Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, September 2001, p. 8538-8546, Vol. 75, No. 18
Station de Recherches de Pathologie Comparée, UMR
5087, INRA-CNRS-Université Montpellier II, 30380 Saint-Christol-les-Alès,1
Laboratoire de Spectrométrie de Masse Bio-Organique,
67087 Strasbourg Cedex 2,3 and Centre de
Biochimie Structurale, INSERM U414, CNRS UMR 5048-Université
Montpellier I Faculté de Pharmacie, 34060 Montpellier,4 France, and Friedrich
Miescher Institut, CH-4002 Basel,
Switzerland2
Received 26 March 2001/Accepted 5 June 2001
The helper component of Cauliflower mosaic virus is
encoded by viral gene II. This protein (P2) is dispensable for virus
replication but required for aphid transmission. The purification of P2
has never been reported, and hence its biochemical properties are largely unknown. We produced the P2 protein via a recombinant baculovirus with a His tag fused at the N terminus. The fusion protein
was purified by affinity chromatography in a soluble and biologically active form. Matrix-assisted laser desorption
time-of-flight mass spectrometry demonstrated that P2 is not
posttranslationally modified. UV circular dichroism revealed the
secondary structure of P2 to be 23% Most plant viruses are transmitted
from one host to another by insect vectors (23), the
majority in a noncirculative manner (25). In this mode of
transmission, virus particles are acquired while the vector feeds on
infected plants and are specifically retained in the food canal of the
mouthparts (stylets). The virus is subsequently released from the
stylets and inoculated to a new host when the insect vector feeds on
another plant. This process implies that specific interactions occur
between virus particles and the cuticle lining of the vector's
stylets. Two distinct molecular strategies mediating these interactions
can be distinguished (24). In the capsid strategy, a motif
within the virus coat protein directly recognizes a binding site in the
vector stylets, whereas in the helper strategy, binding is not direct
but is mediated by a so-called helper component (HC), a viral
nonstructural protein acting as a reversible molecular bridge between
virus and vector (12). The helper strategy is frequently
adopted by plant viruses, and although aphid transmission has been
extensively studied for the genera Caulimovirus
(4) and Potyvirus (26), the
biochemical and structural features of HCs in these two virus groups
remain largely unknown.
For Cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV), the best-studied member
of the genus Caulimovirus, the HC is encoded by viral gene
II (1, 32), whose expression product is a polypeptide of
18 kDa designated P2. Biologically active P2 from various CaMV isolates has been produced in the baculovirus-insect cell expression system (2, 3, 8). Aphids that first acquired this
baculovirus-expressed P2 (P2-loaded aphids) by artificial feeding
through Parafilm membranes were able to transmit several P2-deficient,
and therefore nontransmissible, CaMV isolates. An initially puzzling
result was that P2-loaded aphids could subsequently acquire the
nontransmissible virus from infected plants or crude extracts thereof
but not from purified virion-containing solutions (3).
This was later explained by the finding that P2 does not bind directly
to the CaMV coat protein but rather binds to the capsid-associated
protein P3 (the product of viral gene III), an additional nonstructural
factor that is absolutely mandatory for successful aphid transmission
and that is lost upon virus purification (16, 17). The
region of P2 involved in P3 binding was mapped to the C-terminal 60 amino acids, which are predicted to form two short Apart from interacting with the vector and with P3, there is also
evidence that the rather small P2 protein (159 amino acid residues)
interacts with itself. When expressed in insect cells, P2 was found to
be associated with highly organized cytoplasmic structures, referred to
as paracrystals (5). Small amounts of biologically active
P2 could be reversibly solubilized from these paracrystals, and since
such structures had also been observed in CaMV-infected plant cells
(27), it was suggested that they may act as a reservoir of
HC. The aggregation of P2 into paracrystalline structures could be
considered indirect evidence for the existence of one or several
domains involved in P2 self-interaction. Unfortunately, the lack of a
satisfactory purification procedure, due to the poor solubility of this
protein (8), made it impossible to conclude that P2 is the
only constituent of the observed paracrystals and has thus far thwarted
all attempts to analyze its biochemistry and structure.
In this paper, we describe for the first time the purification of
active CaMV HC, thus allowing its biochemical characterization. We show
that biological activity is associated with a high-molecular-weight oligomeric form of P2 and, further, that polymerization into huge paracrystalline filaments is an intrinsic property of this protein. We
characterize P2 self-interactions involved in such polymerization and
map the motifs responsible to the C-terminal region that is also
involved in binding to P3. We confirm experimentally that the secondary
structure of this domain is mainly Plasmids.
