Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, January 2001, p. 1044-1047, Vol. 75, No. 2
Instituto Nacional de Investigación y
Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA), 28040 Madrid,
Spain,1 and Department of Veterinary
Science, Queens University, Belfast, Northern Ireland2
Received 22 May 2000/Accepted 20 October 2000
The N-terminal region of VP1 of swine vesicular disease virus
(SVDV) is highly antigenic in swine, despite its internal location in
the capsid. Here we show that antibodies to this region can block
infection and that allowing the virus to attach to cells increases this
blockage significantly. The results indicate that upon binding to the
cell, SVDV capsid undergoes a conformational change that is temperature
independent and that exposes the N terminus of VP1. This process makes
this region accessible to antibodies which block virus entry.
Swine vesicular disease virus (SVDV)
is an enterovirus of the Picornaviridae family that infects
pigs, causing a disease whose symptoms resemble those of foot-and-mouth
disease (21). Molecular epidemiological analyses indicate
that SVDV recently arose from the human pathogen coxsackievirus B5
(29). Antigenic characterization of SVDV has been carried
out by analysis of monoclonal-antibody-resistant (MAR) mutants
(14, 22) and by peptide scanning (12).
Analyses of MAR mutants have defined seven neutralization sites, five
of which are analogous to the classical 1, 2, 3A, 3B, and 3C sites
identified in poliovirus, the type species for the enterovirus group
(14), and two of which are in the C termini of structural
proteins VP1 and VP3, respectively (22). All
neutralization sites identified by means of the MAR mutant analyses are
well exposed on the surface of the capsid, as seen in three-dimensional models of the virion (14, 22). However, we have recently
found that sera from SVDV-infected pigs recognize other epitopes, not revealed by the MAR mutant analyses, which are located in the capsid
but not exposed on its surface (12). Among these antigenic regions, the N terminus of VP1 is of particular interest since, despite
being located at the inner side of the capsid shell, it is strongly
recognized by antibodies from infected pigs.
According to a widely accepted model, the capsids of
picornaviruses, notably poliovirus (3, 7),
coxsackievirus (5), and rhinovirus (19),
undergo conformational rearrangements upon binding of the virus to the
cell receptor. In this process, the capsid transforms into a
structurally and antigenically altered form, the A particle, with a
lower sedimentation coefficient and increased hydrophobicity and
sensitivity to proteases. These A particles are the main form of
intracellular virus early after infection (20) and are
considered intracellular intermediates that precede viral uncoating
(11), although they are also found extracellularly as a
result of elution from the receptor after binding. The A particles
undergo two specific changes, namely, the externalization of the N
terminus of VP1 and the loss of VP4 (3, 7, 15). That this
transition is an essential event in the mechanism of infection of many
picornaviruses is well illustrated by the fact that
antiviral drugs that inhibit a broad range of entero- and rhinoviruses
(1, 28) act by stabilizing native virus capsids, thus
preventing these conformational changes (10, 17, 23, 27).
The relevance of the immune response to the VP1 N terminus for host
protection against poliovirus has been pointed out by in vitro studies
of viral neutralization. Synthetic peptides corresponding to this
region elicit the production of neutralizing antibodies in mice, rats,
and rabbits (4, 18). In addition, this region is
immunogenic in humans vaccinated with an attenuated (Sabin) poliovirus
vaccine (25), in rabbits inoculated with coxsackievirus A9
(24), and in SVDV-infected pigs (12).
