Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, May 2001, p. 4519-4527, Vol. 75, No. 10
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.10.4519-4527.2001
Identification and Characterization of the
Helix-Destabilizing Activity of Rotavirus Nonstructural Protein
NSP2
Zenobia F.
Taraporewala and
John T.
Patton*
Laboratory of Infectious Diseases, National
Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of
Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892
Received 30 October 2000/Accepted 20 February 2001
 |
ABSTRACT |
The rotavirus nonstructural protein NSP2 self-assembles into
homomultimers, binds single-stranded RNA nonspecifically, possesses a
Mg2+-dependent nucleoside triphosphatase (NTPase) activity,
and is a component of replication intermediates. Because these
properties are characteristics of known viral helicases, we examined
the possibility that this was also an activity of NSP2 by using a strand displacement assay and purified bacterially expressed protein. The results revealed that, under saturating concentrations, NSP2 disrupted both DNA-RNA and RNA-RNA duplexes; hence, the protein possesses helix-destabilizing activity. However, unlike typical helicases, NSP2 required neither a divalent cation nor a nucleotide energy source for helix destabilization. Further characterization showed that NSP2 displayed no polarity in destabilizing a partial duplex. In addition, helix destabilization by NSP2 was found to proceed
cooperatively and rapidly. The presence of Mg2+ and other
divalent cations inhibited by approximately one-half the activity of
NSP2, probably due to the increased stability of the duplex substrate
brought on by the cations. In contrast, under conditions where NSP2
functions as an NTPase, its helix-destabilizing activity was less
sensitive to the presence of Mg2+, suggesting that in the
cellular environment the two activities associated with the protein,
helix destabilization and NTPase, may function together. Although
distinct from typical helicases, the helix-destabilizing activity of
NSP2 is quite similar to that of the
NS protein of reovirus and to
the single-stranded DNA-binding proteins (SSBs) involved in
double-stranded DNA replication. The presence of SSB-like nonstructural
proteins in two members of the family Reoviridae suggests a
common mechanism of unwinding viral mRNA prior to packaging and
subsequent minus-strand RNA synthesis.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Rotaviruses, members of the
family Reoviridae, are the major cause of severe
gastroenteritis in infants and young children (16). The
viruses are icosahedrons made up of three concentric layers of protein
and contain a genome composed of eleven segments of double-stranded RNA
(dsRNA) (8). The outermost capsid layer consists of the
spike protein, VP4, and the glycoprotein, VP7, and the intermediate
layer is formed by VP6 trimers (34). The innermost layer
consists of 60 dimers of VP2, arranged as a T=1 icosahedron
(21). Positioned at the vertices of the VP2 icosahedron are one copy each of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP), VP1, and
the capping enzyme, VP3 (21). Together, VP1, VP2, VP3, and
the dsRNA genome make up the core of the virion.
Double-layered particles, representing cores surrounded by VP6, have an
associated transcriptase activity that catalyzes the synthesis of viral
mRNAs (6, 22). The mRNAs not only direct protein synthesis
but also serve as templates for the synthesis of minus-strand RNA to
form dsRNA (5). Minus-strand synthesis occurs soon after
or as viral mRNAs are packaged into core-like replication intermediates
(RIs) (9, 32). In addition to the core proteins, several
lines of evidence suggest that the nonstructural protein NSP2 is
involved in mRNA packaging and/or minus-strand synthesis: (i) a mutant
rotavirus with a temperature-sensitive lesion in the NSP2 gene
produces empty virus particles at nonpermissive temperatures (4,
35); (ii) NSP2 is a major component of RIs that support
packaging and replication (9, 31); (iii) cross-linking of
infected cell lysates has revealed that NSP2 is associated with the
viral RdRP (17) and with partially replicated RNA
(1); and (iv) NSP2 accumulates in cytoplasmic inclusions
that form in infected cells (33), the sites where
packaging, dsRNA synthesis, and the assembly of double-layered
particles occurs.
NSP2 is a highly conserved, basic 35-kDa protein that binds
single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) nonspecifically and with high affinity (18, 40). The protein self-assembles into stable
homomultimers consisting of 8 subunits (37), and these
NSP2 octamers bind ssRNA cooperatively to form large RNA-protein
complexes (40). NSP2 also possesses a
Mg2+-dependent nucleoside triphosphatase (NTPase) activity
(40). These features of NSP2, viz., NTPase activity,
affinity for ssRNA, lack of template specificity, association with RIs,
and oligomeric nature, are characteristic of known viral helicases
(15). In this study we report that NSP2 possesses
helix-destabilizing activity, but unlike typical helicases the activity
is dependent on neither Mg2+ nor ATP. The destabilization
activity of the protein is nondirectional and causes the disruption of
both DNA-RNA and RNA-RNA duplexes. The helix-destabilizing activity of
NSP2 is similar to those of ssDNA binding proteins (SSBs) and the
reovirus nonstructural protein
NS and may promote rotavirus RNA
replication by removing secondary structures in the mRNA templates that
impede packaging and minus-strand synthesis.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Expression and purification of NSP2.
NSP2 was expressed in
Escherichia coli M15 cells as described previously
(40). Recombinant NSP2 was purified using
Ni-nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA) affinity chromatography following the
protocol provided by the manufacturer (Qiagen). The protein in the
final eluate was dialyzed against low-salt buffer (LSB) (2 mM Tris-HCl
[pH 7.2], 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM dithiothreitol [DTT]) for 48 h.
The concentration of the purified NSP2 was determined by Bradford assay
using bovine serum albumin as the protein standard and by comparison
with known amounts of bovine serum albumin coelectrophoresed on sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-12% polyacrylamide gels (Novex) and stained
with Coomassie blue. Purified NSP2 was adjusted to a concentration of
0.5 to 1 mg per ml and stored at 4°C.
In vitro synthesis of RNAs.
The T7 transcription vector,
SP65g8 5'-3'SacII, was generated using PCR to delete residues 88 to
1010 of the 1,059-nucleotide (nt) gene 8 cDNA contained within the
vector SP65g8R (29). To produce the A11-StyI and A11-SacII
RNAs, SP65g8 5'-3'SacII was linearized with StyI and
SacII, respectively, blunt-ended by treatment with T4 DNA
polymerase, and transcribed with T7 RNA polymerase using an Ambion
MAXIscript kit (30). After DNase treatment, the RNA
products were purified by phenol-chloroform extraction and isopropanol
precipitation. The A11-StyI and A11-SacII RNAs were purified by
electrophoresis and elution from 8% polyacrylamide gels containing 7 M
urea (28). RNA concentrations were calculated from optical
densities at 260 nm.
Preparation of duplexes for strand displacement assays.
