Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, December 2002, p. 12290-12299, Vol. 76, No. 23
0022-538X/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.23.12290-12299.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
and Thomas Shenk*
Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544-1014
Received 24 June 2002/ Accepted 26 August 2002
|
|
|---|
200-fold-reduced yield of infectious virus in comparison to its wild-type parent. Viral DNA accumulated normally, as did a set of viral mRNAs that were monitored in ADsubTRS1-infected cells. However, two tegument proteins were partially mislocalized and infectious virus particles did not accumulate to normal levels within ADsubTRS1-infected cells. Further, infectious ADsubTRS1 particles sedimented abnormally in a glycerol-tartrate gradient, indicating that the structure of the mutant particles is aberrant. Our analysis of the ADsubTRS1 phenotype indicates that the TRS1 protein is required, either directly or indirectly, for efficient assembly of virus particles. |
|
|---|
The HCMV genome is large,
230,000 bp, and comprises two unique domains (unique long [UL] and unique short [US]) bracketed by repeated sequences (12). The IRS1 and TRS1 open reading frames (22, 26) encode proteins of 846 and 788 amino acids, respectively, and span from repeated domains (c' and c) into the US domain (see Fig. 1A). Expression of their mRNAs is controlled by identical promoters located within the repeated domain that are active during the immediate-early phase of the virus replication cycle. The two encoded proteins, pIRS1 and pTRS1, are identical over their N-terminal 549 amino acids, which are encoded by the repeated domains, and the proteins diverge in their US-encoded C-terminal regions. A promoter that directs the expression of an mRNA corresponding to the 3' region of IRS1 resides within the IRS1 coding region (19). This mRNA encodes pIRS263, which is identical to the C-terminal 263 amino acids of pIRS1 (19).
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Locations of alterations in mutant and revertant viruses and effect of mutations on protein expression within infected cells. (A) Diagram of IRS1 and TRS1 coding regions depicting the locations of mutations. The top portion displays the entire viral genome with unique (UL and US) and repeated (a, b, and c) domains. The region containing the IRS1, IRS1263, and TRS1 open reading frames (arrows) is expanded and displayed below. Cross-hatched boxes, regions deleted when producing the substitution mutations in ADsubIRS1 and ADsubTRS1. Above the boxes the inserted marker cassette is indicated (P, SV40 early promoter; EGFP, EGFP coding region; Puro, puromycin resistance gene). Bar on TRS1 arrow, single base pair change (C to A) introduced into ADrevTRS1. The sequence boundaries of the open reading frames and deletions are indicated at the bottom. (B) Western blot analysis of pIRS1 and pTRS1 expression after infection at a multiplicity of infection of 5 PFU/cell with ADwt or ADsubIRS1. (C) (Left) Western blot assay of pTRS1 expression after infection at a multiplicity of infection of 5 PFU/cell with ADwt or at a multiplicity of infection of 3 transducing units/cell with retroTRS1. (Right) Western blot assay of pIRS1 and pTRS1 expression in retroTRS1-containing cells infected with ADsubTRS1 or ADrevTRS1 at a multiplicity of infection of 5 PFU/cell.
|
To explore the function of pIRS1, pIRS1263, and pTRS1 within infected cells, we constructed two mutant viruses. ADsubIRS1 contains a substitution mutation in the central domain of the IRS1 open reading frame, and it fails to produce pIRS1 and pIRS1263. ADsubTRS1 contains a substitution mutation in the central domain of the TRS1 open reading frame, and it cannot produce pTRS1. Whereas ADsubIRS1 does not exhibit a growth defect, ADsubTRS1 replicates slowly, producing a reduced yield in human fibroblasts. The pTRS1-deficient virus exhibits a defect late in the replication cycle, suggesting that the protein is directly or indirectly involved in the assembly of virus particles.
|
|
|---|
Two recombinant retroviruses, retroIRS1263 and retroTRS1, were prepared by cloning the appropriate HCMV open reading frame into pRetro-EBNA. Retroviruses were propagated by transfecting (7 µl of Lipofectamine reagent/µg of DNA) the plasmids into Phoenix Ampho cells (11). Retroviruses were used to infect Polybrene (Sigma)-treated (4 µg/ml) human fibroblasts. Polybrene was maintained in the culture for 24 h after addition of the retrovirus, and then cells were washed twice and fed with fresh medium. Immunofluorescence assays were used to monitor expression of HCMV proteins in human fibroblasts infected with recombinant retroviruses and to determine the transducing titers of the retroIRS1263 and retroTRS1 stocks. Retrovirus-infected human fibroblasts were maintained in culture for at least 4 days before infection with HCMV because we observed that residual Polybrene inhibited HCMV infection.
