Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, January 2001, p. 867-877, Vol. 75, No. 2
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.2.867-877.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Identification of a Novel Element Involved in
Regulation of the Lytic Switch BZLF1 Gene Promoter of
Epstein-Barr Virus
Richard J.
Kraus,
Sarah J.
Mirocha,
Heather M.
Stephany,
Joel R.
Puchalski, and
Janet E.
Mertz*
McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research,
University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison, Wisconsin
53706-1599
Received 19 July 2000/Accepted 21 October 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a human herpesvirus capable of
establishing a latent state in B lymphocytes. EBV's BZLF1 gene product
plays a central role in regulating the switch from latency to
productive infection. Here, we identify a sequence element, 5'-CAGGTA-3', called ZV, located at nucleotides
17 to
12
relative to the transcription initiation site of the BZLF1 promoter. ZV sequence-specifically binds a cellular nuclear factor(s), ZVR. ZVR
DNA-binding activity was present in the EBV-negative B-lymphocytic cell
line DG75, the EBV-positive B-lymphocytic cell lines GG68 and 721, the
cervical cell line C33A, and the kidney cell line CV-1 but not in the
breast carcinoma cell line MCF-7. Mutations in ZV that relieve binding
of ZVR lead to a two- to fourfold increase in basal expression of the
BZLF1 promoter in DG75, C33A, and CV-1 cells. The same mutants
exhibited a 40- to 180-fold increase in tetradecanoyl phorbol
acetate-ionomycin-induced expression in DG75 cells and a 22-fold
increase in C33A cells. Thus, ZVR functions as a regulator of the BZLF1
promoter, repressing transcription when bound to the ZV site in the
absence of inducers. No differences in basal or induced transcription
between wild-type and ZV mutant BZLF1 promoters were observed in
ZVR-negative MCF-7 cells. ZVR failed to bind any of the previously
identified negative regulatory elements within the BZLF1 promoter. We
conclude that ZV functions as an important regulatory element of the
BZLF1 promoter, with ZVR likely playing important roles in the
maintenance of latency and reactivation of EBV.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a human
herpesvirus that is estimated to infect up to 90% of the world's
population (28, 29). EBV infection is associated
with several human diseases, including infectious mononucleosis,
nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Burkitt's lymphoma, and, in immunosuppressed
patients, B-cell and T-cell lymphomas (28, 29). Thus, EBV
is a serious pathogen and poses a significant threat to human health.
Like other herpesviruses, primary infection with EBV is followed by a
persistent infection of the human host. Oropharyngeal epithelium is
thought to be the primary site of EBV infection and replication and of
viral spread (28-30, 51), while B cells are the major
site of persistent latency (28-31). Eleven of EBV's approximately 100 viral genes are expressed during latency. These include ones encoding the EBV-encoded nuclear antigens (EBNAs 1 to 6),
the latent membrane proteins (LMPs 1 and 2), two EBV-encoded small
nuclear RNAs, and the BamHIA transcripts (28,
29). Expression of a subset of the latter genes is sufficient to
immortalize B cells and to maintain steady-state levels of the viral
genome (31). Treatment of certain latently infected B-cell
populations with reagents such as phorbol esters (5, 17,
64), Ca2+ ionophores (15),
sodium butyrate (26, 38), and serum factors (2) or cross-linking of surface anti-immunoglobulin
(12, 21, 50, 53) leads to cellular differentiation and the
concomitant induction of the rest of EBV's genes, followed by viral
genome replication to higher copy number and production of infectious virus particles (28-30). Two immediate-early genes, BZLF1
and BRLF1, are the first to be expressed during induction of EBV out of
latency (11, 23, 32, 52). The protein products of both of
these genes are strong transcriptional transactivators (9,
16). The product of the BZLF1 gene, referred to as Zta, ZEBRA,
or EB1, plays a crucial role in the disruption of latency and
initiation of the viral infectious cycle (10, 11, 41, 46,
52). Thus, regulation of Zta expression is critical to the state
of EBV in cells.
The transcriptional regulation of the BZLF1 promoter (also referred to
as Zp) has been studied extensively. Zp exhibits very low basal
activity and is readily activated by inducers of the viral infectious
cycle. The cis-acting elements necessary both for basal
activity and for response to exogenous inducers lie within the
nucleotide (nt)
221 to +12 region of the promoter relative to the
transcriptional initiation site (12, 17, 18). These
elements have been divided into three classes (Fig.
1; also, see reference 36
and references therein). Four AT-rich elements, termed ZIA to ZID, are
dispersed throughout the promoter. They can bind the transcription
factors Sp1 and Sp3 (34) and myocyte enhancer
factor 2D (37, 44). A second type of element, ZII, shares
significant homology with the consensus CRE/AP-1 binding site (1,
13, 25, 54). Finally, a region called ZIII contains multiple
binding sites for the Zta protein itself (18). It has been
proposed that activation of the BZLF1 gene occurs via a two-step process involving induction by exogenous factors mediated through the
ZI and ZII domains, followed by autoactivation by Zta binding to the
ZIII elements (18).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
BZLF1 promoter. (A) Schematic representation of the
cis-acting elements and their binding factors present
within the 221 to +20 region of the BZLF1 promoter. The rectangles
denote the approximate locations of the cis-acting
sites. Binding factors are indicated above the sites. ZV, previously
unknown cis-acting element identified here along with
its binding factor, ZVR. Solid bars, cis-acting sites of
previously identified negative regulatory elements for which
trans-acting factors are not yet known. Numbering is
relative to the transcriptional initiation site at +1. (B) Nucleotide
sequence of the 30 to +20 region of the BZLF1 promoter used as the
probe to identify the regulatory element ZV. The ZV site sequence is
boxed.
|
|
During the latent state of infection, expression of the BZLF1 gene
remains quiescent, suggesting the presence of silencing elements within
the promoter. Recently, Liu et al. (36) identified a
negative, cis-acting element located between nt
77 and
70, immediately upstream of the consensus CRE/AP-1 binding site.
Mutations within this region, termed ZIIR, relieve repression of both
basal and activated transcription. Unfortunately, the authors failed to
detect a specific protein complex that recognized this sequence. Recently, Zhang et al. (60) showed that the ubiquitous
factor Sµbp-2 represses transcription of the BZLF1 promoter, with
this repression being significantly affected by an element located between nt
93 and
79. Whether this or the ZIIR element is an Sµbp-2 DNA-binding site remains unclear.
In earlier reports, Montalvo et al. (42) identified a
negative, cis-acting region they called ZIV, between nt
551 and
386 relative to the transcriptional start site of the BZLF1
promoter. They went on to show that the transcription factor YY1
recognized a sequence within nt
433 to
386 (43).
Similarly, Schwarzmann et al. (49) identified a silencing
element, termed HI, repeated throughout the BZLF1 promoter region five
times. This element contains the consensus sequence 5'-
ACAGA(T/G)G(A/G)-3'. Four of the five HI elements are located
between nt
551 and
227. The fifth HI element, termed HI
, is
located between nt
60 and
53.
We report here the identification of a previously unknown regulatory
element within the nt
17 to
12 region of the BZLF1 promoter that
plays a significant role in maintaining basal activity at low levels.
In keeping with previous nomenclature identifying cis-acting
regions of the BZLF1 promoter, we named this element ZV. We also show
that ZV sequence-specifically binds a cellular factor(s) we call ZVR
for "ZV regulator." ZVR activity is present in several cell lines,
including EBV-positive and -negative B-lymphocytic cell lines. ZVR
fails to recognize previously identified negative regulatory elements
in the BZLF1 promoter. Thus, ZVR is a novel regulator of the BZLF1
promoter. It probably plays a significant role in regulation of the
life cycle of EBV as well.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cells.
All B-lymphocytic cell lines were grown in 100-mm
tissue culture dishes and maintained at 37°C in a 5%
CO2 atmosphere. The EBV-negative Burkitt's
lymphoma cell line DG75 and the EBV-positive B lymphocytic cell lines
721 (27) and GG68, a clone of EBV strain P3/HR1-infected B
lymphocytes (55), were grown in RPMI 1640 medium
supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 100 U of penicillin and
streptomycin per ml. The human papillomavirus
