Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, August 2001, p. 7290-7304, Vol. 75, No. 16
Acambis, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts
02139,1 and Tulane Regional Primate
Research Center, Covington, Louisiana 704332
Received 13 March 2001/Accepted 25 May 2001
We previously reported construction of a chimeric yellow
fever-dengue type 2 virus (YF/DEN2) and determined its safety and protective efficacy in rhesus monkeys (F. Guirakhoo et al., J. Virol. 74:5477-5485, 2000). In this paper, we describe construction of
three additional YF/DEN chimeras using premembrane (prM) and envelope
(E) genes of wild-type (WT) clinical isolates: DEN1 (strain PUO359,
isolated in 1980 in Thailand), DEN3 (strain PaH881/88, isolated in 1988 in Thailand), and DEN4 (strain 1228, isolated in 1978 in Indonesia).
These chimeric viruses (YF/DEN1, YF/DEN3, and YF/DEN4) replicated to
~7.5 log10 PFU/ml in Vero cells, were not neurovirulent
in 3- to 4-week-old ICR mice inoculated by the intracerebral route, and
were immunogenic in monkeys. All rhesus monkeys inoculated
subcutaneously with one dose of these chimeric viruses (as monovalent
or tetravalent formulation) developed viremia with magnitudes similar
to that of the YF 17D vaccine strain (YF-VAX) but significantly lower
than those of their parent WT viruses. Eight of nine monkeys inoculated
with monovalent YF/DEN1 -3, or -4 vaccine and six of six monkeys
inoculated with tetravalent YF/DEN1-4 vaccine seroconverted after a
single dose. When monkeys were boosted with a tetravalent YF/DEN1-4
dose 6 months later, four of nine monkeys in the monovalent YF/DEN
groups developed low levels of viremia, whereas no viremia was detected
in any animals previously inoculated with either YF/DEN1-4 vaccine or WT DEN virus. An anamnestic response was observed in all monkeys after
the second dose. No statistically significant difference in levels of
neutralizing antibodies was observed between YF virus-immune and
nonimmune monkeys which received the tetravalent YF/DEN1-4 vaccine or
between tetravalent YF/DEN1-4-immune and nonimmune monkeys which
received the YF-VAX. However, preimmune monkeys developed either no
detectable viremia or a level of viremia lower than that in nonimmune
controls. This is the first recombinant tetravalent dengue vaccine
successfully evaluated in nonhuman primates.
Dengue is a mosquito-borne
flavivirus infection, causing significant morbidity and mortality in
tropical areas worldwide (12). There are four dengue virus
(DEN) serotypes (1 to 4), all of which cause human illness. Over 2.5 billion people live in areas at risk of the disease worldwide, and 100 million people are affected annually (35, 36, 47). The
severe immunopathological form of the disease, dengue hemorrhagic
fever/dengue shock syndrome (DHF/DSS), is the leading cause of
hospitalization of children in Asia. The disease is expanding in
distribution and incidence, particularly in the Americas. The United
States, infested with Aedes aegypti, is vulnerable to
introduction of Dengue. The most recent incursion and autochthonous
outbreak of dengue occurred in Texas in 1999. Areas of the world
recently invaded or at imminent risk include the southern cone
(Argentina and Chile), Australia, parts of Africa, southern Europe, and
the Middle East.
Mosquito control, as a means of preventing dengue, has been a failure
due to expanding urbanization, human population increases, degraded
sanitation, competition for financial resources, pesticide resistance,
and airline travel, which facilitates movement of viremic travelers.
Vaccination has the highest potential as a public health approach that
is likely to blunt the increasing incidence and geographic expansion of
the disease.
The development of a vaccine against DEN has been a high priority of
the World Health Organization for decades (4). An effective vaccine would be used for (i) universal immunization of
children in areas of Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean where
dengue is endemic; (ii) protection of foreign travelers and military
personnel; and (iii) control of epidemics. Because of the importance of
a DEN vaccine for travelers and military personnel in developed
countries, DEN vaccines are of interest to the pharmaceutical industry.
However, the need for a vaccine extends far beyond such markets, to the
people of the most impoverished countries.
Development of a DEN vaccine has been an elusive goal, principally
because of the need to simultaneously immunize and induce long-lasting
protection against all four DEN serotypes. An incompletely immunized
individual, or one in whom antibody titers wanes, may be sensitized to
a severe immunopathological disease (DHS/DSS) (15, 26,
45).
The ChimeriVax technology offers a good probability of successful DEN
vaccine development. The vaccine attributes include the potential for
single-dose application, absent or minimal reactogenicity, extremely
durable immunity, reduced potential for interference between the
individual components in a tetravalent formulation, and low cost of
manufacture. ChimeriVax is a live, attenuated genetically engineered
virus, prepared by replacing the genes encoding two structural
proteins, the premembrane (prM) and envelope (E) proteins of the yellow
fever virus (YF) 17D vaccine strain (YF-VAX) with the corresponding
genes of the vaccine target virus, e.g., DEN.
Construction and characterization of YF/DEN2 (in which prME genes of YF
17D were exchanged with those of the PUO218, a Thai strain of DEN
serotype 2 [DEN2]) have been described previously (10).
In this paper, we describe the construction of chimeric viruses
incorporating the prME genes of DEN serotypes 1, 3, and 4. The safety
and immunogenicity of these viruses were evaluated in animal models.
Studies in rhesus monkeys demonstrated effective simultaneous
immunization with all four YF/DEN serotypes.
Construction of YF-DEN chimeras. (i) Construction of the YF/DEN1
chimera.
The two-plasmid system originally constructed to produce
a YF infectious clone (43) was the most suitable method
for the construction of Japanese encephalitis virus (JE) and DEN2
chimeras (5, 10, 11). However, marked instability of the
plasmids encoding the 3' end of the DEN1 E gene resulted in the use of an overlap-extension PCR alternative. DEN1 prME genes were derived from
wild-type (WT) strain PUO359 isolated in 1980 in Thailand and kindly
provided by Duane J. Gubler, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, Fort Collins, Colo., and Robert E. Shope, University of
Texas Medical Branch, Galveston. The PUO359 strain was received at
passage 1 in C6/36 cells and passaged once more in these cells before
the prME and flanking regions were amplified, sequenced, and used for
construction of the YF/DEN1 chimera. Sequencing primers were designed
based on the DEN1 (strain Philippines 836-1; GenBank accession no.
D00503) sequence (6). To create plasmid pYD1-5'3' (Fig.
1), a reverse transcription (RT)-PCR
product encoding DEN1 prM and the 5' end of E was used as a template
along with a fragment encoding the YF 17D C gene derived from plasmid
pYF5'3'IV/JESA14-14-2 (5). An
overlap-extension PCR resulted in a single fusion product, which was
then cloned into an NheI-NotI vector fragment of
pYF5'3'IV/JESA14-14-2. To obtain the intermediate part of
the chimeric genome, the 3' end of DEN1 E was fused to the YF
nonstructural (NS) genes present in pYFM5.2/JESA14-14-2 by
overlap-extension PCR. The resulting amplicon (fragment H) was cloned
into plasmid pYD1-5'3' by in vitro ligation to produce a full-length
virus cDNA template for RNA transcription after linearization with
XhoI. Infectious virus was obtained from Vero cells
transfected with the YF/DEN1 mRNA. The titer of virus stock at passage
4 was 7.4 log10 PFU/ml.
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.16.7290-7304.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Construction, Safety, and Immunogenicity in Nonhuman Primates of
a Chimeric Yellow Fever-Dengue Virus Tetravalent Vaccine
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
![]()
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

View larger version (26K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Synthesis of pYD1-5'3' and YF/DEN1 fragment H. Overlap-extension PCR was used to fuse the prME sequence of DEN1 strain
PUO359 (fragment B) to the YF capsid gene. The resulting PCR product
was then subcloned as a NotI-NheI fragment. A
silent BstBI site was introduced to facilitate ligation to
form the full-length cDNA chimeric clone. Overlap-extension PCR was
used to fuse the DEN1 envelope gene to the YF NS genes from
pYFM5.2/JE-S (fragment H). In vitro ligation of the
BstBI-AatII fragment with plasmid pYD1-5'3'
produced the full-length clone for transcription.
