Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, May 2002, p. 4199-4211, Vol. 76, No. 9
0022-538X/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.9.4199-4211.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Linda Buonocore,1 and John K. Rose1,3*
Departments of Pathology,1 Cell Biology,3 Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 065102
Received 9 May 2001/ Accepted 29 January 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In order to determine which specific N-linked glycans are critical for Env protein function or immune escape, several recent studies have been directed to individual or multiple mutations of glycosylation sites. Effects of glycosylation on viral replication, gp160 cleavage, CD4 binding activity, and coreceptor usage have been documented (34, 42). Specific Env glycosylation sites also appear to have an important role in modulating the antibody response. For example, removal of an N-linked glycan in the HIV-1BRU Env V1 region can make the virus more resistant to neutralization by anti-V3 antibodies (22). HIV IIIB env clones lacking an N-glycan in the V3 loop of Env protein can become more sensitive to virus neutralization (2). By masking an immunodominant epitope in the V3 loop with additional N-linked carbohydrates, the antibody response can be shifted from the V3 epitope to the V1 epitope in an HIV HXB2 strain (19).
One of the most dramatic effects of carbohydrate removal from an envelope glycoprotein has been reported from studies with simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) (48). Rhesus monkeys infected with SIVmac 239 mutants lacking glycosylation sites in the V1 region of gp120 produced high titers of neutralizing antibody against the mutant virus. Most importantly, the mutant viruses induced much higher titers of antibody to the wild-type (wt) virus than were induced by the wt itself. Related but less dramatic effects of glycosylation have been observed in the V3 domain of TCLA HIV type 1 (HIV-1) (2, 57). In addition, experiments in guinea pigs with HIVBRU Env containing mutated glycosylation sites in the V4 and V5 domains showed that immunizations with mutant viruses generated antibodies that neutralized mutant viruses twofold better than they neutralized wt virus. Similarly, immunizations with wt viruses generated antibodies that neutralized wt virus twofold better than they neutralized mutant viruses (3).
Based on the results with SIV showing that carbohydrate removal can significantly enhance the neutralizing antibody response to Env (48) and considering the need for more studies involving HIV primary isolates, we studied the functional roles of Env N-linked glycans from the HIV primary isolate 89.6. Single glycosylation mutations and combinations of glycosylation mutations were introduced across the entire V1 and V2 regions and were studied in a transient expression system. Recombinant vesicular stomatitis viruses (VSVs) expressing HIV Env glycosylation mutants were recovered, and these Env proteins were shown to be incorporated into the surfaces of VSV virions. The effects of Env carbohydrate removal on syncytium formation, CD4 binding activity, and cleavage were examined.
We also studied the antibody response to Env glycosylation mutants expressed in VSV vectors. Previous studies have shown that VSV vectors can induce neutralizing antibodies to HIV-1 89.6 both in mice and in rhesus macaques (53, 54). Mice were immunized with recombinant VSVs expressing HIV Env with four or six sequential glycosylation sites mutated in the V1 and V2 regions. Serum antibodies were tested for binding to oligomeric parental Env, binding to nonglycosylated peptides covering the mutated sites, and neutralization of parental or mutated Env.
|
|
|---|
Mutations eliminating glycosylation sites were introduced into pBS-89.6G by using the Quick Change site-directed mutagenesis kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Stratagene). Mutants were generated with reverse and forward primers containing the desired mutation. All mutations substituted the AAT parental sequence encoding asparagine with a CAA sequence encoding glutamine. After Maxi-Prep (Qiagen) purification of mutated plasmids, they were sequenced to confirm the presence of mutations. A total of six glycosylation sites in pBS-89.6G were mutated (Fig. 1); these were sites 2 to 7, numbered starting from the site closest to the N terminus of gp160. Table 1 summarizes the parental plasmids and primers used to generate each glycosylation mutant. For example, by using pBS-89.6G as a parental plasmid, the first glycosylation mutant generated was pBS-89.6G(4), which eliminated the fourth glycosylation site of gp120. The forward primer was 5' GAATATCACTAAGCAAACTACTCAACCCACTAGTAGCAGC 3', and the reverse primer was 3' TTATAGTGATTCGTTTGATGAGTTGGGTGATCATCGTCGACCCCTTAC 5' (Table 1). (Sequence changes that eliminated sites are boldfaced.) All glycosylation mutants were designated by the number of sites eliminated. We also mutated the asparagine codon at position 421 in the gp120 sequence (shown underlined), although glycosylation was not expected or observed at this position because of a proline residue between the asparagine and the threonine (20).