The
sequences of the DNA (Life Technologies) and RNA (Dharmacon)
oligonucleotides used to prepare DNA-RNA and RNA-RNA duplexes are given
in Table 1. To prepare 5'-end-labeled
oligonucleotides, 50-µl reaction mixtures containing 100 pmol of an
oligonucleotide, 10 µCi of [
-32P]ATP (3,000 Ci/mmol;
NEN), and 20 U of T4 polynucleotide kinase were incubated at 37°C for
1 h (Life Technologies). The reactions were terminated by
incubation at 65°C for 20 min. The unincorporated nucleotides were
removed from the reaction mixtures by centrifugation through Sephadex
G-25 spin columns (Roche). Following electrophoresis on 20%
polyacrylamide gels containing 7 M urea, the concentrations of the
end-labeled oligonucleotides were estimated using a Molecular Dynamics
PhosphorImager 445SI.
The following procedure was used to prepare the DNA-RNA duplexes
A11-StyI-18AD, A11-StyI-5'18AD, and A11-StyI-3'22AD and the
RNA-RNA
duplexes A11-StyI-14AR and A11-StyI-10AR (the numbers
refer to the
number of annealed nucleotides present in DNA-RNA
[AD] and RNA-RNA
[AR] duplexes). Twenty picomoles of 5'-end-labeled
DNA or RNA
oligonucleotide was mixed with 40 to 200 pmol of unlabeled
A11-StyI or
A11-SacII RNA in buffer containing 10 mM Tris, pH
8, and 200 mM NaCl.
After being heated to 95°C for 5 min, the
mixture was cooled
gradually to 25°C over a 5-h period. The quality
of the duplexes was
assessed by electrophoresis on nondenaturing
20% polyacrylamide gels
in Tris-glycine buffer (
28). The concentrations
of the
duplexes were determined by comparison with known amounts
of
radiolabeled oligonucleotides using a
PhosphorImager.
Strand displacement assay.
In a standard strand displacement
assay, between 1 and 200 pmol of NSP2 was added to 0.1 pmol of a
radiolabeled DNA-RNA or RNA-RNA duplex in buffer containing 25 mM
HEPES-KOH (pH 7.5), 20 mM NaCl, and 1 mM DTT. In some cases, the
reaction mixtures also included 1 to 10 mM MgCl2,
MnCl2, or CaCl2, 50 to 250 mM NaCl, and/or a 1 or 5 mM concentration of a nucleoside triphosphate (NTP). After
incubation at 37°C for 30 min, the products of the reactions were
treated with 40 µg of proteinase K for 15 min at 37°C. The
digestion reactions were terminated by the addition of an equal volume
of sample buffer (50 mM Tris, 50 mM glycine, 20 mM EDTA, 0.2% SDS,
0.04% Triton X-100, 25% glycerol and bromophenol blue [pH 8.8]).
The products of the assay were analyzed by electrophoresis on
nondenaturing 20% polyacrylamide gels, visualized by autoradiography, and quantitated with a PhosphorImager. The helix-destabilizing activity
of NSP2 was calculated as the amount of single-stranded (unannealed)
32P-labeled oligonucleotide detected in assays performed
with NSP2 minus the amount of single-stranded 32P-labeled
oligonucleotide detected in control assays performed in the absence of
NSP2. The calculated helix-destabilizing values were then reported as
the percentage of the total amount of radiolabeled oligonucleotide
(annealed plus unannealed) in the assay.
 |
RESULTS |
Detection of helix-destabilizing activity.
NSP2 containing a
C-terminal His tag was expressed in E. coli and purified to
homogeneity as described previously (40) (Fig. 1). NSP2 prepared in this manner consists
nearly exclusively of 12 S homomultimers, each consisting of 8 protein
subunits, which possess ssRNA binding activity (37, 40).
NSP2 was examined for the ability to destabilize a short partial
DNA-RNA duplex constructed by annealing the 5'-end-labeled 27-mer DNA
oligonucleotide, 18AD, to the unlabeled 48-mer RNA, A11-StyI (Fig.
2A). The resulting duplex,
A11-StyI-18AD, had single-stranded 5' and 3' overhangs on both the RNA
and DNA strands and was stabilized by 18 complementary nucleotides. The
strand displacement assay was performed by incubating 0.1 pmol of the
duplex with increasing amounts of purified recombinant NSP2 (1 to 200 pmol) for 30 min at 37°C. Based on previous experiments showing that
NSP2 binds to ssRNA as an octamer and protects a region of 10 to 25 nt
of an RNA oligonucleotide from RNase digestion (37, 1),
NSP2 should saturate the 14- and 16-nt ssRNA tails of the duplex when
the amount of NSP2 in the assay is
10 pmol. After incubation of the
duplex and NSP2, the reaction mixtures were treated with proteinase K
and then diluted into sample buffer containing 0.1% SDS. The reaction
mixtures were analyzed by electrophoresis on a nondenaturing 20%
polyacrylamide gel and by autoradiography. As shown in Fig. 2B, the
partial duplex substrate was stable when NSP2 was not added to the
reaction mixture (lane 2). However, with the addition of increasing
amounts of NSP2 to the reaction mixtures, a proportional decrease of
the duplex substrate and an increase in the amount of the
5'-end-labeled DNA oligonucleotide, 18AD, was observed (lanes 4 to 9).
From this we concluded that NSP2 catalyzed the displacement of the
radiolabeled DNA oligonucleotide from the partial DNA-RNA duplex and,
therefore, that NSP2 possessed a helix-destabilizing activity. Since
the reaction buffer for the assay lacked Mg2+ and ATP, the
helix-destabilizing activity of NSP2 is dependent on neither of these.

View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Expression and purification of recombinant NSP2. NSP2
expressed in E. coli with a C-terminal His tag was purified
by NTA affinity chromatography, and the final eluate was dialyzed
against LSB. The eluate (lane 2) and protein dialyzed in LSB (lane 1)
were resolved by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and stained
with Coomassie blue. M, molecular size marker.
|
|

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
NSP2 possesses helix-destabilizing activity. (A) A
schematic representation of the 32P-labeled DNA-RNA partial
duplex A11-StyI-18AD. (B) From 1 to 200 pmol of NSP2 (lanes 4 to 9)
was incubated with 0.1 pmol of A11-StyI-18AD for 30 min at 37°C.
Afterwards, the reaction mixtures were analyzed by nondenaturing gel
electrophoresis and autoradiography. Reaction mixtures containing 0.1 pmol of the 32P-labeled 18AD DNA oligonucleotide instead of
the duplex (lane 1), 0.1 pmol of the duplex and no NSP2 (lane 2), and
0.1 pmol of the duplex denatured by heating at 95°C for 2 min and
containing no NSP2 (lane 3) were also analyzed.
|
|
Directionality the of helix-destabilizing activity.
