Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, September 2002, p. 8875-8889, Vol. 76, No. 17
0022-538X/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.17.8875-8889.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology,1 Department of Biochemistry, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, New York 10021,4 Department of Human Retrovirology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands,2 Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, New York 105913
Received 5 March 2002/ Accepted 27 May 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
One reason to prepare recombinant forms of the native Env complex is for structural studies. At present, structural information on HIV-1 Env is limited to core fragments of gp120 in the CD4-associated configuration and the six-helix bundle form of the gp41 core, which represent its terminal, most stable configuration (10, 16, 45, 46, 51, 54, 89, 94). Although the six-helix bundle is often referred to as the fusogenic form of gp41, this term can be misleading, because it is the formation and not the mere presence of the six-helix bundle that drives membrane fusion (25, 35, 56). Hence, antibodies to the six-helix bundle cannot interfere with fusion and are nonneutralizing (42, 59, 65, 71, 90). We therefore use the term "postfusion form" of gp41 when referring to the six-helix bundle, to reflect its persistence on infected cells as a major immunogen after the fusion process is complete and on virions when conformational changes in Env leading to gp120 shedding have occurred prematurely or abortively (25). Most antibodies to gp41 in HIV-1-infected individuals recognize this postfusion conformation (36, 59, 71, 78, 90, 100).
A second reason to make the native Env complex is to study its immunogenicity and determine its suitability as a vaccine antigen. The few monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) that potently neutralize HIV-1 all recognize epitopes exposed on the native Env complex and may well have been induced by such a complex (9, 34, 58, 69-71, 73, 81). In contrast, nonneutralizing MAbs do not bind to the native complex and probably represent immune responses to nonnative forms of Env, such as uncleaved gp160 precursors, dissociated gp120 subunits, or the six-helix bundle, postfusion form of gp41 (9, 59, 69, 70, 73).
Eliciting neutralizing antibodies by vaccination with any form of Env is problematic, because of the mechanisms that the native Env complex has evolved to shield its most critical sites and to limit its overall immunogenicity. Thus, conserved regions of gp120 involved in receptor binding are shielded by variable loops and by extensive glycosylation. The CD4 binding site (CD4BS) is recessed, and the coreceptor binding site is only formed or exposed for a short period after CD4 has already bound, thereby limiting the time and space available for antibody interference (57, 58, 66, 97). Whether such defense mechanisms can be overcome by vaccine-induced antibodies remains uncertain (59, 71). Our approach to the problem has been to try to make a stabilized native Env complex which may then have to be further modified to improve its immunogenicity.
The lability of the noncovalent interaction between gp120 and the gp41 ectodomain (gp41ECTO) is an obstacle to the production of stable, fully processed HIV-1 Env trimers. It was previously reported that the association between gp120 and gp41ECTO can be stabilized by the introduction of a correctly positioned intermolecular disulfide bond to make a soluble form of Env, SOS gp140 (5, 79). In the presence of cotransfected furin, the peptide bond linking gp120 to gp41ECTO is cleaved, allowing the production of properly processed gp140 (5, 79). It was initially reported that oligomeric proteins were present in supernatants from 293T cells transiently expressing SOS gp140 (5). However, these oligomers were not abundant, and they did not survive purification: purified SOS gp140 is a monomeric protein (83). We now describe a way to further stabilize the gp41-gp41 interactions in SOS gp140. We have introduced amino acid substitutions into the N-terminal heptad repeat region of gp41 that we hypothesize destabilize the postfusion form of the protein and thereby render the transition to this configuration less likely. One such protein, SOS I559P gp140 (designated SOSIP gp140), is properly folded, proteolytically cleaved, substantially trimeric, and has appropriate receptor binding and antigenic properties. The SOSIP gp140 trimer can be converted to the monomeric form by heat or anionic detergents but is partially resistant to nonionic detergents.
|
|
|---|
Antibody binding assays. The procedures and MAbs used to perform radioimmunoprecipitation assays have all been described elsewhere (1, 5, 60, 80, 93). MAbs were provided by James Robinson (17b and 2.2B), George Lewis (B12), Hermann Katinger (2F5, 2G12, 4D4, and 4E10), and Dennis Burton (b12).
SDS-PAGE, BN-PAGE, and Western blot analyses. Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), blue native (BN)-PAGE, and Western blot analyses were performed as described previously (5, 79, 83). Culture supernatants from transiently transfected 293T cells were concentrated 10-fold before gel electrophoresis by using Ultrafree-15 concentrators (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.).
Gel filtration analysis of envelope glycoproteins. Supernatants from 293T cells, transfected with pPPI4-gp140 plus pcDNA3.1-Furin, were concentrated 100-fold and then size fractionated by using an analytical Superdex 200 HR 10/30 column equilibrated with 100 mM NaCl-50 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.0) (phosphate-buffered saline [PBS]) (Amersham-Pharmacia, Piscataway, N.J.). Fractions (300 µl) were analyzed by using SDS-PAGE and BN-PAGE; in both cases, Western blotting was used to detect Env. The column was calibrated by using protein standards of known sizes (HMW-standard; Amersham-Pharmacia).
