Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, November 2001, p. 11196-11204, Vol. 75, No. 22
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.22.11196-11204.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
PE2 Cleavage Mutants of Sindbis Virus: Correlation between Viral
Infectivity and pH-Dependent Membrane Fusion Activation of the
Spike Heterodimer
Jolanda M.
Smit,1
William B.
Klimstra,2
Kate D.
Ryman,2
Robert
Bittman,3
Robert E.
Johnston,2 and
Jan
Wilschut1,*
Molecular Virology Section, Department of
Medical Microbiology, University of Groningen, 9713 AV Groningen,
The Netherlands1; Department of
Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of
North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
27599-72902; and Department of
Chemistry and Biochemistry, Queens College of the City University
of New York, Flushing, New York 113673
Received 25 June 2001/Accepted 16 August 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The spike glycoprotein E2 of Sindbis virus (SIN) is synthesized in
the infected cell as a PE2 precursor protein, which matures through cleavage by a cellular furin-like protease. Previous work has
shown that SIN mutants impaired in PE2 cleavage are noninfectious on BHK-21 cells, the block in infection being localized at a step after
virus-receptor interaction but prior to RNA replication. Here, we
studied the membrane fusion properties of SIN PE2 cleavage mutants
and observed that these viruses are impaired in their ability to form
an E1 homotrimer and to fuse with liposomes at a mildly acidic pH. The
block in spike rearrangement and fusion could be overridden by
exposure of the mutant viruses to very low pH (<4.5). Cleavage mutants
with second-site resuscitating mutations in PE2 were highly
infectious for BHK-21 cells. The ability of these viruses to form E1
homotrimers and to fuse at a mildly acidic pH was completely
restored despite a sustained lack of PE2 cleavage.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Alphaviruses, such as Sindbis virus
(SIN), Semliki Forest virus (SFV), and Venezuelan equine encephalitis
virus (VEE), are enveloped viruses which contain three major structural
proteins, the capsid protein, C, and two envelope glycoproteins, E2 and E1 (38). The glycoproteins are organized on the surface of
the virion in 80 heterooligomeric spikes, which mediate the infectious entry of these viruses into cells. The E2 glycoprotein is primarily involved in the interaction of a virus particle with cell surface attachment receptors (37), whereas the E1 glycoprotein is
necessary for the subsequent membrane fusion process (8,
40). Very recent crystallographic and cryoelectron microscopy
studies have revealed that E1 in many respects resembles the flavivirus
E glycoprotein. The alphavirus E1 protein appears to lie flat on the
viral surface, driving lateral spike interactions, whereas E2 forms the
spike protrusions (21, 30).
In the infected cell, the alphavirus structural proteins are translated
as a large polyprotein. Once the C protein is cleaved off the
polypeptide chain, the NH2 terminus of PE2, the precursor protein of E2 (PE2 is called p62 in SFV), serves to direct the cotranslational translocation of the remaining polyprotein to the
endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (38). This polyprotein is
processed by a signal peptidase within the ER, and the two envelope
proteins associate to form PE2/E1 heterodimers (38). The
PE2/E1 heterodimer matures further while passing through the Golgi and
trans-Golgi network (TGN). In the TGN or in a post-TGN compartment, PE2
is cleaved close to its amino terminus to form E2 and a residual peptide, E3 (24). PE2 cleavage is mediated by a furin-like
host protease at a consensus recognition sequence, XBXBBX, in which B
is a basic and X a hydrophobic amino acid (18). Peptide
E3, which contains the XBXBBX sequence, is retained on the SFV spike, but it is released in the case of SIN (24, 28).
Several investigators have shown that the efficiency of PE2 cleavage
can be influenced by amino acid changes within the cleavage site
(5, 13, 19, 22, 34, 39). Thus, a number of PE2 cleavage
mutants of SIN, SFV, and VEE have been identified, and these viruses
appear to have defects in one or more biological functions due to the
presence of uncleaved PE2. For example, in SFV, cleavage of p62 was
prevented by replacement of Arg by Leu at position
1 of E2
(34). This p62 cleavage mutant virus (mL) was found to be
noninfectious on BHK-21 cells. The block in infection appeared to
involve both the virus-receptor interaction and fusion activity of the
mutant virus. Viral infectivity on BHK-21 cells was restored by in
vitro cleavage of p62 with trypsin or by exposure of the virus to very
low pHs (22, 34, 40). Likewise, several SIN PE2 cleavage
mutants have been shown to be noninfectious. For example, replacement
of the Arg or Ser residue at position 1 of E2 (the last amino acid of
the XBXBBX cleavage site) by an Asn residue within the context of the
infectious clones TRSB (corresponding to a laboratory-adapted strain of
SIN) and TR339 (containing the consensus sequence of wild-type SIN)
almost completely blocked viral infectivity (13, 14, 19,
25). SIN cleavage mutants in which part of the cleavage site was
deleted were also found to be essentially noninfectious on BHK-21 cells
(19).
Interestingly, it has been found that the lethality of PE2 cleavage
mutations in TRSB-N (Arg-to-Asn substitution at position 1 of E2) could
be reversed by resuscitating second-site mutations in PE2
(14). These investigations showed that after infection with TRSB-N virions, small plaques were occasionally formed. Sequence analysis of the purified plaques revealed that some of these viruses carried second-site mutations in PE2 but remained cleavage deficient. While these PE2 cleavage mutants with a resuscitating mutation in PE2
were found to be infectious on BHK-21 cells, the viruses appeared to
have an attenuated virulence in CD-1 mice compared to the parental TRSB virus.
Recent data showed that the block in infection of PE2
cleavage-deficient SIN viruses without second-site resuscitating
mutations is not at the level of the initial virus-receptor interaction (19). SIN PE2 cleavage mutants with an intact cleavage
site do bind very efficiently to BHK-21 cells, even better than the parental TR339 virus. It has been shown that the presence of the basic
XBXBBX sequence mediates an efficient interaction with heparan sulfate
(HS), which is abundantly expressed on BHK-21 cells and thus acts as a
receptor for the virus (4, 20). Furthermore, it has been
shown that the presence of uncleaved PE2 in virions does not influence
RNA replication or virus assembly and release (14, 19).
Taken together, these data indicate that the block in infection of
these SIN PE2 cleavage mutants lies downstream of the interaction of a
virus particle with a cellular receptor but prior to RNA replication,
suggesting that these mutant viruses are impaired in membrane fusion.
Here, we studied the fusogenic properties of PE2 cleavage mutants,
based on the infectious clone TR339, using a liposomal model system.
