Previous Article
Journal of Virology, February 2001, p. 2029-2032, Vol. 75, No. 4
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.4.2029-2032.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Intact EAV-HP Endogenous Retrovirus in Sonnerat's
Jungle Fowl
M. A.
Sacco,
K.
Howes, and
K.
Venugopal*
Institute for Animal Health, Compton,
Newbury, Berkshire RG20 7NN, United Kingdom
Received 22 August 2000/Accepted 20 November 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The EAV-HP group of chicken endogenous retrovirus elements was
previously shown to be defective, with large deletions of the pol gene. In this report, we demonstrate that genomes of
other Gallus species also maintain EAV-HP elements with
similar deletions. The chicken EAV-HP1 locus was detected in both red
(Gallus gallus gallus) and Sonnerat's (Gallus
sonneratii) jungle fowl with identical integration sites,
indicating that these elements had integrated before separation of the
Gallus species. Furthermore, we demonstrate for the first
time that the G. sonneratii genome carries EAV-HP elements
with intact pol regions.
 |
TEXT |
The EAV-HP (also designated ev/J),
the most recently identified members of the endogenous avian retrovirus
(EAV) family, are present in Gallus species as 10 to 15 copies per genome (12). Four different structures of
EAV-HP proviruses have been identified in the chicken genome. Three of
these 4-kbp-long provirus structures, designated types I, II, and III,
show large deletions spanning the entire pol gene and parts
of the gag and env regions. Each structure has a
different gag-env deletion junction, with the type II and
III provirus deletions extending an additional 57 and 86 bp,
respectively, than the smallest (type I) provirus deletion size
(9, 10). These proviruses are found at multiple loci, with
the type I provirus appearing to be the most abundant, based on its
frequency in clones randomly screened from separate chicken genomic DNA
libraries (9, 10). A single clone, designated ev/J clone
4-1, forms the fourth type of proviral structure, comprising a cDNA of
the env subgenomic transcript bounded by long terminal repeats (LTRs) (9). The EAV-HP proviruses are more than
97% identical to the newly emerged subgroup J avian leukosis virus (ALV-J) env gene and demonstrate >96% sequence identity to
other EAV family members in the R and U5 regions, the 5' untranslated region, and portions of the gag gene (6, 9,
10).
Because of their distribution in several Gallus species, the
EAV family is considered an ancient group of retroviruses that integrated into a common ancestor. The genus Gallus is
composed of four species: the Sonnerat's or grey jungle fowl (SJF;
G. sonneratii), the green jungle fowl (GJF; G. varius), the Ceylonese jungle fowl (CJF; G. lafayettei), and the red jungle fowl (RJF; G. gallus), of which domesticated chickens are a subspecies (G. gallus
domesticus) (4). EAV-HP proviruses have also been
detected in both RJF and SJF by hybridization of env and LTR
sequences and PCR amplification of the env region (10,
12). In this study, we have used a PCR approach to examine
whether (i) the EAV-HP proviruses in RJF and SJF have the same
pol region deletions as in chickens, (ii) the EAV-HP1 and
EAV-HP2 loci, present in chickens, could be detected in the jungle
fowls, and (iii) the genomic deletion and integration events occurred
before or after the separation of Gallus species.
The EMBL accession numbers for the sequences described here are
AJ292966 for clone EAV-JF1 and AJ292967 for EAV-JF2, which includes the
assembled sequences of the 5'-end and 3'-end PCR products.
As a first step, PCR was carried out with primers for the
gag and env regions (Fig.
