Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, March 2001, p. 3038-3042, Vol. 75, No. 6
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.6.3038-3042.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Membrane-Anchored Peptide Inhibits Human Immunodeficiency
Virus Entry
Markus
Hildinger,1
Matthias T.
Dittmar,1
Patricia
Schult-Dietrich,2
Boris
Fehse,3
Barbara S.
Schnierle,2
Sonja
Thaler,2
Gabriela
Stiegler,4
Reinhold
Welker,1 and
Dorothee
von Laer1,*
Heinrich-Pette-Institut für
Experimentelle Virologie und Immunologie an der Universität
Hamburg,1 Zentrum für
Knochenmarktransplantation, Universitätskrankenhaus
Eppendorf,3 D-20251 Hamburg, and
Georg-Speyer-Haus, 60596 Frankfurt,2
Germany, and Institute of Applied Microbiology, A-1190 Vienna,
Austria4
Received 27 April 2000/Accepted 1 December 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Peptides derived from the heptad repeats of human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV) gp41 envelope glycoprotein, such as T20, can efficiently inhibit HIV type 1 (HIV-1) entry. In this study,
replication of HIV-1 was inhibited more than 100-fold in
a T-helper cell line transduced with a retrovirus vector expressing
membrane-anchored T20 on the cell surface. Inhibition was independent
of coreceptor usage.
 |
TEXT |
Despite aggressive combination
therapy in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, latently
infected cells persist and viral rebound is observed after prolonged
treatment. Moreover, many patients are intolerant of the available
drugs (3, 7, 17). Several gene therapeutic strategies have
been proposed that could improve the therapy for HIV infection
(25, 27). However, in most approaches, virus production
from an integrated provirus is inhibited, whereas only a few antiviral
gene products described so far, such as single-chain antibodies to HIV
integrase, inhibit steps prior to retrovirus integration
(18).
HIV replication is initiated by binding of the virus envelope
glycoprotein gp120 to the CD4 receptor and a coreceptor on
the target cell. The gp41 subunit of the HIV envelope
glycoprotein then plays a key role in virus entry by
mediating fusion of the viral lipid membrane and the plasma membrane of
the target cell. In crystallographic studies, heptad repeat sequences
were shown to form a coiled-coil structure during the conformational
change of gp41 that is crucial for HIV membrane fusion (2,
28). Peptides derived from one of the heptad repeats most likely
interact with this coiled coil, thereby locking gp41 in a
fusion-incompetent conformation and inhibiting HIV type 1 (HIV-1) entry
(30).
A potent peptide inhibitor is T20 (formerly DP178), which overlaps with
the C-terminal heptad repeat and inhibits HIV infection at
concentrations of less than 2 ng/ml (8). In a recent
clinical study, short-term administration of T20 to HIV-infected
patients was found to be safe and to potently suppress viremia
(13). However, very large amounts of the peptide are
required to achieve an antiviral effect. The peptides are not orally
bioavailable and have an extremely short half-life, and large-scale
production is expensive (5). The aim of the present study
was to overcome these drawbacks by expressing the inhibitory peptide in
the target cell of HIV-1 infection.
Design of retrovirus vectors.
Six retrovirus vectors designed
to express secreted (M85 and M86) or membrane-bound (M87)
T20 were constructed. The T20 sequences were cloned 5' to an internal
ribosome entry site (IRES)-neo cassette in retrovirus vector
MPIN (Fig. 1). In M85, T20 was
expressed as a fusion protein behind the signal peptide (SP) of the
human low-affinity nerve growth factor receptor (LNGFR). In M86, the sequence coding for peptide RGD was introduced in frame between the SP
and T20. The RGD motif binds integrins and thereby could increase local
concentrations of T20 on the cell surface by trapping secreted peptides
on the cell membrane. The LNGFR SP was amplified by PCR from the vector
dLN, using the primers SPNOT+
(5'-gcggccgccatgggggcaggtgccaccggc-3') and SPBgl
(5'-agatctggcacctccaagggacacccccag-3') to introduce a
NotI site at the 5' end and a BglII site at the
3' end (6). The sequence coding for T20 was amplified from
NL4-3, using the primers T20Bgl+ (M85;
5'-agatcttacactagcttaatacactcctta-3') or T20Bgl+RGD+ (M86;
5'-agatctagaggcgactacactagcttaatacactcctta-3') and T20Hind
(5'-aagcttattaaaaccaattccaca aacttgccc-3') to introduce a
BglII site at the 5' end and a HindIII site
at the 3' end. The fragments were ligated via the NotI and
HindIII sites into pBluescript KS.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
(A) Maps of retroviral vectors. The SP and the
MSD are derived from the LNGFR. The hinge is derived from the IgG heavy
chain. (B) Amino acid sequence of the membrane-anchored T20 expressed
by M87. (C) Amino acid sequence of the SP and the T20 region in the
mutated proteins expressed from M87m1 through M87m3.