![]() View larger version (18K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Diagram of a recombinant VSV encoding the 89.6G protein. The symbol shows the positions of all of the predicted glycans on the expanded gp120 diagram. The amino acid sequences of the V1 and V2 regions are expanded at the bottom of the figure, with individual glycosylation sites numbered. Note that the NPT sequence following site 4 is not a glycosylation site because of the proline. Glycosylation mutations were introduced at the numbered sites in the V1 and V2 regions of 89.6G gp120, replacing asparagine (boldfaced) with glutamine. Peptide sequences used in ELISAs are underlined.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Primers used to generate EnvG glycosylation mutants
|
To generate plasmids for recovery of VSV
G recombinants expressing Env glycosylation mutants, the sequences of DNA encoding constructs 89.6G(4-7) and 89.6G(3-7) were amplified by PCR using Vent polymerase (New England Biolabs). The forward primer, 5' CCGGGCCCCCCCACGCGTACAATGAGAGTG AAGGAGATCAGG 3', contained an MluI site (boldfaced). The reverse primer, 5' GATCGGATCCGCGGCCGCGCTAGCGGTATCACAAGTTGATTTGG 3', contained an NheI site (underlined). The PCR product was digested with MluI and NheI restriction enzymes (New England Biolabs) and ligated to pVSV
G-JRFLG-GFP (4), which had previously been digested with MluI and NheI to remove the JRFLG insert. The resulting plasmids were designated pVSV
G-89.6G(4-7)-GFP and pVSV
G-89.6G(3-7)-GFP.
Protein expression using the vaccinia virus-T7 system. Approximately 2.5 x 105 baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells were plated onto 35-mm-diameter dishes and incubated for 18 h at 37°C. Cells were then washed twice with Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) and infected for 0.5 h at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 with vTF7-3, a recombinant vaccinia virus that encodes T7 RNA polymerase (18). Cells were then transfected with 5 µg of either pBS-SKII, pBS-89.6G, or pBS-89.6G glycosylation mutants by using a cationic liposome reagent (52). The medium was removed after 3 h and replaced with DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS). BHK cells were then washed twice with methionine-free medium and labeled for 1 h in 0.5 ml of methionine-free medium containing 100 µCi of [35S]methionine. Cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed with 0.5 ml of detergent solution (1% Nonidet P-40 [NP-40], 0.4% deoxycholate, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8], 62.5 mM EDTA) with 5 U of aprotinin. Lysates were transferred to 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged in an Eppendorf microcentrifuge at 10,000 rpm for 2 min to remove nuclei. Supernatants were transferred to new tubes, and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was added to a final concentration of 0.2%.
Immunoprecipitations. Immunoprecipitations were performed by adding 2 µl of sheep polyclonal anti-gp120 serum (National Institutes of Health [NIH] AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program) to the cell lysates and incubating for 0.5 h at 37°C. Samples were incubated with 40 µl of protein A-agarose for 15 min, pelleted, washed three times with ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (0.1% SDS, 1% deoxycholate, 1% NP-40, and 0.15 M NaCl in 10 mM Tris [pH 7.4]), and resuspended in 40 µl of sample buffer.
Recovery of VSV recombinants. VSV recombinants expressing Env mutants were recovered as previously described (55). BHK cells were infected at an MOI of 10 with vTF7-3, and after 1 h they were transfected with 3 µg of pBS-N, 5 µg of pBS-P, 1 µg of pBS-L, and 10 µg of either pVSV-89.6G, pVSV-89.6G(4), pVSV-89.6G(4-7), or pVSV-89.6G(2-7) by using a cationic liposome reagent. After incubation for 48 h at 37°C, cell supernatants were removed, filtered through a 0.2-µm-pore-size filter, and transferred to fresh BHK cells for 48 h. VSV recoveries were confirmed initially by observation of cytopathic effect in BHK cells and immunofluorescence microscopy. Virus stocks were prepared by using plaque-purified virus to infect BHK cells.
VSV
G viruses expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) and 89.6G glycosylation mutants were recovered as previously described (4). BHK cells (about 75% confluent) were plated onto 10-cm-diameter petri dishes. Cells were infected at an MOI of 10 with vTF7-3 (18). After 1 h of infection, cells were transfected with 3 µg of pBS-N, 5 µg of pBS-P, 1 µg of pBS-L, 4 µg of pBS-G, and 10 µg of full-length VSV plasmid. At 48 h posttransfection, supernatants were filtered and passaged onto BHK-G cells (56), which had been induced 24 h earlier to express G. Cells were incubated for 48 h at 37°C, and viral supernatants were then filtered through a 0.2-µm-pore-size filter to remove vaccinia virus. Viral stocks were prepared by expansion of recovered virus in 107 BHK-G cells for 32 h and subsequent transfer of the entire supernatant to 107 BHK cells. After infection for 3.5 h at 37°C, the viral inoculum was removed, cells were washed three times with DMEM, and 10 ml of DMEM supplemented with 5% FBS was added. After an additional 11 h, supernatants were harvested, clarified by centrifugation at 1,250 x g for 5 min, and stored at -80°C.
Western blotting. Purification of virions and Western blotting were performed as previously described (23). Approximately 106 BHK cells on 10-cm-diameter dishes were infected at an MOI of 0.01 for 0.5 h in serum-free (SF) DMEM, after which the medium was removed and replaced with DMEM supplemented with 5% FBS. Cells were incubated for 18 h, and supernatants were collected and centrifuged at 1,250 x g for 10 min at 21°C. Clarified supernatants were layered on top of a solution of 20% sucrose in TE buffer (10 mM Tris-Cl [pH 7.5]-1 mM EDTA) and centrifuged for 1 h at 4°C in a Beckman SW41 Ti rotor at 38,000 rpm. Viral pellets were then resuspended in 200 µl of TE buffer.
