Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, February 2002, p. 1718-1730, Vol. 76, No. 4
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.4.1718-1730.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Ann M. Powers,1,
Edward C. Holmes,2 C. H. Woelk,2 and Scott C. Weaver1*
Center for Tropical Diseases and Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-0609 ,1 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, United Kingdom2
Received 21 August 2001/ Accepted 7 November 2001
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The VEEV antigenic complex of alphaviruses is comprised of six antigenic subtypes (I to VI) (5). Subtype I is comprised of five varieties: AB, C, D, E, and F. Only viruses from subtypes IAB and IC have been implicated in large outbreaks of equine and human encephalitis that have occurred from northern South America to southern Texas (43, 47). These viruses cause large outbreaks by exploiting equines as highly efficient amplification hosts. The remaining, enzootic subtypes--including ID, IE, and II--circulate in continuous sylvatic foci and do not cause epidemic disease because they replicate poorly in equines. However, two recent outbreaks in Chiapas and Oaxaca, Mexico, in which four isolates of VEEV subtype IE were made from horses, demonstrated for the first time the potential for this subtype to emerge and cause equine disease. These strains provide an opportunity to investigate further the mutations associated with epizootic emergence (27).
Subtype IE VEEV occurs from western Panama through much of Central America and as far north as Tampico, Mexico. The first isolate of VEEV subtype IE was made from a pool of Culex (Melanoconion) taeniopus mosquitoes in Almirante, Panama, in 1961 (31). The following year, a human isolate was obtained in Panama. Extensive ecological investigations conducted by Cupp and colleagues indicated that these viruses are transmitted in discrete enzootic foci between small mammals and the enzootic vector C. taeniopus (6, 7). Although humans can develop severe and sometime fatal disease from infection with VEE subtype IE viruses when they contact sylvatic transmission foci, they are believed to be only tangential hosts that do not serve as a reservoir to infect mosquitoes. Experimental infections of previous enzootic IE strains indicated that they are generally equine avirulent and produce little or no viremia in equines (9, 11, 42, 43). The two Mexican outbreaks of equine encephalitis mark the first isolations of subtype IE VEEV from equines and the first confirmed cases of equine disease as a result of VEEV subtype IE infection (27).
Epizootic-epidemic subtype IAB and IC VEEVs appear to emerge when mutations of enzootic ID strains from Colombia or Venezuela allow highly efficient amplification in rural habitats (45, 47). Two amino acid substitutions in the E2 glycoprotein, one in the capsid, and four in the nonstructural region have been associated with the epidemiological and phenotypic switch to equine virulence that accompanied a 1992 epizootic-epidemic in western Venezuela (44, 45). However, when compared to genomic sequences from other enzootic and epizootic VEEVs, no consistent amino acid or nucleotide substitutions were associated with epizootic emergence. This indicates that different sets of mutations in the structural and/or nonstructural proteins could be responsible for the epizootic phenotype.
Previous sequencing studies of the N terminus of the PE2 envelope glycoprotein precursor gene of many enzootic and epizootic VEE subtype IE viruses indicated a high degree of genetic similarity (less than 1% nucleotide sequence divergence) between isolates obtained from the two recent Mexican outbreaks and enzootic isolates taken from sylvatic habitats on the Pacific Coast of Guatemala (29). Based on this high genetic similarity between enzootic and epizootic subtype IE VEEV, we hypothesized that the emergence of epizootic subtype IE viruses could have resulted in a similar manner as epizootic IAB or IC viruses, from enzootic progenitors. To determine the nucleotide substitution(s) that could be involved in the evolution of the subtype IE epizootic phenotype, genomic sequences of all four of the available epizootic Mexican viruses were determined and compared to those of closely related enzootic IE strains. Analysis of these sequences and of complete E2 glycoprotein sequences of a number of other enzootic and epizootic subtypes implicated positively charged amino acid residues with epizootic VEE emergence. Plaque size differences that correlate with the epizootic phenotype appear to be mediated by mutations resulting in increased positive charge on the surface of the E2 protein. Unfortunately, like other closely related enzootic and epizootic VEEV strains, laboratory rodents did not respond differently to the epizootic and enzootic IE strains, complicating reverse genetic studies of VEE emergence.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Subtype IE VEEV isolates used for complete genomic sequence analysis
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Subtype I VEEV isolates utilized for E2 glycoprotein sequence analysis
|
Plaque size determination. The plaque phenotypes of the enzootic subtype IE VEEV (strains 80U76, MenaII and 68U201) and epizootic subtype IE viruses (strains CPA201, CPA152, OAX131, and OAX142) were compared as described by Martin et al. (25). In addition, a number of previously characterized enzootic and epizootic VEEVs were used as controls. Briefly, Vero cells were seeded into 10-cm-diameter tissue culture plates and allowed to grow to confluency. Approximately 150 PFU of each virus was diluted in 10 ml of minimal essential medium supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum and adsorbed to the Vero monolayers for 1 h at 37°C. A 25-ml 0.4% Noble agar (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) minimal essential medium overlay was added, and the cells were incubated at 37°C for 72 h. Agar plugs were removed, and the cells were stained with a 20% methanol, 0.25% crystal violet solution. Approximately 30 to 40 well-isolated plaques were measured for each virus. An analysis of variance was performed from the average mean plaque diameters of each virus tested.
