This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dzuris, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Sette, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dzuris, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Sette, A.

 Previous Article  |  Next Article 

Journal of Virology, November 2001, p. 10958-10968, Vol. 75, No. 22
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.22.10958-10968.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.

Molecular Determinants of Peptide Binding to Two Common Rhesus Macaque Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Molecules

John L. Dzuris,1 John Sidney,1 Helen Horton,2 Rose Correa,1 Donald Carter,2 Robert W. Chesnut,1 David I. Watkins,2 and Alessandro Sette1,*

Epimmune, Inc., San Diego, California 92121,1 and Wisconsin Regional Primate Research Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 537152

Received 5 July 2001/Accepted 13 August 2001


    ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Major histocompatibility complex class II molecules encoded by two common rhesus macaque alleles Mamu-DRB1*0406 and Mamu-DRB*w201 have been purified, and quantitative binding assays have been established. The structural requirements for peptide binding to each molecule were characterized by testing panels of single-substitution analogs of the two previously defined epitopes HIV Env242 (Mamu-DRB1*0406 restricted) and HIV Env482 (Mamu-DRB*w201 restricted). Anchor positions of both macaque DR molecules were spaced following a position 1 (P1), P4, P6, P7, and P9 pattern. The specific binding motif associated with each molecule was distinct, but largely overlapping, and was based on crucial roles of aromatic and/or hydrophobic residues at P1, P6, and P9. Based on these results, a tentative Mamu class II DR supermotif was defined. This pattern is remarkably similar to a previously defined human HLA-DR supermotif. Similarities in binding motifs between human HLA and macaque Mamu-DR molecules were further illustrated by testing a panel of more than 60 different single-substitution analogs of the HLA-DR-restricted HA 307-319 epitope for binding to Mamu-DRB*w201 and HLA-DRB1*0101. The Mamu-DRB1*0406 and -DRB*w201 binding capacity of a set of 311 overlapping peptides spanning the entire simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) genome was also evaluated. Ten peptides capable of binding both molecules were identified, together with 19 DRB1*0406 and 43 DRB*w201 selective binders. The Mamu-DR supermotif was found to be present in about 75% of the good binders and in 50% of peptides binding with intermediate affinity but only in approximately 25% of the peptides which did not bind either Mamu class II molecule. Finally, using flow cytometric detection of antigen-induced intracellular gamma interferon, we identify a new CD4+ T-lymphocyte epitope encoded within the Rev protein of SIV.


    INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

During the last few years, great advancements have been made in the direct quantification of immune responses, as a result of increased accuracy of epitope prediction technology and the availability and widespread use of revolutionary techniques, such as intracellular cytokine staining, enzyme-linked immunospot assay, and tetramer staining (6, 34, 44). Advances in the measurement of immune responses in both murine and human systems have involved cancer and infectious disease applications. Among the areas that have benefited most are basic studies aimed at understanding disease pathogenesis and its relation to immunity. Studies of a more-applied nature have benefited as well, providing the tools for more-accurate quantitation of immunological responses elicited by various vaccine constructs and formulations (25, 48).

Because of the overall similarity of rhesus macaque and human immune systems, rhesus macaques are utilized in disease models for transplantation, AIDS, malaria, and other important human diseases (8, 19, 27, 28, 38, 39, 45, 54). Many macaque genes that encode proteins important in the immune system are similar to those of humans. As far as major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules are concerned, genes found in rhesus macaques are homologous to the HLA-A and -B genes, and accurate techniques have been developed to type particular class I alleles in macaques (9, 29). However, alleles at either the A or B locus cluster together, not with their HLA-A or -B human counterparts, suggesting that allelic lineages are not shared evolutionarily over the 35 million years separating humans and rhesus macaques (9). Peptide binding motifs specific for several common Mamu class I types have been defined (5, 14, 50), and epitopes have been identified for a number of them (2, 3, 14, 15, 17, 20, 50). Subsequently, several different tetrameric Mamu MHC/epitope complexes have been prepared for use as reagents. As a result, a number of different studies have been performed, which start to shed light on issues such as those involved in simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) mutation and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte (CTL) escape (4, 16) or in recognition of different epitopes in different phases of infection (4). At the applied level, this knowledge has been successfully utilized to monitor the immune responses elicited by various vaccine constructs and also to engineer macaque-specific epitope-based vaccines (15, 33).

By contrast, the Old World monkey species whose MHC class II has been studied most completely is the rhesus macaque. At the genetic level, an unprecedented number of different configurations of the DRB region have been detected, together with extensive allelic polymorphism of the DR beta chain (13). Although 116 Mamu-DRB alleles have been reported, just over half of the alleles have been allocated to a certain haplotype (13, 30, 36). It would thus appear that, although Mamu-DR molecules do share with human HLA-DR molecules the presence of a monomorphic alpha chain, they are also associated with an unparalleled degree of complexity, apparent at both the haplotype and allelic levels (13, 30, 36, 42, 52). Multiple methods to detect various different alleles and configurations are currently being developed (30, 36, 42).

At the molecular level, two human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Env epitopes recognized by Mamu-DRB*w201- and Mamu-DRB1*0406-restricted Th cells have been described (35). The same group has recently reported the establishment of a peptide or class II tetrameric reagent and its application to the study of class II-restricted immune responses in SIV-infected macaques (32). Geluk and coworkers have also reported another Mamu-DRB-restricted epitope, derived from HSP60 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (21).

Little is known at the level of the specific motifs recognized by Mamu class II molecules. Humans and rhesus macaques share several MHC-DRB loci and lineages, but most DRB alleles appear to be of postspeciation origin (42). Thus, it is speculated that some similarity to HLA-DRB alleles at the level of specific peptide binding motifs could exist. This speculation is also based on the recognition of an identical epitope by HLA-DRB1*0301-restricted T cells in humans and Mamu-DRB1*03-positive macaques (21).

Despite these early insights, the field has been hampered by the lack of knowledge regarding amino acid sequence motifs associated with Mamu class II molecules and of quantitative assays to measure the interaction between Mamu class II molecules and candidate epitopes. Our research group has utilized classical receptor-ligand assays based on purified MHC molecules and synthetic peptides to establish quantitative assays specific for more than 50 different murine and human MHC molecules. These assays have been utilized to define the structural motifs associated with peptide binding to the various alleles (31, 53). More recently, we have also applied this experimental strategy to the definition of motifs recognized by class I molecules derived from nonhuman primates, such as macaques and chimpanzees (7, 14). In the current study, we report for the first time the establishment of quantitative assays to measure the interaction between Mamu class II molecules and their peptide ligands and to define the structural requirements of such interactions.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Cells. RM3 cell lines transfected with Mamu-DRA and either Mamu-DRB*w201 or Mamu-DRB1*0406 cDNA were utilized as the source of rhesus macaque MHC molecules (35). RM3 is a MHC class II-negative derivative of the human Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-transformed B-LCL Raji cell line (11). Cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U (100 µg/ml) penicillin-streptomycin, and 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (FCS).

Peptides and iodine-125 labeling. Peptides were obtained as lyophilized crude products from Chiron Mimotopes (San Diego, Calif.) or synthesized at Epimmune using standard tert-butoxycarbonyl (t-Boc) or 9-fluorenylmethoxy carbonyl (F-moc) solid-phase synthesis methods as previously described (47). Peptides subsequently used as radiolabeled probes were further purified by standard high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods, and their composition was ascertained by mass spectrometry analysis. Peptides were stored in stock solutions at either 10 or 20 mg/ml in 100% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) and then diluted to required concentrations with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). HPLC-purified peptides were radiolabeled with 125I according to the chloramine-T method (23).

