Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, May 2001, p. 4283-4296, Vol. 75, No. 9
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.9.4283-4296.2001
Papillomavirus Type 16 Oncogenes Downregulate
Expression of Interferon-Responsive Genes and Upregulate
Proliferation-Associated and NF-
B-Responsive Genes in Cervical
Keratinocytes
Matthias
Nees,1,
Joel M.
Geoghegan,1
Tehila
Hyman,1
Stephan
Frank,2
Lance
Miller,3 and
Craig D.
Woodworth1,*
Laboratory of Cellular Carcinogenesis and
Tumor Promotion, National Cancer Institute,1 and
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and
Stroke,2 Bethesda, and NCI Array
Facility, Advanced Technology Center,
Gaithersburg,3 Maryland
Received 13 October 2000/Accepted 1 February 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Infection with high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPV) is a major
risk factor for development of cervical cancer. Expression of the HPV
E6 and E7 oncoproteins increases in differentiating keratinocytes,
resulting in inactivation of the p53 and retinoblastoma proteins, two
important transcriptional regulators. We used cDNA microarrays to
examine global alterations in gene expression in differentiating
cervical keratinocytes after infection with retroviruses encoding HPV
type 16 (HPV-16) E6 and E7. Expression of 80 cellular genes
(approximately 4% of the genes on the array) was altered reproducibly
by E6 and/or E7. Cluster analysis classified these genes into three
functional groups: (i) interferon (IFN)-responsive genes, (ii) genes
stimulated by NF-
B, and (iii) genes regulated in cell cycle
progression and DNA synthesis. HPV-16 E6 or a dominant negative p53
protein downregulated multiple IFN-responsive genes. E6 decreased
expression of IFN-
and -
, downregulated nuclear STAT-1 protein,
and decreased binding of STAT-1 to the IFN-stimulated response element.
E7 alone was less effective; however, coexpression of E6 and E7
downregulated IFN-responsive genes more efficiently than E6. The HPV-16
E6 protein also stimulated expression of multiple genes known to be
inducible by NF-
B and AP-1. E6 enhanced expression of functional
components of the NF-
B signal pathway, including p50, NIK, and
TRAF-interacting protein, and increased binding to NF-
B and AP-1 DNA
consensus binding sites. Secretion of interleukin-8, RANTES, macrophage
inflammatory protein 1
, and 10-
Da IFN-
-inducible protein were
increased in differentiating keratinocytes by E6. Thus, high-level
expression of the HPV-16 E6 protein in differentiating keratinocytes
directly alters expression of genes that influence host resistance to
infection and immune function.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are
small DNA tumor viruses that replicate in differentiating keratinocytes
of the epidermis and anogenital tract (59). The E6 and E7
viral genes are expressed at low levels in proliferating basal cells,
but transcription is activated as cells enter the terminal
differentiation pathway (11, 16). E6 and E7 delay
keratinocyte differentiation, reactivate host DNA synthesis, and
stimulate cell cycle progression (60), allowing the virus
to utilize host DNA synthetic enzymes to replicate its genome. HPVs
induce benign warts and papillomas; however, infection with high-risk
types (HPV-16, -18, -31, and -45) is a major risk factor for the
development of cervical cancer (reviewed in reference 60).
The E6 and E7 genes are particularly important because they are
retained and expressed in most cervical carcinomas, and continued
expression is required to maintain the malignant phenotype
(55).
An early step in HPV-associated carcinogenesis is perturbation of
cellular gene expression by the E6 and E7 oncoproteins. E6 binds to a
number of cellular proteins and transactivates or represses gene
expression (reviewed in reference 48). An important target
for E6 is E6-associated protein (E6AP), a protein-ligase of the
ubiquitin pathway of proteolysis. E6-E6AP complexes target the tumor
suppressor protein p53 for degradation by the proteasome (51). p53 is a central transcription activator that
regulates responses to stress and DNA damage. Loss of p53 leads to
genetic instability and rapid malignant progression. The HPV-16 E7
protein binds to the retinoblastoma protein (pRb) (17) and
members of the pRb family (reviewed in reference 31). Interaction
occurs primarily with the hypophosphorylated form of pRb causing
release of active E2F transcription factors, which in turn stimulate
expression of genes involved in cell cycle progression and DNA
synthesis (21). The E7 protein also binds to and alters
the functions of other proteins, including AP-1 transcription factors
(2). E6 and E7 exert overlapping effects on cell cycle
control, and in combination, they efficiently immortalize human
keratinocytes (39).
Because E6 and E7 interact with numerous cellular transcription
regulators, these viral proteins have the potential to significantly modify keratinocyte gene expression. Recently, cDNA microarrays have
been successfully used to study global patterns of gene expression in
human cancer (1, 13, 14, 25, 47). For this methodology, labeled cDNAs from two samples are hybridized with a microarray containing spots for thousands of genes. Differences in gene expression are measured directly, and groups of differentially expressed genes can
be clustered to identify common regulatory pathways. We used cDNA
arrays to identify alterations in gene expression in cultures of human
cervical keratinocytes infected with HPV-16 E6 and E7 retroviruses.
Cervical keratinocytes are the natural target for HPV infection and the
progenitors for cervical cancer. We examined how E6 and E7 influenced
the pattern of gene expression in proliferating and differentiating
cultures, as well as after treatment with tumor necrosis factor alpha
(TNF-
), a factor that plays a role in cervical infection and
inflammation. Our results show that E6 and E7 alter expression of a
large number of cellular genes and that these genes can be grouped into
functional categories, suggesting common regulatory pathways.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cell culture.
Primary cultures of human ectocervical
keratinocytes were established from fresh cervical tissue obtained
after hysterectomy due to fibroids or endometriosis (57).
We used cell pools as well as cell preparations from single donors.
Cells were maintained in serum-free MCDB153-LB medium (K-SFM; Life
Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.). Primary cultures were infected with
high-titer retroviruses expressing the neomycin resistance gene only
(pLXSN) or the HPV-16 E6, E7, or E6/E7 genes (27).
Retroviruses encoding mutant E6 proteins with single amino acid
exchanges (F2V, F125V, and L110Q) have been described elsewhere
(35, 40). A retrovirus producer line expressing a dominant
negative p53 (p53DN) miniprotein was established in the PA317 packaging
cell line, using a recombinant construct kindly provided by Moshe Oren
(26). After retrovirus infection, cells were always
selected in G418 (200µg/ml for 2 to 4 days) and subcultured prior to
extraction of RNA. Killing of noninfected cells is observed after 2 days in G418 and is complete by day 4. At this time point, all cells in
the mock-infected control dish are dead. Longer exposure to 200 µg of
G418/ml shows no detectable cytopathic effects. Western blots show that
E7 is actively expressed under these conditions and that p53 is
strongly diminished, suggesting that E6 is also expressed
(40). For array analysis, all cell cultures, including the
immortalized cell lines and those for the experiments using recombinant
IFNs, were treated identically. After reaching confluency, keratinocyte
cultures were rendered quiescent (growth arrested) by removal of growth
factors including epidermal growth factor, bovine pituitary extract,
insulin, hydrocortisone, triiodothyronine, and transferrin for 24 h. Quiescent cells were then induced to undergo terminal
differentiation by adding 1.4 mM calcium for 24 h. In additional
experiments, keratinocytes were treated with 300 to 1,000 U of
recombinant alpha interferon (IFN-
) or IFN-
per ml, 500 U of
IFN-
per ml, 1 nM TNF-
, or 1 nM interleukin-1
(IL-1
)
(all from R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn.). Treatment was for 4 to
6 h. For immortalization, keratinocytes were infected with HPV-16
E6/E7 retroviruses, and cells were seeded at low density
(105 cells/150-mm-diameter dish) and passaged several times
until growth ceased due to crisis or senescence (usually between 7 and 15 passages). Senescent cultures were maintained in complete medium until colonies of rapidly growing cells appeared as described in
reference 40. After colonies reached a diameter of approximately 1 cm,
selected colonies were picked and cultured for at least three more
passages (eight population doublings) to confirm that cells were immortal.