(HPV)-negative human cervical cell line C33A and the monkey kidney cell
line CV-1 were grown in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium
supplemented with 10 or 5% fetal bovine serum, respectively, and 100 U
of penicillin and streptomycin per ml. The human breast cancer cell
line MCF-7 was grown in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal
bovine serum, 6 ng of insulin per ml, 3 µg of glutamine per ml, and
100 U of penicillin and streptomycin per ml.
Where indicated, transcription was induced by addition to the media at
the times indicated of tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate
(TPA; 20 ng/ml;
Sigma Chemical Co.) and ionomycin (1 µM; Sigma
Chemical
Co).
Plasmids.
Plasmid DNAs were constructed by standard
recombinant DNA techniques (48). Plasmid
221ZpCAT
(reference 36 and references therein), a generous gift
from Sam Speck, contains the nt
221 to +12 region relative to the
transcription initiation site of the BZLF1 promoter driving the
expression of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene. We
transferred this promoter sequence and variants of it into luciferase
reporter plasmids by insertion of appropriate PCR-generated fragments
into the KpnI and HindIII restriction sites
of the pGL3 basic luciferase vector (Promega Corp., Madison, Wis.). The
PCR fragments were obtained using
221ZpCAT as a template and the
following oligonucleotides as primers. The forward primer,
5'-GAGGTACCCCATGCATATTTCAACTGGGCTGTCTATTTTTGACACCAGCTT-3', annealed to nt
221 to
178 of the BZLF1 promoter. The primers containing the wild-type sequence or mutations (underlined) within or
adjacent to the ZVR DNA-binding site annealed to the complementary strand corresponding to the +10 to
40 region of the BZLF1 promoter. They were 5'-
GTGTAAGCTTGCAAGGTGCAATGTTTAGTGAGTTACCTGTCTAACATCTCCC-3' for
WTZpLUC,
5'-GTGTA AGCTTGCAAGGTGCAATGTTTAGTGAGTTAgCTGTCTAACATCTCC C-3'
for
23CZpLUC,
5'-GTGTAAGCTTGCAAGGTGCAATGTTTAGTGAGTTAgCTGTCTAAgATCTCCC-3' for
23C/
14CZpLUC, 5'-
GTGTAAGCTTGCAAGGTGCAATGTTTAGTGAGTTACCTGTCctgCATCTCCC-3' for
22/
20CAGZpLUC,
5'-GTGTAAGCTTGCAAGGTGCAATGTTTAGTGAGTTACCTactTAACATCTCCC-3' for
19/
17AGTZpLUC, 5'-
GTGTAAG CTTGCAAGGTGCAATGTTTAGTagaTTACCTGTCTAACATCTCCC-3' for
10/
8TCTZpLUC,
and5'-GTGTAAGCTTGCAAGGTGCAATGTTTAGTGAGTgACCTGTCTAACATCTCCC-3' for
12CZpLUC. The sequences of the promoter regions of all of the luciferase reporter plasmids were confirmed by DNA sequence analysis. All oligonucleotides were purchased from Integrated DNA
Technologies Inc. (Coralville, Iowa).
Nuclear extracts.
Nuclear extracts were prepared essentially
as described by Dignam et al. (14) as modified by Zuo
(63). B-lymphocytic cells (5 × 108), grown to a density of approximately 1 × 106/ml, were harvested by centrifugation at
2,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. The cells were washed
twice with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and the packed-cell
volume (PCV) was determined. The cells were resuspended in 2 PCVs of
buffer A (10 mM HEPES [pH 7.9], 1.5 mM MgCl2,
10 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT]), incubated for 10 min on ice,
and lysed by 10 strokes in a Dounce homogenizer using a B pestle. The
nuclei were recovered by centrifugation at 17,000 × g
for 30 min at 4°C and resuspended in 3 ml of buffer C (20 mM HEPES
[pH 7.9], 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.42 M NaCl, 0.2 mM
EDTA, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF], 1 mM DTT, 25%
glycerol) per 109 cells. The resuspended nuclei
were extracted by 5 strokes in a Dounce homogenizer using a B pestle.
Extraction was continued for an additional 30 min at 4°C. The nuclear
debris was removed by centrifugation at 17,000 × g for
30 min at 4°C. The supernatant containing the nuclear extract was
dialyzed against 50 volumes of buffer D (20 mM HEPES [pH 7.9], 6 mM
MgCl2, 100 mM KCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM
DTT, 20% glycerol) overnight at 4°C. Aliquots of nuclear extract
were stored at
70°C until use.
C33A, CV-1, and MCF-7 cells were grown to confluency in dishes, and
nuclear extracts were prepared from approximately 5 ×
10
8 cells. Since these cells adhere, they were
scraped from the dishes
into 2 ml of cold PBS and pelleted by
centrifugation. The PCVs
were determined and nuclear extracts were
prepared exactly as
described
above.
EMSAs.
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) were
performed as follows. The probes consisted of gel-purified,
double-stranded synthetic oligonucleotides that had been 5'-end labeled
with T4 polynucleotide kinase and 50 µCi of
[
-32P]ATP. The binding reaction mixtures
typically contained 2 to 12 µg of nuclear extract incubated in 20 M
HEPES (pH 7.9)-0.1 M KCl-6 mM MgCl2-4 µg of
poly(dI-dC)·(dI-dC)-0.5 mM PMSF-0.5 mM DTT-8% Ficoll. Following
incubation for 20 min at 4oC, 0.5 to 1.0 ng
(25,000 to 50,000 cpm) of the desired probe was added and the mixture
was incubated at 25°C for 15 min. For those experiments in which
competition EMSAs were performed, the desired unlabeled competitor
oligonucleotides were added to the reaction mixture, which was
incubated for 20 min at 4°C, after which the desired probe was added
and the incubation was continued. The protein-DNA complexes were
separated from the free probe by electrophoresis at 200 V for 2 h
at 4°C in a nondenaturing 4% polyacrylamide gel with 0.5×
Tris-borate-EDTA as the running buffer. The gels were dried and
exposed to X-ray films.
Transient transfections and luciferase assays.
DG75 cells
were transfected by the DEAE-dextran
dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) shock
method described by Liu et al. (36) with the minor
modification that the 20% DMSO stock solution was prepared in RPMI
1640 medium. Transfected cells were harvested 72 h
posttransfection, washed twice with PBS, and suspended in 300 µl of
luciferase assay cell lysis buffer provided by the manufacturer
(Promega Corp., Madison, Wis.). The suspension was cleared of debris by
microcentrifugation. Luciferase activity present in the cell extracts
was assayed according to the manufacturer's protocol (Promega Corp.).
Luciferase activities were normalized to protein concentrations
determined by a modified Bradford assay that utilizes a protein assay
dye (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, Calif.).
C33A, CV-1, and MCF-7 cells, grown to approximately 80% confluency in
100-mm dishes, were transfected with 2 µg of reporter
plasmid by the
DEAE-dextran-chloroquine method as described by
Good et al.
(
22). Cells were harvested 48 h after transfection,
and luciferase activities were determined as described
above.
 |
RESULTS |
Identification of a novel sequence-specific binding site in the
BZLF1 promoter.
To look for putative binding sites for cellular
factors that might regulate the BZLF1 promoter, we performed EMSAs
using nuclear extracts prepared from DG75 cells and radiolabeled
double-stranded oligonucleotides corresponding to various regions of
the BZLF1 promoter as probes. We observed the binding of a factor(s) to the
30 to +20 region of the BZLF1 promoter (Fig.
2A, lane 2), a region not previously
reported to bind regulatory factors. Data from competition EMSAs
indicated that the cellular factor(s) present in the DG75 nuclear
extract bound sequence specifically to this region of the BZLF1
promoter (Fig. 2A, lanes 3 to 5 versus lanes 6 to 8). Four regulatory
regions of the BZLF1 promoter have been defined previously. Therefore,
we chose to term this new element ZV.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Identification of a novel binding site within the BZLF1
promoter. (A) A cellular factor(s) binds sequence specifically to the
30 to +20 region of the BZLF1 promoter. Six micrograms of protein
from a nuclear extract prepared from DG75 cells was incubated with the
indicated amounts of unlabeled double-stranded DNA corresponding to the
30 to +20 (lanes 3 to 5) and 165 to 115 (lanes 6 to 8) regions of
the BZLF1 promoter as competitors, respectively, and then with a
radiolabeled double-stranded oligonucleotide corresponding to the 30
to +20 region of the BZLF1 promoter as probe. The protein-DNA complexes
were separated from free probe by electrophoresis in a native 4%
polyacrylamide gel. The location of the sequence-specific binding
complex (ZVR) identified here is indicated. (B) ZVR binding localizes
to the 25 to 11 region of the BZLF1 promoter. Competition EMSAs
were performed as described for panel A. Unlabeled double-stranded DNAs
corresponding to the 30 to +20 (lanes 3 to 5) and 165 to 115
(lanes 6 to 8) regions of the BZLF1 promoter and unlabeled
double-stranded oligonucleotides containing the sequences
5'-ATGTTAGACAGGTAACTCACTAAACATTGCC-3' ( 25/+5, lanes 9 to
11) and 5'- CTCACTAAACATTGCACCTTGCCGGCCACC-3' ( 10/+20,
lanes 12 to 14) were used as competitors.
|
|
To begin to localize the sequence-specific binding element, we
performed competition EMSAs using unlabeled double-stranded
oligonucleotides that spanned nt

