Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, June 2002, p. 5959-5965, Vol. 76, No. 12
0022-538X/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.12.5959-5965.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Department of Tumor Virology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka,1 Division of Infectious Diseases, Advanced Clinical Research Center, Institute of Medical Science, University of Tokyo,3 Department of Veterinary Science, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan,4 Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee2
Received 13 December 2001/ Accepted 15 March 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Defects in the nef gene of HIV-1 have been linked to nonprogressive infection. Following an earlier case report of an LTNP carrying only nef-defective HIV-1 (28), an Australian cohort study has also shown that six LTNPs were infected with nef-deleted HIV-1 from a single blood donor (30). Supporting this view, rhesus monkeys inoculated experimentally with a nef-defective simian immunodeficiency virus have low viral loads and normal CD4+ T-cell numbers (26). Furthermore, there are reports that document the presence of nef-defective HIV-1 genomes in LTNPs (14, 19, 32, 42). However, some reports argue against the role of nef in the establishment of long-term nonprogression because most of the nef alleles isolated from LTNPs were intact in the length of the coding region and in the tested biological function (9, 23, 24, 32, 34).
The in vitro function of nef can largely be summarized in four categories (for reviews see references 12, 13, 16, and 19): downregulation of cell surface CD4, downregulation of the class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC), stimulation of the signal transduction cascades, and enhancement of viral replication in specific cell types. More recently, an antiapoptotic effect of Nef has also been reported (46). Extensive mutagenic studies have revealed that these activities are genetically separable and mapped to different regions of Nef (reviewed in reference 19); however, it remains elusive as to which in vitro function is most critical for the in vivo pathogenicity of primate lentiviruses.
Among the many in vitro functions of Nef, the enhancement of viral infectivity appears to be associated most directly with the replication cycle of HIV-1; however, Nef is dispensable for viral replication under commonly used laboratory conditions (26). Thus, reporter cells including HeLa-CD4-LTR-ßGal cells (MAGI) (27) are often preferred for analysis. In assays using reporter cells, the difference in infectivity between the nef-defective mutant and wild-type HIV is less than 10-fold in most cases (2, 3, 7, 11, 25). Considering a large statistical error in the infectivity assay, this difference seems to be subtle. We postulated that the previous failure in the detection of functional differences between the nef alleles from LTNPs and those from progressors might have been caused by this small requirement for Nef in many reporter cells. Based on the observation that the Nef-induced enhancement of HIV-1 infectivity correlates inversely with the amount of CD4 in the target cells (45), we have isolated a MAGI-derived cell line, MAGNEF, which requires nef more strictly than does the parent MAGI cell in the single-round infectivity assay (44). Here we used MAGNEF cells for the quantitative analysis of the enhancement of HIV-1 infectivity by nef genes isolated from patients with different clinical outcomes.
|
|
|---|
Isolation, cloning, and expression of the proviral nef gene. Primers used in nested PCR were set at highly conserved regions of env and the long terminal repeat as described previously (48). PCR products were cloned into pCR-blunt Topo II (Invitrogen) and were sequenced with a BigDye sequencing kit (PE Biosystems). To facilitate subcloning, the coding sequence of nef was amplified by PCR with primer sets containing SalI and NotI sites in forward and reverse primers, respectively. A primer set used to amplify each nef gene was chosen so that the amino acid sequence of each Nef would not change after PCR amplification. After PCR amplification, the fragments were again subcloned into pCR-blunt Topo II and verified for the sequence. For Nef expression, we used pCAGGS-IRES-EGFP, which was derived from the pCAGGS eukaryotic expression vector (37) and contained the internal ribosome entry site (IRES) of encephalomyocarditis virus at the 3' end of the cloning site, followed by the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) gene. The Nef-coding DNA fragments were cleaved out from the plasmids with SalI and NotI and were subcloned into pCAGGS-IRES-EGFP cleaved with XhoI and NotI.
