Journal of Virology, August 2001, p. 7188-7192, Vol. 75, No. 15
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.15.7188-7192.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Abundant Early Expression of gpUL4 from a Human Cytomegalovirus
Mutant Lacking a Repressive Upstream Open Reading Frame
John P.
Alderete,
Stephanie
J.
Child, and
Adam P.
Geballe*
Divisions of Human Biology and Clinical
Research, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle,
Washington 98109, and Departments of Microbiology and
Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
98115
Received 13 March 2001/Accepted 4 May 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The human cytomegalovirus UL4 gene encodes a 48-kDa glycoprotein,
expression of which is repressed at the translational level by a short
upstream open reading frame (uORF2) within the UL4 transcript leader.
Mutation of the uORF2 initiation codon in the viral genome eliminates
ribosomal stalling at the uORF2 termination site, resulting in early
and abundant gpUL4 protein synthesis. This mutation does not appear to
affect viral replication kinetics in human fibroblasts. These results
reveal that the unusual uORF2 inhibitory mechanism is a principal
determinant of the abundance and timing of gpUL4 expression but is
nonessential for replication in cell culture.
 |
TEXT |
Viral gene expression during human
cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is regulated at multiple levels,
including translation (14). Previous studies of gpUL4 (or
gp48), the glycoprotein product of the UL4 gene (8),
revealed that its expression is repressed by an unusual translational
mechanism that depends on the nascent peptide product of the second of
three short upstream open reading frames (uORF2) within the UL4
transcript leader (3, 4, 9, 10, 17). Results from
transfection and cell-free translation assays support a model in which
the peptide product of uORF2 inhibits translation termination at its
own stop codon (3, 4, 6). As a result, ribosomes stall on
the mRNA and block ribosomal access to the downstream UL4 cistron.
Clinical isolates of CMV have naturally occurring polymorphisms in
uORF2 that change the predicted peptide sequence and, based on
transfection assays, are predicted to reduce or eliminate the inhibitory effect of uORF2. In fact, the two such viral isolates analyzed thus far express considerably more gpUL4 protein than strains
that have inhibitory uORF2 sequences, even though the levels of UL4
mRNA are similar (1). However, the conclusion that uORF2
controls gpUL4 expression during viral infection based on these
observations is limited by the fact that clinical isolates differ at
multiple genetic loci in addition to uORF2. Therefore, the present
studies were designed to determine the role of uORF2 in controlling
gpUL4 expression during infection using an engineered virus that
contains precise mutations of the UL4 transcript leader but which is
otherwise isogenic with wild-type CMV(Towne).
Construction of uORF2
CMV.
To assess the effect
of uORF2 on gpUL4 expression when both are expressed from their natural
positions within the viral genome, we constructed recombinant CMV in
which the UL4 transcript leader was either wild-type or mutant (Fig.
1). The cosmids Tn15, Tn20, Tn23, Tn26,
Tn44, Tn45, Tn47, and Tn50 (13) (kindly provided by G. Kemble, Aviron, Mountain View, Calif.) were digested with PacI and then cotransfected into diploid human foreskin
fibroblasts (HF) by calcium phosphate coprecipitation (13)
to generate a recombinant wild-type CMV (rTowne-1). Two independent
mutant viruses that lack uORF2 (uORF2
),
vEQ694-1 and vEQ694-2, were constructed using the same cosmid fragments
except that Tn45 was digested with SpeI in addition to
PacI and a SacI/BamHI fragment derived
from plasmid pEQ694 was added to the mixture of fragments. pEQ694 was
constructed by inserting an ~9.6-kb SacI/BamHI
fragment derived from Tn45 into pBS+ (Stratagene, Inc.). The uORF2 AUG
codon in this plasmid was changed to AAG, thereby eliminating uORF2
(Fig. 1). In addition, eight nucleotides were inserted into the
NaeI site in the UL4 transcript leader in pEQ694, creating a
BglII site to facilitate the identification of these
mutants. The insertion of this BglII linker did not alter
uORF2 inhibitory activity in transient-transfection assays (data not
shown). Viruses isolated from transfected cells were plaque purified
three times prior to subsequent analyses.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Construction of recombinant wild-type and mutant CMV.
