Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, May 2001, p. 4649-4654, Vol. 75, No. 10
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.10.4649-4654.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Passive Transfer of Antibodies Protects
Immunocompetent and Immunodeficient Mice against Lethal Ebola Virus
Infection without Complete Inhibition of Viral Replication
Manisha
Gupta,1,2
Siddhartha
Mahanty,1
Mike
Bray,3
Rafi
Ahmed,2 and
Pierre E.
Rollin1,*
Special Pathogens Branch, Division of Viral
and Rickettsial Diseases, National Center for Infectious Diseases,
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention,1 and Emory Vaccine Center,
Emory University,2 Atlanta, Georgia, and
U.S. Army Research Institute for Infectious Diseases,
Frederick, Maryland3
Received 10 November 2000/Accepted 20 February 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
Ebola hemorrhagic fever is a severe, usually fatal illness
caused by Ebola virus, a member of the filovirus family. The use of
nonhomologous immune serum in animal studies and blood from survivors
in two anecdotal reports of Ebola hemorrhagic fever in humans has shown
promise, but the efficacy of these treatments has not been demonstrated
definitively. We have evaluated the protective efficacy of polyclonal
immune serum in a mouse model of Ebola virus infection. Our results
demonstrate that mice infected subcutaneously with live Ebola virus
survive infection and generate high levels of anti-Ebola virus
immunoglobulin G (IgG). Passive transfer of immune serum from these
mice before challenge protected upto 100% of naive mice against lethal
Ebola virus infection. Protection correlated with the level of
anti-Ebola virus IgG titers, and passive treatment with high-titer
antiserum was associated with a delay in the peak of viral replication.
Transfer of immune serum to SCID mice resulted in 100% survival after
lethal challenge with Ebola virus, indicating that antibodies alone can
protect from lethal disease. Thus antibodies suppress or delay viral
growth, provide protection against lethal Ebola virus infection, and
may not require participation of other immune components for protection.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Ebola hemorrhagic fever (EHF), a
severe, fatal illness caused by the Ebola virus, is characterized in
humans by a rapidly progressive multisystem failure. Significant
outbreaks of EHF have occurred in Zaire (1976 and 1995), Sudan (1976 and 1979), Gabon (1996), and most recently, Uganda (2000). Widespread
viral replication and lytic infection of various cells in the liver, kidneys, lungs, and spleen have been found in humans and experimental models of EHF using nonhuman primates (19). Because of the
high morbidity and mortality associated with EHF and the occurrence of
the disease in remote and poorly staffed and equipped health care
settings, there has been keen interest in the development of treatment
modalities that can be used in the field. Ribavirin, an antiviral drug
that is effective in the treatment of several viral hemorrhagic fevers
caused by members of the families Arenaviridae (4, 16,
17) and Bunyaviridae (5, 7, 22) appears to be ineffective against filoviruses (6, 9).
Convalescent-phase human serum has been successful in Argentine
hemorrhagic fever (14) and has been used in the treatment of Ebola virus infections with limited success. One laboratorian, accidentally exposed to Ebola virus, recovered after treatment with
immune serum (IS) and human interferon (3). Passive
immunotherapy with convalescent-phase human blood was also attempted
during the EHF outbreak in Kikwit in 1995 (18). Only one
of nine patients who received convalescent-phase blood died (versus
80% overall mortality in the hospital). However, in this uncontrolled
trial, most of the survivors received treatment more than 9 days after symptom onset, and several of them received additional blood
transfusions and better than usual medical care during their hospital
stay, making it difficult to evaluate the contribution of transfusions to their recovery (20). A panel of monoclonal antibodies
(MAbs) isolated from a phage library constructed from RNA isolated from bone marrow cells from survivors of the 1995 Kikwit Ebola virus outbreak was found to have a low frequency of anti-glycoprotein (GP)
monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) that neutralized Ebola virus in vitro
(15).
DNA vaccination studies with full-length constructs of Ebola GP and
secreted glycoprotein (sGP) have demonstrated protection against lethal
challenge with Ebola virus (21, 24). In these studies,
high titers of anti-GP and anti-sGP immunoglobulin G (IgG) were found
to correlate with protection, although small numbers of animals and
insufficient assessment of vaccination-induced T-cell responses make it
difficult to evaluate the contribution of antibodies (Abs) in the
protection. We used a mouse model of Ebola virus infection to
investigate mechanisms of Ab-mediated protection against Ebola virus.
Our data demonstrate that it is possible to confer protection against
fatal infection with Ebola virus by transfer of polyclonal IS. However,
Ab-mediated protection appears to act by delaying viral growth, thereby
providing a window of opportunity for host innate or cellular immune
mechanisms to act synergistically in viral clearance. Abs may also
completely inhibit viral growth and protect against lethal infection in
the absence of adaptive immune responses.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Viruses, cells, and media.