RNA isolation and purification.
Confluent monolayers of
differentiating, growth-arrested cells were washed with prewarmed
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and lysed with Trizol reagent (Life
Technologies), and residual genomic DNA was removed by digestion with
RNase-free DNase I. DNase, proteins, and other contaminants were
removed by two extractions with buffer-saturated phenol-chloroform, and
RNA was precipitated with 1.5 volumes of isopropanol or lithium
chloride. The precipitated RNA was centrifuged at 6,000 × g, washed with 70% ethanol, dried by evaporation, and resuspended
in diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated water. RNA integrity was confirmed by
electrophoresis, and samples were stored at
80°C until used. All
RNA combinations used for array analysis were matched. For example,
pLXSN controls and HPV-16 E6- and/or E7-infected cells were from the
same donor(s) and treated identically (basal medium with 1.4 mM calcium
for 24 h). The same applies to immortalized cell clones, which
were compared to matching, pLXSN-infected primary cultures from the
same donors or cell pools, cultured under identical growth conditions.
This parameter is critical considering the high biological variability
and age, gender, and racial differences between donors. We used a
number of different single donors and, in about 50% of experiments,
pools of three to five donors. A small number of arrays are duplicates using the same RNA preparations in independent experiments. These can
easily be identified in Fig. 1 by their highly similar expression patterns.
cDNA synthesis and cDNA array hybridization.
The National
Cancer Institute (NCI) oncochip glass arrays were manufactured and
printed at the NCI microarray core facility (Advanced Technology
Center, Gaithersburg, Md.). The oncochip contains 2,208 named cDNAs
that are immobilized on poly-L-lysine-coated glass slides.
Thirty to 50 µg of purified total RNA in 20 µl of diethyl
pyrocarbonate-treated water was denatured at 70°C for 5 min and
primed with 4 µg of oligo(dT)20 primer while cooling to
room temperature. Reverse transcription was performed in a volume of 40 µl using 8 µl of first-strand reaction buffer, 4 µl of 0.1 M
dithiothreitol, 4 µl of 10 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP), 2 µl of RNasin (Promega, Madison, Wis.), and 4 µl of 1 mM Cy3- or
Cy5-dUTP (Amersham, Piscataway, N.J.). cDNA synthesis was completed at
42°C for 1 h. Remaining RNA was hydrolyzed by adding 10 µl of
1 M NaOH and 5 µl of 0.5 M EDTA and incubation for 0.5 1 h at
65°C or by adding DNase-free RNase. The reaction was quenched by
adding 25 µl of 1 M Tris HCl (pH 7.4), and the probe was purified
using Microcon YM-30 columns. Purified probes were combined and reduced
to a volume of 15.6 µl, and 14 µg of cot-1 DNA, 14 µg
of poly(A), 5.6 µg of yeast tRNA, and 4.4 µl of 20× SSC (1× SSC
is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate) were added to a final
volume of 24 µl. Before hybridization, the mixture was heated to
100°C for 2 min and cooled to room temperature, and 1 µl of 10%
sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was added. Hybridization was performed
overnight at 65°C. After hybridization, slides were washed in 2× SSC
with 0.1% SDS for 2 min and then sequentially with 1× SSC, 0.2× SSC,
and 0.05× SSC (1 min with each). Before drying by centrifugation,
slides were briefly immersed in ultrapure water.
Scanning and analysis of cDNA array data.
Hybridized arrays
were scanned at 10-µm resolution on a GenePix 4000 scanner (Axon
Instruments, Inc., Foster City, Calif.) at variable photomultiplier
tube voltage to obtain maximal signal intensities with <1% probe
saturation. Resulting images were analyzed with the ArraySuite software
(National Human Genome Research Institute, Bethesda, Md.).
Differentially expressed genes were defined as reproducible outliers in
consecutive arrays that exhibit Cy3/Cy5 ratios significantly different
from 1.0 at a 99% confidence level (cutoff ratio in most experiments
usually 1.6- to 1.7-fold). Array data (images and sample intensity
files) were entered into the NCI microarray database (mAdb), and
expression profiles and single data were retrieved from multiple arrays
for cluster analysis using a high-stringency data filter (Cy3/Cy5 or
Cy5/Cy3 ratios of >3-fold in at least 33.3% or more of all relevant
arrays, fluorescence intensity of >500 in each channel unless that of
the other channel was >2,000, and a spot size of >50 µm or 50 pixels). Data were processed with the Cluster program using the K-Means
clustering algorithm and visualized using the TreeView software
(18). Protocols and gene lists for the NCI oncochip can be
downloaded from http://nciarray.nci.nih.gov.
RT-PCR.
For cDNA synthesis, 5 to 10 µg of purified total
RNA were reverse transcribed for 1 h at 42°C in a volume of 50 µl
containing 500 µM each dNTP, 10 µM dithiothreitol, 1.25 µM
oligo(dT) primer (T16-18), 20 to 40 U of RNasin (Promega),
and 75 U of Superscript Reverse Transcriptase II (Life Technologies) in
1× reverse transcription (RT) buffer. RT reaction mixtures were
diluted 2.5- to 10-fold and stored at
70°C. PCRs were performed in
20 µl containing 2 µl of reaction product, 50 µM dNTPs, 0.2 to
0.5 µM each oligonucleotide primer, 1.75 mM magnesium chloride, and 1 U of AmpliTaq Gold (Perkin-Elmer Corp.). Amplification was limited to a
total of 20 to 25 cycles to avoid saturation of the reaction. Each
reaction was performed at least twice in independent experiments to
confirm reproducibility. Oligonucleotide primers were designed using
the Genetics Computer Group (Madison, Wis.) program package, available
at http://bimas.dcrt.nih.gov.
ELISA analysis of cell-associated and secreted cytokines.
To
measure cell-associated cytokines, cells were lysed in buffer
containing 150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 1% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 5 mM EGTA, and
protease inhibitors 4-(2-aminoethyl) benzenesulfonyl fluoride (AEBSF),
leupeptin, and aprotinin (each at 100 µg/ml). Protein samples and
standards were diluted with lysis buffer to a concentration of 0.25 to
0.5 µg of protein/µl. Total protein concentration was determined by the bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, III.), and
protein concentration was used for normalization of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) data. Roughly, 1 mg of total protein equaled approximately 106 cells. To measure secreted
cytokines, cell conditioned medium (5 ml/10-cm-diameter dish) was
supplemented with 10 mM EDTA and the protease inhibitors AEBSF (1 mM)
and aprotinin, pepstatin A, and leupeptin (each at 10 µg/ml) and then
centrifuged for 5 min at 5,000 × g to remove cell
debris. After sampling media, cells were trypsinized and counted in a
Coulter Counter for normalization of ELISA data. Samples and standards
were added to ELISA plates in duplicate or triplicate (200 µl/well)
and incubated overnight at 4°C with constant agitation. Plates were
washed four times, and the protocol was continued according to the
manufacturer's recommendations. Levels of macrophage inflammatory
protein 1
(MIP-1
), RANTES, vascular endothelial growth factor
(VEGF), IL-8, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor,
TNF-
, and IL-6 were measured using Quantikine ELISA kits from R&D
Systems. For the 10-kDa IFN-
-induced protein (IP-10), matched
antibody pairs and recombinant IP-10 were purchased from R&D Systems.
