Next Article 
Journal of Virology, November 2001, p. 10015-10023, Vol. 75, No. 21
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.21.10015-10023.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Kilham Polyomavirus: Activation of Gene Expression
and DNA Replication in Mouse Fibroblast Cells by an Enhancer
Substitution
Shouting
Zhang and
Göran
Magnusson*
Department of Medical Biochemistry and
Microbiology, Biomedical Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Received 12 July 2000/Accepted 25 July 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The Kilham strain of polyomavirus (KV) infects vascular endothelial
cells in vivo (J. E. Greenlee, Infect. Immun.
26:705-713, 1979), but no permissive cell type for growth
of the virus in vitro has been identified. The failure of KV DNA to
replicate in mouse fibroblast cells after transfection suggested that
viral gene expression had narrow cell specificity. A KV substitution mutant having a part of the regulatory region of KV DNA replaced with a
segment of the polyomavirus transcriptional enhancer was constructed.
The substitution mutant was able to replicate in transfected 3T3 cells,
and the newly replicated viral DNA associated with protein to form
particles with the density of virions in CsCl equilibrium gradients.
However, these particles were noninfectious when tested on 3T3 cells,
suggesting that absorption or uptake of virus particles was defective
for these cells. Analysis of early and late promoter activities by
luciferase reporter gene expression showed that the enhancer
substitution had a moderate positive effect on early gene expression
and a large effect on the expression of the late genes. KV large T
antigen inhibited the activities of both the wild-type and the
substitution mutant early promoter, whereas only the mutant late
promoter was activated under the same conditions. A comparison of the
KV and polyomavirus large T antigens showed that they were not
interchangeable in the initiation of KV and polyomavirus DNA synthesis.
Furthermore, the wild-type KV origin of DNA replication was less active
than the mutant structure in the presence of saturating amounts of KV
large T antigen. Together, our data demonstrate several differences between the two types of large T antigen in their interactions with
cellular proteins.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The Kilham strain of polyomavirus
(KV) is a second murine member of the polyomavirus family, first
isolated by Kilham and Murphy in 1953 (31). KV, in
contrast to other mammalian polyomaviruses, is associated with severe
disease. Infection of newborn mice causes interstitial pneumonia with a
high fatality rate (19, 20), whereas exposure of fully
immunocompetent mice to KV leads to a persistent and inapparent
infection. In primary infection, KV replicates mostly in vascular
endothelial cells of the lung, liver, and spleen (19-21,
38). However, during the persistence phase, infected cells are
found mainly in renal tubules (24). Thus, although KV and
mouse polyomavirus (PyV) show differences in organ and cell tropism
during primary infection, they appear to share specificity for tubulus
epithelium during persistent infection (22). A major
difference between KV and PyV is that inoculation of newborn mice with
KV does not result in tumors (23, 41, 43). However, cells
transformed with KV can form transplantable tumors (43).
Both the virulence upon primary infection of suckling mice and the
nontumorigenic phenotype separate KV from PyV, justifying a comparative
investigation of the two viruses.
The genome of KV is a circular, 4,754-bp double-stranded DNA molecule.
As predicted from the nucleotide sequence (37), KV DNA
encodes two early proteins (large and small T antigens) and three late
proteins (VP1, VP2, and VP3). Although analysis of cloned DNA
definitely established that KV belongs to the polyomaviruses (32), it is not closely related to the previously
characterized PyV (3, 37). Unlike PyV and the hamster
polyomavirus, KV does not encode any middle T antigen. In this respect
and by comparison of deduced amino acid sequences, KV is more closely
related to the human polyomaviruses JCV and BKV.
KV exhibits stringent host and cell specificities, and the absence of a
permissive tissue culture system has hampered its study. A possible
determinant of cell tropism is the enhancer segment of the regulatory
region of the genome. With PyV, numerous mutants with altered host
range have been described (18, 28, 35). Most of these have
point mutations or rearrangements of the enhancer segment, and these
mutations have been directly linked to the host range phenotype.
Similar observations have been made with the primate polyomaviruses
(46).
To investigate the biological properties of KV, we analyzed viral gene
expression and DNA replication in mouse fibroblasts and attempted to
widen the host range of KV by genetic manipulation of the KV regulatory region.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cells and virus.
The mouse cell lines NIH 3T3, BALB/c 3T3,
and Swiss 3T6 were obtained from the European Collection of Cell
Cultures (Porton Down, England). They were cultured in Dulbecco
modified Eagle medium (Gibco) supplemented with 10% newborn calf
serum. IE cells, derived from mouse brain capillary endothelial
cells (27), were kindly provided by P. Gerwins, Uppsala
University, and were grown in Ham F-12 medium supplemented with 10%
fetal calf serum and 20 IU of gamma interferon per ml. KV was obtained
from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, Va.) as a
suspension of organ material. Infections were carried out by
inoculating cells with virus suspended in Tris-buffered saline
(13) for 2 h at 37°C. For transfection, cell
cultures were started at a density of 2.5 × 105 per 60-mm-diameter petri dish. On the
following day the cells were transfected with 0.3 µg of DNA using the
DEAE-dextran method (34) or with 4 µg of DNA using the
Lipofectamine procedure according to the instructions of the
manufacturer (Life Technologies Products).
Viral genomes and construction of recombinant plasmids.
The
recombinant plasmid pKV19, carrying KV DNA in the XbaI site
of pUC12 (37), was obtained from Kristina Dörries
(Würzburg University, Würzburg, Germany). In this report,
pKV19 is called pKVwt. DNA of the wild-type A2 strain of PyV was
propagated as a recombinant of plasmid pML2, as described previously
(2). PCR was done using the high-fidelity Vent DNA
polymerase (New England Biolabs). For cloning of DNA made by PCR, A
residues were added to the 3' ends of the molecules by use of
Taq DNA polymerase (MBI Fermentas). The KV mutant KVm1 was
generated by replacing part of the pKVwt DNA
(XhoI-NarI) with a corresponding region of PyV
DNA (nucleotides [nt] 5102 to 5231) synthesized by PCR. Reporter gene
plasmids were constructed by ligating polyomavirus promoter DNA
segments into the multiple cloning site of the pGL2-basic vector
(Promega), which carries the luciferase gene downstream of the cloning
site. The early and late promoters of KVwt and KVm1 were synthesized by
PCR using pKVwt and pKVm1 DNAs as templates and oligonucleotide primers
corresponding to nt 4624 to 4641 and nt 351 to 335, respectively, of KV
DNA. The resulting PCR products were cloned into the SacI
site of the pGL2-basic vector (pGL2-basic-/KVwtrr, and -/KVm1rr). The
corresponding promoter segment of PyV DNA was isolated from pPYE-CAT
and pPYL-CAT (1) by XbaI digestion. The
resulting DNA fragments were inserted into the NheI site of the pGL2-basic vector (pGL2-basic/PyVrr). KV and PyV large T antigens were expressed by inserting the coding sequence of the protein into the
vector pcDNA3 (Invitrogen), which contains the cytomegalovirus immediate-early promoter. The resulting plasmids were designated pcDNA3/KV-LT and pcDNA3/PyV-LT, respectively.