A mouse-adapted strain of Ebola
virus was derived from a 1976 isolate of the Zaire subtype by serial
passage through progressively older suckling mice, followed by plaque
purification as described elsewhere (2). Virus was
amplified to a titer of 5 × 107 PFU/ml by one passage
in Vero E6 (monkey kidney) cells. Vero E6 cells were obtained from the
American Type Culture Collection and propagated in modified Eagle's
medium supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum, glutamine (2 mM; Life
Technologies, Gaithersburg, Md.), streptomycin (100 µg/ml; Life
Technologies), and penicillin (100 U/ml; Life Technologies). All
infected samples and animals were handled under maximum containment in
the biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) laboratory at the Centers of Disease
Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga. All samples from the BSL-4
laboratory were gamma irradiated (5 × 106 rads)
before further processing in BSL-2 and -3 conditions.
Quantitation of virus.
Virus was titrated by a standard
plaque assay on Vero E6 cells (2). Briefly,
virus-containing Vero E6 supernatants or samples were serially diluted
(1:10) and incubated for 1 h at 37°C on confluent monolayers of
Vero E6 cells in 35-mm-diameter-well plates. Three milliliters of 2×
Basal Eagle's medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with 5% fetal
bovine serum, antibiotics, HEPES, and L-glutamine mixed
1:1 with 2% SeaKem agarose (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) was added to each
well and allowed to incubate for 6 days at 37°C (until the appearance
of cytopathic effect). A second layer of basal Eagle's medium-agarose
medium (2 ml) containing 2% neutral red (Life Technologies) was added,
and plates were reincubated at 37°C for a another 24 to 48 h for
to allow for the development of plaques.
Viral antigen assay.
Levels of circulating Ebola virus
antigens (Ags) in sera and organs were estimated by using a capture
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) as described
(10). Briefly, Flexiplates (Becton Dickinson, Bedford,
Mass.) were coated overnight at 4°C with mouse ascites fluid (control
wells) or wells containing a mixture of seven mouse MAbs raised against
viral protein VP40, GP, and nucleoprotein (NP) from Zaire 1976 and
Sudan 1976 strains of Ebola virus. Tissue and serum samples were
serially diluted in 5% skim milk in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH
7.2) with 0.1% Tween 20 (blocking buffer) and incubated at 37°C for
1 h. Captured Ag was detected by polyclonal anti-Ebola Virus Zaire
serum produced in rabbits, followed by a goat anti-rabbit horseradish
peroxidase conjugate and ABTS
[2,2'-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)] substrate
(both from Kirkegaard & Perry, Gaithersburg, Md.). The optical density
at 410 nm (OD410) of each sample in control wells (coated
with normal mouse ascites fluid) was subtracted from the OD of the same
sample in the corresponding well coated with anti-Ebola virus MAbs to
derive a corrected OD. The highest dilution of sample that resulted in
a corrected OD of
0.1 was designated the viral Ag titer of the
sample. Viral Ag titers were found to have a log-linear relationship
with PFU values (data not shown) for values of
300 PFU. We used viral
Ag titers to compare levels of virus in sera and tissues.
Anti-Ebola virus IgG detection by ELISA.
Anti-Ebola virus
IgG titers were determined by ELISA as previously described (11,
12). Briefly, 96-well Falcon Flexiplates (Becton Dickinson) were
coated overnight (4°C) with Ebola virus-infected or uninfected
(control) Vero E6 cell lysates. Sera diluted serially in blocking
buffer were incubated for 1 h at 37°C, and bound IgG was
detected by addition of an anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase conjugate
(Biosource International, Camarillo, Calif.) followed by ABTS substrate
(Kirkegaard & Perry). Corrected OD410 values were
calculated as done for the Ag assay above, and IgG titers were assigned
for the highest serum dilution resulting in a corrected OD of
0.1.
Mice.
Six- to eight-week-old BALB/c male and female mice
were obtained from commercial suppliers (Jackson Laboratory, Bar
Harbor, Maine; Harlan Sprague-Dawley, Indianapolis, Ind.). T- and
B-cell-deficient BALB/cj (SCID) mice aged 6 to 8 weeks were obtained
from the Jackson Laboratory. All mice were housed under pathogen-free
conditions and allowed to acclimate to the BSL-4 laboratory for 3 to 4 days before use in our experiments.
Immune serum.
To generate anti-Ebola virus IS, mice were
infected subcutaneously (s.c.) with 100 PFU of Ebola virus followed by
intraperitoneal (i.p.) rechallenge with 104 to
106 PFU of Ebola virus 3 weeks later. One to three weeks
after i.p. challenge, sera were collected, pooled,
irradiated
(5 × 106 rads), and titrated for IgG by ELISA. The
pooled serum from these mice had IgG titers ranging from 20,000 to
1,600,000.
Purification of IgG from IS.
