Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, September 2001, p. 8524-8537, Vol. 75, No. 18
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.18.8524-8537.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Activation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus
Transcription in T Cells Revisited: NF-
B p65 Stimulates
Transcriptional Elongation
Michelle J.
West,
Anthony D.
Lowe, and
Jonathan
Karn*
Medical Research Council Laboratory of
Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 2QH, United Kingdom
Received 24 April 2001/Accepted 18 June 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is able to establish a
persistent latent infection during which the integrated provirus
remains transcriptionally silent. Viral transcription is stimulated by
NF-
B, which is activated following the exposure of infected T cells
to antigens or mitogens. Although it is commonly assumed that NF-
B
stimulates transcriptional initiation alone, we have found using RNase
protection assays that, in addition to stimulating initiation, it can
also stimulate elongation from the HIV-1 long terminal repeat. When
either Jurkat or CCRF/CEM cells were activated by the mitogens phorbol
myristate acetate and phytohemagglutinin, elongation, as measured by
the proportion of full-length transcripts, increased two- to fourfold,
even in the absence of Tat. Transfection of T cells with plasmids
carrying the different subunits of NF-
B demonstrated that the
activation of transcriptional elongation is mediated specifically by
the p65 subunit. It seems likely that initiation is activated because of NF-
B's ability to disrupt chromatin structures through the recruitment of histone acetyltransferases. To test whether p65 could
stimulate elongation under conditions where it did not affect histone
acetylation, cells were treated with the histone deacetylase inhibitor
trichostatin A. Remarkably, addition of p65 to the trichostatin A-treated cell lines resulted in a dramatic increase in transcription elongation, reaching levels equivalent to those observed in the presence of Tat. We suggest that the activation of elongation by
NF-
B p65 involves a distinct biochemical mechanism, probably the
activation of carboxyl-terminal domain kinases at the promoter.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
In addition to its normal lytic
growth pathway, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is able to
enter a latent state in which the integrated proviral genome remains
transcriptionally silent for long periods. The ability to infect cells
latently helps HIV to establish persistent infections despite strong
humoral and cellular immune responses against the viral proteins. When T cells residing in lymphoid tissues are activated, the latent proviruses that they harbor can efficiently infect adjacent cells without the release of neutralizable virus particles through
cell-to-cell transfer of virions (12, 30). A second
consequence of latency during the development of HIV disease is that
the latent proviruses create a large and stable reservoir of genetic
variants from which strains carrying resistance to immune responses and
therapeutic drugs can be selected (45).
Studies using viral long terminal repeats (LTRs) linked to reporter
genes demonstrated that the transcription factor NF-
B plays a
central role in the proviral activation pathway (28). In
resting T cells and most established T-cell lines, NF-
B is sequestered in the cytoplasm by the inhibitor protein I
B
(for reviews, see references 1 and 2). Following
exposure of T cells to antigen or treatment of the cells by mitogens
such as phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) and phytohemagglutinin (PHA), NF-
B is unmasked due to the sequential phosphorylation,
ubiquitination, and degradation of I
B
. Free NF-
B then
translocates to the nucleus, where it can activate transcription from a
wide variety of promoters, including the HIV LTR (11, 26, 28,
32). The HIV promoter contains two NF-
B binding sites located
near the transcription start site. These sites are recognized by a
variety of cellular proteins from the NF-
B/Rel family,
including p52-p65 and p50-p65 heterodimers and p50 and p65 homodimers
(4, 21). Binding to the NF-
B motifs in the HIV LTR is
cooperative and can be enhanced by binding of SP-1 to adjacent sites in
the promoter (21, 32).
Transcription from the HIV LTR during proviral activation is also
regulated by the viral transactivator protein Tat. In the absence of
Tat, initiation from the LTR is efficient, but transcription is
impaired because the promoter recruits poorly processive polymerases that disengage from the DNA template prematurely (for reviews, see
references 17 and 41). Activation of
transcriptional elongation occurs following the recruitment of Tat to
the transcription machinery by a specific interaction with an RNA
regulatory element called TAR (18). After binding to TAR
RNA, Tat stimulates a specific protein kinase complex called TAK
(Tat-associated kinase) which contains a kinase subunit, CDK9, and its
cyclin partner cyclin T1 (CycT1). CycT1 is able to bind directly to Tat
and promote its binding to TAR RNA (44). The activated
kinase is then able to hyperphosphorylate the large subunit of the RNA
polymerase II (Pol II) carboxyl-terminal domain (14, 49).
When T cells carrying latent proviruses are activated, the low amounts
of Tat that are produced initially create a powerful feedback mechanism
that dramatically increases the overall transcription efficiency. This
leads to a substantial rise in Tat levels and, after the expression of
sufficient amounts of the regulatory protein Rev, the eventual
expression of the full complement of viral proteins.
Although the critical role played by NF-
B during the activation of
HIV transcription is well established, the precise molecular mechanisms
underlying its activity are still unknown. Most models of HIV
activation assume that the increased levels of NF-
B exclusively stimulate initiation rates from the viral LTR. According to these models, Tat is produced initially simply because the promoter is
"leaky" and a small fraction of the transcription complexes fortuitously synthesize full-length transcripts (24).
However, it seems more likely that rather than relying on a stochastic process, specialized mechanisms exist that ensure early Tat production. An example of the type of mechanism that could be involved is activation of an enhancer element, since the addition of a strong cellular enhancer to the HIV LTR induces a high level of transcription even in the absence of Tat (46).
To test the hypothesis that HIV LTR carries an enhancer-like element
that is utilized specifically during T-cell activation, we looked for
evidence that NF-
B, or some other factor that is concomitantly
upregulated during T-cell activation, can increase the elongation
capacity of the polymerases recruited to the LTR in the absence of Tat.
The results show that, unexpectedly, the p65 subunit of NF-
B is able
to stimulate transcription elongation by a novel mechanism that
operates in addition to its role in stimulating transcription initiation.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmids.
The chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT)
reporter plasmid, D5-3-3, contains a wild-type HIV-1 LTR upstream of
the CAT gene (3). Mutations in the NF-
B sites and
surrounding sites were generated by site-directed mutagenesis using
PCR. PCRs contained 10 ng of D5-3-3; 125 ng of each mutagenic primer;
200 µM dATP, dGTP, dCTP and dTTP; 1× Pfu polymerase
buffer (Stratagene); and 2.5 U of Pfu polymerase
(Stratagene) in a total volume of 50 µl. Reactions were carried out
at 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 1 min, and 68°C for 9 min for a
total of 16 cycles. Template plasmid was digested with the
methylation-sensitive enzyme DpnI, and the mutated plasmid
DNA containing staggered nicks was then transformed into endonuclease-minus Escherichia coli cells (ACE). The
EcoRV (
340) to HindIII (+78) region of the
new mutant
B and mutant spacer plasmids was sequenced to verify the
mutation and then subcloned in place of the wild-type EcoRV
to HindIII fragment of D5-3-3 to generate plasmids
MJW-35 and MJW-36, respectively.
The luciferase reporter plasmid containing the wild-type LTR (LTR-FF)
was generated by cloning the EcoRV-to-HindIII
fragment of D5-3-3 into the SmaI and HindIII
sites of pGL3 basic (Promega). The MJW-37 and MJW-38 luciferase
reporter plasmids were generated by subcloning the EcoRV to
HindIII fragments of MJW-35 (mutant
B) and MJW-36
(mutant spacer), respectively, into the SmaI and HindIII sites of pGL3-basic. MJW-39 [
(
340 to
80)] was derived by cloning the
XhoI-to-HindIII LTR fragment of MTX-3
(38) into the XhoI and HindIII
sites of pGL3-basic. MJW-40 [
(
340 to
104)] was generated in a
similar manner by cloning the XhoI-to-HindIII LTR fragment of MTX-13 into pGL3-basic. RNase protection analysis of
CAT reporter transcripts was carried out as described previously using
the plasmids MTX-89 and MTX-147 to generate proximal and distal
antisense probes, respectively (46).
Cell culture.
The T-cell lines Jurkat and CCRF/CEM were
maintained in RPMI 1640 medium containing penicillin (100 U/ml) and
streptomycin (100 µg/ml) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum and
were cultured at 37°C in 7% CO2.
Transfections were carried out initially using Superfect (Qiagen) and
later using the newer and more efficient transfection
reagent Effectene
(Qiagen). Cells were diluted 1 in 3 into fresh
medium 24 h prior
to transfection. Large-scale transfections for
RNA analysis using
Superfect were performed in 25-cm
3 flasks with
7.5 µg of HIV plasmid, containing a CAT or luciferase
reporter gene
and 0 to 200 ng of C63-4-1, which expresses Tat
in
trans
from a Moloney murine leukemia virus LTR. To compensate
for the
variable amounts of C63-4-1 in the mixture, pUC12 DNA
was also added.
DNA samples were mixed in a total volume of 150
µl of medium
containing no fetal calf serum or antibiotics and
Superfect was then
added at a ratio of 5 µl per µg of DNA. After
a 10-min incubation
at room temperature, 1 ml of normal growth
medium was added to the
transfection mixes, and the total volume
then transferred to a
25-cm
3 flask containing 4 ml of cells resuspended
at 1 × 10
6 to 1.25 × 10
6/ml in fresh media. The flasks were incubated
at 37°C for 2 h,
and 5 ml of normal growth medium was then
added. For luciferase
assays, small-scale transfections with Superfect
were carried
out in six-well dishes, and all quantities and volumes
were reduced
by approximately half. In addition, 1 µg of pRL-CMV
(Promega)
which contains the Renilla luciferase gene under the control
of
the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter was included as a transfection
control.
Large-scale transfections carried out for RNA analysis using Effectene
contained 1 or 2 µg of D5-3-3, 0 to 500 ng of C63-4-1,
and pUC12 DNA
to maintain constant DNA levels. DNA was mixed in
a total volume of 300 µl of EC buffer (Qiagen), and 8 µl of Enhancer
was added for
every microgram of DNA present. Samples were then
vortexed and
incubated at room temperature for 5 min prior to
the addition of
Effectene (10 µl for every microgram of DNA).
After vortexing the
mixture, the samples were incubated for a
further 5 min at room
temperature, and 1 ml of normal growth medium
was then added. The total
mix was then added to a 25-cm
3 flask containing 4 ml of cells resuspended at 2.5 × 10
5/ml in
fresh medium. The flasks were incubated at 37°C for 2 h,
and 5 ml of normal growth medium was then
added.
Jurkat and CCRF/CEM cells were activated 24 h after transfection
by the addition of PHA (Sigma) to a final concentration of
10 µg/ml
and PMA (Sigma) to a final concentration of 50 ng/ml.
Transfection mixtures for the RNase protection experiments utilizing
the CDK9 mutant (D167N) contained 1 µg of D5-3-3, 250
ng of C63-4-1
and 0 or 0.5 µg of FLAG-D167N. Transfection mixtures
for the
luciferase assays contained 600 ng of LTR-FF, 0 or 50
ng of C63-4-1,
and 1.5 or 3 µg of D167N. The FLAG-DNA content
of all samples was
maintained at a constant level by the addition
of the vector DNA
(CMV-FLAG).
Luciferase assays for the NF-