Double-stranded DNA probes specific for KV and PyV DNA were prepared
from restriction endonuclease fragments (nt 2094 to 2803 of KV DNA and
nt 5102 to 5231 of PyV DNA). A probe for detection of viral origin DNA
replication was made by cleavage of pGL2-basic plasmid DNA with
HindIII and EcoRI followed by isolation of
the smaller fragment (
600 bp). Radioactive labeling of the DNA from [
-32P]dCTP was done by random
oligonucleotide-primed synthesis (16).
Analysis of viral DNA replication.
Viral DNA replication was
analyzed using transfected NIH 3T3 or 3T6 cells. The experiments were
carried out with complete viral genomes prepared by excision from
recombinant plasmids and recircularization by treatment with T4 DNA
ligase at a DNA concentration of 5 µg per ml. Alternatively,
replication was monitored using plasmids containing the polyomavirus
regulatory region (pGL2-basic/KVwtrr, pGL2-basic/KVm1rr, or
pGL2-basic/PyVrr). In these experiments KV or PyV large T antigen was
expressed from pcDNA3/KV-LT and pcDNA3/PyV-LT, respectively. Cells were
harvested at 42 to 44 h posttransfection. Low-molecular-weight DNA
was extracted from the cells, partially purified (26, 40),
and cleaved with DpnI and a second enzyme having one
cleavage site (SacI for KVwt and KVm1 or BamHI
for PyV). Replicated DNA was separated from DpnI-cleaved, unreplicated molecules by agarose gel electrophoresis and was then
transferred to a GeneScreen hybridization membrane by capillary blotting, according to the instructions of the manufacturer (NEN Research Products). DNA on the membrane was annealed with
32P-labeled DNA probes.
Assay of luciferase activity.
Transfected NIH 3T3 cells in
60-mm-diameter dishes were washed twice with ice-cold
phosphate-buffered saline and then lysed by the addition of 300 µl
lysis buffer (1% Triton X-100, 25 mM glycyl-glycine [pH 7.8], 15 mM
MgSO4, 4 mM EGTA) (6, 39). After
incubation for 15 min on ice, cells were scraped off the plates and
debris was removed by centrifugation for 1 min at 7,000 × g. Analysis of luciferase activity was done in a
Luminoskan luminometer (Labsystems, Helsinki, Finland).
Ten-microliter portions of the cell extracts were mixed with 50 µl of
a solution consisting of 20 mM Tricine (pH 7.8), 2.67 mM
MgSO4, 1.07 mM MgCO3, 0.10 mM EDTA, 33.3 mM dithiothreitol, 0.53 mM ATP, 0.27 mM coenzyme A, and
0.47 mM luciferin (Promega). Integrated values for luminescence intensity during 60-s intervals were recorded. In all cases, three or
more separate transfections were performed, and the results shown are
the average values from the experiments.
Analysis of virus assembly.
Virions and viral nucleoprotein
complexes were extracted from NIH 3T3 cells at 40 h
posttransfection as described previously (49). The
cultures were washed with Tris-buffered saline and then with a low-salt
buffer (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.9], 5.0 mM KCl, 1.0 mM
CaCl2, 1.0 mM MgCl2). The
cells were scraped off the plate, resuspended in the low-salt buffer,
and then lysed by three cycles of freeze-thawing. Cell debris was
removed by centrifugation for 10 min at 10,000 × g, and
material in the supernatants was resolved by CsCl equilibrium density
gradient centrifugation. Centrifugation was carried out in an SW50.1
rotor (Beckman Instruments Inc.) for 20 h at 35 krpm and 20°C,
and fractions were collected from the bottoms of the tubes. The
refractive index of each fraction was determined, to assess the
density. Each fraction was extracted with phenol and chloroform, and
DNA was transferred to a hybridization membrane by dot blotting and
annealed with a 32P-labeled viral DNA probe.
 |
RESULTS |
Replication of KV in mouse cell lines and effect of an enhancer
substitution.
KV has a restricted host range in vivo and does not
infect standard mouse cell lines (37). In initial
experiments the susceptibilities of various cell lines, including NIH
3T3 cells, BALB/c 3T3 cells, and the endothelial cell-like IE cells, to
KV were tested. The cells were exposed to a virus preparation obtained
from lung tissue of infected mice, but none of the three cell lines
appeared to be susceptible to the virus. To investigate whether the
restriction was at the level of absorption to the cells or penetration
into the cells, transfection with KV DNA prepared from the recombinant plasmid pKVwt was performed. As a positive control, PyV DNA was used.
In this experiment (data not shown), no newly replicated KV DNA was
detected in any of the transfected cultures. Moreover, no infectious KV
was recovered from extracts of the cells, as analyzed by serial blind
inoculation of cell cultures. At the same time, all of the cell lines
were susceptible to transfection with PyV DNA. Newly replicated PyV DNA
was easily detectable, and a cytopathic effect was observed in a
fraction of the transfected NIH 3T3 and BALB/c 3T3 cultures after 2 days. The results of this experiment suggest that there was an
intracellular restriction to KV replication in cells fully permissive
to PyV. However, the experiment did not rule out the possibility that
the tested cells had an additional restriction in virus uptake.