Anti-Ebola virus IgG was
purified from IS with a protein G-Sepharose affinity column (Pierce,
Rockford, Ill.) following the procedure recommended by the
manufacturer. Purified IgG was dialyzed against PBS (pH 7.2) and filter
sterilized for injection. Anti-Ebola virus titers were determined by
ELISA as described above. The titers of purified IgG ranged from 20,000 to 1,600,000.
Infection procedure.
Lethal Ebola virus infections were
produced by i.p. inoculation of 10 to 103 PFU mouse-adapted
Ebola virus (in 0.2 ml of PBS); for nonlethal infections, 100 PFU of
mouse-adapted Ebola virus (in 0.2 ml of PBS) was given s.c. as
previously described (2). After infection, mice were caged
in groups of five, weighed daily or on alternate days, and observed for
survival for at least 21 days. For serum transfer experiments, mice
were given 1 ml of
-irradiated, pooled IS, purified IgG from IS, or
normal mouse serum (NMS) i.p. 1 day before or after i.p. challenge with
Ebola virus. In some experiments, blood samples were collected via
retro-orbital phlebotomy for determination of Ab and viral Ag titers
prior to i.p. challenge with Ebola virus.
Statistics.
Comparisons of anti-Ebola virus Ab and Ag titers
between experimental groups were done by Student's t test
on log-transformed data. Animal weights and survival data were compared
by analysis of variance. Differences between groups for categorical
data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. P values of
<0.05 were designated the cutoff for statistical significance.
 |
RESULTS |
Mice immunized s.c. with live Ebola virus have high levels of
anti-Ebola IgG and are protected against lethal rechallenge.
All
adult BALB/c infected i.p. with the mouse-adapted Ebola virus died as
reported previously (2). Signs of disease in i.p.-infected
mice appeared from day 3 onward, when mice begin to lose weight and
exhibit ruffled fur, huddling, and inactivity progressing to death
between 6 and 8 days postinfection. In marked contrast, mice challenged
s.c. showed no signs of illness, and all survived (data not shown).
Furthermore, s.c.-infected mice (hereafter referred to as immune mice)
were completely protected against i.p. rechallenge with doses as high
as 106 PFU per mouse given 3 weeks after the primary
infection (data not shown). Naive mice infected i.p. had a progressive
increase in levels of viral Ag in their serum, spleen, liver, and
kidneys (Fig. 1A) from day 2 postinfection until death, in contrast to immune mice, which had no
detectable Ag in these tissues after i.p. challenge. Immune mice had
high titers of anti-Ebola virus IgG Abs (range, 20 to 50,000) that were
further elevated up to fourfold by i.p. rechallenge with Ebola virus
(Fig. 1B). Anti-Ebola virus Ab titers declined from 100,000 to 100 by
32 weeks postinfection (data not shown). On Western blots, sera from
immune mice detected bands representing GP, NP, VP35, VP24, and VP40
proteins, with a weaker recognition of GP compared to the other viral
proteins (data not shown). In contrast, naive mice infected i.p. had
undetectable levels of anti-Ebola virus IgG by ELISA until death around
day 6 postinfection (Fig. 1B). These data are in agreement with
patterns of Ab responses to Ebola virus reported for human disease
(1, 11) in which survivors were found to have high titers
of anti-Ebola virus IgG in the convalescent phase, whereas fatal
disease was associated with low levels or absence of anti-Ebola virus
Abs.

View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Subcutaneous infection with Ebola virus confers
protection against lethal challenge in a mouse model. (A) Viral Ag
levels in peripheral tissues and serum of naive ( ) and immune ( )
BALB/c mice following i.p. challenge. Three mice from each group were
sacrificed on days 2, 4, and 6. Viral Ag levels measured by ELISA (see
Materials and Methods) are shown for serum
( ), spleens
(···), and livers ( ). (B) Anti-Ebola virus IgG titers measured by
ELISA in naive ( ) and immune ( ) mice following i.p. challenge
(n = 3 per time point). Gray regions indicate the limit
of detection in the Ab and Ag ELISAs.
|
|
Passive transfer of IS or IgG protects mice against lethal Ebola
virus infection.
Studies of Ebola virus, infection in guinea pigs
(24), nonhuman primates (9), and humans
(1, 18) suggest an important role of Abs in protective
immunity. However, studies using animal models to date have used
nonhomologous serum in passive transfer experiments. We took advantage
of the immune status of s.c.-infected mice to assess the ability of
homologous IS to protect against lethal i.p. challenge with Ebola
virus. Mice infected s.c. had high levels of anti-Ebola virus IgG that
were boosted by i.p. challenge (Fig. 1B). Pooled serum from these mice
was transferred to naive mice prior to lethal challenge with Ebola
virus to assess the protective efficacy of IS. Mice that received NMS
lost 15 to 25% of their original body weight during the course of
infection, and all died 6 to 8 days postinfection (Fig. 2A and
B). Immune serum recipients also showed
signs of illness characterized by ruffling of fur and weight loss (10 to 15% of original body weight), but these changes occurred later than
in NMS recipients, and a proportion of IS recipients recovered by days
12 to 14 postinfection (Fig. 2B). Fifty-six percent (18 of 32) of the
mice that received IS survived i.p. infection with >30 times the 50%
lethal dose of Ebola virus (Fig. 2A). In nine experiments done to
evaluate the efficacy of immune serum transfer in protection against
i.p. infection with Ebola virus, the survival among immune serum
recipients ranged from 43 to 100%.