(ii) Construction of the YF/DEN3 chimera.
The viable YF/DEN3
chimera contained the prME genes of WT DEN3 in place of the
corresponding prME region of the genome of YF 17D. The DEN3 parent
(strain PaH881/88, Thailand) was originally isolated in 1988 from a
patient with classical dengue fever by a single amplification in
mosquito AP61 cells and kindly provided by Vincent Deubel, Pasteur
Institute, Paris, France. This virus was passed once in C6/36 cells
before cloning and sequencing. The prME region of the virus was RT-PCR
amplified in two adjacent fragments (Fig.
2), using oligonucleotide primers
designed based on the Philippine prototype strain of DEN3, H-87, for
which the entire nucleotide sequence was known (42).
Direct sequencing of these fragments produced a consensus prME sequence
of the parent, except for nucleotides 437 to 459, nt 1079 to 1131, and
nt 2385 to 2413 (numbering according to the H-87 strain sequence).
|
Xho. All plasmids were sequenced to
ensure the absence of any additional mutations. Similar to the
situation with YF/DEN1, technical difficulties were encountered during
cloning of plasmid 5.2/Den3 due to its toxicity in Escherichia
coli. The selected clone of the plasmid (clone 26) had no
mutations except for a single nucleotide deletion at the 3' end of the
DEN3 insert. Therefore, to correct the deletion, a three-fragment
ligation was used (Fig. 3). The DEN3 part of 5.2/Den3 was amplified by PCR using the clone 26 template with high-fidelity ExTaq polymerase (TaKaRa) (the opposite primer corrected the deletion) and digested with
BstBI and NarI. The
NarI-AatII fragment was derived from pYFM5.2/JESA14-14-2. The two fragments were ligated with
the large BstBI-AatII fragment of
5'3'/Den3/
Xho. Ligation products were digested with XhoI
and transcribed in vitro with SP6 RNA polymerase. Subsequently, the
DEN3-specific BstBI-NarI fragment was
individually cloned without any mutations resulting, in plasmid
pCL/Den3E. Thus, YF/DEN3 has a complete plasmid backup and can be
reproduced in the future without a PCR step. The chimera was obtained
by transfection of Vero cells with the RNA transcripts and then
amplified in Vero cells. The chimera peak titers at both passage 2 (P2) and P4 were 6.3 log10 PFU/ml.
|
(iii) Construction of the YF/DEN4 chimera.
To construct the
YF/DEN4 chimera, we used the standard two-plasmid system (5, 10,
43). The source of DEN4 prME genes was strain 1228, isolated in
1978 from a classical dengue fever case in Indonesia, passaged twice in
mosquitoes by intrathoracic inoculation and once in C6/36 cell culture
(the virus was a gift from Duane J. Gubler and Robert E. Shope). The
virus was passaged once in C6/36 cells; viral RNA was extracted from
infected cells; the prME region was amplified, sequenced, and used to
construct a YF/DEN4 chimera. The DEN4 prME region was first amplified
and sequenced using primers mostly derived from DEN4 (Caribbean strain 814669; GenBank accession no. M14931) (32). The sequence data created were used to design primers for synthesis of cDNA and
assembly of the two-plasmid system of DEN4 (i.e., by replacing the
corresponding prME sequences of JESA14-14-2 with those of DEN4 in each plasmid). First, a PCR product encoding DEN4 prM and the
5' end of E (Fig. 4, fragment B) was used
along with a template encoding the C gene of YF 17D (fragment A)
derived from plasmid pYF5'3'IV/JESA14-14-2 in an
overlap-extension PCR. This resulted in a single fusion product, which
was then cloned into an NheI-NotI fragment of
pYFM5'3'IV, where JESA14-14-2 sequences were deleted to
create plasmid pYD4-5'3'. The 3' end of the DEN4 E protein gene was
also amplified (fragment C) and then cloned into plasmid
pYFM5.2/ JESA14-14-2 as an
NheI-SfoI fragment replacing JESA14-14-2 sequences with that of DEN4 to create plasmid
pYD4-5.2. In vitro ligation of the two plasmids resulted in a
full-length virus cDNA template of YF/DEN4 for RNA transcription. The
titer of virus stock at P3 posttransfection was 7.1 log10
PFU/ml. The plaque analysis of this virus revealed a mixed population
of small to large plaques in Vero cells. One large and one small plaque were subjected to three rounds of plaque purifications (with one amplification between each round). Plaque-purified viruses were sequenced at P8 (prME regions), and their growth kinetics in Vero cell
were compared to the kinetics of their uncloned chimeric parent virus
(at P3 posttransfection) (see below). The purified large-plaque viruses
(at P8) were used in all monkey experiments.
|
Cells and viruses. Vero cells were provided by Aventis Pasteur (Lyon, France) and were used between P141 and P151 for transfection with chimeric in vitro RNA transcripts and between P143 and P170 for other purposes such as plaque assays and neutralization tests. C6/36 cells were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Va. In addition to the four YF/DEN chimeras described above, YF-VAX (Aventis Pasteur) and three WT viruses, DEN1 (strain PUO359, Thailand), DEN3 (strain PaH881/88, Thailand), and DEN4 (strain 1228, Indonesia), were used in this study.
Animal studies. All studies were carried out under an Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee-approved protocol in accordance with the USDA Animal Welfare Act (9 CFR parts 1 to 3) as described in the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (41).
For studies of neurovirulence in mice, groups of five 4-week-old outbred ICR mice (Taconic Farm, Inc. Germantown, N.Y.) were inoculated by the intracerebral (i.c.) route with ~5 log10 PFU of YF/DEN chimera, parent WT DEN (from which prME genes were derived for chimera construction), or YF-VAX. Animals were observed for 21 days, and any animals found in an advanced moribund stage were euthanized. Experiments with monkeys were performed at the Tulane Regional Primate Research Center (Covington, La.) in healthy, young adult, colony-reared Indian rhesus monkeys (Macacca mulatta). The goals of these experiments were to determine (i) viremia and immunogenicity of YF/DEN chimeras compared to those of their parent viruses (WT DEN and YF 17D) after primary immunization, (ii) whether a second dose of the tetravalent vaccine would increase the level of neutralizing antibodies to individual viruses, and (iii) whether there is any interference between YF-VAX and the YF/DEN1-4 tetravalent vaccine.(i) Viremia and immunogenicity profiles of ChimeriVax-DEN (experiment a). Twenty-seven male monkeys weighing between 5.8 and 8.35 kg were divided randomly into eight groups and immunized subcutaneously (s.c.) into the right arm over the area of the deltoid muscle with 0.5 ml of test vaccine. Groups 1 to 3 and 5 to 7 (three monkeys per group) were immunized with 4.7 log10 PFU of YF/DEN1, YF/DEN3, YF/DEN4, WT DEN1 (strain PUO359), WT DEN3 (strain PaH881/88), and WT DEN4 (strain 1228), respectively. Monkeys in group 4 (n = 6) received a mixture of equal concentrations (4.7 logs/0.5 ml) of each of the four YF/DEN chimeras (total, 5.3 log10PFU/2 ml) administered into the right and left arms (1 ml into each arm). The eighth group of monkeys (n = 3) received 0.5 ml of undiluted YF-VAX (5.0 log10 PFU). The remaining inocula were frozen for back titration. Blood from the femoral vein was collected from all animals under anesthesia prior to immunization, then daily for the following 10 days for determination of viremia, and on days 15, 30, and 79 for assessment of neutralizing antibody titers.
(ii) Booster immunization with tetravalent chimeric DEN vaccine (experiment b). Six months after primary immunization, six additional naive monkeys (weighing between 2.6 and 3.9 kg) were added to the experiment as an unimmunized control group (group 9). All animals (n = 27) that had been immunized as described above plus the six unimmunized control monkeys received 2.0 ml of YF/DEN1-4 vaccine (a tetravalent mixture containing 5.0 log10 PFU each of YF/DEN1, YF/DEN2, YF/DEN3, and YF/DEN4) by the s.c. route into both arms (1 ml per arm). Inocula were frozen for back titration. Blood was collected immediately prior to inoculation, then daily for the next 12 days for determination of viremia, and on day 30 for assessment of neutralizing antibody titers. Animals were released from the study on day 31.
