Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, April 2000, p. 3245-3252, Vol. 74, No. 7
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Asymmetric Subunit Organization of Heterodimeric Rous Sarcoma
Virus Reverse Transcriptase 
: Localization of the Polymerase
and RNase H Active Sites in the
Subunit
Susanne
Werner and
Birgitta M.
Wöhrl*
Abteilung Physikalische Biochemie,
Max-Planck-Institut für Molekulare Physiologie, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
Received 30 August 1999/Accepted 3 January 2000
 |
ABSTRACT |
The genes encoding the
(63-kDa) and
(95-kDa) subunits of
Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) reverse transcriptase (RT) or the entire Pol
polypeptide (99 kDa) were mutated in the conserved aspartic acid
residue Asp 181 of the polymerase active site (YMDD) or in the
conserved Asp 505 residue of the RNase H active site. We have analyzed
heterodimeric recombinant RSV 
and
Pol RTs within which one
subunit was selectively mutated. When 
heterodimers contained the
Asp 181
Asn mutation in their
subunits, about 42% of the
wild-type polymerase activity was detected, whereas when the
heterodimers contained the same mutation in their
subunits, only
7.5% of the wild-type polymerase activity was detected. Similar results were obtained when the conserved Asp 505 residue of the RNase H
active site was mutated to Asn. RNase H activity was clearly detectable
in 
heterodimers mutated in the
subunit but was lost when the
mutation was present in the
subunit. In summary, our data imply
that the polymerase and RNase H active sites are located in the
subunit of the heterodimeric RSV RT 
.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Reverse transcriptase (RT) of Rous
sarcoma virus (RSV) is a component of the Gag-Pol precursor protein.
Pol is composed of polymerase, RNase H, and integrase domains and an
additional short 4.1-kDa protein located at the C terminus of the
protein. Pol is processed into polypeptides of various lengths by the
viral protease; its
polypeptide (63 kDa) contains the polymerase
and RNase H domains, and its
polypeptide (95 kDa) consists of the polymerase, RNase H, and integrase domains but lacks the C-terminal 4.1-kDa protein (1, 7, 8, 17, 28, 30). In addition, the
integrase domain (32 kDa) is also present and active as a separate
enzyme (9, 30). Three forms of RT have been isolated from
avian sarcoma and leukosis viruses (ASLV):
,
, and 
, with
the major form being the heterodimer (8, 11, 16). We have
shown previously that the different forms of RSV RT can be expressed
and purified from insect cells using the baculovirus expression system
(37). In order to examine the subunit organization of RSV
RT, the technique of subunit-selective mutagenesis was used (13,
21) to analyze the effect of RSV RTs carrying a mutation in only
one of the two subunits constituting the 
or
Pol heterodimer.
It has been shown previously by biochemical and crystallographic data
that heterodimeric human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) RT
p66-p51 reveals an asymmetric subunit organization. The polymerase
active site is present only in the larger p66 subunit of the
heterodimer (13, 14, 19, 36), while the p51 subunit, which
is identical in sequence to p66 but lacks the RNase H domain, is not
directly involved in catalysis (21). However, p51 has to
fulfill an important stabilizing function since the monomeric subunits
are inactive (26, 27). Recent kinetic analyses we performed
with homodimeric p51 RT from equine infectious anemia virus (EIAV)
lacking the RNase H domain indicated an asymmetric subunit organization
similar to that of heterodimeric p66-p51 RT, with the polymerase active
site being present in only one of the subunits (32).
Taking these results into consideration, the question of whether RSV
RTs possess similar subunit organizations arises, since the heterodimer
is organized differently from lentivirus RTs. Heterodimeric RSV RTs

and
Pol differ from heterodimeric lentivirus RTs by the
presence of two RNase H domains instead of only one and by the presence
of the integrase domain, which is located in the larger subunits of the
heterodimers. In order to obtain more information about the subunit
organization of heterodimeric RSV RT, we coinfected insect cells with
two different types of baculoviruses harboring the gene coding for a
wild-type or a mutant RSV RT subunit. This method allows purification
of mutant heterodimeric RSV RT 
or
Pol possessing a mutation
in only one subunit. Our results indicate that both the polymerase and
RNase H active sites are located in the
subunit of heterodimeric
RSV RT 
or
Pol.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Mutagenesis of baculovirus transfer vectors.
For mutagenesis
of the RSV RT genes, we used the recombinant baculovirus transfer
vectors described previously (37). The mutagenesis procedure
of the transfer vector pBac-
is shown schematically in Fig.
1. The
mutation in the active site of the polymerase of RSV RT
was created
using an oligodeoxynucleotide created by PCR that contained the desired
mutation. A fragment of about 580 bases harboring a mutated codon 181 in which Asp 181 was changed to Asn (GAT
AAT) was amplified by PCR.
