. Celma, and R. Fernandez-Munoz. 1997. Sequence divergence of measles virus haemagglutinin during natural evolution and adaptation to cell culture. J. Gen. Virol. 78:97-106.[Abstract]
22 - Rota, J. S., K. B. Hummel, P. A. Rota, and W. J. Bellini. 1992. Genetic variability of the glycoprotein genes of current wild-type measles isolates. Virology 188:135-142.[CrossRef][Medline]
23 - Rota, J. S., Z. D. Wang, P. A. Rota, and W. J. Bellini. 1994. Comparison of sequences of the H, F, and N coding genes of measles virus vaccine strains. Virus Res. 31:317-330.[CrossRef][Medline]
24 - Schlender, J., J. J. Schnorr, T. Cattomen, R. Cattaneo, M. A. Billeter, V. Ter Meulen, and S. Schneider-Schaulies. 1996. Surface interaction of measles virus glycoproteins is necessary and sufficient for the induction of proliferative inhibition of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:13194-13199.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25 - Schneider-Schaulies, J., L. M. Dunster, F. Kobune, B. Rima, and V. ter Meulen. 1995. Differential downregulation of CD46 by measles virus strains. J. Virol. 69:7257-7259.[Abstract]
26 - Schneider-Schaulies, J., J.-J. Schnorr, U. Brinckmann, L. M. Dunster, K. Baczko, U. G. Liebert, S. Schneider-Schaulies, and V. ter Meulen. 1995. Receptor usage and differential downregulation of CD46 by measles virus wild type and vaccine strain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92:3943-3947.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27 - Shibahara, K., H. Hotta, Y. Katayama, and M. Homma. 1994. Increased binding activity of measles virus to monkey red blood cells after long-term passage in Vero cell cultures. J. Gen. Virol. 75:3511-3516.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28 - Singh, M., R. Cattaneo, and M. A. Billeter. 1999. A recombinant measles virus expressing hepatitis B virus surface antigen induces humoral immune responses in genetically modified mice. J. Virol. 73:4823-4828.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
29 - Takeuchi, K., N. Miyajima, F. Kobune, and M. Tashiro. 2000. Comparative nucleotide sequence analyses of the entire genomes of B95a cell-isolated and Vero cell-isolated measles viruses from the same patient. Virus Genes 20:253-257.[CrossRef][Medline]
30 - Tatsuo, H., N. Ono, K. Tanaka, and Y. Yanagi. 2000. SLAM (CDw150) is a cellular receptor for measles virus. Nature 406:893-897.[CrossRef][Medline]
31 - Taylor, M. J., E. Godfrey, K. Baczko, V. ter Meulen, T. F. Wild, and B. K. Rima. 1991. Identification of several different lineages of measles virus. J. Gen. Virol. 72:83-88.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
32 - van Binnendijk, R. S., R. W. van der Heijden, G. van Amerongen, F. G. Uytdehaag, and A. D. Osterhaus. 1994. Viral replication and development of specific immunity in macaques after infection with different measles virus strains. J. Infect. Dis. 170:443-448.[Medline]
33 - Wyde, P. R., D. K. Moore-Poveda, N. J. Daley, and H. Oshitani. 1999. Replication of clinical measles virus strains in hispid cotton rats. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 221:53-62.[CrossRef][Medline]
Journal of Virology, January 2003, p. 150-158, Vol. 77, No. 1
0022-538X/03/$08.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.77.1.150-158.2003
Copyright © 2003, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.