IFN-
and IFN-
ELISA kits were purchased from Research Diagnostics.
Preparation of cytoplasmic and nuclear protein extracts.
Cells were washed with PBS, scraped from the plate, and snap-frozen in
liquid nitrogen. For cytoplasmic extracts, frozen pellets were thawed
in 4 volumes of buffer (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.9], 10 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM
EDTA, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 5% [vol/vol] glycerol, 500 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 50 mM NaF, 100 mM sodium vanadate, 100 µg of leupeptin/ml, 4 µg of aprotinin/ml, 2 µg of pepstatin/ml, 2 µg of antipain/ml). After repeated pipetting, the lysate was
centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 20 min, and the supernatant (cytoplasmic
fraction) was frozen at
70°C until use. For nuclear extracts, the
pellet was resuspended in 2 volumes of the above buffer with 0.4 M NaCl
and centrifuged again, and the supernatant (nuclear fraction) was
collected and frozen at
70°C.
EMSA.
The Promega gel shift assay system containing
oligonucleotides for SP1, AP-1, AP-2, CREB, NF-
B, Oct-1, and
TFIID transcription factors was used for electrophoretic
mobility shift assay (EMSA). Additional oligonucleotides (STAT-1,
insulin response factor 1 [IRF-1], and SIE) for band shift
experiments were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (San Diego,
Calif.). Oligonucleotides were labeled using Escherichia
coli polynucleotide kinase and [
-32P]dATP
(>3,000 Ci/mmol; Amersham) and purified by gel filtration; 10,000 cpm
was used per reaction. Reactions were performed according to
manufacturer's protocol, using 5 µg of nuclear protein/20 µl of
reaction mixture. Supershift experiments were performed using p50, p52,
and p65 NF-
B and p84/p91 STAT-1
antibodies (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology). Reaction products were fractionated on polyacrylamide gels at room temperature; gels were dried on Whatman 3MM paper and
analyzed by autoradiography.
Western blotting.
Cells were lysed in lysis buffer (10 mM
Tris HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 1% deoxycholate, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% SDS, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100, 1 µg of leupeptin/ml, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 0.5 mM orthovanadate) on ice for 5 min.
Lysates were centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 15 min to remove insoluble
components. Equal amounts of protein lysates were separated by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on 10% or 4 to 15% gradient
gels (Bio-Rad) and transferred to Immobilon-P polyvinylidene difluoride
membranes (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.). The membranes were blocked with
5% dry milk in wash buffer (PBS, 0.05% Tween 20) for 1 h.
Primary antibodies were incubated in PBS-1% bovine serum
albumin-0.05% thimerosal or 5% dry milk overnight at 4°C, washed
for 1 h with several changes of buffer, and incubated with
anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibodies conjugated with
horseradish peroxidase (Sigma Chemical Co.) for another hour. After a
second wash as described above, the signal was visualized by enhanced
chemiluminescence (ECL Plus; Amersham). Antibodies against human STAT-1
p84/91, phosphorylated STAT-1, RelA p65, NF-
B-1 (p50) and -2 (p52),
and IRF-1 were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
RNase protection assay.
RNase protection assays were
performed using RiboQuant Multi-Probe RNase Protection Assay
Systems hCK3 and hCK, an in vitro transcription kit, and an RPA kit
(all Pharmingen, San Diego, Calif.). Reactions were performed following
the standard protocol provided by the manufacturer. Purified,
DNase-treated total RNA (10 or 20 µg per reaction) was incubated with
in vitro-transcribed radioactive probe for 16 h at 56°C and then
15 min 37°C, followed by RNase treatment (RNase A-RNase
T1 mix for 45 min at 30°C). Residual RNase was digested
by proteinase K (15 min at 37°C), and protected fragments were
precipitated with 75% ethanol-4 M ammonium acetate for 16 h at
70°C. RNA pellets were dissolved in 8 µl of loading buffer, and 4 µl was loaded on 6% polyacrylamide-50% urea gels. Dried gels were
analyzed and signals were quantified using a STORM PhosphorImager
(Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, Calif.).
 |
RESULTS |
Microarray analysis of keratinocytes expressing HPV-16 E6, E7, or
E6/E7.
We used the first version of the NCI human oncochip with
2,208 cDNAs to search for genes whose expression is reproducibly altered by E6 and/or E7. Cultures of human cervical keratinocytes were
infected with retroviruses encoding HPV-16 E6, E7, E6/E7, or the empty
vector (pLXSN) as a control and selected with G418 for stably
expressing cells, and RNA was purified for array hybridization. In
these experiments, we compared gene expression in vector-infected, differentiating cells to that in cells with one or both HPV
oncoproteins. Cells were analyzed under different conditions by using
medium that promoted either cell growth (data not included), quiescence (growth factor removal), or squamous differentiation (1.4 mM
Ca2+). We also examined E6E7-expressing, differentiating
cervical keratinocytes that were treated with IFN-
, -
, or
-
(300 to 1,000 U/ml for 6 h), as well as several independent,
E6/E7-immortalized cervical cell lines. E6 and E7 stimulated very few
changes in gene expression in rapidly growing cells; therefore, these
experiments were excluded from further analyses. Similarly, infection
with E6 and E7 oncogenes of HPV-6b, a low-risk HPV type associated with
benign genital warts, resulted in few changes in cellular gene
expression in cervical keratinocytes and were also excluded from this
study. In contrast, HPV-16 E6 and E7 reproducibly altered expression of
80 to 90 genes in quiescent and/or differentiating cultures
(approximately 4% of all genes on the array). HPV-16 E6/E7-immortalized cells also exhibited numerous, usually more pronounced alterations relative to normal keratinocytes. Gene expression patterns varied slightly in cultures isolated from different
patients, and these differences probably represent true biological
variations between donors since they were reproducible in multiple
assays. For this reason, a large number of array experiments (total of
48 selected for this study) had to be performed and analyzed.
Cluster analysis of expression data.
Figure
1 represents an
analysis of combined data from 48 independent hybridization
experiments. Genes were considered to be differentially expressed if
they were upregulated or downregulated more than threefold in at least
one-third of all comparable experiments. Expression data were sorted
using the K-Means clustering algorithm and displayed using the TreeView
program (18). As expected, clustering reorganized all
array experiments into treatment groups based on similarity in patterns
of gene expression. These included (i) differentiating keratinocytes
infected with HPV-16 E6, E7, E6/E7, or p53DN, (ii) E6/E7-immortalized
cell lines, (iii) experiments in which the Cy3-Cy5 cDNA labeling was
inverted as an internal control for cDNA labeling, and (iv)
keratinocytes expressing E6/E7 and treated with 300 to 1,000 U of
recombinant IFN-
, -
, or -
.

View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Cluster analysis of cellular gene expression.