|
|
In the construct M87, membrane-bound T20 was expressed as a fusion
protein with the hinge region from the immunoglobulin G
(IgG)
heavy chain and the membrane-spanning domain (MSD) from
the LNGFR. The
MSD was amplified from dLN by using a 5' primer
that also
contained the sequence coding for the hinge of the murine
IgG heavy
chain and a
BglII site (hingeTMBgl+;
5'-agatctgttccaagagactgtggatgcaaaccctgtatatgtaccctcatccctgtctattgctccatcctggct
gctg-3') and a 3' primer (U3

;
5'-cgcgcgaacagaagcgagaag-3') (
6).
This
PCR product was introduced together with the SP PCR product
into
pBluescript (
NotI ×
BglII ×
HindIII), and the sequence for
T20 was then introduced
as a PCR product flanked by
BglII sites
(primers T20Bgl+ and
T20Bgl

; 5'-agatctaaaccaattccacaaacttgccc-3').
The genes coding for the different T20 fusion proteins were transferred
as
NotI-
HindIII fragments from pBluescript
together
with the poliovirus IRES from SF1 MIN into MPIN
(
12).
In addition, mutations were introduced into M87 by site-directed
mutagenesis (Fig.
1C). In mutant M87m1, the four C-terminal
amino acids
of the T20 peptide (WNWF) were mutated to ANAA. T20
peptides with these
substitutions have been shown to be inactive
(
16). Two
adjacent sequences in the coding region of M87 were
amplified by PCR by
using the following primers: PCR A, Af 5'-ttgtacaccctaagcctccgc-3'
and Ar 5'-cagatctagccgcattcgccaaacttgccc-3'; PCR B, Bf
5'-ttggcgaatgcggctagatctgttccaagagactgtggatgc-3'
and Br
5'-atggccgatcccatattggc-3'. The PCR products of PCR A and
B
were used as a template for PCR C, with the following primers:
PCR C,
Cf 5'-ttatccagccctcactccttc-3' and Cr
5'-gagcggccgcaatccaattcgc-3'.
The PCR C product was cloned
into
EcoRV of pBluescript and then
introduced as a
NotI fragment into M87 from which the original
NotI fragment was removed. Three plasmid clones were
sequenced.
M87m1 had only the expected mutations. M87m2 had an
additional
G to A mutation in the fourth codon, resulting in a
substitution
of aspartic acid for glycine in the SP. M87m2 had an
additional
G to A mutation in the seventh codon, leading again to a
substitution
of aspartic acid for glycine. These additional mutations
were
most likely introduced by
PCR.
Surface expression of membrane-anchored T20.
Retrovirus
vectors were packaged by transfection of Phoenix packaging cells, and
supernatants were used to transduce the T-helper cell line PM-1
(10, 19). As a control, the vector MPIN containing only
neo was used. After G418 selection, PM-1/MPIN, PM-1/M87, and
PM-1/M87m1-3 were stained with a human monoclonal antibody directed
against a motif in gp41 (ELDKWA) that was present in T20 (2F5)
and analyzed on a flow cytometer (FACScalibur; Becton Dickinson,
Heidelberg, Germany). As a control, a human monoclonal antibody
directed against HIV-1 gp120 was used (2G12). Both antibodies have been
described in detail (1). The control antibody showed a
similar level of background staining for PM-1/MPIN and PM-1/M87 (Fig.
