JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beaumont, T.
Right arrow Articles by Schuitemaker, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beaumont, T.
Right arrow Articles by Schuitemaker, H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, March 2001, p. 2246-2252, Vol. 75, No. 5
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.5.2246-2252.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Reversal of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 IIIB to a Neutralization-Resistant Phenotype in an Accidentally Infected Laboratory Worker with a Progressive Clinical Course

Tim Beaumont,1,2 Ad van Nuenen,1,2 Silvia Broersen,1,2 William A. Blattner,3 Vladimir V. Lukashov,2,4 and Hanneke Schuitemaker1,2,*

Department of Clinical Viro-Immunology, CLB Sanquin, and Laboratory for Experimental and Clinical Immunology1 and Human Retrovirus Laboratory4 of the University of Amsterdam, Academic Medical Center,2 Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 212013

Received 13 September 2000/Accepted 8 December 2000


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The role of humoral immunity in controlling human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is still controversial. The resistance of primary HIV-1 variants to neutralization by antibodies, sera from HIV-1-infected patients, and soluble CD4 protein has been suggested to be a prerequisite for the virus to establish persistence in vivo. To further test this hypothesis, we studied the neutralization sensitivity of two IIIB/LAV variants that were isolated from a laboratory worker who accidentally was infected with the T-cell-line-adapted neutralization-sensitive IIIB isolate. Compared to the original virus in the inoculum, the reisolated viruses showed an increased resistance to neutralization over time. The ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous nucleotide substitutions in the envelope gene pointed to strong positive selection. The emergence of neutralization-resistant HIV preceded disease development in this laboratory worker. Our results imply that the neutralization resistance of primary HIV may indeed be considered an escape mechanism from humoral immune control.


    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The length of the asymptomatic period between the moment of infection with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and the development of AIDS-like symptoms differs between patients. This may be interrelated with variables such as the level of immune control, the biological properties of the virus, and host susceptibility. High frequencies of cytotoxic T lymphocytes have indeed been correlated with the clearance of viremia during primary infection and prolonged asymptomatic survival (39, 40, 48). Neutralizing antibodies emerge only relatively late in the course of infection (28, 36, 37) and may contribute to the control of virus replication. Indeed, passive immunization in animal models provided partial protection (2, 31, 56), although this was not confirmed by all studies (47). In addition, titers of neutralizing antibody correlated with a lack of disease progression in long-term survivors of HIV-1 infection (7, 10, 15, 41, 44). Finally, the emergence of neutralization escape mutants has pointed to the presence of humoral immunity (1, 18, 28, 60). The efficiency of antibody neutralization in vivo may be limited by the neutralization resistance as generally observed for primary HIV-1 variants (1, 12, 35, 36). This resistance is observed in vitro for immune sera from HIV-infected patients and from vaccinees, for monoclonal antibodies, and for soluble CD4. With adaptation to replication in immortalized cell lines, HIV-1 but also other lentiviruses, such as equine infectious anemia virus and simian and feline immunodeficiency virus variants, become highly neutralization sensitive (4, 19, 32, 38, 51, 64). It is at present still unclear whether neutralization resistance of primary HIV-1 should be considered an escape mechanism from humoral immunity. Neutralization resistance in vivo might be a prerequisite for pathogenicity of HIV because it will allow the virus to persist in the presence of neutralizing antibodies.

To further study the clinical significance of primary HIV-1 neutralization resistance, we analyzed HIV-1 variants that were isolated longitudinally from a laboratory worker (LW-F) who progressed to AIDS within 8 years after accidental infection with the T-cell-line-adapted (TCLA) neutralization-sensitive IIIB strain (62).


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Cells. Virus isolation and virus stock preparation were performed with human phytohemagglutinin (PHA)-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) according to standard procedures (53). PBMC were isolated from buffy coats from healthy blood donor volunteers by Ficoll-Isopaque density gradient centrifugation. For stimulation, 5 × 106 cells/ml were cultured for 3 days in Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium (IMDM) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, penicillin (100 U/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml), and PHA (5 µg/ml). Subsequently, cells (106/ml) were grown in the absence of PHA, in medium supplemented with 10 U of recombinant interleukin-2 (Chiron Benelux, BV Amsterdam, The Netherlands)/ml. The T-cell line H9 was cultured in IMDM supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum, penicillin (100 U/ml), and streptomycin (100 µg/ml).

Viruses and neutralizing agents. The IIIB isolate was a kind gift of R. Gallo. IIIB variants were reisolated from an accidentally infected laboratory worker (LW-F) at approximately three (4 May 1988; isolate fe0233) and seven (7 May 1992; isolate FF3346) years after the assumed moment of infection (before 1986) (62). All viruses, including the originally H9-cell-line-adapted IIIB virus, were propagated on PHA-stimulated PBMC. Each week, virus production in the supernatant was monitored by an in-house p24 antigen capture ELISA (58). If sufficient p24 antigen production could be demonstrated, the titer of the virus stock was quantified by determination of the 50% tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) on PHA-stimulated healthy donor PBMC.

Viruses were tested for their relative neutralization sensitivity against increasing concentrations of recombinant soluble CD4 (sCD4), HIV-1 immune globulin (HIVIg), human sera Amshps, and the monoclonal antibodies (MAb) gp13, gp68, IgG1b12, F105, 902, 1577, and 2F5. In short, HIVIg is a preparation of purified polyclonal Ig derived from HIV-infected donors; Amshps consists of pooled plasma of 34 patients from the Amsterdam Cohort studies on AIDS and HIV-1 infection. The gp13, gp68, and F105 antibodies recognize epitopes surrounding the CD4bs of gp120 (49, 55), IgG1b12 recognizes the CD4bs of gp120 (9), and the antibody 902 reacts with the immunodominant hypervariable loop of gp120 (17) and the gp41-directed antibodies CHO 2F5 (epitope ELDKWA; amino acids 662 to 667 of BH10 gp160) and 1577 (region 735 to 752 of IIIB) (8, 21).

