Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, December 2001, p. 11755-11765, Vol. 75, No. 23
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.23.11755-11765.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
The trans Golgi Network Is Lost from
Cells Infected with African Swine Fever Virus
Mari
McCrossan,1,
Miriam
Windsor,1
Sreenivasan
Ponnambalam,2
John
Armstrong,3 and
Thomas
Wileman1,*
Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright
Laboratories, Woking, Surrey,1 School of
Biological Studies, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton,
Sussex,3 and School of Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology, University of Leeds, Leeds,
Yorkshire2 United Kingdom
Received 7 March 2001/Accepted 23 August 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The cellular secretory pathway is important during the assembly and
envelopment of viruses and also controls the transport of host
proteins, such as cytokines and major histocompatibility proteins, that
function during the elimination of viruses by the immune system.
African swine fever virus (ASFV) encodes at least 26 proteins with
stretches of hydrophobic amino acids suggesting entry into the
secretory pathway (R. J. Yanez, J. M. Rodriguez, M. L. Nogal, L. Yuste, C. Enriquez, J. F. Rodriguez, and E. Vinuela, Virology 208:249-278, 1995). To predict how and where
these potential membrane proteins function, we have studied the
integrity of the secretory pathway in cells infected with ASFV.
Remarkably, ASFV caused complete loss of immunofluorescence signal for
the trans Golgi network (TGN) marker protein TGN46 and
dispersed the AP1 TGN adapter complex. Loss of TGN46 signal was not due
to degradation of TGN46, suggesting redistribution of TGN46 to other
membrane compartments. ASFV markedly slowed transport of cathepsin D to lysosomes, demonstrating that loss of TGN structure correlated with
loss of TGN function. ASFV shows a tropism for macrophages, and it is
possible that ASFV compromises TGN function to augment the activity of
viral membrane proteins or to suppress the function of host
immunoregulatory proteins.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The cellular secretory pathway plays an important
role during the assembly and envelopment of viruses. Cellular membrane
compartments provide the lipids necessary for the production of viral
envelopes, and membrane trafficking pathways transport viral envelope
proteins to sites of virus budding (reviewed in reference
18). In addition to providing the intracellular pathways
necessary for virus envelopment, the secretory pathway controls the
transport of host proteins, such as cytokines, adhesion molecules, and
major histocompatibility (MHC) proteins, that play key roles during the
recognition and elimination of viruses by the immune system. The
assembly of MHC class 1 peptide complexes takes place in the
endoplasmic reticulum (ER), while endosomes, lysosomes, and late
compartments of the Golgi apparatus facilitate the processing of
exogenous antigens and the binding of viral peptides to MHC class 2 complexes (20, 44). The importance of control over the
secretory pathway for the survival of viruses is underpinned by the
observation that many viruses perturb the secretory pathway to subvert
recognition by the immune system. The activity of secreted cytokines
and the cell surface expression of MHC class 1 and class 2 are
inhibited by several viruses, aiding the establishment of persistent
infections (1, 42).
African swine fever virus (ASFV) is a large icosahedral enveloped DNA
virus that infects the pig genus Suidae. The virus causes a
persistent and asymptomatic infection of natural hosts, such as the
African warthog and bushpig (43). Infection of domestic pigs, however, causes a fatal hemorrhagic disease for which there are
no cures or vaccines. The 170-kDa virus genome encodes at least 150 proteins (45), and as many as 50 are assembled into virions (7). In common with poxviruses, DNA replication
and assembly of ASFV take place in the cytoplasm at specialized
perinuclear sites called "virus factories." Virus factories are
located close to the microtubule organizing center, require an intact
microtubule network for assembly (29), and, in the case of
ASFV, are found in aggresome-like structures surrounded by the
intermediate filament protein vimentin (19). The envelope
of ASFV is derived from the ER. Current models suggest that
interactions between capsid subunits recruited from the cytosol, and
possibly other viral proteins targeted to the ER, cause constriction of
ER cisternae (3, 8-10, 36). The cisternae subsequently
bend through a complex series of angular intermediates, eventually
producing icosahedral particles with two internal envelopes (3,
36). This process of viral wrapping by membrane cisternae is
shared by other large enveloped DNA viruses, such as herpesviruses and poxviruses (18, 37, 38).
Twenty-six proteins encoded by ASFV have stretches of hydrophobic amino
acids suggestive of leader sequences or transmembrane domains. Unlike
other large enveloped DNA viruses, such as herpesvirus, envelope
glycoproteins are present at low levels in ASFV (12), and
the functions of most of the ASFV proteins with hydrophobic sequences
are unknown. With the exception of a C-type lectin and a CD2 homologue
(4, 35), ASFV does not appear to encode homologues of host
membrane and secreted proteins with potential to affect the immune
system. This differs from large DNA viruses, such as herpesviruses and
poxviruses, that manipulate the host through the use of virally encoded
chemokine and cytokine receptors, complement control proteins, and
secreted growth factors (1, 42). In contrast, many of the
proteins encoded by ASFV that have signal or transmembrane sequences
are retained within the cell. Members of the multigene 110 family have
leader sequences and C-terminal KDEL motifs and are retained in the ER
(2, 36). Of the nine other proteins with hydrophobic
N-terminal leader peptides, only one (E146l/J16L) is predicted to have
a cleaved signal sequence and therefore to be able to be secreted from
cells. In common with vaccinia virus (15), many ASFV
proteins with hydrophobic sequences lack signal sequences and have
central, or, unusually, C-terminal transmembrane domains. The ASFV
proteins that have been studied in detail are excluded from the
secretory pathway and localize almost exclusively to virus assembly
sites (5, 34, 36, 39, 40).
