Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, June 2002, p. 5993-6003, Vol. 76, No. 12
0022-538X/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.12.5993-6003.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Institute of Virology, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G11 5JR, Scotland
Received 21 November 2001/ Accepted 14 March 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
The 8-kb HPV-31 genome, in common with all papillomavirus genomes, comprises an early and a late coding region. The early gene products control viral DNA replication, episomal maintenance of the genome, transcription, and host cell division. The late genes, L1 and L2, encode the major and minor capsid proteins, respectively. A noncoding region lies downstream of the late region and upstream of the early region. This contains sequences controlling the activity of the viral promoter P97 and replication of the genome. At its 5' end is the late gene 3' untranslated region (UTR), which contains a single polyadenylation site (16). The P97 promoter is most likely active throughout the viral life cycle (17, 32, 39). The genome comprises a single transcription unit, and individual mRNAs are produced by extensive alternative splicing events and by choice of an early or late polyadenylation site (17, 31). Late gene expression is controlled partly by activation of a cryptic late promoter P742 in the E7 open reading frame (17) and partly by posttranscriptional mechanisms, due to read-through of the early polyadenylation site at early times of infection (47, 48).
Inhibitory elements controlling production of late RNAs have been identified in several papillomaviruses. They include elements in the HPV-16 late gene coding regions (4, 40, 45) and in the bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV-1) (8), HPV-1 (46), and HPV-16 (20) late gene 3' UTRs. These appear to act via diverse posttranscriptional mechanisms. The elements within the L1 and L2 coding regions regulate mRNA stability and translation, the latter through interaction with hnRNPK and poly(rC) binding proteins 1 and 2 (4, 40). The AU-rich 57-nucleotide (nt) HPV-1 3' UTR inhibitory element binds the elav-like regulator of mRNA stability, HuR (23), suggesting that this element controls decay of late transcripts (41). The 53 nt BPV-1 3' UTR element acts to inhibit pre-mRNA polyadenylation by binding U1 snRNP (9, 14). The HPV-16 negative regulatory element (NRE) has been mapped to a 79-nt region spanning the 3' end of the L1 open reading frame and extends into the late gene 3' UTR (5). The element includes in its 5' portion four weak 5' splice sites and a putative stem-loop structure. The 3' portion comprises a GU-rich region. In vitro UV cross-linking experiments demonstrated the binding of the NRE RNA to several cellular proteins (5, 22). These include auxiliary splicing factor U2AF65 (35), polyadenylation factor CstF-64 (42, 43), and elav-like protein HuR (23), which has roles in mRNA stability (7, 30, 33) and possibly in nucleus-to-cytoplasm transport of RNA (7). The HPV-16 NRE appears to regulate polyadenylation (K. McGuire and S. V. Graham, unpublished results), nuclear export (22), and mRNA stability (21).
In this study we set out to determine whether HPV-31, being closely related to HPV-16, contains a similar NRE. We show that the HPV-31 late gene 3' UTR indeed contains sequences that inhibit gene expression in undifferentiated epithelial cells. We have identified a region of the HPV-31 late 3' UTR termed the NRE-like element (NLE) that structurally resembles the HPV-16 NRE. The HPV-31 NLE and the HPV-16 NRE bind many of the same proteins, including RNA-processing factors U2AF65, CstF-64, and HuR. However, precise deletion of the NLE only partially alleviates inhibition of gene expression in undifferentiated epithelial cells. Instead, we have identified a bipartite inhibitory element flanking the late polyadenylation site. The upstream element binds the same proteins as the HPV-16 NRE, and its 5' portion has high sequence homology to the NRE. The downstream element is quite distinct and binds some different nuclear proteins, suggesting that it may act by a separate mechanism.