2). In contrast, the anti-T20 antibody
stained PM-1/M87 significantly. Interestingly, T20 could be detected on
the cell surface of all M87 mutants, although in mutants M87m2 and
M87m3 amino acid substitutions were present in the SP.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Expression of membrane-anchored T20. PM-1 cells were
transduced with the retroviral vectors indicated and selected. The bulk
cultures were stained either with a control human monoclonal antibody
directed against gp120 (2G12) or with a human monoclonal antibody
directed against a sequence within T20 (2F5) followed by a
PE-conjugated anti-human IgG goat serum. Shaded curve, PM-1/MPIN; solid
line, PM-1 transduced with the vector indicated.
|
|
Membrane-anchored T20 inhibits HIV-1 replication.
The
different PM-1 cell lines were infected with HIV-1 produced from the
proviral clone NL4-3 or NL4-3AGFP, at a multiplicity of
infection of 0.1 50% tissue culture infective dose. In the latter virus, green fluorescent protein (GFP) was fused to the anchor
domain of Nef, so that HIV-1 replication could be monitored by analysis
of p24 antigen production as well as by flow cytometry (29). NL4-3 p24 antigen was measured in the culture
supernatants as soon as a cytopathic effect became evident in the
control cells (day 6 in the experiment shown in Fig.
3A) by enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay, as described previously (9, 15).
Production of p24 was inhibited more than 500-fold in PM-1/M87. If the
cultures were monitored further, NL4-3 finally broke through and a
cytopathic effect became evident between days 14 to 20. Spread of
NL4-3AGFP was monitored by flow cytometry (Fig. 3B). On day 6, when
100% of the control cells were GFP positive, less than 1% of
the PM-1/M87 cells expressed GFP. Therefore, replication of
NL4-3AGFP was reduced by more than 2 orders of magnitude by M87.
The constructs designed to express secreted T20 (M85 and M86) had no
antiviral activity (Fig. 3A and B). Most likely, the level of
expression or secretion of the peptide was too low to achieve
inhibitory concentrations. However, secreted peptide would be a highly
attractive alternative to the membrane-anchored T20 for gene therapy
applications, because of a possible bystander effect.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Inhibition of HIV-1 replication by membrane-anchored
T20. (A) PM-1 cells were transduced with different retroviral vectors
encoding T20 and then selected with G418. These bulk cultures were
infected with NL4-3 at a multiplicity of infection of 0.1. On day 5, medium was replaced and the concentration of p24 antigen was determined
in supernatants collected on day 6. *, detection limit. (B) In
parallel, the selected PM-1 cultures were infected with
NL4-3AGFP and the spread of virus was monitored by flow cytometry. × M85; M86; M87; MPIN. (C) Selected cultures were infected
with NL4-3AGFP, and the spread of virus was monitored by flow
cytometry. M87; MPIN; M87m1; M87m2; M87m3. (D)
Inhibition of a single round of infection by membrane-anchored T20.
PM-1 transduced with the control vector MPIN or the vector M87
expressing the membrane-anchored T20 was infected with fivefold
dilutions of a replication-deficient virus NL4-3env GFP
pseudotyped either with VSV G protein or an HIV-1 envelope
glycoprotein from one of the HIV strains depicted (solid
bars). Cells were also transduced with an MLV vector with EGFP as a
marker gene pseudotyed with the envelope glycoprotein of
HIV-1 strain BH10 (shaded bar). Titers of different pseudotypes were
determined on day 3 by flow cytometry for each of the PM-1 cultures.
Titers on PM-1/M87 relative to the titer on PM-1/MPN are given.
|
|
We found that conditioned medium from cells expressing M87 did not
inhibit HIV infection (data not shown). This indicates
that the
peptide inhibits infection while anchored to the target
cell membrane
and not after being shed into the supernatant. Interestingly,
the
peptide is anchored to the target membrane by a very short
linker of
only 13 amino acids. To interact with the membrane-anchored
T20, the
N-terminal coiled coil of gp41 must come very close to
the target cell
membrane, which would predict an elongated intermediate
conformation of
gp41.
