Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, April 2002, p. 3774-3783, Vol. 76, No. 8
0022-538X/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.8.3774-3783.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Institut für Virologie und Immunbiologie, Universität Würzburg,1 Institut für Virologie, Medizinische Fakultät "Carl Gustav Carus," Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany2
Received 31 August 2001/ Accepted 15 January 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
In previous studies, two cis-acting sequences (CASI and CASII) have been identified that are required for transfer of FV vectors (8, 14, 45). A further sequence element located in the 5' untranslated region (UTR) was found to be essential for expression and processing of the Gag and Pol proteins (15, 35). The situation is further complicated by the fact that vector particles that were produced from constructs with large deletions in the 5' UTR packaged as much pregenomic RNA as did constructs without deletions (15). Although the practical consequences as far as safety issues and vector titers are concerned may be minor or even nonexistent in the FV system, expression of the Gag and Pol proteins independently of RNA packaging would allow better characterization of FV capsid assembly and Pol incorporation.
Therefore, we set out to improve current FV vectors and packaging systems. To do this, we used derivatives of the virus isolate previously called human FV. Large-scale surveys did not identify natural human FVs (2, 41), and the sequencing of a chimpanzee virus demonstrated that the two isolates are almost identical (17). Thus, the so-called human FV likely represents a chimpanzee virus accidentally transmitted to a human (16, 40). Since the true origin of this reference virus will probably never be disclosed (1), we designated this isolate primate FV type 1 (PFV-1).
|
|
|---|
Recombinant DNA. All of the FV constructs used in this study are based on infectious PFV-1 molecular clone pHSRV2 (39). PFV-1 sequence positions are given with respect to the start of transcription (position 1 corresponds to the first nucleotide of the R region of the 5' long terminal repeat [LTR]). All constructs were made by established molecular cloning techniques (3, 36). All point mutations generated by recombinant PCR (18) were verified by automated DNA sequence analysis of amplimers using AmpliTaqFS and the ABI 310 sequence analysis system (Perkin-Elmer). Other recombinant clones were characterized by multiple restriction enzyme digestions.
(i) Vector constructs. The pMD9 vector was derived from pMH25 (14). It harbors a human cytomegalovirus (CMV) immediate-early gene enhancer/promoter, the 5' PFV-1 sequences up to nucleotide (nt) 645 (covering CASI), 3' pol sequences from nt 3871 to nt 5885 (covering CASII), an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) expression cassette under control of the spleen focus-forming virus U3 promoter downstream of CASII, the polypurine tract (ppt), and the 3' LTR. The initiation sequence of the gag gene in pMD9 was changed from ATG GCT TCA to CTG GCT TAA (mutated nucleotides are in boldface) by recombinant PCR, and the 3' U3 region from nt 10262 to nt 10820 was deleted. Note that this internal 558-bp U3 deletion from the BstEII site to the XbaI site in the HSRV2 LTR comes to a 1,204-bp deletion compared with the wild-type PFV-1 U3 region, since the HSRV2 U3 region is already a deletion variant (37). The vector pMD11 deviates from pMD9 in that the egfp marker gene was replaced with a lacZ marker with a nuclear localization signal (nlsLacZ) derived from the SFG NLS-lacZ retroviral vector (34). The vectors pMD12 and pMD15 are equivalent to pMD9 and MD11, respectively, but the marker gene cassettes were placed between CASI and CASII. The vector pMH32 has already been described (14).
