Previous Article | Next Article ![]()
Journal of Virology, May 2000, p. 4220-4228, Vol. 74, No. 9
Department of Biochemistry, North Carolina
State University, Raleigh, North Carolina
27695,1 and Yonsei Cancer Center,
Institute of Cancer Research, Yonsei University College of Medicine,
Seoul, Korea2
Received 18 November 1999/Accepted 7 February 2000
The envelopment of the Sindbis virus nucleocapsid in the modified
cell plasma membrane involves a highly specific interaction between the
capsid (C) protein and the endodomain of the E2 glycoprotein. We have
previously identified a domain of the Sindbis virus C protein involved
in binding to the E2 endodomain (H. Lee and D. T. Brown, Virology
202:390-400, 1994). The C-E2 binding domain resides in a hydrophobic
cleft with C Y180 and W247 on opposing sides of the cleft. Structural
modeling studies indicate that the E2 domain, which is proposed to bind
the C protein (E2 398T, 399P, and 400Y), is located at a sufficient
distance from the membrane to occupy the C protein binding cleft (S. Lee, K. E. Owen, H. K. Choi, H. Lee, G. Lu, G. Wengler,
D. T. Brown, M. G. Rossmann, and R. J. Kuhn, Structure
4:531-541, 1996). To measure the critical spanning length of the E2
endodomain which positions the TPY domain into the putative C binding
cleft, we have constructed a deletion mutant, Sindbis virus, the prototype of the
alphaviruses, has a precise and complex three-dimensional structure.
The virion is made up of 240 copies of each of three structural
proteins (E1, E2, and capsid [C] protein) in a 1:1:1 stoichiometric
arrangement, a membrane bilayer, and a single copy of plus polarity
single-stranded RNA. The three virus proteins are organized as a
double-shelled icosahedron (32, 33). The envelope
glycoproteins E1 and E2 are organized as heterotrimers. Eighty of the
E1-E2 heterotrimers are organized in a T=4 icosahedral lattice through
E1-E1 protein associations which interconnect all of the heterotrimers
(1, 2). The membrane bilayer is derived from the host cell
during virus assembly and is situated between the outer T=4 icosahedral protein shell of E1 and E2 glycoproteins and the inner T=4 icosahedral shell composed of C protein (7, 11, 32, 34). The envelope glycoproteins are both type 1 membrane-spanning proteins, and the E2
glycoprotein has a 33-amino-acid endodomain which specifically interacts with the C protein, locking the outer protein shell to the
inner protein shell (18, 19, 25). The alphaviruses are not
typical of membrane-containing viruses, the majority of which are well
described as membrane bilayers with associated virus proteins. The
alphaviruses are protein icosahedra with an associated lipid bilayer.
The assembly of the complex, double-shell, membrane-containing
structure involves numerous and highly specific protein-protein interactions occurring through two separate pathways (45).
The virus structural proteins are synthesized from a subgenomic
polycistronic RNA with the potential of producing all of the structural
proteins as a single polypeptide. As the nascent protein is produced,
the C protein located at the NH-terminal end cuts itself from the developing polyprotein utilizing a proteolytic activity contained in
its structure. The freed C protein assembles together with progeny RNA
to produce a nucleocapsid which comprises the inner protein shell. The
remainder of the polyprotein containing the sequences of glycoproteins
E1 and E2 is integrated into the membranes of the cell endoplasmic
reticulum (ER). In the ER, the proteins are proteolytically processed
to form PE2, the precursor to E2, and E1. The glycoprotein E1 folds
from a fully extended form into a more compact form and then binds PE2
to create a heterodimer. The heterodimer forms trimers (three copies
each of E1 and PE2), and E1 continues folding through disulfide-bridged
intermediates into a compact, energy-rich conformation (6,
30). After formation of the heterotrimer and E1 folding is
complete, the glycoprotein trimers are exported from the ER to the
plasma membrane. En route, PE2 is converted to E2 by a furin-like
protease in the trans-Golgi network and E1 is converted from a stable
to a metastable form.
The plasma membrane is the point at which the final events in
alphavirus assembly take place. The assembled nucleocapsid binds to the
endodomain of the E2 glycoprotein in a two-step interaction which is
highly specific (22, 23, 25). The 33-amino-acid E2
endodomain is a multifunctional structure (Fig.
1). The E2 glycoprotein begins its
maturation as PE2, which, in the ER, has two membrane-spanning domains
(21). The first membrane-spanning domain is composed of
amino acids 365 to 390 and is the anchor domain for this glycoprotein
(36). The second membrane-spanning domain is predicted to be
composed of amino acids 405 to 418 (39) and contains a
sequence which is essential for the specific recognition of virus C
protein. Binding within this domain is the first of two steps in the
binding of nucleocapsids to the E2 endodomain (25).
Nucleocapsid binding requires that this domain be removed from the cell
membrane and exposed to the cytoplasm. We have demonstrated that this
event occurs after the maturation of the spike trimer in the ER and its
export from the ER (24). The precise point in the secretory
pathway at which the second domain is withdrawn from the cell membrane
is not known. The removal of a hydrophobic domain from a membrane
bilayer is a very energetically unfavorable event. We have shown that a
phosphorylation-dephosphorylation event accompanies this process;
however, we have not been able to demonstrate that the event is
phosphorylation dependent (23). The sequence of amino acids
connecting the two membrane-spanning domains, the cytoplasmic loop, has
been implicated as containing the sites for phosphorylation and as
encoding the sequence involved in the second tight binding domain for
nucleocapsid binding (19).
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
A Single Deletion in the Membrane-Proximal Region
of the Sindbis Virus Glycoprotein E2 Endodomain Blocks Virus
Assembly
![]()
ABSTRACT
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
K391, in which a
nonconserved lysine (E2 K391) at the membrane-cytoplasm junction of the
E2 tail has been deleted. This mutant was found to produce very low
levels of virus from BHK-21 cells due to a defect in an unidentified
step in nucleocapsid binding to the E2 endodomain. In contrast,
K391
produced wild-type levels of virus from tissue-cultured mosquito cells.
