Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, March 2001, p. 2792-2802, Vol. 75, No. 6
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.6.2792-2802.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Variations in Disparate Regions of the Murine
Coronavirus Spike Protein Impact the Initiation of Membrane
Fusion
Dawn K.
Krueger,
Sean M.
Kelly,
Daniel N.
Lewicki,
Rosanna
Ruffolo, and
Thomas M.
Gallagher*
Department of Microbiology and Immunology,
Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois 60153
Received 7 July 2000/Accepted 18 December 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The prototype JHM strain of murine hepatitis virus (MHV) is an
enveloped, RNA-containing coronavirus that has been selected in vivo
for extreme neurovirulence. This virus encodes spike (S) glycoproteins
that are extraordinarily effective mediators of intercellular membrane
fusion, unique in their ability to initiate fusion even without prior
interaction with the primary MHV receptor, a murine carcinoembryonic
antigen-related cell adhesion molecule (CEACAM). In considering the
possible role of this hyperactive membrane fusion activity in
neurovirulence, we discovered that the growth of JHM in tissue culture
selected for variants that had lost murine CEACAM-independent fusion
activity. Among the collection of variants, mutations were identified
in regions encoding both the receptor-binding (S1) and fusion-inducing
(S2) subunits of the spike protein. Each mutation was separately
introduced into cDNA encoding the prototype JHM spike, and the set of
cDNAs was expressed using vaccinia virus vectors. The variant spikes were similar to that of JHM in their assembly into oligomers, their
proteolysis into S1 and S2 cleavage products, their transport to cell
surfaces, and their affinity for a soluble form of murine CEACAM.
However, these tissue culture-adapted spikes were significantly stabilized as S1-S2 heteromers, and their entirely CEACAM-dependent fusion activity was delayed or reduced relative to prototype JHM spikes. The mutations that we have identified therefore point to
regions of the S protein that specifically regulate the membrane fusion
reaction. We suggest that cultured cells, unlike certain in vivo
environments, select for S proteins with delayed, CEACAM-dependent fusion activities that may increase the likelihood of virus
internalization prior to the irreversible uncoating process.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Enveloped virus particles introduce
their genetic cargo into organisms by binding to cellular receptors and
by the subsequent coalescence of the membranes surrounding virus and
cell. Since glycoproteins projecting from the virus envelope perform
both of these functions, it is not surprising that paradigms for
protein-mediated membrane fusion reactions come from studies of viral
glycoprotein structure and function. The current general view is that
viral glycoproteins are metastable entities, poised to convert to
alternative "fusion-competent" conformations following
binding to a cellular receptor(s) and/or endocytosis into acidic
intracellular vesicles (5, 6, 13, 47). For many viral
glycoproteins, the precise way in which this conversion process is
initiated and then completed is unclear. However, a mechanistic
understanding is required to identify determinants of viral tropism and
pathogenesis (31), to rationally design therapeutic
antiviral agents (34), and to develop viruses as gene
therapy vectors (33).
Our studies are aimed at understanding how coronaviruses perform these
essential cell entry functions. A coronavirus particle projects about
200 spikes (S) from its virion membrane (15)
these projections are essential for receptor binding and membrane fusion. Each spike projection is comprised of oligomeric type I integral membrane glycoproteins. The monomeric units of each oligomer exist either as single-chain proteins or as two similarly sized
endoproteolytic cleavage products (see Fig. 2). The cleavage
products are designated S1 and S2; S1 is the peripheral fragment and
remains noncovalently associated with the membrane-spanning S2 fragment
(7). During the initial stages of infection, the
peripheral S1 on some of these virion projections engages host cell
receptors (37). For the murine hepatitis coronaviruses
(MHVs), these receptors are members of the carcinoembryonic antigen
family of cell adhesion molecules (CEACAMs) (4, 18). The
CEACAMs are integral membrane proteins with immunoglobulin-like
ectodomains, and their binding to spikes is thought to induce
structural changes that are relevant to the fusion of virus and cell
membranes (23, 32, 61). The initial virion-cell fusion
reaction may take place at or near the cell surface, as acidification
is not additionally required for MHV infection, although there are
notable rare isolates that do require endocytosis into acid-pH vesicles
for entry (25). Later during infection, another important
membrane fusion reaction takes place as S proteins accumulate on
infected cell surfaces and engage CEACAM receptors on opposing cells.
These important intercellular fusion events generate easily identified
syncytia and permit the rapid spread of virus infection.
The coronaviruses exhibit considerable serologic and sequence variation
(57), with the most extreme variability being within S
genes. S protein differences are now known to impact pathogenic outcome
(14, 39, 55), and in this regard it is notable that there
exists a wide spectrum of coronavirus-induced diseases, including
common colds, peritonitis, and gastroenteritis. This diversity in
pathogenetic outcome is also evident among the MHV strains. Despite the
name, some MHV strains cause gastroenteritis or encephalitis rather
than hepatitis (52). This directs attention to mechanisms
by which variation in MHV spikes impacts entry into distinct cells and
tissues, thereby causing a particular disease pattern.
To begin to address how differences in S protein structure impact virus
entry and resulting in vivo pathogenesis, we have focused attention on
a particular strain of MHV termed the JHM strain (9). The
JHM strain was originally discovered as the causative agent of
demyelination and paralysis and was subsequently passaged several times
in suckling mouse brain to generate an exceedingly neurovirulent
isolate (9, 66). Neurovirulent JHM is unique with respect
to its very rapid, ultimately lethal dissemination throughout the
murine central nervous system. At the same time, JHM is poorly
propagated in tissue culture, and variants of JHM that exhibit superior
growth in culture are readily amplified (25, 26). These
variants contain spike mutations, and those variants that have been
tested have greatly reduced neurovirulence (20, 51), again
establishing the link between spike variation and in vivo pathogenesis.
Here we have explored how different JHM-derived spike variants compare
with the prototype JHM spikes in their capacities for binding to the
murine CEACAM receptor and for their induction of membrane fusion. We
found that many of the mutations fixed into spike genes during tissue
culture adaptation had little if any effect on spike-receptor binding
but that all reduced fusion. Indeed, we demonstrate here that the
prototype JHM spikes induced membrane fusion even without the
requirement for murine CEACAM binding. However, the tissue
culture-adapted mutants could not mediate this type of
"spontaneous" fusion reaction. We have further explored the impact
of these mutations on the gross structural features of the spike
protein. Possible relationships between spike-induced membrane fusion
potential and virus entry kinetics are discussed.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cells.
HeLa-tTA (27), HeLa-MHVR
(53), and rabbit kidney clone 13 (RK13) cells were grown
in Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10%
heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Summit Biotechnology). 293 EBNA:sMHVR-Fc cells (23) were grown in DMEM-10% FBS
containing the antibiotics G418 (100 µg/ml) and hygromycin B (200 µg/ml). Murine 17 clone 1 (17 cl 1) fibroblasts were grown in DMEM
containing 5% FBS and 5% tryptose phosphate broth (Difco
Laboratories). All growth media were buffered with 0.01 M sodium HEPES
(pH 7.4). All cell lines were propagated as adherent monolayer cultures.
Viruses.
All coronaviruses were plaque purified on HeLa-MHVR
cells, propagated as stocks in 17 cl 1 cells, and purified by
differential centrifugation as previously described (26).
Vaccinia virus recombinants, each harboring spike cDNA of a particular
coronavirus strain, were generated in a stepwise fashion. Total RNA
from coronavirus-infected 17 cl 1 cells was isolated by
phenol-chloroform extraction, and subsequent cDNA preparation, PCR
amplification, and S gene sequencing were performed as previously
described (23). PCR restriction fragments containing
mutations (relative to JHM) were then used to replace corresponding
fragments from the vaccinia virus insertion-expression vector
pTM1-SJHM (23). All recombinant pTM1-S
plasmids were cloned, amplified in Escherichia coli DH5
,
and sequenced to confirm that only the desired S gene mutations were
present in the cDNAs. Plasmids were then recombined into the thymidine
kinase gene of vaccinia virus (strain WR) by standard methods
(43), and the plaque-purified thymidine kinase-negative
virus isolates were amplified in RK13 cells. Expression of S genes from
these vaccinia virus vectors required bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase,
which was supplied by coinfection with vTF7.3 (22).
Intercellular fusion assays.
The cell fusion-dependent
reporter gene (
-galactosidase) activation assay of Nussbaum et al.
was adapted to our studies of spike protein-mediated membrane fusion
(48). In brief, effector (spike-bearing) cells were
generated by coinfection of HeLa-tTA cell monolayers (106
cells/well) with vTF7.3 and respective vTM1-S recombinants. Target cells (containing the
-galactosidase reporter gene) were generated by infection of either HeLa-tTA or HeLa-MHVR no. 5 cells
(53) with vCB21R-lacZ (1). All inoculations
were for 1 h at 37°C at multiplicities of 2 PFU/cell. After 6 h,
target cells were trypsinized, resuspended in DMEM-10% FBS,
repelleted, and resuspended in serum-free DMEM (SFM). Tests for the pH
dependence of intercellular fusion involved resuspending target cells
in SFM lacking HEPES and containing the following buffers at a
concentration of 0.025 M: at pHs of 6.0 and 6.5, piperazine-N,N'-bis(2-ethanesulfonic acid) (PIPES) or
morpholineethanesulfonic acid (MES); at pHs of 7.0 and 7.5, HEPES; and
at pHs of 8.0 and 8.5, Tris or Bicine. Target cells were then overlaid
onto the spike-bearing (effector) cells at an effector/target ratio of
1.0 and were incubated for the indicated time periods at 37°C. Media
were then removed and cells were lysed with 0.5 ml of
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.5% NP-40/well.
