Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, February 2001, p. 1722-1735, Vol. 75, No. 4
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.4.1722-1735.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Orientation of a Novel DNA Binding Site Affects
Human Papillomavirus-Mediated Transcription and Replication
Christopher D.
Newhouse1 and
Saul J.
Silverstein1,2,*
Integrated Program in Cellular, Molecular and
Biophysical Studies1 and Department
of Microbiology,2 Columbia University, New
York, New York 10032
Received 18 October 2000/Accepted 22 November 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
A consensus binding site for the human papillomavirus (HPV) E2
protein was determined from an unbiased set of degenerate
oligonucleotides using cyclic amplification and selection of targets
(CASTing). Detectable DNA-protein complexes were formed after six to
nine cycles of CASTing. A population of selected binding sites was cloned, and a consensus was determined by statistical analysis of the
DNA sequences of individual isolates. Starting from a pool with 20 random bases, a consensus binding site of ACAC-N5-GGT was
derived. CASTing and electrophoretic mobility shift analyses demonstrate that human but not bovine papillomavirus E2 proteins recognize this sequence. The presence of this sequence in
papillomavirus genomes suggests a role for its function. We demonstrate
that this site functionally substitutes for the canonical E2 binding site (ACCG-N4-CGGT) in both transient-transcription and DNA
replication assays. This sequence, in most instances, is
interchangeable with the resident E2 binding sites in the context of
the HPV type 16 long control region. Where the novel sequence does not
support E2-mediated effects on gene expression or DNA replication, we demonstrate that changing the orientation of the novel sequence restores this effect.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Papillomaviruses (PVs) cause a
benign hyperproliferation of epithelial cells that sometimes progress
to form carcinomas. The model system for studying papillomaviruses has
been bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV1) because of its ability to
infect and transform a variety of rodent cells in tissue culture
(41).
Papillomaviruses encode early and late proteins that are involved in
regulation of virus gene expression and replication, and assembly of
the virion, respectively. E2 is a dimeric multifunctional early protein
that is intimately involved in the regulation of gene expression and
viral genome replication. The primary structures of papillomavirus E2
proteins are highly conserved. They consist of an N-terminal domain
that can act as a transcriptional activator and is also involved in
viral DNA replication and interaction with the viral DNA replication
protein E1; a central, poorly conserved hinge region; and the
C-terminal DNA binding and protein dimerization domains
(17). Analysis of the crystal structure of the C terminus of the BPV1 E2 protein bound to its DNA binding site revealed that two
-helices, one from each monomer of an E2 dimer, bind in the major
groove of the DNA (8, 9). The original studies of the BPV1
E2 protein identified the high-affinity DNA binding sites within the
BPV genome to be 12 bp long and to minimally contain the sequence
ACC-N6-GGT (canonical site), with the highest-affinity site
being ACCG-N4-CGGT (2, 15).
The occurrence of BPV1 E2 high-affinity DNA binding sites in the long
control region (LCR) of the human papillomaviruses (HPVs) has led
investigators to assume that the HPV E2 proteins preferentially bind
this site (1, 33, 39, 40, 42).
Many E2 functions are dependent on the relative affinity of the protein
for its various DNA binding sites. HPVs that infect the genital mucosal
epithelium contain multiple E2 binding sites within their LCRs, both
proximal and distal to the transcription initiation site for early-gene
expression. The distal, higher-affinity sites apparently act as
enhancers, and the proximal, lower-affinity sites act as repressors of
early gene expression (17). These sites are thought to be
part of a switching mechanism that modulates the levels of early gene
expression during the viral life cycle. In addition, it has been shown
that E2 can compete for the binding of cellular transcription factors
from their neighboring or overlapping sites within the LCR (5,
37, 38).
The papillomavirus proteins E1 and E2 are necessary for HPV genome
replication (12, 32, 36). For HPVs, the minimal origin of
replication is defined as an E1 (E1BS) and an E2 binding site (E2BS) in
close proximity flanked by an A/T-rich region, with additional E2BSs
facilitating replication (3, 16, 36). In the absence of an
E1BS, two E2BSs near the A/T-rich region can support transient HPV
replication (36). Deletion analyses around the BPV1 origin
of replication have revealed that the location of E2BSs with respect to
the E1BS and A/T-rich region is flexible. Moreover, the affinity of the
E2 protein for a particular site directly correlates with its ability
to stimulate DNA replication (6, 43, 45).
The primary objective of our studies was to elucidate the
highest-affinity binding sites for HPV E2 proteins. To address this question, we employed the nonbiased cyclic amplification and selection of targets (CASTing) technique (48). We identified a
unique set of sequences, ACAC-N5-GGT, that HPV E2 proteins
(but not the BPV1 E2 protein) bind with a relative affinity that is
indistinguishable from the canonical high-affinity site. Our studies
also suggest the existence of preferred nucleotides within the flanking
and core (N5) sequences. Comparisons of the relative
affinities and binding complex half-lives were made for the HPV51,
HPV-16, and BPV1 E2 proteins with the different DNA binding sites.
These novel sites are located within papillomaviruses genomes at
locations where E2BSs are typically found.
In order to assess how an E2 protein might utilize the novel E2BSs, we
used it in place of the wild-type sites found in the early promoter and
replication origin of the better-characterized HPV type 16. HPV16
infects the epithelial cells of the genital mucosa and, like all other
high-risk HPVs, is strongly associated with cervical carcinoma. We have
designed a single plasmid that allows the assay of both transient
transcription and transient replication. This plasmid, pOri16L, was
built with a portion of the HPV16 LCR that contains both the origin of
replication and the early promoter driving the expression of the
firefly luciferase reporter gene. There are three canonical E2BSs
within this portion of the LCR (see Fig. 5). In this study, we mutated
each of the wild-type E2BSs to either eliminate binding (BS-KO) or
create new E2BSs with the novel binding site sequence
ACACAAATCGGT. Here we demonstrate that the novel E2BS
functionally substitutes for the native E2BSs within this portion of
the LCR in both transient-transcription and replication assays. Because
bp 3 of the novel E2BSs disrupts the canonical site's palindrome, we
also addressed the influence of the orientation of this binding site on
E2 function. The results of our experiments with these mutated LCRs
demonstrate that the functional role for the ACAC-N5-GGT
sites in E2-mediated replication of and transcription from the HPV
genome can be dependent on binding site orientation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
DNA constructs for protein expression.
DNA constructs used
for expression of proteins in bacteria were made by PCR amplification
of portions of the genes encoding the E2 proteins from HPV types 51 and
16 and BPV type 1. The resulting PCR products were digested with
BamHI and EcoRI, whose sites are in the primers
used for amplification (underlined in the primer sequences listed in
Table 1) and then ligated in frame with
and C-terminal to the glutathione S-transferase (GST) gene
of pGEX-3X (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, N.J.). These
constructs were designed to express GST fusion proteins with either the
full-length (fl) or the short C terminus (sct) E2 proteins that contain
only the DNA binding and dimerization domain of the respective E2
proteins. The fl constructs GST-51E2fl, and
GST-B1E2fl contain the entire E2 coding sequences. The set
constructs GST-51E2sct, GST-16E2sct, and
GST-B1E2sct contain papillomavirus nucleotide
sequences 3536 to 3811 from HPV51, 3584 to 3892 from HPV16, and 3457 to
3840 from BPV1, respectively. Nucleotide numbering corresponds to
papillomavirus genome sequences listed in the Human Papillomavirus
Compendium, HPV database (22). The primers used to create
these constructs are listed in Table 1.
pALEX, which expresses the GST protein fused to six histidines
(GST-His
6) (
23), and
pCPC-XE2(51), which expresses the GST-
51E2fl
protein, were provided by Christos
Panagiotidis.
Recombinant baculoviruses used for expression of proteins were the HPV
16E2 full length and short C terminus protein expressing
viruses rvE2 and rvE2sct (
34), BPV
1E2 full
length-protein expressing
virus vE2 (
20), and HPV
51E2 full-length protein expressing
virus v
51E2
that was constructed by cleaving the
BamHI-
EcoRI
fragment
from pCPC-XE2(51) and ligating it into the
pFastBac1 expression
vector (Life Technologies, Grand Island, N.Y.),
creating pBac
51E2.
This construct was then used with the
Bac-to-Bac expression system
(Life Technologies) to create a
baculovirus that expressed full-length
HPV51 E2 protein.

