Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, January 2002, p. 912-917, Vol. 76, No. 2
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.2.912-917.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Murine Retroviral Pseudotype Virus Containing Hepatitis B Virus Large and Small Surface Antigens Confers Specific Tropism for Primary Human Hepatocytes: a Potential Liver-Specific Targeting System
Vicky M.-H. Sung1 and Michael M. C. Lai1,2*
Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology,1
Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 900332
Received 26 June 2001/
Accepted 9 October 2001

ABSTRACT
We have developed a system for producing murine leukemia virus
(MLV) pseudotyped with human hepatitis B virus (HBV) large (L)
and small (S) surface antigens (HBsAg) for targeting primary
human hepatocytes. Using the MLV(HBV) pseudotype virus containing
a ß-galactosidase reporter gene, we demonstrated that
this pseudotype virus exhibits strict tropism for primary human
hepatocytes, similar to the natural target cell specificity
of HBV. It does not infect any of the established tissue culture
cell lines, including human hepatoma cell lines (HepG2 and Huh-7),
or rat primary hepatocytes. The infectivity of MLV(HBV) for
human hepatocytes was inhibited by anti-HBs antibody. The L
form of HBsAg was both necessary and sufficient for virus infectivity,
but the presence of both L and S forms enhanced the surface
expression of HBsAg and thus increased virus production. The
middle form of HBsAg was not necessary. This pseudotype virus
bypasses the requirement for the liver-specific transcription
factors for HBV replication, enabling direct study of HBV tissue
tropism conferred by the viral envelope proteins. This virus
also offers a potential liver-specific targeting system for
gene therapy.

TEXT
The liver is important for the synthesis and secretion of a
variety of proteins and intermediate mediators in various metabolic
pathways. Many congenital metabolic diseases affect primarily
the liver (
9), and persistent viral infections in the liver
may be considered acquired genetic diseases (
9). Therefore,
the liver is an important target for gene therapy. Several different
gene delivery vectors have been developed, including liver-specific
nonviral vectors (e.g., an asialoglycoprotein receptor-targeting
system) and viral vectors (e.g., a retrovirus-mediated gene
transfer system, adenoviral vector, herpes simplex virus vector,
etc.) (
8); however, none of these viral vectors exclusively
target hepatocytes. Recently, Protzer et al. reported a hepatitis
B virus (HBV) vector for liver-specific targeting to hepatocytes
(
22); however, its potential use as a gene transfer system may
be limited by its small capacity due to the small size of the
HBV genome (3.2 kb). The liver-specific tropism of HBV is due
to its requirement for both the liver-specific transcription
factors for viral replication and the liver-specific receptors
for viral entry. HBV envelope, which consists of three HBV surface
antigens (HBsAg), the large (L), middle (M), and small (S) forms,
is responsible for the interaction with the receptor. In particular,
L-HBsAg has been demonstrated to be important for the formation
of infectious virus particles and for receptor interaction (
13,
16,
26). The receptor-binding domain has been mapped to the
pre-S region of the L-HBsAg (
11,
13,
16). To circumvent the
small capacity of HBV genome for the purpose of gene delivery,
we have taken advantage of the liver-specific tropism of HBsAg
and the versatility of the retrovirus vector and successfully
developed a murine leukemia virus (MLV) pseudotype virus containing
HBV surface proteins, which confers strict hepatotropism. This
virus will be useful for studying the target cell tropism of
HBV and also as a gene delivery vector to specifically target
human hepatocytes.
The previous failures to take advantage of the hepatotropism of HBsAg to construct retrovirus vectors were apparently due to the consideration that retroviruses mature by budding at the plasma membrane (25), whereas HBV is assembled at the post-endoplasmic reticulum-pre-Golgi membranes, where the HBV nucleocapsids enclosing the viral DNA genome are packed by the transmembrane HBsAg (18, 20). The different maturation pathways of these two viruses were thought to negate the possibility that they could form pseudotype viruses between them. In this study, we overcame this theoretical limitation by overexpressing both L- and S-HBsAg so that a sufficient amount of HBsAg was expressed on the cell surface to allow formation of MLV(HBV) pseudotype virus at the plasma membrane.