View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Protection of mice following passive transfer of IS
correlates with anti-Ebola virus IgG titers. Pooled IS from
s.c.-infected mice was irradiated, titered for anti-Ebola virus IgG
(mean titer, 25,600), and administered i.p. (1 ml/mouse) 1 day before
an i.p. challenge with a mouse-adapted Ebola virus (10 PFU/mouse).
Irradiated NMS was administered (1 ml/mouse i.p.) to age-matched mice
as controls. Circulating IgG titers estimated 1 day after serum
transfer ranged from 100 to 6,400 in IS recipients. (A) Survival of
mice that received NMS (n = 32; ) or IS
(n = 32; ) before challenge with mouse-adapted Ebola
virus. (B) Weight change in NMS (n = 32; ) and IS
(n = 20; ) recipients that survived Ebola virus
challenge during the course of infection. Each point represents the
mean and standard error of the calculated percent prechallenge (day 0)
weight for each mouse. (C) Survival of mice that received NMS
(n = 19; ) or IS resulting in IgG titers of 1:100 to
1:400 (n = 6; ), 1:1,600 (n = 4;
), or 1:6,400 (n = 9; ).
|
|
The variability in survival among IS recipients was further
investigated by determination of anti-Ebola virus IgG titers resulting
from serum transfer. Survival after IS transfer correlated with
anti-Ebola IgG titers. Thus, serum titers below 100 to 400 resulted
in
no survivors among six mice (Fig.
2C), whereas titers of 1,600
resulted
in a delay in death (mean time to death, 10.5 days in
IS recipients
versus 7 days in NMS recipients) and a 25% survival
(one of four mice
surviving) (Fig.
2C). In a representative experiment
(Fig.
2C),
posttransfer serum titers of

6,400 provided the highest
protection,
89% (8 of 9 mice), with the only death occurring on
day 9. Further, in
a different experiment, all of five IS recipients
with anti-Ebola virus
IgG titers of >6,400, survived a lethal
challenge with 10
3
PFU (30,000 times the 50% lethal dose) of Ebola virus. IS recipients
that survived i.p. Ebola virus infection remained healthy and
had no
detectable viral Ags by day 25 postinfection (data not
shown), and
these survivors had anti-Ebola virus IgG titers (25,600
to 409,600)
that were higher than those before challenge (100
to 6,400). IS
recipients that survived the first i.p. infection
were able to resist a
subsequent lethal challenge with Ebola virus
on day 30 postinfection
(data not shown), indicating the development
of protective immunity as
seen with s.c. challenge with Ebola
virus (Fig.
1). In repeated
experiments we found that the titer
required for protection against
lethal infection with Ebola varied
between different batches of pooled
IS; however, in each experiment
we were able to determine a titer above
which complete protection
was
achieved.
To further confirm that the protection associated with IS is Ab
mediated, we tested the protective efficacy of IgG purified
from IS in
naive mice. As shown in Fig.
3, 40% (two
of five) mice
that received purified IgG resulting in a circulating
titer of
<100,000 survived, compared to 75% (three of four) of IS
recipients
with anti-Ebola virus Ab titers of

100,000. The percentage
of
survivors increased with increasing posttransfer titers. Thus,
66%
(two of three) of mice with titers of >400,000 survived, compared
to
75% (three of four) of IS recipients with similar titers.
Nevertheless,
these data indicate that at equivalent titers, IgG
provided levels
protection similar to those associated with IS.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Transfer of purified IgG from IS protects mice from
lethal Ebola virus infection. Shown is the survival of mice that
received NMS (n = 12; ) IS, with resulting titers of
1:100,000 (n = 4; ) or 1:200,000 (n = 4; ), or purified IgG with titers of 1:100,000 (n = 5; ) or
1:200,000 (n = 3; ).
|
|
The ability of IS to protect mice after infection was also tested. IS
provided complete protection from lethal Ebola virus
infection
(survival of all of six IS recipients, versus none of
six NMS
recipients) when given 1 day postinfection. In this experiment,
all IS
recipients had posttransfer serum anti-Ebola virus IgG
titers of

6,400.
Ab-associated protection does not require complete suppression of
viral replication.
Ab-mediated protection in this model could be
operating either by complete inhibition of viral replication or by
simply delaying the rate of viral growth. To investigate these
possibilities, we determined the relationship between viral Ag titers
and survival in IS recipients. Two of nine IS recipients had high
levels of viral Ags in serum (range, 640 to 2,560 [Fig.
