Journal of Virology, November 2001, p. 10250-10258, Vol. 75, No. 21
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.21.10250-10258.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Institute for Gene Therapy and Molecular Medicine1 and Department of Microbiology,4 Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Medical Biochemistry, Goteborg University, Goteborg, Sweden2; and Laboratory of Genetics, Salk Institute, San Diego, California3
Received 8 May 2001/Accepted 20 July 2001
| |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Productive infection by adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV) requires coinfection with a helper virus, e.g., adenovirus or herpesviruses. In the case of adenovirus coinfection, the replication machinery of the host cell performs AAV DNA replication. In contrast, it has been proposed that the herpesvirus replication machinery might replicate AAV DNA. To investigate this question, we have attempted to reconstitute AAV DNA replication in vitro using purified herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) replication proteins. We show that the HSV-1 UL5, UL8, UL29, UL30, UL42, and UL52 gene products along with the AAV Rep68 protein are sufficient to initiate replication on duplex DNA containing the AAV origins of replication, resulting in products several hundred nucleotides in length. Initiation can occur also on templates containing only a Rep binding site and a terminal resolution site. We further demonstrate that initiation of DNA synthesis can take place with a subset of these factors: Rep68 and the UL29, UL30, and UL42 gene products. Since the HSV polymerase and its accessory factor (the products of the UL30 and UL42 genes) are unable to efficiently perform synthesis by strand displacement, it is likely that in addition to creating a hairpin primer, the AAV Rep protein also acts as a helicase for DNA synthesis. The single-strand DNA binding protein (the UL29 gene product) presumably prevents reannealing of complementary strands. These results suggest that AAV can use the HSV replication apparatus to replicate its DNA. In addition, they may provide a first step for the development of a fully reconstituted AAV replication assay.
| |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adeno-associated virus type 2 (AAV), a member of the parvovirus family, contains a single-stranded genome of 4,679 bases. The genome of AAV contains two open reading frames, one coding for the replication (Rep) proteins and the other coding for the structural proteins. The Rep proteins are designated Rep78, Rep68, Rep52, and Rep40 according to their apparent molecular weights. They are produced by the use of different transcriptional start sites and splicing patterns. Either Rep68 or Rep78, both of which possess origin binding, helicase, ATPase, and strand- and site-specific nicking activities, is absolutely required for the replication of AAV DNA. The Rep proteins are the only AAV proteins involved in AAV DNA replication, necessitating that most replication functions must be provided by non-AAV proteins. The ends of the AAV genome contain identical origins of DNA replication. Each origin consists of an inverted terminal repeat (ITR) capable of complementary intrastrand base pairing to form a hairpin, thereby providing the replication apparatus with a primer terminus. The hairpin primers can be recreated indefinitely by the process called terminal resolution, which consists of site-specific nicking at the terminal resolution site (TRS), followed by strand displacement synthesis from the nick towards the end of the genome. The newly synthesized double-stranded ITR can then fold back and serve as a primer for synthesis of full-length genomes (reviewed in reference 2). The AAV Rep protein appears to be involved in all of these functions (4, 16, 19, 30, 42).
A curious feature of the biology of AAV is that productive infection generally requires that a helper virus, either adenovirus or a member of the herpesvirus family (reviewed in reference 2), simultaneously or subsequently infect the AAV-infected cell. There are, however, some observations illustrating that AAV may not be completely dependent on a helper virus. It has been shown that limited production of AAV can be achieved upon AAV infection of tissue culture cells that have been treated with DNA-damaging agents such as UV light, hydroxyurea, X rays, and alkylating substances (39, 40, 41). More recently, productive infection by AAV has been observed in epithelial cells maintained in raft culture (25). These cultures were apparently uninfected by any of the known helper viruses. It is also worth noting that AAV DNA can be replicated in extracts from HeLa cells which have not been infected by a helper virus, provided that Rep is supplied (26, 33).
The molecular mechanisms by which helper viruses promote AAV replication vary. The major effect that adenovirus exerts on AAV replication appears to be on gene expression and on promoting the entry of cells into S phase. It has, for example, been demonstrated that the synthesis of the AAV DNA in cells infected with adenovirus is mediated by the cellular replication machinery and not by the adenovirus polymerase (26, 27). One adenovirus protein is apparently directly involved in AAV DNA replication. The adenovirus single-strand DNA binding protein is found in cells at foci of AAV DNA replication and in vitro helps to stabilize single-stranded DNA during DNA synthesis (34, 36).