HCMV particles were purified (2, 7, 25) from the medium of infected cultures when
50% of the cells were detached from the plate. The medium was layered over a sorbitol cushion (20% D-sorbitol, 50 mM Tris [pH 7.4], 1 mM MgCl2, 100 µg of bacitracin/ml), and virus was pelleted by centrifugation (20,000 rpm, 1 h, 4°C, Beckman SW28 rotor). Bacitracin was included to inhibit aggregation of virus particles (24). This crude preparation of virus particles was resuspended in buffer containing 50 mM Tris, pH 7.4, and 100 mM NaCl. To further purify virus particles, the crude preparation was supplemented with bacitracin (100 µg/ml) and urea (0.5 M) and the solution was sonicated for 15 s, layered onto a glycerol-tartrate gradient (0 to 30% glycerol, 35 to 15% potassium tartrate, 50 mM Tris [pH 7.4], 100 mM NaCl), and subjected to centrifugation (40,000 rpm, 15 min, 4°C, Beckman SW41 rotor). Three fractions were removed from the gradient (noninfectious enveloped particles [NIEPs], virions, and dense bodies [DBs]), diluted in buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 7.4], 100 mM NaCl), pelleted by centrifugation, and resuspended in the same buffer.
Analysis of viral nucleic acids. Viral DNA present in total-cell-DNA preparations was analyzed by Southern blot assay. After digestion with restriction enzymes, DNA was separated on an 0.8% agarose gel, blotted to a nylon membrane, and probed with [32P]dCTP-labeled DNA prepared by random priming of the entire HCMV genome. Specific viral mRNAs in total cellular RNA isolated with the TRIzol reagent (Gibco-BRL) were analyzed by Northern blot assay. RNAs were separated by electrophoresis for 3 h at 100 V in a formaldehyde-containing gel and blotted to a nylon membrane, and viral mRNAs were detected by hybridization to [32P]dCTP-labeled DNA probes prepared by random priming of viral sequences that were purified from recombinant plasmids.
Analysis of viral proteins. The steady-state levels of individual proteins in preparations of purified virus particles or lysates of infected cells were determined by Western blot assay. Protein samples were separated by electrophoresis in a sodium dodecyl sulfate-containing 8 or 10% polyacrylamide gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Blots were probed with antibodies and then developed with the ECL reagent (Amersham). An antibody (MAb810) recognizing the common domain of pUL122 and pUL123 was purchased (Chemicon). Antibodies to pUL32 (13), pUL55 (13), pUL69 (5), pUL83 (13), pUL86 (27), pUL99 (13), pIRS1 (19), and pTRS1 (4) have been described previously, and an antibody to the Golgi marker mannosidase II was a gift from G. Waters (Princeton University).
The locations of viral proteins within infected cells were determined by indirect immunofluorescence. Cells were fixed in paraformaldehyde (4%) and treated with blocking solution (phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin, 5% goat serum, 0.5% Tween 20, 1% Triton X-100). Cells were incubated with the primary antibody in blocking solution for 1 h and with the secondary antibody in blocking solution for 30 min and washed with blocking solution three times after each incubation. Cells were then washed twice with distilled water, incubated with YOYO-1 (Molecular Probes) or Hoechst 33342 (Sigma) to stain DNA, washed twice in distilled water, and mounted onto slides.