4]) similar to those in all of nine NMS
recipients (range, 640 to 2,560) and died by day 7 postinfection. These
IS recipients also had lower anti-Ebola virus Ab titers (1:400),
consistent with earlier results (Fig. 2C). The surviving seven IS
recipients had undetectable serum Ag titers on day 4 postinfection. In
three of these mice, the titers peaked on day 8 postinfection (mean
titer, 3,680; range, 160 to 10,240) and returned to undetectable levels
by day 15 (Fig. 4), whereas the remaining four survivors had no
detectable viral Ag in serum at any time point tested. The delayed peak
of viral antigenemia suggests that anti-Ebola virus Ab inhibits or
retards viral growth in at least a proportion (three of seven [43%])
of mice, and the failure to detect viral Ag indicates complete
neutralization of the virus in the remaining four survivors.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Recipients of IS have delayed viral Ag kinetics compared
to recipients of NMS following Ebola virus infection. Viral Ag levels
were measured by ELISA on days 4, 8, and 15 after i.p. infection with
10 PFU of Ebola virus. All of nine NMS recipients ( ) died by day 8. Two of nine IS recipients with anti-Ebola virus Ab titers of 1:400
( ) also
died by day 8. The remaining seven IS recipients, with Ab titers of
1:1,600 to 1:6,400 ( ), survived beyond 25 days. The gray region
indicates the limit of detection of Ag ELISAs.
|
|
Immunodeficient mice are protected against lethal Ebola virus
infection by IS transfer.
The experiments above with transfer of
IS in immunocompetent mice suggested that nonhumoral adaptive immune
responses may participate in protection against Ebola virus infection.
We next investigated the ability of IS alone to protect against lethal Ebola virus infection by transferring IS to T- and B-cell-deficient (SCID) mice. All SCID mice that received IS had high titers of anti-Ebola virus IgG (1:400,000) 1 day after the transfer. All of five
SCID mice that received IS survived lethal challenge, whereas none of
five recipients of NMS survived (Fig. 5).
None of the IS recipients showed any sign of illness during the 21-day observation period. Thus, IS alone had the ability to confer protection against lethal Ebola virus infection in the absence of the adaptive host immune system.

View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
IS with high titers of anti-Ebola virus IgG alone is
sufficient to protect immunodeficient mice from lethal Ebola virus
infection. The graph shows the survival of SCID mice administered NMS
(n = 5; ) or IS with resulting titers of 1:400,000
(n = 5; ) and were challenged with a lethal dose of
Ebola virus (10 PFU/mouse i.p.) 1 day after serum transfer.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
The mouse model of Ebola virus infection used in our experiments
has some features that resemble human infections with Ebola virus. Mice
infected s.c. clear the virus and generate high titers of anti-Ebola
virus IgG (Fig. 1), as do human survivors (1, 11). In
contrast, the disease course in mice infected i.p. resembles that in
humans who die, who have high levels of Ebola virus in the circulation
and low levels or absence of anti-Ebola IgG at the time of death
(1). This dichotomy in the outcome of Ebola virus
infection is not seen in other animal models. In guinea pigs and
nonhuman primates, inoculation with adapted or naturally lethal live
virus results in death irrespective of the route of infection
(19). Thus, other animal models do not allow the
development of high Ab titers. These advantages over other animal
models and similarities with human cases encouraged us to use a mouse
model to investigate the role of Abs in protection against Ebola virus infection.
Intraperitoneal infection of mice with the mouse-adapted Ebola virus
resulted in a predictable and progressive rise in viral Ag leading to
death in 6 to 8 days. However, IS transfer in mice before and 1 day
after Ebola virus challenge protected them from lethality. Our data are
supported by a recent study by Wilson et al. that demonstrated that a
panel of MAbs that recognized epitopes from Ebola virus GP1 and sGP
provide protection from lethal challenge with Ebola virus in mice at
levels similar to our experiments (23). However, in this
study it was not clear whether protection in recipients was mediated by
immediate neutralization of challenged virus or viral replication
occurred initially and was followed by clearance.
Our study points to a complex role of Abs in protection against Ebola
virus. The protection observed is clearly mediated by the IgG fraction
of serum (Fig. 3). Our data also demonstrate directly that there is
complete clearance of virus by day 15 postinfection (Fig. 4). The
protective efficacy of Abs appears to be titer dependent. Although
there was significant variability between the protective titer of
different batches of IS in our experiments, in general, serum transfer
resulting in titers of
6,400 provided at least partial protection,
and posttransfer titers of
400,000 resulted in complete protection,
even in the absence of adaptive host immunity.