25 to +5 and

10 to +20 as
competitors
for binding of the factor(s) to the radiolabeled

30 to
+20 probe.
Only the oligonucleotide containing nt

25 to +5 competed
efficiently
for binding the factor (Fig.
2B, lanes 9 to 11). Thus, we
conclude
that the binding element maps at least partially within the
sequence
5'- ATGTTAGACAGGTAA-3' located between nt

25 and

11.
To identify more precisely the specific region involved in
binding cellular factors, we next performed competition EMSAs
utilizing
a series of competitor oligonucleotides that contained 3-bp
cluster
point mutations spanning nt

22 to

7. The results of these
experiments
(Fig.
3A; summarized in Fig.
3B) mapped the binding site to approximately
nt

19 to

11,
containing the sequence 5'-GACAGGTAA-3'.

View larger version (72K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
The cellular factor ZVR recognizes bases within the 19
to 11 region of the BZLF1 promoter. (A) Competition EMSAs
performed by incubation of 6 µg of protein obtained from a DG75
nuclear extract with the indicated amounts of the 25-bp
oligonucleotides shown in panel B as competitors and approximately 1 ng
of the 30 to +20 radiolabeled probe. The protein-DNA complexes were
separated from free probe by electrophoresis in a native 4%
polyacrylamide gel. No comp, no competitor. (B) Nucleotide sequences of
the oligonucleotides used as competitors in the experiment in panel A
and binding affinities for ZVR as determined from these data.
|
|
To identify specific bases important for the binding, we lastly
performed competition EMSAs utilizing competitor oligonucleotides
containing single base pair mutations in the binding site (Fig.
4). While G

C and A

C mutations at nt

19 and

18, respectively,
recognized the binding complex as
efficiently as did the wild-type
competitor (Fig.
4A, lanes 6 to 11 versus lanes 3 to 5), G

C and
A

C mutations at nt

14 and

12,
respectively, completely abrogated
binding activity (Fig.
4A,
lanes 12 to 17 versus lanes 3 to 5).
Finally, the mutant with
the A

C base change at nt

11 retained
efficient binding
activity (Fig.
4A lanes 19 to 21 versus lanes
3 to 5). Given that the

19/

17 cluster point mutation also abrogated
binding, we conclude
that the 5' end of the binding region likely
maps to nt

17. Based on
the binding data presented here, the
3' end of the binding region
likely maps to nt

12. Thus, the
ZV binding site sequence is more
accurately defined as 5'-CAGGTA-3'.

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Identification of specific bases within the BZLF1
promoter necessary for binding of ZVR. (A) Competition EMSAs
performed by incubation of 6 µg of protein obtained from a DG75
nuclear extract with the indicated amounts of the 25-bp competitor
oligonucleotides shown in panel B and approximately 1 ng of the 30 to
+20 radiolabeled probe. The protein-DNA complexes were separated from
free probe by electrophoresis in a native 4% polyacrylamide gel. No
comp, no competitor. (B) Nucleotide sequences of the oligonucleotides
used as competitors and binding affinities for ZVR as determined from
the data shown in panel A.
|
|
Mutations within ZV relieve transcriptional repression of the BZLF1
promoter.
Having identified a previously unknown sequence-specific
binding site in the BZLF1 promoter, we wished to determine the role this element plays in regulating expression of the BZLF1 promoter. To
achieve this end, we cloned the wild-type and mutant versions of the nt
221 to +10 region of the BZLF1 promoter into a luciferase reporter
plasmid. DG75 cells were transiently transfected in parallel with these
plasmids and incubated at 37°C for 72 h in the presence or
absence of TPA plus ionomycin as inducers. Mutations in sequences flanking ZV that do not affect protein binding had little or no effect
on the transcriptional activity of the BZLF1 promoter in either the
uninduced or the induced state (Fig. 5,
mutants
23C,
22/
20CAG, and
10/
8TCT versus the wild type). On
the other hand, mutations that abrogate protein binding increased
uninduced transcriptional activity 2- to 4-fold and induced activity
40- to 180-fold (Fig. 5, mutants
19/
17 AGT,
23C/
14C, and
12C versus the wild type). Interestingly, the mutations that partially relieve repression of the BZLF1 promoter permit superactivation of
transcription by the inducers: whereas the wild-type promoter was
activated 6- to 7-fold by the inducers, the mutant promoters were
activated 20- to 45-fold above their uninduced levels. Thus, we
conclude that the
17 to
12 region of the BZLF1 promoter
sequence-specifically binds a factor(s) that can function as a potent
repressor of the BZLF1 promoter when inducers are not present. We named
this factor ZVR, for "ZV regulator."

