Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, July 2002, p. 7228-7238, Vol. 76, No. 14
0022-538X/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.14.7228-7238.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Departments of Neurology,1 Microbiology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 802622
Received 20 February 2002/ Accepted 16 April 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Just as the severity of primary infection varies among humans, so does the VZV DNA burden in latently infected ganglia. In previous studies, from 37 to >3,500 copies of VZV DNA have been detected per 100 ng of total human ganglionic DNA (18, 55). PCR of latent virus DNA has demonstrated that the latent virus genome assumes a circular structure, and in situ hybridization as well as PCR evidence indicates that the neuron is the primary site of virus latency (12, 35, 36, 42). Analyses of RNA from latently infected human ganglia by Northern blotting, reverse Northern blotting, reverse transcription nested PCR, cDNA cloning followed by DNA sequencing, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and in situ hybridization have all revealed limited transcription of VZV genes. With the caveat that less than 20% of the VZV genome has been studied in detail, only transcripts mapping to open reading frames (ORFs) 4, 21, 29, 62, and 63 have been detected during latency (14-16, 18, 36, 53). The translation products of the latently transcribed VZV genes have been even more difficult to detect; IE63, the immediate-early protein encoded by ORF 63, was the first VZV translation product detected in latently infected human ganglia (47), and another study has since detected proteins encoded by ORFs 4, 21, 29, 62, and 63 during latency (46).
Propagation of VZV in tissue culture is difficult due to the highly cell-associated nature of the virus. Hence, the functional analysis of VZV proteins has been largely by analogy to herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), the prototype neurotropic human alphaherpesvirus. The HSV-1 homologues of VZV ORFs 21 and 29 are UL37 and ICP8, respectively. HSV-1 UL37 encodes an early tegument-associated 120-kDa phosphoprotein that functions in virus maturation (2, 22, 24, 30, 64, 65). The UL37 protein contains a putative nuclear export signal that may account for its cytoplasmic location (50, 51). However, in HSV-1-infected cells, UL37 interacts with ICP8 and this complex is transported into the nucleus (2). Within the nucleus, the UL37-ICP8 protein complex can be isolated by DNA affinity chromatography (66).
HSV-1 ICP8 encodes the major virus DNA binding protein and is synthesized before viral DNA replication. The 133-kDa zinc metalloprotein is initially diffusely located in the nucleus, where it associates with duplex chromatin (4, 29, 43, 59). As virus infection proceeds, ICP8 is localized only in areas containing the virus DNA polymerase and newly replicated virus DNA (9, 57, 63). ICP8 stimulates HSV-1 DNA polymerase activity and functions in the redistribution of cellular DNA replication complexes (10, 21, 45, 59, 67, 69). ICP8 binding to single-stranded DNA facilitates localized DNA melting, thus potentiating the helicase activity associated with the HSV-1 origin binding protein (6, 7, 23, 32-34, 44, 49, 56). In addition to its effect on DNA replication, ICP8 also stimulates the transcription of late virus genes (25). Expression of late HSV-1 transcripts is reduced in cells infected with HSV-1 virus lacking functional ICP8 (11). The decrease in gene transcription in ICP8-deficient HSV-1-infected cells is not solely due to reduced virus DNA replication, suggesting that ICP8 may form multifunctional complexes (52).
VZV ORF 29 protein (29p) is a nonstructural 130 kDa nuclear protein that can be extracted from infected cells by affinity chromatography on DNA-cellulose columns (39, 40). Site-specific binding of 29p to the late glycoprotein I (gI) promoter modulates the activation in trans of the gI gene by the major VZV immediate-early ORF 62 protein (IE62). In rat PC-12 neuronal cells, 29p reduces the ability of IE62 to activate gI transcription (8), whereas in permissive human T lymphocytes, 29p augments IE62-induced transcription from the gI promoter (31). VZV ORF 21 protein (21p) maps to a contiguous 3,113-bp ORF (17, 19, 68). In VZV-infected cells, the 115-kDa 21p is associated with maturing nucleocapsids (48). Both VZV gene 21 and 29 transcripts have been detected in latently infected human ganglia; however, the question regarding the nature of their function remains. The present study was undertaken to characterize two VZV proteins during productive infection whose genes are expressed during latency.
