Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, November 2002, p. 11744-11747, Vol. 76, No. 22
0022-538X/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.22.11744-11747.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
A Reverse Genetics Approach for Recovery of Recombinant Influenza B Viruses Entirely from cDNA
David Jackson,1 Andrew Cadman,2 Thomas Zurcher,2 and Wendy S. Barclay1*
University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AJ,1
GlaxoSmithKline Medicine Research Centre, Stevenage SG1 2NY, United Kingdom2
Received 16 July 2002/
Accepted 12 August 2002

ABSTRACT
The recovery of recombinant influenza A virus entirely from
cDNA was recently described (
9,
19). We adapted the technique
for engineering influenza B virus and generated a mutant bearing
an amino acid change E116G in the viral neuraminidase which
was resistant in vitro to the neuraminidase inhibitor zanamivir.
The method also facilitates rapid isolation of single-gene reassortants
suitable as vaccine seeds and will aid further investigations
of unique features of influenza B virus.

TEXT
Influenza illness, a cause of more than 20,000 excess deaths
in epidemic years in the United Kingdom (
7), is attributable
to infection with one of two subtypes of influenza A virus or
with influenza type B virus (
8). Thus, influenza B virus surface
antigens are an essential component of any vaccine effective
in reducing influenza morbidity. Influenza B viruses, like their
type A counterparts, are orthomyxoviruses with genomes comprised
of eight segments of negative-sense single-stranded RNA. In
general, they encode proteins with homology to those encoded
by influenza A virus, although there are notable and interesting
differences, particularly in RNA segments 6 and 7 (
16). In addition,
a recently described additional open reading frame within RNA
segment 2 present in many influenza A virus strains is absent
from influenza B viruses (
5). The reasons for and biological
consequences of the genetic differences between influenza A
and B viruses are of considerable academic interest and may
have implications for understanding the limited host range for
influenza B virus as well as for developing antiviral strategies
for these orthomyxoviruses.
The manipulation of the influenza virus genome was first described by Palese and coworkers in 1989 (17), and the development of the technique to site-specifically change an infectious influenza B virus followed shortly after (1). However, this method, which utilized a helper virus and appropriate selection system, suffered from the limitation that engineering of all RNA segments was not possible. Since 1999 it has been possible to recover recombinant influenza A viruses entirely from cDNAs (9, 13, 19). Even within the short time this system has been available, it has revolutionized the potential for influenza virus research by facilitating a reverse genetic approach to the study of all the influenza A virus genes (3, 5, 11, 12, 20, 27). The process involves the in situ generation of virus RNAs transcribed from eight separate plasmids in which the influenza virus sequences are placed downstream of polymerase I promoters. In addition, expression of the four proteins which comprise the viral polymerase, NP, PB1, PB2, and PA, is achieved by placing their coding sequences under the control of a polymerase II promoter either in separate expression plasmids or in bidirectional plasmids (13). In this report we describe the adaptation of reverse genetics technology for engineering recombinant influenza B viruses.
The strategy we applied is based upon that described for recovery of recombinant influenza A viruses (9, 19). We used a cassette vector, pPRG, which allows cloning of the segments of the influenza B virus genome so that they are flanked by a human polymerase I promoter at the 5' terminus and the hepatitis delta virus (HDV) antigenomic ribozyme at the 3' terminus, such that their transcription results in negative-sense RNAs with exact viral-like termini. The polymerase I promoter was cloned from a human genomic library by PCR using primers based on published sequences (15). The ribozyme sequence was the antigenomic sense ribozyme of HDV (kindly provided by A. Ball). The plasmid pPRG was previously used for the rescue of influenza virus A/Victoria/3/75 H3N2 from cloned DNA (J. Daly, A. Cadman, W. Snowden, M. Tisdale, and T. Zurcher, Abstr. Options Control Influenza IV, abstr. W23-5, 2000). We inserted sequences encoding the influenza B virus-like model RNA HABCAT (1) and cotransfected this plasmid, pPRGCAT, with four plasmids directing expression of the influenza B virus polymerase complex. These helper plasmids were based on vector pCI (Invitrogen) and had coding sequences for NP, PB1, PB2, and PA derived from B/Panama/45/90 virus (14) inserted downstream of a cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter. As a control we inserted HABCAT sequences into the pPolIRTSapI vector, described and kindly provided by Fodor et al. (9), to create pPRFCAT. We sequenced both polymerase I promoters and found no nucleotide differences between them, although they differed from published sequences (15). However, it should be noted that pPRFCAT contains the HDV genomic sense ribozyme. The data in Fig. 1 indicate that chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) expression following transfection of each construct varied. It may be that the efficiency of cleavage by either ribozyme affects expression. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that different sequences surrounding the promoter and ribozyme in the two vectors affect their efficiencies. Since the pPRG vector resulted in the most CAT protein produced, we chose this for insertion of the influenza B virus gene segments.