Infection of guinea pigs and mice. In order to determine the potential effects of cell culture passage on the in vivo phenotype of VEE subtype IE viruses assayed, virulence of these viruses was determined in guinea pigs as well as suckling and adult mice. Stocks of parental enzootic (68U201) IE and epizootic (CPA201) viruses were inoculated into four (per virus) 6- to 8-week-old (300- to 500-g) strain 13 inbred, English shorthaired guinea pigs. A 200-µl aliquot of each virus (1,000 Vero cell PFU) in phosphate-buffered saline was injected subcutaneously. Animals were observed twice daily for signs of infection. Blood (20 µl) was collected daily from the saphenous vein for 5 days, and the titer of virus in the blood was determined by plaque assay on Vero cells as described elsewhere (32). In addition, 1,000 PFU of strains 68U201, CPA152, and CPA201 were inoculated subcutaneously into 12-week-old Swiss NIH mice (n = 6). To determine the potential role of suckling mice for the selection of the Glu-117 residue, strain CPA201 was intracerebrally inoculated into six suckling mice, and the E2 glycoprotein gene of the viruses recovered from the brains was sequenced following reverse transcription (RT)-PCR amplification.
RT-PCR. Synthesis of cDNA was performed from the RNA preparation using a poly(T) oligonucleotide primer (T25V-Mlu; 5"-TTACGAATTCACGCGT25V-3") for amplification of the structural region of the genome and primer V-IE-6707(-) (5"-GCACCAATTCTCTATGAATCCCAC-3") for amplification of the nonstructural region as described previously (44). Amplicons were produced using the high-fidelity polymerase Pfu Turbo (Stratagene, La Jolla, Calif.). The following conditions were used for synthesis of IE amplicons: 30 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, primer annealing for 30 s at a temperature 5°C below the lowest predicted melting temperature for the respective primer pair (Table 3), and extension at 72°C for 2 min per kb amplified. A final 10-min extension was performed in order to ensure complete amplicon synthesis. Amplification of the IE genomes was performed in five overlapping amplicons ranging from 1.5 to 3.1 kb. Primers used for amplification and sequencing are listed in Table 3. Amplicons were synthesized with the following primer pairs: V-IE-XbaI(+)-V-IE-3141(-), V-IE-2908(+)-V-IE-4447(-), V-IE-4252(+)-V-IE-6707(-), V-IE-6509(+)-V-IE-9284(-), and V-IE-9101(+)-T25VMluI(-).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Primers utilized for amplification and sequencing of VEE IE genomes
|
Amplification and sequencing of the 5" terminus. The 5" untranslated region (UTR) of strains CPA201, CPA152, OAX131, OAX142, and 80U76 was amplified with the 5" RACE System (version 2.0) from Gibco-BRL. Briefly, cDNA was synthesized using the negative-sense primer V-IE-538(-) (Table 3) and tailed with dCTP using terminal deoxynucleotide transferase. Amplification of the 5" end of the modified cDNA was performed using poly(G) forward sense primer in conjunction with V-IE-332(-) to generate an amplicon containing the 5" terminus. Sequence was determined using the V-IE-332(-) primer as described above.
Sequence and phylogenetic analyses.