|
|
|---|
Antiserum and immunoprecipitation. Antibodies against VZV immediate-early gene 63 protein (IE63) or 21p were raised in rabbits as described previously (20, 48). Rabbit antibodies against a 12-amino acid peptide in the carboxy-terminal region of 29p were also raised (39). To resolve VZV proteins, cell extracts were prepared in radioimmunoprecipitation (RIPA) lysis buffer (20 mM Na2HPO4 [pH 7.6], 100 mM NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.5% deoxycholate, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS]). Where required, viscosity of the cell extract was reduced by centrifugation at 12,500 x g for 2 min through a shredding device (Qiashredder; Qiagen, Valencia, Calif.). Cell extracts were clarified by centrifugation (10,000 x g, 60 min, 4°C). Proteins were immunoprecipitated overnight at 4°C with the addition of the specific rabbit antiserum (1:200 final dilution) and collected on recombinant protein A-coated Sepharose beads (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.). Beads were collected by low-speed centrifugation (2,000 x g for 2 min), washed twice in RIPA wash buffer I (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.6], 400 mM NaCl, 0.5% NP-40, 1 mM EDTA), centrifuged through a 1 M sucrose cushion prepared in RIPA wash buffer II (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.6], 40 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 1 mM EDTA), and washed twice in RIPA wash buffer II. Immunoprecipitated proteins were released from beads by boiling in SDS sample buffer for 5 min and electrophoresed through denaturing polyacrylamide gels (13). The 35S signal was amplified by soaking for 60 min in Enlightning (NEN Life Science Products, Boston, Mass.) before drying. Radiolabeled proteins were located by exposure to a phosphorstorage screen, and intensities were quantitated with attendant ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics, San Francisco, Calif.).
In situ histochemistry. VZV-infected Vero cells were grown on 6-mm-diameter glass disks. At daily intervals, cultures were processed for two-color analysis to detect 21p and 29p. Cells were fixed in ice-cold PLP (4% paraformaldehyde, 0.1 M L-lysine, 1.3 mM sodium m-periodate, 50 mM Na2HPO4 [pH 7.4]), permeabilized for 10 min in methanol-acetone (50:50), and blocked for 60 min in normal mouse serum diluted 1:20 in Tris-buffered saline (TBS) (20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl). Between all solution changes, cells were extensively washed in TBS. Cells were incubated for 60 min at room temperature with rabbit anti-29p serum (1:250), followed by incubation for 60 min with unconjugated goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin (Ig) (Fab fragment) diluted 1:250 in TBS. Samples were incubated for 60 min with fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated mouse anti-goat IgG diluted 1:250 in TBS, followed by incubation with rabbit anti-21p diluted 1:200 in TBS. After incubation for 60 min with Cy3-conjugated mouse anti-rabbit IgG diluted 1:500 in TBS, samples were mounted in 4',6'-diamidine-2-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) containing mineral oil (Vectashield; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, Calif.). All immunoreagents were obtained from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, Pa., and prior to use, the rabbit anti-21p sera was adsorbed with acetone-fixed Vero cells. Transmission immunofluorescence microscopy was performed using a Nikon E-800 microscope equipped with equipped with epifluorescence, DAPI, fluorescein, and Texas Red barrier filters. Images were also collected using a Nikon Diaphot inverted confocal microscope with an attached argon ion laser. All images were captured using a Cooke SensiCam charge-coupled device camera at x400 or x630 magnification. Slide Book (Intelligent Imagining Innovations, Inc. Denver, Colo.) and Adobe PhotoShop version 6.0 (Mountain View, Calif.) software was used to deconvolute and overlay the digital images.