(iii) Preimmunity to YF/DEN1-4 tetravalent vaccine. Ten monkeys (four monkeys from group 4 and six monkeys from group 9, which had previously received two and one doses of tetravalent vaccine, respectively, in experiments a and b) were recaptured 6 months after their release. These animals, together with a group of four naive monkeys (as unimmunized controls [group 1]), were inoculated s.c. with 0.5 ml of undiluted YF-VAX (~5.0 log10 PFU). Inocula were frozen for back titration. Blood was drawn immediately prior to immunization, then daily for 10 days for determination of viremia, and on day 30 for determination of neutralizing antibody titers.
Throughout the study, animals were observed daily for clinical signs. All animals remained healthy and appeared normal with respect to eating and behavioral activity. However, 1 week after the second dose of vaccine (>6 months after the original immunization), a minimal rash was observed in three monkeys (monkey T791 from group 2, YF/DEN1; monkey T264 from group 7, WT DEN4; and monkey T354 from group 8, tetravalent vaccine) confined to the upper arms (monkeys T791 and T264) and the left shoulder (monkey T354). Four days later, the rash on all monkeys had resolved, and no other clinical signs were recorded until the monkeys were released 7 months post-primary immunization.Viremia and neutralization assays. Viremia and plaque reduction neutralization tests were determined on Vero cells, using agarose double overlay and neutral red as described previously (10, 11, 38). Virus titers in serum were determined by direct plaquing in Vero cells using undiluted, 2- and 10-fold dilutions of sera. The level of virus detection was 0.7 log10 PFU/ml. Neutralizing antibody titers were determined on heat-inactivated (56°C, 30 min) sera without the addition of complement (38).
Serotype identification by RT-PCR amplification and
immunocytochemical focus-forming assay. (i) Serotype identification by
RT-PCR-restriction enzyme assay.
Individual plaques from sera of
monkeys immunized with tetravalent YF/DEN1-4 vaccine were amplified
once in Vero cells. Virions RNAs were extracted (from 125 µl of
supernatants of infected cells) using TRI Reagent-LS (Molecular
Research Center, Inc.) according to the manufacturer's procedure. To
amplify the prME regions, each extracted RNA was used as a template in
a 25-µl single-tube RT-PCR (Titan; Roche), according to the
manufacturer's protocol, using YF0.2+ (5'-ATGGTACGACGAGGAGTTCGC)
and KP5.2/1.66
(5'-CTCTAAATATGAAGATACCATC) YF-specific primers flanking the DEN-specific prME genes of the chimeras. Following amplification, a 2-µl aliquot of each RT-PCR mixture containing approximately 0.5 µg of a 2.37-kb fragment was
digested with HindIII in a 15-µl volume. Digestion
products were resolved in a 1% agarose gel in the presence of ethidium bromide, and the DEN type specificity of each fragment was visually identified. DEN1-, DEN2-, and DEN3-specific fragments were digested only once, producing two bands of 1972 and 402 bp for DEN1, 1,429 and
945 bp for DEN2, and 1,217 and 1,151 bp for DEN3 chimeras. The
DEN4-specific fragment was not digested with HindIII.
(ii) Serotype identification by immunocytochemical focus-forming assay. Individual plaques from sera of monkeys immunized with tetravalent YF/DEN1-4 vaccine were amplified once in Vero cells; supernatants were harvested and inoculated into 4 wells of a 12-well plate seeded with Vero cells. After 1 h of virus adsorption at 37°C, wells were overlaid with minimal essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine saline, 100 U of penicillin per ml, 100 µg of streptomycin per ml, and 0.75% methylcellulose (Sigma) and incubated for 3 days at 37°C. Cell monolayers were fixed for 1 h by addition of 1 ml of 4% formalin, wells were washed with tap water, and 1 ml of blocking/permeabilizing buffer (2.5% nonfat dry milk, 0.05% Tween 20, and 0.5% Triton X-100 in phosphate-buffered saline) was added to each well. After 15 min at room temperature, blocking/permeabilizing buffer was removed and 0.5 ml of virus-specific primary antibody was added to wells. Primary monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) used were D2-1F1-3 and D6-8A1-12 (provided by John Roehrig, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colo.), specific for DEN1 and DEN3, respectively, and 3H5-1 and 1H10 (American Type Culture Collection), specific for DEN2 and DEN4, respectively. MAbs were produced by growth of hybridoma cells in tissue culture and diluted in blocking/permeabilizing buffer. Supernatant fluids of tissue culture flasks (D2-1F1-3 and D6-8A1-12) were diluted 1:10, and ammonium sulfate-precipitated material from CL-1000 high-density culture flasks (Integra Biosciences, Ijamsville, Md.) was diluted 1:4,000 (3H5-1) or 1:1,000 (1H10). Following 1 h incubation at room temperature on a rotating platform, plates were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline-0.05% Tween 20 (wash buffer), and 0.5 ml of alkaline phosphatase-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, Ala.) diluted 1:500 in blocking/permeabilizing buffer was added to each well. Following 1-h incubation at room temperature, plates were washed three times with wash buffer, and antibody-bound foci of infection were developed (by addition of 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate-nitroblue tetrazolium [Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis. Mo.] containing 4 mM levamisole [Sigma] to block endogenous alkaline phosphatase activity) and counted.
Sequencing. WT DEN strains were grown in C6/36 cells, while chimeric viruses were grown in Vero cells. Supernatants were harvested 7 days (from C6/36 cells) or 3 to 4 days (from Vero cells) postinfection, and viruses were sequenced across prME regions by automated sequencing, essentially as described previously (10), using a collection of DEN-specific primers.
Statistical analysis. Differences in responses among groups and between two groups were analyzed for significance using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t tests, respectively (JMP software version 4.0.2).
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Sequence of YF/DEN chimeras.
In addition to the amino acid
change from Q to G at E protein 494 position (E494; E492 for YF/DEN3),
which were intentionally created for insertion of a NarI
restriction site at the E/NS1 junction, other mutations were observed
in the chimeric viruses (Table 1). DEN1
chimeras differed from the parental PUO359 strain at M39 (H to R) and
E204 (K to R). An amino acid difference at the membrane-spanning domain
(E484, I to V) separated DEN2 chimeras and their parent PUO218 strain
(Table 1) (10). There was one amino acid difference
between the DEN3 chimera and the parental strain, PaH881/88 (E489 A to
V), also in the membrane-spanning region (primer region) of the E
proteins. Sequencing of the DEN4 chimeras revealed mutations at M43 (A
to T), E4 (V to I), E56 (L to F), and E437 (H to Y) compared to the
parental DEN4 1228 strain. Three additional amino acid substitutions in
the E proteins of the large-plaque phenotype of YF/DEN4 chimeras
distinguished them from the small-plaque phenotype: E277 (H to N), E366
(N to S), and E437 (H to Y) (Table 1).
|
Growth of chimeric viruses in Vero cells. Vero cells were infected with chimeric viruses at a multiplicity of infection of ~0.001. Aliquots of cell culture medium were taken on days 1 to 5 and tested in a Vero cell plaque assay as described previously (38). The peak titers were 8.0, 7.9, 6.3, and 7.5 log10 PFU/ml for YF/DEN1, YF/DEN2, YF/DEN3, and YF/DEN4 (uncloned), respectively. The peak titer of large-plaque YF/DEN4 (7.7 log10 PFU/ml, on day 4) was similar to that of its uncloned parent virus (7.5 log10 PFU/ml, on day 4). The small-plaque virus grew slower and reached its peak titer 1 day later (7.2 log10 PFU/ml on day 5) (data not shown).