Samples containing equal amounts of protein (normalized by the Pierce bicinchoninic acid protein assay) were fractionated by electrophoresis on an SDS-8% polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose filter at 4°C, for 18 h at 40 mA. The nitrocellulose filter was blocked in 15 ml of TTBS (0.02% Tween 20, 0.9% NaCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5]) supplemented with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (American Bioanalytical) at 21°C. After 2 h, 7.5 µl of sheep anti-gp120 (1:2,000 dilution) was added to the blocking solution. After 0.5 h, the nitrocellulose filter was washed three times for 5 min each time with TTBS. The nitrocellulose filter was then incubated with 15 ml of TTBS-1% BSA including 1.5 µl of a biotin-conjugated rabbit anti-sheep secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories) (1:10,000 dilution). After 0.5 h, the nitrocellulose filter was washed again and incubated in 15 ml of TTBS-1% BSA including 1.5 µl of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin (Vector Laboratories) (1:10,000 dilution) for 0.5 h. Finally, the nitrocellulose filter was washed again and developed by chemiluminescence (ECL reagents; Amersham).
Pulse-chase metabolic labeling of VSV-infected cells. Approximately 5 x 105 BHK cells on 35-mm-diameter plates were infected in 0.5 ml of DMEM for 0.5 h with wt or recombinant VSVs at an MOI of 100. DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS (1.5 ml) was added to the plates, and cells were incubated for 3.5 h at 37°C. Cells were then washed with methionine-free medium and pulse-labeled for 0.5 h with 100 µCi of [35S]methionine. The labeling medium was removed from the cells and replaced with DMEM supplemented with 2 mM methionine. Immediately after labeling, or at 1 and 4 h after the chase, cell supernatants and cell lysates were collected. Cell lysates were prepared as described above. Cell supernatants were collected in 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged in an Eppendorf microcentrifuge for 2 min at 10,000 rpm. Supernatants were transferred to new tubes and adjusted to a solution containing 1% NP-40, 0.4% deoxycholate, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), 62.5 mM EDTA, and 0.2% SDS. Cell lysates and supernatants were precleared by addition of 2 µl of a polyclonal rabbit anti-VSV antibody for 0.5 h at 37°C, followed by addition of 40 µl of protein A-agarose and incubation for 10 min at 37°C. Samples were pelleted, and supernatants were transferred to new Eppendorf tubes. Sheep anti-gp120 (1.5 µl) was added to the samples for 0.5 h at 37°C, followed by incubation with 40 µl of protein A-agarose for 0.5 h at 37°C. Samples were pelleted, washed three times with RIPA buffer, and resuspended in 40 µl of sample buffer. Samples were analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) (8% acrylamide), followed by exposure to a PhosphorImager screen (Molecular Dynamics).
Protein expression in cells infected with VSV
G recombinants.
Approximately 6 x 105 BHK cells on 6-cm-diameter plates were infected with recombinant VSVs at an MOI of 20 for 1 h in 3 ml of DMEM. The medium was then replaced with 3 ml of DMEM supplemented with 5% FBS for 8 h at 37°C. Cells were washed twice with a methionine-free medium and labeled in 3 ml of methionine-free medium containing 200 µCi of [35S]methionine. After 1 h, cells were washed again with PBS and lysed with 1.5 ml of detergent solution (1% NP-40, 0.4% deoxycholate, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8], 62.5 mM EDTA) containing 5 U of aprotinin. Lysates were transferred to 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 2 min in an Eppendorf microcentrifuge, after which supernatants were transferred to new tubes. Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (8% acrylamide), followed by exposure to a PhosphorImager screen (Molecular Dynamics).
Preparation of viral stocks for boosting. Approximately 106 BHK cells on 10-cm-diameter dishes were infected at an MOI of 0.01 with either recombinant wild-type (rwt) VSV, VZV expressing influenza virus hemagglutinin (VSV-HA) (51), VSV-89.6G, VSV-89.6G(4-7), or VSV-89.6G(2-7) for 0.5 h in SF DMEM. The medium was removed and replaced with DMEM supplemented with 5% FBS. Cells were incubated for 18 h, and supernatants were collected and centrifuged at 1,250 x g for 10 min at 21°C. Clarified supernatants were layered on top of a solution of 20% sucrose in TE buffer and centrifuged for 1 h at 4°C in a Beckman SW41 Ti rotor at 38,000 rpm. Viral pellets were then resuspended in 200 µl of PBS. Viral titers, as well as viral protein concentrations, were determined.
Inoculation of mice. Inoculations were performed as previously described (51, 54). Six-week-old female BALB/c mice (Charles River Laboratories) were inoculated intranasally with 25 µl of virus inoculum (105 PFU) in DMEM (day 0). Each group (four to five mice per group) was inoculated with one of five different recombinants: rwt VSV, VSV-HA (51), VSV-89.6G, VSV-89.6G(4-7), or VSV-89.6G(2-7). Mice were weighed daily in a plastic beaker on a Sartorius balance (model 1409). At day 31, mice were boosted intraperitoneally (i.p.) with 50 µg of the same VSV recombinant administered in the first inoculation. An identical i.p. boost was performed at day 84. At day 98, mice were boosted again intranasally with VSV recombinants.