PE2 cleavage mutants in which either the Ser residue at position 1 of
E2 was replaced by Asn (E2:N1) or from which the BXBB sequence
within the PE2 cleavage site was deleted (FDF) were used. The results
show that PE2 cleavage mutants were unable to fuse with liposomes at pH
5.0, indicating that the block in infection lies at the level of the
fusion process. Incubation of PE2 cleavage mutants at low pH
demonstrated that the viruses are impaired in their ability to form an
E1 homotrimer, the fusion-active conformation of the viral spike
protein. The block in rearrangement and fusion could be overridden by
exposure of the virus to very low pHs (pH < 4.5). Furthermore,
E2:N1 cleavage mutants with resuscitating mutations in PE2 were
generated, analogous to those identified in TRSB-N, and found to be
infectious in BHK-21 cells. These PE2 resuscitated mutant viruses do
form E1 homotrimers at a physiologically relevant acidic pH despite the
lack of PE2 cleavage. Accordingly, their membrane fusion activity
appeared to be completely restored.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Constructs.
The construction of the cDNA clones pTR339,
pE2:N1 (called p39N1 in previous articles), and pFDF has been described
previously (19, 20). The p prefix indicates the cDNA form
of the virus clone. The cDNA pE2:N1/E3:R25 was constructed by
substitution into pE2:N1 of an AatII-to-StuI
fragment from pTRSB-E3R25 (14). The cDNA clones
pE2:N1/T191 and pE2:N1/G216 were constructed by substitution into
pE2:N1 of a StuI-to-BssHII fragment from
pTRSB-NE2T191 and pTRSB-NE2G216, respectively (14).
The introduced mutations were confirmed by DNA sequence analysis at the
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Automated Sequencing
Facility with a 373A DNA sequencer with the Taq DyeDeoxy terminator
cycle sequencing kits (Applied Biosystems).
Production and characterization of pyrene- and
[35]methionine-labeled virus particles.
Viruses were
produced on BHK-21 cells. The cells were cultured in Glasgow's
modification of Eagle's minimal essential medium (Gibco-BRL, Breda,
The Netherlands), supplemented with 5% foetal calf serum (FCS), 10%
tryptose phosphate broth, 200 mM glutamine, 25 mM HEPES, and 7.5%
sodium bicarbonate. For the production of pyrene-labeled virus
particles, BHK-21 cells cultured for 48 h on medium containing 10 µg of 16-(1-pyrenyl)hexadecanoic acid (pyrene fatty acid; Molecular
Probes, Eugene, Oreg.) per ml were transfected by electroporation with
in vitro transcripts of linearized cDNA clones. Pyrene-labeled SIN
particles released from the cells at 20 h posttransfection were
harvested and purified from the medium as described before (3,
27, 36). For the production of
[35S]methionine-labeled virus particles, BHK-21 cells
were transfected with in vitro-transcribed viral RNA by
electroporation, essentially as previously described (3, 27,
36). Briefly, at 3 to 4 h posttransfection, the culture
medium was replaced by methionine-free Dulbecco's modified Eagle's
medium (Gibco-BRL) supplemented with 5% FCS and 200 mM glutamine.
After 2 h of starvation, 200 µCi of
[35S]methionine per 5 ml was added to the medium, and
incubation was continued overnight. At 20 h posttransfection,
[35S]methionine-labeled virus was harvested and purified
from the medium as described before (3, 27, 36, 43). The
purity of the virus was analyzed by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE). Visualization of
the protein bands and quantification of the PE2 content in virions were
done by phosphorimaging analysis using Image Quant 3.3 software
(Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, Calif.). The percent PE2 in virions was
determined by relating the intensity of PE2 to the total intensity of
E1, PE2, and E2, corrected for the contribution of E1 on the basis of
the relative number of methionine residues in the E1, E2, and PE2
proteins (19, 32). The specific infectivity (PFU per count per minute [cpm]) was calculated for all batches of
[35S]methionine-labeled viruses by plaque assay on BHK-21
cells (20).
Binding assays.
Virus attachment to BHK-21 cells and to
heparin- and bovine serum albumin-agarose beads (both from Sigma
Chemical Co, St. Louis, Mo.) was performed essentially as described
previously (19, 20). Briefly, BHK-21 cells (cultured in a
12-well plate [Costar, Cambridge, Mass.]) were washed two times with
cold 5 mM HEPES-150 mM NaCl-0.1 mM EDTA (pH 7.4) (HNE) plus 1% fetal calf serum (HNE+). Subsequently, 150 µl of
[35S]methionine-labeled virus particles was added to the
cells (ranging from 106 to 107 cpm, approx.
109 to 1010 virus particles), and incubation
was continued at 4°C for 2 h with gentle agitation. The cells
were washed twice with HNE+ and trypsinized. For binding to
heparin-agarose and albumin-agarose beads, 1 ml of beads was washed
with HNE+ three times and resuspended in 1 ml of HNE+. Fifty
microliters of beads was added to 50 µl of virus particles, similar
to that in the cell-binding assay, and incubated for 2 h at 4°C
with gentle agitation. Subsequently, the mixtures were washed three
times with HNE+ and resuspended in 0.6% Triton (Sigma) in HNE.
Radioactivity was quantified by liquid scintillation analysis.
Preparation of liposomes.
Liposomes (large unilamellar
vesicles) were prepared by freeze/thaw extrusion as described before
(3, 27, 36, 43). Briefly, lipid mixtures dried from
chloroform-methanol were hydrated in HNE and subjected to five cycles
of freezing and thawing. Subsequently, the suspension was
extruded 21 times through two 0.2-µm filters (Nucleopore,
Inc., Pleasanton, Calif.) in a LiposoFast miniextruder (Avestin,
Ottawa, Canada). Liposomes consisted
of phosphatidylcholine (PC), phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), sphingomyelin(SPM), and cholesterol (Chol) in a molar ratio of 1:1:1:1.5. The phospholipids were obtained from Avanti Polar Lipids (Alabaster, Ala.), and cholesterol was from
Sigma. The phospholipid concentration of the liposomes was determined
by phosphate analysis (2).
Fusion assay.
Fusion of pyrene-labeled SIN with liposomes
was monitored on-line in an AB2 fluorimeter (SLM/Aminco, Urbana, Ill.)
at excitation and emission wavelengths of 345 and 480 nm, respectively
(3, 27, 36, 43). Briefly, pyrene-labeled SIN was mixed
with liposomes in 0.665 ml of HNE at final concentrations of 0.5 µM viral and 200 µM liposomal phospholipid (corresponding to
approximately 1010 virus particles and 2.5 × 1011 liposomes per 0.7 ml). The mixture was stirred
continuously and maintained at 37°C. Fusion was initiated by the
addition of 35 µl of 0.1 M MES (morpholinoethanesulfonic acid)-0.2 M
acetic acid, pretitrated with NaOH to achieve the final desired pH. The
fusion scale was calibrated so that 0% fusion corresponded to the
initial pyrene-excimer fluorescence level and 100% fusion to the
fluorescence value obtained after the addition of 35 µl of 0.2 M
octaethylene glycol monododecyl ether (Fluka Chemie AG, Buchs,
Switzerland) (3, 27, 36, 43). The extent of fusion was
determined 60 s after acidification.
Analysis of conformational changes in viral spike protein.
The conformational changes occurring in the viral spike protein were
examined under the same conditions as in the fusion experiments (3, 36). After the indicated pH treatment, samples were
neutralized by addition of a pretitrated volume of NaOH, solubilized in
SDS-PAGE sample buffer, and analyzed by SDS-PAGE. Running gels were
further incubated for 30 min in 1 M sodium salicylate and dried.