At present, the prediction of how and where membrane proteins encoded
by ASFV function in cells is based on the assumption that the secretory
pathway is normal in cells infected with ASFV. It is possible, however,
that ASFV may compromise protein trafficking through the secretory
pathway to augment the activity of viral proteins or suppress the
function of host immunoregulatory proteins. In this study, we have
investigated the structure and function of the secretory pathway in
cells infected with ASFV. Remarkably ASFV caused complete loss of the
trans Golgi network (TGN). The TGN is a late compartment of
the secretory pathway important for proteolytic processing of bioactive
peptides and the sorting of proteins as they leave the Golgi apparatus.
Given that ASFV shows a tropism for macrophages, an understanding of
the consequences of TGN loss on the processing and sorting of
macrophage immunoregulatory proteins may hold the key to understanding
the complex cell biology and pathogenesis of ASFV.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Viruses and cells.
Vero (ECACC 84113001) cells were obtained
from the European Collection of Animal Cell Cultures (Porton Down,
United Kingdom) and cultured and infected with the tissue
culture-adapted BA71 (7). Vaccinia virus strain VTF7.3 was
obtained from Bernard Moss (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda,
Md.).
Antibodies.
Viral proteins. Antibody 4H3, specific for p73,
the major capsid protein of ASFV, is described by Cobbold et al.
(8). The monoclonal antibody C18, specific for early
phosphoprotein p30 of ASFV, was from Dan Rock (Plumb Island Animal
Disease Center, Plumb Island, N.Y.). The rabbit antibodies specific for
adaptin (AP1) were from Margaret Robinson (Cambridge, United
Kingdom). The rabbit and sheep antibodies specific for TGN46 were from
S. Ponnambalam (Department of Biochemistry, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom). H4B4, which recognizes the major lysosomal membrane protein LAMP-2, was obtained from the Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Md.). The rabbit
anti-cathepsin D antibody was provided by Janice Blum (Indiana University, Bloomington).
Immunofluorescence.
Cells were grown on 13- or
19-mm-diameter round sterile glass coverslips to approximately 70%
confluency. Following the appropriate drug treatments and infection or
transfection protocols, the cells were fixed in
20°C methanol,
20°C methanol followed by
20°C acetone, or 4%
paraformaldehyde. Cells were permeabilized in Tris-buffered saline
containing 0.2% gelatin and 0.5% Nonidet P-40 and then blocked with
the same buffer containing 30% goat serum (blocking buffer). Primary
antibodies were added to samples diluted in blocking buffer and
visualized by second antibodies conjugated to Alexa 488 (green) or
Alexa 594 (red) purchased from Molecular Probes (Leiden, The
Netherlands). Viral and cellular DNA was stained with DAPI
(4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) purchased from Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.
Cells were mounted in Fluoromount-G (Southern Biotechnology Associates,
Birmingham, Ala.), and in most studies, the cells were viewed at
×60/1.4 NA with a Nikon E800 microscope. The images from
0.2-µm-thick optical sections were captured with a Hamamatsu C-4746A
DCC camera and deconvolved with Improvision Openlab software (Warwick,
United Kingdom).
Metabolic labeling and immunoprecipitation.
Cells infected
with ASFV were labeled metabolically with
[35S]methionine and
[35S]cysteine by using
35S-Pro-mix (Amersham Pharmacia, United Kingdom)
as described previously (8-10). At the appropriate time
intervals, cells were washed once in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
and lysed in immunoprecipitation buffer (10 mM Tris [pH 7.5]; 150 mM
NaCl; 10 mM iodoacetamide; 1 mM EDTA; 1 mM phenymethylsulfonyl
fluoride; 1 µg each of pepstatin, chymostatin, and antipain per ml)
containing 1% Brij35 or Nonidet P-40. Antigens were immunoprecipitated
by overnight incubation with antibodies immobilized on protein A or G
coupled to Sepharose beads. For digestion with
endo-
-N-acetylglucosamine (endo H), immunoprecipitates
were boiled for 3 min after addition of 10 µl of 1% sodium dodecyl
sulfate (SDS), and enzyme digestions were performed at 37°C overnight
after the addition of 50 µl of endo H buffers and 1 µU of
enzyme (Boehringer Mannheim). Immunoprecipitates were resolved by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE), and proteins were
detected by autoradiography.
Western blotting.
Proteins were resolved by SDS-PAGE and
transferred to cellulose nitrate membranes (Schleicher and Schuell,
Dassel, Germany). The membrane was blocked overnight at 4°C in PBS
containing 5% Marvel and Tween 20. Blocked and washed membranes were
incubated with primary antibodies and then incubated with goat
anti-mouse or anti-rabbit antibody coupled to horseradish peroxidase.
Blots were visualized by using the ECL enhanced chemiluminescence
system (Amersham Life Sciences, United Kingdom) and fluorography.
 |
RESULTS |
ASFV infection causes loss of the TGN.
The TGN is important
for sorting proteins as they leave the Golgi apparatus for transport to
the cell surface, lysosomes, or endosomal systems. TGN46 is a type 1 membrane protein that recycles between the cell surface and the TGN
(13, 32), and at steady-state distribution, most of the
protein is located to the TGN, making TGN46 an accepted marker for the
organelle. Figure 1 shows the effect of
ASFV on the distribution of TGN46 at 8 and 10 h after infection.
Infected cells were identified by positive staining for the early ASFV
protein, vp30 (Fig. 1a and d). In the cells negative for vp30, the
TGN46 signal was concentrated in a characteristic compact perinuclear
crescent (Fig. 1b and e). At both time points, however, a fragmented
TGN was observed in infected cells. The fragmentation of the TGN is
shown at higher magnification in panels c and f. In some cells observed
at 10 h, the signal for TGN46 was difficult to detect (large
arrow, Fig. 1e). The effects of the virus 16 h after infection are
shown in Fig. 2. Infected cells were
identified by positive staining for the major capsid protein p73 (Fig.
