Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, June 2002, p. 5769-5783, Vol. 76, No. 11
0022-538X/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.11.5769-5783.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
and Thomas Stamminger1*
Institut für Klinische und Molekulare Virologie der Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany,1 Institute of Medical Microbiology, Department of Virology, The National Hospital, N-0227 Oslo, Norway2
Received 27 November 2001/ Accepted 5 March 2002
|
|
|---|
|
|
|---|
Similar to other herpesviruses, the HCMV open reading frames are expressed in a temporally regulated cascade consisting of three sequential phases, termed immediate early (IE), early (E) and late (L) (19, 27, 44, 47, 69, 70). IE gene expression results in the synthesis of viral regulatory factors, in particular the major IE proteins IE1-p72 and IE2-p86, which act as strong transactivators of viral early promoters and are therefore required for efficient productive infection (44, 51, 53, 65). Expression from the major IE gene locus is driven by a very strong, complex regulatory element known as the major IE enhancer-promoter (MIEP), which contains several binding sites for known eucaryotic transcription factors (for a review, see reference 48). These in turn modulate gene expression not only in various cell types but also in both differentiated and undifferentiated cells (6, 12, 23, 43, 48, 50, 60, 63). In addition to cellular transcription factors, activation of IE transcription is controlled by structural protein components of the incoming virion (62, 66). These proteins are localized in the so-called tegument, which separates the nucleocapsid from the viral envelope. Tegument components are often phosphoproteins which are thought to have both structural and regulatory functions. In the case of the alphaherpesvirus herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), the tegument protein VP16 in complex with two cellular factors is responsible for stimulation of the IE phase (for a review, see reference 57). Concerning HCMV, at least 20 proteins of both cellular and viral origin are estimated to be part of the tegument. However, only some of these tegument proteins have already been investigated in greater detail, such as the viral phosphoproteins ppUL69, pp65, and pp71 (10, 24, 25, 52, 56, 58, 61, 74). The most abundant protein of the tegument is the so-called lower matrix protein pp65, which is expressed from the reading frame UL83. From the adjacent gene locus, UL82, the upper matrix protein pp71 is synthesized. This protein is discussed as the HCMV functional analogue of the HSV-1 VP16 transactivator since pp71 is able to activate IE gene expression in the infected cell via stimulation of the HCMV MIEP, as well as additional viral and cellular promoters (15, 17, 34, 42, 74). Consistent with these findings, it was demonstrated that pp71 is imported into the nucleus immediately after infection (30). Furthermore, pp71 has been shown to enhance the infectivity of viral DNA and to accelerate the viral infectious cycle (9).
The specific mechanism of how pp71 activates transcription is poorly understood. As is the case for HSV-1 VP16, additional cellular factors are discussed to contribute to pp71-mediated transactivation, since no direct binding of pp71 to DNA has been detected thus far (42). Therefore, we were looking for potential cellular binding partners of pp71 by yeast two-hybrid screening. Hereby, we identified the factor hDaxx as specific interaction partner of pp71. This cellular protein has been shown to be localized within specific subnuclear compartments known as ND10 domains, which in turn are the transcriptional active sites during HCMV IE gene expression (35, 36, 45). We provide evidence here that this interaction is required for colocalization of pp71 with ND10 domains both after transient transfection and viral infection. Furthermore, pp71 is recruited to the ND10 domain by hDaxx, which in turn results in an enhanced transactivation capacity of pp71.
(Initial reports of this work were presented at The 25th International Herpesvirus Workshop [Portland, Oreg., July 29 to August 4, 2000].)
|
|
|---|
Plasmid constructions and in vitro mutagenesis. The bait plasmid pHM677 for the yeast two-hybrid screen was constructed by PCR amplification with the oligonucleotides pp71-5NheII and pp71-3BamHI and plasmid pCB6-pp71 containing the pp71 cDNA as a template (30), followed by insertion into the GAL4 DNA-binding domain vector pAS1 via NheI and BamHI (20). Deletion mutagenesis of hDaxx in the context of the GAL4 activation domain vector pGAD424 (Clontech, Palo Alto, Calif.) was performed by PCR mutagenesis with the 5'oligonucleotides DAXXaa43-5, DAXXaa197-5, and DAXXaa371-5 in combination with the 3'oligonucleotides DAXXaa740-3, DAXXaa657-3, DAXXaa628-3, DAXXaa560-3, DAXXaa501-3, DAXXaa439-3, and DAXXaa371-3, respectively. After cleavage with BamHI and SalI, the PCR products were cloned into the pGAD424 vector. The yeast vectors pAS-PML and pAS-Sp100 were a kind gift of G. Maul (Philadelphia, Pa.). The plasmid UL69-pGBT was described earlier (72); the vector UL26-pGBT will be described in detail elsewhere.