Neutralization sensitivity of HIV-1 variants. From each virus isolate, an inoculum of 100 TCID50/ml in a 100-µl final volume was incubated for 1 to 2 h at 37°C with increasing concentrations of the neutralizing agents. Subsequently, the mixtures of virus with sCD4, sera, or antibodies were added to 105 3-day-stimulated human PBMC in 96-well microtiter plates. The same mixtures of human PHA-stimulated PBMC were used to grow virus stocks and to determine virus titers. The following day, plates incubated with HIVIg or Amshps were washed extensively. On days 7 and 14, virus production in supernatants was analyzed in an in-house p24 antigen capture ELISA. Means of quadruplicate experiments of each agent, tested at least twice, were plotted. Percent neutralization was calculated by determining the reduction in p24 production in the presence of the agent compared to that for the cultures with virus only. When possible, 50% (IC50) and 90% (IC90) inhibitory concentrations were determined by linear regression.

Determination of virus coreceptor usage and cell tropism. U87 cells stably expressing CD4 alone or in combination with CCR5 or CXCR4 (a kind gift of D. Littman) were seeded at 104 cells per well in 96-well plates in IMDM supplemented with 5 µg of Polybrene/ml and 1 µg of puromycin/ml. Occasionally 200 µg of G418/ml was added to select for CD4-expressing cells. The next day, cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline, and 102 to 104 TCID50 of virus/ml was added in a 100-µl final volume. After 24 h, cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline and 200 µl of fresh medium was added. Supernatants were harvested on days 7, 14, and 21 and tested for the presence of p24 antigen in an in-house ELISA.

Replication in macrophages was determined as described previously (25). In brief, PBMC were obtained from heparinized venous blood by Percoll density gradient. The monocyte fraction was purified by centrifugal elutriation. Monocytes were cultured for 5 days at a cell concentration of 106 monocytes/ml in IMDM supplemented with 10% human pooled serum, penicillin (100 U/ml), and streptomycin (100 µg/ml) in 24-well plates.

DNA isolation, PCR, and sequence analysis. Total DNA from PBMC infected with the HIV-1 variants under study was isolated as described previously (6). PCR amplification of the complete envelope gene was performed using primer TB/3 (5'-GGCCTTATTAGGACACATAGTTAGCC-3') (positions relative to the HXB2D proviral genome: nucleotides 5405 to 5430) and TB/C (5'-GCTGCCTTGTAAGTCATTGGTCTTAAAGG-3') (nucleotides 9018 to 9046) using a mixture of Taq DNA and Pwo DNA polymerases (Expand High Fidelity; Boehringer Mannheim). All reactions were performed in the presence of 15 mM MgCl2 and 5 mM deoxynucleoside triphosphate (dNTP). Thermo-cycling conditions were the following: 2 min 30 s at 94°C once, 15 s at 94°C, 45 s at 50°C (2°C/sec slope), 6 min at 68°C repeated 10 times, followed by 30 times of the same program at 53°C and subsequently an additional 10-min extension at 68°C. PCR products were purified with a QIAquick PCR purification kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The gp120-gp41 region of the HIV envelope gene was completely sequenced with Dye terminator cycle sequencing with Ampli Taq DNA polymerase, FS (Perkin-Elmer, Applied Biosystems Division, Foster City, Calif.), performed according to the manufacturer's protocol on an ABI 373S automated sequencer.

Phylogenetic analysis. From each isolate unambiguous DNA sequences were obtained, and within the two sequence sets nucleotide sequences were aligned manually. Phylogenetic analysis was performed by using the PHYLIP DNADIST and NEIGHBOR software (22), based on the Kimura two-parameter distance estimation method with the HIV-1 MN sequence as an out-group. For both sequence sets, the bootstrap analysis was performed using SEQBOOT and CONSENSE (100 replicates). Synonymous (Ds) and nonsynonymous (Dn) distances were calculated by using the MEGA software (26) as previously described.


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Sensitivity to neutralization of IIIB and the LW-F isolates. From a laboratory worker who accidentally was infected in 1985 with IIIB (62), HIV variants that were isolated in 1988 (fe0233) and 1992 (FF3346) were used in this study. Viruses were isolated by coculture with PHA-stimulated PBMC. These HIV isolates have not been passaged through T-cell lines unless specifically indicated.

First the sensitivities of IIIB, fe0233, and FF3346 to neutralization by recombinant sCD4 were compared. The IC50 and IC90 of sCD4 for FF3346 were 26 and 54 µg/ml, respectively. A 10- to 15-fold-lower level of resistance to neutralization by sCD4 was observed for IIIB and isolate fe0233, which showed IC50 and IC90 values ranging from 2 to 8 µg of sCD4/ml for IIIB and 2 to 13 µg of sCD4/ml for fe0233 (Fig. 1a). The sensitivity of IIIB to sCD4 neutralization after adaptation to replicate on human PBMC was not different from that of the original H9-adapted IIIB virus (data not shown). Passage of FF3346 through the H9 T-cell line resulted in a neutralization-sensitive T-cell-line-adapted phenotype with an IC50 and IC90 of sCD4 comparable to those observed for IIIB and fe0233 (data not shown). Subsequently the sensitivity to neutralization by two polyclonal anti-HIV-1 sera, HIVIg and Amshps, was tested (Fig. 1b). Again, FF3346 was relatively neutralization resistant, with 50 and 90% inhibition at serum dilutions of 1:110 and 1:68 for HIVIg and 1:85 and 1:65 for Amshps, respectively. These dilutions were about fivefold lower than those required for neutralization of IIIB (50 and 90% neutralization at serum dilutions of 1:600 and 1:115 for HIVIg and 1:600 and 1:275 for Amshps, respectively). Compared to IIIB and FF3346, isolate fe0233 showed an intermediate neutralization-sensitive phenotype, with 50 and 90% neutralization at serum dilutions of 1:175 and 1:70 for HIVIg and 1:200 and 1:100 for Amshps.