Individual 15-mer peptides overlapping by 5 amino acids were synthesized according to the predicted amino acid sequences of SIVmac239 (GenBank accession no. M33262).

Affinity purification of Mamu-DR molecules. Mamu class II molecules were purified from cell lysates using affinity chromatography as previously described (22, 49). Mamu-DRB1*0406 and -DRB*w201 were captured using Sepharose CL-4B beads conjugated with the anti-HLA-DR antibody LB3.1 (ATCC 422). The LB3.1 antibody was determined to be cross-reactive with Mamu-DR by flow cytometry (data not shown). After the cell lysates were passed over the column, macaque class II DRB*w201 and DRB1*0406 molecules were eluted and concentrated. Protein purity and concentration and effectiveness of depletion steps were monitored by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).

Class II peptide binding assay. Quantitative assays for the binding of peptides to soluble Mamu-DRB1*0406 and Mamu-DRB*w201 molecules was based on the inhibition of binding of a radiolabeled standard probe peptide. These assays were performed using the same protocol described for the measurement of peptide binding to HLA class II molecules (49). The radiolabeled probe used in the Mamu-DRB*w201 binding assays was the Y486right-arrowF analog of the previously described Mamu-DRB*w201-restricted T-helper cell epitope HIV Env 482-497 (ELYKYKVVKIEPLGVA) (35). The radiolabeled probe used in the Mamu-DRB1*0406 binding assays was an analog of the HIV Env 242-262 (VSTVQCTHGIRPVVSTQLLL; Y addition at the C terminus) Mamu-DRB1*0406-restricted T-helper cell epitope (35). In preliminary experiments, the titers of rhesus macaque MHC preparations were determined in the presence of fixed amounts of radiolabeled peptide to determine the concentration of class II molecules necessary to bind 10 to 20% of the total radioactivity. All subsequent competitive inhibition and direct binding assays were then performed using these class II concentrations.

For competitive-inhibition assays, a dose range (0.001 to 100 nM) of unlabeled competitor peptide was coincubated with 1 to 10 nM 125I-radiolabeled probe and the MHC for 48 h at room temperature.

All assays were done in PBS containing 0.05% Nonidet P-40 (NP-40) and in the presence of a protease inhibitor mixture. The final concentrations of protease inhibitors were 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), 1.3 nM 1,10-phenanthroline, 73 mM pepstatin A, 8 mM EDTA, 6 mM N-ethylmaleimide, and 200 mM Nalpha -p-tosyl-L-lysine chloromethyl ketone (TLCK). Assays were performed at pH 7.0. Class II peptide complexes were separated from free peptide by gel filtration on TSK200 columns (Tosohaas, Montgomeryville, Pa.).

Class II peptide complexes were also separated from free peptide in some assays using TopCount microplate scintillation counting technology. A 96-well Optiplate (Packard Instrument Co., Meriden, Conn.) was precoated for 24 h at room temperature with 100 µl of LB3.1 antibody per well (30 µg/ml in PBS). Plates were then blocked for 24 h at room temperature with 250 µl of 0.3% NP-40 in PBS per well. Blocking solution was removed, and class II peptide complexes were transferred to and allowed to bind to the antibody-coated Optiplate for 3 to 4 h at room temperature. Unbound material was removed, and plates were washed once with PBS (250 µl/well). To each well was then added 100 µl of Microscint 20 scintillation fluid (Packard). Radioactivity was quantified using a TopCount Scintillation detector (Packard). The fraction of MHC-bound peptide was then calculated as previously described (23).

The concentration of peptide yielding 50% inhibition of the binding of the radiolabeled probe peptide (IC50) was then calculated. Under the conditions used in these assays, where the concentration of label was less than the concentration of MHC and IC50 was greater than or equal to the concentration of MHC, the measured IC50s are reasonable approximations of the true Kd values. Each peptide was tested in two or three independent experiments, and all different replicate observations were contained in a threefold range. For assays that utilized the TopCount microplate scintillation counting, IC50s were calculated relative to the IC50 achieved by the indicator peptide tested by HPLC. For a positive control, in each experiment the unlabeled version of the radiolabeled probe was tested.

Peptide pools and antibodies for intracellular staining. Peptides, 15 amino acids in length, overlapping by 11 amino acids and which spanned the entire Rev protein sequence of SIVmac239 were synthesized (Chiron Mimitopes). Peptides were divided into three pools (each peptide at 10 mg/ml in 10% DMSO-PBS) for use in intracellular staining experiments. Individual peptides were also resuspended at 1 mg/ml in 10% DMSO-PBS. Antibodies used for staining included anti-CD4-APC (clone RPA-T4), anti-CD8-PerCP (clone RPA-T8), fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated anti-gamma interferon (anti-IFN-gamma ) (IFN-gamma clone 4S.B3), and anti-CD69-PE (clone FN50) and were supplied by BD Pharmingen (San Diego, Calif.).

Intracellular staining procedure. Intracellular staining for cytokine production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) was performed on an animal (no. R93062) typed Mamu-DRB*w201 positive, which had been previously immunized with DNA constructs encoding the entire SIVmac239 genome using the Powderject gene gun. Briefly, PBMC were isolated from whole peripheral blood by Ficoll-diatrizoate density gradient centrifugation. Cells were resuspended at 5 × 106/ml in RPMI 1640 medium (Life Technologies, Grand Island, N.Y.) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Biocell Labs Inc., Rancho Dominguez, Calif.), 2 nM glutamine, 20 nM HEPES, 50 U of penicillin per ml, and 50 µg of streptomycin per ml. Anti-CD28 and anti-CD49d antibodies (BD Pharmingen) (2.5 µg/ml each) were added to the cell suspension, and cells were divided into aliquots in 200-µl volumes into microtubes (Costar; Corning Inc., Corning, N.Y). Each Rev peptide pool (1 µg of each peptide/sample) was tested in three different samples. Flu peptide (SNEGSYFI; 1 µg/sample) was used as a negative control, and staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) (10 µg/ml; Sigma) was used as a positive control. After the cells were incubated at 37°C for 1.5 h, the protein transport inhibitor brefeldin A (10 µg/ml; Sigma) was added to allow intracellular accumulation of cytokines. Samples were incubated for a further 5 h before staining. Samples were washed once with fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) buffer (2% FBS-PBS), cells were pelleted by centrifugation, and pellets were resuspended in 100 µl of FACS buffer. Cells were surface stained for CD4 and CD8 for 40 min at room temperature. Cells were washed twice with FACS buffer and fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4°C. Cells were washed once with FACS buffer and twice with 0.1% saponin-FACS buffer in order to permeabilize cell membranes. Cells were stained intracellularly for IFN-gamma and CD69 for 50 min at room temperature. Following two more washes with 0.1% saponin buffer to remove unbound antibodies, cells were resuspended in 2% paraformaldehyde and stored at 4°C until analyzed. Acquisition was performed on a FACS Caliber flow cytometer collecting 100,000 to 200,000 lymphocyte gated events per sample.