Data from 48 independent hybridization experiments examined multiple
experimental conditions and different combinations of HPV-16 E6 and/or
E7 genes or p53DN. Data were organized and displayed using cluster
analyses (K-Means clustering algorithm). The four treatment groups are
indicated at the top. Group 1 included cells expressing p53DN, E6, E7,
or E6/E7 and maintained in the absence of growth factors with 1.4 mM
Ca2+ to induce differentiation. Three experiments were
performed using cells that were made quiescent but that were not
induced to differentiate with calcium (qui). Group 2 included
HPV-immortalized keratinocytes in Ca2+ to induce
differentiation. Group 3 denotes a subset of experiments performed in
parallel with group 1 but with inversion of Cy3 and Cy5 dyes as a
control for labeling. Group 4 includes HPV-infected, differentiating
keratinocytes treated with 300 to 1,000 of U IFN- , - , or - per
ml. In groups 1 to 3, vector-only-infected cells are compared to
HPV-infected cells; in group 4, E6/E7-expressing cells with and without
IFN are compared. Clusters of differentially expressed mRNAs are shown
on the left (I to IV); gene names and IMAGE clone IDs are given at the
right. Color coding: green, downregulation of gene expression; red,
induction; black, no significant change; grey, no data available.
|
|
Most importantly, the K-Means algorithm grouped the 80 differentially
expressed genes into four distinct gene clusters (I to IV) based on
similar patterns of expression (Fig. 1). Figure 1 also shows gene names
(denoted by product encoded) and IMAGE clone identifier (ID) numbers;
additional data (UniGene ID numbers, gene symbols, and average factors
of differential mRNA expression) are included in Table
1. Several genes were
represented more than once on the array and are usually located in the
same cluster (e.g., p16 INK4a and p67 guanylate binding protein). These
spots are composed of different portions of the same gene and serve as
internal controls for the quality of hybridization and clustering. Clusters I and III contain mostly genes that are involved in cell cycle
progression and DNA synthesis. However, they also contain genes whose
differential expression indirectly correlates with changes in cell
proliferation but have no functional role in cell cycle regulation
(keratin 6, prion protein, heat shock protein 60, insulin-like growth
factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), gravin, etc.). Additionally,
cluster III also contains a subset of genes inducible by the
proinflammatory cytokine TNF-
and the transcription factor NF-
B
(Table 2). Cluster II represents
IFN-inducible genes. Last but not least, cluster IV shows genes that
are over expressed exclusively in immortal cell lines in comparison to
primary keratinocytes. Each cluster is discussed in detail below.
E6 inhibits expression of IFN-inducible genes and IFN-
and
-
.
Genes in cluster II were consistently downregulated in
HPV-16 E6- and E6/E7-expressing keratinocytes, and this effect was even
more pronounced in their immortal derivatives. The IFN inducibility of
genes in cluster II was confirmed by treatment of E6/E7-expressing, differentiating keratinocytes with 300 to 1,000 U of recombinant IFN-
or -
per ml (Table 1). Each IFN type strongly stimulated expression of genes in cluster II. Interestingly, E6 or E6/E7 decreased
expression of most genes in cluster II more effectively than E7 alone.
Decreased mRNA expression for some candidates in E6- or E6/E7-infected
cells was confirmed by RT-PCR (Fig. 2A). For example, two isoforms of 2'-5' oligoadenylate synthetase, a
well-established IFN-inducible gene, were downregulated. Expression of
both TRAIL (TNF family member 10) and the p67 guanylate binding protein
were decreased. The highest factors of downregulation were observed for
Staf50 and SOCS-1 (STAT-induced STAT inhibitor 1), genes originally
identified as regulated by STAT-1. The STAT-1 transcription factor
constitutes part of the IFN-stimulated gene factor 3 (ISGF-3) complex
that activates IFN-regulated gene expression in response to IFN
exposure (reviewed in references 12 and 24). Promoter
sequences of genes in cluster II, if represented in GenBank, were
analyzed using the PromoterScan program (courtesy of Dan Prestridge,
Singapore University), and most contained one or multiple IFN-stimulated response elements (ISRE), which promote the expression of IFN-responsive genes.

View larger version (55K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
RT-PCR and ELISA of differential expression of
IFN-inducible genes in cluster II. (A) RT-PCR analysis of IFN-regulated
genes after infection of keratinocytes with HPV E6 and/or E7. Duplicate
data are from two independent experiments. 2'-5'-OAS, 2'-5'
oligoadenylate synthase. (B) RT-PCR analysis of IFN- and - RNAs
using consensus primer pairs for IFN. NC indicates the negative control
in which no enzyme was added to the RT reaction. (C) ELISA analysis of
intracellular IFN- from one representative experiment. Keratinocytes
were infected with HPV-16 E6, E6/E7, or p53DN. (D) ELISA analysis of
intracellular IFN- from three independent experiments. Cells were
infected with HPV-16 oncogenes or p53DN mutant as above, with low-risk
HPV-6 E6 or E7, or with sense p53 (p53+). Bars depict the means of
three experiments, and brackets indicate standard errors. Changes other
than HPV-6 E7 were statistically significant (Fisher's exact test).
|
|
E6 and E6/E7 downregulate IFN-
and -
expression.
In
contrast to E7, E6 decreased expression of RNAs for IFN-
and -
,
as shown by RT-PCR analysis (Fig. 2B). IFN-
and -
RNAs were
detected in both growing and differentiating keratinocytes, but
differentiating cells expressed significant higher levels (data not
shown). Secreted IFN-
or -
proteins were not detected by ELISA in
conditioned medium of normal keratinocytes or retrovirus-infected cells. The inability to detect secreted IFN may be due to rapid sequestering of secreted IFN molecules by the extracellular matrix that
is produced in abundance by keratinocytes in culture. Similar effects
have been observed with TGF-
(40). However,
intracellular IFN-
protein could be detected in cell lysates by
ELISA (Fig. 2C and D). In this context, it is important to note that
infection of human cervical keratinocytes with retrovirus vectors
(pLXSN) and selection with G418 does not induce detectable changes in cellular IFN-
/
expression. In several control experiments,
uninfected primary keratinocytes and pLXSN-infected cells expressed
similar levels of IFN. The total amount of intracellular IFN-
ranged from 40 to 55 pg/mg of cellular protein in cultures from different individuals, and E6 or E6/E7 decreased levels to 0 to 10 pg/mg of
protein (factors of 5 or greater). Infection of keratinocytes with a
p53DN retrovirus (26) reduced levels of IFN-
only about twofold. Although the total amount of IFN-
produced was variable in
different cultures, HPV-16 E6 and E6/E7 reproducibly lowered IFN-
levels in three independent experiments (Fig. 2D). The E7 protein was
considerably less effective. Over expression of functional wild-type
p53 protein induced IFN-
expression approximately twofold. When
normal keratinocytes were treated with double-stranded RNA (dsRNA; a
strong inducer of IFN production), IFN-
expression increased 5- to
10-fold; however, cells expressing E6/E7 were partially resistant to
induction of IFNs by dsRNA (only two- to fivefold increase [data not
shown]). We were not able to reproducibly detect the IFN-
protein
using several commercially available ELISA test systems.
E6 decreases STAT-1 protein expression and binding to the
ISRE.
RT-PCR demonstrated that E6 or/and E7 did not significantly
alter expression of mRNAs encoding components of the IFN signal transduction pathway including IFN receptors R1 and R2, Jak kinases, STAT-1, STAT-2, and p48 (data not shown). Similarly, cDNA array experiments did not show any significant differences in mRNA expression for these genes. However, E6 reproducibly reduced total and cytoplasmic STAT-1 protein as detected by Western blotting (Fig.