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1.   Neutralization sensitivity of HIV-IIIB and LW-F isolates as determined on human PHA-stimulated PBMC. Of the tested viruses, HIV-IIIB (), fe0233 (open circle ), and FF3346(black-down-triangle ), 100 TCID50/ml was incubated with increasing concentrations of recombinant sCD4 (a), polyclonal pooled serum of HIV-1-infected patients (HIVIg and Amshps) (b), anti-CD4 binding site-directed MAbs (IgG1b12, 902, gp13, gp68, and F105) (c), and anti-gp41 MAbs 2F5 and 1577 (d). In the neutralization assay, p24 was measured, and mean optical densities (OD) were calculated from quadruplicate cultures from at least duplicate experiments. The percent neutralization was calculated by determining the reduction in supernatant p24 production in the presence of the neutralizing agent relative to that for control cultures lacking these agents.

Next, a panel of monoclonal antibodies was used for further characterization of the neutralization sensitivity of IIIB, fe0233, and FF3346. The IgG1b12 antibody, which recognizes a conserved epitope in the CD4 binding site, indeed, like sCD4, neutralized IIIB at an IC50 and IC90 of 0.7 and 0.9 µg/ml, respectively, and neutralized fe0233 at an IC50 of 1.5 and an IC90 of 1.7 µg/ml (Fig. 1c). Although IgG1b12 has been reported to be capable of neutralizing many primary viruses (9, 33), FF3346 was relatively resistant (IC50 and IC90 of 15 and 31 µg/ml respectively). The gp68, gp13, and F105 monoclonal antibodies, which all recognize amino acid residues surrounding the CD4 binding cavity, could neutralize IIIB only with IC50 values between 1.0 and 7.0 µg/ml and IC90 values between 22 and 65 µg/ml. The same phenomenon was seen for the monoclonal antibody 902, which recognizes the hypervariable immunodominant loop of HIV-1 (Fig. 1c). Neutralization with antibodies against gp41 (1577 and 2F5) (Fig. 1d) was not different among the three HIV-1 isolates. Although there was a tendency towards a more neutralization-resistant phenotype for the two LW-F isolates, IIIB was also relatively resistant at the concentrations tested. These results suggest ongoing evolutionary progression towards an increased resistance to neutralization within the CD4 binding region of the gp120 envelope protein.

Phylogenetic and sequence analysis. Sequence analysis of the nucleotides spanning the gp120 envelope region and subsequent phylogenetic analysis showed that fe0233 and FF3346 clustered together with HXB2D, BH10, PV22, and LW90-2 (GenBank accession no. K03455, M15654, K02083, and U12053, respectively) (Fig. 2). BH10 and PV22 are H9/HTLV-III proviral DNA clones, and LW90-2 is another isolate from LW-F (isolated in 1990) from which the complete envelope genome was sequenced (50). Genetic distances between the IIIB isolate and the two LW-F isolates never exceeded 3%, indicative of their close relatedness (data not shown). We next analyzed changes in the deduced amino acid sequence of gp120 that could be associated with the observed phenotypic changes in the viruses isolated from the laboratory worker (Fig. 3). Amino acid substitutions in fe0233 and FF3346 were observed mainly in the variable regions of gp120 and in the loop region of gp41. Both V3 and potential N-linked glycosylation sites in gp120 have been implicated in biological properties of HIV-1 (13, 65). Despite the high number of five amino acid substitutions in V3, only one (Arg-Gly 304) resulted in a change of the overall charge (-1) of the V3 loop in fe0233 and FF3346. However, the fe0233 and FF3346 V3 loops still had a charge of +8, compatible with their restricted CXCR4 coreceptor use (23). In agreement with the preserved syncytium-inducing (SI) phenotype, there was a positively charged amino acid residue at position 311 in all three viruses. We were able to confirm a mutation in the highly antigenic GPGRAF sequence in the top of the V3 loop, which was already found 1 year after infection (20). The overall charge of the V2 loop was also reduced (-2) in isolates fe0233 and FF3346 compared to that in isolate IIIB. In isolate FF3346, two potential N-linked glycosylation sites were lost (positions 289 and 674). In addition, the two amino acid substitutions Val-Ala 275 and Ala-Val 281 may redirect the glycoprotein moiety on the Asp at position 276, which could influence the accessibility of the underlying CD4 binding cavity. The importance of this specific N-linked glycosylation site in neutralization sensitivity has been described previously (13).


View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2.   Phylogenetic analysis of complete HIV envelope sequences of the HXB2D and LW-F isolates. Included are two other IIIB-related sequences, BH10 (M15654) and PV22 (K02083), respectively, and an LW-F clone named LW90-2 (U12053) from which the envelope sequence was determined previously (50). The phylogenetic tree was constructed with the neighbor-joining, Kimura two-parameter distance estimation method. The MN branch is truncated to facilitate presentation and was used as an outgroup.


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3.   Sequence of the parental HXB2D and the two reisolated LW-F isolates. The predicted amino acid sequences of the envelope glycoproteins of the fe0233 and FF3346 viruses, based on the consensus sequence of the Env fragment amplified from infected human PBMC, are aligned with the HXB2D sequence. Differences in amino acid residues are indicated. The start sites of gp120 and gp41 are shown, as are the locations of the different gp120 regions.