Visualization and quantification of the E1 trimer were done by
phosphorimaging analysis, relating the intensity of the E1 trimer to
the total intensity of E1, PE2, E2, and E1 trimer, as described above.
 |
RESULTS |
Characterization of PE2 cleavage mutant SIN viruses.
In this
study we investigated the membrane fusion activity of a number of SIN
PE2 cleavage mutant viruses. PE2 cleavage mutations were introduced
into the background of the infectious SIN clone TR339. Two mutants were
chosen that have previously been shown to affect PE2 cleavage
efficiency (Table 1) (19).
In the mutant construct E2:N1, the Ser residue at position 1 of E2 is
replaced by an Asn residue. This residue creates an N-linked
glycosylation signal. Glycosylation of an Asn residue at position 1 of
E2 has been proposed to interfere with furin activity
(19). SDS-PAGE analysis of the E2:N1 mutant showed that,
indeed, PE2 cleavage was completely inhibited. Furthermore, the virus
was poorly infectious, as determined by plaque assay on BHK-21 cells.
Likewise, the FDF mutant, in which the BXBB sequence was deleted,
incorporated 100% uncleaved PE2 and also had a very low specific
infectivity (Table 1).
The first step in virus entry is the interaction of a virus particle
with a cellular receptor. Consistent with previous reports
(
20), we found that TR339 virus does not bind very
efficiently
to BHK-21 cells (Fig.
1A).
The FDF mutant bound equally poorly
to BHK-21 cells. On the other hand,
the E2:N1 virus did bind efficiently
to BHK-21 cells. Recent data have
demonstrated that SIN viruses
with an intact cleavage site interact
with HS, a cellular receptor
which is abundantly expressed on BHK-21
cells (
19). Accordingly,
we found that the E2:N1 mutant
bound efficiently to heparin-agarose
beads (Fig.
1B). In a control in
which albumin-agarose beads were
used, none of the viruses bound
to the beads (data not shown).
Since the two mutant viruses, compared
to TR339, bind similarly
(FDF) or much better (E2:N1) to BHK-21 cells,
it is clear that
the block in infection for these mutants lies after
binding of
the virus particle to the cell surface, presumably at the
level
of the viral membrane fusion process.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Binding of PE2 cleavage-deficient SIN viruses to BHK-21
cells or heparin-agarose beads. Approximately 1010
[35S]methionine-labeled virus particles were added to the
cells or beads, and binding was measured after 2 h of incubation
at 4°C, as described in Materials and Methods. Each bar represents
the mean of triplicate binding assays. Each set of triplicates was
repeated three times. The error bars represent standard deviations. (A)
Binding to BHK-21 cells. (B) Binding to heparin-agarose beads.
|
|
Fusion activity of pyrene-labeled PE2 cleavage mutant SIN
viruses.
To study the fusogenic properties of the PE2 cleavage
mutants, we used SIN variants biosynthetically labeled with the
fluorescent probe pyrene. Because the mutant viruses are almost
non-infectious, RNA transcripts derived from the cDNA were transfected
directly into BHK-21 cells, cultured beforehand in the presence of
pyrene fatty acid. At 20 h posttransfection the pyrene-labeled
virus particles were harvested and purified from the medium (3,
27, 36). With this procedure, no additional passage of the virus is involved, minimizing the possibility of generating revertant viruses. Subsequently, fusion of pyrene-labeled SIN was measured in a
liposome model system (3, 27, 36). Upon fusion of a
pyrene-labeled virus particle with a target liposome, the pyrene phospholipids are diluted into the liposomal membrane, resulting in a
decrease in pyrene excimer fluorescence intensity by more than an order
of magnitude. Figure 2 presents the
results. SIN derived from the infectious clone TR339 fused rapidly and
efficiently with the liposomes at pH 5.0 (curve a), 60% of the virus
fusing within 60 s after acidification. No fusion was seen at
neutral pH (data not shown). In contrast to TR339, PE2 cleavage mutant E2:N1 hardly fused with the liposomes at pH 5.0 (curve b). At 60 s
after acidification to pH 5.0, an extent of fusion of only 7% was
observed. Like E2:N1, PE2 cleavage mutant FDF was unable to fuse at pH
5.0 (curve c).

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Fusion of PE2 cleavage-deficient SIN viruses with
liposomes at pH 5.0. On-line fusion experiments with pyrene-labeled
viruses were performed at 37°C as described in Materials and Methods.
All fusion measurements were repeated at least three times. Liposomes
consisted of PC/PE/SPM/Chol (molar ratio, 1:1:1:1.5). Curve a, TR339;
curve b, E2:N1; curve c, FDF.
|
|
Construction and characteristics of viable E2:N1 revertants.
Using SIN PE2 cleavage mutant TRSB-N, Heidner et al. (14)
showed that after infection of cells with TRSB-N virions, small plaques
were occasionally formed. These viruses were found to be infectious
revertants either with a restored PE2 cleavage phenotype or with
second-site mutations in PE2 along with retention of the PE2 cleavage defect.
Some of the second-site resuscitating mutations identified in TRSB-N
were now introduced into the E2:N1 PE2 cleavage mutant
virus, i.e., in
the TR339 background. In the first mutant, E2:N1/T191,
the Pro residue
(CCG) at position 191 of E2 was replaced by a
Thr (ACG). In the second
mutant, E2:N1/G216, the Glu residue (GAA)
at position 216 of E2 was
replaced by a Gly (GGA). In the third
mutant, E2:N1/E3:R25, the Cys
residue (TGT) at a position corresponding
to position 25 of E3 was
replaced by an Arg (CGT). We were interested
in whether the introduced
mutations promoted viral viability and
membrane fusion capacity, with
retention of the PE2 cleavage-defective
phenotype.
First, PE2 cleavage of each of the mutants was determined by SDS-PAGE
analysis of [
35S]methionine-labeled protein from purified
particles (Table
2).
In agreement with
earlier observations on the corresponding TRSB-N
revertants
(
14), all of the second-site mutant viruses retained
the
defect in PE2 cleavage. On the other hand, the specific infectivities
of the mutants were increased by a factor of about 150 to 200
compared
to the parental E2:N1 virus (Table
2). Thus, all three
resuscitating
mutations restored virus viability while retaining
the PE2
cleavage-deficient phenotype. It is noteworthy that the
specific
infectivities of the resuscitated mutants (Table
2)
were significantly
higher than the specific infectivity of the
TR339 virus (Table
1).
To determine whether the high specific infectivity of the resuscitated
mutants was due to an improved binding of these viruses
to BHK-21
cells, cell-binding assays were performed. Figure
3A
shows the results. As indicated above
(Fig.
