Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, April 2000, p. 3029-3036, Vol. 74, No. 7
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
A Single-Amino-Acid Substitution of a Tyrosine
Residue in the Rubella Virus E1 Cytoplasmic Domain Blocks Virus
Release
Jiansheng
Yao and
Shirley
Gillam*
Department of Pathology and Laboratory
Medicine, Research Institute, University of British Columbia,
Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4H4, Canada
Received 1 October 1999/Accepted 21 December 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Rubella virus particles, consisting of a nucleocapsid surrounded by
a lipid envelope in which two virus-encoded glycoproteins E1 and E2 are
embedded, assemble on intracellular membranes and are secreted from
cells, possibly via the cellular secretory pathway. We have recently
demonstrated that the cytoplasmic domain of E1 (residues 469 to 481, KCLYYLRGAIAPR) is required for virus release. Alteration of cysteine
470 to alanine did not affect virus release, whereas mutation of
leucine 471 to alanine reduced virus production by 90%. In the present
study, substitutions of remaining amino acids in the E1 cytoplasmic
domain were made in order to investigate the role of each amino acid in
regulating rubella virus release. Generated mutants were analyzed in
the context of infectious full-length cDNA clone and virus-like
particles using combined genetic, biochemical, and electron microscopic
approaches. Substitution of a single residue of tyrosine 472 to alanine
or tyrosine 473 to serine resulted in a block in virus release without
affecting protein transport and virus budding into the lumen of the
Golgi complexes. Infectious RNA transcripts bearing these mutations
were incapable of forming plaques. Mutants with substitutions at the
amino-terminal region (leucine 474, arginine 475, and glycine 476) in
the E1 cytoplasmic domain had reduced virus release and small-plaque
phenotype, while mutants with substitutions at the carboxy-terminal
region (alanine 477, isoleucine 478, alanine 479, proline 480, and
arginine 481) had only marginal defects in virus release.
Plaque-forming revertants could be isolated from mutants Y472A and
Y473S. Sequencing analysis revealed that the substituted serine residue
in mutant Y473S reverted to the original tyrosine residue, whereas the
substituted alanine residue in mutant Y472A was retained. These results
indicate that the E1 cytoplasmic domain modulates virus release in a
sequence-dependent manner and that the tyrosine residues are critical
for this function. We postulate that residues YYLRG constitute a domain
in the E1 tail that may interact with other proteins and this
interaction is involved in regulating virus release.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Rubella virus (RV), the etiological
agent of German measles, is the only member of the Rubivirus
genus in the Togaviridae family (7, 8, 17). The
RV virion consists of three structural proteins: a capsid protein which
forms nucleocapsid inside the virion; and two membrane glycoproteins,
E1 and E2, embedded in the viral envelope (26). The
structural proteins are synthesized as a polyprotein precursor in the
order capsid-E2-E1 (5, 6, 20, 21). This polyprotein is
translocated into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by two independently
functioning signal peptides within the carboxy (C) terminus of capsid
and E2 (10, 13). In the ER, the polyprotein precursor is
cleaved by cellular signal peptidases into the three structural
proteins, capsid, E2, and E1 (11). The capsid protein is
associated with membranes, presumably mediated by the E2 signal
sequence attached at its C terminus (10, 18). It is unknown
how nucleocapsid is formed. The glycoproteins E2 and E1 form a specific
heterodimer in the ER shortly after synthesis (2). The E2-E1
heterodimers are transported out of the ER and to the Golgi complexes,
where virus buds through cellular membranes (12, 22). The
budded viral particles are then released from the cells, possibly via
the cellular secretory pathway. It has been proposed that the E1
cytoplasmic domain may drive virus budding by interaction with
nucleocapsids (12). By using an infectious cDNA clone
derived from RV M33 strain (27), we have recently
demonstrated that the E1 cytoplasmic domain is required for virus
release. Mutation of leucine 471 at the amino (N) terminus of the E1
cytoplasmic domain reduced virus production by 90% (27). Garbutt et al. (9) also reported that replacement of E1
cytoplasmic domain with the analogous region from other type I membrane
glycoproteins results in arrest in release of virus-like particles but
does not affect virus budding into the Golgi complexes. In this study, we continued the investigation of the role of the remaining amino acid
residues in the E1 cytoplasmic domain in regulating virus release. Our
results show that substitutions of most of the N-terminal amino acids
in the E1 tail affected virus release and plaque phenotype, while
substitutions in the C-terminal amino acids had only marginal effects
on virus release. Of the substitutions, a single-amino-acid substitution of alanine for tyrosine 472 or serine for tyrosine 473 in
the E1 tail blocked virus release without affecting virus budding into
the lumen of the Golgi complexes, indicating that the E1 tail regulates
virus release in a sequence-dependent manner and that the tyrosines are
the key residues for virus release.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Virus and cells.