-Glucuronidase-expressing baculovirus was provided
as part of the
Bac-to-Bac kit and was used as a control. All constructs
were sequenced
to confirm their
identity.
Protein purification.
Escherichia coli strain
BL21/DE3 was used for bacterial expression of recombinant proteins.
Proteins were extracted from cultures (500 to 1,000 ml) of bacteria
grown in liquid overnight at 25°C without IPTG
(isopropylthiogalactoside) induction because induction resulted
in partitioning of most of the E2 proteins to the insoluble fraction
upon extraction (data not shown). Total-cell extracts were made by
sonication, and proteins were purified by their affinity for
glutathione-agarose beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). Cleavage of the
GST from the E2 protein was performed by addition of factor Xa protease
(Roche Molecular Biochemicals, Indianapolis, Ind.) to the
glutathione-eluted fraction and incubation with gentle agitation at
4°C for 16 to 24 h in factor Xa cleavage buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl
[pH 8.0], 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM MgSO4, 1 mM
CaCl2, 5 mM dithiothreitol [DTT]). To further purify this
protein, it was applied to an S-Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech,
Piscataway, N.J.) column that was equilibrated with S-Sepharose buffer
(20 mM Tris-HCl [pH 8.5], 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA [pH 8.0]). Protein was eluted with a linear salt gradient (100 mM to 1 M NaCl) in S-Sepharose buffer, and 1-ml fractions were collected and screened for
active E2 protein by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and
Western blotting (data not shown).
Proteins expressed from Sf-21 cells infected with recombinant
baculoviruses for 36 to 72 h postinfection (depending on virus
and
multiplicity of infection) were harvested, and nuclear extracts
were
made from them as described previously (
24).
Cloning of PCR-amplified sequences.
Sequences amplified by
PCR were cloned using the TA cloning kit (Invitrogen Corp., Carlsbad,
Calif.) with the pCRII and pCR2.1 vectors according to the
manufacturer's instructions.
Sequencing reactions.
DNA sequencing was performed using the
Sequenase version 2.0 DNA sequencing kit as per the manufacturer's
instructions (Amersham/USB) with M13 forward and M13 reverse primers
end labeled with [
-32P] ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase.
CASTing.
The CASTing method was performed as previously
described (48) with minor modifications. Each
oligonucleotide in the degenerate oligonucleotide library (DOL)
contains PCR primer binding sites that flank a core region of 20 randomly generated nucleotides. The oligonucleotides used were DOL,
5'-AGACGGATCCATTGCA-N20-CTGTAGGAATTCGGA-3', and the primers used for PCR amplification were
N20-B (5'-AGACGGATCCATTGCA-3') and
N20-R (5'-TCCGAATTCCTACAG-3'). CASTing
was performed by adding about 10 µg of double-stranded DOL to
20 µl of glutathione-agarose beads with approximately 15 to 20 µg
of GST fusion protein (GST-HPV51E2fl, GST-His6,
or GST-BPV1E2fl) captured from dialyzed extracts in a total
volume of 100 µl of binding buffer (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5] 50 mM
NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 4 mM DTT, 250 µg of bovine serum albumin [BSA] per
ml, 5% glycerol). This mix was allowed to interact at room temperature
for 3 h with gentle agitation followed by three washes with binding
buffer. The complexes of glutathione-agarose beads/GST
protein/double-stranded DOLs were then resuspended in the PCR buffer
mix (30 µl of 10× Taq buffer [Promega], 18 µl of 25 mM MgCl2, 3 µl of 10 mM deoxynucleotide triphosphate
(dNTP) mix 3 µl of Taq DNA polymerase, 3 µl of
500-pmol/µl N20B primer, 3 µl of 500-pmol/µl
N20R primer, in a total volume of 300 µl) and amplified
according to the following protocol: 95°C for 5 min, then 10 PCR
cycles of 94°C for 1 min, 40°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 30 sec,
followed by cooling to 4°C, and a 100-µl aliquot was removed and
stored on ice. The remaining 200 µl was cycled four more times (14 in
total) and cooled to 4°C, and another 100-µl aliquot was removed
and stored on ice. The remaining 100 µl was subjected to four more
rounds of amplification (18 in total), followed by cooling to 4°C. A
10-µl aliquot (plus 1 µl of loading dye) from each of the PCR
amplifications (10, 14, and 18 cycles) was electrophoresed on a 2.5%
agarose-1× TBE (90 mM Tris-borate, 1 mM EDTA [pH 8.5]) gel and
visualized by ethidium bromide staining and UV transillumination. A
portion of the pool obtained from each round of CASTing was amplified
using radiolabeled primers and tested for enrichment by EMSA. After
nine rounds of CASTing with GST-HPV51E2fl, a protein-probe
complex was easily detected by EMSA, and the CASTing procedure was
stopped. The amplified pools were cloned into the pCRII vector
(Invitrogen), the resulting plasmid DNAs were isolated from individual
clones, and their sequences were determined.
CASTing with the GST-BPV
1 E2fl protein was performed as
above with the exception that the alignment was based on 65 independent
clones from two independent CASTing
experiments.
Additional plasmid constructs. (i) E2 binding
sites.
The construct pBPV1E2BS (a gift from Eliot
Androphy) is a pUC18 derivative containing the sequence
tcgagaACCGAATTCGGTagcc cloned into the polycloning sequence.
This clone was used as a positive control in EMSAs that analyzed the
products of the CASTing reactions and for screening TA clones (last two
lanes of Fig. 1). Additional E2 binding sites used as probes for EMSAs
were cloned by annealing two complementary oligonucleotides (H and B
clones; see Table 2) that contain the same flanking sequences; +,
5'-CCAGAGTGAATTCCAGA-(12-bp binding
site)-TCCCAAGCTTGGCG-3', and
,
5'-CGCCAAGCTTGGGA-(complement of 12-bp binding
site)-TCTGGAATTCACTCTGG-3'.These were then cleaved with
EcoRI and HindIII and ligated into a pUC18 vector between its unique EcoRI and HindIII sites.
(ii) pOri16L.
The pOri16L plasmid was constructed by
building a portion of the HPV16 LCR and the firefly luciferase gene
into a pUC19 plasmid backbone. The portion of the HPV16 LCR from
nucleotide positions 7800 to 73 (nucleotide numbering as in reference
22) that includes the HPV16 origin of replication and
the P97 early promoter, including its TATA box, was amplified by
PCR. The primers used to amplify this portion of the LCR contain
novel PstI and BamHI restriction sites to
facilitate cloning: 16Ori-upper/PstI primer, 5'-
CATGAACTGTCTGCAGGTTAGTCATAC-3', and 16Ori-lower/BamHI
primer, 5'- GTGCATAAAGGATCCGCTTTTATAC-3'.
The plasmid backbone was provided by pUC19-EX. The pUC19-EX plasmid was
constructed by digestion of pUC19 DNA at its
EcoRI
and
XmaI sites in
EcoRI buffer (New England Biolabs,
Beverly,
Mass.) and filling in the 5' overhangs with
deoxyribonucleotides
using T4 DNA polymerase in T4 DNA polymerase
buffer (New England
Biolabs) with 100 mM dNTPs. The blunt ends were
then ligated using
T4 DNA ligase in T4 DNA ligase buffer (New England
Biolabs). The
pUC19-EX and the HPV16 LCR PCR products were digested
with
PstI
and
BamHI, gel purified, and ligated to
each other. The resulting
plasmid is referred to as pOri16. The open
reading frame (ORF)
encoding firefly luciferase was purified after
BamHI digestion
of the p19luc plasmid (
46) and
inserted into the pOri16 plasmid
at the
BamHI site to yield
pOri16L.
(iii) pOri16L mutants.
The binding site knockouts and
sequence substitutions were all created by site-directed mutagenesis of
pOri16L using either the MORPH kit (5 Prime
3 Prime, Inc., Boulder,
Colo.) or the QuickChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene
Cloning Systems, La Jolla, Calif.) as per the manufacturers'
instructions. For plasmids with mutations in more than one E2BS, one
site was altered using the pOri16L plasmid as the template and the
second site was altered using the partially mutated plasmid as the
template. All mutated plasmids were screened by DNA sequence analysis.
Upon isolation of mutant clones, origin-containing fragments were
removed by digestion with PstI and EcoRI (the
EcoRI used for this recloning step is found in the
luciferase BamHI cassette) and then ligated into a pOri16L
plasmid from which the wild-type LCR was removed by digestion with the
same enzymes.
(iv) pCMV Series.
The pCMV-E216 and
pCMV-E116 expression plasmids were kindly provided by Peter
Howley (32). They express the full-length HPV16 E1 and
HPV16 E2 proteins driven by the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter. The
pCMV4-XS plasmid was constructed by digesting
pCMV-E116 with XbaI and SmaI, filling
in the resulting overhangs with deoxyribonucleotides using T4 DNA
polymerase, and ligating the resulting blunted ends as described above
for the pUC19-EX plasmid construct. The identities of all of the above
constructs were confirmed by DNA sequence analysis.
EMSA.
M13rev primers were end labeled with
[
-32P]ATP using T4 polynucleotide kinase. PCR was then
performed using this radiolabeled primer plus an unlabeled M13for
primer to create a single end-labeled, double-stranded DNA probe for
EMSA. The constructs used as templates for making probes were either
the CASTing TA clones in the pCRII vector or pH and pB clones (see
above for cloning details and Table 2 for binding site sequences) in
pUC18. The resulting PCR products were gel purified. EMSAs were
performed in binding buffer with purified protein, 1 µg of sonicated
salmon sperm DNA (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.), 3 µg of BSA, and
104 cpm of radiolabeled DNA probe. This binding reaction
was incubated at room temperature for 30 min and then loaded directly
onto 6 to 8% native polyacrylamide gels containing 0.25×TBE and 2.5% glycerol.
Relative affinities were determined by adding dilutions of unlabeled
competitor DNAs prepared by PCR amplification of clones
(see Table
2)
using unlabeled M13 primers that were partially
purified using the
Concert PCR rapid purification system (Life
Technologies, Rockville,
Md.).
Off-rates (
T1/2) were determined by performing
binding reactions as above, and after the 30-min incubation, a 500- to
1,000-fold
excess of unlabeled competitor DNA (see Fig.
4 legend for
details)
was added and incubated for an additional 0, 1, 5, 10, 30, or
90 min before electrophoresis. Following polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis
(PAGE), the gels were dried and exposed to
PhosphorImager screens
(Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, Calif.), and the
bands were quantified
using ImageQuant software (Molecular
Dynamics).
Tissue culture.
J2-3T3 cells were cultured in Dulbecco's
modified Eagle's medium with 10% bovine calf serum. SCC-13 cells
(29) were grown on mitomycin C-treated J2-3T3 cell feeder
layers in E medium as described previously (19).
Luciferase expression assays.
SCC-13 cells were plated on
mitomycin C-treated J2-3T3 feeder layers in 35-mm dishes 24 h
before transfection. The plasmids pOri16L, pRL-TK, and
pCMV-E216 or pCMV4-XS (see the legends to Fig.
6 and 7 for details) were introduced into the SCC-13 cells using
LipofectAmine, as per the manufacturer's instructions (Life Technologies). Cells were harvested and assayed at 36 h
posttransfection using the dual luciferase kit (Promega, Madison,
Wis.), and units of luciferase activity were determined using a
Berthold Lumat LB9501 luminometer (Berthold Systems, Inc., Pittsburgh,
Pa.). Expression levels were determined from duplicate transfections in
three independent experiments.
Transient-replication assays.
Transient-replication assays
were performed with SCC-13 cells as previously described for HPV31
(12). Briefly, plasmid DNAs (quantities and identities
detailed in the legend to Fig. 5) were electroporated into SCC-13 cells
as detailed by Hubert et al. (12) and Ustav and Stenland
(44). Replication was assayed after DpnI
digestion of low-molecular-weight DNA extracted by a modified Hirt
protocol (10) followed by gel electrophoresis and Southern
blot hybridization.
 |
RESULTS |
Cyclic amplification and selection of targets.
High-affinity
DNA binding sites for the HPV E2 protein were identified using
the CASTing technique (48). A GST fusion with the
full-length HPV type 51 E2 protein (GST-51E2fl) was
used to select specific DNA binding sites from a random pool of
degenerate double-stranded oligonucleotides (see Materials and Methods
for details).
DNAs from the degenerate oligonucleotide pool were amplified by PCR,
cloned, and sequenced to determine if representation
within the central
20-bp region was truly random. DNA sequence
analysis shows that the
starting DNA pool used for CASTing contained
a stretch of 20 bp where
the abundance of all four bases was the
same (data not shown). This
demonstrates the random nature of
the starting degenerate
oligonucleotide N
20S pool and that there
was no apparent
overrepresentation of any particular
sequence.
Each round of the CASTing consisted of three steps: binding of the
double-stranded DNA oligonucleotide pool (N
20S) to the
GST-E2 protein, removal of unbound DNA, and PCR amplification
of DNA
that remained bound to the GST-E2 protein-glutathione-agarose
bead
complex. EMSAs were performed after each round of CASTing
to assess the
efficiency of binding site selection (Fig.
1). The
enriched population pools were
cloned (see Materials and Methods),
their DNA sequences were
determined, and a consensus binding site
was determined.