1), the E2:N1 virus
binds efficiently to BHK-21 cells. Likewise,
the resuscitated
mutants E2:N1/T191, E2:N1/G216, and E2:N1/E3:R25 also
bound efficiently
to BHK-21 cells. Clearly, all PE2 cleavage-deficient
mutants retaining
the XBXBBX sequence bind better to BHK-21 cells than
TR339, explaining
the higher specific infectivity of the resuscitated
mutants.

View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Binding of PE2 cleavage-deficient second-site
resuscitated SIN viruses to BHK-21 cells or heparin-agarose
beads. Binding was measured after 2 h of incubation
at 4°C as described in the legend to Fig. 1. Bars: a, E2:N1; b,
E2:N1/T191; c, E2:N1/G216; d, E2:N1/E3:R25. (A) Binding to BHK-21
cells. (B) Binding to heparin-agarose beads.
|
|
Since the resuscitated mutants are still PE2 cleavage deficient,
retaining the XBXBBX furin cleavage site, it is likely that
these
viruses bind to HS on BHK-21 cells (
19). To investigate
this directly, we determined the binding capacity of the resuscitated
mutants for heparin- versus albumin-agarose beads. All viruses
appeared
to bind efficiently to the heparin beads (Fig.
3B). None
of the viruses
bound to albumin beads (data not shown). PE2 cleavage-deficient
resuscitated viruses are therefore infectious and have a high
specific
infectivity on BHK-21 cells, presumably due to an interaction
of the
uncleaved PE2 with HS on the cell surface. The high infectivity
of the
resuscitated mutant viruses compared to the low infectivity
of the
parent E2:N1 virus suggests that the second-site mutations
somehow
restore the fusion capacity of these viruses. This question
was
addressed
subsequently.
Fusion activity of pyrene-labeled PE2 cleavage mutant SIN viruses
carrying a resuscitating mutation in PE2.
Figure 4 presents the fusion kinetics of
pyrene-labeled PE2 resuscitated cleavage mutant SIN viruses with
liposomes at pH 5.0. The E2:N1/T191 mutant fused efficiently with
liposomes, the extent of fusion being about 55% within 60 s
(curve a). The E2:N1/G216 and E2:N1/E3:R25 mutants also fused
efficiently with liposomes at pH 5.0 (curves b and c). Again, the E2:N1
virus was unable to fuse at pH 5.0 (curve d). Thus, it appears that as
a result of a single amino acid substitution, the noninfectious PE2
cleavage-deficient E2:N1 virus regains infectivity due to restoration
of its membrane fusion competence despite retention of the uncleaved
PE2 phenotype.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Fusion of PE2 cleavage-deficient SIN viruses with
liposomes. On-line fusion experiments were performed at 37°C as
described in the legend to Fig. 2. Curve a, E2:N1/T191; curve b,
E2:N1/G216; curve c, E2:N1/E3:R25; curve d, E2:N1.
|
|
PE2 cleavage mutant SIN viruses show an acidic pH shift in
activation of membrane fusion.
Previous work, based on SFV, showed
that the block in infection of the p62 cleavage mutant mL (Arg-to-Leu
substitution at position
1 of E2) could be overridden by exposure of
the virus to very low pH (34). Therefore, we were
interested in whether incubation at a very low pH could activate fusion
activity of PE2 cleavage mutant SIN.
Figure
5A presents the fusion kinetics of
several pyrene-labeled PE2 cleavage mutants at pH 4.0 in the liposome
model system.
As expected, the resuscitated mutant E2:N1/T191 (curve a)
fused
efficiently, with fusion kinetics identical to those of the TR339
virus (curve b). Importantly, however, under these extreme pH
conditions the noninfectious E2:N1 and FDF mutants were able to
fuse as
well (curves c and d). As a control, the different pyrene-labeled
SIN
viruses were incubated at pH 4.0 in the absence of liposomes.
In all
cases, the fluorescence intensity remained constant, demonstrating
that
under these extreme pH conditions, the decrease in pyrene
excimer
fluorescence intensity observed in the presence of liposomes
was due to
dilution of the fluorescent probe from the viral membrane
into the
liposomal membrane (data not shown). These results indicate
that the
PE2 cleavage mutants FDF and E2:N1 are fusion competent,
but only when
the viruses are exposed to an unphysiologically
low pH.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Low-pH-dependent fusion of PE2 cleavage-deficient SIN
viruses with liposomes. On-line fusion experiments were performed as
described in the legend to Fig. 2. (A) Time course of fusion at pH 5.0. Curve a, E2:N1/T191; curve b, TR339; curve c, E2:N1; curve d, FDF. (B)
The extent of fusion at different pHs was determined 60 s after
acidification. , TR339; , E2:N1/T191; , E2:N1/G216;
, E2:N1; , FDF.
|
|
Figure
5B shows the detailed pH dependence of fusion of SIN PE2
cleavage mutants with liposomes. For TR339, optimal fusion
was observed
at pH 5.0 (squares). The threshold for fusion was
pH 6.25, similar to
that of the laboratory-adapted SIN strain
AR339 (
36). The
PE2 cleavage mutants FDF (diamonds) and E2:N1
(circles) showed a
clear-cut downward shift in the pH dependence
of fusion, with a
threshold at pH 5.0. Only at very low pHs was
fusion of these viruses
fast and extensive. Interestingly, an
intermediate pH dependence was
observed for the resuscitated mutant
viruses E2:N1/T191 (upward
triangles) and E2:N1/G216 (downward
triangles). The other resuscitated
mutant virus, E2:N1/E3:R25,
showed a pH dependence comparable to that
of the E2:N1/T191 and
E2:N1/G216 mutants (data not shown). The
threshold for fusion
was very close to pH 5.75 for all
cleavage-deficient SIN viruses
with a resuscitating mutation in PE2. In
summary, SIN PE2 cleavage
mutants exhibit an acidic pH shift in their
ability to fuse with
liposomes, and resuscitating mutations in PE2
partly reverse this
pH
shift.
Rearrangement of spike heterodimer is impaired in PE2 cleavage
mutants.
Earlier studies on SFV and SIN have demonstrated that
under low-pH conditions, the E2/E1 heterodimer dissociates and a
trypsin-resistant E1 homotrimer is formed. (3, 16, 29, 36, 40,
41). It is believed that the E1 homotrimer is the fusion-active
conformation of the viral spike protein (16, 40). To
determine whether the PE2 cleavage mutants were blocked in their
ability to rearrange to the fusion-active conformation, the
conformational changes of the viral spike proteins were studied.
[35S]methionine-labeled virus was incubated at low pH in
the presence of liposomes. At 60 s after acidification, the
mixture was neutralized and the appearance of the E1 homotrimer was
analyzed by SDS-PAGE.