Trimer stability experiments. Eluates from gel filtration columns, containing SOSIP gp140 trimers, were incubated with various reagents or under different conditions and then analyzed by BN-PAGE and Western blotting. The following detergents were obtained from the following suppliers: SDS, Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.; t-octylphenoxypolyethoxyethanol (Triton X-100), Sigma; polyoxyethylene sorbitan monolaurate (Tween 20), Sigma; ethylphenyl-polyethylene glycol (Nonidet P-40), United States Biochemicals, Cleveland, Ohio; n-octyl ß-D-glucopyranoside, Sigma; and Empigen BB, 30% solution (Empigen), Calbiochem, La Jolla, Calif.
Peptide production. Plasmid pN36/C34JR-FL, encoding the HIV-1JR-FL N36(L6)C34 model peptide (which consists of the N36 and C34 peptides connected via a short peptide linker that replaces the disulfide-bonded loop region of gp41ECTO), was derived from pN36/C34HXB2 (51). Amino acid substitutions were introduced into the N36 segment of pN36/34JR-FL by using the method of Kunkel et al. (44) and then verified by DNA sequencing. All recombinant peptides were expressed in Escherichia coli strain BL21(DE3)/pLysS (Novagen, Madison, Wis.). The bacteria were grown at 37°C in Luria-Bertani medium to an optical density at 600 nm of 0.8 and induced with isopropylthio-ß-D-galactoside for 3 to 4 h. Cells were lysed at 0°C with glacial acetic acid. The bacterial lysate was centrifuged (35,000 x g for 30 min) to separate the soluble fraction from inclusion bodies. The soluble fraction, containing denatured peptides, was dialyzed in 5% acetic acid overnight at room temperature. Peptides were purified from the soluble fraction to homogeneity by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (Waters, Milford, Mass.) with a C18 preparative column (Vydac, Hesperia, Calif.) and a water-acetonitrile gradient in the presence of 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid and then lyophilized. The molecular weight of each peptide was confirmed by using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (PerSeptive Biosystems, Framingham, Mass.). The concentration of each peptide was determined at 280 nm after solubilization in 6 M guanidinium chloride (32).
CD spectroscopy.
High-performance liquid chromatography-purified peptides were solubilized in 6 M guanidinium chloride-10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.0) and refolded by dilution in PBS at a neutral pH. The single-point-substituted variant peptides were named according to the position of the substitution. Circular dichroism (CD) experiments were performed by using an Aviv 62A DS CD spectrometer. The wavelength dependence of molar ellipticity,
, was monitored at 4°C by using a 10 µM peptide solution in PBS. Helix content was calculated by the method of Chen et al. (22). Thermal stability was determined by monitoring the change in the CD signal at 222 nm (
222) as a function of temperature. Thermal melts were performed in 2°C increments with an equilibration time of 2 min at the desired temperature and an integration time of 30 s. All melts were reversible. Superimposable folding and unfolding curves were observed, and >90% of the signal was regained upon cooling. The melting temperatures, or midpoints of the cooperative thermal unfolding transitions (Tm), were determined from the maximum of the first derivative, with respect to the reciprocal of the temperature, of the
222 values (12). The error in the estimation of Tm was ±0.5°C.
Sedimentation equilibrium analysis. An XL-A analytical ultracentrifuge equipped with an An-60 Ti rotor (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, Calif.) was used for sedimentation equilibrium analysis. Peptide solutions were dialyzed overnight against PBS, loaded at initial concentrations of 10, 30, and 100 µM, and analyzed at rotor speeds of 20,000 and 23,000 rpm at 20°C. Data sets were fitted simultaneously to a single-species model of ln(absorbance) versus (radial distances)2 by using the program NONLIN (43). Protein partial specific volume and solvent density were calculated as described by Laue et al. (48).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (42K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Instability of SOS gp140 and a mutagenesis strategy for gp41ECTO. (A) BN-PAGE analysis of SOS gp140 present in culture supernatants derived from four individual experiments each involving transient transfection of 293T cells with the same Env and furin expression plasmids. (B) The residues at positions a and d in the N-terminal heptad repeat of gp41ECTO, depicted in gray in the secondary structure, were substituted in this study. Major MAb epitopes are indicated (26, 68, 100, 106). (C) Schematic representation of a cross-section of the six-helix bundle, postfusion form of gp41ECTO and a helical-wheel representation of one N-terminal helix. The residues at positions a and d of the N-terminal heptad repeat (black symbols) form the trimer interface.
|
The trimeric stability of gp41 in the six-helix bundle form of the protein is determined by the residues at positions a and d of the N-terminal heptad repeat region (40, 41, 52) (Fig. 1B and C). Most of these amino acids are absolutely conserved. Hydrophobic Val, Leu, and Ile residues form the apolar interface of the three N-terminal helices; these residues are critical determinants of the folding and thermal stability of the six-helix bundle (84). We assumed that making nonconservative substitutions at these conserved, hydrophobic residues would destabilize the six-helix bundle and so, by reducing the probability of its formation, cause the gp41ECTO subunits to remain in their desired, prefusion configuration. The hydrophilic glutamine residues at positions 552, 562, and 590 were initially left unaltered, since buried polar interactions involving these residues confer structural specificity for the formation of the N-terminal coiled-coil trimer at the expense of its thermal stability (41) (Fig. 1B and C). Substitutions at the Thr-569 residue were also evaluated.