Chromatography of DNA binding proteins. At 3 days postinfection, VZV-infected MeWo cells (5 x 108 cells) were labeled with [35S]methionine for 16 h. Cells were collected, washed in phosphate-buffered saline, resuspended in high-salt buffer (1.7 M KCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.6], 5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.12 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride), and lysed by sonication. Samples were clarified by centrifugation (20,000 x g, 30 min, 4°C), and the supernatant was brought to an 8% concentration in polyethylene glycol. After 60 min of incubation on ice and clarification, the supernatant was diluted with an equal volume of TEDPGK (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.6], 5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol, 0.12 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 20% glycerol, 150 mM KCl) containing 0.4% NP-40 and 0.1% bovine serum albumin. After extensive dialysis against TEDPGK containing 0.2% NP-40, the sample was again clarified and applied to washed DNA-agarose beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Unbound proteins were removed by washing with 150 mM KCl in TEDPGK containing 0.2% NP-40. Proteins were eluted from the DNA-agarose beads by stepwise increase of the KCl concentration from 0.2 to 2.4 M. After elution, each fraction was brought to 0.1% with respect to bovine serum albumin, dialyzed against TBS (20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.6], 150 mM NaCl), and reduced to 1 ml by centrifugal concentration (Ultrafree-CL filters; Millipore Corp., Bedford, Mass.). Each fraction was divided into equal portions and precipitated with either anti-21p or anti-29p serum, and the immuncomplexes were collected on recombinant protein A-coated Sepharose beads, washed, and resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) as described above.
Saccharomyces cerevisiae two-hybrid analyses. The Hybrid Hunter yeast two-hybrid system (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) was used to detect in vivo protein-protein interactions. Initially, full-length ORF 21 and ORF 29 were shuttled from eukaryotic expression plasmids (21AM-pCIneo and 29 AM-pCIneo; for details, see below) into yeast pHybLex/Zeo (bait) and pYESTrp2 (prey) plasmids. The multiple cloning sites of both yeast plasmids were modified to ensure in-frame ORF insertion and multiple downstream translation termination signals. In subsequent experiments, various segments of ORF 21 and ORF 29 were amplified by PCR using high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Advantage-HF; Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.) and subcloned in-frame into the yeast bait and prey plasmids. Oligonucleotide primers (Table 1) were selected from regions of 21p and 29p that lack consensus amino acid sequence homology to HSV-1 (ClustalW; European Bioinformatics Institute). The DNA sequences bracketing the cloning sites were determined for all constructs to confirm in-frame insertions.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Oligonucleotide primers used to construct yeast bait and prey plasmids
|
Eukaryotic expression and reporter plasmid construction. Plasmids expressing 21p, 29p, and IE62 in eukaryotic cells were constructed by inserting the full-length ORFs 21 and 29 into pCI-neo (Invitrogen). Initially, plasmid DNA containing the selected ORFs was extracted (14). Restriction endonucleases were used to shuttle ORF 21 (Hsp921 and BanI), ORF 29 (HphI), and ORF 62 (TthIII1 and ScaI) into pAlter1 (Promega). Unique restriction endonuclease recognition sequences were placed outside ORF 21 (HindIII and SpeI), ORF 29 (HindIII and SpeI), and ORF 62 (EcoRI) by using oligonucleotide base site-directed mutagenesis of the pAlter1 inserts. The altered ORFs were then shuttled into pCIneo, yielding eukaryotic expression plasmids for 21p (21AM-pCIneo), 29p (29AMK-pCIneo), and IE62 (62AM-pCIneo). DNA sequencing confirmed the expected constructions.
To construct promoter and reporter plasmids, various VZV gene promoters were inserted into pGL3Basic-Luc (Promega) to drive expression of the luciferase reporter gene. The 284-bp ORF20/ORF21 and the 220-bp ORF28/ORF29 intergenic DNA sequences were amplified using oligonucleotide primers tagged with either KpnI or MluI restriction endonuclease sites. PCR products were digested with KpnI and MluI and purified on agarose gels. Insertion of the PCR products into pGL3Basic-Luc generated reporter plasmids containing ORF 20 (p20-luc) and ORF 29 (p29-Luc) promoters. To generate reporter constructs for opposing promoters (p21-Luc and p29-Luc), the pGL3Basic-luc multiple cloning site was reversed by ligation of synthetic adaptors. DNA sequencing of all inserted PCR products confirmed amplification fidelity.