Vero cells were grown in Eagle's minimum
essential medium (MEM) supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum,
penicillin (100 U/ml), and streptomycin (50 µg/ml). BHK-21 cells were
grown in MEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, and 10% tryptose
phosphate broth.
Construction of mutants.
A series of mutations was
introduced into the E1 coding region by PCR-mediated mutagenesis with
appropriate primers containing the desired nucleotide changes using the
full-length cDNA clone pBRM34 template. This contains a new
SphI site created by changing T to A at nucleotide (nt) 9647 (27).
To construct mutants Y472A and Y473S, PCR amplifications were performed
in reactions with sense primers
5'-TTACTCGCATGCTGTGCCAAATGCTTGGCCTACTTG-3' for
mutant Y472A and
5'-TTACTCGCATGCTGTGCCAAATGCTTGTACAGCTTGCGC-3' for mutant Y473S (nucleotide changes are underlined) and with antisense primer 5'-GAATTCAAGCT17-3' (the latter
contains a HindIII site). The amplified DNA fragments
were cut with SphI and HindIII and
reintroduced into the full-length cDNA clone pBRM34. To construct mutants L474S, R475S, G476C, A477S, I478V, A479S, P480S, and R481S, PCR
amplifications were done with sense primer
5'-AATGCCCGAGTGGATCCA-3' and antisense primers
5'-TACTCCGCGGCGCTATAGCACCGCGCTAGCGGGCC-3' for
L474S, 5'-TTGAGCGGCGCTATAGCACCGCGCTAGCGGGCC-3'
for R475S, 5'-CGCAGCGCTATAGCACCGCGCTAGCGGGCC-3'
for R476C, 5'-GGCTCTATAGCACCGCGCTAGCGGGCC-3' for A477S, 5'-GCTGTAGCACCGCGCTAGCGGGCC-3'
for I478V, 5'-ATATCACCGCGCTAGCGGGCC-3' for
A479S, 5'-ATAGCATCGCGCTAGCGGGCC-3' for P480S,
and 5'-ATAGCACCGAGCTAGCGGGCC-3' for R481S
(nucleotide changes are underlined). The amplified DNA fragments were
cut with BamHI and NheI and reinserted into the full-length cDNA clone pBRM34. All of the mutations were verified by sequencing.
To construct wild-type 24S (24S/WT), the DNA fragment containing
full-length RV subgenomic cDNA was isolated from plasmid
24S/pSPT19
(
11) and cloned into pSFV-1 vector (
15). To
construct
mutants 24S/Y472A, 24S/Y473S, 24S/L474S, 24S/R475S,
24S/G476C,
24S/A477S, and 24S/R481S,
BamHI-
HindIII fragments containing these
mutations were isolated from mutants Y472A, Y473S, L474S, R475S,
G476C,
A477S, and R481S and inserted to replace the corresponding
fragment in
24S/WT.
RNA transcription and transfection.
RNA transcripts were
synthesized using SP6 RNA polymerase in the presence of
m7Gpp(5')G cap analog as described previously
(27). Vero cells were transfected by a Lipofectin-mediated
transfection method. Briefly, 10 µl of RNA transcription reaction was
mixed with 10 µl of Lipofectin (Gibco/BRL) at room temperature. The
mixtures were added to Vero cells that had been washed twice with MEM. After incubation at 37°C for 2 h, the solutions were removed and replaced with growth medium. At day 5 posttransfection, the liquid medium was harvested as viral stock for virus titration. BHK cells were
transfected by electroporation as described previously (27, 28). Briefly, BHK cells were harvested by trypsin treatment and
washed twice with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline without Ca2+ and Mg2+ and resuspended at a
concentration of 107 cells/ml; 20 µl of RNA transcript
was mixed with 0.5 ml of cells, and the mixture was transferred to a
2-mm cuvette. Electroporation was at room temperature with two
consecutive 1.5-kV, 25-µF pulses with a Gene-Pulser (Bio-Rad). After
electroporation, the cells were diluted into 10 ml of culture medium
and distributed into six-well culture plates.
Metabolic labeling, immunoprecipitation, and endoglycosidase H
(endo H) digestion.
Analysis of viral structural protein synthesis
and release of viral particles was as described previously
(27). Briefly, BHK cells transfected with mutant RNAs by
electroporation were incubated at 37°C for 40 h, washed with
MEM, and starved in methionine-free medium for 30 min at 37°C. This
medium was replaced with one containing [35S]methionine
(200 µCi/ml; NEN), and the cells were pulse-labeled for 80 min. After
labeling, the cells were chased for 10 min or 4 h in chase medium
containing unlabeled methionine at 10 times the usual concentration. At
either chase point, the medium was harvested for assay of released
virus particles. The cells were washed with ice-cold phosphate-buffered
saline and lysed in 100 µl of Triton-TNE lysis buffer (1% Triton
X-100, 10 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.4], 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 100 µg of
phenymethylsulfonyl fluoride per ml). The lysates were centrifuged to
remove nuclei and immunoprecipitated with human anti-RV serum.