Because we could not predict which amino acids would be tolerated in the prefusion configuration of gp41ECTO, we performed random mutagenesis. Hence, various amino acids with different biochemical properties were introduced in place of the targeted Val, Ile, and Leu residues. An emphasis of our mutagenesis approach was to alter the Ile-559 and Ile-573 residues, because core isoleucines are known to confer the greatest stability to trimeric coiled coils (also known as isoleucine zippers) (38). In most simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) strains, Val and Thr residues are found, respectively, at these positions, where they may serve to destabilize the postfusion, coiled-coil structure (40, 49, 50). Of note is that SIV gp140UNC has a greater tendency to be trimeric than the corresponding HIV-1 protein (15, 19).
The use of BN-PAGE to monitor the oligomeric state of HIV-1 gp140 has been described elsewhere (83). This technique served as a screening assay to identify more stable SOS gp140 variants, i.e., ones that remained trimeric under conditions in which unmodified SOS gp140 ran mainly as a monomer. The SOS gp140 variants were expressed in transiently transfected 293T cells, in the presence of cotransfected furin to facilitate gp120-gp41 cleavage. The effects of various single-residue substitutions on the expression and trimer stability of these SOS gp140 variants are summarized in Table 1. An example of how BN-PAGE was used to derive this information is shown in Fig. 2A.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Summary of characteristics of SOS gp140 variants
|
![]() View larger version (39K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. PAGE analysis of SOS gp140. (A) BN-PAGE of SOS gp140 containing changes at position 559. gp140UNC was included for comparison. (B and C) SDS-PAGE of SOS gp140 variants under nonreducing (B) or reducing (C) conditions. (D) BN-PAGE analysis after treatment with increasing SDS concentrations. SOSIG gp140 was treated with SDS for 1 h at 25°C. The SDS concentrations used were 0, 0.005, 0.01, 0.015, 0.02, 0.025, 0.03, 0.035, and 0.04%, increasing from left to right. BN-PAGE analysis was then performed. Monomeric gp120 (20 ng) served as a molecular weight standard.
|
We used BN-PAGE to determine whether there were differences in oligomer stability among the SOS gp140 mutants that were efficiently expressed. Under native conditions, wild-type SOS gp140 migrates predominantly as a monomer, with some dimeric and trimeric species also present (Fig. 2A, second lane). The proportion of SOS gp140 that is oligomeric varies from experiment to experiment (Fig. 1A), but the gel shown in Fig. 2A is typical of what is most commonly observed. In contrast, gp140UNC migrates as oligomeric forms, with the dimer predominating (Fig. 2A, first lane).
Most of the amino acid substitutions consistent with the efficient expression of SOS gp140 had little effect on the extent of its oligomerization (Table 1). However, several substitutions at position 559 clearly altered the oligomerization state of SOS gp140 (Fig. 2A). Thus, when Ile-559 was replaced by a nonconservative Gly (I559G), Arg (I559R), or Pro (I559P) residue, the most abundant protein form was consistently the trimer (Fig. 2A, fourth, fifth, and eighth lanes). In contrast, the conservative Ile-to-Val substitution at position 559 had no effect, in that the I559V protein and wild-type SOS gp140 were indistinguishable (Fig. 2A, second and seventh lanes). Some substitutions at positions 566 and 569 (e.g., L566V and T569P) marginally increased the proportions of SOS gp140 variants that were trimeric (Table 1). Note that the percentage of trimers varied per transfection, but the amount of trimer in the SOS gp140 I559P preparation shown in Fig. 2A (see also Fig. 3) was typical. Sometimes, larger amounts of trimer, up to 90%, were observed.
![]() View larger version (53K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Gel filtration analysis of SOSIP gp140. (A) SOS gp140 and SOSIP gp140 (SOS I559P) were fractionated on a Superdex 200 column. The individual fractions were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. (B) The SOSIP gp140 fractions from panel A were analyzed by BN-PAGE and Western blotting. The elution positions (peak fractions) of standard proteins are indicated.
|
The above experiments show that the introduction of the helix-destabilizing residue Gly or Pro at position 559 increased the tendency of SOS gp140 to form trimers. Hence, this region of gp140 may not be helical in the prefusion configuration of the protein. In the influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA2) protein, a loop-to-helix transition induced by exposure to low pH is essential for the formation of the fusion-intermediate, extended coiled-coil conformation (8). Various proline substitutions in this particular region of HA2 permit the production of proteolytically cleaved trimers, but these mutants are fusion impaired because they cannot undergo the critical loop-to-helix transition (37, 75). We therefore investigated whether proline substitutions at other residues near position 559 of HIV-1 gp41 could have the same, trimer-stabilizing effect as the I559P substitution. However, although most of the mutants could be efficiently expressed, none of the substitutions stabilized the trimeric form of SOS gp140 in the same way that the I559P substitution did (Table 2).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Effect of proline substitutions at residues near position 559
|
The I559G and I559P substitutions that conferred increased stability on SOS gp140 were also made in the context of HIV-1LAI expressing membrane-bound Env to determine whether they were compatible with Env function. Both substitutions completely abolished Env function and virus replication (R. W. Sanders and B. Berkhout, unpublished results). This finding is consistent with previous reports of the deleterious effects of most substitutions in this region of gp41 (13, 20, 21, 74, 95, 96).
