Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, February 2001, p. 1408-1413, Vol. 75, No. 3
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.3.1408-1413.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Identification of Two Prion Protein Regions That
Modify Scrapie Incubation Time
Surachai
Supattapone,1,2
Tamaki
Muramoto,2,
Giuseppe
Legname,1,2
Ingrid
Mehlhorn,2,
Fred E.
Cohen,1,3,4,5
Stephen J.
DeArmond,1,6
Stanley B.
Prusiner,1,2,5 and
Michael R.
Scott1,2,*
Institute for Neurodegenerative
Diseases1 and Departments of
Neurology,2
Medicine,3 Pharmaceutical
Chemistry,4 Biochemistry and
Biophysics,5 and
Pathology,6 University of California,
San Francisco, California 94143
Received 8 August 2000/Accepted 23 October 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
A series of prion transmission experiments was performed in
transgenic (Tg) mice expressing either wild-type, chimeric, or truncated prion protein (PrP) molecules. Following inoculation with
Rocky Mountain Laboratory (RML) murine prions, scrapie incubation times
for Tg(MoPrP)4053, Tg(MHM2)294/Prnp0/0, and
Tg(MoPrP,
23-88)9949/Prnp0/0 mice were ~50, 120, and
160 days, respectively. Similar scrapie incubation times were obtained
after inoculation of these lines of Tg mice with either MHM2(MHM2(RML))
or MoPrP(
23-88)(RML) prions, excluding the possibility that
sequence-dependent transmission barriers could account for the observed
differences. Tg(MHM2)294/Prnp0/0 mice displayed prolonged
scrapie incubation times with four different strains of murine prions.
These data provide evidence that the N terminus of MoPrP and the
chimeric region of MHM2 PrP (residues 108 through 111) both influence
the inherent efficiency of prion propagation.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The prion diseases are an unusual
group of fatal neurodegenerative disorders which include
Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, fatal familial insomnia, and
Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker disease in humans as well as
bovine spongiform encephalopathy in cattle and scrapie in sheep and
goats. A wealth of evidence supports the hypothesis that these diseases
are caused by a conformational change in the prion protein (PrP) from
its normal, cellular isoform (PrPC) into a pathogenic,
infectious isoform (PrPSc) (17, 18, 21).
To investigate the pathogenesis of prion diseases and to identify
potential therapeutic targets, much effort is now directed toward
characterizing the structural biology of PrPSc formation.
Recent nuclear magnetic resonance studies of recombinant PrP molecules
provide evidence for a three-
-helix bundle protein with a short
-strand region and a relatively unstructured N terminus (4, 7,
9, 23, 24). These structural data have facilitated the rational
analysis of mutagenesis-specific PrP segments in order to determine
their importance for prion propagation.
As part of a systematic PrP deletion mutagenesis study, we discovered
that Tg(MHM2,
23-88)9381/Prnp0/0 mice expressing
N-terminally truncated MHM2 PrP molecules were resistant to Rocky
Mountain Laboratory (RML) murine prions (30). MHM2 is a
chimeric construct that differs from wild-type mouse (Mo) PrP at
positions 108 and 111 (28). Substitution at these positions with the homologous residues from the Syrian hamster (SHa)
PrP sequence (L108M and V111M) creates an epitope for the anti-PrP 3F4
monoclonal antibody (MAb) (8). Although
Tg(MHM2,
23-88)9381/Prnp0/0 mice failed to propagate RML
prions, MHM2(
23-88) molecules expressed in scrapie-infected mouse
neuroblastoma (ScN2a) cells successfully formed
protease-resistant MHM2(
23-88)PrPSc (13).
Furthermore, Tg(MHM2,
23-88)9381/Prnp+/0 mice
expressing endogenous MoPrP in addition to the truncated, chimeric
transgene were susceptible to RML prion infection. These heterozygote
mice developed scrapie ~260 days after inoculation with RML prions,
and biochemical analysis revealed the accumulation of
protease-resistant MHM2(
23-88)PrPSc in their brains
(30). These complementary results in ScN2a cells and
Prnp+/0 mice indicate that coexpression of MoPrP
facilitates the conversion of MHM2(
23-88)PrPC to
MHM2(
23-88)PrPSc.
In view of the foregoing results, it remained unclear why
Tg(MHM2,
23-88)9381/Prnp0/0 mice were not susceptible to
RML prions in the absence of MoPrP. Immunofluorescence studies did not
reveal any significant differences in the cellular localization of
truncated, chimeric, and wild-type PrP molecules in transfected mouse
neuroblastoma (N2a) cells (data not shown). Possible explanations for
the resistance of Tg(MHM2,
23-88)9381/Prnp0/0 mice to
prion infection include (i) a prion transmission barrier between
full-length mouse PrP and MHM2(
23-88), (ii) decreased prion
conversion efficiency caused by removal of the N terminus, (iii)
insufficient expression of the MHM2(
23-88) transgene, and (iv)
decreased prion conversion efficiency caused by introduction of the 3F4
epitope. To distinguish between these possibilities, we conducted a
series of transmission studies in transgenic mice expressing
full-length and truncated PrP. These studies provide evidence that both
the N terminus and the region comprising the 3F4 epitope of PrP
influence scrapie incubation times.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Construction of transgenic mice.
Tg(MoPrP)4053,
Tg(MHM2)294/Prnp0/0, and
Tg(MHM2,
23-88)9381/Prnp0/0 mice used in this study have
been described previously (11, 28, 32).
Tg(MoPrP,
23-88)Prnp0/0 mice were generated in the
following manner. Plasmid pT2MoPrP (obtained from Takeshi Haga)
containing the MoPrP-A open reading frame in a