We propose that the phenotypic differences displayed by this mutant in
the two diverse host cells arise from fundamental differences in the lipid composition of the insect cell membranes which affect the physical and structural properties of membranes and thereby virus assembly. The data suggest that these viruses have evolved properties adapted specifically for assembly in the diverse hosts in which they grow.
![]()
INTRODUCTION
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References

View larger version (14K):
[in a new window]
FIG. 1.
Functional map of the E2 endodomain. See the text for
details.
The interaction of nucleocapsid with E2 is virus strain specific, which implies that a specific C protein site exists for E2 binding. Using site-directed mutagenesis, we have identified a domain in the C protein of Sindbis virus which binds to the E2 endodomain (18). The Y180S/E183G mutation in the C protein resulted in the production of virus particles with reduced infectivity and an altered interaction of C protein with the E2 endodomain. Membrane glycoproteins of the C protein mutant had normal functional properties of attachment and membrane fusion, which led us to propose that the defect in this mutant was a failure to uncoat the nucleocapsid as the process of virus membrane-host membrane fusion took place. We postulated that this failure resulted from the altered (weakened) E2-C association (18). In the X-ray crystallographic structure produced by Choi et al. (7), the C protein domain which we identified as critical for E2-C association has a fold which places aromatic ring structures on opposite sides of a hydrophobic cleft. A conserved tyrosine at position 400 in the E2 tail, accessible to binding in the C protein hydrophobic cleft, suggested that an aromatic interaction was possible between E2 Y400, C Y180, and W247 (19). If such an interaction existed, it would suggest that the loss of one of the three aromatic structures participating in the association would significantly weaken the strength of the E2-C association.
A critical role for the interaction of aromatic E2 Y400 with C protein has been supported by experiments in which Y400 has been exchanged for other amino acids. Aromatic substitutions supported virus production, while nonaromatic substitutions resulted in failure to assemble mature virions (13). Molecular modeling of the E2 endodomain into the C cleft containing C Y180 and W247 indicated that E2 Y400 could penetrate to a point at which the postulated aromatic interaction could take place (19). Molecular modeling also implicated a hydrophobic interaction involving E2 L402 as participating in nucleocapsid binding (19).
We have attempted to further assess the role that the aromatic and hydrophobic interactions between residues in E2 and C play in virus maturation by reducing the distance between the point at which the E2 endodomain emerges from the membrane bilayer and E2 Y400. The hypothesis is that shortening of this distance will prevent the specific interaction and prevent virus maturation. To this end, we have produced a deletion in the membrane-proximal region of the E2 endodomain, reducing the distance between E2 Y400 and the membrane by a single amino acid. We have investigated the effects of this deletion on the events leading to the binding of the E2 endodomain to C and the ensuing process of envelopment.
| |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Na125I, [35S]methionine-cysteine, and [32P]orthophosphate were from New England Nuclear Life Science Products (Boston, Mass.). Restriction enzymes, T4 DNA ligase, and reagents for in vitro transcription (SP6 polymerase, RNasin, etc.) were from New England Biolabs (Beverly, Mass.). Taq DNA polymerase and Moloney murine leukemia virus (MMLV) reverse transcriptase (RT) were from PE Applied Biosystems (Branchburg, N.J.). Sequencing reagents were from United States Biochemical Corporation (Cleveland, Ohio), or for automated sequencing, BigDye terminator chemistry (for plasmids) or dRhodamine terminator chemistry (for PCR products) was used; both were from PE Applied Biosystems. Shrimp alkaline phosphatase was from Amersham-Pharmacia Biotech.
Cell culture, plaque assay, and virus. Baby hamster kidney (BHK-21) cells were initially provided by Peter Faulkner (Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada). These cells were grown in minimal essential medium (MEM) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 10% tryptose phosphate broth, and 2 mM glutamine as described previously (35). The Aedes albopictus subclones used were all derived from Singh's original larval isolates (43). The U4.4 cells maintained in this laboratory were cloned from cells provided by Sonya Buckley (Yale Arbovirus Research Unit, New Haven, Conn.). This line is maintained in MEM as described above or in Mitsuhashi and Maramorosch (M and M) medium (28). The C7-10 line was provided by Victor Stollar (Rutgers Medical School, New Brunswick, N.J.) and is maintained in MEM as described above and previously (27).
Virus produced from the Toto 1101 cDNA clone of Sindbis virus contains a tyrosine at E2 position 420, S420Y, has been described elsewhere (24), and served as the wild-type template for mutagenesis and as the wild-type cDNA construct for transfection experiments. Titration of
K391 virus grown in U4.4 cells was done on C7-10 cells.
For this assay, 1 × 107 to 2 × 107
C7-10 cells/ml are plated onto 25-cm2 flasks in serum-free
medium for 1 h prior to infection. Virus dilutions are in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 3% FBS. The remainder of the
assay is essentially the same as for BHK cells (35), except
that the plaques are allowed to develop for an additional day before
staining with 2% neutral red.
Site-directed mutagenesis of Toto S420Y and RT PCR.
Using
standard megaprimer site-directed mutagenesis protocols (40)
described previously (24) and Taq DNA polymerase,
we generated a single mutant with the nonconserved lysine at position 391 in E2 (designated
391K) deleted from the S420Y template DNA. The
S420Y construct is derived from Toto 1101 full-length Sindbis virus
cDNA which contains an SP6 promoter from which full-length infectious
transcripts can be generated. The AAA sequence encoding lysine was
deleted in the mutagenic primer and amplified using a standard PCR
during a second cycle. The resulting product was placed into the
wild-type vector using the Bcl (nucleotide 9358) and
Spl (nucleotide 10381) sites. After confirmation of the
correct sequence throughout the insert, infectious RNA was transcribed in vitro using SP6 polymerase and introduced into cells by
electroporation as described below.
In vitro transcription and RNA transfection.