Deduced amino acid sequences were aligned using the PILEUP program in the Wisconsin Package (8) using default parameters, and the nucleotide sequences were aligned manually based on codon positional homology. Phylogenetic analyses were performed using maximum-parsimony, neighbor-joining, and maximum-likelihood (ML) programs implemented in the PAUP 4.0 software package (41). Distance analyses used the Kimura two-parameter and HKY85 formulas to correct for multiple substitutions of the same nucleotides. Unordered and ordered characters (transition/transversion ratio = 4.5:1 based on previous estimates [2, 44]) were used in the parsimony analysis. Homologous sequences of other VEEV subtypes were used as an outgroup. Bootstrap analysis was performed with 1,000 replicates to determine confidence values on the nodes within trees (10). For ML analyses, the general time-reversible model of nucleotide substitution was used (relative substitution rates: A
C = 1.512, A
G = 4.952, A
T = 1.728, C
G = 0.2439, C
T = 14.110, G
T =1), with a proportion of 0.472 nucleotide sites being invariable and a gamma distribution of among-site rate variation (alpha shape parameter) of 1.821. Finally, the estimated base composition was as follows: A = 0.259, C = 0.278, G = 0.249, T = 0.213. The starting tree in the analysis was found using neighbor-joining which was followed by successive rounds of tree bisection reconstruction branch-swapping, identifying the ML substitution parameters at each stage, until the tree of highest likelihood was found.
Identification of positive selection using ML.
An ML approach, using various models of codon substitution which differ in how they treat positive selection (51), was used to examine selection pressures acting on the E2 glycoprotein of VEEVs. Seven models of codon substitution were used which either fixed or estimated nonsynonymous/synonymous substitution (dN/dS) ratios, denoted as the
parameter, for different categories of sites (p) along the sequences. The simplest model, M0, estimates a single
value for all sites. In contrast, M1 has parameters that describe solely neutral evolution, by allowing sites to be either deleterious (p0,
0 = 0) or neutral (p1,
1 = 1). M2 adds a third category of sites (p2) that may be positively selected if
2 is >1. A more-sensitive test for positive selection was provided by M3, which estimates
individually for three classes of site. Again, cases in which
was >1 were allowed. M7 and M8 both use a discrete beta distribution (with 10 categories) to model
among sites, although M8 also estimates an 11th category of sites at which
can be >1. Because some of these models are nested, they can be compared using a likelihood ratio test, in which twice the difference in log likelihood between models follows a
2 distribution (degrees of freedom equal to the difference in the number of parameters between the models). Evidence for positive selection is inferred when models that allow positive selection (M2, M3, and M8) are significantly favored over those that do not (M0, M1, and M7). Sites that were positively selected could also be identified individually using a Bayesian approach that calculates the probability that a site falls into the selected site class. Finally, the free-ratio model estimates
for the entire gene for each branch of the tree separately. The likelihood of this model was compared to that of M0, in which a single
value applies to the whole tree. All these methods were implemented using the CODEML program of the PAML package (41).
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. Nucleotide sequence accession numbers AF448535 through AF448539AF448539 were deposited in GenBank.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (15K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Guinea pig viremia following infection with enzootic (68U201) and epizootic (CPA201) VEE subtype IE viruses. Guinea pigs were inoculated with 1,000 PFU, and 20 µl of blood was drawn at the postinoculation time points listed. Viremia was determined by plaque assay on Vero cells with a detection limit of 1.7 log PFU/ml. Error bars indicate standard errors. , CPA201; , 68U201.
|
Plaque size phenotypes. Using Noble agar, analysis of 20 plaques from each of the enzootic and epizootic VEE subtype IE viruses examined indicated that three of the four epizootic, Mexican strains produced plaques which were significantly (analysis of variance: P < 0.001) smaller than those of the enzootic IE viruses examined (Fig. 2). Smaller but still significant differences in plaque size were observed using agarose (data not shown). These results agree with past studies demonstrating a strong, inverse correlation between plaque size and equine virulence (25, 45).