A relatively high number of amino acid substitutions in the LW-F isolates compared to the IIIB isolate were present in the so-called anti-hotspots (27, 65). These surface-accessible residues are located adjacent to amino acids that are directly involved in CD4 binding and are positioned mainly in the constant regions C2, C3, and C4 but also in V5. Two amino acid residues that are directly involved in CD4 binding were also changed (Ala-Val 281 in fe0233 and FF3346; Glu-Ala 370 in FF3346). Amino acid residues in C1, C4, and C5 of gp120 that are involved in the noncovalent association between gp120 and gp41 were preserved in all three isolates. In addition, we observed a recovery of the VPR open reading frame, which underscores the importance of VPR for viral replication in primary cells (data not shown). Finally we analyzed whether the sequence changes were due to selective immune pressure or random mutations. This was analyzed by calculating the ratio of synonymous versus nonsynonymous mutations for gp120, gp41, and the total envelope sequence (Table 1). A relatively low Ds/Dn ratio (approximately 0.35) suggests positive selection of favorable amino acid substitutions, whereas a low level of immune pressure is represented by a high ratio (approximately 0.65) (30). The Ds/Dn ratio of 0.57 between isolates IIIB and fe0233 for gp120 was somewhat higher than the ratio found between fe0233 and FF3346 (Ds/Dn = 0.42). In gp41, Ds/Dn ratios between fe0233 and FF3346 were also markedly lower than between IIIB and fe0233, 0.33 and 1.0, respectively. Ds/Dn ratios between parental HXB2D and isolate FF3346 showed a relatively normal ratio for gp120 and the complete envelope and a low mean Ds/Dn ratio for gp41. The lower ratios for fe0233 than for FF3346 are indicative of positive selection pressure on the virus in the period from 3 to 7 years after infection, which is in agreement with the observed changes in neutralization sensitivity of the viruses.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1.   Intrahost evolution of HIV-IIIB in the laboratory worker as determined by the Ds/Dn ratio based on synonymous (Ds) and nonsynonymous (Dn) mutations in different regions of the envelope genea

Coreceptor usage and cell tropism. In recently infected individuals, the HIV-1 quasispecies in general is very homogeneous, with a non-syncytium-inducing (NSI) macrophage-tropic phenotype and a CCR5-restricted coreceptor usage (54). This is also observed in recipients who were infected by individuals with SI CXCR4 using viruses. In these cases, selective transmission or outgrowth of NSI HIV-1 occurred, although at least low-level SI virus replication persisted (61). Cell-free inoculation of 5-day-cultured monocyte-derived macrophages revealed that isolates fe0233 and FF3346 indeed both had the capacity to replicate in macrophages (Table 2). However, as determined by infection of the MT2 cell line and microscopic analysis for the appearance of syncytia, isolates fe0233 and FF3346 were also both classified as T-cell line tropic and SI. The macrophage tropism of the LW-F viruses prompted us to analyze their coreceptor usage. U87 cell lines stably expressing CD4 and CCR5 or CXCR4, the two coreceptors that are considered most relevant for in vivo HIV infection (66), were inoculated with fe0233 or FF3346. Both isolates established a productive infection only in the U87/CD4/CXCR4 cell line and lacked the capacity to use coreceptor CCR5 (Table 2). Although we cannot exclude the possibility that NSI CCR5 viruses may have been present very early in infection or coexist as a minor population, our data at least confirm that CCR5 usage is no prerequisite for macrophage tropism or neutralization resistance (14, 34, 57, 59).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2.   Coreceptor usage and macrophage tropism of isolate IIIB and HIV variants isolated from LW-Fa


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The neutralization resistance of primary HIV-1 variants is considered instrumental for HIV-1 persistence in the presence of neutralizing antibodies and HIV-1 pathogenicity in vivo (7, 13, 18, 24, 35, 60). Since all infections are established by primary neutralization-resistant HIV-1, it has been impossible to conclude whether neutralization resistance should indeed be considered an escape mechanism. The unfortunate accidental infection of a laboratory worker (LW-F) with the TCLA neutralization-sensitive IIIB variant provided the opportunity to study directly the relevance of HIV-1 neutralization resistance in vivo. LW-F had a typical clinical course, developing AIDS within 8 years after infection (62). Comparison of viruses that were isolated from the laboratory worker 4 and 7 years after infection showed a gradual loss of HIV neutralization sensitivity, preceding clinical progression to AIDS. Based on this observation, we conclude that the neutralization resistance of HIV may be considered an escape mechanism from humoral immunity. The clinical relevance of HIV-1 neutralization resistance is in line with our finding that a IIIB variant reisolated from an experimentally infected chimpanzee after 10 years of asymptomatic HIV infection was still sensitive to neutralization by CD4-binding-site-directed antibodies and sCD4 (5). Symptom-free follow-up of this animal has now extended to more than 18 years. It is remarkable that the neutralization-sensitive IIIB virus could persist in LW-F, since steadily increasing and broadening antibody responses against the gp160 protein and IIIB-derived V3 peptides were demonstrated even 5 years after infection (45). Moreover, a strong antibody response was already measured in serum 1 year after infection (37, 42), and neutralizing activity in serum against TCLA viruses was demonstrated between 3 and 5 years after infection (45, 46, 50). However, since binding to monomeric gp120 in a CD4 binding inhibition assay or neutralization against TCLA isolates is not a relevant quantification for neutralizing activity (37, 38, 42), it may be possible that titers of neutralizing antibody were absent or at least too low to fully suppress viral replication.

Other mechanisms to escape humoral immunity have been hypothesized. HIV-1 macrophage tropism may be critical for viral replication in the presence of neutralizing antibodies in vivo (52). Spreading of virus during close cell-cell contact, which frequently occurs between macrophages and T cells, would prevent a cell-free state during which HIV-1 otherwise would be vulnerable to neutralizing antibodies and would select for macrophage-tropic HIV-1. In support of this is the macrophage tropism of the LW-F isolates which, however, did not coincide with the capacity to use coreceptor CCR5.