Plasmid. An infectious proviral clone of HIV-1, pNL4-3, and its nef-defective mutant, pNL-Xh, have been described previously (1). We introduced XhoI and NotI sites in pNL4-3 for insertion of the nef gene from patients as follows: DNA fragments extending from the 3' region of env of NL4-3, nucleotides (nt) 8032 to 8785, were amplified by PCR with a forward primer, 5'-TGCTGTGCCTTGGAATGCTAG-3', and a reverse primer, 5'-GTCGACGCGGCCGCACGCGTCTCGAGTTATAGCAAAATCCTTTCCAAGCCC-3'. The underlined sequence contains recognition sites of SalI, NotI, MluI, and XhoI from the 5' end. The amplified DNA fragment was cloned into pCR-blunt Topo II, and the sequences were verified. From this plasmid, a DNA fragment of the carboxyl-terminal region of env was cleaved out by BamHI and SalI, and it was inserted into pNL4-3 cleaved with BamHI at nt 8465 and XhoI at nt 8892. Therefore, in the resulting plasmid, named pNL-Not, the 5' region of nef from nt 8786 to 8892 was replaced with the recognition sites of XhoI, MluI, and NotI. The nef alleles derived from patients and NL4-3 were cleaved with SalI and NotI and inserted into pNL-Not cleaved with XhoI and NotI. As a positive control, we amplified the nef allele of pNL4-3 and inserted it into pNL-Not.
Cells and transfection. MAGIC5 and MAGIC5D cells were CCR5-expressing derivatives of HeLa-CD4-LTR-ßGal (MAGI) cells (22, 27). The cell line named MAGNEF was obtained by limiting dilution of MAGIC5 cells. Compared with the parent MAGIC5 cells, MAGNEF cells expressed a lower level of CD4 and required Nef more strictly for HIV-1 infectivity (44). By using of a phycoerythrin fluorescence quantitation kit (Becton Dickinson), the numbers of cell surface CD4 were determined as 4 x 104 in human peripheral CD4-positive T cells, 5 x 103 in MAGIC5, 5 x 105 in MAGIC5D, and 1 x 103 in MAGNEF. MAGNEF and MAGIC5D cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 5% fetal calf serum (FCS). 293T human embryonic kidney cells were a gift from Bruce J. Mayer at the University of Connecticut and were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium with 10% FCS. Plasmid DNAs were transfected into 293T cells by the calcium phosphate coprecipitation method or into MAGIC5D cells with Lipofectamine 2000 (Gibco-BRL).
MAGI assay. Infectious DNAs of HIV-1 were transfected into 293T cells by the calcium phosphate coprecipitation method. Forty-eight hours later, cultured supernatants were filtered through a 0.45-µm-pore-size filter (Whatman, Clifton, N.J.) and examined for their p24gag concentration by an HIV-1 p24 antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (ZeptoMatrix, Buffalo, N.Y.). We plated 104 MAGNEF cells on 96-well tissue culture plates and inoculated them with serially diluted virus stocks. Forty-eight hours after infection, cells were fixed and stained with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactoside as described elsewhere (27). We chose wells in which the number of positive cells was about 50 for calculation of the infectivity of the virus stocks. Under this condition, the dilution of the viral stocks and the number of infected cells were in a linear range.
Flow cytometry analysis . MAGIC5D cells were transfected with pCAGGS-IRES-EGFP-derived vectors carrying the nef alleles of patients. Thirty-six hours after transfection cells were detached from culture dishes with EDTA treatment and were suspended in phosphate-buffered saline containing 1% FCS. After being stained with saturating amounts of phycoerythrin-conjugated Leu3A monoclonal antibody specific for CD4 (Becton Dickinson) or phycoerythrin-conjugated W6/32 monoclonal antibody specific for the assembled MHC-I heavy chain ß2-microglobulin complex (DAKO), cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and fixed with 1% formaldehyde. Fluorescence intensities of green fluorescent protein (GFP) and either CD4 or MHC-I were analyzed with a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson). After gating with GFP intensity, the geometric mean fluorescence intensity of CD4 or MHC-I was calculated with CELLQuest software (Becton Dickinson). The relative downregulation efficiency was shown by the formula (intensity of NL4-3-Nef-expressing cells)/(intensity of cells to be evaluated).
