Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, August 2001, p. 7435-7452, Vol. 75, No. 16
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.16.7435-7452.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Protection against Simian Immunodeficiency Virus
Vaginal Challenge by Using Sabin Poliovirus Vectors
Shane
Crotty,1
Christopher J.
Miller,2,3
Barbara L.
Lohman,2
Martha R.
Neagu,1
Lara
Compton,2
Ding
Lu,2
Fabien X.-S.
Lü,2
Linda
Fritts,2
Jeffrey D.
Lifson,4 and
Raul
Andino1,*
Department of Microbiology and Immunology,
University of California, San Francisco, California
94143-04141; California Regional Primate
Research Center, Department of Pathology, School of
Medicine,2 and Department of
Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine,
and Center for Comparative Medicine,3
University of California, Davis, California 95616; and
Retroviral Pathogenesis Laboratory, AIDS Vaccine Program,
SAIC Frederick, National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research
and Development Center, Frederick, Maryland
217024
Received 9 February 2001/Accepted 12 May 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Here we provide the first report of protection against a vaginal
challenge with a highly virulent simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) by
using a vaccine vector. New poliovirus vectors based on Sabin 1 and 2 vaccine strain viruses were constructed, and these vectors were used to
generate a series of new viruses containing SIV gag,
pol, env, nef, and
tat in overlapping fragments. Two cocktails of 20 transgenic polioviruses (SabRV1-SIV and SabRV2-SIV) were inoculated
into seven cynomolgus macaques. All monkeys produced substantial
anti-SIV serum and mucosal antibody responses. SIV-specific cytotoxic
T-lymphocyte responses were detected in three of seven monkeys after
vaccination. All 7 vaccinated macaques, as well as 12 control macaques,
were challenged vaginally with pathogenic SIVmac251. Strikingly,
four of the seven vaccinated animals exhibited substantial protection
against the vaginal SIV challenge. All 12 control monkeys became SIV
positive. In two of the seven SabRV-SIV-vaccinated monkeys we found no
virological evidence of infection following challenge, indicating that
these two monkeys were completely protected. Two additional
SabRV-SIV-vaccinated monkeys exhibited a pronounced reduction in
postacute viremia to <103 copies/ml, suggesting that the
vaccine elicited an effective cellular immune response. Three of six
control animals developed clinical AIDS by 48 weeks postchallenge. In
contrast, all seven vaccinated monkeys remained healthy as judged by
all clinical parameters. These results demonstrate the efficacy of
SabRV as a potential human vaccine vector, and they show that the use
of a vaccine vector cocktail expressing an array of defined antigenic sequences can be an effective vaccination strategy in an outbred population.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
The current human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV) pandemic has affected a cumulative total approaching 40 million people, and the search for an AIDS vaccine continues. Live
viral vectors are leading candidates in the hunt for a potential
vaccine. Several viral vectors have showed promise in simian
immunodeficiency virus (SIV) protection experiments in monkeys
(11, 18, 53, 58), and numerous other viral vector systems
are in earlier testing phases of vaccine development (8, 12, 14,
71, 73).
Poliovirus is an attractive live viral vector for several reasons. The
Sabin live poliovirus vaccine is one of the best human vaccines in the
world. It produces long-lasting immunity (59, 75) and herd
immunity (75); it is very safe and easy to experimentally manipulate (47); it has a proven safety and efficacy
record in over 1 billion vaccinees (75); it is inexpensive
to produce and to distribute in developing countries (29);
and, most importantly, it produces a potent mucosal immune response
(51, 56, 79). The capacity of poliovirus to generate a
strong mucosal immune response is particularly important given that
more than 90% of HIV type 1 (HIV-1) infections worldwide have occurred
via sexual transmission (77). Any strategy to control the
AIDS pandemic must include a vaccine that prevents sexual transmission
of HIV-1.
With the exception of live-attenuated viruses (which are generally
considered too pathogenic for use in humans [7, 68]), no
candidate AIDS vaccine has been demonstrated to consistently provide
protection against mucosal challenge with a highly virulent simian
immunodeficiency virus (SIV). Direct inoculation of a subunit vaccine
into the iliac lymph nodes of macaques did provide protection against a
rectal mucosal challenge with a virulent SIV (34), although that subunit vaccine was unable to consistently protect against infection after a vaginal challenge with the highly virulent SIVmac251 (40). Those experiments suggest that generating
local mucosal immunity may be as important as other characteristics of
the anti-SIV immune response generated by candidate vaccines.
More vaginal challenge experiments need to be done, because an AIDS
vaccine needs to protect against vaginal-penile sexual transmission of
HIV. At this point in time, there have been relatively few SIV
vaginal-challenge experiments, and no vaccine vector has been
demonstrated to provide any protection against a vaginal challenge.
We have previously reported the development of a recombinant poliovirus
live viral vector system in which we inserted an immunogenic gene
fragment of interest at the junction between the genes encoding the
capsid proteins and the nonstructural proteins (the P1/P2 junction) in
the poliovirus polyprotein reading frame (76). The gene
fragment is expressed with the rest of the poliovirus genome as part of
the polyprotein and is cleaved away from the polyprotein via the
activity of poliovirus-encoded protease 2Apro,
which cleaves at engineered proteolytic sites flanking the insert (76). That recombinant poliovirus live viral vector was
tested in mice susceptible to poliovirus infection and was demonstrated to elicit strong antibody (76) and cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte
(42, 72) responses.
In a study in which we immunized four cynomolgus macaques with two
recombinant polioviruses expressing SIV antigens, we further demonstrated that poliovirus vectors are immunogenic in primates. Significant humoral, mucosal, and cellular anti-SIV immune responses were elicited (15). Notably, all macaques generated a
mucosal anti-SIV immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibody response in rectal
secretions, and strong anti-SIV serum IgG antibody responses lasting
for at least 1 year were detected in two of the four monkeys
(15).
Here we report the development of Sabin vaccine-based vectors that we
used to produce a defined series of SabRV1- and SabRV2-SIV viruses containing SIV gag, pol, env,
nef, and tat in overlapping fragments. We then
evaluated the safety, immunogenicity, and protective efficacy of the
SabRV1-SIV-SabRV2-SIV candidate SIV vaccine. Strikingly, four of seven
vaccinated monkeys showed substantial protection against SIV
viremia after a vaginal challenge with the highly virulent
SIVmac251. Two of those vaccinated animals appear to have been
completely protected by the SabRV1-SabRV2-SIV vaccine; all seven of the
vaccinated monkeys have remained healthy for over 48 weeks
postchallenge, while three of six control monkeys developed clinical
AIDS. These results suggest that a Sabin-based viral vector may be a
promising approach for developing a vaccine for the prevention of
mucosal transmission of HIV.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Plasmids.
The Sabin 1 plasmid (which we call pS1 for
simplicity) was kindly provided by A. Nomoto [construct pVS(1)IC-0
(25, 33, 57)]. The entire Sabin 1 cDNA in pS1 was
sequenced in our laboratory by the fluorescent dye terminator method,
using an ABI 310 machine (Perkin-Elmer Applied Biosystems, Foster City,
Calif.). The accuracy of the genome sequence as published
(54) was confirmed. To construct pSabRV1, first the
EcoRI and XhoI sites upstream of the T7 promoter of pS1 were eliminated by inserting a SalI linker
(oligonucleotides C and D) at that position to create plasmid pS1XT.
Then the 747-bp BstEII fragment of pMoV2.11
containing the
duplicated 2Apro cleavage site, the 5-glycine
spacer, and the EcoRI, NotI, and XhoI
cloning sites
was swapped into pS1XT to create pSabRV1. The accuracy
of the pSabRV1 construct was confirmed by restriction digestion and
sequencing of the DNA. This DNA swap between pMoV2.11 and Sabin 1 results in Sabin 1 gaining three wild-type (wt) coding changes in 2A
and one in 2B. None of the changes is associated with neurovirulence or
other wt phenotypes. All pSabRV1 plasmids contain an
Ampr selectable marker. Plasmids pS1, pS1XT, and
pSabRV1 were electroporated into SURE cells (Stratagene, La Jolla,
Calif.), which were plated on Luria-Bertani (LB) plus ampicillin
agar plates and incubated for 20 to 24 h at 37°C. Single
colonies were then inoculated into 50-ml cultures of Luria broth plus
ampicillin (50 µg/ml) and grown at 30°C for 16 to 18 h. (Note
that growth conditions for the Sabin 1 derivative plasmids [pS1,
pS1XT, and pSabRV1] are specific because rearrangements of the
plasmids and very low plasmid yields are frequently seen otherwise.)