The resulting PCR fragment was treated with BamHI and
NheI (Fig. 1A). An NheI/HindIII
fragment containing the 3'-terminal region of the RT
gene was
created by restriction of pBac-
. The two fragments were cloned into
pBac-
restricted with BamHI and HindIII,
yielding pBac-
D181N. The mutation was confirmed by
sequencing. The resulting plasmid, pBac-
D181N, was used
to obtain the corresponding mutation in the gene encoding
.
pBac-
D181N was digested with XhoI and
PmlI. The resulting XhoI/PmlI fragment
containing the mutation was cloned into pBac-
that had been digested
with XhoI and PmlI.


View larger version (2327K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Mutagenesis of baculovirus transfer vectors. The open
reading frame of the gene encoding RSV RT is shaded in light gray.
The start (ATG) and stop of the gene are indicated. The restriction
enzymes relevant for the cloning procedure are shown. Abbreviations for
other enzymes are as follows: B, BamHI; E, EcoRV;
H, HindIII; P, PmlI; S, SacII; and
X, XhoI. The locations of the PCR primers are indicated by
black arrows. A white circle indicates the location of Asp 181 or Asp
505. A black circle indicates the mutagenized codon for Asn 181 or Asn
505. (A) Mutagenesis of the codon for Asp 181 in pBac- . (B)
Mutagenesis of the codon for Asp 505 in pBac- .
|
|
To obtain the mutation Asn 505 in the RNase H active site of pBac-
,
a combination of overlap extension PCR (12) and restriction fragment cloning was used. This is schematically shown in Fig. 1B. The
PCR fragment was restricted with EcoRV and
HindIII. The SalI/EcoRV fragment
was obtained from pBac-
. Both fragments were purified on an agarose
gel and cloned into pBac-
restricted with SacII and
HindIII. The resulting plasmid,
pBac-
D505N, was used to obtain
pBac-
D505N. As described above,
pBac-
D505N was digested with XhoI and
PmlI and the fragment was cloned into pBac-
digested with
XhoI and PmlI.
Deletion of the DNA sequence coding for the His6 tag
at the N terminus of RSV RT.
In the transfer vector pBlueBacHis2A
(Invitrogen), the DNA sequences for the N-terminal His6 tag
and the enterokinase cleavage site are located between a
SacII and a BamHI restriction site upstream of
the corresponding RSV RT gene. The ATG start codon is located upstream
of the SacII site (Fig. 1). The BamHI site represents the original start site for the RSV RT gene. The
BamHI site was exchanged for a SacII site via PCR
amplification of a fragment including the XhoI site at the
3' end. The fragment was treated with SacII and
XhoI and purified. pBac-
was also restricted with
SacII and XhoI, thus deleting the DNA coding
sequence for the His6 tag, the enterokinase site, and the
5' end of the RSV RT. The purified plasmid backbone was ligated to the
SacII/XhoI PCR fragment and used for
transformation of Escherichia coli. Since the 5' termini of
the genes coding for Pol and
are identical to that of the gene
coding for
, the same PCR fragment was cloned into the corresponding
plasmids pBac-
and pBac-Pol, which contain the genes for Pol and
, respectively. Thus, enzymes lacking the His6 tag and
the enterokinase cleavage site were obtained.
Isolation of recombinant virus.
The methods used to isolate
recombinant virus and high-titer viral stocks and to quantify growth
and infection of Sf21 insect cells have been described previously
(37).
Purification of mutated RSV RT proteins.
Heterodimeric
wild-type or mutant RSV RTs 
and
Pol harbored an N-terminal
His6 extension on both subunits. The RTs were prepared by
coinfection of Sf21 insect cells with two different types of
baculoviruses, each harboring the gene for one of the subunits. Enzymes
were purified by metal chelate chromatography as previously described
(37). Subsequent purification over a heparin-Sepharose
column via elution with an NaCl gradient allowed separation of the
mutant heterodimer from the homodimeric
and
or Pol.
Purification of the corresponding enzymes harboring the
His6 tag only in the mutated subunit was performed in the same way, thus allowing separation of the heterodimer from the wild-type homodimer, which, due to the lack of a tag, does not bind to
the Ni-chelate column. To identify DNase or RNase contaminations in our
enzyme preparations, an aliquot was incubated with radioactively labeled DNA or RNA substrate for 10 min. The presence of degradation products was determined by analysis of the substrates on a denaturing sequencing gel. All enzymes were free of nuclease contamination.
HPLC gel filtration analysis.
High-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) gel filtration analysis was performed as
described previously (32, 37).
Evaluation of RT enzyme activities.
Quantitative RT activity
assays and qualitative analysis of polymerization products and of RNase
H activities were performed as described recently (37). For
the quantitative RT activity assay whose results are shown in Table
1, poly(rA) · oligo(dT) was used
as a substrate. Dimeric RSV RT enzyme (0.1 pmol) was added to a final
volume of 30 µl of reaction mixture (37).
 |
RESULTS |
Strategy for construction and isolation of the selectively mutated
heterodimeric RSV RTs 
and
Pol.