Many polyomavirus mutants with widened or restricted host range have
base pair substitutions or more complex rearrangements of the enhancer
segment of the viral genome (18, 28, 35). To investigate
the importance of the KV DNA enhancer for the narrow host range of the
virus, we replaced part of the structure with a corresponding segment
from PyV DNA (Fig. 1). KV DNA was cleaved with the restriction endonucleases XhoI and NarI
to remove a 126-bp fragment. A 130-bp fragment of PyV DNA (nt 5102 to
5231) containing the major part of the PyV enhancer was then inserted,
and the resulting substitution mutant was designated KVm1.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Schematic representation of the regulatory regions of KV
and PyV DNAs. In PyV DNA the positions of the replication origin
(orirep), the transcriptional enhancer core elements A and
B, and the 5' ends of early and late RNAs (10, 45) are
indicated. Corresponding positions in KV DNA, as deduced from the
nucleotide sequence (37), are also shown. The arrowheads
represent large-T-antigen binding motifs (GPuGGC), and the hatched
boxes represent a run of A-T pairs at the replication origin. The
crosshatched DNA segment indicates the substitution made in KVm1 DNA.
Numbers refer to the established nucleotide sequences (37,
42).
|
|
To investigate whether the PyV enhancer was able to expand the host
range of KV, KVm1 DNA was excised from the recombinant plasmid,
recircularized, and used for transfection of Swiss 3T6 cells. PyV DNA
and KVwt DNA were used as controls. Low-molecular-weight DNA was
extracted at 42 h posttransfection, partially purified, digested
with DpnI to degrade unreplicated DNA, and subjected to
Southern blot analysis. Since KVm1, KVwt, and PyV DNA do not have any
segment in common, the DNA samples were blotted onto two separate
membranes and were then analyzed with different
32P-labeled DNA probes. In mouse 3T6 cells, the
KVm1 genome replicated well, while no synthesis of KVwt DNA was
detectable (Fig. 2A). Although this
experiment showed a positive effect of the PyV enhancer on the KV
replication in 3T6 cells, a direct comparison between KVm1 and PyV DNA
replication (Fig. 2B) showed that the PyV origin of replication was
approximately fivefold more effective under these conditions. The same
result was obtained when viral DNA replication was tested in NIH 3T3
and BALB/c 3T3 cells (data not shown).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Analysis of viral DNA replication in 3T6 mouse
fibroblasts. Rapidly growing cells were transfected with PyV, KVwt, and
KVm1 DNAs, respectively, using DEAE-dextran. Viral DNA molecules were
prepared by excision from recombinant plasmids followed by
recircularization. At 42 h posttransfection, low-molecular-weight
DNA was selectively extracted from the cells and partially purified.
After digestion with restriction endonuclease DpnI and a
second enzyme, making replicated molecules linear, DNA was resolved by
agarose gel electrophoresis. Following transfer of DNA to hybridization
membranes, it was annealed with 32P-labeled KV (A) or PyV
(B) DNA probes. The membranes were then analyzed by autoradiography.
Radioactivity was quantified in a PhosphorImager (C). The
positions of linear KV and PyV DNAs visualized by ethidium bromide
staining are indicated by arrows.
|
|
To investigate whether the replication defect was a result of low
large-T-antigen expression, NIH 3T3 cells were cotransfected with
recircularized, full-length KVwt or KVm1 DNA (0.5 µg) and a second
nonreplicating plasmid expressing large T antigen (0 to 2 µg of
pcDNA3/KV-LT). In the absence of large T antigen expressed in
trans, KVwt DNA failed to replicate. However, in the
presence of the protein, the wild-type origin of replication was
functional (Fig. 3A). The stimulatory
effect of large T antigen on viral DNA synthesis was also apparent with
KVm1 DNA. However, viral DNA replication was increased only with small
amounts of cotransfecting pcDNA3/KV-LT plasmid, and quantitation of the
hybridization signals showed that there was a complex relationship
between viral DNA replication and the total amount of DNA used for
transfection. In Fig. 3B the quantity of replicated DNA is expressed as
a percentage of the total viral DNA extracted from the cell culture.
Calculated in this way, cotransfection of the cells with pcDNA3/KV-LT
stimulated viral DNA replication only when small amounts of the
expression plasmid were used. A larger input of the helper DNA did not
increase, or even inhibited, viral DNA replication. This effect is more likely to be a result of competition between the viral genome and the
expression plasmid DNA for intracellular factors than of an inhibitory
activity of large T antigen on viral DNA replication. Regardless, the
data show that one reason for the failure of KVwt DNA in replication
was low expression of the early genes.

View larger version (60K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Viral DNA replication in NIH 3T3 mouse fibroblasts and
effect of large T antigen expressed in trans. Growing
cells were transfected, using Lipofectamine, with KVwt or KVm1 DNA
mixed with the indicated amount of pcDNA3/KV-LT (KV-LT). Extraction and
analysis of viral DNA were done as described in the legend to Fig. 2.
(A) Southern blot analysis of viral DNA. (B) Fraction of
DpnI-resistant viral DNA normalized to the fraction of
KVm1 DNA synthesized in the absence of separate large-T-antigen
expression.
|
|
In spite of the significant replication of KVm1 DNA, the cell cultures
showed no cytopathic effect. In addition, no infectious virus was
recovered from the transfected cells, as tested on BALB/c 3T3 cultures.
The absence of infectious virus might be a result of defective late
gene expression, since the replacement of the enhancer region in KVm1
affected the predicted late promoter domain of KV DNA (37)
(Fig. 1).
Effect of the m1 enhancer substitution on the activity of the viral
origin of DNA replication.
Initiation of polyomavirus DNA
replication has a dual dependence on the enhancer segment of the
genome. In addition to the expression of the viral initiator protein
large T antigen, the initiation event itself requires the activity of
an enhancer adjacent to the replication origin (9). To
investigate the activity of the KV enhancer in the initiation event,
NIH 3T3 cells were transfected with two plasmids. One carried the
origin of viral DNA replication but no other elements of viral origin
(pGL2-basic/KVwtrr, pGL2-basic/KVm1rr, or pGL2-basic/PyVrr) and served
as a reporter of viral DNA replication. The second nonreplicating
plasmid encoded large T antigen (pcDNA3/KV-LT or pcDNA3/PyV-LT). The
KVwt and KVm1 regulatory regions were tested, and, as a reference, the PyV regulatory region was used. The activities of these three origins
of replication were analyzed in the presence of the KV and PyV large T antigens.