Plasmid DNA was isolated from cells by the QiaFilter Midiprep technique
(Qiagen, Santa Clarita, Calif.).
For pSabRV1-SIV clones, SIVmac239 plasmids p239SpSp5', p239SpE3', and
pSIV239opennef (obtained from the AIDS Research and Reference Reagent
Program, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases,
courtesy of Ronald Desrosiers [32]) were used as the PCR
template to generate SIV inserts. Inserts were amplified by using
Pfu Turbo high-fidelity DNA polymerase under the conditions recommended by the manufacturer (Stratagene). A complete table of the
40 oligonucleotides used for these reactions is available on request.
PCR fragments were purified on Qiaquick spin columns; digested with the
DpnI restriction enzyme (to eliminate any input SIV plasmid
carried over), EcoRI, and XhoI; and then purified on a Qiaquick spin column a second time. Plasmid vector pSabRV1 was cut
with EcoRI and XhoI, Qiaquick spin column
purified, and then quantified by agarose gel electrophoresis. Gel
purification of the vector was generally avoided. SIV inserts were
ligated into pSabRV1 overnight at 16°C by using T4 DNA ligase (New
England Biolabs, Beverly, Mass.) in a reaction mixture containing 25 ng of pSabRV1 and 20 ng of SIV insert DNA. Ligation products were dialyzed
on 13-mm-diameter, 0.025-µm-pore-size VSWP membranes (Millipore, Bedford, Mass.) against 50 ml of deionized
H2O for 10 min. Then 1 µl of the ligation
product was electroporated into 25 µl of SURE cells in a
0.1-cm-light-path cuvette (BTX ElectroCell 600; 129
, 1,400 V, 5-ms
pulse). One milliliter of Luria broth was immediately added to the
cuvette, and 20- to 200-µl volumes of electroporated SURE cells were
plated on LB plus ampicillin plates and incubated at 37°C overnight.
Further culturing and DNA isolation were performed as described above.
All plasmid clones were analyzed by restriction digestion, and all
inserts were DNA sequenced in their entirety to confirm that the
appropriate clone had been obtained and was not mutated.
Sabin 2 early-passage virus (SO + 3) was kindly provided by K. Chumakov. HeLa cells were infected with Sabin 2 at a multiplicity of
infection (MOI) of >1 and incubated at 37°C. Cells were harvested at
9 h postinfection; RNA was extracted from the cells by using an
RNeasy kit (Qiagen), and cDNA was synthesized by using randomly primed
Superscript II reagent (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.). Using XL
polymerase (Perkin-Elmer Cetus, Emeryville, Calif.), 2 mM
magnesium acetate, and 500 µM each deoxyribonucleoside triphosphate, full-length Sabin 2 was PCR amplified with primers SAB21 and SAB24 for
30 cycles consisting of 3 min at 94°C and 8 min at 65°C. The full-length Sabin 2 genome was then Qiaquick spin column purified, digested with SalI and HindIII, and ligated
into SalI- and HindIII-digested pUC18. Ligations
were introduced into chemically competent Escherichia coli
DH5
cells as recommended by the manufacturer (Life Technologies). Plasmid minipreps of clones were analyzed by restriction digestion and
tested for the ability to produce infectious virus. The three plasmid
clones that produced virus (pS2-2, pS2-3, and pS2-10) were sequenced,
and their genome sequences were compared with the Sabin 2 consensus
sequence generated by Pollard et al. (63). Two coding
mutations in pS2-10 were identified, one in Vp2 and one in 3C. The
latter was corrected by swapping the 374-bp
BsiWI-NcoI DNA fragment from a clone (pS2-3) with
no 3C mutation into pS2-10 to create pS2-10F. We have since fixed the
other coding mutation in pSabRV2 (nucleotide [nt] 1492, amino acid
249, F to L in Vp2) by site-directed mutagenesis and checked the
resulting plasmid, pSabRV2.2, by DNA sequencing. Viruses derived from
pS2-10, pS2-10F, pSabRV2, and pSabRV2.2 all grow in a manner
identical to that of Sabin 2 as determined by plaque assay.
To generate pSabRV2, the 60-bp cloning site
which contains a 5-glycine
spacer and AvrII and NotI restriction sites
flanked by 2Apro cleavage sites (only the 5' [or
N-terminal] cleavage site is counted in the 60 bp, since it contains
modified codon usage [76] and the 3' [or C-terminal]
cleavage site is endogenous and essential)
was cloned into pS2-10F. A
BstEII-SnaBI fragment containing the unique SabRV2 cloning sites was generated by overlapping PCR of DNA fragments B and S and subsequent digestion with BstEII and
SnaBI. DNA fragment B was achieved by PCR (Pfu
Turbo; Stratagene) with oligonucleotides B1 and B2. Similarly, DNA
fragment S was generated by PCR with oligonucleotides S1 (63 nt long,
45 nt of which overlap with oligonucleotide B2, with S1 and B2 together
containing the full pSabRV2 cloning site) and S2. Both PCR fragments
were gel purified with a Qiagen Qiaquick spin column and used as
a template, together with oligonucleotides B1 and S2, in an overlapping
PCR to generate a 1,635-bp fragment containing the 60-bp SabRV2 cloning
site flanked by the BstEII and SnaBI restriction
sites. The digested BstEII-SnaBI fragment was
ligated into BstEII- and SnaBI-digested pS2-10F
to create pSabRV2. Viruses derived from pS2-10, pS2-10F, pSabRV2, and
pSabRV2.2 all grow identically to Sabin 2 as determined by plaque assay (Fig. 1C and data not shown).

View larger version (93K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
(A) Recombinant Sabin poliovirus vector plasmid clones.
Grey boxes indicate 2A proteolytic cleavage sites (GLTTY/GFGH). In both
the pSabRV1 and pSabRV2 vectors, the first proteolytic-cleavage-site
coding sequence is followed by a 5-glycine spacer (not marked) and,
immediately prior to the second proteolytic cleavage site, the in-frame
cloning sites (white boxes). In total, an additional 60 to 70 nt are
added to the viral genome to create the vector. (B) Plaque assay of
cloned Sabin 1 virus (pS1 derived) and the Sabin 1 recombinant virus
vector (SabRV1) at 32°C. (C) Plaque assay of cloned Sabin 2 (pS2-10F
derived) and the Sabin 2 recombinant virus vector (SabRV2) at 37°C.
(D) SabRV1-SIV plaque assays. The titers of all SabRV1-SIV viruses made
were determined by plaque assay. Growth of several representative
viruses at 32°C is shown here. SabRV1 without an insert is shown as a
control. (E) SabRV2-SIV plaque assays. The titers of all SabRV2-SIV
virus constructs were determined by plaque assay. Growth of
several representative viruses at 37°C is shown here. SabRV2 without
an insert is shown as a control. (F) Library schematic. Map of SIV
antigens used in SabRV1-SIV and SabRV2-SIV vaccine cocktails. Each of
the numerically labeled fragments corresponds to the different
SabRV-SIV constructs defined in Table 1.
|
|
For pSabRV2-SIV cloning, SIV PCR fragments were generated as described
above (using similar oligonucleotides; a complete list of all 42 oligonucleotides is available on request), and cloning was done in a
manner similar to that used for pSabRV1-SIVs, except that
AvrII-NotI digestions were employed and XL1-Blue
cells (Stratagene) were used for transformations. Stocks of pSabRV2-SIV
plasmids were made by inoculating single colonies of transformed
XL1-Blue cells (grown overnight on LB plus ampicillin plates) into 5-ml cultures of Luria broth plus ampicillin (50 µg/ml) and grown at 37°C for 8 to 14 h. Plasmid DNA was isolated from cells by the Qiafilter Miniprep technique (Qiagen). All clones were analyzed by
restriction digestion, and all inserts were DNA sequenced in their
entirety to confirm that the appropriate clone had been obtained and
was not mutated.
All vectors and plasmids are readily available to any interested investigator.
Oligonucleotides.