Transient transformation and reporter assay. Vero cells (4 x 105) were seeded into 9.6-cm2 culture dishes and incubated overnight. Endotoxin-free supercoiled plasmid DNA was extracted by affinity chromatography (Qiagen). Each transfection consisted of reporter plasmid (300 ng), ß-Gal expression plasmid DNA (300 ng; pCMV-ßgal, Promega), and various amounts of VZV 21p, 29p, or IE62 expression vector. The CMV IE-3 promoter was used to drive all inserts (ß-Gal, 21p, 29p, and IE62) to ensure equivalent expression from all cotransfected plasmids. Lipid-based (Lipofectamine-plus; GIBCO-BRL) transfection protocols were used as directed by the supplier. Cells were harvested 24 h after transfection and lysed in 100 µl of reporter lysis buffer (Promega). Each transfection assay was performed at least in duplicate, and for each independent transfection, the ß-Gal and luciferase activities were assayed in replicate 30-µl aliquots of the culture lysate. To account for possible variations in transfection efficiency, luciferase activities were normalized with respect to ß-Gal.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (59K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Intracellular locations of VZV gene 21 protein (21p) and VZV gene 29 protein (29p) viewed by transmission UV microscopy. VZV-infected Vero cells were stained for cellular DNA in the nucleus (blue) with DAPI, FITC-tagged 29p (green), and Cy3-tagged 21p (red) as described in Materials and Methods. 29p and 21p are seen in punctuate intranuclear regions (row A), with 21p also present in the cytoplasm. Staining specificity was confirmed by the omission of anti-21p antibody (row B) and anti-29p antibody (row C).
|
![]() View larger version (53K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Intracellular location of VZV 21p and 29p viewed by confocal UV microscopy. VZV-infected Vero cells were stained for DNA with DAPI (blue), Cy3-tagged 21p (red), and FITC-tagged 29p (green) as described in Materials and Methods. Note 21p in the nucleus and cytoplasm of infected cells (left panel) and 29p exclusively in the nucleus (middle panel). The right panel shows intranuclear colocalization of both 21p and 29p (yellow).
|
![]() View larger version (48K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. 21p and 29p are not significantly phosphorylated in vivo. At 48 h postinfection, VZV-infected (lanes 2, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 11, 12, 14, 15, 17, and 18) and uninfected (lanes 1, 4, 7, 10, 13, and 16) MeWo cells were labeled with [35S]methionine (lanes 1 to 6 and 13 to 15) or 32P (lanes 7 to 12 and 16 to 18) for 6 h (lanes 2, 5, 8, 11, 14, and 17) or 22 h (lanes 1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 12, 13, 15, 16, and 18). At the end of the labeling period, protein extracts were prepared and immunoprecipitated as described in Materials and Methods with antisera directed against 21p (lanes 1 to 3 and 7 to 9), 29p (lanes 4 to 6 and 10 to 12), or IE63 (lanes 13 to 18). 21p and 29p were resolved by SDS-8% PAGE (panel A) and IE63 by SDS-12% PAGE (panel B). Phosphorimaging of immunoprecipitated 21p, 29p, and IE63 (40.5 kDa) demonstrated that all three proteins were synthesized during both the 6-h and 22-h labeling periods, but only IE63 was significantly phosphorylated. Two smaller phosphorylated proteins (lanes 17 and 18) are likely to be IE63 degradation products.
|
![]() View larger version (36K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Pulse-chase labeling of 21p and 29p during productive VZV infection. At 24 h (lane 1), 48 h (lane 2), 72 h (lane 3), and 96 h (lane 4) postinfection, cells were labeled with [35S]methionine for 3 h and processed for immunoprecipitation of 21p or 29p. Lane 5 shows the results for uninfected cells labeled for 3 h beginning at 48 h after mock infection. The results depicted in lanes 6 to 9 indicate the stability of 21p and 29p. At 48 h postinfection, cultures were labeled with [35S]methionine for 3 h and chased with excess unlabeled methionine for an additional 6 h (lane 6), 24 h (lane 7), 31 h (lane 8), or 48 h (lane 9). Protein extracts were prepared and processed by immunoprecipitation to detect 21p or 29p. Both 21p and 29p were detected in all infected cells, but 21p and 29p did not coimmunoprecipitate in any sample. Quantitation of the immunoprecipitated proteins showed that the steady-state rates of synthesis and degradation for both 21p and 29p remained constant during the 96-h labeling period.