The role of the herpes simplex virus (HSV) replication machinery in the synthesis of AAV DNA is less clear. It was shown by Handa and Carter (13) that the treatment of HSV- and AAV-coinfected cells with phosphonoacetic acid (PAA), an inhibitor of the HSV polymerase, resulted in a reduction of both HSV and AAV DNA synthesis. This result raised the possibility that synthesis of the AAV DNA might be by the HSV polymerase.
The components of a minimal HSV replication machine (replisome) were identified by Challberg and colleagues (6, 38). They used selective transfection of HSV genes to demonstrate that in cell culture, replication of an HSV origin-containing plasmid could be achieved with only seven HSV genes. These were the genes coding for an origin binding protein (UL9), a single-strand DNA binding protein (UL29), a polymerase (UL30) and its accessory factor (UL42), and a helicase-primase complex (UL5, UL52, and UL8) (reviewed in reference 22).
Transfection of actively dividing HeLa cells with these seven plasmids encoding the HSV type 1 (HSV-1) replication proteins efficiently promoted synthesis of AAV DNA as well as the production of infectious particles (35). The contribution made by the individual replication proteins was also addressed. The HSV-1 origin binding protein, UL9, was not needed. The DNA polymerase, UL30, and its processivity factor, UL42, were also dispensable. In contrast, components of the helicase-primase complex, UL5, UL8, and UL52, as well as the single-strand DNA binding protein, UL29, were required (35). The interpretation of these findings is not straightforward. One would like to imagine that the HSV-1 replisome, which in itself is capable of processive and coupled synthesis of leading and lagging strands, would remain intact also during replication of AAV DNA. However, it is possible that individual components can be utilized for strand displacement synthesis together with AAV Rep and cellular enzymes.
HSV infection typically occurs in nondividing cells, and unlike adenovirus, rather than directing the host cells towards S phase, HSV down regulates host cell functions (28). It would seem that if, in this case, HSV is to serve as a helper for AAV replication, then AAV must be able to either replicate its DNA with the HSV replisome or induce a reversal of the normal HSV down regulation of host cell functions. Therefore, the question of whether in the absence of cellular replication functions AAV can use the HSV replisome to replicate its DNA remains significant.
Here we have examined replication of AAV DNA in vitro using highly purified HSV-1 replication proteins, AAV Rep68, and double-stranded template DNA containing the AAV origin of DNA replication. Our results demonstrate that AAV Rep68 is required to promote origin-specific initiation of DNA synthesis in the presence of HSV-1 replication proteins. Interestingly, efficient synthesis of AAV DNA is also obtained in the presence of a subset of HSV-1 replication proteins consisting of the single-strand DNA binding protein, UL29, and the HSV-1 DNA polymerase and its accessory factor. The products formed on longer templates, however, were often of less than full length, indicating that DNA synthesis was nonprocessive.
Recombinant AAV is becoming increasingly important as a vector for gene therapy, and HSV-1 is being proposed as a helper virus in vector production (7, 8). An understanding of the mechanisms by which AAV replicates in the presence of a helper virus should be useful in optimizing the efficiency and accuracy of vector production.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DNA substrates. The plasmid used for these studies (pAV2DA) is derived from pAV2 and has been described previously (31). pAV2 consists of the entire AAV2 genome inserted into a pBR derivative with BglII linkers (20). The deletion construct pAV2DA(31) was made by digesting pAV2 at the DraIII (AAV nucleotide 235) and ApaI (AAV nucleotide 4045) sites. The construct was treated with T4 polymerase and circularized by religating. Replication substrates were produced by digestion with BglII, which released a duplex complete genome in the case of pAV2 and a duplex minigenome (mAAV) in the case of pAV2DA. pBS-AAV (29) was made by insertion of a double-stranded oligonucleotide equivalent to nucleotides 89 to 133 of AAV; i.e., it contains the Rep binding site (RBS) and the TRS between the XbaI and SalI sites of pBluescript KS(+) plasmid (Stratagene). The plasmid was linearized by digestion at the XmnI site prior to use.