The oligonucleotides used in this study
were as follows: A, GGTGGGGGAGGTGAATTCATGGTGAGCAAGGGCGAGGAG;
E, GTGGTCAGATCCTCGAGCTTGTACAGCTCGTCCATGCCG; C,
AATTGGTTCCTGGTCGACCGATGATCCGCG; D,
TCGACGCGGATCATCGGTCGACCAGGAACC; B1,
ACATATTCGAGATTTGAC; B2,
TGCGGCCGCTGCCCTAGGCCCTCCGCCACCTCCATGACCGAAACCGTATGTGGTCAGACCCTTTTCTGG; S1,
GGTTTCGGTCATGGAGGTGGCGGAGGGCCTAGGGCAGCGGCCGCAGGATTAACGACTTATGGA; S2, GCTCAATACGGTGCTTGC; SAB21,
AAAAGGTCGACTAATACGACTCACTATAGGTTAAAACAGCTCTGGGGTTG; SAB24,
GGGGGAAGCTTAGGCCTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTCCTCCGAATTAAAGAAAAAT; S1-3240F, CCTCCAAAATCAGAGTGTATC; S1-3580R,
GCCCTGGGCTCTTGATTCTGT; S2-3151F,
GAAGGCGATTCGTTGTAC; and S2-3518R, CTTGATTCAGCCACTAAG.
Transcriptions and electroporations.
Transcriptions were
generally performed with T7 RNA polymerase (150 U; New England
Biolabs), using the supplied transcription buffer supplemented with 40 U of RNasin (Promega, Madison, Wis.) and 1.25 mM each nucleoside
triphosphate. Plasmid templates (1 to 3 µg) were first linearized
with ClaI (pS1 or pSabRV1 vector) or HindIII
(pS2-10F or pSabRV2) for 1 h at 37°C in a 20-µl volume. The
restriction enzyme was then inactivated for 10 min at 65°C. Once
linearized, plasmid template was added to the complete transcription mixture (total volume, 200 µl), and transcription was allowed to
proceed for 60 to 90 min at 37°C before the reaction was terminated by freezing the mixture at
80°C. The RNA's quality and quantity were assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis before its use in subsequent experiments. RNA from transcription reactions was used directly, without purification, in electroporations.
Electroporations were performed with 40 to 75% confluent HeLa S3 cells
(plated the previous day), which were then trypsinized, centrifuged,
and resuspended at a concentration of 3 × 106/ml in Ca2+- and
Mg2+-free phosphate-buffered saline (on some
occasions, 293 cells were used in an identical manner). Cells (800 µl) were added to a cold 0.4-cm-path-length electroporation cuvette
(Bio-Rad, Richmond, Calif., or BTX, San Diego, Calif.), 10 to 40 µg
of RNA was added to the cells, and the cuvette was agitated multiple
times to resuspend any cells that had settled; electroporation was
immediately performed in a BTX electroporator with settings of 950 µF, 24
, and 300 V. The entire contents of the cuvette were then
added to a 6-cm-diameter dish (10-cm dishes were used for SabRV2
viruses) with 3 ml of warm Dulbecco's modified Eagle medium (DMEM)-F12
medium (50:50) plus 10% fetal calf serum (FCS) (see reference
23 for related details). These electroporation conditions
consistently give a 50 to 80% electroporation efficiency (data not
shown), resulting in first-generation (P0) virus
stocks. Sabin 1 and SabRV1 recombinants were grown at 32°C because
Sabin 1 has a tendency to acquire wt characteristics when passaged
multiple times at temperatures higher than 34°C (65).
Sabin 2 (S2-10F) and SabRV2 recombinants were grown at 37°C. Plates
were incubated until complete cytopathic effect (CPE) was
observed (frequently 24 to 36 h for SabRV1 and SabRV2 recombinants).
HeLa S3 cells obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC)
(ATCC stock passaged 5 to 30 times) were grown in DMEM-F12
medium (Gibco/Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FCS (Gibco/Life
Technologies), penicillin-streptomycin, and L-glutamine. Adherent cell cultures were maintained at 10 to 80% confluence by
incubation at 37°C in a 6% CO2 atmosphere. 293 cells were grown under the same conditions but were sometimes allowed
to reach 100% confluence.
Viral stocks, passages, and plaque assays.
P0 viral stocks were harvested from
electroporated cells exhibiting full CPE by taking the cells and
supernatant and freezing-thawing three times, using a dry ice-ethanol
bath and a 37°C water bath. Cellular debris was then pelleted by a
5-min, 300 × g centrifugation, and
P0 viral stock supernatant was transferred to a
fresh tube. The titers of some of the MoV2.11, SabRV1, and SabRV2
recombinant viral stocks appeared to be reduced by multiple freeze-thaw
cycles. (This was not observed with normal wt poliovirus.) Therefore, viral stocks were stored in constant-temperature
30°C or
80°C freezers.
Concentration of several viruses was achieved with Centriprep
concentration filters units with a molecular-mass cutoff of 50 kDa
(Millipore). Low-titer SabRV1-SIV or SabRV2-SIV viral stocks (12 to
15 ml each) were spun in Centriprep filter units for 30 min at
3,000 × g. This resulted in a 5- to 15-fold
concentration of virus. The titers of the concentrated stocks were then
determined by plaque assay.
Equal amounts of nine P0 SabRV2-SIV viruses were
mixed and passaged five times, at an MOI of 0.1, at both 32°C and
37°C (only the data from the 37°C incubation are shown in Fig.
2; identical data were obtained for
passages at 32°C and are not shown). Passaging of SabRV2-SIV viruses
was done by infecting 3 × 106 HeLa cells in
10-cm-diameter plates with the P0 viral cocktail stock at an MOI of 0.1. Cells were incubated at 32°C or 37°C in 3 ml of DMEM-F12 medium supplemented with 10% FCS, and
P1 viral stock was harvested when complete CPE
was observed (24 to 36 h postinfection). The same procedure was
followed when carrying out passages P2 through
P5. Each passage at an MOI of 0.1 represents approximately two generations of viral replication. In total, P5 viruses had gone through 10 to 12 generations
of viral replication; this is represented as generation 10 in Fig. 2.
P1 virus is conservatively represented as
generation 2 in Fig. 2 for simplicity. The passaged cocktail viruses
were tested for the presence of the SIV inserts by reverse
transcription (RT)-PCR with primers in the poliovirus sequence flanking
all of the SIV inserts.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Propagation of vaccine viruses. (A) Stability of SabRV2
recombinant viruses passaged as a cocktail. Nine SabRV2-SIV viruses
were mixed in equal amounts and passaged five times at an MOI of 0.1, for a total of at least 10 generations of viral replication. The
P1 virus is conservatively estimated as generation 2. Cocktail stocks were tested for the presence of the SIV inserts by
RT-PCR using primers corresponding to the poliovirus sequence flanking
the SIV inserts. The lane containing the SabRV2 empty-vector RT-PCR
product is indicated by a V. The size of the SabRV2 band (427 bp) is the size of the virus containing no insert. Inserts were fully
retained throughout all five passages. (B) Composition of SabRV2
cocktail over a series of passages. The passaged cocktail stocks were
checked for the presence of the individual viruses by RT-PCR with
primers specific for each SIV insert. Generation 1 indicates the
original cocktail in which the nine P0 viral stocks
obtained directly from high-efficiency transfections were mixed in
equal proportions. The generation 1 stock contained all nine viruses,
as determined by RT-PCR. The middle and right panels show the presence
of all nine SabRV2-SIV viruses both at generation 6 and at generation
10. The small bands present in Env15C and Env17 are minor deletion
products representing less than 1% of the virus population (data not
shown).
|
|
All plaque assays were done as previously described (15,
16). Plates for plaque assays involving SabRV1 recombinants were incubated at 32°C for 5 days postinfection, while those for plaque assays involving SabRV2 recombinants were incubated at 37°C for 4 days postinfection.
Viruses used in the SabRV1-SIV and SabRV2-SIV vaccines are listed in
Table 1. In the SabRV1-SIV cocktail,
viruses were mixed together such that each virus (of the 20) was
present at 2.5 × 106 PFU/ml, giving a final
virus concentration of 5 × 107 PFU/ml. The
SabRV2-SIV cocktail was mixed such that each virus (of the 20) was
present at 5 × 104 PFU/ml, giving a final
virus concentration of 106 PFU/ml. The cocktails
were made with pure P0 viral stocks.