In light of these previous results, we investigated the presence of
neutralization sites in the N terminus of SVDV VP1 and the role of this
region during infection. To this end, we synthesized the peptide VP1
N-ter (GPPGGVTEGIIARVADTVGS), spanning the 20 N-terminal
residues of the VP1 capsid protein of the SVDV SPA/1/'93 isolate
(GenBank accession no. AF039166). Antibodies to this synthetic peptide
were produced by immunization of rabbits with two consecutive
subcutaneous inoculations of keyhole limpet hemocyanin-coupled peptide
conjugate (200 µg each) at 4-week intervals, using QuilA (Quillaja saponaria saponing; Superfos Biosector a/s; 0.5%
final concentration) as an adjuvant. This antiserum recognized the
peptide in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay performed as previously described (13) (data not shown). To determine the ability
of these VP1 N-ter antibodies to interfere with SVDV infection, we carried out an in vitro neutralization assay based on a previously described protocol (8). Briefly, duplicate 100-PFU inocula of SVDV (SPA/1/'93 isolate) were incubated at 37°C for 30 min with
dilutions of the antiserum in 96-well plates. IB-RS-2 cells (a swine
kidney cell line; kindly provided by C. Gomez-Tejedor, CISA-INIA,
Valdeolmos, Spain [a description of the history of this cell line is
found in reference (6)]) were added (2 × 104/well), and the plates were further incubated at 37°C
for 18 to 20 h. Noninfected cells, which remained attached to the
wells, were formalin fixed and stained with crystal violet. To
determine the level of cell survival, the dye was eluted from the cells by adding 200 µl of methanol/well and the absorbance of each well at
595 nm was measured. The average optical density of uninfected-cell controls represented 0% cytopathic effect (CPE), and that of cells infected in the absence of antibodies was considered 100% CPE. As
shown in Fig. 1A, the antiserum to VP1
N-ter specifically neutralized the infection produced by the SVDV
SPA/1/'93 isolate with a classical sigmoidal titration curve, reaching
45% CPE inhibition. This virus neutralization titer was similar to
that described for antibodies against the poliovirus VP1 N terminus
(4, 18). The SVDV UKG/27/'72 isolate, differing from SVDV
SPA/1/'93 isolate in 6 amino acid residues of the VP1 N-terminal
sequence (26), was not neutralized. These results
suggested that the neutralizing epitope is probably located in the
variable region of the VP1 N terminus between amino acid positions 5 and 18.
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.2.1044-1047.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
The N-Terminal Region of the VP1 Protein of Swine Vesicular
Disease Virus Contains a Neutralization Site That Arises upon Cell
Attachment and Is Involved in Viral Entry
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Text
References
![]()
TEXT
Top
Abstract
Text
References

View larger version (61K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
(A) Virus neutralization titration of the antiserum to
VP1 N-ter, using the SPA/1/'93 (
) and UKG/27/'72 (
) isolates of
SVDV. Open circles represent the titration of preimmune serum using
SPA/1/'93 SVDV. Each point represents the mean of duplicate
determinations. (B) Immunofluorescence staining of SVDV bound to the
cell membrane. SVDV particles were adsorbed to IB-RS-2 cells for 30 min
at 4°C, washed, and fixed with PFA. Bound viral particles were
stained with VP1 N-ter antiserum (panel 1) or with MAb 5D9, which is
specific for a surface epitope of the virus (panel 2). The preimmune
anti-VP1 N-ter serum (panel 3) and an irrelevant MAb (panel 4) were
used as negative controls. Viral particles were stained with a Texas
red-conjugated secondary antibody. (C) Binding of the VP1 N-ter
antiserum (
) or preimmune serum (
) to SVDV adsorbed to IB-RS-2
cells. Virus was incubated with cells at 4°C and fixed with PFA.
O.D., optical density. (D) Neutralization of SVDV attached to cells.
Virus was incubated with the VP1 N-ter antibody at 4°C for 30 min,
after (left bars) or before (right bars) adsorption to IB-RS-2 cells at
4°C. Cells were then incubated at 37°C to allow viral infection.
Virus neutralization was determined as described in the text.
The above results indicated that under these conditions the N terminus of VP1 is accessible to antibodies; thus, it must be exposed on the capsid. However, about 50% of the virus pool was still able to infect the cells at saturating serum antibody concentrations.