NIH 3T3 cells were transfected with 2 µg of plasmid DNA, containing
either the KVwt or KVm1 origin of replication, mixed with 0 to 2 µg
of pcDNA3/KV-LT. At 42 h posttransfection newly replicated DNA was
prepared, and in a Southern blot analysis (Fig.
4A) the hybridization signals of
replicated DNA molecules were separated from those of
DpnI-sensitive unreplicated DNA. Quantitation of viral DNA
replication was done by determining the DpnI-resistant fraction of total viral DNA extracted from each cell culture (Fig. 4B).
The data show that saturating amounts of large T antigen were produced
from 0.5 µg of pcDNA3/KV-LT and that KVm1 DNA replicated about twice
as well as KVwt DNA under these conditions. Thus, the m1 substitution
had a direct positive effect on the activity of the replication origin.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Activities of the KV and PyV origins of replication with
large T antigen expressed in trans. Growing NIH 3T3
cells were transfected, using Lipofectamine, with one plasmid
containing an isolated viral origin of replication mixed with a second
plasmid expressing large T antigen. (A) Cells were cotransfected with 2 µg of pGL2-basic/KVwtrr or pGL2-basic/KVm1rr, carrying a viral origin
of replication (orirep), and the indicated quantities of
pcDNA3/KV-LT. pcDNA3 without insert was added to give 2 µg of
expression plasmid per transfected culture. Low-molecular-weight DNA
was prepared and analyzed by Southern blotting as described in the
legend to Fig. 2. (B) The hybridization signals of
DpnI-resistant and -susceptible DNA were quantified,
using a PhosphorImager, and the relative signal intensity of
DpnI-resistant material was calculated. (C) Cells were
cotransfected with 2 µg of pGL2-basic/KVwtrr (wt), -/KVm1rr (m1), or
-/PyV (p) and 2 µg of pcDNA3/KV-LT or -/PyV-LT. As negative controls,
plasmid pGL2-basic without a replication origin ( ) and pcDNA3 without
the large T-antigen-coding region were used. Analysis of DNA and
processing of data were done as described for panels A and B. The positions of size markers (in kilobase pairs) are shown on the
left.
|
|
The activities of the KV and PyV replication origins and the
specificities of the two types of large T antigen for their cognate origin structures were also compared. For this purpose, NIH 3T3 cells
were transfected with 2 µg of a plasmid containing either the KV or
PyV origin and 2 µg of a second plasmid (pcDNA3/KV-LT or
pcDNA3/PyV-LT) expressing either KV or PyV large T antigen. The cells
were harvested at 42 h posttransfection, and low-molecular-weight DNA was isolated and processed as described above. The results (Fig.
4C) show that the KV and PyV origins of DNA replication were active
only in the presence of the cognate large T antigen. Apparently, KV
large T antigen did not initiate DNA synthesis at the PyV origin of
replication and vice versa. Furthermore, the PyV origin of replication
was approximately twice as active as the KV structure, even under these
experimental conditions with an excess of large T antigen. Also, in
this experiment the m1 substitution had a positive effect on the
activity of the KV origin of DNA replication.
Effects of the m1 enhancer substitution on the activity of the
early and late promoters.
To analyze the effect of the m1
substitution on promoter activity, the regulatory regions of KVm1 and
KVwt were amplified by PCR and cloned in both orientations in a plasmid
carrying the luciferase reporter gene (pGL2-basic). As reference
material, the corresponding segment of PyV DNA was isolated and cloned
in the same reporter plasmid. The nucleotide sequences of the cloned KV
DNA segments were analyzed to exclude the possibility that errors had
occurred during the PCR.
The reporter gene constructs were transfected into NIH 3T3 cells,
cytoplasmic protein was extracted at 40 h posttransfection, and
luciferase activity was assayed. The result of the experiment (Fig.
5) showed that the early KVwt promoter
was active in NIH 3T3 cells but that its activity was about half of
that obtained with the early PyV promoter. In contrast, the late KVwt
promoter had a very low activity, both in absolute terms and in
comparison to the PyV late promoter. The m1 substitution in the
enhancer had effects on both the early and late KV promoters. The
strongest effect was on the late KV promoter, which was activated more
than 30-fold, almost to the level of the late PyV promoter. At the same
time, the m1 substitution appeared to decrease the activity of the
early promoter approximately threefold, which was unexpected considering its positive effect on DNA synthesis.

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Analysis of early and late promoter activities by
reporter gene expression. Growing NIH 3T3 cells were transfected, using
Lipofectamine, with 4.0 µg of plasmid pGL2-basic/KVwtrr, -/KVm1rr, or
-/PyVrr with the regulatory regions in the early (E) or late (L)
orientation relative to the luciferase reporter gene. Cytoplasmic
protein was extracted at 40 h posttransfection, and luciferase
activity was assayed in duplicate samples. Transfections were carried
out in triplicate, and the variation in luciferase activity is
indicated by error bars.
|
|
In the experiment described above, the luciferase reporter gene
expression was analyzed in the absence of large T antigen. However,
viral DNA replication occurs only in the presence of this protein.
Therefore, the reporter expression experiment was carried out in cells
expressing large T antigen. In this experiment, NIH 3T3 cells were
cotransfected with the luciferase reporter constructs and pcDNA3/KV-LT
or pcDNA3/PyV-LT. As in the experiment described above, the KVwt, KVm1,
and PyV regulatory regions were tested in the early and late
orientations. All transfections were done with the same quantities of
plasmid DNA, and as a negative control, pcDNA3 without a
large-T-antigen-coding sequence was used.
The luciferase expression driven by the early promoters was lower in
cells cotransfected with the plasmid derivatives encoding large T
antigen or the pcDNA3 control (Fig. 6A)
than in the absence of the expression vector (Fig. 5). Part of this
inhibition was probably a result of competition between the
polyomavirus and cytomegalovirus promoters for transcription factors.