The SIVmac251 stock used for challenge was obtained in May 1998 and had
not been previously published. The SIVmac251 (5/98) stock has a titer
of >105 50% tissue culture infective doses
(TCID50) per ml.
RT-PCR of recombinant polioviruses.
HeLa cells (2 × 105 to 5 × 105) in
six-well dishes were infected with the appropriate virus at an MOI of
0.5 to 10 (an MOI of 10 was used if possible). Cells were incubated at
37°C in 1 ml of DMEM-F12 plus 10% FCS for 6 to 8 h and then
harvested by scraping or trypsinization. RNA was collected by using an
RNeasy kit, and cDNA was synthesized by using randomly primed
Superscript II (Life Technologies) reactions. PCR was done using
rTth (Perkin-Elmer XL polymerase) and primers
S1-3240F and S1-3580R (MoV2.11, S1, and SabRV1 recombinants) or primers
S2-3151F and S2-3518R (S2-10F and SabRV2 recombinants). Conditions were
as follows: 0.5 µl of cDNA, 2.2 mM magnesium acetate, 0.5 µl of XL
polymerase, and manufacturer-recommended buffer and primer
concentrations in a 50-µl reaction mixture, with 30 cycles consisting
of 94°C for 1 min, 50°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min. Generally
1 to 5 µl of the final product was loaded on a 1.5% agarose gel for analysis.
Animals.
All animals used in this study were mature,
cycling, female cynomolgus macaques from the California Regional
Primate Research Center. The animals were housed in accordance with
American Association for Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care
standards. When necessary, animals were immobilized by intramuscular
injection of 10 mg of ketamine HCl (Parke-Davis, Morris Plains, N.J.)
per kg of body weight. The investigators adhered to the recommendations
set forth in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory
Animals (14a). Prior to use, animals were negative for
antibodies to HIV-2, SIV, type D retrovirus, and simian T-cell leukemia
virus type 1.
Intranasal inoculations of SabRV1-SIV and SabRV2-SIV were done with a
total volume of 1 ml. The animals were anesthetized and placed in
dorsal recumbancy with their heads tilted backward. One-half milliliter
of virus preparation was instilled dropwise into each nostril. The
animals were kept in this position for 10 min and then placed in
lateral recumbancy until they had recovered from the anesthesia
(30). Seven animals were inoculated intranasally with 1 ml
(5 × 107 PFU) of SabRV1-SIV on days 1, 3, 14, and 16, for a total of four immunizations. Nineteen weeks after the
first series of inoculations, these same seven animals were given
boosters of two intranasal inoculations of 1 ml
(106 PFU/ml) of SabRV2-SIV, one at week 19 and a
second at week 21. Intranasal inoculations were done because cynomolgus
macaques can be consistently infected with poliovirus by this route
(15) and also because macaque experiments using the model
antigen cholera toxin indicate that intranasal immunization is better
at eliciting vaginal immune responses than is oral immunization
(30).
The animals were challenged with 105
TCID50 of SIVmac251 intravaginally, using the
SIVmac251 (5/98) stock (see above). Two intravaginal SIV inoculations
were given to each monkey in a single day, with a 4-h rest period
between the inoculation procedures. The procedure and technique used
were previously described (48).
Serum and vaginal- and rectal-lavage antibody responses.
Anti-SIV IgG and IgA responses in vaginal and rectal washes and serum
were measured at weekly time points during the study. Vaginal and
rectal wash samples were collected and analyzed as previously described
(38, 40, 48). Briefly, vaginal washes were collected by
infusing 2 ml of sterile phosphate-buffered saline into the vaginal
canal and aspirating the instilled volume. Rectal washes were collected
in a comparable manner. Samples were immediately snap-frozen on dry ice
and stored at
80°C until analysis. To account for the presence of
IgG interfering with and reducing the detection of IgA, serum was first
depleted of IgG by using protein G-Sepharose beads (Pharmacia Biotech,
Uppsala, Sweden) prior to its use in the IgA enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay (ELISA). To deplete IgG, 25 µl of serum sample
was incubated with 100 µl of protein G-Sepharose beads for 1 h
at 37°C and then at 4°C overnight; subsequently, the protein
G-Sepharose was pelleted and the supernatant was collected. During this
process, samples were diluted 1:3. The change in optical density
(
OD) between test and control wells was defined as the difference
between the mean OD of sample tested in two antigen-coated wells and
the mean OD of the sample tested in two antigen-free control wells. The negative-control OD value was determined from 12 uninfected monkey serum samples and defined stringently as the average OD plus 3 standard
deviations. Endpoint titers were determined if the
OD of the test
sample exceeded the negative-control value by a factor of 2. To then
quantify anti-SIV antibody titers, serial fourfold dilutions of
duplicate samples of serum, vaginal wash, or rectal wash were tested by
an ELISA using whole pelleted SIVmac251 (Advanced Biologics Inc.,
Columbia, Md.). Antibody binding was detected with
peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-monkey-IgG (Fc) or -IgA (Fc) (Nordic
Laboratories, San Juan Capistrano, Calif.) and developed with
o-phenylenediamine dihydrochloride (Sigma). The endpoint titer was defined as the reciprocal of the last dilution giving a
OD
greater than 0.1 (15).
Neutralizing-antibody responses.
Neutralizing-antibody
assays were performed as previously described (11, 50). A
neutralizing-antibody titer was defined as the dilution resulting in
50% inhibition of cell killing by lab-adapted SIVmac251.
SIV isolation and serum viral RNA load determination.
Virus
was isolated from heparinized whole blood obtained from the
SIV-inoculated cynomolgus macaques. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells
(PBMCs) were isolated by Ficoll gradient separation (Lymphocyte Separation Medium; Organon Teknika, West Chester, Pa.) and cocultured with CEMx174 cells (28) (provided by James A. Hoxie,
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia) as previously described
(37). PBMCs (5 × 106) were
cocultivated with CEMx174 cells (2 × 106 to
3 × 106). Aliquots of the culture medium
were regularly obtained and assayed for the presence of the SIV major
core protein (p27) by antigen capture ELISA (37). Cultures
were considered positive if they were antigen positive at two
consecutive time points. A detailed description of the technique and
criteria used to determine whether the culture medium was antigen
positive has been published (43). All cultures were
maintained for 8 weeks and tested for SIV p27 by ELISA before being
scored as virus negative. Blood samples for virus isolation were
collected at the times indicated in Table
2. SIV RNA loads (see Fig. 9) were
determined by a modification (J. D. Lifson, unpublished
data) of a real-time RT-PCR assay on monkey plasma samples,
performed essentially as previously described (74). The
assay has a threshold sensitivity of 100 copy equivalents/ml of plasma
and an interassay coefficient of variation of <25%.
SIV provirus PCR analysis.
Nested PCR was carried out on
PBMC genomic DNA in a DNA thermal cycler (Perkin-Elmer) as
previously described (48). Briefly, cryopreserved PBMCs
isolated from whole blood of each monkey in the experiment were washed
three times in Tris buffer at 4°C and resuspended at a density of
107 cells/ml. Ten microliters of the cell
suspension was added to 10 µl of PCR lysis buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl
[pH 8.3], 0.45% NP-40, 0.45% Tween 20) with 200 µg of proteinase
K/ml. The cells were incubated for 3 h at 55°C and then for 10 min at 96°C. Two 30-cycle rounds of amplification were performed on
aliquots of plasmid DNA containing the complete genome of SIVmac1A11
(positive control) or aliquots of cell lysates, using conditions
described elsewhere (48). The primers used specifically
amplify SIV Gag. DNA from uninfected CEMx174 cells was amplified as a
negative control in all assays to monitor potential reagent
contamination.
-Actin DNA sequences were amplified from all PBMC
lysates by two rounds of PCR (30 cycles/round) to detect potential
inhibitors of Taq polymerase. Following the second round of
amplification, a 10-µl aliquot of the reaction product was removed
and electrophoresed on a 1.5% agarose gel. Amplified products in the
gel were visualized by ethidium bromide staining. Blood samples for PCR
analysis were collected at the times indicated in Table
3.
Western blot analysis of serum antibody responses.
HeLa
cells (2 × 106) infected with wt poliovirus
were incubated for 7 h at 37°C. Cells were harvested and lysed
on ice for 1 min (the lysis buffer consisted of 10 mM Tris [pH 7.5],
140 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, and 1% IGEPAL [Sigma, St. Louis,
Mo.]), and the nuclei were removed by centrifugation.