As noted above, it has been shown that enterovirus-receptor interaction triggers the structural changes leading to the externalization of the VP1 N terminus. Accordingly, the binding of anti-VP1 N-ter antibodies to the virus could be increased by allowing the virus to interact with the cells before adding the antiserum. This hypothesis was analyzed by immunofluorescence microscopy, using IB-RS-2 cells incubated with SVDV (10 PFU/cell) for 30 min at 4°C and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). At this temperature, the virus-receptor interaction occurs but internalization of the virion is prevented. Cultures were incubated with VP1 N-ter antiserum (Fig. 1B, panel 1) or with monoclonal antibody (MAb) 5D9, which is specific for a known viral capsid epitope (22) (Fig. 1B, panel 2). Viral particles were stained with a Texas red-conjugated secondary antibody. Both antibodies, but neither the preimmune antiserum nor an irrelevant MAb, bound to the viral particles attached to the cell surface. Apart from specific binding to cell-attached virus, we found some nuclear staining with VP1 N-ter antiserum and, to a lesser extent, with the preimmune serum. This binding is probably due to nonspecific interactions, since under the conditions of this experiment the presence of viral proteins inside the cells was not expected, as immunofluorescence staining with MAb 5D9 clearly showed (Fig. 1B, panel 2). This result indicated that the N terminus of VP1 of the attached virus particles was accessible. This result was confirmed by ELISA (Fig. 1C). SVDV particles (106 PFU/well) were incubated for 15 min at 4°C with IB-RS-2 cells grown in 96-well plates. After being washed to remove unbound virus, the cells were fixed in 4% PFA and incubated with the anti-VP1 N-ter serum. The antibodies bound to cell-adsorbed virus were revealed by using an anti-rabbit immunoglobulin coupled to horseradish peroxidase. As shown in Fig. 1C, the anti-VP1 N-ter serum efficiently bound to SVDV adsorbed to cells.
The degree of virus neutralization produced by the VP1 N-ter antibodies was then determined under conditions in which the antipeptide antibodies were bound to SVDV that had been adsorbed to cells at 4°C. SVDV (4 × 103 PFU/well) was adsorbed to IB-RS-2 cell monolayers in 96-well plates for 30 min at 4°C. After being washed with Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium to eliminate unbound virus, the cells were incubated with anti-VP1 N-ter (1:20) for 30 min at 4°C. The cells were washed with Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium and then incubated for 18 to 20 h at 37°C, and the CPE was determined as described above. As shown in Fig. 1D, the level of neutralization achieved by the VP1 N-ter antibody was 91%, which is a magnitude similar to that resulting with the neutralizing MAb 5D9, which is specific for a surface-exposed epitope in the C-terminal region of VP3 (22). It could be argued that the externalization of the VP1 N-ter epitope was an effect of the incubation at 4°C and not a result of the binding to the cells. To eliminate this possibility, the virus was incubated with either the anti-VP1 N-ter serum or MAb 5D9 for 30 min at 4°C and then added to the cells and further incubated at 37°C. In this experiment, the neutralization caused by MAb 5D9 remained at the level seen under previous conditions (100%), but the VP1 N-ter antibody did not neutralize the infection, indicating that binding of the virus to the cells was required for VP1 externalization. In addition, when the in vitro neutralization test (Fig. 1A) was performed in the presence of chloroquine, a drug that impairs the endolysosomic pathway, at a concentration (20 µM) that did not affect SVDV infection, the anti-VP1 N-ter serum blocked 100% of infection (data not shown). This result further supports the hypothesis that the interaction of VP1 N-ter antibodies with the SVDV VP1 N terminus is greatly facilitated by treatments that inhibit endocytosis, probably increasing the period of interaction of the virus with specific receptors on the surface of the cells before its internalization.
Taken together, these results indicate that the neutralization epitope located at the N terminus of SVDV VP1 becomes externalized when the virus attaches to the cells, allowing the binding of antibodies to this site and thereby resulting in a blockage of the infection. In poliovirus, the normally internal N terminus of VP1 is known to be exposed on the capsid surface in at least two different circumstances: during a reversible change occurring at physiological temperatures in solution (virus "breathing"), and as the result of an irreversible process triggered by binding of the virus to the cell receptor, leading to the production of A particles. Both processes take place at 37°C and are inhibited at 4°C (7, 18). Furthermore, at least 15 min of incubation at 37°C is required for detection of significant conversion to A particles (7, 9, 16). The results that we observed in this work suggest that in SVDV there is an intermediate stage in the process of viral entry, involving what we have named pre-A particles. These particles can be found on the cell surface as soon as 15 min after the virus is added to the cell cultures. In addition, the transition of the native form to the pre-A particle can take place at 4°C, provided that the virus has interacted with the cellular receptor. Thus, the externalization of the VP1 N terminus of SVDV could take place before the transition to A particles seen in poliovirus. This model is in accordance with recent data showing that in poliovirus, the externalization of the VP1 N terminus and the loss of VP4 are two independent events that can be uncoupled (2). These observations were made in studies using poliovirus empty capsids, and the authors showed that in these particles the N terminus of VP1 can be externalized under conditions in which VP4 remains inside the virion, allowing an efficient attachment to cells in a receptor-dependent mechanism.