At day 113, blood samples from mice in each group were pooled and allowed to clot at 21°C. Clots were removed, and samples were centrifuged in a TOMY MTX-150 centrifuge (TMA-11 fixed-angle rotor) at 4°C for 10 min at 5,500 rpm. Clarified sera were transferred to sterile Eppendorf tubes and heat inactivated at 56°C for 1 h.
ELISA. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) were performed as previously described (54). Ninety-six-well plates (Costar 9018) were first coated with 0.1 mg of concanavalin A (ConA; Sigma)/ml in 20 mM Tris-HCl-1 M NaCl (pH 8.5) at 21°C. After 2 h, 30 µl of gp140 supernatant (derived from vBD1 infections) diluted in PBS was added to the wells for 18 h at 4°C. vBD1 is a recombinant vaccinia virus vector that expresses an oligomeric 89.6 gp140 protein containing the extracellular domains of gp120 and gp41 but lacking the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of gp41 (49). After gp140 binding, blocking was performed by addition of PBS-10% calf serum for 30 min. Serial twofold dilutions of serum (from 1:100 to 1:800) were added to the wells for 2 h at 21°C. A horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibody (Pierce) diluted 1:20,000 was then added to the wells for 1 h at 21°C. For colorimetric analysis, 2,2'-azinobis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6 sulfonic acid) tablets (Immunopure ABTS; Pierce) were used. After each incubation step mentioned above, wells were washed three times with 200 µl of PBS-0.05% Tween 20, and immediately after the last incubation, an extra wash with 2x PBS-0.05% Tween was performed. Optical densities were determined at a wavelength of 405 nm.
ELISAs for peptides covering the V1 and V2 regions (Fig. 1) did not use ConA for the first coating step. Approximately 1 µg of peptide was added to each well in 150 µl of 100 mM NaHCO3 (pH 9.6). Coating was performed for 18 h at 4°C. The remaining steps were performed as described above.
VSV neutralization assay. Serial twofold dilutions of sera in PBS were added to 96-well plates in a total volume of 50 µl. rwt VSVs (50 µl, containing 100 PFU) resuspended in SF DMEM were added to the wells and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Approximately 1,500 BHK cells in 100 µl of DMEM-10% FBS were then added to each well, and plates were incubated for 2 to 3 days at 37°C. The neutralization titer was defined as the highest dilution which corresponded to complete inhibition of VSV cytopathic effect. All assays were performed in duplicate, and all results agreed within 1 dilution.
HIV-1 envelope neutralization.
Neutralization assays were performed as previously described (4). A day before the assay, approximately 20,000 HeLa-CD4 cells were plated in individual wells on 96-well plates. After 18 h, VSV
G-89.6G-GFP or VSV
G-89.6G(4-7)-GFP virus stocks were incubated with monoclonal antibody (MAb) I1 (1 µl/ml) against VSV G (35) in order to neutralize any infectivity due to residual G protein. After 10 min at 21°C, 25 µl of DMEM-10% FBS containing 100 infectious units (i.u.) of VSV
G-89.6G-GFP or VSV
G-89.6G(4-7)-GFP was mixed with serial dilutions (typically 1:10 to 1:160) in 25 µl of DMEM-10% FBS. After incubation for 30 min at 37°C, 50 µl of the virus-serum mixture was added to the HeLa-CD4 cells in duplicate wells containing 150 µl of DMEM-10% FBS. After 18 h of incubation, GFP-positive cells and syncytia were counted by fluorescence microscopy using an Olympus CK40 microscope with a 4x objective.
|
|
|---|
To confirm that mutated glycosylation sites were actually used in the parental protein, the mutant proteins were expressed in BHK cells by using the vaccinia virus-T7 system (18) and were labeled with [35S]methionine. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with sheep anti-gp120 and analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2). An increase in protein mobility was observed for all 89.6G glycosylation mutants, and the increase was proportional to the number of sites mutated. To ensure that the differences in size between 89.6G envelope glycosylation mutants were due to differences in N glycosylation, all samples were treated with N-glycosidase F (Fig. 2), which removes all N-linked glycans (38). The predicted molecular size of the 89.6G protein without glycans is 80 kDa. All samples treated had the same mobility between the 58- and 84-kDa markers, indicating that glycosylation was responsible for mobility differences before treatment.