For expression in mammalian cells, the following plasmids were constructed. A plasmid expressing the pp71-green fluorescent protein (GFP) fusion protein was created by PCR amplification of the pp71 open reading frame by using oligonucleotides pp71pEGFP-N1-5 and pp71pEGFP-N1-3, followed by cleavage with SstI and EcoRI and ligation with the vector pEGPF-N1 (Clontech). An expression vector for myc-tagged proteins was constructed by annealing oligonucleotides myc-5'pcDNA3 and myc-3'pcDNA3, followed by insertion into the pcDNA3 vector (Invitrogen, San Diego, Calif.) via the HindIII and Asp718 sites, resulting in plasmid myc-pcDNA3. The myc-pp71 expression vector was thereafter constructed by amplification of the pp71 open reading frame by using oligonucleotide myc-pp71-5' and pp71-3 XbaI. The resulting PCR product was cleaved with BamHI and XbaI and ligated with the myc-pcDNA3 vector. The internal pp71 deletion mutants pp71
(206-213) and pp71
(324-331) were constructed by PCR amplification of the N-terminal pp71 fragments by using the oligonucleotide myc-pp71-5' in combination with pp71-DID1-3 or pp71-DID2-3, respectively. The C-terminal pp71 fragments were amplified by using the oligonucleotides pp71-DID1-5 or pp71-DID2-5, as well as oligonucleotide pp71-3XbaI. Thereafter, the N-terminal fragments were inserted into the myc-pcDNA3 vector by using the BamHI and EcoRI restriction sites, followed by ligation with the C-terminal fragment via EcoRI and XbaI. Further subcloning of these internal deletion mutants into the yeast vector pAS1 and vector pEYFP-C1 was performed in analogy to wild-type pp71 as described above. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed by using the QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit according to the manufacturer's protocol (Stratagene, Heidelberg, Germany) with either the myc-pp71 plasmid or the pp71-GFP vector as templates. The pp71 single-amino-acid mutants were constructed by using the respective oligonucleotides mentioned above. The double-amino-acid mutant pp71-P324A/P332A was created by using the pp71-P324A plasmid as a template and oligonucleotides pp71mutP332A-5 and pp71mutP332A-3; the double-amino-acid mutant pp71-V326A/P332A was generated by PCR mutagenesis of vector pp71-V326A and oligonucleotides pp71mutP332A-5 and pp71mutP332A-3. The double-amino-acid mutant L207A/T208S was produced due to a second-site mutation within oligonucleotides pp71mutL207A-5 and pp71mutL207A-3.
The FLAG-hDaxx expression vector was created by isolation of the hDaxx insert from one of the respective library clones obtained in the yeast two-hybrid screen and ligation with the FLAG-pcDNA3 vector by using the EcoRV and XbaI sites (32). N- and C-terminal hDaxx deletion mutants were isolated from the respective yeast expression vectors via BamHI and SalI and ligated with the FLAG-pcDNA3 vector additionally encoding the simian virus 40 nuclear localization signal to ensure nuclear localization. A plasmid expressing FLAG-Sp100 was constructed by PCR amplification of the Sp100 cDNA from vector pSG-Sp100 (kindly provided by T. Sternsdorf, Hamburg, Germany) with oligonucleotides FL-Sp100-5'and FL-Sp100-3'; the resulting PCR product was restricted with EcoRI and EcoRV and ligated with the FLAG-pcDNA3 vector. Plasmids encoding FLAG-hSPT6, FLAG-IE2 (amino acids 135 to 579) and pCB6-UL69 were described previously (32, 72, 73). The luciferase reporter construct containing the HCMV major IE enhancer-promoter, termed pHM287, has also been described previously (73). The DNA sequence of all plasmid constructs was confirmed by automated sequence analysis (ABI, Weiterstadt, Germany).
Yeast two-hybrid screening. Yeast two-hybrid screening was performed with GAL4 fusion proteins as described previously (18, 21). Yeast strain Y153 was transformed by the lithium acetate method by using the bait plasmid pHM677 (26). The presence of pHM677 in the yeast cells was maintained stable by selection for tryptophane prototrophy. Expression of the resulting pp71 fusion protein GAL4-pp71 was confirmed by Western blot analysis with an anti-His antiserum. Y153 yeast cells transfected with pHM677 alone or in combination with pACT were then tested for activation of the reporter genes HIS3 and lacZ. In neither case was an activation of the reporter genes by GAL4-pp71 observed. Yeast strain Y153 containing pHM677 was subsequently transformed with a cDNA library derived from human B lymphocytes fused to the GAL4 activation domain in the pACT vector (20). A total of 107 primary transformants were selected for growth on histidine dropout plates containing 20 mM 3-aminotriazole. His+ colonies were subsequently analyzed for ß-galactosidase activity by filter test experiments (13). Interactor plasmids from positive clones were rescued by transformation of competent KC8 bacteria with total yeast DNA (31). The nucleotide sequences of the cDNA inserts were determined by automated sequence analysis (ABI).
Cell culture, virus infection, transfection, and reporter assays. Human foreskin fibroblast (HFF) cells were cultured as described previously (64). U373MG and 293 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, Md.) and maintained in Dulbecco minimal essential medium (Gibco-BRL, Eggenstein, Germany) supplemented with 5% or 10% fetal calf serum, respectively. The day before transfection, HFF cells were plated onto six-well plates at 3.5 x 105 cells per well. 293 cells were seeded onto six-well plates at 3 x 105 cells per well 2 days before transfection. Plasmid transfections were performed by the calcium phosphate coprecipitation procedure by using BES [N,N-bis(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-aminoethanesulfonic acid] and a total of 1 to 2 µg of DNA for six-well plates (8). Cells were harvested 48 h after transfection and used for Western blotting or immunoprecipitation. For indirect immunofluorescence analysis, HFF cells grown on coverslips were transfected with 2 µg of plasmid DNA by using the FuGENE transfection reagent according to the manufacturer's protocol (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). For luciferase assays, U373MG cells were plated onto six-well dishes at 3.5 x 105 cells per well the day before transfection. Plasmid transfection was performed by the DEAE-dextran method as described previously (7). Routinely, 1 µg of luciferase target and 4.5 µg of the cotransfected transactivator plasmids were used. The total amount of transfected DNA was kept constant by using the cloning vectors pCB6, FLAG-pcDNA3, or myc-pcDNA3 in order to replace the missing transactivator plasmid. Approximately 48 h after transfection, cells were harvested and luciferase assays were performed as described previously (32). Luciferase activity in the supernatant was determined by using a luminometer (Bertholt, Freiburg, Germany). Each transfection was performed in triplicates and was repeated at least three times. Infection of HFF cells with HCMV (0.5 PFU/cell) and treatment of cells with cycloheximide were performed as described previously (55, 64).