BglII/XhoI cassette was digested with
BglII/KpnI. The vector was religated using a
synthetic oligonucleotide linker (sense,
GATCTCATCATGGCGAACCTTAGCTACTGGCTGCTAGCACTCTTTGTGGCTATGTGGACTGATGTTGGCCTCTGOGGCCAAGGAGGAGGTAC; antisense,
CTOCTOCTTGGOOGCAGAGGOCAACATCAGTOCACATAGOCACAAAGAGTG CTAGCAGOCAGTAGCTAAGGTTOGOCATGATGA)
to create pT2MoPrP(
23-88). The resulting plasmid
was digested with BglII, and the single-strand ends were
filled in using avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase (Boehringer Mannheim). The newly created blunt ends were ligated to
SalI linker (Promega), and the mixture was digested with
SalI. The linearized DNA was purified by agarose
electrophoresis and self-ligated to make
pT2(SalI)MoPrP(
23-88). SalI-digested pT2(Sal I)MoPrP(
23-88) was inserted into the cos. SHa.Tet vector for oocyte microinjection as described previously (28).
Automated screening for transgenic integration was carried out using a
Beckman robotic workstation. Genomic DNA was isolated from tail tissue and screened by dot blot analysis as described previously
(26), using a radioactive oligonucleotide probe that
hybridizes to the 3'-untranslated region of the SHaPrP gene within the
cos.SHa.Tet vector. FVB mice were obtained from Charles River
Laboratories (Wilmington, Mass.). Tg(MHM2,
23-88)Prnp+/0
heterozygotes were generated by crossing
Tg(MHM2,
23-88)Prnp0/0 mice with wild-type FVB mice and
followed by screening the offspring for the transgene.
Determination of scrapie incubation periods.
Ten percent
brain homogenates in sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) without
calcium or magnesium were prepared by repeated extrusion through
syringe needles of successively smaller size, from 18 to 22 gauge. New,
sterile, individually packaged needles, syringes, and tubes were used.
All work was carried out in laminar flow hoods to avoid
cross-contamination. Mice of either sex aged 7 to 10 weeks were
inoculated intracerebrally with 30 µl of 1% brain homogenate in
calcium- and magnesium-free PBS plus 1 mg of bovine serum albumin per
ml. Inoculation was carried out with a 27-gauge disposable hypodermic
needle inserted into the right parietal lobe. After inoculation, mice
were examined daily for neurologic dysfunction. Standard diagnostic
criteria were used to identify animals exhibiting signs of scrapie
(2, 20). In each group, some animals whose deaths were
imminent were sacrificed, and their brains were removed for histologic
and biochemical analysis.
The full-length murine RML prion strain propagated in Swiss mice was
originally provided by W. Hadlow (Rocky Mountain Laboratory, Hamilton,
Mont.) and was passaged in Swiss CD-1 mice obtained from Charles River
Laboratories (3). The MHM2-adapted RML prion inoculum was
generated by passaging RML through Tg(MHM2)294 mice (27).
Infectivity of this inoculum was verified by repassaging in Tg(MHM2)294
mice. Me7 and 139A inocula were obtained from R. Kimberlin, and the 22a
inoculum was obtained from A. Dickinson. The passage histories of these
strains have been reviewed (22). PrP 27-30 was prepared
from the brains of CD-1 mice inoculated with RML prions, as described
previously (19), utilizing both proteinase K digestion and
sucrose gradient sedimentation.
Neuropathology.
Brains were removed rapidly at the time of
sacrifice, immersion-fixed in 10% buffered formalin, and embedded in
paraffin. Eight-micrometer-thick sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for evaluation of prion disease. Peroxidase
immunohistochemistry with antibodies to glial fibrillary acidic protein
was used to evaluate the degree of reactive astrocytic gliosis.
Hydrolytic autoclaving was performed as previously described
(12), using RO73 polyclonal antibody to detect
PrPSc.
Protease digestion and PrP immunostaining.
Nuclei and debris
were removed from brain homogenates by centrifugation at
1,000 × g for 10 min. Homogenates were adjusted to 1 mg of protein per ml in 100 mM NaCl-1 mM EDTA-2% Sarkosyl-50 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5). Twenty micrograms of proteinase K (Boehringer Mannheim) per ml was added to 0.5 ml of adjusted homogenate to achieve
a ratio of total protein to enzyme of 50:1. After incubation at 37°C
for 1 h, proteolytic digestion was terminated by the addition of 8 µl of 0.5 M phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride in absolute ethanol. Both
proteinase K-digested and undigested samples were prepared for sodium
dodecyl sulfate-12% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis by mixing equal
volumes of adjusted homogenate and 2× sample buffer.
Following electrophoresis, Western blotting was performed as previously
described (
26). Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat
milk protein in calcium- and magnesium-free PBS plus 0.1% Tween
20 (PBST) for 1 h at room temperature. Blocked membranes were
incubated with primary 1-µg/ml D13 chimeric antibody in PBST for
1 h at 4°C. Following incubation with primary antibody,
membranes
were washed 3× for 10 min in PBST, incubated with
horseradish
peroxidase-labeled anti-human Fab secondary antibody (ICN),
diluted
1:5,000 in PBST for 25 min at room temperature, and washed
again
3× at 10 min in PBST. After chemiluminescent development with
ECL reagent (Amersham) for 1 to 5 min, blots were sealed in plastic
covers and exposed to ECL Hypermax film (Amersham). Films were
processed automatically in a Konica film
processor.
Human-mouse chimera (HuM) Fab preparation.
Sequence
information obtained from a phage display library (34) was
utilized for the D13 clone, and the variable sequences were inserted