Figure
6 shows the results. The spike
protein of TR339 had already rearranged to form an E1 homotrimer at pH
5.75. Under optimal
conditions for fusion (pH 5.0), 76% of the TR339
E1 protein was
converted to the trimeric configuration. The PE2
cleavage mutants
FDF and E2:N1 showed a large pH shift in the formation
of the
E1 trimer. Clearly, with these viruses, at pHs of 5.0 or above,
no significant trimer formation occurred. Only when these mutants
were
incubated at a very low pH did the E1 spike protein rearrange
to its
trimeric configuration. By contrast, the resuscitated cleavage
mutant
E2:N1/T191 did convert to an E1 homotrimer at pH 5.0. The
extent of E1
trimerization increased by incubation at pHs lower
than pH 5.0. Similar
results were obtained with the other resuscitated
mutants, E2:N1/G216
and E2:N1/E3:R25 (data not shown). These results
suggest that the
PE2/E1 heterodimer of the PE2 cleavage mutants
FDF and E2:N1 is stable
at pH 5.0, rearranging to the fusion-active
state only at very low,
unphysiological, pHs. On the other hand,
the PE2/E1 heterodimer of the
resuscitated viruses is less stable
than that of the parental E2:N1
virus and rearranges to a fusion-active
conformation at a physiological
mildly acidic pH (pH 5.0).

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
E1 trimerization of PE2 cleavage-deficient SIN viruses
at 37°C and the indicated pHs. Approximately 1010
[35S]methionine-labeled SIN particles were incubated with
an excess of liposomes consisting of PC/PE/SPM/Chol (molar ratio,
1:1:1:1.5). After 60 s, samples were neutralized and analyzed for
the appearance of E1 trimers by SDS-PAGE, as described in Materials and
Methods.
|
|
Figure
7 presents a comparison of E1
trimerization and fusion for the PE2 cleavage mutant SIN viruses at
different pHs. Clearly,
there is a distinct correlation between the
appearance of the
E1 homotrimer and the ability of the virus to fuse
with liposomes.
Under optimal conditions for fusion, the extent of E1
trimerization
and fusion of TR339 at 60 s after acidification were
76 and 59%,
respectively. At pH 5.75, 64% of the E1 glycoprotein had
already
rearranged to the fusion-active conformation, and half-maximal
fusion was observed. On the other hand, the PE2 cleavage mutant
FDF, at
pH 5.0, showed extents of E1 trimerization and fusion
of only 5 and
3%, respectively. At pH 4.0, the FDF mutant did
become fusogenic, 70%
of the E1 protein converting to a homotrimer
and 40% of the virus
particles fusing with liposomes under these
conditions. Likewise, the
PE2 cleavage mutant E2:N1 showed little
E1 trimerization and fusion at
pH 5.0 (6 and 8%, respectively),
whereas at pH 4.0 the extents of E1
homotrimer formation and fusion
for this virus were 70 and 43%,
respectively.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Relative pH dependence of E1 trimerization and fusion
for several PE2 cleavage-deficient SIN viruses. The extents of E1
trimerization (solid bars) and fusion (open bars) are shown at 60 s postacidification to the indicated pHs. To compare E1 trimerization
and fusion, the final extents of these processes at pH 4.0 were set to
100%. (A) TR339 (absolute extents: 76% E1 trimerization, 55%
fusion). (B) FDF (absolute extents: 70% E1 trimerization, 40%
fusion). (C) E2:N1 (absolute extents: 70% E1 trimerization, 43%
fusion). (D) E2:N1/T191 (absolute extents: 70% E1 trimerization, 56%
fusion). E1 trimerization was determined as described in the
legend to Fig. 6. Fusion was measured as described in the legend
to Fig. 2.
|
|
At pH 5.0, the resuscitated mutant E2:N1/T191 showed extents of E1
trimerization and fusion of 38 and 49%, respectively. At
a pH lower
than 5.0, the extent of E1 trimerization and fusion
increased further.
At pH 5.75, only a very small amount (2%) of
the E1 glycoprotein was
converted to a homotrimer, and accordingly,
fusion was negligible.
Similar results were obtained for the other
resuscitated mutants,
E2:N1/G216 and E2:N1/E3:R25 (data not shown).
The pH threshold of
fusion for TR339 is pH 6.2 (Fig.
5B), which
is 0.5 pH unit higher than
that of the resuscitated viruses. The
resuscitated mutants clearly
showed a pH shift in E1 trimer formation
and fusion compared to TR339.
Altogether, the lower stability
of the PE2/E1 heterodimer of the
resuscitated mutants compared
to the parental E2:N1 mutant enables the
virus to become fusion
active under physiological pH conditions,
consistent with the
restored infectivity of these viruses in BHK-21
cells.
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this paper, we provide evidence that the block in viral
infectivity of SIN PE2 cleavage mutant viruses on BHK-21 cells lies at
the level of the membrane fusion activity of the viral envelope
glycoprotein (Fig. 2, 6, and 7). Earlier studies on similar SIN PE2
cleavage mutants had shown that viral infection in vertebrate cells was
not blocked at the level of virus-receptor interaction, RNA
replication, or virus assembly (14, 19). Our present
results show that SIN PE2 cleavage mutants are impaired in their fusion activity because of the inability of the immature PE2/E1 heterodimer to
rearrange to an E1 homotrimer at a physiological acidic pH. The E1
trimer has been shown to represent the fusion-active conformation of
the alphavirus spike (3, 11, 16, 36, 40). The lethality of
SIN PE2 cleavage defect could be overridden by second-site resuscitating mutations in PE2 (Table 2), which destabilize the PE2/E1
heterodimer interaction. Thus, the spike regains the ability to form a
fusion-competent E1 trimer at a physiologically relevant acidic pH
(Fig. 4 to 7).
Among members of the alphavirus genus, PE2 cleavage has been associated
with different biological functions of the viruses involved. Recent
work has shown that SIN PE2 cleavage mutants with an intact cleavage
site (XBXBBX) interact electrostatically with HS, a glycosaminoglycan
which is abundantly expressed on BHK-21 cells (19). These
findings are in agreement with our results, showing that the E2:N1
mutant (with an intact cleavage site) binds efficiently to BHK-21 cells
and heparin beads compared to the PE2 cleavage mutant FDF (with a
deleted cleavage site) (Fig. 1). PE2 cleavage mutant E2:N1 binds much
more efficiently to BHK-21 cells than the parental SIN TR339,
confirming that the TR339 virus does not interact with HS
(20). For SFV, p62 cleavage mutants have been generated by
mutation of the cleavage site from RHRR to RHRL (mL mutant) (22,
34) or SHQL (1, 39). In contrast to our PE2
cleavage-deficient SIN viruses, these SFV mutants show a large
reduction in binding capacity to BHK-21 cells compared to wild-type
SFV. However, in the case of SFV, the cleavage site was disrupted to
create the p62 cleavage-deficient viruses. Therefore, it is difficult
to interpret these results in the context of our present data on SIN
mutants which are known to bind to cells through the furin cleavage
site. Despite the efficient binding of the E2:N1 PE2 cleavage mutant to
BHK-21 cells, the virus was still found to be noninfectious, due to its
inability to fuse (Table 1, Fig. 2). However, after introduction of
resuscitating mutations in PE2, E2:N1 regained fusion competence and
infectivity on BHK-21 cells, as discussed in more detail below.