Control of the virus in animals that receive IS could be attained
either by complete suppression of viral replication, e.g., by binding
and neutralization of the virus, or by a partial inhibition of
replication, allowing other immune mechanisms to clear the virus. The
observation that the peak of viral antigenemia occurs later in IS
recipients that survive indicates that Abs limit but do not completely
block viral replication in a proportion of animals, although all these
mice cleared the virus by day 15 postinfection. In the remaining
survivors, however, there was no detectable viral Ag at any of the
sampling time points. In these mice, viral replication appears to be
completely suppressed by the transferred IS. Thus, it appears that Abs
can induce protection by both means, complete neutralization and
inhibition of viral replication. It is possible that the mechanism that
dominates is determined by the Ab titer in the recipient. Recipients
with the highest titers can clear the virus even in the absence of
adaptive immunity and may neutralize virions early in the course of
infection, as demonstrated by the survival of SCID mice, while those
with lower (but protective) titers have a delayed kinetics of viral
growth allowing other factors, such as adaptive immune responses, to
clear the virus. Interestingly, mice protected by passive
immunotherapy, on exposure to the virus, attained protection against
subsequent lethal rechallenge with Ebola virus (data not shown).
In the mouse model, high-titered homologous IS provides significant
protection against lethal infection with Ebola virus, but the
mechanisms underlying Ab-mediated protection, particularly the
relationship between Ab-mediated immunity and viral clearance by
adaptive immune responses, need further exploration. Our data suggest
that the use of convalescent-phase or immune serum as potential therapy
for Ebola virus infections warrants further investigation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank T. Ksiazek for antibodies and advice on the antigen and
antibody ELISAs for Ebola virus, G. Reynolds and L. Pezzanite for
assistance in animal handling, C. J. Peters and Kaja Murali Krishna for
critical comments and helpful suggestions, and J. O'Connor for
editorial assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Special
Pathogens Branch, DVRD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
Mailstop G14, 1600 Clifton Rd. N. E., Atlanta, GA 30333. Phone:
(404) 639-1124. Fax: (404) 639-1118. E-mail: pyr3{at}cdc.gov.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Baize, S.,
E. M. Leroy,
M. C. Georges-Courbot,
M. Capron,
J. Lansoud-Soukate,
P. Debre,
S. P. Fisher-Hoch,
J. B. McCormick, and A. J. Georges.
1999.
Defective humoral responses and extensive intravascular apoptosis are associated with fatal outcome in Ebola virus-infected patients.
Nat. Med.
5:423-426[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Bray, M.,
K. Davis,
T. Geisbert,
C. Schmaljohn, and J. Huggins.
1998.
A mouse model for evaluation of prophylaxis and therapy of Ebola hemorrhagic fever, J.
Infect. Dis.
178:651-661. (Erratum, 178:1553.)
|
| 3.
|
Emond, R. T.,
B. Evans,
E. T. Bowen, and G. Lloyd.
1977.
A case of Ebola virus infection.
Br. Med. J.
2:541-544.
|
| 4.
|
Enria, D. A.,
A. M. Briggiler,
S. Levis,
D. Vallejos,
J. I. Maiztegui, and P. G. Canonico.
1987.
Tolerance and antiviral effect of ribavirin in patients with Argentine hemorrhagic fever.
Antiviral Res.
7:353-359[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Fisher-Hoch, S. P.,
J. A. Khan,
S. Rehman,
S. Mirza,
M. Khurshid, and J. B. McCormick.
1995.
Crimean Congo-haemorrhagic fever treated with oral ribavirin.
Lancet
346:472-475[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 6.
|
Huggins, J. W.
1989.
Prospects for treatment of viral hemorrhagic fevers with ribavirin, a broad-spectrum antiviral drug.
Rev. Infect. Dis.
11(Suppl. 4):S750-S761.
|
| 7.
|
Huggins, J. W.,
C. M. Hsiang,
T. M. Cosgriff,
M. Y. Guang,
J. I. Smith,
Z. O. Wu,
J. W. LeDuc,
Z. M. Zheng,
J. M. Meegan, and Q. N. Wang.
1991.
Prospective, double-blind, concurrent, placebo-controlled clinical trial of intravenous ribavirin therapy of hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome.
J. Infect. Dis.
164:1119-1127[Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Jahrling, P. B.,
J. Geisbert,
J. R. Swearengen,
G. P. Jaax,
T. Lewis,
J. W. Huggins,
J. J. Schmidt,
J. W. LeDuc, and C. J. Peters.
1996.
Passive immunization of Ebola virus-infected cynomolgus monkeys with immunoglobulin from hyperimmune horses.
Arch. Virol. Suppl.
11:135-140[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Jahrling, P. B.,
T. W. Geisbert,
J. B. Geisbert,
J. R. Swearengen,
M. Bray,
N. K. Jaax,
J. W. Huggins,
J. W. LeDuc, and C. J. Peters.
1999.
Evaluation of immune globulin and recombinant interferon-alpha2b for treatment of experimental Ebola virus infections.