Poliovirus-infected whole-cell lysate (20 µl) and
sucrose-gradient-purified SIVmac251 (ABI, Columbia, Md.; 22 µg) were
electrophoresed in parallel lanes through a sodium dodecyl sulfate-10
or 12% polyacrylamide gel and analyzed by immunoblotting. The
anti-SIV serum used as a positive control for SIV proteins was pooled
serum from SIV-infected rhesus macaques. The antipoliovirus serum used
as a positive control for poliovirus proteins was obtained from a
poliovirus-immune human. Antisera from all vaccinated cynomolgus
macaques were used as primary antibodies (serum collected on the day of
challenge was used for monkeys 27270, 27244, 28508, 27273, and 27253, while serum collected 1 month prior to challenge was used for monkeys 25231 and 27250). Also, preimmune serum from monkey 27250 was used. The
secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-human
IgG) was obtained from DAKO (Carpinteria, Calif.) and used for monkeys
27270, 27244, 28508, 27273, 27253, and 27250 (preimmune). A horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated rabbit anti-rhesus monkey IgG (Sigma, St. Louis,
Mo.) was used for monkeys 25231 and 27250, employing serum obtained 1 month prechallenge. Blots were probed with 1:100-diluted monkey serum
in TBST (10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.5], 150 mM NaCl, 0.15% Tween 20) with
10% fat-free dry milk (Bio-Rad, Hercules, Calif.), washed twice in
TBST containing 0.15% Tween 20 and once in TBST containing 0.5% Tween
20, probed with the secondary antibody (1:2,000 dilution), and then
detected by enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL; Amersham, Arlington
Heights, Ill.) as specified by the manufacturer. Rhesus monkey serum
was used at a dilution of 1:200, and poliovirus-immune human serum was
used at a dilution of 1:25. Films were digitally scanned and exported
to Photoshop 5.5 (Adobe, San Jose, Calif.).
Statistical methods.
SIV viremia levels were analyzed by
Student's t test by comparison of the 24- to 32-week
average log viral load of each animal in the two groups
(vaccinated:control) with a two-tailed distribution. Weight gain (or
loss) was analyzed by the Mann-Whitney rank test of the 33- to 44-week
average weight change (from day of challenge) of each animal in the two
groups (vaccinated versus control) with a two-tailed distribution.
Mortality differences between the two groups at week 48 were analyzed
by Fisher's exact test.
Lymphocyte proliferative responses to SIV antigens.
Antigen-specific proliferation was tested as described elsewhere, using
PBMCs from fresh blood samples (46). The cells were suspended at a density of 2 × 106 per ml in
RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FCS and plated in triplicate at
50 µl per well in 96-well round-bottom microtiter plates. Antigen
dilutions or control reagents were plated at 50 µl per well. Fresh
medium (100-µl volumes) was added after 48 h, and the plates
were incubated for 7 days in a CO2 incubator. The
wells were pulsed with [3H]thymidine (1 µCi
per well; NEN-DuPont Co., Wilmington, Del.) overnight prior to harvest.
The plates were aspirated onto fiberglass filters and washed with a
cell harvester (Inotech Biosystems International, Lansing, Mich.). The
filters were saturated with scintillation cocktail, and counts
in the 3H window were measured with a 96-well
scintillation counter (Microbeta 1450; Wallac Biosystems,
Gaithersburg, Md.). The SIV antigen was whole inactivated SIVmac239
(kindly provided by Larry Arthur). Concanavalin A (ConA) was tested as
a positive-control antigen. Medium alone was used as a control for
spontaneous proliferation. The antigens were tested at 0.1, 1.0, and 10 µg/ml in every assay. This assay was used in our previous study
(15). Lymphocyte proliferation assays were performed
before immunization and at regular intervals after immunization (data
not shown), using PBMCs. Because of an unusually high level of
spontaneous proliferation (~10,000 to 100,000 cpm/well) in
negative-control wells (PBMCs plus medium alone) at all time points
tested over a 28-week period, it was difficult to assess SIV-specific
CD4+ T-cell responses in the immunized animals,
since minimal additional stimulation was seen in the presence of
antigen or ConA.
SIV-specific CTL responses.
The presence of SIV-specific
cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) in cynomolgus PBMCs was assessed as
previously reported (15). Briefly, PBMCs from immunized
monkeys were stimulated with ConA (Sigma) at a concentration of 10 µg/ml and cultured for 14 days in complete RPMI 1640 medium
supplemented with 5% human-lymphocyte-conditioned medium (human
interleukin-2; Hemagen Diagnostics, Waltham, Mass.). Autologous
B cells were transformed by herpesvirus papio (595Sx1055 producer cell
line, provided by M. Sharp, Southwest Foundation for Biomedical
Research, San Antonio, Tex.) and infected overnight at an MOI of 30 with wt vaccinia virus (vvWR) or a recombinant vaccinia virus
expressing the p55gag (vv-gag) or
gp160env (vv-env) protein of SIVmac239 (provided
by L. Giavedoni and T. Yilma, University of California, Davis). The
level of vaccinia virus infection of target cells was estimated by an
indirect-immunofluorescence technique using a monkey anti-vaccinia
virus antibody followed by fluoresceinated goat anti-human IgG (Vector
Laboratories, Burlingame, Calif.). The level of vaccinia virus
infection of target cells in this series of experiments was estimated
to fall between 5 and 15%. Target cells were labeled with 50 µCi of
51Cr
(Na2CrO4; Amersham,
Arlington Heights, Ill.) per 106 cells. Effector
and target cells were added together at multiple effector/target ratios
in a 4-h chromium release assay. Assays were considered reliable if
specific lysis was >10% and at least twice the level of spontaneous
lysis of vvWR-infected cells. At many time points, the data from the
CTL assays could not be meaningfully interpreted because of a high
level of spontaneous lysis of the cynomolgus macaque transformed B-cell
targets. Lysis was not due to NK cell activity, since no lysis was seen
when the NK target cell line K562 was substituted as a negative control
(data not shown). Numerous variations of the CTL assay were attempted
in an effort to generate consistently reliable chromium release assay data for immunized or infected cynomolgus macaques. Cold-target inhibition, a variety of stimulation procedures, and enrichment of
CD8+ cells by using anti-CD8 bead purification
failed to consistently resolve this problem.
 |
RESULTS |
Sabin-based vaccine vector construction and production.
Given
the excellent safety record of Sabin vaccine strain polioviruses in
humans (75), we wished to do all future experiments, in
primates and humans, with only Sabin-based viruses produced from
molecularly defined constructs. Hence, we engineered new plasmid clones
of Sabin 1- and Sabin 2-derived vectors (pSabRV1 and pSabRV2,
respectively) (Fig. 1A to C). We then constructed a collection of 20 SabRV1 viruses, expressing SIV gag, pol,
env, and nef, which represent nearly the entire
SIV genome (Fig. 1F and Table 1). These viruses grew well, as assessed
by plaque assay (Fig. 1D). Twenty SabRV2-SIV viruses were produced in a comparable manner, being selected to represent a similar coverage of
the major SIV genes plus Tat (Fig. 1F and Table 1). These viruses also
grew well, as assessed by plaque assay (Fig. 1E). In some cases, there
were difficulties in producing genetically pure stocks by the use of
recombinant polioviruses, since viruses with deletions in their insert
sequences can accumulate as recombinant polioviruses replicate through
a number of generations (15, 52, 76). Therefore, we took
great care to check the viral stocks for deletions. We did so by using
a sensitive RT-PCR assay capable of detecting deleted virus comprising
as little as 0.1% of the stock (data not shown). The SabRV1-SIV
vaccine stocks were more than 99.9% pure in total (data not
shown), as were the SabRV2-SIV stocks (Fig. 2B). To further
test the viability and stability of the recombinant viruses, a cocktail
of nine of the SabRV2-SIV viruses was then passaged repeatedly and
assessed by RT-PCR (Fig. 2). The vaccine cocktail as a whole maintained
the SIV sequences for at least 10 generations (Fig. 2A), and all of the
individual component viruses maintained their inserts and viability
(Fig. 2B).