Western blotting and immunoprecipitation analysis. Coimmunoprecipitation analysis for detection of protein interactions was performed as described previously (11). Briefly, transfected cells were lysed in NP-40 lysis buffer for 20 min at 4°C, followed by a high-speed centrifugation. The supernatant was incubated with the appropriate antibody for 1 h at 4°C, and then a 50% protein A-Sepharose solution was added for another 2 h. The Sepharose beads were collected and washed three times in NP-40 lysis buffer. Antigen-antibody complexes were recovered by boiling in sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) sample buffer. Samples were subjected to SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), and the proteins were transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany). Western blotting and chemiluminescence detection were performed according to the manufacturer's protocol (ECL Western detection kit; Amersham Pharmacia Biotech Europe, Freiburg, Germany).
Antibodies and indirect immunofluorescence analysis. Monoclonal antibody anti-FLAG M2, which is directed against the synthetic FLAG octapeptide N-Asp-Tyr-Lys-Asp-Asp-Asp-Asp-Lys-C, was purchased from INTEGRA Bioscience (Fernwald, Germany). Hybridoma cells producing monoclonal antibody 9E10 against the synthetic myc epitope N-Met-Glu-Gln-Lys-Leu-Ile-Ser-Glu-Glu-Asp-Leu-C were a kind gift of S. Lang (Erlangen, Germany). For detection of endogenous ND10 proteins, polyclonal antibody M-112 against hDaxx and monoclonal antibody PG-M3 against PML were employed (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif.). The anti-Sp26 antiserum directed against Sp100 was kindly provided by T. Sternsdorf (Hamburg, Germany). The monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies recognizing ppUL69 or IE2-p86 of HCMV were described previously (22, 73). The monoclonal antibody MAb810 against HCMV major IE proteins was obtained from Chemicon (Hofheim, Germany) (46). The monoclonal antibody p63-27 directed against IE1 was described previously (5). Monoclonal antibodies 65-33 (directed against pp65) and CMV 355 (directed against pp71) were the kind gifts of B. Britt and T. Shenk, respectively. Anti-mouse and anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase- or fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated secondary antibodies were obtained from Dianova (Hamburg, Germany).
For indirect immunofluorescence analysis, HFF cells on coverslips were washed two times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), followed by fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. Cells were permeabilized with PBS-0.2% Triton X-100 on ice for 20 min. Thereafter, the cells were incubated for 30 min at 37°C with primary antibodies in PBS, followed by incubation with FITC- and TRITC (tetramethyl rhodamine isocyanate)-conjugated secondary antibodies at a dilution of 1/100 in PBS. Cells were mounted by using Vectashield mounting medium plus DAPI (4',6'-diamidino-2-phenylindole; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, Calif.) and analyzed by using a Zeiss Axiovert-135 microscope. FITC and TRITC were analyzed by using filter sets 10 and 14 (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with excitation wavelengths of 450 to 490 nm and 510 to 560 nm, respectively. In the case of double staining, the two channels were recorded when no cross talk was detectable, and the channels were overlaid by the computer for dual images. Images were recorded with a cooled Spot Color digital camera (Diagnostic Instruments, Burroughs, Mich.) and processed by using the Meta-Imaging series and Adobe Photoshop (Universal Imaging Corp., Brandywine, Pa.; Adobe Systems, Inc.). Because of the variability of protein expression after transient transfection, at least 50 cells were studied in each sample. Each experiment was repeated at least three times and evaluated by two investigators.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Specific interaction between HCMV pp71 and the hDaxx protein in yeast cells. Yeast cells were transformed with two separate vectors, one of which encoded a GAL4 activation domain either alone (pGAD) or as fusion with the indicated protein (AD), the second plasmid encoded a GAL4 DNA-binding domain fusion as indicated (DBD). Thereafter, yeast colonies were selected for the presence of both plasmids on dropout medium lacking tryptophane and leucine and subsequently analyzed for the expression of ß-galactosidase. (A) Interaction analysis between pp71 fused to the GAL4 activation domain and the ND10-associated factors PML, Sp100, and hDaxx as fusions with the GAL4 DNA-binding domain. (B) Interaction analysis between hDaxx fused to the GAL4 activation domain and the HCMV tegument proteins UL69, UL26, and pp71 as fusions with the GAL4 DNA-binding domain.
|
hDaxx was originally cloned as an adapter molecule binding to the death domain of Fas (75). It was also reported to interact with the CENP-C protein and the transcription factors Ets-1 and Pax-3, resulting in transcriptional repression (33, 41, 54). Furthermore, hDaxx turned out to bind to the ND10 protein PML and, as a consequence, to colocalize with PML within these subnuclear compartments (35, 40). Since hDaxx has been identified as an interactor of various cellular proteins, we wondered whether binding to pp71 was specific. For that reason, we performed several control experiments in yeast: first, we confirmed that pp71 was not capable of binding the ND10 proteins PML and Sp100 (Fig. 1A); similarly, hDaxx was not able to interact with pUL26 and ppUL69, two other HCMV tegument proteins (Fig. 1B). We concluded from these experiments that the binding between pp71 and hDaxx in the yeast two-hybrid system was specific.