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Correlation between binding of ZVR and repression from
the BZLF1 promoter. (A) Structure of the wild-type reporter plasmid
WTZpLUC constructs. The cloning vector was the pGL3 basic vector, whose
sequences are not shown. Arrow, transcription initiation site. The
location of the ZV element is indicated, as are sequences encoding
luciferase (LUC). Nucleotides are numbered relative to the
transcription initiation site. (B) Effects of ZV mutations on
transcription in DG-75 cells. Luciferase reporter plasmids (2 µg/100-mm dish) containing the wild-type sequence or the indicated
mutations in the BZLF1 promoter were transfected in parallel into DG75
cells, incubated for 72 h, and then harvested. Luciferase
activities were determined and normalized to the protein concentration
of each extract. The data are presented relative to the activity
observed for the wild-type promoter not treated with inducers (rel. to
WT). They are the means with standard errors of the means for three
sets of transfections performed on different days. (C) Effects of ZV
mutations on transcription in the presence of inducers. Cells were
treated in parallel with the ones in panel B, except for incubation
after transfection with TPA (20 ng/ml) plus ionomycin (1 µM) until
harvesting.
|
|
Repression of the BZLF1 promoter through the ZV element requires
the presence of ZVR DNA-binding activity.
If the ZV element does,
indeed, function by binding ZVR, mutations in ZV may have little effect
on transcriptional activity in cell lines lacking ZVR activity. Thus,
we tested several additional cell lines for ZVR activity: the
HPV-negative human cervical cell line C33A, the human breast cancer
cell line MCF-7, and the monkey kidney cell line CV-1. All three are
epithelium derived. Nuclear extracts were prepared from each of these
cell lines and assayed for ZVR DNA-binding activity as described above.
The C33A and CV-1 cell lines were found to contain as much ZVR
DNA-binding activity as do DG75 cells, if not slightly more (Fig.
6, lanes 5 to 7 and 8 to 10, respectively, versus lanes 2 to 4). MCF-7 cells appeared to lack
detectable ZVR DNA-binding activity (Fig. 6, lanes 11 to 13), at least
with the electrophoretic mobility observed with the other cell lines.
Therefore, MCF-7 cells likely represent a cell line one can use to
examine regulation of the BZLF1 promoter in the absence of significant
levels of ZVR.

View larger version (104K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
ZVR DNA-binding activity is present in C33A and CV-1
cells but not MCF-7 cells. The indicated amounts of protein from
nuclear extracts obtained from DG75 cells (lanes 2 to 4), C33A cells
(lanes 5 to 7), CV-1 cells (lanes 8 to 10), and MCF-7 cells (lanes 11 to 13) were incubated with approximately 1 ng of the 30 to +20
radiolabeled probe. The DNA-protein complexes were separated from free
probe by electrophoresis in a native 4% polyacrylamide gel.
|
|
To look for cell-dependent effects on transcription of the BZLF1
promoter, each of these cell lines was transfected in parallel
with
luciferase reporter constructs containing the wild-type or

23C/

14C
mutant version of the BZLF1 promoter. Luciferase activity
was assayed
after incubation for 2 days with or without the inducers.
As expected,
the mutation in the ZVR element led to approximately
three- to fourfold
derepression of basal transcription in the
ZVR-positive cell lines C33A
and CV-1 (Fig.
7A and B). Treatment
with
TPA plus ionomycin induced wild-type activity approximately
sevenfold
in C33A cells and three- to fourfold in CV-1 cells.
Interestingly,
superactivation was not observed with the mutant
promoter in either
C33A or CV-1 cells. This finding probably reflects
differences in other
factors involved in the transcriptional regulation
of the BZLF1
promoter between epithelial and B-lymphocytic cells.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
The presence of ZVR correlates with regulation of
expression of the BZLF1 promoter via the ZV element. Luciferase
reporter plasmids (2 µg/100-mm dish) containing the wild-type
sequence or the 23C/ 14C mutation in the BZLF1 promoter were
transfected in parallel into C33A (A), CV-1 (B), and MCF-7 (C) cells.
Cells were incubated for 48 h with or without TPA (20 ng/ml) plus
ionomycin (1 µM) and then harvested. Luciferase activities (act.)
were determined and normalized to the protein concentration of each
extract. The data are presented relative to the activity observed for
the wild-type promoter not treated with inducers (rel. to WT). They are
the means with standard errors of the means for three experiments
performed on different days.
|
|
The effects of the mutation in the ZV site and inducers on expression
of the BZLF1 promoters were markedly different in the
ZVR-negative cell
line MCF-7. In this case, both the mutation
and the inducers had at
most marginally significant effects on
transcription (Fig.
7C). The
former finding provides further support
for our hypothesis that the
primary function of the ZV element
is to serve as a binding site for a
regulatory factor. The latter
finding may reflect differences between
MCF-7 and DG75 cells in
their responses to the inducers as well as
factors present in
these cells. We conclude that, at least for these
four cell lines
examined to date, a correlation exists between the
presence of
ZVR DNA-binding activity and regulation of the BZLF1
promoter
via the ZV
element.
ZVR does not bind previously identified repressor elements within
the BZLF1 promoter.
Three other negative cis-acting
elements have previously been identified within the nt
221 to +20
region of the BZLF1 promoter. No sequence-specific factors have been
identified to date that bind these three negative elements. One, called
ZIIR, is centered around nt
70 (36). Another, HI
, is
located between nt
59 and
52 (49). The third region
maps to nt
93 to
79 (60). To examine whether ZVR
recognizes any of these sequences, we performed EMSAs utilizing as
competitors unlabeled double-stranded oligonucleotides containing the
sequences of the ZIIR, HI
, and
93/
79 elements (Fig.
8B). None of these oligonucleotides
competed effectively for ZVR DNA binding (Fig. 8A). Thus, the factor(s)
that binds to the
17 to
12 region of the BZLF1 promoter is distinct
from the ones yet to be identified that interact with the previously known negative regulatory elements of the BZLF1 promoter.

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
ZVR is a previously unidentified DNA-binding factor. (A)
Competition EMSAs performed by incubation of 6 µg of nuclear
extract obtained from DG75 cells with the radiolabeled 30 to +20
region oligonucleotide as probe and the indicated amounts of unlabeled
30 to +20 wild-type DNA (lanes 3 to 5), 23/ 14 mutant DNA (lanes 6 to 8), or the double-stranded oligonucleotides shown in panel B
containing the ZIIR (lanes 9 to 11), the HI (lanes 12 to 14), or the
93/ 79 (lanes 15 to 17) element as a competitor. (B) Sequences of
the oligonucleotides used as competitors in the experiment shown in
panel A. Bases shown by others to play roles in repression of the BZLF1
promoter are boxed.
|
|
Effect of EBV latent products on ZVR DNA-binding activity.
To
determine the effects of EBV latent proteins on the DNA-binding
activity of ZVR, we performed EMSAs with nuclear extracts obtained
from two EBV-positive B-lymphocytic cell lines, GG68 and 721. ZVR
DNA-binding activity was readily observed in both of these cell lines
(Fig. 9). Competition EMSAs with
wild-type and mutant oligonucleotides as competitors confirmed that
these DNA-protein complexes contained ZVR (data not shown). Thus, the amount of DNA-binding activity present in B-lymphocytic cells is
probably not appreciably affected by the presence of the EBV latent
gene products responsible for cellular immortalization. However, the
effects EBV latent gene products have on other activities of ZVR, e.g.,
transcriptional activities, remain unknown.