(ii) Packaging constructs. Expression of all packaging constructs is under the transcriptional control of the CMV enhancer/promoter. Plasmids pCgp-1 (no deletion in the 5' UTR) and pCgp-10 (with a deletion in the 5' UTR from position 151 to position 444), both directing expression of the PFV-1 Gag and Pol proteins; pCgp-8 (with a deletion in the 5' UTR from position 10 to position 345), which fails to express the Gag and Pol proteins; and pCpol-2 and pCenv-1, which direct expression of the Pol and Env proteins, respectively, have been described previously (11, 14, 15). In pCgp-14, the PFV-1 major 5' SD sequence (underlined) was changed from 5'-GGTTTGGTAAG-3' to 5'-GGTTTGGGAAG-3' by recombinant PCR on a 0.41-kb NdeI/SspI fragment. In a similar fashion, the sequence just upstream of the SD site was changed to 5'-GATTTGGTAAG-3' in pCgp-15. Plasmid pCZgag-2 was obtained by inserting the PFV-1 gag sequences from the ATG start codon up to a HincII site at position 2617, which is located in the pol gene, into the pcDNA3.1zeo+ expression vector (Invitrogen). In addition, this plasmid contains the M54 mutation inactivating the pol ATG start codon (7). In pCZgp-1, the gag/pol coding sequences from the gag ATG start codon up to the EcoRV site at position 5884 located in env were inserted into pcDNA3.1zeo+. Plasmids pCIgag-2 and pCIgp-2 harbor the gag and gag/pol sequences, respectively, which were inserted downstream of the chimeric ß-globin-immunoglobulin G (IgG) intron of the pCI expression vector (Promega). The pCZI expression vector was generated by inserting the CMV enhancer/promoter and CMV intron A, excised as a 2.35-kb EcoRI fragment from plasmid pHit60 (42), via blunt-end ligation into MfeI/NheI-cut pcDNA3.1zeo+. pCZIgag-2 and pCZIgp-2 were derived by inserting the PFV-1 gag and gag/pol sequences, respectively, into pCZI. In pCZgag-5 and pCZgp-5, two self-annealed oligonucleotides, representing the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) molecular clone HXB2 sequence from nt 728 to nt 773 (GenBank accession number K03455), were inserted between the CMV promoter and the PFV-1 gag and gag/pol genes. This insertion corresponds to the sequence from position 274 to position 319 after the HIV-1 start of transcription, and therefore, the major 5' SD at position 289 is contained (30). pCZgag-6 and pCZgp-6 were derived by insertion of PCR-amplified murine leukemia virus (MuLV) SFG vector (34) sequences from nt 1 to nt 616 (GenBank accession number J02255) into the PFV-1 gag and gag/pol expression plasmids to replace the PFV-1 leader. In these plasmids, the PFV-1 gag ATG is in the same position relative to the start of transcription as the original MuLV gag ATG. The CTG used to initiate translation of glycosylated MuLV Gag is still present in this construct (32). However, a stop codon was introduced 18 amino acids downstream of the CTG and, consequently, N-terminally elongated PFV-1 Gag was prevented. For the gag/pol-encoding gp plasmids, the respective pol ATG initiation codon mutations to CTG were obtained by exchange of a 1.83-kb SwaI/PacI fragment with the M54 mutant (7).
(iii) Vectors used to generate cRNA probes. pSP/HFV-3 contains a 1.6-kbp NcoI/SacI fragment of pHSRV2 in plasmid pSP65 (Roche) (15). A gag gene-related in vitro antisense RNA transcript stretching from nt 1593 to nt 1258 was generated after linearization of pSP/HFV-3 with XbaI. pSP/HFV-4 contains nt 5551 to nt 5884 between the MscI and EcoRV sites of PFV-1 inserted in the antisense direction downstream of the SP6 promoter in pSP65. Following linearization with AflII, it was used to generate an in vitro RNA transcript stretching from nt 5884 to nt 5624 that covers the overlap of the pol and env genomic regions.
(iv) Bacterial expression of PFV-1 Gag protein. The pET15b vector (Novagen) was modified to contain an SmaI restriction site in its polylinker by oligonucleotide insertion as previously described (20). In a subgenomic plasmid covering the gag open reading frame, the ATG initiation site was modified to contain an NdeI restriction site. pETgag was derived by inserting a 2.17-kb NdeI/HincII fragment ranging from the gag ATG to a HincII restriction site in pol into NdeI/SmaI-cut pET15b in frame to the N-terminal histidine tag.
DNA transfections and analysis of vector transfer efficiency. All transfections were carried out by using a calcium phosphate cotransfection protocol essentially as previously described (14, 15), with up to 21 µg of plasmid DNA per 1.8 x 106 293T cells seeded in 6-cm-diameter dishes the day before. Vector transduction efficiencies were determined as previously described (14, 15), with slight modifications. Briefly, 48 h following transfection, 3 ml of cell-free supernatant (0.45 µM filtrate) was added to HT1080 recipient cells, which were seeded at a density of 104 per well in 12-well plates 1 day before transduction. The cells were monitored for EGFP expression 3 days after transduction by flow cytometry on a FACScan using the LysisII and CellQuest software packages (Becton Dickinson). Transduction efficiency was expressed as the percentage of EGFP-positive cells in relation to the total number of cells assayed (usually 104). To analyze the titer of LacZ-expressing vectors, the cell-free supernatants were serially diluted 10-fold and added to 104 HT1080 recipient cells seeded the day before. ß-Galactosidase expression was assayed 2 days after transduction by counting blue cells under a light microscope following fixation with 0.5% glutaraldehyde and staining with freshly prepared staining solution (4 mM K-ferricyanide, 4 mM K-ferrocyanide, 2 mM MgCl2, 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside [X-Gal] at 0.4 mg/ml ) as described previously (39). All vector transfer experiments were done in quadruplicate with at least two independent preparations of plasmid DNAs.