After incubation at 4°C for 1 h, 40 µl of a 50% suspension of
protein A-Sepharose beads (Pharmacia Biotech) were added and incubated
for a further 1 h at room temperature with shaking. The
beads were washed three times with lysis buffer, resuspended in sample
buffer (0.1 M citrate [pH 5.5], 0.15% sodium dodecyl sulfate
[SDS]), and boiled for 5 min. After centrifugation, the
immunoprecipitates were collected and mixed with SDS-gel loading
buffer (62.5 mM Tris-HCl [pH 6.0], 2% SDS, 5% 2-mercaptoethanol,
500 mM sucrose) and then analyzed by SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis (PAGE) on 10% gels under reducing conditions.
For assay of released virus particles from transfected cells, the viral
particles in the chase medium were precipitated with
40% polyethylene
glycol (PEG) containing 2.5M NaCl and resuspended
in Triton-TNE buffer.
The suspension was immunoprecipitated with
human anti-RV serum, and
SDS-PAGE analysis of the immunoprecipitates
was done as described
above.
For endo H digestion, the immunoprecipitates were digested with endo H
(1 mU per 10 µl of immunoprecipitate) in the presence
of
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride for 14 h at 37°C. After digestion,
the immunoprecipitates were mixed with SDS-gel loading buffer
and
analyzed on SDS-PAGE.
Electron microscopy.
Transfected BHK cells were treated with
2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2), immediately
scraped from the plate, and kept at 4°C for 15 min. After pelleting,
the cells were postfixed, dehydrated, and infiltrated with Epon.
Sections were cut, stained with 2% uranyl acetate and lead citrate,
and examined by electron microscopy.
 |
RESULTS |
Construction and growth characteristics of E1 cytoplasmic domain
mutants.
The E1 cytoplasmic domain of RV is predicted to contain
13 amino acids in sequence KCLYYLRGAIAPR (residues 469 to 481).
In our previous studies, we found that mutation of the cysteine residue at position 470 to alanine did not affect virus release but mutation of
the leucine residue at position 471 to alanine reduced virus production
by 90% (27). To further determine the role of each amino
acid in the E1 cytoplasmic domain in virus release and to identify the
residues within this domain that are essential for the process, we
mutated each of the remaining amino acid residues in the E1 cytoplasmic
domain as shown in Fig. 1. The nucleotide sequences (nt 9673 to 9700) encoding amino acids from tyrosine 473 to
arginine 481 form a prominent stem-loop (SL) structure (4,
8). The loop contains a sequence UAUA that exhibits eukaryotic
promoter activity in the negative polarity (3), and the
GC-rich stem is implicated to play an important role in viral RNA
replication (4). Thus, amino acid substitutions were chosen
to maintain this SL structure (checked by computer modeling of RNA
folding). The small polar serine residue was chosen to substitute for
tyrosine 473, leucine 474, arginine 475, alanine 477, alanine 479, and
proline 480. Glycine 476 was mutated to cysteine, of similar polarity
to serine, by changing G to U at nucleotide 9680 and isoleucine 478 to
valine by changing A to G at nucleotide 9686 (resulting in UAUA to UACA
in the negative-polarity strand). The exception was mutant R481S, in
which replacement of arginine 481 (CGC) with serine (AGC) led to
abolition of this SL structure. To compare the role of tyrosine 472 in
virus release with that of leucine 471 (27), tyrosine 472 was mutated to alanine. These mutations were introduced into a
full-length infectious cDNA clone, pBRM34, derived from the wild-type
RV M33 strain (27).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Mutations in E1 cytoplasmic domain. (A) Amino acid
sequence of the E1 cytoplasmic domain and the substitutions produced by
mutagenesis. Numbering is based on the sequence published by Clarke et
al. (5). (B) Vero cells were transfected with RNAs using
Lipofectin and overlaid with growth medium. After 5 days of
transfection, the medium was removed for virus titration. Mean titers
of two independent plaque assays are shown. (C) Plaque sizes of some of
the mutants shown in Fig. 2.
|
|
To characterize the E1 cytoplasmic domain mutants, RNAs transcribed in
vitro from each mutant and parental pBRM34 clone were
transfected into
Vero cells by using Lipofectin. After transfection,
culture medium was
harvested at 5 days posttransfection, and the
virus titers in the
medium were determined by plaque assay on
Vero cells. As shown in Fig.
1, all of the mutants produced lower
amounts of viruses than did
parental BRM34 except for mutant I478V.
Substitutions of alanine for
tyrosine 472 and serine for tyrosine
473 dramatically impaired virus
production. Virus in the medium
from these two mutants was not
detectable by plaque assay on Vero
cells (Fig.
