This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gangappa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Virgin, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gangappa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Virgin, H. W., IV

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, November 2002, p. 11460-11468, Vol. 76, No. 22
0022-538X/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.22.11460-11468.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Antibody to a Lytic Cycle Viral Protein Decreases Gammaherpesvirus Latency in B-Cell-Deficient Mice

Shivaprakash Gangappa,1 Sharookh B. Kapadia,1 Samuel H. Speck,2* and Herbert W. Virgin IV1*

Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110,1 Division of Microbiology and Immunology, Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 303292

Received 20 May 2002/ Accepted 14 August 2002


arrow
ABSTRACT
 
While antiviral antibody plays a key role in resistance to acute viral infection, the contribution of antibody to the control of latent virus infection is less well understood. Gammaherpesvirus 68 ({gamma}HV68) infection of mice provides a model well suited to defining contributions of specific immune system components to the control of viral latency. B cells play a critical role in regulating {gamma}HV68 latency, but the mechanism(s) by which B cells regulate latency is not known. In the experiments reported here, we determined the effect of passively transferred antibody on established {gamma}HV68 latency in B-cell-deficient (B-cell-/-) mice. Immune antibody decreased the frequency of cells reactivating ex vivo from latency in splenocytes (>10-fold) and peritoneal cells (>100-fold) and the frequency of cells carrying latent viral genome in splenocytes (>5-fold) and peritoneal cells (>50-fold). This effect required virus-specific antibody and was observed when total and virus-specific serum antibody concentrations in recipient B-cell-/- mice were <8% of those in normal mice during latent infection. Passive transfer of antibody specific for the lytic cycle {gamma}HV68 RCA protein, but not passive transfer of antibody specific for the v-cyclin protein or the latent protein M2, decreased both the frequency of cells reactivating ex vivo from latency and the frequency of cells carrying the latent viral genome. Therefore, antibody specific for lytic cycle viral antigens can play an important role in the control of gammaherpesvirus latency in immunocompromised hosts. Based on these findings, we propose a model in which ongoing productive replication is essential for maintaining high levels of latently infected cells in immunocompromised hosts. We confirmed this model by the treatment of latently infected B-cell-/- mice with the antiviral drug cidofovir.


arrow
INTRODUCTION
 
Infection by herpesviruses leads to the establishment of lifelong latency in different tissues (20, 25). Reactivation of herpesviruses from latency, or the expansion of latently infected cells, in immunocompromised hosts is thought to contribute to herpesvirus-induced diseases (25, 37). However, the precise mechanisms by which the host limits latent infection or reactivation from latency are incompletely understood.

Human gammaherpesviruses such as Epstein-Barr virus and Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (human herpesvirus 8) establish latent infection and are associated with chronic diseases, including lymphoma in immunocompromised patients. One of the difficulties in studying the immune control of gammaherpesvirus latency and reactivation has been the lack of a suitable small animal model. Since murine gammaherpesvirus 68 ({gamma}HV68) establishes latent infection in laboratory mice and is associated with the induction of lymphomas (34; unpublished observations), infection of mice with {gamma}HV68 provides a tractable small animal model for studying mechanisms of gammaherpesvirus latency and chronic disease (6-8, 28, 32, 34, 35, 45, 47).

Acute {gamma}HV68 infection in mice lasts for about 2 weeks, after which latency is established (4, 43, 46). {gamma}HV68 establishes a latent infection in B cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, and perhaps epithelial cells (9, 33, 36, 46, 49). In addition to being a site of {gamma}HV68 latency, B cells play a number of different roles in {gamma}HV68 pathogenesis. After intraperitoneal (i.p.) inoculation, B cells are required for normal levels of splenic replication during acute infection but are not required for the establishment of splenic latency (46, 48). After intranasal inoculation of {gamma}HV68 into B-cell-deficient (B-cell-/-) mice, ex vivo reactivating virus was detectable in peritoneal cells but not in the spleen at 7 weeks postinfection (p.i.) (48). Another report also indicates that B cells are required for splenic latency when the virus is administered by the intranasal route of infection (41). In addition, B-cell-/- mice die over 200 days of infection and develop severe chronic arteritis restricted to the great elastic arteries (47). Elastic arteritis is due to the chronic productive infection of smooth muscle cells of the elastic media (6-8, 47). Additional data demonstrating the presence of ongoing productive infection in B-cell-/- mice was provided by Stewart et al., who found evidence for replicative linear forms of the {gamma}HV68 genome in the lungs of {gamma}HV68-infected B-cell-/- mice 8 weeks after infection (33). In addition to ongoing productive infection in specific anatomic sites, B-cell-/- mice exhibit abnormal regulation of latency with increases in both the number of splenocytes and peritoneal cells that reactivate ex vivo from latency and the number of peritoneal cells carrying the latent viral genome (46, 48).

While B-cell-/- mice have a number of abnormalities during {gamma}HV68 infection, the mechanism(s) responsible for these changes in pathogenesis is not known. One possible role for B cells is in the secretion of virus-specific antibody. The virus-specific antibody response to {gamma}HV68 develops slowly (30) and is long lasting, but the importance of sustained humoral immunity is not completely understood. Kim et al. have shown that antibody can limit recrudescence from latency in T-cell-depleted CD28-/- mice, showing that antibody can contribute to the control of chronic infection in immunodeficient mice (21). This observation is similar to that made in the studies of Polic et al. demonstrating an increased dissemination of murine cytomegalovirus in T-cell-depleted B-cell-/- mice compared to that in T-cell-depleted normal mice (24).

To determine whether there is a role for virus-specific antibody in controlling the establishment, maintenance, and/or ex vivo reactivation of {gamma}HV68 from latency, we used the passive transfer of antibody into B-cell-/- mice. We found that polyclonal antiviral antibody and antibody specific for a lytic cycle viral protein can play a significant role in the regulation of {gamma}HV68 latency. These data support a model in which persistent, productive viral replication contributes to the high levels of latency observed in immunocompromised hosts. Studies using the viral DNA synthesis inhibitor cidofovir further support this model.


arrow
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 
Viruses and tissue culture. {gamma}HV68 clone WUMS (ATCC VR1465) was passaged and grown, and the titers of the virus in NIH 3T12 cells or BALB/c or C57BL/6 murine embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) were determined as described previously (43). Viral stocks were generated from NIH 3T12 cells infected at a multiplicity of infection of 0.05 and harvested at a 50% cytopathic effect (CPE) (43).

Mice, infections, and organ harvests. B-cell-/- mice backcrossed onto a C57BL/6 background (46) were bred and maintained at the Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Mo., in accordance with all federal and university policies. C57BL/6J (B6) mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory. Unless otherwise stated, mice were age and sex matched, used between 7 to 10 weeks of age, and infected with 106 PFU of {gamma}HV68 by i.p. injection in 0.5 ml of complete Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (4, 43). For the data presented here, peritoneal cells and spleen tissue were harvested and processed as described previously from groups of five mice per experiment in two independent experiments (10 mice total per condition) (4, 43, 46).