Although
possessing strong affinity for ssRNA, NSP2 has little or no affinity
for dsRNA (40). This difference in binding activities
provides an explanation as to why NSP2 can destabilize duplexes that
contain single-stranded overhangs (i.e., partial duplexes) but not
duplexes that lack single-stranded overhangs (i.e., complete duplexes)
(data not shown). When NSP2 binds to the ssRNA region of a partial
DNA-RNA duplex such as A11-StyI-18AD (Fig. 2A), displacement of the
annealed DNA oligonucleotide may occur in a 5'-to-3' or 3'-to-5'
direction or in both directions. In order to assess the directionality
of the strand displacement activity of NSP2, the two 5'-end-labeled DNA
oligonucleotides, 5'18AD (18-mer) and 3'22AD (22-mer), were
simultaneously annealed to the 144-mer A11-SacII RNA. The DNA-RNA
duplex formed with 5'18AD lacks a 5'-ssRNA overhang, while the DNA-RNA
duplex formed with 3'22AD lacks a 3'-ssRNA overhang (Fig.
3A). The product of the annealing
reaction, containing A11-SacII RNA and 5'18AD and 3'22AD, migrated as
multiple poorly resolved bands upon electrophoresis (Fig. 3B, labeled
duplex mixture), suggesting either that they represented a mixture of
three different partial duplexes or that the RNA component of the
duplexes had alternative secondary structures. Strand displacement
assays showed that the addition of increasing amounts of NSP2 to the
duplexes resulted in a corresponding release of both the 5'18AD and
3'22AD DNA oligonucleotides from the DNA-RNA duplexes (Fig. 3B). Thus,
NSP2 was able to bind to the ssRNA component of the DNA-RNA duplexes
and displace DNA oligonucleotides in both 5'-to-3' and 3'-to-5'
directions. From this, the helix-destabilizing activity of NSP2 was
inferred to lack directionality.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Directionality of the unwinding activity of NSP2. (A) A
schematic representation of the possible duplexes formed by annealing
the 32P-labeled DNA oligonucleotides 5'18AD and 3'22AD to
the A11-SacII RNA. (B) A standard strand displacement assay was
performed by incubating 0.1 pmol of the duplex mixture as shown in
panel A with 1 to 100 pmol of recombinant NSP2 (rNSP2) (lanes 4 to 7).
The reaction mixtures were analyzed by nondenaturing gel
electrophoresis and autoradiography. Reaction mixtures containing
32P-labeled 5'18AD (lane 1) or 5'22AD (lane 2) and no
duplexes were also analyzed.
|
|
Kinetics of strand separation.
NSP2 binds ssRNA cooperatively
(40). To determine if NSP2 could function cooperatively to
destabilize a helix, the A11-SacII-5'18AD duplex was prepared by
annealing the 5'18AD DNA oligonucleotide to the A11-SacII RNA (Fig.
4A). The duplex has a 126-nt ssRNA tail
to which more than one NSP2 octamer can bind. After incubation of 0.1 pmol of the duplex with 1 to 200 pmol of NSP2, the reaction mixtures
were analyzed by nondenaturing gel electrophoresis and the amount of
annealed versus released DNA oligonucleotide was determined with a
PhosphorImager. The values were used to calculate the percent
helix-destabilizing activity of the protein (as described in Materials
and Methods) and were plotted as functions of the NSP2 concentration in
the reaction mixtures (Fig. 4B). Consistent with the results presented
in Fig. 2, strand displacement was readily observed when the ratio of
NSP2 to duplex was 100:1 (10 pmol of NSP2; 0.1 pmol of
A11-SacII-5'18AD) (Fig. 4B). As the NSP2 concentration was increased
from 10 to 100 pmol in the reaction mixtures, a steep rise in the level
of helix-destabilizing activity was observed. An additional increase in
the NSP2 concentration from 100 to 200 pmol did not result in a greater
level of helix destabilization, indicating that the reaction had
reached equilibrium (Fig. 4B). Similar results were obtained when the
DNA oligonucleotide used in the assay (5'18AD) was annealed to the
48-mer A11-StyI RNA instead of the 144-mer A11-SacII RNA (data not
shown). The sigmoidal (nonlinear) curve generated by the results of
this experiment (Fig. 4B) indicated that NSP2 operated cooperatively to
destabilize the duplex.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Helix destabilization by NSP2 is cooperative. (A)
A schematic representation of the 32P-labeled DNA-RNA
duplex A11-SacII-5'18AD, formed by incubating the DNA
oligonucleotide, 5'18AD, with the A11-SacII RNA. (B) A set of standard
strand displacement assays was performed in parallel by incubating 0.1 pmol of the duplex with 1 to 200 pmol of NSP2. The reaction mixtures
were analyzed by nondenaturing gel electrophoresis, and the percent
helix-destabilizing activity was determined using a PhosphorImager. The
percent helix-destabilizing activity of NSP2 was plotted as a function
of the amount of NSP2 in the reaction mixtures.
|
|
The rate at which NSP2 was able to destabilize a helix was evaluated by
combining 50, 100, or 200 pmol of the protein with
the DNA-RNA duplex
A11-SacII-5'18AD. During incubation, aliquots
were taken from the
reaction mixtures and were analyzed by gel
electrophoresis for the
level of 5'18AD DNA oligonucleotide displaced
from the duplex. Similar
to the rate of interaction of NSP2 with
ssRNA (unpublished results),
the results showed that the helix
destabilization activity by NSP2 was
also rapid (Fig.
5), reaching
equilibrium
or nearly so within 2 min of incubation of the protein
with the duplex.
The percent helix-destabilizing activity was
approximately 45, 65, or
98% when 50, 100, or 200 pmol, respectively,
of NSP2 was present in
the reaction mixture, and in each case
little or no additional change
in the level of helix destabilization
was observed after 2 min of
incubation. The net amount of helix
destabilization was, therefore,
limited not by the reaction time
but rather by how much NSP2 was
incubated with the duplex substrate.
These results suggest that NSP2
destabilizes a helix not by an
enzymatic process but by a passive
process that is driven by the
affinity of the protein for
single-stranded regions of a partial
duplex.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Kinetics of helix destabilization by NSP2. The
32P-labeled DNA-RNA duplex A11-StyI-5'18AD (0.1 pmol) was
incubated with 50 ( ), 100 ( ), or 200 ( ) pmol of NSP2 for 2, 10, 15, or 30 min at 37°C. Afterwards, the reaction mixtures were
analyzed by nondenaturing gel electrophoresis, and the percent
helix-destabilizing activity was determined using a PhosphorImager. The
percent helix-destabilizing activity of NSP2 was plotted as a function
of reaction time.
|
|
Effect of ions and nucleotides on the helix-destabilizing activity
of NSP2.
Although the helix-destabilizing activity of NSP2
requires neither Mg2+ nor NTP, the NTPase activity of the
protein requires the cation to carry out the hydrolysis of NTP to NDP
(40). To determine whether conditions that allow the
NTPase of NSP2 to function have any effect on its helix-destabilizing
activity, we analyzed the impact of Mg2+ and NTP separately
and in combination on the ability of NSP2 to disrupt the helix of the
DNA-RNA duplex A11-StyI-18AD. The results showed that when increasing
amounts (0 to 10 mM) of only Mg2+ were included in the
strand displacement assay, the helix-destabilizing activity of the
protein progressively decreased to a level that, at 10 mM
Mg2+, was only 25% of that in a Mg2+-free
control reaction (Fig. 6A).