The CMV genome containing unique long (UL) and unique short
(US) regions flanked by repeats (ab,
b' a'c', and
ca) is depicted (top) along with the approximate
positions of the cosmid fragments used in construction of the
recombinant viruses (middle). The ~9.6 kb
SacI/BamHI insert present in pEQ694
(bottom) contains the UL4 gene and flanking regions. Relevant
restriction sites are indicated. The pEQ694 sequence corresponding to
the 5' end of the UL4 mRNA contains a BglII linker
insertion (bold) into a NaeI site and a mutation of the
uORF2 AUG codon to AAG (underlined).
|
|
To confirm the genomic structures of the recombinant viruses, we
analyzed viral DNA by Southern blot hybridization (Fig.
2). DNA purified from cells infected with
CMV(Towne), rTowne-1, vEQ694-1, and vEQ694-2 cells was digested with
HindIII alone or with HindIII and
BglII, separated electrophoretically, and transferred to
nitrocellulose paper. Ethidium bromide staining (Fig. 2A) and
hybridization with a 32P-labeled probe
corresponding to the whole CMV(Towne) genome (Fig. 2B) revealed similar
patterns among all viruses, suggesting that no major deletions or
rearrangements occurred during construction of the viruses. As
expected, hybridization with a UL4-specific probe revealed the presence
of the new BglII site in vEQ694-1 and vEQ694-2 [but not in
CMV(Towne) or rTowne-1] ~800 bp downstream from another
BglII site in this region (Fig. 2C and D). We further confirmed the structures of the UL4 transcript leader region in rTowne-1, vEQ694-1, and vEQ694-2 using PCR and sequencing analyses (data not shown).

View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Analyses of wild-type and mutant CMV genomic structures.
DNA purified from HF infected with the indicated viruses was digested
with HindIII or with HindIII and
BglII After electrophoretic separation, the ethidium
bromide staining pattern was photographed (A) and samples were analyzed
by Southern blot hybridization (B and C) using either a whole-virus
probe (B) or a UL4 probe (C). (D) Diagram of the UL4 probe.
|
|
These results confirm that the transfection method yielded the expected
viruses and that no gross alterations were evident in the recombinant
viral genomes. It is possible that mutations elsewhere in the genome
that would not be detected by these assays were generated during the
transfection process. However, the identity of results (see below)
using two viruses (vEQ694-1 and vEQ694-2) obtained from two independent
transfections minimizes the possibility that any effects were due to
mutations other than those intentionally introduced into the UL4 leader.
Abundant early expression of gpUL4 in
uORF2
-CMV-infected cells.
Using the wild-type and
recombinant viruses, we evaluated the effects of the mutations on gpUL4
expression. HF were infected with CMV(Towne), rTowne-1, vEQ694-1, or
vEQ694-2 at a multiplicity of infection of 3. Cell extracts prepared by
sodium dodecyl sulfate lysis every 12 h until 96 h
postinfection (p.i.) were analyzed for gpUL4 accumulation by immunoblot
assays using gpUL4 polyclonal rabbit serum (1). While
little or no gpUL4 was detectable in CMV(Towne)- or rTowne-1-infected
cells even at late times, abundant gpUL4 was detectable at 12 h
p.i. in vEQ694-1- and vEQ694-2-infected cells (Fig.
3A). The level of accumulated gpUL4
increased by 24 h p.i. and then remained relatively constant in
abundance through 96 h p.i. in these cells. The basis for the
slight changes in electrophoretic mobility of gpUL4 during infection is
unknown, but they may be due to variation in posttranslational
modification of this heavily glycosylated protein (8).

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Kinetics of UL4 gene expression by wild-type and mutant
viruses. Extracts of HF were prepared at various times after infection
with the indicated viruses. After sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide
gel electrophoresis, gpUL4 (A) and ppUL44 (C) were detected by
immunoblot analysis using rabbit anti-gpUL4 serum or a mouse monoclonal
antibody, respectively. (B) RNA samples harvested from HF infected at
the same time were analyzed by Northern blot hybridization, using
probes specific for UL4 or -actin. Since all the RNA samples were
analyzed on one Northern blot for each probe, the mock-infected-cell
lane, shown only in the CMV(Towne) panel, is the control for all
panels.
|
|
Additional analyses supported the conclusion that the abundant early
expression of gpUL4 following infection with vEQ694-1 and vEQ694-2
resulted from derepressed translation. First, Northern blot
hybridizations revealed that UL4 mRNA levels in cells infected with
vEQ694-1 or vEQ694-2 were no greater than those in cells infected with
CMV(Towne) or rTowne-1 (Fig. 3B). Thus, differences in transcript
accumulation could not explain differences in gpUL4 expression. To
exclude the possibility that there was a generalized reduction in
protein synthesis in cells infected with CMV(Towne) or rTowne-1, we
measured expression of the viral protein ppUL44 (ICP36). Immunoblot
assays using monoclonal antibody 10D8 (Virusys Corporation, North
Berwick, Maine) revealed similar levels of ppUL44 protein in extracts
from cells infected with each virus (Fig. 3C).