Quantitation of cells harboring the {gamma}HV68 genome. The frequency of cells harboring the {gamma}HV68 genome was determined by a limiting-dilution nested-PCR assay that amplifies {gamma}HV68 gene 50 sequences with single-copy sensitivity (48, 49). Briefly, peritoneal cells and splenocytes were frozen in 10% dimethyl sulfoxide at -80°C, thawed, counted, resuspended in isotonic buffer, and serially diluted into 96-well PCR plates. Uninfected NIH 3T12 cells were added so that each well contained 104 cells. Cells were then lysed in proteinase K, and nested PCR was performed (48, 49). Ten PCRs were analyzed for each cell dilution, with six dilutions per sample per experiment. Control reactions in each experiment included uninfected cells alone (six reactions/plate) or cells with 10, 1, or 0.1 copies of plasmid DNA containing the target sequence (six reactions/plate each). There were no false-positive reactions in the assays reported here, and all assays demonstrated approximately one-copy sensitivity for plasmid DNA, with control reactions containing 10, 1, and 0.1 copies of plasmid DNA positive in 88, 39, and 6% of all reactions, respectively.

Ex vivo reactivation from latency. The frequency of cells reactivating from latency ex vivo was determined by using a limiting-dilution reactivation assay (46, 48). Briefly, peritoneal cells and splenocytes were harvested 42 or 65 days p.i. and plated in a serial twofold dilution (starting at 4 x 104 peritoneal cells and 105 splenocytes per well) onto MEF monolayers in 96-well plates. Twenty-four wells were plated per dilution, and 12 dilutions were plated per sample. Wells were scored microscopically 21 days later for viral CPE. When CPE was difficult to discern at high cell numbers, wells were replated onto fresh MEFs and the CPE was assessed. Preformed virus in tissues was detected by plating parallel cell samples that had been subjected to mechanical disruption. Mechanical disruption does not inactivate virus but kills >99% of cells, and thus, samples treated in this way detect preformed virus rather than virus reactivating from latency (46, 48, 49).

Serum harvest, passive transfer, and antibody ELISA. For serum collection, peripheral blood was collected from the retro-orbital sinus of the donor (naive or day 42-{gamma}HV68-immune mice) or recipient B-cell-/- mice and serum separation was performed by using Microtainer serum separator tubes (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, N.J.) and then stored at -20°C until passive transfer into mice or determination of antibody concentration by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Rabbit polyclonal {gamma}HV68-specific antiserum was raised by injecting 6 x 106 PFU of virus (passaged in RK13, a rabbit kidney cell line with 10% rabbit serum) and harvesting serum at 4 weeks after the first boost (47). Serum collected prior to infection served as a preimmune control. In passive antibody transfer experiments, 100 µl of naive or {gamma}HV68-immune (mouse or rabbit) serum was given i.p. For the {gamma}HV68-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) assay, plates were coated with a 1% final concentration of paraformaldehyde-fixed viral antigen or mock antigen in coating buffer (0.1 M Na2CO3, 0.2% NaN3, pH 9.6). For assay of total IgG by ELISA, plates were coated with a 1-µg/ml concentration of donkey anti-mouse IgG (Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, Pa.) or donkey anti-rabbit IgG (Jackson Immunoresearch) in coating buffer, incubated at 37°C for 2 h, and blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin in coating buffer. After washing the plates with ELISA wash buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20), serum samples or mouse or rabbit IgG standards were added to each well after a serial threefold dilution in ELISA III buffer (0.15 M NaCl, 0.001 M EDTA, 0.05 M Tris-HCl, 0.05% Tween 20, 0.1% bovine serum albumin) and then incubated at 37°C for 3 h. Plates were then washed, and horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse (Jackson Immunoresearch) or goat anti-rabbit (Jackson Immunoresearch) IgG was added at a 1:5,000 dilution and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Plates were then washed, and 50 µl of ABTS substrate [2,2'-azinobis(3-ethylbenzthiazolinesulfonic acid), diamino salt (Sigma A1888)] diluted in substrate buffer (0.1 M sodium citrate, 0.016% [vol/vol] H2O2) was added. The reaction was stopped after 10 min with 0.2 N 85% phosphoric acid, and the plates were read in a microplate reader (model 550; Bio-Rad Labs, Hercules, Calif.). The concentration of antibody in the serum samples was determined by using a standard curve generated by serially diluting mouse IgG (Jackson Immunoresearch) or rabbit IgG (Jackson Immunoresearch) in the same assay.

Virus neutralization assay. Virus neutralization assays were performed using an adaptation of a previously described assay (15, 22). Briefly, 104 PFU of virus in 80 µl was incubated with 10 µl of various dilutions of antibody at 37°C for 1 h, followed by plaque assay to quantitate the amount of virus. Wild-type {gamma}HV68 incubated with rabbit serum generated to {gamma}HV68 served as the positive control (47). For the negative control, a {gamma}HV68 RCA protein-deficient virus was incubated with rabbit antiserum generated to recombinant {gamma}HV68 regulator of complement activation (RCA) protein (18). Percent neutralization was measured based on virus titer in samples containing no antibody.

Antiviral therapy. As described previously (6, 8), cidofovir (Vistide; Gilead Sciences, Foster City, Calif.) was diluted in low-endotoxin phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to 6.25 mg/ml and filter sterilized. {gamma}HV68-infected B-cell-/- mice were given cidofovir or PBS subcutaneously every 3 days beginning from day 16 in the scruff of the neck at a dose of 25 mg/kg of body weight (80 to 150 µl/mouse). Individual mice were weighed prior to each injection.

Statistical methods. All data were analyzed by using GraphPad Prism software (San Diego, Calif.). Frequencies were obtained from the cell number at which 63% of the wells scored positive for either reactivating virus or the presence of viral genome based on Poisson distribution. Data were subjected to nonlinear regression analysis to obtain the single-cell frequency for each limiting-dilution analysis. The frequencies of reactivation and genome-positive cells were statistically analyzed by paired t test. Data from virus neutralization assays were analyzed by using the Mann-Whitney test.


arrow
RESULTS
 
Passive transfer of antiviral antibodies into {gamma}HV68-infected B-cell-/- mice decreases the frequency of cells that reactivate from latency ex vivo. Previous reports showed that acute infection in peritoneal cells and splenocytes is cleared and latency is established by 16 days after infection in B6 (4, 43, 46) and B-cell-/- (48) mice. This was confirmed by the lack of significant preformed infectious virus in mechanically disrupted samples throughout the experiments reported here. To address the role of virus-specific antibody in the regulation of {gamma}HV68 latency, we infected B-cell-/- mice and waited until clearance of acute infection before passively transferring immune or naive mouse serum on days 16, 23, and 30 of infection (Fig. 1, Protocol A). We delayed passive transfer until day 16 to avoid antibody effects on acute infection that might alter {gamma}HV68 latency. On day 42 of infection, we determined the frequency of latently infected cells that reactivated from latency ex vivo. B-cell-/- mice that did not receive any serum served as a control for the administration of nonimmune antiserum.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1. Serum transfer protocol. Groups of B-cell-/- mice were infected with 106 PFU of {gamma}HV68 i.p. and transferred i.p. with serum by following either protocol A (days 16, 23, and 30 p.i.) or protocol B (days 42, 49, and 56 p.i.). Serum recipient B-cell-/- mice and untreated B-cell-/- mice were sacrificed on day 42 or 65 for analysis of latency.