Although not sufficient to suppress virus replication, even a modest autologous neutralizing antibody response may have been sufficient to drive evolution of the IIIB variants in LW-F towards neutralization resistance. Comparison of the synonymous versus nonsynonymous mutations between HXB2D and fe0233 and between fe0233 and FF3346 indeed pointed to an increasing selection pressure on the virus, which may be humoral immunity (45). The impact of the increasing selection pressure was most pronounced in gp41, as can be concluded from the low Ds/Dn ratio of 0.33 for this region (29, 30). We did not observe a change in neutralization sensitivity for two gp41-directed antibodies, and in agreement there were no mutations in their respective epitopes. We cannot exclude the possibility that antibodies directed against the region in gp41 that shows nonsilent mutations may have been present in vivo, although the level of gp41 antibodies is generally considered to be very low. In addition, only part of the region in gp41 with the high number of positively selected mutations may be accessible to antibodies, which makes antibody-mediated selection unlikely. Therefore, an alternative explanation for the positive selection of the gp41 mutations could be that the positively selected gp41 mutations contribute to a favorable configuration of the gp41-gp120 complex (3, 16, 43, 63).

A relationship between the presence of HIV-specific humoral immunity and delayed or even absent disease progression has been suggested by several studies (10-12, 41, 44). A progressive disease course in the presence of neutralizing antibodies was in most studies attributed to the emergence of viral escape mutants (1, 7, 18, 24, 28, 36, 37, 60). The LW-F viruses had gained a broad neutralization resistance against immune sera from HIV-infected patients, sCD4, and different antibodies. The molecular basis for neutralization resistance of primary HIV-1 is still unknown. With knowledge of the mechanism of neutralization resistance, we may be able to circumvent it, opening up new therapeutic strategies.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Ray Sweet (Smithkline Beecham) for kindly providing recombinant soluble CD4 and Alfred Prince for HIVIg. Amshps was obtained from Jaap Goudsmit. The human monoclonal antibodies gp13 and gp68 were a kind gift of Martin Schutten. IgG1b12 was kindly provided by Paul Parren and Dennis Burton. The 1577 gp41 MAb and 2F5 were obtained through the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent Program, NIH, contributed by M. Ferguson and H. Katinger, respectively. For critically reading the manuscript and helpful discussion, we thank Frank Miedema and Rene van Lier.