|
|
|---|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Sequences and annealing positions within the HPV-31 genome of PCR primers used to make plasmids with 5' and 3' deletions of the 3' UTR
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 2. Sequences and annealing positions within the HPV-31 genome of PCR primers used to make internal deletions of plasmids
|
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Functional assays with HeLa cells to confirm mapping of inhibitory sequences in the HPV-31 late gene 3' UTR. (A) Diagram of the plasmid constructs used in transfection experiments. Boxes with diamonds, HSV-2 IE gene promoter; open boxes, CAT reporter gene; black boxes, HSV-2 IE gene poly(A) sequences; stippled box; HPV-31 L1/late gene 3' UTR sequences; arrowheads, poly(A) sites; P, PstI restriction site; H, HindIII restriction site; hatched boxes; NLEs; grey boxes, late poly(A) signals and CstF-64 binding sites. (B) Bar chart of CAT activity in HeLa cells for HPV-31 constructs containing internal deletions assayed in the presence of [3H]chloramphenicol. Values are means plus standard deviations of duplicate transfections from three separate experiments. (C) Bar chart of CAT activity in HeLa cells for constructs containing the HSV-2 IE gene 5 poly(A) sequences. Values are means plus standard deviations of duplicate transfections from three separate experiments.
|
![]() View larger version (23K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Functional assays with HeLa cells to map inhibitory sequences in the HPV-31 late gene 3' UTR. (A) Diagram of the plasmid constructs used in transfection experiments. Box with diamonds, HSV-2 IE gene promoter; open box, CAT reporter gene; stippled box, HPV-31 L1/late gene 3' UTR sequences; arrowhead, late poly(A) site; P, PstI restriction site; H, HindIII restriction site; hatched box, NLE; grey box, late poly(A) signal and CstF-64 binding site. (B) Bar chart of CAT activity in HeLa cells for HPV-31 constructs containing 5' or 3' deletions assayed in the presence of [3H]chloramphenicol. Values are means plus standard deviations of duplicate transfections from three separate experiments.
|
Nuclear extracts. Nuclear extracts from HeLa cells were prepared as described previously (50) or purchased from the Computer Cell Culture Center (Seneffe, Belgium).
Transient transfections and CAT assays. HeLa cells (105 cells/35-mm-diameter well) were transfected with 2 µg of CsCl-purified plasmid DNA by using LipofectAce reagent (Life Technologies) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were harvested and assayed after 48 h. Transfected cells were harvested by scraping and then lysed by freezing and thawing. CAT assays were for 2 h at 37°C in the presence of [3H]chloramphenicol (NEN), and then CAT activity was determined as described previously (37).
UV cross-linking and (EMSAs).
Primer sequences used to prepare riboprobe templates are shown in Table 3. HPV-31 probe templates were made by PCR amplification of pBSHPV-31 using forward primers with a 5' extension encoding the bacteriophage T7 promoter. HPV-16 NRE probe templates were amplified by PCR using plasmid pCATPE445 as a template and included T3 RNA polymerase promoter sequences. PCR products were purified by fractionation on a 6% acrylamide gel. Riboprobes were synthesized by in vitro transcription with the Stratagene RNA transcription kit in the presence of 25 µCi of [
-32P]UTP (800 mCi/mmol; NEN) and 0.5 µg of DNA as the template, according to the manufacturer's protocol. Full-length transcripts were purified from a 5% denaturing acrylamide gel for use in electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) or were purified with Mini Quick Spin Sephadex columns (Roche) for UV cross-linking experiments. UV cross-linking experiments were carried out as described previously (29); a Stratalinker (Stratagene) at a setting of 250 mJ was used to cross-link the samples. EMSAs were carried out as described previously (2). For EMSA competition experiments, specific competitor RNAs were transcribed in vitro with 0.5 µg of DNA as the template as described above except that unlabeled UTP was substituted for [
-32P]UTP. Nonspecific competitor RNA was Escherichia coli tRNA or a 65-nt RNA homologous to the pBluescript KS(+) polylinker region transcribed from a plasmid template linearized with EcoRI.
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 3. Sequences and annealing positions within the HPV-31 genome (primers 25 to 32) and the HPV-16 genome (primers 33 to 36) of PCR primers used to make riboprobes
|
Purification of RNA binding proteins on agarose beads. Proteins binding to NLE RNA were purified as described previously (3). Briefly, 500 pmol of RNA was prepared by in vitro transcription, treated with sodium m-periodate, and then incubated with 400 µl of adipic acid dihydrazide agarose beads for 12 h at 4°C to cross-link the RNA to the beads. The beads were washed three times with 2 M NaCl and then equilibrated with buffer D (20 mM HEPES-KOH [pH 7.9], 5% glycerol, 100 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol). HeLa nuclear extract (250 µl; 1.25 mg) in buffer D was applied, and the mixture was incubated at 30°C for 20 min. The beads were washed four times with buffer D containing 4 mM MgCl2. The bound proteins were then eluted in protein loading buffer by heating to 90°C for 5 min. The affinity-selected proteins were electrophoresed on a SDS-12% PAGE gel.