Sequence analyses of
different polymerase genes show that the catalytic amino acid residues
of the polymerase and RNase H active sites of RTs are highly conserved
(2, 3, 15). In addition, comparison of the crystal
structures of HIV-1 RT and the finger and palm domains of murine
leukemia virus RT indicates that the geometry of the polymerase active
sites of RTs is highly conserved (6, 14, 19, 29). We used
this information for selecting the amino acids to be mutated in RSV RT
to obtain enzymes impaired in their polymerase or RNase H activities.
We elected to mutate one aspartic acid residue (Asp 181) of the
conserved YXDD motif of the polymerase active site into an asparagine.
An exchange of the corresponding Asp 185 for His in HIV-1 RT has been
shown to drastically reduce the polymerase activity of HIV-1 RT
(20). Mutation of this residue to Asn in the p66 subunit of
HIV-1 RT yields an enzyme that retains only about 2.1% of the
wild-type polymerase activity (21). Kinetic analysis of the
mutant HIV-1 RT enzyme revealed a 485-fold reduction in the catalytic
constant for dTTP incorporation into a homopolymeric substrate
(18). In the RNase H domain, catalytic Asp 505 of RSV RT was
changed into an asparagine, since the corresponding Asp 498 of HIV-1 RT
has been shown to be crucial for RNase H activity (4, 24).
The mutations were introduced into the transfer vectors pBac-
and
pBac-
(37), which harbor the genes coding for the
and
subunits of RSV RT, respectively (Fig. 1). These mutant transfer
vectors were used to obtain recombinant baculoviruses that could be
utilized to infect Sf21 insect cells. To achieve expression of
heterodimeric RSV 
and
Pol RTs that were selectively mutated
in only one subunit, insect cells were coinfected with wild-type and
mutant virus. The proteins expressed contained a His6 tag
on the N termini of both subunits of heterodimeric 
or
Pol. To
eliminate homodimeric wild-type proteins, chromatography over a
heparin-Sepharose column was performed after elution of the enzymes
from the Ni-chelate column. By means of an NaCl gradient, we were able
to separate the homodimers from the desired mutated heterodimeric
protein. The analysis is demonstrated in Fig.
2A for enzyme
D181NPol and
was carried out in a similar manner for all the other enzymes used. The
fractions eluted from the heparin-Sepharose column were analyzed by
sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)
and Coomassie staining. Figure 2A shows the Coomassie stain of the
eluted enzyme fractions of
D181NPol. The fractions
containing the heterodimer were pooled as indicated by a bracket. With
some of the enzymes the bands on the SDS gel imply that the subunit
ratios are not 1:1 (Fig. 2A and 3). To
verify that the enzyme is dimeric, analytical HPLC size exclusion
chromatography of the pooled enzyme
D181NPol was performed. Our data confirm that the enzyme is a dimer and that the
enzyme did not dissociate and reassociate to form homodimeric
or
Pol. The retention time of the peak at 26.01 min corresponds to an
apparent molecular mass of 175 kDa, which is in good agreement with the
calculated molecular mass of 170 kDa for the heterodimer. The retention
times of the homodimeric
and Pol are also indicated in Fig. 2B. Due
to an overlap of the peaks representing
D181NPol and
homodimeric Pol, we cannot completely rule out the possibility that
there is a minor contamination with homodimeric Pol present in our
preparation which is too small to be visible as a shoulder in the
D181NPol peak (Fig. 2B). Further experiments were
performed to exclude this possibility (see below).

View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Analysis of RSV RT D181NPol after elution
from a heparin-Sepharose column. (A) SDS-PAGE of the eluted fractions.
Proteins were detected by Coomassie staining. Lane M, protein molecular
mass markers. The bracket indicates the pooled fractions. (B) HPLC size
exclusion chromatography of the pooled fractions of
D181NPol (37). The peak with a retention time
of 26.01 min corresponds to a molecular mass of ~175 kDa. The
retention times of homodimeric Pol (25.86 min) and (28.26 min) were
determined in separate runs with the corresponding enzymes and are
indicated by dotted lines. The molecular mass of
D181NPol was determined using molecular mass standard
proteins from U.S. Biochemical Corp. in the same buffer.
|
|

View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Analysis of the purified mutant RSV RT enzymes by
SDS-PAGE. Proteins were detected by Coomassie staining. Lane M, protein
molecular mass markers.
|
|
Figure 3 shows a Coomassie stain of all the RSV RT enzymes used in this
study. They were all purified by the method described above. Mutant
D505N
D505N appears to contain a protein
component larger than the normal
subunit. Western blot analysis of
D505N
D505N with a peptide antiserum
directed against the C-terminal region of
(1) revealed
that this band around 97 kDa is a contamination which does not bind the
antibody (data not shown). However, as expected from the mutations
introduced, the enzyme does not reveal any RNase H activity (see below)
and appears to be free of nuclease contamination. We therefore
decided to include it in our studies.
From the gel shown in Fig. 3 it also appears that there is more of the
subunit present in the 
D505N preparation.