2a and d) and extranuclear DAPI staining of viral DNA in viral
factories (Fig. 2c and f). Strikingly, the TGN46 marker was absent from
all infected cells. This effect is particularly evident in panel f,
where three of the four cells shown have viral factories indicated by
arrows. The green signal indicating TGN46 forms a compact crescent to one side of the nucleus of the cell lacking viral markers, but is
completely absent from the three infected cells.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
The early effects of ASFV on the TGN. BSC40 cells were
fixed 8 h (a to c) or 10 h (d to f) after infection with the
Ba71v strain of ASFV. Samples were incubated with a monoclonal antibody
specific for early viral protein vp30 (a and d) and a rabbit antibody
specific for TGN46 (b and e). Cellular and viral DNA was visualized by
DAPI (b and e). Antigens were visualized by second antibodies coupled
to Alexa 488 or Alexa 594. Samples were viewed at ×60, and 0.2-µm
digital sections were digitally deconvolved with Openlab software from
Improvision. Panels b and e show a digital merge of the DAPI and TGN46
distributions. The small arrows indicate cells with disrupted TGN,
which are shown at higher magnification in panels c and f. The large
arrow indicates a cell lacking TGN signal.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Effects of ASFV on TGN at 16 h postinfection. BSC40
cells were fixed 16 h after infection with the Ba71v strain of
ASFV. Samples were incubated with a monoclonal antibody specific for
the major capsid protein p73 (a and d) and a rabbit antibody specific
for TGN46 (b and e). Cellular and viral DNA was visualized by DAPI (c
and f). Antigens were visualized by second antibodies coupled to Alexa
488 or Alexa 594. Samples were viewed at ×60, and 0.2-µm digital
sections were digitally deconvolved with Openlab software from
Improvision. The bar in panel c represents 10 µm. Note that the cells
in panels d, e, and f are shown at higher magnification. Panels c and f
show a digital merge of the DAPI and TGN46 distributions. The arrows
indicate cells with extranuclear DAPI staining of virus factories and a
lack of TGN46 signal.
|
|
ASFV infection causes scattering of TGN clathrin adapter protein
AP1.
The AP1 adapter protein complex assembles with clathrin coats
formed on the TGN (26, 28). AP1 recognizes sorting motifs in the cytoplasmic domains of membrane proteins entering the TGN and
facilitates their transport to endosomes and lysosomes. The experiments
described above have shown that ASFV infection induced loss of
immunofluorescence signal for the integral membrane protein TGN46.
Antibodies specific for the
chain of AP1 were therefore used to
follow the effects of ASFV on the TGN adapter protein complex. Figure
3 shows the effect of the virus 16 h
postinfection, a time when the virus causes the loss of the TGN46
signal from cells. Each image compares infected and uninfected cells.
Infected cells were indicated by the presence of the viral capsid
protein p73 (Fig. 3b) or extranuclear DAPI staining in virus factories (Fig. 3c and d). At steady state, AP1 is distributed between the TGN
and endosomes. This distribution is seen in the cells lacking viral
markers. The AP1 complex localized at the TGN is identified as a dense
perinuclear staining that colocalizes with TGN46 (Fig. 3c and d), while
the endosomal signal is revealed as a punctate stain seen throughout
the cytoplasm. In the cells infected with virus, the perinuclear
concentration of AP1 stain was lost. In Fig. 3a and b, a compact
perinuclear signal for AP1 was seen in two cells lacking viral markers,
but was dispersed in the infected cell positive for p73. In Fig. 3c and
d, the infected cell is identified by a perinuclear viral factory and
loss of the TGN 46 signal. In this cell, the AP1 stain was dispersed.
In the cell lacking a virus factory, approximately half of the AP1
signal was compact and perinuclear and colocalized with TGN46. ASFV
therefore causes loss of both integral (TGN46) and peripheral (AP1)
membrane proteins from the TGN.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Effects of ASFV on TGN adapter protein AP1. BSC40 cells
were fixed 16 h after infection with the Ba71v strain of ASFV.
Samples were incubated with a monoclonal antibody specific for the
major capsid protein p73 and a rabbit antibody specific for AP1 (a and
b) or a goat antibody specific for TGN46 and a rabbit antibody specific
for AP1 (c and d). In each image, cellular and viral DNA was visualized
by DAPI. Antigens were visualized by second antibodies coupled to Alexa
488 or Alexa 594. Samples were viewed at ×60, and 0.2-µm digital
sections were digitally deconvolved with Openlab software from
Improvision. Panels a and b compare the AP1 and p73 distributions,
while panels c and d compare AP1 and TGN46.
|
|
ASFV slows delivery of cathepsin D to lysosomes.
The lysosomal
aspartinyl protease cathepsin D is synthesized as a preproenzyme of
approximately 53 kDa. A short-lived 47-kDa intermediate proenzyme is
formed on delivery to the TGN and endosomes, and this is further
cleaved in lysosomes to the mature enzyme characterized by
noncovalently associated 31- and 14-kDa polypeptides (11, 16, 25,
33). Delivery of cathepsin D from the TGN to lysosomes is
mediated by the mannose-6-phosphate receptor. This sorting step is
controlled by AP1 adapter complexes present in clathrin-coated pits on
the TGN. An analysis of cathepsin D transport in infected cells
therefore allowed us to test the effects of ASFV on the sorting
function of the TGN.
Metabolic labeling and immunoprecipitation experiments were initially
conducted with uninfected Vero cells in order to ensure
that precursor
and mature forms of cathepsin D could be detected.
Cells were
pulse-labeled for 15 min and chased for increasing
periods of time.
Lysates were immunoprecipitated, and the extent
of N-linked
glycosylation and oligosaccharide processing was tested
by digesting
half of each sample with endo H. The first two lanes
of the upper panel
of Fig.