3A). Both E6 and E7 reduced the levels of
STAT-1 proteins that are translocated to the nucleus. E6 plus E7
decreased nuclear STAT-1 expression more effectively than E6 or E7
alone. E6 or E7 also reduced phosphorylated STAT-1 protein in
comparison to controls infected with the empty vector (Fig. 3A, bottom
panel). EMSA showed that E6 or E6/E7 reduced the amount of nuclear
protein that bound to specific oligonucleotides containing the ISRE
consensus sequence (Fig. 3B). Binding of STAT-1 to oligonucleotides was
reduced by E6 under different culture conditions including the
treatment with dsRNA to induce IFN-mediated gene transcription, use of
basal medium to induce quiescence, or the addition of
Ca2+ to induce squamous differentiation. Keratinocytes
expressing p53DN (26) also showed slightly reduced
specific DNA binding activity.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Western analysis showing altered expression and activity
of STAT-1 in keratinocytes expressing E6 and E7. (A) Western analysis
of total, cytoplasmic, nuclear, and phosphorylated STAT-1 protein in
keratinocytes after infection with retroviruses containing HPV-16 E6
and/or E7. (B) EMSA for binding of STAT transcription factors to
oligonucleotides containing the ISRE consensus sequence. Nuclear
extracts were derived from cells infected with E6 and/or E7 or p53DN
mutant and grown in the presence of dsRNA (which induces STAT
activation), basal medium to induce quiescence (basal), or the same
medium with Ca2+ to induce differentiation. HeLa, control
nuclear extract from HeLa cell line; 100x comp., competition for
specific DNA binding with a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled
oligonucleotide; 100x unsp. comp, unspecific competition with
unrelated oligonucleotide.
|
|
E6 and E7 perturb expression of cell cycle regulatory genes.
Most genes in clusters I and III encode proteins that regulate cell
cycle progression, DNA synthesis, or squamous differentiation. These
genes were either strongly repressed (cluster I) or induced (cluster
III) by E6 and/or E7 retroviruses or, more prominently, after
immortalization (compare Fig. 1 and Table 1). Table 2 summarizes data
from three independent experiments which show that expression of most
genes in clusters I and III correlates with keratinocyte
differentiation. Most genes in cluster I were upregulated during
differentiation but downregulated by E6 and E7. Many of these genes
were also strongly responsive to TGF-
, as shown previously
(40). Differentiation-related genes include cytokeratin
K6, tissue factor, gravin, lipocalin, and the TGF superfamily protein
MIC-1. Cluster I also contains some proapoptotic genes, including
Fas/APO-1, CD27 binding protein or Siva, and NIP3/Bcl-interacting protein. MKP-1 (mitogen-activated
protein kinase [MAPK] phosphatase 1) and the EWS/RNA binding protein
(CHOP or GADD 153) were previously identified as characteristic
stress-inducible genes. In contrast, genes in cluster III were mostly
decreased during differentiation but induced by E6 and E7. Many of
these encode proteins that stimulate cell cycle progression including p55CDC (cdc42), polo-like kinase, cdc2 p34, and cdc2-associated protein, the cyclins A and B, MAPK kinase, and cdc25B. Other genes in
cluster III encode proteins involved in DNA replication and mitosis
including CENP-F, DNA primase, Madp2, topoisomerase II
, and
replication factor C.
Most interestingly, genes in cluster IV were significantly and strongly
induced exclusively in HPV-16 E6/E7-immortalized keratinocytes that are
derived from retrovirus-infected cells after extended in vitro culture
(>20 passages or population doublings). These mRNAs are usually
repressed in differentiation, and many encode cytoskeletal proteins
(e.g., vimentin) or regulators of cell adhesion and extracellular
matrix (TIMP-1, galectin-3, BM-40, or osteonectin [BM-40, SPARC],
fibronectin, and MadCAM-1).
E6 and E7 enhance expression of genes regulated by NF-
B and AP-1
in differentiating cervical keratinocytes.
A subset of genes in
cluster III were induced after treatment of keratinocytes with TNF-
(Table 2), a proinflammatory cytokine that activates the transcription
factors NF-
B and AP-1. We confirmed that TNF-
stimulated
expression of several genes in cluster III, including IL-8,
NF-
B2/p52, matrix metalloproteinase 9, and others by RT-PCR (data
not shown). We also found that E6, E7, or E6/E7 stimulated expression
of several additional genes that are known to be involved in NF-
B
activation (Fig. 4A). Additional RT-PCR analyses showed that E6/E7 characteristically increased mRNA expression of TRAF-interacting protein 1, p50 (NF-
B1), I
B
, and
NF-
B-inducing kinase (NIK). p56 Lck is a tyrosine kinase in the Src
family that is required for TNF-mediated activation of NF-
B and
AP-1. Both nerve growth factor (NGF) and the 75-kDa NGF receptor are
induced by E6, can protect from apoptosis, and contribute to NF-
B
activation (23, 37). Western blot analysis showed
induction of p65 RelA protein expression, one of two major functional
subunits shown to be expressed in cervical keratinocytes (Fig. 4B). In
contrast, p50 (NF-
B1) expression was basically unchanged. Supershift
assays using antibodies against the p50, p52, and p65 subunits of
NF-
B showed that cervical keratinocytes strongly express p65 (cRe1) and p50 but express little p52 (NF-
B2). Induction of mRNA and the
corresponding proteins by HPV were also found for I
B
and NIK.
I
B-
is an inhibitor of NF-
B activity, but this protein is a
component of a large complex of proteins including NIK and IKK which
are generally induced as a result of NF-
B activation (for example,
by IL-1 and TNF-
). p38 MAPK is similarly induced by E6 and E7. MAPK
is required for both NF-
B- and AP-1-dependent gene expression
(6, 7). Levels of both total and phosphorylated p38 MAPK
protein are induced by HPV-16 E6. Very similar results were observed
for p44/p42 MAPK (data not shown).

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
RT-PCR and EMSA demonstrate that E6 increased expression
of NF- B-regulated genes and enhanced activity of NF- B and AP-1.
(A) RT-PCR analysis of several NF- B-regulated genes after infection
with HPV-16 E6 and/or E7. Duplicate data are from two independent
experiments. (B) Western analysis of p65 RelA, p50 (NF- B1),
I B , and p38 MAPK proteins in keratinocytes after infection with
retroviruses containing HPV-16 E6 and/or E7. (C) EMSA analysis for
binding of CREB, AP-1, and NF- B transcription factors in nuclear
extracts to oligonucleotides with the respective DNA consensus
sequences. Nuclear extracts were derived from cells growing in the
presence of dsRNA (which induces STAT activation), and quiescent
(basal) or differentiating keratinocytes (Ca2+). HeLa,
control nuclear extract from HeLa cell line; 100x comp., competition
for specific DNA binding with a 100-fold molar excess of unlabeled
oligonucleotide; 100x unsp. comp, unspecific competition with unrelated
oligonucleotide. D. EMSA analysis of NF- B DNA binding activity in
keratinocytes expressing wild-type HPV-16 E6 and mutants with variable
p53-degrading activities. E6mut F2V does not bind and degrade p53 in
vitro. Mutants L110Q and F125V retain p53 binding activity.
|
|
HPV-16 E6 induces NF-
B DNA binding.
We analyzed the
activity of NF-
B in keratinocytes expressing E6 or E6/E7 by EMSA and
detected activation of DNA binding for NF-
B and AP-1 by E6 (Fig.
4C). NF-
B was activated in both quiescent (basal) and
differentiating (Ca2+-induced) keratinocytes. The high
NF-
B activity in the presence of dsRNA, an inducer of cellular
stress, was further increased by E6 (Fig. 4C). DNA binding activity of
AP-1 was also induced by E6 and E6/E7, particularly under conditions of
quiescence or keratinocyte differentiation. p53DN did not induce
NF-
B activity as effectively as E6 or E6/E7. We also found that
NF-kB activation was induced by several functionally impaired E6
mutants (35) that retain p53 binding activity (Fig. 4D).