We first determined whether the surface expression level of HBsAg could be improved by coexpressing L-HBsAg and S-HBsAg. The plasmid encoding L-HBsAg (pCMV-L) (a gift from T. S. Benedict Yen, University of California, San Francisco) (28) was either singly transfected or cotransfected with the S-HBsAg-encoding plasmid (pCMV-S) into 293T cells by the calcium phosphate method as previously described (24). Forty-eight hours posttransfection, cells were harvested without trypsinization and stained by anti-HBs antibody for fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis (data not shown). Approximately 5.48% of the cells transfected with L-HBsAg alone had a detectable level of HBsAg on the cell surface. When L-HBsAg and S-HBsAg were cotransfected, 16.3% of cells expressed HBsAg on the cell surface. This result suggests that coexpression of S-HBsAg and L-HBsAg can enhance the overall level of surface expression of HBsAg, although we could not determine whether L- and S-HBsAg were simultaneously present on every cell.
Production of MLV(HBV) pseudotype virus expressing both L- and S-HBsAg.
We then determined whether HBV surface proteins could be incorporated into MLV to form MLV(HBV) pseudotype virus. For this purpose, we employed the three- or four-plasmid transient-transfection method for retrovirus vector production, using pHIT112, which carries a retroviral genome expressing a LacZ reporter gene (24), pHIT 60, which expresses MLV Gag-Pol proteins (24), and pCMV-L with or without pCMV-S. Sodium butyrate was added immediately after transfection to enhance gene expression (24). Forty-eight hours posttransfection, culture supernatant was harvested and clarified of cell debris by passage through a 0.45-µm-pore-size filter. Virions were partially purified by ultracentrifugation in a Beckman SW28 rotor at 26,000 rpm for 3 h with a 20% sucrose cushion and analyzed by Western blotting with anti-HBs or anti-MLV-Gag antibodies. The results showed that both L- and S-HBsAg were present in the particles released from the transfected cells (Fig. 1A, top). There appeared to be more L-HBsAg in the virus particles released into the culture when both L- and S-HBsAg were present than when L-HBsAg only was transfected. The MLV Gag protein (p30) could be detected in the supernatant as well (Fig. 1A, bottom). However, there was no apparent difference in the amount of MLV Gag proteins released into the supernatant between cells transfected with L-HBsAg alone and those with both L- and S-HBsAg. Since HBsAg has been known to be secreted from cells even in the absence of HBV core particles (4, 5, 15), and MLV Gag has also been shown to be released by itself from the cells (29), it is possible that some of the HBsAg and MLV Gag proteins observed in the culture supernatant were released directly from the cells but not associated with the pseudotype virus. Therefore, to ascertain that the HBsAg were incorporated into MLV, the concentrated particles were immunoprecipitated with rabbit polyclonal anti-HBs antibody. The antibody-bound protein A beads were extensively washed with phosphate-buffered saline six times. The precipitates were eluted by adding sample buffer and boiling for 3 min and examined by immunoblotting with anti-MLV Gag antibody. The MLV Gag protein was detected in the precipitates derived from the culture supernatant of the cells transfected with both L- and S-HBsAg (Fig. 1B). Significantly, the amount of the Gag protein (p30) in the MLV(HBV L+S) pseudotype virus particles was much greater than that in the MLV(HBV L) pseudotype virus (Fig. 1B). This result indicates that the presence of S-HBsAg enhances the formation of MLV(HBV) pseudotype virus. In the absence of HBsAg, Gag protein was not detected in the immunoprecipitate. Furthermore, the control serum did not precipitate Gag protein. These results combined suggest that the Gag protein detected was present together with HBsAg in the same virus particles.
In vitro cell tropism of MLV(HBV L+S) pseudotype virus.
To determine whether the MLV(HBV L+S) pseudotype virus obtained
from this procedure exhibits the tropism of the natural HBV,
the infectivity of MLV(HBV L+S) was first tested in different
cell lines in vitro. So far, HBV has been known to infect only
primary hepatocytes of humans, chimpanzees, gibbons, and certain
macaque species but not established cell lines (
6), although
some hepatocyte cell lines, such as HepG2, have been reported
to be susceptible to HBV infection after glucocorticoid or dimethyl
sulfoxide induction (
2,
19). We first tested the infectivity
of different MLV pseudotype viruses on two human hepatoma cell
lines (Huh-7 and HepG2), a mouse fibroblast cell line (NIH 3T3),
a monkey kidney cell line (Cos-7), a human embryo kidney cell
line (293T), and a T-cell line (Jurkat). The MLV pseudotype
viral stocks containing L-HBsAg and/or S-HBsAg, prepared as
described above, were concentrated by centrifugation at 26,000
rpm in an SW28 rotor for 90 min with a 20% sucrose cushion (
27)
or by ultrafiltration using Centriplus YM-100 (Amicon Bioseparations).