    RESULTS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Establishment of Mamu-DRB*w210 and Mamu-DRB1*0406 binding assays. Two previously identified CD4+ T-cell epitopes, HIV-1 Env 482-497 (ELYKYKVVKIEPLGVA; Mamu-DR*w201 restricted) and HIV-1 Env 242-261 (VSTVQCTHGIRPVVSTQLLL; Mamu-DRB1*0406 restricted) (35), were used to establish Mamu-DRB*w201 and Mamu-DRB1*0406-specific binding assays. Peptides were 125I radiolabeled and tested for their capacity to bind to Mamu-DRB*w201 and -DRB1*0406 molecules purified from RM3 transfectants. More specifically, a Y486right-arrowF analog of the HIV Env 482-0497 epitope was used to probe for binding to Mamu-DRB*w201, and an analog of HIV Env 242-261 with Y added to the C terminus was used to probe for Mamu-DRB1*0406 binding. A trace amount of each radiolabeled peptide was tested over a range of MHC concentrations to determine the concentration of the MHC molecules required to bind 15% of the total radioactivity (data not shown). All subsequent inhibition assays were then performed using these MHC class II concentrations.

First, to establish binding specificity, we determined whether excess unlabeled ligand would inhibit the binding of the radiolabeled probe. Inhibition curves for the interaction of HIV Env 242-261 and HIV Env 482-497 with Mamu-DRB1*0406 and -DRB*w201, respectively, are shown in Fig. 1. The IC50 for the unlabeled Env 242-261 epitope and Mamu-DRB1*0406 was determined to be 3.3 nM (Fig. 1a), while the IC50 for Env 482-497 epitope Mamu-DRB*w201 binding was 4.9 nM (Fig. 1b). These results are in good agreement with IC50s detected for other epitopes binding to their restriction element in humans (53). By contrast, unrelated control peptide derived from integrin beta 3 did not inhibit either assay, when tested at concentrations up to 3 µM. In conclusion, these results illustrate the establishment of sensitive binding assays, specific for Mamu-DRB1*0406 and -DRB*w201.


View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 1.   Dose-dependent inhibition of binding to rhesus macaque MHC class II molecules by excess unlabeled peptide. (a) Hiv Env 242-261 (solid triangles) was used to inhibit radiolabeled Hiv Env 242-261 binding to Mamu-DRB1*0406. (b) Hiv Env482-501 (solid triangles) was used to inhibit radiolabeled Hiv Env 482-501 analog binding to Mamu-DRB*w201. The unrelated peptide (open triangles) integrin beta 3 (YAWASDEALPLGSPR) served as a negative control for both experiments depicted. Dotted lines indicate concentration of peptide needed to achieve 50% inhibition of binding of the radiolabelled peptide.

Binding capacity of human and rhesus macaque class II-restricted epitopes. Next, the newly established assays were utilized to probe the binding capacity of a panel of known epitopes restricted by either macaque (Mamu) or human (HLA)-DR molecules (Table 1). We found that the Mamu-DRB1*0406-restricted epitope HIV gp120.242-261 bound its relevant restriction element with 3.3 nM affinity and with more than a 100-fold-less affinity to the other Mamu-DR molecule tested (408 nM; Mamu-DR*w201). Conversely, the two Mamu-DRB*w201 epitopes tested bound their known restricting element with good affinity (4.9 to 33 nM). Binding to Mamu-DRB1*0406 of the same Mamu-DRB*w201 epitopes was either weak (237 nM for the HIV gp120.482-497 epitope) or undetectable (IC50 >=  5,000 nM for the SIV Gag 260-274 epitope). Two epitopes (MBP29-48 and HSP65.3-13) which are restricted by other Mamu-DR molecules did not bind at all to Mamu-DRB1*0406 and Mamu-DR*w201. These data demonstrate that, as in the case of class II molecules derived from other species, Mamu class II peptide binding is allele specific and that the specificity correlates with known restrictions. They also illustrate that the two different Mamu-DR molecules exhibit some degree of cross-reactivity. This is not completely surprising because these two molecules share monomorphic alpha chains, and extensive beta-chain homologies. A similar phenomenon has also been noted for both murine and human class II molecules encoded by the same allelic locus (24, 41, 46, 51, 55).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 1.   Specificity of peptide binding to Mamu-DRB1*0406 and DRB*w201

Next, rhesus macaque DR molecules were also tested for their ability to bind known HLA-DR-restricted epitopes. The pan-HLA-DR epitope PADRE (1) bound to both Mamu-DRB1*0406 and Mamu-DRB*w201 with affinities of 121 and 9.4 nM, respectively. Detectable affinities for Mamu-DRB*w201 were also measured for the three promiscuous human HLA-DR-restricted epitopes HCV-1 NS3 1248-1261, HA*307-319, and TT830-849 (10, 12, 40, 43, 49). By contrast, two other natural ligands of human HLA class II molecules, which are not promiscuous but rather selective binders, did not bind to either one of the two Mamu-DR molecules tested. These data suggest that rhesus macaque and human HLA class II molecules can have overlapping binding specificities.

Definition of core binding regions of HIV Env 242-261 and Env 482-497. Next, we analyzed the core regions of HIV Env 242-261 and Env 482-497 crucial for binding to Mamu-DRB1*0406 and -DRB*w201, respectively. A series of N- and C-terminal truncation analogs of the HIV Env 242-261 and Env 482-497 peptides were synthesized and tested for their ability to inhibit binding of the radiolabeled indicator peptides to Mamu-DRB1*0406 and -DRB*w201, respectively (Table 2).

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 2.   Definition of the core binding region for rhesus macaque MHC class II Mamu-DRB1*0406 and -Mamu-DRB*w201

In the case of Mamu-DRB1*0406, removal of the first six residues from the N terminus of the HIV Env 242-261 peptide did not significantly alter the ability to bind this macaque class II molecule, while removal of the T248 residue resulted in a decrease in binding capacity of approximately 50-fold. No significant change was noted upon removal of H249 and G250, but removal of I251 led to a complete loss of activity. Removal of the first two leucine residues at the C-terminal L260 and L261 resulted in a 20-fold or more decrease in the binding capacity. Further removal of the L259 residue led to complete loss of binding capacity. These results suggest that the residues crucial for Mamu-DRB1*0406 binding are contained within the core binding region IRPVVSTQL (HIV Env 251-259).

In the case of Mamu-DRB*w201, removal of the first four N-terminal residues had no appreciable effect on the binding capacity of the peptides (Table 2). Removal of the subsequent residue, Y486, resulted in a greater than 200-fold drop in affinity for MHC binding. Similarly, C-terminal truncations revealed that the removal of the last three residues had no appreciable effect. Removal of the next residue, L494, led to a drop in binding affinity that was greater than 200-fold. These results indicate that the residues crucial for DRB*w201 binding are contained within the core region 486-494 (YKVVKIEPL). The identification of this core binding region for Mamu-DRB*w201 correlates with a previous study identifying the same nine amino acids as the minimal epitope able to be presented to T cells in a proliferation assay (35).

Definition of HIV Env 248-261 residues involved in Mamu-DRB1*0406 binding. In order to determine which residues within the HIV Env 248-261 epitope are crucial for interaction with Mamu-DRB1*0406, single-amino-acid-substitution analogs of the residues contained within the core binding regions (and adjacent amino acids) were synthesized and tested for their binding. Four to nine different substitutions were introduced at each position, and the effects of conservative, semiconservative, and nonconservative substitutions were investigated. We defined main anchor positions as those associated with at least a 10-fold reduction in binding capacity for the majority of analogs tested. The results of this analysis are shown in Fig. 2a. Significant effects can be seen with substitutions at I251, V254, S256, T257, and L259. In position 251, a negative-charged residue (E) and a positive-charged residue (K) were not tolerated, displaying 80- to 100-fold reductions in relative binding. Additionally, an N substitution resulted in a >200-fold reduction in binding capacity. Hydrophobic or aromatic residues (L, M, and F) were well tolerated at this position.