![]() View larger version (59K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Immunoprecipitation of Env G glycosylation mutants from transfected cells and treatment with N-glycosidase F. BHK cells were infected with vTF7-3 and then transfected with pBS-SKII expressing either 89.6G or 89.6G glycosylation mutants for 6 h, and proteins were labeled with [35S]methionine for 1 h. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with a polyclonal sheep anti-gp120 serum and protein A-agarose. For N-glycosidase treatment (30), samples eluted from protein A were divided in two, peptide N-glycosidase F buffer G7 was added, and half of each sample was treated with peptide N-glycosidase F (New England Biolabs). Incubations of all samples were performed at 37°C for 1 h. Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (8% acrylamide), followed by exposure to a PhosphorImager screen (Molecular Dynamics). Positions of Env G, p80, and molecular weight markers are indicated.
|
![]() View larger version (122K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Examples of syncytium formation by 89.6G glycosylation mutants. HeLa-CD4 cells (2.5 x 105) were plated onto 35-mm-diameter dishes and incubated for 18 h at 37°C. Cells were infected with vTF7-3 and transfected with either pBS-89.6G(2-3) (A) or vector alone (B). At 8 h posttransfection, the numbers of syncytia in 10 fields per dish were counted by using a Nikon Diaphot phase microscope with a 20x objective. Arrows indicate syncytia.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Syncytium formation from all plasmid transfections in HeLa-CD4 cells
|
![]() View larger version (72K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. CD4 binding by Env glycoslation mutants. BHK cells were infected with vTF7-3 and transfected with either 10 µg of pBS-sCD4-KDEL (lanes 9 and 10), which encodes a soluble form of CD4 that is retained in the ER (6), 5 µg of pBS-89.6G (lanes 1 and 2) or pBS-89.6G(2-7) (lanes 5 and 6), or a combination of 10 µg of pBS-sCD4-KDEL and 5 µg of pBS-89.6G (lanes 3 and 4) or pBS-89.6G(2-7) (lanes 7 and 8). Cells were labeled with [35S]methionine for 1 h. Immunoprecipitations were performed with 2 µl of sheep polyclonal anti-gp120 serum ( Env) or 2 µl of MAb OKT4 ( CD4) (58). Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (8% acrylamide), followed by exposure to a PhosphorImager screen (Molecular Dynamics). The positions of Env G and sCD4-KDEL are indicated.
|
![]() View larger version (68K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Expression of 89.6G glycosylation mutants from VSV recombinants. Approximately 5 x 105 BHK cells on 35-mm-diameter plates were infected with wt or recombinant VSVs at an MOI of 10 for 1 h in 0.5 ml of DMEM. The medium was then replaced with 2 ml of DMEM supplemented with 5% FBS, and cells were incubated for an additional 7 h at 37°C. Cells were washed twice with methionine-free medium and labeled in 0.5 ml of methionine-free medium containing 100 µCi of [35S]methionine. After 1 h, cells were washed with PBS and lysed with 0.5 ml of detergent solution. Lysates were transferred to 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm in an Eppendorf microcentrifuge for 2 min, and supernatants were transferred to new tubes. About 10 µl of each sample was analyzed by SDS-8% PAGE, followed by exposure to a PhosphorImager screen (Molecular Dynamics). The positions of two VSV proteins (L and G) as well as HIV Env G are indicated. MW, molecular weight (in thousands).
|
![]() View larger version (72K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Incorporation of 89.6G Env glycosylation mutants into VSV virions. BHK cells were infected with the indicated VSV recombinants at an MOI of 0.01 for 18 h. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation, and clarified supernatants were layered on top of a solution of 20% sucrose in TE buffer and centrifuged for 1 h at 4°C in a Beckman SW41 Ti rotor at 38,000 rpm. Western blotting to detect gp120 was performed by using sheep polyclonal anti-gp120 serum. Details of the Western blotting procedure are given in Materials and Methods. Molecular weight markers, as well as positions of cleaved and uncleaved Env G proteins, are indicated.
|
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Immunoprecipitation of Env G from infected cell lysates and supernatants. BHK cells were infected with VSV-89.6G (lanes 1), VSV-89.6G(4) (lanes 2), VSV-89.6G(4-7) (lanes 3), or VSV-89.6G(2-7) (lanes 4) for 4 h and labeled with [35S]methionine for 30 min. Immediately after the labeling (time zero) or at 1 or 4 h after the chase, cell lysates and medium were immunoprecipitated with sheep polyclonal anti-gp120 serum. Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE (8% acrylamide), followed by exposure to a PhosphorImager screen (Molecular Dynamics). Positions of uncleaved and cleaved Env G are indicated.
|
G-89.6G-GFP glycosylation mutants.
Previously, our group described
G VSV Env G-GFP viruses that propagate as live viruses on HeLa-CD4 cells and can be used to quantitate neutralizing antibodies directed to the HIV Env protein (4). Because we wanted to test the effects of these mutations on protein function in infection and on induction of neutralizing antibodies to both glycosylated and nonglycosylated Env, we constructed VSV mutants lacking the VSV glycoprotein gene (
G) but expressing 89.6 Env G proteins lacking glycosylation sites in the V1 and V2 regions, and a GFP marker protein (Fig. 8A). To generate these viruses expressing Env G glycosylation mutants, we cloned the 89.6G(4-7) and 89.6G(3-7) constructs into the pVSV
G-GFP vector and recovered VSV recombinants from these constructs.
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Diagram of recombinant VSV, VSV-89.6G, and VSV G-89.6G-GFP genomes, and expression of 89.6G glycosylation mutants in VSV G-GFP-infected cells. rwt VSV, VSV-89.6G, and VSV-89.6G glycosylation mutants were used for immunizations of mice. The 89.6G glycosylation mutants were also cloned into the MluI and NheI sites of VSV G-GFP cDNA between the M and GFP genes. These recombinant viruses were used for Env neutralization assays (A). BHK-G cells were infected with recombinant VSVs for 8 h and labeled with [35S]methionine for 1 h, and cell lysates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE. The positions of four VSV proteins (L, G, N, and P) as well as HIV Env G are indicated (B).
|
G VSV-Env G-GFP glycosylation mutants.