B overexpression experiments were
carried out on cells transfected with 600 ng of LTR-FF, 0
or 40 ng of
C63-4-1, and 150 to 600 ng of plasmids expressing
the p65 or p52
subunits of NF-

B under the control of the Rous
sarcoma virus
(RSV) LTR (
4). Large-scale experiments for RNA
analysis were carried out in 25-cm
3 flasks using
1 µg of D5-3-3, 0 or 250 ng of C63-4-1 and 1.2 µg
of pRSV-p65, or
600 ng of pRSV-p65 and 600 ng of pRSV-p52. Control
samples contained
1.2 µg of pUC12 DNA. Cells were harvested after
48 h for
analysis. Where indicated, cells were treated with trichostatin
A (TSA;
Sigma) at 24 h posttransfection and harvested after a
further
24 h. Data from the luciferase assays were corrected for
cell
toxicity
effects.
Toxicity assays were performed in parallel with luciferase assays by
transferring 200 µl of transfected cell mix to a 96-well
plate. These
cells were treated in parallel with PMA and PHA on
day 2, and cell
proliferation was measured on day 3 by the addition
of 40 µl of
CellTiter 96 Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation
Assay Reagent
(Promega). Cells were then incubated at 37°C for
2 to 4 h, and
the level of colored product was determined by the
absorbance at 490
nm.
RNase protection assays.
Total RNA was extracted from cells
using Tri-reagent (Sigma) and then treated with 6 U of RNase-free DNase
I (2 U/µl; HT Biotechnology Ltd.) for 30 min at 37°C in a total
volume of 50 µl containing 1× NEB 2 buffer (New England Biolabs) and
80 U of RNasin (40 U/µl; Promega). RNA was then extracted with
phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol and precipitated in ethanol
containing 0.5 M ammonium acetate. The DNase I treatment was repeated
using 30 U of DNase I (10 U/µl; Boehringer Mannheim); and the RNA was
resuspended in sterile water. Antisense probes were prepared exactly as
described previously (46).
Each protection assay was performed on equal amounts of RNA (10 to 20 µg) and 20 to 40,000 cpm of probe as described previously
(
46). The digestion of single-stranded sequences was
carried
out using RNase T
1 (1,800 U/µl;
Gibco-BRL) at a final concentration
of 4.5 U/µl and RNase A at a
final concentration of 5 ng/ml. Protected
fragments were analyzed by
electrophoresis through 6% polyacrylamide
gels containing 6 M urea
which were quantified directly by phosphorimagery
or by laser
densitometry of
autoradiographs.
Luciferase assays.
Cells transfected in six-well plates were
harvested after 48 h, washed once in phosphate-buffered saline,
and then lysed in 100 to 200 µl of 1× Passive Lysis Buffer (Promega)
for 30 min at room temperature. Lysates (10 µl) were assayed using 50 µl of LAR II reagent and 50 µl of Stop and Glo reagent from the
Dual Luciferase Assay System kit (Promega). Firefly luciferase and Renilla luciferase activity were measured sequentially using a microplate luminometer with an injection unit (Berthold detection systems).
Immunoblotting.
Cell pellets were lysed directly in 1× GSB
(50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8; 4% sodium dodecyl sulfate; 10%
2-mercaptoethanol; 0.01% bromophenol blue; 10% glycerol; 1 mM EDTA).
Lysates were vortexed extensively and then heated to 90°C for 5 min
prior to electrophoresis analysis using 10% NuPAGE Bis-Tris gels
(Novex) and morpholinepropanesulfonic acid buffer. Proteins were
transferred onto Protran nitrocellulose membrane (Schleicher & Schuell). CDK9 was detected using a rabbit polyclonal antibody (H-169
sc-8338; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.), and CycT1 was detected using
a goat polyclonal antibody (C-20, sc-8128; Santa Cruz Biotechnology,
Inc.). Complexes were then detected using a rabbit anti-mouse
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody and a rabbit
anti-goat horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Dako),
respectively, and visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech).
 |
RESULTS |
The activation of basal transcription in mitogen-treated T cells is
due to increased levels of both initiation and elongation.
Transcription complexes that initiate from the HIV LTR are known to be
poorly processive and are subsequently converted into a more processive
form after the stimulation of CDK9 kinase activity by Tat. However,
under certain circumstances it is possible to obtain significant
increases in Tat-independent transcription elongation from the HIV LTR.
For example, we have recently demonstrated that when a strong cellular
enhancer is introduced into the HIV LTR it is able to promote the
recruitment of elongation-competent transcription complexes
(46).
Does a similar mechanism operate during the activation of latent
proviruses? Transcription from the HIV-1 LTR has long been
known to
increase dramatically when NF-

B is activated in T cells
that are
stimulated by mitogenic agents that mimic the normal
process of
antigen-mediated T-cell activation in vivo (
28) but,
surprisingly, none of the published studies have examined whether
NF-

B simply stimulates transcription initiation, or whether it
also
has more subtle effects on HIV transcription, including effects
on
elongation. We therefore decided to study HIV transcription
in
activated T cells using sensitive reporter assays and quantitative
RNase protection
assays.
To establish reliable cell culture conditions for these experiments, we
first performed control experiments using luciferase
reporter
constructs transfected into Jurkat and CCRF/CEM T-cell
lines. High
levels of luciferase activity were only obtained following
the
treatment of the cells by the mitogens PMA and PHA (Fig.
1).
Transcription from the viral LTR in
the absence of Tat (basal
transcription) was extremely low in
unstimulated Jurkat cells
(Fig.
1B) and CCRF/CEM cells (Fig.
1C) due to
the combined restrictions
on initiation and elongation. Tat was able to
stimulate luciferase
synthesis from the wild-type LTR by 7-fold in
Jurkat cells and
by 15-fold in CCRF/CEM cells; however, this still
corresponded
to comparatively low levels of transcription.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
The activation of the HIV-1 LTR after stimulation of
T-cell lines by mitogens. (A) Luciferase reporter plasmids. The
wild-type plasmid LTR-FF contains the
EcoRV-to-HindIII fragment of the LTR
( 340 to +78) cloned upstream of the firefly luciferase gene in pGL3
(Promega). The B mutant plasmid (MJW-37) has a CTC substitution in
the two NF- B sites, and the mutant spacer plasmid (MJW-38) has a
GCTG-to-ATAT change in the spacer region between these two sites. The
( 340 to 104) and ( 340 to 80) deletions were created by
cloning the XhoI-to-HindIII (+78)
fragments from plasmids containing the truncated LTRs (MTX-13 and
MTX-3, respectively) into pGL3. (B) Jurkat cells. Cells were
transfected with 4 µg of luciferase reporter in the absence or
presence of 75 ng of the Tat-expressing plasmid C63-4-1 and 1 µg of
the internal control plasmid, pRL-CMV. Cells were treated at 24 h
posttransfection with PMA (50 ng/ml) and PHA (10 µg/ml) for a further
24 h. Data represent the mean ± the standard deviation of
three independent experiments expressed as the fold transactivation
over wild-type basal transcription. Results were also normalized to the
expression of the Renilla luciferase gene expressed from cotransfected
pRL-CMV. Since the CMV promoter was also activated by PMA and PHA,
nonactivated and activated cells were normalized independently. (C) The
activation of the HIV-1 LTR luciferase constructs in CCRF/CEM cells.
|
|
The increase in basal HIV transcription after mitogen stimulation of T
cells is remarkably large and frequently exceeds the
levels of
transcription that can be achieved following the addition
of Tat to
unstimulated cells. For example, there was a mean 64-fold
increase in
basal transcription in Jurkat cells and a mean 19-fold
increase in
basal transcription in CCRF/CEM cells following PMA
and PHA
treatment. Addition of Tat activated transcription synergistically
and
led to extremely high levels of transcription as shown by
the mean
664-fold increase in luciferase in the Jurkat cells and
the mean
323-fold activation of luciferase in the CCRF/CEM cells.
Furthermore,
as shown in Fig.
2, mitogen-activated
transcription
resulted in luciferase levels that were greater than the
levels
obtained in Jurkat cells that had been transfected by Tat
expression
plasmid C63-4-1 over a wide concentration range (25 and 100 ng).
At each Tat concentration, PMA and PHA acted synergistically with
Tat to stimulate high levels of HIV transcription.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Activation of transcription from the HIV-1 LTR in
Jurkat cells stimulated by PMA and PHA in the presence or absence of
Tat. Cells were transfected with 4 µg of luciferase reporter in the
absence or presence of 25, 50, or 100 ng of the Tat-expressing plasmid
C63-4-1 and 1 µg of the internal control plasmid, pRL-CMV. Cells were
treated 24 h posttransfection with PMA (50 ng/ml) and PHA (10 µg/ml) for a further 24 h. The results were normalized to the
expression of the Renilla luciferase gene expressed from cotransfected
pRL-CMV.
|
|
Although numerous studies have shown that basal transcription is
activated in T cells, to our knowledge this is the first
comparison of
the levels of basal transcription in stimulated
cells to Tat-activated
transcription in unstimulated T cells.
The fact that basal
transcription is so dramatically reduced in
unstimulated T cells
suggests that there is a specific molecular
mechanism that is used to
repress HIV LTR transcription that is
subsequently reversed following
mitogen
activation.
Additional control experiments, which are in agreement with earlier
reports, showed that the efficient activation of transcription
by PHA
and PMA required functional NF-