Stabilized SOS trimers form noncovalently and are cleaved. Based on the above results, we focused on the SOSgp140 I559P and I559G variants for further analysis. These proteins are designated SOSIP gp140 and SOSIG gp140, respectively. Although SOSIP gp140 was consistently expressed at higher levels than SOSIG gp140, the presence of a glycine residue at position 559 might confer flexibility to the latter protein. We considered that any such flexibility might prove useful if and when the I559G substitution were combined with other modifications. We also further studied the SOS gp140 L566V and T569P variants to determine whether similar results would be obtained with trimers that had been stabilized, even to only a limited extent, by substitutions at positions other than 559.
To investigate whether the oligomeric species present in the SOSIP gp140, SOSIG gp140, L566V, and T569P preparations were covalently or noncovalently associated, we analyzed them by using denaturing but nonreducing SDS-PAGE (Fig. 2B). gp140UNC was included for comparison (Fig. 2B, first lane). As expected, SOS gp140 migrated predominantly as a 140-kDa species (Fig. 2B, second lane). However, some higher-molecular-weight, SDS-resistant species were also present in both the SOS gp140 and the gp140UNC preparations. The higher-molecular-weight species were only a minor component of the SOS gp140 preparation, but they were the predominant form in the gp140UNC preparation (Fig. 2B, first lane). We believe that the higher-molecular-weight forms of these proteins are predominantly covalently associated dimers and, in some cases, tetramers that could be dimers of dimers (see below).
The SOS gp140 variants were all indistinguishable from wild-type SOS gp140, in that the predominant species after SDS treatment were always 140-kDa monomers (Fig. 2B, third through seventh lanes). Thus, the trimeric forms of SOSIP gp140 and SOSIG gp140 are not created by the aberrant formation of intermolecular disulfide bonds; instead, the protein is associated by noncovalent interactions.
Our goal is to make stable, oligomeric gp140 that is properly processed at the cleavage site between the gp120 and gp41 subunits. We therefore analyzed whether the SOSIP gp140, SOSIG gp140, L566V, and T569P variants were processed appropriately. The proteins were boiled in the presence of SDS and dithiothreitol (DTT), to achieve both denaturation and reduction, before SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig. 2C). Under these conditions, each of the SOS gp140 variants was converted to gp120 and gp41ECTO forms (Fig. 2C and data not shown). Thus, each of the gp140 variants was substantially (>90%) cleaved, in that the 140-kDa band did not survive DTT treatment (Fig. 2C, second through seventh lanes). In contrast, gp140UNC was unaffected by DTT and still migrated as a 140-kDa band, because it possesses a peptide bond between the gp120 and gp41 subunits (Fig. 2C, first lane). Thus, the increased trimer stability of the SOSIP gp140, SOSIG gp140, L566V, and T569P variants is not caused by or associated with any cleavage defect.
Most of the SOS gp140 preparations analyzed by SDS-PAGE contained a small percentage of SDS-resistant oligomers, and these forms of gp140 were relatively abundant in the gp140UNC preparation (Fig. 2B). Since these higher-molecular-weight forms of gp140 were not observed when DTT was used to reduce disulfide bonds (Fig. 2C), they presumably represent protein forms that are linked via aberrant, intermolecular disulfide bonds (83). To determine whether the higher-molecular-weight proteins were dimers or trimers, we treated SOSIG gp140 with increasing amounts of SDS and then performed BN-PAGE analysis (Fig. 2D). In the absence of SDS, trimers, dimers, and monomers were present at approximately equal proportions in the SOSIG gp140 preparation (Fig. 2D, second lane). As the SDS concentration was increased, however, the trimer band completely disappeared, whereas the dimer band survived exposure to SDS concentrations even as high as 1% (Fig. 2B, fourth lane, and Fig. 2D). The stronger intensity of the dimer band on the Western blot is probably attributable to increased reactivity of the detecting MAb once gp140 has been denatured with SDS. The more pronounced increase in the intensity of the monomer band suggests that trimers dissociate to three monomers, rather than to a dimer and a monomer (see below). Overall, we conclude that SOSIG gp140 trimers are formed by noncovalent, SDS-sensitive bonds but that dimers are associated via aberrant, intersubunit disulfide bonds. Similar results were obtained with the SOSIP gp140 preparation (data not shown, but see Fig. 4). Wild-type SOS gp140 could not, of course, be tested in this way, as its trimeric form was too unstable.