Pulse-chase experiments were performed to monitor the intracellular localization of pUL83 as a function of time after its synthesis. Infected cells were maintained for 1 h in medium lacking methionine and cysteine, pulse labeled for 10 min with [35S]methionine and [35S]cysteine (1 mCi/5 x 106 cells), washed, and refed with medium containing unlabeled methionine and cysteine for the chase period. After various periods of chase, cells were harvested, suspended in 10 volumes of hypotonic buffer containing protease inhibitors (5 mM sodium phosphate [pH 7.2], 2 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM CaCl2, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 µg of leupeptin/ml, and 2 µg of aprotinin/ml), held on ice for 10 min, pelleted, and resuspended in the same buffer, and then nuclei were released by seven rapid passages of the cell suspension through a 25-gauge needle. Sucrose (0.1 M) was added to the broken cells, and nuclei were pelleted; the supernatant was the cytosolic fraction. The pelleted nuclei were centrifuged twice through a sucrose (0.54 M) cushion in hypotonic buffer and lysed in buffer containing 0.1% NP-40, 250 mM NaCl, and 50 mM HEPES, pH 7.0. Nuclear and cytosolic fractions were cleared of debris by centrifugation, and their pUL83 contents were analyzed by immunoprecipitation. To confirm that nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were effectively separated, Western blot assays were performed to determine the distribution of nuclear (pUL123) and cytoplasmic (pUL99) viral proteins.
|
|
|---|
After three rounds of plaque purification, the IRS1-deficient mutant, ADsubIRS1, was judged to have the correct genomic structure and to be free of wild-type virus contamination by Southern blot analysis using probes corresponding to viral sequences flanking either side of the deleted sequences or to the marker cassette and by PCR assay using primers spanning the junctions of the predicted recombination regions (data not shown). A Western blot assay also was performed; it demonstrated that the mutant virus did not produce pIRS1 within infected cells but continued to express pTRS1 (Fig. 1B).
It was found that ADsubIRS1 grew with the same kinetics as its parental wild-type virus, ADwt, when growth was assayed after infection at relatively high (5 PFU/cell) and low (0.05 PFU/cell) multiplicities of infection (Fig. 2A). ADsubIRS1 fails to produce pIRS1263 in addition to pIRS1 (Fig. 2B, left). pIRS263, which is encoded by the 3' domain of the IRS1 coding region in the same reading frame as that which encodes pIRS1 (Fig. 1A), has been shown to antagonize the transcriptional-activation function of pIRS1 and pTRS1 (19). Therefore, it was conceivable that the simultaneous loss of pIRS1 and pIRS1263 in ADsubIRS1 could mask a defect that would be observed if pIRS1 was lost while pIRS1263 was retained. This possibility was tested by infecting cells with a recombinant retrovirus expressing pIRS1263, retroIRS1263, prior to infection with ADsubIRS1. The retrovirus was used to infect cells at a multiplicity of infection of 3 transducing units/cell. It produced
50% of the amount of pIRS1263 that is found at 24 h after infection with wild-type HCMV (Fig. 2B, left), and immunofluorescence demonstrated that >95% of fibroblasts contained pIRS1263 (data not shown). Expression of pIRS1263, however, had no effect on the kinetics with which ADsubIRS1 produced progeny virus (Fig. 2B, right) or viral DNA (data not shown). ADsubIRS1 grew normally in the presence or absence of pIRS1263.
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Production of infectious progeny in the medium of cultures infected with wild-type, mutant, or revertant viruses. HCMV was used to infect human fibroblasts at the indicated multiplicities of infection, and retroviruses were used at a multiplicity of infection of 3 transducing units/cell. Virus that accumulated in the medium of infected cultures was determined by plaque assays on fibroblasts (ADwt and ADsubIRS1) and retroTRS1-infected fibroblasts (ADsubTRS1 and ADrevTRS1) in duplicate. (A) Growth of ADwt ( ) and ADsubIRS1 ( ). (B) (Left) Western blot assay of pIRS1 and pIRS1263 expression after infection with ADwt or ADsubIRS1 alone or in combination with retroIRS263; (right) growth of ADwt ( ), ADsubIRS1 ( ), ADwt plus retroIRS1263 ( ), and ADsubTRS1 plus retroIRS1263 (x). (C) Growth of ADwt ( ), ADrevTRS1 ( ), ADsubTRS1 ( ), and ADsubTRS1 plus retroTRS1 (x).
|
18% as much pTRS1 as did ADwt-infected cultures (Fig. 1C, left). After growth in cells expressing pTRS1, ADsubTRS1 was judged to be free of wild-type virus contamination and to have the correct genomic structure by Southern blot, PCR, and DNA sequence analyses (data not shown), and a Western blot experiment confirmed that ADsubTRS1 failed to accumulate pTRS1 while producing pIRS1 (Fig. 1C, right). Revertant virus ADrevTRS1 was generated by replacement of the ADsubTRS1 marker cassette with a TRS1 coding region that contained a 1-bp substitution (C to A at sequence position 228356; Fig. 1A), allowing it to be distinguished from wild-type virus. The structure of the revertant was confirmed by PCR and sequence analyses (data not shown), and it again produced pTRS1 (Fig. 1C, right).