As reported previously (48), the frequency of peritoneal cells reactivating ex vivo from latency in B-cell-/- mice was about 30-fold higher in peritoneal cells (P = 0.0005; Fig. 2A, left panel) and >5-fold higher in spleen (P = 0.008; Fig. 2A, right panel) than in B6 mice. The precise increase in latently infected spleen cells in B-cell-/- mice compared to that in B6 mice could not be determined since the frequency of cells reactivating from latency in B6 splenocytes did not reach a sufficiently high level to allow the application of Poisson statistics.



View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2. {gamma}HV68-specific antibody transfer decreases the frequency of ex vivo reactivation and genome-positive cells. {gamma}HV68-infected B-cell-/- mice were transferred with mouse serum (naive or {gamma}HV68-immune) by using transfer protocol A (A) or rabbit serum (preimmune or {gamma}HV68-immune) by using transfer protocol B (B) (Fig. 1). Control B6 and B-cell-/- mice did not receive any serum. Peritoneal cells (PEC) and splenocytes (Spleen) were harvested at 42 days p.i. (panel A) or 65 days p.i. (panel B) for quantitation of the frequency of cells reactivating from latency. (C) Continuous lines with filled symbols represent reactivation cultures to which immune serum was added at a 1:500 dilution; dashed lines with open symbols represent reactivation cultures to which immune serum was added at a 1:50 dilution. Preimmune and immune refer to in vivo treatment; in vitro immune refers to serum added to the ex vivo reactivation assay. Data represent the results from two separate experiments (mean ± standard error of the mean), with each experiment containing cells pooled from five mice.

Strikingly, peritoneal cells from B-cell-/- mice given immune serum showed a >100-fold decrease in the frequency of cells reactivating from latency (Fig. 2A, left panel) compared to that of the B-cell-/- mice given naive mouse serum (P = 0.0001) or untreated B-cell-/- mice (P = 0.0001). Splenocytes from the same mice showed a >10-fold decrease in cells reactivating from latency in mice given immune serum (Fig. 2A, right panel) compared to that in the mice given naive serum (P = 0.008) or untreated B-cell-/- mice (P = 0.009).

We confirmed these results obtained with mouse antiserum by using polyclonal anti-{gamma}HV68 antiserum from rabbits (47) (Fig. 1, Protocol B, and 2B). {gamma}HV68-infected B-cell-/- mice were treated with either preimmune or {gamma}HV68-immune rabbit serum, and the frequency of peritoneal cells and splenocytes reactivating from latency was determined 65 days after infection. As shown in Fig. 2B (left panel), peritoneal cells from {gamma}HV68-immune serum recipient mice showed a >100-fold decreased reactivation in peritoneal cells compared to that found in the mice given preimmune serum (P = 0.0001) or untreated B-cell-/- mice (P = 0.0001). Splenocytes from the same mice showed a >5-fold decrease in cells reactivating from latency in mice given immune serum (Fig. 2B, right panel) compared to that from the mice given preimmune serum (P = 0.02) or untreated B-cell-/- mice (P = 0.01).

We considered the possibility that decreased reactivation from latency after the passive transfer of antiviral antibody was due to effects of antibody in the ex vivo reactivation assay rather than in vivo effects relevant to the control of viral latency. We viewed this as unlikely since cells were washed extensively prior to coculture with MEFs to detect reactivation from latency. To experimentally address this concern, we tested the effects of anti-{gamma}HV68 antibody added directly to the ex vivo reactivation assay. Direct addition of {gamma}HV68-immune serum (1:500 or 1:50 dilution) in vitro to the reactivation cultures did not alter the frequency of cells reactivating from latency compared to that of the reactivation cultures with no antiserum added (Fig. 2C).

Antiviral antibody decreases the frequency of cells that carry the viral genome in B-cell-/- mice. Changes in the frequency of cells reactivating ex vivo from latency may be due to changes in the frequency of latently infected cells or changes in the efficiency with which cells reactivate from latency in ex vivo reactivation cultures (38). We therefore determined the effects of antiviral antibody on the frequency of cells carrying the viral genome by using a limiting-dilution PCR assay.

While the frequency of spleen cells carrying the latent viral genome was comparable in B6 and B-cell-/- mice (Fig. 3, right panel), peritoneal cells from B-cell-/- mice had fivefold more cells carrying the latent viral genome than the peritoneal cells from B6 mice (P = 0.054; Fig. 3, left panel). This is in agreement with a previous report on the frequency of cells carrying the viral genome in latently infected mice (48). The decrease in the frequency of cells reactivating from latency was associated with a >50-fold decrease in the frequency of peritoneal cells carrying the latent viral genome in mice given immune mouse serum (Fig. 3, left panel) compared to that in the mice given naive serum (P = 0.014) or untreated B-cell-/- mice (P = 0.006). The frequency of splenocytes carrying the viral genome was decreased >5-fold by the transfer of immune mouse serum (Fig. 3, right panel) compared to that of the transfer of naive serum (P = 0.02) or untreated B-cell-/- mice (P = 0.03). Similar to the results found with the transfer of mouse serum, transfer of immune rabbit serum decreased the frequency of genome-positive cells compared to that in either the preimmune serum-treated or untreated B-cell-/- mice (data not shown). These data show that passive transfer of immune serum dramatically decreased the frequency of cells carrying the latent viral genome.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3. {gamma}HV68-specific antibody transfer decreases the frequency of genome-positive cells. Groups of B-cell-/- mice were infected with 106 PFU of {gamma}HV68 and transferred with naive or {gamma}HV68-immune mouse serum by using transfer protocol A (Fig. 1). Control B6 and B-cell-/- mice did not receive any serum. Peritoneal cells (PEC) and splenocytes (Spleen) were harvested at day 42 p.i. for quantitation of the frequency of latently infected cells. Data represent the results from two separate experiments (mean ± standard error of the mean), with each experiment containing cells pooled from five mice.

Effects of antibody on latency occur at physiologically relevant antibody concentrations. To determine whether the effects of antibody we observed occurred at physiologically relevant antibody concentrations, we analyzed donor and recipient antibody levels. Analysis of the transferred serum for total IgG and virus-specific IgG by ELISA showed that the transferred (100 µl) mouse and rabbit serum contained similar concentrations of total IgG and virus-specific IgG (Table 1). These antibody concentrations are the physiologic levels seen in mice or rabbits that have recovered from {gamma}HV68 infection. Analysis of serum from recipient B-cell-/- mice terminated at day 42 or 65 p.i. showed that both total IgG and virus-specific IgG were detectable. Comparison of antibody concentrations in the serum of normal mice after infection to concentrations in B-cell-/- recipients of immune serum showed that there was 30-fold less total IgG and 10- to 12-fold less {gamma}HV68-specific IgG in recipients of passively transferred antiserum than that observed in normal mice after infection (Table 1). These data show that the effects of the passive transfer of antiviral antibody on viral latency observed in B-cell-/- mice occur at antibody concentrations that are <10% of those observed in normal mice after infection.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1. Concentration of total IgG and virus-specific IgG in mouse and rabbit sera before and after transfer to B cell-/- mice