To examine the proteins encoded by the VSV
G recombinants, BHK-G cells were infected at an MOI of 20 and labeled with [35S]methionine. Crude cell lysates were then analyzed by SDS-PAGE (Fig. 8B). As controls, previously described VSV-GFP (4), VSV-89.6G (26), and VSV-89.6G(4-7) were used. VSV N, P, and L proteins were visible in lysates of cells infected with all recombinant viruses. As expected, none of the
G viruses expressed VSV G protein, while both VSV-GFP and VSV-89.6G did. Because expression of cellular genes is shut off by VSV infection, the VSV G encoded by the cells is not seen. The mobilities of the two Env glycosylation mutants were consistent with the loss of four or five N-linked glycans. Note that the GFP and VSV M proteins were electrophoresed out of the gel to allow observation of the small differences in Env G protein mobility.
When HeLa-CD4 cells were infected with the VSV
G-89.6G-GFP viruses, green fluorescent syncytia were observed (Fig. 9). Syncytia formed by VSV
G-89.6G(4-7)-GFP looked similar to those formed by VSV
G-89.6G-GFP in terms of size and number (Fig. 9A). However, many fewer infected cells were detected after VSV
G-89.6G(3-7)-GFP infection, and these were mostly single cells with an occasional smaller syncytium (Fig. 9B). Titers of recovered
G virus determined by counting green fluorescent cells or syncytia on HeLa-CD4 cells were 3 x 103 i.u./ml for VSV-89.6G, 1 x 103 i.u./ml for VSV
G-89.6G(4-7)-GFP, and only 50 i.u./ml for VSV
G-89.6G(3-7)-GFP. The low titers for VSV
G-89.6G(3-7)-GFP were probably a result of the reduced fusion activity of this Env G construct, which was noted above. Because of the very low titers, we were unable to use VSV
G-89.6G(3-7)-GFP for neutralization assays.
![]() View larger version (90K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Infection of HeLa-CD4 cells with VSV G recombinants. HeLa-CD4 cells were infected for 18 h with VSV G-89.6G(4-7)-GFP (A) or VSV G-89.6G(3-7)-GFP (B). Syncytium formation and green fluorescence were observed with a fluorescence microscope. A low level of bright-field light was included to detect background cells.
|
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 10. Vector-associated pathogenesis in BALB/c mice. Five groups of four to five mice were inoculated intranasally (day 0) with 105 PFU of rwt VSV ( ), VSV-HA ( ), VSV-89.6G ( ), VSV-89.6G(4-7) (), or VSV-89.6G(2-7) ( ). Average-daily weights for mice in each group are shown.
|
Analysis of antibodies to glycosylated, oligomeric gp140 by use of ELISA. Total serum antibody binding to a soluble, oligomeric form of 89.6 Env designated 89.6-gp140 was measured by a published ELISA (49, 54). The lectin ConA was used to bind gp140 to the ELISA plates so that gp140 was bound in multiple orientations and exposed as many epitopes as possible. After incubation with serial dilutions of mouse antisera, the plates were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase-coupled anti-mouse antibody. The amount of antibody bound was then determined by a colorimetric assay.
The results of this ELISA are shown in Fig. 11. At 1 month after the initial immunization, only low levels of anti-gp140 antibodies were detected. We did not detect neutralizing antibodies at this time (data not shown). Following two i.p. protein boosts with purified virus at days 31 and 84, and one more intranasal protein boost at day 98, anti-gp140 antibodies were readily detected by ELISA at day 113. Mice immunized with VSV-89.6G(4-7) and mice immunized with VSV-89.6G had similar titers of antibody to gp140, while mice immunized with VSV-89.6G(2-7) had approximately fourfold-lower titers. It is possible that the lower titers generated by 89.6G(2-7) reflect a shift in the immune response to epitopes not represented in the gp140 molecule used for the ELISA.
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 11. ELISA for oligomeric 89.6-gp140. The ELISA was performed as described in Materials and Methods by using serial dilutions of mouse sera. Backgrounds of control mouse sera run in parallel were subtracted. Triangles, sera from VSV-89.6G immunizations; circles, sera from VSV-89.6G(4-7) immunizations; squares, sera from VSV-89.6G(2-7) immunizations. Open and solid symbols represent sera obtained at day 31 or 113 after the initial immunization, respectively.