1A), amplifying across the deletion
junctions to detect proviruses with pol region deletions
from chicken, RJF, and SJF DNA. Chicken and jungle fowl genomic DNAs
isolated as previously described (10) were amplified with
0.5 µM each of primers H83REV (5'-TATTTCTTGCACCAACCTCCC-3')
and H8 (5'-TGGTGAATCCACAATATCTACGAC -3') in PCR buffer
(20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.4], 50 mM KCl, 0.25 mM deoxynucleoside
triphosphate mix (dNTPs) 2 mM MgCl2) with approximately 1 ng of template DNA using Taq Gold DNA polymerase (Bio/Gene
Ltd., Kimbolton, Cambs, U.K.), with the following thermocycling
program: one cycle of 94°C for 2 min, 29 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 50°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 1 min, and one cycle of 72°C
for 7 min. PCR produced two bands of similar size for SJF and line 0 chicken DNA and three bands of similar size for RJF and the remaining chicken lines (Fig. 1B). To determine the provirus deletion junctions, the PCR products were purified using the QIAquick gel extraction kit
(Qiagen) and cloned into the pGEM-T vector (Promega) as described by
the manufacturer. Sequencing was performed using an Applied Biosystems
377 automated sequencing system with the ABI Prism BigDye terminator
reaction kit (Perkin-Elmer) and vector SP6 and T7 primers (Promega).
The sequences of the jungle fowl gag-env junction PCR
products were identical to the corresponding regions of the published
sequences for the prototype clones EAV-HP1 (type I), ev/J clone 3A
(type II), and ev/J clone 1C (type III) (data not shown). Detection of
identical pol deletions in jungle fowl and chicken DNA
strongly suggests that EAV-HP retroviruses integrated into a common
ancestor.

View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
PCR analysis of the gag-env deletion
junctions of the EAV-HP proviruses from chickens and jungle fowl. (A)
Diagram indicating the positions of primers in the gag
region (H83REV) and in the env region (H8) flanking the
deletion junctions of the 4-kbp EAV-HP provirus. (B) Ethidium
bromide-stained PCR products amplified with the H83REV and H8 primers
from two layer-type chicken lines, line 0 and brown leghorn (BRL), two
meat-type chicken lines, 20 and 21, and two jungle fowl species, RJF
and SJF. The EAV-HP1 clone and water were used as positive and negative
controls, respectively. PCR products are indicated as I, II, and III,
corresponding to the 4-kbp provirus types described in the text.
|
|
In order to establish that these proviruses integrated into the genome
of an ancestral Gallus species and to rule out the possibility that defective EAV-HP proviruses with similar structures entered the Gallus genomes by separate infections,
locus-specific PCR analysis was performed on chicken and jungle fowl
DNA. Identification of loci shared by different species would indicate
that an integration event occurred before separation of the species,
since germ line integrations are random and infrequent
(7). PCR was carried out as described above using a primer
specific for EAV-HP with another one specific for the flanking host DNA
for the two chicken loci EAV-HP1 and EAV-HP2 (Fig.
2A) (10). PCR produced
multiple bands for all DNA reactions (not shown) since an annealing
temperature of 50°C was used with the primer pairs
(Tm, >57.3°C) to ensure amplification of loci
from divergent jungle fowl DNA that may have a base pair substitution
in the primer annealing site. In order to confirm the specificity of
the PCR products, DNA gels were blotted and hybridized under
high-stringency conditions (10) with probes derived from
the corresponding purified PCR products of the EAV-HP1 and EAV-HP2
clones. The locus-specific reactions were carried out across both the
left and right LTRs so that agreement would provide confirmation of the
results.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Southern blot analyses of EAV-HP1 and EAV-HP2
locus-specific PCR products from chicken and jungle fowl DNA. (A)
Diagram indicating the relative positions of primers used for EAV-HP
locus-specific PCR analysis. PCR was performed on chicken and jungle
fowl DNA with reverse primer EAVR
(5'-TAAGTGAGCTCAAATGGCGTTTATTGCTATAGGCTACG-3'),
complementary to the EAV-HP LTR, and a forward, host DNA-specific
primer, F1REV (5'-TGGGTGCTGAGGAAGAAGAG -3') for the EAV-HP1
locus or F1-2 (5'-TGTCATGAGCCCACTTCTCC-3') for the EAV-HP2
locus, for amplification of the left LTR and upstream host sequence.