Antibodies specific to a {gamma}HV68-lytic antigen regulate the frequency of latently infected cells in B-cell-/- mice. To determine the antigen specificity of the anti-{gamma}HV68 antibody that regulated latency, polyclonal rabbit sera specific for the {gamma}HV68 lytic cycle protein v-RCA (expressed on the virion surface [see below], on the infected cell surface [19], and as a soluble form [19]), the lytic cycle protein v-cyclin (expressed intracellularly) (43), and the latent {gamma}HV68 protein M2 (expressed intracellularly in latent cells) (14, 16) were used for passive-transfer experiments. Groups of {gamma}HV68-infected B-cell-/- mice were given antiserum on days 16, 23, and 30 p.i. (Fig. 1, Protocol A). B-cell-/- mice that received preimmune rabbit serum or the polyclonal {gamma}HV68-immune rabbit serum served as the control groups. Peritoneal cells and splenocytes were harvested on day 42 p.i., and the frequency of ex vivo reactivation and genome-bearing cells was determined. Interestingly, v-RCA-specific serum recipient B-cell-/- mice showed a frequency of reactivating peritoneal cells >100-fold lower (P = 0.0001; Fig. 4A, left panel) than that for mice receiving preimmune serum, M2-specific antiserum, or v-cyclin-specific antiserum. Splenocytes from the same mice showed a >5-fold decrease in cells reactivating from latency in mice given v-RCA-specific antiserum (Fig. 4A, right panel) compared to that in mice given preimmune serum (P = 0.012), M2-specific antiserum (P = 0.017), or v-cyclin-specific antiserum (P = 0.014). Also, the v-RCA-specific antiserum recipient B-cell-/- mice showed a >50-fold decreased frequency of genome-bearing peritoneal cells (P = 0.0001; Fig. 4B, left panel) compared to that for the mice that received preimmune serum, M2-specific antiserum, or v-cyclin-specific antiserum. The frequency of splenocytes carrying the viral genome was decreased >5-fold by the transfer of v-RCA-specific antiserum (Fig. 4B, right panel) compared to that by the transfer of preimmune serum (P = 0.021), M2-specific antiserum (P = 0.034), or v-cyclin-specific antiserum (P = 0.043).



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4. Antibody to a viral lytic cycle protein regulates the frequency of genome-positive cells and ex vivo reactivation. Groups of B-cell-/- mice were infected with 106 PFU of {gamma}HV68 and given preimmune serum, {gamma}HV68-specific antiserum, or {gamma}HV68 protein-specific antiserum by following transfer protocol A (Fig. 1). Peritoneal cells (PEC) and splenocytes (Spleen) were harvested at 42 days p.i. for quantitation of the frequency of cells reactivating virus (A) and the frequency of latently infected cells (B). Data represent the results from two experiments (mean ± standard error of the mean), with each experiment containing cells pooled from five mice.

We characterized the antisera for specific viral proteins in neutralization assays to determine whether the target proteins were expressed on the virion. {gamma}HV68-specific antiserum and RCA-specific antiserum efficiently neutralized {gamma}HV68 (Fig. 5). Virus neutralization occurred at equivalent levels with {gamma}HV68-specific antiserum (P = 0.0002 at a 1:100 dilution and P = 0.0004 at a 1:10,000 dilution) and v-RCA-specific antiserum (P = 0.0003 at a 1:100 dilution and P = 0.0002 at a 1:10,000 dilution) compared to that with preimmune serum (Fig. 5). Virus neutralization by anti-RCA protein antibody was protein specific since a v-RCA protein-deficient virus ({gamma}HV68-RCA-stop) (18) was not neutralized by the anti-RCA polyclonal antiserum but rather was neutralized by polyclonal anti-{gamma}HV68 antiserum (Fig. 5). These data show that the {gamma}HV68 RCA protein is present on the surface of the virion, as well as on infected cells and in a secreted form (19).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 5. {gamma}HV68-specific antibody and v-RCA-specific antibodies neutralize lytic virus in vitro. {gamma}HV68 virus was incubated with dilutions of antibody and plaque assayed. As a positive control, wild-type {gamma}HV68 was incubated with rabbit antiserum generated to {gamma}HV68 (47). As a negative control, a {gamma}HV68 RCA protein-deficient virus was incubated with rabbit antiserum generated to recombinant {gamma}HV68 RCA protein. Percent neutralization was measured based on virus titer in samples containing no antibody. Data (mean ± standard error of the mean) represent the results from two independent experiments.

Antiviral therapy decreases the frequency of viral genome-positive cells in B-cell-/- mice. The above data show that antibody can effectively limit the frequency of latently infected cells in B-cell-/- mice and that antibody specific for a lytic cycle protein is effective in this role. Since previous work demonstrated replicative linear forms of {gamma}HV68 genome in lungs of {gamma}HV68-infected B-cell-/- mice 8 weeks after infection (33) and we have noted persistent replication in arteritic lesions in these mice (unpublished observations), these data suggest a model in which antibody to a lytic cycle protein can decrease the frequency of latently infected cells by breaking a cycle in which lytic replication contributes to the pool of latently infected cells in B-cell-/- mice. If this is the case, then interruption of lytic replication with a viral DNA synthesis inhibitor should decrease the frequency of cells carrying latent viral genome in B-cell-/- mice. Treatment with the antiviral drug 4'-S-EtdU can delay the establishment of latency (1), providing further support for this hypothesis. To test this prediction, {gamma}HV68-infected B-cell-/- mice were treated with either cidofovir or PBS by following a previously established protocol (6, 8). The dose of cidofovir selected effectively inhibits viral replication to below-detectable levels, even in SCID mice (8). Interestingly, peritoneal cells from cidofovir-treated mice (Fig. 6, left panel) showed a >10-fold decrease in the frequency of viral genome-positive cells compared to the frequency of these cells in PBS-treated mice (P = 0.014). Although the splenocytes in the same experiments (Fig. 6, right panel) showed a decrease in the frequency of viral-genome-positive cells from cidofovir-treated mice, this difference did not reach statistical significance compared to that for the PBS control (P = 0.057). These results suggest that inhibition of virus replication leads to a decrease in genome-positive cells in B-cell-/- mice.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 6. Antiviral therapy decreases the frequency of viral genome-positive cells in B-cell-/- mice. Groups of B-cell-/- mice were infected with 106 PFU of {gamma}HV68 and treated with either cidofovir or PBS as described in Materials and Methods. Peritoneal cells (PEC) and splenocytes (Spleen) were harvested at 42 days p.i. for quantitation of the frequency of latently infected cells. Data represent the results from two experiments (mean ± standard error of the mean), with each experiment containing cells pooled from five mice.


arrow
DISCUSSION
 
Previous studies have demonstrated the kinetics of humoral immune response to {gamma}HV68 (30, 31) and that B cells play a critical role in regulating {gamma}HV68 latency (46, 48). However, the mechanisms by which B cells regulate latency are not known. Results from this study provide one such mechanism via demonstration that {gamma}HV68-specific antibody can significantly decrease the frequency of latently infected cells found in the spleen and peritoneum of B-cell-/- mice. This confirms the findings of Kim et al. made in CD28-/- mice by demonstrating that antibody can play a key role in the control of gammaherpesvirus latency (21). We further demonstrated that the antibody specific for a late-lytic {gamma}HV68 protein, v-RCA, decreased the frequency of latently infected cells, suggesting that antibody works by interacting with virions or productively infected cells. This in turn suggests that ongoing or sporadic productive infection plays an important part in the maintenance of high frequencies of latently infected cells in B-cell-/- mice. Consistent with this model, inhibition of productive infection with an antiviral drug also decreased the frequency of latently infected cells. These studies demonstrating a role for antibody in controlling latency under these experimental conditions provide a strong rationale for investigating the role of antibody in the control of latency and vaccination against latency.