We also tested whether polymerase proteins from a different
strain of influenza B virus, B/AA/66 (
25), or from influenza
A virus could support replication of the HABCAT viral-like RNA.
Figure
1 shows that both supported replication of the model
RNA, although less well than the B/Panama polymerase proteins.
It is well established that influenza A virus polymerases replicate
model RNAs containing influenza B virus promoters (
6,
14,
18,
28). The differences we observed in replication efficiency by
influenza B virus polymerases might be due either to sequence,
since they are from different virus strains, or to the nature
of the expression plasmid in which they were cloned. In virus
rescue experiments we used B/Panama/45/90 polymerases (Table
1).
The influenza B virus gene segments were cloned by reverse transcription-PCR
(RT-PCR), using appropriate primers complementary to the segment
termini (
26) (primer sequences available on request) that introduced
BsmBI or
SapI restriction enzyme sites to facilitate their insertion
into pPRG cassette vectors containing these sites. Six of the
RNA segments were derived from influenza virus B/Beijing/1/87.
Segment 1 was derived from a cDNA clone of the PB2 gene from
influenza virus B/Panama/45/90 (
14). Segment 5 was obtained
by RT-PCR from influenza virus B/Lee/40 viral RNA (vRNA). This
cDNA was inserted into a bidirectional construct containing
both polymerase I and polymerase II promoters by subcloning
the polymerase I and ribozyme sequences into pcDNA3 (Invitrogen)
(Table
1). Aliquots of 0.5 µg of each of the eight plasmids
were cotransfected into 293T cells with B/Panama polymerase
expression plasmids. Sixteen hours after transfection the 293T
cells were cocultured with MDCK cells in the presence of 2.5
µg of trypsin/ml. Cytopathic effect (CPE) was observed
71 h postcoculturing, and subsequent rescue experiments confirmed
that CPE routinely appears between 68 and 72 h postcoculture.
Cell supernatant harvested after a further 36 h displayed a
titer of 32 hemagglutinating units and an infectivity of approximately
10
6 PFU/ml. Analysis of RNA segments of the recovered virus
by RT-PCR, diagnostic restriction enzyme digestion, and sequencing
of the PCR products illustrated that the recovered virus contained
a gene constellation dictated by the plasmids used for transfection
and hitherto unreported in our laboratories or in the literature.
The rescued virus contains a B/Lee/40 virus nucleoprotein (NP)
gene which is easily identified since it differs from other
influenza B virus NP genes in that it contains a single
EcoRI
restriction site, whereas other sequences contain two or more,
and it lacks a
BsmBI restriction site whereas this site is present
at nucleotide 1370 in other influenza B viruses. Moreover, influenza
virus B/Panama/45/90 virus has never been propagated in our
laboratory, and the sequence of RT-PCR products from the recombinant
virus illustrates that it contains a B/Panama/45/90 PB2 segment
(data not shown).
We believe this to be the first successful recovery of recombinant influenza B virus entirely from cDNA. Although the technique we have used is an adaptation of that previously developed for influenza A viruses, we have made some important and possibly significant improvements. Firstly, as discussed above, the plasmid vector and polymerases used in the system differ from those used in other laboratories. Secondly, the genetic constellation of the virus we rescued is unusual (Table 1). Six of the segments are from influenza virus B/Beijing/1/87 virus, but PB2 is from B/Panama/45/90 and NP is from the highly laboratory-adapted strain B/Lee/40. This was useful for identifying the recovered virus and also may contribute to our success, as it results in a virus which replicates very well in MDCK cells, so even if transfection efficiency were low recovered virus would be readily amplified following coculture. Thirdly, we utilized a bidirectional vector for generation of segment 5 RNA. We do not know at present whether this is essential for virus recovery. However, subcloning of segment 5 cDNAs into the pPRG vector did not allow recovery of virus. Interestingly, although the bidirectional plasmid generates NP that can support HABCAT model RNA replication (data not shown), omission of the pCINP plasmid did not allow virus recovery, although substitution with pcDNA3NP from B/AA/66 did.