Full-length
mutant and wild-type cDNAs were first linearized using XhoI,
treated with proteinase K, phenol extracted, and ethanol precipitated.
Templates were then transcribed in vitro as described previously
(24, 37). Templates were removed using RNase-free DNase. For
BHK cells, electroporation was performed essentially as described by
Liljestrom and Garoff (21). For A. albopictus
cells, transfections were performed as follows. Cells were pelleted and
washed in RNase-free electroporation buffer HBS (20 mM HEPES-HCl [pH
7.0], 137 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 0.7 mM Na2HPO4, and 6 mM dextrose) in diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated water. Washed cells
were resuspended in HBS to a concentration of 5 × 107/ml. RNA transcripts in 20 µl were added to 400 µl
of washed cells and transferred to a 0.2-cm gap length cuvette.
Electroporation conditions were 2.0 kV, 25 µF, and
resistance.
Cells were pulsed once. Healthy cells give a time constant of 0.7 s under these conditions. After the pulse, cells were allowed to sit
for 10 min before transfer into 10 ml of M and M medium
(22). Virus was harvested at 30 h posttransfection.
Metabolic labeling of viral proteins. Subconfluent 25-cm2 monolayers of transfected BHK-21 cells were metabolically labeled with a [35S]methionine-cysteine protein-labeling mixture at a concentration of 50 µCi/ml. Cultures were labeled at 6 or 16 h after transfection. Monolayers were starved for 30 min in methionine-cysteine-free medium containing 3% FBS and 2 mM glutamine for 30 min prior to addition of the label.
Radioiodination and immunoprecipitation of E2 tail.
BHK-21
cells were transfected with mutant or wild-type transcripts as
described above. Cycloheximide was added at 75 µg/ml to the cell
monolayers for 1 h at 16 h posttransfection. The cells were
then removed from the flask in 10 ml of lifting buffer (10 mM HEPES
[pH 7.2], 15 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 0.25 M sucrose). We
disrupted the cells by passing the suspension about 20 times through a
27-gauge needle. Nuclei and any remaining intact cells were pelleted by
centrifugation at 11,300 × g for 1 min. The
supernatant contained membrane vesicles of intracellular organelles and
plasma membrane. Half of the membrane vesicles were kept intact on ice, while the other half was dissolved in 1% NP-40. Intact or solubilized membrane vesicles were radioiodinated with Na125I using the
Iodo-bead iodination reagent (immobilized
N-chlorobenzenesulfonamide; Pierce) in accordance with the
manufacturer's instructions. Iodo-beads were resuspended in a 1.5-ml
microcentrifuge tube with 600 µl of phosphate-buffered saline without
CA2+ and Mg2+ and 400 µCi of
Na125I and incubated at room temperature for 5 min, and 500 µl of intact or solubilized membrane vesicles was then added to the
reaction mixture. After a 10 min incubation, the beads were removed to terminate iodination. Virus protein was immunoprecipitated using anti-E2 antibody (Ab) as described previously (24), with the following modifications. Absorptions were done in lysis buffer (0.02 M
Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 0.5% NP-40, 0.05 M NaCl) with 2% bovine serum
albumin. After absorption, the Ab-beads were washed 4 times with 1 ml
of 1 M NaCl in PBS and then once in 2% SDS in water. The washed beads
were divided, and half were cut with 5 µg of chymotrypsin (0.6 U) at
room temperature for 30 min. After proteinase treatment,
phenymethylsulfonyl fluoride was added to 1 mM and the digestion
products were absorbed a second time using anti-PE2 tail Ab-beads as
detailed previously (24) in lysis buffer with 2% bovine
serum albumin. After overnight absorption, the beads were washed as
described above, boiled in polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE)
sample buffer (12.5 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.8], 10% glycerol 1% SDS, 1%
-mercaptoethanol, 0.01% bromophenol blue), and separated by
centrifugation prior to loading onto a 16% Tricine gel as detailed previously (24).
PAGE. PAGE of radiolabeled proteins was carried out under denaturing conditions in 10.8% polyacrylamide (41) for 4 h at a constant power of 5 W. Tricine gel electrophoresis was done as described above. Fluorography was performed as described previously (2a), and gels were exposed to Kodak XAR-5 film and scanned using a Microtek Scanmaker 5, and the image was printed using Photoshop 5.0 software. Prints were generated on a Codonics 1600 dye sublimation printer.
Low-pH-mediated fusion from within (FFWI). BHK-21 cells were transfected as described above and plated onto 24-well plates. After 10 h, the transfected cell monolayers were washed twice with PBS containing 2% FBS as described previously (26). The fusion medium used was PBS containing 10 mM HEPES, 10 mM morpholineethanesulfonic acid (MES), 1% sucrose, 1× MEM amino acids, and 1× MEM vitamins. The pH of the medium was adjusted to 5.3 (fusion medium) or 7.2 (control medium). Fusion medium (pH 5.3) or control medium (pH 7.2) was added to the cells at 10 h posttransfection for 1 min. The cells were then placed into MEM and incubated at 37°C for 1 h. Fusion was assessed using light microscopy.
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM). At 18 h posttransfection, BHK cells were scraped from the flasks and pelleted by low-speed centrifugation. Cell pellets were washed twice in PBS and fixed in 3% glutaraldehyde at 4°C overnight. The cells were then washed three times with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4), postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h at room temperature, and washed again three times in cacodylate buffer. The cells were stained en bloc for 2 h at room temperature with 0.5% uranyl acetate. After three washes, cell pellets were embedded in 1% agarose and dehydrated through a graded ethanol series. Final embedding was in Spur's resin overnight at 70°C. Ultrathin sections were cut on an LKB Nova microtome and collected on 200-mesh copper grids. Sections were stained with 1% uranyl acetate and Reynolds lead citrate and photographed using a JEOL 100S transmission electron microscope. Negatives were scanned using a Microtek Scanmaker 5, and prints were generated on a Codonics 1600 printer.
| |
RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Construction of Sindbis virus mutant
K391.