![]() View larger version (12K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Plaque diameter analysis of enzootic and epizootic subtype IE VEEVs. All enzootic (MenaII, IE.AA [68U201], and 80U76) and epizootic (CPA201, CPA152, OAX131, and OAX142) viruses were incubated on Vero cells for 3 days under a 0.4% Noble agar overlay. Monolayers were fixed with 20% methanol stained with crystal violet, and plaque diameters (n = 15) were measured.
|
Previous data from partial PE2 sequences suggested that the enzootic isolate, 80U76, was the virus most closely related to the four epizootic IE virus strains (29). In contrast, our complete genomic sequences indicate that, in a pairwise comparison with the four epizootic Mexican IE viruses, enzootic strain 68U201 shared a greater nucleotide and amino acid sequence identity than the 1980 isolate that was made from the same sylvatic focus at La Avellana, Guatemala (Table 1). The 1993 epizootic strain CPA201 shared the closest sequence identity to the Guatemalan enzootic IE viruses, having 181 nucleotide differences (1.6%) versus enzootic strain 68U201, compared to 186, 187, and 189 differences for the 1996 strains OAX142, CPA152, and OAX131, respectively. The Mexican epizootic IE viruses were quite conserved with a total of only 39 nucleotide (99.7% sequence identity) and eight amino acid differences (99.8% identity) between the most divergent strains, CPA201 and OAX131 (Table 4). Interestingly, there were no more than four nucleotide differences between any of the 1996 Mexican epizootic isolates, but all differences were nonsynonymous. The OAX142 and CPA152 isolates were different at a single amino acid position within the E2 glycoprotein (E2-117). As in previous analyses, the MenaII isolate from Panama was more distantly related to the Guatemalan and Mexican isolates, with 7.4 to 7.6% nucleotide sequence divergence.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Percent amino acid and nucleotide identity of complete genomic enzootic and epizootic subtype IE VEEV sequences
|
Thirty-five amino acid differences resulted from the 182 nucleotide differences found in the coding regions of the Mexican and Guatemalan subtype IE VEEV genomes (Tables 4 and 5). A total of 31 amino acid differences was found in the nonstructural portion of the genome with only four differences in the structural genes. The greatest concentration of amino acid differences was in the C terminus of nsP3, in which a total of nine amino acid differences were found between genomic nucleotide positions 5046 and 5675. This region is known from previous studies to be variable in sequence and length among VEEV strains (28). A deletion of three consecutive nucleotides (out of the reading frame) was found in this region of nsP3, resulting in a single alanine for the CPA201 strain compared to an aspartic acid and a threonine residue for the other strains.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Deduced amino acid differences among enzootic and epizootic subtype IE VEEV
|
Our results indicated that seven deduced amino acid residues were unique to the four epizootic Mexican VEEV genomes. These differences were found in the nsP1 (enzootic Asp versus epizootic Glu at position 106), nsP2 (Asn versus Ser at position 669), nsP3 (Ile versus Asn at position 476, and Leu versus Phe at position 518), nsP4 (Ser versus Ala at position 604), capsid (Asn versus His at position 100), and E2 (Ser versus Asn at position 218) proteins. Synonymous nucleotide substitutions were found throughout the coding regions (nsP1 to 4, capsid, E2, E1, 6K, and E3 genes), with the greatest number (51) in nsP2 (Tables 4 and 5). There was a total of 162 transitions and 29 transversions, yielding a transition-to-transversion ratio of 5.6:1.
Charge differences on the E2 glycoprotein correlated with these plaque size phenotypes. The three epizootic VEE subtype IE viruses that contained a consensus Lys residue at amino acid position 117 of the E2 glycoprotein all formed smaller plaques than did strains OAX142, 80U76, and 68U201 that had a Glu at that residue. Because strains CPA152 and OAX142 differ by only one nucleotide and deduced amino acid (E2-117) in the entire genome, these results implicated E2 charge interaction with polyanions in the unpurified Noble agar as a determinant of plaque size, as first suggested by Martin and Johnston (25). Increased positive charge on the surface of the glycoprotein and its binding to polyanions in agar probably interferes with the ability of the virus to spread during plaque formation, resulting in a smaller plaque phenotype.
Phylogenetic relationships between enzootic and epizootic subtype IE viruses. The genomic sequences of the Guatemalan and Mexican subtype IE viruses, as well as that of strain MenaII from Panama, were aligned with those of other subtype I and II VEEV strains determined previously, and extremely robust phylogenetic trees were constructed. As in trees published previously from partial PE2 sequences, the IE viruses formed a monophyletic group (Fig. 3). All epizootic Mexican viruses were found on the most-terminal branches of the Pacific Coast lineage and were most closely related to the Guatemalan enzootic strains 68U201 and 80U76. All other relationships among VEE serotypes were also consistent with previous analyses.