However, even if this was the case, it would not interfere with our
investigations to determine the localization of the RNase H active
site. Since homodimeric
D505N
D505N is
inactive as an RNase H (our unpublished results), an excess of mutated
D505N will not influence the activity of the enzyme

D505N.
The polymerase active site of the
subunit of the
heterodimer is crucial for polymerase activity.
For unknown
reasons, the expression of Pol is higher than that of
. However, we
have shown previously that 
and
Pol do not show qualitative
differences in their polymerization and RNase H activities
(37). Therefore, we used mutant
Pol instead of 
for
some of our experiments. To clarify the location of the polymerase
active site, we produced mutant enzymes that contained the mutation
D181N in only one subunit of the heterodimeric 
or
Pol. Table
1 shows the results of a quantitative polymerase activity assay using
the homopolymeric substrate poly(rA) · oligo(dT)12-18. Our results indicate that enzymes
containing Asn 181 in the
subunit or in both subunits display
7.5% of the corresponding wild-type polymerase activity. Enzyme
containing the same mutation in the
subunit retained ~42% of the
wild-type activity. These results strongly suggest that the polymerase
active site is located in the
subunit of the heterodimer. Reduction
of activity within the
subunit was probably due to structural
changes caused by the mutation. However, we cannot completely exclude
the possibility that the catalytic residue of the
subunit
contributed to the activity, although to a much lesser extent than
.
Table 1 shows that the mutants
D181NPol and
D181N
D181N still express polymerase
activity, albeit at a very low level. This is not surprising, since we
mutated only one of the amino acids forming the catalytic triad.
However, in order to confirm that the residual activities of these
enzymes were not due to trace amounts of homodimeric wild-type protein
that was not detectable by HPLC gel filtration, control purifications
were performed. Sf21 insect cells were coinfected with virus expressing
the mutated subunit carrying the His6 tag together with
virus expressing the corresponding wild-type subunit without the
N-terminal His6 tag. Thus, only heterodimeric protein
consisting of a His6-tagged mutated subunit and an untagged
wild-type subunit was able to bind to the Ni-chelate column (e.g.,
His6-
D181N dimerized with Pol). In addition,
homodimers consisting of two mutated subunits could bind but homodimers
of the wild type could not bind due to the lack of a His6
tag. The homodimers were removed by further purification over
heparin-Sepharose.
Similar to the corresponding enzyme carrying the His6 tag
on both subunits, His6-
D181N
was found to
express about 5% (±2.5) of the wild-type activity, indicating that
the residual activity is not due to contaminating homodimeric wild-type
protein. Rather, it is an intrinsic property of the mutated enzyme.
Therefore, for all subsequent experiments we used enzymes containing
the His6 tag on both subunits, since we were not able to
obtain sufficient amounts of protein when only one subunit was tagged.
The low yield was due to the low expression of untagged proteins in
comparison to that of the His6-tagged enzymes.
The DNA polymerase activities of the mutant enzymes were further
investigated by a qualitative analysis. A radioactively labeled 17-mer
DNA primer hybridized to single-stranded M13 DNA was used as a
substrate. Figure 4 demonstrates that the
activities of the two wild-type enzymes,
Pol and 
, were
comparable. As expected from the results obtained with the RT
assay (Table 1), somewhat less product was synthesized
with
PolD181N than with the wild-type enzymes. However, the activity of
D181NPol
was severely impaired and no extension products were detectable with
the double mutant
D181NPolD181N in
this experiment. This confirms our results shown in Table 1 that
indicate the localization of the polymerase active site in the
subunit.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Polymerization activities on a DNA template catalyzed by
RSV RTs selectively mutated in the polymerase active site. Reactions
were performed for 10 min at 37°C in RT buffer with 10 nM M13
substrate and enzyme and a 250 µM concentration of each dNTP
(37). Lane M shows DNA size markers (their sizes are
indicated on the left), and lane -RT shows P-T without enzyme.
|
|
To analyze whether the mutations in the polymerase active site had an
impact on the RNase H activities of the enzymes, we performed an RNase
H assay with a 36-mer-127-mer DNA-RNA primer-template substrate (P-T)
as described previously (37). The RNase H activities of the
polymerase mutants are shown in Fig. 5C,
together with the RNase H activities of the enzymes mutated in the
RNase H active site (see below). Our results demonstrate that the
mutation in the polymerase active site has only very little influence
on RNase H activity.



View larger version (63433K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
RNase H activities catalyzed by RSV RTs. (A) Schematic
representation of the heteropolymeric DNA-RNA P-T substrate comprising
a 5'-end labeled 127-mer RNA to which a 36-mer DNA primer was
hybridized. The major cleavage sites at positions 71 and 72 are
indicated by arrows. RNase H activities of RSV RTs mutated in the RNase
H active site (B) or in the polymerase active site (C) are shown.
Reactions were performed for 10 min at 37°C in RT buffer with 10 nM
36-mer-127-mer DNA-RNA P-T and 10 nM enzyme. The sizes of the 5' RNA
cleavage products are indicated on the left. Lane -RT contains P-T
without enzyme.
|
|
The RNase H active site is located in the
subunit.