Concentrated virus was then used to infect various cell lines.
MLV pseudotype virus containing vesicular stomatitis virus G
protein, MLV(VSV-G), was used as a positive control.
Pelleted virus stock was added to the culture medium containing 8 µl of Polybrene (Sigma) per ml and incubated for 2 h; then an equal volume of fresh medium was added and further incubated overnight. Forty-eight to ninety-six hours postinfection, cells were fixed with glutaraldehyde solution and incubated with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside (Sigma). Only cells with strong blue staining in the nucleus, which reflects the nuclear localization of the reporter ß-galactosidase, were considered positive (Fig. 2A and B). Some faint cytoplasmic staining was occasionally observed, particularly in Huh-7, HepG2, and primary human hepatocytes, but was ignored.
The MLV particles without any envelope glycoprotein, MLV(-),
were not able to infect any of the cell lines tested, consistent
with previous reports (
1,
29) (data not shown). MLV particles
containing the ecotropic MLV envelope protein infected only
a mouse cell line (NIH 3T3), consistent with the natural host
range of the ecotropic MLV (
24) (data not shown). MLV(VSV-G)
pseudotype virus could infect all of the cell lines tested and
thus could serve as a positive control for pseudotype virus
infection, although we did find that different cell lines showed
different degrees of susceptibility to MLV(VSV-G). For example,
the hepatocyte-derived cell lines (Huh-7 and HepG2) were less
susceptible to MLV(VSV-G), yielding about 100-fold fewer transduced
cells than 293T cells (Fig.
2F). MLV(HBV L+S) pseudotype virus
could not infect any of the cell lines tested (data not shown).
We proceeded to test the ability of MLV(HBV L+S) to infect primary
human hepatocytes. Primary human hepatocytes were either obtained
from the Liver Center of the University of Southern California,
Keck School of Medicine, or purchased from In Vitro Technologies,
Inc. (San Diego, Calif.). Primary hepatocytes were cultured
in serum-free Dulbecco modified Eagle medium plus F-12 medium
(Gibco) containing 2
x 10
-6 M insulin (Sigma), 5
x 10
-5 M hydrocortisone
(Sigma), and 0.02 g of bovine serum albumin (Sigma)/ml with
or without 20 ng of epidermal growth factor (Sigma)/ml and 50
ng of hepatocyte growth factor (R&D Systems, Inc.)/ml. The
results showed that MLV(HBV L+S) could infect these cells in
culture (Fig.
2A). The susceptibility of primary human hepatocytes
to MLV(HBV L+S) infection varied with different hepatocyte preparations,
probably reflecting the culture condition and/or the origin
of hepatocytes. Nevertheless, in all the hepatocyte preparations
that were susceptible to MLV(HBV L+S) pseudotype virus infection,
MLV(VSV-G) (Fig.
2B) yielded >5-fold-higher numbers of infected
cells than MLV(HBV L+S) (Table
1). The MLV(HBV) pseudotype virus
containing S-HBsAg only, i.e., MLV(HBV S), and MLV(-) were not
infectious (Fig.
2C and D; Table
1). The MLV(HBV L) pseudotype
virus, which contains only L-HBsAg, had a significantly lower
infectivity than MLV(HBV L+S) (Table
1), consistent with the
lower yield of the MLV(HBV L) virus particles (Fig.
1B). MLV(HBV
L+S) could not infect primary rat hepatocytes (data not shown),
indicating that this pseudotype virus is specific for human
hepatocytes. These results were reproducible in three different
primary human hepatocyte preparations, although the absolute
numbers of infected cells were variable. To verify that the
cells infected by MLV(HBV L+S) pseudotype virus were hepatocytes,
the infected cells were assayed for ß-galactosidase
activity and stained for albumin using a polyclonal rabbit anti-human
albumin antibody (Rockland) followed by peroxidase-conjugated
sheep anti-rabbit antibody (Promega). Figure
2E shows that all
the cells positive for ß-galactosidase activity (with
blue staining in the nucleus) were also positive for albumin
(brown staining). Despite the ability of MLV(HBV L+S) to infect
primary hepatocytes, it cannot infect any of the established
hepatocyte-derived cell lines at all (e.g., HepG2 or Huh-7)
(data not shown).
Neutralization of MLV(HBV L+S) pseudotype virus infection.