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
Presence of EBV's products expressed during latency
does not affect the DNA-binding activity of ZVR. Nuclear extracts were
prepared from the EBV-negative cell line DG75 (lanes 2 to 4) and the
EBV-positive cell lines 721 (lanes 5 to 7) and GG68 (lanes 8 to 10).
The indicated amounts of protein from these extracts were incubated
with approximately 1 ng of the 30 to +20 region radiolabeled probe.
The DNA-protein complexes were separated from free probe by
electrophoresis in a native 4% polyacrylamide gel.
|
|
Treatment with TPA plus ionomycin enhances the DNA-binding activity
of ZVR.
The BZLF1 promoter contains a recognizable CRE/AP-1 motif
previously shown to be essential for transcriptional activation by
phorbol esters (5, 17). Treatment with inducing agents enhances the binding activity of the trans-acting factors
that recognize these sequences (33). Likewise, incubation
of cells with TPA has been shown to relieve binding activities of
transcriptional repressors that recognize elements lying 300 to 400 bp
upstream of the transcriptional start site of the BZLF1 promoter
(43, 49). To determine whether inducers also affect ZVR
DNA-binding activity in ways that might directly contribute toward
activation of the BZLF1 promoter, we prepared nuclear extracts from
DG75 cells treated with TPA plus ionomycin for 72 h prior to
harvesting the cells. In contrast to the response observed with
previously identified transcriptional repressors of the BZLF1 promoter,
treatment with TPA plus ionomycin led to a threefold enhancement of ZVR DNA-binding activity (Fig. 10A, lanes 2 to 4 versus lanes 5 to 7). Competition EMSAs confirmed that this
binding activity was, indeed, ZVR (Fig. 10B). Thus, we conclude that
induction of the BZLF1 promoter by TPA plus ionomycin does not occur in
part via inactivation of binding of ZVR to the BZLF1 promoter. Other
models by which it might act are discussed below.

View larger version (85K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 10.
ZVR DNA-binding activity is increased by treatment with
inducers of the BZLF1 promoter. (A) EMSAs performed with the
indicated amounts of protein obtained from a nuclear extract prepared
from DG75 cells either untreated (lanes 2 to 4) ( ) or treated (lanes
5 to 7) (+) with TPA (20 ng/ml) plus ionomycin (1 µM) for 72 h
prior to harvesting. Each reaction mixture also contained approximately
1 ng of radiolabeled probe corresponding to the 30 to +20 region of
the BZLF1 promoter. The protein-DNA complexes were separated from free
probe by electrophoresis in a native 4% polyacrylamide gel. The
position of the ZVR-DNA complex is indicated. (B) Competition EMSAs
performed with nuclear extract prepared from DG75 cells treated with
TPA (20 ng/ml) plus ionomycin (1 µM). The reactions were performed
with 6 µg of protein, the indicated amounts of the unlabeled
wild-type (lanes 3 to 5) or mutant (lanes 6 to 8) double-stranded
oligonucleotides shown in Fig. 3B as competitors, and the radiolabeled
probe corresponding to the 30 to +20 region of the BZLF1 promoter. No
comp, no competitor.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
We report here the identification within the BZLF1 promoter of a
previously unknown regulatory element called ZV and the cellular factor(s), named ZVR, which sequence-specifically binds to it. The ZV
element maps to nt
17 to
12 of the BZLF1 promoter (Fig. 3 and 4),
although flanking bases may contribute to its specificity. We
demonstrated a correlation between binding of ZVR to the ZV element and
regulation of the BZLF1 promoter both with mutations in the ZV element
(Fig. 5) and with cell lines lacking ZVR DNA-binding activity (Fig. 6
and 7). We further showed that ZVR does not bind to previously
identified negative regulatory elements of the BZLF1 promoter (Fig. 8).
Thus, we conclude that ZVR is a previously unknown regulator of the
BZLF1 promoter. Finally, we found that ZVR DNA-binding activity remains
abundant in lymphocytes that had been immortalized by EBV and express
EBV's latent gene products (Fig. 9), and it is not inactivated by
treatment of cells with the inducers TPA and ionomycin (Fig. 10).
ZV element.
Using EMSAs and nuclear extracts from DG75
cells as a protein source, we identified a novel factor-binding site
located at nt
17 to
12 of the BZLF1 promoter (Fig. 2 to 4). Our
data showed that these 6 bp are required for binding activity.
Mutations outside this region did not affect binding. However, we have
not ruled out the possibility that additional bases also contribute to
binding specificity.
Interestingly, the ZV element lies between the

30 and initiator basal
elements of the BZLF1 promoter. There are numerous
viral promoters that
contain regulatory sequences at this location.
For example, we have
previously identified a regulatory element
that overlaps the initiator
site of the simian virus 40 major
late promoter (
56).
Binding of specific members of the nuclear
factor receptor superfamily
to this element prevents the formation
of transcriptional preinitiation
complexes (
61-63). Likewise, Yu
and Mertz
(
59) found a hormone response element that overlaps
the

30 element of the human hepatitis B virus pre-C
promoter.
Both the major immediate-early gene and the US3 gene promoters of human
cytomegalovirus contain
cis repression sequences that
lie
immediately upstream of their respective transcriptional start
sites
(
3,
4,
8,
35,
39,
40,
47). The regulatory
effect of this
sequence is position dependent; that is, these
sequences no longer
repress when placed upstream of the TATA box
or downstream of the
initiator (
35). Whether the location of
the ZV element is
important for its effects on transcription of
the BZLF1 promoter
remains to be
determined.
Role of ZVR in regulation of the BZLF1 promoter.
Our
experiments demonstrated a correlation between binding of ZVR to the ZV
element and repression of the BZLF1 promoter. First, we found that
promoters containing mutations in the ZV element that abrogated ZVR
binding exhibited higher levels of both basal and induced transcription
than the wild-type promoter in ZVR-positive cells (Fig. 3 to 7).
Second, statistically significant differences were not observed between
the wild-type and mutant promoters in the cell line MCF-7, which lacks
ZVR DNA-binding activity (Fig. 7C). Thus, the ZV element is a
regulatory element of the BZLF1 promoter that functions as a
transcriptional silencing element in the absence of inducers.
Interesting was the finding that some mutants exhibited superactivation
of transcription by inducers in DG75 cells, i.e.,
levels of
transcription from the BZLF1 promoter after induction
that were
significantly greater than the product of the increases
due to
the mutation and inducers alone (e.g., Fig.
5, mutant