Neurovirulence of chimeric viruses for mice. Four-week-old outbred ICR mice were inoculated with either chimeric (YF/DEN1, YF/DEN3, and YF/DEN4) or parent WT (DEN1, strain PUO359; DEN3, strain PaH881/88; and DEN 4, strain 1228) virus by the i.c. route. Inoculated doses (determined by back titration of retained samples) were 5 log10 PFU/0.03 ml for all viruses except YF/DEN3, which was used at a dose of 4 log10 PFU/0.03 ml. No mice died or showed any sign of illness during the 21-day observation period, demonstrating that the YF backbone in the chimeras did not increase the neurovirulence of these viruses (the YF 17D vaccine strain is lethal for mice of all ages inoculated by the i.c. route [11]).
Viremia and immunogenicity of chimeric viruses in rhesus monkeys.
(i) Primary immunization with YF/DEN chimeras.
All monkeys became
viremic after inoculation with chimeric viruses (as monovalent or
tetravalent vaccines), WT DEN, or YF-VAX. The peak virus titers
(ranging from 0.7 to 1.4 log10 PFU/ml) and duration of
viremia (1 to 3 days) for monovalent chimeric viruses were generally
lower than those of monovalent WT parent viruses (mean peak titers of
2.2 to 3.0 log10 PFU/ml and mean duration of 2.7 to 3.3 days) (Table 2). The peak virus titers
and duration of viremia for the tetravalent vaccine or YF-VAX were
similar to those for chimeric monovalent vaccines. To determine which chimeric viruses are present in viremic monkeys, sera of monkeys in
group 4 (tetravalent group) were tested by RT-PCR and
HindIII restriction analysis, as well as by
immunocytochemical focus-forming assay using MAbs specific for
individual serotypes. Both techniques produced similar results,
identifying the presence of three of the four chimeras (YF/DEN2,
YF/DEN3, and YF/DEN4) on different days postinoculation. The most
frequently isolated virus was YF/DEN2, whereas YF/DEN1 could not be
isolated on any days using both techniques (Table 2).
|
|
|
(ii) Viremia and immunogenicity of YF/DEN chimeras after secondary
immunization.
All monkeys described in experiment a (Materials and
Methods), together with 6 naive animals, were given a dose of YF/DEN1-4 tetravalent vaccine (~5.0 log10 PFU of each serotype) 6 months after primary immunization. None of the monkeys immunized
previously with monovalent WT DEN or tetravalent YF/DEN1-4 vaccine
became viremic, whereas all six naive monkeys became viremic for a mean duration of 4.7 days and mean peak titer of 1.2 log10
PFU/ml (Table 5). One of three animals
previously immunized with monovalent YF/DEN3 or YF/DEN4 and two of
three animals previously immunized with YF/DEN1 or YF-VAX became
viremic after the booster dose. Generally, viremia levels in preimmune
monkeys were lower than in the naive control group, indicating a degree
of cross-protection between the different vaccine viruses. Viremia
lasted from 1 to 5 days, and peak titers varied from 1 to 2.4 log10 PFU/ml (Table 5).
|
|
Vector immunity. Since chimeric DEN vaccine candidates were constructed on the backbone of YF 17D, it was important to determine whether YF immunity would restrict immunogenicity of chimeric viruses or vice versa. Two experiments were carried out; in the first experiment, monkeys with or without YF immunity were inoculated with the YF/DEN1-4 tetravalent vaccine; in the second experiment, monkeys without prior immunization or with prior YF/DEN immunization (one or two doses of vaccine) were inoculated with YF-VAX. The interval between the two vaccines (YF/DEN1-4 and YF-VAX) was 6 months.
Immunogenicity of YF/DEN1-4 tetravalent vaccine in YF-immune
monkeys.
Two of three YF-immune and all six nonimmune monkeys
developed viremia after immunization with YF/DEN1-4 tetravalent
vaccine. The mean virus peak titers and duration of viremia in
YF-immune monkeys (1.3 log10 PFU/ml and 1.5 days,
respectively) were lower than in nonimmune monkeys (2.4 log10 PFU/ml and 4.7 days, respectively) (Table
7). Chimeric YF/DEN1 and YF/DEN2 were
isolated from YF-immune monkeys up to 3 days after inoculation, whereas
YF/DEN2, YF/DEN3, and YF/DEN4 could be isolated from nonimmune monkeys
up to 11 days after inoculation. The peak virus titers and durations of viremia were significantly higher in nonimmune than in YF-immune monkeys P values for both peak titers and duration of
viremia were 0.007 as determined by t test (Table 7).
|
|
Immunogenicity of YF-VAX in monkeys previously given
YF/DEN1-4.
Monkeys with or without background immunity to
YF/DEN1-4 tetravalent vaccine (unimmunized or immunized with one dose
[Table 8] or two doses [Table 4] of vaccine) were inoculated with a standard human dose (5 log10 PFU) of YF-VAX. Viremia
(measured from days 1 to 12 postinoculation) and neutralizing titers
(measured 30 days postimmunization) are shown in Table
9. No viremia was detected in any of four
monkeys previously inoculated with two doses of YF/DEN1-4 tetravalent
vaccine, whereas minimal viremia (1 log10 PFU/ml), on a
single day, was observed in two of six monkeys, which previously had
received only one dose of YF/DEN1-4 tetravalent vaccine. In contrast,
three of four monkeys in the control group became viremic (peak titers
ranged from 2.1 to 2.3 log10 PFU/ml, and mean duration was
3 to 4 days) (Table 9). Mean peak and duration of viremia in
unimmunized monkeys were significantly higher (P = 0.01
and 0.006, respectively) than immunized animals. Despite lack of
viremia in some preimmune monkeys, all developed high titers of
neutralizing antibodies against YF 17D. Levels of neutralizing antibody
titers appeared to be similar across groups (P = 0.16)
(Table 9).
|
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
YF 17D has been used successfully as a vector for construction of YF/JE (5) and YF/DEN2 (3, 10, 55) chimeras. We previously described safety and immunogenicity of YF/JE and YF/DEN2 chimeras in mice and monkeys (10, 11, 38, 39), and we recently completed a phase 1 clinical trial of a YF/JE chimera in human volunteers (T. P. Monath et al., unpublished data). In this paper, we describe constructions and evaluations of three additional chimeras as potential vaccine candidates against DEN serotypes 1, 3, and 4.
The genetic construction of the chimeric viral genome and replacement of DEN genes was accomplished based on the full-length clone of YF 17D/JE in a two-plasmid system (5, 10). The advantages of using YF 17D as a live vector include (i) its established safety over a period of >60 years, during which over 350 million doses have been administered to humans; (ii) long duration of immunity after a single dose; and (iii) rapid onset of immunity within a few days after inoculation. The ChimeriVax technology obviates many of the problems of antivector immunity seen with live vectors, since the envelope genes are removed and replaced by the genes of the vaccine target. The chimeric vaccine virus causes an active infection in the recipient. Since the cytokine milieu and innate immune response are similar to those in natural infection, the antigenic mass expands in the host, and properly folded conformational epitopes are processed efficiently, the adaptive immune response is robust, and memory is established. The prM and E proteins derived from the target flavivirus contain the critical antigens for protective humoral and cellular immunity (27, 28). The immune response to infection with the vaccine virus, including all neutralizing antibodies, is directed principally at the target virus (DEN). The NS proteins of the YF 17D vector may also elicit cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses and nonneutralizing antibodies against intracellular chimeric virus, but in preliminary studies in monkeys, these responses appeared not to provide cross-protection (10). The NS genes responsible for intracellular replication are derived from YF 17D and play an important role in attenuation (50). In the case of DEN2, it is clear that the envelope protein sequence is not necessarily linked to a virulence phenotype, since some attenuated live DEN2 vaccine candidates have WT envelope sequences (2). Hence, we predicted that YF/DEN2 chimeras with prME genes donated by WT DEN2 strains would be attenuated for nonhuman primates. This has proven to be the case (10). In addition, insertion of structural genes of WT DEN1 16007, but not its attenuated vaccine variant PDK-13, into the backbone of DEN2 PDK-53 produced a potential attenuated vaccine candidate for DEN1 virus (20).