Proteins. HisRep68 contains six histidine residues fused to the amino-terminal end of the full-length Rep68 protein (29). It was produced in Escherichia coli from a pET 15b vector (New England Biolabs) and purified according to the manufacturer's instructions. The proteins encoded by the HSV UL5, UL8, UL29, UL30, UL42, and UL52 genes were produced from stocks of recombinant Autographa californica nuclear polyhedrosis virus and purified as described previously (9, 10). The purity of each protein was greater than or equal to 95% as judged by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by Coomassie blue staining.
DNA replication assay.
Two types of replication assay were
performed. For the basic assay (containing no cellular extract), the
reaction mixture (15 µl) was 2.7% glycerol; 40 mM HEPES (pH 7.7); 40 mM creatine phosphate (pH 7.7); 7 mM MgCl2; 4 mM
ATP; 200 µM each CTP, GTP, and UTP; 100 µM each dATP, dGTP, and
dTTP; 10 µM dCTP; 2 mM dithiothreitol (DTT); and 6 mM potassium
glutamate. It also contained 2.0 µg of creatine phosphokinase, 10.0 µg of bovine serum albumin, 5 µCi of
[
-32P]dCTP (3,000 Ci/mmol; Amersham), and 35 ng of BglII-digested pAV2DA.
-32P]dCTP [3,000 Ci/mmol; Amersham]) were
added. Incubations were continued at 37°C for an additional 16 h.
Both the extract-free and the extract-containing assays were terminated
by the addition of 50 µl of digestion buffer (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.5],
10 mM KCl, 10 mM EDTA, 1.0% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 50 mM NaCl).
Products were passed over a Sephadex 50 spin column and then digested
with proteinase K at 1 mg/ml for 2 h at 50°C. Aliquots of the
products were separated by electrophoresis on 0.8% agarose gels with
Tris-borate-EDTA buffer. The data were analyzed by PhosphorImager
(Molecular Dynamics) quantification of dried gels using ImageQuant1.1 software.
Cellular extracts. Replication extracts from uninfected HeLa cells were prepared as described previously (32); the procedure was a modification of that of Wobbe et al. (37).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DNA synthesis by HSV DNA replication proteins on an AAV substrate
is dependent on the AAV Rep protein.
We set out to determine
whether purified HSV replication proteins in combination with the AAV
Rep protein could initiate DNA synthesis in an AAV origin-dependent
manner. We employed a minimal AAV genome, referred to as mAAV, as a
substrate. Previous observations have indicated that shorter genomes
have a substantial replicative advantage over full-length genomes in
uninfected HeLa cell extracts (31). Consequently, we used
a linear AAV minigenome which can be excised from the plasmid pAV2DA.
The plasmid pAV2DA had been derived from pAV2 by excising the AAV
sequences between nucleotides 235 and 4045 (31). To create
the substrate for the assay, the AAV sequences are separated from
vector sequences by digesting pAV2DA with BglII, thereby
producing the double-stranded mAAV genome of 870 nucleotides with
intact copies of both ITRs as well as adjacent sequences (Fig.
1). Also present is an equimolar amount of the vector backbone.
|
Rep68-dependent DNA synthesis by HSV-1 replication proteins
requires the AAV ITRs.
To test if Rep68-dependent DNA synthesis
required the AAV ITRs, which contain the origins of AAV DNA
replication, we compared replication of intact mAAV to replication of a
template from which the ITRs had been removed (Fig.
2). Cleavage of mAAV by MscI
removes almost all of both ITRs, except for the D region (the innermost 25 bases of the ITR). As shown above, intact mAAV readily supported DNA
synthesis (Fig. 2, lane 1). In contrast, very little DNA synthesis was
obtained with the truncated version of mAAV referred to as mAAV(
ITR)
(Fig. 2, lane 2). These results demonstrate that the ITRs (i.e., AAV
origins) are required for Rep68 to direct the activity of the HSV-1
replication proteins to the mAAV template.
|
Characterization of replication products.