B sites in the viral LTR
(Fig.
1B and
C). Deletion of all of the LTR sequences found upstream
of the SP1
sites, including the NF-

B sites [

(

340 to

80)],
also
produced a promoter that was very poorly responsive to the
mitogens.
Recent studies have identified a binding site for the NF-ATc protein
that overlaps the NF-

B sites and includes the 4-bp spacer
region
separating these two sites (
20). These results raised
the
possibility that NF-ATc could also contribute to HIV LTR
transcriptional
activation in T cells. In contrast to the results
obtained when
the

B sites were mutated, we found that LTRs carrying
mutations
of the spacer region that inactivate NF-ATc binding had
wild-type
activity (Fig.
1). These reporters showed the same levels of
activation
of basal transcription as the wild-type following
stimulation
by PMA and PHA. Furthermore, the extent of transactivation
by
Tat was unaffected by these mutations in either cell line (Fig.
1B
and C). Potential NF-AT binding sites have also been identified
in the
region from nucleotides (nt)

253 to

213 upstream of the
transcription start site. However, we found that, consistent with
the
results of other authors, the deletion of LTR upstream of
the NF-

B
sites [

(

340 to

104)] also had no measurable effect
on the
levels of basal and Tat-activated transcription in either
the Jurkat or
the CCRF/CEM cell line (
22,
25). Thus, although
NF-ATc
might be able to substitute for NF-

B in certain circumstances,
this
protein does not play a central role in the activation of
HIV
transcription in established T-cell
lines.
In order to compare initiation and elongation levels, transcripts
produced after T-cell activation were next analyzed using
RNase
protection assays (Fig.
3). As described
previously, hybridization
to the promoter-proximal probe allows the
detection of all transcripts
that initiate at the LTR and provides an
approximate measure of
total transcription levels. Hybridization to the
distal probe
detects only those transcripts which have extended to
residues
nt +342 to +482 downstream from the transcription start site
and
therefore provides a measure of elongation (
46). In
order to
compare the proportions of full-length transcripts to total
initiations
in different experiments, the data reported here were
corrected
for the specific activity of the probes. Following this
correction,
the level of full-length transcripts is expressed as a
percentage
of the amount of transcripts detected with the proximal
probe
to provide an approximation of the elongation efficiency. Since
the data are expressed as the ratio of the signals obtained from
the
two probes, the experiment is internally controlled for variations
in
transfection efficiency and independent of variations in the
recovery
of RNA from the transfected cells.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
RNase protection analysis of proximal and distal
transcripts in activated T-cell lines. Jurkat cells (A) and CCRF/CEM
cells (B) were transfected with 7.5 µg of a CAT reporter construct
containing the wild-type LTR (D5-3-3) in the absence ( Tat) or
presence (+Tat) of 100 or 200 ng of C63-4-1. Cells were treated with
PMA and PHA as described in the legend to Fig. 1. Total RNA was then
extracted and analyzed by hybridization to an antisense proximal
( 10/+59, MTX-89) or distal (+342/+482, MTX-147) probe. The positions
of the protected proximal product (59 nt) and protected distal product
(140 nt) are indicated on the gel.
|
|
In unstimulated Jurkat T cells, the level of distal transcripts in the
absence of Tat is very low and represents only 1.9%
of the total
transcription (Fig.
3A). Addition of Tat (cells were
cotransfected with
200 ng of the C63-4-1 plasmid) increased the
levels of the distal
transcripts to 18.4% of the total transcription
but, as expected, Tat
did not significantly affect the total amount
of transcription detected
by the proximal probe. These results
are consistent with the
well-established role of Tat in stimulating
the processivity of a
fraction of the polymerases that have initiated
transcription.
After treatment of Jurkat cells with PMA and PHA there was a 4.3-fold
increase in the level of transcripts that could be detected
by the
proximal probe. Thus, the total transcription levels from
the LTR are
markedly increased during activation of Jurkat cells
by mitogens.
Transcription in the mitogen-treated Jurkat cells
can be further
enhanced by Tat, and the proportion of long transcripts
increased to
between 17 and 25% of the total transcripts (Fig.
3A).
In CCRF/CEM cells, mitogen treatment also stimulated total
transcription, but the effect was smaller than that seen in the
Jurkat
cells. As shown in Fig.
3B, proximal transcript production
increased
only twofold following mitogen stimulation. Further
activation of
elongation by Tat was easily detected in the CCRF/CEM
cells. After Tat
addition, up to 26% of the transcripts are full
length.
It is important to note that, although total transcription increased in
both T-cell lines following stimulation by PHA and
PMA, significant
effects on elongation in the absence of Tat are
also evident in these
experiments. In the Jurkat cells, the proportion
of full-length
transcripts seen in the absence of Tat is increased
by mitogen
treatment from 1.9 to 7.2% of the total. A similar
stimulation of
elongation is also observed in mitogen-treated
CCRF/CEM cells, where
the proportion of Tat-independent full-length
transcripts rises from
1.9 to 8.6% of the total transcripts. This
disproportionate increase
in elongation can be readily seen in
the gel shown in Fig.
3B by
comparing the intensities of the bands
detected by the distal probe
before and after treatment of the
CCRF/CEM cells with PMA and PHA in
the absence of Tat (compare
Distal, 0 Tat, minus PMA + PHA to Distal, 0 Tat, plus PMA + PHA
in Fig.
3).
Thus, the RNase protection experiments demonstrate that there are two
components to the response of HIV LTRs to mitogen treatment
in the
absence of Tat. Although initiation levels increased 4-fold
in the
Jurkat cells and 2-fold in the CCRF/CEM cells after exposure
to the
mitogens, this increase in initiation does not fully correspond
to the
16-fold increase in full-length transcripts seen in Jurkat
cells or the
9-fold increase in full-length transcripts seen in
CCRF/CEM
cells.
NF-
B is required for the activation of basal transcription.
To confirm that the increase in transcriptional elongation observed
following mitogenic stimulation is mediated by NF-
B, additional
RNase protection experiments were performed in Jurkat and CCRF/CEM
cells transfected by constructs carrying mutations that inactivated
both NF-
B sites in the LTR (Fig. 4).

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
The activation of transcription elongation by PMA and
PHA requires functional NF- B sites. (A) Jurkat cells were
transfected with 1 µg of D5-3-3 (wild-type) or 1 µg of MJW-37
(mutant NF- B sites) in the absence ( Tat) or presence (+Tat) of 250 ng of C63-4-1. Cells were activated with PMA and PHA, as indicated, and
RNA levels were analyzed by RNA protection assays as described in the
legend to Fig. 2. (B) CCRF/CEM cells were transfected with 2 µg of
D5-3-3 or 2 µg of MJW-37 in the absence or presence of 500 ng of
C63-4-1, and RNA was analyzed as in panel A. P, proximal probe; D,
distal probe.
|
|
In contrast to the wild-type promoter, the mutant LTRs did not show
significant increases in transcription initiation or elongation
in
response to mitogen treatment. For example, in the stimulated
Jurkat
cells (Fig.
4A), the NF-

B mutations reduced the levels
of
transcripts detected by the proximal probe to 24% of the levels
of
activated transcription from the wild-type reporter (Fig.
4A).
The
levels of full-length transcripts detected by the distal probe
were
reduced by a similar extent and were 31% of the wild-type
levels in
activated
cells.
Because basal transcription is barely above the threshold of detection
in this experiment, it was not possible to accurately
measure whether
the NF-

B mutations produced any changes in the
elongation response
in the Jurkat cells. We therefore performed
similar experiments in the
CCRF/CEM cells, where the basal transcription
levels are substantially
higher and the changes in initiation
are less than
twofold.
As shown in Fig.
4B, in CCRF/CEM cells the mutations in the NF-

B
sites abolished both the increase in total transcription
and the
increase in elongation after treatment of cells with mitogens.
The
control experiments using the wild-type reporter gave similar
results
to those shown in Fig.
3. In this experiment, PMA and
PHA increased the
levels of wild-type transcripts detected by
the proximal probe by
1.25-fold, a finding consistent with the
small effects observed on
initiation following mitogenic stimulation
of CCRF/CEM cells. The
addition of mitogens also resulted in the
stimulation of elongation and
the proportion of long transcripts
detected in the absence of Tat rose
from 6 to 12.2% (Fig.
4B).
Following activation of the CCRF/CEM cells, there was no detectable
increase in elongation by reporters carrying the NF-

B
mutations. The
proportion of long transcripts remained at 5% following
activation of
cells carrying the mutant reporter (Fig.
4B). Significantly,
Tat was
able to stimulate transcriptional elongation even when
the NF-