The baculovirus transfer plasmid p119His, allowing
cloning of foreign genes in frame with the coding sequence of a series of six histidines (His tag), is described elsewhere (M. Drucker, R. Froissart, E. Hébrard, M. Uzest, M. Ravallec, P. Espérandieu, J. C. Mani, M. Pugniere, F. Roquet, and S. Blanc,
submitted for publication). To construct plasmid pHP2, the
coding sequence of gene II of CaMV (strain Cabb B-JI) was PCR amplified
using forward and reverse primers including NotI and
PstI restriction sites, respectively, and the resulting PCR
fragment was cloned into the corresponding sites in p119His. Plasmid
pP2H was constructed similarly, except that BglII and
NcoI sites were included in the forward and reverse primers, respectively.
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.18.8538-8546.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Biochemical Characterization of the Helper
Component of Cauliflower Mosaic Virus

![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-helical. Most
-helices are
suggested to be located in the C-terminal domain. Using size exclusion
chromatography and aphid transmission testing, we established that the
active form of P2 assembles as a huge soluble oligomer containing 200 to 300 subunits. We further showed that P2 can also polymerize as long
paracrystalline filaments. We mapped P2 domains involved in P2
self-interaction, presumably through coiled-coil structures, one of
which is proposed to form a parallel trimer. These regions have
previously been reported to also interact with viral P3, another
protein involved in aphid transmission. Possible interference between
the two types of interaction is discussed with regard to the biological
activity of P2.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
-helices,
designated
1 and
2, separated by an 8-amino-acid loop. These two
helices were further suggested to be capable of engaging in
protein-protein interactions via coiled-coil structures
(16; for a review on coiled coils, see reference
19).
-helical and that both putative
1 and
2 helices are involved in P2 self-association. Possible
interference between P2-P2 and P2-P3 binding is discussed.
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
1 helix and suspected to be involved in a coiled-coil interaction.
In GST-P2 + 4, the insertion of four amino acids in the middle of the
predicted
2 helix should change the overall structure of that motif
and change the phase of the
helix, thus compromising any possible
coiled-coil formation.

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Modifications introduced in P2. The P2 protein is
schematically represented at the top. The empty boxes correspond to the
predicted helices
1 and
2. The amino acid sequence of the
C-terminal domain of P2 encompassing the
1 and
2 regions is
listed below the diagram of P2. Hydrophobic residues at positions
possibly involved in coiled-coil formation are underlined. The four
mutations engineered in mod constructs as well as the four amino acids
inserted in +4 constructs are also indicated. The bottom line
represents the complete amino acid sequence of HP2Cter.
Recombinant baculoviruses. Recombinant baculoviruses were obtained by cotransfecting Spodoptera frugiperda (Sf9) cells with either pHP2 or pP2H and AcSLP10 baculovirus DNA, followed by plaque purification assays, as previously described (6). pHP2 and pP2H give rise to baculovirus recombinants expressing P2 fused to a His tag at the N (HP2) and C (P2H) termini, respectively. The construction and cloning of the recombinant baculovirus expressing native P2 has been described previously (2).
Protein purification from Sf9 cells.
Approximately 2 × 107 Sf9 cells were infected with either P2-,
HP2-, or P2H-encoding baculovirus recombinants at a multiplicity of
infection of 10 and harvested after 48 h of incubation at 28°C. Cells were subjected to a freeze-thaw cycle at
20°C, crushed using
a syringe with a 26-gauge needle (Terumo) in 1 ml of DB5 buffer {50
mM HEPES [pH 7.0], 500 mM LiSO4, 0.5 mM EGTA,
0.2% [wt/vol] 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propane
sulfonate [CHAPS]}, and then diluted in the same buffer to a final
volume of 25 ml. After being shaken for 2 h at 4°C, the extract
was ultracentrifuged at 100,000 × g for 30 min. The
supernatant was stirred for 1 h at 4°C after addition of 1 ml of
Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid resin (Qiagen) preequilibrated with DB5
buffer. The slurry was then transferred to a 1-ml column and rinsed
with 3 volumes of DB5 buffer. The protein was finally eluted with 2 ml
of DB5 buffer supplemented with 500 mM imidazole, dialyzed in DB5, and
concentrated in the dialysis tubing on polyethylene glycol 20,000 powder.
Protein purification from bacteria.
Escherichia
coli (500-ml culture) transformed with pHP2Cter was induced with
1.5 mM IPTG
(isopropyl-
-D-thiogalactopyranoside) for
5 h, pelleted, resuspended in 25 ml of PBS-A buffer
(phosphate-buffered saline [PBS] buffer [4.3 mM
Na2HPO4, 1.4 mM
KH2PO4, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM
KCl, pH 7.3] supplemented with 20 mM
-mercaptoethanol and 10 mM
imidazole), and frozen at
20°C. The bacteria were then thawed and
sonicated before centrifugation for 30 min at 6,000 × g, and the supernatant was subjected to a 20-min period at
70°C prior to an additional identical centrifugation. The heat-stable proteins in the supernatant were mixed with 2 ml of Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid resin (Qiagen) preequilibrated with PBS-A buffer and stirred gently for 3 h at 4°C. The slurry was then transferred to a 1-ml column and rinsed with 2 volumes of PBS-A, followed by 2 additional volumes of PBS supplemented with 1 M NaCl and then by 3 volumes of PBS.