2). Mutations of leucine 474, alanine
477, alanine
479, and proline 480 resulted in 10- to 20-fold reduction
in virus
production compared to parental BRM34 virus. Mutation of
arginine
481 to serine had a moderate effect on virus production,
50-fold
lower than that of parental BRM34 virus. Mutations of arginine
475 to serine and glycine 476 to cysteine reduced virus production
by
400-fold compared to the parental virus. The plaques formed
by these
mutants were smaller than those formed by the parental
virus (Fig.
2).
Change of isoleucine 478 to valine showed no effect
on virus
production; the virus titer and plaque size were similar
to that of the
parental virus (Fig.
1 and
2).

View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Morphology of plaques produced by parental BRM34 virus
and mutant viruses. Vero cells were infected with parental BRM34 virus
or mutant viruses, and the infected cells were overlaid with agarose
medium. After incubation for 6 days at 35°C, the cells were stained
with neutral red. Only representative plates are shown.
|
|
Substitutions of alanine for tyrosine 472 and serine for tyrosine
473 in the E1 cytoplasmic domain block virus release.
We next
examined and compared the effects of these substitutions on viral
structural protein synthesis and release as virus particles by
pulse-chase analysis of BHK cells transfected with mutant RNAs by
electroporation. After 40 h of transfection, the cells were
pulse-labeled for 80 min and chased for 10 min or 4 h, after which
the cell lysates were analyzed by immunoprecipitation using human
anti-RV serum. For analysis of virus release, the virus particles in
the corresponding chase medium were precipitated with PEG and then
immunoprecipitated with human anti-RV serum. The results are shown in
Fig. 3. Immunoprecipitation of the cell lysates after 10 min of chase revealed that E1, E2, and capsid proteins
were correctly produced in all of the mutants, indicating that the
cleavage of mutant polyprotein precursors proceeded normally. Two forms
of E2 were observed: the 39-kDa ER form and the 45-kDa Golgi form.
After 4 h of chase, the ER form of E2 in all of the mutants was
converted to the Golgi form, indicating that transport of the
structural proteins is not affected. The level of protein synthesis,
however, differed between the mutants. After quantitation by
densitometry of autoradiographs of the radiolabel in intracellular E1
after 10 min of chase, it was found that mutants L474S and I478V
synthesized levels of proteins comparable to that of the parental BRM34
virus. Lower levels of protein synthesis were observed in mutants
R475S, G476C, A477S, A479S, and P480S, which produced about 47, 53, 73, 43, and 80%, respectively, of E1 produced by the parental BRM34 virus.
Protein synthesis in mutants Y472A, Y473S, and R481S was, however,
significantly reduced. Observed differences in levels of mutant protein
synthesis is not due to different transfection efficiency for each
mutant, since a similar proportion of cells (about 80%) was
transfected in mutants, as determined by immunofluorescence staining at
40 h posttransfection. A possible explanation for the reduced
protein synthesis may be that the nucleotide changes introduced in
these mutants significantly affect viral RNA replication or protein
translation. It is known that the nucleotide sequences (nt 9673 to
9700) encoding amino acids from tyrosine 473 to arginine 481 form an SL
structure. This SL structure has been shown to bind to calreticulin in
vitro and may have a functional role in virus replication
(4). Indeed, the change of C to A (arginine CGC
serine
AGC) at nucleotide 9695 in mutant R481S completely abolishes the SL
structure (data not shown), suggesting that its maintenance may be
required for viral replication.

View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Synthesis, transport, and release of structural proteins
following transfection of mutant RNAs. BHK cells were transfected with
in vitro-transcribed mutant or parental BRM34 RNAs by electroporation.
At 40 h postinfection, the infected cells were pulse-labeled for
80 min with [35S]methionine and chased with medium
containing unlabeled methionine for 10 min or 4 h. The chase
medium was harvested, and the labeled cells were lysed with lysis
buffer. The lysates were immunoprecipitated with human anti-RV serum
and analyzed by SDS-PAGE on 10% gels under reducing conditions. Virus
particles in the chase medium were precipitated with PEG, and pelleted
virus particles were resuspended in Triton-TNE buffer. The suspension
was immunoprecipitated with human anti-RV serum and analyzed by
SDS-PAGE (10% gel) and subsequent autoradiography. Positions of
migration of RV structural proteins E1, E2, and C are shown.
|
|
Immunoprecipitation of 4-h-chase medium revealed that the amounts of
virus released from the infected cells between the mutants
were very
different. The most significant reduction in released
virus was
observed in mutants Y472A, Y473S, and R481S, which released
barely
detectable level of virus (Fig.