However, there was an additional negative effect on the early promoters by large T antigen, as demonstrated in earlier studies (1, 15). KV and PyV large T antigens inhibited the activities of all
three types of early promoters, although with somewhat different efficiencies. For the KV early promoter, the m1 substitution improved its performance (Fig. 6A), which is different from the effect of the
substitution in the absence of large T antigen. Analysis of the late
promoters gave a different result (Fig. 6B). Like in the absence of
large T antigen, the KVwt late promoter had a very low activity in NIH
3T3 cells, and this activity was not increased by KV or PyV large T
antigen. In contrast, both the KVm1 and PyV late promoters were
transactivated by large T antigen. KV and PyV large T antigens had
similar stimulatory activities on the KVm1 late promoter, while the PyV
late promoter was specifically and strongly stimulated by PyV large T
antigen.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Effect of large T antigen on viral early (A) and late
(B) promoter activities. Growing NIH 3T3 cells were transfected with
2.0 µg of DNA of plasmid pGL2-basic/KVwtrr, -/KVm1rr, or -/PyVrr,
with the insert in the early (E) or late (L) orientation relative to
the luciferase reporter gene, and 2.0 µg of pcDNA3/KV-LT or -/PyV-LT.
As a negative control, pcDNA3 without insert was used. Cytoplasmic
protein was extracted at 40 h posttransfection, and luciferase
activity was assayed. The inset in panel B shows the activity of the
KVwt late promoter in an expanded scale. Error bars indicate the
extreme values.
|
|
KVm1 virion assembly in transfected cells.
Since KVm1
replicated in mouse NIH 3T3 cells and appeared to express the late
genes, we examined whether virus particles were formed. NIH 3T3 cells
were transfected with KVm1 DNA prepared from recombinant plasmid DNA,
and as controls, KVwt DNA and PyV DNA were used. Cells were also
cotransfected with KVwt DNA and pcDNA3/KV-LT to examine whether virions
were formed once viral DNA had been synthesized. At 42 h
posttransfection, the cultures were harvested by extraction of cells
under conditions for release of virions, and the cell extracts were
applied to CsCl density gradients. After centrifugation, the gradients
were fractionated and each fraction was extracted with phenol and
chloroform. DNA was dot blotted to a hybridization membrane and
annealed with a 32P-labeled DNA probe. In Fig.
7, the relative amount of viral DNA in
each fraction is plotted against the calculated density.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Virion formation in transfected NIH 3T3 mouse cells.
Growing cells were transfected, using Lipofectamine, with 0.3 µg of
PyV (A), KVm1 (B), or KVwt DNA in the presence of 2.0 µg of
pcDNA3/KV-LT (C). Viral DNA was prepared by excision from recombinant
plasmid followed by recircularization. Transfected cells were harvested
at 42 h posttransfection by extraction in low-salt buffer and
freeze-thawing three times. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation,
and each cell extract was applied to a CsCl density gradient. After
centrifugation, the gradients were harvested by collecting fractions
from the bottoms of the tubes. The refractive index was measured to
determine the CsCl density, and each fraction was extracted with phenol
and chloroform. DNA was dot blotted to hybridization membranes, and
after annealing to 32P-labeled DNA probes consisting of PyV
or KV, respectively, the hybridization signals on the filters were
quantified using a PhosphorImager. The relative value of each signal
was plotted against the calculated CsCl density.
|
|
In a CsCl density gradient, polyomavirus particles will band at a
density of 1.34 g/cm3 (49). The
material from cells transfected with PyV DNA formed two bands, one at
1.34 g/cm3 and a second at 1.39 g/cm3 (Fig. 7A), containing virus particles and
incompletely packed viral DNA, respectively. Viral DNA from extracts of
KVm1-transfected cells had similar banding properties in CsCl, with a
peak at a position corresponding to virions (Fig. 7B). However, no such material was extracted from KVwt-transfected cells (data not shown). Interestingly, in cells cotransfected with KVwt and pcDNA3/KV-LT, there
was newly replicated DNA but apparently no assembly of virus particles
(Fig. 7C). This result is consistent with the idea that a major
restriction of KVwt replication in 3T3 cells is weakness of late gene
expression, leading to failure of virus formation.
 |
DISCUSSION |
In experimental infection of mice with KV, primary replication
occurs in vascular endothelial cells in various tissues. During the
initial phase of the infection, the largest amounts of virus are
recovered from lung, liver, and spleen (19, 20, 38). Similar tissue distributions of KV are observed after oral,
intraperitoneal, and intrathecal inoculations, raising the question of
what cells are the first to become infected at the portal of entry and
how virus is spread from that site. Experimental infection of newborn mice with PyV has a different outcome. This virus replicates in many
different cell types and can be recovered from most tissues during the
initial phase of the infection (12). The other fundamental difference between KV and PyV is in the ability to induce tumors. The
tumorigenicity of PyV has been related to the efficiency of replication
in various organs (11). The tissue tropism of KV and PyV
in vivo is reflected by the infectivity of the viruses in vitro.
Hitherto, no permissive cell culture system for KV has been reported.
In contrast, PyV multiplies efficiently in a large number of cell lines
and primary cell types in culture. There are no reports on whether the
resistance of cultured cells to KV is a result of failure in uptake of
virus or in its intracellular replication. Given the relatedness of KV
and PyV, the factors determining the host cell specificities and the
tumorigenicities of the two viruses pose an interesting problem.
Following initial unsuccessful attempts to isolate KV or newly
replicated viral DNA from various mouse cell lines inoculated in vitro,
KV DNA was delivered into cells by transfection. Again, KV failed to
replicate in mouse 3T3 and 3T6 cells and in the vascular endothelial IE
cell line. Under the same conditions, PyV replicated well. Since the
failure of KV to grow in transfected cells could not be explained by
the absence of a specific receptor located in the plasma membrane,
other possibilities had to be considered. In both murine and primate
polyomaviruses, the enhancer segment of the genomic regulatory region
determines cell-specific gene expression and viral DNA synthesis
(12, 46). Therefore, a segment of KV DNA at the presumed
position of the enhancer (nt 1 to 124) was replaced with a
corresponding segment of PyV DNA known to contain most of the enhancer
elements active in fibroblast cells (Fig. 1). This substitution (m1)
gave KV DNA the capacity to replicate in mouse 3T3 and 3T6 cells,
albeit not to the same level as PyV DNA (Fig. 2).