into an expression plasmid containing human immunoglobulin G (IgG) Fab
framework. Escherichia coli 33B6 competent cells were transformed with plasmid containing HuM Fab sequences, and a single bacterial colony from a Luria-Bertani medium agar plate containing 100 µg of ampicillin was grown in 500 ml of Luria-Bertani media containing 100 µg of ampicillin per ml at 30°C overnight. A Biostat B controller (B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany) was used together with a
10-liter vessel for all fermentation procedures. Fermentation was
carried out in medium containing (per liter) MT-8 salts (0.26 g of
potassium phosphate dibasic, 0.13 g of sodium phosphate monobasic dihydrate, 0.5 g of ammonium sulfate, 0.1 g of sodium citrate dihydrate, and 0.15 g of potassium chloride per liter); 0.5 g of isoleucine, 20% NZ amines, 20% yeast extract, 1 mM magnesium sulfate, 50% glucose, trace metals, and 100 µg of ampicillin per mg
and was completed in 40 to 48 h. The fermented culture was pelleted at 8,000 rpm for 1 h at 4°C in an Avanti J-20
centrifuge (Beckman), and the pellet was stored at
20°C. The frozen
paste was resuspended in five volumes of 2 mM imidazole-20 mM sodium phosphate-250 mM sodium chloride (pH 7.0), homogenized in a tissue homogenizer at 9,600 rpm, and it was processed twice in a
Microfluidizer M-110 EH (Microfluidics Co., Newton, Mass.). The cell
paste was titrated to 0.1% polyethylenimine (PEI) (5% stock solution
at pH 8.0), and it was stirred at 4°C for 30 min. The processed
sample was then spun down with Sorval J-10 (Beckman) at 10,000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C; the pellet was discarded, and the supernatant was used
for the purification procedure.
For purification, the sample was diluted in an equal volume of 20 mM
imidazole (pH 7.0). The solution was loaded onto a Sepharose
Fast Flow
(Amersham Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) column, and the
recombinant HuM
Fab was eluted with a linear gradient of five
column volumes (cv) of 0 to 100% 20 mM imidazole-500 mM sodium
acetate (pH 7.0). The resulting
peak was directly applied onto
an IMAC column, and it was eluted with 5 cv of 200 mM imidazole
(pH 7.0). The peak was dialyzed with three
changes of 100 volumes
of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.2) at 4°C overnight.
The dialyzed recombinant
material was further purified through a
Sepharose Fast Flow utilizing
a linear gradient of 0 to 100% 10 mM
Tris-HCl-500 mM sodium chloride
(pH 7.2). The final purified HuM Fab
peak was filtered through
a 0.45-µm-pore-size sterile filter and
stored at 4°C.
 |
RESULTS |
Tg(MHM2,
23-88)Prnp0/0 mice are resistant to prion
infection.
Theoretically, an artificial, sequence-dependent prion
transmission barrier could account for the resistance of
Tg(MHM2,
23-88)9381/Prnp0/0 mice to RML mouse prions
composed of full-length mouse PrPSc. We performed three
experiments designed to circumvent possible transmission barriers
caused by PrPC/PrPSc sequence mismatches at
either the N terminus or the 3F4 epitope. First, we inoculated
Tg(MHM2,
23-88)9381/Prnp0/0 mice with PrP 27-30 purified
from the brains of CD-1 mice inoculated with RML prions. PrP 27-30 in
these purified prion preparations has ~67 amino acid residues
enzymatically removed from the N terminus of PrPSc
(19). Although PrP 27-30 preparations are highly
infectious in CD-1 and FVB mice (1), preparations with
PrPSc molecules lacking N-terminal residues did not
transmit disease to Tg(MHM2,
23-88)9381/Prnp0/0 mice
(Table 1). Second, we generated
MHM2-adapted RML prions by passaging RML prions serially through
Tg(MHM2)294/Prnp0/0 mice. These MHM2(MHM2(RML)) prions,
composed of MHM2 PrPSc molecules, did not transmit scrapie
to Tg(MHM2,
23-88)9381/Prnp0/0 mice (Table 1). Finally,
we inoculated brain homogenates from scrapie-affected
Tg(MHM2,
23-88)9381/Prnp+/0 mice (n = 3)
into both Tg(MHM2,
23-88)9381/Prnp0/0 and control
Tg(MoPrP)4053 mice. Although these brain homogenates contained
MHM2(
23-88)PrPSc, they were not infectious for
Tg(MHM2,
23-88)9381/Prnp0/0 mice (Table 1). Taken
together, the results of these three experiments indicate that the
inability of Tg(MHM2,
23-88)9381/Prnp0/0 mice to
propagate prions cannot be explained by the presence of
sequence-dependent transmission barriers. Therefore, we proceeded to
investigate the possibility that either the N terminus or wild-type residues L108 and V111 of MoPrP might be required for efficient prion
propagation.
Tg(MoPrP,
23-88)Prnp0/0 mice propagate prions.
To study the effect of an isolated PrP N-terminus truncation on the
efficiency of prion propagation, we generated
Tg(MoPrP,
23-88)9949/Prnp0/0 mice without the 3F4
epitope substitution. In contrast to
Tg(MHM2,
23-88)9381/Prnp0/0 mice, which were resistant
to prion infection, Tg(MoPrP,
23-88)Prnp0/0 mice
propagated both RML and MHM2(MHM2(RML)) prions (Table 1). Neurological
examination of Tg(MoPrP,
23-88)9949/Prnp0/0 mice
revealed typical signs of scrapie following inoculation with RML
prions. Neuropathological studies revealed focal vacuolation with
associated gliosis in the hippocampus, brain stem, and white matter
(Fig. 1D through F). Intraneuronal
vacuolation was seen in the brain stem (Fig. 1F). No plaques were
detected with the hydrolytic autoclaving technique (data not shown).
Similar findings were seen in three
Tg(MoPrP,
23-88)9949/Prnp0/0 mice affected with scrapie
following serial transmission of MoPrP(
23-88)(RML) prions (Fig. 1G
through I). Immunoblot analysis confirmed that brains of
scrapie-affected Tg(MoPrP,
23-88)9949/Prnp0/0 mice
contained protease-resistant MoPrP(
23-88) PrPSc (Fig.
2).