This work was supported by The Dutch AIDS Foundation grant number 1304.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: CLB Sanquin, Plesmanlaan 125, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Phone: 31 20 5123317. Fax: 31 20 5123310. E-mail: J_Schuitemaker{at}clb.nl.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Arendrup, M., C. Nielsen, J. E. S. Hansen, C. Pedersen, L. Mathiesen, and J. O. Nielsen. 1992. Autologous HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies: emergence of neutralization resistant escape virus and subsequent development of escape virus neutralizing antibodies. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 5:303-307.
2. Baba, T. W., V. Liska, R. Hofmann-Lehmann, J. Vlasak, W. Xu, S. Ayehunie, L. A. Cavacini, M. R. Posner, H. Katinger, G. Stiegler, B. J. Bernacky, T. A. Rizvi, R. Schmidt, L. R. Hill, M. E. Keeling, Y. Lu, J. E. Wright, T.-C. Chou, and R. M. Ruprecht. 2000. Human neutralizing monoclonal antibodies of the IgG1 subtype protect against mucosal simian-human immunodeficiency virus infection. Nat. Med. 6:200-206[CrossRef][Medline].
3. Back, N. K. T., L. Smit, M. Schutten, P. L. Nara, M. Tersmette, and J. Goudsmit. 1993. Mutations in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp41 affect sensitivity to neutralization by gp120 antibodies. J. Virol. 67:6897-6902[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Baldinotti, F., D. Matteucci, P. Mazzetti, C. Giannelli, P. Bandecchi, F. Tozzini, and M. Bendinelli. 1994. Serum neutralization of feline immunodeficiency virus is markedly dependent on passage history of the virus and host system. J. Virol. 68:4572-4579[Abstract/Free Full Text].
5. Beaumont, T., S. Broersen, A. van Nuenen, H. G. Huisman, A. M. De Roda Husman, J. L. Heeney, and H. Schuitemaker. 2000. Increased neutralization sensitivity and reduced replicative capacity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 after short-term in vivo or in vitro passage through chimpanzees. J. Virol. 74:7699-7707[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Boom, R., C. J. A. Sol, M. M. M. Salimans, C. L. Jansen, P. M. E. Wertheim-van Dillen, and J. Van der Noordaa. 1991. A rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28:495-503.
7. Bradney, A. P., S. Scheer, J. M. Crawford, S. P. Buchbinder, and D. C. Montefiori. 1999. Neutralization escape in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected long-term nonprogressors. J. Infect. Dis. 179:1264-1267[CrossRef][Medline].
8. Buchacher, A., R. Predl, K. Strutzenberger, A. Steinfellner, A. Trkola, M. Purtscher, G. Gruber, C. Tauer, F. Steindl, A. Jungbauer, and H. Katinger. 1994. Generation of human monoclonal antibodies against HIV-1 proteins; electrofusion and Epstein-Barr virus transformation for peripheral blood lymphocyte immortalization. AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 10:359-369[Medline].
9. Burton, D. R., J. Pyati, R. Koduri, S. J. Sharp, G. B. Thornton, P. W. H. Parren, L. S. W. Sawyer, R. M. Hendry, N. Dunlop, P. L. Nara, M. Lamacchia, E. M. Garratty, E. R. Stiehm, Y. J. Bryson, Y. Cao, J. P. Moore, D. D. Ho, and C. F. Barbas, III. 1994. Efficient neutralization of primary isolates of HIV-1 by a recombinant human monoclonal antibody. Science 266:1024-1027[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. Cao, Y., L. Qin, L. Zhang, J. T. Safrit, and D. D. Ho. 1995. Virologic and immunologic characterization of long-term survivors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 332:201-208[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Carotenuto, P., D. Looij, L. Keldermans, F. De Wolf, and J. Goudsmit. 1998. Neutralizing antibodies are positively associated with CD4+ T-cell counts and T-cell function in long term AIDS-free infection. AIDS 12:1591-1600[CrossRef][Medline].
12. Cavacini, L. A., J. E. Peterson, E. Nappi, M. Duval, R. Goldstein, K. Mayer, and M. R. Posner. 1999. Minimal incidence of serum antibodies reactive with intact primary isolate virions in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected individuals. J. Virol 73:9638-9641[Abstract/Free Full Text].
13. Cayabyab, M., G. B. Karlsson, B. A. Etemad-Moghadam, W. Hofmann, T. Steenbeke, M. Halloran, J. W. Fanton, M. K. Axthelm, N. L. Letvin, and J. G. Sodroski. 1999. Changes in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoproteins responsible for the pathogenicity of a multiply passaged simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV-HXBc2). J. Virol. 73:976-984[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Cecilia, D., V. N. KewalRamani, J. O'Leary, B. Volsky, P. Nyambi, S. Burda, S. Xu, D. R. Littman, and S. Zolla-Pazner. 1998. Neutralization profiles of primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates in the context of coreceptor usage. J. Virol. 72:6988-6996[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Cecilia, D., C. A. Kleeberger, A. Munoz, J. V. Giorgi, and S. Zolla-Pazner. 1999. A longitudinal study of neutralizing antibodies and disease progression in HIV-1-infected subjects. J. Infect. Dis. 176:1365-1374.
16. Chan, D. C., D. Fass, J. M. Berger, and P. S. Kim. 1997. Core structure of gp41 from the HIV envelope glycoprotein. Cell 89:263-273[CrossRef][Medline].
17. Chesebro, B., and K. Wehrly. 1988. Development of a sensitive quantitative focal assay for human immunodeficiency virus infectivity. J. Virol. 62:3779-3788[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. Ciurea, A., P. Klenerman, L. Hunziker, E. Horvath, M. S. Senn, A. F. Ochsenbein, H. Hengartner, and R. M. Zinkernagel. 1999. Viral persistence in vivo through selection of neutralizing antibody-escape variants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:2749-2754[Abstract/Free Full Text].
19. Cook, R. F., S. L. Berger, K. E. Rushlow, J. M. McManus, S. J. Cook, S. Harrold, M. L. Raabe, R. C. Montelaro, and C. J. Issel. 1995. Enhanced sensitivity to neutralizing antibodies in a variant of equine infectious anemia virus is linked to amino acid substitutions in the surface unit envelope glycoprotein. J. Virol. 69:1493-1499[Abstract].
20. Di Marzo Veronese, F., M. S. Reitz, Jr., G. Gupta, M. Robert-Guroff, C. Boyer-Thompson, A. Louie, R. C. Gallo, and P. Lusso. 1993. Loss of a neutralizing epitope by a spontaneous point mutation in the V3 loop of HIV-1 isolated from an infected laboratory worker. J. Biol. Chem. 268:25894-25901[Abstract/Free Full Text].