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 2.   Definition of epitope residues crucial for binding to rhesus macaque MHC class II molecules. (a) Relative binding of single-amino-acid-substituted analogs of Hiv Env 248-262 (THGIRPVVSTQLLL) to Mamu-DRB1*0406, normalized to the binding of the unsubstituted peptide (3.3 nM). (b) Relative binding of single-amino-acid-substituted analogs of Hiv Env 482-497 (ELYKYKVVKIEPLGVA) to Mamu-DRB*w201, normalized to the binding of the unsubstituted peptide (4.9 nM). The dashed line denotes a 10-fold reduction in binding compared with that of the unsubstituted peptide.

Other residues critical to the capacity of HIV Env 248-261 to bind Mamu-DRB1*0406 include V254 and S256. All substitutions tested at the V254 position resulted in reduced binding capacities. Charged residues (E and K) resulted in a 20- to 40-fold reduction in binding capacity, as the binding of the L- and N-substituted peptides was reduced 10-fold. A four- to sixfold reduction in binding was noted for the remainder of the peptides with substitutions at this position. At the S256 position, five of the seven substitutions resulted in >10-fold reduction in binding affinity. The conserved T substitution at this position was the only substitution that was well tolerated, displaying a fourfold increase in binding capacity.

Reductions in peptide binding of greater than 10-fold can also be seen at the T257 and L259 positions. Charged residues (E and K) were not well tolerated at the T257 position and were associated with 30- to 100-fold reductions in binding capacity. Additionally, a C substitution at this position caused a 30-fold reduction in binding affinity for Mamu-DRB1*0406. Finally, at the L259 position, an N substitution resulted in an 80-fold reduction in binding, and charged residues (E and K) reduced the binding by 15- to 20-fold.

In summary, the results of the single-substitution analogs of the Mamu-DRB1*0406 epitope show that the majority of substitutions at the V254, S256, and L259 residues reduced the binding affinity greater than 10-fold, indicating these residues are crucial for Mamu-DRB*0406 binding capacity. Additionally, three of the seven substitutions at both I251 and T257 were not tolerated, suggesting that these residues may also play a critical role in Mamu-DRB1*0406 peptide binding.

Structural requirements of epitope binding to Mamu-DRB*w201. A similar analysis was performed next to characterize HIV Env 484-495 binding to Mamu-DRB*w201. The Y486, V489, and L494 residues were found to play a critical role in binding capacity (Fig. 2b). Four of the five substitutions at L494 resulted in 15- to 30-fold reductions in binding capacity. Aromatic residues (Y and F) appear to be preferred at this position. It was found that substituting the small residue G or the charged residues E and K at the V489 position resulted in 10- to 15-fold reductions in binding capacity. All of the substitutions for L494 resulted in decreased binding affinity, ranging from 15- to 600-fold decrease in relative binding affinity. A reduction in the relative binding affinity of analogs with substitutions of charged residues (H and K) was also observed at the I491 residue.

In the next series of experiments, we further studied the structural features of peptide binding to Mamu-DRB*w201, by taking advantage of the fact that the human HA 307-319 epitope also binds Mamu-DR*w201 with an affinity of 29 nM (Table 1). A panel of single-amino-acid-substituted analogs of the HA 307-319 epitope has previously been used by our laboratory for similar peptide binding motif analysis of HLA-DR molecules (40). This same panel of analogs was tested for their ability to bind Mamu-DRB*w201 (Fig. 3a). The most crucial residues in the HA 307-319 peptide in determining the Mamu-DRB*w201 binding motif were Y309 and L317. All the semi- and nonconservative substitutions for the Y309 resulted in a 50- to 10,000-fold reduction in relative binding capacity. In the L317 position, five of the seven substitutions tested resulted in >10-fold reduction in relative binding capacity (40- to 1,400-fold range). Less striking but still significant effects were also detected at positions V310, T314, and L315. Substitution of a negative-charged residue (E) was not tolerated at V310 or T314 with 30- to 40-fold reductions in relative binding, respectively. Additionally, substitution of a positive-charged residue (K) was not tolerated at position T314, showing a similar reduction in binding. Substitution with alanine at L315 led to a 20-fold decrease in binding affinity.


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 3.   (a) Relative binding of single-amino-acid-substituted analogs of HA 307-319 (PKYVKQNTLKLAT) to HLA-DR1, normalized to the binding of the unsubstituted peptide (4.3 nM). (b) Relative binding of single-amino-acid-substituted analogs of HA 307-319 to Mamu-DRB*w201, normalized to the binding of the unsubstituted peptide (29 nM). The dashed line denotes a 10-fold reduction in binding compared with that of the unsubstituted peptide.

Interestingly, the binding patterns of HA 307-319 analogs closely resembled the pattern previously noted when the same peptides when tested for binding to HLA-DR1 molecules (Fig. 3b). In the case of DR1, Y309, Q312, T314, L315, and L317 act as anchor residues. These results are similar to data published previously (40).

A general Mamu-DR motif. The data presented above suggest that the Mamu-DRB1*0406 binding motif is based on a preference for a hydrophobic or aromatic anchor residue in position 1 (P1), and other primary and secondary analogs located at P4, P6, P7, and P9. Mamu-DR*w201 is associated with a similar, yet clearly distinct, binding specificity also associated with P1, P4, P6, P7, and P9. These two binding motifs are very similar to the previously described HLA-DR binding motifs (40 to 41), which are also characterized by a P1-P4-P6-P7-P9 spacing of anchor residues. Human and macaque binding motifs are similar not only in their general anchor spacing but also in anchor specificity, as illustrated by the remarkable similarity of the binding patterns of HA 307-319 analogs to human HLA-DR*0101 and macaque Mamu-DR*w201.

Previous studies have defined a general HLA-DR supermotif based on the presence of three main anchors at P1, P6, and P9 (26, 40, 49). The data presented above suggest that a similar general motif might be extended to macaque Mamu-DR and that an overlap in peptide binding repertoire exists between rhesus macaque and human MHC class II molecules. We hypothesized that a general Mamu-DR peptide binding motif may be defined as L, I, V, M, A, F, Y, and W at P1 of the core binding region of the peptide; L, I, V, M, F, Y, S, T, Q, and A at P6; and L, I, V, M, F, and Q at P9. Differences in fine specificity at these anchors, as well as at the other P4 and P7 anchor positions would modulate allelic specificity.

