Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, July 2002, p. 6643-6651, Vol. 76, No. 13
0022-538X/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.13.6643-6651.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
and Ferdinando Liprandi1
Centro de Microbiologia,1 Centro de Biofísica y Bioquímica, Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas (IVIC), Caracas 1020-A, Venezuela2
Received 23 October 2001/ Accepted 2 April 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
/ß integrin family, which have been proposed to mediate rotavirus attachment and entry into cells (16, 17). Viral neutralization is an in vitro process in which virus binds antibodies and loses infectivity (10, 24). It correlates strongly, although not exclusively, with protection from infection in vivo. Neutralization of rotavirus infectivity has been proposed as an important mechanism of immunological defense against rotavirus infection. Both VP4 and VP7 are targets for the humoral immune response, and they independently elicit neutralizing and protective antibodies (20). Passive protection against rotavirus-induced diarrhea has been achieved in experimental mouse models by using monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) against VP4 and VP7 (29). More recently, MAbs of the immunoglobulin A (IgA) subtype directed against VP8* were found to neutralize apically administered virus after transcytosis from the basolateral to the apical domain of polarized epithelial cells and to protect newborn mice from diarrhea in a "backpack tumor" model (33). The antigenic structure of the rotavirus virion is complex, and at least two mechanisms of antibody-mediated neutralization have been proposed. Ruggeri and Greenberg (32) identified distinct patterns of neutralization when comparing the neutralizing activity of a panel of MAbs directed against VP4 and VP7, and they concluded that antibodies directed against VP8*, but not against VP5* or VP7, neutralized virus infectivity by inhibiting viral binding. More recently, Zhou et al. (43) identified a series of MAbs capable of inducing conformational changes upon binding to VP8*, which in turn induced particle disassembly. They proposed virion disruption as a novel mechanism for rotavirus neutralization. However, the most efficient rotavirus-neutralizing antibodies described to date are all directed against VP7, and very little is known of the neutralization mechanism via this glycoprotein. Dormitzer et al. (12) hypothesized that neutralizing MAbs binding to VP7 on the virion may prevent calcium chelation and solubilization of VP7.
Elucidation of the mechanisms of rotavirus neutralization is important not only for immunization purposes but also because such information may help in the understanding of the early events of rotavirus infection. This paper reports results which are consistent with the notion that antibodies directed at VP8* neutralize by inhibiting the binding of rotavirus to the cell and which indicate that antibodies directed at VP7 neutralize rotavirus infectivity by inhibiting virion decapsidation.
|
|
|---|
MAbs. MAbs against OSU VP4, fragment VP8* (4B5, 5G7, 4E8), VP7 (1C10), and VP6 (4B2) have been described previously (5, 25). MAbs against RRV VP4, fragment VP8* (7A12, 1A9) and fragment VP5* (2G4), and VP7 (159, M60) were the kind gift of Harry Greenberg (Stanford University, Palo Alto, Calif.) and have been described previously (39). MAbs 159 and M60 were used as ascites fluids; the other MAbs were purified from ascites fluids with a protein G-Sepharose column (Pharmacia, Inc.). Immunoglobulin concentrations of purified MAbs were determined by measuring absorbance at 280 nm. Antibodies were stored at -20°C. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of the MAbs used in this study.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Designations, isotypes, specificities, and neutralizing capacities of MAbs
|
Light-scattering assays. The TLP-to-DLP transition of virions bound or not to the different MAbs in controlled calcium concentrations was monitored by 90° light scattering. For a given concentration of virus particles, the magnitude of the dispersed light is related to the radius of the particles. Aliquots (10 µl) of purified OSU (200 µg/ml) or RRV (40 µg/ml) virions were mixed with 2 µl of different MAbs (see figure legends for MAb concentrations), and the mixtures were incubated for 1 h at room temperature. The mixtures were introduced into the stirred cuvette of a spectrofluorimeter (model MP1; Photon Technology International Inc.) that contained 1.1 ml of a buffered Ca2+ solution. Solutions of a defined free Ca2+ concentration were obtained by mixing different proportions of two media containing 100 mM KCl-10 mM morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) at pH 7.2 supplemented with 10 mM EGTA or 10 mM Ca-EGTA, respectively (Molecular Probes). The free Ca2+ concentration was calculated from the equilibrium equation for Ca-EGTA at 25°C by using a Kd of 150 nM. Slits were adjusted to 0.5 to 1 nm. Scattering was measured by setting both monochromators of the fluorimeter at a wavelength of 300 nm. Results are presented as relative scattering (expressed as a percentage), calculated as (St - S0)/(Sm - S0) x 100, where S0 is the minimal scattering determined at the end of each experiment by addition of an excess of EGTA, St is the signal at a time t, and Sm is the maximal scattering attained after addition of the rotavirus suspension.