Western blotting. SDS-PAGE gels were electroblotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The blots were blocked overnight at 4°C in 5% (wt/vol) dried milk powder in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Primary antibodies were diluted in a solution containing PBS and 0.05% Tween plus 5% (wt/vol) dried milk powder. Anti-HuR antibody 19F12 was used at a dilution of 1 in 250, and anti-U2AF65 antibody MC3 was used at 1 in 100. Blots were incubated in the primary antibody for 1 h at room temperature with shaking. After being washed in PBS-0.05% Tween, the membrane was incubated in the secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature with shaking. The secondary antibody was antimouse horseradish peroxidase (Sigma) diluted 1 in 1,000 in PBS-0.05% Tween plus 5% (wt/vol) dried milk powder. After being washed, the membranes were visualized with ECL reagents (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (46K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Diagram of the HPV-31 genome, and alignment of HPV-31 (nt 6931 to 7393) and HPV-16 (nt 7014 to 7499) sequences. (A) Linearized genomic structure of HPV-31, showing early (E) and late (L) gene coding regions (boxes). P97 is a constitutively active promoter; P742 is a promoter activated in differentiated cells. p(A)E and p(A)L, positions of the early and late poly(A) sites, respectively; heavy line, noncoding region (NCR) of the virus. (B) HPV-31 L1/late gene 3' UTR sequences contain an NLE. Shown is an alignment of HPV-16 L1/late gene 3' UTR sequences (upper sequences) and HPV-31 L1/late gene 3' UTR sequences (lower sequences). Boxed regions, positions of the HPV-16 NRE and the HPV-31 NLE; light grey boxes, loops of predicted stem-loop structures; boldface boxes, L1 stop codons (TAA); dark grey boxes, GU-rich 3' portions of the NRE and NLE; inverted triangles, intron-exon boundaries of weak consensus 5' splice sites; double-underlined sequences; poly(A) hexanucleotides (AAUAAA); single-underlined sequences, GU/U-rich CstF-binding sites.
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 5. Result of CAT assay with HeLa cells transiently transfected with 5' and 3' end deletion constructs
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 4. Result of CAT assay of HeLa cells transiently transfected with constructs with internal deletions
|
![]() View larger version (76K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. HPV-31 L1/late gene 3' UTR sequences (nt 6931 to 7393), showing the position of inhibitory elements and polyadenylation signals. Open boxes, MIE (nt 7081 to 7210); underlined region, poly(A) hexanucleotide; arrow, CstF binding site (GU/U); Grey box, SIE (nt 7284 to 7393).
|
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 6. Result of CAT assay using constructs containing heterologous (HSV-2 IE gene 5) poly(A) sequences
|
![]() View larger version (81K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. UV cross-linking and EMSA experiments to compare protein binding to the HPV-16 NRE and HPV-31 NLE. (A) UV cross-linking of 32P-labeled NRE and NLE probes to HeLa cell nuclear extracts. Lane 1, full-length (HPV-16) NRE; lane 2, full-length (HPV-31) NLE; lane 3, 5' NRE (49 nt); lane 4, 5' NLE (46 nt); lane 5, 3' NRE (30 nt); lane 6, 3' NLE (56 nt). (B) EMSA using 32P-labeled RNA probes and HeLa cell nuclear extracts very similar to those used for panel A run on a nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel. RNA-protein complexes and free probes are bracketed. Arrows, RNA-protein complexes. NE, HeLa cell nuclear extracts. (C) EMSA competition assay using a 32P-labeled NLE probe (1.5 pmol) and HeLa nuclear extracts. Lane 1, no extracts; lane 2, no competitor RNA; lanes 3 to 7, 1- to 16-fold molar excess of specific competitor, i.e., 1.5 to 24 pmol of in vitro-transcribed, unlabeled NLE RNA; lane 8, no competitor RNA; lanes 9 to 13, 1- to 16-fold molar excess of nonspecific competitor, i.e., 1.5 to 24 pmol of in vitro-transcribed pBluescript KS(+) polylinker RNA; lane 14, no competitor RNA; lanes 15 to 18, nonspecific competitor, i.e., 500 ng to 4 µg of E. coli tRNA. (D) EMSA competition assay using 32P-labeled NLE and NRE probes and HeLa nuclear extracts. Lanes 1 to 7, NLE probe (1.5 pmol); lane 1, no extracts; lane 2, no competitor; lanes 3 to 7, 1- to 16-fold molar excess, i.e., 1.5 to 24 pmol of in vitro-transcribed, unlabeled NRE RNA; lanes 8 to 14, NRE probe (1.5 pmol); lane 8, no extracts; lane 9, no competitor; lanes 10 to 14, 1- to 16-fold molar excess, i.e., 1.5 to 24 pmol of in vitro-transcribed, unlabeled NLE RNA.
