Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, January 2002, p. 507-516, Vol. 76, No. 2
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.2.507-516.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Microbiology, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Peoples Republic of China,1 Department of Virology, St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105-27942
Received 24 July 2001/ Accepted 12 October 2001
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The human H5N1 influenza virus has been proposed to be a reassortant of three precursor viruses. Both A/quail/HK/G1/97 (H9N2)-like and A/teal/HK/W312/97 (H6N1)-like viruses are possible gene donors in the genesis of the H5N1 influenza viruses (6, 8). The A/quail/HK/G1/97 (H9N2)-like influenza viruses have lower rates of amino acid change in the six internal proteins than do the pathogenic H5N1 influenza viruses, indicating that the introduction of H9N2 influenza viruses into terrestrial poultry is not a recent one (7). In other words, the H9N2 influenza viruses could have donated genes for the generation of the pathogenic H5N1 influenza viruses. However, the evolution of H6N1 influenza viruses has not been elucidated. A question remains: were the pathogenic H5N1 influenza viruses in Hong Kong reassortants of A/quail/HK/G1/97-like or A/teal/HK/W312/97-like viruses or were the H5N1 and A/teal/HK/W312/97-like viruses themselves the products of reassortment events?
Until recently, influenza viruses of the H6 subtype have received little attention. The H6 subtype was first isolated from a turkey in 1965, and other viruses that belong to the H6 subtype were subsequently isolated from shorebirds and wild ducks (3, 4, 17). The full-length nucleotide sequences of the H6 HA gene are most homologous to those of the H2 subtype (12). Previous surveillance in Hong Kong of poultry from southern China (1975 to early 1980s) revealed that H6 influenza viruses occurred in domestic ducks and geese and only one H6 influenza virus, viz., H6N4, was isolated from a chicken (19, 21). Of the viruses isolated during the H5N1 incident, four were H6 influenza viruses, and those were isolated from geese and a green-winged teal (this study; 8). These findings demonstrate the continuous circulation of H6 influenza viruses in poultry in southeastern China.
The antigenic and genetic characteristics of influenza viruses from different types of poultry were investigated to determine the molecular epidemiology and evolution of H6 influenza viruses in southeastern China. The results of the present study show the diversity of H6 viruses in poultry in this region. The presence of H6N1 viruses in poultry that possess seven of the eight genes of the human H5N1 virus raises the following question: will this pathogenic H5N1 virus reemerge (24) or will H6N1 viruses directly cross the species barrier into mammals?
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. H6 influenza viruses characterized in this study
|
Nucleotide sequence analysis. Viral RNA was extracted from infected allantoic fluids by using an RNeasy RNA extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Viral RNA was reverse transcribed using an oligodeoxynucleotide primer (5'AGCAAAAGCAGG) and Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies Inc., Grand Island, N.Y.). PCR was performed with gene-specific primers (sequences are available upon request). Amplified products of the expected sizes were purified with a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen). Purified amplicons were sequenced by using the BigDye terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, Calif.) and analyzed on an ABI377 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems).
Phylogenetic analysis. Published sequences used in phylogenetic comparison in this study were obtained from the Influenza Sequences Database (http://www.flu.lanl.gov). Editing, analysis, and alignment of sequence data were performed with the Lasergene package (version 4.0; DNASTAR, Madison, Wis.) and the Wisconsin Package (version 10.0; Genetics Computer Group, Madison, Wis.). Phylogenetic analysis was performed with Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (PAUP, version 4; D. Swofford, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass.) by PAUPSearch in the Wisconsin Package with 100 bootstrap replicates.
Evolutionary analysis. A defined region of the eight gene segments of the H5N1, H6N1, and H9N2 influenza viruses was analyzed with the Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis program (MEGA, version 2.0; S. Kumar, K. Tamura, I. Jakobsen, and M. Nei, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pa., and Arizona State University, Tempe, Ariz.). A reference virus was selected from each group of viruses analyzed. Reference viruses were compared pairwise with the members in their group, and the nonsynonymous substitutions were calculated using the Pamilo-Bianchi-Li method (9, 13). The rate of nonsynonymous substitutions was determined by dividing the average nonsynonymous substitutions by the number of years between the isolation of the reference virus and that of the member viruses. The rates of nonsynonymous substitutions for the virus groups were compared, and the P values were determined by the Student t test.
Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The sequence data obtained in this study have been submitted to the EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database and are listed under accession no. AJ410495 through AJ410614.
|
|
|---|
In surveillance studies conducted during the 1970s, only ducks, geese, and chickens were sampled. The majority of the samples were collected from ducks (19, 21). One chicken, one goose, and seven duck H6 isolates were chosen for characterization in this study. During the H5N1 outbreak, emphasis was on the major poultry, viz., chickens, ducks, and geese, but minor poultry (quails, pheasants, pigeons, chukars, and guinea fowls) were also sampled. Three H6 influenza viruses were isolated from geese, and one was isolated from a green-winged teal (this study; 8). From 1998 to 1999, routine influenza virus surveillance of aquatic poultry at the central slaughtering facility resulted in the isolation of 10 H6 influenza viruses. From 1999 to 2000, in surveillance of the 19 live-poultry retail markets, seven H6 influenza viruses were isolated on six different sampling occasions in five of the markets from 162 quail, 153 pheasant, and 63 chukar fecal samples. These viruses represent the H6 isolates from terrestrial poultry in the present study.
Antigenic analysis. The isolates were characterized antigenically by HI tests (Table 2). The H6 influenza viruses isolated in southeastern China reacted with hyperimmune antisera raised against the viruses A/turkey/Massachusetts/1/65 (H6N2) and A/shearwater/Australia/1/72 (H6N5). While the H6 rabbit hyperimmune reference antiserum raised against A/teal/HK/W312/97 (H6N1) of the World Health Organization supplemental influenza reagent kit (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.) reacted with all contemporary terrestrial isolates, it showed limited reactivity to contemporary aquatic isolates and reduced reactivity to the 1970s isolates. This rabbit hyperimmune reference antiserum has broader cross-reactivity than ferret antiserum raised against the same virus. The H6 influenza viruses can be divided into terrestrial and aquatic groups on the basis of their reaction with postinfection chicken antiserum, postinfection ferret antiserum, and monoclonal antibody. Postinfection chicken antiserum to Ph/HK/SH39/99 (H6N1) reacted with all contemporary terrestrial isolates but, with the exception of Tl/HK/W312/97 (H6N1) and Dk/HK/3461/99 (H6N1), did not react with contemporary aquatic and 1970s isolates. Postinfection chicken antiserum to Gs/HK/W217/97 (H6N2) reacted primarily with contemporary aquatic and 1970s isolates and showed low reactivity with contemporary terrestrial isolates. Postinfection ferret antiserum and monoclonal antibody against Tl/HK/W312/97 (H6N1) showed similar specificities and reacted only with contemporary terrestrial isolates, but postinfection chicken antiserum against Ck/HK/17/77 (H6N4) cannot differentiate the different groups of viruses. These results show the presence of two antigenically distinct groups of H6 influenza viruses in the terrestrial and aquatic poultry of this region.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Antigenic analysis of H6 influenza viruses by HIa
|
G at the cleavage site (arrow) between HA1 and HA2, and none contains the sequence of multiple basic amino acids which is found in highly pathogenic chicken influenza A viruses (25, 28). The consensus amino acid sequences revealed five potential N-linked glycosylation sites in HA1 (asparagine 26 or 27, 39, 182, 306, and 311) and two in HA2 (asparagine 498 and 557). Amino acid changes in Gs/HK/W222/97, Gs/HK/W375/97, and Dk/HK/134/77 (N182K), Dk/HK/175/77 and Dk/HK/3461/99 (N182S), and Dk/HK/1037-1/98 (N306I) led to the loss of potential glycosylation sites. The H6 HA phylogenetic tree revealed that the H6 isolates are clustered into three branches: the 1970s, the contemporary aquatic, and the contemporary terrestrial branches (Fig. 1). All viruses in the contemporary terrestrial branch are exclusively of the N1 subtype. The Tl/HK/W312/97 (H6N1) virus was grouped with the H6 contemporary terrestrial isolates and diverge after the separation from duck virus Dk/HK/3461/99 (H6N1), suggesting that contemporary terrestrial isolates may have been derived from an aquatic ancestor. This observation was strengthened by the cross-reactivity that postinfection chicken antiserum to Ph/HK/SH39/99 (H6N1) demonstrated with Tl/HK/W312/97 (H6N1) and, to a limited extent, Dk/HK/3461/99 (H6N1). The contemporary terrestrial isolates and those of the 1970s branch showed a sister group relationship, indicating that these viruses may have a common ancestor. Thus the contemporary terrestrial branch may have been established in the 1970s or earlier and the ancestor could have been a virus present in aquatic hosts of the time.