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
EMSA analysis of CASTing-enriched probes.
Oligonucleotide probes that formed DNA-protein complexes were amplified
by PCR and radiolabeled by incorporation of [ -32P]dCTP
in the reaction mixture. These DNA probes were used in EMSAs with the
GST-HPV51E2 protein to form complexes. The original
degenerate oligonucleotide pool (N20S) was used as the
template for the lane labeled round 0. The next five lanes represent
amplified probes from rounds 6, 7, 8, and 9, as labeled above the EMSA.
The final two lanes were loaded with complex formed between
radiolabeled probe amplified by PCR from the pBPV1-E2BS plasmid, which
contains the binding site sequence gagaACCGAATTCGGTagcc as
the template with (+) or without ( ) the GST-HPV51E2
protein.
|
|
The first CASTing experiment was performed using the
GST-HPV
51E2fl and GST-His
6 proteins in parallel
to select for specific
and nonspecific DNA binding sites, respectively.
Probes made from
the enriched population pools from rounds 6 through 9 of the GST-HPV
51E2fl
CASTing were used in EMSAs to screen
for enrichment of the population
with high-affinity binding sites (Fig.
1). Abundant gel-shifted
probes were obtained after eight and nine
rounds of selection.
The enriched populations of oligonucleotides were
then cloned
for sequence analysis from both the
GST-HPV
51E2fl and GST-His
6 CASTings.
A second CASTing experiment was performed with the
GST-HPV
51E2fl protein to ensure the reproducibility of our
results. A total
of 75 TA clones pooled from the
GST-HPV
51E2fl CASTing experiments
were sequenced and
aligned to determine the presence of a consensus
binding site sequence
for the GST-HPV
51E2fl protein (not shown).
The frequency
with which a given nucleotide was located at each
position is presented
in Fig.
2A, and statistical analysis of
the sequences identifies the nonpalindromic sequence
RAC
ACAAATCGGTY(where
R is a purine and Y is a
pyrimidine) as the consensus binding
site for the
GST-HPV
51E2fl protein. This sequence is similar to
the
palindromic site previously identified for the BPV1 E2 protein
(ACCG-N
4-CGGT) (
15) in that it has
an A/T-rich core and purine
and pyrimidine nucleotides are present at
the

1 flanking positions
as described for the sites preferred by
HPV16 E2 (
40). However,
two nucleotides from only one half
of the 12-bp site (AC
AC, also
underlined above) differ from
the canonical BPV1 E2 binding site.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Determination of a binding site consensus from the
GST-HPV51E2fl CASTing. PCR amplimers from multiple rounds
of the CASTing process were cloned, and the sequence of the insert was
determined. Seventy-five sequences from the GST-HPV51E2fl
CASTing experiment were isolated, sequenced, and aligned based on
homologies within the variable 20 bp of each clone. (A) The numbers
represent the frequency with which a nucleotide was found at each
position (expressed as a percentage of the total). Listed above the
table is the consensus arrived at by determination of the most
frequently occurring nucleotide at each position. (B) The frequency of
specific sequences within the pool of sequenced clones expressed as a
percentage of the total. Note that the first two and last two sequences
listed are subsets of one another, respectively.
|
|
We also examined the frequency with which particular intact sites are
represented within the enriched population pool (Fig.
2B). Sequences
that contain ACAC-N
4-CGGT at the first and last
four positions of the 12-bp site represent 36% of the
sequenced
clones. Applying slightly less stringent criteria by
searching
for ACAC-N
5-GGT, we observed
that 47% of the total pool match
this site. In contrast, the canonical
DNA binding site for BPV1
E2, ACCG-N
4-CGGT,
was detected in only 3 of the 75 sequenced clones
from the
HPV51 E2 CASTing pools. A lower

affinity site
(ACC-N
6-GGT)
is recognized by HPV51E2,
though it was identified in only 15%
of the sequenced
pool.
As a further control for specificity, a random set of the round 9 TA
clones were subjected to analysis by EMSA. Radiolabeled
probes were
amplified by PCR using the TA-cloned DNAs as the template,
and EMSA
analyses were performed (data not shown). From differences
in the
abundance of the complexes, we concluded that there was
a wide range of
relative affinities between the GST-HPV
51E2fl
protein and
the various DNA sites. In contrast, when a similar
analysis was
performed using probes made from the clones isolated
from the
GST-His
6 CASTing experiment (data not shown), neither
the
GST-HPV
51E2fl nor GST-His
6 protein formed
complexes with these
DNAs. Therefore, neither the GST portion of the
fusion protein
nor glutathione-agarose beads were selecting specific
DNA
sequences.
Because the CASTing consensus sequence differed from the canonical BPV1
E2 site, we were concerned that the CASTing procedure
was not correctly
identifying the HPV E2 consensus binding site.
To address this
possibility, we repeated the CASTing using the
GST-BPV
1E2fl
protein to ensure that its high-affinity, palindromic
site was
efficiently recognized within the pool of degenerate
oligonucleotides.
Under our conditions of selection and enrichment,
the canonical,
high-affinity, palindromic BPV1 E2 DNA binding
site (ACCGggatCGGT)
but not the novel site (ACAC-N
4-CGGT) was
identified (data not shown). These results confirm that, despite
their poor representation among the TA clones isolated from the
GST-HPV
51E2fl CASTing experiment, this procedure
readily identifies
the canonical, high-affinity DNA binding site of the
BPV1 E2
protein.
HPV E2 proteins bind to the novel nonpalindromic site with
higher relative affinities than to a canonical BPV E2 site.
EMSAs were performed using E2 proteins derived from different
mucosal HPVs to ask if binding to the nonpalindromic HPV site was a
general characteristic of HPV E2 proteins (Fig.
3). The probes used were the
CASTing consensus sequence and a high-affinity canonical E2
binding site. Equal amounts of extract were used for each EMSA
reaction; however, because the expression levels of the different E2
proteins varied, meaningful conclusions can only be drawn from
comparisons between the relative amounts of the probes shifted by the
same E2 protein extract. In addition, the expression levels of the
baculoviruses expressing BPV1E2fl and HPV16E2ct
were very low, making the complexes in Fig. 3, lanes 6 and 10, difficult to see in this reproduction of the autoradiograph. Note also
that the complexes formed with nuclear extracts may contain more
proteins that interact with the probes than just the
baculovirus-expressed E2. Thus, the relative mobilities of the
various E2 complexes cannot be meaningfully compared. The GST-51E2fl protein has a higher relative affinity for the
CASTing consensus site than for the canonical E2 binding site (Fig. 3, lanes 1 and 2). The same result is found with the full-length HPV51 E2
protein purified from a baculovirus expression system (Fig. 3, lanes 3 and 4), demonstrating that recognition of the novel binding site was
not a property of either the GST fusion or bacterial expression of the
protein. Note that in the case of the GST fusions with full-length E2
proteins, because both the E2 proteins and the GST tag can dimerize
independently, there is a pair of shifted complexes that likely
represent dimers and tetramers of these proteins (Fig. 3, lanes 1 and
2). When a full-length BPV1 E2 protein was used in the EMSA, there was
no detectable shift of the GST-51E2 CASTing consensus site
(Fig. 3, lanes 5 and 6), consistent with the fact that this site was
not represented within the pool of sequenced GST-BPV1E2fl
CASTing clones (data not shown).

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
EMSA of multiple E2 proteins. Two clones from the
GST-HPV51E2fl CASTing experiment were used to make
radiolabeled probes. They represent the GST-HPV51E2fl
CASTing consensus sequence (ACACAAATCGGT, odd numbered
lanes) and a high-affinity binding site similar to those previously
described for other E2 proteins (ACCGAATATGGT, even numbered
lanes). Below each lane number is the percentage of the total probe
shifted by each E2 protein. These numbers were calculated from the
scanned autoradiogram using ImageQuant software to calculate pixel
densities for each band. Lanes 1 and 2 represent complexes formed
between these probes and the bacterially expressed
GST-HPV51E2fl proteins used for the CASTing experiment.
Lanes 3 through 12 all contained nuclear extracts from
baculovirus-infected insect cells. Lanes 3 and 4 are binding reactions
with the full-length E2 protein of HPV51. Lanes 5 and 6 are binding
reactions with full-length E2 protein of BPV1. Lanes 7 and 8 are
binding reactions with full-length E2 protein of HPV16. Lanes 9 and
10 are binding reactions with the C-terminal portion of the
HPV16E2ct protein. Lanes 11 and 12 contain extracts from
insect cells infected with a baculovirus expressing -glucoronidose.
Lanes 13 and 14 contain the two probes loaded without exposure to any
protein extracts.
|
|
Further analysis of binding reactions performed with the
HPV
16E2fl and the HPV
16E2ct proteins reveals
that each of these proteins
has a higher relative affinity for the
novel site identified by
CASTing than for the BPV1 E2 consensus site
(Fig.
3, lanes 7 to
10). The proteins prepared from bacteria and
baculovirus-infected
insect cells had similar relative affinities (Fig.
3, lanes 1
to 4). Also, the full-length and C-terminal HPV16 E2
proteins
had similar relative affinities for the two probes (Fig.
3,
lanes
7 to 10); this results is consistent with that described for
full-length
and C-terminal BPV1 E2 proteins (
18).
Therefore, all further
analyses of the E2 protein interactions with DNA
binding sites
used C-terminal proteins containing only the DNA binding
and dimerization
domains.
Analysis of DNA binding by highly purified E2 proteins.
So
that a more stringent determination of relative affinities and
off-rates could be made, a purification scheme was designed to isolate
highly purified 16E2sct, 51E2sct, and
GST-BPV1E2sct. Attempts to cleave the GST portion of the
GST-BPV1E2sct protein with factor Xa resulted in loss of
all DNA binding activity (data not shown). Therefore, factor Xa
cleavage was not performed on the GST-BPV1E2sct protein.
The GST-E2sct constructs used above were expressed in bacteria and
purified as described in Materials and Methods. Fractions were screened
for activity by EMSA and examined for the level of purity by sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-PAGE (Fig. 4A). The
active, highly purified fractions were pooled and used for all further
work defining the relative affinities and off-rates for these proteins
with selected DNA binding sites. The E2 proteins used in this study
were of comparable length, and this choice was based on the results of
Pepinsky et al., who demonstrated a correlation between the length of
BPV1 E2 C-terminal constructs and their binding affinity
(25).