Immunoblotting. Cells were lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 1% Triton X-100), clarified by centrifugation, separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.). We used a mixture of monoclonal antibodies against p24gag and gp41env for the detection of viral proteins. Nef on the filters was detected by a pool of monoclonal antibodies provided by K. Ikuta at Osaka University (38).
GST fusion protein and in vitro binding assay. The 5' region of Hck coding the SH2 and SH3 domains was amplified by PCR with the following primers: forward primer, 5'-GGGCCCCCCGTCGACATGGGGTGCATGAAG-3'; reverse primer, 5'-CGCGGCCGCCCCAAGGCTTCTGGGCTTGGA-3'. The underlined sequences indicate SalI and NotI restriction sites. The PCR product was cleaved with SalI and NotI and subcloned in pGEX3X (Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech). The SH2 and SH3 domains of Hck were expressed as a fusion protein with glutathione S-transferase (GST) in transformed Escherichia coli and purified with glutathione-Sepharose beads as described previously (33). 293T cells were transfected with pCAGGS-IRES-EGFP-derived Nef expression vectors carrying the nef allele of each patient. Forty-eight hours after transfection, cells were lysed in lysis buffer, cleared by centrifugation, and incubated with equal amounts of the GST-Hck proteins bound to the glutathione beads. The binding reaction was carried out at 4°C for 12 h. After being washed six times with lysis buffer, bound proteins were separated on SDS-12.5% polyacrylamide gels and analyzed by being immunoblotted with a pool of anti-Nef monoclonal antibodies.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Basic vector for the analysis of Nef enhancement of infectivity. (A) The 5' region of nef of the HIV-1 NL4-3 strain was replaced with oligonucleotides containing XhoI and NotI restriction sites to generate NL-Not. Then nef allele of NL4-3 amplified by PCR was inserted into the XhoI/NotI site to generate NL-Not-Nef. (B) Wild-type NL4-3, nef-defective NL4-3 (NL-Xh), NL-Not, and NL-Not inserted with NL4-3 nef (NL-Not-Nef) were transfected into 293T cells for propagation of virus. 293T cells were lysed and analyzed by immunoblotting with a mixture of monoclonal antibodies against p24gag, gp41env, and Nef. Molecular standards are shown on the left. (C) Serially diluted virus stocks were inoculated into MAGNEF cells plated on 96-well dishes. Forty-eight hours later, infected cells were identified by being stained with 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-ß-D-galactopyranoside. Infectivity was normalized by the quantity of p24gag in the virus stocks. Experiments were done in triplicate and repeated three times. A representative result is shown with standard deviations.
|
Analysis of nef alleles from patients. We analyzed four LTNPs (patients 1 [p1], p3, p4, and p6), six progressors (p13 to p18), and five ACs (p21, p22, p24, p25, and p26). The nef alleles were PCR amplified from PBMCs and cloned into plasmids as described previously (48). More than five independent clones were sequenced for each patient. When all of the analyzed sequences were identical (p13, p17, p18, p22, and p24), only one nef allele for each patient was further subcloned into pNL-Not and pCAGGS-IRES-EGFP. In the other cases, two representative clones were chosen for construction of expression vectors.
To search for any sequence motif that is characteristic for each of the three groups, we analyzed the nef sequences by creating a phylogenetic tree with the neighbor-joining method (Fig. 2). When two distinct sequences were found from any one patient, i.e., p1, p3, p4, p6, p14, p15, p16, p21, or p26, the two sequences formed a cluster, validating the same origin. The only exception was p25, whose two nef alleles clustered with either p21 or p26. This may suggest that patient 25 had suffered from repeated infection. Most importantly, nef alleles of LTNPs, progressors, and ACs did not form any clusters in the phylogenetic tree. We also created a phylogenetic tree by using the decoded amino acid sequences of the nef alleles and found that nef proteins of LTNPs, progressors, and ACs did not form any clusters. The amino acid sequences of the nef alleles and their alignment can be obtained from our web site (http://www-tv.biken.osaka-u.ac.jp/nef/).