23C/

14C).
One
hypothesis to explain this finding is the following. The wild-type
BZLF1 promoter is normally quiescent in B lymphocytes and other
ZVR-positive cell types because it is bound by multiple negative
regulatory factors, including ZVR, repressing transcription (Fig.
11, diagram A1). Treatment with
exogenous inducers leads to modest
activation of transcription of the
BZLF1 promoter through signal
transduction pathways affecting the
activities of some of the
positive and negative
trans-acting regulatory factors that bind
responsive
cis-acting elements situated throughout the BZLF1
promoter
(Fig.
11, diagram A2). Mutations in the ZVR DNA-binding
site prevent
ZVR binding, leading to partial, incomplete
derepression of basal
transcription because other repressors remain
bound to the promoter
(Fig.
11, diagram A3). Treatment with inducers
leads to superactivation
of transcription of ZV mutant promoters
because, in this case,
neither ZVR nor the repressors that are
inactivated by the inducers
remain bound (Fig.
11, diagram A4).
Superactivation of the mutant
promoters does not occur in the
ZVR-positive epithelial cells
because of cell-type-specific differences
in available signal
transduction pathways and regulatory factors (Fig.
11, diagrams
B1 to B4). In addition, basal activity in these cells may
already
be higher than it is in B lymphocytes because of an absence of
some of the sequence-specific repressors of this promoter. In
the
absence of both ZVR and the B-lymphocytic factors and pathways,
neither
mutation of the ZV element nor inducers have a significant
effect
on transcription of the BZLF1 promoter (Fig.
11, diagrams
C1 to C4).
Quite likely, the tissue tropism of EBV is related
to these
differences.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 11.
Model for regulation of the BZLF1 promoter by ZVR. See
the text for details. Relative levels of transcription are indicated by
the heights and thicknesses of the arrows. Rectangles, ZV elements; X,
mutations within the ZV element; R, cellular repressors inactivated by
inducers such as TPA; A, sequence-specific positive factors activated
by inducers in B lymphocytes (triangles) or positive factors present in
epithelial cells (rhomboids).
|
|
Effect of EBV-encoded factors on ZVR activities.
Negative
regulatory elements of the BZLF1 promoter lie both within (36,
43, 60) and outside (42, 43, 49) the
221 to + 20 region. We showed here that ZVR does not bind any of the known proximal
negative elements (Fig. 8). Specific factors that recognize the distal
negative elements have been found only in nuclear extracts obtained
from cells latently infected with EBV (49). We found that
ZVR is abundant not only in B lymphocytes that express EBV's latent
gene products (Fig. 9) but also in B lymphocytes that do not (Fig. 2 to
4). Thus, ZVR DNA-binding activity is independent of EBV status.
Therefore, we conclude that ZVR is, indeed, distinct from any of the
previously identified repressors of the BZLF1 promoter.
Effect of inducers on ZVR activities.
We found that treatment
of cells with the inducers TPA and ionomycin did not eliminate the
DNA-binding activity of ZVR; if anything, it enhanced it (Fig. 10).
Likewise, Grove and Mastro (24) found enhanced binding
activity in extracts obtained from TPA-treated bovine lymphocytes of a
transcription factor that interacts with the negative regulatory
element (NRE-A) of the interleukin-2 (IL-2) promoter. Since the
sequences of these two elements are identical, it is quite likely that
we have identified a similar binding activity. Yet to be determined is
the effect of inducers on ZVR's transcriptional activities. Possibly,
inducers change ZVR from a repressor to an activator by modifying ZVR
directly or altering factors with which it interacts, e.g., corepressor and coactivator complexes, some of which may be lymphoid specific. The
inducers may also be directly or indirectly increasing the specific
DNA-binding activity or half-life of ZVR. Alternatively, although less
likely, the inducers may lead indirectly to another, similar-mobility
factor binding to the ZV site. On the other hand, treatment of
EBV-positive cells with TPA relieves binding to the distal HI and YY1
elements (43, 49). Thus, relief of repression and
activation of transcription represent non-mutually exclusive mechanisms
by which TPA may induce the transcriptional activity of the BZLF1 promoter.
Possible identity of ZVR.
We showed here that ZVR recognizes
the sequence 5'-CAGGTA-3'. This sequence is identical to the
NRE-A within the IL-2 promoter (57). Originally, a
T-cell-specific zinc finger binding protein, termed Nil-2-a, was
identified as the transcription factor that mediates its effects
through NRE-A (57). Subsequently, a similar zinc
finger/homeodomain protein, termed ZEB for "zinc finger E-box binding
protein," was isolated from B cells (19, 20, 58). It is
now known that Nil-2-a is a partial cDNA clone of ZEB. ZEB represents
the full-length protein and is present in a number of cell types
including T cells.
We also found that ZVR binds to the sequence 5'-CAGGTG-3'
(data not shown). Thus, the sequences recognized by ZVR,
5'-CAGGT(A/G)-3',
do not match those of a consensus E box
[CAC(C/G)(T/G)(G/T)] but
can be defined as E box like
(
19). Previous reports show that
ZEB binds these sequences
(
19,
20). Therefore, based on binding
sequence
specificity, we hypothesize that ZVR may be ZEB or a
closely related
zinc finger/homeodomain protein family member
(
6).
Role of ZVR in the life cycle of EBV.
The fundamental question
yet to be answered is the role played by ZVR in EBV latency and the
induction out of latency. We hypothesize that ZVR repressor activity
may predispose a cell toward establishing a latent state of infection.
Target cells of EBV lacking ZVR repressor activity may overproduce Zta,
producing infectious virus rather than entering a latent immortalized
state. Generating strains of EBV containing mutations within the ZV
element and cell lines with levels of ZVR that can be regulated
experimentally should enable one to determine the role of this
regulatory element and its trans-acting factors in the life
cycle of EBV.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
The first two authors contributed equally to this work.
We thank Sam Speck for plasmid
221ZpCAT. We are especially grateful
to Bill Sugden and members of his laboratory for the B-lymphocytic cell
lines and advice for growing them as well as helpful discussions and
comments on this paper. We also thank members of the Mertz laboratory
for helpful discussions.
This work was supported by Public Health Service research grants
CA22443 and CA07175 from the National Cancer Institute.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: McArdle
Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin Medical School,
1400 University Ave., Madison, WI 53706-1599. Phone: (608) 262-2383. Fax: (608) 262-2824. E-mail: mertz{at}oncology.wisc.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Angel, P.,
M. Imagawa,
R. Chiu,
B. Stein,
R. J. Imbra,
H. J. Rahmsdorf,
C. Jonat,
P. Herrlich, and M. Karin.
1987.
Phorbol ester-inducible genes contain a common cis element recognized by a TPA-modulated trans-acting factor.
Cell
49:729-739[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bauer, G.,
P. Höfler, and H. zur Hausen.
1982.
Epstein-Barr virus induction by a serum factor. I. Induction and cooperation with additional inducers.
Virology
121:184-194[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Biegalke, B. J.
1995.
Regulation of human cytomegalovirus US3 gene transcription by a cis-repressive sequence.
J. Virol.
69:5362-5367[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Biegalke, B. J.
1997.
IE2 protein is sufficient for transcriptional repression of the human cytomegalovirus US3 promoter.
J. Virol.
71:8056-8060[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Borras, A. M.,
J. L. Strominger, and S. H. Speck.
1996.
Characterization of the ZI domains in the Epstein-Barr virus BZLF1 gene promoter: role in phorbol ester induction.
J. Virol.
70:3894-3901[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Chamberlain, E. M., and M. M. Sanders.
1999.
Identification of the novel player EF1 in estrogen transcriptional cascades.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
19:3600-3606[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Chatila, T.,
N. Ho,
P. Liu,
S. Liu,
G. Mosialos,
E. Kieff, and S. H. Speck.
1997.
The Epstein-Barr virus-induced Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase type IV/Gr promotes a Ca2+-dependent switch from latency to viral replication.
J. Virol.
71:6560-6567[Abstract].