Mechanism of antibody-mediated control of {gamma}HV68 latency. The frequency of cells latently infected with gammaherpesviruses in vivo likely reflects a balance between viral factors and host immunity. However, the contribution of individual host factors to this balance is not yet fully understood. The {gamma}HV68-specific humoral response is slow to develop but is maintained at high levels for a long period of time (30, 31). We hypothesized that antibody might play a role in the maintenance of gammaherpesvirus latency and used the passive transfer of antibody to demonstrate that antibody can play a very significant role in limiting the number of cells that are latently infected, at least in B-cell-/- mice.

Several viral genes (4, 16, 43) and host factors (38, 40, 48) regulate {gamma}HV68 latency in infected mice. The immune system may control gammaherpesvirus infection at multiple levels, including in altering the frequency of cells carrying the viral genome during latency and/or altering the efficiency with which latently infected cells reactivate in ex vivo cultures (12, 38, 48). Alterations in both the latently infected cell number and the efficiency of reactivation from latency are observed in CD8-/- and gamma interferon-/- mice (12, 38). Since the frequencies of both ex vivo reactivation (>100-fold for peritoneal cells) and viral genome-positive cells (>50-fold for peritoneal cells) are changed with the passive transfer of immune serum in B-cell-/- mice, a significant contributor to the antibody-mediated decrease in the frequency of cells reactivating from latency is a decrease in the number of genome-positive cells rather than the change in efficiency of ex vivo reactivation.

How then does antibody control the frequency of latently infected cells? The antigen specificity of antiviral antibody that can decrease the frequency of latently infected cells is informative. Antibody specific for the v-RCA protein, a lytic cycle protein that is expressed on the surface of infected cells, in a soluble isoform, and on the surface of virions (19), was as effective as polyclonal antibody at decreasing the frequency of latently infected cells. Studies using in situ hybridization failed to detect expression of the v-RCA transcript during latency (27). Thus, the most likely explanation for the effectiveness of antibody to the v-RCA protein in controlling latency is the inhibition of lytic cycle replication in B-cell-/- mice. This hypothesis requires that ongoing virus replication contributes significantly to the high levels of latently infected cells observed in B-cell-/- mice.

It is also possible that antibody to the v-RCA protein altered latency by interacting with the soluble isoform of the v-RCA protein or by altering the nature of antiviral immunity via blocking the complement regulatory effects of the v-RCA protein. We view this as unlikely since the effects of antibody on latency are in the 100-fold range, while the effects of complement factor 3 deficiency on latency are fivefold (18). However, this led us to test the hypothesis that inhibition of lytic cycle infection decreases the frequency of latently infected cells by using an antibody-independent approach. Use of an antiviral drug for this purpose was supported by the findings of Barnes et al., which demonstrated that antiviral therapy with 4'-S-EtdU inhibits {gamma}HV68 replication in the lung and delays the establishment of latency (1). We selected the antiviral drug cidofovir for this purpose, since it has proven efficacy in limiting {gamma}HV68 replication in vivo during both acute and chronic infection (8, 23). Consistent with a critical role for ongoing productive infection in maintaining high levels of latently infected cells in B-cell-/- mice, treatment with cidofovir significantly decreased the frequency of peritoneal cells carrying viral genome in B-cell-/- mice. However, cidofovir treatment was less effective in limiting latency in the spleen, with decreases in splenic latency not reaching statistical significance. Differences in the efficacy of antibody versus cidofovir in the spleen (with antibody more effective) could be due to several factors. It may be that cidofovir is less bioavailable in the spleen than the peritoneum or that it is more effective at controlling replication in peritoneal than splenic cells.

It is notable that lytic cycle replication occurs in B-cell-/- mice for long periods after initial infection (33, 47) but that lytic replication is restricted to specific tissues once acute infection is cleared. Thus, while preformed infectious virus is not found in the spleen or peritoneum of B-cell-/- mice by using very sensitive limiting-dilution culture assays on MEF monolayers or reverse transcription-PCR assays specific for lytic cycle viral transcripts (44, 48), lytic replication is present in the media of the great vessels and in the lungs of chronically infected B-cell-/- mice (33, 47; unpublished observations). It is tempting to speculate that antibody decreases the frequency of latently infected cells in the spleen and peritoneum by limiting lytic replication elsewhere or by preventing the trafficking of virus or virus-infected cells from sites of productive replication to sites at which we measured latency.

Does antibody control latency in normal mice? This study only addresses the role of antibody in B-cell-/- mice. We believe that these findings can be generalized for two reasons. First, the effects of passively transferred antibody on latency were detected when concentrations of both total and virus-specific antibody in recipients of immune serum were less than 10% of those observed in normal mice during latent infection. This strongly suggests that the concentration of antiviral antibody present in a normal host is sufficient to play a role in limiting the frequency of latently infected cells. Second, multiple studies show that T cells specific for lytic {gamma}HV68 antigens are continuously activated during latent {gamma}HV68 infection (2, 11, 13, 27, 29, 30). This suggests that there may be an ongoing productive infection in normal mice at a level too low to be detected by present assays. This could provide a target for the antibody-mediated control of viral latency. We would therefore predict that antibody plays at least some role in the control of {gamma}HV68 latency in normal mice. It is important to note, however, that we did not eliminate latent cells by the passive transfer of antibody to B-cell-/- mice and that latency persists in normal mice despite high levels of antibody. This suggests that there are reservoirs of latency not accessible to control by antibody. For example, since latently infected B cells are present in normal mice but absent in the B-cell-/- mice used here, it may be that B cells contribute to an antibody-resistant form of latency in normal mice.

B cells and {gamma}HV68 latent infection. B cells are important during acute, chronic, and latent {gamma}HV68 infection (33, 41, 46-48). Does the finding that antibody can regulate latency in B-cell-/- mice explain all of the alterations in {gamma}HV68 pathogenesis and latency observed in these mice? We believe the answer is likely no. First, B cells might contribute to the pathogenesis of {gamma}HV68 infection by providing a vehicle for spread throughout the host (33), a function perhaps not duplicated by immune antibody. Second, B cells might contribute to the regulation of {gamma}HV68 latency via the presentation of antigen to T cells (17, 26). For example, B cells are critical for the induction of Vß4-bearing CD8+ T cells during {gamma}HV68 infection (3, 5, 10, 39). While the physiologic role of these T cells is not known, this is likely a function of B cells per se rather than of secreted antibody (3). For these reasons, it is important to note that antibody is only one mechanism by which B cells contribute to the control of latent {gamma}HV68 infection. Our findings do not rule out additional antibody-independent roles of B cells in gammaherpesvirus pathogenesis and immunity.


arrow
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
H.W.V. was supported by grant RPG-97-134-01-MBC from the American Cancer Society and NIH grants CA96511, CA74730, and HL60090. S.H.S. was supported by NIH grants CA43143, CA52004, CA58524, and CA74730. S.G. was supported by PHS grant AI071623-23, and S.B.K. was supported by a predoctoral training grant in tumor immunology from the Cancer Research Institute.

