Previous Article
Journal of Virology, April 2000, p. 3929-3931, Vol. 74, No. 8
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
An Antiviral Compound That Blocks Structural
Transitions of Poliovirus Prevents Receptor Binding at Low
Temperatures
Alan W.
Dove and
Vincent R.
Racaniello*
Department of Microbiology, Columbia
University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10032
Received 3 September 1999/Accepted 24 January 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
Drugs such as WIN51711 that inhibit picornavirus replication are
thought to block poliovirus infectivity by binding to the capsid and
preventing structural transitions required for uncoating. We examined
the activity of WIN51711 at temperatures where capsid flexibility is
thought to be decreased. Below 37°C, WIN51711 inhibits the binding of
wild-type poliovirus to cells but does not affect the binding of a
poliovirus mutant which is believed to undergo structural transitions
more readily. These results suggest that the poliovirus capsid must
undergo structural changes to bind to its cellular receptor.
 |
TEXT |
To initiate the replication cycle,
viruses must first attach to a cell surface receptor and deliver their
nucleic acid to the correct cellular compartment. For some viruses the
cell receptor is simply a hook which concentrates the virus on the cell
surface, and uncoating is triggered by a low pH or the action of
proteinases. In other cases the interaction of the virus with a cell
receptor also initiates conformational changes that prime the capsid
for uncoating. Poliovirus, a member of the family
Picornaviridae, appears to fall into the latter category.
This small, nonenveloped RNA virus initiates infection by binding to
the poliovirus receptor (Pvr), a member of the immunoglobulin
superfamily (13). After binding to Pvr on the cell surface,
the virus undergoes a major structural change which results in the
formation of altered particles. While the intact native virion
sediments at 160S, the altered particle sediments at 135S and has lost
the capsid protein VP4 and extruded the hydrophobic N terminus of VP1.
The altered particle has been proposed as an obligate intermediate step
in the viral entry pathway (5, 7). Less dramatic structural
changes in the capsids of picornaviruses occur in the absence of
receptors. Antibodies against internal epitopes of the poliovirus
capsid proteins VP1 and VP4 can bind to the virus (11), and
VP4 of rhinovirus is transiently exposed on the surface of the virus (10). The functional significance of these structural
changes, called breathing, is unknown.
Breathing of the rhinovirus particle is blocked by WIN compounds
(10). These antiviral drugs, originally developed by the Sterling-Winthrop Research Institute, bind in a hydrophobic pocket in
the viral capsid, replacing a hydrocarbon molecule that normally occupies this site (1, 8, 9, 17). WIN compounds are thought
to block poliovirus infectivity by preventing the transition to 135S
particles (6, 18). It is believed that the release of lipid
from the viral capsid during entry permits the structural changes
required for uncoating of the genome (14). WIN compounds replace lipid in the hydrophobic pocket, preventing structural transitions which are required for uncoating.
Hypothesizing that breathing of the capsid might play an important role
in viral entry, we examined the activity of the capsid-binding antiviral compound WIN51711 at temperatures where the transition to
135S particles does not occur at detectable levels. Here we demonstrate
that, at temperatures below 37°C, the antiviral compound WIN51711
prevents wild-type (WT) virus from binding to Pvr. In contrast, this
drug does not affect the binding of a poliovirus variant which is
believed to undergo structural transitions more readily during entry.
These findings suggest that the viral capsid must undergo structural
changes to bind to the receptor.