The 20 SabRV1-SIV virus stocks were then mixed to create a defined
vaccine cocktail of 5 × 107 PFU/ml for use
in the primate vaccinations described below. The 20 SabRV2-SIV virus
stocks were mixed to make a defined vaccine cocktail of
106 PFU/ml.
Monkey immunizations.
Producing a candidate SIV vaccine in two
different serotypes of poliovirus (type 1 and type 2 strains) was a
strategy employed in our last macaque study to create a better
opportunity for an effective booster immunization with the second
vector serotype, since there is no significant cross-neutralization or
cross-protection between these two serotypes. That approach resulted in
anemnestic booster responses in the immunized animals (15)
and led us to utilize the same strategy in the study reported here.
Cynomolgus macaques are used in our studies because they are
susceptible to poliovirus administered either orally or intranasally. Because the goal of our studies is to test poliovirus vectors as
potential mucosal AIDS vaccines, we used a route of inoculation that
would elicit a vaginal immune response. An intranasal route of
inoculation was chosen for these experiments because previous experiments using SIV subunits plus cholera toxin have demonstrated that the intranasal route of inoculation elicits a better vaginal mucosal immune response than does oral or rectal immunization (30).
In this study, seven cynomolgus macaques were immunized intranasally
with SabRV1-SIV (5 × 107 PFU) at weeks 0 and 2 (Fig. 3). Then, at weeks 19 and 21, these animals were booster immunized intranasally with SabRV2-SIV
(106 PFU). These doses are comparable to normal
Sabin oral poliovirus vaccine doses used in children (2).

View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Time line of vaccination and challenge. The
numbers above the line indicate the weeks at which the various steps
were performed.
|
|
Immunization induces strong serum anti-SIV IgG and IgA
responses.
The results of ELISAs for serum IgG and IgA responses
against SIV are shown in Fig. 4. All
seven monkeys exhibited a rapid and strong anti-SIV IgG response after
immunization with SabRV1-SIV (Fig. 4A). Three of the seven monkeys
showed serum anti-SIV IgA responses, and in two of those animals the
SabRV1-SIV-elicited IgA responses persisted for at least 19 weeks (Fig.
4B).

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Serum anti-SIV antibodies. (A) Anti-SIV IgG titers in
the sera of monkeys immunized with SabRV1-SIV and SabRV2-SIV. Seven
cynomolgus macaques were inoculated intranasally with SabRV1-SIV at
weeks 0 and 2 (indicated by below) and given intranasal
boosters at weeks 19 and 21 with SabRV2-SIV (indicated by below).
Monkeys are labeled as follows: 25231, ; 27244, ; 27250, ;
27253, ; 27270, ; 27273, ; and 28508, . Titers indicated
are reciprocal dilutions. A titer of 1 is stringently defined as an
ELISA optical density reading 3 standard deviations above the average
optical density for a group of negative-control monkeys (see Materials
and Methods). (B) Anti-SIV IgA titers in the sera of SabRV1-SIV- and
SabRV2-SIV-immunized monkeys. Symbols are as noted above. A clear
anemnestic IgA response is evident for all seven macaques after
SabRV2-SIV immunization at week 19. Symbols are as for panel A.
|
|
The SabRV2-SIV booster immunization at 19 weeks resulted in a 20- to
80-fold increase in anti-SIV IgG antibody titers in all monkeys within
7 days, a classic anamnestic antibody response (Fig. 4A). Additionally,
all seven monkeys were positive for anti-SIV serum IgA at 1 week
postboost, with a more than 10-fold titer increase in all monkeys,
confirming the presence of an anamnestic IgA response in all vaccinated
animals (Fig. 4B).
All seven monkeys demonstrated comparable serum IgG anti-SIV antibody
titers, and generally the monkeys had comparable serum IgA anti-SIV
antibody titers after the SabRV2-SIV booster immunization. Individual
variability in the immune response to the vaccine was seen; monkey
27270 exhibited the strongest anti-SIV serum IgG and IgA response after
both the SabRV1-SIV and SabRV2-SIV immunizations (Fig. 4).
Immunization induces vaginal and rectal anti-SIV antibody
responses.
We found in our previous study (15) that
recombinant polioviruses expressing SIV antigens could induce anti-SIV
vaginal and rectal antibody responses after intranasal inoculation. In this study, we again analyzed antibody samples taken from the surfaces
of the vaginal and rectal mucosae. It was recently shown that macaque
vaginal antibody secretions are affected by the menstrual cycle
(38), and therefore in this study we took mucosal antibody samples on a weekly basis to assess the antibody levels more accurately.
In our previous study we observed that four of four monkeys had rectal
anti-SIV IgA antibody responses. In this study, we again observed that
100% of the immunized monkeys exhibited rectal mucosal anti-SIV
antibody responses. After the SabRV1-SIV immunization, all seven
monkeys demonstrated at least transient anti-SIV rectal IgA responses,
even though only three had detectable levels of anti-SIV IgA in their
sera (Fig. 4B and Fig. 5B). These results were consistent with our previous study in which one monkey had a
mucosal IgA anti-SIV response even though it showed no detectable serum
anti-SIV IgG or IgA titers at any time point (15).
Conversely, neither of the two monkeys that had long-lasting serum IgA
responses (27270 and 28508 [Fig. 4B]) after SabRV1-SIV immunization
in the present study exhibited detectable levels of rectal IgA
antibodies for longer than 2 weeks.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Rectal anti-SIV antibodies. (A) Anti-SIV IgG titers in
the rectal washes of monkeys immunized with SabRV1-SIV and SabRV2-SIV.
Vaccinated monkeys were divided into two groups (upper and lower
panels) for easier viewing of data. Titers indicated are reciprocal
dilutions. A titer of 1 is stringently defined as an ELISA optical
density reading 3 standard deviations above the average optical density
for a group of negative-control monkeys (see Materials and Methods).
(B) Anti-SIV IgA titers in the rectal washes of monkeys immunized with
SabRV1-SIV and SabRV2-SIV. Vaccinated monkeys were divided into the
same two groups (upper and lower panels) as in part A, for easier
viewing of data. Monkeys are labeled as described in the legend to Fig.
4.
|
|
We detected anti-SIV IgG in rectal secretions from all seven monkeys
after the SabRV2-SIV immunization (Fig. 5A). It is uncommon to observe
IgG in rectal secretions (38, 55, 78). Monkeys 27253 and
27270 exhibited particularly strong, 50- to 100-fold anamnestic rectal
IgG responses after the SabRV2-SIV immunization. Additionally, we were
intrigued that the SabRV2-SIV immunization appeared to reduce rather
than boost the rectal IgA anti-SIV response in the monkeys (Fig. 5B).
Four monkeys that had a transient rectal IgA responses after the
SabRV1-SIV immunization (25231, 28508, 27244, and 27270) had no
detectable anti-SIV rectal IgA after the SabRV2-SIV immunization (Fig.
5B), even though all four monkeys showed a substantial increase in
serum anti-SIV IgA titer (Fig. 4B).
All of the monkeys demonstrated vaginal IgG anti-SIV responses after
SabRV1-SIV-SabRV2-SIV immunization, and six of seven monkeys had
vaginal IgA anti-SIV responses (Fig. 6).
Interestingly, the monkey with the most substantial vaginal IgA
antibody response (27250) after SabRV1-SIV immunization (Fig. 6B) did
not exhibit a concurrent serum IgA response (Fig. 4B). This animal also
had a robust rectal IgA response (Fig. 5B), providing more evidence that the immune responses to the vaccine in some animals are
compartmentalized.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Vaginal anti-SIV antibodies. (A) Anti-SIV IgG titers in
the vaginal secretions of monkeys immunized with SabRV1-SIV and
SabRV2-SIV. Vaccinated monkeys are divided into two groups (upper and
lower panels) for easier viewing of data, as was done in Fig. 4 and 5.
(B) Anti-SIV IgA titers in the vaginal secretions of monkeys immunized
with SabRV1-SIV and SabRV2-SIV. Monkeys are labeled as described for
Fig. 4.
|
|
As with rectal antibodies, the strongest vaginal IgG antibody responses
occurred after the SabRV2-SIV booster immunization. A 200- to
1,000-fold increase in vaginal anti-SIV IgG was seen in monkeys 27270 and 25231 after the booster immunization. A 100-fold increase in
vaginal IgA anti-SIV antibodies was seen in the same two monkeys. For
each individual monkey, the patterns of vaginal IgA and IgG anti-SIV
responses were generally similar (Fig. 6).