View larger version (88K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Determination of the Krel and
T1/2 for the HPV51E2sct protein with
various DNA binding sites. (A) Silver-stained 4 to 12% gradient
SDS-PAGE of the highly purified HPV51E2sct protein
preparation (lane 1). Proteins in lane 2 are prestained molecular size
markers. (B) EMSAs to determine the relative affinity of the E2 protein
for various DNA probes. Reaction mixtures were made with the
HPV51E2sct protein and equal amounts of radiolabeled Bm#3
probe DNA with no competitor DNAs (lanes 0) or with sequential
dilutions corresponding to a 2-, 100-, and 500-fold excess of the
PCR-amplified unlabeled competitor DNA listed below the EMSAs.
Binding was for 30 min before electrophoresis. Gels were dried, exposed
to PhosporImager screens, and analyzed using ImageQuant
software. (C) EMSAs to determine the rate of E2 protein-DNA
dissociation. The HPV51E2sct protein was reacted for
30 min with the probe DNAs identified below each section of the
EMSA. Then, a 1,000-fold excess of unlabeled competitor DNA,
Bm#3, was added to each reaction mixture. Lanes 0 were loaded
immediately, while others were allowed to incubate for 1, 5, 10, 30, or
90 min before electrophoresis. Gels were dried, exposed to
PhosphorImager screens, and analyzed using ImageQuant
software.
|
|
Relative affinities and off-rates for E2BSs.
To further
confirm the CASTing results, we constructed a novel set of binding site
clones with defined nucleotide differences based on the consensus E2BSs
determined from the GST-HPV51E2fl and
GST-BPV1E2fl CASTing experiments. Figures 4B and C are
representative EMSAs used to define the relative affinities and
off-rates for these protein-DNA complexes. Table 2
lists the binding sites utilized and the
EMSA results for HPV16E2sct, HPV51E2sct, and GST-BPV1E2sct. The relative affinities suggested by the
frequency with which a sequence was identified in the
GST-HPV51E2fl CASTing experiment correlate with the
relative affinities of both HPV E2sct proteins in the EMSAs. Changes in
the most highly conserved nucleotides, the first and last two base
pairs, result in abrogation of binding (Table 2, compare Hwt with
Hm#7). HPV E2 proteins prefer A/T base pairs in the core of their
recognition sites for (Table 2 compare Hwt with Hm#9 and Bm#3 with
Bwt). The HPV E2sct proteins bound both the CASTing consensus and
canonical E2BSs with very similar affinities (Table 2, compare Hwt with
Bm#3). This result does not directly correlate with the
GST-HPV51E2fl CASTing experiment because the
canonical E2BS was identified with a much lower frequency than
the novel E2BS (see Fig. 2B). A novel palindromic sequence,
ACACAAATGTGT (Table 2, Hm#5), was also bound by the HPV E2sct proteins with relative affinities that
were lower but still within the same order of magnitude as the
CASTing consensus and canonical E2 binding sites (Table 2, compare Hm#5 with Hwt and Bm#3).
As expected, GST-BPV
1E2sct proteins bind with
significantly lower
Krels to the novel
site (Table
2, Hwt, Hm#5, and Hm#9).
The set of cloned E2BS
variants described here confirms that binding
to the novel E2BS
sequence is a property common to the HPV16 and
HPV51 E2 proteins but
not to the BPV1 E2
protein.
As reported previously (
42), the off-rate for BPV1
E2 is much faster than for HPV E2 proteins. The
GST-BPV
1E2sct protein
has
T1/2
values of less than 1 min for each of the binding sites
analyzed
here (Table
2, Bwt and Bm#3), whereas the HPV proteins
formed
more stable interactions with the sequences that they
recognized.
Novel DNA binding sites are located throughout HPV genomes.
As
a first step in addressing if these novel E2BSs may have biological
relevance, we searched the papillomavirus genome database (21) for the occurrence of ACAC-N5-GGT,
ACC-N5-GTGT, and
ACAC-N4-GTGT. Most papillomavirus genomes
contain one or more of these sites in regions where E2BSs are commonly
found. Table 3 identifies the locations
of these sites in selected papillomavirus genomes. The HPV51 genome has
two such novel high-affinity sites within the LCR proximal to the
putative E1BS. The site ACCGATTTGTGT (Table 3, column LCR
[ori/E]) closest to the E1BS is identical to the HPV51 E2
CASTing consensus sequence (Fig. 3). For other HPVs that infect mucosal
epithelium (e.g., HPV11 and HPV18), the analogous E2BS is involved in
initiation of replication (E2BS 3) (3, 4, 31, 36),
suggesting that this novel site may serve a similar function in
replication of HPV51.
Among HPVs, the novel E2BSs are most commonly found within the L1 ORF
(Table
3, column L1). The proteins encoded by the two
papillomavirus
late genes L1 and L2 form the viral capsid. No
studies published to
date have directly defined a function for
E2BSs within these late ORFs.
The novel E2BS DNA sequences within
L1, ACA CCT AGT GGT,
encode the conserved amino acid sequence
Thr-Pro-Ser-Gly
(
21). Therefore, we cannot rule out the possibility
that
these DNA sequences may also be conserved because of their
participation in capsid structure or for receptor
interactions.
Construction of the pOri16L reporter plasmids.
We next asked
if the novel E2BS could functionally substitute for the canonical
sites. The E2 protein is involved in the regulation of both
papillomavirus gene transcription and genome replication. By
substituting the novel E2BS for the canonical site in a system that
allows assay of E2-mediated effects, we can assess the functional role
of the sites. The well-characterized HPV type 16 genome was used for
these experiments. To this end, the pOri16L reporter was constructed;
it contains the 3 portion of the HPV16 LCR that includes the DNA origin
of replication and the overlapping early promoter structure that
contains three canonical E2BSs fused to a luciferase reporter. All
three sites are involved in the HPV16 E2 protein-mediated modulation of
viral replication and transcription (4, 26, 32).
Figure
5A presents a schematic of the
HPV16 LCR from which the HPV portion of pOri16L originates. Below it is
another schematic
representing the pOri16L construct, with the relevant
features
of the plasmid highlighted, including each of the wild-type
E2BSs
within the construct and the E1BS and A/T-rich sequence that are
required for replication of virus DNA. In addition, two cellular
transcription factor binding sites (Sp1 and the TATA box) that
are
known to facilitate the initiation of transcription from this
promoter
are present in this portion of the HPV16 LCR (
27,
37).

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
pOri16L constructs. A fragment of the LCR that contains
three of the four E2BSs from the HPV16 LCR (A) was fused to the
luciferase gene. The three E2BSs are labeled and represented by the
circles below the LCR (BS1 to BS3). Adjacent to BS2 is an Sp1 site, and
adjacent to BS1 is the early-gene TATA box. Also contained within this
portion of the LCR is the viral origin of replication (ori).
The minimal viral ori is defined by the proximal E1BS and
E2BS and their neighboring A/T-rich regions. All of these LCR E2BSs
stimulate viral DNA replication. (B) The wild-type and modified
sequences for each of the three E2BSs of the pOri16L constructs. The
names correlate with either the single-nucleotide-transition mutations
or the orientation of the novel E2BS that is created within each
mutated pOri16L construct. Within the sequences, lowercase lettering
corresponds to flanking nucleotides, uppercase letters correspond to
the 12-bp E2BS, and underlined letters correspond to those nucleotides
that differ from the wild type for each site. At the right is a
schematic of each construct. Open boxes are wild-type E2BSs; an X
through the box corresponds to a knocked-out binding site; transition
mutations are specified within the E2BS box; and large arrows within a
box correspond to the novel E2BS in either the forward or reverse
orientation.
|
|
To determine if the novel human E2BS has biological activity in the
context of the LCR, each of the wild-type E2BSs (BS1,
BS2, and BS3) in
the pOri16L plasmid were knocked out (KO) or
replaced with the novel
E2BS by site-directed mutagenesis (Fig.
5B). In addition,
single-nucleotide substitutions for the BS3
and BS1 E2BSs were also
made to help delineate which nucleotide
changes resulted in phenotypic
changes in plasmid activity (Fig.
5B, BS3-t

a and BS1-c

t). Because
the novel site is not a perfect
palindrome, it was placed in the
pOri16L plasmid in both orientations
to determine if this would affect
the function of E2 (Fig.
5B,
hE2BS [the hE2BS orientation found at the
HPV 51
ori; see Table
3] and hFLIP). The mutated pOri16L
plasmids are all named for
the mutation(s) made within their
E2BS(s).
Relative affinities and off-rates of the pOri16L E2BSs.
Relative affinity and stability studies with the HPV16E2sct
protein and the pOri16L construct E2BSs were performed to analyze the
effects of the sequence changes on two important biochemical parameters. Table 4 lists the results of
these HPV16 E2 binding affinity and complex stability analyses.
The single-nucleotide differences in the BS3-g

t and BS3-t

a clones
do not appreciably alter the binding affinity of the
16E2sct
protein for these targets compared with the BS3-wt
site (Table
4). When both of these nucleotides are altered, hE2BS, a
member
of the novel E2BS family, is created. The relative affinity of
E2 for this binding site is 2.5-fold greater than it is for BS3-wt.
Comparisons between the Rep-wt and hFLIP sites, which differ by
6 bp,
show an approximately 8.5-fold-higher relative binding affinity
for
hFLIP. These two comparisons reveal that substitution of the
novel E2BS
in either orientation for the Rep-wt site results in
an increase in the
binding affinity of the E2 protein for that
site.
The affinity of E2 for the BS1-wt site is increased by approximately
4.5-fold when a single-nucleotide change was made that
converts it to
the BS2-wt core sequence (BS2-wt/BS1-c

t clone).
Changing two
nucleotides to create hFLIP results in a 3.5-fold-higher
affinity
compared with BS1-wt (Table
4). There is no appreciable
difference in
the relative binding affinity of E2 for the BS1-wt
and the hE2BS site
despite the fact that 5 of the 12 bp differ
between these two
E2BSs.
E2 had the highest relative affinity for the BS2-wt/BS1-c