Coimmunoprecipitation experiments confirm the interaction between pp71 and hDaxx. In order to confirm the data obtained in yeast, coimmunoprecipitation experiments were employed. To be able to immunologically detect pp71 and hDaxx, we fused pp71 to the myc epitope (named myc-pp71) and hDaxx to the FLAG epitope (named FLAG-hDaxx) in the context of respective eukaryotic expression vectors. Thereafter, 293 cells were transfected with these constructs either alone or in combination. Here as well as in the following experiments, an aliquot of each sample was analyzed by Western blotting prior to immunoprecipitation in order to confirm that equal amounts of protein had been expressed (data not shown). Immunoprecipitation was performed with the anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody against FLAG-tagged proteins; subsequently, coprecipitated pp71 protein was detected by Western blotting with the monoclonal anti-myc antibody (Fig. 2A). After precipitation of FLAG-hDaxx with the anti-FLAG antibody, the bound pp71 protein was clearly visible in Western blot analysis (Fig. 2A, lane 5). This was not the case when using an unrelated antibody for precipitation (Fig. 2A, lane 4) or in the absence of one interaction partner (Fig. 2A, lanes 2 and 3). Furthermore, it was excluded that pp71 was able to bind to the ND10 factor Sp100, which was also expressed as a FLAG-tagged protein (Fig. 2A, lane 6). To further confirm this observation, we performed the reciprocal experiment, in which we precipitated the pp71 fusion protein by using the anti-myc antibody and thereafter employed the anti-FLAG antibody for detection of interacting factors in Western blot (Fig. 2B). The interaction here also required a specific antibody for precipitation and the presence of both binding partners (Fig. 2B, lane 5). In order to strengthen the specificity of the pp71-hDaxx interaction, additional coimmunoprecipitation analyses were performed. As can be seen from Fig. 2C, the HCMV tegument protein ppUL69 did not interact with hDaxx (Fig. 2C, lane 4), whereas the previously described interaction between ppUL69 and the cellular protein hSPT6 (Fig. 2C, lane 2) could be confirmed under the conditions used in this experiment (72). In similiar experiments, we could also exclude binding between hDaxx and the HCMV regulator pUL84 (data not shown). Because of the results of both the yeast system and the coimmunoprecipitation experiments, we considered the interaction between pp71 and hDaxx as specific.
![]() View larger version (16K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Specific interaction between pp71 and hDaxx as determined in coimmunoprecipitation experiments. 293 cells were transfected with eukaryotic expression vectors encoding myc-pp71, FLAG-hDaxx, and FLAG-hSPT6, as well as the HCMV protein ppUL69, as indicated and prepared for immunoprecipitation as described in Materials and Methods. Immunoprecipitation was performed with antibodies as indicated by bars. Precipitates were washed three times and separated by SDS-10% PAGE. (A) Immunoprecipitations were performed with the anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody or an anti-IE2 monoclonal antibody as indicated. Thereafter, coprecipitated pp71protein was detected in Western blot analysis with the anti-myc monoclonal antibody. Lanes: 1, lysates from untransfected cells; 2, transfection with plasmid myc-pp71 alone; 3, transfection with vector FLAG-hDaxx alone; 4 and 5, transfections with a combination of vectors encoding myc-pp71 and FLAG-hDaxx; 6, transfection with plasmid myc-pp71 and a plasmid encoding FLAG-Sp100. (B) Immunoprecipitations were performed with the anti-myc monoclonal antibody or the anti-IE2 monoclonal antibody. Interacting proteins were thereafter detected in a Western blot with the anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody. The lanes are analogous to those in panel A. (C) Immunoprecipitations were performed with the anti-UL69 monoclonal antibody; thereafter, coprecipitated proteins were detected by Western blot analysis with the anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody. The interaction between ppUL69 and the cellular protein hSPT6 served as a positive control (lane 2). Lanes: 1, transfection of expression vector pCB6-UL69; 2, transfection with a combination of plasmids encoding ppUL69 and FLAG-hSPT6; 3, transfection with plasmid FLAG-hDaxx; 4, transfection with constructs expressing FLAG-hDaxx and ppUL69. Molecular masses are indicated in kilodaltons. Abbreviations: IP, immunoprecipitation; wb, Western blot; IgG, immunoglobulin G.
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. Schematic overview depicting interaction domains within hDaxx required for association with previously published cellular proteins and HCMV pp71 (33, 35, 41, 54, 75). The amino acids of hDaxx required for the respective interactions are indicated.
|
![]() View larger version (39K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Delineation of the pp71 interaction domain within hDaxx. (A, B, and C) Yeast cells were transformed with two separate vectors, one of which encoded either PML as a positive control (A) or pp71 (C) fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain. The second plasmid encoded amino- or carboxy-terminal fragments of hDaxx as fusion with the GAL4 activation domain; the amino acids contained in the respective deletion mutants are indicated in panel B. Yeast colonies were selected for the presence of both plasmids on dropout medium lacking tryptophane and leucine and subsequently analyzed for the expression of ß-galactosidase by filter lift assays. As negative controls, the activation domain vector pGAD424 (pGAD) was either transformed with the pp71 or the PML DNA-binding domain fusion (lanes 11, panels A and C, respectively). The pp71 interaction domain within hDaxx is depicted by the box. (D) Interaction between pp71 and hDaxx deletion mutants after coimmunoprecipitation from 293 cells. The hDaxx mutants were precipitated with the anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody; therafter, bound pp71 protein was detected in Western blot experiments employing the anti-myc antibody. Lanes: 1, lysates from untransfected cells; 2, transfection with plasmid myc-pp71 alone; 3, transfection with vector FLAG-hDaxx alone; 4, transfection with a combination of vectors encoding myc-pp71 and FLAG-hDaxx; 5, transfection with a plasmid encoding FLAG-hDaxx 43-501; 6, transfection with vectors encoding myc-pp71 and FLAG-hDaxx 43-501; 7, transfection with vector FLAG-hDaxx 43-371; 8, transfection with a combination of vectors myc-pp71 and FLAG-hDaxx 43-371; 9, transfection with a plasmid expressing FLAG-hDaxx 197-439; 10, transfection with vectors encoding myc-pp71 and FLAG-hDaxx 197-439; 11, transfection with plasmid FLAG-hDaxx 371-740; 12, transfection with a combination of vector myc-pp71 and FLAG-hDaxx 371-740; 13, transfection with a plasmid encoding FLAG-hDaxx 538-740; 14, transfection with vectors expressing myc-pp71 and FLAG-hDaxx 538-740. (E) Western blot analysis of the cell lysates used for immunoprecipitation in panel D. The expression of the hDaxx deletion mutants was investigated with the anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody. Molecular masses are indicated in kilodaltons. Abbreviations: IP, immunoprecipitation; wb, Western blot; IgG, immunoglobulin G.