3). To compare the amounts
of virus
release among the mutants, the quantity of extracellular
E1 after
4 h of chase was quantitated by densitometry. The relative
amount
of virus release was calculated after normalizing the mutant/BRM34
ratio of the radiolabel in the extracellular E1 to the mutant/BRM34
ratio in the intracellular E1. It was found that virus release
in
mutants L474S, R475S, and G476C was only 20 to 40% of the amount
of
parental virus. Mutants A477S and P480S produced half of the
amount of
parental virus. In contrast, only a slight reduction
in virus release
was observed in mutant A479S, and no reduction
was observed in mutant
I478V. These results indicate that individual
substitutions of most of
the N-terminal amino acids in the E1
tail significantly affected virus
release. The reduction in virus
release seen in the mutants was not
sufficient to account for
the reduction in virus infectivity,
particularly in mutants R475S
and G476C, which showed a 400-fold
reduction in virus titer. Thus,
the released mutant viruses may have
reduced infectivity. Lack
of plaque formation by mutants Y472A and
Y473S also indicates
that the released mutant viruses are defective in
infectivity.
In contrast, the infectivity of mutant R481S appeared not
to be
significantly affected since it showed only a 50-fold reduction
in virus titer despite its protein synthesis and virus release
being
similar to those of mutants Y472A and
Y473S.
Since protein synthesis was greatly reduced in mutants Y472A, Y473S,
and R481S, it is possible that the reduced virus release
observed in
these mutants could be due to the reduced level of
viral protein
synthesis. To exclude the effects of mutations on
viral RNA replication
or protein synthesis, we next examined virus
release and protein
synthesis in mutants Y472A, Y473S, and R481S,
using a system in which
RV structural protein synthesis and virus
release were not dependent on
viral RNA replication. It has been
shown that expression of three RV
structural proteins in transfected
BHK (
22) or CHO cells
(
9,
12) results in assembly and release
of virus-like
particles in the absence of genomic RNA. The subgenomic
cDNA (24S)
encoding the three structural proteins of wild-type
or mutants was
inserted into the pSFV-1 vector (
15), a novel
expression
system based on Semliki Forest virus replicon. Protein
synthesis and
release as virus-like particles were examined by
pulse-chase analysis
of the cells transfected with RNAs from 24S/WT
or 24S mutants. Levels
of protein synthesis observed between 24S
mutants and 24S/WT using
pSFV-1 vector were similar to those seen
in the immunoprecipitates of
cell lysates after pulse-labeling
of the transfected cells for 30 min
and chasing for 10 min (Fig.
4A).
However, after 4 h of chase, lower amounts of secreted virus-like
particles in the chase medium were clearly observed in mutants
24S/Y472A, 24S/Y473S, 24S/L474S, 24S/R475S, 24S/G476C, and 24S/A477S
compared to 24S/WT (Fig.
4B). To compare the release of virus-like
particles between the mutants, the amounts of extracellular E1
in the
medium and intracellular E1 in the lysate were quantitated
by
densitometry of the autoradiographs. The relative rate of virus
release
for each mutant was calculated after normalizing the mutant/wild
type
ratio of radiolabel in the extracellular E1 to the ratio
in the
intracellular E1 and is presented in Fig.
4C. Again, the
most dramatic
reduction in secretion of virus-like particles was
found in mutants
24S/Y472A and 24S/Y473S; mutant 24S/Y472A released
a barely detectable
level of virus-like particles; mutant 24S/Y473S
released about 8% of
the wild-type level. The released virus-like
particles in mutants
24S/L474S, 24S/R475S, and 24S/G476C ranged
from 10 to 26% of the
wild-type level; 40% of the amount of wild-type
particles was secreted
by mutant 24S/A477S. However, 64% of the
level of wild-type particles
was released in mutant 24S/R481S,
suggesting that the change of
arginine 481 to serine had only
a minor effect on virus release, and
the reduction in virus titer
and the defect in virus release observed
in mutant R481S (Fig.
3) were mostly due to altered protein synthesis
or viral RNA replication.
Taken together, these results clearly show
that tyrosine residues
at positions 472 and 473 in the E1 cytoplasmic
domain are essential
for virus release. Interestingly, the mutations
introduced in
mutants Y472A and Y473S may also significantly affect
viral protein
synthesis or viral RNA replication.

View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
Expression and secretion of virus-like particles in 24S
mutants. BHK cells were transfected with in vitro-transcribed RNA
derived from pSFV-1 vector containing wild-type or mutant 24S. At
12 h posttransfection, the transfected cells were pulse-labeled
for 30 min with [35S]methionine and chased with medium
containing unlabeled methionine for 10 min or 4 h. The chase
medium was harvested, and the labeled cells were lysed with Triton-TNE
buffer. Immunoprecipitation of the lysates and chase medium were
carried out as described for Fig. 3 and analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE (10%
gel). (A) Immunoprecipitation of cell lysates after 10 min of chase;
(B) immunoprecipitation of virus particles in 4-h-chase medium.