Amino acid substitutions in the C-terminal domain of T20 inactivate the
free peptide (
16). Mutant M87m1, containing three
amino
acid substitutions in the C terminus of T20, also inhibited
spread of
NL4-3AGFP to the same degree as M87 (Fig.
3C). This
region of T20 is
not known to interact directly with the central
gp41 coiled coil, and
it is not clear why it is essential for
efficient inhibition (
2,
28). It is, therefore, not absolutely
unexpected that when
anchored to the cell membrane, the mutated
T20 expressed by M87m1 is
still active. On the other hand, an
additional mutation in the
N-terminal hydrophilic domain of the
SP completely abolished the
inhibitory activity of M87 (Fig.
3C,
M87m2 and M87m3). Since the LNGFR
SP does not have an inhibitory
effect on HIV-1 replication itself
(
14), the effect of the SP
mutations is most likely
indirect. Charged amino acids in this
domain are known to interfere
with the translocation of proteins
into the endoplasmic reticulum and
favor type II orientation (
20).
A possible explanation for
the lack of antiviral activity of M87m2
and M87m3 is that the N
terminus of the proteins expressed is
not translocated into the
endoplasmic reticulum lumen
completely.
Further, HIV-1 and HIV-2 isolates were tested on PM-1/MPIN and PM-1/M87
(World Health Organization primary isolates panel).
The
production of p24 in PM-1/M87 was inhibited by 95% for a subtype
B
HIV-1 isolate (BaL), 74% for a subtype D HIV-1 isolate (92UG35),
82%
for a subtype E isolate (92TH22), 60% for a subtype O isolate
(MVP2171), 87% for an HIV-2 isolate (prCBL23), and 64% for a
different
HIV-2 isolate (CBL23; tissue culture, laboratory
adapted).
Cells were stained with anti-CD4, anti-CCR5, anti-CXCR4, and an isotype
control antibody (Pharmingen, Hamburg, Germany). The
level of
expression for these surface proteins did not differ
significantly
between cells expressing membrane-anchored T20 (PM-1/M87)
and the
control containing
neo vector only (PM-1/MPIN; data not
shown). These results show that resistance of PM-1/M87 to HIV-1
infection is not simply explained by a lack of receptor or
coreceptor.
To exclude overall toxicity of the membrane-anchored T20, growth curves
were determined for PM-1/M87 and, as a control, PM-1/MPIN.
The growth
rates for these two cell lines did not differ significantly
(data not
shown).
M87 inhibits entry of HIV-1.
To determine the level at which
HIV-1 replication was inhibited by M87, single-round infections were
performed with the HIV clone NL4-3env
GFP. This
HIV-1 clone is replication defective, due to a mutation in the
env gene, and expresses GFP instead of nef. To
produce infectious virus, NL4-3env
GFP was
pseudotyped with Env proteins from three different HIV-1 clones (HXB,
Yu2, and JRFL), as well as with the G protein of vesicular stomatitis
virus (VSV-G), as described previously (11). HXB is
classified as T-cell tropic with CXCR4 coreceptor usage, while Yu2 and
JR-FL are macrophage tropic and use CCR5. The latter two Env proteins
were cloned directly from primary HIV-1 isolates (11). In
PM-1/M87 cells, infection via the three different HIV envelopes was
inhibited more than 20-fold, while no significant inhibition was seen
for infection with the VSV-G pseudotype (Fig. 3D). Similar to the
results with free peptide, membrane-anchored T20 inhibited entry
independently of coreceptor usage (8).
In addition, PM-1/M87 and PM-1/MPIN were transduced with a murine
leukemia virus (MLV) vector pseudotyped with an HIV-1 envelope
(
24). This vector was produced with FLY cells
(
4) that express
MLV
gag and
pol
genes, the retrovirus vector pMX-EGFP (
21),
and the
carboxyl-truncated version of HIV-1 BH10 Env. Transduction
with
this vector was also more than 20-fold less efficient for
cells
expressing membrane-anchored T20 than for control cells
(Fig.