t site. Its
relative affinity for the novel E2BSs hFLIP and hE2BS
was 78 and 22%
of that for the BS2-wt/BS1-c

t site respectively
(Table
4).
Alteration of the first two and last two nucleotides
of the 12-bp E2BS,
as in hE2BS-KO, eliminated any detectable binding
in these
assays.
There is an apparent threefold difference in the relative binding
affinities, depending on the binding site orientation (hE2BS
versus
hFLIP), that correlates with the differences in the flanking
sequences.
Despite this, except for the hE2BS-KO, all binding
affinities for this
collection of DNA sequences are within the
same order of magnitude.
Considering that
Kds for the HPV16 E2
protein
binding to its recognition sites are in the range of 10
10
to 10
11 M (
33), all of the interactions
described above are very strong.
Thain et al. (
40) have
determined the
Kds for each of the E2BSs
within
the HPV16 LCR in the context of their wild-type flanking
sequences. The
results reported here agree with both of those
studies, as the binding
sites ranked from lowest affinity to highest
affinity are BS3-E2BS,
BS1-E2BS, and BS2-E2BS (Table
4).
Off-rates of the protein-DNA complexes were also determined for each of
the E2BSs (Table
4). The relative stabilities
(
T1/2)
of the complexes formed with the tested
E2BS variations are indistinguishable
in these
assays.
Effects of site substitutions on basal promoter activity.
This
experiment was designed to determine if the novel E2BS can functionally
substitute for the wild-type E2BSs within pOri16L in either
orientation. Previous studies have shown that the HPV16 E2 protein
affects expression from the early promoter at the level of
transcription (26). Therefore, a luciferase cassette
driven by the pOri16L constructs was used as a reporter to monitor the effects of the E2 protein on transcription from the mutated HPV16 promoters. These assays were first performed in the absence of the E2
protein to determine what effects the sequence alterations might have
on the basal activity of the HPV16 early promoter. The pOri16L
wild-type and mutant plasmids were introduced into SCC-13 cells along
with a reference plasmid and pRL-TK (see Materials and Methods and Fig.
6 legend for details).
Figure
6A shows the effects on promoter
activity when changes were made in E2BS#3. Alteration of the first and
last two nucleotides
of the 12-bp palindrome in BS3-KO (Fig.
5B), which
are critical
for E2 protein-E2BS contact (
8,
15), had
little effect on
the basal activity of the promoter (Fig.
6A).
Similarly, changing
a single nucleotide from within the core 4 bp of
the E2BS, as
in BS3-t

a (Fig.
5B), also had little effect on
expression levels
(Fig.
6A). However, the 2-bp substitution that
creates BS3-hE2BS
(Fig.
5B) decreased the accumulation of luciferase
activity by
60% (Fig.
6A). Creation of BS3-hFLIP results in a more
extensive
sequence change from the wild type (involving 6 of the core
12
bp of the E2BS; Fig.
5B) but only reduces the promoter activity
by
30% (Fig.
6A). There are no known cellular transcription factor
binding sites that directly overlap E2BS#3, but the reductions
in basal
promoter activity suggest that the BS3-hE2BS and BS3-hFLIP
sequence
changes interfere with some aspect of the gene expression
process.

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Basal expression levels from the pOri16L plasmids.
SCC-13 cells were transfected with 0.05 µg of pRL-TK and 0.5 µg of
pCMV4-XS plus 1 µg of each pOri16L template. Dual
luciferase assays were performed on cell extracts prepared at 36 h
posttransfection. The luciferase activity for each cell lysate was
expressed as the ratio between the firefly and Renilla
luciferase activities and then normalized to the pOri16L wild-type
(W.T.) levels (100%) for comparisons between experiments. The average
results from three independent experiments are plotted for each set of
templates. (A) E2BS#3; (B) E2BS#2; (C) E2BS#1; (D) constructs with
alterations to more than one E2BS. Error bars correspond to the
standard deviation for each data set.
|
|
Figure
6B details the effects of changes within E2BS#2 (Fig.
5B). The
changes to the first and last 2 bp of the 12-bp E2BS
found in clone
BS2-KO reduced the level of luciferase expression
by about 40%. The
BS2-hE2BS mutant clone, which has two substitutions
in the core and two
in the 3 portion of the palindrome (Fig.
5B),
has the least effect of
the E2BS#2 mutants on basal-level expression
(Fig.
6B). In contrast,
the BS2-hFLIP mutant which has two substitutions
in the 5 portion of
the palindrome (Fig.
5B), has the lowest basal
expression levels (Fig.
6B). These alterations to E2BS#2's sequence
could influence binding of
the cellular transcription factor Sp1
to its adjacent binding site. In
the absence of E2, Sp1 activates
expression from this HPV early-gene
promoter by binding to its
core recognition sequence, GGGCGT
(
7). It is known that sequences
flanking the core
recognition sequence of Sp1 affect its ability
to bind DNA
(
7), but no Sp1 binding analysis has been performed
with
the mutants that we have
made.
Figure
6C details the effects of changes within E2BS#1 (Fig.
5B).
Substitution with the BS1-KO has very little effect on basal
expression. However, when a single dC-to-dT transition is made
within
the core 4 bp of the 12-bp E2BS (Fig.
5B, BS1-c

t), luciferase
expression is reduced by 50%. More extensive mutations, such as
the
4-bp changes made to create BS1-hE2BS (Fig.
5B), result in
a similarly
reduced level of luciferase expression (Fig.
6C).
These results suggest
that the dC

dT transition affected the basal
activity of the
promoter. However, when this mutation is combined
with alterations to
the third and fourth nucleotides of this E2BS
to create the BS1-hFLIP
clone (Fig.
5B), basal promoter activity
is partially restored (Fig.
6C). There are no known transcription
factor binding sites that overlap
E2BS#1 whose interruption or
alteration could explain the effects of
these sequence changes
on basal promoter activity. The TATA box is
spaced only 3 bp from
E2BS#1 in the HPV16 LCR and pOri16L constructs
(Fig.
5A). It would
not be surprising if any or all of the mutations
that we made
to E2BS#1 had effects on the interaction of the
transcription
initiation complex with this region of the
promoter.
Comparison of the results of mutations to E2BS#3 and E2BS#2 reveals
that substitution with the novel E2BS in a particular
orientation does
not cause an equivalent decrease in levels of
basal promoter activity
(Fig.
6A and B, compare BS3-hE2BS and
BS3-hFLIP versus BS2-hE2BS
and BS2-hFLIP).
We also intended to determine if the novel E2BSs might affect the way
that E2 cooperatively mediates repression by making
substitutions to
more than one of the three E2BSs found in the
pOri16L construct.
However, changes to multiple E2BSs, in the
combinations that we tested,
resulted in severely reduced levels
of basal expression compared to the
wild type (Fig.
6D). Lewis
et al. (
14) described a similar
phenomenon when making mutations
to multiple E2BSs within plasmids
containing the full HPV16 LCR
driving a luciferase reporter. This
suggests that cellular transcription
factors interact with many
sequences overlapping the E2BSs within
the viral LCR even in the
absence of viral proteins. Because of
these results, clones with
mutations to multiple E2BSs were not
used for subsequent
analyses.
Novel E2BS functionally substitutes for wild-type E2BSs in
transient transcription assays.
The E2 protein can repress
transcription from the HPV early promoter (30). Therefore,
an HPV16 E2 protein expression construct was cotransfected into SCC-13
cells along with each of the pOri16L mutants and the reference plasmid
pRL-TK to determine whether the novel E2BS could functionally
substitute for the wild-type sites in an E2-responsive manner.
Although many of the E2BS mutations resulted in reduced levels of basal
expression from this cassette, the activities of all
the promoters were
still high enough to assay for repression by
the HPV16 E2
protein.
The HPV16 E2 protein repressed luciferase expression from the BS3-KO,
BS3-t

a, and BS3-hFLIP plasmids almost as efficiently
as it did from
the wild-type promoter (Fig.
7A). In
stark contrast,
expression from the BS3-hE2BS reporter, which had only
40% of
the basal luciferase activity of the wild-type promoter (Fig.
6A), was stimulated slightly by E2 (Fig.
7A). There is no precedent
for
alteration of the E2 function from a repressor to an activator
of early
promoter activity when only a 2-bp change in an E2BS
sequence is made.
A similarly binding-site orientation-dependent
effect was observed for
E2 protein function in transient-replication
assays (see below). We
propose that E2's functional dependence
on the orientation of the
novel E2BS indicates that the E2 protein
may asymmetrically bind to the
nonpalindromic, novel E2BS and
that this profoundly affects how it is
able to interact with other
proteins.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
pOri16L repression by the HPV16E2 protein. SCC-13 cells
were transfected with 0.05 µg of pRL-TK, 1 µg of each pOri16L
template, and either 0.5 µg of pCMV4-XS or 0.5 µg of
pCMV-E216. Dual luciferase assays were performed on cell
extracts prepared at 36 h posttransfection. The luciferase activity for
each cell lysate was expressed as the ratio between the firefly and
Renilla luciferase activities. The levels of repression were
calculated by dividing the basal promoter activity (transfections with
the pCMV4-XS plasmid) by the promoter activity in the
presence of the E2 protein. The results from three independent
experiments are plotted for each set of templates: (A) E2BS#3; (B)
E2BS#2; and (C) E2BS#1. Error bars correspond to the standard deviation
for each data set.
|
|
Knocking out the BS2 E2BS results in a greater than twofold reduction
in the ability of the HPV16 E2 protein to repress luciferase
expression
from this promoter (Fig.
7B). Substitution of the BS2
E2BS with the
novel E2BS in the forward or reverse orientation
partially restores E2
mediated repression (Fig.
7B).
Substitution of E2BS#1 with the BS1-KO sequence virtually eliminates
repression of this promoter by E2 (Fig.
7C). In contrast,
the presence
of the novel E2BS sequence in either orientation
(Fig.
5B, BS1-hE2BS
and BS1-hFLIP) restores E2 repression (Fig.
7C). Repression occurs even
though the basal levels of expression
from these mutated promoters were
reduced compared to the wild
type (Fig.
6C). These E2BS#1 mutants
demonstrate that the novel
E2BS can functionally substitute for the
wild-type site in either
orientation at this site (Fig.
7C).
These luciferase expression studies demonstrate that the novel E2BS can
functionally substitute for the wild-type E2BSs in
the context of
transient transcription at each of the three HPV16
LCR E2BSs studied
here. However, in the case of E2BS#3, functional
substitution depends
on the binding site orientation. Thus, the
ability of the E2 protein to
interact with cellular proteins can
be affected by the orientation of
the novel
E2BS.
Novel E2BS functionally substitutes for the wild-type E2BSs in
transient-replication assays.
Another major function of the E2
protein in the viral life cycle is the stimulation of DNA replication
in conjunction with the papillomavirus E1 protein. To determine if the
novel E2BS can functionally substitute for the canonical E2BSs in
E2-mediated DNA replication, we used the pOri16L mutants in
transient-replication assays. The pOri16L constructs were designed to
be analogous to plasmids used in other studies of HPV replication
(32, 36). Each of the E2BSs contained in the pOri16L
plasmid is known to influence the efficiency of replication.
Transient-replication assays were performed as described for HPV31
(12, 28, 32).
There is no detectable replication in the absence of E1- and/or
E2-expressing plasmids (Fig.
8A,