The
location of the RNase H active site in the heterodimer was determined
by changing Asp 505 to Asn. Selectively mutated heterodimeric proteins
were purified and analyzed first in an RT activity assay to establish
whether the mutation influences the polymerase activity (Table 1). The
assay showed that the mutations in the RNase H active site have some
impact on the polymerase activity, indicating possible structural
changes caused by the mutations.
Qualitative analysis of the RNase H activities (Fig. 5B) demonstrated
that when the mutation is present in the
subunit of the
heterodimer, cleavage of the DNA-RNA hybrid is detectable. Compared to
that in the wild-type enzyme, the amount of cleaved RNA was reduced.
However, the observation that
D505NPol harboring the Asp
505 mutation in the
subunit exhibited no detectable RNase H
activity suggests that the catalytic center of RNase H is also located
in the
subunit of the heterodimer.
RNase H activity during polymerization.
During reverse
transcription, RNase H hydrolysis and polymerization take place
simultaneously. Therefore, we tested all the enzymes under conditions
where the two enzyme functions could be observed. An RNase H assay was
performed with the 36-mer-127-mer DNA-RNA substrate in the presence of
deoxynucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs) to allow extension of the primer
to the end of the template (Fig. 6). In
this experiment the RNA of the DNA-RNA P-T was 5'-end labeled. Thus,
complete extension of the primer could be detected by the presence of a
short RNase H cleavage product which corresponded to a 5'-end labeled
16-mer RNA created by the RNase H when the RT reached the end of the
RNA template (37).

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Qualitative analysis of RNase H activities during DNA
polymerization. The 127-mer RNA of the 36-mer-127-mer DNA-RNA was
5'-end labeled. Reactions were started by the addition of 10 nM enzyme
to RT buffer containing a 10 nM concentration of the 36-mer-127-mer
DNA-RNA P-T and a 50 µM concentration of each dNTP and stopped with
formamide buffer after 10 min at 37°C. The sizes of the 5' RNA
cleavage products are indicated on the left. Complete primer extension
in the presence of an active RNase H leads to a terminal RNA cleavage
product of 16 nucleotides in length, as indicated at the bottom of the
gel. Lane -RT, no enzyme added.
|
|
Interestingly, in the presence of dNTPs, some of the RT enzymes
performed an additional cleavage around position 80 of the RNA
template. This suggests a conformational rearrangement of the enzymes
after dNTP binding that changed the position of the RNase H active site
relative to that of the nucleic acid. Mutant
D181NPol
performed the RNA cleavage at positions 71 and 72. However, only a few
primer molecules were extended to the end of the RNA template, which
was then cleaved by the RNase H activity of
D181NPol to
create the 16-mer RNA.
No 16-mer RNA could be detected with the double mutant enzyme
D181N
D181N due to the lack of
polymerization. However, in this case the RNase H cleavages at
positions 71 and 72 of the template were visible. The cleavages at
positions 71 and 72 reflect the RNase H cleavage positions obtained
when no dNTPs are present (37). The wild-type enzymes 
and
Pol displayed cleavages at position 80 and positions 71 and 72. Due to their high polymerase activity, they were able to polymerize to
the end of the template. Thus, the 16-mer RNA fragment at the end of
the RNA template can be created by the RNase H. As implied from the
results presented in Table 1, mutant 
D181N exhibited
considerable polymerase activity, and due to its active RNase H, the
16-mer RNA was also present.
From the results shown in Fig. 5 and 6 and in Table 1, it can be
concluded that the mutation in the RNase H catalytic site of the
subunit abrogates RNase H activity but not the concomitant polymerase
activity. The mutant 
D505N showed a somewhat
reduced RNase H activity, as indicated by the weak band at position 80. However, the 16-mer RNA fragment was produced after elongation of the
template. As expected, no RNase H cleavage products were obtained
with
D505NPol or
D505N
D505N.
 |
DISCUSSION |
Due to the difficulties in purifying recombinant RSV RTs, not much
information has been available so far on mutated RSV RT enzymes. Here,
we show for the first time the characterization of heterodimeric RSV RT
selectively mutated in the active sites of the polymerase and RNase H
domains of one subunit.
The structure of RSV RT is different from those of other retrovirus RTs
since it harbors two RNase H domains and one integrase domain in the
active heterodimer. Thus, it was interesting to analyze the
structure-function relationships of this enzyme. Our results strongly
suggest that in the heterodimeric RSV RT 
or
Pol the smaller
subunit contains the catalytic centers of the polymerase and RNase
H domains. In contrast, the polymerase and RNase H domains of the
larger subunit do not appear to play a catalytic role. Since we have
mutated only one amino acid of the catalytic triads, it is not
surprising that residual activities can be detected with the mutant enzymes.