3D).
These results clearly show that membrane-anchored T20
inhibits virus
replication at the level of HIV Env-mediated entry,
most likely
membrane fusion, and that postentry events of HIV-1
replication were
not
affected.
A problem with all protein-based intracellular immunization strategies
is possible immunogenicity. A cytotoxic T-lymphocyte
(CTL) response to
membrane-anchored T20 could be induced, although
T20 does not overlap
with dominant CTL epitopes in gp41 (
26).
In addition,
antibodies may arise that neutralize the inhibitory
effect of T20 or
even lead to the elimination of genetically engineered
cells by
antibody-dependent cell lysis. However, such an immune
response is not
expected to have major adverse effects, as an
anti-T20 immune response
could help control HIV replication. In
stem cell-based gene therapy,
immunologic tolerance to the M87
gene product would be
induced.
An advantage of entry inhibitors that target the heptad repeats of gp41
is the relatively low variability within these regions.
In this study,
HIV-1 strains were thus inhibited independently
of coreceptor usage.
Emergence of resistance is expected to be
slow; however, HIV mutants
resistant to T20 have been isolated
in cell culture (
23).
In addition, across subtypes, the level
of inhibition in this study did
decrease with divergence in the
amino acid sequence of the C-terminal
heptad repeat. Inhibition
was highest for subtype B HIV-1 NL4-3, from
which M87 was derived,
intermediate for the other subtype B isolates,
and lowest for
the non-B subtypes and for HIV-2. Within the 36 amino
acids from
the T20 region, JRFL, Yu2, and BaL (B subtypes) differ in
only
3 amino acids from NL4-3, each. Subtype D differs in 5 amino
acids,
the subtype E isolate differs in 10 amino acids, the group O
isolate
differs in 16 amino acids, and the HIV-2 isolate (prCBL23)
differs
in 19 amino
acids.
Entry inhibitors, such as membrane-anchored T20, have several
advantages over gene products that suppress virus production
from the
integrated HIV provirus. Infected cells protected by
the latter
principle resemble latently infected cells and can
escape immune
surveillance. Moreover, many antiviral genes that
inhibit HIV-1
gene expression still allow expression of early,
potentially
pathogenic viral genes such as
tat. However, similar
to drug
therapy, a combination of antiviral genes is expected
be most effective
and, in addition, would prevent the emergence
of resistant virus
mutants.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank S. Roscher for excellent technical assistance.
M.H. is supported by a grant from the José Carreras
Leukämie Stiftung. M.T.D. has a fellowship from the
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung. The
Heinrich-Pette-Institut is supported by the Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address:
Georg-Speyer-Haus, Paul-Ehrlich-Strasse 42-44, 60596 Frankfurt, Germany. Phone: 49 69 6339 5232. Fax: 49 69 6339 5297. E-mail: laer{at}em.uni-frankfurt.de.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Buchacher, A.,
R. Predl,
K. Strutzenberger,
W. Steinfellner,
A. Trkola,
M. Purtscher,
G. Gruber,
C. Tauer,
F. Steindl,
A. Jungbauer, et al.
1994.
Generation of human monoclonal antibodies against HIV-1 proteins; electrofusion and Epstein-Barr virus transformation for peripheral blood lymphocyte immortalization.
AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir.
10:359-369[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Chan, D. C.,
D. Fass,
J. M. Berger, and P. S. Kim.
1997.
Core structure of gp41 from the HIV envelope glycoprotein.
Cell
89:263-273[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Chun, T.-W.,
D. Engel,
S. B. Mizell,
C. W. Hallahan,
M. Fischette,
S. Park,
R. T. Davey,
M. Dybul,
J. A. Kovacs,
J. A. Metcalf,
J. M. Mican,
M. M. Berrey,
L. Corey,
H. C. Lane, and A. S. Fauci.
1999.
Effect of interleukin-2 on the pool of latently infected, resting CD4+ T cells in HIV-1-infected patients receiving highly active anti-retroviral therapy.
Nat. Med.
