 |
INTRODUCTION |
Infection with human
immunodeficiency virus type 1 or 2 (HIV-1 or -2) causes AIDS, one of
the leading causes of death in young adults globally. Tat-1 and Tat-2,
the transactivator proteins of HIV-1 and HIV-2, respectively, are
crucial for effective viral replication. Though their modes of action
are still not completely understood, the Tat proteins are unique among
eukaryotic viral transactivators in that they bind to the 5' end of the
viral RNA transcript in the Tat activation response (TAR) region and
mediate transactivation by affecting multiple levels of transcriptional regulation. While early studies focused on the direct interactions between Tat and TAR in both HIV-1 and HIV-2, it has become increasingly clear that Tat also requires cellular cofactors to allow it to function
as an initiator of transcription and elongator of viral transcripts in
vivo (16, 34). Though the TAR regions of HIV-1 and HIV-2
differ, both appear to mediate transactivation of the HIV promoters by
recruiting Tat and cellular cofactors to the nascent RNA transcript,
where they can interact with the RNA polymerase II (Pol II) complex.
DNA elements in the promoter are also needed for effective Tat
function, further supporting the involvement of cellular accessory
proteins in the transactivation of HIVs by Tat. For example, the TATA
box, part of the core DNA promoter region of HIV, is necessary for
effective Tat function (22, 23), and Tat has been shown to
associate with the TATA box binding protein (TBP) (29,
64).
We have been studying the effect on retroviral transcription of a
protein first identified as binding to a TG-rich element in the human
T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) promoter, the Tax helper protein
(THP) (60). Subsequent analysis has shown that THP, a
protein with five zinc fingers, is highly likely to be an isoform of
human GLI-2 (59). GLI family members are widely conserved
in nature, being found in nematodes (tra-1 [45, 71, 72]), Drosophila (cubitus interruptus [2, 12,
25]), Xenopus (36), mice (23, 39,
65), zebrafish (28), and humans (GLI-1, GLI-2/THP,
and GLI-3 [27, 55]). They are involved in sex
determination (tra-1), multiple aspects of Drosophila
development controlled by Hedgehog signaling (cubitus interruptus), and
craniofacial, limb, lung, and/or esophagus development in mice (GLI-2
and GLI-3 [41]), zebrafish (GLI-2 [28]),
and humans (GLI-3 and presumably GLI-2). In addition, GLI-1 and GLI-2
show increased expression in certain glioblastoma multiforme tumors,
although a causal relationship has not been clearly established
(32, 48, 51, 55, 67). More recently, overexpression of
GLI-1 has been linked to basal cell carcinomas (10, 25).
GLI-2/THP has been shown to interact with a DNA promoter element in
HTLV-1 that is similar to the peri-ets (pets) site of the HIV-2
enhancer, the latter being an enhancer element that is induced
following T-cell and monocytic activation (8, 21, 37). As
we found that GLI-2/THP could also bind to the HIV-2 pets site, we
tested the effects of GLI-2/THP on HIV-2 promoter activity and found
that it caused a large increase in HIV-2 gene expression in cells also
stimulated with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA). However,
surprisingly our studies revealed that pets and other previously
delineated enhancer elements of HIV-2 were not needed for the GLI-2/THP
activation function, suggesting that the GLI-2/THP effect may be
mediated by more central mechanisms (56a). In
investigating the mechanism of action by which GLI-2/THP activates the
HIV-2 promoter, we found that GLI-2/THP can physically interact with
TBP and with Tat, two proteins previously shown to associate with each
other (29). Further, GLI-2/THP and Tat strongly synergize
to activate both the HIV-1 and HIV-2 promoters. In addition, GLI-2/THP
and Tat synergize with the previously described Tat cofactor cyclin T
(14, 66). It was also observed that overexpression of
GLI-2/THP markedly stimulates viral replication. Interestingly, synergy
between GLI-2/THP and Tat is seen even in the absence of the Tat
binding element TAR. However, the TATA box, the site of TBP interaction
with the promoter, is needed for this synergy to occur, as is the TBP
binding site of the Tat protein. These data suggest that GLI-2/THP is a
Tat cofactor which markedly activates HIV transcription via a
completely unexpected mechanism.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmids.
The HIV-1 pHXB2 infectious clone has been
described elsewhere (18). The NL4-3-derived HIV-1
infectious clone was provided by Kathleen Collins, University of
Michigan. The HIV-1 and HIV-2 long terminal repeat-chloramphenicol
acetyltransferase (CAT) reporter constructs (HIV-1/CAT and HIV-2/CAT)
have been described previously (13, 57). The HIV-1
mutation
TATA plasmid was provided by Gary Nabel (41).
The HIV-2
stem plasmid and the HIV-1 (TAR del) plasmid have been
described elsewhere (5, 52). The GLI-2/THP expression
plasmid pCG-THP-2 was constructed and provided by Mitsuaki Yoshida
(60). The GLI-2/THP-glutathione S-transferase
(GST) bacterial fusion protein construct was made by using PCR to add in-frame BamHI sites to the end of the GLI-2/THP coding
sequence and cloning the full-length THP-2 isoform BamHI
fragment (63) into pGEX-2TK (Pharmacia). The clone
expressing full-length human cyclin T1 under the control of the
cytomegalovirus immediate-early promoter is a modification of a similar
construct (14). The Tat-1 plasmid, in which Tat expression
is driven by the Rous sarcoma virus promoter, has been described
elsewhere (11). The Tat-2 plasmid containing the entire
Tat gene without introns and under the control of the Rous sarcoma
virus promoter was a gift from Sandra Tong-Starksen (63).
The Tat exon 1 from the HIV-1 B strain of an infected individual
(40) and mutant Tat clones were generated by PCR and
ligated into the HindIII-PstI site of the
expression vector pcDNA3.1/Neo (Invitrogen). Two mutations in the TBP
binding domain were introduced in different constructs. The B.E.
mutation changes the conserved lysine at position 41 to a glutamic acid residue, and the B.T. mutation alters it to a threonine. These mutations are analogous to those in the Tat-1 point mutants that were
shown by Kashanchi et al. (29) to be defective in TBP
binding, and both Tat-B.E. and Tat-B.T. proteins fail to interact with TBP in in vitro binding assays (data not shown). The molecular clones
were confirmed by sequencing using a model 373 ABI automated sequencer.
The sequences of the DNA oligonucleotides used to create the wild-type
and mutant Tat plasmids are as follows: external primer Hind III-Btat+,
5'-CCA AGC TTA CCT GCC ATG GAG CCA GTA GAT CCT AGA CTA GAG CCC-3';
external primer Pst I-Btat-, 5'-A AAC TGC AGT TAC TGC TTT
GAT AAA AAA ACT TGA TGA GTC-3'; internal primer K41T+,
5'-T TTC ATA ACA ACA GGC CTA GGC A 3'; internal primer
K41T
, 5'-T GCC TAG GCC TGT TGT TAT GAA A-3'; internal primer K41E+, 5'-T TTC ATA ACA GAA GGC CTA GGC A-3';
and internal primer K41E-, 5'-T GCC TAG GCC TTC TGT TAT GAA
A-3'.