To illustrate the observations made in the present work, we propose the
mechanism shown in Fig. 2 for the events
mediating the entry of SVDV into the cell. The interaction of the virus with the cell receptor triggers the externalization of the VP1 N-ter
epitope, and probably the opening of the capsid pores; thus, all
attached viruses become pre-A particles. In normal infections, these
pre-A particles become A particles (similar to the A particles described for poliovirus), which are intracellular intermediates that
precede viral uncoating. The interaction of the VP1 N-ter antibody with
the virus attached to the cell surface (pre-A particles) results in
complete neutralization, suggesting that the binding of VP1 N-ter
antibody to the virus blocks its internalization or another event
following virus attachment.
|
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank E. Brocchi for providing monoclonal antibody 5D9.
E. Escribano-Romero is an INIA fellow. This work was supported by the European Union (grant IAIR CT96-1545) and by CICYT (grant BIO-0400-C02-02).
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: INIA, Ctra. Coruña Km 7, 28040 Madrid, Spain. Phone: 34 91-3471497. Fax: 34 91-3572293. E-mail: majimene{at}inia.es.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Andries, K.,
B. Dewindt,
J. Snoeks,
R. Willebrords,
K. van Eemeren,
R. Stokbroekx, and P. A. J. Janssen.
1992.
In vitro activity of pirodavir (R 77975), a substituted phenoxy-pyridazinamine with broad-spectrum antipicornaviral activity.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
36:100-107 |
| 2. |
Basavappa, R.,
A. Gómez-Yafal, and J. M. Hogle.
1998.
The poliovirus empty capsid specifically recognizes the poliovirus receptor and undergoes some, but not all, of the transitions associated with cell entry.
J. Virol.
72:7551-7556 |
| 3. |
Belnap, D. M.,
D. J. Filman,
B. L. Trus,
N. Cheng,
F. P. Booy,
J. F. Conway,
S. Curry,
C. N. Hiremath,
S. K. Tsang,
A. C. Steven, and J. M. Hogle.
2000.
Molecular tectonic model of virus structural transitions: the putative cell entry states of poliovirus.
J. Virol.
74:1342-1354 |
| 4. |
Chow, M.,
R. Yabrov,
J. Bittle,
J. Hogle, and D. Baltimore.
1985.
Synthetic peptides from four separate regions of the poliovirus type 1 capsid protein VP1 induce neutralizing antibodies.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
82:910-914 |
| 5. |
Crowell, R. L., and L. Philipson.
1971.
Specific alterations of coxsackievirus B3 eluted from Hela cells.
J. Virol.
8:509-515 |
| 6. | De Castro, M. P. 1964. Behaviour of the foot-and-mouth disease virus in cell cultures: susceptibility of the IB-RS-2 cell line. Arq. Inst. Biol. Sao Paulo 31:63-78. |
| 7. |
Fricks, C. E., and J. M. Hogle.
1990.
Cell-induced conformational change in poliovirus: externalization of the amino terminus of VP1 is responsible for liposome binding.
J. Virol.
64:1934-1945 |
| 8. | Golding, S. M., R. S. Hedger, and P. Talbot. 1976. Radial immuno-diffusion and serum-neutralisation techniques for the assay of antibodies to swine vesicular disease. Res. Vet. Sci. 20:142-147[Medline]. |
| 9. | Gómez Yafal, A., G. Kaplan, V. R. Racaniello, and J. M. Hogle. 1993. Characterization of poliovirus conformational alteration mediated by soluble cell receptors. Virology 197:501-505[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. | Grant, R. A., C. N. Hiremath, D. J. Filman, R. Syed, K. Andries, and J. M. Hogle. 1994. Structures of poliovirus complexes with anti-viral drugs: implications for viral stability and drug design. Curr. Biol. 4:784-797[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 11. |
Huang, Y.,
J. M. Hogle, and M. Chow.
2000.
Is the 135S poliovirus particle an intermediate during cell entry?