The reduction of polymerase activity observed with

D181N is probably due to structural changes since a
similar reduction of polymerase activity is also found with the RNase H
mutants
D505NPol and
D505N
D505N (Table 1). From the results
obtained, we conclude that the
and Pol subunits fulfill mainly a
structural function similar to that of the p51 subunits of HIV-1 RT and
EIAV RT (13, 14, 19, 21, 29, 32). However, we cannot
completely exclude the possibility that the large subunit fulfills some
minor function in catalysis, since mutations in Asp 181 or Asp 505 of the
subunit appear to have some impact on the polymerase or RNase H
activities. The
subunit harboring the active sites has a size of
about 63 kDa and is comparable to the p66 subunit of HIV-1 RT p66-p51.
Similar to HIV-1 p66,
harbors the polymerase and RNase H domains.
The small p51 subunit of HIV-1 RT is an RNase H-deleted version of p66.
The corresponding RNase H-deleted polypeptide of
is not found in
ASLV virions.
The integrase domain of RSV RT is present only in the larger
subunit. Although
does not appear to contain the active sites of
the polymerase and RNase H domains, previous results have shown that
the integrase domain of heterodimeric ASLV RT expresses endonuclease activity (5, 22, 31), indicating a possible enzymatic
function of the
subunit for integration. At present we are
analyzing the integrase activities of our purified homodimeric and
heterodimeric RSV RTs.
We have shown recently that RSV RT
is a homodimer (37).
A dimeric organization has also been found for
and 
,
indicating that dimerization is a necessary feature for RSV RT enzyme
activity (8, 11). The significance of dimerization has also
been demonstrated for HIV-1 and EIAV RTs (26, 27, 32).
Similar to what occurs with the RT from RSV, the catalytic sites of the
polymerase and RNase H domains of these enzymes are formed by only one
subunit. These results imply that an asymmetric subunit organization
might be common for dimeric retroviral RTs, i.e., that the catalytic site is formed by only one of the two subunits. However, dimerization is apparently not important for all retrovirus RTs since previous experiments performed with the RTs from mouse mammary tumor virus and
bovine leukemia virus indicate that these enzymes might be active as
monomers (25, 34). The RT from murine leukemia virus is a
monomeric ~80-kDa protein that was suggested to dimerize upon binding
to nucleic acid (10, 33, 35). However, recent data from a
study using a chimeric HIV-1 RT with the RNase H domain of murine
leukemia virus indicate that this chimeric protein is enzymatically
active as a monomer (23). These results also demonstrate that there are significant differences in the mechanisms of
polymerization and reverse transcription performed by RTs from
different retroviruses.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft and by a
grant from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft to B.M.W.
We thank Martina Wischnewski and Karin Vogel-Bachmayr for skilled
technical assistance with the protein purification and cloning procedures, Paul Rothwell for careful reading of the manuscript, and
Roger Goody for support. We also thank Anna Marie Skalka (Fox Chase
Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pa.) for the kind gift of the peptide
antiserum specific for the C terminus of
. We thank Erika Schlüter and Gesine Schulte for assistance in preparing the figures.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Abteilung
Physikalische Biochemie, Max-Planck-Institut für Molekulare
Physiologie, Otto-Hahn-Strasse 11, 44227 Dortmund, Germany. Phone: 49 231 133 2312. Fax: 49 231 133 2399. E-mail:
birgit.woehrl{at}mpi-dortmund.mpg.de.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alexander, F.,
J. Leis,
D. A. Soltis,
R. M. Crowl,
W. Danho,
M. S. Poonian,
Y.-C. E. Pan, and A. M. Skalka.
1987.
Proteolytic processing of avian sarcoma and leukosis viruses pol-endo recombinant proteins reveals another pol gene domain.
J. Virol.
61:534-542[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Argos, P.
1988.
A sequence motif in many polymerases.
Nucleic Acids Res.
16:9909-9916[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 3.
|
Delarue, M.,
O. Poch,
N. Tordo,
D. Moras, and P. Argos.
1990.
An attempt to unify the structure of polymerases.
Protein Eng.
3:461-467[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
DeStefano, J. J.,
W. Wu,
J. Seehra,
J. McCoy,
D. Laston,
E. Albone,
P. J. Fay, and R. A. Bambara.
1994.
Characterization of an RNase H deficient mutant of human immunodeficiency virus-1 reverse transcriptase having an aspartate to asparagine change at position 498.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1219:380-388[Medline].
|
| 5.
|
Duyk, G.,
J. Leis,
M. Longiaru, and A. M. Skalka.
1983.
Selective cleavage in the avian retroviral long terminal repeat sequence by the endonuclease associated with the  form of avian reverse transcriptase.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
80:6745-6749[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Georgiadis, M. M.,
S. M. Jessen,
C. M. Ogata,
A. Telesnitsky,
S. P. Goff, and W. A. Hendrickson.
1995.
Mechanistic implications from the structure of a catalytic fragment of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase.
Structure
3:879-892.
|
| 7.
|
Golomb, M., and D. Grandgenett.
1979.
Endonuclease activity of purified RNA-directed DNA polymerase from avian myeloblastosis virus.