Taken together, although all monkeys exhibited similar serum IgG
anti-SIV antibody responses and similar serum IgA responses after the
booster immunization, there were substantial differences in the mucosal
antibody responses of different monkeys. In animals with a strong
initial rectal IgA response (monkeys 27253 and 27273 [Fig. 5B]),
vaginal IgA responses were weak or absent. SabRV2 appeared to elicit
rectal IgG antibody responses but not rectal IgA responses, as noted
above. The three monkeys that showed anti-SIV serum IgA responses after
SabRV1-SIV immunization had the strongest rectal IgG responses after
the SabRV2-SIV booster immunization, but the significance of this is
unclear. The results of these experiments clearly demonstrate that
serum antibody titers are not a good indicator of mucosal antibody
responses, consistent with compartmentalization of the immune response.
Diversity of antigens recognized in monkeys immunized with
SabRV1-SIV-SabRV2-SIV.
We are unaware of any precedent for
immunization of primates with a viral vector (or any vector) expressing
a defined library of antigens. Therefore, it was important to determine
whether the measured antibody responses were against a single antigen (expressed by a single SabRV-SIV virus) or multiple antigens (expressed by different SabRV-SIV viruses). To explore this issue, we examined the
anti-SIV and antipoliovirus specificities of the serum antibodies in
immunized animals by Western blotting. All seven monkeys seroconverted to poliovirus antigen positivity, generally with a strong response against capsid protein VP1 and weaker responses against two to four
other poliovirus proteins (Fig. 7). All
seven monkeys also seroconverted to SIV antigen positivity, as
determined by Western blot analysis, confirming the SIV ELISA results
shown in Fig. 4. Importantly, a majority of monkeys demonstrated
substantial antibody responses to multiple SIV proteins (Fig. 7).
Antibody responses against reverse transcriptase (p51/65; all
seven monkeys), Gag (p55; six monkeys [27244, 28508, 27270, 27273, 27253, and 27250]), p17 (monkeys 27270 and 27253), p27 (monkeys 27244 and 27250), Env gp41 (monkeys 27270 and 27253), and Env gp120 (monkeys 27244, 28508, 27270, 25231, and 27253) were all apparent (Fig. 7).
Antibodies against Nef and Tat (also represented in the SabRV1-SIV and/or SabRV2-SIV cocktail) were not assayed in this experiment because
they are not packaged in SIV virions, which is the target material for
the immunoblot analyses. At least five different SabRV1-SIV or
SabRV2-SIV viruses, and possibly many more, were immunogenic and
elicited antibody responses, since the responses against SIV p27,
reverse transcriptase, p17, gp41, and gp120 must have been elicited
from different SabRV-SIVs. In summary, a majority of monkeys responded
to multiple poliovirus and SIV proteins, indicating that the library
vaccine approach is successful at eliciting responses to multiple
expressed proteins, even in a complex cocktail of 20 different viruses.

View larger version (111K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Western blotting. All seven monkeys had anti-SIV and
anti-poliovirus antibody responses that were detectable by Western
blotting. Each serum was immunoblotted against purified SIV
virion-infected (left lanes) and poliovirus-infected (PV; right lanes)
HeLa cell extracts. Positive controls used were SIV-positive rhesus
serum (SIV+) and human poliovirus-immune serum
(Polio+). Preimmune serum from monkey 27250 was used as a
negative control (preimm.). SIV antigens recognized by each monkey are
indicated by symbols on the left of the blot as follows: reverse
transcriptase (RT), ; Gag, -; gp120, ; and gp41, .
Poliovirus VP1, recognized by all monkeys, is indicated by the
leftward-pointing black triangles to the right of each blot.
Bands do not necessarily line up precisely because several of the blots
were done at different times, but SIV and poliovirus positive controls
were always run as markers.
|
|
Cellular immune responses.
Poliovirus vectors can elicit
potent CTL responses in both mice (42, 72) and primates
(15). In the present study, we were able to detect SIV
Env-specific CTLs in three of seven monkeys (25231, 27244, and 27250)
after SabRV1-SIV vaccination by a standard bulk PBMC cytolytic assay
(Fig. 8A). After the SabRV2-SIV
vaccinations, we detected SIV Gag- and Env-specific CTLs in monkey
25231 (Fig. 8B). Cellular immune responses are technically difficult to
assess in cynomolgus macaques (see Materials and Methods), and we
frequently experienced difficulties because of a high level of
background lysis. This technical complication prevented accurate
assessment of CTL activity at additional time points.


View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
SIV-specific CTLs. (A) SIV-specific CTLs after
immunization with SabRV1-SIV. SIV-specific CTLs were detected using
bulk PBMCs collected 2 weeks after immunization with SabRV1-SIV.
Monkeys 25231, 27244, and 27250 tested positive for SIV Env-specific
CTLs. , negative-control target cells; , Env-expressing target
cells. (B) SIV-specific CTLs after immunization with SabRV2-SIV.
SIV-specific CTLs were detected using bulk PBMCs collected 6 weeks
after immunization with SabRV2-SIV. Monkey 25231 tested positive for
SIV Gag-specific CTLs and possibly Env-specific CTLs. ,
negative-control target cells; , Gag-expressing target cells; ,
Env-expressing target cells. E:T, effector/target ratio.
|
|
The three monkeys that tested positive for SIV-specific CTLs after
SabRV-SIV vaccination (25231, 27244, and 27250) also tested positive
for SIV-specific lymphoproliferative responses (stimulation indices of 3.3, 4.1, and 2.7, respectively).
Virologic outcome of vaginal challenge with SIVmac251.
All 7 vaccinated monkeys and a total of 12 control monkeys were challenged
with a vaginal inoculum of SIVmac251. SIVmac251 is an uncloned and
highly virulent virus that has proven to be extremely difficult to
protect against (i.e., prevention of infection is not easily achieved)
or control with vaccine-induced immune responses (14, 17, 22, 25,
39, 40, 69). The vaginal challenge route was chosen because our
primary interest in the SabRV vector is as a vaccine capable of
protecting against sexually transmitted HIV.
Six control cynomolgus macaques were first challenged intravaginally
with 105 TCID50 of
SIVmac251 twice in 1 day (this dose had previously infected 15 of 15 rhesus macaques intravaginally [C. J. Miller, unpublished
data]). All six of those control cynomolgus macaques became infected,
as judged by positive SIV virus isolation, positive SIV provirus PCR,
and seroconversion to SIV antigen positivity (data not shown).
At week 30, 9 weeks after the last immunization, we challenged all
seven of the SabRV-SIV-vaccinated animals, as well as six additional
concurrently tested control cynomolgus macaques, with two vaginal
inoculations of 105 TCID50
of SIVmac251 in 1 day (Fig. 3). All 6 concurrently tested control
monkeys became SIV positive by virus isolation (Table 2), SIV provirus
PCR (Table 3), and seroconversion to SIV positivity (tested by using
neutralizing antibodies [Table 4] and
by ELISA [Fig. 9]), bringing the total
to 12 of 12 control cynomolgus macaques infected after vaginal
inoculation with the challenge dose. In the group of
SabRV-SIV-immunized monkeys, two of the monkeys appeared to be fully
protected. SIV was never isolated from the PBMCs of one animal (27244),
while the other animal (27270) was SIV virus isolation positive at a
single time point, 4 weeks postchallenge (Table 2). We were unable to
detect SIV Gag in PBMC samples from either animal by PCR (Table 3).
Neither animal had an anamnestic serum antibody response to SIV
antigens after the challenge exposure (Fig. 9), again indicating that
they were fully protected from SIV infection.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
Serum anti-SIV IgG antibody responses postchallenge.
Antibody titers are shown for all animals postchallenge. Vaccinated
monkeys (right panel) are indicated by the symbols used in previous
figures: 25231, ; 27244, ; 27250, ; 27253, ; 27270, ;
27273, ; and 28508, . Control monkeys (left panel) are indicated
by symbols as follows: 26383, ; 26385, ; 23414, ; 26405, ;
26560, ; and 28118, .
|
|
All seven vaccinated monkeys and the six new control monkeys were
assayed for SIV-neutralizing antibody titers. No neutralizing antibodies were detected before the vaginal SIV challenge in any animal
(Table 4). No neutralizing antibodies were evident postchallenge in
vaccinated monkeys 27270 and 27244, again consistent with the SIV load
data, indicating that these two monkeys were fully protected from
infection. Among the remaining monkeys, fourfold-higher
neutralizing-antibody titers were seen in the vaccinated monkeys than
in the control monkeys postchallenge.