4 show that cathepsin D migrated
at
53 kDa after a 30-min chase and at approximately 44 kDa following
endo H digestion. These sizes were consistent with documented
properties of this protein. After 1 h of chase in uninfected
cells,
a small quantity of the 31-kDa lysosomal form was detected, and
this increased at 90 min, indicating processing of cathepsin D
to the
mature enzyme in lysosomes had occurred. After 2 h, the
almost
complete loss of the 53-kDa preproenzyme was mirrored by
increased
levels of the mature 31-kDa protein. The intermediate
47-kDa form was
present at very low levels, and detectable only
after long exposure of
gels (data not shown). The effects of ASFV
infection on the transport
of cathepsin D are shown in the lower
panel of Fig.
4. In parallel
experiments, the multiplicity of
infection was checked by
immunofluorescence staining of cells
and was shown to be greater than
70%. Infection with ASFV caused
an obvious delay in the processing of
cathepsin D. At 60 min,
the lysosomal form of the enzyme was absent,
and at 90 min, only
a very small fraction of cathepsin D had reached
lysosomes and
cleaved to the mature 31-kDa form. After 2 h, less
than half of
the cathepsin D in ASFV-infected cells was present as the
mature
enzyme, suggesting that the majority of the protein had not yet
reached lysosomes. The results show that ASFV compromised the
ability
of the TGN to sort lysosomal enzymes to lysosomes.

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Effect of ASFV infection on transport of cathepsin D to
lysosomes. Vero cells were pulse-labeled for 15 min with
[35S]methionine and [35S]cysteine and then
chased in complete media. At the indicated time points, cells were
lysed and immunoprecipitated with an antibody specific for cathepsin D. One half of each immunoprecipitate was digested with endo H (+).
Samples were analyzed by SDS-PAGE followed by autoradiography. The
preproenzyme (53 kDa) and mature enzyme (31 kDa) are indicated. (Top
panel) Control cells. (Bottom panel) Cells analyzed 16 h
postinfection (pi) with ASFV.
|
|
TGN46 is not degraded in cells infected with ASFV.
The loss of
the TGN46 immunofluorescence signal seen in cells infected with ASFV
could have resulted from degradation of TGN46 or from extensive
redistribution of the protein within cells. To distinguish between
these possibilities, the effects of ASFV infection on the turnover of
TGN46 were investigated. In initial experiments (not shown), cells
infected with ASFV were incubated with concanamycin A to neutralize
lysosomal pH and inhibit proteolysis in the organelle. Cells were then
probed for the presence of TGN46 by immunofluorescence microscopy.
Concanamycin A did not rescue the TGN46 signal, suggesting it was
unlikely that TGN46 was degraded in lysosomes. The mature form of TGN38
lacks methionine or cysteine residues and cannot be labeled by
incorporation of [35S]methionine or cysteine.
The stability of TGN46 was therefore tested by adding cycloheximide to
cells and assaying TGN46 levels at increasing times by Western
blotting. The top two panels of Fig. 5
compare the TGN46 signals in the presence or absence of cycloheximide.
The similarity of the signals recovered over 16 h shows that TGN46
is stable in cells. The lower panels of Fig. 5 show the same experiment
carried out on cells infected with ASFV. As for the experiments with
cathepsin D, the multiplicity of infection judged by immunofluorescence
staining of cells was approximately 70%. There was no noticeable loss
of TGN46 in cells incubated with cyclohexmide, showing again that ASFV
does not induce degradation of the protein.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Loss of the TGN46 signal does not involve degradation of
TGN46. The stability of TGN46 in Vero cells was determined by adding
cycloheximide (10 µg/ml) to cell cultures. The cells were then lysed
at the indicated times, and the levels of TGN46 were determined by
Western blotting. For infected cells, cycloheximide was added 4 h
after addition of virus to allow expression of early genes prior to the
block in protein synthesis with cycloheximide. The addition of virus
(ASFV ±) or cycloheximide (CHX ±) is indicated.
|
|
TGN loss does not require DNA-dependent late protein
expression.
Cytosine
-D-arabinofuranoside (Ara-C)
is a selective inhibitor of DNA replication. The drug has no inhibitory
effect on the synthesis of RNA and can be used to prevent expression of
late DNA-dependent proteins. To test whether late viral proteins caused TGN loss, Vero cells were incubated with 50 µg of Ara-C per ml at
3 h postinfection, a time calculated to allow for the attachment and entry of ASFV into cells, but before the onset of viral DNA replication. Cells were incubated for a further 13 h and then processed for immunofluorescence analysis. Figure
6 compares the expression of early and
late ASFV gene products in the presence or absence of Ara-C at 16 h postinfection. In control cells (Fig. 6a to c), incubated in the
absence of Ara-C, both the early viral protein p30 (Fig. 6b) and the
late viral protein p73 (Fig. 6c) were detected. Note that the
characteristic morphology of the TGN was retained in all uninfected
cells (Fig. 6a), yet the fluorescence signal for TGN46 was lost from
the cells infected with ASFV (arrow). The cells observed in Fig. 6d to
f were incubated in the presence of Ara-C. All three cells shown were
infected with ASFV, indicated by a positive signal for p30 (Fig. 6e).
Of importance to this study, there was no expression of the late major
capsid protein p73 (Fig. 6f) in any of the infected cells present.
Ara-C had therefore inhibited ASFV DNA replication effectively.
Significantly, there was a loss of TGN46 signal in all of the infected
cells incubated with Ara-C. Since the loss of immunostaining for TGN46 was observed in the absence of viral DNA replication, and further control experiments showed that Ara-C itself did not cause loss of
TGN46 signal (not shown), the results implied that one or more early
ASFV proteins were responsible for the loss of the TGN46 signal.
Evidence for this also comes from close inspection of Fig. 1e. The cell
indicated by the large arrow has lost TGN46 signal, but lacks
extranuclear DNA. In this cell, the TGN was lost before it was possible
to detect replication of viral DNA in viral factories.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Loss of the TGN46 signal does not require late ASFV gene
expression. Vero cells were fixed 16 h after infection with the
Ba71v strain of ASFV. (a to c) Control cells incubated without Ara-C.