One E6 mutant (F2V) that does not bind p53 did not increase NF-
B
binding. Supershift assays using antibodies against the p50 (NF-
B1),
p52 (NF-
B2), and p65 (Re1A) subunits identified p50 and p65 as the
major components of functional NF-
B in cervical keratinocytes (data
not shown), with little p52 expression. In contrast to NF-
B, DNA
binding activity of transcription factors CREB (Fig. 4C) and Oct-1
transcription factors (data not shown) did not change significantly in
HPV-expressing keratinocytes.
HPV-16 E6 and E7 stimulate secretion of specific proinflammatory
cytokines.
NF-
B and AP-1 activate expression of specific
proinflammatory and immunoregulatory cytokines. Using the RNase
protection assay, we examined whether E6 and/or E7 induced expression
of selected cytokines (Fig. 5). E6 or
mutant p53 induced IL-8, IP-10, MIP-1
, and RANTES. The promoters of
each of these genes contain one or more binding sites for NF-
B or
AP-1. We also examined conditioned medium from keratinocyte cultures by
ELISA to determine whether E6 and/or E7 or p53DN altered cytokine
secretion (Fig. 6). Secretion of IL-8 and
IP-10 was increased directly after infection with E6 and/or E7. E6 but
not E7 increased secretion of MIP-1
and RANTES. E6 and E7 stimulated
expression of several other cytokine mRNAs but did not significantly
increase secretion in vitro (IL-6, IL-12 p35 and p40 subunits,
granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and VEGF-B and -C
[data not shown]).

View larger version (94K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
RNase protection analysis of chemokine gene expression.
Cervical keratinocytes were infected with empty vector (pLXSN) or E6,
E7, and E6/E7 retroviruses and induced to undergo squamous
differentiation. Raw data were normalized using
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and L32 expression. Data were
analyzed by densitometry using a PhosphorImager.
|
|

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
ELISA analysis of chemokine secretion. Keratinocytes
were infected with HPV-16 E6 and/or E7 retroviruses or p53DN mutant.
Cells were induced to undergo differentiation, and some cultures were
treated with TNF- . ELISA was performed on supernatants of
E6/E7-infected cultures; in other experiments, cells were examined
after several (three to eight) subpassages or after immortalization.
Data are averages of four individual ELISA readings from experiments
and were normalized for absolute cell number or total cellular
protein.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Infection with high-risk HPV is a major risk factor for the
development of cervical cancer (60). In infected epithelia
and low-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN I), expression of E6 and E7 mRNAs is increased as keratinocytes enter the terminal differentiation pathway or progress to high-grade dysplasia (CIN II and
III) and cancer (16). We used retroviruses to express high
levels of the E6 and E7 oncoproteins in cultures of differentiating cervical keratinocytes and directly examined resultant alterations in
gene expression using cDNA arrays. Approximately 80 genes out of 2,208 on the chip (4%) were reproducibly increased or decreased more than
threefold by E6 and/or E7. These genes fell into several functional
groups providing insights into pathways by which E6 and E7 deregulate
differentiation, cell cycle progression, and the host response to viral infection.
The most obvious result was that E6/E7 strongly decreased expression of
IFN-responsive genes, as shown in cluster II. Similar or even more
pronounced results were observed in cells immortalized by E6 and E7.
Efficient production of IFNs in virally infected and/or
immortalized cells is an essential aspect of the host defense and
is regulated by a number of cellular transcription factors. The
transcription factor complex ISGF-3 was originally identified as a
critical mediator of IFN signaling. ISGF-3 is formed by association of
STAT-1, STAT-2, and p48 proteins. Upon stimulation of the IFN receptor,
the complex translocates to the nucleus, binds to ISREs, and activates
expression of IFNs and IFN-inducible genes (12, 24).
Transgenic animals that carry a disruption in STAT-1, p48, or IFN
receptor genes exhibit severe defects in virus-induced IFN-
/
gene
expression (28). Our observations that E6 and E7 downregulate expression of IFNs and IFN-responsive genes confirm and
extend recent work by Chang et al. (8) that showed that immortalized foreskin keratinocytes transfected with the complete HPV-31 genome have reduced expression of multiple IFN-responsive genes.
Our cluster analysis determined that the relative effectiveness of
oncoproteins was E6/E7 > E6 > E7. Thus, in particular under conditions promoting differentiation, E6 appears to be primarily responsible for most but not all changes. Furthermore, most
IFN-responsive genes were downregulated by infection with the
retrovirus encoding a p53DN miniprotein (26), suggesting
that E6-mediated degradation of p53 contributes to this response but is
not exclusively responsible. We found that E6 decreased constitutive
expression of IFN-
and -
mRNAs and diminished the intracellular
level of IFN-
5- to 10-fold. IFN-
production was also inhibited
by the p53DN mutant, although not as effectively as by E6 or E6/E7. We
also showed that E6 decreased the level of cytoplasmic and nuclear
STAT-1, an important component of the ISGF-3 complex which binds to
ISRE and activates expression of IFN and IFN-inducible genes. This downregulation of cytoplasmic and nuclear STAT-1 appears to occur at
the posttranscriptional level, as arrays and RT-PCR analyses did not
show a strong reduction of STAT-1 mRNA in response to E6/E7.
Downregulation and inactivation of STAT-1 might directly inhibit IFN
production in E6-expressing cells. It would be interesting to determine
whether STAT-1 protein is targeted for degradation by E6-E6AP
complexes, as is observed for p53 protein. Ronco et al. have shown that
the HPV-16 E6 protein binds and blocks transcriptional activity of
IRF-3 another important activator of IFN-responsive gene expression
(50). In addition, Li et al. used HT1080 cells to show
that E6 binds to and diminishes the activity of Tyk2 a kinase
involved in activation of STAT-1 and STAT-2 (34). Thus, E6
has been shown to target IFN signaling by at least two different types
of interactions. Our observation that E6 downregulates multiple IFN-responsive genes directly demonstrates the biological relevance of
these interactions in the natural target of HPV infection, primary
ectocervical keratinocytes.
HPV-16 E6 or E6/E7 decreased expression of multiple IFN-responsive
genes. However, E7 alone was less effective and diminished expression
of only a subset of genes. Recently, Barnard et al. showed that E7
binds to p48, a component of IGSF3, and abrogates signaling mediated by
IFN-
in HaCaT cells (3). Furthermore, they recently
showed that E7 is able to inhibit the antiproliferative and antiviral
functions of IFN-
(4). E7 also binds and inhibits transactivation by IRF-1, an important component of IFN signaling (44, 46). Thus, E7 targets at least two components of the IFN signal pathway. Surprisingly, our own results showed that E7 alone
did not effectively downregulate the majority of IFN-responsive genes
in differentiating human cervical keratinocytes. However, coexpression
of E6 and E7 was more effective than E6 alone in inhibiting
IFN-responsive genes. These results suggest that E6 is more effective
than E7. However, we have previously shown that high-level expression
of E7 in differentiating cervical keratinocytes sensitizes cells to
apoptosis (29). Thus, it is possible that some cells
(approximately 5% in our previous study) that express very high levels
of E7 are eliminated before the analysis. This might explain, in part,
why E7 had reduced effectiveness for downregulation of IFN-responsive
genes. IFNs provide an important first line of defense against viral
infection. IFNs stimulate expression of several intracellular proteins
with direct antiviral activity. IFNs also enhance expression of major
histocompatibility class I and II proteins, which mediate immune
recognition of viral antigens. Thus, the ability of E6 and E7 to
interfere with expression of IFN-responsive genes may allow
circumvention of the host response to HPV-infected keratinocytes.