Identification of SIVmac239-derived Mamu-DRB1*0406 and -DRB*w201 peptides. To test this hypothesis and to identify peptide ligands derived from SIV proteins that could represent candidate Mamu-DR epitopes, we investigated the binding of a set of overlapping peptides spanning the entire predicted amino acid sequences from SIVmac239. A total of 311 peptides (20-mers overlapping by 5 amino acids) were synthesized and tested for binding to Mamu-DRB1*0406 and -DRB*w201 (Table 3). At peptide concentrations of 1 to 1,000 nM, of the 311 peptides, 10 peptides bound both DR molecules and 239 peptides did not bind either Mamu-DR molecule. A total of 62 peptides (19 for peptides that did not bind to Mamu-DRB*w201 and 43 for peptides that did not bind to Mamu-DRB1*0406) bound only one of the molecules. Thus, concordant results were observed in (239 + 10)/311 = 80.1% of the cases (P = 0.0094). These results demonstrate that, as anticipated from the single-substitution data, a large overlap exists in peptide binding specificity between the two different Mamu-DR molecules studied. Conversely, it should also be noted that the majority of Mamu-DR binders were selective binders, in that they bound only one of the two molecules tested, thus illustrating the crucial influence of DR polymorphism on peptide binding specificity.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 3.   SIV-derived overlapping 15-mer peptide binding to Mamu-DRB*w201 and Mamu-DRB1*0406

Finally, the data were also inspected for a correlation between the presence of the putative Mamu-DR motif and Mamu-DR binding. In terms of predictability, it was noted that a total of 72 of 102 (72%) of motif-carrying peptides bound one DR molecule or both (Table 4). In general, for both Mamu-DR*w201 and -DRB1*0406, more than 75% of good binders (IC50 <=  100 nM) carried the motif, while a little over 50% of intermediate binders and 25% of nonbinders also carried the same motif (P = 8 × 10-7). These results highlight the significance of the proposed motif but also support the notion that additional criteria might be defined to allow for definition of more-stringent, allele-specific motifs associated with the different Mamu-DR molecules.

                              
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		TABLE 4.   Presence of the putative Mamu-DRB peptide binding motif in SIV-derived overlapping 15-mer peptides

Identification of a novel SIV-derived epitope. Based on the results described above, we tested three pools of peptides containing 15-mers, overlapping by five amino acids, spanning the entire Rev protein sequence of SIVmac239 for their capacity to induce IFN-gamma production from PBMC of Mamu-DRB*w201-positive macaques vaccinated with the entire SIVmac239 genome. Fresh PBMC were incubated with brefeldin A in the presence of mitogenic or antigen-specific stimulation and stained for CD4, CD69, and IFN-gamma . The expression of the CD69 lymphocyte activation molecule and the production of IFN-gamma from the CD4 gated population of lymphocytes is shown in Fig. 4. PBMC from this animal responded to both Rev pools A and B (Fig. 4a). For controls, the treatment of cells with a nonspecific Flu peptide (SNEGSYFI) did not induce the production of IFN-gamma , whereas the SEB positive-control mitogen induced very strong production of IFN-gamma . When peptides within Rev pool A were tested individually using the same intracellular staining procedure (Fig. 4b), Rev peptides 3 and 4 did induce production of IFN-gamma . These two peptides contain an overlapping peptide (RKRLRLIHLLHQT) which had been shown to bind to Mamu-DRB*w201 in the binding assays with an IC50 of 34 nM. These results indicate that CD4+ lymphocytes in a SIV-vaccinated macaque are functionally active and capable of responding to the RKRLRLIHLLHQT peptide through the production of intracellular IFN-gamma .


View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		FIG. 4.   Intracellular staining performed on PBMC of a Mamu-DRB*w201-positive macaque immunized with DNA constructs encoding the entire SIV genome. Plots show events gated through both CD4+ and lymphocyte gates. (a) Three pools containing 15-mer peptides overlapping by 11 amino acids spanning the entire Rev protein sequence of SIVmac239. (b) Peptides from Rev pool A tested individually. Bold type in peptide sequence indicates a peptide which had been predicted to bind Mamu-DRB*w201 in binding assays.


    DISCUSSION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

Herein, we report establishment of molecular binding assays for two common rhesus macaque class II molecules, Mamu-DRB*w201 and -DRB1*0406. These assays allowed us to probe the peptide binding characteristics of these two molecules and to establish prominent structural requirements for these interactions. Based on these results, a putative motif associated with Mamu-DR binding peptides was proposed. The relevance of this motif was tested with a set of overlapping peptides spanning the entire SIV genome. The biological relevance of this analysis was highlighted by the demonstration of recall IFN-gamma production from CD4+ lymphocytes in Mamu-DRB*w201-positive macaques directed against one Mamu-DRB*w201 binder. Our report is the first to describe quantitative molecular assays to study peptide interactions with the Mamu MHC class II molecules expressed by rhesus macaques. The MHC class II complex of macaques is relatively diverse, with a large number of active duplicated genes, each associated with a discrete but limited set of polymorphisms. The availability of assays to evaluate the binding function of these class II molecules and the elucidation of their complex genetic organization should allow for an increased understanding of their biological functions.

The availability of these assays allowed the definition of structural requirements of the interactions of the two molecules Mamu-DRB*w201 and -DRB1*0406. In both cases, the residues important for peptide binding were spaced according to a P1, P4, P6, P7, and P9 pattern, with P1, P6, and P9 being the main anchors. P1 was most crucial for B1*0406, while P9 was the most important for B*w0201. The preferred side chains for the various anchor positions varied for the two molecules but were in general hydrophobic or aromatic in nature. As a result of similarities in their binding preferences, a significant overlap was also demonstrated in the peptide binding repertoire of the two Mamu-DR molecules, and a putative Mamu-DR motif was defined.

It was noted that the general spacing of anchor residues and peptide binding of the two Mamu-DR molecules studied are remarkably similar to those of the general motif recognized by human HLA-DR molecules, previously described in detail by other studies (12, 40, 49). This finding raises the possibility that similar epitopes might be recognized by humans and other primates, thus facilitating the design and testing of epitope-based vaccines destined for human use. The notion of some limited cross-reactivity between human- and macaque-derived DR molecules was demonstrated by the observation that certain epitopes, known to be promiscuous binders to several HLA-DR molecules, were also shown to bind Mamu-DR molecules.

As mentioned above, the current set of experiments led to the definition of a general Mamu-DR motif. Seventy-two percent of motif-carrying peptides bound either Mamu-DRB1*0406, -DRB*w201, or both. Further experiments will test whether the motif described herein is predictive of binding capacity to other common DR alleles. More-comprehensive analysis will also allow a more-precise definition of the allele-specific motifs associated with each individual Mamu-DR molecule.

Finally, our analysis has mapped a number of SIV-derived peptides which bind the two Mamu-DR molecules studied. The results of experiments with PBMC derived from SIV-vaccinated macaques have directly demonstrated that at least one SIV-derived peptide is recognized by helper T-lymphocyte responses in the course of natural infection. We anticipate that the availability of well-defined epitopes will allow exact quantitation of class II-restricted responses in disease models that utilize rhesus macaques (10-13). As in the case of class I responses, this should in turn expand our knowledge and understanding of immune functions, directly applicable to development of vaccines for human use.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work is supported in part by NIH grants 2 R44 AI38081-03 (to R.W.C.), R01 A141913, R01 AI48238-01, and R21 AI45461 (to D.I.W.), and RR00167 (to the Wisconsin Regional Primate Research Center). This work was also supported in part by NIH NIAID contract N01-AI-95362. D.I.W. is an Elizabeth Glaser Scientist.

We thank Norman L. Letvin and Marcelo J. Kuroda for the generous gift of the Mamu-DR-transfected RM3 cell lines. The expert secretarial assistance of Robin Delp is gratefully acknowledged.


    FOOTNOTES

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Epimmune Inc., 5820 Nancy Ridge Dr., San Diego, CA 92121. Phone: (858) 860-2500. Fax: (858) 860-2600. E-mail: asette{at}epimmune.com.