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Maximum-parsimony tree generated from complete genomic sequences of enzootic and epizootic VEE subtype I and II viruses. Strains are designated by subtype, location (PA, Panama; GU, Guatemala; MX, Mexico; FL, Florida; TX, Texas; TR, Trinidad; VE, Venezuela; CO, Columbia), year of isolation (last two digits of year only), and strain name. All nodes in the tree have bootstrap values of 100% when nucleotide sequences are analyzed, except for the 68U201-80U76 grouping, with a bootstrap value of 54%. The table shows nucleotide and amino acid changes assigned to the branch representing the emergence of the epizootic subtype IE Mexican epizootic viruses. Trees generated using the neighbor-joining and ML methods had identical topologies.
|
E2 glycoprotein sequence analyses.
Comparison of the amino acid changes predicted to have accompanied the Mexican VEE emergence in 1993 with those identified previously for subtype IAB and IC epizootic VEEV strains yielded no common substitutions. However, both the Mexican (Fig. 3) and 1992 Venezuelan subtype IC (44) emergences were accompanied by the replacement of negatively charged or uncharged E2 envelope glycoprotein residues by lysine (Mexican) or arginine (1992 Venezuelan). To determine if this trend extended to other epizootic VEEV emergences, complete E2 sequences reported previously were aligned with those of additional, representative strains that we sequenced (Table 2) and maximum-parsimony trees were constructed from amino acid sequences based on the more robust topology generated from the nucleotide sequences. The amino acid changes accompanying each epizootic emergence were predicted (Fig. 4). For the IAB viruses that probably emerged during the 1920s, the parsimony analysis predicted 7 substitutions, two of which involve the addition of positive charged amino acids (Glu-75
Lys and Thr-213
Lys) for a net charge change of +3. The 1962 subtype IC emergence was accompanied by 5 E2 amino acid changes, with 3 involving charge changes (Asp-117
Gly, Val-179
Ile, Ala-192
Val, Glu-201
Lys, Thr-213
Lys) for a net change of +4. As described previously, the 1992 IC emergence involved the replacement of Gly-193 and Thr-213 by Arg residues for a net change of +2.
![]() View larger version (43K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Neighbor-joining tree generated from complete PE2 envelope glycoprotein gene nucleotide sequences of representative VEE subtype I viruses. Strains are designated by subtype, location (PA, Panama; GU, Guatemala; MX, Mexico; FL, Florida; TX, Texas; TR, Trinidad; VE, Venezuela; CO, Columbia; PE, Peru), year of isolation (last two digits of year only), and strain name. Boxes indicate amino acid substitutions in the E2 envelope glycoprotein associated with emergence of epizootic strains from predicted enzootic progenitors (internal nodes) and accompanying attenuation of the TC-83 vaccine strain from its TRD parent strain. Numbers indicate bootstrap values of adjacent nodes. The tree was rooted using an outgroup consisting of all other VEEV subtypes. Trees generated using the maximum-parsimony and ML methods had identical topologies except for some groupings within the IAB clade.
|
= 0.0775). A similar picture is apparent from M1, where 91% of sites are conserved and 9% evolve neutrally; in M2, where most sites are conserved and the extra class of sites (p2) also depicts relatively strong constraints (
2 = 0.149); and in the more complex M8 model. However, the M3 model, which has the highest likelihood of any model, provides some evidence for highly localized positive selection. Under M3, 93% of sites are strongly conserved (
0 = 0.025), 7% show relatively high variability (
1 = 0.507), and 0.04% are subject to moderate positive selection (
2= 3.320). Comparing these models using a series of likelihood ratio tests, we found that M3 is significantly favored over the M0 and M1 models (p = 5.053 x 10-33 and 5.117 x 10-40, respectively), which do not allow positive selection, but not over M2 (P = 0.943). Finally, although the free-ratio model is significantly favored over M0 (p = 1.355 x 10-6), no branch on the tree has an anomalously high
value indicative of positive selection. We therefore conclude that adaptive evolution may have acted on these sequences, but is difficult to show this statistically because it has clearly affected such a small number of codons. Using a Bayesian approach we determined that just a single site, E2 amino acid position 213, fell into the positively selected class (95% probability) in M3. The E2-213 residue is adjacent to amino acids implicated in antigenicity of different VEEV subtypes (13) and with mouse attenuation of the vaccine strain TC-83 (15). Interestingly, a positively charged (Lys or Arg) amino acid residue was found for all IAB and IC epizootic VEEVs at position 213. All enzootic VEE subtype ID viruses had a Thr residue at this position; however, VEEV subtype II (Everglades virus), which can be considered a ID genetic variant (48), had a Lys residue at this position. The experimentally demonstrated equine avirulence of the VEE subtype II enzootic viruses (12) implicates at least one additional genetic determinant for the development of an epizootic phenotype.