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Phylogenetic trees based on the sequences of the H6 HA and N1 NA genes of influenza viruses. Nucleotides 29 to 1730 (1,701 bp) of the H6 HA gene were used to construct the HA phylogenetic tree, which was rooted to A/mallard/Potsdam/178-4/83 (H2N2). Nucleotides 66 to 1373 (1,439 bp) of the N1 NA gene were used to construct the NA phylogenetic tree, which was rooted to A/WSN/33 (H1N1). H6 influenza viruses characterized in this study are underlined (NA phylogenetic tree). *, viruses with characteristic deletion of codons for 19 amino acids from the NA gene. The lengths of the horizontal lines are proportional to the minimum number of nucleotide differences required to join nodes. Vertical lines are for spacing branches and labels. Gene sequences used in this study are listed under the following EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database accession numbers: D90303, X5226, K02252, AF036357, AF057292, AF098548, AF144304, AF098551, and AF208598. Abbreviations: Sh, shearwater; Pa, parrot; Ab, aquatic bird.
|
Genetic analysis of internal genes. Surveillance in the Hong Kong live-poultry retail markets in 1997 revealed that the H6 influenza viruses were cocirculating with the H5N1 and H9N2 influenza viruses (23). This circulation increased the possibility of genetic exchange among these viruses. Therefore, the sequences of the NS and PB2 polymerase (PB2) genes of the H6 influenza viruses were characterized and the viruses with gene segments similar to those of the HK/156/97 (H5N1)-like viruses were identified. Phylogenetic analysis of the NS gene revealed that the H6 influenza viruses characterized in this study belonged to the A allele and were part of the Eurasian clade (Fig. 2). Contemporary aquatic and 1970s isolates clustered into a large group represented by the duck influenza viruses Dk/HK/439/97 (H9N2) and Dk/HK/717/79 (H1N3), respectively. As for the N1 NA phylogenetic tree, the 1970s isolates showed an ancestral relationship to the contemporary aquatic isolates. The NS genes of contemporary terrestrial isolates are phylogenetically similar to those of the human H5N1 (HK/156/97) and H9N2 (HK/1073/99 and HK/1074/99) influenza viruses.
![]() View larger version (45K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Phylogenetic trees based on the sequences of the NS1 and PB2 genes of influenza viruses. H6 influenza viruses characterized in this study are underlined. The ranges of nucleotide sequences used to construct the phylogenetic trees are shown in Table 4. The NS1 phylogenetic tree is rooted to A/equine/Prague/1/56 (H7N7), and the PB2 phylogenetic tree is rooted to B/Lee/40. The lengths of the horizontal lines are proportional to the minimum number of nucleotide differences required to join nodes. Vertical lines are for spacing branches and labels. Gene sequences used in this study are listed under the following EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database accession numbers: AF156479, M17070, M60800, M55484, Z26865, U49492, L25830, AF156476, AF262212, U49493, AF250502, AF156482, AF156481, AF036360, AF098569, AF098571, AF250483, AF156477, AJ278649, AJ404735, AF156480, AF156472, AF156475, AF156440, AF156439, M55471, AF255624, AF156434, AF156437, AF156438, AF156436, AF156433, AF156430, AJ404630, AJ404630, AF036363, AF098577, AF098579, AF250476, and AF156435. Sw, swine.