Protein analysis and MAbs. Lysates from transfected cells or from cell-free virus were prepared by resuspension in detergent-containing buffer (12, 14, 15). Cell-free virus from transfected cells was obtained by filtration of supernatant through a 0.45-µm-pore-size filter (Schleicher & Schüll) and subsequent sedimentation through a 20% sucrose cushion in TNE (100 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) in an SW41 rotor (Beckman) at 25,000 rpm and 4°C for 3 h. The samples were subjected to electrophoresis through sodium dodecyl sulfate-containing 8% polyacrylamide gels and blotted semidry onto nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schüll). The blots were incubated with rabbit antisera raised against recombinant PFV-1 Gag (12) or with mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) directed against the PFV-1 Gag and Pol proteins (20). The blots were developed with the ECL detection system (Amersham) after incubation with horseradish-coupled secondary antibodies directed against rabbit or mouse IgG (Dako).
Anti-Gag MAbs were generated from C57BL/6 mice infected with PFV-1 (38), boosted by infection with a recombinant vaccinia virus expressing PFV-1 Gag protein (10), and then boosted again with Gag protein expressed in and purified from bacteria to approximately 95% purity via nickel chelate chromatography as instructed by the supplier (Novagen). MAbs were generated essentially as described recently (20), and the supernatants of the hybridomas were screened by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with the bacterium-expressed, purified Gag protein. Following several subcloning steps, MAb SGG1 showed an almost background-free reaction in immunoblot and immunofluorescence assays and was used in this study.
RPAs. All RNase protection analyses (RPAs) were performed with Direct Protect Detection kits from Ambion, essentially as described by the manufacturer. For detection of RNA in virions, virus was produced as described previously (14, 15). For detection of cellular RNA by RPA, total RNA was prepared 48 h following transfection with the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen) and 5 µg of RNA was used per assay. In some experiments, extracted virion RNA was treated with 0.5 U of RQ1 DNase (Promega) at 37°C for 25 min. Antisense RNA probes were generated in vitro from XbaI-linearized pSP/HFV-3 and AflII-linearized pSP/HFV-4, respectively. RPAs of individual constructs were performed at least three times and quantitated with a PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. PFV-1 proviral genome organization and new FV pMD vectors. The scale bar's left end corresponds to the start of transcription at the U3-R border. The pMH25 reference vector has been described previously (14). It harbors both of the cis-acting elements (CASI and CASII) required for vector transfer. The vectors contain an internal indicator gene cassette. Expression of an EGFP-encoding or nlsLacZ marker gene is directed by the spleen focus-forming virus U3 region. The cassette was inserted either downstream of CASII (pMH25, pMD9, and pMD11) or between CASI and CASII (pMD12 and pMD15). The percentage of EGFP-positive recipient HT1080 cells or the number of LacZ-positive recipient HT1080 cells obtained with supernatant from 293T cells after transient transfection with the vector genome, together with the pCgp-1 and pCenv-1 packaging constructs, is indicated. Mean values ± standard errors are shown. IP is the FV internal promoter (25).
|
5' PFV-1 gag expression constructs essentially require a 5' splice donor sequence. We previously showed that the PFV-1 5' LTR R region is critical for expression of the Gag protein (15). Although the effect was described as mainly posttranscriptional, the mechanism of action remains obscure (35). The most prominent feature in the R region is the presence of the main 5' SD at position +53 (15, 31). To get a better understanding on the regulation of PFV-1 Gag protein expression and to eventually minimize the 5' UTR sequences needed in packaging constructs, we first generated a series of gag/pol expression constructs in which the 5' SD sequence was mutated and analyzed them by immunoblotting. As shown in Fig. 2A, a single point mutation of the 5' SD site (pCgp-14; GT to GG) completely abrogated Gag protein expression while the mutation to AT of a GT motif 5 nt upstream of the SD site (in pCgp-15) did not at all alter the Gag protein expression level. Note that the lack of Pol protein expression in pCgp-14 is not surprising, since it is the consequence of the PFV-1 Pol protein being expressed from a spliced mRNA using the 5' SD site (21, 46).