Poliovirus strains were propagated in HeLa S3 cells as described
previously (12). Antiviral compound WIN51711 was a gift from
the Sterling-Winthrop Corporation (Rensselaer, N.Y.). Stocks were
prepared as 10-mg/ml solutions in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). 35S-methionine-labeled virus stocks were prepared as
described previously (4). For equilibrium binding assays,
aliquots of 35S-methionine-labeled WT P1/Mahoney virus
stocks were preincubated for 0 or 1 h at 4, 25, or 37°C with 0 (0.05% DMSO), 0.5, or 5 µg of WIN51711 per ml. Virus was then added
at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 10 to tubes containing 5 × 106 cells each in 350 µl of Joklik medium with the
above-mentioned concentrations of WIN51711. Samples were agitated at 37 or 25°C for 1 h or at 4°C overnight, and samples were taken in
triplicate from each tube to determine the total quantity of label
present and quantity of label bound to cells. Results are expressed as the percentage of label bound, determined by dividing the number of
counts in the bound fraction by the number of counts in the total
fraction and multiplying by 100. Counts bound at different temperatures
were comparable (data not shown). The effect of WIN51711 on binding of
P1/Mahoney mutants Q3178R/I2231M and P1095S/V1160I was determined by
performing saturation binding assays substantially as described above,
but at a MOI of 5 and without preincubation of the virus with drug. To
determine sensitivity of poliovirus to WIN51711, virus was preincubated
at 25°C with or without 10 µg of WIN51711 per ml before infection
of monolayers. Virus yields were determined, and the fold increase in
titer was calculated (fold increase = titer at 8 h/titer at 0 h).
WIN51711 inhibits virus binding at low temperatures.
The
results of previous studies demonstrate that WIN51711 prevents viral
uncoating but not binding of poliovirus to its cellular receptor
(6, 14, 15, 18). Equilibrium binding assays were done to
determine the temperature dependence of WIN51711 activity. Poliovirus
was preincubated with WIN51711 for 0 or 1 h at either 25 or
37°C, and binding assays were performed at 37, 25, or 4°C, using
drug concentrations of 0 to 5 µg/ml (Fig.
1). At 37°C, virus binding to cells is
unaffected by the presence of the drug, consistent with earlier
results. At 25°C, the compound noticeably inhibits binding, and at
4°C, binding is virtually abolished at the highest drug
concentration, regardless of whether or not a preincubation step is
included. For subsequent experiments, equilibrium binding assays were
performed at 25 or 4°C after a 1-h preincubation with the drug at
25°C.

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
WIN51711 inhibits poliovirus binding at low
temperatures. 35S-methionine-labeled poliovirus (strain
P1/Mahoney) was incubated for 0 or 1 h at different temperatures
with WIN51711 at the indicated concentrations. Virus was added to HeLa
cell suspensions (MOI = 10) in medium containing the same
concentrations of WIN51711, the suspensions were agitated at the
indicated temperatures overnight, and samples were taken in triplicate
to determine the percentage of radioactive methionine bound to cells.
|
|
Capsid mutations can bypass WIN51711 binding inhibition.
The
inhibition of poliovirus binding by WIN51711 at low temperatures
suggested that conformational changes in the capsid are important for
receptor interaction. To test this hypothesis, the effect of WIN51711
on the binding of two variants of poliovirus which are believed to more
readily undergo receptor-induced structural changes was examined.
P1/Mahoney mutant Q3178R/I2231M was isolated in a screen for soluble
receptor-resistant (srr) mutants and found to have an
increased rate of alteration to the 135S A particle, suggesting that
the mutant capsid is more flexible than that of the WT virus
(2). Mutant P1095S/V1160I was selected for growth on cells
expressing an altered poliovirus receptor that does not bind to the WT
virus and was also believed to have greater capsid flexibility than the
WT parent virus (3). Binding of P1095S/V1160I to cells was
unaffected by WIN51711, while binding of Q3178R/I2231M was as sensitive
to the drug as that of the WT virus (Fig.
2). The P1095S/V1160I mutations also
conferred resistance to WIN51711 inhibition of infectivity (Table
1).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Poliovirus capsid mutations can bypass binding
inhibition by WIN51711. 35S-methionine-labeled poliovirus
mutants P1095S/V1160I (labeled 1095) and Q3178R/I2231M (labeled 3178)
were added to cell suspensions (MOI = 5) in medium containing
WIN51711 at the indicated concentrations, the suspensions were agitated
at the indicated temperatures overnight, and samples were taken in
triplicate to determine the percentage of radioactive methionine bound
to cells.
|
|
P1095S/V1160I binds WIN51711 and Pvr.