E1/

E2,

E2, and

E1) (
32).
In addition, various
amounts of E1 and E2 expression plasmids
relative to the pOri16L
plasmid were tested to determine if they
had any effect on transient
replication. Replication of pOri16L
was more readily detected when the
E1 and E2 expression plasmids
were transfected in molar excess to the
pOri16L target. However,
regardless of what the ratios of pOri16L
mutant to E1 and E2 expression
plasmids were, the relative replication
activities between the
mutant pOri 16L targets remained unaffected.
These results agree
with those of Sakai et al. (
32).
Figure
8A is a representative
Southern blot from one of the three
experiments used to determine
the replication activities summarized in
Fig.
8B to D.

View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Transient-replication assays with pOri16L mutants. (A)
Representative Southern blot prepared by electrophoresis of Hirt DNA
digested with both AlwNI and DpnI, transferred to
a nylon membrane, and visualized with radiolabeled probe made using
pOri16L as the template. In the left lane is one-eighth of the
wild-type sample that was digested only with AlwNI. The next
three lanes contain dilutions of DNA standards (in picograms) to
control for hybridization efficiency between blots. (Because all cells
are not efficiently transfected by the electroporation procedure, these
standards cannot be used to determine pOri16L copy numbers replicated
per cell) The lanes labeled E1/ E2, E2, and E1 were transfected
with wild-type (W.T.) pOri16L alone or with the addition of only the E1
or E2 expression plasmid respectively. The remaining lanes are labeled
with the name of the pOri16L clone (3 µg) that was transfected into
SCC-13 cells along with the E1 and E2 expression plasmids (in equal
molar amounts; 3 µg of pOri16L plus 3.3 µg of pCMV-E216
plus 3.8 µg of pCMV-E116). Southern blots were exposed to
PhosphorImager screens and analyzed using ImageQuant software. Shown
are the relative replication activities from three independent
transfections of pOri16L templates with mutations to their (B) E2BS#3,
(C) E2BS#2, or (D) E2BS#1. Error bars correspond to the standard
deviation for each data set.
|
|
Figure
8B shows the effect of changes to sequences in E2BS#3 on DNA
replication. Elimination of the E2 binding activity at
this site
reduces replication levels by about 50% (BS3-KO). The
substitution of
a single dA for the wild-type dT within the central
four nucleotides of
E2BS#3 (Fig.
5B, BS3-t

a) has little effect
on pOri16L replication
(Fig.
8B, BS3-t

a). In contrast, substitution
with the novel E2BS
sequence (Fig.
5B, BS3-hE2BS) results in an
almost twofold increase in
DNA replication. A similar increase
in replication efficiency is
detected when the novel E2BS is placed
in the opposite orientation
(Fig.
8B, BS3-hFLIP). Therefore, the
novel E2BS can substitute in
either orientation for E2BS#3 and
it enhances E2's stimulation of
transient replication activity
1.5- to 2-fold. This increase in
replication efficiency correlates
with an increase in relative affinity
as detected by EMSAs (Table
4).
Figure
8C shows the effect of changes to sequences in
E2BS#2 (see Fig.
5B for sequence details). Elimination of the E2
binding
activity at this site virtually eliminated detectable levels of
transient replication (Fig.
8C, BS2-KO). Substitution of this
site with the novel E2BS stimulates replication levels twofold
(Fig.
8C, BS2-hE2BS), as it did for the BS3-wt to BS3-hE2BS and
BS3-hFLIP
changes (Fig.
8B). However, placement of the novel E2BS
at E2BS#2
in the opposite orientation abrogates replication (Fig.
8B,
BS2-hFLIP). This result contrasts with those from the expression
assay, where the HPV16E2 protein repressed expression from the
BS2-KO, BS2-hE2BS, and BS2-hFLIP plasmids to similar levels (Fig.
7B). Thus, at this position in the LCR, the orientation of the
novel
E2BS influences E2-mediated replication. This orientation
dependence
may reflect changes in the conformation of the E2 protein-DNA
complexes
that form at this site with respect to the replication
machinery. We
detected a threefold effect of orientation on binding
affinities in our
EMSAs. These binding affinity differences between
the BS2-hE2BS and
BS2-hFLIP site, in the context of the pOri16L
plasmid, could explain
the differences in their replication
efficiencies.
Figure
8D shows the effect of changes to sequences in E2BS#1. The
replication capacity of the BS1-KO mutant template is only
40% of the
wild-type template (Fig.
8D, BS1-KO). In contrast,
substitution for
E2BS#1 with the BS1-c

t or the novel E2BS in
either orientation
(BS1-hE2BS and BS1-hFLIP) has little effect
on the replication
efficiency (Fig.
8D). Therefore, in contrast
to its activity when used
to replace E2BS#2, the novel E2BS can
functionally substitute in either
orientation for the wild-type
E2BS#1.
These replication studies demonstrate that the novel E2BS can
functionally substitute for the wild type E2BSs in the context
of
transient replication at each of the three HPV16LCR E2BSs studied
here,
but in the case of the E2BS#2, functional substitution depends
on
orientation. These results, taken together with the similar
orientation
dependence seen in our luciferase expression assays
for the E2BS#3
site, suggest that the ability of the E2 protein
to interact with
cellular proteins can be affected by the orientation
of the novel
E2BS.
 |
DISCUSSION |
CASTing was used to identify a novel family of HPV E2BSs whose
members are bound with affinities similar to that of the canonical E2BS. The CASTing results reveal the promiscuous nature of the HPV E2
protein with respect to DNA binding site selection. Our results allude
to the potential flexibility of the HPV E2 protein's conformation upon
binding to the E2BSs, as these proteins can bind to either the CASTing
consensus (ACAC-N4-CGGT) or canonical E2BS
(ACCG-N4-CGGT) with similar relative affinities
if their core and flanking nucleotides are conserved (Table 2, Hwt
versus Bm#3). These novel sites are present in HPV genomes at locations where E2BSs are commonly found.
To show that the novel site also has biological significance, we
substituted it for each of three of the wild-type canonical sites
within the HPV16 LCR (Fig. 5). We demonstrated that in both transient-transcription assays (Fig. 7) and transient-replication assays (Fig. 8), substitution for the wild-type E2BSs with the novel
E2BSs had, in some instances, very strong and unpredicted effects
on the ability of the HPV16 E2 protein to modulate transcription and
replication. In the case of BS3-hE2BS, reporter expression was
activated rather than repressed. For BS2, replication was only
supported when the site was replaced with the novel hE2BS in one
orientation. Thus, binding to this novel, asymmetric site affects the
HPV16 E2 protein's activities in an orientation-dependent manner.
Binding properties of HPV E2 proteins.
The CASTing experiment
(Fig. 2) and relative affinity studies (Tables 2 and 4) reveal that the
HPV E2 proteins that we examined have a preference for an A/T-rich 4-bp
core. There was a >100-fold difference in binding affinities of the
HPV16 E2 protein for an A/T-rich core versus a core that contained only
2 G/C bp (e.g., Table 2, Hwt versus Hm#9).
In agreement with studies by Thain et al. (
40), we noted a
preference by the HPV E2 proteins for purine (R) and pyrimidine
(Y)
residues at the

1 positions flanking the binding site (Fig.
2A,
78% R adjacent to the ACAC and 92% Y adjacent to the CGGT).
This property of the E2BSs is preserved throughout the HPV
genomes.
The LCRs of the mucosa-specific HPVs contain three E2BSs
involved
in the initiation of replication (
4). In all of
these sites,
the flanking purine and pyrimidine residues are well
conserved.
The novel E2BS was the most frequently isolated sequence in two
independent CASTing experiments with GST-HPV
51E2fl.
Yet, when
the core and flanking sequences are conserved, the HPV E2
proteins
bind the canonical palindromic sites (
2) with a
slightly higher
affinity (e.g., Table
2, Hwt versus Bm#3). This paradox
may reflect
the sensitivity of the CASTing procedure to subtle
differences
in the binding affinities or stability of these protein-DNA
complexes
that were undetectable by
EMSA.
Finally, EMSAs confirm that binding to the novel site is not a property
shared by the BPV1 E2 protein (Table
2, Hwt and Hm#9).
Structural determinants for E2 binding site preferences.
The
molecular basis for the differences in the DNA binding activities of
these proteins is not readily apparent. Cocrystal structures have been
published of only the BPV1 and HPV18 E2 proteins bound to canonical DNA
binding sites (9, 13) (Fig.
9). If we make two assumptions, that the
affinity for the novel hE2BS site and the specific protein-DNA contact
points are conserved between the HPV16 and HPV18 E2 proteins, then the
cocrystal structures cannot explain the differences in binding
properties between the HPV and BPV E2 proteins. The identity of all but
one of the amino acids that contact the DNA is conserved among the E2
proteins used in this study. The single difference is a change from
Phe343 in the BPV1 E2 protein to a Tyr in the corresponding site in the HPV E2 proteins (Fig. 9A). As both crystal structures indicate that these residues make comparable DNA contacts, this sequence difference cannot explain the differences in the binding properties of
the BPV and HPV E2 proteins. In addition, this aromatic residue makes
contact with the T at the 3 end of the DNA binding site (-GGT) that is
absolutely conserved in all functional E2BSs examined to date.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
BPV1E2ct protein-DNA contacts. (A) The amino
acid sequence of the -helix from the BPV1E2 protein that contacts
DNA is aligned with the homologous regions from the E2s of HPV51, -16, and -18. Numbers above the sequence corresponds to the BPV1 E2 protein.
Amino acid residues conserved between these proteins are highlighted.
Arrows above and below the alignment indicate amino acids that make
contact with the bases in the DNA major groove of the E2BS and are
presumed for HPV51 and HPV16 E2 (9, 13). (B) Schematic of
the E2 protein -helix contacting the DNA in the major groove. The
amino acids that make contact with the DNA are capitalized and in
boldface. The 5 and 3 ends of the DNA strands are indicated at the top
and bottom of each strand. (C and D) DNA double helix with
protein-contacting base pairs exposed for the BPV1E2 (C) and HPV18E2
(D) proteins. DNA-contacting amino acid residues are listed along the
sides. Contact points are indicated by arrows between the letters
representing the amino acids and nucleotides. Those contacts that are
mediated by a water molecule are indicated by the waterdrop symbol.
|
|
The cocrystal structure of the E2 proteins bound to the canonical DNA
binding site identified the amino acid-DNA contact points
in the 16-bp
sequence, caACCGAATTCGGTtg (
9,
13) (arrows in
Fig.
9A, C, and D). Figure
9B is a schematic representation of
the
results, showing the E2 protein