Interestingly, the specific infectivity of these viruses on BHK-21
cells was found to be very high, even 10-fold higher than that of the
parental TR339 (Table 2). Our results demonstrate that the resuscitated PE2 cleavage mutants are more infectious than TR339, very likely as a
result of the more efficient interaction of these viruses with HS (Fig.
3).
The inability of cleavage mutants E2:N1 and FDF to fuse at a
physiologically relevant acidic pH appears to be caused by a downward
shift in the pH dependence of the viral membrane fusion reaction (Fig.
5B). Within the overall process of low-pH-dependent alphavirus membrane
fusion, the E2/E1 heterodimer first dissociates, followed by formation
of a trypsin-resistant E1 homotrimer (3, 11, 16, 40). In
the present study, it became clear that the PE2/E1 heterodimer of the
cleavage mutant viruses is too stable to rearrange to the fusion-active
E1 homotrimeric conformation at a physiologically relevant acidic pH
(Fig. 6 and 7). However, when the viruses were incubated at pH 4.0, the
spike did form an E1 homotrimer, resulting in expression of full
membrane fusion activity (Fig. 6 and 7). In conclusion, the low
specific infectivity of SIN PE2 cleavage mutants is the result of an
impairment of the ability of the viral spike to rearrange to the
fusion-active conformation at a mildly acidic pH due to the high
stability of the immature PE2/E1 heterodimer. This is in agreement with
observations on the SFV p62 cleavage-deficient mL mutant, showing that
viral infectivity on BHK-21 cells was restored by exposure of the virus to pH 4.5 (34).
Several investigators have identified second-site resuscitating
mutations in the E3, E2, and E1 glycoproteins which promote infectivity
of PE2 cleavage-deficient alphaviruses (5, 14, 39). Some
of these resuscitating mutations, found with the TRSB-N SIN clone
(14), were now introduced in the E2:N1 virus to
investigate the role of these mutations in viral infectivity versus the
stability of the spike heterodimer. These E2:N1 mutants with
resuscitating mutations in PE2 were indeed infectious on BHK-21 cells
(Table 2), and at the same time exhibited a restored membrane fusion capacity at a physiologically relevant acidic pH (Fig. 4 and 5). In
this respect it is important to note that viruses which do cleave PE2
and also interact efficiently with the cell attachment receptor HS are
more infectious on BHK-21 cells than the resuscitated PE2
cleavage-deficient viruses (20). This indicates that SIN cleavage mutants with resuscitating mutations in PE2 have an
intermediate infectivity on BHK-21 cells, which in fact correlates
precisely with the intermediate pH dependence of their membrane fusion
activity with liposomes (Fig. 5B). For example, the TR339 virus, with a PE2 cleavage-deficient phenotype, is already fully fusion competent at
pH 5.5, whereas the resuscitated PE2 cleavage mutant viruses express
full membrane fusion activity only at pHs of 5.0 or below. Analysis of
the conformational changes occurring in the viral spike protein showed
that the PE2/E1 spikes of the resuscitated mutants were able to form
an E1 homotrimer at a physiological acidic pH, in contrast to the
heterodimer of the E2:N1 virus (Fig. 6). In conclusion, the
presence of the resuscitating mutations in PE2 destabilizes
the PE2/E1 heterodimer so, that the viral spike protein regains
the ability to undergo conformational changes, with formation of a
fusion-active E1 trimer at a physiologically relevant pH despite
retention of the uncleaved PE2 phenotype.
The maturation of the alphavirus spike heterodimer through cleavage of
the PE2 precursor of E2 has a distinct function in the viral life
cycle. During transport of the heterodimer from the ER to the surface
of the infected cell, the uncleaved PE2 protein is presumed to function
as a chaperone, protecting the spike from premature destabilization
within the acidic TGN (9). Subsequently, after cleavage of
PE2 in a post-TGN compartment by a furin-like protease, the mature
viral spike protein is primed for expression of membrane fusion
activity when exposed to a mildly acidic pH within the endosomal
compartment of a new target cell. The results of this study indicate
that while cleavage maturation is a common phenomenon in viral
assembly, it is not absolutely required for viral infection. SIN PE2
cleavage mutants with resuscitating mutations in PE2 were found to be
infectious on BHK-21 cells despite retention of the uncleaved PE2
phenotype. Apparently, the resuscitating mutations in PE2 destabilize
the PE2/E1 heterodimer to such an extent that the spike has the
capacity to rearrange to the fusion-active conformation at the lumenal
pH of endosomes, while at the same time the heterodimer is stable
enough to survive the mildly acidic lumen of the TGN (pH ~6.0
[35]) during transport to the cell surface.
Interestingly, another alphavirus PE2 cleavage mutant called S12
(Ser-to-Asn substitution at position 1 of E2), derived from SAAR86, was
found to be fully infectious on BHK-21 cells (31, 33). In
the light of our present results, we would argue that the PE2/E1
heterodimer of the S12 mutant is less stable than that of the E2:N1
virus, despite the fact that both viruses carry the same amino acid
substitution at E2 position 1. Differences in the genetic background of
S12 and E2:N1 outside the PE2 cleavage region could account for the
different spike stability, in agreement with our present observation
that distant mutations in the E2:N1 mutant have the capacity to restore
viral infectivity by destabilization of the spike heterodimer. We
postulate that the S12 spike heterodimer has a very specific pH
dependence, so that it survives the TGN during maturation but does
become fusion competent at acidic pH in endosomes. The stability of the
spike heterodimer and the fusion competence at low pHs of SAAR86 and
S12 remain to be determined.
The results in Fig. 6 and 7 show that there is a clear correlation
between expression of low-pH-dependent membrane fusion activity of SIN
and formation of the E1 homotrimeric conformation. However, close
scrutiny of the data reveals that mutant SIN viruses with a relatively
low pH threshold for fusion require a lower extent of trimer formation
to reach a certain level of fusion than the TR339 virus with a high pH
threshold for fusion. This suggests that there are different levels of
pH control of viral fusion activation and that, besides E1
trimerization, other pH-dependent conformational alterations are
involved. In previous studies on SFV (3) and SIN
(36), we have shown that, kinetically, fusion in the
liposome model system occurs with a distinct delay after virus-liposome
binding and E1 trimerization. This lag phase prior to the onset of
fusion may well involve the rearrangement of several E1 trimers into a
fusion complex. Interestingly, the duration of the lag phase decreases
with decreasing pH (3, 36). Thus, our present observation
suggesting that, at a relatively high pH, a relatively high extent of
E1 trimerization is required for fusion may well reflect the
comparatively long lag phase between E1 trimerization and the onset of
fusion under these conditions.