5:651-655[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Cosset, F. L.,
Y. Takeuchi,
J. L. Battini,
R. A. Weiss, and M. K. Collins.
1995.
High-titer packaging cells producing recombinant retroviruses resistant to human serum.
J. Virol.
69:7430-7436[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Eckert, D. M.,
V. N. Malashkevich,
L. H. Hong,
P. A. Carr, and P. S. Kim.
1999.
Inhibiting HIV-1 entry: discovery of D-peptide inhibitors that target the gp41 coiled-coil pocket.
Cell
99:103-115[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Fehse, B.,
A. Uhde,
N. Fehse,
H. G. Eckert,
J. Clausen,
R. Ruger,
S. Koch,
W. Ostertag,
A. R. Zander, and M. Stockschlader.
1997.
Selective immunoaffinity-based enrichment of CD34+ cells transduced with retroviral vectors containing an intracytoplasmatically truncated version of the human low-affinity nerve growth factor receptor (deltaLNGFR) gene.
Hum. Gene Ther.
8:1815-1824[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Finzi, D.,
J. Blankson,
J. D. Siliciano,
J. B. Margolick,
K. Chadwick,
T. Pierson,
K. Smith,
J. Lisziewicz,
F. Lori,
C. Flexner,
T. C. Quinn,
R. E. Chaisson,
E. Rosenberg,
B. Walker,
S. Gange,
J. Gallant, and R. F. Siliciano.
1999.
Latent infection of CD4+ T cells provides a mechanism for lifelong persistence of HIV-1, even in patients on effective combination therapy.
Nat. Med.
5:512-517[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Furuta, R. A.,
C. T. Wild,
Y. Weng, and C. D. Weiss.
1998.
Capture of an early fusion-active conformation of HIV-1 gp41.
Nat. Struct. Biol.
5:276-279[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Grattinger, M.,
H. Hohenberg,
D. Thomas,
T. Wilk,
B. Muller, and H. G. Krausslich.
1999.
In vitro assembly properties of wild-type and cyclophilin-binding defective human immunodeficiency virus capsid proteins in the presence and absence of cyclophilin A.
Virology
257:247-260[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Grignani, F.,
T. Kinsella,
A. Mencarelli,
M. Valtieri,
D. Riganelli,
L. Lanfrancone,
C. Peschle,
G. P. Nolan, and P. G. Pelicci.
1998.
High-efficiency gene transfer and selection of human hematopoietic progenitor cells with a hybrid EBV/retroviral vector expressing the green fluorescence protein.
Cancer Res.
58:14-19[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
He, J.,
Y. Chen,
M. Farzan,
H. Choe,
A. Ohagen,
S. Gartner,
J. Busciglio,
X. Yang,
W. Hofmann,
W. Newman,
C. R. Mackay,
J. Sodroski, and D. Gabuzda.
1997.
CCR3 and CCR5 are co-receptors for HIV-1 infection of microglia.
Nature
385:645-649[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Hildinger, M.,
B. Fehse,
S. Hegewisch-Becker,
J. John,
J. Rafferty,
W. Ostertag, and C. Baum.
1998.
Dominant selection of human progenitor cells with retroviral mdr-1-coexpression vectors.
Hum. Gene Ther.
9:33-42[Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Kilby, J. M.,
S. Hopkins,
T. M. Venetta,
B. DiMassimo,
G. A. Cloud,
J. Y. Lee,
L. Alldredge,
E. Hunter,
D. Lambert,
D. Bolognesi,
T. Matthews,
M. R. Johnson,
M. A. Nowak,
G. M. Shaw, and M. S. Saag.
1998.
Potent suppression of HIV-1 replication in humans by T-20, a peptide inhibitor of gp41-mediated virus entry.
Nat. Med.
4:1302-1307[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Klebba, C.,
O. G. Ottmann,
M. Scherr,
M. Pape,
J. W. Engels,
M. Grez,
D. Hoelzer, and S. A. Klein.
2000.
Retrovirally expressed anti-HIV ribozymes confer a selective survival advantage on CD4+ T cells in vitro.
Gene Ther.