To determine whether the infection of human hepatocytes by MLV(HBV
L+S) pseudotype virus occurred specifically through the interaction
of HBsAg with the receptors on primary human hepatocytes, we
performed virus neutralization experiments using a polyclonal
antibody against HBsAg. MLV(HBV L+S) or MLV(VSV-G) virus stocks
were incubated with various dilutions of rabbit anti-HBs polyclonal
antibody at 4°C for 3 h. The antibody-treated virions were
used to infect primary human hepatocytes. The anti-HBs antibody
at a 1:500 dilution or lower was able to block MLV(HBV L+S)
virus infection of primary human hepatocytes (Table
1). This
antibody did not inhibit MLV(VSV-G) infection even at the highest
concentration tested. These results suggest that the infectivity
of MLV(HBV L+S) virus occurred through the HBV surface proteins
interacting with a specific receptor(s) on the primary human
hepatocytes.
These data thus established that we have developed a method for using HBV surface proteins to generate a retrovirus pseudotype virus. HBV surface proteins have long been regarded as an attractive tool for potential targeting of hepatocytes because of the strict hepatotropism of HBV. However, although it is generally assumed that HBsAg confers hepatotropism by binding to a liver-specific receptor, HBsAg can bind to many cell types in culture (21), and no HBV-specific receptors have been identified. Nevertheless, the fact that hepatitis delta virus, which utilizes HBsAg as its envelope protein although its RNA can replicate in many nonhepatic cells in culture, infects only liver cells (12) supports the idea that HBsAg confers hepatotropism. Our finding here that MLV(HBV L+S) exhibits a strict tropism for primary human hepatocytes further indicates that L- and S-HBsAg are sufficient to confer hepatotropism.
Although HBsAg accumulates mostly in ER (15, 20, 28), our fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis showed that at least some L-HBsAg and S-HBsAg are expressed on cell surfaces. Furthermore, the coexpression of S-HBsAg and L-HBsAg enhanced the overall level of HBsAg expression on the cell surface. The presence of S-HBsAg may also stabilize the infectivity of the pseudotype virus particles; in addition, the presence of empty HBsAg particles in the MLV(HBV L+S) virus preparation may enhance the efficiency of infection (3, 19). Our data also confirmed the previous report that M-HBsAg is not necessary for HBV infectivity (7). The ability to express the native L- and S-HBsAg on the cell surface simplifies the task of constructing a retrovirus pseudotype virus with HBsAg. Thus, it is not necessary to engineer a chimeric HBsAg containing the transmembrane domain of a heterologous membrane protein destined for cell surface expression; such a chimeric HBsAg might alter the tropism of the virus or the mechanism of viral entry. The MLV(HBV L+S) pseudotype virus reported here, which contains native HBsAg, will be ideal for studying viral tropism, receptors, and virus entry of HBV.
Our data showed that the MLV(HBV) pseudotype virus indeed retains the strict hepatotropism of the natural HBV, which has been shown to infect only primary hepatocytes of certain primate species (6) but not cultured hepatocyte cell lines. We were unable to make the hepatocyte cell lines (HepG2 and Huh-7) susceptible to MLV(HBV) infection by various treatments, such as steroid hormones (data not shown), which have been reported to render HepG2 cells susceptible to HBV infections (2, 19). Thus, the reported induction of HBV receptors or cellular factors for HBV entry into cultured hepatocytes could not be reproduced in our system.
The infectious titer of MLV(HBV) pseudotype virus for primary human hepatocytes in culture was low. One of the possible reasons is that primary hepatocytes undergo a very low rate of cellular division, which is known to be required for the establishment of retrovirus infection (14, 23). The low infectious titer was also observed for MLV(VSV-G) pseudotype virus, which presumably uses a universally expressed receptor, thus supporting the idea that the major limiting factor for the infection of primary hepatocytes by MLV(HBV) pseudotype virus is the low rate of cell division. Most primary human hepatocytes are probably in the quiescent stage; the use of hepatocyte growth factor and epidermal growth factor in our primary hepatocyte culture system may have helped the proliferation of some hepatocytes. In the future, the low infectious titer of this pseudotype virus could possibly be overcome by use of a lentivirus nucleocapsid core, which does not require cell division for gene expression (10). In addition, there are various maneuvers which can stimulate hepatocyte proliferation (17), thus allowing more efficient transduction. It is worth mentioning that we have attempted to use green fluorescence protein, instead of ß-galactosidase, as a reporter gene. However, we found that primary human hepatocytes gave a very high fluorescence background, making it very difficult to distinguish the positive from the negative cells. In any case, the pseudotype virus reported here provides a potentially useful system for studying HBV virus entry without the complication of the requirement for liver-specific transcription factors for HBV replication. It may also be a prototype of the potential gene therapy vectors for liver-specific targeting.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank T. S. Benedict Yen of the University of California,
San Francisco, for providing HBV surface antigen plasmids and
helpful discussions; Stanley Tahara and James Ou of the University
of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, for providing
retroviral constructs and polyclonal anti-HBs antibody; Alan
Rein from ABL-Basic Research Program, NCI-Frederick Cancer Research
and Development Center, for providing polyclonal anti-Gag antibody;
Daphne Shimoda for editorial assistance; and the USC Liver Center
for providing primary human hepatocytes.