B
mutations in the LTR were present. For example, addition
of Tat in the
presence of mitogens increased the proportion of
long transcripts
observed in the CCRF/CEM cells from 12.2 to 52%
for the wild-type LTR,
and from 5 to 45% in the experiment performed
with the mutant
LTR.
CDK9 and CycT1 levels remain constant in mitogen-stimulated T-cell
lines.
In addition to activating NF-
B, PHA and PMA could also
stimulate the activity of elongation factors that contribute to HIV transcription. For example, the expression of both CDK9 and CycT1 increases when resting T cells are stimulated with a variety of mitogens or when promonocytic cells are induced to differentiate (7, 13, 48). This increase in TAK activity was shown to correlate with the increase in viral replication induced in a promonocytic cell line containing an integrated provirus
(48). These observations led Price (36) to
suggest that an increase in TAK activity is a primary mechanism used to
regulate LTR transcription during T-cell activation.
We therefore measured CDK9 and CycT1 protein levels after the treatment
of both Jurkat and CCRF/CEM cells with PMA and PHA.
As shown in Fig.
5, the levels of both proteins remained
constant
after mitogen activation or expression of Tat. In agreement
with
this result, Yang et al. (
48) have reported that TAK
enzymatic
activity does not increase in Jurkat and CCRF/CEM cells that
have
been stimulated by PMA. Thus, the dramatic increase in HIV
transcription
in these cell lines does not appear to be due to
upregulation
of CDK9 or CycT1 expression and is most likely due to the
activity
of NF-

B itself.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Western blot analysis of levels of the CDK9 and CycT1
proteins in Jurkat and CCRF/CEM cells after stimulation by PMA and PHA.
Whole-cell lysates were fractionated by electrophoresis through 10%
NuPAGE Bis-Tris gels, and the Western blots were probed with anti-CDK9
or anti-cyclin T1 polyclonal antibodies.
|
|
NF-
B p65 selectively activates transcriptional elongation in T
cells.
In order to provide a direct demonstration that NF-
B,
rather than another factor, was responsible for the increase in
transcription elongation, a series of experiments were performed using
plasmids expressing the individual subunits of NF-
B to stimulate HIV
expression. The NF-
B/Rel family of transcription factors is made up
of five proteins: p65 (Rel A), p50 (NF-
B-1), c-Rel, Rel B, and p52
(p49, NF-
B-2). The p50 and p52 subunits are synthesized as
high-molecular-weight precursors (p105 and p100, respectively) that are
proteolytically cleaved to generate their active forms. NF-
B always
binds DNA as a dimer, and previous studies have shown that the
p52-p65 heterodimer is the most effective activator of HIV-1
transcription in T cells (21). However, the binding of p50
and p52 homodimers to promoters has been observed in unstimulated T
cells and macrophages. Similarly, activation of promoters by the p65
homodimer has been observed in mitogen-stimulated T cells
(6).
To assess the roles played by the different forms of NF-

B in the
activation of HIV transcriptional elongation, Jurkat and
CCRF/CEM cells
were transfected with different combinations of
plasmids expressing the
p65, p52, and p50 subunits of NF-

B in
the presence of the HIV-1 LTR
luciferase reporter. Consistent
with the results of others
(
21), we observed that both p50 and
p52 alone were poor
activators of HIV-1 transcription in Jurkat
cells (Fig.
6A). However, in
contrast to Liu et al. (
21), we
observed
that the p52-p65 and p50-p65 heterodimers were able to
stimulate
transcription from the LTR efficiently and to the same
extent.
Interestingly, these results also showed that p65 alone
was able to
activate basal transcription more efficiently than
the p52-p65 or
p50-p65 dimers (12.8-fold, compared to 6- and 5-fold,
respectively). At
the suboptimal concentrations of plasmids used
in this experiment, the
activation of transcription in the presence
of Tat by p65 was lower
than that observed for the heterodimers.

View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
NF- B p65 activates transcription in the absence of
Tat. (A) Jurkat cells were transfected with 600 ng of the wild-type
LTR-FF (firefly luciferase) construct in the absence (minus Tat) or
presence (plus Tat) of 40 ng of C63-4-1. Cells were cotransfected with
150 ng of RSV LTR constructs expressing the p65, p50, or p52 subunits
of NF- B, alone or in the indicated combinations. (B) Jurkat cells
were transfected as in panel A but with increasing amounts of the
p65-expressing plasmid, in the absence or presence of increasing
amounts of the p52-expressing plasmid. For p65 and p52 coexpression,
the indicated amounts of both plasmids were included in the
transfection. (C) The effect of p65 and p52 expression on LTR-FF
activity in CCRF/CEM cells.
|
|
When titrations of p65 alone or p65 in combination with p52 were
performed in Jurkat cells, we observed substantial increases
in basal
transcription (Fig.
6B). The activation of the HIV LTR
by the p65
homodimer resulted in significantly higher levels of
transcription than
observed for the p52-p65 heterodimer throughout
the titration range.
For example, when the Jurkat cells were transfected
with 600 ng of
p65-expressing plasmid, basal transcription was
stimulated 7.4-fold,
whereas a combination of 300 ng of p65-expressing
plasmid plus 300 ng
of p52-expressing plasmid resulted in a stimulation
of only 3-fold.
The activation of transcription by the NF-

B p65 homodimer was even
more pronounced in the CCRF/CEM cells (Fig.
6C). Transfection
of the
CCRF/CEM cells using 600 ng of p65 produced a 29-fold increase
in the
basal transcription level, whereas there was only a 2.6-fold
increase
observed using the p52-p65 heterodimer (Fig.
6C). These
results are
consistent with our previous observations that the
stimulation of basal
transcription elongation following treatment
of CCRF/CEM cells by PHA
and PMA is greater than the stimulation
seen in Jurkat
cells.
The implication of the results obtained from the luciferase assays
described above is that p65 selectively increases basal
transcription
in part by activating elongation. To test this hypothesis,
RNase
protection experiments were carried out on CCRF/CEM cells
that were
cotransfected with the HIV LTR CAT reporter and the
p65- or
p52-expressing plasmids (Fig.
7).

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
NF- B p65 stimulates transcription elongation.
CCRF/CEM cells were transfected with 1 µg of the wild-type CAT
reporter construct (D5-3-3) in the absence ( Tat) or presence (+Tat)
of 250 ng of C63-4-1 and 1.2 µg of the p65-expressing plasmid, or
with a combination of 0.6 µg each of the p65- and p52-expressing
plasmids. Total RNA was extracted and analyzed with proximal and distal
antisense probes as described in Fig. 2. P, proximal probe; D, distal
probe.
|
|
As shown in Fig.
7, p65 clearly stimulated elongation in CCRF/CEM
cells. Although proximal transcript levels increased by
2.3-fold, there
was a much greater increase in distal transcripts
of up to 4.7-fold.
Figure
7 also shows that the p52-p65 heterodimer
was less effective at
stimulating elongation than was p65 alone.
Although the effect on
initiation of p52-p65 was similar to that
observed using p65 alone,
distal transcript levels were stimulated
only twofold. As described
above, another measure of elongation
is to calculate the proportion of
long transcripts measured by
the distal probe compared to the total
transcripts measured by
the proximal probe. In CCRF/CEM cells, p65
increased the levels
of long transcripts from 7% in control cells to
14.2%. The p65-p52
heterodimer had a slightly smaller effect and
increased the proportion
of long transcripts to 10.7%. Tat was able to
further stimulate
transcription elongation. For example, in the
presence of p65,
Tat increased the proportion of long transcripts to
78%.
Thus, NF-

B can directly stimulate the processivity of transcription
complexes recruited to the HIV LTR. The effects of NF-

B
on
transcriptional elongation appear to be primarily mediated
by the p65
subunit of NF-

B, since a stronger effect is observed
when the p65
homodimer is used to activate transcription than
when the p65-p52
heterodimer acts as the
activator.
NF-
B can stimulate HIV transcription under conditions where CDK9
activity is strongly inhibited.
We next examined whether the
stimulation of transcription observed in the mitogen-stimulated T-cell
lines was dependent on the activity of the constitutively expressed
CDK9 kinase. In order to inhibit the kinase activity selectively, cells
were transfected with a catalytic mutant of CDK9 (D167N) alongside the
appropriate reporter plasmids and then treated with PMA and PHA as in
the previous experiments. The expression of D167N in trans
inhibits strongly CDK9-dependent Tat-activated transcription in a wide variety of cell types (10, 23), but it has only minimal
effects on CDK9-independent transcriptional elongation stimulated by a cellular enhancer (46).
Figure
8 shows the effect of the
coexpression of D167N on wild-type LTR-luciferase reporter plasmid
expression in Jurkat cells
(Fig.
8A) and CCRF/CEM cells (Fig.
8B).
Because CDK9 is essential
for Tat-activated transcription, the
expression of the CDK9 mutant
strongly inhibited Tat-activated
transcription in both cell lines.
For example, in Jurkat cells (Fig.
8A), Tat-activated transcription
in the presence of mitogen was reduced
to 26 and 18% of control
levels after cotransfection by 1.5 and 3 µg
of the D167N plasmid.
In CCRF/CEM cells (Fig.
8B) the level of
Tat-activated transcription
in the presence of mitogen was reduced to
36 and 16% of control
levels in the presence of 1.5 and 3 µg of
D167N, respectively.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Activation of HIV transcription by mitogens in T cells
does not require high levels of CDK9 activity. (A) Jurkat cells were
transfected with 600 ng of LTR-FF in the absence ( Tat) or presence
(+Tat) of 50 ng of C63-4-1. Various amounts of a plasmid expressing a
mutant form of CDK9 (FLAG-D167N) were included in the transfections
where indicated. Vector DNA was used to keep the amount of FLAG plasmid
constant in all samples. Cells were treated with PMA and PHA at 24 h posttransfection as in the legend to Fig. 1. Toxicity assays were
performed in parallel, and the results were adjusted accordingly. (B)
Effect of the expression of D167N in trans in CCRF/CEM
cells.
|
|
In contrast, as shown in Fig.
8, basal transcription in
mitogen-activated T cells (

Tat, +PMA, +PHA) is much less sensitive
to
the inhibition of CDK9 than Tat-activated transcription (+Tat,
+PMA,
+PHA). As a result, the net effect of adding D167N to cells
treated
with Tat and mitogens is to selectively inhibit the Tat-dependent
component of transcription and reduce the overall levels of
transcription
to levels that are nearly identical to those seen in the
absence
of Tat. The insensitivity of mitogen-activated transcription to
inhibition by D167N is further demonstrated by the observation
that
there is a large increase in luciferase activity after mitogen
treatment of cells transfected by D167N. For example, there is
a
5.4-fold increase in luciferase levels in Jurkat cells transfected
by
1.5 µg of D167N and subsequently activated by PMA and PHA.
Similarly,
in Jurkat cells transfected with 3.0 µg of D167N and
treated with PMA
and PHA there was a 3.9-fold increase. These
results therefore indicate
that CDK9 is not a primary mediator
of the response to
mitogens.
RNase protection assays were also used to evaluate the role of CDK9 in
the activation of HIV transcription initiation and
elongation in the
mitogen-activated T cells (Fig.
9). Since
Jurkat
cells show a much larger increase in proximal transcript
levels
after mitogen stimulation than CCRF/CEM cells, we used this cell
line for the experiment. These experiments were performed using
concentrations of D167N that fully inactivate Tat-dependent
transcription
but do not significantly inhibit basal transcription.