We engineered a mutation into the pPRNA plasmid to alter amino acid residue 116 of the B/Beijing/1/87 neuraminidase (NA) protein from glutamic acid to glycine (Fig. 2A). This mutation has been independently identified in two laboratory isolates which acquired resistance to the NA inhibitor zanamivir (2, 24). A virus was recovered that grew well in MDCK cells. Figure 2B illustrates the multicycle growth characteristics in comparison with the recovered wild-type virus with the same genetic constellation. As predicted, the E116G mutant displayed a drug-resistant phenotype in plaque reduction assays. At a concentration of 0.03 µg of zanamivir/ml, the size and number of plaques formed by wild-type virus were greatly reduced but the E116G mutant was unaffected. Sequencing of RT-PCR products confirmed that the E116G mutation was present, as was a silent mutation in the preceding codon engineered into the cDNA as a tag (Fig. 2A).
We next assayed the inhibition of mutant NA enzyme activity
by zanamivir. Infected cell supernatants containing wild-type
or E116G virus were adjusted for equivalent NA activity and
then subjected to the 4-methylumbelliferyl-

-
D-acetylneuraminate
(MUNANA) enzyme assay in the presence of different concentrations
of drug. A greater amount of virus was needed to assay the mutant
enzyme, indicating that it had a reduced NA activity. Indeed,
hemagglutination elution at 37°C (assumed to be mediated
by NA activity) was not observed for the mutant virus. Moreover,
the E116G mutant NA was only inhibited by high concentrations
of zanamivir. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC
50) was approximately
1 nM for wild-type virus but increased to over 8 µM for
the mutant (Fig.
3). These results correlate well with IC
50 values previously obtained for wild-type and E116G B/Beijing/1/87
viruses (
2).
Since both influenza B viruses previously described which contain
the E116G mutation also contained additional hemagglutinin (HA)
mutations (
2,
24), we sequenced RT-PCR products derived from
the entire HA gene of the mutant virus. No changes from the
wild-type B/Beijing/1/87 HA sequence were found. Thus, the reverse
genetics procedure has allowed the recovery of a genetically
defined virus altered in a single gene segment which can help
to understand the contribution of single point mutations to
a drug resistance phenotype.
It has been particularly difficult to study the contribution of NA mutations to resistance to the NA inhibitors in the context of live virus when using a traditional genetic approach, since NA mutations are always accompanied by changes in the HA gene both in vitro and in vivo (2, 10, 24). In studies with influenza A virus mutants, the contributions of the NA and HA sequence changes to the drug-resistant phenotype have been separated by generating single-gene reassortants (4). The reverse genetics technology allows the analysis of individual mutations in separate gene segments without needing to resort to such methods. The NA E116G mutant demonstrates that the drug-resistant phenotype to an NA inhibitor can be conveyed by a single amino acid change in the NA gene. Interestingly, the E116G virus displayed efficient replication in MDCK cells. However, it has been shown previously that NA mutants with reduced enzyme activity may grow well in MDCK cells but have reduced infectivity in vivo (11; J. Carr, J. Ives, N. A. Roberts, C. Y. Tai, D. B. Mendel, L. Kelly, R. Lambkin, and J. Oxford, Abstr. 2nd Int. Symp. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses, 1999). It may be that the reduction in NA activity is not sufficient to significantly disrupt the balance between HA affinity and NA activity in MDCK cells. Changes in HA leading to altered receptor binding and antigenic properties of influenza B viruses upon adaptation to cell culture and eggs have been documented (22, 23).
We replaced the pPRHA plasmid with pPRHA2X, which encodes the HA gene from influenza virus B/Md/59 genetically tagged with an XbaI restriction enzyme site (1). A recombinant virus was rescued which contained the genetic tag and displayed similar growth kinetics to the wild type and the drug-resistant mutants described above (Fig. 2B).