Analysis of
images of Sindbis virus produced by electron cryomicroscopy (19,
32) has predicted that a critical spanning distance exists
between the endodomain of E2 and the hydrophobic C protein cleft
thought to be the binding site of the E2 tail. A conserved TPY(A)L (A
at 401 is not conserved) motif has been proposed to interact within a
hydrophobic pocket of the C protein containing C residues Y180, E133,
M132, W247, K135, M137, and F166 (19). The proposed
positioning of these two domains places A401 and L402 of E2 in the
pocket lying between Y180, W247, and F166 of C. It has also been
proposed that an interaction between E2 Y400 and C Y180 and W247 is
critical for stabilizing the E2-C association. These models predict
that a shift in position of these critical amino acids toward the
membrane by as little as the spanning length of one amino acid (4 Å)
could disrupt the binding of the E2 tail with C sufficiently to
abrogate assembly of the virus. We sought to test this hypothesis by
deleting K at E2 position 391 and shifting the position of the TPYAL
domain toward the modified membrane. This was done using site-directed PCR mutagenesis employing the megaprimer technique (22, 40) and a cDNA construct described previously which contains a silent mutation, Y at E2 position 420, which serves to assay for the extraction of the distal region of the E2 endodomain from the membrane
bilayer prior to envelopment. We have previously reported that the
deletion of a five-amino-acid sequence (L402APNA406) downstream from
the E2 TPY domain does not interfere with virus production
(22); however, deletions upstream of this motif have not
been reported.
Mutant E2
K391 is blocked in assembly of Sindbis virus from
BHK-21 cells.
To determine the phenotype of the mutant
K391,
BHK-21 cells were transfected with RNA from
K391 or S420Y cDNA and
virus was harvested at 8 and 20 h posttransfection as described in
Materials and Methods. Virus production was determined by plaque assay
on BHK cells as described above, and the results are shown in Table 1. Little infectious
K391 was detected
from BHK monolayers early in infection (~102), while less
than 1 PFU of infectious virus per cell was detected for the deletion
mutant at later times after transfection. By contrast, the cells
transfected with E2 S420Y produced wild-type virus levels. The
morphology of the plaques produced by
K391 was similar to that
produced by the parent S420Y.
|
K391 is
restricted in its ability to produce infectious virus in BHK-21 cells.
The possibility that
K391 produced noninfectious virus, as did the C
protein mutation previously reported, Y180S/E183G, was tested by
labeling transfected BHK-21 cells with
[35S]methionine-cysteine as described above. Monolayers
(4 × 106 cells) transfected with either
K391 or
S420Y RNA were labeled with 50 µCi of
[35S]methionine-cysteine per ml at 5 h
posttransfection. Medium and cells were harvested from the transfected
cultures after 24 h. The labeled medium was layered onto a 15 to
35% potassium tartrate gradient in PBS-D and centrifuged at
110,000 × g and 4°C for 18 h (22).
Gradients were fractionated, and 10 µl of each fraction was counted
using scintillation spectrometry. The gradient profiles shown in Fig.
2a demonstrate that virus particles
cannot be detected from the mutant-transfected cells, while the
wild-type control shows a significant labeled-virus peak sedimenting to
virus density (1.19 gm/cm3). These data show that the
mutant
K391 does not produce large amounts of noninfectious virus
and suggest that the deletion at K391 in the E2 tail blocks virus
production at a step prior to the assembly of virus particles.
|
Protein production and intracellular trafficking of virus
structural proteins.
The defect in the production of virus
particles described above could result from a failure to synthesize
virus structural proteins or to properly transport and process virus
proteins. To test these possibilities, cells transfected with mutant or wild-type RNA were labeled with [35S]methionine-cysteine
and harvested 24 h posttransfection. The transfected cells were
prepared for SDS-PAGE as described in Materials and Methods, and the
resulting gel is shown in Fig. 2b. This experiment shows that virus
structural proteins produced from both
K391 and S420Y RNAs were
processed normally by the cells. These data indicate that although no
virus particles are produced from the
K391 transfection of BHK
cells, both virus transcripts (
K391 and S420Y) generate the
same amount of labeled protein and that processing of PE2 to E2
proceeds normally in
K391-transfected cells.
K391 proteins was examined in BHK-21 cell
monolayers which were transfected with
K391 or wild-type RNA and
allowed to incubate at 37°C for 10 h. At this time, both
cultures, as well as a mock-transfected control culture, were treated
with fusion medium at pH 5.3 or control medium at pH 7.2 as detailed in
Materials and Methods and returned to pH 7.2 growth medium. Figure
3 shows that the extents of FFWI from
K391 and S420Y transfections are roughly equivalent. These data
indicate that the defect in virus assembly by the mutant virus is not
the result of failure to transport or process the
K391 virus
glycoproteins. The block is therefore at some stage after virus
modification of the plasma membrane.
|
Nucleocapsids do not associate with membranes modified with protein
from
K391.
Nucleocapsid structures can be seen by TEM to
accumulate along virus-modified plasma membranes at intermediate to
late times after infection (4). Toward the later part of the
infection, nucleocapsids are seen accumulating on internal vesicles,
probably from an intracellular accumulation of modified membrane.
Binding of nucleocapsids to modified membranes is a requisite step in the envelopment process. Failure of
K391 to bind nucleocapsids would
result in the failure to produce virions. Liu and Brown (23)
reported that binding of nucleocapsids to virus protein-modified membranes involves at least two steps, extraction and reorientation of
the E2 tail, mediated by or concomitant with phosphorylation of the
endodomain TPY motif, followed by dephosphorylation. Failure to
dephosphorylate wild-type E2 tails in the presence of the phosphatase inhibitor okadaic acid resulted in binding of the nucleocapsids to
modified membrane, but envelopment of the virus particles did not
proceed. To examine the nucleocapsid binding phenotype of cells
infected with the
K391 mutant, mutant and wild-type RNAs were used
to transfect BHK-21 cells and the cells were prepared for TEM at
18 h posttransfection. Figure 4
shows micrographs of
K391- and S420Y-transfected BHK-21 cells. The
wild-type RNA transfection shown in Fig. 4A displays extensive
alignment of nucleocapsid structures along modified membranes, while in
Fig. 4B, the
K391 mutant transfection shows nucleocapsids scattered
throughout the cell cytoplasm, not associated with membranes. We
concluded that membranes modified by the glycoproteins of Sindbis virus
K391 are defective in the ability to bind nucleocapsids.
|
The E2 tail of the
K391 mutant is reoriented into the
cytoplasm.