|
The phylogenetic analysis suggested that the N1 NA, NS, and PB2 genes of all contemporary terrestrial isolates are closely related to those of the H5N1 human influenza viruses. Therefore, the sequences of the M, nucleoprotein (NP), PA polymerase (PA), and PB1 polymerase (PB1) genes of the seven contemporary terrestrial H6N1 isolates were analyzed to explore this relationship further. The generalized phylogeny of these genes revealed that all seven contemporary terrestrial H6N1 isolates clustered with the H5N1 and H9N2 influenza viruses that infected humans (Fig. 3). Seven of the eight gene segments of all the contemporary terrestrial H6N1 influenza viruses are more than 96% homologous to those of human HK/156/97 (H5N1) (Table 3). In contrast, these seven gene segments of duck H6N1 influenza virus Dk/HK/3461/99 were less than 93% homologous to those of HK/156/97 although the Dk/HK/3461/99 HA gene belonged to the contemporary terrestrial branch of the H6 HA gene phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1). In addition, the homology among the gene segments of the influenza viruses of the contemporary aquatic group and the 1970s group and those of HK/156/97 was less than 93%. Thus, the molecular and phylogenetic results confirmed that H6N1 influenza viruses that have seven gene segments closely related to those of the pathogenic HK/156/97 (H5N1)-like viruses are still present in terrestrial poultry in southeastern China.
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Generalized phylogeny of M1, NP, PA, and PB1 genes of influenza viruses. H6 influenza viruses characterized in this study are underlined. Nucleotide ranges used to construct the phylogenetic trees are shown in Table 4. Gene sequences used in this study are listed under the following EMBL Nucleotide Sequence Database accession numbers: AF098560, AF036358, AF156463, AF250482, AJ278646, AF057293, AF036359, AF156470, AF250480, AJ289871, AF098604, AF046095, AF156449, AF250478, AJ404637, AF098590, AF036362, AF156421, AF250477, and AJ404634.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Nucleotide homology between the gene segments of H6 viruses and human virus HK/156/97 (H5N1)
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Rate of nonsynonymous substitutions of H6N1, H9N2, and H5N1 influenza viruses that circulate in Hong Kong
|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies in the 1970s on the association of HA and NA genes in duck influenza viruses generally showed a nonrandomness of association (5). The H6 subtype was an exception in that, as it occurred in combination with all NA subtypes, N1 to N9, apart from N7, its association with N1 was nonrandom, occurring over fourfold more frequently than it might be expected to do. This pattern of H6 and N1 association is not apparent in contemporary aquatic influenza viruses but is found in contemporary terrestrial isolates (Table 1), a pattern that continues in ongoing surveillance studies (Y. Guam, unpublished data). No reason for this H6N1 association can be advanced, but the question of whether the insertion of aspartic acid between positions 144 and 145 (H3 numbering) may be a contributing factor to host range specificity might be raised. The deletion of 19 amino acids in the stalk region of the N1 of terrestrial H6N1 isolates is presumably a recent event associated with pathogenicity for chicken H5N1 influenza viruses (1).
The host range of influenza A viruses is associated with differences in the specificity of the HA to attach to sialic acid (Sa)-containing receptors on susceptible cells (15). HAs of avian influenza viruses preferentially recognize Sa linked to galactose (Gal) by
2,3 linkages (Sa
2,3Gal), whereas HAs of human influenza viruses preferentially recognize Sa
2,6Gal linkages (11). Residues 226 and 228 in the HAs of the H2 and H3 subtypes of human influenza viruses may be important in determining receptor specificity (2, 27). In all H6 influenza viruses, except Gs/HK/W222/97 (H6N7) and Gs/HK/W375/97 (H6N2), the HA possesses a glutamine residue at position 226 and a glycine residue at position 228. This combination of amino acids binds preferentially to Sa
2,3Gal and is essential for virus replication in the duck intestine (2, 27). The Q226L substitution in H6 HA of Gs/HK/W222/97 and Q226V in Gs/HK/W375/97 apparently did not impair the ability of these two viruses to replicate in the duck intestine, as both were isolated from the cloaca. However, if there is an additional substitution of G228S in Gs/HK/W222/97, it may enable this virus to recognize the mammalian receptor and significantly increase the potential of the virus to infect mammals (2).