GST pull-down assays.
Escherichia coli JM109
cells were transformed with a pGEX-2TK vector containing the sequence
for GLI-2/THP or an empty pGEX-2TK vector. Recombinant GLI-2/THP-GST
protein or GST alone was induced by treatment of the culture with 1 mM
isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside for 3 h, and
recombinant protein was extracted as suggested by the manufacturer
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Extracts were analyzed by sodium dodecyl
sulfate (SDS) polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) on a 10% gel
and Coomassie blue staining to confirm expression of recombinant
protein. Crude GLI-2/THP-GST extract was incubated with a 10-µl bed
volume of glutathione-Sepharose 4B resin (Pharmacia) for 1 h at
4°C and washed three times with 200 µl of incubation buffer A (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.9], 75 mM KCl, 2.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM dithiotheitol, 0.1% NP-40). An equivalent amount of GST-only extract was similarly incubated with glutathione-Sepharose 4B resin and washed
for use as a negative control. A 10% slurry of GST or GLI-2/THP-GST bound to glutathione-Sepharose 4B was incubated at 4°C for 2 h with 8 µl of [35S]methionine-labeled, in
vitro-transcribed/translated protein (TBP, Tat-1, Sp1, or the TFIIE
or TFIIE
subunit) which had been made using a TNT kit (Promega).
The mixture was washed three times with 0.5 ml of incubation buffer B
(identical to incubation buffer A but containing 150 mM KCl) to remove
any protein not attached to GST. The resin and attached proteins were
suspended in SDS loading buffer and boiled for 1 min, and the released
protein was resolved by SDS-PAGE (10% gel). The gel was enhanced by
treatment with Amplify (Amersham) and subjected to autoradiography.
Antibodies.
The anti-GLI-2/THP polyclonal serum was
generated in a rabbit using the purified GST fusion protein of the
THP-2 isoform.
Cell culture and transfections.
The 293 and NIH 3T3 cell
lines were transfected by the calcium phosphate method
(38). The Jurkat T-cell line and the U937 monocytic cell
line were grown in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum,
2 µM L-glutamine, and penicillin-streptomycin. For the
reporter gene (CAT) assays, 5 × 106 cells were
transfected by the DEAE-dextran method (47), stimulated where indicated with 16 nM PMA after 20 h, and harvested after an
additional 24 h of incubation. Cell lysates were prepared by multiple freeze-thaw cycles in 0.25 M Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), and CAT activity was assayed by standard methods (17).
Transfection efficiencies were normalized for protein concentration
using the Bio-Rad reagent. CAT activity was quantitated on a Betagen
beta scanner.
Viral replication.
HIV-1 replication was assessed using the
reverse transcriptase (RT) assay as described elsewhere
(1).
 |
RESULTS |
GLI-2/THP interacts with Tat.
Previous experiments suggested
that GLI-2/THP modulated HIV transcription not through the predicted
TG-rich GLI binding sites but rather through interaction with basal
transcription factors (56a). In the process of
investigating the interactions between GLI-2/THP and the basal
transcription factors, we analyzed a HeLa nuclear extract that had been
passed over a Tat-1 affinity column. A Western blot showed that
GLI-2/THP or a related protein was in the fraction which bound to Tat
(not shown), suggesting that Tat might associate biochemically with
GLI-2/THP. The ability of Tat and GLI-2/THP to physically interact was
confirmed by GST pull-down experiments (Fig. 1A and
B). This biochemical interaction suggested that GLI-2/THP might potentiate transactivation by Tat.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
GLI-2/THP interacts biochemically with TBP and Tat-1.
Apparent mass in kilodaltons is indicated at the left in each panel.
(A) 35S-labeled reticulocyte lysate-translated input
proteins used in GST pull-down assays. Approximately 25% of the
quantity of Tat-1, TBP, Sp1, TFIIE , or TFIIE used in the
binding reactions in panels B and C is shown in lanes 1 through 5. Proteins in lanes 1 to 4 were resolved on an SDS-12% polyacrylamide
gel; in vitro transcribed-translated HIV-1 Tat (lane 5) was run on an
SDS-15% polyacrylamide gel. (B) GLI-2/THP interacts specifically with
Tat-1. 35S-labeled reticulocyte lysate-translated Tat-1 was
incubated with resin-bound GLI-2/THP-GST (lane 1) or GST alone (lane
2), the reaction mixture was washed, and residual bound proteins were
resolved on an SDS-15% polyacrylamide gel. Tat-1 bound to
GLI-2/THP-GST but not to GST alone. (C) GLI-2/THP binds specifically to
TBP. Resin-bound GLI-2/THP-GST was incubated with
35S-labeled reticulocyte lysate-translated Sp1 (lane 1),
TBP (lane 2), TFIIE (lane 3), or TFIIE (lane 4). The reaction
mixtures were washed, and residual bound protein was resolved on an
SDS-10% polyacrylamide gel. Only TBP bound GLI-2/THP-GST.
|
|
GLI-2/THP can strongly synergize with Tat-1 or Tat-2 to activate
HIV gene expression.
Using cotransfection assays, we next examined
whether GLI-2/THP might function as a Tat cofactor for HIV-1 or HIV-2.
For these studies, we used the Tat expression vectors and the HIV
promoter-driven CAT plasmids at limiting concentrations, in order to
detect potentiation of the Tat effect. When these limiting quantities
are used, there was only a weak Tat-induced boost in HIV-1 promoter
activity, even in cells treated with PMA (Fig. 2A and
B). However, transactivation was markedly
increased by the expression of GLI-2/THP, demonstrating synergy between
Tat and GLI-2/THP in the HIV-1 system (Fig. 2A and B). Stimulation of
the cells with PMA did not increase the expression of GLI-2/THP
(56a) but was necessary to potentiate the activity of
GLI-2/THP, consistent with our prior observations (56a)
and the previously described regulation of GLI protein function by
phosphorylation events (3, 6, 50). Indeed, cubitus
interruptus is closely associated with a serine threonine kinase,
Fused, which is a vital part of the functional Hedgehog-responsive complex (reviewed in reference 53). The boost in HIV-1
promoter-driven gene expression by GLI-2/THP occurred over a range of
Tat expression vector concentrations in a dose-dependent manner (Fig.
2B). This synergistic effect was similarly seen with the HIV-2 promoter and HIV-2 Tat (Fig. 2C). These studies demonstrated that the Tat proteins of HIV-1 and HIV-2 can act synergistically with GLI-2/THP to
stimulate HIV-1 (Fig. 2A and B) or HIV-2 (Fig. 2C) gene expression in T
cells. Similar results were seen in monocytic cells (see below).