The infectivity of each virus-antibody mixture was assayed in parallel experiments by making 10-fold serial dilutions of the mixtures in MEM and inoculating 100 µl of each dilution in triplicate onto MA-104 cells grown in 96-well plates to measure FFU. Results are expressed as percentages of the control infectivity, as described for the neutralization assays (2, 26).
Papain digestion. For digestion of the anti-VP7 MAb bound to virions, virus-antibody mixtures were treated with papain as described by Johnstone and Thorpe (22), with modifications. In brief, after incubation for 1 h of the OSU-MAb 1C10 mixtures prepared as described above, duplicates were treated with 3 µl of preactivated papain (3.3 µg/µl) for 3 h at room temperature. Since the anti-VP7 MAb used is of the IgG1 subclass (3), digestion with papain was carried out either in the presence of a reducing agent (10 mM cysteine, 0.1 M sodium phosphate [pH 6.5], 20 µM CaCl2), to obtain Fab fragments, or in the absence of a reducing agent (0.1 M sodium phosphate [pH 6.5], 20 µM CaCl2), to obtain F(ab')2 fragments. The reaction was stopped by addition of iodoacetamine (Sigma) to 1.5 mM, and the mixtures were kept in ice until they were added to the cuvettes. Papain (Sigma) was preactivated by incubation of 5 mg in 1 ml of 10 mM cysteine-0.1 M sodium phosphate (pH 6.5)-2 mM EDTA at 37°C for 30 min, followed by removal of the reducing agent and EDTA by desalting on a Sephadex G-25 minicolumn (Pharmacia).
EM analysis of OSU-MAb complexes. Purified OSU virions were diluted in MEM to give a concentration of 3 µg/ml. A range of antibody concentrations from 2,640 to 2.64 µg/ml was prepared by making 10-fold dilutions of MAb 1C10 in MEM. Equal volumes (10 µl) of the viral suspension and the MAb dilutions were incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Aliquots (10 µl) of each mixture were observed directly at the electron microscope (EM). Ionized and collodion-carbon-coated grids were floated over the aliquots at room temperature for 5 min, and the grids were stained with 2% phosphotungstic acid (PTA; pH 6.5) and examined at the EM (27). The rest of the mixture (10 µl) was serially diluted with MEM (10-fold), inoculated onto MA104 cell monolayers in 96-well plates, and assayed for residual infectivity as described above for neutralization assays.
EM analysis of RRV-MAb complexes treated with EDTA. Aliquots of the RRV preparation and the RRV-MAb 159 mixture used for the light-scattering assays were analyzed by EM. Samples were suspended in PBS-1.8 mM Ca2+ or in PBS-10 mM EDTA for 10 min and were observed under the EM after negative staining (25).