Mg2+ is known to neutralize the strong repulsions between
closely packed phosphates in highly folded RNA (26) and
dsDNA (38, 44) and as a result may increase the stability
of the DNA-RNA duplex used in the strand separation assay, making it
more difficult for NSP2 to disrupt the helix. If this is the mechanism
by which Mg2+ reduces the helix-destabilizing activity of
NSP2 in the strand separation assay, then other divalent cations such
as Mn2+ and Ca2+ should have similar effects.
Indeed, experiments performed with Mn2+ and
Ca2+ showed that they reduced the helix-destabilizing
activity of NSP2 in a manner similar to that of Mg2+ (Fig.
6A), suggesting that these cations affected this activity by increasing
the stability of the DNA-RNA duplex. In comparison to the divalent
cations, the monovalent cation Na+ had little effect on
strand displacement by NSP2 (Fig. 6B). For example, even at 250 mM
NaCl, the helix-destabilizing activity of NSP2 was reduced by <20%.
Thus, divalent cations inhibit strand displacement by NSP2 more
effectively than monovalent cations such as NaCl. It is unlikely that
the inhibitory effect of the divalent cations was due to a reduction of
the affinity of NSP2 for ssRNA, since we observed no significant effect
of Mg2+, Ca2+, or Mn2+ on the
ability of NSP2 to bind ssRNA in gel shift assays (data not shown). It
is possible that concentrations of a monovalent cation that are much
higher than those considered physiological (150 mM) could inhibit helix
destabilization by NSP2 to the same extent as a 10 mM concentration of
a divalent cation. However, these concentrations (>250 mM) could not
be tested because of their interfering effects on gel electrophoresis.
Notably, at physiological concentrations of divalent (1 mM) and
monovalent (150 mM) cations, the extent of strand displacement by NSP2
was reduced by less than 20% (Fig. 6).

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Effect of cations on helix destabilization by NSP2. The
DNA-RNA duplex, A11-StyI-18AD (0.1 pmol), was incubated with NSP2 (200 pmol) in the presence of 0 to 10 mM MgCl2 ( ),
CaCl2 ( ), or MnCl2 ( ) (panel A) or 0 to
250 mM NaCl ( ) (panel B). The reaction mixtures were analyzed by
nondenaturing gel electrophoresis, and the percent helix-destabilizing
activity was determined using a PhosphorImager. The percent
helix-destabilizing activity was plotted as a function of salt
concentration, with the value obtained for the reaction mixture lacking
salt normalized to 100%.
|
|
Incubation of 200 pmol of NSP2, 0.1 pmol of the DNA-RNA duplex
A11-StyI-18AD, and 5 mM ATP, GTP, CTP, or UTP showed that the
NTPs, in
the absence of Mg
2+, did not significantly affect the
helix-destabilizing activity
of the protein (Fig.
7A). Consistent with the results shown in
Fig.
6A, the strand displacement activity of NSP2 was reduced
by
approximately 50% when Mg
2+ and not NTPs was added to
reaction mixtures (Fig.
7B). However,
when ATP or CTP was added to the
reaction mixture along with Mg
2+, the strand displacement
activity of NSP2 was restored to levels
(80 or 95%, respectively)
approaching those achieved when Mg
2+ was left out of the
reaction mixtures. In contrast, the addition
of UTP or GTP to reaction
mixtures containing Mg
2+ only minimally increased the
extent of strand displacement activity
(65 or 60%, respectively). The
mechanism by which any of the NTPs
act to overcome the
Mg
2+-mediated inhibition of the helix-destabilizing
activity of NSP2
is not known. But given that NSP2 is a nonspecific
NTPase, the
finding that ATP and CTP were more effective than UTP and
GTP
in restoring the activity of NSP2 is particularly perplexing.
However, this effect of NTPs and Mg
2+ on the helix
destabilization activity of NSP2 was repeatedly
observed even when the
concentration in the reaction mixtures
of either the NTPs or
Mg
2+ was decreased to 1 mM or when the amount of NSP2 was
decreased
to 100 pmol (data not shown).

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Combined effect of Mg2+ and NTP on
helix destabilization by NSP2. (A) NSP2 (200 pmol) was incubated with
0.1 pmol of the DNA-RNA duplex, A11-StyI-18AD, in the absence or
presence of 5 mM ATP, GTP, CTP, or UTP for 30 min at 37°C. (B)
Reaction mixtures containing the same components as those of the
reaction mixtures in panel A, except that these contained 5 mM
MgCl2, were also incubated. (C) NSP2 (100 pmol) was
incubated with 0.1 pmol of the DNA-RNA duplex, A11-StyI-18AD, in the
absence or presence of 1 mM MgCl2 or in the presence of 1 mM MgCl2 and 1 mM ATP, ADP, or ATP- -S. The reaction
mixtures were analyzed by nondenaturing gel electrophoresis, and the
percent helix-destabilizing activity was determined using a
PhosphorImager. The values were normalized to that of 100% for the
assays performed in the absence of MgCl2.
|
|
To investigate the possible connection between the NTPase activity of
NSP2 and the ability of ATP to overcome the inhibitory
effect of
Mg
2+ on helix destabilization, NSP2 and the DNA-RNA duplex,
A11-StyI-18AD,
were incubated in reaction mixtures containing
Mg
2+ and either ATP, ADP, or the nonhydrolyzable ATP
analog, ATP-

-S.
As shown in Fig.
7C, neither ADP nor ATP-

-S
increased the helix-destabilizing
activity of NSP2, although ATP
restored the activity to a level
approximating that seen in reaction
mixtures lacking Mg
2+. The results indicate that under
conditions where NSP2 can hydrolyze
ATP the helix-destabilizing
activity is less sensitive to Mg
2+, and thus these two
activities of the protein may be
related.
NSP2 destabilizes an RNA-RNA duplex.