The present results suggest that there is a direct correlation between
the infectivity of SIN on BHK-21 cells and low-pH-dependent membrane
fusion activity of the virus with liposomes. Not only is SIN-liposome
fusion clearly dependent on low pH, it also appears that subtle shifts
in the pH dependence of fusion have a profound effect on viral
infectivity. This result provides additional support for the notion
that exposure to a mildly acidic pH is an obligatory step in the
infectious entry of SIN into its host cell. This conclusion is in
agreement with recent observations of Glomb-Reinmund and Kielian
(12) and DeTulleo and Kirchausen (6),
indicating that SIN enters cells by receptor-mediated endocytosis and
fusion from within acidic endosomes. On the other hand, very recently Hernandez et al. (15) provided evidence, based on
investigation of mosquito cell infection by SIN, suggesting that
exposure to an acidic pH may not be an obligatory step in alphavirus
cell entry. Clearly, it cannot be excluded that alphaviruses use
different routes of cell entry in mosquito and vertebrate cells. Also,
our observations do not rule out the possibility that interaction of
SIN with cell surface components induces conformational alterations priming the spike to subsequently rearrange to its fusion-active structure (7, 26). Nevertheless, from our present results it would appear that low pH is a crucial factor in alphavirus spike
heterodimer destabilization and thus in the activation of viral
membrane fusion activity. This conclusion is completely consistent with
recent structural data on the SIN spike (30). Furthermore,
SIN closely resembles SFV in terms of both spike organization
(21, 3) and membrane fusion characteristics (3, 27,
36). It has been clearly demonstrated that SFV infects cells via
receptor-mediated endocytosis and fusion from within acidic endosomes
(6, 10, 12, 17, 23, 42).
 |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS |
This work was supported by the U.S. National Institutes of Health
(grants 2R01HL16660-27 and R01AI22186-14), by The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) under the auspices of the
Foundation for Chemical Research (CW), and by the Royal Netherlands
Academy of Arts and Sciences (KNAW) (travel grant to J.M.S.).
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Medical Microbiology, Molecular Virology Section, University of
Groningen, Ant. Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV Groningen, The Netherlands.
Phone: 31 50 3632733. Fax: 31 50 3638171. E-mail:
J.C.Wilschut{at}med.rug.nl.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Berglund, P.,
M. Sjoberg,
H. Garoff,
G. J. Atkins,
B. J. Sheahan, and P. Liljeström.
1993.
Semliki Forest virus expression system: production of conditionally infectious recombinant particles.
Nat. Biotechnol.
11:916-920.
|
| 2.
|
Böttcher, C. J. F.,
C. M. van Gent, and C. Fries.
1961.
A rapid and sensitive sub-micro phosphorus determination.
Anal. Chim. Acta
24:203-204[CrossRef].
|
| 3.
|
Bron, R.,
J. M. Wahlberg,
H. Garoff, and J. Wilschut.
1993.
Membrane fusion of Semliki Forest virus in a model system: correlation between fusion kinetics and structural changes in the envelope glycoprotein.
EMBO J.
12:693-701[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Byrnes, A. P., and D. E. Griffin.
1998.
Binding of Sindbis virus to cell surface heparan sulfate.
J. Virol.
72:7349-7356[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Davis, N. L.,
K. W. Brown,
G. F. Greenwald,
A. J. Zajac,
V. L. Zacny,
J. F. Smith, and R. E. Johnston.
1995.
Attenuated mutants of Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus containing lethal mutations in the PE2 cleavage signal combined with a second-site suppressor mutation in E1.
Virology
212:102-110[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
DeTulleo, L., and T. Kirchhausen.
1998.
The clathrin endocytic pathway in viral infection.
EMBO J.
17:4585-4593[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Flynn, D. C.,
W. J. Meyer,
J. M. Mackenzie, and R. E. Johnston.
1990.
A conformational change in Sindbis virus glycoproteins E1 and E2 is detected at the plasma membrane as a consequence of early virus-cell interaction.
J. Virol.
64:3643-3653[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Garoff, H.,
A. M. Frischauf,
K. Simons,
H. Lehrach, and H. Delius.
1980.
Nucleotide sequence of cDNA coding for Semliki Forest virus membrane glycoproteins.
Nature
288:286-241[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Garoff, H.,
R. Hewson, and D. E. Opstelten.
1998.
Virus maturation by budding.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
62:1171-1190[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Garoff, H.,
J. Wilschut,
P. Liljeström,
J. M. Wahlberg,
R. Bron,
M. Suomalainen,
J. Smyth,
A. Salminen,
B. U. Barth,
H. Zhao,
K. Forsell, and M. Ekstrom.
1994.
Assembly and entry mechanisms of Semliki Forest virus.
Arch Virol.
9(Suppl):329-338.
|
| 11.
|
Gibbons, D. L.,
A. Ahn,
P. K. Chatterjee, and M. Kielian.
2000.
Formation and characterization of the trimeric form of the fusion protein of Semliki Forest virus.
J. Virol.
74:7772-7780[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Glomb-Reinmund, S., and M. Kielian.
1998.
The role of low pH and disulfide shuffling in the entry and fusion of Semliki Forest virus and Sindbis virus.
Virology
248:372-381[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Heidner, H. W., and R. E. Johnston.
1994.
The amino-terminal residue of Sindbis virus glycoprotein E2 influences virus maturation, specific infectivity for BHK cells, and virulence for mice.
J. Virol.
68:8064-8070[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Heidner, H. W.,
K. L. McKnight,
N. L. Davis, and R. E. Johnston.
1994.
Lethality of PE2 incorporation into Sindbis virus can be suppressed by second-site mutations in E3 and E2.
J. Virol.
68:2683-2692[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Hernandez, R.,
T. Luo, and D. T. Brown.
2001.
Exposure to low pH is not required for penetration of mosquito cells by Sindbis virus.
J. Virol.
75:2010-2013[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Justman, J.,
M. R. Klimjack, and M. Kielian.
1993.
Role of spike protein conformational changes in fusion of Semliki Forest virus.
J. Virol.
67:7597-7607[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Kielian, M., and A. Helenius.
1984.
Role of cholesterol in fusion of Semliki Forest virus with membranes.
J. Virol.
52:281-283[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Klenk, H. D., and W. Garten.
1994.
Activation cleavage of viral spike proteins by host proteases, p. 241-280.
In
E. Wimmer (ed.), Cellular receptors for animal viruses. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 19.
|
Klimstra, W. B.,
H. W. Heidner, and R. E. Johnston.
1999.
The furin protease cleavage recognition sequence of Sindbis virus PE2 can mediate virion attachment to cell surface heparan sulfate.
J. Virol.
73:6299-6306[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Klimstra, W. B.,
K. D. Ryman, and R. E. Johnston.
1998.
Adaptation of Sindbis virus to BHK-21 cells selects for use of heparan sulfate as an attachment receptor.
J. Virol.
72:7357-7366[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Lescar, J.,
A. Roussel,
M. W. Wien,
J. Navaza,
S. D. Fuller,
G. Wengler,
G. Wengler, and F. A. Rey.
2001.
The fusion glycoprotein shell of Semliki Forest virus: An Icosahedral assembly primed for fusogenic activation at endosomal pH.
Cell
105:137-148[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Lobigs, M., and H. Garoff.
1990.
Fusion function of the Semliki Forest virus spike is activated by proteolytic cleavage of the enveloppe glycoprotein p62.