We have previously shown that an E2 double mutant,
T398A/Y400N, defective in both potential phosphorylation sites in the
E2 endodomain failed to withdraw the distal amino acids of the E2 endodomain from the membrane bilayer (22, 24). The failure to expose this sequence of amino acids to the cell cytoplasm blocked the binding of nucleocapsids and virus maturation. The inability of the
K391 mutant to bind nucleocapsids could, therefore, be the result of
a failure of this mutant to have the hydrophobic C terminus of the E2
tail extracted from the virus-modified cell membrane.
K391 was
constructed from Toto 1101 carrying tyrosine at position 420 (S420Y) as
described above. Position 420 in the E2 tail is initially oriented
toward the lumen of the ER and is proximal to the signalase cleavage
site. Prior to virus budding, the E2 tail must be extracted from the
membrane to become exposed to the cell cytoplasm for envelopment to
occur (24). The introduction of the silent mutation S420Y
makes it possible to determine the orientation of this part of the E2
endodomain relative to the membrane bilayer by determining if Y420 is
exposed for iodination by a membrane-impermeable iodinating agent.
K391 mutant, transfected monolayers were assayed as detailed in
Materials and Methods. Cycloheximide was added to the monolayers for
1 h at 16 h posttransfection to inhibit protein synthesis and
allow viral proteins to be exported from the rough ER. Transfected BHK
cells expressing
K391, wild-type virus, or nonvirus control RNA were
processed for iodination as described in Materials and Methods
(24). Cell monolayers were harvested using 4°C lifting
buffer, and membrane vesicles containing the virus membrane
glycoproteins were prepared by homogenization of cells through a
27-gauge needle. Iodination of the cell extracts was done in the
presence or absence of the detergent NP-40 using Iodo-beads, a
membrane-impermeable iodination reagent. The E2 Y420 tail has two
tyrosine residues (Y400 and Y420) which can be iodinated once the tail
has been extracted from the cell membrane. To determine which positions
are iodinated, a chymotryptic digest (cleaving on the C-terminal side
of Y) was made of the iodinated E2 tail and a peptide fragment of 2,087 Da was immunoprecipitated and resolved on a Tricine gel. The results of
this experiment are shown in Fig. 5 and
demonstrate that although the
K391 mutant does not bind
nucleocapsids, the E2 tail is extracted from the membrane. As shown in
lanes 2 and 4 of the wild-type transfection, the fragment containing
Y420 is visible without (lane 2) or with (lane 4) NP-40, demonstrating
that the tail is extracted and accessible to label without detergent
treatment. As is also demonstrated, the mutant
K391 displays the
same peptide fragments upon treatment with chymotrypsin as does the
wild type, shown in lanes 6 (without NP-40) and 8 (with NP-40).
Identical processing of transfections with nonviral RNA, lanes 9 to 12, did not generate any of the peptides seen in the virus-transfected
lanes.
|
K391 do produce virus, albeit 5 orders of magnitude less than those transfected with the RNA of the
wild type. This suggests that there is limited interaction of C protein
with E2, allowing virus assembly. It is possible, therefore, that
inefficient exposure of the E2 tail to the cell cytoplasm occurs in the
mutant, but all of the E2 tail that is correctly configured is
incorporated into virus. Although the amount of label in the E2 peptide
containing Y420 is less in the mutant than in the wild type, it is not
reduced enough to account for the 5-order-of-magnitude reduction of
virus production seen in the mutant-transfected cells. The data suggest
that most of the E2 which has reoriented the E2 tail to the cytoplasm
is not incorporated into virus. The reduced amount of label may
therefore result from a somewhat reduced efficiency of reorganization
of the E2 endodomain. These data demonstrate that although
nucleocapsids do not attach to the membranes modified with
K391
proteins, the specific defect in assembly is due not to an inability of
the E2 tail to reorient but to an additional, unidentified step in the
envelopment process.
We have previously shown that extraction of the E2 tail correlates with
its phosphorylation (23). To determine if the E2 protein of
mutant
K391 is subjected to phosphorylation, transfected BHK cells
were treated with okadaic acid and phosphorylation was determined as
described previously (22, 23) and in Materials and Methods.
PAGE analysis revealed equal phosphorylation levels in
K391 and
S420Y transfections (data not shown), indicating that the deletion of
E2 K391 does not effect this process.
The
K391 mutant produces wild-type levels of virus when grown in
A. albopictus U4.4 cells.
Insect and mammalian cells
differ dramatically in their physiological, genetic, and biochemical
properties. Dramatic differences have been demonstrated both in the way
Sindbis virus replicates in these two cell types and in the manner with
which the two cell types respond to virus infection (9, 10, 12,
15-17, 27, 35, 38, 42). Because of the striking differences in
the virus-cell interactions in these two cell types, we examined the phenotype of the mutant
K391 in the insect host cell.