|
| 8.
|
Cherrington, J. M.,
E. L. Khoury, and E. S. Mocarski.
1991.
Human cytomegalovirus ie2 negatively regulates gene expression via a short target sequence near the transcription start site.
J. Virol.
65:887-896[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Chevallier-Greco, A.,
E. Manet,
P. Chavrier,
C. Mosnier,
J. Daillie, and A. Sergeant.
1986.
Both Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-encoded trans-acting factors, EB1 and EB2, are required to activate transcription from an EBV early promoter.
EMBO J.
5:3243-3249[Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Countryman, J., and G. Miller.
1985.
Activation of expression of latent Epstein-Barr herpesvirus after gene transfer with a small cloned subfragment of heterogeneous viral DNA.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:4085-4089[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Countryman, J.,
H. Jenson,
R. Seibl,
H. Wolf, and G. Miller.
1987.
Polymorphic proteins encoded within BZLF1 of defective and standard Epstein-Barr viruses disrupt latency.
J. Virol.
61:3672-3679[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Daibata, M.,
S. H. Speck,
C. Mulder, and T. Sairenji.
1994.
Regulation of the BZLF1 promoter of Epstein-Barr virus by second messengers in anti-immunoglobulin-treated B cells.
Virology
198:446-454[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Delegeane, A. M.,
L. H. Ferland, and P. L. Mellon.
1987.
Tissue-specific enhancer of the human glycoprotein hormone -subunit gene: dependence on cyclic AMP-inducible elements.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
7:3994-4002[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Dignam, J. D.,
R. M. Lebovitz, and R. R. Roeder.
1983.
Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei.
Nucleic Acids Res.
11:1475-1489[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Faggioni, A.,
C. Zompetta,
S. Grimaldi,
G. Barile,
L. Frati, and J. Lazdins.
1986.
Calcium modulation activates Epstein-Barr virus genome in latently infected cells.
Science
232:1554-1556[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Farrell, P. J.,
D. T. Rowe,
C. M. Rooney, and T. Kouzarides.
1989.
Epstein-Barr virus BZLF1 trans-activator specifically binds to a consensus AP-1 site and is related to c-fos.
EMBO J.
8:127-132[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Flemington, E., and S. H. Speck.
1990.
Identification of phorbol ester responsive elements in the promoter of Epstein-Barr virus putative lytic switch gene BZLF1.
J. Virol.
64:1217-1226[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Flemington, E., and S. H. Speck.
1990.
Autoregulation of Epstein-Barr virus putative lytic switch gene BZLF1.
J. Virol.
64:1227-1232[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
Genetta, T.,
D. Ruezinsky, and T. Kadesch.
1994.
Displacement of an E-box-binding repressor by basic helix-loop-helix proteins: implications for B-cell specificity of the immunoglobulin heavy-chain enhancer.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
14:6153-6163[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Genetta, T., and T. Kadesch.
1996.
Cloning of a cDNA encoding a mouse transcriptional repressor displaying striking sequence conservation across vertebrates.
Gene
169:289-290[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Goldfeld, A. E.,
P. Liu,
S. Liu,
E. K. Flemington,
J. L. Strominger, and S. H. Speck.
1995.
Cyclosporin A and FK506 block induction of the Epstein-Barr virus lytic cycle by anti-immunoglobulin.
Virology
209:225-229[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Good, P. J.,
R. C. Welch,
W.-S. Ryu, and J. E. Mertz.
1988.
The late spliced 19S and 16S RNAs of simian virus 40 can be synthesized from a common pool of transcripts.
J. Virol.
62:563-571[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Grogan, E.,
H. Jenson,
J. Countryman,
L. Heston,
L. Gradoville, and G. Miller.
1987.
Transfection of a rearranged viral DNA fragment, WZhet, stably converts latent Epstein-Barr viral infection to productive infection in lymphoid cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
84:1332-1336[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Grove, D. S., and A. M. Mastro.
1996.
Modulation of the levels of a negative transcription factor for IL-2 by 12-O-tetradecanoyl phorbol-13-acetate and okadaic acid.
Cytokine
8:809-816[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Habener, J. F.
1990.
Cyclic AMP response element binding proteins: a cornucopia of transcription factors.
Mol. Endocrinol.
4:1087-1094[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Kallin, B.,
J. Luka, and G. Klein.
1979.
Immunochemical characterization of Epstein-Barr virus-associated early and late antigens in n-butyrate-treated P3HR-1 cells.
J. Virol.
32:710-716[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Kavathas, P.,
F. H. Bach, and R. DeMars.
1980.
Gamma ray-induced loss of expression of HLA and glyoxalase 1 alleles in lymphoblastoid cells.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
77:4251-4255[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Kieff, E., and D. Liebowitz.
1990.
Epstein-Barr virus and its replication, p. 1889-1920.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, R. M. Chanock, M. S. Hirsch, J. L. Melnick, T. P. Monath, and B. Roizman (ed.), Fields virology, 2nd ed. Raven Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 29.
|
Kieff, E., and D. Liebowitz.
1991.
Epstein-Barr virus and its replication, p. 897-928.
In
B. N. Fields, and D. M. Knipe (ed.), Fundamental virology, 2nd ed. Raven Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 30.
|
Kieff, E.
1995.
Epstein-Barr virus and its replication, p. 2343-2396.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, P. M. Howley, R. M. Chanock, J. L. Melnick, T. P. Monath, B. Roizman, and S. E. Straus (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed. Lippincott, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 31.
|
Knutson, J. C., and B. Sugden.
1989.
Immortalization of B lymphocytes by Epstein-Barr virus: what does the virus contribute to the cell?
Adv. Viral Oncol.
8:151-172.
|
| 32.
|
Laux, G.,
U. K. Freese,
R. Fischer,
A. Polack,
E. Kofler, and G. W. Bornkamm.
1988.
TPA-inducible Epstein-Barr virus genes in Raji cells and their regulation.
Virology
162:503-507[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Lee, W.,
P. Mitchell, and R. Tjian.
1987.
Purified transcription factor AP-1 interacts with TPA-inducible enhancer elements.
Cell
49:741-752[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Liu, S.,
A. M. Borras,
P. Liu,
G. Suske, and S. H. Speck.
1997.
Binding of the ubiquitous cellular transcription factors Sp1 and Sp3 to the ZI domains in the Epstein-Barr virus lytic switch BZLF1 gene promoter.
Virology
228:11-18[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Liu, B.,
T. W. Hermiston, and M. F. Stinski.
1991.
A cis-acting element in the major immediate-early (IE) promoter of human cytomegalovirus is required for negative regulation by IE2.
J. Virol.
65:897-903[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Liu, P.,
S. Liu, and S. H. Speck.
1998.
Identification of a negative cis element within the ZII domain of the Epstein-Barr virus lytic switch BZLF1 gene promoter.
J. Virol.
72:8230-8239[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Liu, S.,
P. Liu,
A. Borras,
T. Chatila, and S. H. Speck.
1997.
Cyclosporin A-sensitive induction of the Epstein-Barr lytic switch is mediated via a novel pathway involving a MEF2 family member.
EMBO J.
16:143-153[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Luka, J.,
B. Kallin, and G. Klein.
1979.
Induction of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) cycle in latently infected cells by n-butyrate.
Virology
94:228-231[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Macias, M. P.,
L. Huang,
P. E. Lashmit, and M. F. Stinski.
1996.
Cellular or viral protein binding to a cytomegalovirus promoter transcription initiation site: effects on transcription.
J. Virol.
70:3628-3635[Abstract].
|
| 40.
|
Macias, M. P., and M. F. Stinski.
1993.
An in vitro system for human cytomegalovirus immediate early 2 protein (IE2)-mediated site-dependent repression of transcription and direct binding of IE2 to the major immediate early promoter.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:707-711[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Miller, G.,
M. Rabson, and L. Heston.
1984.
Epstein-Barr virus with heterogeneous DNA disrupts latency.
J. Virol.
50:174-182[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Montalvo, E. A.,
Y. Shi,
T. E. Shenk, and A. J. Levine.