    REFERENCES
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

1. Alexander, J., J. Sidney, S. Southwood, J. Ruppert, C. Oseroff, A. Maewal, K. Snoke, H. M. Serra, R. T. Kubo, A. Sette, et al. 1994. Development of high potency universal DR-restricted helper epitopes by modification of high affinity DR-blocking peptides. Immunity 1:751-761[CrossRef][Medline].
2. Allen, T. M., and D. I. Watkins. 1998. SIV and SHIV CTL epitopes identified in macaques, p. IV 8-13. In B. Korber (ed.), HIV molecular immunology database 1998. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, N.Mex. [Online.] http://hiv-web.lanl.gov/immunology.
3. Allen, T. M., B. R. Mothe, J. Sidney, P. Jing, J. L. Dzuris, M. E. Liebl, T. U. Vogel, D. H. O'Connor, X. Wang, M. C. Wussow, J. A. Thomson, J. D. Altman, D. I. Watkins, and A. Sette. 2001. CD8+ lymphocytes from simian immunodeficiency virus-infected rhesus macaques recognize 14 different epitopes bound by the major histocompatibility complex class I molecule Mamu-A*01: implications for vaccine design and testing. J. Virol. 75:738-749[Abstract/Free Full Text].
4. Allen, T. M., D. H. O'Connor, B. R. Mothe, M. E. Liebl, P. Jing, J. L. Dzuris, C. Emerson, N. Wilson, K. J. Kuntsman, X. Wang, R. C. Desrosiers, J. D. Altman, S. M. Wolinsky, A. Sette, and D. I. Watkins. 2000. Robust Tat-specific CD8 responses select for escape variants during the acute phase of infection with cloned SIV. Nature 407:386-390[CrossRef][Medline].
5. Allen, T. M., J. Sidney, M. F. Del Guercio, R. L. Glickman, G. L. Lensmeyer, D. A. Wiebe, R. Demars, C. D. Pauza, R. P. Johnson, A. Sette, and D. I. Watkins. 1998. Characterization of the peptide binding motif of a rhesus MHC class I molecule (Mamu-A*01) that binds an immunodominant CTL epitope from simian immunodeficiency virus. J. Immunol. 160:6062-6071[Abstract/Free Full Text].
6. Altman, J. D., P. A. H. Moss, P. J. R. Goulder, D. H. Barouch, M. G. McHeyzer-Williams, J. I. Bell, A. J. McMichael, and M. M. Davis. 1998. Phenotypic analysis of antigen-specific T lymphocytes. Science 274:94-96[Abstract/Free Full Text].
7. Bertoni, R., A. Sette, J. Sidney, L. G. Guidotti, M. Shapiro, R. Purcell, and F. V. Chisari. 1998. Human class I supertypes and CTL repertoires extend to chimpanzees. J. Immunol. 161:4447-4455[Abstract/Free Full Text].
8. Borleffs, J. C., R. L. Marquet, Z. de By-Aghai, W. van Vreeswijk, P. Neuhaus, and H. Balner. 1982. Kidney transplantation in rhesus monkeys. Matching for D/DR antigens, pretransplant blood transfusions, and immunological monitoring before transplantation. Transplantation 33:285-290[Medline].
9. Boyson, J. E., C. Shufflebotham, L. F. Cadavid, J. A. Urvater, L. A. Knapp, A. L. Hughes, and D. I. Watkins. 1996. The MHC class I genes of the rhesus monkey. Different evolutionary histories of MHC class I and class II genes in primates. J. Immunol. 156:4656-4665[Abstract].
10. Busch, R., G. Strang, K. Howland, and J. B. Rothbard. 1990. Degenerate binding of immunogenic peptides to HLA-DR proteins on B cell surfaces. Int. Immunol. 2:443-451[Abstract/Free Full Text].
11. Calman, A. F., and B. M. Peterlin. 1987. Mutant human B cell lines deficient in class II major histocompatibility complex transcription. J. Immunol. 139:2489-2495[Abstract].
12. Diepolder, H. M., J. Gerlach, R. Zachoval, R. M. Hoffman, M. Jung, E. A. Wierenga, S. Scholz, T. Santantonio, M. Houghton, S. Southwood, A. Sette, and G. R. Pape. 1997. Immunodominant CD4+ T-cell epitope within nonstructural protein 3 in acute hepatitis C virus infection. J. Virol. 71:6011-6019[Abstract].
13. Doxiadis, G. G., N. Otting, N. G. de Groot, R. Noort, and R. E. Bontrop. 2000. Unprecedented polymorphism of MHC-DRB region configurations in rhesus macaques. J. Immunol. 164:3193-3199[Abstract/Free Full Text].
14. Dzuris, J. L., J. Sidney, E. Appella, R. W. Chesnut, D. I. Watkins, and A. Sette. 2000. Conserved MHC class I peptide binding motif between humans and rhesus macaques. J. Immunol. 164:283-291[Abstract/Free Full Text].
15. Egan, M. A., M. J. Kuroda, G. Voss, J. E. Schmitz, W. A. Charini, C. I. Lord, M. A. Forman, and N. L. Letvin. 1999. Use of major histocompatibility complex class I/peptide/beta 2M tetramers to quantitate CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific for dominant and nondominant viral epitopes in simian-human immunodeficiency virus-infected rhesus monkeys. J. Virol. 73:5466-5472[Abstract/Free Full Text].
16. Evans, D. T., D. H. O'Conner, P. Jing, J. L. Dzuris, J. Sydney, J. da Silva, T. M. Allen, H. Horton, J. E. Venham, R. Rudersdorf, C. D. Pauza, R. E. Bontrop, R. DeMars, A. Sette, A. L. Hughes, and D. I. Watkins. 1999. Virus-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses select for amino-acid variation in simian immunodeficiency virus Env and Nef. Nat. Med. 5:1270-1276[CrossRef][Medline].
17. Evans, D. T., P. Jing, T. M. Allen, D. H. O'Connor, H. Horton, J. E. Venham, M. Piekarczyk, J. L. Dzuris, M. Dykuzen, J. Mitchen, R. A. Rudersdorf, C. D. Pauza, A. Sette, R. E. Bontrop, R. DeMars, and D. I. Watkins. 2000. Definition of five new simian immunodeficiency virus cytotoxic T-lymphocyte epitopes and their restricting major histocompatibility complex class I molecules: evidence for an influence on disease progression. J. Virol. 74:7400-7410[Abstract/Free Full Text].
18. Falk, K., O. Rotzschke, S. Stevanovic, G. Jung, and H. G. Rammensee. 1994. Protein pool sequencing of natural HLA-DR, DQ, and DP ligands reveals detailed peptide motifs, constraints of processing, and general rules. Immunogenetics 39:230-242[CrossRef][Medline].
19. Fujioka, H., P. Millet, Y. Maeno, S. Nakazawa, Y. Ito, R. J. Howard, W. E. Collins, and M. Aikawa. 1994. A nonhuman primate model for human cerebral malaria: rhesus monkeys experimentally infected with Plasmodium fragile. Exp. Parasitol. 78:371-376[CrossRef][Medline].
20. Furchner, M., A. L. Erickson, T. M. Allen, D. I. Watkins, A. Sette, P. R. Johnson, and C. M. Walker. 1999. The simian immunodeficiency virus envelope glycoprotein contains two epitopes presented by the Mamu-A*01 class I molecule. J. Virol. 73:8035-8039[Abstract/Free Full Text].
21. Geluk, A., D. G. Elferink, B. L. Slierendregt, K. E. van Meijgaarden, R. R. P. de Vries, T. H. M. Ottenhoff, and R. E. Bontrop. 1993. Evolutionary conservation of major histocompatibility complex-DR/peptide/T cell interactions in primates. J. Exp. Med. 177:979-987[Abstract/Free Full Text].
22. Gorga, J. C., V. Horejsi, D. R. Johnson, R. Raghupathy, and J. L. Strominger. 1987. Purification and characterization of class II histocompatibility antigens from a homozygous human B cell line. J. Biol. Chem. 262:16087-16094[Abstract/Free Full Text].
23. Greenwood, F., W. Hunter, and J. Glover. 1963. The preparation of 131-I-labelled human growth hormone of high specific radioactivity. Biochem. J. 89:114-119[Medline].
24. Hammer, J., P. Valsasnini, K. Tolba, D. Bolin, J. Higelin, B. Takacs, and F. Sinigaglia. 1993. Promiscuous and allele-specific anchors in HLA-DR-binding peptides. Cell 74:197-203[CrossRef][Medline].
25. Hanke, T., R. V. Samuel, T. J. Blanchard, V. C. Neumann, T. M. Allen, J. E. Boyson, S. A. Sharpe, N. Cook, G. L. Smith, D. I. Watkins, M. P. Cranage, and A. J. McMichael. 1999. Effective induction of simian immunodeficiency virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in macaques by using a multiepitope gene and DNA prime-modified vaccinia virus Ankara boost vaccination regimen. J. Virol. 73:7524-7532[Abstract/Free Full Text].
26. Hill, C. M., A. Liu, K. W. Marshall, J. Mayer, B. Jorgensen, B. Yuan, R. M. Cubbon, E. A. Nichols, L. S. Wicker, and J. B. Rothbard. 1994. Exploration of requirements for peptide binding to HLA DRB1*0101 and DRB1*0401. J. Immunol. 152:2890-2898[Abstract].
27. Hulskotte, E. G., A. M. Geritti, and A. D. Osterhaus. 1998. Towards an HIV-1 vaccine: lessons from studies in macaque models. Vaccine 16:904-915[CrossRef][Medline].
28. Kirk, A. D., L. C. Burkly, D. S. Batty, R. E. Baumgartner, J. D. Berning, K. Buchanan, J. H. Fechner, Jr., R. L. Germond, R. L. Kampen, N. B. Patterson, S. J. Swanson, D. K. Tadaki, C. N. TenHoor, L. White, S. J. Knechtle, and D. M. Harlan. 1999. Treatment with humanized monoclonal antibody against CD154 prevents acute renal allograft rejection in nonhuman primates. Nat. Med. 5:686-693[CrossRef][Medline].