All candidate YF/DEN chimeras against DEN serotypes 1 to 4 were constructed using gene donors (prME) from low-passage-number human isolates of DEN and were sequenced at early passages to establish consensus sequences. Sequencing of chimeras at Vero cell P3 or P4 posttransfection revealed some nucleotide and amino acid differences compared to their parent strains (Table 1). Insertion of a NarI restriction site at the E/NS1 junction resulted in nucleotide changes at positions 1978 to 1980 (in DEN1, DEN2, and DEN4 chimeras) 1972 to 1974 (in DEN3 chimeras), 1983 (in DEN1 and DEN4 chimeras), and 1977 (in DEN3 chimeras). These changes resulted in amino acid changes from Q to G at E494 of DEN1, DEN2, and DEN4 chimeras and at E492 of DEN3 chimeras. Additionally, there were five nucleotide changes in DEN1 and DEN2 chimeras, resulting in two amino acid substitutions (H to R at M39 and K to R at E204) in DEN1 and one substitution (I to V at E484) in DEN2 chimeras (10). The mutation leading to the I484V change, which was present as early as P1 posttransfection, was most likely present in the plasmids, since another chimeric DEN2 (MON310) previously constructed from these plasmids revealed the same substitution (9). Chimeric DEN3 revealed 13 nucleotide changes and 1 amino acid change (A to V at E489) compared to its parent DEN3 strain PaH881/88. Chimeric DEN4 revealed the highest number of amino acid substitutions compared to the parental DEN4 strain 1228 (seven nucleotide changes and four amino acid substitutions) (Table 1). Amino acid substitutions at E484, E489, E492, and E494 of chimeras, which are within the signal sequences for NS1 protein and located within the transmembrane TM2 domain of the E proteins (1), are less likely to affect the immunogenicity of chimeras. A mutation (M to V) at E477 within the TM2 of chimeric D2/D1 E protein was shown not to adversely affect the immunogenicity of this chimera in mice (20). Mutations in M proteins may not have a negative impact on the immunogenicity of chimeras, because the M proteins of mature flavivirions are believed to be masked by the E dimers and therefore may not be exposed to the host immune response. However, immature virus subpopulations containing uncleaved prM proteins are probably exposed on the surface of virions and may induce neutralizing and/or protective antibodies against prM or M protein. There have been some reports of prM-specific MAbs against DEN3, DEN4 (25), or Langat virus (21) that were protective in mice. By using synthetic peptides, the binding site of a protective MAb directed to prM proteins of DEN2 was identified to be within residues 40 to 49 of the M protein (7). It remains to be seen if an H-to-R change at M39 of chimeric DEN1 and an A-to-T change at M43 of chimeric DEN4 affect the immunogenicity of the viruses for mammalian hosts. Mutations observed in E proteins of chimeric DEN1 (K to R at E204) or chimeric DEN4 (V to I at E4, L to F at E56, and H to Y at E437) could affect the immunogenicity of these chimeras by alteration of the native conformation of neutralizing epitopes.
All chimeric viruses grew to peak titers of
7.5 log10
PFU/ml in Vero cells with the exception of chimeric DEN3. The reason for the slower growth of YF/DEN3 than of other chimeras might be due to
the E489 mutation (Table 1). We recently reconstructed this virus
without mutation and found that its growth rate improved 10-fold (data
not shown).
The neurovirulence of chimeric viruses was assessed in 3- to 4-week-old
outbred ICR mice by i.c. inoculation. This test was performed to ensure
that the neurovirulence of chimeras does not exceed that of the
parental YF-VAX, which is associated with rare postvaccinal
encephalitis adverse events in humans (37). In contrast to
YF-VAX, but similar to chimeric YF/DEN2 (10) and WT parent
strains, DEN1, DEN3, and DEN4 chimeras were avirulent for 3- to
4-week-old outbred ICR mice inoculated with high doses (5 log10 PFU) by the i.c. route. We recently determined the
i.c. 50% lethal dose (LD50) of a premaster seed of
chimeric YF/DEN2 viruses in 5- and 9-day-old suckling mice and compared
it to that of YF-VAX. The LD50s for chimeric DEN2 (0.76 and
3.3 log10 PFU for 5- and 9-day-old mice, respectively) were
significantly higher than those for YF-VAX (
0.13 and <0.5
log10 PFU). The average survival time for chimeric YF/DEN2
was also higher than that for YF-VAX at all doses. Once premaster seeds
for other chimeras are prepared, their suckling mouse i.c.
LD50s will be compared to that of YF-VAX. These data
provide a high degree of confidence that the YF/DEN chimeric vaccines
will be safer than YF-VAX with respect to neurotropism.
The pathogenesis of DEN fever in humans appears to be related to direct viral injury to extraneural tissues and cytokine release (31, 40). There is no animal disease model of dengue fever. However viremia in nonhuman primates reflecting extraneural replication of the virus generally reflects virulence for humans (47, 52, 57). In DEN-infected humans, higher viremia is associated with a more severe form of disease (DHF) (56). To assess the safety of YF/DEN chimeras, we therefore determined magnitude of viremia induced by test vaccines. The virus peak titers in sera of monkeys immunized with chimeras were compared to those of WT parent DEN or attenuated YF-VAX. All monkeys became viremic. However, the mean peak titers of viremia in monkeys inoculated with a monovalent or tetravalent chimeric virus (ranging from 0.7 to 1.5 log10 PFU/ml) were similar to that provoked by YF-VAX (1.9 log10 PFU/ml) (P values for peak titers and duration of viremia were 0.17 and 0.29 respectively) and significantly lower than their parent WT viruses (2.2 to 3.0 log10 PFU/ml) (P = 0.003). It is possible that more pathogenic genotypes of DEN, which are associated with severe forms of dengue infections (30, 44, 48), or DEN adapted to monkeys by serial passage would have produced even higher viremia than the current parental WT viruses (donors of prME genes in chimeras) which were isolated from humans with classical dengue fever. Interestingly, when peak viremias of YF/DEN chimeras were compared with those of their parental WT viruses (pairwise, using t test), YF/DEN1 (P = 0.011) and YF/DEN3 (P = 0.016) were significantly less viremic than their parental viruses but not YF/DEN4 (P = 0.24). The mean duration of viremia (1 to 3.3 days for chimeric viruses, 2.7 to 3.3 days for WT, and 2.3 days for YF-VAX) did not differ significantly across groups (P = 0.18) or between chimeric and parental viruses (P = 0.18 for YF/DEN1 and WT DEN1, P = 0.07 for YF/DEN3 and WT DEN3, and P = 0.8 for YF/DEN4 and WT DEN4). No association has been found between severity of disease and duration of viremia after DEN infection in humans (56). As predicted, no correlate between mouse neurovirulence and monkey viremia was observed; both chimeric and WT viruses were attenuated for 3- to 4-week old mice, but WT viruses induced significantly higher viremia in monkeys. In contrast, YF-VAX, which has been used for >60 years with extremely low incidence of adverse effects, was neurovirulent for mice but safe (attenuated) in monkeys (produced a low degree of asymptomatic viremia similar to that of chimeric viruses).