7:408-416[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Konvalinka, J.,
M. A. Litterst,
R. Welker,
H. Kottler,
F. Rippmann,
A. M. Heuser, and H. G. Krausslich.
1995.
An active-site mutation in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 proteinase (PR) causes reduced PR activity and loss of PR-mediated cytotoxicity without apparent effect on virus maturation and infectivity.
J. Virol.
69:7180-7186[Abstract].
|
| 16.
|
Lawless, K. M.,
S. Barney,
K. I. Guthrie,
T. B. Bucy,
S. R. Petteway, Jr., and G. Merutka.
1996.
HIV-1 membrane fusion mechanism: structural studies of the interactions between biologically-active peptides from gp41.
Biochemistry
35:13697-13708[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Ledergerber, B.,
M. Egger,
M. Opravil,
A. Telenti,
B. Hirschel,
M. Battegay,
P. Vernazza,
P. Sudre,
M. Flepp,
H. Furrer,
P. Francioli,
R. Weber, and the Swiss HIV Cohort Study.
1999.
Clinical progression and virological failure on highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-1 patients: a prospective cohort study.
Lancet
353:863-868[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Levy-Mintz, P.,
L. Duan,
H. Zhang,
B. Hu,
G. Dornadula,
M. Zhu,
J. Kulkosky,
D. Bizub-Bender,
A. M. Skalka, and R. J. Pomerantz.
1996.
Intracellular expression of single-chain variable fragments to inhibit early stages of the viral life cycle by targeting human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase.
J. Virol.
70:8821-8832[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Lusso, P.,
F. Cocchi,
C. Balotta,
P. D. Markham,
A. Louie,
P. Farci,
R. Pal,
R. C. Gallo, and M. S. Reitz, Jr.
1995.
Growth of macrophage-tropic and primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates in a unique CD4+ T-cell clone (PM-1): failure to downregulate CD4 and to interfere with cell-line-tropic HIV-1.
J. Virol.
69:3712-3720[Abstract].
|
| 20.
|
Martoglio, B., and B. Dobberstein.
1998.
Signal sequences: more than just greasy peptides.
Trends Cell Biol.
8:410-415[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Onishi, M.,
T. Nosaka,
K. Misawa,
A. L. Mui,
D. Gorman,
M. McMahon,
A. Miyajima, and T. Kitamura.
1998.
Identification and characterization of a constitutively active STAT5 mutant that promotes cell proliferation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
18:3871-3879[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Ory, D. S.,
B. A. Neugeboren, and R. C. Mulligan.
1996.
A stable human-derived cell line for production of high titer retrovirus/vesicular stomatitis virus G pseudotypes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:11400-11406[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Rimsky, L. T.,
D. C. Shugars, and T. J. Matthews.
1998.
Determinants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 resistance to gp41-derived inhibitory peptides.
J. Virol.
72:986-993[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Schnierle, B. S.,
J. Stitz,
V. Bosch,
F. Nocken,
H. Merget-Millitzer,
M. Engelstadter,
R. Kurth,
B. Groner, and K. Cichutek.
1997.
Pseudotyping of murine leukemia virus with the envelope glycoproteins of HIV generates a retroviral vector with specificity of infection for CD4-expressing cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:8640-8645[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Sczakiel, G., and M. Pawlita.
1991.
Inhibition of human immunodeficiency type 1 replication in human cells stably expressing antisense RNA.
J. Virol.
65:468-472[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Shankar, P.,
J. A. Fabry,
D. M. Fong, and J. Lieberman.
1996.
Three regions of HIV-1 gp160 contain clusters of immunodominant CTL epitopes.
Immunol. Lett.
52:23-30[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Sorg, T., and M. Methali.
1997.
Gene therapy for AIDS.
Transfus. Sci.
18:277-289[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Weissenhorn, W.,
A. Dessen,
S. C. Harrison,
J. J. Skehel, and D. C. Wiley.
1997.
Atomic structure of the ectodomain from HIV-1 gp41.
Nature
387:426-430[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Welker, R.,
M. Harris,
B. Cardel, and H. G. Krausslich.
1998.