|
NLE-protein interactions are specific, since complex formation was abolished by adding increasing amounts of specific (unlabeled NLE RNA) (Fig. 5C, lanes 3 to 7), but not nonspecific (in vitro-transcribed pBluescript polylinker RNA or E. coli tRNA) competitor RNA (Fig. 5C, lanes 9 to 13 and 15 to 18). As the binding patterns generated by the NRE and NLE in UV cross-linking experiments appeared similar, we performed competition experiments for protein binding to the NLE using excess unlabeled NRE RNA, and vice versa. In an EMSA, unlabeled NRE RNA competed with an NLE probe for binding HeLa nuclear extract proteins (Fig. 5D, lanes 3 to 7) and, conversely, unlabeled NLE RNA competed for binding with an NRE probe (Fig. 5D, lanes 10 to 14). NRE RNA competed efficiently with the labeled NLE: complexes were disrupted by a one- to twofold or greater molar excess of unlabeled RNA (Fig. 5D, lanes 3 to 7). NLE RNA competed less efficiently with the labeled NRE: complexes were disrupted by a fourfold or greater molar excess of unlabeled RNA (Fig. 5D, lanes 12 to 14). The two elements therefore bind substantially the same proteins present in HeLa nuclear extracts, but the affinities of the complexes are different.
The NLE binds the known NRE-binding proteins CstF-64, U2AF65, and HuR. Next, we asked whether the NLE could bind RNA-processing factors CstF-64, U2AF65, and HuR, all of which have previously been shown to bind the HPV-16 NRE (22). First, we UV cross-linked NLE or NRE probes to a GST-tagged CstF-64 RBD (44). We found that the HPV-31 NLE probe UV cross-linked to the CstF-64 RBD (Fig. 6A, lane 4). The HPV-16 NRE, used as a positive control for binding, produced a slightly stronger band than the NLE probe (lane 3), suggesting that CstF-64 has a greater affinity for the NRE than for the NLE. Neither probe cross-linked to a GST control protein (lanes 1 and 2). In the absence of expression constructs for U2AF65 or HuR, we adopted an alternative approach to test the binding of these proteins to the NLE. NLE RNA was covalently cross-linked to agarose beads and then was used to purify binding proteins present in HeLa nuclear extracts. The affinity-purified proteins were subjected to SDS-PAGE and then Western blotted. We detected HuR (Fig. 6B, lane 3) and U2AF65 (Fig. 6C, lane 3) in the proteins that bound the NLE. We used poly(U) RNA linked to beads as a positive control for binding and detected HuR (Fig. 6B, lane 4) and U2AF65 (Fig. 6C, lane 4). The beads alone did not bind HuR (Fig. 6B, lane 2) or U2AF65 (Fig. 6C, lane 2). The NLE, like the NRE, therefore binds 3' end-processing factor CstF-64, splicing factor U2AF65, and nucleus-to-cytoplasm shuttling protein HuR.
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. UV cross-linking and Western blotting to identify specific RNA-processing factors that bind to the NLE. (A) UV cross-linking of 32P-labeled NRE and NLE probes to bacterially expressed GST-tagged CstF-64 RBD protein. Lane 1, GST protein and NRE probe; lane 2, GST protein and NLE probe; lane 3, GST-tagged CstF-64 RBD and NRE probe; lane 4, GST-tagged CstF-64 RBD and NLE probe. (B) Western blot with the 19F12 anti-HuR monoclonal antibody. Lane 1, 20 µg of HeLa nuclear extracts; lane 2, 20 µl of proteins purified with beads alone; lane 3, 20 µl of proteins purified with NLE RNA; lane 4, 20 µl of proteins purified with poly(U) RNA. (C) Western blot with the MC3 anti-U2AF65 monoclonal antibody. Lane 1, 20 µg of HeLa nuclear extracts; lane 2, 20 µl of proteins purified with beads alone; lane 3, 20 µl of proteins purified using NLE RNA; lane 4, 20 µl of proteins purified with poly(U) RNA.