The replication
products of the basic assay were characterized by restriction enzyme
analysis as well as two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. First, an
MboI digestion of the replication products was performed
(Fig. 3A). The mAAV genome contains only
one MboI restriction site located precisely at its center.
Cleavage at this site implies that the products consist of
double-stranded unmethylated DNA, demonstrating that both strands are
newly synthesized. Furthermore, successful cleavage by MboI
indicates that DNA synthesis must have extended at least through one
half of the 840-bp mAAV genome. The average extent of MboI
cleavage of the mAAV products from three experiments was 37%. In
contrast, fewer than 1% of vector sequences were digested despite the
presence of 20 MboI sites.
|
Rep-dependent DNA synthesis can be performed by a subset of HSV-1
replication proteins.
To examine the contribution of the HSV-1
replication proteins to Rep-dependent DNA synthesis, a set of reactions
in which individual components were omitted were performed. In the
absence of Rep68, no specific synthesis of mAAV was seen (Fig.
4A, lane 2). Omission of the HSV-1 DNA
polymerase, UL30, and its accessory protein, UL42, eliminated all DNA
synthesis (Fig. 4A, lane 4). Interestingly, the single-strand DNA
binding protein ICP8 (encoded by UL29) was required for efficient DNA
synthesis (Fig. 4A, lane 3). Without the UL29 product, the
incorporation of radioactively labeled nucleotides was reduced by
approximately 65%. Moreover, the replication products were more
heterogeneous (Fig. 4A, lane 3). The omission of either the UL5-UL52
components of the helicase-primase complex or the UL8 gene product did
not reduce total synthesis (Fig. 4A, lanes 5 and 6). Quantification of
the replication products revealed that the omission of the UL5 and UL52
proteins reproducibly resulted in a slight increase of about 25% of
the total synthesis of DNA. Possibly, the presence of free UL8 protein
may counteract the tendency of ICP8 (the UL29 gene product) to inhibit
DNA synthesis at high concentrations (11).
|
Initiation of replication from a substrate containing internal AAV
RBS and TRS.
The experiments described above do not show that
HSV-1-mediated replication can proceed from a single-stranded nick
introduced by Rep68 at the TRS. This must happen during the terminal
resolution stage of authentic DNA replication. To determine whether
replication from the Rep-induced nick is possible, we employed a
substrate, pBS-AAV, described previously (29). This
substrate contains the AAV RBS and TRS inserted into the polylinker of
the plasmid pBluescript KS(+). The plasmids pKS(+) and pBS-AAV were
linearized at the XmnI site. The AAV RBS and TRS were thus
located approximately 1,000 and 2,000 nucleotides from the ends
of the template molecules (Fig.
5A). Rep68 greatly stimulated
synthesis by the HSV replisome (Fig. 5A, lane 1). The increase in DNA
synthesis of molecules greater than 500 nucleotides in length was
approximately 35-fold in comparison to the assay in which Rep68 was
omitted, as determined by PhosphorImager analysis. DNA synthesis was
dependent on the AAV RBS and TRS sequences (Fig. 5A, lane 4). Our
minimal system consisting of Rep68 and the HSV UL30, UL42, and UL29
proteins gave similar results (data not shown).
|
Effects of cellular extracts on Rep-dependent DNA synthesis by the
HSV-1 replisome.
A question that arises is whether the HSV
replication complex can initiate replication at the AAV origin in
cells. We have made a first attempt at answering this question by
employing a cell-free replication assay that has been used previously
to study AAV DNA replication. In that assay a duplex AAV genome and the Rep68 protein are added to an extract made from rapidly growing uninfected HeLa cells. Using the cell extract assay, a limited replication of the full-length genome by Rep68 and cellular replication factors has been observed (33). Consequently, a problem
with the use of the cell extract assay to measure the activity of the HSV complex is simultaneous replication of the AAV constructs by
cellular replication proteins. This is especially the case with the
minigenome, which replicates quite well in cellular extracts (31). To distinguish replication by the HSV polymerase
from replication by the cellular polymerase, we have used PAA, which specifically inhibits the HSV polymerase (24). Figure
6A shows PAA inhibition of replication of
the AAV minigenome by the six HSV proteins in the absence of extract.