Positions of migration of RV structural proteins E1, E2, and C are
shown. (C) Relative rate of virus release. The amounts of radiolabel in
intracellular E1 in the lysate and in extracellular E1 in the medium
after chase were quantitated by densitometry of the autoradiographs.
The mutant/wild type ratios of radiolabel in the extracellular and
intracellular E1 were calculated. The relative rate of virus release
for each mutant is shown after normalization of the ratio of the
radiolabel in the extracellular E1 to the ratio in the intracellular
E1.
|
|
The inhibition in virus release in mutants Y472A and Y473S is not
due to either a defect in protein transport or a block in virus
budding.
To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the dramatic
inhibition in virus release observed in mutants Y472A and Y473S, we
next investigated the effects of these mutations on protein transport and viral budding. To examine protein transport to the Golgi complexes, immunoprecipitates of cell lysates were treated with endo H to monitor
the maturation of glycoproteins. RV structural proteins undergo
extensive glycosylation during transport from the ER to the Golgi, and
the acquisition of resistance to endo H digestion by RV structural
proteins signifies that they have reached the Golgi compartment
(11). As shown in Fig. 5,
after 10 min of chase, the ER forms of E2 and E1 in the mutants were
sensitive to endo H digestion, resulting in a reduction in molecular
mass from 39 to 31 kDa in E2 and from 58 to 51 kDa in E1, respectively. After 4 h of chase, the E2 in the mutants became completely endo H
resistant. Part of E1 also became resistant. No change in molecular weight was found in capsid protein after endo H digestion. A similar digestion pattern was observed in the wild-type E2 and E1. Thus, these
results indicate that the structural proteins in the mutants were
transported normally to the Golgi.

View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Endo H treatment of structural proteins.
Immunoprecipitates were isolated as described for Fig. 4, digested with
endo H at 37°C for 14 h (+) or not treated with endo H ( ), and
then analyzed by SDS-PAGE (10% gel) and autoradiography.
|
|
Virus budding was examined by electron microscopy of BHK cells
transfected with mutants 24S/Y472A and 24S/Y473S or 24S/WT.
As shown in
Fig.
6, budding of virus-like particles
into the lumen
of Golgi complexes was observed in cells transfected
with either
24S mutants or 24S/WT. Thus, substitutions of tyrosine
residues
at positions 472 and 473 did not affect the virus budding
process.
From these results, we conclude that the block of virus
release
seen in mutants Y472A and Y473S involves the pathway of virus
secretion from the infected cells after virus budding.

View larger version (66K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
Electron microscopic analysis of intracellular virus
budding. Transfected BHK cells were treated with 2% glutaraldehyde in
0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.2), immediately scraped from the plate,
and kept at 4°C for 15 min. After being pelleted, the cells were
postfixed, dehydrated, and infiltrated with Epon. Sections were cut,
stained, and observed by electron microscopy. (A) 24S/WT; (B)
24S/Y472A; (C) 24S/Y473S. Images were scanned with a UMAX Astra 1220U
scanner with Adobe Photoshop 5.0 software.
|
|
Analysis of Y472A and Y473S revertants.
As shown in Fig. 2,
mutants Y472A and Y473S were found to be incapable of producing viral
plaques. Vero cells infected with mutants Y472A and Y473S also showed
no signs of cytopathic effect (CPE). However, a small amount of
released virus or virus-like particles could be detected in the culture
medium (Fig. 3 and 4). Thus it is possible to passage these mutant
viruses in cells to isolate revertants that grow better and form viral
plaques. Molecular analysis of these revertants would provide some
insights toward the structure-function relationship of the E1
cytoplasmic domain in virus secretion. The culture medium harvested
from Vero cells transfected with mutants Y472A and Y473S RNAs after 6 days of incubation was inoculated into a new monolayer of Vero cells and incubated for another 6 days. The emergence of revertants was
monitored by appearance of CPE in infected cells. After five passages,
Vero cells inoculated with passaged culture medium showed strong CPE.
Plaque assays revealed that the viruses in the passage 5 culture medium
were similar in plaque size and virus titer to parental BRM34 virus
(Fig. 2). To determine the nature of the reversion, viral RNA was
extracted at passage 5 and used for cDNA synthesis and subsequent PCR
amplification. The sequences encoding the E1 cytoplasmic domain were
examined. It was found that the tyrosine-to-serine substitution
introduced in mutant Y473S had reverted to tyrosine in the passage 5 virus although the substitution was based on two nucleotides changes
(Table 1), indicating that this tyrosine
residue at position 473 is essential for the life cycle of RV.
