Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, June 2002, p. 5627-5636, Vol. 76, No. 11
0022-538X/02/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.76.11.5627-5636.2002
Copyright © 2002, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
Receptor Subunit That Are Involved in Ligand Binding and Signaling by Human Herpesvirus 8-Encoded Interleukin-6
Molecular Virology Laboratories, Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21231
Received 12 December 2001/ Accepted 1 March 2002
|
|
|---|
subunit (IL-6R, gp80) that is required for signaling by endogenous IL-6 proteins; however, IL-6R can enhance vIL-6 activity and can enable signaling through a gp130 variant, gp130.PM5, that is itself unable to support vIL-6 signaling. These findings suggest that the vIL-6-gp130 interactions are qualitatively different from those of human IL-6 (hIL-6) and that vIL-6 signaling may be more promiscuous than that of hIL-6 but that IL-6R may play a role in vIL-6 signaling in vivo. To examine the receptor binding requirements of vIL-6, we have undertaken mutational analyses of regions of gp130 and IL-6R potentially involved in interactions with ligand or in functional complex formation and used these variants in functional, ligand-binding, and receptor dimerization assays. The data presented identify positions within two interstrand loops of the gp130 cytokine-receptor homology domain that are important for vIL-6 signaling and vIL-6-induced receptor dimerization and show that vIL-6, like hIL-6, can form complexes with IL-6R and gp130 but that the roles of putative cytokine-binding residues of IL-6R in ligand-induced functional complex formation are qualitatively different in the case of vIL-6 and hIL-6. |
|
|---|
The mechanism by which vIL-6 induces intracellular signal transduction is generally the same as that utilized by the cellular IL-6 proteins in that both viral and cellular proteins bind to the gp130 signal transducer to effect dimerization, phosphorylation of gp130 cytoplasmic tyrosine residues through the recruitment of Janus kinases (Jaks), and the consequent recruitment and activation through tyrosine phosphorylation of SH2 domain-containing STAT transcription factors (10, 14, 25, 27, 35, 36). The mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway is also activated via gp130 by both hIL-6 and vIL-6 (12, 31, 37). However, unlike endogenous IL-6 proteins, vIL-6 can signal through gp130 in the absence of the
receptor subunit, IL-6R (gp80), although there is evidence that IL-6R can enhance vIL-6 signaling (4, 12, 22, 28, 37). That vIL-6 can form functional complexes with IL-6R and gp130 has been inferred also from the finding that a gp130 variant that has been altered in the cytokine-binding E-F loop of the cytokine-receptor homology region (CHR) can support signaling by vIL-6 only in the presence of IL-6R (37). Nevertheless, the ability of vIL-6 to signal through gp130 alone suggests that the viral cytokine may be able to signal more promiscuously than its cellular counterpart in vivo, with possible implications for its role in viral biology and pathogenesis.
IL-6R and gp130 contain homologous domains that are found in other receptor subunits that associate with gp130 to mediate signal transduction. These domains include immunoglobulin-like and cytokine-receptor homology (comprising two protein domains) regions, both of which are involved in hIL-6 binding in the case of gp130, with the CHR region of IL-6R also interacting with hIL-6 (11, 13, 16, 17, 19, 24, 38). Three regions of hIL-6 are known to interact with receptor: site I is involved in binding to IL-6R, while sites II and III interact with gp130 CHR and immunoglobulin domain residues, respectively. In the case of vIL-6, alteration of a triplet of amino acids within the CHR E-F loop, a component of the hIL-6 interacting interface, was found to abrogate IL-6R-independent signaling, suggesting that one or more the altered residues are important for ligand recognition (37). However, whether this is the case and whether other regions of the CHR are required for interactions with vIL-6, via the equivalent of hIL-6 site II, has not been resolved, and the nature of the interactions of vIL-6 with IL-6R has not previously been investigated.