|
Immunofluorescence analyses reveal a colocalization of pp71 with endogenous ND10 domains after transient transfection. The identification of a ND10 component as binding partner of pp71 suggested that pp71 might also be present in ND10 domains as a consequence of this interaction. In order to address this question, an expression construct for pp71 fused C-terminally to GFP (pp71-GFP) was employed. After transfection of this construct into HFF cells, indirect immunofluorescence analyses were carried out. We observed a clear accumulation of pp71-GFP in nuclear speckles in addition to a diffuse nuclear staining. In order to determine whether these dots represented ND10 domains, we costained the transfected cells with antibodies detecting endogenous PML, Sp100, or hDaxx. As can be seen in Fig. 5A, pp71-GFP colocalized with all of these proteins in ND10 domains. Identical results were obtained with a construct expressing YFP fused to the N terminus of pp71 (YFP-pp71), indicating that pp71 subcellular localization was not influenced depending on whether the GFP/YFP was fused to the N- or C-terminal end of pp71 (data not shown). As high hDaxx concentrations had also been published for centromeres (54), we investigated whether hDaxx in HFF cells could also be found in regions distinct from ND10 domains. For this, we performed double immunofluorescence analyses staining endogenous hDaxx and PML, in which we detected hDaxx exclusively in ND10 in all cells examined (Fig. 5B). This observation, together with the colocalization of the pp71-fusion protein with all of the ND10 factors tested, led us to the conclusion that pp71 is able to target ND10 domains after transient transfection.
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. (A) Subcellular localization of pp71-GFP in HFF cells. HFF cells grown on coverslips were transfected with an expression vector encoding pp71 fused to GFP (pp71-GFP) (panels a, d, and g). In order to detect endogenous ND10 domains, indirect immunofluorescence analyses were performed with a monoclonal antibody against PML (panel b) or polyclonal antisera recognizing Sp100 (panel e) and hDaxx (panel h), followed by incubation with TRITC-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibodies. (B) Analysis of hDaxx distribution in HFF cells. HFF cells were costained for endogenous expression of hDaxx as detected by the polyclonal antiserum (panel a) and PML with a monoclonal antibody (panel b).
|
![]() View larger version (21K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Recruitment of pp71 after expression of FLAG-hDaxx. HFF cells (A) and HeLa cells (B) grown on coverslips were transfected with eukaryotic expression vectors encoding pp71-GFP, FLAG-hDaxx, and FLAG-Sp100, as well as the HCMV proteins ppUL69 and IE2, as indicated. Thereafter, indirect immunofluorescence analyses were carried out. pp71 was visible through its GFP moiety (panels Aa, d, k, and n; panels Ba and d). FLAG-hDaxx and FLAG-Sp100 were detected with the anti-FLAG monoclonal antibody (panels Ab and e; panel Be). ppUL69 was stained by using the polyclonal anti-UL69 antiserum (panels Ag and l); IE2 was detected with monoclonal antibody MAb810 (panel Ao). Staining for endogenous hDaxx was performed with a polyclonal anti-hDaxx antiserum (panel Bb). Thereafter, TRITC-conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibodies, as well as FITC-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibodies, were employed.
|
The pp71 virion component is able to target nuclear domains immediately after HCMV infection of fibroblast cells. Having shown that pp71 localized to ND10 domains after transient transfection, we wanted to determine whether the pp71 tegument component could also be found in nuclear dots after HCMV infection. In order to prevent viral de novo protein synthesis, HFF cells were cultured in the presence of cycloheximide 30 min prior to infection and extending for 7 h after infection. Thereafter, immunofluorescence analyses were carried out with monoclonal antibodies against pp71, pp65 and IE1 in combination with the anti-Sp26 antiserum against Sp100. In the absence of viral protein expression, pp71 could be detected within the nucleus of infected cells as reported elsewhere (30). Moreover, a clear colocalization with ND10 domains was found in a representative number of nuclei (Fig. 7a and b). The tegument protein pp65 was distributed in a nuclear diffuse pattern that is consistent with findings by others but did not form dot-like structures (Fig. 7d and e) (28). As determined by staining against the IE1 protein, IE gene expression was prevented under these conditions, indicating an effective inhibition of protein synthesis (Fig. 7g and h). Therefore, the pp71 virion component is not only delivered to the nucleus of infected cells but also deposited at the ND10 domains.