The protein was finally eluted with 2 ml of PBS supplemented with 500 mM imidazole and dialyzed in water. Under these conditions, the HP2Cter
peptide precipitates and can be resuspended in various buffers, as indicated.
Transmission assays. The conditions for aphid (Myzus persicae Sulz.) rearing, plant culture of turnips (Brassica rapa cv. Just Right), virus propagation, and aphid transmission tests were as previously described (3) unless otherwise indicated. We used a P2-deficient CaMV isolate named Del-S (R. Froissart and S. Blanc, unpublished results). This nontransmissible isolate is a derivative of CaMV Cabb-S harboring a deletion of 421 bp within the coding sequence of gene II similar to that found in the naturally occurring CM4-184 strain (11).
Electrophoresis. Protein electrophoresis was performed as described by Laemmli (14). Transfer onto nitrocellulose membranes was carried out using a semidry electroblotting apparatus (Ancos) according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Size exclusion chromatography. Purified HP2 was centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 30 min immediately before size exclusion chromatography in DB5 buffer with Superose 6 prep-grade medium resin (Pharmacia) in an XK70 column (Pharmacia). Gel runs were carried out on an ÄKTA Prime system (Pharmacia) at 4°C with a flow rate of 0.1 ml/min. The columns were calibrated with purified CaMV virus particles (approximately 20,000 kDa), thyroglobulin (669 kDa), ferritin (443 kDa), aldolase (160 kDa), bovine serum albumin (66 kDa), and cytochrome c (12.4 kDa).
Peptide analysis.
The synthetic peptide pep(
1)
(GSCECKQLKEIKSLLEAQNTRIKSLEKAIQSLENKI) was prepared, stored,
cross-linked, and analyzed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and Sephadex G50 medium (Pharmacia)
chromatography precisely as described previously (15). The
calculated molecular mass of pep(
1) is 4.075 kDa.
1 and the entire
2 helix (P2 amino acids 119 to 159). A
nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrum was recorded for peptide P2C3
in PBS (with 5% D2O), at a concentration of 2.5 mg/ml. The acquisition was done at 305 K on a Bruker AMX 600 spectrometer, with 512 scans and 1 s of presaturation to suppress
the water signal.
MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.
Mass measurements were carried
out on a Brucker BIFLEX matrix-assisted laser desorption time-of-flight
(MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometer and done in linear mode (13,
22). A saturated solution of
-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid in
acetone was used as a matrix. A first layer of fine matrix crystals was
obtained by spreading and fast evaporation of 0.5 µl of matrix
solution. Subsequently, on this fine layer of crystals, a droplet of
0.5 µl of water solution was deposited; afterwards, 0.5 µl of
sample solution was added and then a second 0.2-µl droplet of
matrix-saturated solution in 50% H2O-50%
acetonitrile was added (13).
UV-CD. All UV circular dichroism (UV-CD) measurements were recorded with a CD6 spectropolarimeter (Jobin-Yvon). The far-UV-CD spectra were recorded in a thermostated quartz cell with a 0.1-cm path length, in steps of 0.1 nm, at various protein concentrations. Two successive scans were averaged.
In vitro protein-protein interactions. Interaction between P2, or derivatives thereof, and P3 was assessed essentially as described earlier (16), except that the P3 we used was expressed via a baculovirus recombinant in Sf9 insect cells (R. Froissart, M. Drucker, and S. Blanc, unpublished data).
To test P2-P2 interaction, we took advantage of the fusion protein P2::PhoA (PhoA*Color SYSTEM; Q. BIOgene). GST-P2 and derivatives were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. After the membranes were blocked with TBS-Blotto (Tris-buffered saline [TBS] [50 mM Tris-HCl {pH 7.4} and 200 mM NaCl] supplemented with 5% skim milk powder and 0.1% Tween 20), they were incubated overnight with the periplasmic extract of P2::PhoA-producing bacteria (dilution of 1:10 in TBS-Blotto). After three rinses of 15 min with TBS, protein-protein interactions were directly detected using the nitroblue tetrazolium-5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate-p-toluidine salt color reaction.Electron microscopy. Crude extracts from Sf9 cells producing P2 as well as purified soluble HP2 were trapped on carbon-coated microscopy grids, negatively stained with 2% ammonium molybdate, and observed in a Zeiss (Jena) EM 10C/RC electron microscope at 80 kV.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Purification of active CaMV HC.