Because the loss of
WIN51711 sensitivity in the equilibrium binding assay of P1095S/V1160I
correlated with a loss of WIN51711 sensitivity in the virus yield
experiment, the possibilities arose that the drug was unable to bind to
the mutant capsid and that the mutant employed an alternative entry
pathway independent of Pvr binding. To test the first possibility, we
performed a thermolability assay, which takes advantage of the
thermostabilizing effect of WIN51711 on the virus capsid (14,
16). P1/Mahoney WT or mutant virus was incubated at 25°C in
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) with 0.2% bovine calf serum with or
without 5 µg of WIN51711 per ml for 1 h and then transferred to
a 45°C water bath. Samples were taken at different times after the
temperature shift, and the viral titer of each sample was determined by
plaque assay. At 45°C, P1095S/V1160I is stabilized by WIN51711,
indicating that the drug binds to the mutant capsid (Fig.
3). Both mutants are more thermolabile
than the WT virus, consistent with the idea that they have increased
capsid flexibility. Preincubation of cells with a monoclonal antibody
against the poliovirus binding site on Pvr abolished binding of
P1095S/V1160I, demonstrating that the mutant does not utilize an
alternative receptor (data not shown).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Thermostabilization of WT and mutant poliovirus
P1/Mahoney by WIN51711. WT or mutant P1/Mahoney virus was incubated at
25°C in PBS with 0.2% bovine calf serum with or without 5 µg of
WIN51711 per ml for 1 h and then transferred to a 45°C water
bath. Samples were taken in triplicate at 0, 1, 5, 10, 30, and 60 min
after the temperature shift, and the viral titer of each sample was
determined by plaque assay.
|
|
The results of structural and biochemical studies on poliovirus and
rhinovirus have suggested that the viral capsid is dynamic
and breathes
in the absence of receptor, but their relevance to
receptor binding and
uncoating has not been determined (
10,
11). Here, we report
data which support a critical role for
minor capsid transitions in
receptor
binding.
Initial characterization of the antiviral capsid-binding compound
WIN51711 led to the conclusion that poliovirus uncoating,
but not
binding, is inhibited by this drug (
6,
15,
18).
Unfortunately, these assays were performed under conditions where
saturation binding could not occur. Here, we report an analysis
of
saturation binding assays in which WIN51711 is found to inhibit
virus
binding at 25°C and abolish it at 4°C (Fig.
1).
The most likely explanation for these results is that the poliovirus
capsid must undergo conformational changes in order to
bind to Pvr.
This hypothesis would be consistent with the finding
that, in solution,
the poliovirus particle is structurally dynamic
(
11) and
would also explain the temperature dependence of the
inhibition by
WIN51711. At physiological temperatures, the reduction
in capsid
flexibility induced by the drug may be overcome by the
energy available
for structural transitions. At lower temperatures,
where less energy is
available, the effect of drug binding might
become more pronounced,
causing the virion to become frozen and
unable to undergo changes
required for receptor
binding.
Our findings are consistent with observations on the reversible
exposure of internal epitopes of poliovirus capsid proteins
VP1 and VP4
(
11). Such breathing of the capsid occurs at 37°C
but not
at 25°C. Furthermore, exposure of internal epitopes at
37°C is not
blocked by WIN-like antiviral compounds (
11). The
capsid
sequences that are reversibly exposed at 37°C are irreversibly
exposed upon receptor binding (
7). It is possible that
reversible
exposure of internal epitopes also produces conformational
changes
required for tight
binding.