|
![]() View larger version (40K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. DNA column elution profile of 21p and 29p. High-salt nuclear protein extract was prepared from [35S]methionine-labeled VZV-infected cells and loaded (lanes L) onto a DNA-agarose gel. After extensive washing (lanes W), proteins were eluted with increasing molar concentrations of KCl. The presence of 21p and 29p in each dialyzed and concentrated fraction was determined by immunoprecipitation, SDS-PAGE, and phosphorimaging. [35S]methionine-labeled protein extracts from mock (lanes M)- and VZV (lanes V)-infected cells controlled for the location of 21p and 29p. The maximum yield of 29p was obtained in the 0.6 M KCl fraction, whereas 21p was not detected in any fraction.
|
![]() View larger version (26K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Yeast two-hybrid analysis of 21p and 29p. Full-length ORFs 21p and 29p were inserted into pHybLex/Zeo (bait) or pYESTrp2 (prey) yeast expression plasmids. Oligonucleotide primers (between arrowheads) as listed in Table 1 were used to amplify regions within 21p and 29p, generating subclones of 21p and 29p for insertion into the bait and prey plasmids. The PCR primers were selected to be outside regions of homology between 21p and 29p and their analogous HSV-1 proteins (black boxes). The relative positions and nomenclatures for the subcloned fragments of 21p and 29p are listed below the respective proteins. The results of four independent yeast bait-prey transformation experiments (exp.) are shown. -, no growth on YC-WHUK+zeo plates and no ß-Gal induction; +, growth on YC-WHUK+zeo plates and ß-Gal induction; s, slow growth on YC-WHUK+zeo plates and slight ß-Gal induction; nd, not done. The results indicate that full-length 21p contains slight intrinsic transcription activation capabilities, most likely located within the 21pA fragment of the protein. No 21p/29p interaction was demonstrated.
|
Effect of 21p and 29p on VZV gene promoter activity. In latently infected human ganglia, VZV genes 21 and 29 are transcribed (14, 37, 53), whereas transcripts mapping to VZV genes 20 and 28 have not been detected during latency (14). Panel A of Fig. 7 shows the relative locations of ORFs 20, 21, 28, and 29 within the VZV genome. The promoters driving IE62-dependent transcription of genes 21, 28, and 29 have been located to the ORF 20/21 and ORF 28/29 intergenic regions (17, 54, 68). To place all promoters within the same reporter vector, the ORF 20/21 and ORF 28/29 intergenic regions were PCR amplified from VZV DNA and inserted into pGL3 Basic-luc such that each promoter controlled the synthesis of the luciferase reporter protein. Transient transfection of cells with the resulting reporter plasmids showed that each intergenic region contained no detectable intrinsic promoter activity. However, all promoter segments were induced by IE62 (Fig. 7, panel B). Relative activity values (average luciferase normalized to ß-Gal activity) show the absolute magnitudes of the IE62 induction.
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Cloning of gene 20, 21, 28, and 29 promoter reporter plasmids and their activation by IE62. (A) The 125-kbp VZV genome is composed of unique long (UL) and unique short (US) DNA segments, each bound by inverted repeat DNA sequences. The opposing ORFs 20 and 21, along with ORFs 28 and 29, are located within the UL segment (open boxes). The ORF 20/21 and ORF 28/29 intergenic regions were inserted into a promoterless luciferase reporter vector such that each region governed transcription of the luciferase reporter gene. (B) The resulting plasmids (p20-luc, p21-luc, p28-luc, and p29-luc) were used in transient transfection assays to determine intrinsic promoter activity and their response to induction by IE62. Data from at least duplicate experiments are presented as relative activity levels (luciferase activity normalized to ß-Gal activity) to indicate the magnitude of promoter activity. Compared to the promoterless plasmid (p-luc), gene 20, 21, 28, and 29 promoters have no intrinsic activity but are induced by IE62. SD, standard deviation.
|
![]() View larger version (37K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Effect of 21p and 29p on the transcriptional activation of VZV gene 20, 21, 28, and 29 promoters by IE62. In panel A, transient transfection experiments were performed to determine the effect of the presence of 21p (red lines), 29p (blue lines), or both proteins (green lines) on promoter activation (severalfold induction measured as relative activity levels normalized to 0 ng of 62AM-pCIneo) by IE62 (black lines). The presence of 21p has no effect on the induction of the promoter of gene 20, 21, 28, or 29 by IE62. The presence of 29p enhances activation of gene 28 and 29 promoters at low concentrations of IE62. The 29p-associated modulation of IE62 induction is diminished by 21p (green lines). In panel B, Western blot analysis of transfected cells showed that 21p and 29p were translated in the presence and in the absence of IE62.