|
![]() View larger version (62K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. UV cross-linking and EMSA of protein binding to sequences surrounding the late poly(A) signal. (A) Diagram of the HPV-31 late gene 3' UTR sequences showing the positions of the probes used for protein binding studies. Hatched box, MIE; grey box, poly(A) and CstF binding sites; stippled box, SIE; lines, positions of NLE probe (nt 7041 to 7141), M probe (nt 7161 to 7211), and S probe (nt 7284 to 7343). (B) UV cross-linking of 32P-labeled NLE, M, and S probes to HeLa nuclear extracts. Lane 1, NLE (101 nt); lane 2, M (50 nt); lane 3, S (60 nt). Asterisks, minor proteins of similar sizes that bind both NLE and M probes. (C) UV cross-linking of 32P-labeled M and S probes to bacterially expressed CstF-64 RBD. Lane 1, GST-tagged CstF-64 RBD protein with an M probe; lane 2, GST-tagged CstF-64 RBD protein with an S probe; lane 3, GST protein with an M probe; lane 4, GST protein with an S probe. 64 RBD, GST-tagged CstF-64 RBD. (D) EMSA of 32P-labeled NLE, M, and S probes using HeLa cell nuclear extracts. RNA-protein complexes and free probes are bracketed. Arrows, RNA-protein complexes; NE, HeLa nuclear extracts. (E) EMSA competition assay. Lanes 1 to 8, 32P-labeled NLE probe (1.5 pmol); lane 1, no extracts; lane 2, no competitor RNA; lanes 3 to 8, 1- to 32-fold molar excess, i.e., 1.5 to 48 pmol of in vitro-transcribed unlabeled M RNA; lanes 9 to 16, 32P-labeled M probe (1.5 pmol); lane 9, no extracts; lane 10, no competitor RNA; lanes 11 to 16, 1- to 32-fold molar excess, i.e., 1.5 to 48 pmol of in vitro-transcribed unlabeled NLE RNA. (F) EMSA competition assay. Lanes 1 to 8, 32P-labeled M probe (1.5 pmol); lane 1, no extracts; lane 2, no competitor RNA; lanes 3 to 6, 1- to 32-fold molar excess, i.e., 1.5 to 48 pmol of in vitro-transcribed unlabeled S RNA; lanes 9 to 16, 32P-labeled S probe (1.5 pmol); lane 9, no extracts; lane 10, no competitor RNA; lanes 11 to 16, 1- to 32-fold molar excess, i.e., 1.5 to 48 pmol of in vitro-transcribed, unlabeled M RNA.
|
Upstream and downstream probes M and S can compete for binding cellular proteins. Although the M and S probes UV cross-link to proteins of different sizes, in an EMSA experiment they both generated certain retarded complexes of similar mobilities (Fig. 7D). We therefore asked whether these two probes could compete for binding of proteins present in HeLa cell nuclear extracts. In an EMSA experiment, unlabeled S RNA could compete to a limited extent with an M probe for binding HeLa nuclear extract proteins, but only when present in an eightfold or greater molar excess (Fig. 7F, lanes 6 to 8). Unlabeled M RNA could compete efficiently with an S probe for binding proteins in HeLa cell nuclear extracts when present in a twofold or greater molar excess (Fig. 7F, lanes 12 to 16). Taken together, the UV cross-linking and EMSA experiments may suggest that M and S bind some, but not all, proteins in common. They also suggest that the affinity of protein binding to M is higher than that of binding to S.
|
|
|---|
The elements we have identified differ from those previously identified in the late gene 3' UTRs of HPV-16 (20), HPV-1 (46), and BPV-1 (8). The control sequences present in HPV-31 appear more complex: the upstream element is substantially larger than those previously described, and inhibitory sequences present downstream of the poly(A) signal are novel. Further, since the two HPV-31 elements bind some different cellular proteins, they may act by distinct mechanisms.