In contrast to the E2-213 of VEE subtype IAB and IC viruses that appear to evolve in response to positive selection, the ML method was incapable of identifying the Lys (E2-117) of the epizootic VEE subtype IE viruses as being under positive selective pressure. This was a result of the mutation being found only in one clade of epizootic IE viruses and not in the other epizootic subtypes (IAB or IC). VEE IE viruses are approximately 20 to 25% divergent in their nucleotide sequences from subtype IAB and the most closely related IC viruses (37). Therefore, it is not surprising that the development of an epizootic phenotype could evolve through the incorporation of several different combinations of amino acid changes.
Assessment of the possible role of cell culture passage on positive-charge mutations in the E2 envelope glycoprotein. Recent studies with another alphavirus, Sindbis virus, demonstrated that passage in vertebrate cells such as BHK-21 results in selection for binding to heparan sulfate, which is mediated by the replacement of uncharged or negatively charged E2 residues by Arg and Lys (4, 21). Many of the enzootic VEEV strains we sequenced had more-extensive passage histories in cell culture than the epizootic strains yet did not show evidence of the positive-charge E2 mutations predicted to be involved in epizootic emergence. The earliest VEEV isolates, epizootic strains, were generally maintained by animal passage before modern cell culture techniques became available, whereas enzootic strains were first isolated in the 1960s and generally maintained in cell culture. If the overall trends in the charge of our E2 sequences had been influenced by laboratory passage, it would be expected that enzootic strains might be influenced more by artificial adaptation to heparan sulfate binding via positive-charge mutations; this prediction is at odds with our data showing positive-charge trends in epizootic rather than enzootic strains. Furthermore, the possibility that the same combinations of epizootic charge mutations occurred independently from laboratory passage selection seems remote, considering the stochastic nature of mutation. Finally, one of the lowest passage strains we examined, epizootic strain 3908 with only one mosquito cell passage, is highly virulent for horses (R. A. Bowen [Colorado State University], personal communication) and has all of the positive charge amino acids implicated in the subtype IC emergence (Fig. 4).
Despite the data cited above indicating the remote possibility that the positive charge changes implicated in epizootic emergence resulted from artificial passage selection, we investigated experimentally the possibility that selection for heparan sulfate binding affected our prediction of E2 mutations mediating VEE emergence by passaging enzootic ID and IE viruses in BHK-21 cells. Twelve unpassaged strains of enzootic subtype ID VEEV isolated during 1997 to 1998 in western Venezuela and central Colombia (26), including several that are extremely closely related to the predicted progenitor of the 1992 VEEV subtype IC epizootic (44), were passaged 10 times each with dilutions to maintain a multiplicity of infection of approximately 0.1. Virus rescued from an infectious cDNA clone of enzootic Guatemalan strain 68U201 (32) was also passaged in triplicate, parallel series in RK cells to duplicate the history of the Mexican subtype IE epizootic strains prior to our acquisition. Following these passages, RNA was extracted from the cell culture supernatants and the complete PE2 gene was amplified in two overlapping RT-PCR amplicons as described previously (34). Amplicons were sequenced directly to determine consensus sequences of the virus populations. In 3 of the 12 subtype ID passages, positive-charge mutations appeared that were similar to those identified previously in Sindbis virus (4, 21). However, only one of these mutations was identical to one of the two predicted to be associated with VEE emergence (strain ZPC-912, replacement of Gly-193 by Arg) (Table 6). The passage of strain 68U201 in RK cells never resulted in a change at E2 position 117, as was predicted to have accompanied the Mexican VEE emergence (Fig. 3). These results underscore the stochastic nature of E2 mutations selected during cell culture passage and indicate that it is extremely unlikely that selection for convergent, artifactual adaptation to cell culture passage is an explanation for the E2 amino acid changes that our phylogenetic analyses predict are associated with epizootic emergence.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 6. Amino acid changes in the E2 envelope glycoprotein of enzootic subtype ID VEEV isolates following 10 passages in BHK-21 cells
|
|
|
|---|
Previous work based on sequences from the N terminus of the E2 glycoprotein demonstrated that enzootic VEE subtype IAB and IC viruses have evolved or emerged convergently from closely related enzootic ID viruses on at least three separate occasions. Preliminary sequence analysis of the same genetic region of VEE subtype IE viruses, including four isolates made during the two Mexican outbreaks, suggested a similar emergence from an enzootic subtype IE predecessor. To determine the nucleotide substitutions that could be responsible for the acquisition of equine virulence and emergence of a subtype IE epizootic phenotype from an enzootic precursor, complete genomic sequences were determined for all available isolates from the two Mexican outbreaks and compared to those of the most closely related enzootic VEE subtype IE viruses. Our sequence analysis and subsequent phylogenetic analysis confirmed the close genetic identity of these Mexican epizootic and Guatemalan enzootic viruses.