Mutation of uORF2 eliminates ribosomal stalling on the UL4
mRNA.
In previous studies, we utilized the toeprint (or reverse
transcription inhibition) assay to detect ribosomal stalling on the UL4
mRNA. This assay is similar to a primer extension reaction but is
performed in a crude translation extract such that premature termination occurs when the reverse transcriptase encounters a barrier,
such as a ribosome, on the mRNA (11). Previous results demonstrated that cell-free translation of mRNAs containing wild-type but not mutant uORF2 sequences caused ribosomes to stall at the uORF2
termination codon (3, 6). Ribosomal stalling was also detected in CMV(Towne)-infected cells (3).
If the high-level expression of gpUL4 in cells infected with
uORF2
viruses is a result of the elimination of
ribosomal stalling at the uORF2 termination site, then ribosomes should
no longer be detected at this position on the UL4 mRNA. To test this
prediction, we performed toeprint assays (3) using
cytoplasmic extracts of cells infected with rTowne-1 and vEQ694-1.
Briefly, cytoplasmic fractions from mock-infected and CMV-infected
cells were prepared by trypsinization of the cells followed by Dounce
homogenization and ultracentrifugation (100,000 × g).
After the samples had been heated to 55°C for 5 min, a
32P-labeled primer was annealed to the 3' end of
the gpUL4 transcript leader and was extended with reverse transcriptase
(Superscript II; Gibco BRL). After phenol-chloroform extraction, the
reaction products were separated on 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gels
and visualized by autoradiography. A band corresponding to ribosomes stalled at the end of uORF2 was detected in rTowne-1- but not in
vEQ694-1-infected cells (Fig. 4). In
other experiments, the toeprint band corresponding to the uORF2
termination site was also present in cells infected with CMV(Towne) but
not with vEQ694-2 (data not shown). These results reveal that mutation
of uORF2 eliminates ribosomal stalling at the uORF2 termination site.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Mutation of the uORF2 AUG codon eliminates ribosomal
stalling at the uORF2 termination site. Extracts of mock-infected HF or
HF infected with rTowne-1 or vEQ694-1 were analyzed by toeprint assay
using a primer that anneals to the 3' end of the UL4 transcript leader
as described previously (3).
|
|
uORF2
CMV has the same growth kinetics as wild-type
virus.
Our ability to isolate mutant viruses that lack uORF2
and overexpress gpUL4 demonstrates that the uORF2
regulatory mechanism is not essential for viral growth in cell
culture. To assess the consequences of the uORF2 mutation for
viral growth more carefully, we compared viral production after
infection of HF with our wild-type and mutant viruses. As shown in Fig.
5, vEQ694-1, vEQ694-2, and rTowne-1 all
produced similar titers of extracellular virus while CMV(Towne)
produced slightly less virus at each time point. Although we have not
investigated the basis for differences in production between CMV(Towne)
and the other viruses, these results might reflect unrecognized genetic
differences between CMV(Towne) and viruses that were generated from the
cosmids even though the cosmids were derived from an isolate of
CMV(Towne) (13). Regardless, these results suggest that
the uORF2 inhibitory mechanism does not have a discernible impact on
CMV replication kinetics in HF.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Kinetics of viral replication. After infection of
triplicate dishes of HF with the indicated viruses (multiplicity of
infection = 3), the cell medium was collected for determination of
titers, and fresh medium was added every 24 h. CMV titers
(means ± standard deviations) were determined by plaque assay.
Values below the dotted line represent titers of less than ~3
PFU/ml.
|
|
Discussion.
These studies demonstrate that the unusual
translational mechanism mediated by uORF2, previously characterized
using transient transfection, retrovirus-mediated gene transduction,
and cell-free translation assays (1, 3-7, 9, 17), also
functions to repress expression of the authentic UL4 gene contained in
its natural context in the viral genome. Previous studies also
identified polymorphisms within uORF2 that affect the inhibitory
function of uORF2 in naturally occurring clinical isolates of CMV
(1), suggesting that uORF2 is a principal determinant of
gpUL4 expression. However, because clinical isolates are genetically
heterogeneous, polymorphisms other than those within uORF2 could also
be responsible for differences in gpUL4 expression among isolates.