The ability to generate antigenic variants of influenza B virus within a high-growth background of internal genes may have important consequences for generation of vaccine strains. In recent years the World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended strain of influenza B virus has grown poorly in eggs. During 1998 to 2002, alternative influenza B virus strains which resembled the WHO strain antigenically but grew to higher titers in eggs were selected for use in EU vaccines (John Wood, personal communication). Even so, in some cases growth of the chosen virus was still inefficient, causing a potential reduction in the number of available doses. Since typically influenza A virus high-growth reassortants increase yield approximately fourfold over that of wild-type strains, the ability to generate similar high-growth strains of influenza B virus to order will be a useful addition to the influenza virus reverse genetic repertoire.
ADDENDUM IN PROOF
Since submission of this article, Hoffmann et al. have reported the rescue of recombinant influenza B virus using a similar approach (E. Hoffmann, K. Mahmood, C.-F. Yang, R. G. Webster, H. B. Greenberg, and G. Kemble, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:11411-11414, 2002).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Andrew Ball, Ervin Fodor, Juan Ortin, Peter Palese,
and Augustin Portela for providing plasmids. We also thank Philip
Yates for help with the MUNANA assay and Mark Stevens and John
Wood for useful discussion.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: School of Animal and Microbial Sciences, University of Reading, P.O. Box 228, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AJ, United Kingdom. Phone: 44-118-9316368. Fax: 44-118-9316671. E-mail:
w.s.barclay{at}reading.ac.uk.


REFERENCES
1 - Barclay, W. S., and P. Palese. 1995. Influenza B viruses with site-specific mutations introduced into the HA gene. J. Virol. 69:1275-1279.[Abstract]
2 - Barnett, J. M., A. Cadman, F. M. Burrell, S. H. Madar, A. P. Lewis, M. Tisdale, and R. Bethell. 1999. In vitro selection and characterisation of influenza B/Beijing/1/87 isolates with altered susceptibility to zanamivir. Virology 265:286-295.[CrossRef][Medline]
3 - Basler, C. F., A. H. Reid, J. K. Dybing, T. A. Janczewski, T. G. Fanning, H. Y. Zheng, M. Salvatore, M. L. Perdue, D. E. Swayne, A. Garcia-Sastre, P. Palese, and J. K. Taubenberger. 2001. Sequence of the 1918 pandemic influenza virus nonstructural gene (NS) segment and characterization of recombinant viruses bearing the 1918 NS genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98:2746-2751.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4 - Blick, T. J., A. Sahasrabudhe, M. McDonald, I. J. Owens, P. J. Morley, R. J. Fenton, and J. L. McKimm-Breschkin. 1998. The interaction of neuraminidase and hemagglutinin mutations in influenza virus resistance to 4-guanidino-Neu5Ac2en. Virology 246:95-103.[CrossRef][Medline]
5 - Chen, W. S., P. A. Calvo, D. Malide, J. Gibbs, U. Schubert, I. Bacik, S. Basta, R. O'Neill, J. Schickli, P. Palese, P. Henklein, J. R. Bennink, and J. W. Yewdell. 2001. A novel influenza A virus mitochondrial protein that induces cell death. Nat. Med. 7:1306-1312.[CrossRef][Medline]
6 - Crescenzo-Chaigne, B., N. Naffakh, and S. van der Werf. 1999. Comparative analysis of the ability of the polymerase complexes of influenza viruses type A, B, and C to assemble into functional RNPs that allow expression and replication of heterotypic model RNA templates in vivo. Virology 265:342-353.[CrossRef][Medline]
7 - Fleming, D. M. 1996. The impact of three influenza epidemics on primary care in England and Wales. Pharmaco-Economics 9:38-45.