The neutralizing antibody titers were measured 30 and 79 days postimmunization (Table 3). All but two monkeys (one in the chimeric DEN3 group and one in the chimeric DEN4 group) that received the monovalent vaccines seroconverted. All six monkeys that received one dose of tetravalent vaccine seroconverted to all four DEN serotypes except for one animal that did not seroconvert to DEN4. Monkeys immunized with monovalent chimeric viruses developed homologous neutralizing antibodies, but with titers lower than in animals given YF-VAX or WT DEN. These results indicate that the chimeric viruses are more attenuated than parental YF 17D. In the tetravalent group, antibody titers declined somewhat between days 31 and 79 for antibodies against DEN1 and DEN3 but not against DEN2 and DEN4. In a clinical study, out of 10 volunteers who received an empirically derived live attenuated tetravalent DEN vaccine, only one developed antibodies to all four serotypes, and similar to our observation, antibody levels measured 60 days postimmunization had declined in all subjects (24). All DEN chimeras except DEN1 could be detected in viremic monkeys inoculated with tetravalent vaccine by either serotype-specific monoclonal focus-forming assays or PCR-based restriction analysis. The most detectable virus by both methods in the tetravalent group was the YF/DEN2 chimera. Interestingly, the highest neutralizing titers in the tetravalent group were also directed against DEN2. DEN2 is the most important serotype in implication of DHF/DSS in secondary DEN infections. High levels of neutralizing antibodies to this virus after primary immunization with YF/DEN2 would thus provide immunity in vaccinees against the serotype most involved in DHF/DSS. However, in a widespread DHF, DEN3 has also frequently been implicated as a cause of DHF/DSS in Indonesia, Vietnam, and Thailand (13). Suboptimal immunity to one of the components of the tetravalent vaccine may theoretically increase the risk of developing DHF/DSS. Although several years' follow-up of volunteers given live DEN tetravalent vaccines in Thailand did not reveal any related DHF/DSS (N. Brahmarapravati and J. F. Saluzzo, personal communication), it is generally believed that an effective DEN vaccine should simultaneously induce high neutralizing antibody titers against all four serotypes. Because YF/DEN2 is more active or replicates earlier and may interfere with the other chimeric viruses included in a mixture of equal doses, it may be necessary to decrease the dose of the YF/DEN2 component in a tetravalent chimeric formulation. Similar conclusions were made following a study of live attenuated, empirically derived DEN vaccine in humans. In sera of 10 volunteers who received the DEN tetravalent vaccine (PDK derived), only one serotype (DEN3) could be detected. All 10 volunteers developed symptoms including fever and rash, but none developed dengue fever (24). It appeared from this study that the DEN3 component interfered with the other serotypes and was reactogenic.
To determine if the levels of antibody titers can be increased by a
second dose, all monkeys were boosted by a tetravalent dose 6 months
after primary immunization. Low levels of viremia were detected in
monkeys previously immunized with monovalent chimeric viruses. No
viremia was detected in any groups that received WT monovalent or
tetravalent vaccines, demonstrating possible in vivo virus
neutralization by heterologous (WT group) or homologous (tetravalent
group) antibodies (Table 5). A serotype-specific anamnestic response
was observed in all monkeys immunized with monovalent chimeric viruses,
consistent with the principles of "original antigenic sin" well
known in the case of sequential flavivirus infections (17, 19,
22, 29, 49). In addition, these monkeys developed broad
neutralizing antibodies to the other three serotype viruses contained
in the tetravalent booster vaccine. In acute and convalescent sera of
patients with DHF or JE infection, a significant (
4-fold) rise in DEN
and JE neutralizing antibodies was observed. Similarly, sera of
JE-infected patients with preexisting antibodies to YF showed a
significant rise in YF and JE neutralizing antibodies (33,
58). These data indicate that cross-reactive antibodies with
neutralizing activities are quite often induced in sequential
flavivirus infection. The situation with chimeric viruses is unique,
however, and unprecedented by previous studies of heterologous
flavivirus serological interactions, since the nonstructural genes (of
YF 17D) are identical in the priming and boosting virus. It is possible
that the anamnestic response is driven in part by these carrier
proteins, much as the response to polysaccharide conjugate vaccines is
driven by prior inoculation of the carrier protein, e.g., diphtheria
toxoid (8).
The two seronegative monkeys (T747 and T230 in groups 2 and 3, respectively) (Table 3) also developed neutralizing antibodies against all four serotpyes after the booster immunization with YF/DEN1-4 vaccine. Interestingly, the DEN1 chimera, which was never detected in serum after primary immunization, could be isolated along with chimeric DEN2 from monkey T747. It is possible that subneutralizing antibodies against DEN3 (50% neutralizing titer of <1:20 [Table 3]) in this monkey enhanced the replication of DEN1, a phenomenon known as antibody-dependent enhancement of infection (14-16, 26). No viremia (increase in replication of a serotype) was detected in any monkeys after the second dose, confirming that the simultaneous immunization including all four chimeric DEN serotypes has induced sufficient protective antibodies.
The issue of vector immunity is important for any live viral vaccine, because preexisting immunity to the vector in individuals may interfere with the efficacy of vaccination. The mechanism of antivector immunity in the case of two sequential chimeric viruses with different prME genes would involve cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses against the shared (YF) NS3 protein and cytolytic antibodies against NS1. Attenuated recombinant poxviruses expressing JE genes (NYVAC-JEV) failed to induce neutralizing antibody responses in vaccinia virus-immune volunteers (23), whereas a recombinant poliovirus expressing the C-terminal half of chicken ovalbumin (Polio-Ova) produced similar antibody levels in both poliovirus-immune and nonimmune mice and protected them against lethal challenge with a tumor expressing the antigen (34).
Prior infection with one flavivirus may or may not modulate the viremic response to a heterologous flavivirus, depending in part on the level of antigenic relatedness. Thus, prior immunity to JE did not abrogate viremia following YF vaccination (53), whereas prior immunity to DEN (54) and certain other flaviviruses (18) cross-protected against YF. In the case of chimeric viruses, they share NS genes with YF 17D, and therefore cross-protection may be induced by humoral and cellular responses against infected cells early in infection, limiting antigen expression and subsequent immune response. Empirical studies were thus undertaken to determine whether preexisting immunity to YF 17D would interfere with YF/DEN vaccination. YF-immune and nonimmune monkeys were inoculated with tetravalent YF/DEN vaccine, whereas tetravalent immune and nonimmune monkeys were inoculated with YF-VAX. The interval between the two vaccines was 6 months.
Although the magnitude and duration of viremia in YF-immune monkeys were significantly lower than in nonimmune monkeys (P = 0.007 for both magnitude and duration of viremia) (Table 7), there was no statistically significant difference in titers of neutralizing antibodies within the two groups. The only exception was with YF/DEN3; neutralizing titers against the YF/DEN3 chimera (GMT = 350) in YF-immune monkeys was significantly higher than in nonimmune animals (GMT = 36) (P = 0.013) (Table 8). Similar enhancement has been reported in YF-immune subjects who received a live attenuated DEN2 (51) or a live attenuated chimeric YF/JE vaccine (Monath, unpublished). When chimeric tetravalent DEN-immune monkeys were inoculated with YF-VAX, no viremia was detected in any of monkeys previously immunized with two doses of tetravalent DEN vaccine, whereas a low level of viremia was detected in two monkeys that previously received only one dose of tetravalent DEN vaccine. YF-specific neutralizing antibody responses in nonimmune monkeys were significantly higher than those in monkeys previously immunized with one dose of tetravalent DEN vaccine (P = 0.042) but were similar to those in monkeys that previously received two doses of tetravalent DEN vaccine (P = 0.72) (Table 9). These data and those recently obtained from a YF/JE clinical trial in YF-immune and nonimmune volunteers (Monath, unpublished) indicate that antivector immunity will not be a significant factor limiting the practical utilization of chimeric vaccines and YF vaccine in humans.
In summary, all candidate YF/DEN chimeras against four serotypes (DEN1 to DEN4) were constructed using gene donors from low-passage-number human isolates of DEN. All chimeras replicated to high titers (6.3 to 8.0 log10 PFU/ml) in cells acceptable for good manufacturing practices production and were nonneurovirulent for 4-week-old ICR mice. In studies in nonhuman primates, viremia was lower than for parental WT strains and similar to viremia observed in controls given YF-VAX. Neutralizing antibodies against all four serotypes were elicited in almost all animals after a single dose of tetravalent vaccine, but titers were lower than for YF/DEN2. The titers of antibodies against all serotypes were increased when animals were boosted with a second dose of tetravalent vaccine. Despite suppression of viremia in YF-immune monkeys that received the tetravalent vaccine or tetravalent immune monkeys that received YF-VAX, no statistically significant differences were observed in magnitude of immune responses between immune and nonimmune monkeys. Optimization of the vaccine candidates and dose formulations to elicit high antibody titers may require genetic modifications of the DEN prME sequences as well as dose adjustment of the tetravalent formulation.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
We thank Duane J. Gubler, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Fort Collins, Colo., and Robert E. Shope, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, who kindly provided WT DEN1 (strain PUO359) and DEN4 (strain 1228), as well as Vincent Deubel, Pasteur Institute, Paris, France, for providing WT DEN3 (strain PaH881/88). We are also grateful to G. Myers, N. Tobin, and P. Papastathis, Acambis, Inc., for technical assistance, animal care, and cell culture support and F. Rizvi, Aventis Pasteur, Lyon, France, for providing YF-VAX.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Acambis, Inc., 38 Sidney St., Cambridge, MA 02139. Phone: (617) 494-1339. Fax: (617) 494-1741. E-mail: farshad.guirakhoo{at}acambis.com.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Allison, S. L.,
K. Stiasny,
K. Stadler,
C. W. Mandl, and F. X. Heinz.
1999.