Virion incorporation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Nef is mediated by a bipartite membrane-targeting signal: analysis of its role in enhancement of viral infectivity.
J. Virol.
72:8833-8840[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Wild, C. T.,
D. C. Shugars,
T. K. Greenwell,
C. B. McDanal, and T. J. Matthews.
1994.
Peptides corresponding to a predictive alpha-helical domain of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp41 are potent inhibitors of virus infection.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:9770-9774[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, March 2001, p. 3038-3042, Vol. 75, No. 6
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.6.3038-3042.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Ingallinella, P., Bianchi, E., Ladwa, N. A., Wang, Y.-J., Hrin, R., Veneziano, M., Bonelli, F., Ketas, T. J., Moore, J. P., Miller, M. D., Pessi, A.
(2009). Addition of a cholesterol group to an HIV-1 peptide fusion inhibitor dramatically increases its antiviral potency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
106: 5801-5806
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Liu, S., Jing, W., Cheung, B., Lu, H., Sun, J., Yan, X., Niu, J., Farmar, J., Wu, S., Jiang, S.
(2007). HIV gp41 C-terminal Heptad Repeat Contains Multifunctional Domains: RELATION TO MECHANISMS OF ACTION OF ANTI-HIV PEPTIDES. J. Biol. Chem.
282: 9612-9620
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Melikyan, G. B., Egelhofer, M., von Laer, D.
(2006). Membrane-Anchored Inhibitory Peptides Capture Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 gp41 Conformations That Engage the Target Membrane prior to Fusion.. J. Virol.
80: 3249-3258
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lohrengel, S., Hermann, F., Hagmann, I., Oberwinkler, H., Scrivano, L., Hoffmann, C., von Laer, D., Dittmar, M. T.
(2005). Determinants of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Resistance to Membrane-Anchored gp41-Derived Peptides. J. Virol.
79: 10237-10246
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ou, W., Silver, J.
(2005). Inhibition of Murine Leukemia Virus Envelope Protein (Env) Processing by Intracellular Expression of the Env N-Terminal Heptad Repeat Region. J. Virol.
79: 4782-4792
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Alfano, G., Vitiello, C., Caccioppoli, C., Caramico, T., Carola, A., Szego, M. J., McInnes, R. R., Auricchio, A., Banfi, S.
(2005). Natural antisense transcripts associated with genes involved in eye development. Hum Mol Genet
14: 913-923
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Liu, S., Lu, H., Niu, J., Xu, Y., Wu, S., Jiang, S.
(2005). Different from the HIV Fusion Inhibitor C34, the Anti-HIV Drug Fuzeon (T-20) Inhibits HIV-1 Entry by Targeting Multiple Sites in gp41 and gp120. J. Biol. Chem.
280: 11259-11273
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lenz, O., Dittmar, M. T., Wagner, A., Ferko, B., Vorauer-Uhl, K., Stiegler, G., Weissenhorn, W.
(2005). Trimeric Membrane-anchored gp41 Inhibits HIV Membrane Fusion. J. Biol. Chem.
280: 4095-4101
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Egelhofer, M., Brandenburg, G., Martinius, H., Schult-Dietrich, P., Melikyan, G., Kunert, R., Baum, C., Choi, I., Alexandrov, A., von Laer, D.
(2004). Inhibition of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Entry in Cells Expressing gp41-Derived Peptides. J. Virol.
78: 568-575
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Peisajovich, S. G., Gallo, S. A., Blumenthal, R., Shai, Y.
(2003). C-terminal Octylation Rescues an Inactive T20 Mutant: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE MECHANISM OF HIV/SIMIAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS-INDUCED MEMBRANE FUSION. J. Biol. Chem.
278: 21012-21017
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Giannecchini, S., Di Fenza, A., D'Ursi, A. M., Matteucci, D., Rovero, P., Bendinelli, M.
(2003). Antiviral Activity and Conformational Features of an Octapeptide Derived from the Membrane-Proximal Ectodomain of the Feline Immunodeficiency Virus Transmembrane Glycoprotein. J. Virol.
77: 3724-3733
[Abstract]
[Full Text]