-helix oriented in the major
groove
of the DNA. Figures
9C and D show the amino acids that
make specific
contacts with the DNA base pairs. The E2 proteins
contain a conserved
Lys residue that makes direct contact with
the adjacent dG's in the
DNA binding site (C
GGT) (Fig.
9C and
D). Because the Lys
residue is conserved in all of the papillomavirus
E2 proteins sequenced
to date, binding to the novel sequences
ACCG-N
4-GTGT
and ACAC-N
4-GTGT by the HPV E2 proteins
suggests
a fundamental difference in the amino acid-DNA contacts and/or
the positioning of the DNA-contacting

-helices.
The data available to us suggest that protein flexibility is an
important determinant of sequence recognition. Nuclear magnetic
resonance and X-ray crystallographic studies comparing the bound
and
free states of the homodimeric DNA binding domain of BPV1
E2 describe a
conformational change upon binding to DNA. This
change involves both
the dimerization domain and the

-helix that
contacts DNA (
9,
47). It is plausible that HPV E2 proteins
are more flexible than
the BPV1 E2 protein. The fact that the
HPV E2 proteins strongly prefer
a flexible and/or prebent A/T-rich,
4-bp core within their 12-bp
binding sites also supports the concept
that the HPV E2 proteins can
undergo a greater conformational
change to achieve a stable complex
with
DNA.
Structural analyses of an HPV E2 protein complexed with both the
canonical and novel HPV E2 DNA binding sites would help to
address
these
issues.
Effect of E2 protein affinity for its binding sites.
Steger et
al. (35) used in vitro transcription assays to demonstrate
that the amount of HPV18 E2 can determine whether it acts as an
activator or repressor of transcription from the HPV18 early
promoter. When template containing the HPV18 LCR (with four E2BSs) is in excess, addition of the HPV18 E2 protein results in
stimulation of transcription. By contrast, when the HPV18 E2 protein is
in excess, transcription is repressed. Thus, E2 abundance may act as a
switch to differentially control early-gene expression at distinct
stages of the viral life cycle.
Transient-transfection assays in which the E2 protein is expressed from
a strong promoter, as used in this study, resemble
the situation where
the E2 protein is in excess of the available
E2Bss. Therefore, we would
predict that if the new sites had affinities
similar to those of the
wild-type E2BS, E2 should repress early-gene
expression. The
16E2sct protein used in this study had similar
or elevated
affinities for all of the sites studied here, with
the exception of the
KO sites (Table
4). Despite this, the substitution
of the BS3-hE2BS
site in pOri16L resulted in a promoter that was
weakly stimulated
rather than repressed by the HPV16 E2 protein
(Fig.
7A). The BS3-hE2BS
construct retains wild-type E2BS#1 and
E2BS#2, which E2 utilizes to
repress transcription from this promoter.
Even if the E2 protein is not
expressed in excess, it does not
have a higher affinity for
the BS3-hE2BS site than for the E2BS#1
and E2BS#2 E2BSs (Table
4).
Thus, the stimulatory effect of E2
binding to BS3-hE2BS overrides the
repressive effects of E2 binding
to E2BS#1 and E2BS#2. These data
suggest that binding affinity
alone is not sufficient to explain the
effect of E2 protein interactions
with an
E2BS.
Mechanisms of E2 protein-mediated transcription repression.
All three of the E2BSs within pOri16L facilitate E2-mediated repression
of gene expression from this promoter (17). The spacing
and relative locations of the E2BSs are well conserved, with respect to
the TATA box for the early promoter and with respect to the binding
sites of the known cellular transcription factors and the viral E1
protein, among the mucosal HPVs. At two E2BSs, E2BS#1 and E2BS#2, the
E2 protein can compete for binding with the cellular transcription
factors TFIID and Sp1, respectively (5, 37, 38). These two
factors are involved in the stimulation of early-gene expression from
this promoter in the absence of the E2 protein.
The TATA box utilized for the initiation of early-gene expression is
adjacent to E2BS#1. If the E2 protein is bound to E2BS#1,
it will
interfere with the binding of the transcription initiation
complex that
forms around the TFIID complex (
11). Therefore,
direct
interference with the formation of the transcription machinery
complex
is a mechanism for E2-mediated repression of transcription.
All of the
mutated E2BS#1 sites studied here, which were bound
by HPV16 E2 (Fig.
5B and Table
4, BS1-c