21. Evans, D. J., J. McKeating, J. M. Meredith, K. L. Burke, K. Katrak, A. John, M. Ferguson, P. D. Minor, R. A. Weiss, and J. W. Almond. 1989. An engineered poliovirus chimaera elicits broadly reactive HIV-1 neutralizing antibodies. Nature 339:385-388[CrossRef][Medline].
22. Felsenstein, J. 1993. PHYLIP manual version 3.5. University Herbarium of the University of California at Berkeley.
23. Fouchier, R. A. M., M. Groenink, N. A. Kootstra, M. Tersmette, H. G. Huisman, F. Miedema, and H. Schuitemaker. 1992. Phenotype-associated sequence variation in the third variable domain of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 molecule. J. Virol. 66:3183-3187[Abstract/Free Full Text].
24. Kimata, J. T., L. Kuller, D. B. Anderson, P. Dailey, and J. Overbaugh. 1999. Emerging cytopathic and antigenic simian immunodeficiency virus variants influence AIDS progression. Nat. Med. 5:535-541[CrossRef][Medline].
25. Kitano, K., C. N. Abboud, D. H. Ryan, S. G. Quan, G. C. Baldwin, and D. W. Golde. 1991. Macrophage-active colony-stimulating factors enhance human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection in bone marrow stem cells. Blood 77:1699-1705[Abstract/Free Full Text].
26. Kumar, S., K. Tamura, and M. Nei. 1994. MEGA: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis software for microcomputers. CABIOS 10:189-192[Abstract/Free Full Text].
27. Kwong, P. D., R. Wyatt, J. Robinson, R. W. Sweet, J. Sodroski, and W. A. Hendrickson. 1998. Structure of an HIV gp120 envelope glycoprotein in complex with the CD4 receptor and a neutralizing human antibody. Nature 393:648-659[CrossRef][Medline].
28. Lewis, J., P. Balfe, C. Arnold, S. Kaye, R. S. Tedder, and J. A. McKeating. 1998. Development of a neutralizing antibody response during acute primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection and the emergence of antigenic variants. J. Virol. 72:8943-8951[Abstract/Free Full Text].
29. Lukashov, V. V., and J. Goudsmit. 1995. Increasing genotype and phenotypic selection from the original genomic RNA populations of HIV-1 strains LAI and MN (NM) by peripheral blood mononuclear cell culture, B-cell-line propagation and T-cell-line adaptation. AIDS 9:1307-1311[Medline].
30. Lukashov, V. V., C. L. Kuiken, and J. Goudsmit. 1995. Intrahost human immunodeficiency virus type 1 evolution is related to the length of the immunocompetent period. J. Virol. 69:6911-6916[Abstract].
31. Mascola, J. R., G. Stiegler, T. C. VanCott, H. Katinger, C. B. Carpenter, C. E. Hanson, H. Beary, D. Hayes, S. S. Frankel, D. L. Birx, and M. G. Lewis. 2000. Protection of macaques against vaginal transmission of a pathogenic HIV-1/SIV chimeric virus by passive infusion of neutralizing antibodies. Nat. Med. 6:207-210[CrossRef][Medline].
32. Means, R. E., T. Greenough, and R. C. Desrosiers. 1997. Neutralization sensitivity of cell culture-passaged simian immunodeficiency virus. J. Virol. 71:7895-7902[Abstract].
33. Mo, H., L. Stamatatos, J. E. Ip, C. F. Barbas, P. W. H. I. Parren, D. R. Burton, J. P. Moore, and D. D. Ho. 1997. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 mutants that escape neutralization by human monoclonal antibody IgG1b12. J. Virol. 71:6869-6874[Abstract].
34. Montefiori, D. C., R. G. Collman, T. R. Fouts, J. Y. Zhou, M. Bilska, J. A. Hoxie, J. P. Moore, and D. P. Bolognesi. 1998. Evidence that antibody-mediated neutralization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 by sera from infected individuals is independent of coreceptor usage. J. Virol. 72:1886-1893[Abstract/Free Full Text].
35. Montefiori, D. C., I. Y. Zhou, B. Barnes, D. Lake, E. M. Hersh, Y. Masuho, and L. B. J. Lefkowitz. 1991. Homotypic antibody responses to fresh clinical isolates of human immunodeficiency virus. Virology 182:635-643[CrossRef][Medline].
36. Moog, C., H. J. A. Fleury, I. Pellegrin, A. Kirn, and A. M. Aubertin. 1997. Autologous and heterologous neutralizing antibody responses following initial seroconversion in human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected individuals. J. Virol. 71:3734-3741[Abstract].
37. Moore, J. P., Y. Cao, D. D. Ho, and R. A. Koup. 1994. Development of the anti-gp120 antibody response during seroconversion to human immunodeficiency virus type 1. J. Virol. 68:5142-5155[Abstract/Free Full Text].
38. Moore, J. P., and D. D. Ho. 1995. HIV-1 neutralization: the consequences of viral adaptation to growth on transformed T cells. AIDS 9(Suppl. A):S117-S136.
39. Ogg, G. S., X. Jin, S. Bonhoeffer, P. D. Dunbar, M. Nowak, S. Monard, J. P. Segal, Y. Cao, S. L. Rowland-Jones, V. Cerundolo, A. Hurley, M. Markovits, D. D. Ho, D. F. Nixon, and A. J. McMichael. 1998. Quantitation of HIV-1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes and plasma load of viral RNA. Science 279:2103-2106[Abstract/Free Full Text].
40. Ogg, G. S., S. Kostense, M. R. Klein, S. Jurriaans, D. Hamann, A. J. McMichael, and F. Miedema. 1999. Longitudinal phenotypic analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-specific T lymphocytes: correlation with disease progression. J. Virol. 73:9153-9160[Abstract/Free Full Text].
41. Pantaleo, G., S. Menzo, M. Vaccarezza, C. Graziosi, O. J. Cohen, J. F. Demarest, D. Montefiori, J. M. Orenstein, C. Fox, L. K. Schrager, J. B. Margolick, S. P. Buchbinder, J. V. Giorgi, and A. S. Fauci. 1995. Studies in subjects with long-term nonprogressive human immunodeficiency virus infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 332:209-216[Abstract/Free Full Text].
42. Parren, P. W. H. I., J. P. Moore, D. R. Burton, and Q. J. Sattentau. 1999. The neutralizing antibody response to HIV-1: viral evasion and escape from humoral immunity. AIDS 13(Suppl. A):S137-S162.
43. Perrin, C., E. Fenouillet, and I. M. Jones. 1998. Role of glycosylation sites in the biological activity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope glycoprotein. Virology 242:338-345[CrossRef][Medline].
44. Pilgrim, A. K., G. Pantaleo, O. J. Cohen, L. M. Fink, J. Y. Zhou, J. T. Zhou, D. P. Bolognesi, A. S. Fauci, and D. C. Montefiori. 1997. Neutralizing antibody responses to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 in primary infection and long-term-nonprogressive infection. J. Infect. Dis. 176:924-932[Medline].
45. Pincus, S. H., K. G. Messer, P. L. Nara, W. A. Blattner, G. Colclough, and M. Reitz. 1994. Temporal analysis of the antibody response to HIV envelope protein in HIV-infected laboratory workers. J. Clin. Investig. 93:2505-2513.