View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
Stimulation of initiation and elongation in
mitogen-activated T cells does not require CDK9. Jurkat cells were
transfected with 1 µg of the wild-type CAT reporter (D5-3-3) in the
absence ( Tat) or presence (+Tat) of 250 ng of C63-4-1. A total of 0.5 µg of D167N was included in the transfections where indicated. Cells
were treated with PMA and PHA as in the legend to Fig. 1, and total RNA
was analyzed by hybridization to proximal (P) or distal (D) antisense
probes.
|
|
As shown in Fig.
9, the addition of PMA and PHA to control cells
increased proximal transcript levels 4.5-fold. Under these
conditions
expression of D167N did not significantly inhibit total
transcription,
and proximal transcript levels remained at 82%
of the levels detected
in control cells. Addition of PHA and PMA
to control cells resulted in
a 10-fold increase in the level of
transcripts detected by the distal
probe. This large increase
in full-length transcription was maintained
in the presence of
D167N. Thus, the level of distal transcripts
remained at 78% of
wild-type levels in the presence of 0.5 µg of the
D167N-expressing
plasmid. In contrast, at these levels of the
D167N-expressing
plasmid, Tat-dependent transcriptional elongation was
nearly completely
inhibited. In the absence of D167N Tat was able to
increase the
proportion of long transcripts from 19 to 36%. However,
coexpression
of D167N completely abolished the Tat activation effect,
and the
proportion of long transcripts increased from 11% to only
16%.
Thus, NF-

B is able to stimulate both transcription initiation and
elongation under conditions where CDK9 activity is strongly
inhibited.
In contrast, Tat-activated transcription shows a strict
requirement for
CDK9 and is thus mechanistically distinct. Although
these results
indicate that CDK9 is not stringently required for
the NF-

B
response, the partial inhibition of basal transcription
in
mitogen-treated T cells by high concentrations of D167N indicates
that
CDK9 probably plays a role in supporting transcription from
the HIV LTR
even in the absence of
Tat.
NF-
B p65 stimulates elongation independently of histone
acetylation.
Activation of transcription from the HIV LTR by
NF-
B is mediated, at least in part, by the recruitment of histone
acetyltransferases to the promoter and the subsequent disruption of
promoter-proximal nucleosomal structures (8, 27, 33, 39,
42). To determine whether the stimulation of transcriptional
elongation mediated by NF-
B that we have observed can occur
independently of histone acetylation, we performed experiments using
the histone deacetylase inhibitor, trichostatin A (TSA). Exposure of T
cells to TSA increases the acetylation of histones globally and, as a
consequence, transcription from integrated HIV LTRs is strongly
stimulated (42).
Jurkat and CCRF/CEM cells were transfected with the HIV LTR luciferase
reporter construct in the absence or presence of the
NF-

B
p65-expressing plasmid and treated with TSA 24 h posttransfection
(Fig.
10). Although transcription from
transiently transfected
HIV LTR reporter constructs is not activated as
strongly in response
to TSA treatment as integrated proviruses since
the plasmid DNA
is not assembled fully into chromatin (
42)
large increases in
HIV transcription can be observed following TSA
treatment. For
example, treatment of Jurkat cells with 400 nM TSA
resulted in
a 28-fold stimulation of basal transcription, and treatment
of
CCRF/CEM cells with 200 nM TSA resulted in a 14-fold stimulation
of
basal transcription (Fig.
10).

View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 10.
Synergistic stimulation of transcription from the HIV
LTR by treatment of cells with TSA and NF- B p65. (A) Jurkat cells
were transfected with 600 ng of LTR-FF in the absence ( Tat) or
presence (+Tat) of 40 ng of C63-4-1 and in the absence ( p65) or
presence (+p65) of 600 ng of the p65-expressing plasmid. Cells were
treated with the indicated concentration of TSA at 24 h
posttransfection and harvested for analysis after a further 24 h.
Toxicity assays were performed in parallel, and the luciferase
activities were corrected accordingly. (B) CCRF/CEM cells were
transfected and analyzed as for panel A.
|
|
Significantly, we observed that p65 retained the ability to activate
transcription even when cells were treated with TSA.
In the experiment
shown in Fig.
10 addition of p65 resulted in
a further fivefold
increase in luciferase activity in the TSA-treated
Jurkat cells, and a
further ninefold increase in luciferase activity
in the TSA-treated
CCRF/CEM cells. The results demonstrate clearly
that p65 is able to
stimulate transcription independently of histone
acetylation.
To examine the effects of p65 on elongation in the presence of TSA in
more detail, we performed RNase protection experiments
(Fig.
11). When p65 was expressed in the
presence of 400 nM TSA
in Jurkat cells, the level of distal transcripts
increased 3.8-fold.
Furthermore, the proportion of long transcripts
increased from
32 to 57% of the total transcripts, demonstrating that
p65 increased
the elongation potential of the polymerases recruited to
the chromatin-disrupted
templates. Similar results were obtained when
transcription was
analyzed in CCRF/CEM cells. When these cells were
treated with
400 nM TSA, the expression of p65 led to only a 4-fold
increase
in total transcription (proximal transcripts), whereas there
was
a >12-fold increase in distal transcript levels. Thus, expression
of p65 increased the proportion of long transcripts from 12 to
46% of
the total transcripts.

View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 11.
p65 stimulates elongation from the HIV LTR in the
presence of TSA. Jurkat cells (A) and CCRF/CEM cells (B) were
transfected with 1 µg of D5-3-3 in the absence ( Tat) or presence
(+Tat) of 250 ng of C63-4-1 and in the absence ( p65) or presence
(+p65) of 1.2 µg of the p65-expressing plasmid. Cells were treated
with 400 nM TSA at 24 h posttransfection and harvested after a
further 24 h. RNA was extracted and analyzed as in Fig. 2. P,
proximal probe; D, distal probe.
|
|
The remarkable increases in elongation that are mediated by p65 in the
TSA-treated cells result in higher levels of distal
transcripts than
observed by addition of Tat alone. Because basal
transcription is
increased so dramatically, cotransfection of
Tat and p65 into cells
receiving TSA treatment results in only
a minor further increase in
transcription elongation. Thus, p65
is able to stimulate elongation
strongly once chromatin structures
have been disrupted by global
histone
acetylation.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Control of initiation and elongation during HIV proviral
activation.
Although initiation of transcription from the HIV LTR
is generally efficient, only a small fraction of the transcription
complexes which are recruited to the promoter are able to elongate
efficiently in the absence of the viral regulatory protein Tat. Tat
stimulates transcription elongation because it is able to activate a
specific carboxyl-terminal domain (CTD) kinase, CDK9 (23,
44, 50), which phosphorylates RNA Pol II (14, 49),
as well as the elongation factor SPT5 (15, 19, 35, 47).
Efficient proviral activation therefore requires the early synthesis of
Tat to initiate a positive feedback loop that results in a high level
of viral mRNA synthesis.
How is the initiation of Tat synthesis following proviral activation
achieved? Previous studies have shown that transcription
from latent
proviruses is restricted due to the absence of NF-

B
(
28,
32). It has been generally assumed that NF-

B stimulates
initiation alone. If this were the case, then the initial synthesis
of
Tat could only arise if a subset of the transcription complexes
initiating at the LTR are able to fortuitously transcribe the
entire
HIV genome. However, it seemed to us that rather than simply
relying on
random events, basal transcription from the HIV LTR
includes some form
of elongation control in order to guarantee
that a threshold level of
Tat synthesis is reached early during
proviral
activation.
The experiments described in this study provide strong evidence that
both initiation and elongation are regulated when HIV
transcription is
activated in mitogen-stimulated T cells. Both
processes are regulated
by the p65 subunit of NF-

B, but the stimulation
of initiation and
elongation are achieved through distinct biochemical
mechanisms.
Regulation of initiation by NF-
B.
In agreement with
previous reports that looked exclusively at the effects of NF-
B on
overall transcription, the RNase protection assays described here show
that transcription initiation is stimulated by NF-
B in the absence
of Tat. Initiation increased 1.25- to 5.5-fold in CCRF/CEM cells and
Jurkat cells that had been treated with mitogens or transfected with
plasmids expressing NF-
B.
The results presented here show that the stimulation of transcription
initiation by NF-

B does not require CDK9, and all of
the
transcription complexes initiating under these conditions
are able to
respond to Tat. The extent of the activation of initiation
varies
significantly between the Jurkat cells and CCRF/CEM cells,
with the
Jurkat cells showing the highest levels of induction.
All of these
properties make it likely that the effects of NF-