In PyV and simian virus 40, the enhancer has been shown to have a dual
effect on the initiation of viral DNA replication (9). In
addition to activation of the early genes, leading to expression of
replicator protein (T antigen), transcription factors binding to the
enhancer appear to facilitate the initiation step of DNA synthesis
(44). Recruitment of large T antigen to the origin of
replication is probably promoted by transcription factors in complex
with the adjacent enhancer. In PyV DNA synthesis, the transcription
factor AP1 (PEA1) has been demonstrated to have this function
(25). AP1 is one of many transcription factors with
binding sites in the segment from nt 5102 to 5231 of PyV DNA that was
used to construct the substitution mutant KVm1. The segment from nt 1 to 124 of the regulatory region in KV DNA, which was deleted in the
KVm1 mutant, in addition contains a considerable number of predicted
(48) transcription factor binding sites, e.g., recognition
sites for Oct1, SP1, NF1, and Ets1. Closer to the origin of
replication, not affected by the KVm1 substitution, there are
recognition sites for AP1, NF1, and AP4. Whether any of these
transcription factor binding sites is functional has not been tested.
We also noticed binding sites for the erythroid cell-specific
transcription factors GATA C and GATA1 at nt 89 in KVwt DNA. Based on
this observation, we tested whether KVwt DNA was able to replicate in
the Friend erythroleukemia mouse cell line clone 707. However, the
result was negative.
To analyze the effect of the m1 substitution on the activity of the
replication origin in a situation independent of early gene expression,
cells were transfected with one plasmid containing the KVwt or KVm1
origin of replication and a second plasmid expressing large T antigen
at a high level under the control of the cytomegalovirus immediate-early promoter. Under these conditions, both the KVwt and
KVm1 origins of replication were active, but the m1 substitution increased the DNA synthesis approximately twofold in the presence of
saturating amounts of large T antigen (Fig 4B). However, even at a high
large-T-antigen concentration, the KVm1 origin of DNA replication was
much less active than the corresponding PyV structure driven by the PyV
large T antigen (Fig. 4C). Although the KV and PyV large T antigens
activated their cognate origins of replication, there was no
cross-reactivity. Both proteins bind to GRGGC motifs organized in
tandem (8; S. Zhang and G. Magnusson, unpublished data).
However, the organization of these motifs at the origin of replication
is different in KV and PyV DNAs, with four pentanucleotide motifs in
PyV DNA but only three in KV DNA (Fig. 1). Hence, formation of
large-T-antigen hexamers at the origin of replication and subsequent unwinding of double-stranded DNA (14) might differ
slightly for the two proteins.
The ability of KVwt to replicate when large T antigen was expressed
from a separate plasmid (Fig. 3) suggested that low activity of the
early promoter in mouse fibroblasts was a major reason for the
defective viral DNA synthesis. However, in combination with an origin
of DNA replication having a limited sensitivity to large T antigen, a
low early gene expression apparently was detrimental to viral DNA synthesis.
Since the analyses of viral DNA synthesis did not yield any information
on the expression of the viral late genes, the activities of the early
and late KV promoters were assayed in transfected NIH 3T3 cells using
reporter gene constructs. In the absence of large T antigen, the KVwt
early promoter had approximately half the activity of the PyV early
promoter (Fig. 4). In contrast, the KVwt late promoter was nearly
inactive under these conditions. The m1 substitution had opposite
effects on the activities of the early and late promoters. The early
promoter was inhibited 2.5-fold, whereas the late promoter was
stimulated approximately 30-fold. Analyses of the late promoters in PyV
and simian virus 40 have not demonstrated well-defined essential DNA
elements (8). Hence, it is possible that the segment from
nt 1 to 124 of the KVwt regulatory region contains a component having a
negative effect in mouse fibroblasts that is absent in the KVm1 mutant genome. A similar phenomenon has been observed with simian virus 40 (47).
We had also expected a positive effect of the m1 substitution on the
activity of the early promoter. Hence, the possibility of a different
effect of the m1 substitution in the presence of large T antigen was
considered. In the analysis, the synthesis of large T antigen was
uncoupled from the early KV promoter by cotransfecting the cells with
the reporter gene construct and a separate expression plasmid encoding
large T antigen. In agreement with earlier observations on the
autoregulation of the PyV promoter (7), the presence of
either KV or PyV large T antigen in the NIH 3T3 cells inhibited the
KVwt, KVm1, and PyV early promoters, although with different
efficiencies (Fig. 6A). The inhibition was probably mediated by
binding of large T antigen to GAGGC motifs located adjacent to the 5'
ends of the early transcripts (1, 15). In a comparison of
the KVwt and KVm1 early promoters, the m1 substitution alleviated the
inhibition by large T antigen 1.5- to 2.0-fold. This decreased
sensitivity to large T antigen fits with the observed positive effect
of the substitution on viral DNA synthesis.
The late PyV promoter is transactivated by large T antigen (4, 5,
29, 30). A four to fivefold activation was also observed in our
experiments (Fig. 6B). In contrast, the KVwt late promoter, having a
very low activity in the absence of large T antigen, was further
inhibited by both the KV and PyV proteins. This trans-repressive effect
supports the notion that NIH 3T3 cells contain a factor with a negative
activity on late KV transcription. The m1 substitution relieved the
negative effect and provided a target for transactivation by large T
antigen of the late promoter. However, the approximately threefold
transactivation was significantly lower than that for the PyV late
promoter. The observation that PyV large T antigen transactivated both
the PyV and KVm1 late promoters, whereas the KV large T antigen failed
to activate the PyV late promoter, suggested that the two proteins
mediated their effects by interaction with different cellular
transcription factors.
The final question we addressed in this study was whether virus
particles are formed in mouse fibroblast cells by the KVm1 mutant.
Since these mutant KV genomes replicated and had an active late
promoter, they were expected to express the late genes. Analysis of
late RNA in NIH 3T3 cells confirmed that there was cytoplasmic viral
RNA at a late time point after transfection with KVm1 DNA (data not
shown). Thus, capsid proteins were probably synthesized in the
transfected cells. To detect the formation of virus, material extracted
under low-salt conditions was resolved by centrifugation in CsCl
density gradients (49). To obtain a sufficient sensitivity of the analysis, the DNA component of virions was examined. Extracts of
cells transfected with KVm1 and PyV DNA contained material with a
density of 1.34 g/cm3 (Fig. 7), which is typical
for virus particles. Thus, KV capsid protein and DNA appeared to
assemble into virus particles in NIH 3T3 cells. When cells were
cotransfected with KVwt DNA and a plasmid expressing KV large T
antigen, viral DNA was formed but was not properly encapsidated, since
the DNA-containing band was found near the bottom of the gradient.
However, the density in this region was considerably less than the
banding position of DNA in CsCl (approximately 1.70 g/cm3). Thus, the KVwt DNA might be associated
with procapsid structures. Together, the data show that although
replication of KV DNA occurred in the presence of large T antigen,
virus particles failed to be assembled, probably because of low late
gene expression and a consequent lack of capsid proteins.
In spite of the apparent assembly of KVm1 virus, no cytopathic effect
was found in the cells, even after extensive incubation to allow for
repeated infection cycles. There are several possible reasons for this
result. Virus particles formed in NIH 3T3 cells might be noninfectious
from a defect in maturation, or the released virus might not be able to
reinfect mouse fibroblast cells due to a block in the absorption or
uptake processes. In particular, the receptor for KV has not been
identified and might not be present on any of the cell types we have
tested. Studies on cellular receptors for several other polyomaviruses
(17, 33, 36) suggest that they have distinct
specificities. We are currently extending studies on the involvement of
cellular receptors in the cell specificity of KV.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
The experimental studies described in this paper were supported
financially by the Swedish Cancer Society.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: P.O. Box 582, SE-751 23 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone: 46-18-471 4560. Fax: 46-18-50 9876. E-mail: Goran.Magnusson{at}bmc.uu.se.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Bergqvist, A.,
M. Nilsson,
K. Bondeson, and G. Magnusson.
1990.
Loss of DNA-binding and new transcriptional trans-activation function in polyomavirus large T-antigen with mutation of zinc finger motif.
Nucleic Acids Res.
18:2715-2720[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Bergqvist, A.,
K. Söderbärg, and G. Magnusson.
1997.
Altered susceptibility to tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced apoptosis of mouse cells expressing polyomavirus middle and small T antigens.
J. Virol.
71:276-283[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Bond, S. B.,
P. M. Howley, and K. K. Takemoto.
1978.
Characterization of K virus and its comparison with polyoma virus.
J. Virol.
28:337-343[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Bourachot, B.,
M. Yaniv, and P. Herbomel.
1989.
Control elements situated downstream of the major transcriptional start site are sufficient for highly efficient polyomavirus late transcription.
J. Virol.
63:2567-2577[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Brady, J.,
M. R. Loeken, and G. Khoury.
1985.
Interaction between two transcriptional control sequences required for tumor-antigen-mediated simian virus 40 late gene expression.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:7299-7303[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Brasier, A. R.,
J. E. Tate, and J. F. Habener.
1989.
Optimized use of the firefly luciferase assay as a reporter gene in mammalian cell lines.
BioTechniques
7:1116-1122[Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Cogen, B.
1978.
Virus-specific early RNA in 3T6 cells infected by a tsA mutant of polyoma virus.
Virology
85:223-230[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Cole, C. N.
1996.
Polyomavirinae: the viruses and their replication, p. 1997-2025.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed., vol. 2. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 9.
|
DePamphilis, M. L.
1993.
Eukaryotic DNA replication: anatomy of an origin.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
62:29-63[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
de Villiers, J., and W. Schaffner.
1981.
A small segment of polyoma virus DNA enhances the expression of a cloned beta-globin gene over a distance of 1400 base pairs.
Nucleic Acids Res.
9:6251-6264[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Dubensky, T. W.,
R. Freund,
C. J. Dawe, and T. L. Benjamin.
1991.
Polyomavirus replication in mice: influences of VP1 type and route of inoculation.
J. Virol.
65:342-349[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Dubensky, T. W., and L. P. Villarreal.
1984.
The primary site of replication alters the eventual site of persistent infection by polyomavirus in mice.
J. Virol.
50:541-546[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Eckhart, W.
1969.
Complementation and transformation by temperature-sensitive mutants of polyoma virus.
Virology
38:120-125[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Fanning, E., and R. Knippers.
1992.
Structure and function of simian virus 40 large tumor antigen.
Annu. Rev. Biochem.
61:55-85[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Farmerie, W. G., and W. R. Folk.
1984.
Regulation of polyomavirus transcription by large tumor antigen.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
81:6919-6923[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Feinberg, A. P., and B. Vogelstein.
1983.
A technique for radiolabeling DNA restriction endonuclease fragments to high specific activity.
Anal. Biochem.
132:6-13[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Fried, H.,
L. D. Cahan, and J. C. Paulson.
1981.
Polyoma virus recognizes specific sialyligosaccharide receptors on host cells.
Virology
109:188-192[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Fujimura, F. K., and E. Linney.
1982.
Polyoma mutants that productively infect F9 embryonal carcinoma cells do not rescue wild-type polyoma in F9 cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
79:1479-1483[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Greenlee, J. E.
1981.
Effect of host age on experimental K virus infection in mice.
Infect. Immun.
33:297-303[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Greenlee, J. E.
1979.
Pathogenesis of K virus infection in newborn mice.
Infect. Immun.
26:705-713[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Greenlee, J. E.,
S. H. Clawson,
R. C. Phelps, and W. G. Stroop.
1994.
Distribution of K-papovavirus in infected newborn mice.
J. Comp. Pathol.
111:259-268[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Greenlee, J. E., and W. K. Dodd.
1984.
Reactivation of persistent papovavirus K infection in immunosuppressed mice.
J. Virol.
51:425-429[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Greenlee, J. E., and M. F. Law.
1985.
Interaction of K papovavirus with hamster cells: transformation of glial cells in vitro but failure of the virus to produce central nervous system tumors in vivo.
Arch. Virol.
83:207-215[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Greenlee, J. E.,
R. C. Phelps, and W. G. Stroop.
1991.
The major site of murine K papovavirus persistence and reactivation is the renal tubular epithelium.
Microb. Pathog.
11:237-247[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Guo, W.,
W. J. Tang,
X. Bu,
V. Bermudez,
M. Martin, and W. R. Folk.
1996.