46. Pincus, S. H., K. G. Messer, D. H. Schwartz, G. K. Lewis, B. S. Graham, W. A. Blattner, and G. Fisher. 1993. Differences in the antibody response to human immunodeficiency virus-1 envelope glycoprotein (gp160) in infected laboratory workers and vaccines. J. Clin. Investig. 91:1987-1996.
47. Poignard, P., R. Sabbe, G. R. Picchio, M. Wang, R. J. Gulizia, H. Katinger, P. W. H. I. Parren, D. E. Mosier, and D. R. Burton. 1999. Neutralizing antibodies have limited effects on the control of established HIV-1 infection in vivo. Immunity 10:431-438[CrossRef][Medline].
48. Pontesilli, O., M. R. Klein, S. R. Kerkhof-Garde, N. G. Pakker, F. De Wolf, H. Schuitemaker, and F. Miedema. 1998. Longitudinal analysis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses: a predominant gag-specific response is associated with non-progressive infection. J. Infect. Dis. 178:1008-1018[Medline].
49. Posner, M. R., T. Hideshima, T. Cannon, M. Mukherjee, K. H. Mayer, and R. A. Byrn. 1991. An IgG human monoclonal antibody that reacts with HIV-1/gp120, inhibits virus binding to cells, and neutralizes infection. J. Immunol. 146:4325-4332[Abstract].
50. Reitz, M. S., Jr., L. Hall, M. Robert-Guroff, J. Lautenberger, B. M. Hahn, G. M. Shaw, L. I. Kong, S. H. Weiss, D. Waters, R. C. Gallo, and W. Blattner. 1994. Viral variability and serum antibody response in a laboratory worker infected with the HIV type 1 (HTLV type IIIB). AIDS Res. Hum. Retrovir. 10:1143-1155[Medline].
51. Sawyer, L. S. W., M. T. Wrin, L. Crawford-Mikza, B. Potts, Y. Wu, P. A. Weber, R. D. Alfonso, and C. V. Hanson. 1994. Neutralization sensitivity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is determined in part by the cell in which the virus is propagated. J. Virol. 68:1342-1349[Abstract/Free Full Text].
52. Schuitemaker, H. 1994. Macrophage-tropic HIV-1 variants: initiators of infection and AIDS pathogenesis? J. Leukoc. Biol. 56:218-224[Abstract].
53. Schuitemaker, H., M. Koot, N. A. Kootstra, M. W. Dercksen, R. E. Y. De Goede, R. P. Van Steenwijk, J. M. A. Lange, J. K. M. Eeftink Schattenkerk, F. Miedema, and M. Tersmette. 1992. Biological phenotype of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 clones at different stages of infection: progression of disease is associated with a shift from monocytotropic to T-cell-tropic virus populations. J. Virol. 66:1354-1360[Abstract/Free Full Text].
54. Schuitemaker, H., N. A. Kootstra, R. E. Y. De Goede, F. De Wolf, F. Miedema, and M. Tersmette. 1991. Monocytotropic human immunodeficiency virus 1 (HIV-1) variants detectable in all stages of HIV infection lack T-cell line tropism and syncytium-inducing ability in primary T-cell culture. J. Virol. 65:356-363[Abstract/Free Full Text].
55. Schutten, M., A. McKnight, R. C. Huisman, M. Thali, J. A. McKeating, J. Sodroski, J. Goudsmit, and A. D. Osterhaus. 1993. Further characterization of an antigenic site of HIV-1 gp120 recognized by virus neutralizing human monoclonal antibodies. AIDS 7:919-923[Medline].
56. Shibata, R., T. Igarashi, N. Haigwood, A. Buckler-White, R. Ogert, W. Ross, R. Willey, M. W. Cho, and M. A. Martin. 1999. Neutralizing antibody directed against the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein can completely block HIV-1/SIV chimeric virus infection of macaque monkeys. Nat. Med. 5:204-210[CrossRef][Medline].
57. Simmons, G., J. D. Reeves, A. McKnight, N. Dejucq, S. Hibbits, C. A. Power, E. Aarons, D. Schols, E. De Clercq, A. E. I. Proudfoot, and P. R. Clapham. 1998. CXCR4 as a functional coreceptor for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection of primary macrophages. J. Virol. 72:8453-8457[Abstract/Free Full Text].
58. Tersmette, M., I. N. Winkel, M. Groenink, R. A. Gruters, P. Spence, E. Saman, G. van der Groen, F. Miedema, and J. G. Huisman. 1989. Detection and subtyping of HIV-1 isolates with a panel of characterized monoclonal antibodies to HIV-p24 gag. Virology 171:149-155[CrossRef][Medline].
59. Trkola, A., T. Ketas, V. N. KewalRamani, F. Endorf, J. M. Binley, H. Katinger, J. Robinson, D. R. Littman, and J. P. Moore. 1998. Neutralization sensitivity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 primary isolates to antibodies and CD4-based reagents is independent of coreceptor usage. J. Virol. 72:1876-1885[Abstract/Free Full Text].
60. Tsang, M. L., L. A. Evans, P. McQueen, L. Hurren, C. Byrne, R. Penny, B. Tindall, and D. A. Cooper. 1994. Neutralizing antibodies against sequential autologous human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates after seroconversion. J. Infect. Dis. 170:1141-1147[Medline].
61. Van't Wout, A. B., N. A. Kootstra, G. A. Mulder-Kampinga, N. Albrecht-van Lent, H. J. Scherpbier, J. Veenstra, K. Boer, R. A. Coutinho, F. Miedema, and H. Schuitemaker. 1994. Macrophage-tropic variants initiate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection after sexual, parenteral and vertical transmission. J. Clin. Investig. 94:2060-2067.
62. Weiss, S. H., J. J. Goedert, S. Gartner, M. Popovic, D. Waters, P. Markham, F. Di Marzo Veronese, M. H. Gail, W. E. Barkley, J. Gibbons, F. A. Gill, M. Leuther, G. M. Shaw, R. C. Gallo, and W. A. Blattner. 1988. Risk of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) infection among laboratory workers. Science 239:68-71[Abstract/Free Full Text].
63. Weissenhorn, W., A. Dessen, S. C. Harrison, J. J. Skehel, and D. C. Wiley. 1997. Atomic structure of the ectodomain from HIV-1 gp41. Nature 387:426-430[CrossRef][Medline].
64. Wrin, T., T. Loh, J. Charron Vennari, H. Schuitemaker, and J. H. Nunberg. 1995. Adaptation to persistent growth in the H9 cell line renders a primary isolate of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 sensitive to neutralization by vaccine sera. J. Virol. 69:39-48[Abstract].
65. Wyatt, R., P. D. Kwong, E. Desjardins, R. W. Sweet, J. Robinson, W. A. Hendrickson, and J. Sodroski. 1998. The antigenic structure of the HIV gp120 envelope protein. Nature 393:705-711[CrossRef][Medline].
66. Zhang, Y.-J., and J. P. Moore. 1999. Will multiple coreceptors need to be targeted by inhibitors of human immunodeficiency virus type 1? J. Virol. 73:3443-3448[Abstract/Free Full Text].

Journal of Virology, March 2001, p. 2246-2252, Vol. 75, No. 5
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.5.2246-2252.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Beaumont, T.
Right arrow Articles by Schuitemaker, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Beaumont, T.
Right arrow Articles by Schuitemaker, H.

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS