JVI Figure table search 04
Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, H.
Right arrow Articles by Bamford, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, H.
Right arrow Articles by Bamford, D. H.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, November 2001, p. 11088-11095, Vol. 75, No. 22
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.22.11088-11095.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Comparison of Polymerase Subunits from Double-Stranded RNA Bacteriophages

Hongyan Yang, Eugene V. Makeyev, and Dennis H. Bamford*

Department of Biosciences and Institute of Biotechnology, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Finland

Received 16 April 2001/Accepted 16 August 2001


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

The family Cystoviridae comprises several bacteriophages with double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) genomes. We have previously purified the catalytic polymerase subunit (Pol) of one of the Cystoviridae members, bacteriophage phi 6, and shown that the protein can catalyze RNA synthesis in vitro. In this reaction, both bacteriophage-specific and heterologous RNAs can serve as templates, but those containing 3' termini from the phi 6 minus strands are favored. This provides a molecular basis for the observation that only plus strands, not minus strands, are transcribed from phi 6 dsRNA segments in vivo. To test whether such a regulatory mechanism is also found in other dsRNA viruses, we purified recombinant Pol subunits from the phi 6-related bacteriophages phi 8 and phi 13 and assayed their polymerase activities in vitro. The enzymes catalyze template-dependent RNA synthesis using both single-stranded-RNA (ssRNA) and dsRNA templates. However, they differ from each other as well as from phi 6 Pol in certain biochemical properties. Notably, each polymerase demonstrates a distinct preference for ssRNAs bearing short 3'-terminal sequences from the virus-specific minus strands. This suggests that, in addition to other factors, RNA transcription in Cystoviridae is controlled by the template specificity of the polymerase subunit.


    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Bacteriophage phi 6, infecting the plant-pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae, is one of the best-characterized double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) viruses (15, 16). Its genome consists of three linear dsRNA segments: small (S), medium (M), and large (L). These are brought into the host cell inside a transcriptionally active virus core particle. In the course of transcription, plus-sense single-stranded RNAs (ssRNAs) s+, m+, and l+ are produced and extruded into the cytoplasm, where they are translated by the cellular protein synthesis machinery. Early phi 6 proteins P1, P2, P4, and P7 assemble into the polymerase complex, or procapsid (PC). This is followed by packaging of s+, m+, and l+ into the PC and their subsequent replication to form S, M, and L, respectively. We have previously demonstrated that purified P2 protein, the Pol subunit of the phi 6 PC, can act as a replicase and transcriptase in vitro (11, 13). Although it accepts RNA templates of both phi 6 and heterologous origin, phi 6 Pol shows a clear preference for templates containing phi 6-specific plus-strand initiation signals at their 3' ends. This suggests that the enzyme may play an active role in selection between plus- and minus-strand initiation signals, thus favoring the synthesis of plus strands during transcription in vivo (11).

phi 6 has long been the only known species in the family Cystoviridae (20). Recently, the family has been updated with several newly isolated bacteriophages (17). Like phi 6, they contain tripartite dsRNA genomes and a lipid membrane as a structural element. Genomes of two of these bacteriophages, phi 8 and phi 13, have been sequenced completely, thus enabling their phylogenic analysis (8, 18). phi 13 shows limited sequence homology with phi 6, whereas phi 8 differs from phi 6 and phi 13 dramatically. At the amino acid level, the polymerase complex proteins P1, P2, P4, and P7 are homologous between phi 6 and phi 13. However, the only protein that shows detectable similarity across all three bacteriophages is the P2 polymerase, referred to here as Pol (Fig. 1).


View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 1.   Comparision of three recombinant Pol proteins (P2 proteins) from phi 6, phi 8, and phi 13. The protein sequences can be accessed at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (phi6P2, AAA32355; phi8P2 AAF63300; phi13P2, AAG00444). Amino acid sequence alignment is based on structure alignment with ClustalW (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw/) and ESPript 1.9 (http://www-pgm1.ipbs.fr:8080/ESPript/). Strictly conserved residues are highlighted, and similar residues are boxed. Numbers correspond to the phi 6 Pol sequence. Secondary-structure elements are from the high-resolution crystal structure of phi 6 Pol (3), courtesy of S. J. Butcher.

Replication and transcription initiation sites vary considerably between phi 6, phi 8, and phi 13 (Fig. 2). It is obvious, however, that the 3' ends of both minus and plus strands, used in the initiation of plus- and minus-strand syntheses, respectively, are pyrimidine rich, with an invariable C at the 3'-most position of all minus strands. Within each bacteriophage genome, the 3'-proximal sequences of l-, m-, and s- are generally more conserved than those of l+, m+, and s+. phi 13 is the best example of this asymmetry. Interestingly, the 3' end of l- does not match the m-/s- consensus at one (phi 6 and phi 13) or several (phi 8) positions. In the case of phi 6, this single-nucleotide substitution is known to be the reason for the lower transcription efficiency of L compared to M or S (6, 11).


View larger version (73K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 2.   Terminal homologies among dsRNA genomic segments S, M, and L in phi 6, phi 8, and phi 13. Twenty nucleotides (each) of the left- and right-hand termini are shown. Boxed plus and minus signs represent the rest of the plus- and minus-strand sequences, respectively. Nucleotides conserved within each genome are highlighted. Positions of transcription (left-hand) and replication (right-hand) initiation sites are indicated.

Since phi 6 Pol has been suggested to control the bacteriophage RNA metabolism through selective initiation at the transcriptional promoter, the question arises whether a similar regulatory function could also be assigned to the polymerases of phi 8 and phi 13. To this end, we purified the two recombinant polymerase subunits and assayed their activities in vitro. Like their phi 6 counterpart, both polymerases catalyze RNA-dependent RNA synthesis in vitro. However, they differ from each other and from phi 6 Pol in several biochemical properties. Most interestingly, each enzyme has a distinct template specificity, with a clear bias for ssRNAs containing 3' ends similar to those found in bacteriophage-specific minus strands. These data suggest a possible scenario in which polymerase subunit specificity has coevolved with the minus-strand 3'-proximal sequence to ensure efficient transcription initiation. On the other hand, the results with genomic RNAs indicate that some additional factors, such as the melting temperature of the initiation site, are likely to be involved in the regulation of RNA synthesis from dsRNA templates.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Plasmids and strains. phi 6 polymerase was produced using Escherichia coli strain BL21(DE3/pEM2) (13). The phi 8 Pol expression strain was prepared as follows. The p2 gene of phi 8 was first PCR amplified from plasmid pLM2424 (8) using the primer pair p2phi8up and p2phi8down primer pair (Table 1) and Pfu DNA polymerase (Stratagene). The PCR fragment was digested with NdeI and BamHI (underlined sites in primer sequences) and ligated with the similarly cut vector pMG60, a derivative of pMG59 (7). E. coli BL21 was then transformed with the resultant plasmid pHY1 to produce BL21(pHY1). To construct the phi 13 Pol expression strain, the p2 gene of phi 13 was amplified from pLM2200 (18) using primers p2phi13up and p2phi13down. The PCR fragment was inserted into pET32b(+) (Novagen) at NdeI-HindIII sites to produce plasmid pHY2. This was introduced into BL21(DE3) (Novagen), yielding BL21(DE3/pHY2).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 1.   Oligonucleotides used in this study

Expression and purification of recombinant polymerase subunits. Recombinant polymerases from phi 8 and phi 13 were expressed by the procedure described for phi 6 Pol (4, 13). Briefly, starter cultures were grown in Luria-Bertani medium containing 150 mg of ampicillin/ml at 37°C to an optical density at 540 nm (OD540) of 0.6. Cultures were then diluted 50-fold, and incubation was continued until the OD540 reached 1.0. Expression of the recombinant polymerase was induced with 1 mM isopropyl-beta -D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG). After addition of IPTG, bacterial cultures were shaken for 15 h at 23°C [for BL21(pHY1)] or 18 h at 19°C [for BL21(DE3/pHY2)]. Protein purification was carried out at +4°C. Throughout purification, the pH value was 7.4 for phi 8 Pol and 8.0 for phi 13 Pol. Bacterial pellets were resuspended in 35 ml of 100 mM NaCl-50 mM Tris-HCl-1 mM EDTA. Suspensions were passed three times through a precooled French pressure cell at ~105 MPa. Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride was added to 1 mM after the first passage. Lysates were cleared at 120,000 × g for 2.5 h. phi 6 Pol and phi 13 Pol were purified successively on Cibacron Blue 3GA agarose (Sigma), heparin agarose (Sigma), and a HiTrap Q Sepharose column (Pharmacia) as described elsewhere (13). For the phi 8 Pol purification, Reactive Brown 10 agarose (Sigma) and a Superdex 75 gel filtration column (Pharmacia) were used. Protein concentrations were determined by absorbance at 280 nm in 6 M guanidine hydrochloride based on an optical density (OD) of 1.21 OU for 1 mg of phi 8 Pol/ml and an OD of 1.37 for 1 mg of phi 13 Pol/ml (5). Purified proteins were stored at +4°C.

Preparation of RNA substrates. ssRNA substrates were produced by in vitro transcription with T7 RNA polymerase as described previously (13, 14). Templates for the transcription were prepared either by cutting recombinant plasmid DNA with restriction endonucleases or by PCR amplification with Pfu DNA polymerase. For PCR, oligonucleotide T7-1, containing the T7 polymerase promoter sequence, was used as an upstream primer. Oligonucleotides 3'end to 3'end4 were used as downstream primers for amplification of the Delta s+ fragment from pEM15 (11), whereas pT7-3'end to pT7-3'end14 served as downstream primers to amplify the luciferase gene from pT7luc (9). Genomic dsRNA was extracted from purified bacteriophage particles with phenol-chloroform, precipitated with ethanol, and dissolved in sterile water.

Polymerase activity assay. Polymerase activity was assayed in 10-µl reaction mixtures. In the initial experiments, we used the conditions reported previously for the phi 6 polymerase (11, 13). These were further optimized to 50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.4 to 7.8; see Results for details), 20 mM ammonium acetate (NH4OAc), 6% (wt/vol) polyethylene glycol 4000, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM MnCl2, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1% Triton X-100, 1 mM (each) ATP and GTP, 0.2 mM (each) CTP and UTP, 0.8 U of RNasin/µl, and 0.25 mCi of [alpha -32P]UTP (Amersham; 3,000 Ci/mmol)/ml. The final concentration of RNA substrates was 50 to 200 µg/ml. Reactions were started by adding one of the three polymerases up to 0.02 to 0.04 mg/ml, and reaction mixtures were further incubated at 30°C for 1 h. Reaction products were separated by standard agarose gel electrophoresis (13). Gels were dried and exposed to Fuji Super RX film or analyzed with a Fuji BAS1500 phosphorimager.


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Expression and purification of recombinant Pol proteins. To construct plasmids for phi 8 Pol and phi 13 Pol expression, full-length polymerase genes were cloned under the control of inducible promoters and strong Shine-Dalgarno sequences. Soluble polymerases from bacteriophages phi 6, phi 8, and phi 13 were expressed by incubating the corresponding E. coli strains at 16 to 23°C in the presence of IPTG. Expression at higher temperatures (28 to 37°C) led to substantial increases in overall polymerase production, but most of the protein was insoluble. The phi 6 Pol purification protocol, employing a combination of Cibacron Blue 3GA agarose and heparin agarose and an anion-exchange column, gave satisfactory results for phi 13 Pol (Fig. 3A). However, phi 8 Pol failed to bind to the blue agarose, leading us to test other dye affinity resins (Sigma kit no. RDL-9). Reactive Brown 10 agarose bound phi 8 Pol well, without retarding most of the contaminating proteins (50 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 100 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA). Bound phi 8 Pol was eluted with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)-500 mM NaCl- 1 mM EDTA and was further purified to near-homogeneity using a Superdex 75 gel filtration column equilibrated with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 100 mM NaCl, and 0.1 mM EDTA (Fig. 3A). The relative electrophoretic mobilities of the three purified enzymes correlated with their calculated molecular masses (Table 2): phi 13 Pol is larger, and phi 8 Pol is smaller, than phi 6 Pol. The yields of purified proteins in milligrams per liter of bacterial culture are given in Table 2.


View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 3.   Purified polymerase subunits catalyze RNA replication in vitro. (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of purified recombinant Pol proteins from phi 6, phi 8, and phi 13. Lane Mk, protein marker. Molecular masses (in kilodaltons) are given on the right. (B) Agarose electrophoresis of reaction mixtures containing s+13 RNA and one of the three purified polymerases: phi 6 Pol, phi 8 Pol, or phi 13 Pol. Lane C, control without polymerase. The upper panel shows an ethidium bromide-stained gel, with the ssRNA (ss) and dsRNA (ds) marked on the right; the lower panel is the corresponding autoradiogram.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
TABLE 2.   Properties of the Pol subunits from phi 6, phi 8, and phi 13

phi 8 Pol and phi 13 Pol catalyze RNA replication in vitro. RNA replication activity of the purified polymerases was assayed as described earlier for the phi 6 enzyme (13). The mixtures containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.9), 80 mM NH4OAc, 5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM MnCl2, 6% polyethylene glycol 4000, 0.1 mM EDTA, and the phi 6-specific ssRNA template s+13 (s+ segment with the extension CTAGAGGATCCCC 3') were incubated for 1 h at 30°C. Both phi 8 Pol and phi 13 Pol were enzymatically active, producing full-length dsRNA forms indistinguishable from the phi 6 Pol dsRNA product (Fig. 3B). phi 13 Pol was nearly as active as phi 6 Pol, whereas the specific activity of phi 8 Pol was lower under the conditions employed. No radioactive bands were detected when polymerase or the RNA substrate was omitted from the reaction mixture (Fig. 3B, lane 1; also not shown). In addition, labeled products did not appear in the absence of the four unlabeled nucleoside triphosphates (NTPs). These results unequivocally demonstrate that the newly isolated proteins phi 8 Pol and phi 13 Pol possess RNA-dependent replicase activity in vitro.

Effects of reaction conditions on the polymerase activity. The above assay was utilized to study the effects of several parameters on the activities of the three polymerases. All three enzymes synthesized dsRNA over a wide pH range, with the Tris-HCl pH optima increasing in the order phi 13 Pol-phi 6 Pol-phi 8 Pol. Interestingly, the enzyme activity in HEPES-KOH was always higher than that in Tris-HCl at the same pH (Fig. 4A, D, and G).


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 4.   Effects of pH (A, D, and G) and of ammonium acetate (B, E, and H) and Mn2+ (C, F, and I) concentrations on the activities of the three polymerases. Reaction mixtures containing s+13 RNA and phi 6 Pol (A, B, and C), phi 8 Pol (D, E, and F) or phi 13 Pol (G, H, and I) were incubated at 30°C for 1 h and analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis. Radioactivity in the bands of the newly produced dsRNA was quantified with a phosphorimager. Tris-HCl (Tris) or HEPES-KOH (HEPES) buffers were used in panelsA, D, and G, whereas in the other panels pH was buffered with HEPES-KOH (pH 7.8 for phi 6 Pol and phi 8 Pol, and pH 7.4 for phi 13 Pol). Graphs are normalized so that the highest observed value within each panel is set to 1.

To determine the monovalent cation optimum, reaction mixtures were supplemented with different concentrations of NH4OAc. Although all three enzymes were active without NH4OAc, low salt concentrations (20 mM) reproducibly stimulated RNA synthesis. Further increases in NH4OAc concentration were inhibitory, particularly for phi 8 Pol (Fig. 4B, E, and H).

Manganese (Mn2+) has been reported to stimulate phi 6 Pol (11, 13). Here, we systematically studied the effect of this ion on the three RNA polymerases. Regardless of the enzyme origin, the optimal Mn2+ concentration was 2 mM. However, there were differences in concentration dependence (Fig. 4C, F, and I). Added at concentrations up to 1 to 2 mM, Mn2+ increased the polymerase activity of phi 6 Pol more than 10-fold, whereas this stimulatory effect was relatively modest in the case of phi 8 Pol and phi 13 Pol (~2.5-fold). Furthermore, higher concentrations of manganese (5 to 6 mM) inhibited phi 8 Pol but were well tolerated by phi 6 Pol and phi 13 Pol.

To test the effect of incubation temperature, RNA-synthesis was carried out in the optimized buffer containing 50 mM HEPES-KOH (pH 7.8 for phi 6 Pol and phi 8 Pol and pH 7.4 for phi 13 Pol), 20 mM NH4OAc, and 2 mM MnCl2, in addition to other components listed in Materials and Methods. Reaction mixtures were incubated at 20 to 60°C for 1 h, and aliquots were sampled at different time points. For all the polymerases, the highest dsRNA synthesis was observed at 30°C (Fig. 5). Increasing the temperature to 40°C accelerated the initial RNA synthesis, at least for phi 8 Pol and phi 13 Pol (notice the difference in the slopes at 30 and 40°C in Fig. 5B and C), but compromised the final yield. Furthermore, phi 8 Pol and phi 13 Pol retained a substantial fraction of their activity at 50 and even 60°C, whereas phi 6 Pol was almost completely inactivated at >= 50°C.


View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 5.   Effects of temperature on replication. Replication mixtures containing s+13 RNA and phi 6 Pol (A), phi 8 Pol (B), or phi 13 Pol (C) were incubated at 20 to 60°C, as indicated. Aliquots were withdrawn at different time points and analyzed by agarose gel-electrophoresis followed by phosphorimager analysis. The highest observed value within each panel is set to 1.

phi 8 and phi 13 polymerases catalyze dsRNA transcription in vitro. In addition to its replication activity, purified phi 6 Pol can catalyze dsRNA transcription in vitro employing a semiconservative (strand displacement) mechanism (11). To test the transcriptional activities of phi 8 Pol and phi 13 Pol, the two polymerases, along with phi 6 Pol, were assayed with genomic dsRNAs extracted from bacteriophage particles. In all three cases, radioactive products that migrated at the position of the input dsRNA species were found, consistent with the idea of semiconservative transcription (Fig. 6). However, the product patterns varied significantly depending on the polymerase and the dsRNA source.


View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 6.   Polymerase subunits from phi 6, phi 8, and phi 13 catalyze dsRNA transcription in vitro. Reaction mixtures contained phi 6 Pol (lanes 1 to 3), phi 8 Pol (lanes 4 to 6) or phi 13 Pol (lanes 7 to 9) and dsRNA extracted from phi 6 (lanes 1, 4, and 7), phi 8 (lanes 2, 5, and 8) or phi 13 (lanes 3, 6, and 9). The upper panel shows an ethidium bromide-stained gel, and the lower panel is the corresponding autoradiogram. The positions of dsRNA segments L, M, and S are marked on the right.

Effect of the template 3' end on the efficiency of RNA synthesis. To further explore the template preferences of phi 6 Pol, phi 8 Pol, and phi 13 Pol, we compared replication efficiencies with five variants of sDelta + ssRNA (phi 6 s+ segment with an extensive internal deletion [11]). One of the variants, sDelta +(phi ), had the natural phi 6 terminus CUCUCUCUCU3' (also present in the phi 13 m+; see Fig. 2); the other four templates contained different one-nucleotide additions: A3', C3', G3', and U3'. For all three polymerases, replication efficiency increased considerably when C3' was used as a terminal template nucleotide. G3' was the second-best addition (Fig. 7, sDelta +). The effects of the other two terminal bases were polymerase dependent. Both A3' and U3' reduced phi 6 Pol replication, whereas for phi 13 Pol they were neutral or somewhat stimulatory. phi 8 Pol was substantially inhibited by A3' and was activated by U3'. A similar result was also obtained for the set of five firefly luciferase mRNAs: luc(phi ), containing CCCAAGCUUA3', and its one-nucleotide-longer derivatives luc(A3'), luc(C3'), luc(G3'), and luc(U3'). However, in this case, U3' enhanced phi 8 Pol replication by an order of magnitude (Fig. 7, luc).


View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 7.   Effect of the 3'-terminal nucleotide of the template on replication efficiency. Two sets of ssRNA templates, luc and sDelta +, were assayed with phi 6 Pol, phi 8 Pol, or phi 13 Pol at 30°C for 1 h. Each of the sets contained five RNA species with different 3' ends (N3'): either without modifications (phi ) or extended with one additional 3'-terminal nucleotide (U, G, C or A). Reaction products were separated by agarose gel-electrophoresis, and radioactivity in the dsRNA product bands was quantified with a phosphorimager. The graphs are normalized so that the highest value within each panel is set to 1.

We also assayed luciferase mRNAs containing longer 3'-terminal extensions (Fig. 8). Compared to C3', CC3' doubled replication efficiency for all three polymerases. The enhancement was even stronger when the CCC3' terminus was used. Nine terminal bases of phi 13 m- or s- (GUUUUUUCC 3'; also similar in phi 6 m- and s-, as shown in Fig. 2) added to the luc RNA caused approximately the same effect as CC3' for phi 6 Pol and phi 13 Pol. This sequence, however, stimulated phi 8 Pol replication more significantly. Similarly, UC3' was a somewhat weaker enhancer than CC3' for phi 6 Pol and phi 13 Pol, whereas it was clearly superior to CC3' for phi 8 Pol. The phi 8-specific minus-strand 3' terminus GAAAAUUUC3' (Fig. 2) was the best initiation signal for phi 8 Pol but not for phi 6 Pol and phi 13 Pol. Finally, luc RNA with a UCUCUCUCU 3' terminus, found in all three plus strands of phi 6 as well as in m+ of phi 13 (Fig. 2), was a relatively inefficient template for all three polymerases.


View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
FIG. 8.   Replication efficiency of luc ssRNAs containing different 3'-terminal extensions. Reaction mixtures containing one of the seven luciferase ssRNA templates with the different 3' extensions and phi 6 Pol, phi 8 Pol, or phi 13 Pol were incubated at 30°C for 1 h and analyzed as for Fig. 7. The highest value within each panel is set to 1.


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Previous studies have shown that the polymerase subunit of bacteriophage phi 6 can catalyze RNA synthesis without the assistance of other proteins (11, 13). In addition, the high-resolution crystal structures of the phi 6 Pol apoenzyme, as well as its template and NTP complexes, have recently been solved (3). We now demonstrate RNA-dependent RNA polymerization activity of two polymerase subunits isolated from the phi 6-related bacteriophages phi 8 and phi 13.

The three polymerases are homologous to each other, with an overall amino acid identity of 11% and a mean similarity of 41% (Fig. 1). Pairwise sequence alignments reveal ~50 and 20% identity of phi 6 Pol to phi 13 Pol and phi 8 Pol, respectively (8, 18). All three proteins contain the (G/S)DD motif (Fig. 1, turn between beta 15 and beta 16) critical for catalysis in all RNA-dependent RNA polymerases (10). Also strictly conserved is the positively charged RRRTA sequence (beta 11), which has been shown to interact with the phosphate groups of the incoming NTP substrate in phi 6 Pol (3). We also notice the conservation in the C-terminal domain (alpha 23 to alpha 24), implicated in stabilizing the initiation complex via stacking interactions with the first two nucleotides of the nascent strand (3). More-reliable molecular comparisons, however, require knowledge of the atomic structures for phi 8 Pol and phi 13 Pol. Crystallization experiments are under way.

The polymerases are shown to catalyze replication and transcription in vitro using, respectively, ssRNA and dsRNA templates (Fig. 3 and 6). Replication is at least 1 order of magnitude more efficient than transcription for all three enzymes (data not shown), in agreement with earlier data on phi 6 Pol (11).

The three enzymes can be distinguished biochemically. In Tris-HCl buffer, phi 6 Pol is the most active at pH 8.9, with phi 13 Pol having a lower and phi 8 Pol a higher pH optimum (Fig. 4A, D, G). This distribution is mirrored by the predicted isoelectric points (Table 2) and is likely to be a function of protein surface charge at different pH values. When Mn2+ is added to a reaction mixture containing an excess of Mg2+, it increases the activities of all three enzymes, albeit to different extents (Fig. 4C, F, and I). Manganese has been reported to affect the activities of several RNA-dependent RNA polymerases, including those from phi 6 (11, 13), hepatitis C virus (1, 21), brome mosaic virus (19), bacteriophage Qbeta (2), and some other viruses. Recent structural data for phi 6 Pol suggest that Mn2+ could serve to stabilize the polymerase molecule in a compact initiatory conformation (3). Intriguingly, phi 8 Pol and phi 13 Pol are stimulated by Mn2+ to a lesser extent than phi 6 Pol and, at the same time, show a higher thermostability (Fig. 5).

Most importantly, the purified enzymes have different template specificities, for both ssRNAs and dsRNAs (Fig. 6 to 8). Several generalizations are appropriate in this respect. Both phi 6 Pol and phi 13 Pol prefer ssRNA templates with the 3'-terminal cytosine; CC3' and CCC3' are even better initiation signals (Fig. 7 and 8). While phi 8 Pol is also increasingly stimulated with C3', CC3', and CCC3', it initiates more efficiently at the termini containing a 3'-proximal uridine(s), such as GAAAAUUUC 3', GUUUUUUCC 3', UC 3', or U 3'. This is further corroborated by the observation that s+13 RNA (ending in ... CCCC 3') is a better template for phi 6 Pol and phi 13 Pol than for phi 8 Pol (Fig. 3B). Although phi 13 Pol shows a somewhat higher affinity for the U-containing 3'-terminal extensions than phi 6 Pol (Fig. 7 and 8), the two polymerases are obviously closer to each other than to phi 8 Pol in terms of their template specificities, exactly as one would expect from the sequence comparison.