The growth of the mutant, revertant, and wild-type viruses was evaluated by plaque assay of virus released into the medium of infected cells. The yield of ADsubTRS1 was reduced by a factor of
5 on days 5 to 9 after infection of human fibroblasts at a multiplicity of infection of 5 PFU/cell (Fig. 2C, left). When cells were infected at a multiplicity of infection of 0.05 PFU/cell, the mutant's growth defect was greater. Cell-free virus was reduced by a factor of
200 on days 6 to 9 after infection (Fig. 2C, right). ADrevTRS1 grew like ADwt at both multiplicities of infection, arguing that the ADsubTRS1 defect results from the substitution mutation and not from a spurious mutation at another location. In contrast to its defective growth on normal fibroblasts, ADsubTRS1 grew indistinguishably from ADwt or ADrevTRS1 in fibroblasts infected with retroTRS1 (Fig. 2C, right), confirming the expectation that its defect is due solely to the loss of pTRS1.
ADsubTRS1 accumulates DNA normally but fails to assemble infectious virus. Two experiments were performed to roughly identify the point in the HCMV replication cycle at which pTRS1 is needed. Viral DNA accumulation was monitored by Southern blot assay after infection of human fibroblasts with ADsubTRS1 at a multiplicity of infection of 0.5 PFU/cell (Fig. 3A). Controls included ADsubIRS1-, ADwt-, and ADsubTRS1-infected fibroblasts containing pTRS1 supplied by retroTRS1. ADsubTRS1 DNA accumulation was indistinguishable from that of the controls, arguing that its defect occurs during the late phase of infection. Next, we examined the assembly of infectious virus. The growth experiments presented in Fig. 2 were performed by assaying cell-free virus. To determine whether ADsubTRS1 produced infectious particles that failed to escape from the cell, a growth experiment in which cells were lysed by two freeze-thaw cycles in their growth medium was performed. Then the total amount of infectivity produced in infected cultures (intracellular plus extracellular) was assayed (Fig. 3B). ADsubTRS1 failed to produce as much infectious intracellular virus as did ADwt. Consequently, the ADsubTRS1 defect must have its effect after DNA replication and before the assembly of infectious progeny.
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Accumulation of DNA and intracellular virus after infection with wild-type or mutant virus. (A) DNA accumulation. Human fibroblasts were infected at a multiplicity of infection of 0.5 PFU/cell with ADwt (), ADsubIRS1 (igwidth>), ADsubTRS1 ( ), or ADsubTRS1 plus retroTRS1 (igwidth>). Total-infected-cell DNA was prepared at the indicated times, and viral DNA was assayed by Southern blotting with a 32P-labeled HCMV genomic probe DNA. Radioactivity was quantified with a phosphorimager, and results are presented as relative phosphorimager units (RPU). (B) Intracellular virus accumulation. Cells were infected at the indicated multiplicities of infection with ADwt ( ) or ADsubTRS1 ( or igwidth>). Cells were harvested at the indicated times and freeze-thawed twice, and infectious virus was quantified by plaque assay on retroTRS1-infected fibroblasts. Samples were assayed in duplicate.
|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Accumulation of viral mRNAs after infection with wild-type or mutant virus. Fibroblasts were infected at a multiplicity of infection of 0.1 PFU/cell with ADwt ( ), ADsubIRS1 ( ), or ADsubTRS1 ( ). Total cellular RNA was prepared at the indicated times, viral mRNAs were assayed by Western blotting with 32P-labeled probe DNAs, and radioactivity relative to that for a cellular mRNA (cPLA2) was quantified with a phosphorimager. Similar results were obtained in two independent experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (50K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Accumulation of viral proteins after infection with wild-type or mutant virus. Fibroblasts were infected at a multiplicity of infection of 0.5 PFU/cell with ADwt or ADsubTRS1. Cell extracts were prepared at the indicated times (hours postinfection), and viral proteins were assayed by Western blotting with antibodies specific for the indicated proteins. gB, glycoprotein B; MCP, major capsid protein.