Transfection of antibody-rotavirus complexes into MA-104 cells. Transfection experiments were performed as described by Bass et al. (2), with modifications. Purified OSU virions (107 FFU/ml) were mixed with 2 µl of a purified anti-VP4 (5G7), anti-VP7 (1C10), or anti-VP6 (4B2) MAb for 1 h at 37°C. After incubation, each mixture was divided into two 50-µl aliquots. One aliquot was mixed with 50 µl of 100-µg/ml Lipofectin (Gibco), vortexed briefly, and incubated at room temperature for 20 min; the other aliquot was treated with 50 µl of MEM as a control. Each mixture was subsequently diluted up to 200 µl with MEM and then serially diluted (10-fold) in MEM; 100 µl of each dilution was inoculated in duplicate onto MA-104 cells grown in 96-well plates to measure FFU. Results are expressed as percentages of the infectivity present in the nontransfected virus preparation that was not reacted with antibodies.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (19K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Neutralization of OSU infectivity by MAbs directed at VP7 (1C10) and VP8* (4E8 and 5G7). Purified OSU virions (100 µl; 20 ng/ml; 2 x 105 FFU/ml) were mixed with purified MAbs (100 µl) at different concentrations (0.06 to 60 µg/ml) and incubated at 37°C for 1.5 h. Virus-antibody mixtures were serially diluted and inoculated in duplicate onto MA-104 cells grown in 96-well plates. After further incubation at 37°C for 1.5 h, the inoculum was removed and fresh MEM was added to the cells. The next day (12 to 18 h p.i.), the cells were fixed with methanol and immunostained for FFU. Results are expressed as percent residual infectivity after neutralization compared with the infectivity of the virus incubated without antibodies. Results from one experiment are shown. The experiment was repeated twice with similar results.
|
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Kinetics of decapsidation of purified OSU (left) and RRV (right) virions at different Ca2+ concentrations, as analyzed by perpendicular light scattering. Ten microliters of purified OSU (200 µg/ml) or RRV (40 µg/ml) virions was added to a stirred cuvette containing 1.1 ml of EGTA-Ca-EGTA buffers adjusted to various Ca2+ concentrations (as indicated) and maintained at 25°C (see Materials and Methods). Results are presented as relative scattering as described in Materials and Methods. Results of one experiment from a series of two are shown.
|
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Kinetics of decapsidation of purified OSU (top panel) and RRV (bottom panel) virions neutralized by MAbs directed at VP7 and VP4. Purified OSU (10 µl; 200 µg/ml) or RRV (10 µl; 33 µg/ml) virions were mixed with different MAbs (2 µl) and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. The concentration of each MAb in the mixture (in micrograms per milliliter) was as follows: for 1C10, 528; for 5G7, 580; for 159, approximately 500; for M60, approximately 500; for 2G4, 222; and for 7A12, 440. Virus-antibody mixtures (12 µl) were added to a stirred cuvette containing 1.1 ml of EGTA-Ca-EGTA buffers adjusted to the Ca2+ concentrations indicated above the panels and were maintained at 25°C. EGTA (10 mM) was added as indicated (arrows) to the OSU virus to reduce the Ca2+ concentration from 150 to 50 nM and to the RRV virus to reduce the Ca2+ concentration from 26 to 10 nM. MAbs used are indicated. Results of one experiment from a series of three are shown.
|
Since neutralization of viral infectivity by MAbs directed against VP7 is concentration dependent (see Fig. 1), we studied the effect of antibody concentration on the kinetics of decapsidation of purified OSU virions (Fig. 4). Ten microliters of purified virions (200 µg/ml) was mixed with 10-fold dilutions of MAb 1C10. At a MAb concentration of 528 µg/ml in the reaction mixture, decapsidation of the virus was totally prevented in a 150 nM Ca2+ medium. At a 10-fold-lower concentration of MAb 1C10 (52.8 µg/ml), the TLP-to-DLP transition occurred with a lag and at a very low rate. At a final MAb concentration of 5.3 µg/ml, the antibody was no longer capable of preventing decapsidation, and the rate was indistinguishable from that observed for the control without antibody.