Therefore, this study of wild-type and uORF2 mutants in an isogenic
background was necessary to establish the role of uORF2 in governing
gpUL4 expression during viral infection. Our comparisons of wild-type and mutant viruses reveal that mutation of the uORF2 AUG codon in the
viral genome prevents ribosomes from stalling on the gpUL4 transcript
leader and results in early and abundant gpUL4 synthesis.
These results do not enable us to conclude whether the inhibitory
effect of the wild-type uORF2 is modulated during infection. The gpUL4
detected at low levels at late times in cells infected with CMV(Towne)
may result from constitutive low-level translation of the UL4 mRNA,
resulting in gradual accumulation of the gpUL4 protein. Alternatively,
the inhibitory effect of uORF2 may be circumvented late in infection.
If the uORF2 inhibitory mechanism is regulated, the derepressed state
apparently does not completely overcome the effect of the uORF since
the level of gpUL4 expression in wild-type-infected cells never
approaches that seen even at early times in cells infected with a
uORF2
mutant virus (Fig. 3). Other uORFs that
also act in a nascent-peptide-sequence-dependent manner, such as those
present in the mammalian S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase
and Neurospora crassa arg-2 genes, are known to be
conditional inhibitors of downstream translation (reviewed in
references 10 and 15). For example, ribosomal stalling at
the termination site of the uORF in arg-2 occurs only when arginine is abundant (19). Although ribosomal stalling at
the uORF2 termination site is detectable at early and late times after infection (3), the stalling event is transient, at least
in cell-free translation systems (6). Thus, further
studies of duration of ribosomal stalling at various times after
infection as well as of the rate of gpUL4 protein synthesis may be
useful for determining whether uORF2 acts in a regulated or
constitutive manner.
The present studies clearly show that uORF2 and its repressive effects
on gpUL4 are not required for viral replication in cell culture. This
conclusion is bolstered by the previous identification of
low-passage-number clinical isolates of CMV derived from bone marrow transplant recipients that overexpress gpUL4, likely as a
consequence of naturally occurring polymorphisms within uORF2 (1). As well, a recent analysis of uORF2 polymorphisms
among AIDS patients identified one case in which a uORF2 variant
predicted to express a high level of gpUL4 was the only genotype
detected in multiple tissue samples, suggesting that this variant was
in fact replicating in the patient (2). Together these
studies suggest that the uORF2 inhibitory mechanism and the resulting repression of gpUL4 expression are not required for viral growth either
in cell culture or in infected patients. The UL4 gene itself is also
not essential for CMV growth in cell culture (12, 16, 18,
20). Thus, the role of gpUL4 and of the uORF2 inhibitory mechanism remain enigmatic.
The fact that gpUL4 is a unique protein, homologues of which have not
been detected even in other members of the Betaherpesvirinae subfamily, limits our ability to determine why its expression is
repressed in most isolates or what cofactor(s) might regulate its
expression. One possibility is that inhibition of expression of gpUL4
confers a selective advantage on the virus at some site of infection or
in some patients. For example, if gpUL4 is a target of the immune
response (8), then limiting its expression may aid the
virus in evading the immune system, especially in immunocompetent hosts. However, this speculation does not explain why such an unusual
peptide-mediated ribosomal stalling mechanism has evolved to
down-regulate gpUL4 expression in most viral isolates. A better understanding of the mechanism and regulation of translation
termination may aid in elucidating the significance of the uORF2
regulatory strategy.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank George Kemble (Aviron) for providing the CMV(Towne)
cosmids and Jianhong Cao and Sohail Jarrahian (Fred Hutchinson Cancer
Research Center) for technical assistance and advice. We also
thank the Biotechnology, Biocomputing and Image Analysis Resources of the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center for
technical assistance.
This work was supported by Public Health Service grant AI-26672 from
the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Division
of Human Biology, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview
Ave. North
Mail Stop C2-023, P.O. Box 19024, Seattle, Washington
98109-1024. Phone (206) 667-5122. Fax: (206) 667-6523. E-mail:
ageballe{at}fhcrc.org.
Present address: Xenotope Diagnostics, Inc., Stanford, CA
94309-9588.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alderete, J. P.,
S. Jarrahian, and A. P. Geballe.
1999.