(d to f) Cells incubated with 50 µg of Ara-C per ml added 4 h
postinfection. Cells were stained with antibodies specific for TGN46 (a
and d), biotinylated antibody specific for the early ASFV protein p30
(b and e), and a monoclonal antibody binding the late structural
protein, p73 (c and f). Antigens were visualized with secondary
antibodies coupled to Alexa 488 (a and d), Alexa 594 (c and f), and
avidin coupled to Cascade Blue (b and e). Arrows identify an infected
cell.
|
|
ASFV does not affect the distribution of lysosomes.
Since the
TGN was lost following infection by ASFV, and delivery of cathepsin D
to lysosomes was slowed, the effect of ASFV infection on the integrity
and distribution of lysosomes in cells was studied. Figure
7a shows that the
majority of the staining obtained with antibodies specific for
lysosome-associated membrane protein (LAMP2) was found associated with
vesicles in the juxtanuclear region near the Golgi. Vesicles were also
found in smaller numbers throughout the cell cytoplasm. Infected cells
were identified by the presence of p73 (Fig. 7b) and extranuclear DAPI
staining of viral factories (Fig. 7c). Infection of cells by ASFV did
not noticeably affect the distribution of lysosomes (Fig. 7a and c); there was, however, a diminished LAMP2 signal in the area of the virus
factory.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Effect of ASFV on lysosomes. BSC40 cells were fixed
16 h after infection with the Ba71v strain of ASFV and incubated
with a monoclonal antibody (H4B4) specific for LAMP2 (a and c) and
a rabbit antibody specific for viral capsid protein p73 (b). Cellular
and viral DNA was visualized by DAPI (c). Antigens were visualized by
second antibodies coupled to Alexa 488 or Alexa 594. Samples were
viewed at ×60, and 0.2-µm digital sections were digitally
deconvolved with Openlab software from Improvision. Panels c shows a
digital merge of the DAPI and LAMP2 distributions. Bar, 10 µm. The
arrows indicate extranuclear DAPI staining of viral DNA in virus
factories.
|
|
Vaccinia virus does not cause loss of TGN46.
The next
experiment determined whether loss of TGN was unique to ASFV or whether
it was a general consequence of infecting cells with large cytoplasmic
DNA viruses. The morphogenesis of vaccinia virus shares many features
with ASFV. Assembly of both viruses takes place at sites of DNA
replication in perinuclear viral factories (19, 29). In
addition, ASFV and vaccinia virus gain membrane envelopes by being
wrapped by membrane cisternae originating from the membrane
compartments of the secretory pathway (36-38). The
distribution of TGN and lysosomal markers in cells infected with
vaccinia virus was therefore studied (Fig.
8). Cells infected with vaccinia virus
were identified by using an antibody to the viral envelope protein p37,
which produced a punctate stain at the cell surface and within the
cytoplasm of cells (Fig. 8b and d). TGN46 staining (Fig. 8a) was
scattered in the cells infected with virus, however, unlike ASFV,
vaccinia virus did not cause loss of the TGN46 signal. Figure 8d shows
that, in contrast to ASFV, which excluded lysosomes from assembly
sites, vaccinia virus replication areas appeared to recruit lysosomes.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Effect of vaccinia virus on the TGN and lysosomes. BSC40
cells were fixed 16 h after infection with the VTF7 strain of
vaccinia virus and incubated with a rabbit antibody specific for TGN46
(a) or monoclonal antibody H4B4 specific for LAMP2 (c). Vaccinia virus
infection was detected with a rat antibody (15B6) that recognizes viral
protein VV-p37 (b and d). Antigens were visualized by second antibodies
coupled to Alexa 488 or Alexa 594.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
This study has shown that ASFV infection causes a complete loss of
the TGN, as judged by immunofluorescence staining for TGN46 and the TGN
adapter complex AP1. The TGN is normally a compact crescent-shaped
organelle located to one side of the nucleus. Between 8 and 10 h
of infection, the immunofluorescence signal for TGN46 fragmented and
scattered throughout the cytosol, and at 16 h, the signal
disappeared. Similar results were recorded for sialyltransferase, an
enzyme that also localizes predominantly to the TGN (data not shown).
The protein levels of TGN46 remained constant throughout infection,
suggesting TGN46 was not degraded, but was redistributed throughout the
cell. Since the TGN46 signal was undetectable in infected cells, the
site of redistribution of the protein was not obvious. Large organelles
such as the plasma membrane or the ER are candidates. The surface areas
of these membrane compartments are relatively much larger than the TGN, and it is possible that the TGN46 signal was lost through
redistribution and dilution.
A study of the trafficking of the lysosomal enzyme cathepsin D enabled
us to test the effects of ASFV on the function of the TGN. The
recognition of mannose-6-phosphate residues in the TGN by the
mannose-6-phosphate receptor is crucial for recruitment of lysosomal
enzymes into clathrin-coated vesicles for transport to endosomal
compartments and from there to lysosomes (6, 14, 16, 17, 25,
33). In uninfected cells, newly synthesized cathepsin D reached
lysosomes within 2 h of synthesis; however, in cells infected with
virus, only a small proportion of the enzyme was delivered to lysosomes
within this period. The precise site of the block in the transport of
cathepsin D to lysosomes caused by ASFV is not known. Lysosomal
targeting of cathepsin D is dependent on phosphorylation of mannose
residues on N-linked oligosaccharides added to the protein in the ER.
Addition of mannose-6-phosphate to N-linked oligosaccharides in the ER
and/or cis Golgi compartments prevents acquisition of
resistance to endo H. The ability of endo H to remove sugars from
cathepsin D was unaffected by ASFV, showing that addition of
mannose-6-phosphate had occurred correctly in cells infected with the
virus. Inhibition of mannose phosphorylation did not, therefore,
explain the slow delivery of cathepsin D to lysosomes. An alternative
explanation is that the slowed delivery of cathepsin D to lysosomes
results from compromised binding of cathepsin D to the
mannose-6-phosphate receptor in the TGN. This would be expected in the
absence of an organized TGN to concentrate both receptor and ligand. An
alternative possibility is that ASFV inhibited the proteases
responsible for cleaving cathepsin D to the mature form in lysosomes.