|
Titers of neutralizing antibodies to VSV. The VSV G protein is the target of antibodies neutralizing VSV (27), and immunization of mice with VSV recombinants typically elicits neutralizing titers in the range of 1:5,000 to 1:10,000. Because all of the vectors used for immunizations contained VSV G, we measured the anti-VSV neutralizing antibody titers for all mouse sera, using twofold serial dilutions and determination of the end point corresponding to complete neutralization. These values are given in Table 3. Titers generated by all recombinants were 1:10,240, except for VSV-89.6G, for which the titer was 1:5,120. These results indicate that all VSV recombinants replicated to similar levels in the mice, consistent with similar pathogenesis in all animals.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Neutralization titers to VSV and EnvG proteins
|
G-89.6G-GFP or VSV
G-89.6G(4-7)-GFP. At day 113 after the initial inoculation, sera from mice immunized with control viruses failed to neutralize either
G-89.6G or
G-89.6G(4-7) (Table 3). Sera from mice immunized with VSV-89.6G(4-7) or VSV-89.6G(2-7) had titers of neutralizing antibodies against VSV
G-89.6G(4-7) that were higher than those against fully glycosylated VSV
G-89.6G, suggesting that the mutants might expose new epitopes that elicited an increased neutralizing antibody response to mutant Env. However, immunization with VSV-89.6G also generated a higher titer of neutralizing antibodies to the mutant VSV
G-89.6G(4-7) than to VSV
G-89.6G, suggesting that, instead, the mutant was simply more sensitive to neutralizing antibodies, including those elicited by wt Env. A control immunization with pooled immunoglobulin from HIV-infected patients gave identical neutralization titers (1:800) against VSV
G-89.6G and VSV
G-89.6G(4-7). The major conclusion from these data is that immunization with VSV recombinants expressing mutant Env proteins lacking glycans in V1 and V2 elicited lower neutralizing titers to wt Env than immunization with wt Env itself and therefore does not appear to be a useful approach for enhancing the neutralizing antibody response to the primary HIV isolate 89.6. |
|
|---|
Previous studies have described the effects of multiple Env glycosylation mutations on viral replication. Different combinations of triple glycosylation mutations generated in SIV mac239 have resulted in replication-incompetent virus (44, 47). In simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) 89.6 containing the 89.6 envelope, passage in monkeys resulted in a more pathogenic SHIV-89.6P, which lacks a glycosylation site in V2 (site 6), resulting in decreased fusion activity (15). Also, mutation of a glycosylation site (equivalent to site 6 in 89.6 Env) in the V2 loop of Env in HIV-1 strain HXB2 resulted in nonviable virus (17). Triple or individual glycosylation mutations in the HXB2 Env V1 and V2 regions resulted in impaired virus infectivity (65). However, in our studies, single or double mutations at equivalent positions of the 89.6 Env protein had no effect on fusion activity. In another HIV strain (IIIB), the V1 and V2 loops have been deleted and the virus is still replication competent (7). These results, taken together, suggest that mutation of glycosylation sites in the V1 and V2 loops may impair folding of the Env protein or prevent conformational changes required for membrane fusion.
To test these mutants for immunogenic potential with VSV-based vectors, we constructed VSV recombinants expressing HIV Env with a single or multiple glycosylation sites mutated. Having the mutant Env proteins expressed in VSV allowed us to perform kinetic experiments on Env transport, cleavage, and incorporation into virions. This was not possible with the vaccinia virus-T7 system, in which HIV Env transport is much less efficient. Using the recombinant VSV system, we found that Env lacking all V1 and V2 glycosylation sites [pBS-89.6G(2-7)] was cleaved inefficiently, transported slowly, and incorporated into VSV virions as both cleaved and uncleaved forms. In contrast, the Env mutant lacking sites 4 to 7 showed faster cleavage than wt Env and more-rapid release of cleaved gp120 into the medium. The effects of glycan removal on multiple aspects of Env function all suggest indirect effects on protein folding, although no clear conformational changes were detected with a limited number of MAbs that recognized 89.6 HIV Env.
One possible explanation for the increased antigenicity of SIV Env glycosylation mutants is exposure of epitopes such as chemokine receptor-binding sites that are normally hidden. Chemokine receptor binding is thought to require CD4 binding and movement of the V1 and V2 loops to expose the chemokine receptor-binding site (30, 50, 60, 66, 67). A CD4-independent Env mutant derived from HIV IIIB has been identified recently, and its coreceptor binding site is exposed (25, 31). Sequence analysis of this mutant revealed 18 mutations not present in the original HIV IIIB Env. Determinants for CD4 independence mapped outside the regions that determine coreceptor specificity (the V1, V2, and V3 regions) but included loss of five glycosylation sites (one in the V2 region). In addition, the HIV-1 primary isolate Env (ADA) that acquired CD4 independence also lost a glycosylation site in V2 among other mutations (28).
We wanted to investigate whether mutation of glycosylation sites in the V1 and V2 regions had any effect in exposing the chemokine receptor-binding site. However, we could not detect consistent changes in recognition with MAbs 17B and 48D, which bind CD4-induced epitopes that overlap the chemokine receptor-binding site and that have been shown to react with CD4-independent Env (61, 62, 63). We also looked for CD4-independent entry into HOS cells expressing CXCR4 or CCR5 (12, 24, 33) by using VSV
G recombinants expressing Env mutants 89.6G(2-4) and 89.6G(4-7) and were unable to detect it.