We expressed P2 in the
baculovirus-insect cell system as N- and C-terminal fusions with a His
tag to allow its purification by affinity chromatography. A series of
combinations of various salts, buffers, detergents, and pHs were
assessed to determine the combination that would satisfactorily
solubilize P2 while preserving its biological activity (not shown). The
optimal buffer, DB5, described in Materials and Methods, resulted in
the purification of HP2 and P2H (P2 with N- and C-terminal His tags,
respectively) to apparent homogeneity (Fig.
2A). The His tag fusion differentially modified the electrophoretic mobility of the protein depending on its
position at either the N- or C-terminal extremity of P2. However, the
identity of the purified polypeptides was confirmed by immunoreaction
with a P2 antiserum (Fig. 2B). Some minor bands with increased
molecular mass (between 20 and 25 kDa) were also specifically
recognized by the P2 antiserum, in both HP2 and P2H. The possible
significance of these minor forms of P2 is discussed below. Minor bands
with lower molecular mass are degradation products and were seen to
similar extents in P2, HP2, and P2H.
|
|
Experimental evidence for
-helical structure in CaMV HC.
Although the previously published models of the secondary structure of
P2 (16, 21) predict the presence of
-helices, no
consistent experimental data have been available thus far. To
investigate the secondary structure of the CaMV HC experimentally, purified HP2 was analyzed by UV-CD spectroscopy as described in Materials and Methods (Fig. 3A). The UV
spectrum showed minima at around 208 and 222 nm, confirming the
presence of an
-helical conformation. Further calculations carried
out with the K2D program (20) indicated a total
-helix
content of 23% (±5%). For concentrations of HP2 ranging from 2 to 10 µM, the molar CD intensity remained constant (data not shown).
|
CaMV HC is not posttranslationally modified. In MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry (Fig. 3B), the monomeric mass of HP2 was measured as 19.035 kDa, a value slightly lower than the 19.152 kDa calculated from the amino acid sequence. Hence, we conclude that the active form of CaMV HC does not exhibit any posttranslational modification other than removal of the methionine at amino acid position 1. Although MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry does not usually preserve noncovalent oligomers of a protein, additional peaks of higher molecular mass were detected in the HP2 spectrum shown in Fig. 3B. These correspond to di- and trimeric forms of HP2 and suggest that strongly associated oligomers composed of at least three subunits may be present in solution.
Biologically active HC of CaMV forms a huge oligomer.
The
apparent molecular mass of purified HP2 was determined by gel
filtration (Fig. 4). Surprisingly, when
gels with exclusion limits of around 90 kDa (AcA 54; Ultrogel) and 750 kDa (AcA 34; Ultrogel) were used, all HP2 eluted in the void volume of
the column (not shown). In a gel with an exclusion limit of around 20,000 kDa, the vast majority of HP2 eluted as one large peak with a
small shoulder. The apparent molecular mass for this peak was
calculated to be on the order of 5,000 kDa (Fig. 4),
corresponding to an association of 200 to 300 HP2 subunits.
|
CaMV HC polymerizes as paracrystalline filaments.
During
attempts to concentrate purified HP2 in DB5 buffer beyond 1 mg/ml, it
invariably precipitated, indicating that the concentration limit of our
experimental conditions had been reached. Microscopic examination of
the precipitates revealed the presence of huge paracrystal bundles
resembling those found in crude extracts of P2-producing Sf9 cells and
in viroplasm-enriched fractions prepared from CaMV-infected plants
(Fig. 5A and B) (5). The soluble fraction remaining in the supernatant after centrifugation (100,000 × g for 30 min) still contained HP2 at a
concentration of approximately 1 mg/ml. Surprisingly, negative staining
of this supernatant for electron microscopy revealed the presence of
numerous long paracrystalline filaments (Fig. 5C and D). Whether
polymerization of HP2 occurred spontaneously in the soluble fraction or
was nucleated on the carbon film covering the microscopy grids could
not be determined.
|
CaMV HC interacts with itself via the C-terminal domain.
The
results of mass spectrometry, size exclusion chromatography, and
electron microscopy provide ample evidence for the existence of a P2-P2
interaction that would explain oligomerization and paracrystal
formation. A novel in vitro protein blotting-protein overlay assay was
developed, as described in Materials and Methods, to identify P2-P2
interaction domains (Fig. 6).
|
-helices, designated
1 (amino acids 101 to 128) and
2 (amino acids 137 to 159), separated by a loop of 8 amino acids including two helix-breaking prolines
(16). Deletions (Fig. 6C, lanes 3, 4, and 6) or
modifications (lanes 8 and 9) in putative
1 or
2 severely reduced
but did not totally abolish the interaction with P2::PhoA,
suggesting that both presumed helices are involved and that both can
also independently interact. Consistent with this conclusion, the
interaction between P2 and the P2::PhoA probe was totally
abolished only if, in the former, both the
1 and
2 regions were
mutated (Fig. 6C, lanes 5 and 7).