-Galactosidase production was quantified in triplicate 0.05-ml
aliquots using a colorimetric assay involving turnover of chlorophenyl
red
-galactopyranoside (CPRG).
Preparation of 125I-labeled sMHVR-Fc.
The
molecule sMHVR-Fc is a chimeric protein comprising the virus-binding
sMHVR domain, also known as the N domain of murine CEACAM1a
(4), covalently linked to the Fc of human immunoglobulin
G1 (IgG1). The sMHVR-Fc molecule exists as an ~100-kDa dimer and is
constitutively secreted from the transfectant cell line 293 EBNA:sMHVR-Fc (23). T225 flasks containing ~2 × 107 293 EBNA:sMHVR-Fc cells were incubated in SFM for 2 days, and then the spent media (25 ml/flask) were removed and filtered. To 100 ml of medium, 0.1 ml of Sepharose-protein G beads (Pharmacia) was added, and incubation was continued for 18 h at 4°C.
Sepharose beads were pelleted by centrifugation (2,000 × g for 5 min) and were then rinsed with PBS-P (PBS [pH 7.4]
containing 0.1% protease inhibitor cocktail [Sigma catalog no.
P2714]) via three cycles of resuspension and repelleting. The rinsed
bead pellet was resuspended and agitated for 10 min at room temperature
in 1 ml of 0.1 M glycine (pH 2.7). Beads were then removed by
centrifugation. Eluted sMHVR-Fc was added to 0.1 ml of 1 M Tris-HCl (pH
8.7) and was then dialyzed extensively against PBS-P. This process
yielded purified sMHVR-Fc at an ~0.3-mg/ml concentration, as measured
relative to bovine IgG standards in a bicinchoninic acid-based assay (Pierce).
For radioiodination, a highly concentrated (1 mg/ml) preparation of
purified sMHVR-Fc was dialyzed against Tris iodination buffer (25 mM
Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 0.4 M NaCl). One hundred micrograms (1 nmol) was
then iodinated using 1 mCi of Na125I (Amersham) and
IODO-GEN reagent precoated onto iodination tubes (Pierce).
Radioiodination, as well as removal of unincorporated 125I
by gel filtration, was carried out according to Pierce Company Protocol
28601. Following gel filtration, preparations were mixtures of sMHVR-Fc
and bovine serum albumin, a carrier protein added after the iodination
reaction. Therefore, specific activity measurements required capturing
aliquots of 125I-labeled sMHVR-Fc onto Sepharose-protein G
beads (Pharmacia) and subsequent elution of bead-associated proteins at
100°C in sample solubilizer (0.06 M Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 2% sodium
dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 5% 2-mercaptoethanol, 2.5% Ficoll, 0.01%
bromphenol blue). 125I-labeled sMHVR-Fc protein
concentrations were then determined by Coomassie staining after
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in parallel with known amounts
of purified sMHVR-Fc. 125I was measured using a Packard
Tri-Carb gamma counter.
Binding assays.
Parallel monolayers of HeLa-tTA cells
(5 × 105 cells in 5-cm2 wells) were
inoculated at 2 PFU per cell with vTF7.3 and the respective vTM1-S
recombinant vaccinia viruses. At various times after infection, individual cultures were chilled on ice, rinsed with ice-cold PBS, and
then incubated for 2 h at 4°C in PBS containing 1% formalin. Monolayers were then rinsed extensively with PBS to remove formalin and
then overlaid with 0.5 ml of HNB (50 mM Na-HEPES [pH 7.0], 100 mM
NaCl, 0.01% bovine serum albumin) containing serial dilutions of
125I-labeled sMHVR-Fc (specific activity of 1.5 × 109 cpm/nmol)/well. Culture plates were incubated on rocker
platforms for 2 h at room temperature, and then buffer containing
unbound sMHVR-Fc was removed. Cell monolayers were rinsed extensively with ice-cold HNB before being dissolved into 0.5 ml of HNB containing 0.5% NP-40 and 0.1% SDS. Each set of binding conditions was carried out in duplicate, and the cell lysate and medium-associated
radioactivities in duplicate aliquots were quantitated using a Packard
Tri-Carb gamma counter.
Metabolic radiolabeling and immunoprecipitation of S
proteins.
Parallel HeLa-tTA cell monolayers (~106
cells in 10 cm2) were infected with vTF7.3 or with vTF7.3
plus vTM1-S. Cells were incubated from 6.5 to 7.5 h postinfection
with methionine- and cysteine-free DMEM containing 1% dialyzed FBS and
were then pulse labeled for 10 min with methionine- and cysteine-free
DMEM containing [35S]translabel (50 µCi/ml). After
extensive rinsing with ice-cold SFM, 1 ml of prewarmed (37°C) chase
medium (DMEM-0.1% FBS containing 0.3 mg of methionine/ml and 0.6 mg
of cysteine/ml) was then added to each well. After various chase
periods, media were removed and saved, and cell sheets were lysed with
1 ml of PBS-P containing 0.5% NP-40/well. Nuclei were pelleted from
the cell lysates (10,000 × g at 4°C for 5 min), and
0.5-ml volumes of media or clarified cell extract were incubated with
Sepharose-protein G beads (Pharmacia) that had been previously
conjugated with sMHVR-Fc. After 16 h at 4°C, beads were pelleted
(3,000 × g at 4°C for 10 min) and washed with PBS-P
containing 0.5% NP-40 via three cycles of resuspension and pelleting.
The final bead pellets were mixed with sample solubilizer and heated to
100°C for 5 min, and 35S-labeled proteins were visualized
by fluorography after SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
 |
RESULTS |
Differences among MHV strains in syncytium-forming ability: spikes
produced by JHM strain infection are uniquely fusion active in the
absence of the CEACAM receptor.
Cells infected with the JHM strain
of MHV are powerful mediators of intercellular fusion, so powerful that
the prototype receptor, MHVR or murine CEACAM1a (4,
18), is not required on target cells (24).
This result is unusual because the murine CEACAM receptor is
generally considered essential to the membrane fusion reaction; CEACAM
binding to viral spikes may perform a central role in generating a
fusion-active spike conformation (23, 32). We set out to
further characterize JHM spikes, expecting that we might identify
interesting alternative triggers for JHM-specific fusion activation. To
begin the studies, a qualitative assay for intercellular fusion
was performed. Multinucleated syncytia of JHM-infected murine cells
were overlaid with target cells that were devoid of the murine CEACAM.
Some of the target cells were made to constitutively express a
-galactosidase gene; thus their fusion with virus-infected cells
could be recognized by the expansion of
-galactosidase into
syncytia, as measured by in situ turnover of
5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-
-D-galactopyranoside (X-Gal) substrate (42). In performing these assays, we
discovered that our more recent stocks of MHV JHM were incapable of
inducing this receptor-independent fusion, while older stocks from 1992 tested positive (Fig. 1). This finding
was somewhat remarkable because the 1992 and 1999 stocks were closely
related; only five passages in 17 cl 1 cells separated the two. We also
discovered that cells infected with many previously characterized
isolates derived by serial passage of the prototype JHM were unable to
fuse with receptor-negative cells (Fig. 1). This included the JHM-X
strain (63) and the V4B11 and V5A13 isolates
(26). These findings led us to conclude that CEACAM
receptor-independent membrane fusion activity is not stably maintained
as JHM viruses are propagated in tissue culture. These findings also
made it clear to us that we could identify the genetic basis for murine
CEACAM-independent fusion through a comparison of the RNA genomes of
different JHM stocks.

View larger version (148K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Qualitative assessments of spike-induced intercellular
fusion: only the prototype JHM '92 encodes S proteins that can mediate
syncytia with MHVR (murine CEACAM)-negative HeLa cells. Monolayers of
MHVR-negative HeLa cells were transfected with pCMV- -galactosidase
to generate ~1% -galactosidase-positive cells (A). At 1 day
posttransfection, parallel monolayers were overlaid with HeLa-MHVR
cells that were infected 4 h earlier (multiplicity of infection
0.1) with the indicated JHM strains (B to D). After 30 h, cells
were fixed with formaldehyde and incubated with X-Gal to identify
dissemination of -galactosidase into virus-induced syncytia.
|
|
Tissue culture-adapted stocks of JHM have mutations in two
different regions of the spike gene.