Sequencing analysis of the E1 cytoplasmic domain in the passage 5 virus
from mutant Y472A showed that the tyrosine-to-alanine substitution is
conserved in the revertants. No other mutations were found in the E1
cytoplasmic domain (Table 1), indicating that second-site suppressor
mutations arose in other regions of the viral genome. Preliminary
characterization of Y472A revertants revealed that the second-site
suppressor mutations in the E1 gene were not sufficient to reverse the
defective phenotype imposed by the tyrosine change (data not shown),
suggesting some additional suppressor mutation(s) in C or E2 genes.
 |
DISCUSSION |
We have combined genetic, biochemical, and microscopic approaches
to investigate the role of each amino acid residue in the E1
cytoplasmic domain in virus assembly and release in the context of
infectious viruses and virus-like particles. Substitutions of most of
the N-terminal amino acids in the E1 cytoplasmic domain affected virus
growth, virus release, and plaque phenotype, indicating the functional
importance of the E1 cytoplasmic domain in RV replication. In
particular, a single-amino-acid substitution of either of the two
tyrosine residues in this domain resulted in a block in virus release.
Infectious RNA transcripts bearing these mutations were incapable of
forming plaques. Furthermore, analysis of revertants from mutant Y473S
showed that the serine substitution in the mutant quickly reverted to
the original tyrosine residue. Altogether, these results indicate that
the E1 cytoplasmic domain modulates virus release in a
sequence-dependent manner and these two tyrosine residues are critical
for this function.
It is not clear at present how a single substitution of tyrosine
residue in the E1 cytoplasmic domain blocks virus release. The block is
probably not at the steps of intracellular protein transport and viral
budding at the Golgi complexes, since the budding of tyrosine mutants
at the Golgi complexes proceeded normally, consistent with the results
from E1 cytoplasmic domain deletion mutant reported by Garbutt et al.
(9). It is also unlikely that the rate of budding of the
mutants is much reduced, thereby leading to less virus in the culture
fluid, since the viral budding of mutants at the Golgi complexes was
readily seen and the rate was similar to that for the wild type. We
postulate that the block in virus release may be due to a defect in
transport of the budded viral particles from the Golgi complexes to the
plasma membrane for release. In this case, it is still unclear how a
single alteration of a tyrosine residue in the E1 cytoplasmic domain
could modulate viral particle transport since the tyrosine residue is
located within the viral particles. The simplest explanation is that
substitutions of the tyrosine residues in the E1 tail dramatically
affect the overall conformation of the ectodomains of E2-E1 heterodimer
such that the mutant viruses have altered structure and are incompetent for incorporation into transport vesicles for release. Although this
explanation is straightforward, we think it is unlikely since all
mutations near tyrosine 472 and 473 (mutations of leucine 471 to
alanine [24], leucine 474 to serine, arginine 475 to serine and glycine 476 to cysteine) would not be expected to give such
clear negative effects on virus release. Instead, we speculate that
these residues YYLRG may constitute a domain in the E1 tail that may
interact with other proteins and that the two tyrosines are the
essential residues. Another explanation is that RV, after budding at
the Golgi complexes, undergoes a maturation process accompanied by
structural changes; i.e., structural maturation is required for viral
particle transport and release. This maturation step cannot proceed in
the mutant viruses because of alterations to the tyrosine residues,
leading to arrest in virus secretion. As the tyrosine residues are
located inside viral particles, we propose that the structural changes
during virus maturation are brought by a process which involves
interaction of the E1 tail with other viral structural proteins,
possibly nucleocapsids. We favor this explanation, since the single
substitution of tyrosine 472 or tyrosine 473 blocked virus release and
the serine substitution in mutant Y473S quickly reverted to the
original tyrosine in its revertants. The emergence of Y472A revertants
containing second-site mutations which reverse the defect imposed by
the tyrosine change also provides support for the notion that the
intermolecular interactions between E1 tail with other viral structural
proteins occur during the process of virus release. In related
alphaviruses, a similar tyrosine residue in the cytoplasmic domain of
E2 glycoprotein has been identified as being essential for the
interaction between glycoproteins and a hydrophobic pocket of the
nucleocapsids that is required for virus budding and maturation
(14, 24). Lee et al. (14) further suggested that
upon binding of the tyrosine to the capsid packet, the nucleocapsid
undergoes a conformational change such that the core is matured and
readied for disassembly. Without the optimal nucleocapsid-E2 tail
interaction as evidenced in nucleocapsid mutants, the core does not
undergo conformational changes required for subsequent disassembly.
Although evidence supporting structural maturation required for RV
release remains to be established, it is conceivable that the
conformational structure of extracellular viruses is different from
that of intracellularly budded viruses. Structural maturation during
virus release has recently been reported for transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus (TGEV), which has two types of
virus-related particles in infected cells: large annular viral
particles and small dense viral particles (23). The large
annular viral particles are the immature precursors of small dense
viral particles. The latter are the infectious TGEV virions in the
culture supernatants. Monensin treatment of TGEV-infected cells caused
an accumulation of large annular particles in perinuclear elements of
the ER-Golgi intermediate compartment. Removal of monensin led to the
release of small dense viral particles into secretory vesicles and
culture supernatants.