Figure 6B shows that in a cellular extract in the absence of the HSV
replication complex, the addition of PAA has no effect on the
replication of the AAV minigenome, demonstrating that PAA does not
inhibit the cell extract polymerase that replicates AAV DNA.
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Here we have presented results demonstrating the initiation of DNA synthesis in the presence of AAV Rep68 and the products of the HSV-1 UL5, UL8, UL52, UL29, UL30, and UL42 genes that is dependent on the AAV origins of DNA replication. Efficient DNA replication was also seen with a minimal system consisting of Rep68 and the products of the UL30, UL42, and UL29 genes. Surprisingly, while we observed efficient initiation on the duplex AAV minigenome with Rep and the six HSV proteins, we were unable to achieve initiation on the duplex full-length AAV genome with the same seven proteins. In our assays Rep68 apparently creates primer termini either by helicase action at the ends of the double-stranded template molecules or by site-specific endonucleolytic cleavage. In addition, Rep68 most likely acts as the DNA helicase facilitating strand displacement. The HSV-1 DNA polymerase-UL42 complex is able to efficiently utilize primers created by Rep68 but needs the single-strand DNA binding protein (the UL29 gene product) to synthesize long stretches of DNA.
In the case of longer substrates, e.g., pBS-AAV, the products of DNA synthesis were heterogeneous. Molecules of full length were seen, but most products were of less than full length, formed apparently by displacement from the template and fold-back synthesis (Fig. 5B). The reason for this lack of full-length synthesis is presently unknown but may reflect a requirement for a different stoichiometry of replication factors. It has been shown previously that the activity of an HSV replication complex is very sensitive to the ratios of different factors and Mg2+ concentration (11, 12). An alternative possibility is a requirement for an as-yet-unknown cellular factor.
The results shown in Fig. 6 suggest that initiation mediated by the HSV polymerase occurs in the presence of cellular proteins. Therefore, unless processes specific to the intact cell prevent initiation (e.g., the sequestering of AAV DNA and HSV replication proteins in separate nuclear compartments), it is likely that this initiation occurs in the AAV- and HSV-coinfected cell.
Initiation of replication occurred both on a complete double-stranded AAV ITR and on a linear molecule containing a minimal origin, i.e., an RBS and a TRS, located 1,000 nucleotides from the closer end. The latter substrate serves to model the mechanism of initiation that must occur on the ITR during terminal resolution and also that which is predicted to occur on the integrated AAV genome upon its rescue from latency.
Previously, transfection experiments have been used to determine which HSV genes were required for a helper effect. Weindler and Heilbronn showed incontrovertibly that a helper effect could be supplied by a subset of the HSV replication genes, namely, the helicase-primase genes UL5, UL8, and UL52 and the gene for the single-strand DNA binding protein, UL29 (35). The absence of the UL30 and UL42 genes is somewhat surprising. Weindler and Heilbronn (35) suggested that cellular DNA polymerases were replicating AAV DNA in concert with the HSV single-strand DNA binding protein.
There are several previous examples of the HSV replication complex being affected by the AAV Rep protein, namely, Rep inhibition of HSV DNA replication and HSV-induced gene amplification (1, 15, 17). There are also examples of HSV replication proteins interacting with non-HSV replication factors. Blumel and Matz (3) and Heilbronn and zur Hausen (14) showed that in nonpermissive hamster cells infected with HSV, replication of simian virus 40 DNA became possible. Lee et al. (21) demonstrated an interaction between the HSV origin binding protein and the cellular DNA polymerase alpha-primase, leading those authors to suggest that cellular replication enzymes might be involved in HSV DNA replication. Taken together, these experiments suggest that the possibilities for cooperation between HSV and non-HSV replication machineries may be rather complex. By analogy, it may be that in the AAV- and HSV-coinfected cell, replication of AAV DNA might be by both cellular and HSV factors acting in concert.