|
|
|
|---|
Both VZV 21p and 29p partition within infected cells in a manner similar to that of their HSV-1 homologues, UL37 and ICP8. During productive HSV-1 infection, phosphorylated UL37 is chaperoned into the infected cell nucleus through an association with ICP8 and a UL37/ICP8 complex coelutes from single-stranded DNA columns (2, 66). Our search for an association between VZV 21p and 29p by coimmunoprecipitation, by KCl-dependent elution from single-stranded DNA-agarose beads, and by direct protein-protein interactions in yeast revealed no formation of 21p/29p complexes during productive infection. While it is interesting to speculate that an interaction between 21p and 29p occurs during latency, technical considerations preclude such experiments.
VZV 29p shares approximately 88% homology with ICP8 at the amino acid level, while the homology of VZV 21p to HSV-1 UL37 is less than 10%. The amino termini of HSV-1 UL37 and ICP8 have been implicated in the protein-protein interaction (F. Jenkins, personal communication). While 29p and ICP8 share homology at the amino terminus, 21p and UL37 are divergent at this location. Thus, one functional difference between 21p and UL37 might reside within the divergent amino termini. UL37 and 21p also differ with respect to phosphorylation; when extracted from HSV-1-infected cells, UL37 is stably phosphorylated, whereas in vivo-synthesized 21p is not significantly phosphorylated despite multiple predicted serine and threonine phosphorylation sites. It is intriguing to speculate that the divergence between 21p and UL37 at the amino terminus is also important with respect to the altered phosphorylation state of these proteins. However, the phosphorylation site of UL37 is unknown and thus, such comparison is premature. Also, protein phosphorylation may be cell-type dependent. In our assay, 21p and 29p phosphorylation was not detected; however, these proteins may be phosphorylated during latent infection in the human ganglion.
VZV 21p has no detectable intrinsic transcriptional activation capabilities with respect to its cognate promoter (68) (Fig. 7). In addition, the presence of 21p had no significant effect on the ability of IE62 to activate the promoters for VZV genes 20, 21, 28, and 29 (Fig. 8). However, two-hybrid yeast analysis of 21p showed that the protein had a modest ability to activate gene transcription when the protein was correctly tethered to the promoter. Subclonal analysis of 21p in yeast indicated that the transcriptional activation site associated with full-length 21p was situated within the 356 amino acids at the C terminus of the protein. When this 356-amino-acid segment of 21p was further subcloned, neither the resultant 176 amino-terminal amino acids nor 180-amino-acid fragment retained the ability to activate the LexA promoter. The lack of transcriptional activation of the LexA promoter by the full-length 21p or any of the subcloned fragments when inserted into the yeast prey plasmids suggests that the ability of 21p to activate transcription is dependent upon its tethering to the responsive promoter.
Previous transient transfection studies have shown that the presence of 29p affects the ability of IE62 to activate transcription of the gI promoter (8). Specifically, the presence of 29p was shown to stimulate induction of the gI promoter by IE62 in permissive cells while repressing IE62-induced activation of gI promoter in nonpermissive cells. In our study, we analyzed VZV gene 20, 21, 28, and 29 promoters, since the same intergenic regions appear to be differentially regulated in latently infected human ganglia. Our results indicate that both 21p and 29p have no intrinsic ability to activate transcription from the VZV gene promoters tested; however, the presence of 29p modestly enhances the ability of IE62 to activate transcription from gene 28 and 29 promoters, an effect observed at low concentrations of IE62. Thus, along with the ability of 29p to bind DNA, 29p may act in fine-tuning the regulation of VZV gene transcription by IE62. While it would be informative to determine the effect of the presence of 21p and 29p on other VZV promoters, in this study we limited our investigation to the bidirectional promoters for genes 20 and 21 and genes 28 and 29.
We thank C. Grose for MeWo cells, F. Jenkins for helpful discussions, J. Bennett for aid in transmission UV microscopy, and J. MacManaman for aid in confocal microscopy. We also thank G. Owens, M. Burgoon, B. Hammack, and R. Mahalingam for reviewing the manuscript, Marina Hoffman for editorial review, and Cathy Allen for preparation of the manuscript.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»