|
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Localization of late viral proteins in infected cells. Fibroblasts were infected at a multiplicity of infection of 0.5 PFU/cell with ADwt (1 and 2) or ADsubTRS1 (3 and 4). Cells were fixed 60 (1 and 3) or 72 h (2 and 4) later and treated with RNase A. pUL99 (A) was visualized by using a specific monoclonal antibody plus a fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibody (green); Golgi bodies were stained with an antibody to a Golgi-specific marker (mannosidase II) plus a Cy5-conjugated secondary antibody (red), and DNA was stained with Hoechst 33342 dye (blue). Limited colocalization of pUL99 and mannosidase II produces a yellow signal. pUL83 (B) was detected with a specific antibody plus a Cy5-conjugated secondary antibody (red), and DNA was stained with YOYO-1 (green). Colocalization of pUL83 and nuclear DNA yields a yellow signal.
|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Kinetic analysis of pUL83 location after synthesis in infected cells. (A) Fractionation of cells. Fibroblasts were infected with ADwt at a multiplicity of infection of 0.05 PFU/cell. At 72 h later, cells were subjected to mechanical fractionation in hypotonic buffer, separating nuclear (Nuc) and cytoplasmic (Cyto) fractions. The locations of the nuclear pUL123 (IE1) and cytoplasmic pUL99 viral proteins were ascertained by Western blot assay. (B) Localization of pUL83. Fibroblasts were infected at a multiplicity of infection of 0.05 PFU/cell with ADwt ( ) or ADsubTRS1 ( ). At 65 h later, cells were labeled with [35S]methionine plus [35S]cysteine for 10 min, washed, and then chased in the presence of unlabeled methionine plus cysteine. Lysates were prepared at the indicated times, and immunoprecipitated pUL83 from nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions was analyzed by electrophoresis. The radioactivity in pUL83-specific bands was quantified with a phosphorimager, and the ratio of 35S-labeled pUL83 in the nucleus to that in the cytoplasm was calculated.
|
10 (1.2). To further characterize the infectious particles produced in ADsubTRS1-infected fibroblasts, mutant and wild-type virus particles from the medium of infected cultures were pelleted through sorbitol cushions and then sedimented in glycerol-tartrate gradients. Three types of particles produced by wild-type virus have been described previously (2, 7, 25): infectious virions, NIEPs, and noninfectious DBs. NIEPs contain empty capsids, whereas DBs do not contain organized capsids. These three classes of particles were obtained from the ADwt virus preparation, but only material sedimenting at the position of DBs was evident in gradients that received ADsubTRS1 virus. All of the ADsubTRS1 infectivity was located in the DB fractions (Fig. 8A), and this infectivity accounted for all of the gradient's input infectivity.
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Infectivity and protein constituents of wild-type and mutant virus particles. Virus particles from the medium of fibroblasts infected with ADwt or ADsubTRS1 were partially purified by sedimentation through a sorbitol cushion to produce partially purified particles (crude). The particles in the crude fraction were further purified by sedimentation in a glycerol-tartrate gradient. Virions, NIEPs, and (DBs) were separated on the gradient containing the ADwt preparation. No virions or NIEPs were evident in the ADsubTRS1 preparation, and the regions of the gradient that would normally contain these particles were collected in blind fashion and processed. (A) The infectivity present in fractions from glycerol-tartrate gradients was analyzed by plaque assay on retroTRS1-infected fibroblasts. Three independent experiments were performed, and the averages plus standard deviations are displayed. (B) Viral proteins in gradient fractions were analyzed by Western blotting with antibodies to the indicated proteins. gB and MCP are as defined for Fig. 5.