In one model for a helper effect, herpesviruses might help to create subnuclear compartments, perhaps related to the viral prereplicative foci and replication compartments, to facilitate AAV replication. Interestingly, transfection of cells with a mixture of expression plasmids for the UL5, UL8, UL52, and UL9 genes has been shown to localize the single-strand DNA binding protein (ICP8) to punctate sites in the nucleus (23). It would be of great interest to learn whether replication of AAV DNA might be associated with such foci. We can only demonstrate that ICP8, the UL29 gene product, has a direct stimulatory effect on AAV DNA synthesis. However, there is a well-documented functional interaction between the UL29 and UL8 gene products (10, 11). It is therefore not unlikely that proper functioning of the UL29 protein during AAV replication in vivo might require assistance from the helicase-primase complex. The use of mutant genes encoding functionally impaired HSV-1 replication proteins that retain their ability to localize appropriately in the nucleus might help determine whether the enzymatic activities of the replication proteins are needed for the helper effect.
In their report, Weindler and Heilbronn noted that the absence of UL30 or UL42 led to somewhat (almost 10-fold) reduced levels of both DNA synthesis and new AAV particles compared to those after transfection of a complete set of HSV replication genes (35). Those authors used dividing tissue culture cells, and it may be that if the HSV polymerase and its accessory factor are present, they make a significant contribution to AAV DNA synthesis even in the presence of a functioning host cell replication apparatus.
However, the cells most commonly infected by HSV, epithelial cells and neurons, are often nondividing and therefore do not have an active replication machinery. (It has recently been suggested that human epidermal cells may also be the natural host cells for AAV [25].) Furthermore unlike adenovirus, HSV apparently shuts down host cell functions upon infection (28). Consequently, the capacity to use the HSV DNA replication machinery may be important for a successful AAV life cycle in vivo. In addition, as noted previously, the HSV life cycle and HSV's possible role as a helper for AAV provide a rationale for a latent phase for AAV in vivo (5). Upon infecting a neuronal cell, HSV commonly ceases replicating and enters a latent state. The accompanying AAV, no longer able to replicate its DNA, might also be induced to enter a latent state, in its case by site-specifically integrating its genome into chromosome 19 (18). Factors resulting from or inducing HSV release from latency might also activate a latent AAV.
The findings in this report suggest the possibility of in vitro AAV DNA synthesis for the purpose of gene therapy experiments. This would be of interest if replication of AAV genomes in vitro could be coupled to assembly of viral capsids and production of infectious virions. The production of less-than-full-length molecules during our in vitro DNA replication assays might, in fact, be in part due to the lack of direct coupling to the later stages of formation of virions. Considering the limited number of gene products involved in AAV DNA replication, it should not be an insurmountable biochemical task to establish a reconstituted system for production of infectious virions.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Nathalie Dutheil for helpful comments.
This work was supported in part by NIH grants DK55609 and DK57746 (to R.M.L.).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Institute for Gene Therapy and Molecular Medicine, Box 1496, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY 10029. Phone: (212) 659-8247. Fax: (212) 849-2437. E-mail: wardp01{at}doc.mssm.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Bantel-Schaal, U., and H. zur Hausen. 1988. Adeno-associated viruses inhibit SV40 DNA amplification and replication of herpes simplex virus in SV40-transformed hamster cells. Virology 164:64-74[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. | Berns, K. I. 1996. Parvoviridae: the viruses and their replication, p. 2173-2197. In B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa. |
| 3. | Blumel, J., and B. Matz. 1996. Study on simian virus 40 DNA synthesis in herpes simplex virus-infected cells. Virology 217:407-412[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. |
Brister, J. R., and N. Muzyczka.
1999.
Rep-mediated nicking of the adeno-associated virus origin requires two biochemical activities, DNA helicase activity and transesterification.
J. Virol.
73:9325-9336 |
| 5. |
Buller, R. M.,
J. E. Janik,
E. D. Sebring, and J. A. Rose.
1981.
Herpes simplex virus types 1 and 2 completely help adenovirus-associated virus replication.
J. Virol.
40:241-247 |
| 6. |
Challberg, M. D.
1986.
A method for identifying the viral genes required for herpesvirus DNA replication.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:9094-9098 |
| 7. | Conway, J., C. Rhys, I. Zolotukhin, S. Zolotukhin, N. Muzyczka, G. Hayward, and B. Byrne. 1999. High-titer recombinant adeno-associated virus production utilizing a recombinant herpes simplex virus type I vector expressing AAV-2 Rep and Cap. Gene Ther. 6:986-993[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | Conway, J. E., S. Zolotukhin, N. Muzyczka, G. S. Hayward, and B. J. Byrne. 1997. Recombinant adeno-associated virus type 2 replication and packaging is entirely supported by a herpes simplex virus type 1 amplicon expressing Rep and Cap. J. Virol. 71:8780-8789[Abstract]. |
| 9. |
Crute, J. J., and I. R. Lehman.