Further, GLI-2/THP expression caused a similar boost in transactivation
when a Tat protein cloned from an HIV-1 subtype B primary isolate
(40) was used (see Fig. 6), demonstrating that this marked
effect occurs with Tat from more than one HIV-1 strain, as well as with
HIV-2 Tat.

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
GLI-2/THP synergizes with Tat. (A) An HIV-1/CAT
construct was transfected into Jurkat T cells with (striped bars) or
without (solid and empty bars) a limiting concentration (50 ng) of a
Tat-1 expression vector and the indicated amount of the GLI-2/THP
expression vector or control vector. The indicated samples were treated
with 16 nM PMA 20 h after transfection. The cells were harvested
24 h later. Protein was standardized, and CAT assays were
performed. The lack of activation seen with PMA alone is due to the low
amount of reporter plasmid (1 µg). (B) HIV-1 Tat dose response.
Jurkat cells were transfected with 1 µg of HIV-1/CAT and either 0, 1, 10, or 25 ng of the HIV-1 Tat expression vector and 100 ng of
GLI-2/THP expression vector where indicated. In panels B and C, open
bars indicate basal activity of the HIV-1 promoter, and solid bars show
the PMA response, widely striped bars represent activity when 100 ng of
the GLI-2/THP expression vector was cotransfected, and dark striped
bars show activity of the GLI-2/THP cotransfectants after stimulation
with PMA. (C) HIV-2 Tat dose response. Jurkat cells were transfected
with 1 µg of HIV-2/CAT and either 0, 25, 50, or 100 ng of the HIV-2
Tat expression vector, plus 100 ng of GLI-2/THP expression vector where
indicated.
|
|
GLI-2/THP stimulates HIV-1 replication.
As GLI-2/THP is able
to strongly synergize with Tat to activate the HIV-1 and HIV-2
promoters, we next assessed whether GLI-2/THP also stimulates HIV-1
replication. This was first examined by cotransfecting the HIV-1
infectious clone pHXB2 along with GLI-2/THP into the 293 cell line.
These experiments clearly demonstrate that GLI-2/THP can stimulate
replication of the HXB2 isolate (Fig. 3).
GLI-2/THP was also able to stimulate replication in 293 cells of
another isolate of HIV-1, an NL4-3-based infectious clone (data not
shown).

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
GLI-2/THP stimulates single-round HIV-1 replication in
293 cells. 293 cells were transfected with 2 µg of pHXB2 and 5 µg
of GLI-2/THP or control plasmid. Supernatants were collected 1, 2, 3, and 5 days after transfection and assayed in triplicate for RT
activity. This experiment is representative of three independent
experiments.
|
|
We next tested whether GLI-2/THP can activate HIV-1 replication in
monocytic cells, which are more biologically relevant than 293 cells.
In these experiments, the pHXB2 infectious clone was again
cotransfected with GLI-2/THP, this time using the U937 monocytic cell
line. As shown in Fig. 4, HXB2
replication was again strongly stimulated by GLI-2/THP. While PMA was
not strictly necessary to demonstrate this stimulation, it did lead to
much more rapid induction of viral replication in the presence of
GLI-2/THP. GLI-2/THP was also able to markedly stimulate replication of
the NL4-3-based clone, and with this isolate the presence of PMA was
necessary for stimulation (data not shown). Therefore, in these
cotransfection experiments involving infectious HIV-1 clones, similar
to the experiments using reporter gene constructs, the presence of PMA greatly augmented the GLI-2/THP effect in monocytic cells. It must also
be pointed out that similar to what is seen in reporter gene assays,
the GLI-2/THP effect on infectious virus shows a dose-response
relationship (data not shown). In both the reporter gene and infectious
clone experiments, once GLI-2/THP is present beyond a certain
concentration, the synergistic effect with Tat, and the ability to
activate viral replication, is lost (data not shown).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
GLI-2/THP stimulates HIV-1 replication in U937 monocytic
cells. U937 cells were transfected with 2 µg of pHXB2 and 5 µg of
either a control vector or a vector which expresses GLI-2/THP. The
indicated cells were stimulated with PMA at a concentration of 16 nM
20 h after transfection. RT activity was measured in supernatants
collected each day after transfection. Data represent mean RT activity
in triplicate wells. This experiment is representative of three
independent experiments.
|
|
GLI-2/THP-Tat synergy is independent of TAR.
Our data
demonstrated that GLI-2/THP can markedly stimulate HIV-1 replication
and powerfully synergize with Tat, and our biochemical studies
suggested that GLI-2/THP might directly interact with Tat in the
transcription complex. We next tested whether TAR is necessary for the
GLI-2/THP synergy, as it is for synergy with other reported Tat
cofactors (9, 15, 43, 46, 66, 69, 74), using an HIV-1
promoter construct containing a deletion in the TAR region. The results
of these cotransfection experiments, here shown in U937 monocytic
cells, demonstrated that GLI-2/THP-Tat synergy is, surprisingly,
independent of TAR-1 (Fig. 5A). An HIV-2 TAR mutant,
stem-CAT (5), was also responsive to the
combination of GLI-2/THP plus HIV-2 Tat (data not shown), despite its
weak transactivation by even large amounts of HIV-2 Tat alone
(5). Consistent with these findings is the observation
that HIV-2 Tat, which does not interact well with TAR-1 and does not
transactivate the HIV-1 promoter (49), markedly boosts
HIV-1 promoter activity in the presence of GLI-2/THP (Fig. 5B). Thus,
GLI-2/THP synergizes with Tat in T cells and monocytic cells and
operates through a TAR-independent mechanism. TAR-independent
transactivation of HIV promoters has been seen in experiments using
artificial systems such as GAL4 to tether Tat to the HIV promoter
(58) but has not been observed previously with the
wild-type promoter and any cloned Tat cofactor.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
GLI-2/THP-Tat synergy is independent of TAR. (A) The TAR
region is not required for synergy. The human monocytic cell line U937
was transfected with 1 µg of either HIV-1/CAT or HIV-1 (TAR del)/CAT
and 100 ng of either the GLI-2/THP expression vector or empty vector;
50 ng of an HIV-1 Tat expression vector was also cotransfected where
indicated. Twenty hours after transfection, the indicated samples
(striped bars) were treated with 16 nM PMA. The cells were harvested
24 h later; samples were normalized for protein concentration and
used in the CAT assay. (B) Tat-2 is able to synergize with GLI-2/THP to
activate the HIV-1 promoter. HIV-1/CAT (1 µg) was transfected into
U937 cells with either empty vector, 50 ng of Tat-2 expression vector,
100 ng GLI-2/THP expression vector, or a combination of 50 ng of Tat-2
expression vector and 100 ng of GLI-2/THP expression vector. The
transfected cells were treated and harvested as for panel A. These data
are representative of three separate experiments.
|
|
GLI-2/THP-Tat synergy is dependent on the TATA box and Tat-TBP
interactions.