E2 charge differences associated with epizootic VEE emergence.
When amino acid changes in the E2 envelope protein were examined, a similar pattern of substitution was found to be associated with all epizootic emergence events (Fig. 4). In all four branches leading to subtype IAB, IC, or IE epizootic clades, amino acid substitutions resulting in increased charge were observed. The evidence for amino acid 213 involvement is especially strong because both the IAB and IC emergences are associated with changes from threonine to either Lys or Arg, respectively (44), and our methods identified this site as affected by positive selection and convergent evolution. Furthermore, the attenuation of the TC-83 vaccine strain from its IAB Trinidad donkey (TRD) parent is accompanied by a decrease in the E2 charge, although the major attenuating mutation is Lys-120, presumably the result of cell culture adaptation (17). Although the mutations involving charge are not believed to be the most important determinants of murine attenuation (15), previous studies indicate that murine virulence does not necessarily correlate with equine virulence (16, 45). Thus, our sequence data provide strong circumstantial evidence that E2 amino acid substitutions leading to increased charge, especially the T-213
Lys/Arg substitution, are involved in increased equine virulence that accompanies VEE emergence. Interestingly, the enzootic VEE subtype II virus, Everglades, also has a lysine residue at amino acid 213 of the E2 glycoprotein. This suggests that Everglades virus could possess a genotype capable of emerging into an equine-virulent phenotype with minor amino acid alterations. However, Everglades, although a subtype ID virus in the genetic sense, represents a lineage that has not produced epizootic strains (33). A possible explanation is that minor differences within the enzootic genetic backbone could strongly influence the propensity for epizootic emergence by imposing different requirements for the number of mutations that must occur simultaneously. The use of infectious clones produced in our laboratory from several enzootic subtype ID, IE, and II strains is under way to isolate and evaluate the effect of these positively charged E2 amino acids on the epizootic phenotype and to evaluate the enzootic strain specificity of VEE emergence.
Markers of the epizootic phenotype. A number of criteria have been utilized for the classification of VEEVs as epizootic. The ability to develop a high-titer viremia in equines, resulting in the infection of mosquito vectors, has traditionally been viewed as the most important phenotype for epizootic potential. Animals such as English shorthaired guinea pigs have also been used as virulence models for enzootic IE and epizootic IAB and IC viruses; however, infection of these guinea pigs with some enzootic subtype ID viruses result in lethal infections (35, 36), limiting their usefulness for studying emergence mechanisms (45). Another possible epizootic marker is an increased infectivity for mosquito vectors, such as Aedes taeniorhynchus, that have been implicated in epizootic transmission during many VEE outbreaks (22).
Several in vitro markers of the epizootic phenotype, such as elution from hydroxylapatite chromatography columns at low pH, have also been used to distinguish enzootic and epizootic VEEVs. Hydroxylapatite binding profiles, like plaque sizes, are believed to be related to charge differences on the surface of the E2 glycoprotein (39). Another marker of the epizootic phenotype that has been proposed has been sensitivity to alpha/beta interferon. Spotts et al. (38) reported that epizootic VEEVs, including, Mexican strain CPA201, were more resistant to the effects of exogenously administered murine alpha/beta interferon. Epizootic viruses produced cytopathic effects in the presence of higher concentrations of interferon than did enzootic strains. Mutagenesis of an epizootic subtype IAB virus demonstrated that determinants of interferon sensitivity are encoded by the 5' untranslated genome region as well as the E2 glycoprotein (32, 38).