![]() View larger version (57K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Stability of SOSIP gp140 trimers. Fractions 6 and 7 from a gel filtration profile similar to that shown in Fig. 3 were pooled as a source of SOSIP gp140 trimers. The trimers were incubated for 1 h at the temperatures indicated (A) or exposed to a 0.1% concentration of various detergents for 1 h at 25°C (B). The proteins were then analyzed by BN-PAGE and Western blotting. -80°C x3, three freeze-thaw cycles at -80°C; NP-40, Nonidet P-40; Oct-glucoside, n-octyl ß-D-glucopyranoside.
|
The eluate fractions were collected and then analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting to identify the migration positions of various Env forms (Fig. 3). Because the input Env was unpurified, unrelated proteins are also present in the eluate, so the fractions in which Env forms eluted could not be determined by nonspecific methods. SOS gp140 was found predominantly in fractions 13, 14, and 15, corresponding to an apparent molecular mass similar to that of catalase (232 kDa) (Fig. 3A, top panel). Thus, the average apparent molecular mass of the eluted SOS gp140 monomer was
240 kDa, a value consistent with the value of
220 kDa that was reported previously, also by gel filtration (83). The small amount of gp120 present in this preparation of SOS gp140 had a slightly lower apparent molecular mass of
220 kDa (Fig. 3A). In most preparations of SOS gp140, a small quantity of covalently linked oligomers, probably dimers, was also seen, centered around fractions 9 and 10 (data not shown). These results confirm the previous report that SOS gp140 is usually predominantly a monomeric protein (83) (Fig. 1A).
In contrast, SOSIP gp140 eluted over a broad range in fractions 1 to 16, indicating that both oligomeric and monomeric species are present (Fig. 3A, bottom panel). A small amount of covalently linked oligomers was also observed (Fig. 2B, third lane), just as similar oligomers were usually present in SOS gp140 preparations (Fig. 2B, second lane). To resolve the different oligomeric species, the same SOSIP gp140 gel filtration fractions were then analyzed by BN-PAGE. This analysis showed that trimeric, dimeric, and monomeric proteins had been clearly resolved on the Superdex 200 column; the trimers were predominantly in fractions 4 to 9, the dimers were in fractions 7 to 11, and the monomers were in fractions 11 to 15 (Fig. 3B). Similar results were obtained with an SOS gp140 triple mutant containing the I559P, L566V, and T569P mutations (data not shown).
The apparent molecular mass of the SOSIP gp140 monomer corresponds to what was observed with wild-type SOS gp140 (
240 kDa; see above). The retention of dimers, centered around fraction 9, corresponds to an average apparent molecular mass of
410 kDa, whereas the trimer (peak fraction 6) has an average apparent molecular mass of
520 kDa. It is notable that the trimers do not elute in a position consistent with their expected size of three times the size of a gp140 monomer. They elute at a position corresponding to a molecular mass of
520 kDa, as opposed to the "expected"
660 to 720 kDa (i.e., 3 x
220 to 240 kDa). The same is true, to a lesser extent, for the dimers, which elute at
410 kDa, compared to the "expected"
440 to 480 kDa (i.e., 2 x
220 to 240 kDa). The explanation for these results is probably that the trimers, and perhaps also the dimers, are folded into a conformation which is more compact than that of gp140 monomers. Electron microscopy studies may be able to confirm this suggestion. Alternatively, the nature and extent of glycosylation of the different oligomeric forms of gp140 may vary, because glycosylation sites on the trimer could be less accessible to modifying enzymes than the same sites on the monomer. Overall, given the limitations of gel filtration for estimating the molecular masses of nonglobular proteins (14, 15, 83), other techniques will need to be used (e.g., mass spectrometry) to establish the absolute molecular masses of the various purified oligomeric species of SOS gp140.
Clearly, SOSIP gp140 preparations are not pure trimers prior to fractionation by gel filtration (Fig. 2A and 3); monomers, dimers, and tetramers are also present. We estimate that typically 40% of an SOSIP gp140 preparation elutes in the trimer fraction. We assume that the dimers and tetramers are aberrant forms of Env that are generated by much the same, albeit unknown, processes that also cause them to be present in gp140UNC preparations (Fig. 2) (28-30, 33, 83, 101, 102). The small amount of monomers present in SOSIP gp140 preparations probably arises because the effect of the trimer-stabilizing I559P substitution is imperfect. We are presently determining how to purify SOSIP gp140 trimers from other non-Env forms that elute from gel filtration columns at similar positions.
Stability of SOSIP gp140 trimers. The Superdex 200 column fractions corresponding to the trimer peak of the SOS gp140 variant I559P (fractions 6 and 7) were pooled for analysis of their stability (Fig. 4). The trimers were stable when incubated for 1 h at 25 and 37°C (Fig. 4A, first and second lanes), but some monomers became visible after 1 h at 45°C (third lane) and almost all of the protein was in the monomeric form after heating for 1 h at 55 or 65°C (fourth and fifth lanes). Three freeze-thaw cycles at -80°C did not convert the trimers into monomers (Fig. 4A, seventh lane). We next incubated the fractionated trimers with various detergents for 1 h at 25°C (Fig. 4B). The trimers dissociated into monomers upon incubation with 0.1% SDS, an anionic detergent (Fig. 4B, second lane), but they were at least partially resistant to the same concentration of the nonionic or zwitterionic detergents Triton X-100, Tween 20, Nonidet P-40, n-octyl ß-D-glucopyranoside, and Empigen (third through seventh lanes). We also observed that SOSIP gp140 trimers did not dissociate into monomers in the presence of NaCl concentrations of up to 1.0 M or after exposure to mild acid (pH 4.0) (data not shown). The effects of various adjuvants and of long-term storage at various temperatures on the trimeric state of purified SOSIP gp140 trimers are currently under investigation.