The above findings suggested that as neither TAR
(Fig. 5) nor the TG-rich element to which GLI-2/THP binds (not shown)
was necessary for GLI-2/THP-Tat synergy, neither Tat nor GLI-2/THP was
directly responsible for recruiting the complex to the HIV promoter.
Therefore, we investigated other proteins that might serve this
function. One such attractive candidate protein was TFIIE, which has
been demonstrated to interact with Krüppel, a
Drosophila protein related to the GLI proteins
(56), and the transcription factors Sp1 and TBP, which
have been shown previously to interact physically and functionally with
Tat (24, 26, 29). Using GST pull-down experiments (Fig. 1A
and C), we found that TBP interacts with GLI-2/THP-GST (Fig. 1C, lane
2) but not with GST alone (not shown), whereas Sp1 and the TFIIE
and
subunits do not interact with GLI-2/THP-GST (Fig. 1C, lanes 1, 3, and 4). As GLI-2/THP can interact with Tat (Fig. 1B) and TBP (Fig.
1C), and TBP can also interact with Tat (29), we
hypothesized that a Tat-TBP-GLI-2/THP association might be involved in
the activation of HIV transcription by the crucial Tat transactivator. This would imply that the TATA box, the binding site for TBP, was
necessary for the GLI-2/THP-Tat synergy to occur. Indeed, when
TATA,
an HIV-1 promoter construct with a site-directed mutation in the TATA
box (42), was transfected into U937 cells, only weak
activation was detected in the presence of PMA, GLI-2/THP, and Tat-1
(Fig. 6A). In a parallel transfection
using larger amounts of
TATA and GLI-2/THP, we demonstrated response
to activation by PMA (56a), consistent with previous
observations (4) that
TATA is still capable of
responding to cellular stimulation. Thus, mutation of the TATA box
specifically inhibits the response to the GLI-2/THP-Tat synergistic
effect. Further, synergy was not seen with two Tat mutants (Tat-B.E.
and Tat-B.T.) that contain point mutations in the TBP interaction
domain (Fig. 6B), suggesting that direct Tat-TBP interactions must
occur for synergy to be seen. The lack of GLI-2/THP-Tat synergy seen
with the
TATA promoter or with the Tat point mutants suggests that
the functional interaction between Tat, GLI-2/THP, and TBP requires
tethering of these factors to the promoter via the TBP-TATA
interaction. Such tethering through the TATA box would be consistent
with TAR-independent activation, as Tat-TAR interactions have been
shown to be unnecessary for effective Tat function if the activation
domain of Tat can be recruited to the transcription complex by other,
artificial means (49, 58). It must also be noted that the
requirement for the TATA box is not seen in other circumstances in
which GLI-2/THP modulates retroviral transcription (56a),
and thus is specific for the Tat synergy. In addition, while the HIV
promoters are stimulated by GLI-2/THP, HTLV-1 promoter-driven
transcription is suppressed and HTLV-2-driven transcription is
unaffected by GLI-2/THP (56a), further demonstrating the
specificity of the GLI-2/THP-Tat-TBP interaction.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
GLI-2/THP-Tat synergy requires the TATA box and
functional Tat-TBP interaction. (A) HIV-1/CAT (1 µg) or HIV-1/CAT
with the TATA box mutated (1 µg) was transfected into U937 cells with
either empty vector or 50 ng of Tat-1 expression vector and 100 ng of
GLI-2/THP expression vector. The cells were treated and harvested as
for Fig. 5. Open bars represent unstimulated samples; solid bars
represent PMA-treated samples. The data are representative of four
separate experiments. (B) Transfections were performed as for panel A
except that 25 ng of expression vectors for wild-type HIV-1 B strain
Tat and the point mutants Tat-B.E. and Tat-B.T., which have been shown
not to physically interact with TBP, were used instead of the Tat-1
expression vector. Fifty-nanograms of the GLI-2/THP expression vector
was cotransfected into samples as indicated. Open bars represent
unstimulated samples; solid bars represent PMA-treated samples. The
data are representative of four separate experiments.
|
|
GLI-2/THP synergizes with cyclin T1 to augment Tat function.
The C-terminal domain of RNA Pol II is needed for effective
transactivation by Tat (7, 44, 46, 69). Recently, the Pol
II-associated cyclin-dependent kinase-activating kinase (CAK) (9,
15, 43, 46) and the Tat-associated kinase (TAK/P-TEFb) (35, 69, 74) have been implicated in the elongation
effects of Tat. Both CAK and TAK appear to function by phosphorylating the C-terminal domain of Pol II, an event that allows Pol II to effectively elongate transcripts (19, 20, 68). An 87-kDa cyclin C-related protein, cyclin T1, identified in the TAK/P-TEFb complex, plays a particularly crucial role in Tat-mediated
transactivation (14, 66). Unlike GLI-2/THP, cyclin T1
function requires the presence of TAR. As cyclin T1 appears to be the
most powerful and biologically relevant Tat cofactor previously
described, we tested whether GLI-2/THP could further augment the
combined effect of Tat and cyclin T1 on HIV-1 promoter-driven
expression in cotransfection studies in NIH 3T3 cells (Fig.
7). As expected, in these cells Tat-1 had
a relatively small effect (14-fold activation) on HIV-1 promoter
function, and cyclin T1 showed marked synergy (240-fold activation)
with Tat-1. A very similar degree of synergy was seen with GLI-2/THP
and Tat-1 (280-fold activation). The addition of GLI-2/THP to Tat-1 and
cyclin T1 gave a further, marked synergistic effect (2,000-fold
activation above baseline). Thus, a TAR-independent Tat cofactor,
GLI-2/THP, and cyclin T1, a TAR-dependent cofactor, together greatly
augment HIV-1 promoter-driven expression in conjunction with Tat-1.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
GLI-2/THP synergizes with cyclin T1 to augment Tat
function. NIH 3T3 cells were transfected with 5 µg of
HIV-1/luciferase, 0.33 µg of a vector expressing Tat-1, 0.33 µg of
a vector expressing human cyclin T1 (hCycT1), and/or 0.33 µg of a
vector expressing GLI-2/THP. Transfections were normalized with 0.5 µg of Renilla luciferase standard. When necessary, pcDNA3
plasmid was added to keep the total amount of DNA constant at 6.5 µg.