8 - Fleming, D. M., M. Zambon, and A. I. M. Bartelds. 2000. Population estimates of persons presenting to general practitioners with influenza-like illness, 1987-96: a study of the demography of influenza-like illness in sentinel practice networks in England and Wales, and in the Netherlands. Epidemiol. Infect. 124:245-253.[CrossRef][Medline]
9 - Fodor, E., L. Devenish, O. G. Engelhardt, P. Palese, G. G. Brownlee, and A. Garcia-Sastre. 1999. Rescue of influenza A virus from recombinant DNA. J. Virol. 73:9679-9682.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
10 - Gubareva, L. V., M. N. Matrosovich, M. K. Brenner, R. C. Bethell, and R. G. Webster. 1998. Evidence for zanamivir resistance in an immunocompromised child with influenza B virus. J. Infect. Dis. 178:1257-1262.[CrossRef][Medline]
11 - Hatta, M., G. Neumann, and Y. Kawaoka. 2001. Reverse genetics approach towards understanding pathogenesis of H5N1 Hong Kong influenza A virus infection. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 356:1841-1843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12 - Hatta, M., P. Halfmann, K. Wells, and Y. Kawaoka. 2002. Human influenza A viral gene responsible for the restriction of its replication in duck intestine. Virology 295:250-255.[CrossRef][Medline]
13 - Hoffmann, E., G. Neumann, Y. Kawaoka, G. Hobom, and R. G. Webster. 2002. A DNA transfection system for generation of influenza A virus from eight plasmids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:6108-6113.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14 - Jambrina, E., J. Barcena, O. Uez, and A. Portela. 1997. The three subunits of the polymerase and the nucleoprotein of influenza B virus are the minimum set of proteins required for expression of a model RNA template. Virology 235:209-217.[CrossRef][Medline]
15 - Jones, M. H., R. M. Learned, and R. Tjian. 1988. Analysis of clustered point mutations in the human ribosomal RNA gene promoter by transient expression in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:669-673.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16 - Lamb, R. A., and C. M. Horvath. 1991. Diversity of coding strategies in influenza viruses. Trends Genet. 7:261-266.[Medline]
17 - Luytjes, W., M. Krystal, M. Enami, J. D. Parvin, and P. Palese. 1989. Amplification, expression, and packaging of a foreign gene by influenza virus. Cell 59:1107-1113.[CrossRef][Medline]
18 - Muster, T., E. K. Subbarao, M. Enami, B. R. Murphy, and P. Palese. 1991. An influenza A virus containing influenza B virus 5' and 3' noncoding regions on the neuraminidase gene is attenuated in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:5177-5181.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19 - Neumann, G., T. Watanabe, H. Ito, S. Watanabe, H. Goto, P. Gao, M. Hughes, D. R. Perez, R. Donis, E. Hoffmann, G. Hobom, and Y. Kawaoka. 1999. Generation of influenza A viruses entirely from cloned cDNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:9345-9350.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20 - Neumann, G., M. T. Hughes, and Y. Kawaoka. 2000. Influenza A virus NS2 protein mediates vRNP nuclear export through NES-independent interaction with hCRM1. EMBO J. 19:6751-6758.[CrossRef][Medline]
21 - Potier, M., L. Mameli, M. Belisle, L. Dallaire, and S. B. Melancon. 1979. Fluorimetric assay of neuraminidase with a sodium (4-methylumbelliferyl-
-D-N-acetylneuraminate) substrate. Anal. Biochem. 94:287-296.[CrossRef][Medline]
22 - Robertson, J. S., C. W. Naeve, R. G. Webster, J. S. Bootman, R. Newman, and G. C. Schild. 1985. Alterations in the hemagglutinin associated with adaptation of influenza B virus to growth in eggs. Virology 143:166-174.[CrossRef][Medline]
23 - Schild, G. C., J. S. Oxford, J. C. de Jong, and R. G. Webster. 1983. Evidence for host-cell selection of influenza virus antigenic variants. Nature 303:706-709.[CrossRef][Medline]
24 - Staschke, K. A., J. M. Colacino, A. J. Baxter, G. M. Air, A. Bansal, W. J. Hornback, J. E. Munroe, and W. G. Laver. 1995. Molecular basis for the resistance of influenza viruses to 4-guanidino-Neu5Ac2en. Virology 214:642-646.[CrossRef][Medline]
25 - Stevens, M. A., and W. S. Barclay. 1998. The N-terminal extension of the influenza B virus nucleoprotein is not required for nuclear accumulation or the expression and replication of a model RNA. J. Virol. 72:5307-5312.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26 - Stoeckle, M. Y., M. W. Shaw, and P. W. Choppin. 1987. Segment-specific and common nucleotide sequences in the noncoding regions of influenza B virus genome RNAs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:2703-2707.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27 - Watanabe, T., S. Watanabe, H. Ito, H. Kida, and Y. Kawaoka. 2001. Influenza A virus can undergo multiple cycles of replication without M2 ion channel activity. J. Virol. 75:5656-5662.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28 - Weber, F., E. Jambrina, S. Gonzalez, J. T. Dessens, M. Leahy, G. Kochs, A. Portela, P. A. Nuttall, O. Haller, J. Ortin, and T. Zurcher. 1998. In vivo reconstitution of active Thogoto virus polymerase: assays for the compatibility with other orthomyxovirus core proteins and template RNAs. Virus Res. 58:13-20.[CrossRef][Medline]
Journal of Virology, November 2002, p. 11744-11747, Vol. 76, No. 22
0022-538X/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.22.11744-11747.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Robb, N. C., Smith, M., Vreede, F. T., Fodor, E.