1991.
Negative regulation of the BZLF1 promoter of Epstein-Barr virus.
J. Virol.
65:3647-3655[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Montalvo, E. A.,
M. Cottam,
S. Hill, and Y.-C. J. Wang.
1995.
YY1 binds to and regulates cis-acting negative elements in the Epstein-Barr virus BZLF1 promoter.
J. Virol.
69:4158-4165[Abstract].
|
| 44.
|
Murre, C.,
A. Voronova, and D. Baltimore.
1991.
B-cell- and myocyte-specific E2-box-binding factors contain E12/E47-like subunits.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
11:1156-1160[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Niederman, J. C.,
A. S. Evans,
L. Subrahmanyan, and R. W. McCollum.
1970.
Prevalence, incidence and persistence of EB virus antibody in young adults.
N. Engl. J. Med.
282:361-365.
|
| 46.
|
Patton, D. F.,
R. C. Ribeiro,
J. J. Jenkins, and J. W. Sixbey.
1994.
Thymic carcinoma with a defective Epstein-Barr virus encoding the BZLF1 trans-activator.
J. Infect. Dis.
170:7-12[Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Pizzorno, M. C., and G. S. Hayward.
1990.
The IE2 gene products of human cytomegalovirus specifically down-regulate expression from the major immediate-early promoter through a target sequence located near the cap site.
J. Virol.
64:6154-6165[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 48.
|
Sambrook, J.,
E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis.
1989.
Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 49.
|
Schwarzmann, F.,
N. Prang,
B. Reichelt,
B. Rinkes,
S. Haist,
M. Marschall, and H. Wolf.
1994.
Negatively cis-acting elements in the distal part of the promoter of Epstein-Barr virus trans-activator gene BZLF1.
J. Gen. Virol.
75:1999-2006[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Shimizu, N., and K. Takada.
1993.
Analysis of the BZLF1 promoter of Epstein-Barr virus: identification of an anti-immunoglobulin response sequence.
J. Virol.
67:3240-3245[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 51.
|
Sixbey, J. W.,
J. G. Nedrud,
N. Raab-Traub,
R. A. Hanes, and J. S. Pagano.
1984.
Epstein-Barr virus replication in oropharyngeal epithelial cells.
N. Engl. J. Med.
310:1225-1230[Abstract].
|
| 52.
|
Takada, K.,
N. Shimizu,
S. Sakuma, and Y. Ono.
1986.
trans activation of the latent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) genome after transfection of the EBV DNA fragment.
J. Virol.
57:1016-1022[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 53.
|
Tovey, G. M.,
G. Lenoir, and J. Begon-Lours.
1978.
Activation of latent Epstein-Barr virus by antibody to human IgM.
Nature
276:270-272[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Urier, G.,
M. Buisson,
P. Chambard, and A. Sergeant.
1989.
The Epstein-Barr virus early protein EB1 activates transcription from different responsive elements including AP-1 binding sites.
EMBO J.
8:1447-1453[Medline].
|
| 55.
|
Weigel, R., and G. Miller.
1983.
Major EB virus-specific cytoplasmic transcripts in a cellular clone of the HR-1 Burkitt lymphoma line during latency after induction of viral replicative cycle of phorbol esters.
Virology
125:287-298[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 56.
|
Wiley, S. R.,
R. J. Kraus,
F. Zou,
E. E. Murray,
K. Loritz, and J. E. Mertz.
1993.
SV40 early-to-late switch involves titration of cellular transcriptional repressors.
Genes Dev.
7:2206-2219[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 57.
|
Williams, T. M.,
D. Moolten,
J. Burlein,
J. Romano,
R. Bhaerman,
A. Godillot,
M. Mellon,
F. J. Rauscher III, and J. A. Kant.
1991.
Identification of a zinc finger protein that inhibits IL-2 gene expression.
Science
254:1791-1794[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 58.
|
Yasui, D. H.,
T. Genetta,
T. Kadesch,
T. M. Williams,
S. L. Swain,
L. V. Tsui, and B. T. Huber.
1998.
Transcriptional repression of the IL-2 gene in Th cells by ZEB.
J. Immunol.
160:4433-4440[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 59.
|
Yu, X., and J. E. Mertz.
1996.
Promoters for the synthesis of the pre-C and pregenomic mRNAs of human hepatitis B virus are genetically distinct and differentially regulated.
J. Virol.
70:8719-8726[Abstract].
|
| 60.
|
Zhang, Q.,
Y.-C. J. Wang, and E. A. Montalvo.
1999.
Sµbp-2 represses the Epstein-Barr virus lytic switch promoter.
Virology
255:160-170[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 61.
|
Zuo, F., and J. E. Mertz.
1995.
Simian virus 40 late gene expression is regulated by members of the steroid/thyroid hormone receptor superfamily.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:8586-8590[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 62.
|
Zuo, F.,
R. J. Kraus,
T. Gulick,
D. D. Moore, and J. E. Mertz.
1997.
Direct modulation of simian virus 40 late gene expression by thyroid hormone and its receptor.
J. Virol.
71:427-436[Abstract].
|
| 63.
|
Zuo, F.
1995.
Regulation of the SV40 late promoter by members of the steroid/thyroid hormone receptor superfamily. Ph.D. thesis.
University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wis.
|
| 64.
|
zur Hausen, H.,
F. J. O'Neill,
U. K. Freese, and E. Hecker.
1978.
Persisting oncogenic herpesvirus induced by the tumour promoter TPA.
Nature
272:373-375[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, January 2001, p. 867-877, Vol. 75, No. 2
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.2.867-877.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Feng, W.-h., Kraus, R. J., Dickerson, S. J., Lim, H. J., Jones, R. J., Yu, X., Mertz, J. E., Kenney, S. C.
(2007). ZEB1 and c-Jun Levels Contribute to the Establishment of Highly Lytic Epstein-Barr Virus Infection in Gastric AGS Cells. J. Virol.
81: 10113-10122
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Huang, J., Liao, G., Chen, H., Wu, F. Y., Hutt-Fletcher, L., Hayward, G. S., Hayward, S. D.
(2006). Contribution of C/EBP Proteins to Epstein-Barr Virus Lytic Gene Expression and Replication in Epithelial Cells. J. Virol.
80: 1098-1109
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Amon, W., Binne, U. K., Bryant, H., Jenkins, P. J., Karstegl, C. E., Farrell, P. J.
(2004). Lytic Cycle Gene Regulation of Epstein-Barr Virus. J. Virol.
78: 13460-13469
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
McNees, A. L., Mahr, J. A., Ornelles, D., Gooding, L. R.
(2004). Postinternalization Inhibition of Adenovirus Gene Expression and Infectious Virus Production in Human T-Cell Lines. J. Virol.
78: 6955-6966
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wu, F. Y., Wang, S. E., Chen, H., Wang, L., Hayward, S. D., Hayward, G. S.
(2004). CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Protein {alpha} Binds to the Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) ZTA Protein through Oligomeric Interactions and Contributes to Cooperative Transcriptional Activation of the ZTA Promoter through Direct Binding to the ZII and ZIIIB Motifs during Induction of the EBV Lytic Cycle. J. Virol.
78: 4847-4865
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Thomas, C., Dankesreiter, A., Wolf, H., Schwarzmann, F.
(2003). The BZLF1 promoter of Epstein-Barr virus is controlled by E box-/HI-motif-binding factors during virus latency. J. Gen. Virol.
84: 959-964
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kraus, R. J., Perrigoue, J. G., Mertz, J. E.
(2002). ZEB Negatively Regulates the Lytic-Switch BZLF1 Gene Promoter of Epstein-Barr Virus. J. Virol.
77: 199-207
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Miller, I. G. Jr., El-Guindy, A.
(2002). Regulation of Epstein-Barr Virus Lytic Cycle Activation in Malignant and Nonmalignant Disease. JNCI J Natl Cancer Inst
94: 1733-1735
[Full Text]
-
Binne, U. K., Amon, W., Farrell, P. J.
(2002). Promoter Sequences Required for Reactivation of Epstein-Barr Virus from Latency. J. Virol.
76: 10282-10289
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bryant, H., Farrell, P. J.
(2002). Signal Transduction and Transcription Factor Modification during Reactivation of Epstein-Barr Virus from Latency. J. Virol.
76: 10290-10298
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kraus, R. J., Ariazi, E. A., Farrell, M. L., Mertz, J. E.
(2002). Estrogen-related Receptor alpha 1 Actively Antagonizes Estrogen Receptor-regulated Transcription in MCF-7 Mammary Cells. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 24826-24834
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Niller, H. H., Salamon, D., Uhlig, J., Ranf, S., Granz, M., Schwarzmann, F., Wolf, H., Minarovits, J.
(2002). Nucleoprotein Structure of Immediate-Early Promoters Zp and Rp and of oriLyt of Latent Epstein-Barr Virus Genomes. J. Virol.
76: 4113-4118
[Abstract]
[Full Text]