Plaque size analysis has been used most extensively as a marker for epizootic potential of VEEVs. With the exception of subtypes III and VI and the VEEV subtype IAB vaccine derivative, TC-83, a small-plaque phenotype has been correlated strongly with the equine-virulent phenotype (25). In our studies, enzootic subtype IE isolates 68U201, 80U76, and MenaII produced large plaques while three of the four epizootic Mexican IE viruses (CPA201, CPA152, and OAX131) produced significantly smaller plaques. However, one Mexican subtype IE strain isolated from an equine during the 1996 outbreak, OAX142, had a large-plaque phenotype similar to that of the enzootic strains. These results underscore the limitations of plaque size as a marker of the epizootic phenotype; this marker appears to be useful only for naturally occurring subtype IABCD VEEV strains.
The consensus genomic sequence of strain OAX142 differed from one of the small-plaque isolates, CPA152, by a single nucleotide that encodes an amino acid difference at position 117 of the E2 glycoprotein. The OAX142 consensus sequence encodes a Glu residue that results in a charge difference on the E2 glycoprotein compared with the Lys found in the other Mexican epizootic strains. This charge difference could reduce the electrostatic interaction between the E2 glycoprotein and polyanions present in partially purified agar (Noble) used in our plaque assay. The smaller difference observed with agarose probably reflects a smaller amount of anionic contaminants.
Although the plaque size phenotype was described nearly 20 years ago and was believed to reflect virion charge differences (25), the role of virion charge in expression of the epizootic phenotype remains unknown. Recent studies demonstrated the propensity of another alphavirus, Sindbis virus, to incorporate positive charge on the surface of the E2 glycoprotein in response to selection for heparan sulfate binding (4, 21). Heparan sulfate-adapted viruses produce smaller plaques than wild-type Sindbis viruses, but these strains also exhibit reduced virulence for mice. This contrasts with the association between the small plaque size and equine virulence of most VEEV variants (25, 44, 45). Because equines are unique in their differential response to epizootic and enzootic VEEV, the plaque size and charge differences suggest a fundamental difference in cell binding properties of equine cells important in the pathogenesis process. Studies of VEE pathogenesis in a murine model suggest that dendritic cells deserve study in this regard (24).
The OAX142 isolate from the brain of an encephalitic horse during a VEE outbreak represents an exception to the generally strong correlation between plaque size and equine virulence. If the Glu-117 amino acid in the consensus sequence of this strain represents the virus population present in this horse, this indicates that, at least for subtype IE VEEV, plaque size is imperfect for the prediction of equine virulence and epizootic potential. Although the Lys-117 residue may be selected during cell culture passage, our results suggest that this mutation in the Mexican epizootic VEE IE viruses did not arise independently in all three strains during RK cell passage, since a genetically similar, cloned enzootic strain 68U201 did not acquire this mutation during even more extensive RK cell passages. A mixture of Glu and Lys in the original, natural quasispecies population is a likely explanation. Results from suckling-mouse passages and adult-mouse infections indicate that the Glu residue is selected in both adult and suckling mice. This finding could be used to explain previous reports of a Glu residue in strain CPA201 that was passaged previously in suckling mice (26). The rapid development of a mixed genotype (Glu and Lys) at E2 position 117 following a single suckling-mouse passage indicates an original quasispecies that consisted of both genotypes. Due to the highly selective nature of this substitution in vivo, determination of its role in pathogenesis and epidemiology presents unique obstacles. Use of an infectious cDNA clone of strain 68U201 to assess the role of the Glu and Lys substitutions in homogenous virus populations in vitro and in vivo is under way in our laboratory.
A.C.B. was supported by the James L. McLaughlin Infection and Immunity Fellowship Fund and by NIH Emerging Tropical Diseases T32 Training Grant AI-107526. A.M.P. was supported by the James W. McLaughlin Fellowship Fund and NIH T32 Training Grant on Emerging and Reemerging Infectious Diseases AI-07536. This research was supported by National Institutes of Health grants AI-39800 and AI-48807 and by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
Present address: Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, CO 80522 ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»