We present here data that identify residues in gp130 that are involved in vIL-6-mediated functional dimerization and heterodimerization with IL-6R and residues of IL-6R that are necessary for vIL-6-induced association with gp130. Our results suggest that the E-F and C-D loops of gp130 CHR and regions of IL-6R equivalent to gp130 CHR B2-C2 are involved in receptor recognition by vIL-6.
|
|
|---|
2MCAT reporter plasmid. Where necessary, total amounts of transfected DNA were made up to a standard amount by using pEF-BOS (receptor expression vector) DNA. For the generation of proteins for use in ligand-receptor and receptor-receptor binding assays, 2 to 10 µg of expression vector was used for transfection. Mutagenesis. Mutagenesis was conducted on M13-gp130 and M13-IL-6R uracil-containing single-stranded DNA templates by using the Kunkel method (18), essentially as described previously (37). Coding sequences containing introduced mutations were excised from M13 replicative-form DNA by restriction digestion for cloning into pEF-BOS or were amplified by PCR with primers containing introduced restriction enzyme sites, and the appropriately digested PCR products were cloned into pSG5 or immunoglobulin G (IgG) Fc-containing pSG5 (pSG5.X.Fc) eukaryotic expression vectors (see below).
Plasmids and oligonucleotides.
The pSG5-based eukaryotic expression plasmids for vIL-6 and hIL-6 comprise the respective coding sequences cloned into the BamHI site of pSG5 (37). The human IL-6R and human gp130 expression vectors pEF-BOS-hIL-6R and pEF-BOS-hgp130 were provided by M. Narazaki and T. Kishimoto; they comprise the receptor coding sequences cloned between the XbaI (IL-6R) or SacI and BamHI sites of the pEF-BOS eukaryotic expression vector (21). The p
2MCAT reporter plasmid comprises
2-macroglobulin promoter sequences cloned upstream of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene (33). The generation of the signaling-defective gp130 variant, gp130.PM5, has been described previously (37). Other altered gp130 and IL-6R coding sequences were generated similarly by using the Kunkel mutagenesis procedure (18). Sequences encoding the receptor proteins were derived by digestion with XbaI (IL-6R) or SacI and BamHI (gp130) of M13-receptor replicative-form DNA for cloning into the same sites in pEF-BOS. Sequences encoding the extracellular regions of the proteins were PCR amplified from M13 vectors and cloned into a polylinker-modified pSG5 vector, pSG5.X, between the HindIII and BamHI (IL-6R) and SmaI and BamHI (gp130) sites. Sequences specifying the extracellular regions of gp130 and IL-6R were cloned between the HindIII and BamHI (sIL-6R) and EcoRV and BamHI (sgp130) sites of a similar vector, pSG5.X.Fc, containing human IgG Fc coding sequences downstream of the polylinker, to generate contiguous sIL-6R-Fc and sgp130-Fc open reading frames for the expression of these fusion proteins by transfected cells. Expression vectors for Flag-tagged, soluble versions of gp130 variants PM5, PM16, PM17, PM29, PM31, and PM33 were made by cloning of SmaI-BamHI-digested PCR-amplified sgp130 sequences between the SmaI and BamHI sites of a Flag epitope-containing pSG5-based vector, pSG5.S.Flag. The primers used for cloning sIL-6R and sgp130 were the universal sequencing primer (GTAAAACGACGGCCAGT; 5', IL-6R; HindIII site in the M13 polylinker), IL-6R.P8 (acggatcCTTGCACTGGGAGGCT; 3', sIL-6R; lowercase indicates noncomplementary sequences containing introduced restriction site), gp130.P1 (acacccgggGATGTTGACGTTGCAGA; 5', gp130), and gp130.P5 (acggatccGGCTTCAATTTCTCCTT; 3', sgp130).