J. Biol. Chem.
254:1606-1613[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Grandgenett, D. P.,
G. F. Gerard, and M. Green.
1973.
A single subunit from avian myeloblastosis virus with both RNA-directed DNA polymerase and ribonuclease H activity.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
70:230-234[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Grandgenett, D. P.,
A. C. Vora, and R. D. Schiff.
1978.
A 32,000-dalton nucleic acid-binding protein from avian retrovirus cores possesses DNA endonuclease activity.
Virology
89:119-132[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Guo, J. H.,
W. X. Wu,
Z. Y. Yuan,
K. Post,
R. J. Crouch, and J. G. Levin.
1995.
Defects in primer-template binding, processive DNA synthesis and RNase H activity associated with chimeric reverse transcriptases having the murine leukemia virus polymerase domain joined to Escherichia coli RNase H.
Biochemistry
34:5018-5029[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Hizi, A., and W. K. Joklik.
1977.
RNA-dependent DNA polymerase of avian sarcoma virus B77. I. Isolation and partial characterization of the , 2, and  forms of the enzyme.
J. Biol. Chem.
252:2281-2289[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Ho, S. N.,
H. D. Hunt,
R. M. Horton,
J. K. Pullen, and L. R. Pease.
1989.
Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction.
Gene
77:51-59[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Hostomsky, Z.,
Z. Hostomska,
T. B. Fu, and J. Taylor.
1992.
Reverse transcriptase of human immunodeficiency virus type 1: functionality of subunits of the heterodimer in DNA synthesis.
J. Virol.
66:3179-3182[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Jacobo-Molina, A.,
A. D. Clark, Jr.,
R. L. Williams,
R. G. Nanni,
P. Clark,
A. L. Ferris,
S. H. Hughes, and E. Arnold.
1992.
Crystals of a ternary complex of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase with a monoclonal Fab fragment and double stranded DNA diffract to 3.5 Å resolution.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
88:10895-10899[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Johnson, M. S.,
M. A. McClure,
D. F. Feng,
J. Gray, and R. F. Doolittle.
1986.
Computer analysis of retroviral pol genes: assignment of enzymatic functions to specific sequences and homologies with nonviral enzymes.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
83:7648-7652[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Kacian, D. L.,
K. F. Watson,
A. Burny, and S. Spiegelman.
1971.
Purification of the DNA polymerase of avian myeloblastosis virus.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
246:365-383[Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Katz, R. A., and A. M. Skalka.
1988.
A C-terminal domain in the avian sarcoma-leukosis virus pol gene product is not essential for viral replication.
J. Virol.
62:528-533[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Kaushik, N.,
N. Rege,
J. S. Yadav,
S. G. Sarafianos,
M. J. Modak, and V. N. Pandey.
1996.
Biochemical analysis of catalytically crucial aspartate mutants of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase.
Biochemistry
35:11536-11546[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Kohlstaedt, L. A.,
J. Wang,
J. M. Friedman,
P. A. Rice, and T. A. Steitz.
1992.
Crystal structure at 3.5 Å resolution of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase complexed with an inhibitor.
Science
256:1783-1790[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Larder, B. A.,
D. J. Purifoy,
K. L. Powell, and G. Darby.
1987.
Site-specific mutagenesis of AIDS virus reverse transcriptase.
Nature
327:716-717[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 21.
|
Le Grice, S. F.,
T. Naas,
B. Wohlgensinger, and O. Schatz.
1991.
Subunit-selective mutagenesis indicates minimal polymerase activity in heterodimer-associated p51 HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.
EMBO J.
10:3905-3911[Medline].
|
| 22.
|
Leis, J.,
G. Duyk,
S. Johnson,
M. Longiaru, and A. Skalka.
1983.
Mechanism of action of the endonuclease associated with the  and  forms of avian RNA tumor virus reverse transcriptase.
J. Virol.
45:727-739[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Misra, H. S.,
P. K. Pandey, and V. N. Pandey.
1998.
An enzymatically active chimeric HIV-1 reverse transcriptase (RT) with the RNase-H domain of murine leukemia virus RT exists as a monomer.
J. Biol. Chem.
273:9785-9789[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Mizrahi, V.,
M. T. Usdin,
A. Harington, and L. R. Dudding.
1990.
Site-directed mutagenesis of the conserved asp-443 and asp-498 carboxy-terminal residues of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.
Nucleic Acids Res.
18:5359-5363[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 25.
|
Perach, M., and A. Hizi.
1999.
Catalytic features of the recombinant reverse transcriptase of bovine leukemia virus expressed in bacteria.
Virology
259:176-189[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 26.
|
Restle, T.,
B. Müller, and R. S. Goody.
1990.
Dimerization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase.
J. Biol. Chem.
265:8986-8988[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Restle, T.,
B. Müller, and R. S. Goody.
1992.
RNase H activity of HIV reverse transcriptases is confined exclusively to the dimeric forms.
FEBS Lett.
300:97-100[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Rho, H. M.,
D. P. Grandgenett, and M. Green.
1975.