This could be mediated by a virally encoded protease inhibitor,
neutralization of endosomal or lysosomal acid pH, or by preventing
delivery of the processing proteases to lysosomes.
It is interesting to speculate about the mechanism of virus-induced
loss of the TGN. Resident TGN proteins, such as TGN46 and furin,
recycle between the TGN, endosomes, and the plasma membrane. It has
been calculated that TGN46 molecules traffic between the TGN and the
plasma membrane, with half-times of 45 to 60 min (13).
Rapid internalization and delivery of TGN38 or -46 back to the TGN,
coupled with a slower exit of the protein from the TGN, results in the
bulk of the protein being localized to the TGN. It is likely that the
supply of TGN46 to late Golgi compartments and the TGN is normal in
cells infected with ASFV. ASFV did not, for example, cause accumulation
of TGN46 in pre-TGN compartments that could be detected by
immunofluorescence. The loss of TGN signal was, therefore, most likely
caused by disruption of the TGN46 recycling pathway. The rate of
budding and transport of TGN46-positive vesicles from the TGN to the
plasma membrane could have been increased, or the virus may slow return
of TGN46 to the TGN by inhibition of endocytosis pathways. Both would
result in dilution of TGN46 within the endosomal system and plasma
membrane, which eventually results in the loss of immunofluorescence
signal of the protein. As TGN46, and possibly other integral membrane proteins, continually leave the TGN and fail to return, this causes an
eventual breakdown of the structure of the TGN. At early stages, this
would produce a scattered vesicle population, as we observed between 8 and 10 h of infection.
At present, it is not clear exactly how TGN38 or -46 reaches the cell
surface, although it is suspected that transport does not involve
recruitment into clathrin-coated vesicles at the TGN (26).
Several proteins are recruited to areas of the TGN where TGN46 is
concentrated: these include the cytoplasmic phosphoprotein p62, a
phosphatidylinositol-specific 3-kinase (21-23, 30), and cytoplasmic factors, such as Rab6 and dynamin-2 (24).
These molecules may be involved in a signaling pathway that leads to the recruitment of factors involved in the biogenesis of vesicles containing TGN46. The activity of these kinases and GTPases could potentially be altered by ASFV, and enhanced exit of TGN46 from the TGN
would, for example, lead to a greater quantity of TGN46 at the cell
surface, resulting in a dilution of the protein and an eventual loss of
signal. TGN38 or -46 is rapidly internalized from the cell surface via
clathrin-coated vesicles. ASFV may modulate the factors necessary for
either nucleating clathrin coat formation or later steps in the
biogenesis of clathrin-coated vesicles at the plasma membrane. Either
effect would slow internalization of the protein and result in a
greater amount of TGN46 at the cell surface of infected cells, leading
to a dilution and subsequent loss of immunofluorescence signal.
Vaccinia virus and ASFV are both large double-stranded DNA viruses that
replicate in the cytosol of infected cells. In common with ASFV,
vaccinia virus acquires envelopes through enwrapment (36-38). The effects of vaccinia virus on the TGN were
therefore studied. There was no loss of the TGN46 signal following
infection of cells with vaccinia virus. Instead, the TGN46 signal was
scattered throughout the cytosol. The data suggested that the loss of
the TGN was unique to infection by ASFV and was not a common feature of
infection of cells with pox-like viruses.
The potential consequences of TGN loss are numerous. The TGN is
important for sorting proteins to their correct destination as they
leave the Golgi apparatus. A loss of the TGN could result in
compromised secretion of proteins and slowed movement of proteins through the endocytic pathway to lysosomes, as demonstrated for cathepsin D in this study. ASFV replicates in macrophages, and an
ability to block cytokine secretion following infection could exert an
anti-inflammatory effect. NF-
B-dependent cytokine transcription is
suppressed in infected macrophages by a virally encoded homolog of
I
B (31, 41). A block in the secretory pathway at the
TGN would offer a second means of preventing secretion of these potent modulators of the proinflammatory immune response. Macrophages are
professional antigen-presenting cells, and perturbation of MHC class 2 processing and peptide loading in the TGN and endosome compartments
offers a second site for inhibition of the immune response by ASFV.
Infection of macrophages by ASFV causes bystander apoptosis of T and B
cells "in vivo" (27); a block in the surface expression of macrophage proteins that rescue lymphocytes from apoptosis may provide a mechanism. It is clear that a thorough characterization of the effects of virus-induced TGN loss on the processing of proteins by macrophages is now worthy of study and may
provide answers to the complex pathology of African swine fever.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Dan Rock, Geoff Smith, Jenny Hirst, Margaret Robinson,
and Janice Blum for gifts of antibodies. The figures would not have
been possible without help with graphics from Steve Archibald.
This project was supported by the BBSRC, the BBSRC Bioimaging
Initiative, and DEFRA.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute for
Animal Health, Pirbright Laboratory, Ash Rd., Woking, Surrey GU240NF, United Kingdom. Phone: 44 01483 232441. Fax: 44 01483 232448. E-mail:
thomas.wileman{at}bbsrc.ac.uk.
Present address: Department of Cell Biology, Washington University
Medical School, St. Louis, MO 63110.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alcami, A., and U. H. Koszinowski.
2000.
Viral mechanisms of immune evasion.
Trends Microbiol.
8:410-418[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Almendral, J. M.,
F. Almazán,
R. Blasco, and E. Viñuela.
1990.
Multigene families in African swine fever virus: family 110.
J. Virol.
64:2064-2072[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Andrés, G.,
R. Garcia-Escudero,
C. Simón-Mateo, and E. Viñuela.
1998.
African swine fever virus is enveloped by a two-membraned collapsed cisterna derived from the endoplasmic reticulum.