Dimers were present at only very low levels in heat- or detergent-treated SOSIP gp140 trimers. This result suggests that the assembly units of the trimers are three equivalent monomers rather than a monomer and a dimer.
Antigenic structure analysis of stabilized SOS gp140. Since our goal is to make cleaved, stable gp140 trimers that mimic as closely as possible the antigenic structure of virion-associated Env, we studied the reactivity of unpurified SOSIP gp140 with a panel of MAbs and CD4-based reagents. SOS gp140 and gp140UNC were also studied for comparison (Fig. 5). Both wild-type SOS gp140 and SOSIP gp140 were immunoprecipitated by the CD4 IgG2 molecule, indicating that the CD4BS was intact on the gp120 subunits of both proteins (Fig. 5, second lane). Neutralizing MAb b12 to a CD4BS-associated epitope also bound to both proteins efficiently, as did neutralizing MAb 2G12 to a mannose-dependent gp120 epitope (80, 93) (Fig. 5, first and third lanes). Furthermore, soluble CD4 induction of the 17b epitope was highly efficient in both SOS gp140 and SOSIP gp140 (Fig. 5, fourth and fifth lanes). This epitope overlaps the CD4-inducible coreceptor binding site on gp120 (77, 91, 97, 98). Thus, the I559P substitution in gp41ECTO does not affect the ability of the gp120 subunits of SOS gp140 to bind the CD4 receptor and then to undergo receptor-mediated conformational changes. SOSIP gp140 appears indistinguishable from wild-type SOS gp140 in this regard.
![]() View larger version (59K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Antigenic structure analysis of gp140. Radioimmunoprecipitation assays were performed with gp140UNC, SOS gp140, and SOSIP gp140 (SOS gp140 I559P) and various neutralizing and nonneutralizing MAbs as previously described (5). sCD4, soluble CD4.
|
The SOS gp140 variants I559G, L566V, and T569P were also tested for reactivity with the above MAbs and CD4-based reagents. Each of them behaved in a manner similar to that of SOS gp140 and SOSIP gp140 (data not shown). Further studies on the receptor and MAb binding properties of purified SOSIP gp140 trimers will be described elsewhere in a comparison with other forms of gp140 (M. Vesanen, R. W. Sanders, and J. P. Moore, unpublished results). These experiments, together with other planned structural analyses, should determine whether the gp41ECTO moieties of SOSIP gp140 adopt a native configuration or whether the helix-destabilizing effect of the I559P substitution creates a nonnative gp41ECTO conformation that is not recognized by some anti-gp41 MAbs.
Destabilization of the six-helix bundle form of gp41. Our mutagenesis results indicate that SOS gp140 trimers can be stabilized by the I559G, I559P and, to some extent, L566V and T569P substitutions in the N-terminal heptad repeat region of gp41ECTO. Given that hydrophobic interactions are a dominant factor in the stabilization of the gp41 core (40, 51), it would appear that these amino acid substitutions destabilize the six-helix bundle structure. To directly test this hypothesis, we determined the effects of each of the four amino acid substitutions on the overall structure and stability of the JR-FL gp41ECTO core. To do this, we constructed a recombinant peptide model of the soluble gp41 core. This model peptide, designated N36(L6)C34, consists of the N36 and C34 peptides connected via a short peptide linker that replaces the disulfide-bonded loop region of gp41ECTO (Fig. 6A ) (51). The N36 peptide consists of residues 546 to 581 and the C34 peptide consists of residues 628 to 661 of the JR-FL gp41 sequence. Each of the above four amino acid changes was introduced into the N36(L6)C34 peptide. Sedimentation equilibrium analysis showed that the molecular weights of the N36(L6)C34 variants, except for the I559P mutant, were all within 10% those calculated for an ideal trimer, with no systematic deviation of the residuals (data not shown).