J. Infect. Dis.
179(Suppl. 1):S224-S234.
|
| 10.
|
Ksiazek, T. G.,
P. E. Rollin,
P. B. Jahrling,
E. Johnson,
D. W. Dalgard, and C. J. Peters.
1992.
Enzyme immunosorbent assay for Ebola virus antigens in tissues of infected primates.
J. Clin. Microbiol.
30:947-950[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Ksiazek, T. G.,
P. E. Rollin,
A. J. Williams,
D. S. Bressler,
M. L. Martin,
R. Swanepoel,
F. J. Burt,
P. A. Leman,
A. S. Khan,
A. K. Rowe,
R. Mukunu,
A. Sanchez, and C. J. Peters.
1999.
Clinical virology of Ebola hemorrhagic fever (EHF): virus, virus antigen, and IgG and IgM antibody findings among EHF patients in Kikwit, Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1995.
J. Infect. Dis.
179(Suppl. 1):S177-S187.
|
| 12.
|
Ksiazek, T. G.,
C. P. West,
P. E. Rollin,
P. B. Jahrling, and C. J. Peters.
1999.
ELISA for the detection of antibodies to Ebola viruses.
J. Infect. Dis.
179(Suppl. 1):S192-S198.
|
| 13.
|
Kudoyarova-Zubavichene, N. M.,
N. N. Sergeyev,
A. A. Chepurnov, and S. V. Netesov.
1999.
Preparation and use of hyperimmune serum for prophylaxis and therapy of Ebola virus infections.
J. Infect. Dis.
179(Suppl. 1):S218-S223.
|
| 14.
|
Maiztegui, J. I.,
N. J. Fernandez, and A. J. de Damilano.
1979.
Efficacy of immune plasma in treatment of Argentine haemorrhagic fever and association between treatment and a late neurological syndrome.
Lancet
2:1216-1217[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Maruyama, T.,
L. L. Rodriguez,
P. B. Jahrling,
A. Sanchez,
A. S. Khan,
S. T. Nichol,
C. J. Peters,
P. W. Parren, and D. R. Burton.
1999.
Ebola virus can be effectively neutralized by antibody produced in natural human infection.
J. Virol.
73:6024-6030[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
McCormick, J. B.,
I. J. King,
P. A. Webb,
C. L. Scribner,
R. B. Craven,
K. M. Johnson,
L. H. Elliott, and R. Belmont-Williams.
1986.
Lassa fever. Effective therapy with ribavirin.
N Engl. J. Med.
314:20-26[Abstract].
|
| 17.
|
McKee, K. T., Jr.,
J. W. Huggins,
C. J. Trahan, and B. G. Mahlandt.
1988.
Ribavirin prophylaxis and therapy for experimental Argentine hemorrhagic fever.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
32:1304-1309[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Mupapa, K.,
M. Massamba,
K. Kibadi,
K. Kuvula,
A. Bwaka,
M. Kipasa,
R. Colebunders, and J. J. Muyembe-Tamfum.
1999.
Treatment of Ebola hemorrhagic fever with blood transfusions from convalescent patients. International Scientific and Technical Committee.
J. Infect. Dis.
179(Suppl. 1):S18-S23.
|
| 19.
|
Peters, C. J.,
A. Sanchez,
P. E. Rollin, et al.
1996.
Filoviridae: Marburg and Ebola viruses, p. 1161-75.
In
B. N. Fields, D. N. Knipe, P. M. Howley, et al. (ed.), Virology, 3rd ed. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 20.
|
Sadek, R. F.,
A. S. Khan,
G. Stevens,
C. J. Peters, and T. G. Ksiazek.
1999.
Ebola hemorrhagic fever, Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1995: determinants of survival.
J. Infect. Dis.
179(Suppl. 1):S24-S27.
|
| 21.
|
Vanderzanden, L.,
M. Bray,
D. Fuller,
T. Roberts,
D. Custer,
K. Spik,
P. Jahrling,
J. Huggins,
A. Schmaljohn, and C. Schmaljohn.
1998.
DNA vaccines expressing either the GP or NP genes of Ebola virus protect mice from lethal challenge.
Virology
246:134-144[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 22.
|
van de Wal, B. W.,
J. R. Joubert,
P. J. van Eeden, and J. B. King.
1985.
A nosocomial outbreak of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever at Tygerberg Hospital. Part IV. Preventive and prophylactic measures.
S. Afr. Med. J.
68:729-732[Medline].
|
| 23.
|
Wilson, J. A.,
M. Hevey,
R. Bakken,
S. Guest,
M. Bray,
A. L. Schmaljohn, and M. K. Hart.
2000.
Epitopes involved in antibody-mediated protection from Ebola virus.
Science
287:1664-1666[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Xu, L.,
A. Sanchez,
Z. Yang,
S. R. Zaki,
E. G. Nabel,
S. T. Nichol, and G. J. Nabel.
1998.
Immunization for Ebola virus infection.
Nat. Med.