As mentioned in Materials and Methods, either only
1 or only
2
remains intact in the P2 + 4::PhoA and P2mod::PhoA
fusion proteins, and these two constructs revealed another interesting facet of the P2-P2 interaction. The
1-preserving P2 + 4::PhoA probe could interact only with P2 derivatives
retaining wild-type
1 (Fig. 6D, lanes 1, 2, 6, and 9). Similarly,
with the
2-preserving P2mod:PhoA probe, interaction was detected
only with P2 derivatives harboring an unmodified
2 (Fig. 6E, lanes
1, 2, 3, 4, and 8). Taken together, these results suggest the existence
of a self-interaction for both
1 and
2.
When P2Cter::PhoA was used as a probe, the signal was still
strong on GST-P2 derivatives containing both
1 and
2 (Fig. 6F, lanes 1 and 2). Although signals were very faint, the other lanes in
Fig. 6F show that the P2Cter::PhoA probe binds to GST-P2
fusion derivatives carrying wild-type
1 sequences (lanes 6 and 9)
but not to those in which
2 is present alone (lanes 3, 4, and 8). This result suggests that sequences in the N-terminal portion of
P2::PhoA, which are absent in P2Cter::PhoA, are
also required for a proper
2-driven interaction. In Fig. 6F, the
band at a position slightly above that of the GST-P2C3 fusion in lane 3 is a nonspecific staining also seen in lanes 6 and 8 and to a lesser
extent in all other lanes. In lane 8, we have no explanation for the
band reproducibly appearing at around 30 kDa, a molecular mass that
does not correspond to GST-P2mod.
Taken together, the results presented in Fig. 6 provide the first
direct evidence for a P2-P2 interaction. We demonstrate that a
60-amino-acid-long C-terminal domain plays a pivotal role in this
interaction, presumably by the concerted action of helices
1 and
2.
Characterization of the C-terminal region of CaMV HC.
To
investigate the oligomerization state of the self-interacting
C-terminal domain of P2, we expressed a peptide encompassing the
predicted
1 and
2 helices (amino acids 100 to 159) as a C-terminal fusion to a His tag in E. coli. The corresponding
HP2Cter peptide was purified, and, to verify that it was correctly
folded, a UV-CD spectrum was recorded in DB5 buffer (Fig.
7A). A strong signal with typical minima
at around 208 and 222 nm revealed the presence of
-helical
conformations, which were further calculated to concern 80% (±5%) of
the HP2Cter sequence. The presence of HP2Cter oligomers was first
suggested by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry measurements which showed,
besides a major peak corresponding to the monomer, the presence of
additional peaks precisely at the molecular masses of di- and trimers
(Fig. 7B). These peaks are significantly more intense than the
artifactual multimeric peaks usually observed with this technique. The
fact that they were also visualized in SDS-PAGE analysis (Fig. 7C, lane
1) both confirmed the specificity of dimers and trimers detected by
mass spectrometry and indicated that the interaction responsible for the formation of these oligomers is very stable. Moreover, chemical cross-linking with glutaraldehyde greatly augmented the proportions of
both dimers and trimers (Fig. 7C, lanes 2 and 3).
|
1 and
2 are implicated in
self-interaction (Fig. 6), we produced each of the corresponding
regions independently for further characterization. Gel filtration in Sephadex G-50 medium and under native conditions showed that pep(
1) eluted in totality at a molecular mass corresponding to a trimer, together with cytochrome c (12.4 kDa) (not shown).
Cross-linking of pep(
1) with
N-(
-maleimidobutyryloxy)sulfosuccinimide ester (sulfo-GMBS) (Pierce) confirmed the presence of a major band
corresponding to a trimer in SDS-Tricine gel electrophoresis (Fig. 7D,
lanes 2 and 3). In pep(
1), the
1 sequence (P2 amino acids 100 to
130) is preceded by the sequence GSCECK. The two cysteines in this extension allow the orientation of the interacting molecules to be
assessed by oxidative disulfide cross-linking as described previously
(15). Figure 7D (lanes 4 and 5) shows that 1 min of
oxidation was sufficient to cross-link the majority of pep(
1) into a
trimer, thus indicating that the three
1 helices involved are
associated in parallel orientation. We also observed the formation of
tetramers and pentamers, but the corresponding bands were not as
prominent as that of the trimer.