![]() View larger version (61K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Subcellular localization of pp71 in HCMV infected cells. HFF cells were treated with 100 µg of cycloheximide/ml 30 min prior to infection (0.5 PFU/cell) and extending for 7 h after infection. Indirect immunofluorescence analyses were carried out with monoclonal antibodies directed against pp71 (a), pp65 (d) and IE1 (g). ND10 domains were visualized by staining the Sp100 protein (b, e, and h). DAPI staining of the respective cell nuclei is shown in panels c, f, and i.
|
(206-213) and pp71
(324-331), respectively. These mutants were subsequently analyzed for interaction with hDaxx by either the yeast two-hybrid system (data not shown) or coimmunoprecipitation experiments (Fig. 8C). We observed that both mutants no longer interacted with hDaxx after precipitation from transfected 293 cells, although the proteins were expressed in sufficient amounts and at equal levels, as determined by Western blot analysis (Fig. 8C, lysate). In order to test whether the loss of hDaxx interaction would affect the subnuclear localization of the pp71 mutants, HFF cells were transfected with the respective expression constructs; these analyses were followed by indirect immunofluorescence experiments. Interestingly, both mutants exhibited a microspeckled nuclear pattern, which was clearly distinct from ND10 domains (Fig. 8D, compare panels a and d with panels b and e and panels c and f). Furthermore, overexpression of FLAG-hDaxx did not recruit these mutants into nuclear dots (data not shown). We concluded from these experiments that the deletion of DIDs within pp71 not only affected binding to hDaxx but also abolished the targeting to ND10 domains.
![]() View larger version (22K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 8. Analyses of pp71 deletion mutants. (A) Mapping of DIDs within pp71. Yeast cells were transformed with two separate vectors, one of which encoded full-length pp71 (lane 1) or amino- and carboxy-terminal deletion mutants fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain (lanes 2 to 7); the amino acids contained in the respective deletion mutants are indicated. The second plasmid encoded either the empty GAL4 activation domain (lefthand side) or the hDaxx fusion (righthand side). Yeast colonies were selected for the presence of both plasmids on dropout medium lacking tryptophane and leucine and subsequently analyzed for the expression of ß-galactosidase by filter lift assays. (B) Specific amino acid sequence homologies between theDIDs of CENP-C and HCMV pp71 (41). Within pp71, internal deletion mutagenesis was performed, resulting in mutants pp71 (206-213) and pp71 (324-331), respectively. (C) Loss of interaction between pp71 deletion mutants and hDaxx as determined by coimmunoprecipitation experiments. 293 cells were transfected with eukaryotic expression vectors encoding myc-pp71, the internal deletion mutants myc-pp71 (206-213) and myc-pp71 (324-331), and FLAG-hDaxx as indicated and prepared for immunoprecipitation as described in Materials and Methods. Immunoprecipitation was performed with the monoclonal anti-FLAG antibody. Precipitates were washed three times and separated by SDS-10% PAGE. Thereafter, coprecipitated pp71 proteins were detected in Western blot analysis with the anti-myc monoclonal antibody. Lanes: 1, transfection with plasmid myc-pp71 alone; 2, transfection with vector FLAG-hDaxx alone; 3, transfection with a combination of vectors encoding myc-pp71 and FLAG-hDaxx; 4, transfection with plasmid myc-pp71 (206-213), together with the FLAG-hDaxx vector; 5, transfection of plasmid myc-pp71 (206-213) alone; 6, combination of plasmids myc-pp71 (324-331) and FLAG-hDaxx; 7, transfection of vector myc-pp71 (324-331) alone. Prior to immunoprecipitation, an aliquot of each sample was analyzed for expression of pp71 and the respective mutants, as determined by Western blot with the anti-myc monoclonal antibody (lysate; lower part of panel C). Molecular masses are indicated in kilodaltons. Abbreviations: IP, immunoprecipitation; wb, Western blot; IgG, immunoglobulin G. (D) Subcellular localization of the pp71 mutants in HFF cells. HFF cells grown on coverslips were transfected with an expression vector encoding pp71-GFP as control (panel a) and the mutants pp71 (206-213) and pp71 (324-331) (panels b and c, respectively). ND10 domains were visualized employing the polyclonal Sp26 serum detecting Sp100, followed by incubation with a TRITC-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary antibody (panels d, e, and f).
|
![]() View larger version (29K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 9. Analyses of pp71 point mutants. Within the two potential DIDs of pp71, several amino acid residues were substituted by alanine as indicated in the left part of the figure. These mutants were expressed as GFP fusion proteins and were tested for ND10 localization via indirect immunofluorescence staining of the PML protein (ND10/PML); subsequently, recruitment of the inividual mutants was investigated after coexpression of FLAG-hDaxx (recruitment). Additionally, all mutants were expressed as myc-fusions and tested for hDaxx binding in coimmunoprecipitation experiments (co-IP). Positive or negative results in the individual experiments are indicated by "+" or "-." Wild-type pp71 (wt-pp71) and the internal deletion mutants [ (206-213) and (324-331)] were tested in parallel.