![]() View larger version (24K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. HIV-1 gp41ECTO core structure and mutant peptides. (A) The N36-C34 crystal structure is shown with one N36 helix and one C34 helix labeled at the amino termini. Three C34 helices (red) pack against the N36 trimeric coiled coil (blue). The van der Waal surfaces of residues at positions a (red) and d (green) are superimposed on the helix backbone of the N36 coiled coil. Amino acids substituted in this study are indicated above the a and d layers. The diagram was prepared by using the program GRASP (64). (B) Thermal melting transition curves of the N36(L6)C34 (open circles), I559G (closed circles), I559P (open squares), L566V (open diamonds), and T569P (open triangles) peptides were determined by CD spectroscopy at 222 nm and at a peptide concentration of 10 µM in PBS. The increase in the fraction of unfolded molecules is shown as a function of temperature. All melts were reversible. Superimposable folding and unfolding curves were observed, and >90% of the signal was regained upon cooling. (C) Equilibrium sedimentation analysis of the T569P peptide.Representative data for this peptide were collected at 20°C, 20,000 rpm, and a peptide concentration of 30 µM in PBS. The data fit best to a trimer model (curve 3). Curves for a dimer (curve 2) and a tetramer (curve 4) are depicted for comparison. Analyses of residual differences from curve 3 did not reveal a systematic error.
|
75% alpha helical (Table 3). Under these conditions, the Tm of the I559G, I559P, L566V, and T569P peptides are 46, 34, 72, and 44°C, respectively; the Tm for the wild-type peptide is 78°C (Table 3). The pre- and posttransitional slopes and the steepness of the main transition are very similar for the N36(L6)C34, I559G, and L566V peptides (Fig. 6B). In contrast, the I559P and T569P peptides display broad thermal unfolding transitions (Fig. 6B). Sedimentation equilibrium experiments indicate that the N36(L6)C34 peptide and the I559G, L566V, and T569P variant peptides each sediment as discrete trimers over a 10-fold range of peptide concentrations (10 to 100 µM) (Table 3 and Fig. 6C). The I559P peptide is also trimeric in solution at concentrations of less than 15 µM but exhibits a systematic deviation from the trimer molecular weight at 10 to 100 µM, indicating that it is prone to aggregation. Taken together, these results indicate that the Ile-559-to-Gly and Thr-569-to-Pro substitutions each lead to an appreciable destabilization of the six-helix bundle structure but do not affect its overall fold. In contrast, the Ile-559-to-Pro substitution essentially disrupts the six-helix bundle structure. Moreover, the Leu-566-to-Val change is associated with a small, unfavorable, residual destabilization of the six-helix bundle structure. |
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Biophysical characterization of JR-FL gp41 core mutantsa
|
|
|
|---|
Our efforts were guided by the hypothesis that destabilization of the postfusion state of gp41 might lead to stabilization of the native, trimeric SOS gp140 complex. The native HIV-1 Env complex is metastable and undergoes a transition to the postfusion, six-helix bundle structure after activation by receptor binding, probably losing gp120 in the process (17, 24, 25, 31, 61, 99). The gp120 moiety of SOS gp140 can bind CD4 and undergo conformational changes that expose the coreceptor binding site. We do not know whether any additional conformational changes are initiated in the gp41ECTO moiety of SOS gp140 upon CD4 and/or coreceptor binding. Any such changes cannot be completed. However, whether or not SOS gp140 has bound to CD4, the gp41-gp41 interactions that are responsible for its trimerization are unstable, and the protein readily becomes a monomer (83).
Our hypothesis for stabilizing the trimeric form of SOS gp140 was based on an increasing understanding of the delicate balance between the metastable, prefusion state of gp140 and its stable, postfusion, six-helix bundle configuration. The balance involves not only the trimeric interactions between gp41ECTO moieties but also the association between gp120 and gp41ECTO. Several lines of evidence support our experimental approach. SIVmac gp140 seems to be a more stable trimeric protein than HIV-1 gp140 (15, 19). In contrast, the postfusion state of SIVmac Env is less stable than that of HIV-1 Env (50); it may or may not be relevant that SIVmac Env contains a valine and not an isoleucine residue at position 559. Furthermore, SIVmac Env with an unusually strong gp120-gp41 association has a destabilized, postfusion, six-helix bundle conformation, unlike the parental virus from which it evolved (47, 50). Also consistent with our hypothesis are studies with an HIV-1LAI variant engineered to contain SOS substitutions and so to have gp120 covalently linked to gp41. This virus is minimally infectious but evolves in cultures to a more infectious form via reversions at a region of gp41ECTO that corresponds to the trimer interface of the postfusion form (Sanders and Berkhout, unpublished). These changes in gp41ECTO may influence the interactions both between gp120 and gp41 and between the gp41 moieties.
We believe that the substitutions that we have introduced at position 559 to make SOSIP gp140 or SOSIG gp140 block one or more of the conformational transitions in gp41ECTO (39). A model of how the substitutions might act is presented in Fig. 7. We argue that preventing these transitions stabilizes SOS gp140 as a trimer. However, we do not yet know which of the several conformational transitions that gp41ECTO undergoes during fusion is impaired by the changes at position 559. Two possibilities are that the transition from the elusive native state to the prehairpin intermediate is affected or that the subsequent transition from the prehairpin intermediate to the six-helix bundle structure is prevented (Fig. 7). The observation that the N36(L6)C34 I559P peptide is only
75% helical argues in favor of the first possibilityinterference with the formation of the N-terminal helixalthough additional studies will be required to confirm this notion. Peptide-based studies of the gp41 N-terminal helix have shown that the first part of this helix, including the region around position 559, is more flexible than the last part (18). There is evidence that the prehairpin intermediate may exist as an equilibrium between a monomeric state and a trimeric coiled coil and that disrupting the homotrimeric coiled coil is an efficient way to block fusion (4, 11, 72). Preventing the formation of the inherently unstable prehairpin intermediate state may therefore stabilize the Env complex in its native conformation.