B
on
initiation are due to its ability to derepress chromatin
structures
(
8,
42).
After integration into the host chromosome, the HIV-1 provirus is
assembled into chromatin, with nucleosomes that are positioned
at
precise locations around the viral promoter (
43).
Nucleosome
0 (Nuc-0) and Nuc-1 are located at positions

415 to

255
and
positions +10 to +155 with respect to the transcription start
site
(Fig.
10). Although the binding sites for SP1 and NF-

B remain
accessible, Nuc-1 impedes transcription by occluding the initiation
site.
There is strong evidence that Nuc-1 is disrupted after the activation
of HIV-1 transcription by tumor necrosis factor alpha
and PMA in
transfected T cells (
43) and latently infected cell
lines
(
42). This modulation of chromatin structure appears to
be
mediated by recruitment of histone deacetylases to the HIV
LTR by
NF-

B. NF-

B is able to recruit multiple coactivators to
promoters,
including CBP (CREB-binding protein), p300, and members
of the p160
family of coactivators (
8,
27,
31,
33). Many
of these
coactivators possess histone acetyltransferase activity
and are
therefore capable of hyperacetylating histones at specific
promoters.
Consistent with this idea, the histone deacetylase
inhibitor
TSA has been shown to promote the hyperacetylation of
histones and
activate HIV-1 transcription (
42).
Role of NF-
B subunits in the stimulation of transcriptional
elongation.
A second, more subtle, feature of the activation of
the HIV LTR by NF-
B, which is documented here for the first time, is that it is also able to stimulate elongation. We have shown that the
proportion of total transcripts extending to distal regions of the
template was increased following activation, indicating that a
proportion of the recruited polymerases had enhanced elongation properties. This demonstration that DNA elements present in the LTR can
regulate elongation is consistent with our earlier observation that the
insertion of a cellular enhancer into the LTR led to the recruitment of
processive polymerases to this promoter and alleviated the requirement
for Tat (46).
The stimulation of transcriptional elongation by NF-

B appears to be
due to the p65 subunit. We have found that p65 homodimer
is a more
potent activator of transcriptional elongation than
the p52-p65
heterodimer and that no effect on elongation is observed
with the p52
homodimer. Similarly, it has been observed that the
p50/Rel B
heterodimer of NF-

B is able to stimulate transcriptional
elongation
through a pause site in intron I of the
c-myb gene
(
40). Rel B is homologous to p65 and contains a
transcriptional
activation domain at its C terminus that is absent from
p52. These
observations suggest that the unique carboxyl-terminal
activation
domain of p65 is responsible for regulating elongation
(
5).
It is important to note that stimulation of transcription elongation by
NF-

B involves a distinct biochemical mechanism. Disruption
of
chromatin structures by treatment of cells with TSA increases
HIV
transcription initiation and, to a lesser degree, elongation.
Since
Nuc-1, the major nucleosome disrupted during HIV LTR transcriptional
activation, is positioned downstream from the transcription start
site,
it is possible that histone acetylation itself could relieve
a small
block to transcriptional elongation imposed by the nucleosomal
structure. However, dramatic further increases in transcriptional
elongation are seen when p65 is added to TSA-treated cell lines.
The
effect of p65 under these conditions is as strong as the elongation
enhancement mediated by Tat. Because basal transcription is increased
so significantly, the addition of Tat under these conditions results
in
only a small further increase in
elongation.
Role of TAK in proviral activation.
Recent studies in T cells
and monocytes have suggested that the induction of TAK might contribute
to the escape from viral latency. TAK activity increases when resting T
cells are stimulated with PHA and PMA as a result of an upregulation in
CDK9 and CycT1 levels (7, 13). An increase in TAK activity
is also observed when promonocytic cell lines are stimulated to
differentiate into macrophages with PMA, although this appears to be
mediated by an increase in CycT1 levels alone (13). This
increase in TAK activity correlates with the increase in viral
replication observed in a promonocytic cell line containing an
integrated provirus (48). Our results show, however, that
although we observed an enormous increase in LTR expression following
T-cell activation, there is no concomitant increase in CDK9 or CycT1
protein levels in the cell lines that we have studied. Similarly, Yang
et al. (48) reported that TAK activity does not increase
in Jurkat and CEM cells after treatment by PMA.
It is likely that even in cells in which TAK is activated upon
mitogenic stimulation, basal transcription levels are repressed
due to
chromatin assembly. Consistent with this hypothesis, we
have found that
the level of LTR transcription in the unstimulated
promonocytic cell
line U937 is below detectable levels and that
stimulation of the LTR is
associated with parallel increases in
both NF-

B and CycT1 (data not
shown).
Molecular mechanisms regulating HIV proviral induction.
A
model for the mechanism of proviral induction in T cells incorporating
the ideas discussed above is shown in Fig.
12. In unstimulated T cells,
transcription is repressed by the presence of extensive chromatin
structure around the viral promoter. After exposure to mitogen or
antigen, NF-
B translocates to the nucleus and binds to its
recognition sites in the HIV LTR. NF-
B then directs the assembly of
a multicomponent complex containing CBP, p300, p/CAF, SRC-1, and
SRC-1-related proteins at the promoter. The acetylation of histones by
this complex, possibly in combination with the activity of other
chromatin remodeling factors, leads to the disruption of Nuc-1 and the
stimulation of initiation (16).

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 12.
Activation of HIV transcription during T-cell
activation. (1) In unstimulated T-cells the integrated HIV-1 proviral
DNA is assembled into chromatin, with nucleosomes positioned at defined
positions along the DNA. The extensive chromatin structure around the
HIV promoter helps to suppress transcription. (2) Following stimulation
of T cells with antigen or mitogen, NF- B translocates to the nucleus
and binds to its recognition sites in the LTR. NF- B associates with
a coactivator complex containing histone acetyltransferases (CBP, p300,
p/CAF, SRC-1, and SRC-1-related proteins). The histone
acetyltransferase activity, together with additional chromatin
remodeling factors, leads to the disruption of Nuc-1 and the
stimulation of transcription initiation. The ability of NF- B p65 to
stimulate transcription elongation is probably due to the activation of
a CTD kinase which catalyzes the phosphorylation of the CTD of RNA Pol
II. (3) Tat produced during the early rounds of HIV transcription binds
to the TAR RNA element present at the 5' end of all viral transcripts
and further stimulates transcription. Tat activation of transcription
is due to the hyperphosphorylation of the CTD by CDK9.
|
|
Consistent with NF-

B's ability to depress chromatin, the increase
in transcription initiation that we have observed in stimulated
T cells
is insensitive to the expression of a CDK9 mutant in
trans that is able to efficiently inhibit CDK9-dependent Tat-activated
transcription. Thus, although evidence from our own and other
laboratories has shown that both CDK9 and CycT1 are present at
the
promoter (
14,
34,
49), our results suggest that this
kinase is not required for transcription initiation during T-cell
activation.
It is also interesting in the context of this model to consider the
different activation profiles we observed in Jurkat and
CCRF/CEM cells.
In Jurkat cells the effect of mitogenic stimulation
on initiation
levels was always much greater than in the CCRF/CEM
cells. Similarly,
TSA stimulates elongation in the Jurkat cells
to a greater extent than
in CCRF/CEM cells. It is likely that
these differences are the result
of increased chromatin repression
in the Jurkat cells resulting in
lower levels of basal transcription.
The chromatin derepression
function of NF-

B would therefore lead
to more pronounced increases
in initiation from the promoter.
In contrast, in CCRF/CEM cells there
may be less chromatin structure
around the promoter, and the effects of
NF-

B on initiation are
therefore less
evident.
We have shown here that, in addition to stimulating initiation, NF-

B
p65 is also able to stimulate elongation. This effect
is particularly
apparent when chromatin structures are disrupted
by treatment of cells
with TSA. The biochemical basis for this
activity is not yet
understood, but one attractive hypothesis
is that the p65 subunit of
NF-

B is able to stimulate CTD phosphorylation
at the HIV promoter
and that this, in turn, results in the stimulation
of elongation. For
example, Nissen and Yamamoto (
29) have shown
that NF-

B
can stimulate the phosphorylation of serine 2 and serine
5 residues in
the CTD of the Pol II complexes assembled at the
promoters of the
interleukin-8 and ICAM-1 genes. Repression of
these genes by the
glucocorticoid receptor correlates with its
ability to bind to NF-

B
and inhibit the phosphorylation of serine
2. Since the phosphorylation
of the CTD of Pol II is a prerequisite
for promoter clearance and
efficient transcriptional elongation,
it seems likely that the
activation of transcriptional elongation
by p65 is mediated by the
phosphorylation of the
CTD.
The three CTD kinases present in preinitiation complexes formed at the
HIV promoter

CDK7, CDK8, and CDK9

can each be considered
to be
potential mediators of NF-

B activity. Our initial observations
suggest that CDK9 may not be the primary mediator of responses
to p65
since NF-

B-stimulated elongation is less sensitive than
Tat-activated transcription to the expression of the CDK9 mutant
in
trans. The partial inhibition of mitogen-activated
transcription
that can be observed when cells are treated by high
concentrations
of D167N is possibly a reflection of the generalized
contribution
made by CDK9 to the maintenance of polymerase processivity
rather
than an indication that CDK9 is required specifically for the
response to NF-

B. In agreement with these observations, we reported
previously that the stimulation of transcriptional elongation
by the
immunoglobulin heavy-chain enhancer is also mediated by
CDK9-independent mechanisms (
46). Another candidate for
the
mediator role is the CTD kinase CDK8, which has substrate
specificity
that is distinct from CDK7 and CDK9 (
37). CDK8
is present in
HIV preinitiation complexes (data not shown) and in
complexes
formed with the viral activators E1a and VP16
(
9). We are currently
testing whether CDK8 or CDK9 can be
activated by NF-