The hypothesis that poliovirus breathing is required for binding to Pvr
was tested by examining the effects of WIN51711 on
two poliovirus
variants which are believed to possess a capsid
that more readily
undergoes structural changes. Virus mutant P1095S/V1160I
was selected
for growth on cells expressing a mutant poliovirus
receptor that cannot
bind the WT virus (
3). This variant can
bind to two
different poliovirus receptors that have amino acid
changes in
well-separated regions of the molecule. Because of
this property, it is
believed that the mutations in this virus
do not directly contact the
receptor but modulate structural changes
necessary for receptor
binding. Binding of this mutant is not
inhibited by WIN51711, even at
temperatures as low as 4°C (Fig.
2). In addition, the replication of
this mutant in cells is not
inhibited by the drug. These data suggest
that this mutant has
considerably lower energy requirements for the
structural changes
that occur during breathing and
uncoating.
The mutant Q3178R/I2231M, which was isolated in a screen for soluble
receptor-resistant (
srr) mutants (
2), has an
increased
rate of alteration to the 135S A particle. The Q3178R
mutation
is located at the interface between promoters; it was
hypothesized
that it increases the flexibility of the interface,
facilitating
conversion to 135S particles. However, binding of this
mutant
to cells at low temperatures is inhibited by WIN51711 to the
same
degree as that of the WT virus. It is possible that the mutation
selectively increases conversion to 135S particles, without affecting
structural changes required for receptor
binding.
We find that WIN compounds, which bind to the viral capsid and prevent
structural changes required for uncoating, can block
poliovirus
attachment to cells at low temperatures. These findings
indicate that
the binding of poliovirus to its cellular receptor
requires structural
changes in the
capsid.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by a grant (AI20017) to V. Racaniello from
the National Institutes of Health.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 701 W. 168th St., New York, NY 10032. Phone: (212) 305-5707. Fax: (212)
305-5106. E-mail: vrr1{at}columbia.edu.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Chapman, M. S.,
I. Minor,
M. G. Rossman,
G. D. Diana, and K. Andries.
1991.
Human rhinovirus 14 complexed with antiviral compound R 61837.
J. Mol. Biol.
217:455-463[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Colston, E., and V. R. Racaniello.
1994.
Soluble receptor-resistant poliovirus mutants identify surface and internal capsid residues that control interaction with the cell receptor.
EMBO J.
13:5855-5862[Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Colston, E. M., and V. R. Racaniello.
1995.
Poliovirus variants selected on mutant receptor-expressing cells identify capsid residues that expand receptor recognition.
J. Virol.
69:4823-4829[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Dove, A. W., and V. R. Racaniello.
1997.
Cold-adapted poliovirus mutants bypass a postentry replication block.
J. Virol.
71:4728-4735[Abstract].
|
| 5.
|
Flore, O.,
C. E. Fricks,
D. J. Filman, and J. M. Hogle.
1990.
Conformation changes in poliovirus assembly and cell entry.
Semin. Virol.
1:429-438.
|
| 6.
|
Fox, M. P.,
M. J. Otto, and M. A. McKinlay.
1986.
Prevention of rhinovirus and poliovirus uncoating by WIN 51711, a new antiviral drug.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
30:110-116[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Fricks, C. E., and J. M. Hogle.
1990.
The cell-induced conformational change of poliovirus: externalization of the amino terminus of VP1 is responsible for liposome binding.
J. Virol.
64:1934-1945[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Grant, R. A.,
C. N. Hiremath,
D. J. Filman,
R. Syed,
K. Andries, and J. M. Hogle.
1994.
Structures of poliovirus complexes with anti-viral drugs: implications for viral stability and drug design.
Curr. Biol.
4:784-797[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Kim, K. H.,
P. Willingmann,
Z. X. Gong,
M. J. Kremer,
M. S. Chapman,
I. Minor,
M. A. Oliveira,
M. G. Rossmann,
K. Andries,
G. D. Diana,
F. J. Dutko,
M. A. McKinlay, and D. C. Pevear.
1993.