To quantify the SIV viremia in the challenged animals, a sensitive
quantitative RT-PCR assay was used that has been used in several
macaque SIV studies (36, 53, 67). All six concurrently challenged control monkeys had significant SIV loads, peaking between
weeks 2 and 4 and reaching postacute geometric means of 9.3 × 105 copies/ml by weeks 24 to 32 (Fig.
10).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 10.
SIV RNA loads. SIV RNA levels in plasma were measured
postchallenge. All seven vaccinated monkeys and six control monkeys
were challenged with an intravaginal inoculation of highly virulent
SIVmac251 at week 30 of the experiment (challenge was at week 0).
Vaccinated monkeys (right panel) are indicated by the symbols used in
previous figures: 25231, ; 27244, ; 27250, ; 27253, ;
27270, ; 27273, ; and 28508, . Control monkeys (left panel)
are indicated by symbols as follows: 26383, ; 26385, ;
23414, ; 26405, ; 26560, ; and 28118, . Vaccinated monkeys
27270 and 27244 were never positive for SIV RNA and appeared to be
completely protected. The threshold sensitivity of the assay (indicated
by a dashed line) is 100 RNA copy equivalents/ml. Data points below the
threshold value are shown at 100. , animal died between weeks 32 and
44 postchallenge.
|
|
SabRV-SIV-vaccinated animals 27244 and 27270 had no detectable SIV RNA
in their plasma at any time point, confirming that these two animals
were solidly protected (Fig. 10). Compared with the control monkeys,
the seven monkeys vaccinated with SabRV1-SIV-SabRV2-SIV exhibited a
3.0 log10 reduction in postacute geometric-mean
viral load (P < 0.01). Control of postacute viremia
was particularly obvious in two vaccinated monkeys: vaccinated monkey
28508 exhibited stable long-term control of viremia to
103 copies/ml, and vaccinated monkey 25231 reduced its SIVmac251 viremia by more than
106-fold during the postacute phase, indicative
of a strong vaccine-elicited cellular immune response (Fig. 10).
Clinical outcome of vaginal challenge with SIVmac251.
The
clinical outcome of SIV infection was much worse in the control animals
than in the SabRV-SIV-immunized animals. Five of six control animals
had marked decreases in CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts (Fig.
11A)
and body weight (Fig. 11B) over the 48-week postchallenge observation
period. Three of the six control animals were euthanatized, at 34, 35, and 44 weeks postchallenge, because of severe clinical AIDS (Fig. 11C).
At necropsy, two of the animals (23414 and 26560) had lymphoma and the
other animal (28118) had severe nonresponsive enteritis and wasting.

View larger version (29K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 11.
Clinical outcomes of vaginal challenge with
SIVmac251. (A) Postchallenge CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts.
CD3+ CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts in the peripheral
blood of naive control cynomolgus macaques (left) and SabRV1-SIV- and
SabRV2-SIV-vaccinated macaques (right) were determined on the day of
challenge and through 36 weeks postchallenge. Symbols are as defined in
the legend to Fig. 10. (B) Body weight. Weights of control macaques
(left) and SabRV1-SIV- and SabRV2-SIV-vaccinated macaques (right) were
measured on the day of challenge and through 44 weeks postchallenge.
Weight is indicated as a percentage of the body weight measured on the
day of challenge. Body weight changes of vaccinated animals were
significantly better (P < 0.003) than those of the
control monkeys. Symbols used are the same as for panel A. (C)
Mortality curve. SabRV-SIV-vaccinated animals, ; control animals,
.
|
|
In sharp contrast, all seven of the vaccinated monkeys were alive
(P < 0.07) and healthy (significantly higher body
weight, P < 0.003 [Fig. 11B]) at 48 weeks
postchallenge. Although CD4+ T-cell counts
declined initially after challenge, the counts stabilized at about 16 weeks postchallenge for five of the seven vaccinated animals (Fig.
11A). Over the course of the study, the SabRV-SIV-vaccinated animals
had higher average CD4+ counts than the control
animals. At 36 weeks postchallenge, the average
CD4+ cell count of vaccinated animals was
840/µl, while five of six control monkeys had
CD4+ counts below 150 cells/µl. Two vaccinated
animals (27250 and 27273) had depressed CD4+
T-cell counts after challenge, consistent with their higher SIV viremia
levels, but their body weights have remained stable (Fig. 11B) and they
appear clinically normal. The other five animals have gained weight
steadily since the vaccine challenge (Fig. 11B). These results
demonstrate that the SabRV-SIV vaccine protects monkeys from
SIV-related disease progression.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The primary goals of this study were to construct SabRV-SIV
candidate SIV vaccine viruses and assess their immunogenicity and
efficacy in preventing vaginal transmission of SIV. A vaginal challenge
was chosen because our primary interest in the SabRV vector is as a
vaccine vector capable of protecting against sexually transmitted HIV.
Given that more than 90% of HIV-1 infections worldwide occur via
sexual transmission, any strategy to truly control the AIDS pandemic
must include a vaccine that prevents sexual transmission of
HIV-1. SIVmac251 is an uncloned and highly virulent virus that
has proven to be extremely difficult to protect against in rhesus and
cynomolgus macaque challenge experiments (14, 17, 22, 25, 39,
69). We decided to use SIVmac251 as the challenge virus because
the use of a pathogenic, uncloned, difficult-to-neutralize virus models
"real-world" HIV transmission.
The SabRV1-SIV-SabRV2-SIV vaccine provided protection from SIV
infection in two of seven vaccinated monkeys and rendered protection from disease progression in all vaccinated monkeys. SIV replication was
controlled (650 copies/ml and <100 copies/ml at week 32) in two
monkeys. Thus, there was a clear difference between the clinical courses of the postchallenge SIV infection in the control and vaccinated animals. Half of the control animals developed end-stage clinical AIDS, while all of the vaccinated monkeys were protected from
AIDS through the 48-week postchallenge observation period (P < 0.07). Although not all vaccinated monkeys were
protected from infection, the SabRV-SIV vaccine protected all of the
immunized monkeys from SIV-related disease progression, in terms of
both viral load (P < 0.01) and general health (body
weight; P < 0.003). This is the first report of a
vaccine vector providing protection against a vaginal challenge with a
highly virulent SIV. Indeed, although experiments with cynomolgus
macaques and rhesus macaques are not necessarily directly comparable,
the results reported here appear equivalent to or better than the
highest levels of mucosal protection afforded by any published subunit
vaccine (40), DNA vaccine (25), or viral
vector system (3, 11, 14, 24) in macaques challenged with
a highly virulent uncloned SIV. The significant levels of protection
observed in this study indicate that SabRV has considerable potential
as a human vaccine vector.
Immunogenicity.
We previously showed that live
poliovirus-based vaccine vectors elicit humoral, mucosal, and cellular
immune responses in primates (15). In the present study,
we observed better serum and mucosal antibody responses than we
observed with the previous poliovirus vector system, in terms of the
proportion of monkeys responding, maximum antibody titers, and the
consistency of the immune responses. We believe that these enhanced
responses are due to higher-quality virus stocks, the use of vectors
based on Sabin 1 and Sabin 2 molecular clones, and the use of a
cocktail vaccine approach that allowed the expression of a
10-fold-larger number of SIV antigens. This was our first use of
pSabRV2- or pSabRV1-derived viruses, and the results demonstrate that
Sabin 1- and Sabin 2-based constructs are immunogenic as viral vectors. Also, these data show the effectiveness of a prime-and-boost strategy using two serotypes of the same viral vector.
A consistent feature in both of our live poliovirus vector primate
experiments to date is the compartmentalization of the IgA immune
responses in some monkeys. We found that all seven monkeys exhibited at
least transient anti-SIV rectal IgA responses after SabRV1-SIV
immunization, even though only three had detectable levels of anti-SIV
IgA in their sera (Fig. 4B and 5B). Neither of the two monkeys that had
long-lasting serum IgA responses after SabRV1-SIV immunization (27270 and 28508 [Fig. 4B]) had a detectable level of rectal IgA antibodies
for more than 2 weeks. The results of these experiments are consistent