J. Virol.
72:8988-9001[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Borca, M. V.,
C. Carillo,
L. Zsak,
W. W. Laegreid,
G. F. Kutish,
J. G. Neilan,
T. G. Burrage, and D. L. Rock.
1998.
Deletion of a CD2-like gene, 8DR, from African swine fever virus affects viral infection in domestic swine.
J. Virol.
72:2881-2889[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Brookes, S. M.,
H. Sun,
L. K. Dixon, and R. M. E. Parkhouse.
1998.
Characterisation of African swine fever virion proteins j5R and j13L: immunolocalization in virus particles and assembly sites.
J. Gen. Virol.
79:1179-1188[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Brown, W. J.,
J. Goodhouse, and M. G. Farquhar.
1986.
Mannose 6-phosphate receptors for lysosomal enzymes cycle between the Golgi complex and endosomes.
J. Cell Biol.
103:1235-1247[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Carrascosa, A. L.,
M. del Val,
J. F. Santarén, and E. Viñuela.
1985.
Purification and properties of African swine fever virus.
J. Virol.
54:337-344[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Cobbold, C.,
J. T. Whittle, and T. Wileman.
1996.
Involvement of the endoplasmic reticulum in the assembly and envelopment of African swine fever virus.
J. Virol.
70:8382-8390[Abstract].
|
| 9.
|
Cobbold, C., and T. Wileman.
1998.
The major structural protein of African swine fever virus, p73, is packaged into large structures, indicative of viral capsid or matrix precursors, on the endoplasmic reticulum.
J. Virol.
72:5215-5223[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Cobbold, C.,
S. M. Brookes, and T. Wileman.
2000.
Biochemical requirements of virus wrapping by the endoplasmic reticulum: involvement of ATP and endoplasmic reticulum calcium store during envelopment of African swine fever virus.
J. Virol.
74:2151-2160[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Delbrück, R.,
C. Desel,
K. von Figura, and A. Hille-Rehfeld.
1994.
Proteolytic processing of cathepsin D in prelysosomal organelles.
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
64:7-14[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Del Val, M., and E. Vinuela.
1987.
Glycosylated components induced in African swine fever virus-infected Vero cells.
Virus Res.
7:297-308[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Ghosh, R. N.,
W. G. Mallet,
T. T. Soe,
T. E. McGraw, and F. R. Maxfield.
1998.
An endocytosed TGN38 chimeric protein is delivered to the TGN after trafficking through the endocytic recycling compartment in CHO cells.
J. Cell Biol.
142:923-936[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Goda, Y., and S. R. Pfeffer.
1988.
Selective recycling of the mannose 6-phosphate/IGF-II receptor to the trans Golgi network in vitro.
Cell
55:309-320[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Goebel, S. J.,
G. P. Johnson,
M. E. Perkus,
S. W. Davis,
J. P. Winslow, and E. Paoletti.
1990.
The complete DNA sequence of vaccinia virus.
Virology
179:247-266[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Goldberg, D. E., and S. Kornfeld.
1983.
Evidence for extensive subcellular organization of asparagine-linked oligosaccharide processing and lysosomal enzyme phosphorylation.
J. Biol. Chem.
258:3159-3165[Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Griffiths, G.,
B. Hoflack,
K. Simons,
I. Mellman, and S. Kornfeld.
1988.
The mannose 6-phosphate receptor and the biogenesis of lysosomes.
Cell
52:329-341[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Griffiths, G., and P. Rottier.
1992.
Cell biology of viruses that assemble along the biosynthetic pathway.
Semin. Cell Biol.
3:367-381[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Heath, C. M.,
M. Windsor, and T. Wileman.
2001.
Aggresomes resemble sites specialized for virus assembly.
J. Cell Biol.
153:449-455[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Heemels, M. T., and H. Ploegh.
1995.
Generation, translocation and presentation of MHC class I-restricted peptides.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
64:463-491[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Hickinson, D. M.,
J. M. Lucocq,
M. C. Towler,
S. Clough,
J. James,
S. R. James,
C. P. Downes, and S. Ponnambalam.
1997.
Association of a phosphatidylinositol-specific 3-kinase with a human trans-Golgi network resident protein.
Curr. Biol.
7:987-990[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Jones, S. M., and K. E. Howell.
1997.
Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase is required for the formation of constitutive transport vesicles from the TGN.
J. Cell Biol.
139:339-349[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Jones, S. M.,
J. G. Alb,
S. E. Phillips,
V. A. Bankaitis, and K. E. Howell.
1998.
A phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and phosphatidylinositol transfer protein act synergistically in formation of constitutive transport vesicles from the trans-Golgi network.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:10349-10354[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Jones, S. M.,
K. E. Howell,
J. R. Henley,
H. Cao, and M. A. McNiven.
1998.
Role of dynamin in the formation of transport vesicles from the trans-Golgi network.
Science
279:573-577[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Kornfeld, S., and I. Mellman.
1989.
The biogenesis of lysosomes.
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
5:483-525[CrossRef].
|
| 26.
|
Ohno, H.,
J. Stewart,
M. C. Fournier,
H. Bosshart,
I. Rhee,
S. Miyatake,
T. Saito,
A. Gallusser,
T. Kirchhausen, and J. S. Bonifacino.
1995.
Interaction of tyrosine-based sorting signals with clathrin-associated proteins.
Science
269:1872-1875[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Oura, C. A. L.,
P. P. Powell, and R. M. E. Parkhouse.
1998.
African swine fever: a disease characterized by apoptosis.
J. Gen. Virol.
79:1427-1438[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Pearse, B. M. F., and M. S. Robinson.
1990.
Clathrin, adaptors, and sorting.
Annu. Rev. Cell Biol.
6:151-171[CrossRef].
|
| 29.
|
Ploubidou, A.,
V. Moreau,
K. Ashman,
I. Reckmann,
C. Gonzalez, and M. Way.
2000.