M.M.C.L is an investigator of HHMI.

FOOTNOTES
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, University of Southern California School of Medicine, 2011 Zonal Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90033. Phone: (323) 442-1748. Fax: (323) 342-9555. E-mail:
michlai{at}hsc.usc.edu.


REFERENCES
1
- Abe, A., S.-T. Chen, A. Miyanohara, and T. Friedmann. 1998. In vitro cell-free conversion of noninfectious Moloney retrovirus particles to an infectious form by the addition of the vesicular stomatitis virus surrogate envelope G protein. J. Virol. 72:63566361.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
2
- Bchini, R., F. Capel, C. Dauguet, S. Dubanchet, and M. A. Petit. 1990. In vitro infection of human hepatoma (HepG2) cells with hepatitis B virus. J. Virol. 64:30253032.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3
- Bruns, M., S. Miska, S. Chassot, and H. Will. 1998. Enhancement of hepatitis B virus infection by noninfectious subviral particles. J. Virol. 72:14621468.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
4
- Cheng, K. C., G. L. Smith, and B. Moss. 1986. Hepatitis B virus large surface protein is not secreted but is immunogenic when selectively expressed by recombinant vaccinia virus. J. Virol. 60:337344.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5
- Chisari, F. V., P. Filippi, J. Buras, A. McLachlan, H. Popper, C. A. Pinkert, R. D. Palmiter, and R. L. Brinster. 1987. Structural and pathological effects of synthesis of hepatitis B virus large envelope polypeptide in transgenic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:69096913.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
6
- De Meyer, S., Z. J. Gong, W. Suwandhi, J. van Pelt, A. Soumillion, and S. H. Yap. 1997. Organ and species specificity of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection: a review of literature with a special reference to preferential attachment of HBV to human hepatocytes. J. Viral Hepatitis 4:145153.[CrossRef][Medline]
7
- Fernholz, D., P. R. Galle, M. Stemler, M. Brunetto, F. Bonino, and H. Will. 1993. Infectious hepatitis B virus variant defective in pre-S2 protein expression in a chronic carrier. Virology 194:137148.[CrossRef][Medline]
8
- Ferry, N., and J. M. Heard. 1998. Liver-directed gene transfer vectors. Hum. Gene Ther. 9:19751981.[Medline]
9
- Ganem, D. 1999. An advance in liver-specific gene delivery. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:1169611697.[Free Full Text]
10
- Kimpton, J., and M. Emerman. 1992. Detection of replication-competent and pseudotyped human immunodeficiency virus with a sensitive cell line on the basis of activation of an integrated ß-galactosidase gene. J. Virol. 66:22322239.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11
- Klingmuller, U., and H. Schaller. 1993. Hepadnavirus infection requires interaction between the viral pre-S domain and a specific hepatocellular receptor. J. Virol. 67:74147422.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
12
- Lai, M. M. C. 1995. The molecular biology of hepatitis delta virus. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 64:259286.[CrossRef][Medline]
13
- Le Seyec, J., P. Chouteau, I. Cannie, C. Guguen-Guillouzo, and P. Gripon. 1999. Infection process of the hepatitis B virus depends on the presence of a defined sequence in the pre-S1 domain. J. Virol. 73:20522057.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14
- Miller, D. G., M. A. Adam, and A. D. Miller. 1990. Gene transfer by retrovirus vectors occurs only in cells that are actively replicating at the time of infection. Mol. Cell. Biol. 10:42394242.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15
- Molnar-Kimber, K. L., V. Jarocki-Witek, S. K. Dheer, S. K. Vernon, A. J. Conley, A. R. Davis, and P. P. Hung. 1988. Distinctive properties of the hepatitis B virus envelope proteins. J. Virol. 62:407416.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16
- Neurath, A. R., S. B. Kent, N. Strick, and K. Parker. 1986. Identification and chemical synthesis of a host cell receptor binding site on hepatitis B virus. Cell 46:429436.[CrossRef][Medline]
17