The polymerases from the Cystoviridae do not require a primer to commence RNA synthesis (12, 13). As shown for phi 6 Pol, the polymerase forms a quaternary initiation complex where the template 3' terminus is engaged in Watson-Crick base pairing with two cognate NTPs (3). The NTPs are additionally stabilized by stacking interactions to each other and to a special C-terminal "platform" in the polymerase. Since purine bases possess a very high stacking propensity, it is not surprising that the cystoviral polymerases show a bias for pyrimidine-rich template termini. In fact, many other RNA- and DNA-dependent RNA polymerases also initiate de novo and prefer purine nucleotides at the 5' end of the nascent RNA, thus indicating that all these enzymes might utilize protein-NTP stacking to facilitate the initiation step.

There is a clear correlation between the terminal preferences of the polymerase subunits and the transcription initiation sequences from the corresponding bacteriophages (Fig. 2). Indeed, all three phi 8 minus strands end with UC 3', which is shifted to (C/U)C 3' in phi 13 and (C/A)C 3' in phi 6, consistent with the Pol specificity profiles. As the transcription in dsRNA viruses is asymmetric, we suggest that the polymerase subunit and the plus sense initiation sites have become mutually fit as a result of coevolution. The replication promoters seem to experience a lower evolutionary pressure, consistent with weaker conservation of the right-hand termini in phi 8 and phi 13 (Fig. 2). Indeed, both phi 6 Pol and phi 13 Pol prefer the minus-strand 3'-terminal sequence to that of the plus strands (compare GUUUUUUCC 3' and UCUCUCUCU 3' in Fig. 8).

In addition to the 3'-terminal preferences of the polymerase subunits, plus-strand synthesis in the Cystoviridae is also likely to be controlled by the melting temperature of the dsRNA termini. The GC content of the transcription initiation sites is noticeably lower than that of the replication promoters in all three bacteriophages (Fig. 2), which should facilitate access of the polymerase to the 3' termini of the minus strands. This is consistent with the fact that the template tunnel inside the polymerase molecule can accommodate only ssRNA, not dsRNA (3). The efficiency of the dsRNA terminal unzipping could explain, for example, why minus strands of phi 6 and phi 13 do not end in CCC 3', although it is preferred by phi 6 Pol and phi 13 Pol for ssRNA (Fig. 8). Furthermore, different accessibilities of initiation sites in a single-stranded form might explain the results shown in Fig. 6, where phi 8 Pol utilized the phi 13 S segment more efficiently than homologous templates, and phi 13 Pol preferred phi 13 L to M and S (Fig. 6).

In summary, biochemical comparison of three Pol subunits from Cystoviridae reveals, in addition to the expected similarity, a substantial degree of functional divergence. Further experiments with the purified polymerases will address the molecular basis for the difference in template specificity and will provide more-detailed insights into the regulation of the viral RNA metabolism.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Sarah Butcher for providing Fig. 1 and for critical reading of the manuscript. Leonard Mindich and A. Marika Grahn are thanked for donating materials used in this study. Purified phi 8 and phi 13 virions were kindly provided by Ausra Gaidelyte. The expert technical assistance of Riitta Tarkiainen and Marja-Leena Perälä is greatly appreciated.

This work was supported by the Academy of Finland ("Finnish Centre of Excellence Program 2000-2005" grants 162993 and 164298) and the European Union (grant BIO4-CT97-2364).