A hallmark of HPV infection is reactivation of host DNA synthesis and
cell cycle progression in differentiating keratinocytes. This allows a
small DNA tumorvirus to utilize host enzymes to replicate its own DNA.
Cluster I contains genes that are downregulated by E6 and E7 and that
promote keratinocyte differentiation or growth arrest. Some of these
genes are regulated by p53 (reviewed in reference 19), which is
targeted for degradation by HPV-16 E6 (51). p53-inducible
genes that are downregulated by HPV in cluster I include the Fas/APO-1
receptor, p21 Waf-1, p53-induced genes 8 and 10, Fanconi's anemia
antigen C, IGFBP-3, EWS/GADD 153 or CHOP, the TNF-related proapoptotic
ligand TRAIL, and the TRAIL receptors R2 and R3/decoy receptor DcR3
(not included in array and cluster analysis but confirmed by RT-PCR).
Most p53-inducible genes play a role in regulation of cellular
responses to genotoxic stress. E6 and/or E7 also repressed expression
of genes typically induced during keratinocyte differentiation or in
inflammation. For instance, tissue factor/thromboplastin is expressed
by keratinocytes and induced during differentiation. GADD 153, heat
shock protein 60, gravin, and lipocalin are induced under pathological
conditions and inflammation (10). MAPK phosphatase 1 (MKP-1) is a dual-specificity protein phosphatase induced in
immediate-early gene responses to growth factors and during cellular
stress. MKP-1 selectively inactivates stress-activated protein kinase 3 in vitro by dephosphorylation (22). Cluster I also
contains proapoptotic genes, including Fas/APO-1, CD27 binding protein
or Siva, and NIP3. In general, genes in cluster I encode proteins that
regulate various aspects of host response to cellular stress.
Downregulation of these genes could contribute to increased resistance
of keratinocytes to environmental or host stress factors.
The mRNAs found in cluster III were induced by HPV-16 E6 and E7. Many
represent proteins that stimulate cell cycle progression or are
functional in mitosis (15), including BUB1,
CENP-F/mitosin, Madp2, p55CDC, polo-like kinase 1, cdc2 p34, and
cdc2-associated protein, cdc6, the cyclins A and B, and cdc25B. Other
genes in cluster III encode proteins involved in DNA synthesis and
repair, including ribonucleotide reductase M2, DNA primase,
topoisomerase II
, and several subunits of replication factor C. These are representative of a large number of genes that are induced by
the E2F transcription factor family, not all of which were included in
the first version of the NCI oncochip. Active E2F factors are released
upon binding of HPV-16 E7 protein to hypophosphorylated pRB and
directly induce expression of genes involved in DNA synthesis (S phase)
and cell cycle progression. Many of these genes are strongly repressed by TGF-
, one of the most potent growth suppressors known that strongly inhibits keratinocyte proliferation. TGF-
itself is efficiently repressed by HPV-16, as shown previously (40).
Previous work over the past decade has demonstrated that HPV-16 E6 and E7 proteins enhance expression of many of the genes located in cluster
III (53), thus confirming the accuracy of the cDNA array analysis.
A fraction of genes in cluster III encode proteins known as induced by
the transcription factors NF-
B and/or AP-1. Because of apparently
similar expression profiles, the clustering software could not
distinguish between cell cycle regulatory genes and NF-
B-inducible
genes in cluster III. We used additional microarray experiments to show
that these genes were induced by TNF-
(Table 2). TNF-
activates
both NF-
B and AP-1 and stimulates expression of many inflammatory
genes such as IL-6 and IL-8. However, TNF-
does not significantly
effect cell cycle regulation and proliferation of normal, primary
keratinocytes (reviewed in reference 43). Using EMSA, we show that E6
significantly induced DNA binding activity for NF-
B and AP-1,
consistent with the hypothesis that these transcription factors
regulate a subset of E6-induced genes. We also observed increased mRNA
and/or protein expression of a number of genes that are necessary for
or involved in NF-
B activation. These include p38 MAPK, which is
required for NF-
B dependent gene expression (6, 7).
Also induced were NIK, NF-
B1 and -2 (p50 and p52), TRAF-interacting
protein 1, p56 Lck (36), NGF (37), and the
75-kDa NGF receptor (23). Transcriptional activation of
NF-
B and AP-1 in HPV-immortalized mouse keratinocytes has been
reported recently (32). In contrast, Patel et al. have reported that E6 reduces NF-
B activity in SAOS and U20S cells, which
are derived from osteosarcomas, a mesenchymal tissue (45). The explanation for this difference between this study and our results
is unclear; however, one possibility is that E6 affects NF-
B
activation differently in differentiating cervical keratinocytes than
in osteosarcoma cells.
Both p53 and NF-
B regulate the cellular response to stress. In
contrast to p53, which is proapoptotic, NF-
B can efficiently protect
keratinocytes from apoptosis (9). Recent studies have shown that NF-
B and p53 directly compete for binding to the
transcriptional coactivator CBP/p300. Therefore, degradation of p53 by
E6 could result in an activation of NF-
B as shown in our work.
Furthermore, cross-transcriptional interference between p53 and RelA
may occur due to direct interaction between these two transcription
factors which is mediated by their dimerization/tetramerization domains and results in inhibition of each other's transcriptional activity (30, 56). The postulated cross talk between p53 and
NF-
B is consistent with our observation that wild-type E6 and E6
mutants that degrade p53 also induce NF-
B activity, in contrast to a mutant that binds p53 insufficiently (E6mut F2V). Constitutive activation of NF-
B and AP-1 transcription factors occur regularly during mouse skin carcinogenesis (5), and elevated NF-
B
activity is typically detected in HPV-immortalized cell lines
(32). In contrast, inhibitors of NF-
B and AP-1
activation block neoplastic transformation (33). Thus,
NF-
B and AP-1 activation occurs commonly during carcinogenesis, and
increased activity may contribute to HPV-induced transformation.
Expression of E6 and E7 in differentiating keratinocytes stimulated
secretion of several cytokines including IL-8, IP-10, MIP-1
, and
RANTES. IL-8 and IP-10 are members of the CXC family of chemokines that
exert inflammatory, growth-promoting, and/or chemotactic activity. CXC
chemokines are induced by stressful stimuli such as wound healing
(20), inflammation, or exposure to UV light
(54). IP-10 is chemotactic for monocytes and T lymphocytes and promotes adhesion to endothelial cells. IL-8 stimulates
leukocyte chemotaxis. RANTES is a CC chemokine that is
chemotactic for memory T lymphocytes and activates naive T cells
(49). Elevated RANTES and IP-10 occur in psoriasis and
cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions. Both IL-8 and IP-10 were more
strongly induced in HPV-immortalized cell lines (data not shown). The
potential biological significance of increased chemokine production in
differentiating keratinocytes after high-level E6/E7 expression is
unclear. Most chemokines are not normally expressed in resting cells
but are rapidly induced in response to various inflammatory and
mitogenic stimuli. Induction of chemokine secretion might reflect
activation by NF-
B or AP-1 transcription factors due to cell stress
induced by E6 and/or E7. Increased chemokine production might
facilitate recognition and elimination of HPV-infected cells in vivo.
However, chemokines such as IL-8 can also stimulate tumor proliferation
or angiogenesis (38, 42).
Cluster IV contains a number of genes that are characteristically
induced in immortal cell lines established from retrovirus-infected keratinocytes. Infection of keratinocytes with high-risk HPV E6 and E7
results in hyperproliferation, in dysregulation of the cell cycle, and
eventually in increasing genetic instability and acquisition of somatic
mutations. In vivo, these events can eventually lead to malignant
progression and cervical cancer. In vitro, neoplastic progression is
reflected in immortalization of primary cells. Immortalization requires
long-term cell culture and survival of cellular senescence or crisis
and involves massive losses and/or amplifications of genetic material.