![]() View larger version (28K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Kinetics of decapsidation of purified OSU virions reacted with different concentrations of purified MAb 1C10 directed against VP7. Purified OSU (10 µl; 200 µg/ml) virions were mixed with different concentrations of MAb 1C10 (2 µl) and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Virus-antibody mixtures (12 µl) were added to a stirred cuvette containing 1.1 ml of EGTA-Ca-EGTA buffers adjusted to a 150 nM Ca2+ concentration and maintained at 25°C. MAb concentrations in the mixture are indicated. Results of one experiment from a series of two are shown.
|
![]() View larger version (32K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Effect of papain digestion on decapsidation of purified OSU virions neutralized by MAb 1C10, directed against VP7. Purified OSU (10 µl; 200 µg/ml) virions were mixed with purified MAb 1C10 (2 µl; 2,640 µg/ml) and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Virus-antibody mixtures were treated with papain (0.8 mg/ml) for 3 h at room temperature in the presence or absence of a reducing agent (10 mM cysteine). After the reaction was stopped with iodoacetamide (1.5 mM), the mixtures were added to a stirred cuvette containing 1.1 ml of EGTA-Ca-EGTA buffers adjusted to 150 nM Ca2+ and were maintained at 25°C. The MAb and digestion conditions used are indicated. Results of one experiment from a series of two are shown.
|
![]() View larger version (54K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Kinetics of neutralization and aggregation of OSU virus. Purified OSU (3 µg/ml) virions were mixed with MAb 1C10 at different concentrations and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. (A) Aliquots of each virus-antibody mixture were observed directly by EM. Each mixture was identified by a number from 1 to 5. Bar, 100 nm. (B) The same virus-antibody mixtures for which images are shown in panel A were diluted, inoculated onto MA-104 cell monolayers in 96-well plates, and assayed for residual infectivity. Results are expressed as percent residual infectivity after neutralization compared with the infectivity of the virus incubated without antibodies. (C) Residual infectivity after neutralization (data from Fig. 6B) and inhibition of decapsidation after incubation with different MAb 1C10 concentrations (data from Fig. 4) were plotted as functions of the MAb/virus ratio.
|
![]() View larger version (162K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. EM analysis of RRV-anti-VP7 MAb complexes. Purified RRV virions were incubated with PBS-2 mM Ca2+ (A) or PBS-10 mM EDTA (B and C) for 10 min at room temperature. Purified RRV virions (33 µg/ml) reacted with the anti-VP7 MAb 159 (500 µg/ml) were incubated with PBS-2 mM Ca2+ (D) or PBS-10 mM EDTA (E) for 10 min at room temperature. Grids were floated on the samples for 5 min at room temperature and stained with 2% PTA, pH 6.5. Bar, 75 nm.
|
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Liposome-mediated transfections of OSU virions treated with MAbs directed against VP7 (1C10), VP8* (5G7), and VP6 (4B2) in MA-104 cells. Purified OSU virions (20 µg/ml; 107 FFU/ml) were mixed with different MAbs (52 µg/ml) and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Virus-antibody mixtures were divided into two aliquots (50 µl), and each aliquot was treated either with Lipofectin (50 µg/ml) or with MEM, vortexed briefly, and incubated for 20 min at room temperature. The mixtures were serially diluted in MEM and inoculated in duplicate onto MA-104 cells grown in 96-well plates. The next day (12 to 18 h p.i.), the cells were fixed with methanol and immunostained for FFU. Results are expressed as percent infectivity compared with the infectivity of the virus that was not transfected or reacted with antibodies. Results are means ± standard deviations from three experiments conducted on three separate days.
|
|
|
|---|
Neutralization experiments with MAbs directed against VP8* and VP7 of the porcine rotavirus strain OSU indicated that neutralization by these antibodies followed a very different dependence on MAb concentration, suggesting that different mechanisms are involved. Similar results were previously obtained by Ruggeri and Greenberg (32) using the simian rotavirus strain RRV. These authors postulated that the blocking of viral attachment was most likely the mechanism by which MAbs directed against VP4 mediated neutralization. On the other hand, antibodies that neutralized at concentrations below saturation, such as those directed against VP7, probably acted by mechanisms other than inhibition of binding. Since neutralization mediated by a few antibody molecules per virion has been associated with inhibition of structural transitions in other nonenveloped viruses (10, 24), we decided to test whether neutralizing antibodies directed against VP7 were able to inhibit the low-calcium-mediated solubilization of the outer capsid proteins of rotavirus.