1989.
Herpes simplex-1 DNA polymerase. Identification of an intrinsic 5'-3' exonuclease with ribonuclease H activity.
J. Biol. Chem.
264:19266-19270 |
| 10. |
Falkenberg, M.,
D. A. Bushnell,
P. Elias, and I. R. Lehman.
1997.
The UL8 subunit of the heterotrimeric herpes simplex virus type 1 helicase-primase is required for the unwinding of single strand DNA-binding protein (ICP8)-coated DNA substrates.
J. Biol. Chem.
272:22766-22770 |
| 11. |
Falkenberg, M.,
I. R. Lehman, and P. Elias.
2000.
Leading and lagging strand DNA synthesis in vitro by a reconstituted herpes simplex virus type 1 replisome.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
97:3896-3900 |
| 12. |
Falkenberg, M.,
P. Elias, and I. R. Lehman.
1998.
The herpes simplex virus type 1 helicase-primase. Analysis of helicase activity.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:32154-32157 |
| 13. |
Handa, H., and B. J. Carter.
1979.
Adeno-associated virus DNA replication complexes in herpes simplex virus or adenovirus-infected cells.
J. Biol. Chem.
254:6603-6610 |
| 14. |
Heilbronn, R., and H. zur Hausen.
1989.
A subset of herpes simplex virus replication genes induces DNA amplification within the host cell genome.
J. Virol.
63:3683-3692 |
| 15. |
Heilbronn, R.,
A. Burkle,
S. Stephan, and H. zur Hausen.
1990.
The adeno-associated virus rep gene suppresses herpes simplex virus-induced DNA amplification.
J. Virol.
64:3012-3018 |
| 16. | Im, D. S., and N. Muzyczka. 1990. The AAV origin binding protein Rep68 is an ATP-dependent site-specific endonuclease with DNA helicase activity. Cell 61:447-457[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. | Kleinschmidt, J. A., M. Mohler, F. W. Weindler, and R. Heilbronn. 1995. Sequence elements of the adeno-associated virus rep gene required for suppression of herpes-simplex-virus-induced DNA amplification. Virology 206:254-262[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. |
Kotin, R. M.,
M. Siniscalco,
R. J. Samulski,
X. D. Zhu,
L. Hunter,
C. A. Laughlin,
S. McLaughlin,
N. Muzyczka,
M. Rocchi, and K. I. Berns.
1990.
Site-specific integration by adeno-associated virus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
87:2211-2215 |
| 19. | Kyostio, S. R., and R. A. Owens. 1996. Identification of mutant adeno-associated virus Rep proteins which are dominant-negative for DNA helicase activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 220:294-299[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. | Laughlin, C. A., J. D. Tratschin, H. Coon, and B. J. Carter. 1983. Cloning of infectious adeno-associated virus genomes in bacterial plasmids. Gene 23:65-73[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 21. |
Lee, S. S.,
Q. Dong,
T. S. Wang, and I. R. Lehman.
1995.
Interaction of herpes simplex virus 1 origin-binding protein with DNA polymerase alpha.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:7882-7886 |
| 22. |
Lehman, I. R., and P. E. Boehmer.
1999.
Replication of herpes simplex virus DNA.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:28059-28062 |
| 23. | Liptak, L. M., S. L. Uprichard, and D. M. Knipe. 1996. Functional order of assembly of herpes simplex virus DNA replication proteins into prereplicative site structures. J. Virol. 70:1759-1767[Abstract]. |
| 24. | Mao, J. C., and E. E. Robishaw. 1975. Mode of inhibition of herpes simplex virus DNA polymerase by phosphonoacetate. Biochemistry 14:5475-5479[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. | Meyers, C., M. Mane, N. Kokorina, S. Alam, and P. L. Hermonat. 2000. Ubiquitous human adeno-associated virus type 2 autonomously replicates in differentiating keratinocytes of a normal skin model. Virology 272:338-346[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 26. |
Ni, T. H.,
W. F. McDonald,
I. Zolotukhin,
T. Melendy,
S. Waga,
B. Stillman, and N. Muzyczka.
1998.