![]() View larger version (27K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Phylogenetic analysis of the nucleotide sequences of nef alleles from LTNPs, AIDS patients (AIDS), and asymptomatic carriers (ACs). The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining method. Symbols before hyphens indicate patient codes, and numbers or letters after hyphens specify each nef clone. Values along the branches indicate the bootstrap probability. All branch lengths are drawn in accordance with their relative genetic distances.
|
![]() View larger version (39K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Expression of Nef from recombinant HIV-1. The sequence-verified nef alleles from LTNPs, AIDS patients, and ACs were inserted into the XhoI/NotI site of pNL-Not. The infectious DNAs were transfected into 293T cells to propagate viruses. The cell lysates were analyzed by being immunoblotted with a pool of anti-Nef monoclonal antibodies.
|
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Enhancement of viral infectivity by the nef alleles derived from LTNPs, AIDS patients, or ACs. The recombinant HIV-1 viruses carrying nef alleles of patients were prepared by transfection of infectious DNAs to 293T cells. Infectivity was examined as for Fig. 1. Three independent experiments were performed, and representative data with standard deviations are shown.
|
![]() View larger version (43K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Downregulation of cell surface CD4 by Nef derived from LTNPs, AIDS patients, and ACs. (A) MAGIC5D indicator cells were transfected with pCAGGS (MOCK), pCAGGS-IRES-EGFP (Vector), or pCAGGS-IRES-EGFP-4-3-Nef (NL4-3). After 36 h, cells were stained with phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody and were analyzed for fluorescence intensity by FACSCaliber. The vertical bars indicate the thresholds for GFP. (B) pCAGGS-IRES-EGFP (Vector), pCAGGS-IRES-EGFP-4-3Nef (NL4-3), or expression vectors for the nef alleles from patients as indicated at the bottom were transfected and analyzed as described for panel A. After gating for the EGFP-positive cells, the expression level of CD4 was determined as geometric mean fluorescence with CELLQuest software. Relative downregulation efficiency (%) is shown by the following equation: (mean fluorescence intensity of cells expressing NL4-3 Nef)/(mean fluorescence intensity of cells to be evaluated) x 100. Averages from three independent experiments are shown with standard deviations.
|
Downregulation of cell surface MHC-I by nef alleles from patients. We also examined the downregulation of MHC-I (Fig. 6). All nef alleles reduced the surface expression level of MHC-I, at least as efficiently as did NL4-3-derived nef. Most importantly, we did not observe any difference in the level of MHC-I downregulation among LTNPs, progressors, and ACs.
![]() View larger version (43K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Downregulation of cell surface MHC-I by Nef derived from LTNPs, AIDS patients, and ACs. (A) MAGIC5D indicator cells were transfected with pCAGGS (MOCK), pCAGGS-IRES-EGFP (Vector), or pCAGGS-IRES-EGFP-4-3Nef (NL4-3). After 36 h, cells were stained with phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-MHC-I monoclonal antibody and analyzed for fluorescence intensity by FACSCalibur. The vertical bars indicate the thresholds for EGFP. (B) pCAGGS-IRES-EGFP (Vector), pCAGGS-IRES-EGFP-4-3Nef (NL4-3), or expression vectors for the nef alleles from patients as indicated at the bottom were transfected and analyzed as described for panel A. After gating for EGFP-positive cells, the expression level of MHC-I was determined as geometric mean fluorescence with CELLQuest software. Relative downregulation efficiency (%) is shown by the following equation: (mean fluorescence intensity of cells expressing NL4-3 Nef)/(mean fluorescence intensity of cells to be evaluated) x 100. Averages from three independent experiments are shown with standard deviations.