The right LTR of the two EAV-HP loci was amplified with forward primer
EAVF (5'-GACGGGAGCTCTCGGCATAGGGAGGGGGAGATGTTG-3') and
reverse, host-specific primer H37REV (5'-TCTTACTCAGGCTCAACTGC-3')
for EAV-HP1 or H37REV-2 (5'-GCAGATGACACCAAGCTGAG-3')
for EAV-HP2. (B) PCR was performed on chicken and jungle fowl
DNAs, with EAV-HP1 and EAV-HP2 clones used as positive controls and
water used as a negative control. PCR products were separated on a 2%
agarose gel, blotted, and hybridized with the corresponding purified
labeled PCR product of the positive control reactions.
|
|
PCR for the EAV-HP1 locus, originally isolated from a line N chicken
genomic DNA library, produced products from both jungle fowl DNA
reactions (Fig. 2B). The presence of the chicken EAV-HP1 provirus locus
in both jungle fowl species provides direct evidence of integration of
this EAV-HP provirus before speciation. The EAV-HP2 locus-specific PCR
amplified products from the chicken DNA but not the jungle fowl DNA
samples. The absence of this provirus may be the result of segregation
of this locus within the Gallus population, leading to its
loss from the contemporary jungle fowl populations. Conversely, this
locus may be the result of reintegration of an endogenous retrovirus
from another locus following the domestication of chickens during a
subsequent exogenous retrovirus infection.
EAV-HP proviruses with intact pol sequences encoding reverse
transcriptase (RT) and integrase (IN) and the splice acceptor at the
pol-env junction have not yet been identified, possibly due
to the random selection of genomic library clones and the preferential
amplification of small PCR products from deleted proviruses. A PCR
approach using one primer from the LTR and another from the
env region that is deleted in the predominant EAV-HP provirus types was employed to selectively amplify proviruses with
intact pol genes in chicken and jungle fowl DNA (Fig.
3A). The jungle fowl species were
examined for intact proviruses, since they have not undergone any
selective breeding, as is the case for chickens, and may contain
provirus sequences that have otherwise been eliminated from commercial
chicken flocks. DNA samples from line 21 chickens, RJF, and SJF
were amplified with primers EVJFOR (5'-TTCGTGATTGGAGGAAACACTTG-3') and 103ER
(5'-CACGTTTCCTGGTTGTTG-3') with the thermocycling program of
one cycle at 94°C for 2 min, 29 cycles at 94°C for 30 s,
50°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 4 min, and one cycle at 72°C for
7 min. A 568-bp product was produced from RJF (Fig. 3B, bottom
arrowhead). Cloning and sequencing established that this PCR product
was amplified from the corresponding region of the type IV provirus
structure described for ev/J clone 4-1 (9). Since we
failed to amplify this provirus from a line 21 chicken after repeated
attempts, we conclude that this provirus was absent in this line of
chicken and the inability to amplify the provirus was not due to the
failure of PCR. Remarkably, an approximately 5-kbp PCR product was
amplified from SJF which was the correct size for an intact EAV-HP
provirus containing the pol gene (Fig. 3B, top arrowhead).


View larger version (53K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
PCR amplification of 5-kbp EAV-HP provirus products with
putative pol region sequences. (A) Schematic diagram showing
the positions of oligonucleotide primers EVJFOR and 103ER used for PCR
relative to a complete provirus. The sequence recognized by 103ER is
deleted from the 4-kbp provirus types, indicated as chicken EAV-HP
(ev/J), but is present in the type IV ev/J clone 4-1 sequence. ,
packaging signal; SD, splice donor; SA, splice acceptor. (B) Ethidium
bromide-stained agarose gel of separated PCR products amplified from
line 21 chicken, RJF, and SJF DNA. The 0.6-kbp product from RJF was
amplified from the type IV provirus, and a 5-kbp product with putative
pol sequences was amplified only from SJF DNA.
|
|
PCR was repeated using the Expand high-fidelity PCR system (Boehringer
Mannheim) for cloning the 5-kbp SJF EAV-HP PCR product into the pGEM-T
vector. Two cloned PCR products, designated EAV-JF1 and EAV-JF2, were
isolated and sequenced. The sequences of the SJF EAV-HP products were
compared with published avian leukosis and sarcoma virus (ALSV)
sequences to determine the structure of the proviruses from which they
were amplified. The two clones had complete open reading frames
encoding the gag-pro-pol proteins. The EAV-HP sequences
encoding the terminal three protease residues and the first RT residue
(ACAAAUUUAUA) were identical to the ALSV gag-pol
frameshift site sequence (5). While the EAV-JF1 clone encoded potentially functional Gag, RT, and IN, the EAV-JF2 clone showed a single-base-pair deletion causing a frameshift in the gag gene leading to truncation of the deduced Gag
polyprotein. A comparison between the two EAV-HP clones and modern
ALSVs demonstrated approximately 61% nucleotide sequence identity in
the pol gene. The deduced amino acid sequence demonstrated
approximately 62% identity and 70% similarity with the RT and IN of
ALV-J (1) and 62% identity and 71% similarity to the RT
and IN of the Prague C strain of Rous sarcoma virus (11).