In vitro decapsidation of OSU and RRV virions is blocked by neutralizing MAbs that recognize conformationally determined epitopes of VP7 on the virion (5, 39). These results indicate that inhibition of decapsidation may be one of the mechanisms by which neutralizing MAbs directed against VP7 exert their potent action in vivo. The proposed mechanism of action is consistent with previous data, which showed that calcium chelation disrupts complexes of neutralizing MAbs and solubilized VP7, but not when VP7 is attached to the virion (11). In fact, neutralizing anti-VP7 MAbs, such as MAb 159, bind to recombinant expressed VP7 in a Ca2+-dependent fashion (11, 12). However, once VP7 is assembled onto the virion, the neutralization domains are stabilized and the VP7-MAb interaction becomes Ca2+ independent (11). In agreement, our results also suggest that rotavirus-MAb interactions are not modified at different Ca2+ concentrations, at least down to the Ca2+ concentration critical for decapsidation of different strains; rather, this interaction seems to protect virions from decapsidation induced by a reduction in Ca2+ concentration.
A clear dose-response effect with the anti-VP7 MAb 1C10 was observed in the scattering as well as the neutralization assays. The relationship between neutralization or decapsidation and the MAb/virus ratio was the same for both effects. This suggests that inhibition of decapsidation is the mechanism of neutralization of infectivity.
Our results are also consistent with numerous observations that MAbs directed against VP7 do not inhibit binding of the rotavirus to the cell and are able to neutralize infectivity even if they are allowed to act after virus attachment (8, 25, 32). Neutralizing MAbs directed against VP8* have also been demonstrated to block infectivity after virus binding. However, MAbs directed against VP8* exert their postattachment effects by detaching the virus from the cell surface (32). Presumably, they are able to overcome the weak initial interaction between the virion and its receptor via VP8*. On the other hand, the postattachment inhibition activity of the MAbs directed against VP7 observed with RRV did not involve displacement of the virus from the cell surface (32). Postattachment neutralization has been reported for several other nonenveloped viruses (4, 18, 41). Stabilization of the capsid, preventing essential conformational changes, has been suggested as a mechanism of postattachment neutralization of polioviruses and reoviruses (19, 41). In addition, protective MAbs specific to reoviruses inhibit replication and intracellular proteolytic uncoating of the virion independently of effects on binding (18).
Neutralizing antibodies directed against VP7 have also been shown to inhibit TLP-induced cell membrane permeabilization as measured by the coentry of the protein toxin
-sarcin into the cell (8, 25). Solubilization of the outer capsid of trypsinized TLP in the absence of calcium has been proposed as a requirement for the virus to induce destabilization of the membrane (34, 37). The present data suggest that binding of antibodies to VP7 blocks membrane permeabilization indirectly by preventing the solubilization of VP7. In reoviruses, MAbs directed against intermediate subviral particle protein µ1 added postattachment are able to stabilize the virus particle and therefore inhibit permeabilization of L-cell membranes (18, 19). A similar situation has been reported for polioviruses, where compounds that inhibit poliovirus uncoating block the early permeabilization of cell membranes to protein toxins induced by virus particles (1). Together, these data strongly suggest that disassembly of the virion is a necessary step for nonenveloped viruses to achieve membrane permeabilization, a process that has been taken as an indicator of productive virus penetration (8, 13, 19, 25).
The capacity of MAbs directed against VP7 of OSU to inhibit outer capsid solubilization was completely reversed by papain treatment to generate Fab fragments, while F(ab')2 fragments fully retained the capacity to prevent decapsidation. These findings are in complete agreement with previous data showing that papain treatment of RRV neutralized with three different IgG MAbs directed against VP7 led to substantial recovery of infectivity (32). Despite the requirement for bivalent binding of the anti-VP7 MAbs, virion aggregation appears not to be a major mechanism by which these MAbs neutralize rotaviruses. In addition, the role of virion aggregation as a mechanism of protection in vivo has been questioned, because it occurs over a narrow range of antibody/virus ratios (3). The finding that bivalent binding of the antibody is required for neutralization supports the notion that anti-VP7 MAbs exert their effect by stabilizing the virion, presumably by cross-linking adjacent VP7 subunits and impeding conformational changes or rearrangements necessary for the solubilization of the outer capsid proteins (11, 12). The neutralization experiments with OSU and RRV suggest that not all VP7 molecules need to be combined with antibodies for the capsid to be stabilized. The requirement for bivalent binding has been observed for polioviruses and reoviruses, where conformational alteration of the capsid proteins is a necessary step for productive viral entry (18, 41).