Results shown are from two separate transfections (stippled and solid
bars) performed at the same time and are representative of two
independent transfection experiments.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
Here we have shown that GLI-2/THP markedly stimulates HIV
replication and synergizes with Tat-1, Tat-2, and cyclin T1, potent activators of HIV transcription. As it has become clear that Tat requires cellular cofactors to function in vivo (34),
intensive efforts have been made to identify functionally important Tat cofactors which might interact with Tat, the TAR RNA element, DNA
promoter elements, the basal transcriptional machinery, or some
combination of these elements. Despite the requirement for cellular
cofactors for Tat-mediated transactivation, few potential cofactors,
other than GLI-2/THP, cyclin T1, and cyclin-dependent kinases, have
demonstrated convincing functional effects in promoter and viral
replication studies. We have now shown that GLI-2/THP clearly can work
with Tat-1 or Tat-2 to stimulate HIV-1 or HIV-2 expression well above
the absolute level seen with Tat alone. The Tat-GLI-2/THP synergy is
dependent on an intact TATA box in the promoter and does not take place
with Tat mutants incapable of interacting with TBP.
An individual GLI protein is found in multiple different forms in the
cell, and variants which are less abundant are often biologically very
significant (3, 54). GLI-2/THP is an isoform found in low
abundance in cells, which we have detected only in cellular extracts
that have been enriched through Tat affinity chromatography (M. Smith
and D. Markovitz, unpublished data). Several new isoforms of GLI-2/THP
have recently been described (56a, 59), and their ability
to synergize with Tat is under investigation. However, our findings
demonstrate that the GLI-2/THP isoform is able to activate
transcription through an unexpected mechanism that has not previously
been reported for any other GLI protein family member. These proteins
bind TG-rich enhancer elements in vitro, and all previously published
studies have implicated these upstream enhancer sites as the mediators
of GLI function. Here, we demonstrate that GLI-2/THP can activate
transcription through a central, TBP/TATA box-dependent mechanism.
Therefore, GLI-2/THP-Tat synergy occurs not only through a mechanism
which is unique among Tat cofactors but also through a mechanism not previously reported for GLI family members. As GLI proteins play an
important role in the development of multiple species, are involved in
the Hedgehog signaling pathway, which is crucial for correct patterning
of the embryo, and have been implicated in the genesis of cancer in
humans, it will be important to further examine the exact mechanisms by
which GLI-2 and other GLI proteins interact with cellular and viral
proteins to regulate gene expression.
The TAR independence of the GLI-2/THP-Tat synergy might suggest that
GLI-2/THP stimulates initiation of transcription, rather than
elongation. It is possible that a GLI-2/THP-mediated increase in
initiated RNA Pol II complexes could potentiate a cryptic
TAR-independent recruitment mechanism for Tat. However, under the
conditions tested here, which employ limiting concentrations of
promoter and Tat, it does not appear that GLI-2/THP simply initiates
HIV transcription independently of Tat, as this explanation would not
be compatible with the fact that the TAR-independent Tat synergy seen
with GLI-2/THP is such a high proportion of the wild-type activity
(Fig. 5). Use of limiting concentrations of Tat, as seen in the present studies, would seem to mirror the in vivo situation, in which low to
limiting levels of Tat are seen in HIV-1-infected cells (reviewed in
reference 31). It must also be noted that for optimal effect of GLI-2/THP, PMA appears to be necessary. This is not surprising, in view of the dependence of most GLI proteins on phosphorylation changes to function. As noted above, the
Drosophila protein cubitus interruptus is actually
accompanied by a kinase in a complex in the cell. Clearly, PMA simply
mimics a natural kinase or other unidentified signal transduction
mechanism. However, it should be noted that GLI-2/THP stimulation of
HIV-1 replication in 293 cells is not at all dependent on PMA (Fig. 3).
In addition, while PMA potentiates the effect of GLI-2/THP in U937
monocytic cells, GLI-2/THP alone can also augment viral replication to
a lesser degree (Fig. 4). In addition, PMA is not necessary to
demonstrate the GLI-2/THP effect, or its marked synergy with cyclin T1,
in NIH 3T3 cells (Fig. 7). Thus, while it makes sense that activation of monocytic or T cells will augment viral transcription and
replication, GLI-2/THP can also function without cellular stimulation.
Thus, GLI-2/THP is a strong modulator of Tat function and HIV-1
replication, which is under the control of signal transduction pathways.
The Tat-GLI-2/THP synergy is dependent on an intact TATA box in the
promoter and does not take place with Tat mutants incapable of
interacting with TBP. In addition, GLI-2/THP can interact physically with both Tat and TBP, and Tat and TBP also interact. Thus, a Tat-TBP-GLI-2/THP complex might be an intermediary in the process of
Tat transactivation, with GLI-2/THP augmenting the Tat-TBP functional
interaction and TBP recruiting the complex to the promoter, though
other mechanisms of GLI-2/THP/Tat corecruitment are certainly possible.
As the mere presence of a TATA box does not indicate that a promoter
will be stimulated by GLI-2/THP (56a), other factors must
further confer specificity. How GLI-2/THP works with cyclin T1 to give
such marked stimulation of HIV promoter-driven transcription is
currently being studied. The use of GLI-2/THP, in conjunction with
cyclin T1, to overcome the Tat block in murine cells and thus
facilitate the development of a mouse model of HIV infection is also
under investigation.
One of the most intriguing aspects of our findings is the observation
that GLI-2/THP can potentiate Tat transactivation of HIV gene
expression in the absence the TAR element. To our knowledge, no other
TAR-independent Tat cofactor has been clearly characterized at the
molecular level in lymphocytic or monocytic cell types, although
TAR-independent Tat activation of the HIV-1 promoter has been observed
in neuronal cells and linked to variations in the NF-
B complex in
this cell type (61, 62). Previous studies have clearly
shown that when Tat is brought to the HIV-1 promoter by use of
heterologous constructs, it can activate gene expression in the absence
of TAR (26, 58). Thus, if GLI-2/THP does indeed bring Tat
to the HIV promoter via TBP or another corecruited factor, it would be
expected to readily transactivate in the absence of TAR. In this light,
it is of interest to note that Kashanchi et al. recently showed that
Tat-dependent, TAR-independent transactivation of the HIV-1 promoter
can be seen at specific times in the cell cycle (30). Our
studies demonstrate that the Tat cofactor GLI-2/THP can markedly
augment HIV-1 replication in a TAR-independent manner (Fig. 3 and 4).
Whether or not GLI-2/THP contributes to cell cycle stage-specific
TAR-independent activation of HIV-1 transcription is now under study.
Our findings clearly demonstrate that HIV transactivation by the viral
Tat protein can be potentiated by the THP isoform of the human GLI-2
protein. This synergistic activation is dependent on other cellular
signaling processes, which can occur following stimulation of the cells
by either mitogens or cyclin T1 overexpression. Further, GLI-2/THP is
able to enhance Tat transactivation of HIV even in the absence of the
TAR element, suggesting that GLI-2/THP can provide an alternate
recruitment method for Tat to the core HIV promoter. Clearly, HIV gene
expression can be triggered by a variety of stimuli, and further
studies on how cellular signaling pathways interconnect and interface
with viral regulatory elements are needed to effectively model this
complex process.