Sequence relatedness between the subunits of avian myeloblastosis virus reverse transcriptase.
J. Biol. Chem.
250:5278-5280[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Rodgers, D. W.,
S. J. Gamblin,
B. A. Harris,
S. Ray,
J. S. Culp,
B. Hellmig,
D. J. Woolf,
C. Debouck, and S. C. Harrison.
1995.
The structure of unliganded reverse transcriptase from the human immunodeficiency virus type 1.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
92:1222-1226[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
Schiff, R. D., and D. P. Grandgenett.
1978.
Virus-coded origin of a 32,000-dalton protein from avian retrovirus cores: structural relatedness of p32 and the beta polypeptide of the avian retrovirus DNA polymerase.
J. Virol.
28:279-291[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Skalka, A. M.
1993.
Endonuclease activity associated with reverse transcriptase of avian sarcoma-leukosis viruses, p. 193-204.
In
A. M. Skalka, and S. P. Goff (ed.), Reverse transcriptase. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.
|
| 32.
|
Souquet, M.,
T. Restle,
R. Krebs,
S. F. Le Grice,
R. S. Goody, and B. M. Wöhrl.
1998.
Analysis of the polymerization kinetics of homodimeric EIAV p51/51 reverse transcriptase implies the formation of a polymerase active site identical to heterodimeric EIAV p66/51 reverse transcriptase.
Biochemistry
37:12144-12152[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Sun, D.,
S. Jessen,
C. Liu,
X. Liu,
S. Najmudin, and M. M. Georgiadis.
1998.
Cloning, expression, and purification of a catalytic fragment of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase: crystallization of nucleic acid complexes.
Protein Sci.
7:1575-1582[Abstract].
|
| 34.
|
Taube, R.,
S. Loya,
O. Avidan,
M. Perach, and A. Hizi.
1998.
Reverse transcriptase of mouse mammary tumour virus: expression in bacteria, purification and biochemical characterization.
Biochem. J.
329:579-587.
|
| 35.
|
Telesnitsky, A., and S. P. Goff.
1993.
RNase H domain mutations affect the interaction between Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase and its primer-template.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
90:1276-1280[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 36.
|
Wang, J.,
S. J. Smerdon,
J. Jäger,
L. A. Kohlstaedt,
P. A. Rice,
J. M. Friedman, and T. A. Steitz.
1994.
Structural basis of asymmetry in the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 reverse transcriptase heterodimer.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:7242-7246[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Werner, S., and B. M. Wöhrl.
1999.
Soluble Rous sarcoma virus reverse transcriptases ,  and purified from insect cells are processive DNA polymerases that lack an RNase H 3' 5' directed processing activity.
J. Biol. Chem.
274:26329-26336[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, April 2000, p. 3245-3252, Vol. 74, No. 7
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Mitchell, M. S., Tozser, J., Princler, G., Lloyd, P. A., Auth, A., Derse, D.
(2006). Synthesis, Processing, and Composition of the Virion-associated HTLV-1 Reverse Transcriptase. J. Biol. Chem.
281: 3964-3971
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Chang, K. W., Julias, J. G., Alvord, W. G., Oh, J., Hughes, S. H.
(2005). Alternate Polypurine Tracts (PPTs) Affect the Rous Sarcoma Virus RNase H Cleavage Specificity and Reveal a Preferential Cleavage following a GA Dinucleotide Sequence at the PPT-U3 Junction. J. Virol.
79: 13694-13704
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Wilhelm, M., Wilhelm, F.-X.
(2005). Role of Integrase in Reverse Transcription of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Retrotransposon Ty1. Eukaryot Cell
4: 1057-1065
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bibillo, A., Lener, D., Klarmann, G. J., Le Grice, S. F. J.
(2005). Functional roles of carboxylate residues comprising the DNA polymerase active site triad of Ty3 reverse transcriptase. Nucleic Acids Res
33: 171-181
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gerard, G. F., Potter, R. J., Smith, M. D., Rosenthal, K., Dhariwal, G., Lee, J., Chatterjee, Deb. K.
(2002). The role of template-primer in protection of reverse transcriptase from thermal inactivation. Nucleic Acids Res
30: 3118-3129
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Werner, S., Hindmarsh, P., Napirei, M., Vogel-Bachmayr, K., Wohrl, B. M.
(2002). Subcellular Localization and Integration Activities of Rous Sarcoma Virus Reverse Transcriptase. J. Virol.
76: 6205-6212
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nymark-McMahon, M. H., Beliakova-Bethell, N. S., Darlix, J.-L., Le Grice, S. F. J., Sandmeyer, S. B.
(2002). Ty3 Integrase Is Required for Initiation of Reverse Transcription. J. Virol.
76: 2804-2816
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Werner, S., Vogel-Bachmayr, K., Hollinderbaumer, B., Wohrl, B. M.
(2001). Requirements for Minus-Strand Transfer Catalyzed by Rous Sarcoma Virus Reverse Transcriptase. J. Virol.
75: 10132-10138
[Abstract]
[Full Text]