The results obtained in the transfection experiments support the idea that OSU virions neutralized via VP7 are not able to decapsidate at the low Ca2+ concentration of the cytoplasm. Bass et al. (2) were also unable to recover infectivity after liposome-mediated transfections of RRV virions neutralized via VP7 with MAb 159. Furthermore, the lipofection results suggest that the blockade in decapsidation observed in the scattering experiments in vitro also occurs in live cultured cells.
The mechanism of rotavirus entry into the cell is still unclear. Both direct virion penetration of the cytoplasmic cell membrane (23) and pH-independent, Ca2+-dependent endocytosis (28, 34, 37) have been proposed. Although the data presented here do not allow us to draw conclusions as to the pathway of virus penetration, they suggest that the low Ca2+ concentration in the cell cytoplasm is sufficient to induce outer capsid destabilization and infection.
Our data are entirely consistent with the notion that MAbs to VP8* neutralize rotavirus infectivity by inhibiting binding of the virion to the target cell (32). MAbs directed against OSU VP8* showed a neutralization efficiency that was proportional to the concentration of the antibody, suggesting that interaction of the anti-VP8* antibodies with all or most VP8* molecules is a requirement for neutralization to be accomplished. The partial recovery of infectivity observed with transfected OSU virions neutralized via VP8* also supports the hypothesis that neutralizing MAbs directed against VP8* exert their effect by inhibiting the binding of the virion to the cells. The outer capsid protein VP5* has been implicated in the permeabilization of membranes (9, 35). Our data are also consistent with the suggestion that MAbs directed against VP5* may neutralize infectivity by preventing virus-membrane interactions and cellular entry. In these studies, the neutralizing antibodies against VP8* or VP5* that were tested did not inhibit the decapsidation process, even though these antibodies were used at very high (saturating) concentrations.
Calcium plays an important structural role in the stability of the rotavirus capsid by binding within VP7 trimers, which are the basic building blocks of the outer layer of the virion (12). Binding of neutralizing MAbs directed against VP7 may prevent solubilization of the outer capsid by increasing the affinity of the VP7 trimers for calcium. Alternatively, the bound neutralizing MAbs may substitute for calcium in holding together the VP7 layer on the virion. However, this possibility seems unlikely in view of the fact that not all molecules of VP7 need to be combined with antibodies in order to achieve neutralization. Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the bivalent binding of a few molecules of neutralizing MAbs directed against VP7 results in the prevention of possible changes in VP7 conformation necessary for Ca2+ release and decapsidation.
In summary, the present data and the findings of others suggest that neutralizing MAbs against VP7 mediate their neutralizing activity by inhibiting decapsidation of the virion, probably by increasing the affinity for Ca2+ and preventing dissociation of the VP7 trimers. Cryelectron microscopy has been used to localize the binding sites for neutralizing MAbs directed against VP8* and VP5* (31, 40). Cryoelectron microscopy images of virus-MAb complexes should lead to identification of the topographical location of the epitopes recognized by these MAbs and further explain their mechanism of action.
This work was supported in part by FONACIT (Venezuela) grant 2001000329.
Present address: Department of Structural Biology, IVIC Apdo. 21827, Caracas 1020-A, Venezuela. ![]()
|
|
|---|
vß3 mediates rotavirus cell entry. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:14644-14649.
2ß1 and
4ß1 can mediate SA11 rotavirus attachment and entry into cells. J. Virol. 74:228-236.
1 and µ1 proteins inhibit chromium release from mouse l cells. J. Virol. 70:672-677.[Abstract]
-sarcin. Virology 237:430-438.[CrossRef][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»