AP1 enhances polyomavirus DNA replication by promoting T-antigen-mediated unwinding of DNA.
J. Virol.
70:4914-4918[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Hirt, B.
1967.
Selective extraction of polyoma DNA from infected mouse cell cultures.
J. Mol. Biol.
26:365-369[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 27.
|
Kanda, S.,
E. Landgren,
M. Ljungström, and L. Claesson-Welsh.
1996.
Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-induced differentiation of endothelial cell line established from tsA58 large T transgenic mice.
Cell Growth Differ.
7:383-395[Abstract].
|
| 28.
|
Katinka, M.,
M. Yaniv,
M. Vasseur, and D. Blangy.
1980.
Expression of polyoma early functions in mouse embryonal carcinoma cells depends on sequence rearrangements in the beginning of the late region.
Cell
20:393-399[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Keller, J. M., and J. C. Alwine.
1984.
Activation of the SV40 late promoter: direct effects of T antigen in the absence of viral DNA replication.
Cell
36:381-389[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Kern, F. G.,
S. Pellegrini,
A. Cowie, and C. Basilico.
1986.
Regulation of polyomavirus late promoter activity by viral early proteins.
J. Virol.
60:275-285[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Kilham, L., and H. W. Murphy.
1953.
A pneumotropic virus isolated from C3H mice carrying the Bittner milk agent.
Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.
82:133-137.
|
| 32.
|
Law, M. F.,
K. K. Takemoto, and P. M. Howley.
1979.
Characterization of the genome of the murine papovavirus K.
J. Virol.
30:90-97[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Liu, C. K.,
A. P. Hope, and W. J. Atwood.
1998.
The human polyomavirus, JCV, does not share receptor specificity with SV40 on human glial cells.
J. Neurovirol.
4:49-58[Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Luthman, H., and G. Magnusson.
1983.
High efficiency polyoma DNA transfection of chloroquine treated cells.
Nucleic Acids Res.
11:1295-1308[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Maione, R.,
C. Passananti,
V. De Simone,
P. Delli-Bovi,
G. Augusti-Tocco, and P. Amati.
1985.
Selection of mouse neuroblastoma cell-specific polyoma virus mutants with stage differentiative advantages of replication.
EMBO J.
4:3215-3221[Medline].
|
| 36.
|
Mantyjarvi, R. A.,
P. P. Arstila, and O. H. Meurman.
1972.
Hemagglutination by BK virus, a tentative new member of the papovavirus group.
Infect. Immun.
6:824-828[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Mayer, M., and K. Dorries.
1991.
Nucleotide sequence and genome organization of the murine polyomavirus, Kilham strain.
Virology
181:469-480[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Mokhtarian, F., and K. V. Shah.
1980.
Role of antibody response in recovery from K-papovavirus infection in mice.
Infect. Immun.
29:1169-1179[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Nguyen, V. T.,
M. Morange, and O. Bensaude.
1988.
Firefly luciferase luminescence assays using scintillation counters for quantitation in transfected mammalian cells.
Anal. Biochem.
171:404-408[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Nilsson, S. V., and G. Magnusson.
1983.
T-antigen expression by polyoma mutants with modified RNA splicing.
EMBO J.
2:2095-2101[Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Parsons, D. F.
1963.
Morphology of K virus and its relation to the papova group of viruses.
Virology
20:385-388[CrossRef].
|
| 42.
|
Soeda, E.,
J. R. Arrand,
N. Smolar,
J. E. Walsh, and B. E. Griffin.
1980.
Coding potential and regulatory signals of the polyoma virus genome.
Nature
283:445-453[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Takemoto, K. K., and P. Fabisch.
1970.
Transformation of mouse cells by K-papovavirus.
Virology
40:135-143[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Trotot, P.,
F. Mechali,
D. Blangy, and M. Lacasa.
1994.
Transcriptional activity in 3T3, F9, and PCC4 embryonal carcinoma cells: a systematic deletion and linker-scanning study of the polyomavirus enhancer.
Virology
202:724-734[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Tyndall, C.,
G. La Mantia,
C. M. Thacker,
J. Favaloro, and R. Kamen.
1981.
A region of the polyoma virus genome between the replication origin and late protein coding sequences is required in cis for both early gene expression and viral DNA replication.
Nucleic Acids Res.
9:6231-6250[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Vacante, D. A.,
R. Traub, and E. O. Major.
1989.
Extension of JC virus host range to monkey cells by insertion of a simian virus 40 enhancer into the JC virus regulatory region.
Virology
170:353-361[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Wiley, S. R.,
R. J. Kraus,
F. Zuo,
E. E. Murray,
K. Loritz, and J. E. Mertz.
1993.
SV40 early-to-late switch involves titration of cellular transcriptional repressors.
Genes Dev.
7:2206-2219[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Wingender, E.,
X. Chen,
R. Hehl,
H. Karas,
I. Liebich,
V. Matys,
T. Meinhardt,
M. Pruss,
I. Reuter, and F. Schacherer.
2000.
TRANSFAC: an integrated system for gene expression regulation.
Nucleic Acids Res.
28:316-319[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Winocour, E.
1963.
Purification of polyoma virus.
Virology
19:158-168[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, November 2001, p. 10015-10023, Vol. 75, No. 21
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.21.10015-10023.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Tegerstedt, K., Andreasson, K., Vlastos, A., Hedlund, K. O., Dalianis, T., Ramqvist, T.
(2003). Murine pneumotropic virus VP1 virus-like particles (VLPs) bind to several cell types independent of sialic acid residues and do not serologically cross react with murine polyomavirus VP1 VLPs. J. Gen. Virol.
84: 3443-3452
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Caruso, M., Belloni, L., Sthandier, O., Amati, P., Garcia, M.-I.
(2003). {alpha}4{beta}1 Integrin Acts as a Cell Receptor for Murine Polyomavirus at the Postattachment Level. J. Virol.
77: 3913-3921
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zhang, S., Magnusson, G.
(2003). Cellular Mobile Genetic Elements in the Regulatory Region of the Pneumotropic Mouse Polyomavirus Genome: Structure and Function in Viral Gene Expression and DNA Replication. J. Virol.
77: 3477-3486
[Abstract]
[Full Text]