Mapping of functional elements in the stem-anchor region of tick-borne encephalitis virus envelope protein E.
J. Virol.
73:5605-5612 |
| 2. |
Butrapet, S.,
C. Y. Huang,
D. J. Pierro,
N. Bhamarapravati,
D. J. Gubler, and R. M. Kinney.
2000.
Attenuation markers of a candidate dengue type 2 vaccine virus, strain 16681 (PDK-53), are defined by mutations in the 5' noncoding region and nonstructural proteins 1 and 3.
J. Virol.
74:3011-3019 |
| 3. | Caufour, P. S., M. C. A. Mutta, A. M. Y. Yamamura, S. Vazquez, I. I. Ferreira, A. V. Jabor, M. C. Bonaldo, M. S. Freire, and R. Galler. Construction, characterization and immunogenicity of recombinant yellow fever 17D-dengue type 2 viruses. Virus Res., in press. |
| 4. | Chambers, T. J., T. F. Tsai, Y. Pervikov, and T. P. Monath. 1997. Vaccine development against dengue and Japanese encephalitis: report of a World Health Organization meeting. Vaccine 15:1494-1502[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 5. |
Chambers, T. J.,
A. Nestorowicz,
P. W. Mason,
K. H. Eckels, and C. M. Rice.
1999.
Yellow fever/Japanese encephalitis chimeric viruses: construction and biological properties.
J. Virol.
73:3095-3101 |
| 6. |
Chu, M. C.,
E. J. O'Rourke, and D. W. Trent.
1989.
Genetic relatedness among structural protein genes of dengue 1 virus strains.
J. Gen. Virol.
70:1701-1712 |
| 7. | Falconar, A. K. 1999. Identification of an epitope on the DEN virus membrane (M) protein defined by cross-protective Mabs: design of an improved epitope sequence based on common determinants present in both envelope (E and M) proteins. Arch. Virol. 144:2313-2330[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | Granoff, D. M., M. H. Rathbone, and S. J. Holmes. 1993. Effect of immunity to the carrier protein on antibody responses to Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccines. Vaccine 11:S46-S51. |
| 9. | Gualano, R. C., M. J. Pryor, M. R. Cauchi, P. J. Wright, and A. D. Davidson. 1998. Identification of a major determinant of mouse neurovirulence of dengue virus type 2 using stably cloned genomic-length cDNA. J. Gen. Virol. 79:437-446[Abstract]. |
| 10. |
Guirakhoo, F.,
R. Weltzin,
T. J. Chambers,
Z.-X. Zhang,
K. Soike,
M. Ratterree,
J. Arroyo,
K. Georgakopoulos,
J. Catalan, and T. P. Monath.
2000.
Recombinant chimeric yellow fever-dengue type 2 virus is immunogenic and protective in nonhuman primates.
J. Virol.
74:5477-5485 |
| 11. | Guirakhoo, F., Z. X. Zhang, T. J. Chambers, S. Delagrave, J. Arroyo, A. D. T. Barrett, and T. P. Monath. 1999. Immunogenicity, genetic stability, and protective efficacy of a recombinant, chimeric yellow fever-Japanese encephalitis virus (ChimeriVaxTM-JE) as a live, attenuated vaccine candidate against Japanese encephalitis. Virology 257:363-372[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. | Gubler, D. J. 1997. Human behavior and cultural context in disease control. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2(11):A1-A2[Medline]. |
| 13. | Ha, D. Q., N. T. Tien, V. T. Huong, H. T. Loan, and C. M. Thang. 2000. Dengue epidemic in southern Vietnam, 1998. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 6:422-425[Medline]. |
| 14. | Halstead, S. B. 1970. Observations related to pathogenesis of dengue hemorrhagic fever. VI. Hypotheses and discussion. Yale J. Biol. Med. 42:350-362[Medline]. |
| 15. |
Halstead, S. B.
1988.
Pathogenesis of dengue: challenge to molecular biology.
Science
239:476-481 |
| 16. | Halstead, S. B. 1989. Antibody, macrophage, dengue virus infection, shock and hemorrhage: a pathogenic cascade. Rev. Infect. Dis. 11:S830-S839. |
| 17. | Halstead, S. B., S. Rojanasuphot, and N. Sangkawibha. 1983. Original antigenic sin in dengue. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 32:154-156. |
| 18. | Henderson, B. E., P. P. Cheshire, G. B. Kirya, and M. Lule. 1970. Immunologic studies with yellow fever and selected African group B arboviruses in rhesus and vervet monkeys. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 19:110-118. |
| 19. | Holzmann, H., M. Kundi, K. Stiasny, J. Clement, P. McKenna, C. Kunz, and F. X. Heinz. 1996. Correlation between ELISA, hemagglutination inhibition, and neutralization tests after vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis. J. Med. Virol. 48:102-107[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 20. |
Huang, C. Y.-H.,
S. Butrapet,
D. J. Pierro,
G.-J. J. Chang,
A. R. Hunt,
N. Bhamarapravati,
D. J. Gubler, and R. M. Kinney.
2000.
Chimeric DEN type 2 (vaccine strain PDK-53)/DEN type 1 virus as a potential candidate DEN type 1 virus vaccine.
J. Virol.
74:3020-3028 |
| 21. | Iacono-Connors, L. C., J. F. Smith, T. G. Ksiazek, C. L. Kelley, and C. S. Schmaljohn. 1996. Characterization of Langat virus antigenic determinants defined by Mabs to E, NS1 and preM and identification of a protective, non-neutralizing preM-specific monoclonal antibody. Virus Res. 43:125-136[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 22. | Inouye, S., S. Matsuno, and Y. Tsurukubo. 1984. "Original antigenic sin" phenomenon in experimental flavivirus infections of guinea pigs: studies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Microbiol. Immunol. 28:569-574[Medline]. |
| 23. | Kanesa-thasan, N., J. J. Smucny, Ch. Hoke, D. H. Marks, E. Konishi, I. Kurane, D. B. Tang, D. W. Vaughn, P. W. Mason, and R. E. Shope. 2000. Safety and immunogenicity of NYVAC-JEV and ALVAC-JEV attenuated recombinant Japanese encephalitis virus-poxvirus vaccines in vaccinia-nonimmune and vaccinia-immune humans. Vaccine 19:483-491[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 24. | Kanesa-thasan, N., W. Sun, G. Kim-Ahn, S. Van Albert, J. R. Putnak, A. King, B. Raengsakulsrach, H. Christ-Schmidt, K. Gilson, J. M. Zahradnik, D. W. Vaughn, B. L. Innis, J. F. Saluzzo, and C. Hoke, Jr. 2001. Safety and immunogenicity of attenuated dengue virus vaccines (Aventis Pasteur) in human volunteers. Vaccine 19:3179-3188[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 25. | Kaufman, B. M., P. L. Summers, D. R. Dubois, W. H. Cohen, M. K. Gentry, R. L. Timchak, D. S. Burke, and K. H. Eckels. 1989. Mabs for DEN virus prM glycoprotein protect mice against lethal DEN infection. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 41:576-580. |
| 26. | Kliks, S. C., A. Nisalak, W. E. Brandt, L. Wahl, and D. S. Burke. 1989. Antibody-dependent enhancement of dengue virus growth in human monocytes as a risk factor for dengue hemorrhagic fever. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 40:444-451. |
| 27. | Konishi, E., S. Pincus, E. Paoletti, W. W. Laegreid, R. E. Shope, and P. W. Mason. 1992. A highly attenuated host range-restricted vaccinia virus strain, NYVAC, encoding the prM, E, and NS1 genes of Japanese encephalitis virus prevents JEV viremia in swine. Virology 190:454-458[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 28. |
Konishi, E.,
M. Yamaoka,
Khin-Sane-Win,
I. Kurane, and P. W. Mason.
1998.