It is perhaps surprising that the 101-nt NLE does not substantially inhibit gene expression in undifferentiated epithelial cells, since it closely resembles the NRE, both structurally and in terms of protein binding. The 5' portion of the NLE, unlike that of the NRE (data not shown), does not inhibit gene expression on its own. This could be because it contains only a single weak consensus 5' splice site, a feature known to be an important determinant of the ability of the NRE to inhibit gene expression (9; S. A. Cumming and S. V. Graham, unpublished observations).
RNA probes derived from the MIE bind many cellular proteins, including RNA-processing factors HuR, CstF-64, and U2AF65. HuR has roles in mRNA stability and RNA transport (7, 30, 33). It binds the HPV-16 NRE (22), as well as the HPV-1 AU-rich element (41), and may act by stabilizing late mRNAs in the cytoplasm of differentiated cells (36). The HPV-31 element may act in a similar way.
The GU-rich MIE also binds CstF-64 in vitro. During 3' end processing, CstF-64 binds a GU/U-rich element downstream of the cleavage site (24, 43). The cleavage-polyadenylation specificity factor (CPSF) binds to the AAUAAA hexanucleotide, which directs cleavage downstream. CPSF also binds to CstF, allowing cleavage of the transcript between the two protein binding sites and addition of poly(A) to the cleaved 3' end (19, 34). The carboxy-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II is found in association with CstF and CPSF (28) and is essential for 3' end processing (15). During transcription of the late gene 3' UTR, CstF comes into contact with the GU-rich tracts in the MIE before reaching the proper CstF binding site downstream of the polyadenylation site. Thus the MIE could compete for binding of CstF with the downstream GU/U-rich element. This may reduce the rate of polyadenylation at the late site by reducing the availability of free CstF subunits to bind the correct GU/U-rich site, leading to inhibition of late gene expression in undifferentiated epithelial cells.
Terhune et al. have demonstrated that there is a higher concentration of all three CstF subunits in undifferentiated than in differentiated epithelial cells (47). If the MIE indeed binds CstF-64 in vivo, then this would be expected to compromise efficient polyadenylation in differentiated cells. However, the MIE binds many cellular proteins, and formation of a differentiation-specific complex may block the binding of CstF in differentiated cells, resulting in a higher concentration of free CstF-64 subunits. These would then be available to bind to the downstream GU/U-rich element, thus increasing the efficiency of polyadenylation.
The MIE also binds U2AF65. U2AF65 is one subunit of an auxiliary splicing factor that interacts with the U2 snRNP at intronic branch points and 3' splice sites (35). The binding of splicing factors to transcripts may prevent nuclear export (18). For example, the Caenorhabditis elegans U2AF65 protein was shown to bind reporter gene transcripts containing U2AF65 binding sequences in their 3' UTRs, causing nuclear retention and preventing gene expression (25). Some splicing factors can disrupt polyadenylation. For example, the U1 snRNP components U1A (12, 13) and the U1 70-kDa subunit (U1 70K) (14) interact with and inhibit poly(A) polymerase. U2AF65, which is closely related to U1 70K, also binds poly(A) polymerase (49) and could perhaps also inhibit polyadenylation.
The inhibitory element located downstream of the late poly(A) site is probably rather short-lived in the RNA. Transcription proceeds for up to 500 nt beyond the poly(A) site before cleavage and polyadenylation occur (6); however the 3' product is rapidly degraded following cleavage (51). The downstream element binds two proteins of around 70 kDa in vitro. These have yet to be identified. If these were also polyadenylation factors, their binding could reduce the efficiency of upstream cleavage and hence the polyadenylation of transcripts.
We have shown that HPV-31, like certain other papillomaviruses, contains inhibitory RNA sequence elements in its late gene 3' UTR. Unlike those other papillomaviruses, HPV-31 contains complex inhibitory sequences located downstream, as well as upstream, of the late poly(A) site. In light of the interactions with RNA-processing factors we have shown, we propose that these elements most likely act by disrupting polyadenylation at the late site in undifferentiated cells. It seems likely, however, that the HPV-31 inhibitory elements, like the HPV-16 NRE, are multifunctional, operating via more than one posttranscriptional mechanism.
We thank Richard Elliott for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank Craig Meyers for the pBSHPV-31 plasmid, Yoshio Takagaki and James Manley for the CstF-64 RBD expression construct, Henry Furneaux for the 19F12 HuR antibody, and Juan Valcárcel for the MC3 U2AF65 antibody.
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»