We thank C.-C. Hui for helpful comments, Kathleen Collins for
HIV-1 expression clones, Mitsuaki Yoshida for the gift of GLI-2 expression plasmids, Gloria Wanty for manuscript preparation, and
Christopher Nixon for assistance with the Tat-B studies.
This work was supported by grants AI36685 and AI30924 from the NIH to
D.M.M. and by grants from the NIH and the Tebil Foundation to
R.G.R. N.M.C. was supported by grant K08-AI01293 from the NIH and
by an Infectious Diseases Society of America Young Investigator Award.
C.M.B. was supported by the Cellular Biotechnology Training Program (5 T32 GM08353) and the Cancer Biology Training Program (T32 CA09676) of
the University of Michigan. B.R.L. was supported by the Medical
Scientist Training Program (NIGMS T32 GM07863) of the University of
Michigan and by the Harvey Fellows Program.
| 1.
|
Aldovini, A., and B. D. Walker.
1990.
Techniques in HIV research.
Stockton Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 2.
|
Alexandre, C.,
A. Jacinto, and P. W. Ingham.
1996.
Transcriptional activation of hedgehog target genes in Drosophila is mediated directly by the Cubitus interruptus protein, a member of the GLI family of zinc finger DNA-binding proteins.
Genes Dev.
10:2003-2013[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Aza-Blanc, P.,
F. A. Ramirez-Weber,
M. P. Laget,
C. Schwartz, and T. B. Kornberg.
1997.
Proteolysis that is inhibited by hedgehog targets Cubitus interrupts protein to the nucleus and converts it to a repressor.
Cell
89:1043-1053[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Bielinska, A.,
S. Krasnow, and G. J. Nabel.
1989.
NF- B-mediated activation of the human immunodeficiency virus enhancer: site of transcriptional initiation is independent of the TATA box.
J. Virol.
63:4097-4100[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Browning, C.,
J. M. Hilfinger,
S. Rainier,
V. Lin,
S. Hedderwick,
M. Smith, and D. M. Markovitz.
1997.
The sequence and structure of the 3' arm of the first stem-loop of the human immunodeficiency virus type 2 trans-activation responsive region mediate Tat-2 transactivation.
J. Virol.
71:8048-8055[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Chen, Y.,
N. Gallaher,
R. H. Goodman, and S. M. Smolik.
1998.
Protein kinase A directly regulates the activity and proteolysis of cubitus interruptus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:2349-2354[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Chun, R. F., and K. T. Jeang.
1996.
Requirements for RNA polymerase II carboxyl-terminal domain for activated transcription of human retroviruses human T-cell lymphotropic virus I and HIV-1.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:27888-27894[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Clark, N. M.,
M. J. Smith,
J. M. Hilfinger, and D. M. Markovitz.
1993.
Activation of the human T-cell leukemia virus type I enhancer is mediated by binding sites for Elf-1 and the pets factor.
J. Virol.
67:5522-5528[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Cujec, T. P.,
H. Okamoto,
K. Fujinaga,
J. Meyer,
H. Chamberlin,
D. O. Morgan, and B. M. Peterlin.
1997.
The HIV transactivator TAT binds to the CDK-activating kinase and activates the phosphorylation of the carboxy-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II.
Genes Dev.
11:2645-2657[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Dahmane, N.,
J. Lee,
P. Robins,
P. Heller, and A. Ruiz i Altaba.
1997.
Activation of the transcription factor Gli1 and the Sonic hedgehog signalling pathway in skin tumours.
Nature
389:876-881[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Dayton, A. I.,
J. G. Sodroski,
C. A. Rosen,
W. C. Goh, and W. A. Haseltine.
1986.
The trans-activator gene of the human T cell lymphotropic virus type III is required for replication.
Cell
44:941-947[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Dominguez, M.,
M. Brunner,
E. Hafen, and K. Basler.
1996.
Sending and receiving the hedgehog signal: control by the Drosophila Gli protein cubitus interruptus.
Science
272:1621-1625[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Emerman, M.,
M. Guyader,
L. Montagnier,
D. Baltimore, and M. A. Muesing.
1987.
The specificity of the human immunodeficiency virus type 2 transactivator is different from that of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
EMBO J.
6:3755-3760[Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Garber, M. E.,
P. Wei,
V. N. KewalRamani,
T. P. Mayall,
C. H. Herrmann,
A. P. Rice,
D. R. Littman, and K. A. Jones.
1998.
The interaction between HIV-1 Tat and human cyclin T1 requires zinc and a critical cysteine residue that is not conserved in the murine CycT1 protein.
Genes Dev.
12:512-527.
|
| 15.
|
Garcia-Martinez, L. F.,
D. Ivanov, and R. B. Gaynor.
1997.
Association of Tat with purified HIV-1 and HIV-2 transcription preinitiation complexes.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:6951-6958[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Gaynor, R. B.
1995.
Regulation of HIV-1 gene expression by the transactivator protein Tat.
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
193:51-77[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Gorman, C. M.,
L. F. Moffat, and B. H. Howard.
1982.
Recombinant genomes which express chloramphenicol acetyltransferase in mammalian cells.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
2:1044-1051[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Hahn, B. H.,
G. M. Shaw,
S. K. Arya,
M. Popovic,
R. C. Gallo, and F. Wong-Staal.
1984.
Molecular cloning and characterization of HTLV-III virus associated with AIDS.
Nature
312:166-169[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Herrmann, C. H.,
M. O. Gold, and A. P. Rice.
1996.
Viral transactivators specifically target distinct cellular protein kinases that phosphorylate the RNA polymerase II C-terminal domain.
Nucleic Acids Res.
24:501-508[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Herrmann, C. H., and A. P. Rice.
1995.
Lentivirus Tat proteins specifically associate with a cellular protein kinase, TAK, that hyperphosphorylates the carboxyl-terminal domain of the large subunit of RNA polymerase II: candidate for a Tat cofactor.
J. Virol.
69:1612-1620[Abstract].
|
| 21.
|
Hilfinger, J.,
N. Clark,
K. Robinson,
M. Smith, and D. M. Markovitz.
1993.
Differential regulation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 2 in monocytic cells at varying stages of differentiation.
J. Virol.
67:4448-4453[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Huang, L. M., and K. T. Jeang.
1993.
Increased spacing between Sp1 and TATAA renders human immunodeficiency virus type 1 replication defective: implication for Tat function.
J. Virol.
67:6937-6944[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Hui, C.-C.,
D. Slusarski,
K. A. Platt,
R. Holmgren, and A. L. Joyner.
1994.
Expression of three mouse homologs of the Drosophila segment polarity gene cubitus interruptus, GLI, GLI-2, and GLI-3, in ectoderm- and mesoderm-derived tissues suggests multiple roles during postimplantation development.
Dev. Biol.
162:402-413[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Jeang, K. T.,
R. Chun,
N. H. Lin,
A. Gatignol,
C. G. Glabe, and H. Fan.
1993.
In vitro and in vivo binding of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat protein and Sp1 transcription factor.