The
2-containing P2C3 peptide (see Materials and Methods) was
produced and purified in order to assess its putative oligomerization through
2 self-interaction. An NMR spectrum, established as
indicated in Materials and Methods, did not show a significant amount
of slowly exchanging NH signals among the ca. 40 expected for a peptide of that size, eliminating the possibility of the presence of a persistent and stable
2 self-association.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The high insolubility of the CaMV HC has been a longstanding problem (3, 5, 7, 8) preventing its purification and hence biochemical and structural characterization. We determined conditions for solubilizing P2 and showed that an N-terminal His tag fusion allows the purification of the resulting HP2 from baculovirus-infected Sf9 cells without compromising HC activity. An apparent quantitative difference (Table 1) in the HC efficiency of P2 versus that of HP2 was not investigated statistically. However, repeated aphid transmission testing seems to confirm that HP2 is not as efficient as native P2 (not shown). It is possible that the His tag fusion slightly affects some properties of the N terminus of P2. Unfortunately, both the structure of that region and its associated functions are thus far totally obscure.
Previous experiments, in which P2 was expressed in Sf9 cells by a baculovirus recombinant in the presence of tunicamycin or radiolabeled orthophosphate, indicated that the active form of the CaMV HC is neither phosphorylated nor N glycosylated (S. Blanc, unpublished data). The MALDI-TOF spectrometry data presented here show a molecular mass for the HP2 monomer slightly less than that calculated from its amino acid sequence, thus confirming that such posttranslational modifications are not required for HC activity. The minor bands of higher molecular mass detected by SDS-PAGE in both HP2 and P2H preparations (Fig. 2B) were not seen with MALDI-TOF spectrometry, probably due to their low abundance. Such forms of P2 are not observed when native P2 is baculovirus expressed in Sf9 cells (Fig. 2) and have never been reported for CaMV-infected plants. Since their presence does not correlate with HC biological activity, they may be artifacts from the baculovirus-insect cell expression system.
Our UV-CD study of HP2 secondary structure reveals that the
60-amino-acid C-terminal domain is nearly completely
-helical (80% ± 5%). This result is in perfect agreement with the model previously
published by Leh et al. (16). Furthermore, this 80%
-helical content in the C-terminal domain could fully account for
the 23% (±5%) that we found in the entire HP2 molecule, thus also
confirming the prediction by Modjtahedi et al. (21) that most
-helical motifs of P2 are located in the C terminus.
Alpha helices and their possible association through the formation of
coiled-coil structures have been extensively documented (18). The
1 region of P2 contains motifs typical of
coiled-coil structures and is demonstrated here to self-assemble, most
likely into a parallel trimer. In cross-linking experiments, however, minor bands corresponding to tetra- and pentamers were also visible. Since the formation of tetrameric (15) or pentameric
(29) coiled coils has been reported previously, the
possible existence of
1 oligomers containing more than three
molecules could not be totally ruled out.
The trimeric form of HP2Cter, as revealed by chemical cross-linking
experiments and MALDI-TOF spectrometry, can easily be explained by the
1 self-association described above. That the suggested
2-
2
interaction (Fig. 6E) also participates in the oligomerization of
HP2Cter is considered unlikely. Indeed, binding of P2::PhoA
to
2 requires sequences located in the N-terminal half of P2 (Fig.
6F), thus indicating that the
2-driven P2-P2 association is a more
integrated property that requires several motifs in the entire
molecule. The involvement of the corresponding domain in the
polymerization of full-length P2, however, is confirmed by previously
published results reporting that mutations in
2 prevented the
formation of P2 paracrystals (28).
While the HC involved in aphid transmission of potyviruses (HC-Pro) has been demonstrated to be functional as a soluble dimer, the situation appears to be much more complex in the case of caulimoviruses. By using an experimental approach similar to that described for potyviruses (30, 31), i.e., purification and gel filtration followed by an aphid transmission assay, we show that the HC activity of CaMV is most likely associated with a huge soluble P2 oligomer containing 200 to 300 subunits. The HC biological activity of the corresponding fraction from gel filtration was very low. It was impossible to load more soluble HP2 on the column because a higher concentration of protein would have triggered the formation of a precipitate. Moreover, we did not concentrate the eluted fractions, as this could have modified the oligomeric form of HP2 present in the solution.
Because it seems inherently obvious that P2-P2 interactions are also
required to assemble this soluble active form of the CaMV HC, we have
investigated a possible correlation between the P2-P2 interaction and
HC activity. Unfortunately, we could not directly answer this question.
Indeed, mutations affecting
1-
1 interaction resulted in a marked
decrease of P2 expression to undetectable levels both in the
baculovirus-insect cell system and in plants infected with a mutant
CaMV, although the corresponding RNA was present (data not shown).
Hence, beyond biological activity, P2-P2 association appears to be
required for stability and correct folding of the protein. The effect
of the
2-driven P2-P2 interaction on HC activity was not tested
because we have previously shown that point mutations that alter the
2 helix totally abolish not only the formation of P2 paracrystals
(28) but also the P2-P3 interaction (16).