![]() ![]() ![]() View larger version (66K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Analysis of the Gag and Pol protein expression levels of different FV packaging constructs. (A) Detail of the gag/pol expression constructs with either deletion or mutation of the 5' leader sequence and analysis of Gag and Pol protein expression following transfection of 293T cells and immunoblotting with mouse anti-Gag and anti-Pol MAbs (20). pbs is the primer binding site. (B) Detail of gag/pol expression constructs with heterologous 5' splice sites and analysis of Gag and Pol protein levels after transfection. (C) Vector transfer using packaging constructs with heterologous leader sequences. Determination of the abilities of different gag/pol expression constructs to transfer the pMD9 vector following cotransfection of 293T cells with pCenv-1 and transduction of HT1080 recipient cells. Mean values ± standard errors as, determined by fluorescence-activated cell sorter analysis, are shown.
|
Analysis of vector transfer by using FV gag/pol packaging constructs with the 5' UTR deleted. The efficiency with which the newly established gag/pol packaging constructs incorporate the pMD9 vector was analyzed by triple transfection of 293T cells together with pCenv-1 and determination of transduction efficiency on HT1080 fibroblastoid cells. As shown in Fig. 2C, the abilities of the different packaging constructs to give rise to vector particles that transduce recipient cells correlated roughly with their protein expression levels observed in the previous experiment (Fig. 2B). Even with constructs pCZgp-6 and pCZIgp-2, which gave rise to the highest Gag levels and the best vector transfer rates, we obtained only 30 to 50% of the transduction rates achieved with the previously constructed packaging constructs containing wild-type PFV-1 5' UTR sequences.
Packaging of RNA transcribed from gag/pol expression constructs.
To allow quantification of the RNA content of extracellular particles, thereby avoiding its degradation by particle-associated reverse transcription in the vector-producing cell (29), we used derivatives of the gag/pol-encoding packaging constructs in which the pol gene ATG was down-mutated to CTG. The packaging constructs were cotransfected with an env-expressing plasmid, and particles were prepared after centrifugation of the cell-free supernatant through a sucrose cushion. One-half of the particles were analyzed for the amount of Gag capsid protein by Western blotting (Fig. 3A). In parallel, RNA was extracted from the other half of the particle preparation and analyzed by RPA with a gag-derived probe (Fig. 3B). In these experiments, we specifically analyzed the packaging constructs pCZgp-6 and pCZIgp-2 (Fig. 3) because these yielded the best vector transfer among the newly created constructs. As expected, control experiments revealed that no viral particles were produced when pCgp-1/M54 was transfected in the absence of Env (11). Quantification of three independent RPAs revealed that the pCgp-1/M54 construct with the 5' UTR not deleted, as well as the pCgp-10/M54 (
151-444) construct with the 5' UTR partially deleted, gave rise to particles that package relatively large amounts of gag RNA (15). In contrast, both of the constructs with heterologous splice sites, pCZgp-6/M54 and pCZIgp-2/M54, showed approximately 80 and 60% reduced amounts of PFV-1 gag RNA, respectively (Fig. 3B). Still, packaging of some gag-related RNA was clearly detectable. Treatment of nucleic acids extracted from virions with DNase prior to RPA did not change the outcome of the experiment (data not shown), which indicated that potential contamination of the particles by transfected plasmid DNA was of no concern.
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Determination of RNA incorporation from the gag/pol packaging constructs into FV vector particles. 293T cells were transfected with the M54 derivatives of the indicated gag/pol expression constructs together with an env expression plasmid. Viral particles were concentrated from cell-free supernatant by centrifugation through a sucrose cushion. Gag protein was detected by immunoblotting (A). Particles were analyzed for the gag RNA content derived from the packaging construct by RPA (B). Three independent RPAs were quantified by PhosphorImager analysis. The value obtained with reference plasmid pCgp-1/M54 was arbitrarily set to 100%, and means ± standard errors are shown for the other constructs (B).
|
![]() ![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Analysis of the level of protein expression and the abilities of different gag expression constructs to package an FV vector. In panel A, the expression constructs used in this assay are shown in detail. Panel B shows a representative immunoblot analysis of Gag protein expression levels. In the experiment shown in panel C, 293T cells were cotransfected with the gag expression constructs, pCpol-2 and pCenv-1, and the vector pMD9, except for cells that were transfected with pCgp-1, pCenv-1, and pMD9. The efficiency with which the different gag expression constructs packaged the vector was determined by analyzing the transduction rate of EGFP marker-positive HT1080 recipient cells. The means ± standard errors of four independent experiments are shown.
|
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Determination of the amount of gag RNA incorporated into particles obtained after transfection of cells with different gag expression constructs. Approximately equal amounts of Gag protein (A), from particles that were obtained after cotransfection of 293T cells with individual packaging constructs and an env expression plasmid and purified by centrifugation through a sucrose cushion, were subjected to RPA for the incorporation of packaging construct (gag) RNA (B). The mean values ± standard errors of three independent experiments, as determined by quantitation of RPA results by PhosphorImager analysis, are shown. The value obtained with reference construct pCgp-1/M54 was arbitrarily set to 100%.