The substrates for the
helix-destabilizing activity of NSP2 in the infected cell are likely to
be the helical regions present in the secondary structures of viral
mRNAs. As a consequence, we evaluated whether the helix-destabilizing
activity of NSP2 could disrupt an RNA-RNA duplex in addition to the
DNA-RNA duplexes that were used in our previous experiments. The
radiolabeled RNA-RNA duplex, A11-StyI-14AR, was prepared by annealing
the radiolabeled RNA, 14AR, to the unlabeled RNA, A11-StyI. The duplex
contained a 14-nt annealed region and 5' and 3' single-stranded
overhangs (Fig. 8A). The assay was
performed by incubating increasing amounts of NSP2 (1 to 200 pmol) with
0.1 pmol of the RNA-RNA duplex in the absence (Fig. 8B, lanes 10 to 15)
or presence (lanes 4 to 9) of 5 mM Mg2+. The results showed
that in the absence of Mg2+, the duplex was disrupted when
50 or more pmol of NSP2 was present in the reaction mixture. Thus, the
helix-destabilizing activity of NSP2 functions on both DNA-RNA and
RNA-RNA duplexes and does not require the cofactors, i.e., NTPs or
Mg2+, normally required by helicases. Consistent with data
obtained using DNA-RNA duplexes as substrates, Mg2+ in the
absence of NTPs inhibited the destabilizing activity of NSP2 (lanes 4 to 9). Although both types of duplexes were used as substrates, the
destabilizing activity observed with NSP2 was much greater with DNA-RNA
than RNA-RNA duplexes under identical reaction conditions. For example,
in assays where the ratio of NSP2 to DNA-RNA duplex was 500:1,
approximately 75% of the duplex was disrupted (Fig. 2, lane 7). In
contrast, in assays where the ratio of NSP2 to RNA-RNA duplex was also
500:1, only 1% of the duplex was disrupted (Fig. 8B, lane 13). Further
increases in the ratio of NSP2 to RNA-RNA duplex to 1:1,000 and 1:2,000
marginally increased the percentage of helix-destabilization by NSP2
(Fig. 8B, lanes 14 and 15).

View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 8.
Destabilization of an RNA-RNA duplex by NPS2. (A) A
schematic representation of the 32P-labeled RNA-RNA duplex
A11-StyI-14AR produced by annealing the RNAs A11-StyI and 14AR. (B)
Strand displacement assays were performed by incubating 0.1 pmol of the
RNA-RNA duplex with 1 to 200 pmol of NSP2 in the presence (lanes 4 to
9) or absence (lanes 10 to 15) of 5 mM MgCl2. As controls,
reaction mixtures were also prepared that contained 0.1 pmol of the
14AR RNA instead of the duplex (lane 1), 0.1 pmol of A11-StyI-14AR
duplex and no NSP2 (lane 2), or 0.1 pmol of A11-StyI-14AR and no NSP2,
denatured by heating at 95°C for 2 min (lane 3). (C) Strand
displacement assays were performed by incubating 5 to 20 fmol of the
RNA-RNA duplex in the presence or absence of recombinant NSP2 (rNSP2).
The reaction mixtures were analyzed by nondenaturing gel
electrophoresis and autoradiography. A PhosphorImager was used to
determine the percent helix-destabilizing activity for each reaction.
The values were normalized to that of 100% for the assay reaction
wherein the substrate duplex was denatured by heating.
|
|
To test if even higher ratios of NSP2 to RNA-RNA duplex further
increased the extent of destabilization, assays were performed
in which
the amount of substrate included was reduced from 0.1
pmol to 5, 10, or
20 fmol and the amount of NSP2 added was 200
pmol. As shown in Fig.
8C,
when protein was present in molar excess
over substrate by 10,000- to
40,000-fold, the percentage of helix
destabilization increased to 20 to
30%.
The limited destabilizing activity of NSP2 on the RNA-RNA duplex,
compared to that of a DNA-RNA duplex, may be due to the
increased
stability of the helix of the RNA-RNA duplex. If so,
then NSP2 should
be able to destabilize RNA-RNA duplexes which
have shorter annealed
regions more efficiently than RNA-RNA duplexes
with longer annealed
regions. To test this hypothesis, the partial
duplex, A11-StyI-10AR,
was constructed by annealing the radiolabeled
10AR RNA to the unlabeled
A11-StyI RNA. The A11-StyI-10AR duplex
contained a 10-nt annealed
region instead of the 14-nt annealed
region of A11-StyI-14AR (Fig.
9A). When increasing amounts of
NSP2 (1 to 200 pmol) were incubated with A11-StyI-10AR, 30 and
38% of the
duplex was destabilized in reactions with 100 and 200
pmol of NSP2,
respectively (Fig.
9B, lanes 9 and 10). Thus, under
conditions where
the ratio of NSP2 octamer to duplex was 12.5:1
to 25:1 (8 pmol of NSP2
equals 1 pmol of NSP2 octamer), significant
amounts of the duplex were
destabilized. The fact that NSP2 more
effectively destabilized an
RNA-RNA duplex with a 10-nt annealed
region than an RNA-RNA duplex with
a 14-nt annealed region indicates
that the stability of the duplex has
an impact on the destabilizing
activity of NSP2. Based on the computed
predictions of the secondary
structures of rotavirus mRNAs, nearly all
of the RNA-RNA helices
formed by folding of the RNAs are shorter than
10 nt (data not
shown). As a consequence, given the high level of NSP2
produced
in the infected cell and associated with rotavirus replication
intermediates (
9), the ability of NSP2 to efficiently
destabilize
the 10-mer duplex of A11-StyI-10AR suggests that NSP2 can
interact
with mRNA templates to destabilize secondary structures during
dsRNA synthesis.

View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 9.
NSP2 destabilizes a short RNA-RNA duplex with greater
efficiency. (A) A schematic representation of the
32P-labeled RNA-RNA duplex A11-StyI-10AR produced by
annealing the RNAs A11-StyI and 10AR. (B) Strand displacement assays
were performed by incubating 0.1 pmol of the RNA-RNA duplex with 1 to
200 pmol of NSP2 (lanes 5 to 10). As controls, reaction mixtures were
also prepared that contained 0.1 pmol of the 10AR RNA instead of the
duplex (lane 1), 0.1 pmol of the A11-StyI-14AR duplex and no NSP2
(lane 2 and 4), or 0.1 pmol of A11-StyI-10AR and no NSP2, denatured by
heating at 95°C for 2 min (lane 3). A PhosphorImager was used to
determine the percent helix-destabilizing activity for each reaction.
The values were normalized to that of 100% for the assay reaction
wherein the substrate duplex was denatured by heating.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
NSP2 is a helix-destabilizing protein but not a helicase.
In
this study, we have shown that NSP2 possesses a helix-destabilizing
activity which is independent of cofactor and energy requirements.
Since the helix-destabilizing activities of known viral RNA helicases
are characterized by a requirement for ATP and Mg2+
(15), we do not consider it appropriate to classify NSP2
as a helicase. Moreover, while the strand displacement activity of NSP2
was bidirectional, viral RNA helicases classically display a
unidirectional strand displacement activity, mostly in the 3'-to-5' direction of the ssRNA on which they are bound (15). The
helix-destabilizing activity of NSP2 was detected only when the protein
was added in saturating and stoichiometric amounts relative to the
duplex substrate. The destabilization activity of NSP2 was also
observed to rapidly reach equilibrium (within a few minutes). These
characteristics are indicative not of an enzyme-based processive strand
displacement activity (as is the case with helicases) but rather of a
passive strand displacement activity that is the consequence of the
saturative and high-affinity binding of NSP2 to a partial duplex.