Thus, it would be impossible to distinguish whether disruption of P2-P2
or of P2-P3 interactions was responsible for the loss of HC activity.
This last point highlights an interesting aspect of the work presented
here; that is, P2 interacts with itself via amino acid motifs that are
also involved in binding to P3. The P2-P3 interaction described by Leh
et al. (16) and the P2-P2 interaction reported here are
surprisingly similar. Both are very strong when both predicted helices
1 and
2 are present and weaker when only
2 remains.
Nevertheless, under our experimental conditions, a striking difference
can be observed. In contrast to P2::PhoA (Fig. 6), P3 was
never reported to bind to a P2 derivative in which the
2 region is
either mutated or deleted (13). For this reason, it seems
most probable that
2 is the primary motif of P2 recognized by P3.
How the P2-P3 interaction interferes with
2-driven P2-P2 interaction
remains to be investigated. Whether binding of P3 initiated on
2 can
extend to
1 as speculated by Leh et al. (16) is also
unknown, but in that case, P3 would presumably have to displace the
rather stable
1-
1 interaction characterized here. Finally, the
N-terminal region of P3 that interacts with P2 is also responsible for
P3 tetramer formation (15). Whether the form of P3 that
binds to P2 is mono- or tetrameric is also unknown. In any case, it is
predictable that interaction with P3 will modify the structure of P2
oligo- or polymers and vice versa. Consequently, elucidation of the
precise molecular mechanisms of CaMV aphid transmission will require
further studies to gain a better understanding of how P3 influences and
regulates the functions of P2.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Eugénie Hébrard and Martin Drucker contributed equally to this work.
We are extremely grateful to Q. BIOgene for kindly providing the Color*PhoA SYSTEM kit. The seeds of turnip cv. Just Right were kindly provided by Takii Europe B.V. We thank P. Espérandieu for aphid transmission testing.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Station de Recherches de Pathologie Comparée, UMR 5087, INRA-CNRS-Université Montpellier II, 30380 Saint-Christol-les-Alès, France. Phone: 33 4 66 78 37 15. Fax: 33 4 66 52 46 99. E-mail: blanc{at}ensam.inra.fr.
Present address: Centre de Recherche en Infectiologie
PavillonCHUL, Université Laval, Ste-Foy, P.Q. G1V
4G2, Canada.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. | Armour, S. L., U. Melcher, T. P. Pirone, D. J. Lyttle, and R. C. Essenberg. 1983. Helper component for aphid transmission encoded by region II of cauliflower mosaic virus DNA. Virology 129:25-30[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2. | Blanc, S., M. Cerutti, H. Chaabihi, C. Louis, G. Devauchelle, and R. Hull. 1993. Gene II product of an aphid-nontransmissible isolate of cauliflower mosaic virus expressed in a baculovirus system possesses aphid transmission factor activity. Virology 192:651-654[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. | Blanc, S., M. Cerutti, M. Usmany, J. M. Vlak, and R. Hull. 1993. Biological activity of cauliflower mosaic virus aphid transmission factor expressed in a heterologous system. Virology 192:643-650[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 4. | Blanc, S., E. Hébrard, M. Drucker, and R. Froissart. Molecular basis of vector transmission: caulimoviruses. In K. Harris, O. P. Smith, and J. E. Duffus (ed.), Virus-insect-plant interactions, in press. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif. |
| 5. | Blanc, S., I. Schmidt, G. Kuhl, P. Esperandieu, G. Lebeurier, R. Hull, M. Cerutti, and C. Louis. 1993. Paracrystalline structure of cauliflower mosaic virus aphid transmission factor produced both in plants and in a heterologous system and relationship with a solubilized active form. Virology 197:283-292[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 6. |
Chaabihi, H.,
M. H. Ogliastro,
M. Martin,
C. Giraud,
G. Devauchelle, and M. Cerutti.
1993.
Competition between baculovirus polyhedrin and p10 gene expression during infection of insect cells.
J. Virol.
67:2664-2671 |
| 7. | Espinoza, A. M., P. G. Markham, A. J. Maule, and R. Hull. 1988. In vitro biological activity associated with the aphid transmission factor of cauliflower mosaic virus. J. Gen. Virol. 68:1819-1830. |
| 8. | Espinoza, A. M., M. Usmany, T. P. Pirone, M. Harvey, C. J. Woolston, V. Medina, J. M. Vlak, and R. Hull. 1992. Expression of cauliflower mosaic virus ORF II in a baculovirus system. Intervirology 34:1-12[Medline]. |
| 9. | Franck, A., H. Guilley, J. Jonard, K. Richards, and L. Hirth. 1980. Nucleotide sequence of cauliflower mosaic virus DNA. Cell 21:285-294[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 10. | Hohn, T., and J. Fütterer. 1997. The proteins and functions of plant pararetroviruses: knowns and unknowns. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 16:133-167[CrossRef]. |
| 11. | Howarth, A. J., R. C. Gardner, J. Messing, and R. J. Shepherd. 1981. Nucleotide sequence of naturally occurring deletion mutants of cauliflower mosaic virus. Virology 112:678-685[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. |
Kassanis, B., and D. A. Govier.