J. Virol.
67:6224-6233[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Johnson, R. L.,
A. L. Rothman,
J. Xie,
L. V. Goodrich,
J. W. Bare,
J. M. Bonifas,
A. G. Quinn,
R. M. Myers,
D. R. Cox,
E. H. Epstein, Jr., and M. P. Scott.
1996.
Human homolog of patched, a candidate gene for the basal cell nevus syndrome.
Science
272:1668-1671[Abstract].
|
| 26.
|
Kamine, J.,
T. Subramanian, and G. Chinnadurai.
1993.
Activation of a heterologous promoter by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat requires Sp1 and is distinct from the mode of activation by acidic transcriptional activators.
J. Virol.
67:6828-6834[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Kang, S.,
J. M. Graham, Jr.,
A. H. Olney, and L. G. Biesecker.
1997.
GLI3 frameshift mutations cause autosomal dominant Pallister-Hall syndrome.
Nat. Genet.
15:266-268[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Karlstrom, R. O.,
W. S. Talbot, and A. F. Schier.
1999.
Comparative synteny cloning of zebrafish you-too: mutations in the Hedgehog target gli2 affect ventral forebrain patterning.
Genes Dev.
13:388-393[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Kashanchi, F.,
G. Piras,
M. F. Radonovich,
J. F. Duvall,
A. Fattaey,
C. M. Chiang,
R. G. Roeder, and J. N. Brady.
1994.
Direct interaction of human TFIID with the HIV-1 transactivator tat.
Nature
367:295-299[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Kashanchi, F.,
E. T. Agbottah,
C. Pise-Masison,
R. Mahieux,
J. Duvall,
A. Kumar, and J. N. Brady.
2000.
Cell cycle-regulated transcription by the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat transactivator.
J. Virol.
74:652-660[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Kiernan, R. E.,
C. Vanhulle,
L. Schiltz,
E. Adam,
H. Xiao,
F. Maudoux,
C. Calomme,
A. Burny,
Y. Nakatani,
K.-T. Jeang,
M. Benkirane, and C. Van Lint.
1999.
HIV-1 tat transcriptional activity is regulated by acetylation.
EMBO J.
18:6106-6118[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Kinzler, K. W.,
S. H. Bigner,
D. D. Bigner,
J. M. Trent,
M. L. Law,
S. J. O'Brien,
A. J. Wong, and B. Vogelstein.
1987.
Identification of an amplified, highly expressed gene in a human glioma.
Science
236:70-73[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Lu, X.,
T. M. Welsh, and B. M. Peterlin.
1993.
The human immunodeficiency virus type 1 long terminal repeat specifies two different transcription complexes, only one of which is regulated by Tat.
J. Virol.
67:1752-1760[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Madore, S. J., and B. R. Cullen.
1993.
Genetic analysis of the cofactor requirement for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat function.
J. Virol.
67:3703-3711[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Mancebo, H. S.,
G. Lee,
J. Flygare,
J. Tomassini,
P. Luu,
Y. Zhu,
J. Peng,
C. Blau,
D. Hazuda,
D. Price, and O. Flores.
1997.
P-TEFb kinase is required for HIV Tat transcriptional activation in vivo and in vitro.
Genes Dev.
11:2633-2644[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Marine, J.-C.,
E. J. Bellefroid,
H. Pendeville,
J. A. Martial, and T. Pieler.
1997.
A role for Xenopus Gli-type zinc finger proteins in the early embryonic patterning of mesoderm and neuroectoderm.
Mech. Dev.
63:211-225[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 37.
|
Markovitz, D. M.,
M. J. Smith,
J. Hilfinger,
M. C. Hannibal,
B. Petryniak, and G. J. Nabel.
1992.
Activation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 2 enhancer is dependent on purine box and KB regulatory elements.
J. Virol.
66:5479-5484[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Markovitz, D. M.,
S. Kenney,
J. Kamine,
M. Smith,
M. Davis,
E. S. Huang,
C. Rosen, and J. Pagano.
1989.
Disparate effects of two herpesvirus immediate-early gene transactivators on the HIV-1 LTR.
Virology
173:363-367[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Mo, R.,
A. M. Freer,
D. L. Zinyk,
M. A. Crackower,
J. Michaud,
H. H.-Q. Heng,
K. W. Chik,
X.-M. Shi,
L.-C. Tsui,
S. H. Cheng,
A. L. Joyner, and C.-C. Hui.
1997.
Specific and redundant functions of Gli2 and Gli3 zinc finger genes in skeletal patterning and development.
Development
124:113-123[Abstract].
|
| 40.
|
Montano, M. A.,
V. A. Novitsky,
J. T. Blackard,
N. L. Cho,
D. A. Katzenstein, and M. Essex.
1997.
Divergent transcriptional regulation among expanding human immunodeficiency virus type 1 subtypes.
J. Virol.
71:8657-8665[Abstract].
|
| 41.
|
Motoyama, J.,
J. Liu,
R. Mo,
Q. Ding,
M. Post, and C.-C. Hui.
1998.
Essential function of Gli2 and Gli3 in the formation of lung, trachea and oesophagus.
Nat. Genet.
20:54-57[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Nabel, G. J.,
S. A. Rice,
D. M. Knipe, and D. Baltimore.
1988.
Alternative mechanisms for activation of human immunodeficiency virus enhancer in T cells.
Science
23:1299-1302.
|
| 43.
|
Nekhai, S.,
R. R. Shukla, and A. Kumar.
1997.
A human primary T-lymphocyte-derived human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat-associated kinase phosphorylates the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II and induces CAK activity.
J. Virol.
71:7436-7441[Abstract].
|
| 44.
|
Okamoto, H.,
C. T. Sheline,
J. L. Corden,
K. A. Jones, and B. M. Peterlin.
1996.
Trans-activation by human immunodeficiency virus Tat protein requires the C-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:11575-11579[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Orenic, T. V.,
D. C. Slusarski,
K. L. Kroll, and R. A. Holmgren.
1990.
Cloning and characterization of the segment polarity gene cubitus interruptus Dominant of Drosophila.
Genes Dev.
4:1053-1067[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Parada, C. A., and R. G. Roeder.
1996.
Enhanced processivity of RNA polymerase II triggered by Tat-induced phosphorylation of its carboxy-terminal domain.
Nature
384:375-378[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Queen, C., and D. Baltimore.
1983.
Immunoglobulin gene transcription is activated by downstream sequence elements.
Cell
33:741-748[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Reifenberger, G.,
K. Ichimura,
J. Reifenberger,
A. G. Elkahloun,
P. S. Meltzer, and V. P. Collins.
1996.
Refined mapping of 12q13-q15 amplicons in human malignant gliomas suggests CDK4/SAS and MDM2 as independent amplification targets.
Cancer Res.
56:5141-5145[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Rhim, H., and A. P. Rice.
1993.