(2009). NS2/NEP protein regulates transcription and replication of the influenza virus RNA genome. J. Gen. Virol.
90: 1398-1407
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gao, Q., Brydon, E. W. A., Palese, P.
(2008). A Seven-Segmented Influenza A Virus Expressing the Influenza C Virus Glycoprotein HEF. J. Virol.
82: 6419-6426
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Crescenzo-Chaigne, B., van der Werf, S.
(2007). Rescue of Influenza C Virus from Recombinant DNA. J. Virol.
81: 11282-11289
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Muraki, Y., Murata, T., Takashita, E., Matsuzaki, Y., Sugawara, K., Hongo, S.
(2007). A Mutation on Influenza C Virus M1 Protein Affects Virion Morphology by Altering the Membrane Affinity of the Protein. J. Virol.
81: 8766-8773
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zurcher, T., Yates, P. J., Daly, J., Sahasrabudhe, A., Walters, M., Dash, L., Tisdale, M., McKimm-Breschkin, J. L.
(2006). Mutations conferring zanamivir resistance in human influenza virus N2 neuraminidases compromise virus fitness and are not stably maintained in vitro. J Antimicrob Chemother
58: 723-732
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Pinto, L. H., Lamb, R. A.
(2006). The M2 Proton Channels of Influenza A and B Viruses. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 8997-9000
[Full Text]
-
Jackson, D., Barclay, W., Zurcher, T.
(2005). Characterization of recombinant influenza B viruses with key neuraminidase inhibitor resistance mutations. J Antimicrob Chemother
55: 162-169
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Imai, M., Watanabe, S., Ninomiya, A., Obuchi, M., Odagiri, T.
(2004). Influenza B Virus BM2 Protein Is a Crucial Component for Incorporation of Viral Ribonucleoprotein Complex into Virions during Virus Assembly. J. Virol.
78: 11007-11015
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Muraki, Y., Washioka, H., Sugawara, K., Matsuzaki, Y., Takashita, E., Hongo, S.
(2004). Identification of an amino acid residue on influenza C virus M1 protein responsible for formation of the cord-like structures of the virus. J. Gen. Virol.
85: 1885-1893
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hatta, M., Goto, H., Kawaoka, Y.
(2004). Influenza B Virus Requires BM2 Protein for Replication. J. Virol.
78: 5576-5583
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dauber, B., Heins, G., Wolff, T.
(2004). The Influenza B Virus Nonstructural NS1 Protein Is Essential for Efficient Viral Growth and Antagonizes Beta Interferon Induction. J. Virol.
78: 1865-1872
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Watanabe, S., Imai, M., Ohara, Y., Odagiri, T.
(2003). Influenza B Virus BM2 Protein Is Transported through the trans-Golgi Network as an Integral Membrane Protein. J. Virol.
77: 10630-10637
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Flandorfer, A., Garcia-Sastre, A., Basler, C. F., Palese, P.
(2003). Chimeric Influenza A Viruses with a Functional Influenza B Virus Neuraminidase or Hemagglutinin. J. Virol.
77: 9116-9123
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hatta, M., Kawaoka, Y.
(2003). The NB Protein of Influenza B Virus Is Not Necessary for Virus Replication In Vitro. J. Virol.
77: 6050-6054
[Abstract]
[Full Text]