We thank members of the laboratories of H.W.V. and S.H.S. and also David Leib and Lynda Morrison for constructive comments on this research. Helpful comments on this report were made by Scott A. Tibbetts, Rebecca L. Sparks-Thissen, Douglas Braaten, and Eric Barton.


arrow
FOOTNOTES
 
* Corresponding author. Mailing address for Samuel H. Speck: Division of Microbiology and Immunology, Yerkes Regional Primate Research Center, Emory University, 954 Gatewood Rd., NE, Atlanta, GA 30329. Phone: (404) 727-7665. Fax: (404) 727-7768. E-mail: sspeck{at}rmy.emory.edu. Mailing address for Herbert W. Virgin IV: Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8118, 660 South Euclid Ave., Saint Louis, MO 63110. Phone: (314) 362-9223. Fax: (314) 362-4096. Mailing address for Herbert W. Virgin IV: Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8118, 660 South Euclid Ave., Saint Louis, MO 63110. Phone: (314) 362-9223. Fax: (314) 362-4096. E-mail: virgin{at}immunology.wustl.edu. Back


arrow
REFERENCES
 
    1
  1. Barnes, A., H. Dyson, N. P. Sunil-Chandra, P. Collins, and A. A. Nash. 1999. 2'-Deoxy-5-ethyl-beta-4'-thiouridine inhibits replication of murine gammaherpesvirus and delays the onset of virus latency. Antivir. Chem. Chemother. 10:321-326.[Medline]
    2. 2
  2. Belz, G. T., and P. C. Doherty. 2001. Virus-specific and bystander CD8+ T-cell proliferation in the acute and persistent phases of a gammaherpesvirus infection. J. Virol. 75:4435-4438.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    3. 3
  3. Brooks, J. W., A. M. Hamilton-Easton, J. P. Christensen, R. D. Cardin, C. L. Hardy, and P. C. Doherty. 1999. Requirement for CD40 ligand, CD4+ T cells, and B cells in an infectious mononucleosis-like syndrome. J. Virol. 73:9650-9654.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    4. 4
  4. Clambey, E. T., H. W. Virgin IV, and S. H. Speck. 2000. Disruption of the murine gammaherpesvirus 68 M1 open reading frame leads to enhanced reactivation from latency. J. Virol. 74:1973-1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    5. 5
  5. Coppola, M. A., E. Flano, P. Nguyen, C. L. Hardy, R. D. Cardin, N. Shastri, D. L. Woodland, and M. A. Blackman. 1999. Apparent MHC-independent stimulation of CD8+ T cells in vivo during latent murine gammaherpesvirus infection. J. Immunol. 163:1481-1489.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    6. 6
  6. Dal Canto, A. J., P. E. Swanson, A. K. O'Guin, S. H. Speck, and H. W. Virgin. 2001. IFN-gamma action in the media of the great elastic arteries, a novel immunoprivileged site. J. Clin. Investig. 107:R15-R22.[CrossRef]
    7. 7
  7. Dal Canto, A. J., and H. W. Virgin IV. 2000. Animal models of infection-mediated vasculitis: implications for human disease. Int. J. Cardiol. 75(Suppl. 1):S37-S45.
    8. 8
  8. Dal Canto, A. J., H. W. Virgin IV, and S. H. Speck. 2000. Ongoing viral replication is required for gammaherpesvirus 68-induced vascular damage. J. Virol. 74:11304-11310.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    9. 9
  9. Flano, E., S. M. Husain, J. T. Sample, D. L. Woodland, and M. A. Blackman. 2000. Latent murine gamma-herpesvirus infection is established in activated B cells, dendritic cells, and macrophages. J. Immunol. 165:1074-1081.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    10. 10
  10. Flano, E., D. L. Woodland, and M. A. Blackman. 1999. Requirement for CD4+ T cells in V beta 4+CD8+ T cell activation associated with latent murine gammaherpesvirus infection. J. Immunol. 163:3403-3408.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    11. 11
  11. Flaño, E., D. L. Woodland, M. A. Blackman, and P. C. Doherty. 2001. Analysis of virus-specific CD4+ T cells during long-term gammaherpesvirus infection. J. Virol. 75:7744-7748.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    12. 12
  12. Gangappa, S., L. F. Van Dyk, T. J. Jewett, S. H. Speck, and H. W. Virgin IV. 2002. Identification of the in vivo role of a viral bcl-2. J. Exp. Med. 195:931-940.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    13. 13
  13. Hamilton-Easton, A. M., J. P. Christensen, and P. C. Doherty. 1999. Turnover of T cells in murine gammaherpesvirus 68-infected mice. J. Virol. 73:7866-7869.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    14. 14
  14. Husain, S. M., E. J. Usherwood, H. Dyson, C. Coleclough, M. A. Coppola, D. L. Woodland, M. A. Blackman, J. P. Stewart, and J. T. Sample. 1999. Murine gammaherpesvirus M2 gene is latency-associated and its protein a target for CD8(+) T lymphocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:7508-7513.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    15. 15
  15. Isaacs, S. N., G. J. Kotwal, and B. Moss. 1992. Vaccinia virus complement-control protein prevents antibody-dependent complement-enhanced neutralization of infectivity and contributes to virulence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:628-632.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    16. 16
  16. Jacoby, M. A., H. W. Virgin IV, and S. H. Speck. 2002. Disruption of the M2 gene of murine gammaherpesvirus 68 alters splenic latency following intranasal, but not intraperitoneal, inoculation. J. Virol. 76:1790-1801.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    17. 17
  17. Janeway, C. A., Jr., J. Ron, and M. E. Katz. 1987. The B cell is the initiating antigen-presenting cell in peripheral lymph nodes. J. Immunol. 138:1051-1055.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    18. 18
  18. Kapadia, S. B., B. Levine, S. H. Speck, and H. W. Virgin IV. 2000. Critical role of complement and viral evasion of complement in acute, persistent, and latent gamma-herpesvirus infection. Immunity 17:143-155.
    19. 19
  19. Kapadia, S. B., H. Molina, B. van Berkel, V., S. H. Speck, and H. W. Virgin IV. 1999. Murine gammaherpesvirus 68 encodes a functional regulator of complement activation. J. Virol. 73:7658-7670.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    20. 20
  20. Khanna, R., and S. R. Burrows. 2000. Role of cytotoxic T lymphocytes in Epstein-Barr virus-associated diseases. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 54:19-48.[CrossRef][Medline]
    21. 21
  21. Kim, I. J., E. Flano, D. L. Woodland, and M. A. Blackman. 2002. Antibody-mediated control of persistent {gamma}-herpesvirus infection. J. Immunol. 168:3958-3964.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    22. 22
  22. McNearney, T. A., C. Odell, V. M. Holers, P. G. Spear, and J. P. Atkinson. 1987. Herpes simplex virus glycoproteins gC-1 and gC-2 bind to the third component of complement and provide protection against complement-mediated neutralization of viral infectivity. J. Exp. Med. 166:1525-1535.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    23. 23
  23. Neyts, J., and C. E. De. 1998. In vitro and in vivo inhibition of murine gamma herpesvirus 68 replication by selected antiviral agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 42:170-172.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    24. 24