Induction of protective immunity against Japanese encephalitis with a plasmid encoding Japanese encephalitis virus premembrane and envelope genes.
J. Virol.
72:4925-4930 |
| 29. | Kuno, G., D. J. Gubler, and A. Oliver. 1993. Use of `original antigenic sin' theory to determine the serotypes of previous dengue infections. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 87:103-105[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 30. |
Leitmeyer, K. C.,
D. W. Vaughn,
D. M. Watts,
R. Salas,
I. Villalobos,
C. de Chacon,
Ramos, and R. Rico-Hesse.
1999.
Dengue virus structural differences that correlate with pathogenesis.
J. Virol.
73:4738-4747 |
| 31. |
Libraty, D. H.,
S. Pichyangkul,
C. Ajariyakhajorn,
T. P. Endy, and F. A. Ennis.
2001.
Human dendritic cells are activated by dengue virus infection: enhancement by gamma interferon and implications for disease pathogenesis.
J. Virol.
75:3501-3508 |
| 32. | Mackow, E., Y. Makino, B. T. Zhao, Y. M. Zhang, L. Markoff, A. Buckler-White, M. Guller, R. Chanock, and C. J. Lai. 1987. The nucleotide sequence of dengue type 4 virus: analysis of genes coding for nonstructural proteins. Virology 159:217-228[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 33. | Makino, Y., M. Tadano, M. Saito, N. Maneekarn, N. Sittisombut, V. Sirisanthana, B. Poneprasert, and T. Fukunaga. 1994. Studies on serological cross-reaction in sequential flavivirus infections. Microbiol. Immunol. 38:951-955[Medline]. |
| 34. |
Mandl, S.,
L. Hix, and R. Andino.
2001.
Preexisting immunity to poliovirus does not impair the efficacy of recombinant poliovirus vaccine vectors.
J. Virol.
75:622-627 |
| 35. | McBride, W. J., and H. Bielefeldt-Ohmann. 2000. Dengue viral infections; pathogenesis and epidemiology. Microbes Infect. 2:1041-1050[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 36. |
Monath, T. P.
1994.
Dengue-the risk to developed and developing countries.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:2395-2400 |
| 37. | Monath, T. P. 1999. Yellow fever, p. 815-879. In S. Plotkin, and W. Orenstein (ed.), Vaccines, 3rd ed. The W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, Pa. |
| 38. |
Monath, T. P.,
I. Levenbook,
K. Soike,
Z. X. Zhang,
M. Ratterree,
K. Draper,
A. D. T. Barrett,
R. Nichols,
R. Weltzin,
J. Arroyo, and F. Guirakhoo.
2000.
Chimeric yellow fever 17D- Japanese encephalitis virus vaccine: dose-response effectiveness and extended safety testing in rhesus monkeys.
J. Virol.
74:1742-1751 |
| 39. | Monath, T. P., K. Soike, I. Levenbook, Z.-X. Zhang, J. Arroyo, S. Delagrave, G. Myers, A. D. T. Barrett, R. E. Shope, T. J. Chambers, and F. Guirakhoo. 1999. Recombinant, chimeric live, attenuated vaccine (ChimeriVaxTM) incorporating the envelope genes of Japanese encephalitis (SA14-14-2) and the capsid and nonstructural genes of yellow fever (17D) is safe, immunogenic and protective in non-human primates. Vaccine 17:1869-1882[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 40. | Mustafa, A. S., E. A. Elbishbishi, R. Agarwal, and U. C. Chaturvedi. 2001. Elevated levels of interleukin-13 and IL-18 in patients with dengue hemorrhagic fever. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 30:229-233[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 41. | National Institutes of Health. 1998. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, rev. ed. Department of Health and Human Services publication no. (NIH) 85-23. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md. |
| 42. | Osatomi, K., and H. Sumiyoshi. 1990. Complete nucleotide sequence of dengue type 3 virus genome RNA. Virology 176:643-647[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 43. | Rice, C. M., A. Grakoui, R. Galler, and T. J. Chambers. 1989. Transcription of infectious yellow fever virus RNA from full-length cDNA templates produced by in vitro ligation. New Biol. 1:285-296[Medline]. |
| 44. | Rico-Hesse, R., L. M. Harrison, A. Nisalak, D. W. Vaughn, S. Kalayanarooj, S. Green, A. L. Rothman, and F. A. Ennis. 1998. Molecular evolution of dengue type 2 virus in Thailand. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 58:96-101[Abstract]. |
| 45. | Rigau-Perez, J. G., G. G. Clark, D. J. Gubler, P. Reiter, E. J. Sanders, and A. V. Vorndam. 1998. Dengue and dengue haemorrhagic fever. Lancet 352:971-977[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 46. | Rosen, L. 1958. Experimental studies of New World monkeys with dengue and yellow fever. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 7:406-410. |
| 47. | Rosen, L. 1999. Comments on the epidemiology, pathogenesis and control of dengue. Med. Trop. 59:495-498. |
| 48. | Salas, R. A., D. Tovar, A. Barreto, E. de Miller, K. Leitmeyer, and R. Rico-Hesse. 1998. Serotypes and genotypes of DEN virus circulating in Venezuela, 1990-1997. Acta Cient. Venez. 49:33-37. |
| 49. | Schlesinger, R. W., I. Gordon, J. W. Frankel, et al. 1956. Clinical and serologic response of man to immunization with attenuated dengue and yellow fever viruses. J. Immunol. 77:352. |
| 50. |
Schlesinger, J. J.,
S. Chapman,
A. Nestorowicz,
C. M. Rice,
T. E. Ginocchio, and T. J. Chambers.
1996.
Replication of yellow fever virus in the mouse central nervous system: comparison of neuroadapted and non-neuroadapted virus and partial sequence analysis of the neuroadapted strain.
J. Gen. Virol.
77:1277-1285 |
| 51. | Scott, R. M., K. H. Eckels, W. H. Bancroft, P. L. Summers, J. M. McCown, J. H. Anderson, and P. K. Russell. 1983. Dengue-2 vaccine: dose response in volunteers in relation to yellow fever immune status. J. Infect. Dis. 148:1055-1060[Medline]. |
| 52. | Simmons, J. S., J. H. St. John, and F. H. Rynolds. 1931. Experimental studies of dengue. Philipp. J. Sci. 44:1-251. |
| 53. |
Sweet, B. H.,
C. J. Wisseman, Jr.,
M. Kitaoka, and T. Tamiya.
1962.
Immunological studies with group B arthropod-borne viruses. II. Effect of prior infection with Japanese encephalitis virus on the viremia in human subject following administration of 17D yellow fever vaccine.
Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg.
11:562-569 |
| 54. | Theiler, M., and C. R. Anderson. 1975. The relative resistance of dengue-immune monkeys to yellow fever virus. Am J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 24:115-122. |
| 55. |
van der Most, R. G.,
K. Murali-Krishna,
R. Ahmed, and J. H. Strauss.
2000.
Chimeric yellow fever/dengue virus as a candidate dengue vaccine: quantitation of the dengue virus-specific CD8 T-cell response.
J. Virol.
74:8094-8101 |
| 56. | Vaughn, D. W., S. Green, S. Kalayanarooj, B. L. Innis, S. Nimmannitya, S. Suntayakorn, T. P. Endy, B. Raengsakulrach, A. L. Rothman, F. A. Ennis, and A. Nisalak. 2000. Dengue viremia titer, antibody response pattern, and virus serotype correlate with disease severity. J. Infect. Dis. 181:2-9[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 57. | Whitehead, R. H., V. Chaicumpa, L. C. Olson, and P. K. Russell. 1970. Sequential dengue virus infections in the white-handed gibbon (Hylobates lar). Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 19:94-102. |
| 58. | Wisseman, C. L., Jr, B. Sweet, M. Kitaoka, et al. 1962. Immunological studies with group B arthropod-borne viruses. I. Broadened neutralizing antibody spectrum induced by strain 17D yellow fever vaccine in human subjects previously infected with Japanese encephalitis virus. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 11:550-559. |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»