K391 in U4.4 cells, we
transfected both mutant and wild-type RNAs into mosquito U4.4 cells as
described in Materials and Methods. The results are shown in Table
2. Whereas
K391 produced very little
virus from BHK cells, compared to wild-type virus, yields of this
mutant were at wild-type levels when the virus was grown in mosquito
cells. Thus, the defect in assembly resulting from the deletion of E2
K391 is a host range mutation.
|
K391 mutant in C7-10 cells was consistently higher,
regardless of the host cell used to produce it. The wild-type SVHR
strain of Sindbis virus and the S420Y cDNA clone used as the wild type
show equivalent titers on BHK-21 or C7-10 cells. The
K391 mutant,
however, produces virus particles which display differential titers
from the two indicator cell lines used. Titers of mosquito-grown
K391 on BHK cells are 5% of that recorded on A. albopictus cells. Despite its host-specific restriction in assembly,
K391 can infect BHK-21 cells and the resulting low level
of progeny virus forms plaques on BHK-21 cells at about 4% of the
level obtained with C7-10 cells. This effect is not the result of a
difference in the level of plaque-forming efficiency in these two cell
lines, as seen from the titers of the SVHR and S420Y strains in both
BHK-21 and C710 cells (Table 2). These results were not due to
instability of the virus or an effect of temperature sensitivity (data
not shown). The progeny virus recovered from
K391 RNA-transfected
BHK or U4.4 cells was found to retain the mutant sequence by sequencing
of RT PCR products, and the
K391 plaques from BHK-21 cells retained
the large-plaque phenotype of the S420Y parent (data not shown).
Collectively, these data indicate that the mutant
K391 is restricted
in the ability to produce infectious virions in a host-dependent fashion.
| |
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Structural details of Sindbis virus have been obtained by electron cryomicroscopy of intact virions and by X-ray crystallography of expressed C protein (7, 19, 32, 33). These studies show Sindbis virus to have a highly ordered structure consisting of nested interconnected T=4 icosahedra with an associated membrane. Our laboratory has investigated the assembly of this structure for over 30 years, and we have particularly focused on the specific structural requirements for assembly. An important event and interaction in Sindbis virus structure and assembly are maturation of the E2 cytoplasmic tail and its binding interaction with the nucleocapsid, respectively. This interaction plays a pivotal role in initiating C envelopment in the virus-modified host cell membrane. The endodomain of Sindbis virus E2 is 33 amino acids in length and contains the sequence KARRECLTPYALAPNAVIPTSLALLCCVRSANA (amino acids 391 to 423, Fig. 1) (36). The carboxy terminus is a multifunctional domain (Fig. 1) and contains the hydrophobic signal sequence for the integration of the adjacent 6,000-molecular-weight (6K) protein into the ER, as well as the signalase cleavage site which separates PE2 from 6K. Algorithms which predict protein sequences as existing as transmembranal domains (39) place amino acids N405 to V418 of PE2 in the ER membrane.
The E2 endodomain sequence TPYALAPNA has been implicated as critical for the binding of C protein by molecular modeling and genetic analysis (13, 22, 25). We have demonstrated that the sequence LAPNA beginning at position L402 is not essential for virus growth in either BHK-21 or U4.4 cells (22), even though L402, P404, and A406 are completely conserved among the alphaviruses. The reason why this deletion is not lethal may be that the hydrophobic properties of this sequence and those of the immediately following V407IPTS sequence are redundant and this sequence may perform the function of LAPNA in C binding. The TPY domain is also completely conserved and contains T398 and Y400, which are both possible substrates for phosphorylation, a modification which occurs concurrently with extraction of the tail domain (23). These residues are implicated as critical for C binding through an aromatic interaction with C Y180 and W247 (19, 44) and E2 Y400.
These data suggest that recognition and binding of the nucleocapsid by the E2 tail involve more than one domain in the E2 tail. The region involved in binding specificity mapped genetically to the E2 carboxy terminus and comprises one domain, while current models predict that the TPYAL region is bound in the C protein binding pocket (19), predicting a second C protein binding domain. Collectively, these data begin to outline several overlapping structural and functional domains contained in the E2 tail (Fig. 1). These domains include (i) tail extraction, (ii) phosphorylation-dephosphorylation, (iii) nucleocapsid binding specificity, (iv) a redundant and nonessential sequence, and (v) a signal for 6K integration. Some of these domains appear to function in vastly different contexts in mammalian and insect cells.
The phenotypic difference between the growth of the
K391 mutant in a
vertebrate host and its growth in an invertebrate host is very
significant. We detected very little mutant virus by plaque assay and
none by metabolic labeling of BHK-21 cells, while wild-type virus
levels were produced by this deletion mutant in mosquito cells.
Although little virus is produced in vertebrate cells, all structural
proteins are synthesized and trafficked normally. Membrane
glycoproteins are processed normally, and E1 is functional for fusion;
however, virus envelopment does not take place in the vertebrate cell.
Among the many physiological and biochemical differences between mammalian and insect cells are the differences in cell membranes. Insect and mammalian cell membranes differ in lipid composition, and their physical and structural properties differ because of the differences in composition. The mosquito cell membrane, therefore, presents an environment to the Sindbis virus glycoproteins which differs greatly from that in the mammalian cell. Insect cells do not synthesize cholesterol (8, 29), and it is unclear how much, if any, dietary cholesterol is incorporated into insect membranes. Cholesterol (3, 8) is known to cause cell membranes to thicken, and the degree of thickening is proportional to the amount of cholesterol present (8). The addition of an equimolar amount of cholesterol to phosphatidylcholine, reflecting roughly the plasma membrane composition in vertebrate cells, increases the bilayer thickness from 25 to 31Å (8). The presence of cholesterol also increases membrane viscosity and reduces membrane permeability.
As the membrane bilayer is the major unique host cell component in the
envelopment process, it appears that deletion of the amino acid K at E2
position 391 affects the interaction(s) of the E2 tail with the cell
membranes of vertebrate and invertebrate hosts in a differential
manner. Deletion of E2 K391 at the membrane junction leaves A392 at the
membrane interface. It is plausible that, in BHK-21 cells, this
aliphatic amino acid is pulled into the membrane, leaving the basic
arginine pair (E2 R393-R394) juxtaposed with the membrane. In this
scenario, the spanning distance from the membrane to the TPYAL
nucleocapsid binding motif is shortened not by one amino acid but
effectively by two. This circumstance may render the distance from the
membrane to the TPYAL sequence insufficient to reach the critical
binding sequences in the hydrophobic pocket in the C protein,
preventing the second nucleocapsid binding step. However, this model
predicts that the first binding step should still occur. In fact,
nucleocapsid binding is not observed in
K391-infected BHK-21 cells.