Highly conserved regions such as the RT catalytic site showed stretches
of high sequence identity. At the pol-env boundary, both the
EAV-JF1 and EAV-JF2 clones demonstrated the intact EAV-HP splice
acceptor site for processing of the env subgenomic transcript.
PCR products representing the 3' end of an intact provirus were
amplified using primer EAV-IN1 (5'-TTCCCGCCCCAAATTAAGAC-3') from the EAV-HP IN sequence and primer EAVR for the right LTR. A
cloned PCR product that was 100% identical to the EAV-JF2 clone in the
700-bp overlapping region was chosen for sequence assembly using Staden
version 2000.0 (2, 13). The intact SJF EAV-HP provirus had
a 6.8-kbp genome with complete gag, pol, and env genes. As in the case of the gag and pol genes of
clone EAV-JF2, the deduced amino acid sequence encoded by the
env gene of this provirus indicated that it was also
nonfunctional due to the presence of a stop codon in the surface
protein coding sequence. The EAV-HP clones reported here would be
useful for the reconstitution of competent retrovirus for studying the
pathology and tropism of this ancient retrovirus and generating new
tools such as antibodies to further define the repertoire of EAV-HP
elements resident in commercial chicken flocks. The assembled
full-length sequence is an important contribution to the growing
database of ancient avian retrovirus sequences as a complete EAV-HP
reference provirus that would be essential to describe the evolution of
modern ALVs.
Since PCR failed to amplify products representing the 5' end of intact
EAV-HP proviruses from line 21 chickens and RJF, Southern blot analysis
was conducted to determine if these proviruses were also present in
chicken and RJF DNA. A 275-bp sequence was amplified from the
pol region with primers RT1
(5'-CTTTTCGCTTGCTGCATGAC-3') and RT3
(5'-TTGACAAATGGTGGGGGAG-3') to be used as a probe for Southern blot analysis as described above. The pol fragment
had approximately 68% nucleotide sequence identity with the
corresponding ALV-J region. Using high-stringency conditions to prevent
cross-hybridization with endogenous ALV-E loci, three EAV-HP proviruses
with pol region sequences were detected by Southern blot
analysis in SJF (Fig. 4). No proviruses
were detected with the pol probe from RJF or the chicken
lines examined, demonstrating conclusively that these intact elements
are not present in the G. gallus genomes examined. As in the
case of EAV-HP2 locus, the absence of these intact elements from RJF
and chickens could be due to segregation of these loci in the
Gallus ancestral population and their subsequent loss from the evolutionary line leading to domesticated chickens. Although it is
possible that these elements integrated after the separation of SJF, it
is unlikely, because the more complete form must have preceded the
deleted provirus structures, and the high sequence identity between the
deleted and intact EAV-HP proviruses (>97%) suggests that these
viruses have not diverged over a great length of time. Previous studies
have demonstrated that line 0 chicken embryo fibroblasts, which are
free of ALV, produce retrovirus-like particles with associated RT
activity in culture supernatants (3, 8). The demonstration
that all line 0 chicken EAV-HP proviruses have their pol
genes deleted shows that these elements are not likely to contribute to
the RT activity. However, it remains to be resolved whether EAV-HP
elements produce structural proteins that may yet play a role in the
formation of retrovirus-like particles associated with the RT activity.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Detection of EAV-HP RT-encoding sequences in SJF.
Southern blot hybridization was performed on EcoRI-digested
genomic DNA from three chicken lines, line 0, line 21, and brown
leghorn (BRL), and two jungle fowl species, RJF and SJF, by
hybridization under high-stringency conditions with the 275-bp
RT-specific probe. Three bands hybridized only from the SJF DNA.
|
|
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was partly funded by the Ministry of Agriculture,
Fisheries and Food, United Kingdom, and the National Institute for
Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC).