A straightforward reverse
transcriptase PCR and cDNA sequencing approach was initiated to compare
the S gene sequences of passaged viruses with those of the previously
sequenced JHM (50). We first concentrated on the V4B11
isolate that was tested for Fig. 1. This is a previously characterized
isolate that was originally generated by serial passage in the presence
of neutralizing anti-S monoclonal antibody 4B11 (12). Our
sequencing data confirmed the presence of a large 149-residue deletion
in the receptor-binding S1 subunit (
437-585) (26, 50).
Omissions of this sort in S1 are commonly found in JHM isolates from a
number of laboratories
for example, there are JHM-X (
446-598) and
JHM-Wurzburg (
454-594). We have generally found that the tissue
culture yields (in PFU) of S1 deletion variants are about 100 times
that of the prototype JHM, consistent with their in vitro selection. In
this report we refer to this region of S1 that is missing in the tissue
culture-adapted variants as the deletion-prone region (DPR). Since no
deletions extend beyond residues 429 to 604, we presently designate
this segment the consensus DPR of the 1,376-amino-acid S protein (Fig. 2).

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Schematic diagram of the JHM spike protein, delineation
of relevant functional regions, and location of mutations eliminating
MHVR (CEACAM)-independent fusion activity. Lines depict a single S
protein monomer after removal of the signal sequence (residues 1 to 14)
and endoproteolytic cleavage into S1 and S2 near the multibasic
residues 765 to 769 (arrow). While not depicted here, the native S
protein structure contains multiple noncovalent associations between S1
and S2 fragments (29). S1 is the peripheral fragment, and
S1 fragments comprising the amino-terminal 330 residues will bind to
receptors (37). S2 contains a single membrane-spanning
region, designated TM. Membrane fusion is accomplished by S2, which has
three regions predicted to form helical coiled coils (58),
identified here as the N (amino acids 838 to 872), M (amino acids 1020 to 1124), and C (amino acids 1274 to 1300) helices. The M and C helices
match earlier predictions (16), and they are positioned
similarly to those found in fusion proteins from other virus families
(59). S2 also contains a candidate fusion peptide (FP)
region (41), similar to those found in fusion proteins
from many other virus families (68). Mutations eliminating
receptor-independent fusion include deletions DPR1 and DPR2,
whose endpoints are indicated. These two deletions lie within S1
residues 429 to 604, a region known to accommodate omissions ranging
from 29 to 159 amino acids (50, 54). S2 point mutations
V870A and A1046V also eliminate receptor-independent fusion.
|
|
We also sequenced reverse transcriptase PCR products derived from the
RNA of a single plaque-purified isolate from the 1999
JHM stock that
was tested for Fig.
1. Sequencing of the S gene
revealed only two
relatively conservative missense mutations in
this isolate, V870A and
A1046V. Both of these changes were within
the integral membrane
fusion-inducing S2 subunit. Furthermore,
both of these changes were
within regions identified by the Learn-Coil
VMF program
(
58) as putative amphipathic helical coiled coils.
These
mutations and the three putative coiled-coil regions of
S2 are
schematically illustrated in Fig.
2.
Mutant spikes selected after tissue culture adaptation are poor
inducers of membrane fusion.
To determine whether the spike
mutations identified by sequencing (Fig. 2) would indeed eliminate
CEACAM-independent membrane fusion (Fig. 1), we first constructed a
series of vaccinia virus recombinants capable of expressing different S
genes. These recombinants were designated vTM1-SJHM
(complete JHM S gene), vTM1-S
DPR1 (
446-598, JHM-X
deletion), vTM1-S
DPR2 (
437-585, V4B11 deletion), and
vTM1-SV870A/A1046V. Expression of spike genes from vaccinia virus vectors provides many advantages for studying the structure and
function of this membrane fusion protein. First, spike cDNAs are
amenable to molecular genetic manipulation, and the mutations identified by sequencing of variant virus cDNAs can be easily inserted
into spike cDNAs and then expressed to produce well-defined mutant
proteins. Second, the vaccinia virus vectors allow us to synthesize
spike proteins in a variety of cell lines that are otherwise resistant
to natural infection by coronaviruses. Third, the vectors permit spike
synthesis in the absence of other components of coronavirus particles,
and this allows spikes to flow from the endoplasmic reticulum to the
cell surface without recruitment into intracellular sites of
coronavirus assembly (49). Thus, cells infected with the
vaccinia virus vectors display spikes abundantly on the plasma
membrane, making them potent effectors of intercellular fusion
(64).
We expressed the different S genes containing defined mutations in HeLa
cells and then tested their potential as "effectors"
of
intercellular fusion in quantitative assays of the type originally
described by Nussbaum et al. (
48). In brief, this involved
infecting
target HeLa cells with vCB21R-lacZ (
1), which
harbors a transcriptionally
silent

-galactosidase reporter gene
under T7 promoter control,
and then overlaying the targets onto the
various spike-bearing
effector cells. Since the effector cells were
infected with vTF7.3
(
22), which encodes T7 RNA
polymerase, intercellular fusion
with target cells mixes the T7
polymerase with the
lacZ reporter
gene, and

-galactosidase enzyme is
generated.
The

-galactosidase enzyme levels in lysates collected at various
times after effector/target cell cocultivation facilitated
estimating
the relative syncytium-inducing potency of each S protein
(Fig.
3). When the target cells were HeLa-MHVR,
which stably express
the prototype murine CEACAM1
a gene at
levels sufficient to display ~100,000 receptors per cell
(
53), membrane fusion was observed for all S proteins
(Fig.
3A). The JHM spikes were the most potent effectors, and they
promoted
fusion most rapidly, ~30 min sooner than did the parallel
S
DPR proteins. The variant spikes with S2 point
mutations (S
V870A/A1046V)
were by far the least potent
effectors of syncytium formation.
The data in Fig.
3 are from
effector/target cell cocultivations
that began at 6 h
post-vaccinia virus infection. However, the
observation of rapid and
powerful S
JHM-induced fusion was consistently
observed,
regardless of whether cocultivations were initiated
at 6, 9, or 12 h
postinfection (data not shown).

View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Quantitative and qualitative assessment of intercellular
fusion mediated by MHV spike proteins. HeLa cell monolayers
(106 cells in 10-cm2 dishes) were inoculated
with vTF7.3 (No S) or with vTF7.3 plus vTM1-S recombinants encoding
JHM, DPR1, DPR2, or V870A/A1046V spikes. At 6 h
postinfection, media were removed from parallel cultures and replaced
with suspensions of HeLa-MHVR (A) or HeLa (B) target cells that had
been infected 6 h earlier with vCB21R-lacZ (1). Each
dish received 106 target cells in a volume of 2 ml of SFM
(pH 7.5). Cocultivation fuses the S-bearing effector cells with
targets, a process which then initiates lacZ gene
expression. At the indicated times after cocultivation, media were
removed, cells were dissolved in PBS-0.5% NP-40, and
-galactosidase enzyme activities in lysates were determined using a
colorimetric assay involving spectrophotometric quantitation of CPRG at
590 nm. The photographs below each graph reveal the extent of syncytium
formation after 3 h of cocultivation. OD, optical density.
|
|
To assess the requirement for the MHV receptor in these intercellular
fusion reactions, we replaced HeLa-MHVR target cells
with the parent
HeLa cell line and repeated the cocultivation
(fusion) assays. Our
results indicated that S
JHM proteins induced
fusion with
HeLa cells that was ~10% of that observed with HeLa-MHVR
targets
(Fig.
3B). This level of fusion with HeLa cells was variable;
in 12 independent assays, the level of reporter gene activation
after 3 h of cocultivation with HeLa targets ranged from 5 to
21% (average,
8%) of that observed with HeLa-MHVR targets. However,
in every assay
performed, effector cells displaying mutant S proteins
were incapable
of generating

-galactosidase on cocultivation
with HeLa cells (Fig.
3B). Results of this sort were additionally
documented by inspection of
cultures for syncytia (Fig.
3, lower
panels). These results
conclusively demonstrated that hyperactive
(murine CEACAM-independent)
fusion activity is unique to S
JHM and that the deletions in
S1 or the two point mutations in S2
will eliminate this
property.
Effect of spike mutations on interaction with the prototype MHV
receptor.
The extraordinarily powerful fusion activity of
SJHM might be explained by its relatively high presentation
on the surface of effector cells or, in the case of fusion with
HeLa-MHVR cells, by its relatively high affinity for the MHV receptor.
To address these possibilities, a series of binding assays were
performed in which 125I-labeled sMHVR-Fc was incubated with
S-bearing effector cells. The sMHVR-Fc molecule is a hybrid protein
that is comprised of the spike-binding N domain of murine
CEACAM1a fused to the Fc portion of human IgG1 (19,
23). Interaction of spikes with sMHVR-Fc is considered to be a
relevant mimic of the authentic binding between spikes and integral
membrane MHV receptors.
To perform the binding assays, adherent HeLa cell cultures displaying S
proteins were chilled at 12 h post-vaccinia virus
infection to
halt exocytic transport and to stabilize the S1-S2
complexes that had
reached the plasma membrane. Parallel cultures
were then rinsed,
incubated at 4°C with 1% formalin in PBS, and
then rinsed again
before application of increasing amounts of
125I-labeled
sMHVR-Fc. This formalin fixation prevented undesired
detachment of
cells from plastic and had no effects on the spike-sMHVR-Fc
interaction, which reached equilibrium within 2 h at room
temperature
(data not
shown).
The results of the binding assays are presented in Fig.
4. In sharp contrast to
earlier suspicions, the surface levels of
S
JHM proteins
were far lower than those of any of the other mutant
S proteins. The
sMHVR-Fc radioligand began to exhibit saturable
binding on
S
JHM cultures at ~0.085 nM, which corresponds to
~40,000
sMHVR-Fc molecules per cell. The monolayers displaying
S
V870A/A1046V and S
DPR2 maximally bound
about 5 and 10 times more sMHVR-Fc
(~200,000 and ~400,000 molecules
per cell), respectively. Similar
differences were obtained upon
sMHVR-Fc binding to cultures fixed
at earlier times (8 and 10 h)
postinfection (data not shown).
Therefore, the powerful fusion activity
of S
JHM occurs even though
its surface presentation is
relatively low.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Quantitation of sMHVR-Fc binding to HeLa cells
displaying S proteins. A series of HeLa cell cultures (5 × 105 cells in 5-cm2 dishes) were infected with
vTF7.3 (no S) or with vTF7.3 plus one of the vTM1-S recombinants (JHM,
DPR2, or V870A/A1046V). At 12 h postinfection, cells were rinsed with
ice-cold PBS and fixed with 1% formalin in PBS.
125I-labeled sMHVR-Fc (1.5 × 109
cpm/nmol) was diluted in HNB buffer to the indicated concentrations,
and 0.5-ml volumes were then added to the formalin-fixed cells. After a
2-h incubation at 22°C, unbound (free) 125I-labeled
sMHVR-Fc was removed. Cells were rinsed extensively with ice-cold HNB buffer and
were then dissolved in HNB-0.5% NP-40-0.1% SDS. Bound and free
radioactivities in 0.05-ml aliqouts were counted in a Packard Tri-Carb
gamma counter. Error bars represent mean standard deviations
(n = 4). Bmax, maximal binding (in
molecules/cell).
|
|
All of the S proteins under investigation exhibited similar affinities
for sMHVR-Fc. This was evident from estimating the
concentrations of
free
125I-labeled sMHVR-Fc under conditions of half-maximal
binding (Fig.
4B to D).
Kd values were in the
~0.5 nM range, which is similar
to the affinity of human
immunodeficiency virus (HIV) gp120 for
sCD4-IgG (
46), a
soluble form of the HIV receptor that is structurally
analogous to the
sMHVR-Fc used in this study. Our results suggest
that the potency of
S
JHM-induced fusion with HeLa-MHVR cells (Fig.
3) cannot be
attributed to an increased affinity of this particular
spike for the
receptor.
Mutant spikes selected after tissue culture adaptation maintain
relatively stable S1-S2 heteromeric association.
The relatively
poor capture of 125I-labeled sMHVR-Fc onto cells presenting
SJHM could be due to inefficient SJHM transport
to the plasma membrane, low cell surface stability of the
SJHM proteins, or both. These possibilities were
investigated by monitoring the posttranslational fate of different S
proteins via metabolic radiolabeling experiments. We pulse labeled
infected HeLa cells producing the S proteins with
[35S]methionine and chased (without radioactivity) and
then solubilized cells at hourly intervals with nonionic detergent. The
S proteins were immunoprecipitated with either polyclonal anti-S serum
or with sMHVR-Fc and were then visualized by fluorography following SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
The electrophoretic profiles of S proteins immunoprecipitated by
sMHVR-Fc are depicted in Fig.
5. The
profiles obtained from
immunoprecipitation with polyclonal antiserum
are not shown because
they paralleled those depicted in all but one
parameter. Newly
synthesized S proteins were not efficiently captured
by sMHVR-Fc
(see cell lanes for 0 h in all panels), but they were
captured
by polyclonal serum. This was because the receptor-binding
site
formed ~30 min after synthesis, concomitant with S protein
oligomerization
within the endoplasmic reticulum (D. N. Lewicki
and T. M. Gallagher,
manuscript in preparation).

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Electropherograms depicting the stability of S1-S2
interactions among S variants. HeLa-tTA cells infected with vaccinia-S
recombinant viruses were pulse labeled with
[35S]methionine and/or [35S]cysteine from
7.5 to 7.7 h postinfection and were then further incubated
(chased) for various times in media containing unlabeled amino acids.
At hourly intervals, media (1 ml per culture) were collected and
remaining adherent cells were solubilized in media containing 0.5%
NP-40 (1 ml per culture). Radiolabeled S proteins from 0.25-ml aliquots
were bound to Sepharose-protein G beads conjugated with sMHVR-Fc, and
the adsorbed 35S-labeled proteins were identified after
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and fluorography. Lanes in each
panel represent the 35S-labeled proteins precipitated after
0, 1, 2, and 3 h of chase. Molecular masses are indicated in
kilodaltons. ORI, origin of resolving gel. Sagg,
SDS-resistant aggregates of S proteins. Sunc,
uncleaved precursors.
|
|
The electrophoretic profiles revealed additional important
characteristics of S proteins. First, similar levels of the different
S
proteins were immunoprecipitated as the chase progressed, indicating
that the various mutations did not impact S protein biosynthesis.
Second, SDS-resistant aggregates of S proteins were observed (see
S
agg bands in Fig.
5), and these aggregates were absent in
spikes
with the V870A/A1046V mutations. Third, the major
cell-associated
S proteins were high-molecular-weight ~180-kDa
chains. These are
uncleaved precursors (S
unc), and their
presence throughout the
3-h chase indicated that only a subset of
spikes transported successfully
to Golgi-localized sites of
endoproteolysis (
7). This data
supported the view that
all of the S proteins were similarly effective
in transport
through the exocytic pathway, although it is reasonable
to
suspect that minor differences would not be revealed by these
tests.
The major effect of the S mutations was revealed by recovery of
peripheral S1 posttranslational cleavage products in the various
immunoprecipitates. In cultures synthesizing S
JHM, the S1
cleavage
products were found exclusively in the media, with no clear
evidence
of cell-associated S1. This pattern contrasted most sharply
with
the pattern from cells producing S
DPR2, where the
deletion
mutant S1
DPR2 was primarily cell associated. In
cultures
producing S
V870A/A1046V, the presence of
cell-associated S1 was
somewhat difficult to identify, although
relative to S
JHM there
was clearly more radioactive protein
in a position consistent
with S1, and significantly less S1 was
captured from medium samples.
Therefore, the collective findings
indicate that the various S
proteins assemble into oligomers with
similar speed and efficiency
but that only a minor fraction of these
oligomers advance into
mature S1 and S2 cleavage products within 3 h. For S
JHM, these
mature S1 and S2 cleavage products
separate without delay, and
S1 is therefore recovered in culture media.
For S
DPR2, and
to a lesser extent for
S
V870A/A1046V, the S1 and S2 cleavage products
remained
associated and both were recovered from cell extracts.
Thus, under the
physiological conditions employed in these experiments
(37°C media at
pH 7.5), the S1 deletion and the double S2 point
mutation stabilized
the S1-S2 hetero-oligomer and increased its
life span on the infected
cell surface. All of these observations
were consistent with the
finding that cells producing the variant
S proteins bound relatively
high levels of sMHVR-Fc (Fig.
4).
Consideration of JHM-specific alternative receptors.
One
explanation for the extended membrane fusion activity of
SJHM with human (HeLa) cells appeals to the existence of a
receptor(s) on nonmurine cells that is specifically recognized by JHM
spikes (32). These putative receptors may trigger
SJHM-induced membrane fusion. Indeed, a growing body of
evidence indicates that some MHV strains can utilize nonmurine CEACAMs
for cross-species transmission of infection (3, 10, 30, 35,
56). However, at present we have no evidence for the involvement
of JHM-specific HeLa cell receptors in our fusion assays; we have never
observed any selective binding of JHM virions to our HeLa target cells.
We favor an alternative explanation for our membrane fusion data (Fig.
3B), in which we suggest that JHM spikes are highly unstable proteins
that simply do not require the free energy of receptor binding to
transit into the fusion-active conformation. This is not to say that
there is no trigger for JHM spikes to convert into fusion-active forms. Indeed, we have found that CEACAM-independent fusion responds to
changes in extracellular pH, a condition that is known to dramatically alter spike protein conformation (61). While
CEACAM-induced fusion by SJHM was largely pH independent,
CEACAM-independent fusion was only observed in cultures incubated at pH
values above ~7.0 (Fig. 6A). This
fusion activity at elevated pH correlated with S1 separation from S2.
When SJHM-bearing cells were first incubated with sMHVR-Fc
at 4°C and then shifted to 37°C at various pH values, S1 release
occurred, and this S1 separation increased at basic pH (Fig. 6B, + gel). Without preincubation with sMHVR-Fc, S1 was still released from
the SJHM-bearing cells, but the extent of release was lower
and was prominent only at basic pH (Fig. 6B,
gel). We conclude that
elevated pH can to some extent replace receptor interaction as a
mediator of both S1-S2 separation and fusion activation.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Effect of pH on SJHM-induced fusion
activation (A) and on S1 separation from cells (B). (A) HeLa ( R) and
HeLa-MHVR (+R) target cells were suspended in ice-cold SFM adjusted to
the indicated pH values and were then deposited onto S-bearing effector
cells by centrifugation. After a 3-h, 37°C cocultivation period, all
cells were dissolved and -galactosidase enzyme activites were
determined and plotted. (B) Release of peripheral S1 fragments into
media was performed. At 12 h postinfection, S-bearing HeLa cells
were radiolabeled for 2 h with [35S]translabel,
rinsed extensively, and then incubated for 3 h at 4°C in SFM
alone ( ) or in SFM containing 10 µg of sMHVR-Fc/ml (+). Cell
monolayers were rinsed and were then incubated for 1 h at 37°C
in buffered DMEM-0.1% FBS adjusted to the indicated pH values. Medium
samples were collected and 35S-labeled S1 fragments were
adsorbed onto Sepharose-sMHVR-Fc beads and visualized by fluorography
after SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Molecular masses are
given in kilodaltons. Only the relevant portions of the fluorograms are
depicted.
|
|
CEACAM-independent membrane fusion by JHM spikes also required
temperatures above 30°C (data not shown). Interestingly, recent
fusion assays performed at highly elevated temperatures revealed
that a
spike point mutant (S
A1046V) that we had deemed incompetent
for CEACAM-independent fusion can induce syncytium formation on
HeLa
cell targets at temperatures above 42°C (E. Thorp and T.
M. Gallagher, unpublished). These findings bring us to a theory
in which
many of the coronavirus spikes can mediate a membrane
fusion reaction
without CEACAM binding, if a sufficiently high
temperature is provided
to create the requisite structural changes.
In this context, the JHM
spikes that we have set apart as uniquely
CEACAM independent would
actually represent an extreme case in
which the mild conditions of
slightly basic pH and physiologic
temperature are sufficient for the
fusion
reaction.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The JHM strain of MHV was selected for rapid growth within the
murine central nervous system. After more than 50 serial passages in
suckling mouse brain, JHM was isolated and investigated as an agent of
neuropathogenesis (9, 66). The spike glycoproteins of this
enveloped virus can promote an unusual intercellular membrane fusion
activity that is not dependent on either acid pH exposure or binding to
the murine CEACAM1a receptor. Therefore, when JHM spikes
are displayed on infected-cell surfaces, adjacent cells need not
express the receptor to be recruited into syncytia. This characteristic
may contribute to the rapid, disseminated, and lethal panencephalitis
that is unique to JHM virus infection (20, 51). In
summary, the prototype JHM spikes are well suited for rapid,
indiscriminate cell-cell membrane fusion.
When stocks of MHV strain JHM are generated by growth in
tissue culture, variants are selected that possess a more tempered cell-cell fusion activity. A reasonable explanation for this selection may rest on the fact that some of our tissue culture cells, in particular 17 cl 1 cells, are relatively resistant to JHM-induced syncytium formation. This prompts us to speculate that prototype JHM
virions may release the hyperactive fusion potential within their
spikes on 17 cl 1 cell surfaces in irreversible and unproductive reactions. On serial passage in these cells, these JHM viruses are
replaced by variant progeny that are less prone to releasing their
potential energy in futile cell surface reactions. These variant
viruses would instead release their membrane fusion potential at later
times in the infection cycle, most likely after virus internalization
and perhaps in response to acidification in the endosome. In summary,
the variant spikes may be well suited for delayed, CEACAM- or
acid-dependent virus-cell fusion reactions, and this activity may
well support efficient infection of tissue culture cells by virions.
S1 deletion variants: delayed membrane fusion reactions.
In
support of our views on coronavirus variation and selection, we
routinely observed that spikes from the tissue culture-adapted S1
deletion variants (S
DPR) were relatively slow in
mediating intercellular fusion, ~30 min slower than prototype
SJHM spikes (Fig. 3A). This delay could not be attributed
to a relatively low affinity of S
DPR for MHV receptors,
nor could it be due to poor presentation of S
DPR on cell
surfaces
variant spikes were in fact far more abundant on effector
cells than was SJHM (Fig. 4). These results suggest that
the efficiency of S1 deletion variant viruses in tissue culture is
related to their delay of the fusion reaction. Interestingly,
internalization of MHV (strain A59) into murine L2 cells was completed
within 40 min (36), and we hypothesize that this endocytic
process precedes the fusion reactions brought about by S1 deletion
variant spikes. Such temporal regulation may improve the efficiency by
which virions deliver genomes to the cytosol.
The deletion of residues within the central portion of S1 also made
spike-induced fusion entirely dependent on MHV receptor
(CEACAM1
a) binding (Fig.
3B). One way of interpreting this
finding is to
suggest that this DPR can change the energy barrier
between native
and fusion-active S conformations such that the free
energy released
upon CEACAM binding becomes critical to the reaction.
It is not
yet clear how the DPR might affect S protein conformation,
but
it is notable that functional homologs of this region may exist
in
spike proteins of retroviruses. A proline-rich region exists
within the
SU portion of murine leukemia virus, and mutations
in this region
affect membrane fusion (
38), modulating envelope
protein
function similarly to the way that S1 deletions impact
coronavirus S
protein functions. It is furthermore remarkable
that mutations in the
retrovirus proline-rich region also change
the stability of the SU-TM
heteromeric interaction (
28), similar
to the increased
S1-S2 stability seen upon removal of the S1 DPR
(Fig.
5). Although
atomic structures for the retroviral proline-rich
regions are not yet
available, existing models suggest that the
residues fold as a series
of beta turns, to generate so-called
polyproline beta-turn helices
(
21). The DPR of the coronavirus
spike is also rich in
proline and glycine, with 10 predicted beta
turns within the
~150-amino-acid consensus deletion region (
11).
This
region is relatively hydrophilic and accessible to antiviral
antibodies
(
26), leading to a view of the DPR as a surface-exposed
removable module. This module regulates the membrane fusion reaction
without noticeably altering the CEACAM-binding
site.
S2 variants: a move toward acid pH-dependent membrane fusion
reactions.
Spike protein-mediated membrane fusion is influenced by
pH, and while some studies indicate increased fusion at elevated pH (61), other reports point toward endosome acidification as
a component of MHV entry (44). Earlier studies of tissue
culture-adapted JHM variants correlated point mutations within the
putative M helix of S2 (Q1067H, Q1094H, L1114R) (Fig. 2) with a strong
conversion to acid pH-dependent fusion activity (25). Such
changes ensure that the membrane fusion reaction is delayed to a time
after virus internalization into acidic endosomes. The V870A and A1046V
mutations identified in this report greatly reduce intercellular fusion activity (Fig. 3A). Very recent findings have revealed that this low
fusion potential of SV870A/A1046V is actually increased by acidification (Thorp and Gallagher, unpublished), making it likely that
we have identified yet another way that S2 can change to create an acid
pH sensor for the fusion reaction.
It is interesting that the mutations identified in this report, V870A
and A1046V, both fit within regions predicted to form
alpha-helical
coiled coils (
58; see also Fig.
2). In attempts
to provide
context, we favor a possibility in which all three
of these putative
helical regions collapse into a low-energy coiled-coil
core during the
process of membrane coalescence. This general
view of stable
coiled-coil formation upon membrane connection
is in keeping with
existing models of protein-mediated membrane
fusion (
65,
67). As for the effects of the alanine-valine
exchanges, we note
that changes in the bulk or the hydrophobicity
of side chains can
impact coiled-coil generation or stability
(
40) or alter
coil conformations (
45). Thus, our current aims
are to
determine whether alpha-helical coiled coils form in S2
fragments and
whether the alanine-valine substitutions change
the pH dependence of
their
formation.
Role of S1 separation from S2 in the fusion reaction.
Relative
to the prototype JHM, spike proteins of the tissue culture-adapted
variants maintained a stable S1-S2 association. This was first inferred
by the relatively high levels of 125I-labeled sMHVR-Fc
bound to cells displaying S
DPR2 and
SV870A/A1046V (Fig. 4) and was subsequently confirmed by
monitoring the posttranslational fate of 35S-labeled spike
proteins. In these studies of metabolically labelled spikes, most of
the S1JHM was recovered from culture media in the absence
of S2, while the majority of S1
DPR2 was recovered from
cell lysates in conjunction with S2 (Fig. 5).
These results are remarkable in revealing the extreme instability of
the S
JHM proteins. That these proteins might have remained
stable during transport to the plasma membrane is suggested by
S1-S2
integrity at pHs of 6.0 to 6.5 (Fig.
6), values equivalent
to that
found in the Golgi and
trans-Golgi network (
17,
69).
This raises the possibility that stable S1-S2 heteromers
might
transit through acidic intracellular organelles and then
encounter
the elevated pH that triggers S1 elution at the cell surface.
This would then induce a CEACAM-independent membrane fusion reaction
(Fig.
6). The continuous presentation of recently synthesized
S
JHM at infected cell surfaces would maintain this
spontaneous
membrane fusion
activity.
It is important to remember that this correlation between S1 elution
and rapid, CEACAM-independent membrane fusion does not
imply that the
reaction requires complete separation of S1 from
S2. It is known that S
proteins rendered uncleavable through site-directed
mutagenesis will
reach infected-cell surfaces and never elute
any S1, yet they will
mediate membrane fusion (
60,
62). Validating
these
results, we found that uncleavable forms of S
JHM were fully
capable of both receptor-triggered and high-pH-triggered membrane
fusion (data not shown). We therefore suggest that the membrane
fusion
reaction involves subtle displacements of S1 from S2 and
that the total
separation of all S1-S2 contacts is, in some cases,
merely an outcome
of this earlier displacement
process.
This S1 displacement hypothesis is consistent with prevailing models of
virus-induced membrane fusion. Models of structural
transitions
in HIV gp120/41, influenza virus HA1/HA2, and paramyxovirus
F2/F1
all include a displacement of peripheral subunits, which
allows
underlying integral subunits to change conformation and
link opposing
membranes via extended alpha-helical coiled coils
(
2,
5,
8). For these proteins as well as for the MHV
spikes,
displacement of peripheral fragments may have to proceed
along a
precise pathway to activate fusion. For example, S
DPR2 may proceed along an unproductive pathway, as S1
DPR2
does
indeed elute to some extent from S2 (Fig.
5), yet
CEACAM-independent
fusion does not take place (Fig.
3B). We suggest
that there are
alternative pathways of conformational change that can
end in
S1-S2 separation but that only a subset of these pathways
proceeds
through the S1 displacement process that produces membrane
fusion.
Role of the murine CEACAM receptor in the fusion reaction.
While changes in membrane fusion potential were observed after tissue
culture adaptation, the binding sites for the prototype CEACAM1a receptor by contrast remain unaffected (Fig. 4).
This maintenance of the receptor-binding site is perhaps not
surprising, because the tissue cultures that we have used for JHM
isolation and growth are HeLa-MHVR and 17 cl 1, both of which produce
the prototype murine CEACAM1a receptors. There is
apparently little pressure to amplify mutants with altered receptor
specificity. This issue brings up a related question, regarding the
possibility that JHM spikes have a unique receptor specificity which we
have not identified in this study. Indeed, the promiscuous
CEACAM1a-independent fusion activity of JHM spikes has
generated suggestions that they may uniquely recognize alternative, as
yet undiscovered, receptors that act as specific fusion triggers
(32). However, to appeal for the existence of an
alternative receptor(s) that specifically recognizes JHM spikes and
triggers fusion, one must argue that two disparate types of spike
variation, S1 deletions and S2 point mutations, would each render this
hypothetical receptor unrecognizable. This elimination of alternative
receptor-binding site(s) would have to occur without any effect on the
binding site for the primary CEACAM1a receptor (Fig. 4).
The hypothetical JHM-specific receptor would also have to trigger
membrane fusion exclusively at elevated pH (Fig. 6) and at temperatures
above 30°C. The alternative receptors would have to exist on rabbit
(RK13) and hamster (BHK) cells as well as human (HeLa) cells, as these
cell types also formed syncytia in response to SJHM
(24). While all of these conditions might be met by a
novel alternative receptor(s), we favor a view of JHM spike-induced
membrane fusion that is not dependent on any receptor binding.
It appears then that the JHM strain of MHV has adapted to a lifestyle
involving intercellular dissemination of infection via
syncytium
formation. In this context the instability of the S
JHM proteins on the cell surface is not a serious disadvantage

all
that is
necessary is that some of the proteins continuously reach
the surface
near an adjacent cell and then rapidly promote membrane
fusion. This
type of intercellular spread to cells lacking the
MHV receptor may in
fact be advantageous in vivo. In other contexts,
such as the tissue
culture environment, serial infections may
be most effective with
extracellular virions containing relatively
stable spikes. Virions with
these stabilized spikes have the alternative
advantage of delaying
irreversible fusion reactions to times after
internalization.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grant
R01-NS-31616.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology and Immunology, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 South First Ave., Maywood, IL 60153. Phone: (708) 216-4850. Fax: (708) 216-9574. E-mail: tgallag{at}luc.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alkhatib, G.,
C. C. Broder, and E. A. Berger.
1996.
Cell-type-specific fusion cofactors determine human immunodeficiency virus type 1 tropism for T-cell lines versus primary macrophages.
J. Virol.
70:5487-5494[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Baker, K. A.,
R. E. Dutch,
R. A. Lamb, and T. S. Jardetzky.
1999.
Structural basis for paramyxovirus-mediated membrane fusion.
Mol. Cell
3:309-319[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Baric, R. S.,
E. Sullivan,
L. Hensley,
B. Yount, and W. Chen.
1999.
Persistent infection promotes cross-species transmissibility of mouse hepatitis virus.
J. Virol.
73:638-649[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Beauchemin, N.,
P. Draber,
G. Dveksler,
P. Gold,
S. Gray-Owen,
F. Grunert,
S. Hammarstrom,
K. Holmes,
A. Karlsson,
M. Kuroki,
S.-H. Lin,
L. Lucka,
S. Najjar,
M. Neumaier,
B. Obrink,
J. Shively,
K. Skubitz,
C. Stanners, and P. Thomas.
1999.
Redefined nomenclature for members of the carcinoembryonic antigen family.
Exp. Cell Res.
252:243-249[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Bullough, P. A.,
F. M. Hughson,
J. J. Skehel, and D. C. Wiley.
1994.
Structure of influenza haemagglutinin at the pH of membrane fusion.
Nature
371:37-43[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Carr, C. M.,
C. Chaudhry, and P. S. Kim.
1997.
Influenza hemagglutinin is spring-loaded by a metastable native conformation.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:14306-14313[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Cavanagh, D.
1995.
The coronavirus surface glycoprotein, p. 73-115.
In
S. G. Siddell (ed.), The Coronaviridae. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 8.
|
Chan, D. C.,
D. Fass,
J. M. Berger, and P. S. Kim.
1997.
Core structure of gp41 from the HIV envelope glycoprotein.
Cell
89:263-273[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Cheever, F. S.,
J. B. Daniels,
A. M. Pappenheimer, and O. T. Bailey.
1949.
A murine virus (JHM) causing disseminated encephalomyelitis with extensive destruction of myelin: isolation and biological properties of the virus.
J. Exp. Med.
90:181-194[Abstract].
|
| 10.
|
Chen, D. S.,
M. Asanaka,
F. S. Chen,
J. E. Shively, and M. M. C. Lai.
1997.
Human carcinoembryonic antigen and biliary glycoprotein can serve as mouse hepatitis virus receptors.
J. Virol.
71:1688-1691[Abstract].
|
| 11.
|
Chou, P. Y., and G. D. Fasman.
1978.
Empirical predictions of protein conformation.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
47:251-276[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Dalziel, R. G.,
P. W. Lampert,
P. J. Talbot, and M. J. Buchmeier.
1986.
Site-specific alteration of murine hepatitis virus type 4 peplomer glycoprotein E2 results in reduced neurovirulence.
J. Virol.
59:463-471[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Damico, R. L.,
J. Crane, and P. Bates.
1998.
Receptor-triggered membrane association of a model retroviral glycoprotein.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:2580-2585[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Das Sarma, J.,
L. Fu,
J. C. Tsai,
S. R. Weiss, and E. Lavi.
2000.
Demyelination determinants map to the spike glycoprotein gene of coronavirus mouse hepatitis virus.
J. Virol.
74:9206-9213[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Davies, H. A., and M. R. Macnaughton.
1979.
Comparison of the morphology of three coronaviruses.
Arch. Virol.
59:25-33[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
de Groot, R. J.,
W. Luytjes,
M. C. Horzinek,
B. A. M. van der Zeijst,
W. J. M. Spaan, and J. A. Lenstra.
1987.
Evidence for a coiled-coil structure in the spike proteins of coronaviruses.
J. Mol. Biol.
196:963-966[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Demaurex, N.,
W. Furuya,
S. D'Souza,
J. S. Bonifacino, and S. Grinstein.
1998.
Mechanism of acidification of the trans-Golgi network: in situ measurements of pH using retrieval of TGN38 and furin from the cell surface.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:2044-2051[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Dveksler, G. S.,
M. N. Pensiero,
C. B. Cardellichio,
R. K. Williams,
G.-S. Jiang,
K. V. Holmes, and C. W. Dieffenbach.
1991.
Cloning of the mouse hepatitis virus (MHV) receptor: expression in human and hamster cell lines confers susceptibility to MHV.
J. Virol.
65:6881-6891[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Dveksler, G. S.,
M. N. Pensiero,
C. W. Dieffenbach,
C. B. Cardellichio,
A. A. Basile,
P. E. Elia, and K. V. Holmes.
1993.
Mouse coronavirus MHV-A59 and blocking anti-receptor monoclonal antibody bind to the N-terminal domain of cellular receptor MHVR.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:1716-1720[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Fazakerley, J. K.,
S. E. Parker,
F. Bloom, and M. J. Buchmeier.
1992.