HPV-immortalized cell lines show highly dysplastic differentiation and
growth properties and acquire many characteristics shared by
preneoplastic, high-grade CIN lesions (58). Therefore, we
were particularly interested in identification of genes induced in
immortalized cell lines independently of early responses to the E6 and
E7 oncogenes. Many genes in cluster IV encode components of the
cytoskeleton or the extracellular matrix such as vimentin, osteonectin
(SPARC or BM-40), and fibronectin. Interestingly, increased production
of soluble and cell surface-associated fibronectin or thrombospondin is
not specific for HPV-16-immortalized keratinocytes, since these genes are also characteristically increased in adenovirus and simian virus
40-immortalized cells (52). Upregulation of fibronectin gene expression and extracellular matrix formation are consistent characteristics of malignantly converted human keratinocytes. Fibronectin and other genes in cluster IV, including galectin-1 and
osteonectin/SPARC, might therefore be useful as potential molecular
markers that indicate an increased risk for malignant progression of
HPV-associated lesions (41) and could be highly interesting as novel diagnostic tools for early detection of
preneoplastic cervical lesions.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Eliot Androphy and Yun Liu for providing HPV-16 E6
mutants, Moshe Oren for the p53 miniprotein used for constructing the
p53DN retrovirus, and John Sunwoo for assistance with the EMSAs.
Human cervical tissue was supplied by the Cooperative Human Tissue Network.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Present address: Biology
Department, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY 13699-5805. Phone: (315)
268-2391. Fax: (315) 268-7118. E-mail: woodworth{at}clarkson.edu.
Present address: Department of Surgery, Division of Molecular
Diagnostics and Therapy, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alizadeh, A. A.,
M. B. Eisen,
R. E. Davis,
C. Ma,
I. S. Lossos,
A. Rosenwald,
J. C. Boldrick,
H. Sabet,
T. Tran,
X. Yu,
J. I. Powell,
L. Yang,
G. E. Marti,
T. Moore,
J. Hudson, Jr.,
L. Lu,
D. B. Lewis,
R. Tibshirani,
G. Sherlock,
W. C. Chan,
T. C. Greiner,
D. D. Weisenburger,
J. O. Armitage,
R. Warnke, and L. M. Staudt.
2000.
Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling.
Nature
403:503-511[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Antinore, M. J.,
M. J. Birrer,
D. Patel,
L. Nader, and D. J. McCance.
1996.
The human papillomavirus type 16 E7 gene product interacts with and trans-activates the AP1 family of transcription factors.
EMBO J.
15:1950-1960[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Barnard, P., and N. A. McMillan.
1999.
The human papillomavirus E7 oncoprotein abrogates signaling mediated by interferon-alpha.
Virology
259:305-313[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Barnard, P.,
E. Payne, and N. A. McMillan.
2000.
The human papillomavirus E7 protein is able to inhibit the antiviral and anti-growth functions of interferon-alpha.
Virology
277:411-419[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Budunova, I. V.,
P. Perez,
V. R. Vaden,
V. S. Spiegelman,
T. J. Slaga, and J. L. Jorcano.
1999.
Increased expression of p50-NF- B and constitutive activation of NF- B transcription factors during mouse skin carcinogenesis.
Oncogene
18:7423-7431[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Carter, A. B., and G. W. Hunninghake.
2000.
A constitutive active MEK ERK pathway negatively regulates NF- B-dependent gene expression by modulating TATA-binding protein phosphorylation.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:27858-27864[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Carter, A. B.,
K. L. Knudtson,
M. M. Monick, and G. W. Hunninghake.
1999.
The p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase is required for NF- B-dependent gene expression. The role of TATA-binding protein (TBP).
J. Biol. Chem.
274:30858-30863[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Chang, Y. E., and L. A. Laimins.
2000.
Microarray analysis identifies interferon-inducible genes and Stat-1 as major transcriptional targets of human papillomavirus type 31.
J. Virol.
74:4174-4182[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Chaturvedi, V.,
J. Z. Qin,
M. F. Denning,
D. Choubey,
M. O. Diaz, and B. J. Nickoloff.
1999.
Apoptosis in proliferating, senescent, and immortalized keratinocytes.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:23358-23367[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Cowland, J. B., and N. Borregaard.
1997.
Molecular characterization and pattern of tissue expression of the gene for neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin from humans.
Genomics
45:17-23[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Crish, J. F.,
F. Bone,
S. Balasubramanian,
T. M. Zaim,
T. Wagner,
J. Yun,
E. A. Rorke, and R. L. Eckert.
2000.
Suprabasal expression of the human papillomavirus type 16 oncoproteins in mouse epidermis alters expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins.
Carcinogenesis
21:1031-1037[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Darnell, J. E., Jr.
1997.
STATs and gene regulation.
Science
277:1630-1635[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
DeRisi, J.,
L. Penland,
P. O. Brown,
M. L. Bittner,
P. S. Meltzer,
M. Ray,
Y. Chen,
Y. A. Su, and J. M. Trent.
1996.
Use of a cDNA microarray to analyse gene expression patterns in human cancer.
Nat. Genet.
14:457-460[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Diehn, M.,
A. A. Alizadeh, and P. O. Brown.
2000.
Examining the living genome in health and disease with DNA microarrays.
JAMA
283:2298-2299[Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Duensing, S.,
L. Y. Lee,
A. Duensing,
J. Basile,
S. Piboonniyom,
S. Gonzalez,
C. P. Crum, and K. Munger.
2000.
The human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins cooperate to induce mitotic defects and genomic instability by uncoupling centrosome duplication from the cell division cycle.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:10002-10007[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Durst, M.,
D. Glitz,
A. Schneider, and H. zur Hausen.
1992.
Human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV 16) gene expression and DNA replication in cervical neoplasia: analysis by in situ hybridization.
Virology
189:132-140[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Dyson, N.,
P. Guida,
K. Munger, and E. Harlow.
1992.
Homologous sequences in adenovirus E1A and human papillomavirus E7 proteins mediate interaction with the same set of cellular proteins.
J. Virol.
66:6893-6902[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Eisen, M. B.,
P. T. Spellman,
P. O. Brown, and D. Botstein.
1998.
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:14863-14868[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
El Deiry, W. S.
1998.
Regulation of p53 downstream genes.
Semin. Cancer Biol.
8:345-357[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Engelhardt, E.,
A. Toksoy,
M. Goebeler,
S. Debus,
E. B. Brocker, and R. Gillitzer.
1998.
Chemokines IL-8, GRO , MCP-1, IP-10, and Mig are sequentially and differentially expressed during phase-specific infiltration of leukocyte subsets in human wound healing.
Am. J. Pathol.
153:1849-1860[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Foster, S. A., and D. A. Galloway.
1996.
Human papillomavirus type 16 E7 alleviates a proliferation block in early passage human mammary epithelial cells.
Oncogene
12:1773-1779[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Franklin, C. C., and A. S. Kraft.
1997.
Conditional expression of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) phosphatase MKP-1 preferentially inhibits p38 MAPK and stress-activated protein kinase in U937 cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:16917-16923[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Gentry, J. J.,
P. Casaccia-Bonnefil, and B. D. Carter.
2000.
Nerve growth factor activation of nuclear factor B through its p75 receptor is an anti-apoptotic signal in RN22 schwannoma cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:7558-7565[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Gilmour, K. C., and N. C. Reich.
1 |