|
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 10. Luciferase analyses after cotransfection of a reporter construct carrying the HCMV MIEP with expression vectors for wild-type pp71 or the pp71 mutants pp71 (206-213) and pp71 (324-331), FLAG-hDaxx and ppUL69 as indicated. Each experiment was performed in triplicate and repeated at least three times. The fold activation was calculated relative to the basal activity of the reporter construct after cotransfection of the empty expression vectors pCB6 or myc-pcDNA3 and FLAG-pcDNA3. Western blot analyses reveal that similiar amounts of pp71 and hDaxx were expressed (insert). (A) Lanes: 1, cotransfection was performed with the empty expression vectors pCB6 and FLAG-pcDNA3; 2, cotransfection was performed with a construct expressing pp71 (pCB6-pp71); 3, cotransfection was performed with the FLAG-hDaxx plasmid; 4, cotransfection was performed with vectors encoding pp71 and FLAG-hDaxx; 5, cotransfection was performed with a plasmid expressing ppUL69 (pCB6-UL69); 6, cotransfection was performed with plasmids encoding ppUL69 and FLAG-hDaxx. (B) Lanes: 1, cotransfection was performed with the empty expression vectors FLAG-pcDNA3 and myc-pcDNA3; 2, cotransfection was performed with a construct expressing myc-pp71; 3, cotransfection was performed with the FLAG-hDaxx plasmid; 4, cotransfection was performed with vectors encoding myc-pp71 and FLAG-hDaxx; 5, cotransfection was performed with a plasmid expressing the mutant myc-pp71 (206-213); 6, cotransfection was performed with vectors encoding myc-pp71 (206-213) and FLAG-hDaxx; 7, cotransfection was performed with a plasmid expressing the mutant myc-pp71 (324-331); 8, cotransfection was performed with plasmids encoding myc-pp71 (324-331) and FLAG-hDaxx.
|
(206-213) and pp71
(324-331). As shown in Fig. 10B, both mutants were not able to transactivate the HCMV MIEP above background, indicating that their transactivation capacity was completely lost (Fig. 10B, bars 5 and 7). Furthermore, a simultaneous expression of hDaxx did not result in enhanced transactivation as observed for wild-type pp71 (Fig. 10B, bars 6 and 8). Thus, the loss of hDaxx binding and ND10 localization severely affected the transactivating potential of the pp71 internal deletion mutants. In contrast, all pp71 point mutants within the putative DIDs which were able to bind to hDaxx were still able to transactivate and exhibited an enhanced activity after coexpression of hDaxx (data not shown). In summary, these experiments suggested that the recruitment of pp71 by hDaxx strongly contributed to pp71-mediated transactivation. |
|
|---|
The hDaxx protein is very conserved in higher eukaryotes and is widely expressed in adult tissues (37, 75). Furthermore, targeted disruption of the hDaxx gene locus in mouse resulted in early embryonic lethality, defining also an important developmental role for this protein (49). Currently, the biochemical functions of hDaxx are not fully understood but seem to be linked to the cellular localization of the protein. HDaxx was originally identified as an adapter molecule bridging the Fas death domain with the cytoplasmic apoptosis signal-regulating kinase ASK-1, resulting in activation of JNK and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and thereby Fas-induced apoptosis (16, 38, 75). Other studies, however, have suggested that hDaxx indeed is dispensable for Fas-mediated cell death (49, 68). Therefore, the role of hDaxx in either inducing or preventing apoptosis remains a matter of debate.
Apart from a possible role in regulation of signal transduction in the cytoplasm, hDaxx has also been reported to act in the nucleus of a variety of different cell types. It is able to bind to the transcription factors Ets-1 and Pax-3, thereby exerting a repressory effect on respective target genes (33, 41). Furthermore, it was shown that the carboxy terminus of hDaxx strongly repressed transcription, which possibly is due to interaction between hDaxx and histone deacetylases (40, 67). It has been shown that the nuclear localization of hDaxx changed during the cell cycle, since it associates with the centromer protein CENP-C during interphase (54). In addition, hDaxx has been shown to be a constituent of the nuclear domain ND10 as a consequence of interaction with the PML protein (35, 76).
Since hDaxx had been shown to interact with a variety of cellular proteins, we first wanted to investigate whether its binding to pp71 was specific. For this, we employed the yeast two-hybrid system by which we were able to show that hDaxx specifically interacted with pp71, since it did not bind to other HCMV tegument proteins such as pUL26 and ppUL69. Similarly, an interaction between pp71 and other ND10 proteins, such as PML and Sp100, was not detected. These findings were additionally strengthened by coimmunoprecipitation experiments which confirmed the interaction between pp71 and hDaxx but again could exclude binding between pp71 and the ND10 protein Sp100. Moreover, no affinity of hDaxx toward the tegument protein ppUL69 or the HCMV regulatory factor pUL84 was observed. Taken together, we provide evidence that the interaction between pp71 and hDaxx indeed is specific.
Therefore, we wanted to closer define the pp71 binding site within the hDaxx protein. By using the yeast two-hybrid system, we identified a central domain containing a cluster of acidic amino acids within hDaxx as required for pp71 binding. Immunoprecipitation experiments confirmed this central domain as a strong hDaxx binding site. Additionally, we observed that the amino terminus of hDaxx was able to coprecipitate pp71 after expression in mammalian cells. The negative result with this region in the yeast two-hybrid system could possibly be explained by the fact that this interaction was rather weak and might therefore not be detected in yeast or might be due to instability of this mutant in yeast cells. Alternatively, the binding could require posttranslational modification which does not take place in yeast cells. Consistent with the latter, the N-terminal region of hDaxx contains putative phosphorylation sites which could be required for efficient pp71 binding (41). Thus far, all published hDaxx-binding factors had turned out to bind via the carboxy terminus of hDaxx (33, 40, 41, 54, 75). Interestingly, this region was completely dispensable for interaction with pp71 both in yeast and in mammalian cells, thus further confirming the specificity of the interaction. Consistent with this, we could reconfirm that the ND10 protein PML, which was used as a positive control in the yeast experiments, bound via the carboxy terminus of hDaxx, a finding which suggests that both pp71 and PML might bind to hDaxx simultaneously via distinct domains.