TAR RNA binding properties and relative transactivation activities of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and 2 Tat proteins.
J. Virol.
67:1110-1121[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Robbins, D. J.,
K. E. Nybakken,
R. Kobayashi,
J. C. Sisson,
J. M. Bishop, and P. P. Therond.
1997.
Hedgehog elicits signal transduction by means of a large complex containing the kinesin-related protein Costal 2.
Cell
90:225-234[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 51.
|
Roberts, M.,
E. C. Douglass,
S. C. Peiper,
P. J. Houghton, and A. T. Look.
1989.
Amplification of the gli gene in childhood sarcomas.
Cancer Res.
49:5407-5413[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Rosen, C. A.,
J. G. Sodroski, and W. A. Haseltine.
1985.
The location of cis-acting regulatory sequences in the human T cell lymphotropic virus type III (HTLV-III/LAV) long terminal repeat.
Cell
41:813-823[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Ruiz i Altaba, A.
1997.
Catching a Gli-mpse of Hedgehog.
Cell
90:193-196[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Ruiz i Altaba, A.
1999.
Gli proteins encode context-dependent positive and negative functions: implications for development and disease.
Development
126:3205-3216[Abstract].
|
| 55.
|
Ruppert, J. M.,
B. Vogelstein, and K. W. Kinzler.
1991.
The zinc finger protein GLI transforms primary cells in cooperation with adenovirus E1A.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:1724-1728[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 56.
|
Sauer, F.,
J. D. Fondell,
Y. Ohkuma,
R. G. Roeder, and H. Jackle.
1995.
Control of transcription by Kruppel through interactions with TFIIB and TFIIE beta.
Nature
375:162-164[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 56a.
|
Smith, M. J.,
S. D. Gitlin,
C. M. Browning,
B. R. Lane,
N. M. Clark,
N. Shah,
S. Rainier, and D. M. Markovitz.
2001.
GLI-2 modulates retroviral gene expression.
J. Virol.
75:2301-2313[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 57.
|
Sodroski, J. G.,
C. A. Rosen, and W. A. Haseltine.
1984.
trans-acting transcriptional activation of the long terminal repeat of human T lymphotropic viruses in infected cells.
Science
225:381-385[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 58.
|
Southgate, C. D., and M. R. Green.
1991.
The HIV-1 Tat protein activates transcription from an upstream DNA-binding site: implications for Tat function.
Genes Dev.
5:2496-2507[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 59.
|
Tanimura, A.,
S. Dan, and M. Yoshida.
1998.
Cloning of novel isoforms of the human Gli2 oncogene and their activities to enhance tax-dependent transcription of the human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 genome.
J. Virol.
72:3958-3964[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 60.
|
Tanimura, A.,
H. Teshima,
J.-I. Fujisawa, and M. Yoshida.
1993.
A new regulatory element that augments the Tax-dependent enhancer of human T-cell leukemia virus type 1 and cloning of cDNAs encoding its binding proteins.
J. Virol.
67:5375-5382[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 61.
|
Taylor, J. P., and K. Khalili.
1994.
Activation of HIV-1 transcription by Tat in cells derived from the CNS: evidence for the participation of NF-kappa B a review.
Adv. Neuroimmunol.
4:291-303[Medline].
|
| 62.
|
Taylor, J. P.,
R. J. Pomeranz,
J. W. Oakes,
K. Khalili, and S. Amini.
1995.
A CNS-enriched factor that binds to NF-kappa B and is required for interaction with HIV-1 tat.
Oncogene
10:395-400[Medline].
|
| 63.
|
Tong-Starksen, S. E.,
A. Baur,
X. B. Lu,
E. Peck, and B. M. Peterlin.
1993.
Second exon of Tat of HIV-2 is required for optimal trans-activation of HIV-1 and HIV-2 LTRs.
Virology
195:826-830[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 64.
|
Veschambre, P.,
P. Simard, and P. Jalinot.
1995.
Evidence for functional interaction between the HIV-1 Tat transactivator and the TATA box binding protein in vivo.
J. Mol. Biol.
250:169-180[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 65.
|
Walterhouse, D.,
M. Ahmed,
D. Slusarski,
J. Kalamaras,
D. Boucher,
R. Holmgren, and P. Iannaccone.
1993.
gli, a zinc finger transcription factor and oncogene, is expressed during normal mouse development.
Dev. Dyn.
196:91-102[Medline].
|
| 66.
|
Wei, P.,
M. E. Garber,
S. M. Fang,
W. H. Fischer, and K. A. Jones.
1998.
A novel CDK9-associated C-type cyclin interacts directly with HIV-1 Tat and mediates its high-affinity, loop-specific binding to TAR RNA.
Cell
92:451-462[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 67.
|
Xiao, H.,
D. A. Goldthwait, and T. Mapstone.
1994.
A search for Gli expression in tumors of the central nervous system.
Pediatr. Neurosurg.
20:178-182[Medline].
|
| 68.
|
Yang, L.,
G. F. Morris,
J. M. Lockyer,
M. Lu,
Z. Wang, and C. B. Morris.
1997.
Distinct transcriptional pathways of TAR-dependent and TAR-independent human immunodeficiency virus type-1 transactivation by Tat.
Virology
235:48-64[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 69.
|
Yang, X.,
M. O. Gold,
D. N. Tang,
D. E. Lewis,
E. Aguilar-Cordova,
A. P. Rice, and C. H. Herrmann.
1997.
TAK, an HIV Tat-associated kinase, is a member of the cyclin-dependent family of protein kinases and is induced by activation of peripheral blood lymphocytes and differentiation of promonocytic cell lines.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:12331-12336[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 70.
|
Yang, X.,
C. H. Herrmann, and A. P. Rice.
1996.
The human immunodeficiency virus Tat proteins specifically associate with TAK in vivo and require the carboxyl-terminal domain of RNA polymerase II for function.
J. Virol.
70:4576-4584[Abstract].
|
| 71.
|
Zarkower, D., and J. Hodgkin.
1992.
Molecular analysis of the C. elegans sex-determining gene tra-1: a gene encoding two zinc finger proteins.
Cell
70:237-249[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 72.
|
Zarkower, D., and J. Hodgkin.
1993.
Zinc fingers in sex determination: only one of the two C. elegans Tra-1 proteins binds DNA in vitro.
Nucleic Acids Res.
21:3691-3698[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 73.
|
Zhou, Q., and P. A. Sharp.
1995.
Novel mechanism and factor for regulation by HIV-1 Tat.
EMBO J.
14:321-328[Medline].
|
| 74.
|
Zhu, Y.,
T. Peery,
J. Peng,
Y. Ramanathan,
N. Marshall,
T. Marshall,
B. Amendt,
M. B. Mathews, and D. H. Price.
1997.
Transcription elongation factor P-TEFb is required for HIV-1 tat transactivation in vitro.
Genes Dev.
11:2622-2632[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|