- Ott, M., R. J. Stockert, Q. Ma, S. Gagandeep, and S. Gupta. 1998. Simultaneous up-regulation of viral receptor expression and DNA synthesis is required for increasing efficiency of retroviral hepatic gene transfer. J. Biol. Chem. 273:1195411961.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18
- Ou, J.-H., and W. J. Rutter. 1987. Regulation of secretion of the hepatitis B virus major surface antigen by the preS-1 protein. J. Virol. 61:782786.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19
- Paran, N., B. Geiger, and Y. Shaul. 2001. HBV infection of cell culture: evidence for multivalent and cooperative attachment. EMBO J. 20:44434453.[CrossRef][Medline]
20
- Patzer, E. J., G. R. Nakamura, C. C. Simonsen, A. D. Levinson, and R. Brands. 1986. Intracellular assembly and packaging of hepatitis B surface antigen particles occur in the endoplasmic reticulum. J. Virol. 58:884892.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
21
- Peeples, M. E. 1994. The hepatitis B virus receptor: book em, Dano? Hepatology 20:13641366.[Medline]
22
- Protzer, U., M. Nassal, P.-W. Chiang, M. Kirschfink, and H. Schaller. 1999. Interferon gene transfer by a hepatitis B virus vector efficiently suppresses wild-type virus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:1081810823.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23
- Roe, T., T. C. Reynolds, G. Yu, and P. O. Brown. 1993. Integration of murine leukemia virus DNA depends on mitosis. EMBO J. 12:20992108.[Medline]
24
- Soneoka, Y., P. M. Cannon, E. E. Ramsdale, J. C. Griffiths, G. Romano, S. M. Kingsman, and A. J. Kingsman. 1995. A transient three-plasmid expression system for the production of high titer retroviral vectors. Nucleic Acids Res. 23:628633.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25
- Suomalainen, M., K. Hultenby, and H. Garoff. 1996. Targeting of Moloney murine leukemia virus gag precursor to the site of virus budding. J. Cell Biol. 135:18411852.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
26
- Urban, S., K. M. Breiner, F. Fehler, U. Klingmuller, and H. Schaller. 1998. Avian hepatitis B virus infection is initiated by the interaction of a distinct pre-S subdomain with the cellular receptor gp180. J. Virol. 72:80898097.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
27
- Wool-Lewis, R. J., and P. Bates. 1998. Characterization of Ebola virus entry by using pseudotyped viruses: identification of receptor-deficient cell lines. J. Virol. 72:31553160.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
28
- Xu, Z., and T. S. B. Yen. 1996. Intracellular retention of surface protein by a hepatitis B virus mutant that releases virion particles. J. Virol. 70:133140.[Abstract]
29
- Yee, J. K., T. Friedmann, and J. C. Burns. 1994. Generation of high-titer pseudotyped retroviral vectors with very broad host range. Methods Cell Biol. 43:99112.
Journal of Virology, January 2002, p. 912-917, Vol. 76, No. 2
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.2.912-917.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Chai, N., Chang, H. E., Nicolas, E., Gudima, S., Chang, J., Taylor, J.
(2007). Assembly of Hepatitis B Virus Envelope Proteins onto a Lentivirus Pseudotype That Infects Primary Human Hepatocytes. J. Virol.
81: 10897-10904
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Saha, M. N., Tanaka, A., Jinno-Oue, A., Shimizu, N., Tamura, K., Shinagawa, M., Chiba, J., Hoshino, H.
(2005). Formation of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus Pseudotypes Bearing Surface Proteins of Hepatitis B Virus. J. Virol.
79: 12566-12574
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bartosch, B., Dubuisson, J., Cosset, F.-L.
(2003). Infectious Hepatitis C Virus Pseudo-particles Containing Functional E1-E2 Envelope Protein Complexes. JEM
197: 633-642
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sung, V. M.-H., Shimodaira, S., Doughty, A. L., Picchio, G. R., Can, H., Yen, T. S. B., Lindsay, K. L., Levine, A. M., Lai, M. M. C.
(2003). Establishment of B-Cell Lymphoma Cell Lines Persistently Infected with Hepatitis C Virus In Vivo and In Vitro: the Apoptotic Effects of Virus Infection. J. Virol.
77: 2134-2146
[Abstract]
[Full Text]