|
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Analysis of pol and env RNA copackaging into FV vector particles. An RPA was designed to determine whether pol or env RNA is incorporated into FV vector particles. In panel A, an overview of the individual constructs and RPA probes (pSP/HFV-3 and pSP/HFV-4) used in this assay is shown. Dotted lines represent untranscribed regions or intron sequences spliced out after transfection of cells with control plasmid pCgp-1. In panel B, the result of an RPA of cellular RNA prepared after transfection of cells with the individual expression constructs is shown. Note that the vector RNA (pMH32) was not detected by either probe. Viral particles (C) were prepared from the supernatant of transfected cells and analyzed for content of RNA from packaging constructs. As shown in panel D, we found no evidence of packaging of subgenomic pol- or env-related RNA into particles produced by transfection of 293T cells with pCIgag-2 and pCZgag-5.
|
|
|
|---|
We and others recently reported that PFV-1 Gag and Pol protein expression essentially requires the R region of the 5' LTR (15, 35). Determination of cellular RNA amounts suggested that the effect is mainly posttranscriptional (15, 35). There is no evidence for regulation at the level of RNA transport; however, the mechanism of action has remained obscure (35). Although the elucidation of this mechanism is far beyond the aim of our study, we identified the 5' SD as the sequence in R that is responsible for the effect observed. Replacement of the authentic PFV-1 R region with heterologous intron sequences, with other retroviral leader sequences with 5' SD sites, and even with a short sequence supplying a heterologous viral 5' SD sequence was found to be sufficient to rescue Gag, as well as Pol, protein expression. Further studies, such as analysis of the translational efficiency of gag RNA with and without 5' SD, are required to resolve the function of the 5' SD in PFV-1 Gag protein generation.
Replacement of the PFV-1 leader with other sequences containing splice sites enabled us to eliminate the complete PFV-1 5' UTR of FV vector packaging constructs without abrogating Gag and Pol protein expression. However, vector transfer was significantly reduced when these constructs were used to package FV gene transfer vectors. This limitation could be overcome by using separate gag and pol packaging plasmids. Two Gag expression constructs for efficient generation of vector capsids containing barely detectable amounts of RNA transcribed from the packaging constructs were identified. Furthermore, we were unable to detect packaging of pol and env RNA into these particles.
These results, together with those of our previous studies (14, 15), are suggestive of some hypotheses for the understanding of the molecular biology of PFV-1 and the design of packaging cell lines and PFV-1 vectors. (i) The primary packaging signal of PFV-1 is still ill defined; it may be bipartite and reside in the first approximately 650 nt of the RNA pregenome and the last approximately 2 kb of Pol. Neither signal alone is sufficient for efficient packaging. Recently, it has been shown that CASII contains an element that is able to promote HIV-1 Gag expression in the absence of the Rev/Rev-responsive element system (44). However, FV Gag expression appears to be independent of the presence of CASII. Thus, further work is required to elucidate the biochemical mode of action of CASI and -II more precisely. (ii) The authentic FV 5' UTR is not required for Gag protein expression. However, the presence of a 5' SD sequence is essential. (iii) The separation of gag expression and pol expression on different plasmids and the use of heterologous splice sites enabled efficient generation of vector particles while the incorporation of RNA transcribed from the packaging constructs into virus particles could be reduced to barely detectable levels. This strategy allows separation of the expression of the Gag and Pol proteins from RNA packaging. However, vector transfer rates could not be enhanced by this approach and, to our knowledge, it is unknown whether the incorporation of packaging construct RNA is of practical relevance for the safety of FV vectors. (iv) The interaction of capsid and polymerase proteins together with pregenomic RNA during the assembly of PFV-1 capsids appears to be complex and difficult to analyze since the modification of one variable may influence the other components (14, 15). The system we suggest for investigation of these complex interactions makes use of the separated gag and pol expression plasmids, which do not package their own RNA. Thus, this systems allows investigation of the constituents of PFV-1 capsids (Gag, Pol, and RNA) by alteration of an individual component with a reduced risk of affecting the others.
We thank Ottmar Herchenröder for critical review of the manuscript and Bryan Cullen and Rebecca Russel for helpful discussion.
This work was supported by grants from the DFG (Re627/6-2 and Li621/2-3), the BMBF (01KV9817/0 and BEO 0312191), the Bayerische Forschungsstiftung, Sächsisches Staatsministerium für Umwelt und Landwirtschaft (13-8811.61/142), the EU (BMH4-CT97-2010), and Bayer AG. G.J. was supported by the Hector Stiftung.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»