![]() View larger version (25K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Model of gp41ECTO and its transitions during fusion. (Left panel) Hypothetical, native prefusion configuration of gp41 (39). (Middle panel) Prehairpin intermediate form. (Right panel) Postfusion state. In the prefusion configuration, the N-terminal helix is not present, and the region around positions 559 to 569 is not helical. The I559P and related substitutions are proposed to disrupt either the formation of the N-terminal helix in the prehairpin intermediate form or the formation of the six-helix bundle. As a result, modified SOS gp140 is maintained in the prefusion configuration. The position of the T605C substitution that creates SOS gp140 is also specified, as is the adjacent intermolecular disulfide bond (yellow bar). The positions of N-linked glycans are represented as black branching structures. Only two helices from one gp41 molecule are shown, for clarity. The letters A, B, and C are added to assist with orientation of the helices.
|
The SOSIP gp140, SOSIG gp140, L566V, and T569P variants do not suffer from any proteolytic cleavage defects, in contrast to the cleavage defects that are caused by amino acid substitutions at the same positions in the context of wild-type gp160 (13, 20, 21, 74). An explanation for the apparent discrepancy may be provided by the earlier observation that the presence of the SOS intersubunit disulfide bond can rescue some cleavage defects in gp140 (79). Moreover, the SOS gp140 variants are expressed in the presence of cotransfected furin, so the increased concentration of this enzyme may compensate for any partial reduction in cleavage efficiency. The use of basic substitutions within the gp140 cleavage site to increase the efficiency with which SOS gp140 variants are processed by endogenous and exogenous furin proteases has been described elsewhere (6). The utility of these cleavage site changes in the context of SOSIP gp140 is now being evaluated.
Several unpurified and purified gp140UNC preparations from both HIV-1 and SIVmac have been described elsewhere (2, 15, 19, 28, 86, 87, 105). There is general agreement that SIVmac gp140UNC is predominantly trimeric (15, 19). In contrast, the oligomeric state of HIV-1 gp140UNC varies from study to study. After a purification procedure that included an earlier size exclusion chromatography step, HIV-1 strain ADA gp140UNC was eluted homogeneously from size exclusion columns with a molecular weight that indicated that it was a trimer (105). The production of oligomeric US4 gp140UNC that might be trimeric has also been reported (86). The presence of both dimers and tetramers in uncleaved versions of both membrane-bound gp160 and soluble gp140 molecules has been observed in several studies (27-30, 33, 101-103). Our own experience, with the BN-PAGE assay, is that a mixture of dimers, trimers, and tetramers is present in unpurified and purified HIV-1 strain JR-FL gp140UNC preparations, with dimers being the most abundant species (83). Moreover, the dimeric and tetrameric forms of HIV-1 gp140UNC and gp160 are probably oligomerized by aberrant intermolecular disulfide bonds (Fig. 2) (67, 83). It is unlikely that oligomeric gp140 of this type will fully mimic the native conformation of Env. Indeed, we have found that unpurified gp140UNC has an antigenic structure different from that of unpurified SOS gp140 monomers and SOSIP gp140 trimers. Thus, nonneutralizing antibody epitopes in both the gp120 and the gp41ECTO moieties are exposed to a much greater extent in gp140UNC than in SOS gp140 (Fig. 5) (5, 79, 83). We are now comparing purified, cleaved and uncleaved trimers as well as purified, uncleaved dimers and tetramers to assess their antigenic structures, their migration in BN-PAGE analysis after various treatments, and their receptor binding properties. These and other planned structural studies should help determine whether SOSIP gp140 truly has properties that mimic those of the native Env trimer or whether the I559P or related substitutions have converted the gp41ECTO moieties into a nonnative, irrelevant conformation. It is possible that the gp41ECTO component of SOSIP gp140 is in a fusion-incompetent configuration without any adverse effect on the native conformation of the gp120 moieties.
The trimer-stabilizing substitutions that we have described here should simplify the production of cleaved Env trimers, which may be useful in vaccine design and for structural studies. Whether cleaved, stabilized trimeric Env forms such as SOSIP gp140 will turn out to be better or worse immunogens than other forms of Env (e.g., gp140UNC) can be determined only empirically. It may be necessary to further modify the structure of SOSIP gp140 to increase its immunogenicity, for example, by removing the variable loops to increase the exposure of underlying conserved epitopes or by reducing the extent to which the protein is glycosylated (2, 7, 23, 53, 62, 76, 104). Proteins with such changes are now being constructed for future structural and immunogenicity studies.
This work was supported by NIH grants AI39420, AI42382, AI45463, and AI49764. J.P.M. is a Stavros S. Niarchos Scholar. The Department of Microbiology and Immunology at the Weill Medical College, Cornell University, gratefully acknowledges the support of the William Randolph Hearst Foundation.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»