Vaccinia virus infection disrupts microtubule organization and centrosome function.
EMBO J.
19:3932-3944[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Ponnambalam, S.,
S. Clough,
C. P. Downes,
J. M. Lucocq,
H. J. McLauchlan, and M. C. Towler.
1999.
Lipid kinases and trans-Golgi network membrane dynamics.
Biochem. Soc. Trans.
27:670-673[Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Powell, P. P.,
L. K. Dixon, and R. M. E. Parkhouse.
1996.
An I B homolog encoded by African swine fever virus provides a novel mechanism for downregulation of proinflammatory cytokine responses in host macrophages.
J. Virol.
70:8527-8533[Abstract].
|
| 32.
|
Prescott, A. R.,
J. M. Lucocq,
J. James,
J. M. Lister, and S. Ponnambalam.
1997.
Distinct compartmentalization of TGN46 and beta 1,4-galactosyltransferase in HeLa cells.
Eur. J. Cell Biol.
72:238-246[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Rijnboutt, S.,
W. Stoorvogel,
H. J. Geuze, and G. J. Strous.
1992.
Identification of subcellular compartments involved in biosynthetic processing of cathepsin D.
J. Biol. Chem.
267:15665-15672[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Rodriguez, F.,
C. Alcarez,
A. Eiras,
R. J. Yáñez,
J. M. Rodriguez,
C. Alonso,
J. F. Rodriguez, and J. M. Escribano.
1994.
Characterization and molecular basis of heterogeneity of the African swine fever virus envelope protein p54.
J. Virol.
68:7244-7252[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Rodriguez, J. M.,
R. J. Yañez,
F. Almazán,
E. Viñuela, and J. F. Rodriguez.
1993.
African swine fever virus encodes a CD2 homolog responsible for the adhesion of erythrocytes to infected cells.
J. Virol.
67:5312-5320[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Rouiller, I.,
S. M. Brookes,
A. D. Hyatt,
M. Windsor, and T. Wileman.
1998.
African swine fever virus is wrapped by the endoplasmic reticulum.
J. Virol.
72:2373-2387[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Schmelz, M.,
B. Sodiek,
M. Ericsson,
E. J. Wolffe,
H. Shida,
G. Hiller, and G. Griffiths.
1994.
Assembly of vaccinia virus: the second wrapping cisternae is derived from the trans Golgi network.
J. Virol.
68:130-147[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Sodeik, B.,
R. W. Doms,
M. Ericsson,
G. Hiller,
C. E. Machamer,
W. Vanthof,
G. Vanmeer,
B. Moss, and G. Griffiths.
1993.
Assembly of vaccinia virus role of the intermediate compartment between the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi stacks.
J. Cell Biol.
121:521-541[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Sun, H.,
S. Jacobs,
G. L. Smith,
L. K. Dixon, and R. M. E. Parkhouse.
1995.
African swine fever virus gene j13L encodes a 25-27 kDa virion protein with variable numbers of amino acid repeats.
J. Gen. Virol.
76:1117-1127[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Sun, H.,
J. S. Jenson,
L. K. Dixon, and R. M. E. Parkhouse.
1996.
Characterisation of African swine fever virion protein j18L.
J. Gen. Virol.
77:941-946[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Tait, S. W. G.,
E. B. Reid,
D. R. Greaves,
T. Wileman, and P. P. Powell.
2000.
Mechanism of inactivation of NF-kB by a viral homologue of ASFV.
J. Biol. Chem.
275:34656-34664[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Tortorella, D.,
B. E. Geurz,
M. H. Furman,
D. J. Schurt, and H. L. Ploegh.
2000.
Viral subversion of the immune system.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
18:861-926[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Wilkinson, P. J.
1989.
African swine fever virus, p. 17-35.
In
M. B. Pensaert (ed.), Virus infections of porcines. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
|
| 44.
|
Wolf, P. R., and H. Ploegh.
1995.
How MHC class II molecules acquire peptide cargo: biosynthesis and trafficking through the endocytic pathway.
Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol.
II:267-306[CrossRef].
|
| 45.
|
Yanez, R. J.,
J. M. Rodriguez,
M. L. Nogal,
L. Yuste,
C. Enriquez,
J. F. Rodriguez, and E. Vinuela.
1995.
Analysis of the complete nucleotide sequence of African swine fever virus.
Virology
208:249-278[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, December 2001, p. 11755-11765, Vol. 75, No. 23
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.23.11755-11765.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Netherton, C. L., McCrossan, M.-C., Denyer, M., Ponnambalam, S., Armstrong, J., Takamatsu, H.-H., Wileman, T. E.
(2006). African Swine Fever Virus Causes Microtubule-Dependent Dispersal of the trans-Golgi Network and Slows Delivery of Membrane Protein to the Plasma Membrane. J. Virol.
80: 11385-11392
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jouvenet, N., Wileman, T.
(2005). African swine fever virus infection disrupts centrosome assembly and function. J. Gen. Virol.
86: 589-594
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jouvenet, N., Monaghan, P., Way, M., Wileman, T.
(2004). Transport of African Swine Fever Virus from Assembly Sites to the Plasma Membrane Is Dependent on Microtubules and Conventional Kinesin. J. Virol.
78: 7990-8001
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Netherton, C., Rouiller, I., Wileman, T.
(2004). The Subcellular Distribution of Multigene Family 110 Proteins of African Swine Fever Virus Is Determined by Differences in C-Terminal KDEL Endoplasmic Reticulum Retention Motifs. J. Virol.
78: 3710-3721
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kay-Jackson, P. C., Goatley, L. C., Cox, L., Miskin, J. E., Parkhouse, R. M. E., Wienands, J., Dixon, L. K.
(2004). The CD2v protein of African swine fever virus interacts with the actin-binding adaptor protein SH3P7. J. Gen. Virol.
85: 119-130
[Abstract]
[Full Text]