Similarity of NSP2,
NS of reovirus, and NS2 of BTV.
Other
members of Reoviridae, orthoreovirus and bluetongue virus
(BTV), encode proteins that, despite the lack of sequence identity,
seem structurally and functionally related to NSP2. This includes the
orthoreovirus nonstructural protein
NS, which, like NSP2,
self-assembles into homomultimers and binds ssRNA nonspecifically and
with high affinity to form higher-order RNA-protein complexes (11). In infected cells,
NS and NSP2 both localize to
cytoplasmic inclusions (23) and have been implicated in
viral RNA replication and packaging. In a recent report, Gillian et al.
(12) showed that saturating concentrations of
NS can
unwind DNA-RNA duplexes in vitro in a manner that is ATP and
Mg2+ independent. Unwinding was detected when the molar
ratio of
NS to the duplex was 100:1 and this activity was inhibited
by the presence of Mg2+ in the reaction. These properties
are reminiscent of those observed for the helix-destabilizing activity
of NSP2. We have shown that NSP2 destabilizes both DNA-RNA and RNA-RNA
duplexes, although the specific activity is reduced with RNA-RNA
duplexes, possibly as a result of the increased stability of its helix.
It was not possible to demonstrate the unwinding activity of
NS on
an RNA-RNA duplex (12).
Another putative homolog of NSP2 that may function as a
helix-destabilizing protein is NS2 of BTV. Some of the features of
NS2
are similar to those of NSP2 and

NS, and these features are
probably
crucial for helix destabilization. These features include
the ability
of NS2 to bind nonspecifically to ssRNA (
14,
41,
43), to
form large 7S multimeric complexes (
43) and to localize
to
cytoplasmic inclusions in the infected cell (
3). However,
there has been no report of a helix-destabilizing activity associated
with NS2
protein.
Similarity of NSP2 and SSBs.
A number of SSBs involved in the
replication of dsDNA have been reported to have a helix-destabilizing
activity similar to that of NSP2. Examples of SSBs for eukaryotic dsDNA
viruses include the ICP8 protein of herpes simplex virus type 1 (2), the adenovirus DNA binding protein (27),
the ssDNA binding protein of Epstein-Barr virus (42), the
I3 gene product of vaccinia virus (36), and the LEF-3
protein of baculovirus (24). SSBs with helix-destabilizing activity are also encoded by the bacteriophages T4 (13),
29 (39), Nf, and GA-1 (10). In addition,
SSBs are ubiquitous in bacterial and eukaryotic cells. Collectively,
SSBs are noncatalytic proteins that bind ssDNA cooperatively, with high
affinity and in a sequence-independent manner (19).
Through these activities, SSBs destabilize the helix and prevent base
pairing of complementary sequences (7). Generally, their
function is to bind to ssDNA that has been unwound at the replication
fork by helicases and to assist in the processivity of the replication
complex. SSBs also stimulate the activity of helicases and origin
binding proteins (19). Based on the similarities of the
activities of SSBs and NSP2, NSP2 may be predicted to remove secondary
structures in rotavirus mRNA templates that impede their packaging into
cores and their replication to dsRNA. Indeed, using a cell-free system developed for the segmented dsRNA bacteriophage
6, Mindich
(25) has directly shown that secondary structures within
mRNA templates can interfere with packaging and replication. The idea
that NSP2 is an integral part of the rotavirus replication machinery is supported by the observation that the protein is a major component of
RIs and is associated with the viral RdRP (1, 9, 17). Indeed, the amount of NSP2 associated with replication intermediates with replicase activity (i.e., the core and single-shelled
intermediates) exceeds by severalfold the amount of the VP1 and VP3
that is present in these structures (9).
Mechanism of helix destabilization by NSP2.
The
double-stranded regions of a partial helix are not necessarily stable
and can occasionally "breathe," producing regions that are
transiently single stranded. Conditions that can stabilize a partial
helix substrate, such as the presence of divalent cations (26), were found to interfere with the helix-destabilizing
activity of NSP2. From this result, it can be inferred that binding of NSP2 to the transiently single-stranded regions prevents the
reformation of the duplex and thereby destabilizes partial helices. The
destabilizing activity of NSP2 is probably further amplified by the
cooperativity that the protein displays in binding to ssRNA. The
structural integrity of the NSP2 octamer also may be an important
factor in the helix-destabilizing activity of the protein. This is
supported by a recent study showing that 5 mM Mg2+ (but not
100 mM NaCl) causes the disassembly of NSP2 octamers into smaller
units, most likely tetramers (37). Hence, the
inhibitory effect of Mg2+ on helix destabilization could be
the consequence of the effect of the cation not only on helix stability
but also on the structural integrity of the functional unit of NSP2.
Relationship between the helix-destabilizing and NTPase
activities of NSP2.
NSP2 is distinct from
NS and most other
SSBs, since in the presence of NTP and Mg2+ the protein
also functions as an NTPase and undergoes autophosphorylation (40). Under conditions where the NTPase of NSP2 is active,
the inhibitory effect of Mg2+ alone on the
helix-destabilizing activity of NSP2 is lessened, particularly when the
NTP present is ATP or GTP. This suggests that the NTPase and
helix-destabilizing activities of the protein are linked. Perhaps the
NTPase-induced phosphorylated form of NSP2 displays a higher affinity
or cooperativity for binding ssRNA, and this overcomes the enhanced
stability of the helix brought on by Mg2+. Such is the case
for an SSB derived from ascites tumor cells, which binds ssDNA with
higher affinity following phosphorylation (20).
Alternatively, ligands such as NTP and Mg2+ may act in
combination to affect the structure of the NSP2 multimer in a way that
enhances its helix-destabilizing activity. Support for this possibility
comes from the observation that in the presence of nucleosides, the
NSP2 multimer changes to a significantly more compact conformation
(37). The nucleoside-induced change in the structure of
the NSP2 octamer is consistent with the hypothesis that the complex
functions not only to destabilize secondary structures within viral
mRNAs but also as a molecular motor helping to drive the packaging and
replication of viral mRNAs.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENT |
We acknowledge Karen Kearney for critical review of the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Laboratory of
Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious
Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 7 Center Dr., MSC 0720, Room
117, Bethesda, MD 20892. Phone: (301) 594-1615. Fax: (301) 496-8312. E-mail: jpatton{at}niaid.nih.gov.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Aponte, C.,
D. Poncet, and J. Cohen.
1996.
Recovery and characterization of a replicase complex in rotavirus-infected cells using a monoclonal antibody against NSP2.
J. Virol.
70:985-991[Abstract].
|
| 2.
|
Boehmer, P. E., and I. R. Lehman.
1993.
Herpes simplex virus type 1 ICP8: helix-destabilizing properties.
J. Virol.
67:711-715[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Brookes, S. M.,
A. D. Hyatt, and B. T. Eaton.
1993.