View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Typical neuropathological features of scrapie
occur in Tg(MoPrP, 23-88)Prnp0/0 mouse brains following
inoculation with RML prions. (A, B, and C) A 300-day-old, uninoculated
control Tg(MoPrP, 23-88)Prnp0/0 mouse shows no evidence
of spongiform degeneration or reactive astrocytic gliosis. (D, E, and
F) Primary inoculation of Tg(MoPrP, 23-88)Prnp0/0 mouse
with RML prions. This brain was taken from a scrapie-affected mouse
sacrificed at 130 days of age. (D) Characteristic spongiform
degeneration is found in the hippocampus with loss of neurons in the
CA1 region. (E) The neurodegenerative changes are associated with
intense reactive astrocytic gliosis. (F) In the tegmentum of the pons,
many nerve cells bodies were vacuolated. (G, H, and I) Secondary
transmission of RML in Tg(MoPrP, 23-88)Prnp0/0 mice
showed similar but less intense neuropathological changes compared to
the primary passage. This brain was taken from a scrapie-affected mouse
sacrificed at 130 days of age. Specimens shown in panels A, C, D, F, G,
and I were stained by the hematoxylin and eosin technique. B, E, and F
were immunostained for glial fibrillary acidic protein. The bar in H is
25 mm and also applies to panels A, B, D, E, and G. The bar in I is 25 µm and also applies to C and F.
|
|