29. Knapp, L. A., E. Lehmann, M. S. Piekarczyk, J. A. Urvater, and D. I. Watkins. 1997. A high frequency of Mamu-A*01 in the rhesus macaque detected by polymerase chain reaction with sequence-specific primers and direct sequencing. Tissue Antigens 50:657-661[Medline].
30. Knapp, L. A., L. F. Cadavid, M. E. Eberle, S. J. Knechtle, R. E. Bontrop, and D. I. Watkins. 1997. Identification of new Mamu-DRB alleles using DGGE and direct sequencing. Immunogenetics 45:171-179[CrossRef][Medline].
31. Krieger, J. I., R. W. Karr, H. M. Grey, Y. Wei-Yuan, D. O'Sullivan, L. Batovsky, Z. Zhong-Li, S. M. Colon, F. C. A. Gaeta, J. Sidney, M. Albertson, M. F. del Guercio, R. W. Chesnut, and A. Sette. 1991. Single amino acid changes in DR and antigen define residues critical for peptide-MHC binding and T cell recognition. J. Immunol. 146:2331-2340[Abstract].
32. Kuroda, M. J., J. E. Schmitz, C. Lekutis, C. E. Nickerson, M. A. Lifton, G. Franchini, J. M. Harhouse, C. Cheng-Mayer, and N. L. Letvin. 2000. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope epitope-specific CD4+ T lymphocytes in simian/human immunodeficiency virus-infected and vaccinated rhesus monkeys detected using a peptide-major histocompatibility complex class II tetramer. J. Virol. 74:8751-8756[Abstract/Free Full Text].
33. Kuroda, M. J., J. E. Schmitz, D. H. Barouch, A. Craiu, T. M. Allen, A. Sette, D. I. Watkins, M. A. Forman, and N. L. Letvin. 1998. Analysis of Gag-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes in simian immunodeficiency virus-infected rhesus monkeys by cell staining with a tetrameric major histocompatibility complex class I-peptide complex. J. Exp. Med. 187:1373-1381[Abstract/Free Full Text].
34. Lalvani, A., R. Brookes, S. Hambleton, W. J. Britton, A. V. Hill, and A. J. McMichael. 1997. Rapid effector function in CD8+ memory T cells. J. Exp. Med. 186:859-865[Abstract/Free Full Text].
35. Lekutis, C., and N. L. Letvin. 1997. HIV-1 envelope-specific CD4+ T helper cells from simian/human immunodeficiency virus-infected rhesus monkeys recognize epitopes restricted by MHC class II DRB1*0406 and DRB*w201 molecules. J. Immunol. 159:2049-2057[Abstract].
36. Lobashevsky, A., J. P. Smith, J. Kasten-Jolly, H. Horton, L. Knapp, R. E. Bontrop, D. I. Watkins, and J. Thomas. 1999. Identification of DRB alleles in rhesus monkeys using polymerase chain reaction-sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP) amplification. Tissue Antigens 54:254-263[CrossRef][Medline].
37. Meinl, E., B. A. Hart, R. E. Bontrop, R. M. Hoch, A. Iglesias, R. de Waal Malefyt, H. Fickenscher, I. Muller-Fleckenstein, B. Fleckenstein, H. Wekerle, R. Hohlfeld, and M. Jonker. 1995. Activation of a myelin basic protein-specific human T cell clone by antigen-presenting cells from rhesus monkeys. Int. Immunol. 7:1489-1495[Abstract/Free Full Text].
38. Millet, P., K. K. Grady, M. Olsen, G. G. Galland, J. S. Sullivan, C. L. Morris, B. B. Richardson, W. E. Collins, and R. L. Hunter. 1995. Use of the rhesus monkey as an experimental model to test the degree of efficacy of an anti-sporozoite peptide malarial vaccine candidate combined with copolymer-based adjuvants. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 52:328-335.
39. Ossevoort, M. A., J. Ringers, E. M. Kuhn, L. Boon, K. Lorre, Y. van den Hout, J. A. Bruijn, M. de Boer, M. Jonker, and P. de Waele. 1999. Prevention of renal allograft rejection in primates by blocking the B7/CD28 pathway. Transplantation 68:1010-1018[CrossRef][Medline].
40. O'Sullivan, D., T. Arrhenius, J. Sidney, M. F. del Guercio, M. Albertson, M. Wall, C. Oseroff, S. Southwood, S. M. Colon, F. C. A. Gaeta, and A. Sette. 1991. On the interaction of promiscuous antigenic peptides with different DR alleles. J. Immunol. 147:2663-2669[Abstract/Free Full Text].
41. O'Sullivan, D., J. Sidney, E. Appella, L. Walker, L. Phillips, S. M. Colon, C. Miles, R. W. Chesnut, and A. Sette. 1990. Characterization of the specificity of peptide binding to four DR haplotypes. J. Immunol. 145:1799-1808[Abstract].
42. Otting, N., N. G. de Groot, M. C. Noort, G. G. Doxiadis, and R. E. Bontrop. 2000. Allelic diversity of MHC-DRB alleles in rhesus macaques. Tissue Antigens 56:58-68[CrossRef][Medline].
43. Panina-Bordignon, P., A. Tan, A. Termijtelen, S. Demotz, G. Corradin, and A. Lanzavecchia. 1989. Universally immunogenic T cell epitopes: promiscuous binding to human MHC class II and promiscuous recognition by T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 19:2237-2242[Medline].
44. Pitcher, C. J., C. Quittner, D. M. Peterson, M. Connors, R. A. Koup, V. C. Maino, and L. J. Picker. 1999. HIV-1-specific CD4+ T cells are detectable in most individuals with active HIV-1 infection, but decline with prolonged viral suppression. Nat. Med. 5:518-525[CrossRef][Medline].
45. Rausch, D. M., E. A. Murray, and L. E. Eiden. 1999. The SIV-infected rhesus monkey model for HIV-associated dementia and implications for neurological diseases. J. Leukoc. Biol. 65:466-474[Abstract].
46. Rothbard, J. B., and W. R. Taylor. 1988. A sequence pattern common to T cell epitopes. EMBO J. 7:93-100[Medline].
47. Rupert, J., J. Sidney, E. Celis, R. T. Kubo, H. M. Grey, and A. Sette. 1993. Prominent role of secondary anchor residues in peptide binding to HLA-A2.1 molecules. Cell 74:929-937[CrossRef][Medline].
48. Seth, A., I. Ourmanov, M. J. Kuroda, J. E. Schmitz, M. W. Carroll, L. S. Wyatt, B. Moss, M. A. Forman, V. M. Hirsch, and N. L. Letvin. 1998. Recombinant modified vaccinia virus Ankara-simian immunodeficiency virus gag pol elicits cytotoxic T lymphocytes in rhesus monkeys detected by a major histocompatibility complex class I/peptide tetramer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:10112-10116[Abstract/Free Full Text].
49. Sette, A., S. Buus, S. Colon, C. Miles, and H. M. Grey. 1989. Structural analysis of peptides capable of binding to more than one Ia antigen. J. Immunol. 142:35-40[Abstract].
50. Sidney, J., J. L. Dzuris, M. I. Newman, R. P. Johnson, K. Amitinder, C. M. Walker, E. Appella, B. Mothe, D. I. Watkins, and A. Sette. 2000. Definition of the Mamu-A*01 peptide binding specificity: application to the identification of wild-type and optimized ligands from simian immunodeficiency virus regulatory proteins. J. Immunol. 165:6387-6399[Abstract/Free Full Text].
51. Sinigaglia, F., M. Guttinger, J. Kilgus, D. M. Doran, H. Matile, H. Etlinger, A. Trzeciak, D. Gillessen, and J. R. Pink. 1988. A malaria T-cell epitope recognized in association with most mouse and human MHC class II molecules. Nature 336:778-780[CrossRef][Medline].
52. Slierendregt, B. L., N. Otting, M. Jonker, and R. E. Bontrop. 1994. Gel electrophoretic analysis of rhesus macaque major histocompatibility complex class II DR molecules. Human Immunol. 40:33-40[Medline].
53. Southwood, S., J. Sidney, A. Kondo, M. F. del Guercio, E. Appella, S. Hoffman, R. T. Kubo, R. W. Chesnut, H. M. Grey, and A. Sette. 1998. Several common HLA-DR types share largely overlapping peptide binding repertoires. J. Immunol. 160:3363-3373[Abstract/Free Full Text].
54. Thomas, J. M., D. E. Eckhoff, J. L. Contreras, A. L. Lobashevsky, W. J. Hubbard, J. K. Moore, W. J. Cook, F. T. Thomas, and D. M. Neville, Jr. 2000. Durable donor-specific T and B cell tolerance in rhesus macaques induced with peritransplantation anti-CD3 immunotoxin and deoxyspergualin: absence of chronic allograft nephropathy. Transplantation 69:2497-2503[CrossRef][Medline].
55. Wall, M., S. Southwood, J. Sidney, C. Oseroff, M. F. del Guercio, A. G. Lamont, S. M. Colon, T. Arrhenius, F. C. A. Gaeta, and A. Sette. 1992. High affinity for class II molecules as a necessary but not sufficient characteristic of encephalitogenic determinants. Int. Immunol. 4:773-777[Abstract/Free Full Text].
56. Wu, S., K. Maslanka, and J. Gorski. 1997. An integrin polymorphism that defines reactivity with alloantibodies generates an anchor for MHC class II peptide binding: a model for unidirectional alloimmune responses. J. Immunol. 158:3221-3226[Abstract].