Cellular proteins required for adeno-associated virus DNA replication in the absence of adenovirus coinfection.
J. Virol.
72:2777-2787 |
| 27. |
Ni, T. H.,
X. Zhou,
D. M. McCarty,
I. Zolotukhin, and N. Muzyczka.
1994.
In vitro replication of adeno-associated virus DNA.
J. Virol.
68:1128-1138 |
| 28. | Roizman, B., and P. R. Roane, Jr. 1964. Multiplication of herpes simplex virus. II. The relation between protein synthesis and the duplication of viral DNA in infected HEp-2 cells. Virology 22:262-269[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 29. |
Smith, D. H.,
P. Ward, and R. M. Linden.
1999.
Comparative characterization of Rep proteins from the helper-dependent adeno-associated virus type 2 and the autonomous goose parvovirus.
J. Virol.
73:2930-2937 |
| 30. | Snyder, R. O., R. J. Samulski, and N. Muzyczka. 1990. In vitro resolution of covalently joined AAV chromosome ends. Cell 60:105-113[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 31. | Ward, P., and K. I. Berns. 1996. In vitro replication of adeno-associated virus DNA: enhancement by extracts from adenovirus-infected HeLa cells. J. Virol. 70:4495-4501[Abstract]. |
| 32. | Ward, P., and K. I. Berns. 1991. In vitro rescue of an integrated hybrid adeno-associated virus/simian virus 40 genome. J. Mol. Biol. 218:791-804[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 33. |
Ward, P.,
E. Urcelay,
R. Kotin,
B. Safer, and K. I. Berns.
1994.
Adeno-associated virus DNA replication in vitro: activation by a maltose binding protein/Rep 68 fusion protein.
J. Virol.
68:6029-6037 |
| 34. |
Ward, P.,
F. B. Dean,
M. E. O'Donnell, and K. I. Berns.
1998.
Role of the adenovirus DNA-binding protein in in vitro adeno-associated virus DNA replication.
J. Virol.
72:420-427 |
| 35. |
Weindler, F. W., and R. Heilbronn.
1991.
A subset of herpes simplex virus replication genes provides helper functions for productive adeno-associated virus replication.
J. Virol.
65:2476-2483 |
| 36. | Weitzman, M. D., K. J. Fisher, and J. M. Wilson. 1996. Recruitment of wild-type and recombinant adeno-associated virus into adenovirus replication centers. J. Virol. 70:1845-1854[Abstract]. |
| 37. |
Wobbe, C. R.,
F. Dean,
L. Weissbach, and J. Hurwitz.
1985.
In vitro replication of duplex circular DNA containing the simian virus 40 DNA origin site.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:5710-5714 |
| 38. |
Wu, C. A.,
N. J. Nelson,
D. J. McGeoch, and M. D. Challberg.
1988.
Identification of herpes simplex virus type 1 genes required for origin-dependent DNA synthesis.
J. Virol.
62:435-443 |
| 39. |
Yakinoglu, A. O.,
R. Heilbronn,
A. Burkle,
J. R. Schlehofer, and H. zur Hausen.
1988.
DNA amplification of adeno-associated virus as a response to cellular genotoxic stress.
Cancer Res.
48:3123-3129 |
| 40. |
Yakobson, B.,
T. A. Hrynko,
M. J. Peak, and E. Winocour.
1989.
Replication of adeno-associated virus in cells irradiated with UV light at 254 nm.
J. Virol.
63:1023-1030 |
| 41. |
Yakobson, B.,
T. Koch, and E. Winocour.
1987.
Replication of adeno-associated virus in synchronized cells without the addition of a helper virus.
J. Virol.
61:972-981 |
| 42. |
Zhou, X.,
I. Zolotukhin,
D. S. Im, and N. Muzyczka.
1999.
Biochemical characterization of adeno-associated virus rep68 DNA helicase and ATPase activities.
J. Virol.
73:1580-1590 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | Mol. Cell. Biol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|