This is not a result of failure of the
K391 mutant to perform the
functions related to the exposure of the first-step binding domain to
the cell cytoplasm (see above). It is possible that the
misconfiguration of the E2 transmembrane domain prevents some critical
configuring of the trimeric structure of the spike structure at the
cytoplasmic side of this structure. This alteration may prevent C
binding in BHK cells. The observation that a small amount of virus (<1
PFU/cell) is produced by
K391-transfected cells may be explained if
association with C stabilizes an assembly-competent form of the spike
glycoprotein which, in the absence of C binding, is rapidly converted
into a defective configuration.
Because of the differences in composition of the insect cell membrane, this hypothesized misconfiguration does not occur and sufficient E2 endodomain is available to allow efficient virus assembly to proceed in this host. These data suggest that exposure of the E2 tail carboxy terminus to the cell cytoplasm is not a sufficient condition for binding of nucleocapsids to virus-modified membranes and that other requirements are placed upon the virus spike glycoprotein complex for the conditions required for nucleocapsid binding to be met. These data imply that membrane composition plays critical roles in establishing these conditions. This hypothesis is being tested in our laboratory.
| |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
This research was supported by a grant from The Foundation for Research, Carson City, Nev., and by grant AI42775 from the National Institutes of Health.
| |
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of Biochemistry, North Carolina State University, Campus Box 7622, Raleigh, NC 27695-7622. Phone: (919) 515-5802. Fax: (919) 515-2047. E-mail: dennis_brown{at}ncsu.edu.
| |
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| 1. |
Anthony, R. P., and D. T. Brown.
1991.
Protein-protein interactions in an alphavirus membrane.
J. Virol.
65:1187-1194 |
| 2. | Anthony, R. P., A. M. Paredes, and D. T. Brown. 1992. Disulfide bonds are essential for the stability of the Sindbis virus envelope. Virology 190:330-336[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 2a. | Bonner, W. M., and R. A. Laskey. 1974. A film detection method for tritium-labeled proteins and nucleic acids in polyacrylamide gels. Eur. J. Biochem. 46:83-88[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 3. |
Bretscher, M.
1993.
Cholesterol and the Golgi apparatus.
Science
261:1280 |
| 4. |
Brown, D. T., and J. F. Smith.
1975.
Morphology of BHK-21 cells infected with Sindbis virus temperature-sensitive mutants in complementation groups D and E.
J. Virol.
15:1262-1266 |
| 5. | Carleton, M., and D. T. Brown. 1996. Events in the endoplasmic reticulum abrogate the temperature sensitivity of Sindbis virus mutant ts23. J. Virol. 70:952-959[Abstract]. |
| 6. | Carleton, M., H. Lee, M. Mulvey, and D. T. Brown. 1997. Role of glycoprotein PE2 in formation and maturation of the Sindbis virus spike. J. Virol. 71:1558-1566[Abstract]. |
| 7. | Choi, H. K., L. Tong, W. Minor, P. Dumas, U. Boege, M. G. Rossmann, and G. Wengler. 1991. Structure of Sindbis virus core protein reveals a chymotrypsin-like serine proteinase and the organization of the virion. Nature 354:37-43[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 8. | Clayton, R. B. 1964. The utilization of sterols by insects. J. Lipid Res. 5:3-19[Abstract]. |
| 9. |
Condreay, L. D.,
R. H. Adams,
J. Edwards, and D. T. Brown.
1988.
Effect of actinomycin D and cycloheximide on replication of Sindbis virus in Aedes albopictus (mosquito) cells.
J. Virol.
62:2629-2635 |
| 10. |
Condreay, L. D., and D. T. Brown.
1986.
Exclusion of superinfecting homologous virus by Sindbis virus-infected Aedes albopictus (mosquito) cells.
J. Virol.
58:81-86 |
| 11. | Coombs, K., and D. T. Brown. 1987. Organization of the Sindbis virus nucleocapsid as revealed by bifunctional cross-linking agents. J. Mol. Biol. 195:359-371[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 12. |
Erwin, C., and D. T. Brown.
1983.
Requirement of cell nucleus for Sindbis virus replication in cultured Aedes albopictus cells.
J. Virol.
45:792-799 |
| 13. | Gaedigk-Nitschko, K., and M. J. Schlesinger. 1991. Site-directed mutations in Sindbis virus E2 glycoprotein's cytoplasmic domain and the 6K protein lead to similar defects in virus assembly and budding. Virology 183:206-214[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 14. | Gallaher, W. R., D. B. Levitan, K. S. Kerwin, and H. A. Blough. 1980. Molecular and biological parameters of membrane fusion. Academic Press, Inc., London, England. |
| 15. |
Gliedman, J. B.,
J. F. Smith, and D. T. Brown.
1975.
Morphogenesis of Sindbis virus in cultured Aedes albopictus cells.
J. Virol.
16:913-926 |
| 16. | Karpf, A. R., J. M. Blake, and D. T. Brown. 1997. Characterization of the infection of Aedes albopictus cell clones by Sindbis virus. Virus Res. 50:1-13[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 17. | Karpf, A. R., and D. T. Brown. 1998. Comparison of Sindbis virus-induced pathology in mosquito and vertebrate cell cultures. Virology 240:193-201[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 18. | Lee, H., and D. T. Brown. 1994. Mutations in an exposed domain of Sindbis virus capsid protein result in the production of noninfectious virions and morphological variants. Virology 202:390-400[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 19. | Lee, S., K. E. Owen, H. K. Choi, H. Lee, G. Lu, G. Wengler, D. T. Brown, M. G. Rossmann, and R. J. Kuhn. 1996. Identification of a protein binding site on the surface of the alphavirus nucleocapsid and its implication in virus assembly. Structure 4:531-541[Medline]. |
| 20. |
Levy-Mintz, P., and M. Kielian.