Phylogenetic analysis of the HA genes indicated that the H6 influenza viruses isolated from domestic poultry in southeastern China can be classified into three distinct branches: the 1970s branch, the contemporary aquatic branch, and the contemporary terrestrial branch. The sequences of the H6 HA genes of viruses from terrestrial hosts originated from the same node of the H6 HA phylogenetic tree of the contemporary terrestrial branch and have an out-group relationship with aquatic isolate Dk/HK/3461/99 (H6N1). This finding suggests that the contemporary terrestrial H6N1 influenza viruses may have evolved from an aquatic bird virus. However, the HA gene of the H6N1 influenza viruses in the terrestrial branch is only about 91% homologous to that of Dk/HK/3461/99, indicating that this particular duck influenza virus did not directly contribute the HA gene to the contemporary terrestrial isolates. Further surveillance of influenza viruses in aquatic poultry may identify the precursor viruses of the contemporary terrestrial isolates.
The topology of the contemporary terrestrial branch of the H6 HA phylogenetic tree showed that the terrestrial isolates evolved in a sequential fashion and that contemporary terrestrial isolates evolved more rapidly than the Dk/HK/3461/99 (H6N1) virus. This trend in evolution is not seen in other branches of the H6 HA phylogenetic tree, e.g., the contemporary aquatic branch. Thus, it appears that the precursor virus of the contemporary terrestrial isolates was subjected to significant selective pressure once it infected terrestrial poultry and circulated in the wholesale and retail live-poultry markets.
The HA molecule is the prime determinant of host range of influenza viruses, but PB2, NP, and M2 are also thought to be involved. All contemporary terrestrial H6N1 viruses possessed avian virus-like amino acid E627, human virus-like amino acids T661 and I667 in the PB2 protein, and human virus-like amino acid M136 in the NP protein. These human virus-like amino acids are also found in the chicken H5N1 viruses of 1997 (33). The other human virus-like amino acids shared by the contemporary terrestrial H6N1 viruses and the chicken H5N1 viruses can be found in the M2 protein and are G16, V28, and F55. It is not known how these amino acids determine the host range of influenza viruses, but the presence of human virus-like amino acids in avian H6N1 viruses may enable the viruses to cross the host barrier and infect mammals.
The common features of the human H5N1 and the Qa/HK/G1/97 (H9N2) viruses are the six genes encoding the internal components (6). Whether this commonality is an important factor in the ability of these viruses to infect humans is not known, but influenza A viruses possessing this feature are of particular concern. The H6N1 influenza viruses from terrestrial poultry possess not only similar genes encoding internal proteins but also the N1 gene of HK/156/97 (H5N1) virus. The N1s of the H6N1 terrestrial isolates have the characteristic deletion of 19 amino acids in the stalk region. Thus, the terrestrial H6N1 influenza viruses may have the potential to infect humans. A 7-month surveillance study of the live-poultry retail markets conducted in 1999 resulted in the isolation of 16 H9N2 influenza viruses from quail, 3 from pheasants, and 2 from chukas (7). During the same surveillance period, only one H6N1 influenza virus was isolated, and that was from a pheasant. During the first 4 months of 2000, four H6N1 influenza viruses were isolated from quail, pheasants, and chukas. There appears to be an increasing prevalence of H6N1 influenza viruses from 1999 to the present (Guam, unpublished data), suggesting that they may be adapting to terrestrial poultry and establishing themselves in the live-poultry retail markets and perhaps in the wider region. The high prevalence of H9N2 influenza viruses in quail in the live-poultry retail markets in 1999 may be one of the factors that contributed to the human infection in that year (14). Thus, if the prevalence of H6N1 influenza viruses in the live-poultry retail markets reaches a level comparable to that of H9N2 influenza viruses, the chances of H6N1 influenza viruses infecting humans could increase.