|
|
|
|---|
In contrast to pIRS1, pTRS1 is required for efficient growth of HCMV in fibroblasts (Fig. 2C). The growth defect of ADsubTRS1 is multiplicity of infection dependent, being greater at lower multiplicities of infection. ADsubTRS1 DNA accumulation is normal (Fig. 3A), arguing that most immediate-early and early viral functions are intact. All of the late viral mRNAs and proteins that were assayed accumulated to nearly normal levels in ADsubTRS1-infected fibroblasts (Fig. 4 and 5), but two virion tegument proteins, pUL82 and pUL83, were aberrantly localized (Fig. 6 and data not shown). Whereas the proteins were present in both the nuclei and cytoplasm of ADwt-infected cells, they were detected only in the nuclear compartment at 60 h, and primarily in the nucleus at 72 h, after infection with ADsubTRS1. A pulse-chase analysis of pUL83 confirmed its altered localization in mutant virus-infected cells (Fig. 7B). In fibroblasts infected with ADwt, newly synthesized pUL83 rapidly accumulated in the nucleus and then slowly moved to the cytoplasm. Presumably, pUL83 associates with newly assembled capsids as well as other tegument proteins that accumulate in the nucleus; then, after passing through the inner and outer nuclear envelope, it reenters the cytoplasm as part of a capsid-tegument protein complex. The complex subsequently buds through a virus-modified membrane to produce infectious virions (reviewed in reference 22). We assume that cytoplasmic pUL83 is detected by immunofluorescence in wild-type-virus-infected cells (Fig. 6) either because the capsid-tegument protein complex is not immediately packaged or not quantitatively packaged into virus particles or because newly assembled particles are disrupted by the fixation process. In contrast to what is found for the wild-type situation, much of the newly synthesized pUL83 in ADsubTRS1-infected cells translocated slowly to the nucleus and then stayed there (Fig. 7B). The failure of pUL83 to efficiently depart the nucleus likely reflects a breakdown in the assembly process. Conceivably, pUL83 and perhaps other viral structural proteins reach the nuclei of ADsubTRS1-infected cells in an abnormal state that is not competent for assembly into a capsid-tegument complex that is able to move out of the nucleus. The failure of the majority of pUL83 proteins to exit the nucleus in the pulse-chase experiment probably explains the absence of a cytoplasmic signal for the protein in the immunofluorescence assay (Fig. 6).
A defect in assembly is consistent with the failure of ADsubTRS1 to accumulate normal quantities of intracellular infectious particles (Fig. 3B). A defect in assembly also fits well with the observation that ADsubTRS1 produces particles of reduced infectivity that sediment abnormally in a glycerol-tartrate gradient (Fig. 8A).
What is the role of pTRS1 late after infection? It might act indirectly to influence assembly of virus particles. Both pIRS1 and pTRS1 have been shown to activate transcription in cooperation with other viral activators (8, 10, 19, 23). pTRS1 might be required to efficiently activate the expression of a late protein whose accumulation we did not monitor and that functions during assembly. Alternatively, pTRS1 might function directly in assembly. For example, it could serve as a chaperone, helping to properly fold pUL83, assemble it into a complex, or to deliver it to the nucleus in a functional state. A failure to properly fold pUL83 could explain our inability to detect newly synthesized pUL83 in the cytoplasm of ADsubTRS1-infected cells (Fig. 6), even though its movement to the nucleus is delayed (Fig. 7B).
Although transfection experiments with reporter genes have indicated that pIRS1 and pTRS1 can cooperate with other immediate-early proteins to activate early and late viral promoters (8, 10, 19, 23), we failed to detect a significant alteration in the accumulation of the set of viral mRNAs in ADsubTRS1-infected cells that were tested (Fig. 4). Since pTRS1 is packaged in the virion, ADsubTRS1 made in complementing cells should contain the protein, but we have not purified a sufficient quantity of infectious ADsubTRS1 particles to confirm this supposition. Nevertheless, if there are viral genes that depend for their normal activation on pTRS1 delivered in virions but not on newly synthesized pTRS1, then they might have been missed in our assays. We examined only a small subset of viral mRNAs, and we may have failed to assay one or more viral genes that are dependent on TRS1 for their full activation. Finally, since both pIRS1 and pTRS1 are able to elevate the expression of reporter constructs, it is possible that the retention of just one of the two proteins is sufficient for transcriptional activation. We are currently constructing a virus unable to express either pIRS1 or pTRS1 to test the hypothesis that a transcriptional activation function resides in the conserved N-terminal domains of pIRS1 and pTRS1.
This work was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute (CA85786).
Present address: Johnson and Johnson Research and Development, Raritan, NJ 08869. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»