We thank Jim Kaufman for critical reading of the manuscript. We are
grateful to Jim Robertson (National Institute for Biological Standards
and Control) and Peter Russell (Royal Veterinary College, University of
London) for support.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute for
Animal Health, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire RG20 7NN, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 (0) 1635-578411. Fax: 44 (0) 1635-577237. E-mail:
venu.gopal{at}bbsrc.ac.uk.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bai, J.,
L. N. Payne, and M. A. Skinner.
1995.
HPRS-103 (exogenous avian leukosis virus, subgroup J) has an env gene related to those of endogenous elements EAV-0 and E51 and an E element found previously only in sarcoma viruses.
J. Virol.
69:779-784[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Bonfield, J. K.,
K. F. Smith, and R. Staden.
1995.
A new DNA sequence assembly program.
Nucleic Acids Res.
23:4992-4999[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Boni, J.,
J. Stalder,
F. Reigel, and J. Schupbach.
1996.
Detection of reverse transcriptase activity in live attenuated virus vaccines.
Clin. Diagn. Virol.
5:43-53.
|
| 4.
|
Fumihito, A.,
T. Miyake,
S.-I. Sumi,
M. Takada,
S. Ohno, and N. Kondo.
1994.
One subspecies of the red junglefowl (Gallus gallus gallus) suffices as the matriarchic ancestor of all domestic breeds.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:12505-12509[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Jacks, T.,
H. D. Madhani,
F. R. Masiarz, and H. E. Varmus.
1988.
Signals for ribosomal frameshifting in the Rous sarcoma virus gag-pol region.
Cell
55:447-458[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Nikiforov, M. A., and A. V. Gudkov.
1994.
ART-CH: a VL30 in chickens?
J. Virol.
68:846-853[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Resnick, R. M.,
M. T. Boyce-Jacino,
Q. Fu, and A. J. Faras.
1990.
Phylogenetic distribution of the novel avian endogenous provirus family EAV-0.
J. Virol.
64:4640-4653[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Robertson, J. S., and P. Minor.
1996.
Reverse transcriptase activity in vaccines derived from chick cells.
Biologicals
24:289-290[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Ruis, B. L.,
S. J. Benson, and K. F. Conklin.
1999.
Genome structure and expression of the ev/J family of avian endogenous viruses.
J. Virol.
73:5345-5355[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Sacco, M. A.,
D. M. J. Flannery,
K. Howes, and K. Venugopal.
2000.
Avian endogenous retrovirus EAV-HP shares regions of identity with avian leukosis virus subgroup J and the avian retrotransposon ART-CH.
J. Virol.
74:1296-1306[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Schwartz, D. E.,
R. Tizard, and W. Gilbert.
1983.
Nucleotide sequence of Rous sarcoma virus.
Cell
32:853-869[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Smith, L. M.,
A. A. Toye,
K. Howes,
N. Bumstead,
L. N. Payne, and K. Venugopal.
1999.
Novel endogenous retroviral sequences in the chicken genome closely related to HPRS-103 (subgroup J) avian leukosis virus.
J. Gen. Virol.
80:261-268[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Staden, R.
1996.
The Staden sequence analysis package.
Mol. Biotechnol.
5:233-241[Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, February 2001, p. 2029-2032, Vol. 75, No. 4
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.4.2029-2032.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Tarlinton, R., Meers, J., Hanger, J., Young, P.
(2005). Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR for the endogenous koala retrovirus reveals an association between plasma viral load and neoplastic disease in koalas. J. Gen. Virol.
86: 783-787
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sacco, M. A., Howes, K., Smith, L. P., Nair, V. K.
(2004). Assessing the Roles of Endogenous Retrovirus EAV-HP in Avian Leukosis Virus Subgroup J Emergence and Tolerance. J. Virol.
78: 10525-10535
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sacco, M. A., Venugopal, K.
(2001). Segregation of EAV-HP Ancient Endogenous Retroviruses within the Chicken Population. J. Virol.
75: 11935-11938
[Abstract]
[Full Text]