Western blotting. vIL-6, sgp130, and sIL-6R proteins or Fc- or Flag-fused derivatives obtained from transfected cell media were size fractionated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. These were blocked in TBS-T (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.0], 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20) containing 5% nonfat milk, prior to the addition of primary antibody (0.1 to 0.5 µg/ml). Antibodies used for the detection of gp130, IL-6R, and Flag epitope were obtained from PharMingen (San Diego, Calif.; catalog no. 33831A), R&D Systems (Minneapolis, Minn.; catalog no. AB-227-NA), and Sigma (St. Louis, Mo.; catalog no. F3165), respectively; the vIL-6 peptide antiserum used for the detection of vIL-6 has been described previously (37). After a washing in TBS-T containing 5% nonfat milk, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-goat (hIL-6R), anti-mouse (gp130 and Flag), or anti-rabbit (vIL-6) secondary antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, Calif.; catalog numbers sc-2020, sc-2064, and sc-2004, respectively) diluted 1:2,000 was used to detect filter-bound primary antibody. Horseradish peroxidase on TBS-washed filters was visualized by a chemiluminescence assay.
Ligand-receptor and receptor-receptor binding assays. Assays of vIL-6 binding to sgp130-Fc, or altered derivatives, and receptor-receptor dimerization (gp130-gp130 and gp130-IL-6R) assays were carried out with the component proteins derived from growth media of HEK293-T cells transfected with the appropriate expression vectors; sgp130 and sIL-6R were also obtained as purified recombinant proteins from a commercial source (R&D Systems; catalog numbers 228-GP and 227-SR). For assays involving exogenous mixing of separate components, 400-µl aliquots of ligand and receptor samples (or pSG5 controls) were incubated with protein A-Sepharose (Pharmacia Biotech; catalog no. 17-0974) at 4°C overnight, and the matrix and bound material was then subjected to repeated centrifugation and washing in phosphate-buffered saline prior to Western analysis. For coexpressed (cotransfected) components, 1-ml aliquots of media were treated similarly. Precipitated, washed samples were heat-denatured, applied to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels, and transferred to nitrocellulose for Western analysis to detect vIL-6, sgp130 (native, or Fc or Flag fusions), or sIL-6R (Fc fusion).
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (43K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 1. Functional analyses of gp130 CHR variants. (A) Positions of alanine-scanning substitutions in the C-D, E-F, and B2-C2 loops of gp130. (B) Activities of the gp130 variants in comparison to wild-type gp130 in vIL-6 signaling assays. Expression vectors for each of the gp130 proteins, or empty vector (pEF-BOS), were cotransfected with vIL-6 and the STAT-responsive CAT target p 2MCAT (33). Cell extracts were harvested for determinations of CAT activities by standard methods. The results of duplicate experiments are shown. (C) Activities of the gp130 variants relative to wild-type gp130 in hIL-6 signaling assays in which an IL-6R expression vector was cotransfected with ligand and gp130 expression plasmids and p 2MCAT. WT, wild type. (The ribbon diagram of sgp130 in panel A was reproduced from Fig. 1A of reference 3 with the permission of Yvonne Jones and Oxford University Press.)
|
2MCAT (33) into HEK293-T cells. CAT activities in cell extracts were subsequently determined. The results of these experiments are shown in Fig. 1B. While several of the constructions showed reduced activities relative to the wild-type gp130 expression vector, mutations PM16, PM17, PM29, PM31, and PM33 (in addition to PM5) showed greatly reduced activities (<25% compared to the wild type). Similar assays performed with expression vectors for hIL-6 and IL-6R (required for hIL-6 signaling) cotransfected with the each of the gp130 expression plasmids and p
2MCAT revealed essentially wild-type activities of each of the gp130 variants (Fig. 1C). Additional experiments were performed with the gp130 variants showing reduced vIL-6 signaling to determine whether IL-6R could "rescue" the altered gp130 proteins to allow efficient vIL-6 signal transduction, as seen for hIL-6. Parallel, multiply repeated experiments were performed in the presence or absence of IL-6R for vIL-6 and in the presence of IL-6R for hIL-6. The data from these experiments are presented in Fig. 2. The results revealed positive effects of IL-6R coexpression on signaling by each of the gp130 variants in response to vIL-6, a finding analogous to the situation for IL-6R-dependent hIL-6 signal transduction by these altered gp130 proteins.
![]() View larger version (30K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 2. Effect of IL-6R coexpression with gp130 variants on vIL-6 signaling. Data derived from triplicate cotransfection experiments for vIL-6 signaling through gp130 and functionally altered gp130 variants either in the presence or absence of overexpressed IL-6R are shown, together with corresponding data for hIL-6 signal transduction through the same gp130 proteins in the presence IL-6R. WT, wild type.
|
Binding of vIL-6 to functionally defective gp130 variants. We reasoned that the inability of gp130 variants PM16, PM17, PM29, PM31, and PM33 to support high-level signaling by vIL-6 could be due to reduced affinity of vIL-6-gp130 interactions or to reduced or altered formation of higher order vIL-6-gp130 signaling complexes. To test the former hypothesis, we cloned sequences specifying the soluble components (lacking the transmembrane domain and cytoplasmic region) of gp130 and the respective PM variants into a pSG5-based human IgG-Fc-containing vector to generate eukaryotic expression plasmids that could be used to express the respective gp130-Fc fusion proteins in transfected cells. These constructions, pSVvIL-6, or pSG5 (negative control), were transfected separately into HEK293-T cells to obtain the component proteins for use in protein A-Sepharose-mediated coprecipitation binding assays (see Materials and Methods). Coprecipitated vIL-6 was identified by Western analysis by using vIL-6-specific antiserum (37). These experiments were performed in the absence or presence of recombinant sIL-6R (obtained commercially). An alternative procedure that involved cotransfection of each of the gp130-Fc expression vectors with pSVvIL-6 into HEK293-T-cell cultures was also used to control for the possibility that coexpression of the ligand and receptor proteins may be important for their interaction.
Representative results from experiments in which the protein components were expressed independently and then mixed exogenously are shown in Fig. 3A. Wild-type sgp130-Fc was able to interact with vIL-6 in this assay, with vIL-6 protein being coprecipitated with the protein A-bound Fc fusion protein, but not by protein A-Sepharose alone. The gp130 variants PM17, PM29, PM31, and PM33 were also able to coprecipitate vIL-6, whereas variants PM5 (Y190FV to AAA) and PM16 (Y190 to A) were unable to bind vIL-6, either with or without added sIL-6R. The data in the absence of sIL-6R for gp130.PM5 and gp130.PM16 are consistent with the inability of these altered proteins to support vIL-6 signaling and with recently published vIL-6:gp130 crystallographic data demonstrating that gp130 Y190 is positioned appropriately for interactions with vIL-6 (7).
![]() View larger version (51K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 3. Binding of IL-6 by gp130 variants as determined by coprecipitation assays. (A) Soluble Fc fusion proteins of wild-type and specifically altered gp130 were obtained from the media of HEK293-T cells transfected with expression vectors for each of the proteins. Separate cultures were transfected with pSV-vIL-6 to generate vIL-6-containing media. Samples of each of the sgp130-Fc media were mixed with samples of vIL-6 medium and incubated with protein A-Sepharose, and then pelleted material was analyzed by Western blotting to detect sgp130-Fc and vIL-6 (top panels). Parallel experiments were done in the presence of added recombinant soluble IL-6R (rIL-6R) (bottom panels). (Note that a nonspecific immunoreactive species migrating to a position slightly higher than vIL-6 is present on the blots [including in lanes 2, sgp130-Fc alone] and should not be confused with vIL-6.) (B) Coexpression of each of the sgp130-Fc proteins with vIL-6 was achieved by cotransfection of each of the sgp130-Fc expression vectors with pSVvIL-6. Samples of transfected cell media were used in coprecipitation assays, as before. wt, wild type.
|
Effects of gp130 mutations on vIL-6 induced gp130-gp130 complexing. To test the possibility that the functionally altered gp130 variants were unable to dimerize, we undertook cotransfection assays in which each sgp130-Fc proteins (wild-type and variants) was cotransfected with its respective Flag-tagged counterpart and vIL-6 (or pSG5, for wild-type gp130). After protein A-agarose coprecipitation, Western analysis with Flag epitope antibody was undertaken for the detection of coprecipitated sgp130-Flag proteins. As shown in the top panel of Fig. 4A, each of the sgp130 (wild-type and variant) Fc and Flag fusion proteins was expressed and secreted in transfected HEK293-T-cell cultures. Significantly, both sgp130.PM5-Flag and sgp130.PM16-Flag were coprecipitated (by protein A-Sepharose) with their Fc-fused counterparts, demonstrating ligand-independent complexing of these variants. No evidence of gp130-gp130 dimerization (above background) was seen for wild-type sgp130 or the other gp130 variants. Coexpression of vIL-6 with the wild-type sgp130 enabled the association of sgp130-Flag with sgp130-Fc in the coprecipitation assays, but vIL-6 was unable to induce dimerization of gp130 variants PM17, PM29, PM31, and PM33 in this assay (Fig. 4B), a finding consistent with the greatly reduced abilities of these gp130 proteins to support vIL-6 signaling. Homodimerization of gp130.PM5 and gp130.PM16 was seen in the presence of vIL-6 as in its absence.
![]() View larger version (52K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 4. gp130 dimerization assays. (A) Fc and Flag epitope fusions of wild-type and variant sgp130 proteins were coexpressed in cotransfected cells. After protein A-Sepharose precipitation, coprecipitated sgp130-Flag was detected by Western blotting (bottom panel). Expression of each of the Fc and Flag fusion proteins in samples of transfected cell media was checked by Western blotting with gp130 antibody (top panel; the upper band corresponds to sgp130-Fc, and the lower band corresponds to sgp130-Flag). (B) Effect of vIL-6 coexpression on gp130 dimerization. Coexpression of vIL-6 with the sgp130 fusion proteins was achieved by cotransfection of pSVvIL-6 with the respective gp130 expression constructions. Ligand-induced dimerization was seen only for wild-type gp130. wt, wild type.
|
Identification of IL-6R residues important for vIL-6 signaling. We reported previously (37) that IL-6R could restore the ability of gp130.PM5 to respond to vIL-6, presumably by stabilizing vIL-6-gp130 interactions by formation of vIL-6-gp130-IL-6R signaling complexes analogous to those induced by hIL-6. Therefore, to investigate vIL-6-IL-6R interactions through the mutagenesis of residues of IL-6R, we used gp130.PM5 as the signaling molecule in transient-transfection assays, thereby rendering vIL-6 signaling dependent on vIL-6-IL-6R interactions. IL-6R residues previously reported to negatively affect hIL-6 interactions with IL-6R or hIL-6-IL-6R interactions with gp130, as determined by coprecipitation-based binding assays (17, 32, 38), were targeted for mutagenesis. The alterations that were made are listed in Fig. 5A. The altered amino acids correspond to gp130 residues in the E-F (PM1) and B2-C2 (PM3 and PM4) CHR loops and to IL-6R residues (PM2 and PM5) believed to lie in an IL-6R-gp130 dimerization interface (3, 32).