Post-1997 surveillance reveals that Tl/HK/W312/97 (H6N1)-like viruses are not present in aquatic poultry; instead, these viruses are found in terrestrial poultry, suggesting that aquatic poultry are not a major host of them. The exception to this is the lone Dk/HK/3461/99 (H6N1) virus, with which the terrestrial H6N1 viruses have an out-group relationship. In this sense, the Tl/HK/W312/97 (H6N1) virus may be an anomaly since wild birds such as the teal, after capture, may be held on a farm prior to sale and may have acquired the virus from other poultry in the farm. Thus there is a possibility that the Tl/HK/W312/97 (H6N1) virus could have originated in part from terrestrial poultry and, as an isolate from an aquatic bird, is not the ideal representative for the terrestrial H6N1 group of viruses. The present study and ongoing surveillance indicate that terrestrial poultry, particularly the quail, is the major host for the Tl/HK/W312/97 (H6N1)-like viruses (Guam, unpublished data).
The presence of H6N1 influenza viruses bearing seven genes that are highly homologous to those of the pathogenic H5N1 viruses of 1997 highlights the potential of H6N1 viruses to reassort and generate pathogenic viruses. This is particularly important because it was hypothesized that the H6N1 virus may have been involved, along with the H9N2 viruses, in the genesis of the H5N1 viruses (8). It was believed that the H5N1 influenza viruses might be reassortants of three precursor influenza viruses. The HA gene could have originated from a Gs/Guangdong/1/96 (H5N1)-like virus whose HA gene is 99% homologous to the Hong Kong H5N1 influenza viruses in 1997 (31). The six genes encoding the internal proteins could have originated from a Tl/HK/W312/97 (H6N1)-like (8) or a Qa/HK/G1/97 (H9N2)-like virus (6), and the Tl/HK/W312/97-like virus could have provided the N1 gene. The hypothesis that H6N1 influenza viruses isolated from terrestrial poultry were involved in the genesis of the human H5N1 influenza viruses was investigated by comparing the rates of evolution of Tl/HK/W312/97 (H6N1)-like viruses with those of Qa/HK/G1/97 (H9N2)-like and Ck/HK/258/97 (H5N1)-like viruses. The genes of the Ck/HK/258/97 (H5N1)-like viruses appeared to be evolving more rapidly than those of the Qa/HK/G1/97 (H9N2)-like viruses, and this is consistent with the results of previous reports (7, 33). The rates of evolution of Tl/HK/W312/97 (H6N1)-like viruses characterized in this study and the Qa/HK/G1/97 (H9N2)-like viruses are not significantly different, suggesting that these viruses are coevolving. It was also suggested that the Qa/HK/G1/97 (H9N2)-like viruses were introduced into their terrestrial hosts earlier than the H5N1 viruses (7). The Tl/HK/W312/97 (H6N1)-like viruses could have also been introduced into their hosts before the H5N1 viruses. Together, these observations suggest that Tl/HK/W312/97 (H6N1)-like viruses and Qa/HK/G1/97 (H9N2)-like viruses were present in poultry before the H5N1 outbreak and that these viruses and the Gs/Guangdong/1/96 (H5N1)-like viruses were involved in the genesis of the pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus. On the other hand, the presence of all three precursors in the region means that there is the opportunity for the pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus of 1997 to reappear (24).
The results of the present study show that antigenically distinct H6 influenza viruses are present in poultry in southeastern China. H6N1 influenza viruses which possess seven genes that are closely related to those of the human H5N1 influenza viruses are still circulating and exhibit increasing prevalence in the live-poultry retail markets (Guam, unpublished data). These findings highlight the need for further epidemiological and genetic studies of H6 influenza viruses in southeastern China, as has been the case with H9N2 influenza viruses (6, 7). Further surveillance studies will provide a better guide to the epidemiological patterns of these H6N1 influenza viruses in the hypothetical influenza epicenter of southern China (20) and hopefully will advance the understanding of the genetic parameters involved and contribute to baseline directions in influenza pandemic preparedness.
We gratefully acknowledge the continued support of the officers of the Agriculture, Fisheries and Conservation Department and the Food and Environmental Hygiene Department of the Hong Kong SAR Government. We also thank A. Hay for providing the postinfection ferret antiserum and K. Dyrting for supplying viruses. We thank P. Ghose for technical support.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»