|
![]() View larger version (43K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Binding of Hck to the Nef proteins derived from LTNPs, AIDS patients, and ACs. 293T cells were transfected with expression plasmids encoding the nef alleles derived from patients. Two days after transfection, cells were lysed in lysis buffer, cleared by centrifugation, and incubated with GST-Hck SH2-SH3. Proteins bound to the GST fusion proteins were separated by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and were analyzed by being immunoblotted with a pool of anti-Nef monoclonal antibodies.
|
|
|
|---|
The results of our analyses are summarized in Table 1. The nef alleles of LTNPs were inefficient in the enhancement of infectivity and in CD4 downregulation. However, these two activities were not always correlated in the nef alleles of progressors or ACs. For example, nef p24-2, which was derived from an AC, enhanced infectivity efficiently but downregulated CD4 only at a marginal level. Similarly, we could not find any correlation when we expanded the comparison to the four parameters. These findings are in agreement with previous reports proposing that the four nef functions are genetically separable and mapped to different regions of nef (reviewed in reference 19).
|
View this table: [in a new window] |
TABLE 1. Summary of the analyses
|
It has been reported that some nef alleles derived from LTNPs are defective in CD4 downregulation (7, 32). Mariani and coworkers reported that one patient among four LTNPs carried nef alleles that did not downregulate CD4 expression (32). Carl and coworkers reported a similar observation with nef alleles from one LTNP. Although we also found that Nef-induced CD4 downregulation was abrogated in two nef alleles from LTNPs (Fig. 5), three downregulated CD4 to a level comparable to that of the wild-type Nef. To reach a conclusion, we need to expand the number of LTNPs and to set up more quantitative assays.
The ability to downregulate cell surface MHC-I expression was retained in all nef alleles (Fig. 6). Carl and coworkers recently reported that nef alleles from progressors downregulate MHC-I less efficiently than those from ACs or LTNPs (7). The discrepancy between their results and ours may arise from the difference in cell types: we used MAGI-derived MAGIC5D cells, whereas Carl et al. used Jurkat T cells. Nevertheless, our data agree with respect to the lack of association of defective MHC-I downregulation with the establishment of LTNPs.
Binding to the SH3 domain of Hck is another function of Nef that has been associated with the Nef-dependent increase in HIV-1 infectivity (41); however, subsequent studies have shown that Nef binding to the SH3 domain-containing proteins is required for efficient downregulation of MHC-I (20, 31). Furthermore, it has been shown that dominant-negative mutants of Hck inhibit downregulation of MHC-I (10). In agreement with these previous reports, we found that the efficiency of Hck binding correlated with the level of MHC-I downregulation induced by each Nef (Table 1).
Our results of the sequence analysis of nef alleles from Japanese LTNPs were in complete agreement with those of previous studies denying the presence of a common sequence anomaly in LTNPs (9, 24, 34). We paid particular attention to the 9 sequence motifs in Nef that have been associated with biochemical or biological features (19); however, no mutation was commonly found in any patient group (www-tv.biken.osaka-u.ac.jp/nef/). Moreover, sequences from each group are found to be interdigitated in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 2), confirming previous reports (9, 24, 34). Future development of a program that predicts the structure-function relationship of Nef may decipher this discrepancy; however, at present our infectivity assay that uses the patient nef gene will help to predict the prognosis of HIV-infected patients.
Nef is known to have many functions, and the number of functions is still increasing. For example, it has been recently shown that Nef binds to Pak to protect the infected cells from apoptosis (4, 17, 39, 46). Therefore, further efforts should be directed to seek a function of nef that correlates better with the clinical course. Finally, a positive correlation in vitro does not give evidence that the deteriorated Nef function causes the long-term nonprogression. Further study is required to examine whether these characteristics of nef alleles of LTNPs are the cause or the consequence of the long-term nonprogression after HIV-1 infection.
The research was sponsored in part by a Grant for International Health Cooperation Research (12C-1) from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Japan, and Research Fellowships of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for Young Scientists (M.T.).
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»