![]() View larger version (34K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 5. Functional analyses of IL-6R CHR variants. (A) Codons specifying residues within the proximal and distal domains of the CHR previously reported to affect hIL-6 binding or interactions of hIL-6-IL-6R complexes with gp130 were altered to effect amino acid substitutions, as indicated. (B) Expression constructions of each were cotransfected with p 2MCAT, pEFBOS-hgp130.PM5 (or pEFBOS, negative control), and either vIL-6 or hIL-6 expression vectors into HEK293-T cells or Hep3B cells (both used for each ligand, with indistinguishable results). Cell extracts were subsequently made and assayed for CAT activity. Each datum point is derived from either five (hIL-6) or six (vIL-6) independent transfections, and values are expressed relative to CAT activities obtained with wild-type IL-6R. WT, wild type.
|
2MCAT reporter to below 30% of that obtained with wild-type IL-6R. In sharp contrast, all but one (PM5) of the IL-6R variants were able to support near-wild-type levels of signal transduction by hIL-6, despite the previously reported effects of these mutations on ligand-receptor interactions in vitro (17, 32, 38). That the effects of mutations PM1 to PM4 on hIL-6 signaling were relatively minor in our transfection assays, while clearly detectable in the previously reported binding assays, may be due to greater stability of signaling complexes in the presence of gp130 (for altered hIL-6-IL-6R interactions, PM3 and PM4) and in the context of membrane-bound receptors. Regardless, the clear effects of mutations PM2 to PM4, in addition to the PM5 alteration, on vIL-6 signaling indicate that the altered residues are important for vIL-6-induced functional complex formation, possibly reflecting their involvement in direct vIL-6-IL-6R interactions in the case of Y249 and R250/L251, and that there are differences in vIL-6 and hIL-6 interactions with IL-6R in the context of cell surface-expressed ligand-IL-6R-gp130 complexes. Effects of IL-6R mutations on ligand-induced gp130-IL-6R complexing. To determine the effects of introduced IL-6R mutations on the ability of IL-6R to form vIL-6-induced complexes with gp130, we used sIL-6R-Fc fusions proteins (wild type and variants PM1 to PM5) in coprecipitation assays similar to those described above. Protein components for use in the assays were derived either as recombinant protein (sgp130) or from media of cell cultures separately transfected with vIL-6 and sIL-6R-Fc expression constructions or from cells cotransfected with expression vectors for vIL-6, sgp130, and the sIL-6R-Fc fusion proteins. Appropriate negative controls were provided by using empty expression vectors in place of vIL-6 or the receptor constructions. Parallel experiments were undertaken with hIL-6 instead of vIL-6 in cotransfections. The results of the assays are shown in Fig. 6. For vIL-6, using either the in vitro mixing (Fig. 6A) or cotransfection (Fig. 6B) approaches, ligand-dependent complexing of sgp130 with sIL-6R-Fc was seen for wild-type sIL-6R and variant PM1 but not for functionally defective variants PM2, PM3, PM4, and PM5. In the case of hIL-6, gp130 complexing with sIL-6R and sIL-6R variants PM1 to PM4 could be induced efficiently by coexpression of the ligand; hIL-6-induced sgp130 complexing with sIL-6R.PM5 was barely detectable.
![]() View larger version (38K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 6. Effects of IL-6R CHR mutations on ligand-induced IL-6R-gp130 complexing. Expression constructions for Fc fusions of wild-type and variant sIL-6R proteins were individually transfected (A) or cotransfected (B and C) with sgp130 and ligand (vIL-6 or hIL-6) expression vectors or corresponding pEFBOS or pSG5 negative controls (-). Results of protein A-Sepharose-mediated coprecipitation assays are shown for vIL-6 (A and B) and hIL-6 (C); coprecipitation of sgp130 indicates complexing between sgp130 and sIL-6R-Fc proteins. Expression and secretion of each of the receptor components by transfected cells was checked by Western analysis of samples of culture media ("sup."). wt, wild type.
|
Taken together, our functional and binding data implicate IL-6R residues N230, Y249, and R250/L251 as being involved in vIL-6-specific ligand-induced assembly of functional complexes of gp130 and IL-6R and indicate that IL-6R residues H280 and/or D281 are critical for both vIL-6 and hIL-6 IL-6R-dependent signaling through gp130.
|
|
|---|
![]() View larger version (20K): [in a new window] |
FIG. 7. Diagrammatic summary of results and their interpretation. (A) Ligand-independent complexing occurs between gp130 proteins containing either YFV192AAA (PM5) or Y190A (PM16) substitutions (Fig. 4); Fc fusions of these proteins are unable to coprecipitate vIL-6 when mixed in vitro but can do so when coexpressed with vIL-6 in transfected cells (Fig. 3). PM5 and PM16 variants of gp130 are unable to form functional signaling complexes either in the presence (Fig. 1B) or absence (37) of vIL-6. Other functionally defective gp130 CHR variants (PM17, PM29, PM31, and PM33) are able to coprecipitate vIL-6, added either exogenously or coexpressed with the sgp130-Fc fusion proteins (Fig. 3) but are unable to undergo ligand-induced dimerization (Fig. 4). (B) Coexpression of IL-6R together with vIL-6 and functionally defective gp130 variants restores their signaling activities (Fig. 2B) (37), presumably by stabilizing ligand-induced gp130 dimerization through formation of hexameric complexes (as occurs for hIL-6). (C) IL-6R variants PM2 and PM5 containing substitutions in residues N230 and H280D281, predicted to occur in the gp130-IL-6R dimerization interface, are unable to complex with gp130 in the presence of vIL-6; Fc fusions of the sIL-6R proteins could not coprecipitate sgp130 (Fig. 6A and B). These results indicate the importance of direct gp130-IL-6R interactions for vIL-6-induced complexing of the receptor subunits. IL-6R variants PM3 and PM4 containing substitutions (Y249A and RL251SI) at positions within the distal CHR domain alsocould not coprecipitate sgp130 in the presence of vIL-6 (Fig. 6A and B); based on previous results from investigations of hIL-6-IL-6R interactions (17, 38) and the positions of these residues within the predicted structure of IL-6R, this is likely to result from effects of the substitutions on interactions of vIL-6 with IL-6R. Our data do not distinguish between the predicted effects of the IL-6R PM3 or PM4 and PM2 or PM5 alterations, and these models are therefore speculative. For hIL-6, only the HD281SV IL-6R variant (PM5) showed significantly reduced ability to support signaling (Fig. 5) and ligand-induced complexing with gp130 (Fig. 6C).
|
In the case of IL-6R, interpretation of our data is less clear-cut, since we do not have the benefit of corresponding structural information. However, we can speculate on the basis of the deduced structure of IL-6R (17, 32) that residues Y249 and R250/L251 are involved in functionally important interactions with vIL-6, whereas residues N230 and H280/D281 are involved in stabilization of vIL-6-induced gp130-IL-6R complexing through a receptor subunit dimerization interface. Only the H280/D281 residues were found to be important also for hIL-6-mediated signaling and gp130-IL-6R complexing in our assays, revealing differences in the relative contribution of the IL-6R residues to vIL-6- versus hIL-6-induced functional complex formation.
In summary, our data show for the first time that residues within the C-D (W164, H167, and F169) and E-F (Y190 and F191) loops of gp130 CHR are required for vIL-6 binding to the signal transducer to effect formation of functional signaling complexes and also identify residues within the IL-6R equivalent of gp130 CHR B2-C2 (Y249 and R250/L251) that are involved in IL-6R-dependent vIL-6 signaling (through gp130.PM5) and ligand-induced IL-6R-gp130 complexing. IL-6R residues (N230 and H280/D281) within the predicted IL-6R-gp130 interaction interface were also required for vIL-6-induced receptor subunit complexing and signaling. These data help define the requirements for functional vIL-6-receptor complexing and may be useful in the design of antagonists of this potential contributor to HHV-8 pathogenesis.
This work was supported by grants CA-76445 and CA-83519 from the National Institutes of Health.
|
|
|---|
mutated in the predicted gp130-binding interface. J. Biol. Chem. 270:12242-12249.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»