Characterization of virus inclusion bodies in bluetongue virus-infected cells.
J. Gen. Virol.
74:525-530[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Chen, D.,
J. L. Gombold, and R. F. Ramig.
1990.
Intracellular RNA synthesis directed by temperature-sensitive mutants of simian rotavirus SA11.
Virology
178:143-151[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Chen, D.,
C. Y. Zeng,
M. J. Wentz,
M. Gorziglia,
M. K. Estes, and R. F. Ramig.
1994.
Template-dependent, in vitro replication of rotavirus RNA.
J. Virol.
68:7030-7039[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Cohen, J.
1977.
Ribonucleic acid polymerase activity associated with purified calf rotavirus.
J. Gen. Virol.
36:395-402[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Dekker, J.,
P. N. Kanellopoulos,
A. K. Loonstra,
J. A. van Oosterhout,
K. Leonard,
P. A. Tucker, and P. C. van der Vliet.
1997.
Multimerization of the adenovirus DNA-binding protein is the driving force for ATP-independent DNA unwinding during strand displacement synthesis.
EMBO J.
17:1455-1463[CrossRef].
|
| 8.
|
Desselberger, U., and M. A. McCrae.
1994.
The rotavirus genome.
Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.
68:5945-5952.
|
| 9.
|
Gallegos, C. O., and J. T. Patton.
1989.
Characterization of rotavirus replication intermediates: a model for the assembly of single-shelled particles.
Virology
172:616-627[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Gascon, I.,
J. M. Lazaro, and M. Salas.
2000.
Differential functional behavior of viral phi29, Nf and GA-1 SSB proteins.
Nucleic Acids Res.
28:2034-2042[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Gillian, A. L., and M. L. Nibert.
1998.
Amino terminus of reovirus nonstructural protein NS is important for ssRNA binding and nucleoprotein complex formation.
Virology
240:1-11[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Gillian, A. L.,
S. C. Schmechel,
J. Livny,
L. A. Schiff, and M. L. Nibert.
2000.
Reovirus protein sigma NS binds in multiple copies to single-stranded RNA and shares properties with single-stranded DNA binding proteins.
J. Virol.
74:5939-5948[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Hosoda, J.,
B. Takacs, and C. Brack.
1974.
Denaturation of T4 DNA by an in vitro processed gene 32 protein.
FEBS Lett.
47:338-342[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Huismans, H.,
A. A. Van Dijk, and A. R. Bauskin.
1987.
In vitro phosphorylation and purification of a nonstructural protein of bluetongue virus with affinity for their single-stranded RNA.
J. Virol.
61:3589-3595[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Kadare, G., and A. L. Haenni.
1997.
Virus-encoded RNA helicases.
J. Virol.
71:2583-2590[Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Kapikian, A. Z.,
Y. Hoshino,
R. M. Chanock, and I. Perez-Schael.
1996.
Efficacy of a quadrivalent rhesus rotavirus-based human rotavirus vaccine aimed at preventing severe rotavirus diarrhea in infants and young children.
J. Infect. Dis.
1:S65-S72[CrossRef].
|
| 17.
|
Kattoura, M. D.,
X. Chen, and J. T. Patton.
1994.
The rotavirus RNA binding protein NS35 (NSP2) forms 10S multimers and interacts with the viral RNA polymerase.
Virology
202:803-813[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Kattoura, M.,
L. L. Clapp, and J. T. Patton.
1992.
The rotavirus non-structural protein, NS35, is a nonspecific RNA-binding protein.
Virology
191:698-708[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Kornberg, A., and J. Baker.
1992.
DNA replication, 2nd ed., p. 280.
W. H. Freeman & Co., New York, N.Y.
|
| 20.
|
Koterov, A. N.,
N. A. Novoradovskaia,
N. B. Pushkareva,
A. V. Vorotnikov,
A. V. Nikol'skii, and V. V. Risnik.
1991.
Phosphorylation and other properties of proteins binding single-stranded DNA (SSB-proteins) from chromatin and extrachromatin fractions of Ehrlich ascites carcinoma.
Biokhimiya
56:666-673.
|
| 21.
|
Lawton, J. A.,
C. Q.-Y. Zeng,
S. K. Mukherjee,
J. Cohen,
M. K. Estes, and B. V. V. Prasad.
1997.
Three-dimensional structural analysis of recombinant rotavirus-like particles with intact and amino-terminal deleted VP2: implications for the architecture of the VP2 capsid layer.
J. Virol.
71:7353-7360[Abstract].
|
| 22.
|
Lawton, J. A.,
M. K. Estes, and B. V. V. Prasad.
1997.
Three-dimensional visualization of mRNA release from actively transcribing rotavirus particles.
Nat. Struct. Biol.
2:118-121.
|
| 23.
|
Mbisa, J. L.,
M. M. Becker,
S. Zhou,
T. S. Dermody, and E. G. Brown.
2000.
Reovirus µ2 protein determines strain-specific differences in the rate of viral inclusion formation in L929 cells.
Virology
272:16-26[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 24.
|
Mikhailov, V. S.
2000.
Helix-destabilizing properties of the baculovirus single-stranded DNA-binding protein (LEF-3).
Virology
270:180-189[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Mindich, L.
1999.
Precise packaging of the three genomic segments of the double-stranded-RNA bacteriophage phi6.
Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.
63:149-160[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Misra, V. K., and D. E. Draper.
1999.
On the role of magnesium ions on RNA stability.
Biopolymers
48:113-135.
|
| 27.
|
Monaghan, A.,
A. Webster, and T. H. Ronald.
1994.
Adenovirus DNA binding protein: helix-destabilizing activity.
Nucleic Acids Res.
22:742-748[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Patton, J. T.
1996.
Rotavirus VP1 alone specifically binds to the 3' end of viral mRNA but the interaction is not sufficient to initiate minus-strand synthesis.
J. Virol.
70:7940-7947[Abstract].
|
| 29.
|
Patton, J. T., and D. Chen.
1999.
RNA-binding and capping activities of proteins in rotavirus open cores.
J. Virol.
73:1382-1391[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Patton, J. T.,
M. Wentz,
J. Xiaobo, and R. F. Ramig.
1996.
cis-acting signals that promote genome replication in rotavirus mRNA.
J. Virol.
70:3961-3971[Abstract].
|
| 31.
|
Patton, J. T., and C. O. Gallegos.
1988.
Structure and protein composition of the rotavirus replicase particle.
Virology
166:358-365[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Patton, J. T., and C. O. Gallegos.
1990.
Rotavirus RNA replication: single-stranded RNA extends from the replicase particle.
J. Gen. Virol.
71:1087-1094[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Petrie, B. L.,
H. B. Greenberg,
D. Y. Graham, and M. K. Estes.
1984.
Ultrastructural localization of rotavirus antigens using colloidal gold.
Virus Res.