J. Virol.
74:8757-8761 |
| 12. | Jimenez-Clavero, M. A., A. Douglas, T. Lavery, J. A. Garcia-Ranea, and V. Ley. 2000. Immune recognition of swine vesicular disease virus structural proteins: novel antigenic regions that are not exposed in the capsid. Virology 270:76-83[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 13. | Jiménez-Clavero, M. A., E. Escribano-Romero, J. M. Sánchez-Vizcaíno, and V. Ley. 1998. Molecular cloning, expression and immunological analysis of the capsid precursor polypeptide (P1) from swine vesicular disease virus. Virus Res. 57:163-170[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. |
Kanno, T.,
T. Inoue,
Y. Wang,
A. Sarai, and S. Yamaguchi.
1995.
Identification of the location of antigenic sites of swine vesicular disease virus with neutralization-resistant mutants.
J. Gen. Virol.
76:3099-3106 |
| 15. | Ketterlinus, R., and K. Wiegers. 1994. Mapping of antigenic domains in poliovirus VP1 involved in structural rearrangements during virus morphogenesis and antigenic alterations of the virion. Virology 204:27-37[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 16. |
Kirkegaard, K.
1990.
Mutations in VP1 of poliovirus specifically affect both encapsidation and release of viral RNA.
J. Virol.
64:195-206 |
| 17. |
Lewis, J. K.,
B. Bothner,
T. J. Smith, and G. Siuzdak.
1998.
Antiviral agent blocks breathing of the common cold virus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:6774-6778 |
| 18. |
Li, Q.,
A. G. Yafal,
Y. M.-H. Lee,
J. Hogle, and M. Chow.
1994.
Poliovirus neutralization by antibodies to internal epitopes of VP4 and VP1 results from reversible exposure of these sequences at physiological temperature.
J. Virol.
68:3965-3970 |
| 19. |
Lonberg-Holm, K., and B. D. Korant.
1972.
Early interaction of rhinovirus with host cells.
J. Virol.
9:29-40 |
| 20. |
Longberg-Holm, K.,
L. B. Gosser, and E. J. Shimshick.
1975.
Early alteration of poliovirus in infected cells and its specific inhibition.
J. Gen. Virol.
27:329-345 |
| 21. | Nardelli, L., E. Lodetti, G. L. Gualandi, R. Burrows, D. Goodridge, F. Brown, and B. Cartwright. 1968. A foot and mouth disease syndrome in pigs caused by an enterovirus. Nature 219:1275-1276[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. | Nijhar, S. K., D. K. J. Mackay, E. Brocchi, N. P. Ferris, R. P. Kitching, and N. J. Knowles. 1999. Identification of neutralizing epitopes on a European strain of swine vesicular disease virus. J. Gen. Virol. 80:277-282[Abstract]. |
| 23. | Phelps, D. K., and C. B. Post. 1995. A novel basis of capsid stabilization by antiviral compounds. J. Mol. Biol. 254:544-551[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 24. | Pulli, T., M. Roivainen, T. Hovi, and T. Hyypia. 1998. Induction of neutralizing antibodies by synthetic peptides representing the C terminus of coxsackievirus A9 capsid protein VP1. J. Gen. Virol. 79:2249-2253[Abstract]. |
| 25. | Roivainen, M., A. Narvanen, M. Korkolainen, M. L. Huhtala, and T. Hovi. 1991. Antigenic regions of poliovirus type 3/Sabin capsid proteins recognized by human sera in the peptide scanning technique. Virology 180:99-107[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 26. | Seechurn, P., N. J. Knowles, and J. W. McCauley. 1990. The complete nucleotide sequence of a pathogenic swine vesicular disease virus. Virus Res. 16:255-274[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 27. | Tsang, T. S., P. Danthi, M. Chow, and J. M. Hogle. 2000. Stabilization of poliovirus by capsid-binding antiviral drugs is due to entropic effects. J. Mol. Biol. 296:335-340[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 28. |
Woods, M. G.,
G. D. Diana,
M. C. Rogge,
M. J. Otto,
F. J. Dutko, and M. A. McKinlay.
1989.
In vitro and in vivo activities of WIN 54954, a new broad-spectrum antipicornavirus drug.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
33:2069-2074 |
| 29. | Zhang, G., D. T. Haydon, N. J. Knowles, and J. W. McCauley. 1999. Molecular evolution of swine vesicular disease virus. J. Gen. Virol. 80:639-651[Abstract]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| J. Bacteriol. | Mol. Cell. Biol. | Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. |
|---|
| Clin. Vaccine Immunol. | ALL ASM JOURNALS |
|---|