B.
In conclusion, the results described in this study provide new insights
into the mechanisms involved in the stimulation of
transcription during
proviral activation. Studies using cell-free
transcription systems
should provide additional evidence that
NF-

B can stimulate
transcription elongation and permit the identification
of additional
components of the transcription machinery required
for efficient
proviral
activation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Martin Rowe for the gift of the NF-
B-expressing
plasmids. We also acknowledge our colleagues in the LMB for their help
and advice, and we especially thank Cyril Bourgeois, Catherine Isel,
Young Kyeung Kim, and Marc Bailey.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: MRC Laboratory
of Molecular Biology, Hills Rd., Cambridge CB2 2QH, United Kingdom. Phone: (44) 1223-402376. Fax: (44) 1223-412282. E-mail:
karn{at}mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Baeuerle, P. A., and T. Henkel.
1994.
Function and activation of NF- B in the immune system.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
12:141-179[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Baldwin, A. S. J.
1996.
The NF- B and I B proteins: new discoveries and insights.
Annu. Rev. Immunol.
14:649-681[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Dingwall, C.,
I. Ernberg,
M. J. Gait,
S. M. Green,
S. Heaphy,
J. Karn,
A. D. Lowe,
M. Singh, and M. A. Skinner.
1990.
HIV-1 Tat protein stimulates transcription by binding to a U-rich bulge in the stem of the TAR RNA structure.
EMBO J.
9:4145-4153[Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Duckett, C. S.,
N. D. Perkins,
T. F. Kowalik,
R. M. Schmid,
E. S. Huang,
A. S. J. Baldwin, and G. J. Nabel.
1993.
Dimerization of NF- B2 with RelA(p65) regulates DNA binding, transcriptional activation, and inhibition by an I B-alpha (MAD-3).
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:1315-1322[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Fujita, T.,
G. P. Nolan,
S. Ghosh, and D. Baltimore.
1992.
Independent modes of transcriptional activation by the p50 and p65 subunits of NF- B.
Genes Dev.
6:775-787[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Ganchi, P. A.,
S.-C. Sun,
W. C. Greene, and D. W. Ballard.
1993.
A novel NF- B complex containing p65 homodimers: implications for transcriptional control at the level of subunit dimerization.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
13:7826-7835[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Garriga, J.,
J. Peng,
M. Parreno,
D. H. Price,
E. E. Henderson, and X. Grana.
1998.
Upregulation of cyclin T1/CDK9 complexes during T cell activation.
Oncogene
17:3093-3102[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Gerritsen, M. E.,
A. J. Williams,
A. S. Neish,
S. Moore,
Y. Shi, and T. Collins.
1997.
CREB-binding protein/p300 are transcriptional coactivators of p65.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:2927-2932[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Gold, M. O.,
J.-P. Tassan,
E. A. Nigg,
A. P. Rice, and C. H. Herrmann.
1996.
Viral transactivators E1A and VP16 interact with a large complex that is associated with CTD kinase activity and contains CDK8.
Nucleic Acids Res.
24:3771-3777[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Gold, M. O.,
X. Yang,
C. H. Herrmann, and A. P. Rice.
1998.
PITALRE, the catalytic subunit of TAK, is required for human immunodeficiency virus Tat trans-activation in vivo.
J. Virol.
72:4448-4453[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Griffin, G. E.,
K. Leung,
T. M. Folks,
S. Kunkel, and G. J. Nabel.
1989.
Activation of HIV gene expression during monocyte differentiation by induction of NF- B.
Nature
339:70-73[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Grossman, Z.,
M. B. Feinberg, and W. E. Paul.
1998.
Multiple modes of cellular activation and virus transmission in HIV infection: a role for chronically and latently infected cells in sustaining viral replication.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:6314-6319[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Herrmann, C. H.,
R. G. Carroll,
P. Wei,
K. A. Jones, and A. P. Rice.
1998.
Tat-associated kinase, TAK, activity is regulated by distinct mechanisms in peripheral blood lymphocytes and promonocytic cell lines.
J. Virol.
72:9881-9888[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Isel, C., and J. Karn.
1999.
Direct evidence that HIV-1 Tat activates the Tat-associated kinase (TAK) during transcriptional elongation.
J. Mol. Biol.
290:929-941[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Ivanov, D.,
Y. T. Kwak,
J. Guo, and R. B. Gaynor.
2000.
Domains in the SPT5 protein that modulate its transcriptional regulatory properties.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:2970-2983[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Jones, K. A., and J. T. Kadonaga.
2000.
Exploring the transcription-chromatin interface.
Genes Dev.
14:1992-1996[Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Karn, J.
1999.
Tackling Tat.
J. Mol. Biol.
293:235-254[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Keen, N. J.,
M. J. Churcher, and J. Karn.
1997.
Transfer of Tat and release of TAR RNA during the activation of the human immunodeficiency virus type-1 transcription elongation complex.
EMBO J.
16:5260-5272[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Kim, J. B., and P. A. Sharp.
2001.
Positive transcription elongation factor b phosphorylates hSPT5 and RNA polymerase II carboxyl-terminal domain independently of cyclin-dependent kinase-activating kinase.
J. Biol. Chem.
276:12317-12323[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Kinoshita, S.,
L. Su,
M. Amano,
L. A. Timmerman,
H. Kaneshima, and G. P. Nolan.
1997.
The T cell activation factor NF-ATc positively regulates HIV-1 replication and gene expression in T cells.
Immunity
6:235-244[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Liu, J.,
N. D. Perkins,
R. M. Schmid, and G. J. Nabel.
1992.
Specific NF- B subunits act in concert with tat to stimulate human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transcription.
J. Virol.
66:3883-3887[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Lu, Y.,
N. Touzjian,
M. Stenzel,
T. Dorfman,
J. Sodroski, and W. A. Haseltine.
1990.
Identification of cis-acting repressive sequences within the negative regulatory element of human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
J. Virol.
64:5226-5229[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Mancebo, H. S. Y.,
G. Lee,
J. Flygare,
J. Tomassini,
P. Luu,
Y. Zhu,
J. Peng,
C. Blau,
D. Hazuda,
D. Price, and O. Flores.
1997.
p-TEFb kinase is required for HIV Tat transcriptional activation in vivo and in vitro.
Genes Dev.
11:2633-2644[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Marciniak, R. A., and P. A. Sharp.
1991.
HIV-1 Tat protein promotes formation of more-processive elongation complexes.
EMBO J.
10:4189-4196[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Markovitz, D. M.,
M. C. Hannibal,
M. J. Smith,
R. Cossman, and G. J. Nabel.
1992.
Activation of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 enhancer is not dependent on NFAT-1.
J. Virol.
66:3961-3965[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Moses, A. V.,
C. Ibanez,
R. Gaynor,
P. Ghazal, and J. A. Nelson.
1994.
Differential role of long terminal repeat control elements for the regulation of basal and tat-mediated transcription of the human immunodeficiency virus in stimulated and unstimulated primary human macrophages.
J. Virol.
68:298-307[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Na, S.-Y.,
S.-K. Lee,
S.-J. Han,
H.-S. Choi,
S.-Y. Im, and J. W. Lee.
1998.
Steriod receptor coactivator-1 interacts with the p50 subunit and coactivates nuclear factor B-mediated transactivations.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:10831-10834[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Nabel, G., and D. A. Baltimore.
1987.
An inducible transcription factor activates expression of human immunodeficiency virus in T cells.
Nature
326:711-713[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Nissen, R. M., and K. R. Yamamoto.
2000.
The glucocorticoid receptor inhibits NFkB by interferring with serine-2 phosphorylation of the RNA polymerase II carboxy-terminal domain.
Genes Dev.
14:2314-2329[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Pantaleo, G.,
C. Graziosi,
J. F. Demarest,
L. Butini,
M. Montroni,
C. H. Fox,
J. M. Orenstein,
D. P. Kotler, and A. S. Fauci.
1993.
HIV infection is active and progressive in lymphoid tissue during the clinically latent stage of disease.
Nature
362:355-358[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 31.
|
Pazin, M. J.,
P. L. Sheridan,
K. Cannon,
Z. Cao,
J. G. Keck,
J. T. Kadonaga, and K. A. Jones.
1996.
NF- B-mediated chromatin recongifuration and transcriptional activation of the HIV-1 enhancer in vitro.
Genes Dev.
10:37-49[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 32.
|
Perkins, N. D.,
N. L. Edwards,
C. S. Duckett,
A. B. Agranoff,
R. M. Schmid, and G. J. Nabel.
1993.
A cooperative interaction between NF- B and Sp1 is required for HIV-1 enhancer activation.
EMBO J.
12:3551-3558[Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Perkins, N. D.,
L. K. Felzien,
J. C. Betts,
K. Leung,
D. H. Beach, and G. J. Nabel.
1997.
Regulation of NF- B by cyclin-dependent kinases associated with the p300 coactivator.
Science
275:523-527[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 34.
|
Ping, Y.-H., and T. M. Rana.
1999.
Tat-associated kinase (P-TEF-b): a component of transcription preinitiation and elongation complexes.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:7399-7404[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Ping, Y. H., and T. M. Rana.
2001.
DSIF and NELF interact with RNA polymerase II elongation complex and HIV-1 Tat stimulates pTEFb-mediated phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II and DSIF during transcription elongation.
J. Biol. Chem.
276:12951-12958[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Price, D. H.
2000.
P-TEFb, a cyclin-dependent kinase controlling elongation by RNA polymerase II.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:2629-2634[Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Ramanathan, Y.,
S. M. Rajpara,
S. M. Reza,
E. Lees,
S. Shuman,
M. B. Mathews, and T. Pe'ery.
2001.
Three RNA polymerase II CTD kinases display distinct substrate preferences.
J. Biol. Chem.
276:10913-10920[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 38.
|
Rittner, K.,
M. J. Churcher,
M. J. Gait, and J. Karn.
1995.
The human immunodeficiency virus long terminal repeat includes a specialised initiator element which is required for Tat-responsive transcription.
J. Mol. Biol.
248:562-580[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 39.
|
Sheridan, P. L.,
T. P. Mayall,
E. Verdin, and K. A. Jones.
1997.
Histone acetyltransferases regulate HIV-1 enhancer activity in vitro.
Genes Dev.
11:3327-3340[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 40.
|
Suhasini, M., and R. B. Pilz.
1999.
Transcriptional elongation of c-myb is regulated by NF- B (p50/RelB).
Oncogene
18:7360-7369[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 41.
|
Taube, R.,
K. Fujinaga,
J. Wimmer,
M. Barboric, and B. M. Peterlin.
1999.
Tat transactivation: a model for the regulation of eukaryotic transcriptional elongation.
Virology
264:245-253[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 42.
|
Van Lint, C.,
S. Emiliani,
M. Ott, and E. Verdin.
1996.
Transcriptional activation and chromatin remodeling of the HIV-1 promoter in response to histone acetylation.
EMBO J.
15:1112-1120[Medline].
|
| 43.
|
Verdin, E.,
P. J. Paras, and C. Van Lint.
1993.
Chromatin disruption in the promoter of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 during transcriptional activation.
EMBO J.
12:3249-3259[Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Wei, P.,
M. E. Garber,
S.-M. Fang,
W. H. Fischer, and K. A. Jones.
1998.
A novel cdk9-associated c-type cyclin interacts directly with HIV-1 Tat and mediates its high-affinity, loop specific binding to TAR RNA.
Cell
92:451-462[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 45.
|
Wei, X.,
S. K. Ghosh,
M. E. Taylor,
V. A. Johnson,
E. A. Emini,
P. Deutsch,
J. D. Lifson,
S. Bonhoeffer,
M. A. Nowak,
B. H. Hahn,
M. S. Saag, and G. M. Shaw.
1995.
Viral dynamics in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection.
Nature
373:117-122[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 46.
|
West, M. J., and J. Karn.
1999.
Stimulation of Tat-associated kinase-independent transcriptional elongation from the human immunodeficiency virus type-1 long terminal repeat by a cellular enhancer.
EMBO J.
18:1378-1386[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 47.
|
Wu-Baer, F.,
W. S. Lane, and R. B. Gaynor.
1998.
Role of the human homolog of the yeast transcription factor SPT5 in HIV-1 Tat-activation.
J. Mol. Biol.
277:179-197[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Yang, X.,
M. O. Gold,
D. N. Tang,
D. E. Lewis,
E. Aguilar-Cordova,
A. P. Rice, and C. H. Herrmann.
1997.
TAK, an HIV Tat-associated kinase, is a member of the cyclin-dependent family of protein kinases and is induced by activation of peripheral blood lymphocytes and differentiation of promonocytic cell lines.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
94:12331-12336[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 49.
|
Zhou, M.,
M. A. Halanski,
M. F. Radonovich,
F. Kashanchi,
J. Peng,
D. H. Price, and J. N. Brady.
2000.
Tat modifies the activity of CDK9 to phosphorylate serine 5 of the RNA polymerase II carboxyl-terminal domain during human immunodeficiency virus type 1 transcription.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:5077-5086[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Zhu, Y.,
T. Pe'ery,
J. Peng,
Y. Ramanathan,
N. Marshall,
T. Marshall,
B. Amendt,
M. B. Mathews, and D. H. Price.
1997.
Transcription elongation factor p-TEFb is required for HIV-1 Tat trans-activation in vitro.
Genes Dev.
11:2622-2632[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, September 2001, p. 8524-8537, Vol. 75, No. 18
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.18.8524-8537.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Pearson, R., Kim, Y. K., Hokello, J., Lassen, K., Friedman, J., Tyagi, M., Karn, J.
(2008). Epigenetic Silencing of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Transcription by Formation of Restrictive Chromatin Structures at the Viral Long Terminal Repeat Drives the Progressive Entry of HIV into Latency. J. Virol.
82: 12291-12303
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Paruch, S., Heinis, M., Lemay, J., Hoeffel, G., Maranon, C., Hosmalin, A., Perianin, A.
(2007). CCR5 signaling through phospholipase D involves p44/42 MAP-kinases and promotes HIV-1 LTR-directed gene expression. FASEB J.
21: 4038-4046
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Williams, S. A., Kwon, H., Chen, L.-F., Greene, W. C.
(2007). Sustained Induction of NF-{kappa}B Is Required for Efficient Expression of Latent Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1. J. Virol.
81: 6043-6056
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kwon, O., Kim, K. A, Kim, S. O., Ha, R., Oh, W. K., Kim, M. S., Kim, H. S., Kim, G. D., Kim, J. W., Jung, M., Kim, C. H., Ahn, J. S., Kim, B. Y.
(2006). NF-{kappa}B inhibition increases chemosensitivity to trichostatin A-induced cell death of Ki-Ras-transformed human prostate epithelial cells. Carcinogenesis
27: 2258-2268
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kaniowska, D., Kaminski, R., Amini, S., Radhakrishnan, S., Rappaport, J., Johnson, E., Khalili, K., Del Valle, L., Darbinyan, A.
(2006). Cross-Interaction between JC Virus Agnoprotein and Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 (HIV-1) Tat Modulates Transcription of the HIV-1 Long Terminal Repeat in Glial Cells.. J. Virol.
80: 9288-9299
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Victoriano, A. F. B., Asamitsu, K., Hibi, Y., Imai, K., Barzaga, N. G., Okamoto, T.
(2006). Inhibition of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Replication in Latently Infected Cells by a Novel I{kappa}B Kinase Inhibitor. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 547-555
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sancho, R., de la Vega, L., Macho, A., Appendino, G., Di Marzo, V., Munoz, E.
(2005). Mechanisms of HIV-1 Inhibition by the Lipid Mediator N-Arachidonoyldopamine. J. Immunol.
175: 3990-3999
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dreikhausen, U., Hiebenthal-Millow, K., Bartels, M., Resch, K., Nourbakhsh, M.
(2005). NF-{kappa}B-Repressing Factor Inhibits Elongation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Transcription by DRB Sensitivity-Inducing Factor. Mol. Cell. Biol.
25: 7473-7483
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cowling, R. T., Zhang, X., Reese, V. C., Iwata, M., Gurantz, D., Dillmann, W. H., Greenberg, B. H.
(2005). Effects of cytokine treatment on angiotensin II type 1A receptor transcription and splicing in rat cardiac fibroblasts. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.
289: H1176-H1183
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Desfosses, Y., Solis, M., Sun, Q., Grandvaux, N., Van Lint, C., Burny, A., Gatignol, A., Wainberg, M. A., Lin, R., Hiscott, J.
(2005). Regulation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gene Expression by Clade-Specific Tat Proteins. J. Virol.
79: 9180-9191
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lemieux, A.-M., Pare, M.-E., Audet, B., Legault, E., Lefort, S., Boucher, N., Landry, S., van Opijnen, T., Berkhout, B., Naghavi, M. H., Tremblay, M. J., Barbeau, B.
(2004). T-cell Activation Leads to Poor Activation of the HIV-1 Clade E Long Terminal Repeat and Weak Association of Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B and NFAT with Its Enhancer Region. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 52949-52960
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lassen, K. G., Bailey, J. R., Siliciano, R. F.
(2004). Analysis of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Transcriptional Elongation in Resting CD4+ T Cells In Vivo. J. Virol.
78: 9105-9114
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
West, M. J., Webb, H. M., Sinclair, A. J., Woolfson, D. N.
(2004). Biophysical and Mutational Analysis of the Putative bZIP Domain of Epstein-Barr Virus EBNA 3C. J. Virol.
78: 9431-9445
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Brooks, D. G., Arlen, P. A., Gao, L., Kitchen, C. M. R., Zack, J. A.
(2003). Identification of T cell-signaling pathways that stimulate latent HIV in primary cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
100: 12955-12960
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Adam, E., Quivy, V., Bex, F., Chariot, A., Collette, Y., Vanhulle, C., Schoonbroodt, S., Goffin, V., Nguyen, T. L.-A., Gloire, G., Carrard, G., Friguet, B., de Launoit, Y., Burny, A., Bours, V., Piette, J., Van Lint, C.
(2003). Potentiation of Tumor Necrosis Factor-Induced NF-{kappa}B Activation by Deacetylase Inhibitors Is Associated with a Delayed Cytoplasmic Reappearance of I{kappa}B{alpha}. Mol. Cell. Biol.
23: 6200-6209
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
De Bosscher, K., Vanden Berghe, W., Haegeman, G.
(2003). The Interplay between the Glucocorticoid Receptor and Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B or Activator Protein-1: Molecular Mechanisms for Gene Repression. Endocr. Rev.
24: 488-522
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Reynolds, L., Ullman, C., Moore, M., Isalan, M., West, M. J., Clapham, P., Klug, A., Choo, Y.
(2003). Repression of the HIV-1 5' LTR promoter and inhibition of HIV-1 replication by using engineered zinc-finger transcription factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
100: 1615-1620
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Surabhi, R. M., Gaynor, R. B.
(2002). RNA Interference Directed against Viral and Cellular Targets Inhibits Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Replication. J. Virol.
76: 12963-12973
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Quivy, V., Adam, E., Collette, Y., Demonte, D., Chariot, A., Vanhulle, C., Berkhout, B., Castellano, R., de Launoit, Y., Burny, A., Piette, J., Bours, V., Van Lint, C.
(2002). Synergistic Activation of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Promoter Activity by NF-{kappa}B and Inhibitors of Deacetylases: Potential Perspectives for the Development of Therapeutic Strategies. J. Virol.
76: 11091-11103
[Abstract]
[Full Text]