1971.
New evidence on the mechanism of transmission of potato C and potato aucuba mosaic viruses.
J. Gen. Virol.
10:99-101 |
| 13. | Kiselar, J. G., and K. M. Downard. 2000. Preservation and detection of specific antibody-peptide complexes by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Spectrom. 11:746-750. |
| 14. | Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 277:680-684. |
| 15. |
Leclerc, D.,
L. Burri,
A. V. Kajava,
J. L. Mougeot,
D. Hess,
A. Lustig,
G. Kleemann, and T. Hohn.
1998.
The open reading frame III product of cauliflower mosaic virus forms a tetramer through a N-terminal coiled-coil.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:29015-29021 |
| 16. |
Leh, V.,
E. Jacquot,
A. Geldreich,
M. Haas,
S. Blanc,
M. Keller, and P. Yot.
2001.
Interaction between cauliflower mosaic virus ORFIII product and the coat protein is required for transmission of the virus by aphids.
J. Virol.
75:100-106 |
| 17. | Leh, V., E. Jacquot, A. Geldreich, T. Hermann, D. Leclerc, M. Cerrutti, P. Yot, M. Keller, and S. Blanc. 1999. Aphid transmission of cauliflower mosaic virus requires the viral PIII protein. EMBO J. 18:7077-7085[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. | Lupas, A. 1996. Coiled coils: new structures and new functions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 21:375-382[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. | Lupas, A. 1997. Predicting coiled-coil regions in proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7:388-393[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. | Merelo, J., M. Andrade, A. Prieto, and F. Morán. 1994. Proteinotopic feature maps. Neurocomputing 6:443-454[CrossRef]. |
| 21. | Modjtahedi, N., M. Volovitch, L. Mazzolini, and P. Yot. 1985. Comparison of the predicted secondary structure of aphid transmission factor for transmissible and non-transmissible cauliflower mosaic virus strains. FEBS Letter. 181:223-228[CrossRef]. |
| 22. | Moniatte, M., F. G. Van der Goot, J. T. Buckley, F. Pattus, and A. Van Dorsselaer. 1996. Characterisation of the heptameric pore-forming complex of the Aeromonas toxin aerolysin using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. FEBS Lett. 384:269-372[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 23. | Nault, L. R. 1997. Arthropod transmission of plant viruses : a new synthesis. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 90:521-541. |
| 24. | Pirone, T., and S. Blanc. 1996. Helper-dependent vector transmission of plant viruses. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 34:227-247[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. | Pirone, T. P., and K. L. Perry.
Aphids non-persistent transmission. In R. T. Plumb
(ed.), Advances in botanical research, vol. 30, in press. Academic
Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 26. | Raccah, B., H. Huet, and S. Blanc. Potyviruses. In K. Harris, J. E. Duffus, and O. P. Smith (ed.), Virus-insect-plant interactions, in press. Academic Press, San Diego, Calif. |
| 27. | Rodriguez, D., D. Lopez-Abella, and J. R. Diaz-Ruiz. 1988. An electron microscopic study of Cauliflower mosaic virus-induced viroplasms: unusual structures within the viroplasms matrix with possible functional significance in the viral replication cycle. J. Ultrastruct. Mol. Struct. Res. 100:118-125[CrossRef]. |
| 28. |
Schmidt, I.,
S. Blanc,
P. Esperandieu,
G. Kuhl,
G. Devauchelle,
C. Louis, and M. Cerutti.
1994.
Interaction between the aphid transmission factor and virus particles is a part of the molecular mechanism of cauliflower mosaic virus aphid transmission.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:8885-8889 |
| 29. |
Simmerman, H. K. B.,
Y. M. Kobayashi,
J. M. Autry, and L. R. Jones.
1996.
A leucine zipper stabilizes the pentameric membrane domain of phospolamban and forms a coiled-coil pore structure.
J. Biol. Chem.
271:5941-5946 |
| 30. | Thornbury, D. W., G. M. Hellman, R. E. Rhoads, and T. P. Pirone. 1985. Purification and characterization of potyvirus helper component. Virology 144:260-267[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 31. | Wang, R., and T. Pirone. 1999. Purification and characterization of turnip mosaic virus helper component protein. Phytopathology 89:564-567[Medline]. |
| 32. | Woolston, C. J., S. N. Covey, J. R. Penswick, and J. W. Davies. 1983. Aphid transmission and a polypeptide are specified by a defined region of the cauliflower mosaic virus genome. Gene 23:15-23[CrossRef][Medline]. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»