  24. Polic, B., H. Hengel, A. Krmpotic, J. Trgovcich, I. Pavic, P. Luccaronin, S. Jonjic, and U. H. Koszinowski. 1998. Hierarchical and redundant lymphocyte subset control precludes cytomegalovirus replication during latent infection. J. Exp. Med. 188:1047-1054.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    25. 25
  25. Roizman, B. 1996. Herpesviridae, p. 2221-2230. In B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology. Lippincott-Raven Publishers, Philadelphia, Pa.
    26. 26
  26. Ron, Y., and J. Sprent. 1987. T cell priming in vivo: a major role for B cells in presenting antigen to T cells in lymph nodes. J. Immunol. 138:2848-2856.[Abstract]
    27. 27
  27. Simas, J. P., D. Swann, R. Bowden, and S. Efstathiou. 1999. Analysis of murine gammaherpesvirus-68 transcription during lytic and latent infection. J. Gen. Virol. 80:75-82.[Abstract]
    28. 28
  28. Speck, S. H., and H. W. Virgin. 1999. Host and viral genetics of chronic infection: a mouse model of gamma-herpesvirus pathogenesis. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2:403-409.[CrossRef][Medline]
    29. 29
  29. Stevenson, P. G., G. T. Belz, J. D. Altman, and P. C. Doherty. 1999. Changing patterns of dominance in the CD8+ T cell response during acute and persistent murine gamma-herpesvirus infection. Eur. J. Immunol. 29:1059-1067.[CrossRef][Medline]
    30. 30
  30. Stevenson, P. G., and P. C. Doherty. 1998. Kinetic analysis of the specific host response to a murine gammaherpesvirus. J. Virol. 72:943-949.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    31. 31
  31. Stevenson, P. G., and P. C. Doherty. 1999. Non-antigen-specific B-cell activation following murine gammaherpesvirus infection is CD4 independent in vitro but CD4 dependent in vivo. J. Virol. 73:1075-1079.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    32. 32
  32. Stewart, J. P. 1999. Of mice and men: murine gammaherpesvirus 68 as a model. Epstein-Barr Virus Rep. 6:31-35.
    33. 33
  33. Stewart, J. P., E. J. Usherwood, A. Ross, H. Dyson, and T. Nash. 1998. Lung epithelial cells are a major site of murine gammaherpesvirus persistence. J. Exp. Med. 187:1941-1951.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    34. 34
  34. Sunil-Chandra, N. P., J. Arno, J. Fazakerley, and A. A. Nash. 1994. Lymphoproliferative disease in mice infected with murine gammaherpesvirus 68. Am. J. Pathol. 145:818-826.[Abstract]
    35. 35
  35. Sunil-Chandra, N. P., S. Efstathiou, J. Arno, and A. A. Nash. 1992. Virological and pathological features of mice infected with murine gammaherpesvirus 68. J. Gen. Virol. 73:2347-2356.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    36. 36
  36. Sunil-Chandra, N. P., S. Efstathiou, and A. A. Nash. 1992. Murine gammaherpesvirus 68 establishes a latent infection in mouse B lymphocytes in vivo. J. Gen. Virol. 73:3275-3279.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    37. 37
  37. Taylor, T. J., M. A. Brockman, E. E. McNamee, and D. M. Knipe. 2002. Herpes simplex virus. Front. Biosci. 7:D752-D764.
    38. 38
  38. Tibbetts, S. A., L. F. van Dyk, S. H. Speck, and H. W. Virgin IV. 2002. Immune control of the number and reactivation phenotype of cells latently infected with a gammaherpesvirus. J. Virol. 76:7125-7132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    39. 39
  39. Tripp, R. A., A. M. Hamilton-Easton, R. D. Cardin, P. Nguyen, F. G. Behm, D. L. Woodland, P. C. Doherty, and M. A. Blackman. 1997. Pathogenesis of an infectious mononucleosis-like disease induced by a murine gamma-herpesvirus: role for a viral superantigen? J. Exp. Med. 185:1641-1650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    40. 40
  40. Usherwood, E. J., D. J. Roy, K. Ward, S. L. Surman, B. M. Dutia, M. A. Blackman, J. P. Stewart, and D. L. Woodland. 2000. Control of gammaherpesvirus latency by latent antigen-specific CD8(+) T cells. J. Exp. Med. 192:943-952.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    41. 41
  41. Usherwood, E. J., J. P. Stewart, K. Robertson, D. J. Allen, and A. A. Nash. 1996. Absence of splenic latency in murine gammaherpesvirus 68-infected B cell-deficient mice. J. Gen. Virol. 77:2819-2825.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    42. 42
  42. van Dyk, L. F., J. L. Hess, J. D. Katz, M. Jacoby, S. H. Speck, and H. W. Virgin IV. 1999. The murine gammaherpesvirus 68 v-cyclin is an oncogene that promotes cell cycle progression in primary lymphocytes. J. Virol. 73:5110-5122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    43. 43
  43. van Dyk, L. F., H. W. Virgin IV, and S. H. Speck. 2000. The murine gammaherpesvirus 68 v-cyclin is a critical regulator of reactivation from latency. J. Virol. 74:7451-7461.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    44. 44
  44. Virgin, H. W., IV, R. M. Presti, X.-Y. Li, C. Liu, and S. H. Speck. 1999. Three distinct regions of the murine gammaherpesvirus 68 genome are transcriptionally active in latently infected mice. J. Virol. 73:2321-2332.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    45. 45
  45. Virgin, H. W., and S. H. Speck. 1999. Unraveling immunity to gamma-herpesviruses: a new model for understanding the role of immunity in chronic virus infection. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11:371-379.[CrossRef][Medline]
    46. 46
  46. Weck, K. E., M. L. Barkon, L. I. Yoo, S. H. Speck, and H. W. Virgin IV. 1996. Mature B cells are required for acute splenic infection, but not for establishment of latency, by murine gammaherpesvirus 68. J. Virol. 70:6775-6780.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    47. 47
  47. Weck, K. E., A. J. Dal Canto, J. D. Gould, A. K. O'Guin, K. A. Roth, J. E. Saffitz, S. H. Speck, and H. W. Virgin. 1997. Murine gamma-herpesvirus 68 causes severe large-vessel arteritis in mice lacking interferon-gamma responsiveness: a new model for virus-induced vascular disease. Nat. Med. 3:1346-1353.[CrossRef][Medline]
    48. 48
  48. Weck, K. E., S. S. Kim, H. W. Virgin IV, and S. H. Speck. 1999. B cells regulate murine gammaherpesvirus 68 latency. J. Virol. 73:4651-4661.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
    49. 49
  49. Weck, K. E., S. S. Kim, H. W. Virgin IV, and S. H. Speck. 1999. Macrophages are the major reservoir of latent murine gammaherpesvirus 68 in peritoneal cells. J. Virol. 73:3273-3283.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Journal of Virology, November 2002, p. 11460-11468, Vol. 76, No. 22