Translational effects of mutations and polymorphisms in a repressive upstream open reading frame of the human cytomegalovirus UL4 gene.
J. Virol.
73:8330-8337[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Bar, M.,
C. Shannon-Lowe, and A. P. Geballe.
2001.
Differentiation of human cytomegalovirus genotypes in immunocompromised patients on the basis of UL4 gene polymorphisms.
J. Infect. Dis.
183:218-225[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Cao, J., and A. P. Geballe.
1996.
Coding sequence-dependent ribosomal arrest at termination of translation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:603-608[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Cao, J., and A. P. Geballe.
1996.
Inhibition of nascent-peptide release at translation termination.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
16:7109-7114[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Cao, J., and A. P. Geballe.
1994.
Mutational analysis of the translational signal in the human cytomegalovirus gpUL4 (gp48) transcript leader by retroviral infection.
Virology
205:151-160[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Cao, J., and A. P. Geballe.
1998.
Ribosomal release without peptidyl tRNA hydrolysis at translation termination in a eukaryotic system.
RNA
4:181-188[Abstract].
|
| 7.
|
Cao, J., and A. P. Geballe.
1995.
Translational inhibition by a human cytomegalovirus upstream open reading frame despite inefficient utilization of its AUG codon.
J. Virol.
69:1030-1036[Abstract].
|
| 8.
|
Chang, C. P.,
D. H. Vesole,
J. Nelson,
M. B. Oldstone, and M. F. Stinski.
1989.
Identification and expression of a human cytomegalovirus early glycoprotein.
J. Virol.
63:3330-3337[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Degnin, C. R.,
M. R. Schleiss,
J. Cao, and A. P. Geballe.
1993.
Translational inhibition mediated by a short upstream open reading frame in the human cytomegalovirus gpUL4 (gp48) transcript.
J. Virol.
67:5514-5521[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Geballe, A. P., and M. S. Sachs.
2000.
Translational control by upstream open reading frames, p. 595-614.
In
W. B. Hershey, M. B. Matthews, and N. Sonenberg (ed.), Translational control. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 11.
|
Hartz, D.,
D. S. McPheeters,
R. Traut, and L. Gold.
1988.
Extension inhibition analysis of translation initiation complexes.
Methods Enzymol.
164:419-425[Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Hobom, U.,
W. Brune,
M. Messerle,
G. Hahn, and U. H. Koszinowski.
2000.
Fast screening procedures for random transposon libraries of cloned herpesvirus genomes: mutational analysis of human cytomegalovirus envelope glycoprotein genes.
J. Virol.
74:7720-7729[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Kemble, G.,
G. Duke,
R. Winter, and R. Spaete.
1996.
Defined large-scale alterations of the human cytomegalovirus genome constructed by cotransfection of overlapping cosmids.
J. Virol.
70:2044-2048[Abstract].
|
| 14.
|
Mocarski, E. S.
1996.
Cytomegaloviruses and their replication, p. 2447-2492.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, and P. M. Howley (ed.), Fields virology, 3rd ed. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 15.
|
Morris, D. R., and A. P. Geballe.
2000.
Upstream open reading frames as regulators of mRNA translation.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
20:8635-8642[Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Ripalti, A., and E. S. Mocarski.
1991.
The products of human cytomegalovirus genes UL1-UL7, including gp48, are dispensable for growth in cell culture, p. 57-62.
In
M. P. Landini (ed.), Progress in cytomegalovirus research. Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, N.Y.
|
| 17.
|
Schleiss, M. R.,
C. R. Degnin, and A. P. Geballe.
1991.
Translational control of human cytomegalovirus gp48 expression.
J. Virol.
65:6782-6789[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Takekoshi, M.,
F. Maeda-Takekoshi,
S. Ihara,
S. Sakuma, and Y. Watanabe.
1991.
Site-specific stable insertion into the human cytomegalovirus genome of a foreign gene under control of the SV40 promoter.
Gene
101:209-213[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Wang, Z., and M. S. Sachs.
1997.
Ribosome stalling is responsible for arginine-specific translational attenuation in Neurospora crassa.
Mol. Cell. Biol.
17:4904-4913[Abstract].
|
| 20.
|
Wolff, D.,
G. Jahn, and B. Plachter.
1993.
Generation and effective enrichment of selectable human cytomegalovirus mutants using site-directed insertion of the neo gene.
Gene
130:167-173[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, August 2001, p. 7188-7192, Vol. 75, No. 15
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.15.7188-7192.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.