The interaction between pp71 and a ND10 component gave rise to the question whether pp71 itself might be present in ND10 domains. In order to elucidate this, we performed transient-transfection experiments in HFF cells with a plasmid expressing pp71 in fusion with GFP. Immunofluorescence analyses revealed that the pp71-GFP protein colocalized with PML, Sp100, and hDaxx in nuclear speckles, indicating that pp71 was indeed able to target ND10 domains. In order to exclude artifacts arising from the fusion with GFP itself, we additionally analyzed the localization of an N-terminal fusion of pp71 to YFP and came to the same results. Since fusions at both the amino terminus and the carboxy terminus of pp71 had no influence on ND10 localization, we concluded that pp71 itself carried the information for ND10 targeting. In summary, our data suggest that, apart from already-known ND10-associated HCMV regulatory proteins such as IE1-p72, IE2-p86, and UL112-113, the tegument protein pp71 is also able to target ND10 domains independent of other viral proteins (1, 3, 39, 71).
Moreover, coexpression of hDaxx drastically altered the distributon of pp71-GFP, since we observed a strong recruitment of pp71 to ND10 domains. This recruitment was not a general effect after overexpression of ND10-associated factors, since a construct expressing FLAG-Sp100 was not able to recruit pp71, although FLAG-Sp100 localized to enlarged nuclear dots comparable to the speckles observed after overexpression of FLAG-hDaxx (2, 29, 35, 40, 67). The specificity of hDaxx-mediated recruitment of pp71 was further strengthened by the observation that the intracellular localization of another HCMV regulatory protein, the tegument protein ppUL69, was not affected after coexpression of hDaxx. Furthermore, overexpression of the ND10-associated viral regulatory protein IE2-p86 did not alter the subcellular distribution of pp71.
Finally, in an attempt to define the hDaxx binding domain within pp71, we observed that two internal deletion mutants of pp71 lacking potential DIDs as described for CENP-C and ETS-factors were no longer able to bind hDaxx (41). This correlated with a failure to accumulate in ND10 even after overexpression of hDaxx. However, when site-directed mutagenesis experiments were performed we were not able to identify individual amino acid positions within the putative DIDs with a critical function for binding. This may indicate that an alteration of the three-dimensional protein structure after internal deletion of the putative DIDs is responsible for the observed loss of interaction. The loss of interaction after deletion of N- and C-terminal sequences as observed in the yeast two-hybrid system also supports the view that the structure of pp71 is easily affected by deletions. Thus, further experiments will be required to unequivocally identify the domain within pp71 that is directly involved in contacting hDaxx.
In summary, we provide evidence that hDaxx is able to specifically recruit pp71 to ND10 domains. Since hDaxx itself localizes within ND10 as a consequence of interaction with the PML protein (35, 40), hDaxx might serve as an adapter polypeptide for the ND10 localization of this viral protein. This would be consistent with the following findings of other groups. First, pp71 has previously been observed in a punctate nuclear pattern in transient-expression experiments which might correlate to the ND10 localization observed in this study (30). Second, HCMV genomes are targeted to ND10 domains immediately after infection, and it was shown that only viral genomes adjacent to ND10 give rise to IE mRNAs, suggesting that ND10 represent the site of active viral transcription immediately after infection (36). Since pp71 was previously identified as a transactivator of viral IE gene expression, a colocalization with viral genomes in the vicinity of ND10 might be required for pp71 in order to directly affect gene expression during infection.
This hypothesis was investigated via indirect immunofluorescence experiments with HCMV-infected cells. In order to specifically detect the pp71 protein as imported by viral particles, cells were treated with cycloheximide prior to infection. This treatment efficiently abolished de novo protein synthesis since no IE gene expression was detectable in the infected culture. Consistent with previous findings, we observed the translocation of incoming pp71 protein to the nucleus (30). Moreover, pp71 appeared in nuclear speckles which perfectly overlapped with the ND10 factor Sp100, indicating that pp71 targeted these nuclear domains also in the context of viral infection. As a control, the abundant tegument protein pp65 was employed, which gave a nuclear diffuse signal under these conditions as reported by others but did not colocalize with ND10 domains (28). In summary, pp71 was found to target ND10 after transient expression, as well as after viral infection.
Finally, we addressed the question whether hDaxx-mediated recruitment to ND10 could influence transactivation by pp71. For this, we performed luciferase reporter experiments in HCMV-permissive U373MG cells. We observed a synergistic transactivation of the HCMV MIEP when pp71 and hDaxx were coexpressed, whereas hDaxx alone had no effect on the basal activity of the reporter construct. Therefore, we concluded that pp71-mediated transactivation could be strongly enhanced if pp71 was tethered to ND10 domains by hDaxx. However, an indirect effect of hDaxx on pp71-mediated transactivation which is independent from ND10 localization cannot be excluded entirely at present. The synergistic activation measured after coexpression of pp71 and hDaxx is surprising in the light of published data describing hDaxx as a transcriptional repressor (33, 41, 67). Our finding, however, is consistent with findings by Li et al., who showed that PML is able to inhibit hDaxx-mediated repression, which in turn correlates with the recruitment of hDaxx to ND10 domains (40). In conclusion, the ND10 domain might regulate transcription at two different levels. First, a number of both cellular and viral transcriptional coactivators are able to target ND10 domains (for a review, see reference 59). Second, ND10 domains may sequester transcriptional repressors such as hDaxx, thereby preventing them to exert their inhibitory function on respective target genes. HCMV additionally takes advantage of the latter, since the deposition of hDaxx at ND10 allows for localization of pp71 at these domains, which in turn is required for efficient activation of IE gene expression.
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB473) and the Bundesministerium für Forschung und Technologie (IZKF Erlangen). In addition, H.S. was supported by an EMBO short-term fellowship award.
Present address: Department for Immune Prophylaxis, National Veterinary Institute, N-0033 Oslo, Norway. ![]()
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»