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Immunoblot of PrPSc in brains of
Tg(MoPrP, 23-88)Prnp0/0 mice. Paired sample lanes are
numbered as follows: (1) normal FVB mouse, (2) RML-infected FVB mouse,
(3) 440-day-old, uninoculated Tg(MHM2, 23-88)Prnp0/0
mouse, (4) 800-day-old Tg(MHM2, 23-88)Prnp0/0 mouse
inoculated with RML prions, (5) 300-day-old, uninoculated
Tg(MoPrP, 23-88)Prnp0/0 mouse, (6) scrapie-affected,
130-day-old Tg(MoPrP, 23-88)Prnp0/0 mouse inoculated
with RML prions, (7) scrapie-affected, 130-day-old
Tg(MoPrP, 23-88)Prnp0/0 mouse inoculated with
MoPrP( 23-88)(RML) prions. Minus ( ) symbol denotes undigested
control sample, and plus (+) symbol designates sample subjected to
limited proteolysis. Apparent molecular sizes based on migration of
protein standards are given in kilodaltons.
|
|
We compared scrapie incubation times of
Tg(MoPrP,

23-88)9949/Prnp
0/0 mice with those of
Tg(MoPrP)4053 mice expressing full-length
MoPrP to assess the
contribution of residues 23 through 88 towards
efficient prion
propagation. After inoculation with full-length
RML prions,
Tg(MoPrP,

23-88)9949/Prnp
0/0 mice developed scrapie in
~160 days; Tg(MoPrP)4053 mice developed
scrapie in only ~50
days (Table
1). Upon serial transmission,
inoculation of
MoPrP(

23-88)(RML) prions caused scrapie with an
incubation time of
~140 days in Tg(MoPrP,

23-88)9949/Prnp
0/0 mice and
~50 days in Tg(MoPrP)4053 mice (Table
1). Because
Tg(MoPrP,

23-88)9949/Prnp
0/0 mice have longer
scrapie incubation times than Tg(MoPrP)4053
mice on both primary and
serial passages, the prolongation of
incubation times cannot be
explained by a transmission barrier.
Furthermore, the
prolonged scrapie incubation times obtained with
Tg(MoPrP,

23-88)9949/Prnp
0/0 mice cannot be explained by
differential transgene expression,
because these mice express twice as
much PrP as do Tg(MoPrP)4053
mice (16 versus 8 times the PrP level in
normal SHa brain, respectively).
Rather, the prolonged incubation times
must result from reduced
PrP conversion efficiency, caused by removal
of the N
terminus.
Scrapie incubation times in Tg(MHM2)Prnp0/0 mice.
To assess the influence of the 3F4 epitope on prion propagation
efficiency, we compared scrapie incubation times of
Tg(MHM2)294/Prnp0/0 and Tg(MoPrP)4053 mice. Following
inoculation of RML prions, Tg(MHM2)294/Prnp0/0 mice
developed scrapie in ~120 days, whereas Tg(MoPrP)4053 mice developed
scrapie in ~50 days (Table 1). This difference in scrapie incubation times was not caused by a sequence-dependent prion transmission barrier since second-passage MHM2(MHM2(RML)) prions were
also transmitted less efficiently in Tg(MHM2)294/Prnp0/0
mice (~140 days) than in Tg(MoPrP)4053 mice (~60 days) (Table 1). Furthermore, the long scrapie incubation times obtained in Tg(MHM2)294/Prnp0/0 mice cannot be attributed to low
transgene expression since these mice express twice as much PrP as
Tg(MoPrP)4053 mice. Therefore, we conclude that introduction of the 3F4
epitope into MoPrP, like N-terminal truncation, reduces PrP conversion efficiency.
We sought to determine whether the prolongation of scrapie incubation
time caused by the 3F4 epitope might be a strain-specific
phenomenon.
We inoculated Tg(MHM2)294/Prnp
0/0 and Tg(MoPrP)4053 mice
with four different strains of murine
prions. For each strain, scrapie
incubation times were longer
in Tg(MHM2)294/Prnp
0/0 mice
than in Tg(MoPrP)4053 mice (Table
2).
These results indicate
that the control exerted by residues L108 and
V111 over scrapie
incubation time is not strain specific.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The N terminus of PrP is required for efficient prion
propagation.
Our studies indicate that removal of the N terminus
of PrP diminishes the efficiency of prion propagation. Why might
N-terminally truncated PrP form PrPSc less efficiently than
full-length PrP? Two independent studies suggest possible explanations.
First, comparative chemical shift data from structural nuclear magnetic
resonance studies of SHaPrP(29-331) and SHaPrP(90-231) indicate that
residues 29 through 89 may help stabilize
-helix B (4).
Second, deletion of the N terminus diminished the efficacy of
MHM2(
23-88)Q218K as a dominant negative inhibitor of
PrPSc formation in a ScN2a cells (35). These
findings suggest that the N terminus of PrP may participate in
intermolecular as well as intramolecular interactions necessary for
PrPSc formation. Furthermore, the observation that
coexpression of full-length MoPrP enables formation of
MHM2(
23-88)PrPSc in Prnp+/0 mice and ScN2a
cells indicates that these interactions can be restored in
trans (30).
Others have reported that Tg(MoPrP,