The V5A13.1 envelope glycoprotein deletion mutant of mouse hepatitis virus type-4 is neuroattenuated by its reduced rate of spread in the central nervous system.
Virology
187:178-188[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Fontenot, J. D.,
N. Tjandra,
C. Ho,
P. C. Andrews, and R. C. Montelaro.
1994.
Structure and self assembly of a retrovirus (FeL V) proline rich neutralization domain.
J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn.
11:821-837[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Fuerst, T. R.,
P. L. Earl, and B. Moss.
1987.
Use of a hybrid vaccinia virus-T7 RNA polymerase system for expression of target genes.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7:2538-2544[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Gallagher, T. M.
1997.
A role for naturally occurring variation of the murine coronavirus spike protein in stabilizing association with the cellular receptor.
J. Virol.
71:3129-3137[Abstract].
|
| 24.
|
Gallagher, T. M.,
M. J. Buchmeier, and S. Perlman.
1992.
Cell receptor-independent infection by a neurotropic murine coronavirus.
Virology
191:517-522[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Gallagher, T. M.,
C. Escarmis, and M. J. Buchmeier.
1991.
Alteration of the pH dependence of coronavirus-induced cell fusion: effect of mutations in the spike glycoprotein.
J. Virol.
65:1916-1928[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Gallagher, T. M.,
S. E. Parker, and M. J. Buchmeier.
1990.
Neutralization-resistant variants of a neurotropic coronavirus are generated by deletions within the amino-terminal half of the spike glycoprotein.
J. Virol.
64:731-741[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Gossen, M., and H. Bujard.
1992.
Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
89:5547-5551[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Gray, K. D., and M. J. Roth.
1993.
Mutational analysis of the envelope gene of Moloney murine leukemia virus.
J. Virol.
67:3489-3496[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Grosse, B., and S. G. Siddell.
1994.
Single amino acid changes in the S2 subunit of the MHV surface glycoprotein confer resistance to neutralization by S1 subunit-specific monoclonal antibody.
Virology
202:814-824[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Hensley, L. E., and R. S. Baric.
1998.
Human biliary glycoproteins function as receptors for interspecies transfer of mouse hepatitis virus.
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
440:43-52[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Hensley, L. E.,
K. V. Holmes,
N. Beauchemin, and R. S. Baric.
1998.
Virus-receptor interactions and interspecies transfer of a mouse hepatitis virus.
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
440:33-41[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Holmes, K. V., and G. S. Dveksler.
1994.
Specificity of coronavirus/receptor interactions, p. 403-443.
In
E. Wimmer (ed.), Cellular receptors for animal viruses. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 33.
|
Kasahara, N.,
A. M. Dozy, and Y. W. Kan.
1994.
Tissue-specific targeting of retroviral vectors through ligand-receptor interactions.
Science
266:1373-1376[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Kilby, J. M.,
S. Hopkins,
T. M. Venetta,
B. DiMassimo,
G. A. Cloud,
J. Y. Lee,
L. Alldredge,
E. Hunter,
D. Lambert,
D. Bolognesi,
T. Matthews,
M. R. Johnson,
M. A. Nowak,
G. M. Shaw, and M. S. Saag.
1998.
Potent suppression of HIV-1 replication in humans by T-20, a peptide inhibitor of gp41-mediated virus entry.
Nat. Med.
4:1302-1307[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Koetters, P. J.,
L. Hassanieh,
S. A. Stohlman,
T. M. Gallagher, and M. M. C. Lai.
1999.
Mouse hepatitis virus strain JHM infects a human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line.
Virology
264:398-409[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Kooi, C.,
L. Mizzen,
C. Alderson,
M. Daya, and R. Anderson.
1988.
Early events of importance in determining host cell permissiveness to mouse hepatitis virus infection.
J. Gen. Virol.
69:1125-1135[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Kubo, H.,
Y. K. Yamada, and F. Taguchi.
1994.
Localization of neutralizing epitopes and the receptor-binding site within the amino-terminal 330 amino acids of the murine coronavirus spike protein.
J. Virol.
68:5403-5410[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Lavillette, D.,
M. Maurice,
C. Roche,
S. J. Russell,
M. Sitbon, and F.-L. Cosset.
1998.
A proline-rich motif downstream of the receptor binding domain modulates conformation and fusogenicity of murine retroviral envelopes.
J. Virol.
72:9955-9965[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Leparc-Goffart, I.,
S. T. Hingley,
M. M. Chua,
J. Phillips,
E. Lavi, and S. R. Weiss.
1998.
Targeted recombination within the spike gene of murine coronavirus mouse hepatitis virus-A59: Q159 is a determinant of hepatotropism.
J. Virol.
72:9628-9636[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Lu, M.,
H. Ji, and S. Shen.
1999.
Subdomain folding and biological activity of the core structure from human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp41: implications for viral membrane fusion.
J. Virol.
73:4433-4438[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Luo, Z., and S. R. Weiss.
1998.
Roles in cell-to-cell fusion of two conserved hydrophobic regions in the murine coronavirus spike protein.
Virology
244:483-494[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
MacGregor, G. R.,
G. P. Nolan,
S. Fiering,
M. Roederer, and L. Herzenberg.
1991.
Use of E. coli lacZ as a reporter gene.
In
E. J. Murray (ed.), Gene transfer and expression protocols, vol. 7. Humana Press, Clifton, N.J.
|
| 43.
|
Mackett, M.,
G. L. Smith, and B. Moss.
1984.
General method for production and selection of infectious vaccinia virus recombinants expressing foreign genes.
J. Virol.
49:857-864[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Mizzen, L.,
A. Hilton,
S. Cheley, and R. Anderson.
1985.
Attenuation of murine coronavirus infection by ammonium chloride.
Virology
142:378-388[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Monera, O. D.,
N. E. Zhou,
P. Lavigne,
C. M. Kay, and R. S. Hodges.
1996.
Formation of parallel and antiparallel coiled-coils controlled by the relative positions of alanine residues in the hydrophobic core.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:3995-4001[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Moore, J. P.,
J. A. McKeating,
Y. Huang,
A. Ashkenazi, and D. D. Ho.
1992.
Virions of primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates resistant to soluble CD4 (sCD4) neutralization differ in sCD4 binding and glycoprotein gp120 retention from sCD4-sensitive isolates.
J. Virol.
66:235-243[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Mothes, W.,
A. L. Boerger,
S. Narayan,
J. M. Cunningham, and J. A. T. Young.
2000.
Retroviral entry mediated by receptor priming and low pH triggering of an envelope glycoprotein.
Cell
103:679-689[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Nussbaum, O.,
C. C. Broder, and E. A. Berger.
1994.
Fusogenic mechanisms of enveloped-virus glycoproteins analyzed by a novel recombinant vaccinia virus-based assay quantitating cell fusion-dependent reporter gene activation.
J. Virol.
68:5411-5422[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Opstelten, D.-J. E.,
M. J. B. Raamsman,
K. Wolfs,
M. C. Horzinek, and P. J. M. Rottier.
1995.
Envelope glycoprotein interactions in coronavirus assembly.
J. Cell Biol.
131:339-349[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Parker, S. E.,
T. M. Gallagher, and M. J. Buchmeier.
1989.
Sequence analysis reveals extensive polymorphism and evidence of deletions within the E2 glycoprotein of several strains of murine hepatitis virus.
Virology
173:664-673[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Pearce, B. D.,
M. V. Hobbs,
T. S. McGraw, and M. J. Buchmeier.
1994.
Cytokine induction during T-cell-mediated clearance of mouse hepatitis virus from neurons in vivo.
J. Virol.
68:5483-5495[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Perlman, S.
1998.
Pathogenesis of coronavirus-induced infections.
Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.
440:503-513[Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Rao, P. V., and T. M. Gallagher.
1998.
Intracellular complexes of viral spike and cellular receptor accumulate during cytopathic murine coronavirus infections.
J. Virol.
72:3278-3288[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 54.
|
Rowe, C. L.,
S. C. Baker,
M. J. Nathan, and J. O. Fleming.
1997.
Evolution of mouse hepatitis virus: detection and characterization of spike deletion variants during persistent infection.
J. Virol.
71:2959-2969[Abstract].
|
| 55.
|
Sánchez, C. M.,
A. Izeta,
J. M. Sánchez-Morgado,
S. Alonso,
I. Sola,
M. Balasch,
J. Plana-Durán, and L. Enjuanes.
1999.
Targeted recombination demonstrates that the spike gene of transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus is a determinant of its enteric tropism and virulence.
J. Virol.
73:7607-7618[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 56.
|
Schickli, J. H.,
B. D. Zelus,
D. E. Wentworth,
S. G. Sawicki, and K. V. Holmes.
1997.
The murine coronavirus mouse hepatitis virus strain A59 from persistently infected murine cells exhibits an extended host range.
J. Virol.
71:9499-9507[Abstract].
|
| 57.
|
Siddell, S. G.
1995.
The Coronaviridae: an introduction, p. 1-10.