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biosciences and Institute of Biotechnology, P.O. Box 56, Viikinkaari 5, FIN-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland. Phone: 358 9 191 59100. Fax: 358 9 191 59098. E-mail: dennis.bamford{at}helsinki.fi.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Alaoui-Ismaili, M. H., M. Hamel, L. L'Heureux, O. Nicolas, D. Bilimoria, P. Labonte, S. Mounir, and R. F. Rando. 2000. The hepatitis C virus NS5B RNA-dependent RNA polymerase activity and susceptibility to inhibitors is modulated by metal cations. J. Hum. Virol. 3:306-316[Medline].
2. Blumenthal, T. 1980. Qbeta replicase template specificity: different templates require different GTP concentrations for initiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77:2601-2605[Abstract/Free Full Text].
3. Butcher, S. J., J. M. Grimes, E. V. Makeyev, D. H. Bamford, and D. I. Stuart. 2001. A mechanism for initiating RNA-dependent RNA polymerization. Nature 410:235-240[CrossRef][Medline].
4. Butcher, S. J., E. V. Makeyev, J. M. Grimes, D. I. Stuart, and D. H. Bamford. 2000. Crystallization and preliminary X-ray crystallographic studies on the bacteriophage phi 6 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. Acta Crystallogr. D56:1473-1475[Medline].
5. Edelhoch, H. 1967. Spectroscopic determination of tryptophan and tyrosine in proteins. Biochemistry 6:1948-1954[CrossRef][Medline].
6. Frilander, M., M. Poranen, and D. H. Bamford. 1995. The large genome segment of dsRNA bacteriophage phi 6 is the key regulator in the in vitro minus and plus strand synthesis. RNA 1:510-518[Abstract].
7. Grahn, A. M., J. Caldentey, J. K. Bamford, and D. H. Bamford. 1999. Stable packaging of phage PRD1 DNA requires adsorption protein P2, which binds to the IncP plasmid-encoded conjugative transfer complex. J. Bacteriol. 181:6689-6696[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. Hoogstraten, D., X. Qiao, Y. Sun, A. Hu, S. Onodera, and L. Mindich. 2000. Characterization of phi 8, a bacteriophage containing three double-stranded RNA genomic segments and distantly related to phi 6. Virology 272:218-224[CrossRef][Medline].
9. Kolb, V. A., E. V. Makeyev, and A. S. Spirin. 2000. Co-translational folding of a eukaryotic multidomain protein in a prokaryotic translation system. J. Biol. Chem. 275:16597-16601[Abstract/Free Full Text].
10. Koonin, E. V., A. E. Gorbalenya, and K. M. Chumakov. 1989. Tentative identification of RNA-dependent RNA polymerases of dsRNA viruses and their relationship to positive strand RNA viral polymerases. FEBS Lett. 252:42-46[CrossRef][Medline].
11. Makeyev, E. V., and D. H. Bamford. 2000. The polymerase subunit of a dsRNA virus plays a central role in the regulation of viral RNA metabolism. EMBO J. 19:6275-6284[CrossRef][Medline].
12. Makeyev, E. V., and D. H. Bamford. 2001. Primer-independent RNA sequencing with bacteriophage phi 6 RNA polymerase and chain terminators. RNA 7:774-781[Abstract].
13. Makeyev, E. V., and D. H. Bamford. 2000. Replicase activity of purified recombinant protein P2 of double-stranded RNA bacteriophage phi 6. EMBO J. 19:124-133[CrossRef][Medline].
14. Makeyev, E. V., V. A. Kolb, and A. S. Spirin. 1996. Enzymatic activity of the ribosome-bound nascent polypeptide. FEBS Lett. 378:166-170[CrossRef][Medline].
15. Mindich, L. 1999. Precise packaging of the three genomic segments of the double-stranded RNA bacteriophage phi 6. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:149-160[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Mindich, L. 1999. Reverse genetics of dsRNA bacteriophage phi 6. Adv. Virus Res. 53:341-353[Medline].
17. Mindich, L., X. Qiao, J. Qiao, S. Onodera, M. Romantschuk, and D. Hoogstraten. 1999. Isolation of additional bacteriophages with genomes of segmented double-stranded RNA. J. Bacteriol. 181:4505-4508[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. Qiao, X., J. Qiao, S. Onodera, and L. Mindich. 2000. Characterization of phi 13, a bacteriophage related to phi 6 and containing three dsRNA genomic segments. Virology 275:218-224[CrossRef][Medline].
19. Sun, J. H., S. Adkins, G. Faurote, and C. C. Kao. 1996. Initiation of (-)-strand RNA synthesis catalyzed by the BMV RNA-dependent RNA polymerase: synthesis of oligonucleotides. Virology 226:1-12[CrossRef][Medline].
20. Vidaver, A. K., R. K. Koski, and J. L. Van Etten. 1973. Bacteriophage phi 6: a lipid-containing virus of Pseudomonas phaseolicola. J. Virol. 11:799-805[Abstract/Free Full Text].
21. Zhong, W., A. S. Uss, E. Ferrari, J. Y. Lau, and Z. Hong. 2000. De novo initiation of RNA synthesis by hepatitis C virus nonstructural protein 5B polymerase. J. Virol. 74:2017-2022[Abstract/Free Full Text].


Journal of Virology, November 2001, p. 11088-11095, Vol. 75, No. 22
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.22.11088-11095.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.



This article has been cited by other articles:


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yang, H.
Right arrow Articles by Bamford, D. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yang, H.
Right arrow Articles by Bamford, D. H.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
J. Bacteriol. Mol. Cell. Biol. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
Clin. Vaccine Immunol. ALL ASM JOURNALS