t, BS1-hE2BS, and BS1-hFLIP),
maintained their
ability to repress luciferase expression (Fig.
7C), demonstrating that
the novel E2BS can functionally substitute
for the canonical
E2BS.
The mechanism of E2-mediated repression via E2BS#3 has not yet been
characterized. There are no known cellular transcription
factor binding
sites that overlap with E2BS#3, although Lewis
et al. (
14)
have described a protein complex (CEF-2) from HeLa
cell extracts that
interacts with some of the nucleotides within
this site. Alternatively,
E2 binding to E2BS#3 may merely enhance
the repressive effects of E2
binding to E2BS#1 and E2BS#2. The
marked differences in the response to
the E2 protein of the pOri16L
constructs BS3-wt and BS3-hFLIP versus
BS3-hE2BS will require
further characterization to elucidate how the E2
protein utilizes
E2BS#3 to repress
transcription.
E2-stimulated replication.
Transient-replication assays were
used in this study because they combine the relative ease of genetic
manipulation with the ability to perform the assays in an epithelial
cell. However, only low-level replication, corresponding to the
maintenance stage of the viral life cycle, is detected under these conditions.
Substitution of BS2 with the novel hE2BS (Fig.
5B, BS2-hE2BS)
stimulated replication levels above wild type (Fig.
8C, BS2-hE2BS).
In
contrast, when the orientation of the novel hE2BS was reversed
(Fig.
5B, BS2-hFLIP), DNA replication was not detected (Fig.
8B,
BS2-hFLIP).
This indicates that functional substitution for wild-type
E2BS#2 by the
novel hE2BS is orientation
dependent.
Transient-replication studies with BPV1 have shown that BPV1 E2's
relative affinity for an E2BS correlates with its ability
to stimulate
replication (
43). From relative affinities alone,
we
presume that both the hE2BS and hFLIP E2BSs should support
E2-mediated
transient replication (Table
4). The caveat is that
HPV16 transient
replication is much less robust than that seen
for BPV1 (
32,
43) (Fig.
8A). Because replication levels are
low to begin with,
we cannot rule out the possibility that the
lower relative affinity of
BS2-hFLIP than of BS2-hE2BS is responsible
for the reduced
transient-replication levels (Fig.
8C). Alternatively,
there may be an
orientation dependence of the E2BS that cannot
be explained solely by
differences in relative affinities created
by flanking sequences.
Because the novel E2BS is not a palindrome,
E2 may bind asymmetrically
to the DNA and/or bend the DNA asymmetrically.
Asymmetrical binding may
influence the ability of the E2 protein
to functionally interact with
the replication machinery, whereas
distortion of the DNA bend may
influence how neighboring replication
factors interact with the
DNA.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Lou Laimins and Walter Hubert for help in getting the
replication assays up and running and for many helpful discussions. We
thank Ken Alexander for helpful suggestions for purification of the E2
proteins. We also thank Carey Waldberger, Rashmi Hedge, Richard Mann,
and Hamish Young for reading the manuscript and for insightful comments.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology Columbia University, 701 W. 168th St., New York,
NY 10032. Phone: (212) 305-8149. Fax: (212) 305-5106. E-mail:
sjs6{at}columbia.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alexander, K. A., and W. C. Phelps.
1996.
A fluorescence anisotropy study of DNA binding by HPV-11 E2C protein: a hierarchy of E2-binding sites.
Biochemistry
35:9864-9872[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Androphy, E. J.,
D. R. Lowy, and J. T. Schiller.
1987.
Bovine papillomavirus E2 trans-activating gene product binds to specific sites in papillomavirus DNA.
Nature
325:70-73[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Chiang, C. M.,
G. Dong,
T. R. Broker, and L. T. Chow.
1992.
Control of human papillomavirus type 11 origin of replication by the E2 family of transcription regulatory proteins.
J. Virol.
66:5224-5231[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Chow, L. T., and T. R. Broker.
1994.
Papillomavirus DNA replication.
Intervirology
37:150-158[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Dong, G.,
T. R. Broker, and L. T. Chow.
1994.
Human papillomavirus type 11 E2 proteins repress the homologous E6 promoter by interfering with the binding of host transcription factors to adjacent elements.
J. Virol.
68:1115-1127[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Gillitzer, E.,
G. Chen, and A. Stenlund.
2000.
Separate domains in E1 and E2 proteins serve architectural and productive roles for cooperative DNA binding.
EMBO J.
19:3069-3079[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Gloss, B., and H. U. Bernard.
1990.
The E6/E7 promoter of human papillomavirus type 16 is activated in the absence of E2 proteins by a sequence-aberrant Sp1 distal element.
J. Virol.
64:5577-5584[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Hegde, R. S.,
S. R. Grossman,
L. A. Laimins, and P. B. Sigler.
1992.
Crystal structure at 1.7 Å of the bovine papillomavirus-1 E2 DNA-binding domain bound to its DNA target.
Nature
359:505-512[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Hegde, R. S.,
A. F. Wang,
S. S. Kim, and M. Schapira.
1998.
Subunit rearrangement accompanies sequence-specific DNA binding by the bovine papillomavirus-1 E2 protein.
J. Mol. Biol.
276:797-808[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Hirt, B.
1967.
Selective extraction of polyoma DNA from infected mouse cell cultures.
J. Mol. Biol.
26:365-369[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Hou, S. Y.,
S. Y. Wu,
T. Zhou,
M. C. Thomas, and C. M. Chiang.
2000.
Alleviation of human papillomavirus E2-mediated transcriptional repression via formation of a TATA binding protein (or TFIID)-TFIIB-RNA polymerase II-TFIIF preinitiation complex.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:113-125[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Hubert, W. G.,
T. Kanaya, and L. A. Laimins.
1999.
DNA replication of human papillomavirus type 31 is modulated by elements of the upstream regulatory region that lie 5' of the minimal origin.
J. Virol.
73:1835-1845[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Kim, S. S.,
J. K. Tam,
A. F. Wang, and R. S. Hegde.
2000.
The structural basis of DNA target discrimination by papillomavirus E2 proteins.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:31245-31254[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Lewis, H.,
K. Webster,
A. M. Sanchez-Perez, and K. Gaston.
1999.
Cellular transcription factors regulate human papillomavirus type 16 gene expression by binding to a subset of the DNA sequences recognized by the viral E2 protein.
J. Gen. Virol.
80:2087-2096[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Li, R.,
J. Knight,
G. Bream,
A. Stenlund, and M. Botchan.
1989.
Specific recognition nucleotides and their DNA context determine the affinity of E2 protein for 17 binding sites in the BPV-1 genome.
Genes Dev.
3:510-526[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Lu, J. Z.,
Y. N. Sun,
R. C. Rose,
W. Bonnez, and D. J. McCance.
1993.
Two E2 binding sites (E2BS) alone or one E2BS plus an A/T-rich region are minimal requirements for the replication of the human papillomavirus type 11 origin.
J. Virol.
67:7131-7139[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
McBride, A., and G. Myers.
1997.
The E2 proteins, p. III-54-III-73.
In
G. Myers, C. Baker, K. Münger, et al. (ed.), Human papillomaviruses: a compilation of analysis of nucleic acid and amino acid sequences, vol. IV. Theoretical Biology and Biophysics Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N. Mex.
|
| 18.
|
McBride, A. A.,
R. Schlegel, and P. M. Howley.
1988.
The carboxy-terminal domain shared by the bovine papillomavirus E2 transactivator and repressor proteins contains a specific DNA binding activity.
EMBO J.
7:533-539[Medline].
|
| 19.
|
McCance, D. J.,
R. Kopan,
E. Fuchs, and L. A. Laimins.
1988.
Human papillomavirus type 16 alters human epithelial cell differentiation in vitro.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:7169-7173[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Mohr, I. J.,
R. Clark,
S. Sun,
E. J. Androphy,
P. MacPherson, and M. R. Botchan.
1990.
Targeting the E1 replication protein to the papillomavirus origin of replication by complex formation with the E2 transactivator.
Science
250:1694-1699[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Myers, G.,
C. Baker,
K. Münger,
F. Sverdrup,
A. McBride,
H.-U. Bernard, and J. Meissner (ed.).
1997.
Human papillomaviruses: a compilation and analysis of nucleic acid and amino acid sequences.
Theoretical Biology and Biophysics Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N. Mex.
|
| 22.
|
Myers, G.,
F. Sverdrup,
C. Baker,
A. McBride,
K. Munger,
H.-U. Bernard, and J. Meissner (ed.).
1994-1997.
Human papillomaviruses: a compilation of analysis of nucleic acid and amino acid sequences, vol. I through IV.
Theoretical Biology and Biophysics Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N. Mex.
|
| 23.
|
Panagiotidis, C. A., and S. J. Silverstein.
1995.
pALEX, a dual-tag prokaryotic expression vector for the purification of full-length proteins.
Gene
164:45-47[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Papavassiliou, A. G., and S. J. Silverstein.
1990.
Characterization of DNA-protein complex formation in nuclear extracts with a sequence from the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:1648-1657[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Pepinsky, R. B.,
S. S. Prakash,
K. Corina,
M. J. Grossel,
J. Barsoum, and E. J. Androphy.
1997.
Sequences flanking the core DNA-binding domain of bovine papillomavirus type 1 E2 contribute to DNA-binding function.
J. Virol.
71:828-831[Abstract].
|
| 26.
|
Phelps, W. C., and P. M. Howley.
1987.
Transcriptional trans-activation by the human papillomavirus type 16 E2 gene product.
J. Virol.
61:1630-1638[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Rank, N. M., and P. F. Lambert.
1995.
Bovine papillomavirus type 1 E2 transcriptional regulators directly bind two cellular transcription factors, TFIID and TFIIB.
J. Virol.
69:6323-6334[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Remm, M.,
R. Brain, and J. R. Jenkins.
1992.
The E2 binding sites determine the efficiency of replication for the origin of human papillomavirus type 18.
Nucleic Acids Res.
20:6015-6021[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Rheinwald, J. G., and M. A. Beckett.
1981.
Tumorigenic keratinocyte lines requiring anchorage and fibroblast support cultures from human squamous cell carcinomas.
Cancer Res.
41:1657-1663[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Romanczuk, H.,
F. Thierry, and P. M. Howley.
1990.
Mutational analysis of cis elements involved in E2 modulation of human papillomavirus type 16 P97 and type 18 P105 promoters.
J. Virol.
64:2849-2859[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Russell, J., and M. R. Botchan.
1995.
cis-Acting components of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA replication: linker substitution analysis of the HPV type 11 origin.
J. Virol.
69:651-660[Abstract].
|
| 32.
|
Sakai, H.,
T. Yasugi,
J. D. Benson,
J. J. Dowhanick, and P. M. Howley.
1996.
Targeted mutagenesis of the human papillomavirus type 16 E2 transactivation domain reveals separable transcriptional activation and DNA replication functions.
J. Virol.
70:1602-1611[Abstract].
|
| 33.
|
Sanders, C. M., and N. J. Maitland.
1994.
Kinetic and equilibrium binding studies of the human papillomavirus type-16 transcription regulatory protein E2 interacting with core enhancer elements.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:4890-4897[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Sanders, C. M.,
P. L. Stern, and N. J. Maitland.
1995.
Characterization of human papillomavirus type 16 E2 protein and subdomains expressed in insect cells.
Virology
211:418-433[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Steger, G., and S. Corbach.
1997.
Dose-dependent regulation of the early promoter of human papillomavirus type 18 by the viral E2 protein.
J. Virol.
71:50-58[Abstract].
|
| 36.
|
Sverdrup, F., and S. A. Khan.
1995.
Two E2 binding sites alone are sufficient to function as the minimal origin of replication of human papillomavirus type 18 DNA.
J. Virol.
69:1319-1323[Abstract].
|
| 37.
|
Tan, S. H.,
B. Gloss, and H. U. Bernard.
1992.
During negative regulation of the human papillomavirus-16 E6 promoter, the viral E2 protein can displace Sp1 from a proximal promoter element.
Nucleic Acids Res.
20:251-256[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Tan, S. H.,
L. E. Leong,
P. A. Walker, and H. U. Bernard.
1994.
The human papillomavirus type 16 E2 transcription factor binds with low cooperativity to two flanking sites and represses the E6 promoter through displacement of Sp1 and TFIID.
J. Virol.
68:6411-6420[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Thain, A.,
O. Jenkins,
A. R. Clarke, and K. Gaston.
1996.
CpG methylation directly inhibits binding of the human papillomavirus type 16 E2 protein to specific DNA sequences.
J. Virol.
70:7233-7235[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Thain, A.,
K. Webster,
D. Emery,
A. R. Clarke, and K. Gaston.
1997.
DNA binding and bending by the human papillomavirus type 16 E2 protein. Recognition of an extended binding site.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:8236-8242[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Thomas, M.,
M. Boiron,
J. Tanzer,
J. P. Levy, and J. Bernard.
1964.
In vitro transformation of mice cells by bovine papilloma virus.
Nature
202:709-710[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Ushikai, M.,
M. J. Lace,
Y. Yamakawa,
M. Kono,
J. Anson,
T. Ishiji,
S. Parkkinen,
N. Wicker,
M. E. Valentine,
I. Davidson,
L. P. Turek, and T. H. Haugen.
1994.
trans activation by the full-length E2 proteins of human papillomavirus type 16 and bovine papillomavirus type 1 in vitro and in vivo: cooperation with activation domains of cellular transcription factors.
J. Virol.
68:6655-6666[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Ustav, E.,
M. Ustav,
P. Szymanski, and A. Stenlund.
1993.
The bovine papillomavirus origin of replication requires a binding site for the E2 transcriptional activator.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:898-902[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 44.
|
Ustav, M., and A. Stenlund.
1991.
Transient replication of BPV-1 requires two viral polypeptides encoded by the E1 and E2 open reading frames.
EMBO J.
10:449-457[Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Ustav, M.,
E. Ustav,
P. Szymanski, and A. Stenlund.
1991.
Identification of the origin of replication of bovine papillomavirus and characterization of the viral origin recognition factor E1.
EMBO J.
10:4321-4329[Medline].
|
| 46.
|
van Zonneveld, A. J.,
S. A. Curriden, and D. J. Loskutoff.
1988.
Type 1 plasminogen activator inhibitor gene: functional analysis and glucocorticoid regulation of its promoter.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
85:5525-5529[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 47.
|
Veeraraghavan, S.,
C. C. Mello,
E. J. Androphy, and J. D. Baleja.
1999.
Structural correlates for enhanced stability in the E2 DNA-binding domain from bovine papillomavirus.
Biochemistry
38:16115-16124[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Wright, W. E.,
M. Binder, and W. Funk.
1991.
Cyclic amplification and selection of targets (CASTing) for the myogenin consensus binding site.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:4104-4110[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, February 2001, p. 1722-1735, Vol. 75, No. 4
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.4.1722-1735.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Sanchez, I. E., Dellarole, M., Gaston, K., de Prat Gay, G.
(2008). Comprehensive comparison of the interaction of the E2 master regulator with its cognate target DNA sites in 73 human papillomavirus types by sequence statistics. Nucleic Acids Res
36: 756-769
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chang, Y. E., Pena, L., Sen, G. C., Park, J. K., Laimins, L. A.
(2002). Long-Term Effect of Interferon on Keratinocytes That Maintain Human Papillomavirus Type 31. J. Virol.
76: 8864-8874
[Abstract]
[Full Text]