A comparison of the anti-rhinoviral drug binding pocket in HRV14 and HRV1A.
J. Mol. Biol.
230:206-227[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Lewis, J. K.,
B. Bothner,
T. J. Smith, and G. Siuzdak.
1998.
Antiviral agent blocks breathing of the common cold virus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
95:6774-6778[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 11.
|
Li, Q.,
A. G. Yafal,
Y. M.-H. Lee,
J. Hogle, and M. Chow.
1994.
Poliovirus neutralization by antibodies to internal epitopes of VP4 and VP1 results from reversible exposure of these sequences at physiological temperature.
J. Virol.
68:3965-3970[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Liao, S., and V. Racaniello.
1997.
Allele-specific adaptation of poliovirus VP1 B-C loop variants to mutant cell receptors.
J. Virol.
71:9770-9777[Abstract].
|
| 13.
|
Mendelsohn, C.,
E. Wimmer, and V. R. Racaniello.
1989.
Cellular receptor for poliovirus: molecular cloning, nucleotide sequence and expression of a new member of the immunoglobulin superfamily.
Cell
56:855-865[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 14.
|
Mosser, A. G., and R. R. Rueckert.
1993.
WIN 51711-dependent mutants of poliovirus type 3: evidence that virions decay after release from cells unless drug is present.
J. Virol.
67:1246-1254[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Otto, M. J.,
M. P. Fox,
M. J. Fancher,
M. F. Kuhrt,
G. D. Diana, and M. A. McKinlay.
1985.
In vitro activity of WIN 51711, a new broad-spectrum antipicornavirus drug.
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
27:883-886[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Rombaut, B.,
K. Andries, and A. Boeyé.
1991.
A comparison of WIN 51711 and R 78206 as stabilizers of poliovirus virions and procapsids.
J. Gen. Virol.
72:2153-2157[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Smith, T. J.,
M. J. Kremer,
M. Luo,
G. Vriend,
E. Arnold,
G. Kamer,
M. G. Rossmann,
M. A. McKinlay,
G. D. Diana, and M. J. Otto.
1986.
The site of attachment in human rhinovirus 14 for antiviral agents that inhibit uncoating.
Science
233:1286-1293[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Zeichhardt, H.,
M. J. Otto,
M. A. McKinlay,
P. Willingmann, and K. O. Habermehl.
1987.
Inhibition of poliovirus uncoating by disoxaril (WIN 51711).
Virology
160:281-285[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, April 2000, p. 3929-3931, Vol. 74, No. 8
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Kim, M. S., Racaniello, V. R.
(2007). Enterovirus 70 Receptor Utilization Is Controlled by Capsid Residues That Also Regulate Host Range and Cytopathogenicity. J. Virol.
81: 8648-8655
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Shih, S.-R., Tsai, M.-C., Tseng, S.-N., Won, K.-F., Shia, K.-S., Li, W.-T., Chern, J.-H., Chen, G.-W., Lee, C.-C., Lee, Y.-C., Peng, K.-C., Chao, Y.-S.
(2004). Mutation in Enterovirus 71 Capsid Protein VP1 Confers Resistance to the Inhibitory Effects of Pyridyl Imidazolidinone. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
48: 3523-3529
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Tsang, S. K., McDermott, B. M., Racaniello, V. R., Hogle, J. M.
(2001). Kinetic Analysis of the Effect of Poliovirus Receptor on Viral Uncoating: the Receptor as a Catalyst. J. Virol.
75: 4984-4989
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
McDermott, B. M. Jr., Rux, A. H., Eisenberg, R. J., Cohen, G. H., Racaniello, V. R.
(2000). Two Distinct Binding Affinities of Poliovirus for Its Cellular Receptor. J. Biol. Chem.
275: 23089-23096
[Abstract]
[Full Text]