32-80)Prnp
0/0
mice propagate prions efficiently (
5), whereas
Tg(MoPrP,

32-93)Prnp
0/0 mice display prolonged incubation
times (
6), similar to
Tg(MoPrP,

23-88)9949/Prnp
0/0 mice. Taken together, these
results argue that at least one intact
octapeptide sequence is required
for efficient prion propagation.
It is interesting that histological
features of scrapie in Tg(MoPrP,

32-93)Prnp
0/0 mice
infected with RML were limited to the spinal cord, and the
brains of
these animals did not contain protease-resistant PrP
Sc
(
6). In contrast, focal vacuolation and astocytic gliosis
could be seen in the hippocampus, white matter, and brain stem
of
RML-infected Tg(MoPrP,

23-88)9949/Prnp
0/0 mice (Fig.
1).
Furthermore, protease-resistant PrP
Sc was easily detected
in the brains of RML-infected
Tg(MoPrP,

23-88)9949/Prnp
0/0 mice by immunoblotting
(Fig.
2). The different neuropathological
and biochemical profiles
obtained in RML-infected Tg(MoPrP,

32-93)Prnp
0/0 versus
Tg(MoPrP,

23-88)9949/Prnp
0/0 mice could be caused by (i)
the absence of residues 89 through
93, (ii) the presence of residues 23 through 31, (iii) a difference
between the half-genomic and cos.SHa.Tet
expression vectors, or
(iv) a difference in expression levels. More
work will be required
to distinguish among these
possibilities.
Control of scrapie incubation time by the 3F4 epitope.
Our
results also show that residues within the 3F4 epitope control scrapie
incubation time. The combined substitutions L108M and V111M led to
prolonged scrapie incubation times in
Tg(MHM2)294/Prnp0/0 mice. The inability of
Tg(MHM2)294/Prnp0/0 mice to propagate prions efficiently
was caused neither by poor PrP expression nor by a prion transmission
barrier. Furthermore, Tg(MHM2)294/Prnp0/0 mice propagated
four different strains of murine prions inefficiently, indicating that
the adverse effect of L108M/V111M substitution on prion propagation is
not a strain-specific phenomenon. An independent finding that also
implicates residue 108 in controlling scrapie incubation times is that
polymorphic substitutions at residues 108 or 189 lengthen incubation
times in mice (10, 33).
Residues within the 3F4 epitope might influence the efficiency of prion
conversion by participating in the conformational
change from
PrP
C to PrP
Sc. This concept is supported by
data showing that the 3F4 epitope
is accessible in PrP
C
molecules but hidden in PrP
Sc molecules (
14,
25,
29).
Others have demonstrated that long-term expression of MHM2 molecules in
ScN2a cells slowly reduced levels of endogenous MoPrP
Sc
(
15,
16). The authors claimed that precise interactions
between
homologous PrP molecules are important in PrP
Sc
accumulation, and heterologous MHM2 molecules can block these
interactions (
15). We suggest a different interpretation.
Our
data indicate that the conversion of MHM2 PrP
C
molecules into MHM2 PrP
Sc is inherently inefficient. In
chronically infected, dividing
cells, slowing the rate of prion
propagation would progressively
dilute and eventually eliminate
PrP
Sc. The rate at which prions are propagated must match
or exceed
the rate of cell division in order to maintain the levels of
infection.
Finally, examination of the amino acid sequence of PrP regions 100 through 109 (KPSKPKTNMK) and 23 through 31 (KKRPKPGGW)
revealed that
each region contains four basic residues. It remains
to be determined
whether the positive charges contributed by multiple
basic residues
contribute to the control of scrapie incubation
times exerted by these
two regions. However, it is interesting
that positively charged,
synthetic polyamine compounds can render
PrP
Sc molecules
protease sensitive and reduce prion infectivity in
ScN2a cells
(
31), suggesting that primary amine groups might
play a
role in prion
propagation.
Conclusion.
We performed a series of experiments to
investigate why Tg(MHM2,
23-88)9381/Prnp0/0 mice are
resistant to prion propagation. Our results identify two regions of the
PrP molecule which control scrapie incubation times. The N terminus may
be necessary for the inter- as well as intramolecular interactions
required for efficient prion propagation. Residues comprising the 3F4
epitope may participate in the conformational change from
PrPC to PrPSc.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank P. Tremblay, D. Groth, and C. Petromilli for helpful advice.
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of
Health (NS14069, AG08967, AG02132, and AG10770) and a gift from the G. Harold and Leila Y. Mathers Charitable Foundation. Surachai Supattapone
was supported by the Burroughs Wellcome Fund Career Development Award
and an NIH Clinical Investigator Development Award (K08 NS02048-02).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute for
Neurodegenerative Diseases, Box 0518, University of California, San
Francisco, CA 94143-0518. Phone: (415) 476-4482. Fax: (415) 476-8386.
Present address: Department of Neurological Science, Tohoku
University School of Medicine, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Japan 980-8575.
Present address: Montclair Group, Tal Biosciences, Alameda, CA 94501.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bolton, D. C.,
M. P. McKinley, and S. B. Prusiner.
1987.
Properties and characteristics of scrapie PrP 27-30 protein, p. 173-196.
In
S. B. Prusiner, and M. P. McKinley (ed.), Prions novel infectious pathogens causing scrapie and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Academic Press, Orlando, Fla.
|
| 2.
|
Carlson, G. A.,
D. T. Kingsbury,
P. A. Goodman,
S. Coleman,
S. T. Marshall,
S. DeArmond,
D. Westaway, and S. B. Prusiner.
1986.
Linkage of prion protein and scrapie incubation time genes.
Cell
46:503-511[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Chandler, R. L.
1961.
Encephalopathy in mice produced by inoculation with scrapie brain material.
Lancet
i:1378-1379.
|
| 4.
|
Donne, D. G.,
J. H. Viles,
D. Groth,
I. Mehlhorn,
T. L. James,
F. E. Cohen,
S. B. Prusiner,
P. E. Wright, and H. J. Dyson.
1997.
Structure of the recombinant full-length hamster prion protein PrP(29-231): the N terminus is highly flexible.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:13452-13457[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Fischer, M.,
T. Rülicke,
A. Raeber,
A. Sailer,
M. Moser,
B. Oesch,
S. Brandner,
A. Aguzzi, and C. Weissmann.
1996.
Prion protein (PrP) with amino-proximal deletions restoring susceptibility of PrP knockout mice to scrapie.
EMBO J.
15:1255-1264[Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Flechsig, E.,
D. Shmerling,
I. Hegyi,
A. J. Raeber,
M. Fischer,
A. Cozzio,
C. von Mering,
A. Aguzzi, and C. Weissmann.
2000.
Prion protein devoid of the octapeptide repeat region restores susceptibility to scrapie in PrP knockout mice.
Neuron
27:399-408[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
James, T. L.,
H. Liu,
N. B. Ulyanov,
S. Farr-Jones,
H. Zhang,
D. G. Donne,
K. Kaneko,
D. Groth,
I. Mehlhorn,
S. B. Prusiner, and F. E. Cohen.
1997.
Solution structure of a 142-residue recombinant prion protein corresponding to the infectious fragment of the scrapie isoform.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:10086-10091[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Kascsak, R. J.,