0022-538X/02/$04.00+0     DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.22.11460-11468.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Wright, D. E., Colaco, S., Colaco, C., Stevenson, P. G. (2009). Antibody limits in vivo murid herpesvirus-4 replication by IgG Fc receptor-dependent functions. J. Gen. Virol. 90: 2592-2603 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Stevenson, P. G., Simas, J. P., Efstathiou, S. (2009). Immune control of mammalian gamma-herpesviruses: lessons from murid herpesvirus-4. J. Gen. Virol. 90: 2317-2330 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Flach, B., Steer, B., Thakur, N. N., Haas, J., Adler, H. (2009). The M10 Locus of Murine Gammaherpesvirus 68 Contributes to both the Lytic and the Latent Phases of Infection. J. Virol. 83: 8163-8172 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Krug, L. T., Collins, C. M., Gargano, L. M., Speck, S. H. (2009). NF-{kappa}B p50 Plays Distinct Roles in the Establishment and Control of Murine Gammaherpesvirus 68 Latency. J. Virol. 83: 4732-4748 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Stapler, D., Lee, E. D., Selvaraj, S. A., Evans, A. G., Kean, L. S., Speck, S. H., Larsen, C. P., Gangappa, S. (2008). Expansion of Effector Memory TCR V{beta}4+CD8+ T Cells Is Associated with Latent Infection-Mediated Resistance to Transplantation Tolerance. J. Immunol. 180: 3190-3200 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tarakanova, V. L., Kreisel, F., White, D. W., Virgin, H. W. IV (2008). Murine Gammaherpesvirus 68 Genes both Induce and Suppress Lymphoproliferative Disease. J. Virol. 82: 1034-1039 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kayhan, B., Yager, E. J., Lanzer, K., Cookenham, T., Jia, Q., Wu, T.-T., Woodland, D. L., Sun, R., Blackman, M. A. (2007). A Replication-Deficient Murine {gamma}-Herpesvirus Blocked in Late Viral Gene Expression Can Establish Latency and Elicit Protective Cellular Immunity. J. Immunol. 179: 8392-8402 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Cush, S. S., Anderson, K. M., Ravneberg, D. H., Weslow-Schmidt, J. L., Flano, E. (2007). Memory Generation and Maintenance of CD8+ T Cell Function during Viral Persistence. J. Immunol. 179: 141-153 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Mora, A. L., Torres-Gonzalez, E., Rojas, M., Xu, J., Ritzenthaler, J., Speck, S. H., Roman, J., Brigham, K., Stecenko, A. (2007). Control of Virus Reactivation Arrests Pulmonary Herpesvirus-induced Fibrosis in IFN-{gamma} Receptor-deficient Mice. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 175: 1139-1150 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kim, I.-J., Burkum, C. E., Cookenham, T., Schwartzberg, P. L., Woodland, D. L., Blackman, M. A. (2007). Perturbation of B Cell Activation in SLAM-Associated Protein-Deficient Mice Is Associated with Changes in Gammaherpesvirus Latency Reservoirs. J. Immunol. 178: 1692-1701 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gillet, L., May, J. S., Colaco, S., Stevenson, P. G. (2007). Glycoprotein L Disruption Reveals Two Functional Forms of the Murine Gammaherpesvirus 68 Glycoprotein H. J. Virol. 81: 280-291 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gillet, L., Gill, M. B., Colaco, S., Smith, C. M., Stevenson, P. G. (2006). Murine gammaherpesvirus-68 glycoprotein B presents a difficult neutralization target to monoclonal antibodies derived from infected mice. J. Gen. Virol. 87: 3515-3527 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Gill, M. B., Gillet, L., Colaco, S., May, J. S., de Lima, B. D., Stevenson, P. G. (2006). Murine gammaherpesvirus-68 glycoprotein H-glycoprotein L complex is a major target for neutralizing monoclonal antibodies. J. Gen. Virol. 87: 1465-1475 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Moser, J. M., Farrell, M. L., Krug, L. T., Upton, J. W., Speck, S. H. (2006). A Gammaherpesvirus 68 Gene 50 Null Mutant Establishes Long-Term Latency in the Lung but Fails To Vaccinate against a Wild-Type Virus Challenge. J. Virol. 80: 1592-1598 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Steed, A. L., Barton, E. S., Tibbetts, S. A., Popkin, D. L., Lutzke, M. L., Rochford, R., Virgin, H. W. IV (2006). Gamma Interferon Blocks Gammaherpesvirus Reactivation from Latency. J. Virol. 80: 192-200 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tarakanova, V. L., Suarez, F., Tibbetts, S. A., Jacoby, M. A., Weck, K. E., Hess, J. L., Speck, S. H., Virgin, H. W. IV (2005). Murine Gammaherpesvirus 68 Infection Is Associated with Lymphoproliferative Disease and Lymphoma in BALB {beta}2 Microglobulin-Deficient Mice. J. Virol. 79: 14668-14679 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Barton, E. S., Lutzke, M. L., Rochford, R., Virgin, H. W. IV (2005). Alpha/Beta Interferons Regulate Murine Gammaherpesvirus Latent Gene Expression and Reactivation from Latency. J. Virol. 79: 14149-14160 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Flano, E., Jia, Q., Moore, J., Woodland, D. L., Sun, R., Blackman, M. A. (2005). Early Establishment of {gamma}-Herpesvirus Latency: Implications for Immune Control. J. Immunol. 174: 4972-4978 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Willer, D. O., Speck, S. H. (2005). Establishment and Maintenance of Long-Term Murine Gammaherpesvirus 68 Latency in B Cells in the Absence of CD40. J. Virol. 79: 2891-2899 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Braaten, D. C., Sparks-Thissen, R. L., Kreher, S., Speck, S. H., Virgin, H. W. IV (2005). An Optimized CD8+ T-Cell Response Controls Productive and Latent Gammaherpesvirus Infection. J. Virol. 79: 2573-2583 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Sparks-Thissen, R. L., Braaten, D. C., Kreher, S., Speck, S. H., Virgin, H. W. IV (2004). An Optimized CD4 T-Cell Response Can Control Productive and Latent Gammaherpesvirus Infection. J. Virol. 78: 6827-6835 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • McClellan, J. S., Tibbetts, S. A., Gangappa, S., Brett, K. A., Virgin, H. W. IV (2004). Critical Role of CD4 T Cells in an Antibody-Independent Mechanism of Vaccination against Gammaherpesvirus Latency. J. Virol. 78: 6836-6845 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • May, J. S., Coleman, H. M., Smillie, B., Efstathiou, S., Stevenson, P. G. (2004). Forced lytic replication impairs host colonization by a latency-deficient mutant of murine gammaherpesvirus-68. J. Gen. Virol. 85: 137-146 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Kim, I.-J., Flano, E., Woodland, D. L., Lund, F. E., Randall, T. D., Blackman, M. A. (2003). Maintenance of Long Term {gamma}-Herpesvirus B Cell Latency Is Dependent on CD40-Mediated Development of Memory B Cells. J. Immunol. 171: 886-892 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tibbetts, S. A., Loh, J., van Berkel, V., McClellan, J. S., Jacoby, M. A., Kapadia, S. B., Speck, S. H., Virgin, H. W. IV (2003). Establishment and Maintenance of Gammaherpesvirus Latency Are Independent of Infective Dose and Route of Infection. J. Virol. 77: 7696-7701 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • van Dyk, L. F., Virgin, H. W. IV, Speck, S. H. (2003). Maintenance of Gammaherpesvirus Latency Requires Viral Cyclin in the Absence of B Lymphocytes. J. Virol. 77: 5118-5126 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Tibbetts, S. A., McClellan, J. S., Gangappa, S., Speck, S. H., Virgin, H. W. IV (2003). Effective Vaccination against Long-Term Gammaherpesvirus Latency. J. Virol. 77: 2522-2529 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gangappa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Virgin, H. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gangappa, S.
Right arrow Articles by Virgin, H. W., IV

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»