Journal of Virology, November 2001, p. 10958-10968, Vol. 75, No. 22
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0   DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.22.10958-10968.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.


This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Reynolds, M. R., Weiler, A. M., Weisgrau, K. L., Piaskowski, S. M., Furlott, J. R., Weinfurter, J. T., Kaizu, M., Soma, T., Leon, E. J., MacNair, C., Leaman, D. P., Zwick, M. B., Gostick, E., Musani, S. K., Price, D. A., Friedrich, T. C., Rakasz, E. G., Wilson, N. A., McDermott, A. B., Boyle, R., Allison, D. B., Burton, D. R., Koff, W. C., Watkins, D. I. (2008). Macaques vaccinated with live-attenuated SIV control replication of heterologous virus. JEM 205: 2537-2550 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Giraldo-Vela, J. P., Rudersdorf, R., Chung, C., Qi, Y., Wallace, L. T., Bimber, B., Borchardt, G. J., Fisk, D. L., Glidden, C. E., Loffredo, J. T., Piaskowski, S. M., Furlott, J. R., Morales-Martinez, J. P., Wilson, N. A., Rehrauer, W. M., Lifson, J. D., Carrington, M., Watkins, D. I. (2008). The Major Histocompatibility Complex Class II Alleles Mamu-DRB1*1003 and -DRB1*0306 Are Enriched in a Cohort of Simian Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Rhesus Macaque Elite Controllers. J. Virol. 82: 859-870 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • de Groot, N., Doxiadis, G. G., de Groot, N. G., Otting, N., Heijmans, C., Rouweler, A. J. M., Bontrop, R. E. (2004). Genetic Makeup of the DR Region in Rhesus Macaques: Gene Content, Transcripts, and Pseudogenes. J. Immunol. 172: 6152-6157 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Shoukry, N. H., Sidney, J., Sette, A., Walker, C. M. (2004). Conserved Hierarchy of Helper T Cell Responses in a Chimpanzee during Primary and Secondary Hepatitis C Virus Infections. J. Immunol. 172: 483-492 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
  • Alexander, J., Oseroff, C., Dahlberg, C., Qin, M., Ishioka, G., Beebe, M., Fikes, J., Newman, M., Chesnut, R. W., Morton, P. A., Fok, K., Appella, E., Sette, A. (2002). A Decaepitope Polypeptide Primes for Multiple CD8+ IFN-{gamma} and Th Lymphocyte Responses: Evaluation of Multiepitope Polypeptides as a Mode for Vaccine Delivery. J. Immunol. 168: 6189-6198 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowReprints and Permissions
Right arrow Copyright Information
Right arrow Books from ASM Press
Right arrow MicrobeWorld
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dzuris, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Sette, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dzuris, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Sette, A.

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology.   For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»