1991.
Mutagenesis of the putative fusion domain of the Semliki Forest virus spike protein.
J. Virol.
65:4292-4300 |
| 21. |
Lilijestrom, P., and H. Garoff.
1991.
Internally located cleavable signal sequences direct the formation of Semliki Forest virus membrane proteins from a polyprotein precursor.
J. Virol.
65:147-154 |
| 22. | Liu, L. N., H. Lee, R. Hernandez, and D. T. Brown. 1996. Mutations in the endo domain of Sindbis virus glycoprotein E2 block phosphorylation, reorientation of the endo domain, and nucleocapsid binding. Virology 222:236-246[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 23. | Liu, N., and D. T. Brown. 1993. Phosphorylation and dephosphorylation events play critical roles in Sindbis virus maturation. Virology 196:703-711[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 24. |
Liu, N., and D. T. Brown.
1993.
Transient translocation of the cytoplasmic (endo) domain of a type I membrane glycoprotein into cellular membranes.
J. Cell Biol.
120:877-883 |
| 25. |
Lopez, S.,
J.-S. Yao,
R. J. Kuhn,
E. G. Strauss, and J. H. Strauss.
1994.
Nucleocapsid-glycoprotein interactions required for assembly of alphaviruses.
J. Virol.
68:1316-1323 |
| 26. |
Mann, E.,
J. Edwards, and D. T. Brown.
1983.
Polycaryocyte formation mediated by Sindbis virus glycoproteins.
J. Virol.
45:1083-1089 |
| 27. |
Miller, M. L., and D. T. Brown.
1992.
Morphogenesis of Sindbis virus in three subclones of Aedes albopictus (mosquito) cells.
J. Virol.
66:4180-4190 |
| 28. | Mitsuhashi, J., and K. Maramorosch. 1964. Leafhopper tissue culture: embryonic, nymphal and imaginal tissues from aseptic insects. Contrib. Boyce Thompson Inst. 22:435. |
| 29. | Mitsuhashi, J., S. Nakasone, and Y. Horie. 1983. Sterol-free eukaryotic cells from continuous cell lines of insects. Cell Biol. Int. Rep. 7:1057-1062[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 30. | Mulvey, M., and D. T. Brown. 1996. Assembly of the Sindbis virus spike protein complex. Virology 219:125-132[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 31. | Omar, A., and H. Koblet. 1988. Semliki Forest virus particles containing only E1 envelope glycoprotein are infectious and can induce cell-cell fusion. Virology 166:17-23[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 32. |
Paredes, A. M.,
D. T. Brown,
R. Rothnagel,
W. Chiu,
R. J. Schoepp,
R. E. Johnston, and B. V. Prasad.
1993.
Three-dimensional structure of a membrane-containing virus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:9095-9099 |
| 33. |
Paredes, A. M.,
H. Heidner,
P. Thuman-Commike,
B. V. V. Prasad,
R. E. Johnston, and W. Chiu.
1998.
Structural localization of the E3 glycoprotein in attenuated Sindbis virus mutants.
J. Virol.
72:1534-1541 |
| 34. | Paredes, A. M., M. N. Simon, and D. T. Brown. 1992. The mass of the Sindbis virus nucleocapsid suggests it has T = 4 icosahedral symmetry. Virology 187:329-332[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 35. |
Renz, D., and D. T. Brown.
1976.
Characteristics of Sindbis virus temperature-sensitive mutants in cultured BHK-21 and Aedes albopictus (mosquito) cells.
J. Virol.
19:775-781 |
| 36. | Rice, C. M., J. R. Bell, M. W. Hunkapiller, E. G. Strauss, and J. H. Strauss. 1982. Isolation and characterization of the hydrophobic COOH-terminal domains of the Sindbis virion glycoproteins. J. Mol. Biol. 154:355-378[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 37. |
Rice, C. M.,
R. Levis,
J. H. Strauss, and H. V. Huang.
1987.
Production of infectious RNA transcripts from Sindbis virus cDNA clones: mapping of lethal mutations, rescue of a temperature-sensitive marker, and in vitro mutagenesis to generate defined mutants.
J. Virol.
61:3809-3819 |
| 38. |
Riedel, B., and D. T. Brown.
1979.
Novel antiviral activity found in the media of Sindbis virus-persistently infected mosquito (Aedes albopictus) cell cultures.
J. Virol.
29:51-60 |
| 39. | Rost, B., R. Casadio, P. Fariselli, and C. Sander. 1995. Transmembrane helices predicted at 95% accuracy. Protein Sci. 4:521-533[Medline]. |
| 40. | Sarkar, G., and S. S. Sommer. 1990. The "megaprimer" method of site directed mutagenesis. BioTechniques 8:404-407[Medline]. |
| 41. |
Scheefers, H.,
U. Scheefers-Borchel,
J. Edwards, and D. T. Brown.
1980.
Distribution of virus structural proteins and protein-protein interactions in plasma membrane of baby hamster kidney cells infected with Sindbis or vesicular stomatitis virus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
77:7277-81 |
| 42. | Scheefers-Borchel, U., H. Scheefers, J. Edwards, and D. T. Brown. 1981. Sindbis virus maturation in cultured mosquito cells is sensitive to actinomycin D. Virology 110:292-301[CrossRef][Medline]. |
| 43. | Singh, K. R., and K. M. Pavri. 1967. Experimental studies with chikungunya virus in Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus. Acta Virol. 11:517-526[Medline]. |
| 44. | Skoging, U., M. Vihinen, L. Nilsson, and P. Liljestrom. 1996. Aromatic interactions define the binding of the alphavirus spike to its nucleocapsid. Structure 4:519-529[Medline]. |
| 45. |
Strauss, J. H., and E. G. Strauss.
1994.
The alphaviruses: gene expression, replication, and evolution.
Microbiol. Rev.
58:491-562 |
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Copyright © 2009 by the American Society for Microbiology. For an alternate route to Journals.ASM.org, visit: http://intl-journals.asm.org | More Info»