1:133-152[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 34.
|
Prasad, B. V. V.,
G. J. Wang,
J. P. M. Clerx, and W. Chiu.
1988.
Three-dimensional structure of rotavirus.
J. Mol. Biol.
199:269-275[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 35.
|
Ramig, R. F., and B. L. Petrie.
1984.
Characterization of temperature sensitive mutants of simian rotavirus SA11: protein synthesis and morphogenesis.
J. Virol.
49:665-673[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Rochester, S. C., and P. Traktman.
1998.
Characterization of the single-stranded DNA binding protein encoded by the vaccinia virus 13 gene.
J. Virol.
72:2917-2926[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
| Schuck, P., Z. Taraporewala, P. McPhie, and J. T. Patton. 2000. Rotavirus nonstructural protein NSP2 self-assembles
into octamers that undergo ligand-induced conformational changes.
J. Biol. Chem. (published online ahead of print December 19, 2000).
|
| 38.
|
Shaw, S. Y., and J. C. Wang.
1993.
Knotting of a DNA chain during ring closure.
Science
260:533-536[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Soengas, M. S.,
C. Gutierrez, and M. Salas.
1995.
Helix-destabilizing activity of phi 29 single-stranded DNA binding protein: effect on the elongation rate during strand displacement DNA replication.
J. Mol. Biol.
253:517-529[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Taraporewala, Z.,
D. Chen, and J. T. Patton.
1999.
Multimers formed by the rotavirus nonstructural protein NSP2 bind to RNA and have nucleoside triphosphatase activity.
J. Virol.
73:9934-9943[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Thomas, C. P.,
T. F. Booth, and P. Roy.
1990.
Synthesis of bluetongue virus-encoded phosphoprotein and formation of inclusion bodies by recombinant baculovirus in insect cells: it binds the single-stranded RNA species.
J. Gen. Virol.
71:2073-2083[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 42.
|
Tsurumi, T.,
J. Kishore,
N. Yokoyama,
M. Fujita,
T. Daikoku,
H. Yamada,
Y. Yamashita, and Y. Nishiyama.
1998.
Overexpression, purification and helix-destabilizing properties of Epstein-Barr virus ssDNA-binding protein.
J. Gen. Virol.
79:1275-1264.
|
| 43.
|
Uitenweerde, J. M.,
J. Theron,
M. A. Stoltz, and H. Huismans.
1995.
The multimeric nonstructural NS2 proteins of bluetongue virus, African horsesickness virus and epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus differ in their single-stranded RNA-binding ability.
Virology
209:624-632[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Xu, Y. C., and H. Bremer.
1997.
Winding of DNA helix by divalent cations.
Nucleic Acids Res.
25:4067-4071[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, May 2001, p. 4519-4527, Vol. 75, No. 10
0022-538X/01/$04.00+0 DOI: 10.1128/JVI.75.10.4519-4527.2001
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Kumar, M., Jayaram, H., Vasquez-Del Carpio, R., Jiang, X., Taraporewala, Z. F., Jacobson, R. H., Patton, J. T., Prasad, B. V. V.
(2007). Crystallographic and Biochemical Analysis of Rotavirus NSP2 with Nucleotides Reveals a Nucleoside Diphosphate Kinase-Like Activity. J. Virol.
81: 12272-12284
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Arnoldi, F., Campagna, M., Eichwald, C., Desselberger, U., Burrone, O. R.
(2007). Interaction of Rotavirus Polymerase VP1 with Nonstructural Protein NSP5 Is Stronger than That with NSP2. J. Virol.
81: 2128-2137
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Jiang, X., Jayaram, H., Kumar, M., Ludtke, S. J., Estes, M. K., Prasad, B. V. V.
(2006). Cryoelectron Microscopy Structures of Rotavirus NSP2-NSP5 and NSP2-RNA Complexes: Implications for Genome Replication. J. Virol.
80: 10829-10835
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Taraporewala, Z. F., Jiang, X., Vasquez-Del Carpio, R., Jayaram, H., Prasad, B. V. V., Patton, J. T.
(2006). Structure-Function Analysis of Rotavirus NSP2 Octamer by Using a Novel Complementation System.. J. Virol.
80: 7984-7994
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sen, A., Agresti, D., Mackow, E. R.
(2006). Hyperphosphorylation of the Rotavirus NSP5 Protein Is Independent of Serine 67 or NSP2, and the Intrinsic Insolubility of NSP5 Is Regulated by Cellular Phosphatases. J. Virol.
80: 1807-1816
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Campagna, M., Eichwald, C., Vascotto, F., Burrone, O. R.
(2005). RNA interference of rotavirus segment 11 mRNA reveals the essential role of NSP5 in the virus replicative cycle. J. Gen. Virol.
86: 1481-1487
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Silvestri, L. S., Taraporewala, Z. F., Patton, J. T.
(2004). Rotavirus Replication: Plus-Sense Templates for Double-Stranded RNA Synthesis Are Made in Viroplasms. J. Virol.
78: 7763-7774
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Carpio, R. V.-D., Gonzalez-Nilo, F. D., Jayaram, H., Spencer, E., Prasad, B. V. V., Patton, J. T., Taraporewala, Z. F.
(2004). Role of the Histidine Triad-like Motif in Nucleotide Hydrolysis by the Rotavirus RNA-packaging Protein NSP2. J. Biol. Chem.
279: 10624-10633
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Eichwald, C., Rodriguez, J. F., Burrone, O. R.
(2004). Characterization of rotavirus NSP2/NSP5 interactions and the dynamics of viroplasm formation. J. Gen. Virol.
85: 625-634
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Becker, M. M., Peters, T. R., Dermody, T. S.
(2003). Reovirus {sigma}NS and {micro}NS Proteins Form Cytoplasmic Inclusion Structures in the Absence of Viral Infection. J. Virol.
77: 5948-5963
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Berois, M., Sapin, C., Erk, I., Poncet, D., Cohen, J.
(2003). Rotavirus Nonstructural Protein NSP5 Interacts with Major Core Protein VP2. J. Virol.
77: 1757-1763
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Taraporewala, Z. F., Schuck, P., Ramig, R. F., Silvestri, L., Patton, J. T.
(2002). Analysis of a Temperature-Sensitive Mutant Rotavirus Indicates that NSP2 Octamers Are the Functional Form of the Protein. J. Virol.
76: 7082-7093
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Vende, P., Taraporewala, Z. F., Patton, J. T.
(2002). RNA-Binding Activity of the Rotavirus Phosphoprotein NSP5 Includes Affinity for Double-Stranded RNA. J. Virol.
76: 5291-5299
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Eichwald, C., Vascotto, F., Fabbretti, E., Burrone, O. R.
(2002). Rotavirus NSP5: Mapping Phosphorylation Sites and Kinase Activation and Viroplasm Localization Domains. J. Virol.
76: 3461-3470
[Abstract]
[Full Text]