J. Virol.
64:1233-1240[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Marsh, M.,
E. Bolzau, and A. Helenius.
1983.
Penetration of Semliki Forest virus from acidic prelysosomal vacuoles.
Cell
32:931-940[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Mayne, J. T.,
C. M. Rice,
E. G. Strauss,
M. W. Hunkapiller, and J. H. Strauss.
1984.
Biochemical studies of the maturation of the small Sindbis virus glycoprotein E3.
Virology
134:338-357[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
McKnight, K. L.,
D. A. Simpson,
S. C. Lin,
T. A. Knott,
J. M. Polo,
D. F. Pence,
D. B. Johannesen,
H. W. Heidner,
N. L. Davis, and R. E. Johnston.
1996.
Deduced consensus sequence of Sindbis virus strain AR339: mutations contained in laboratory strain will affect cell culture and in vivo phenotypes.
J. Virol.
70:1981-1989[Abstract].
|
| 26.
|
Meyer, W. J.,
S. Gidwitz,
V. K. Ayers,
R. J. Schoepp, and R. E. Johnston.
1992.
Conformational alteration of Sindbis virion glycoproteins induced by heat, reducing agents, or low pH.
J. Virol.
66:3504-3513[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Nieva, J. L.,
R. Bron,
J. Corver, and J. Wilschut.
1994.
Membrane fusion of Semliki Forest virus requires sphingolipids in the target membrane.
EMBO J.
13:2797-2804[Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Paredes, A. M.,
H. W. Heidner,
P. Thuman-commike,
B. V. Venkararam Prasad,
R. E. Johnston, and W. Chiu.
1998.
Structural localization of the E3 glycoprotein in attenuated Sindbis virus mutants.
J. Virol.
72:1534-1541[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Phalen, T., and M. Kielian.
1991.
Cholesterol is required for infection by Semliki Forest virus.
J. Cell Biol.
112:615-623[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Pletnev, S. V.,
W. Zhang,
S. Mukhopadhyay,
B. R. Fisher,
R. Hernandez,
D. T. Brown,
T. S. Baker,
M. G. Rossmann, and R. J. Kuhn.
2001.
Locations of carbohydrate sites on alphavirus glycoproteins show that E1 forms an icosahedral scaffold.
Cell
105:127-136[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Presley, J. F.,
J. M. Polo,
R. E. Johnston, and D. T. Brown.
1991.
Proteolytic processing of the Sindbis virus membrane protein precursor PE2 is nonessential for growth in vertebrate cells but is required for efficient growth in invertebrate cells.
J. Virol.
65:1905-1909[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Rice, C. M., and J. H. Strauss.
1981.
Nucleotide sequence of the 26S mRNA of Sindbis virus and deduced sequence of the encoded virus structural proteins.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
78:2062-2066[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Russel, D. L.,
J. M. Dalrymple, and R. E. Johnston.
1989.
Sindbis virus mutations which coordinately affect glycoprotein processing, penetration, and virulence in mice.
J. Virol.
63:1619-1629[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Salminen, A.,
J. M. Wahlberg,
M. Lobigs,
P. Liljeström, and H. Garoff.
1992.
Membrane fusion process of Semliki Forest virus. II. Cleavage dependent reorganization of the spike protein complex controls virus entry.
J. Cell Biol.
116:349-357[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Seksek, O.,
J. Biwersi, and A. S. Verkman.
1995.
Direct measurement of trans-Golgi pH in living cells and regulation by second messengers.
J. Biol. Chem.
270:4967-4970[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Smit, J. M.,
R. Bittman, and J. Wilschut.
1999.
Low-pH-dependent fusion of Sindbis virus with receptor-free cholesterol- and sphingolipid-containing liposomes.
J. Virol.
73:8476-8484[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Smith, T. J.,
R. H. Cheng,
N. H. Olson,
P. Peterson,
E. Chase,
R. J. Kuhn, and T. S. Baker.
1995.
Putative receptor binding sites on alphaviruses as visualized by cryoelectron microscopy.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:10648-10652[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Strauss, J. H., and E. G. Strauss.
1994.
The alphaviruses: gene expression, replication, and evolution.
Microbiol. Rev.
58:491-562[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Tubulekas, I., and P. Liljeström.
1998.
Suppressors of cleavage site mutations in the p62 envelope protein of Semliki Forest virus reveal dynamics in spike structure and function.
J. Virol.
72:2825-2831[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Wahlberg, J. M.,
R. Bron,
J. Wilschut, and H. Garoff.
1992.
Membrane fusion of Semliki Forest virus involves homotrimers of the fusion protein.
J. Virol.
66:7309-7318[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Wahlberg, J. M., and H. Garoff.
1992.
Membrane fusion process of Semliki Forest virus. I. Low pH-induced rearrangement in spike protein quaternary structure precedes virus penetration into cells.
J. Cell Biol.
116:339-348[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
White, J., and A. Helenius.
1980.
pH-dependent fusion between the Semliki Forest virus membrane and liposomes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
77:3273-3277[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Wilschut, J.,
J. Corver,
J. L. Nieva,
R. Bron,
L. Moesby,
K. C. Reddy, and R. Bittman.
1995.
Fusion of Semliki Forest virus with cholesterol-containing liposomes at low pH: a specific requirement for sphingolipids.
Mol. Membr. Biol.
12:143-149[Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, November 2001, p. 11196-11204, Vol. 75, No. 22
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.22.11196-11204.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Ryman, K. D., Gardner, C. L., Burke, C. W., Meier, K. C., Thompson, J. M., Klimstra, W. B.
(2007). Heparan Sulfate Binding Can Contribute to the Neurovirulence of Neuroadapted and Nonneuroadapted Sindbis Viruses. J. Virol.
81: 3563-3573
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Elshuber, S., Mandl, C. W.
(2005). Resuscitating Mutations in a Furin Cleavage-Deficient Mutant of the Flavivirus Tick-Borne Encephalitis Virus. J. Virol.
79: 11813-11823
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Waarts, B.-L., Smit, J. M., Aneke, O. J. C., McInerney, G. M., Liljestrom, P., Bittman, R., Wilschut, J.
(2005). Reversible Acid-Induced Inactivation of the Membrane Fusion Protein of Semliki Forest Virus. J. Virol.
79: 7942-7948
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chanel-Vos, C., Kielian, M.
(2004). A Conserved Histidine in the ij Loop of the Semliki Forest Virus E1 Protein Plays an Important Role in Membrane Fusion. J. Virol.
78: 13543-13552
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhang, X., Fugere, M., Day, R., Kielian, M.
(2003). Furin Processing and Proteolytic Activation of Semliki Forest Virus. J. Virol.
77: 2981-2989
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Smit, J. M., Waarts, B.-L., Kimata, K., Klimstra, W. B., Bittman, R., Wilschut, J.
(2002). Adaptation of Alphaviruses to Heparan Sulfate: Interaction of Sindbis and Semliki Forest Viruses with Liposomes Containing Lipid-Conjugated Heparin. J. Virol.
76: 10128-10137
[Abstract]
[Full Text]