R. Rubenstein,
P. A. Merz,
M. Tonna-DeMasi,
R. Fersko,
R. I. Carp,
H. M. Wisniewski, and H. Diringer.
1987.
Mouse polyclonal and monoclonal antibody to scrapie-associated fibril proteins J.
Virol.
61:3688-3693.
|
| 9.
|
Liu, H.,
S. Farr-Jones,
N. B. Ulyanov,
M. Llinas,
S. Marqusee,
D. Groth,
F. E. Cohen,
S. B. Prusiner, and T. L. James.
1999.
Solution structure of Syrian hamster prion protein rPrP(90-231).
Biochemistry
38:5362-5377[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Moore, R. C.,
J. Hope,
P. A. McBride,
I. McConnell,
J. Selfridge,
D. W. Melton, and J. C. Manson.
1998.
Mice with gene targeted prion protein alterations show that Prn-p, Sinc and Prni are congruent.
Nat. Genet.
18:118-125[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Muramoto, T.,
S. J. DeArmond,
M. Scott,
G. C. Telling,
F. E. Cohen, and S. B. Prusiner.
1997.
Heritable disorder resembling neuronal storage disease in mice expressing prion protein with deletion of an -helix.
Nat. Med.
3:750-755[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Muramoto, T.,
T. Kitamoto,
J. Tateishi, and I. Goto.
1992.
The sequential development of abnormal prion protein accumulation in mice with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease.
Am. J. Pathol.
140:1411-1420[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Muramoto, T.,
M. Scott,
F. E. Cohen, and S. B. Prusiner.
1996.
Recombinant scrapie-like prion protein of 106 amino acids is soluble.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
93:15457-15462[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Peretz, D.,
R. A. Williamson,
Y. Matsunaga,
H. Serban,
C. Pinilla,
R. B. Bastidas,
R. Rozenshteyn,
T. L. James,
R. A. Houghten,
F. E. Cohen,
S. B. Prusiner, and D. R. Burton.
1997.
A conformational transition at the N terminus of the prion protein features in formation of the scrapie isoform.
J. Mol. Biol.
273:614-622[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Priola, S. A.,
B. Caughey,
R. E. Race, and B. Chesebro.
1994.
Heterologous PrP molecules interfere with accumulation of protease-resistant PrP in scraple-infected murine neuroblastoma cells.
J. Virol.
68:4873-4878[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Priola, S. A., and B. Chesebro.
1995.
A single hamster PrP amino acid blocks conversion to protease-resistant PrP in scrapie-infected mouse neuroblastoma cells.
J. Virol.
69:7754-7758[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
Prusiner, S. B.
1982.
Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie.
Science
216:136-144[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Prusiner, S. B.
1998.
Prions.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:13363-13383[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Prusiner, S. B.,
D. C. Bolton,
D. F. Groth,
K. A. Bowman,
S. P. Cochran, and M. P. McKinley.
1982.
Further purification and characterization of scrapie prions.
Biochemistry
21:6942-6950[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Prusiner, S. B.,
S. P. Cochran,
D. F. Groth,
D. E. Downey,
K. A. Bowman, and H. M. Martinez.
1982.
Measurement of the scrapie agent using an incubation time interval assay.
Ann. Neurol.
11:353-358[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Prusiner, S. B.,
M. R. Scott,
S. J. DeArmond, and F. E. Cohen.
1998.
Prion protein biology.
Cell
93:337-348[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Ridley, R. M., and H. F. Baker.
1996.
To what extent is strain variation evidence for an independent genome in the agent of the transmissible spongiform encephalopathies?
Neurodegeneration
5:219-231[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Riek, R.,
S. Hornemann,
G. Wider,
M. Billeter,
R. Glockshuber, and K. Wüthrich.
1996.
NMR structure of the mouse prion protein domain PrP(121-231).
Nature
382:180-182[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Riek, R.,
S. Hornemann,
G. Wider,
R. Glockshuber, and K. Wüthrich.
1997.
NMR characterization of the full-length recombinant murine prion protein, mPrP(23-231).
FEBS Lett.
413:282-288[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Safar, J.,
H. Wille,
V. Itri,
D. Groth,
H. Serban,
M. Torchia,
F. E. Cohen, and S. B. Prusiner.
1998.
Eight prion strains have PrPSc molecules with different conformations.
Nat. Med.
4:1157-1165[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Scott, M.,
D. Foster,
C. Mirenda,
D. Serban,
F. Coufal,
M. Wälchli,
M. Torchia,
D. Groth,
G. Carlson,
S. J. DeArmond,
D. Westaway, and S. B. Prusiner.
1989.
Transgenic mice expressing hamster prion protein produce species-specific scrapie infectivity and amyloid plaques.
Cell
59:847-857[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Scott, M.,
D. Groth,
D. Foster,
M. Torchia,
S.-L. Yang,
S. J. DeArmond, and S. B. Prusiner.
1993.
Propagation of prions with artificial properties in transgenic mice expressing chimeric PrP genes.
Cell
73:979-988[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Scott, M. R.,
R. Köhler,
D. Foster, and S. B. Prusiner.
1992.
Chimeric prion protein expression in cultured cells and transgenic mice.
Protein Sci.
1:986-997[Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Serban, D.,
A. Taraboulos,
S. J. DeArmond, and S. B. Prusiner.
1990.
Rapid detection of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and scrapie prion proteins.
Neurology
40:110-117[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Supattapone, S.,
P. Bosque,
T. Muramoto,
H. Wille,
C. Aagaard,
D. Peretz,
H.-O. B. Nguyen,
C. Heinrich,
M. Torchia,
J. Safar,
F. E. Cohen,
S. J. DeArmond,
S. B. Prusiner, and M. Scott.
1999.
Prion protein of 106 residues creates an artificial transmission barrier for prion replication in transgenic mice.
Cell
96:869-878[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Supattapone, S.,
H.-O. B. Nguyen,
F. E. Cohen,
S. B. Prusiner, and M. R. Scott.
1999.
Elimination of prions by branched polyamines and implications for therapeutics.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
96:14529-14534[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Telling, G. C.,
T. Haga,
M. Torchia,
P. Tremblay,
S. J. DeArmond, and S. B. Prusiner.
1996.
Interactions between wild-type and mutant prion proteins modulate neurodegeneration in transgenic mice.
Genes Dev.
10:1736-1750[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Westaway, D.,
P. A. Goodman,
C. A. Mirenda,
M. P. McKinley,
G. A. Carlson, and S. B. Prusiner.
1987.
Distinct prion proteins in short and long scrapie incubation period mice.
Cell
51:651-662[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Williamson, R. A.,
D. Peretz,
C. Pinilla,
H. Ball,
R. B. Bastidas,
R. Rozenshteyn,
R. A. Houghten,
S. B. Prusiner, and D. R. Burton.
1998.
Mapping the prion protein using recombinant antibodies.
J. Virol.
72:9413-9418[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Zullanello, L.,
K. Kaneko,
M. Scott,
S. Erpel,
D. Han,
F. E. Cohen, and S. B. Prusiner.
2000.
Dominant-negative inhibition of prion formation diminished by deletion mutagenesis of the prion protein.
J. Virol.
74:4351-4360[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, February 2001, p. 1408-1413, Vol. 75, No. 3