To determine the effect of carbohydrate removal in the HIV Env V1 and V2 domains on the antibody response against HIV, we inoculated mice with VSV recombinants expressing mutant Env proteins. Inoculations were performed with VSV vectors encoding Env protein of the primary HIV isolate 89.6 with mutations in four glycosylation sites in V1 or with mutations in all six sites in V1 and V2. Neutralizing antibodies directed against parental or mutated Env were measured by using VSV
G viruses that express Env glycosylation mutants and the GFP marker protein. All constructs induced antibodies that recognized oligomeric 89.6 Env gp140 in an ELISA, but Env glycosylation mutants with mutations in V1 and V2 were no better than wt Env at inducing antibodies neutralizing wt Env. However, the mutant Env proteins did appear to be somewhat more sensitive to neutralizing antibodies raised against either wt or mutant Env, suggesting conformational changes in the mutant Env proteins.
The major goal of our study was to compare the neutralizing antibody response to HIV Env glycosylation mutants with mutations in the V1 and V2 domains to the results obtained with SIV (48). Infection of rhesus macaques with SIV carrying glycosylation mutations in or near the Env V1 domain can increase the neutralizing antibody response to SIV as much as 25-fold over that obtained with infection with wt SIV. Titers of neutralizing antibodies to the homologous SIV glycosylation mutant were even greater than titers of antibodies neutralizing SIV. The greater neutralization of wt SIV by sera from animals infected with the mutant viruses suggested that glycans were masking neutralizing epitopes that do not induce neutralizing antibodies when glycans are present. Our results with Env from an HIV primary isolate are very different in that the mutants were less effective than wt Env at inducing neutralizing antibodies against wt Env.
The SIV results are puzzling because it is difficult to visualize how antibodies generated to a nonglycosylated protein sequence would be able to recognize the same sequence in glycosylated form better than it is recognized by antibodies generated to the glycosylated sequence itself. Our results with HIV are more consistent with what might be expected and suggest that the SIV results may require an explanation other than direct epitope masking by glycans. It is possible, for example, that removal of glycans in the V1 region of SIV Env has effects on protein conformation, perhaps exposing epitopes elsewhere in SIV Env that do not normally elicit neutralizing antibodies. The SIV Env glycosylation mutants were subsequently reported to be CD4 independent (13), suggesting that the high neutralizing titers were due to the exposure of usually hidden intermediate epitopes such as the chemokine receptor-binding site. If these epitopes were only transiently exposed, for example, during virus entry, they might not normally elicit an antibody response. Antibodies raised to the nonglycosylated SIV Env protein exposing these hypothetical epitopes might, however, be able to neutralize wt virus during entry. A similar explanation was invoked to explain the broadly neutralizing "fusion-competent" antibodies described by Nunberg and colleagues (32). Structural differences between HIV Env and SIV Env could explain differences in conformational changes in HIV Env versus SIV Env caused by glycan removal in V1 and V2.
Although no detailed analysis of the effect of glycans in the V1 and V2 regions of HIV-1 has been reported, neutralizing epitopes in the V1 and V2 domains of HIV primary isolates have been identified (46). An earlier study has shown that acquisition of a glycan in the V1 region can mask a major neutralizing epitope of SIV Env (9). Similarly, addition of a glycan in the V3 domain of a TCLA HIV-1 strain has been shown to block neutralization by antibodies recognizing the V3 domain (21, 39). In fact, mutation of N-linked glycans in the HIV-1 V1 domain has been associated with resistance to neutralization. Removal of an N-linked glycan in the V1 domain of HIV BRU-LAV resulted in a strain more resistant to neutralization by MAbs to the V3 loop and to soluble CD4 (22). Also, in vivo adaptation of a SHIV clone expressing TCLA SF33 (SHIVSF33A) resulted in a neutralization-resistant variant by removal and addition of a glycosylation site in the V1 and V3 regions, respectively (10, 11). Effects of glycan removal in the V4 and V5 domains of TCLA HIV have been reported. Here the results showed that an antibody to mutant envelope neutralized the mutant envelope better than an antibody to the wt, but the antibody to mutant envelope did not exhibit greater neutralization of wt Env (3).
Other possible explanations for the differences between our results with HIV and those obtained for SIV are the use of mice instead of primates to generate neutralizing antibodies. However, the magnitude of the neutralizing antibody response to HIV Env generated by VSV vectors in mice is very similar to that seen in rhesus macaques (unpublished data). It thus seems very likely that there are significant differences in the effects of carbohydrate removal in the V1 region between HIV and SIV in terms of induction of a greater neutralization response to fully glycosylated Env proteins in the latter. Given the extensive sequence divergence among HIV isolates, it is also likely that there will be significant differences among HIV strains with regard to the role of glycans in the immune response.
We thank Anjeanette Roberts and Karl Haglund for instruction in inoculation of mice, and we are grateful to Nina Rose for development of the ELISA and the neutralization assay and for instruction in their use. We are grateful to Tracey Ferguson and other members of the Yale Animal Resource Center, BCMM, for care and assistance with our mice. We thank Robert Doms and James Robinson for providing mouse and human anti-Env MAbs. We also thank the Rose laboratory members for helpful comments and suggestions during the preparation of the manuscript, and we thank JoAnn Falato for administrative assistance.
Present address: Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico at Bayamón, Bayamón, PR 00959. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»