4:37-42[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, May 2001, p. 4649-4654, Vol. 75, No. 10
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.10.4649-4654.2001
Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Halfmann, P., Ebihara, H., Marzi, A., Hatta, Y., Watanabe, S., Suresh, M., Neumann, G., Feldmann, H., Kawaoka, Y.
(2009). Replication-Deficient Ebolavirus as a Vaccine Candidate. J. Virol.
83: 3810-3815
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Hartman, A. L., Bird, B. H., Towner, J. S., Antoniadou, Z.-A., Zaki, S. R., Nichol, S. T.
(2008). Inhibition of IRF-3 Activation by VP35 Is Critical for the High Level of Virulence of Ebola Virus. J. Virol.
82: 2699-2704
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dowling, W., Thompson, E., Badger, C., Mellquist, J. L., Garrison, A. R., Smith, J. M., Paragas, J., Hogan, R. J., Schmaljohn, C.
(2007). Influences of Glycosylation on Antigenicity, Immunogenicity, and Protective Efficacy of Ebola Virus GP DNA Vaccines. J. Virol.
81: 1821-1837
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Enterlein, S., Warfield, K. L., Swenson, D. L., Stein, D. A., Smith, J. L., Gamble, C. S., Kroeker, A. D., Iversen, P. L., Bavari, S., Muhlberger, E.
(2006). VP35 Knockdown Inhibits Ebola Virus Amplification and Protects against Lethal Infection in Mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
50: 984-993
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Olinger, G. G., Bailey, M. A., Dye, J. M., Bakken, R., Kuehne, A., Kondig, J., Wilson, J., Hogan, R. J., Hart, M. K.
(2005). Protective Cytotoxic T-Cell Responses Induced by Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis Virus Replicons Expressing Ebola Virus Proteins. J. Virol.
79: 14189-14196
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Warfield, K. L., Olinger, G., Deal, E. M., Swenson, D. L., Bailey, M., Negley, D. L., Hart, M. K., Bavari, S.
(2005). Induction of Humoral and CD8+ T Cell Responses Are Required for Protection against Lethal Ebola Virus Infection. J. Immunol.
175: 1184-1191
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gupta, M., Greer, P., Mahanty, S., Shieh, W.-J., Zaki, S. R., Ahmed, R., Rollin, P. E.
(2005). CD8-Mediated Protection against Ebola Virus Infection Is Perforin Dependent. J. Immunol.
174: 4198-4202
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gupta, M., Mahanty, S., Greer, P., Towner, J. S., Shieh, W.-J., Zaki, S. R., Ahmed, R., Rollin, P. E.
(2004). Persistent Infection with Ebola Virus under Conditions of Partial Immunity. J. Virol.
78: 958-967
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Warfield, K. L., Bosio, C. M., Welcher, B. C., Deal, E. M., Mohamadzadeh, M., Schmaljohn, A., Aman, M. J., Bavari, S.
(2003). Ebola virus-like particles protect from lethal Ebola virus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
100: 15889-15894
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sullivan, N., Yang, Z.-Y., Nabel, G. J.
(2003). Ebola Virus Pathogenesis: Implications for Vaccines and Therapies. J. Virol.
77: 9733-9737
[Full Text]
-
HAN, S. Z., ALFANO, M. C., PSOTER, W. J., REKOW, E. D.
(2003). Bioterrorism and catastrophe response: A quick-reference guide to resources. Journal of the American Dental Association
134: 745-752
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Takada, A., Feldmann, H., Stroeher, U., Bray, M., Watanabe, S., Ito, H., McGregor, M., Kawaoka, Y.
(2002). Identification of Protective Epitopes on Ebola Virus Glycoprotein at the Single Amino Acid Level by Using Recombinant Vesicular Stomatitis Viruses. J. Virol.
77: 1069-1074
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Rao, M., Bray, M., Alving, C. R., Jahrling, P., Matyas, G. R.
(2002). Induction of Immune Responses in Mice and Monkeys to Ebola Virus after Immunization with Liposome-Encapsulated Irradiated Ebola Virus: Protection in Mice Requires CD4+ T Cells. J. Virol.
76: 9176-9185
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Borio, L., Inglesby, T., Peters, C. J., Schmaljohn, A. L., Hughes, J. M., Jahrling, P. B., Ksiazek, T., Johnson, K. M., Meyerhoff, A., O'Toole, T., Ascher, M. S., Bartlett, J., Breman, J. G., Eitzen, E. M. Jr, Hamburg, M., Hauer, J., Henderson, D. A., Johnson, R. T., Kwik, G., Layton, M., Lillibridge, S., Nabel, G. J., Osterholm, M. T., Perl, T. M., Russell, P., Tonat, K., for the Working Group on Civilian Biodefense,
(2002). Hemorrhagic Fever Viruses as Biological Weapons: Medical and Public Health Management. JAMA
287: 2391-2405
[Abstract]
[Full Text]