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.3.1408-1413.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Chiesa, R., Piccardo, P., Biasini, E., Ghetti, B., Harris, D. A.
(2008). Aggregated, Wild-Type Prion Protein Causes Neurological Dysfunction and Synaptic Abnormalities. J. Neurosci.
28: 13258-13267
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Deleault, A. M., Deleault, N. R., Harris, B. T., Rees, J. R., Supattapone, S.
(2008). The effects of prion protein proteolysis and disaggregation on the strain properties of hamster scrapie. J. Gen. Virol.
89: 2642-2650
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Colby, D. W., Zhang, Q., Wang, S., Groth, D., Legname, G., Riesner, D., Prusiner, S. B.
(2007). Prion detection by an amyloid seeding assay. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
104: 20914-20919
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lau, A. L., Yam, A. Y., Michelitsch, M. M. D., Wang, X., Gao, C., Goodson, R. J., Shimizu, R., Timoteo, G., Hall, J., Medina-Selby, A., Coit, D., McCoin, C., Phelps, B., Wu, P., Hu, C., Chien, D., Peretz, D.
(2007). Characterization of prion protein (PrP)-derived peptides that discriminate full-length PrPSc from PrPC. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
104: 11551-11556
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Phuan, P.-W., Zorn, J. A., Safar, J., Giles, K., Prusiner, S. B., Cohen, F. E., May, B. C. H.
(2007). Discriminating between cellular and misfolded prion protein by using affinity to 9-aminoacridine compounds. J. Gen. Virol.
88: 1392-1401
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Legname, G., Nguyen, H.-O. B., Peretz, D., Cohen, F. E., DeArmond, S. J., Prusiner, S. B.
(2006). Continuum of prion protein structures enciphers a multitude of prion isolate-specified phenotypes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
103: 19105-19110
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shiraishi, N., Utsunomiya, H., Nishikimi, M.
(2006). Combination of NADPH and Copper Ions Generates Proteinase K-resistant Aggregates from Recombinant Prion Protein. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 34880-34887
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mathiason, C. K., Powers, J. G., Dahmes, S. J., Osborn, D. A., Miller, K. V., Warren, R. J., Mason, G. L., Hays, S. A., Hayes-Klug, J., Seelig, D. M., Wild, M. A., Wolfe, L. L., Spraker, T. R., Miller, M. W., Sigurdson, C. J., Telling, G. C., Hoover, E. A.
(2006). Infectious prions in the saliva and blood of deer with chronic wasting disease.. Science
314: 133-136
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Leliveld, S. R., Dame, R. T., Wuite, G. J. L., Stitz, L., Korth, C.
(2006). The Expanded Octarepeat Domain Selectively Binds Prions and Disrupts Homomeric Prion Protein Interactions. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 3268-3275
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Safar, J. G., DeArmond, S. J., Kociuba, K., Deering, C., Didorenko, S., Bouzamondo-Bernstein, E., Prusiner, S. B., Tremblay, P.
(2005). Prion clearance in bigenic mice. J. Gen. Virol.
86: 2913-2923
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Barron, R. M., Baybutt, H., Tuzi, N. L., McCormack, J., King, D., Moore, R. C., Melton, D. W., Manson, J. C.
(2005). Polymorphisms at codons 108 and 189 in murine PrP play distinct roles in the control of scrapie incubation time. J. Gen. Virol.
86: 859-868
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Legname, G., Nguyen, H.-O. B., Baskakov, I. V., Cohen, F. E., DeArmond, S. J., Prusiner, S. B.
(2005). Strain-specified characteristics of mouse synthetic prions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
102: 2168-2173
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Legname, G., Baskakov, I. V., Nguyen, H.-O. B., Riesner, D., Cohen, F. E., DeArmond, S. J., Prusiner, S. B.
(2004). Synthetic Mammalian Prions. Science
305: 673-676
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
O'Rourke, K. I., Spraker, T. R., Hamburg, L. K., Besser, T. E., Brayton, K. A., Knowles, D. P.
(2004). Polymorphisms in the prion precursor functional gene but not the pseudogene are associated with susceptibility to chronic wasting disease in white-tailed deer. J. Gen. Virol.
85: 1339-1346
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lawson, V. A., Priola, S. A., Meade-White, K., Lawson, M., Chesebro, B.
(2004). Flexible N-terminal Region of Prion Protein Influences Conformation of Protease-resistant Prion Protein Isoforms Associated with Cross-species Scrapie Infection in Vivo and in Vitro. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 13689-13695
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Barron, R. M., Thomson, V., King, D., Shaw, J., Melton, D. W., Manson, J. C.
(2003). Transmission of murine scrapie to P101L transgenic mice. J. Gen. Virol.
84: 3165-3172
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Satoh, K., Muramoto, T., Tanaka, T., Kitamoto, N., Ironside, J. W., Nagashima, K., Yamada, M., Sato, T., Mohri, S., Kitamoto, T.
(2003). Association of an 11-12 kDa protease-resistant prion protein fragment with subtypes of dura graft-associated Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and other prion diseases. J. Gen. Virol.
84: 2885-2893
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chiesa, R., Piccardo, P., Quaglio, E., Drisaldi, B., Si-Hoe, S. L., Takao, M., Ghetti, B., Harris, D. A.
(2003). Molecular Distinction between Pathogenic and Infectious Properties of the Prion Protein. J. Virol.
77: 7611-7622
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Korth, C., Kaneko, K., Groth, D., Heye, N., Telling, G., Mastrianni, J., Parchi, P., Gambetti, P., Will, R., Ironside, J., Heinrich, C., Tremblay, P., DeArmond, S. J., Prusiner, S. B.
(2003). Abbreviated incubation times for human prions in mice expressing a chimeric mouse-human prion protein transgene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
100: 4784-4789
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vorberg, I., Groschup, M. H., Pfaff, E., Priola, S. A.
(2003). Multiple Amino Acid Residues within the Rabbit Prion Protein Inhibit Formation of Its Abnormal Isoform. J. Virol.
77: 2003-2009
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Legname, G., Nelken, P., Guan, Z., Kanyo, Z. F., DeArmond, S. J., Prusiner, S. B.
(2002). Prion and doppel proteins bind to granule cells of the cerebellum. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
99: 16285-16290
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Perrier, V., Kaneko, K., Safar, J., Vergara, J., Tremblay, P., DeArmond, S. J., Cohen, F. E., Prusiner, S. B., Wallace, A. C.
(2002). Dominant-negative inhibition of prion replication in transgenic mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
99: 13079-13084
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Warner, R. G., Hundt, C., Weiss, S., Turnbull, J. E.
(2002). Identification of the Heparan Sulfate Binding Sites in the Cellular Prion Protein. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 18421-18430
[Abstract]
[Full Text]