In
S. G. Siddell (ed.), The Coronaviridae. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 58.
|
Singh, M.,
B. Berger, and P. S. Kim.
1999.
LearnCoil-VMF: computational evidence for coiled-coil-like motifs in many viral membrane fusion proteins.
J. Mol. Biol.
290:1031-1041[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 59.
|
Skehel, J. J., and D. C. Wiley.
1998.
Coiled coils in both intracellular vesicle and viral membrane fusion.
Cell
95:871-874[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 60.
|
Stauber, R.,
M. Pfleiderara, and S. Siddell.
1993.
Proteolytic cleavage of the murine coronavirus surface glycoprotein is not required for fusion activity.
J. Gen. Virol.
74:183-191[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 61.
|
Sturman, L. S.,
C. S. Ricard, and K. V. Holmes.
1990.
Conformational change of the coronavirus peplomer glycoprotein at pH 8.0 and 37°C correlates with virus aggregation and virus-induced cell fusion.
J. Virol.
64:3042-3050[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 62.
|
Taguchi, F.
1993.
Fusion formation by the uncleaved spike protein of murine coronavirus JHMV variant cl-2.
J. Virol.
67:1195-1202[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 63.
|
Taguchi, F., and J. O. Fleming.
1989.
Comparison of six different murine coronavirus JHM variants by monoclonal antibodies against the E2 glycoprotein.
Virology
169:233-235[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 64.
|
Vennema, H.,
L. Heignen,
A. Zijderveld,
M. C. Horzinek, and W. J. M. Spaan.
1990.
Intracellular transport of recombinant coronavirus spike proteins: implications for virus assembly.
J. Virol.
64:339-346[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 65.
|
Weber, T.,
B. V. Zemelman,
J. A. McNew,
B. Westermann,
M. Gmachl,
F. Parlati,
T. H. Sollner, and J. E. Rothman.
1998.
SNAREpins: minimal machinery for membrane fusion.
Cell
92:759-772[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 66.
|
Weiner, L. P.
1973.
Pathogenesis of demyelination induced by a mouse hepatitis virus (JHM virus).
Arch. Neurol.
28:298-303[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 67.
|
Weissenhorn, W.,
A. Dessen,
S. C. Harrison,
J. J. Skehel, and D. C. Wiley.
1997.
Atomic structure of the ectodomain from HIV-1 gp41.
Nature
387:426-430[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 68.
|
White, J. M.
1992.
Membrane fusion.
Science
258:917-924[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 69.
|
Wu, M. M.,
J. Llopis,
S. Adams,
J. M. McCaffery,
M. S. Kulomaa,
T. E. Machen,
H. P. Moore, and R. Y. Tsien.
2000.
Organelle pH studies using targeted avidin and fluorescein-biotin.
Chem. Biol.
7:197-209[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, March 2001, p. 2792-2802, Vol. 75, No. 6
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.6.2792-2802.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
York, J., Dai, D., Amberg, S. M., Nunberg, J. H.
(2008). pH-Induced Activation of Arenavirus Membrane Fusion Is Antagonized by Small-Molecule Inhibitors. J. Virol.
82: 10932-10939
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ren, W., Qu, X., Li, W., Han, Z., Yu, M., Zhou, P., Zhang, S.-Y., Wang, L.-F., Deng, H., Shi, Z.
(2008). Difference in Receptor Usage between Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus and SARS-Like Coronavirus of Bat Origin. J. Virol.
82: 1899-1907
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Miura, T. A., Travanty, E. A., Oko, L., Bielefeldt-Ohmann, H., Weiss, S. R., Beauchemin, N., Holmes, K. V.
(2008). The Spike Glycoprotein of Murine Coronavirus MHV-JHM Mediates Receptor-Independent Infection and Spread in the Central Nervous Systems of Ceacam1a / Mice. J. Virol.
82: 755-763
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
de Haan, C. A. M., te Lintelo, E., Li, Z., Raaben, M., Wurdinger, T., Bosch, B. J., Rottier, P. J. M.
(2006). Cooperative Involvement of the S1 and S2 Subunits of the Murine Coronavirus Spike Protein in Receptor Binding and Extended Host Range. J. Virol.
80: 10909-10918
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Anghelina, D., Pewe, L., Perlman, S.
(2006). Pathogenic Role for Virus-Specific CD4 T Cells in Mice with Coronavirus-Induced Acute Encephalitis. Am. J. Pathol.
169: 209-222
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yu, I-M., Oldham, M. L., Zhang, J., Chen, J.
(2006). Crystal Structure of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Protein Dimerization Domain Reveals Evolutionary Linkage between Corona- and Arteriviridae. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 17134-17139
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Watanabe, R., Matsuyama, S., Taguchi, F.
(2006). Receptor-independent infection of murine coronavirus: analysis by spinoculation.. J. Virol.
80: 4901-4908
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Thorp, E. B., Boscarino, J. A., Logan, H. L., Goletz, J. T., Gallagher, T. M.
(2006). Palmitoylations on Murine Coronavirus Spike Proteins Are Essential for Virion Assembly and Infectivity. J. Virol.
80: 1280-1289
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Weiss, S. R., Navas-Martin, S.
(2005). Coronavirus Pathogenesis and the Emerging Pathogen Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
69: 635-664
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rottier, P. J. M., Nakamura, K., Schellen, P., Volders, H., Haijema, B. J.
(2005). Acquisition of Macrophage Tropism during the Pathogenesis of Feline Infectious Peritonitis Is Determined by Mutations in the Feline Coronavirus Spike Protein. J. Virol.
79: 14122-14130
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Servin, A. L.
(2005). Pathogenesis of Afa/Dr Diffusely Adhering Escherichia coli. Clin. Microbiol. Rev.
18: 264-292
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
St-Jean, J. R., Jacomy, H., Desforges, M., Vabret, A., Freymuth, F., Talbot, P. J.
(2004). Human Respiratory Coronavirus OC43: Genetic Stability and Neuroinvasion. J. Virol.
78: 8824-8834
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Babcock, G. J., Esshaki, D. J., Thomas, W. D. Jr., Ambrosino, D. M.
(2004). Amino Acids 270 to 510 of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Protein Are Required for Interaction with Receptor. J. Virol.
78: 4552-4560
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Thorp, E. B., Gallagher, T. M.
(2004). Requirements for CEACAMs and Cholesterol during Murine Coronavirus Cell Entry. J. Virol.
78: 2682-2692
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ontiveros, E., Kim, T. S., Gallagher, T. M., Perlman, S.
(2003). Enhanced Virulence Mediated by the Murine Coronavirus, Mouse Hepatitis Virus Strain JHM, Is Associated with a Glycine at Residue 310 of the Spike Glycoprotein. J. Virol.
77: 10260-10269
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bosch, B. J., van der Zee, R., de Haan, C. A. M., Rottier, P. J. M.
(2003). The Coronavirus Spike Protein Is a Class I Virus Fusion Protein: Structural and Functional Characterization of the Fusion Core Complex. J. Virol.
77: 8801-8811
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bonavia, A., Zelus, B. D., Wentworth, D. E., Talbot, P. J., Holmes, K. V.
(2003). Identification of a Receptor-Binding Domain of the Spike Glycoprotein of Human Coronavirus HCoV-229E. J. Virol.
77: 2530-2538
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zelus, B. D., Schickli, J. H., Blau, D. M., Weiss, S. R., Holmes, K. V.
(2002). Conformational Changes in the Spike Glycoprotein of Murine Coronavirus Are Induced at 37{degrees}C either by Soluble Murine CEACAM1 Receptors or by pH 8. J. Virol.
77: 830-840
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tsai, J. C., Zelus, B. D., Holmes, K. V., Weiss, S. R.
(2002). The N-Terminal Domain of the Murine Coronavirus Spike Glycoprotein Determines the CEACAM1 Receptor Specificity of the Virus Strain. J. Virol.
77: 841-850
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Matsuyama, S., Taguchi, F.
(2002). Receptor-Induced Conformational Changes of Murine Coronavirus Spike Protein. J. Virol.
76: 11819-11826
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bossart, K. N., Wang, L.-F., Flora, M. N., Chua, K. B., Lam, S. K., Eaton, B. T., Broder, C. C.
(2002). Membrane Fusion Tropism and Heterotypic Functional Activities of the Nipah Virus and Hendra Virus Envelope Glycoproteins. J. Virol.
76: 11186-11198
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lewicki, D. N., Gallagher, T. M.
(2002). Quaternary Structure of Coronavirus Spikes in Complex with Carcinoembryonic Antigen-related Cell Adhesion Molecule Cellular Receptors. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 19727-19734
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Taguchi, F., Matsuyama, S.
(2002). Soluble Receptor Potentiates Receptor-Independent Infection by Murine Coronavirus. J. Virol.
76: 950-958
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wurzer, W. J., Obojes, K., Vlasak, R.
(2002). The sialate-4-O-acetylesterases of coronaviruses related to mouse hepatitis virus: a proposal to reorganize group 2 Coronaviridae. J. Gen. Virol.
83: 395-402
[Abstract]
[Full Text]