It is also possible that the tyrosine residues at positions 472 and 473 may be required to recruit targeting signals to a specific vesicle
containing budded viruses by interacting with cellular proteins. There
is a body of evidence showing that many transmembrane proteins harbor a
tyrosine-based signal in their cytoplasmic domains for transport.
Examples are the membrane envelope glycoproteins of the retroviruses,
vesicular stomatitis virus, and varicella-zoster virus (1, 16,
25). Sorting of the membrane glycoprotein of retrovirus is
reported to require interaction of the tyrosine-based motif in the
cytoplasmic domain with the clathrin-associated adapter complexes
(19). Although substitutions of tyrosine residues in the E1
cytoplasmic domain did not affect RV structural protein transport, it
is still possible that RV has evolved to use a tyrosine based signal in
its E1 tail for sorting and release of assembled virus. These possible
mechanisms are currently under investigation.
In this study, we observed that nucleotide changes introduced into
mutants Y472A, Y473S, and R481S greatly reduced the level of viral
structural protein synthesis. RNA secondary structure analysis of the
3'-terminal 305 nt of RV genomic RNA reveals four SL structures; SL1 is
located in the E1 transmembrane and ectodomain coding regions, SL2 is
located in the exact E1 tail coding region, while SL3 and SL4 are
within the 59-nt 3'-terminal nontranslated region preceding the poly(A)
tract (4). The change of C (arginine CGC) to A (serine AGC)
in mutant R481S completely abolishes the SL2 structure, whereas the
nucleotide changes introduced in mutants L474S, R475S, G476C, A477S,
I478V, A479S, and P480S do not and the overall SL2 structure is
maintained in these mutants. However, some minor alterations in the SL2
are shown in mutants R475S, G476C, A477S, A479S, and P480S by RNA
folding. Chen and Frey (4) analyzed this structure in the
context of a full-length infectious cDNA clone by mutagenesis and found
that the overall maintenance of the SL structure is important in viral
replication, presumably by binding to calreticulin in vivo and
regulating negative-sense RNA replication. Thus, the reduced protein
synthesis in mutant R481S could be explained by a similar mechanism.
The lower levels of protein synthesis observed in mutants R475S, G476C,
and A479S indicate that some alterations in the SL2 structure due to
the nucleotide changes in these mutants probably affect the
calreticulin binding activity of SL2. However, the changes of UA to GC
(tyrosine UAC
alanine GCC) in mutant Y472A and UA to AG (tyrosine
UAC
serine AGC) in mutant Y473S do not affect overall SL2 structure as examined by RNA folding. Thus, it is not clear how these nucleotide changes reduced viral protein synthesis. It will be of interest in the
future to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the effects on protein
synthesis by the nucleotide changes introduced in mutants Y472A and Y473S.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
This work was supported by a grant from the Medical Research
Council of Canada. Shirley Gillam is an investigator of the British Columbia's Children's Hospital Foundation.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia,
Research Institute, 950 W. 28th Ave., Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z
4H4, Canada. Phone: (604) 875-2474. Fax: (604) 875-2496. E-mail:
sgillam{at}interchange.ubc.ca.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Alconda, A.,
U. Bauer, and B. Hoffack.
1996.
A tyrosine-based motif and a casein kinase II phosphorylation site regulate the intracellular trafficking of the varicella-zoster virus glycoprotein I, a protein localized in the trans-Golgi network.
EMBO J.
15:6096-6110[Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Baron, M., and K. Forsell.
1991.
Oligomerization of the structural proteins of rubella virus.
Virology
185:811-819[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 3.
|
Cao, X. Q.,
T. Y. Liu, and H. L. Nakhasi.
1992.
The cis-acting 3'-element of rubella virus RNA has DNA promoter activity.
Gene
114:251-256[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 4.
|
Chen, M. H., and T. K. Frey.
1999.
Mutagenic analysis of the 3' cis-acting elements of the rubella virus genome.
J. Virol.
73:3386-3403[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Clarke, D. M.,
T. W. Loo,
I. Hui,
P. Chong, and S. Gillam.
1987.
Nucleotide sequence and in vitro expression of rubella virus 24S subgenomic mRNA encoding the structural proteins E1, E2 and C.
Nucleic Acids Res.
15:3041-3057[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 6.
|
Clarke, D. M.,
T. W. Loo,
H. McDonald, and S. Gillam.
1988.
Expression of rubella virus cDNA coding for the structural proteins.
Gene
65:23-30[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Dominguez, G.,
C. Wang, and T. K. Frey.
1990.
Sequence of the genome RNA of rubella virus: evidence for genetic rearrangement during Togavirus evolution.
Virology
177:225-238[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 8.
|
Frey, T. K.
1994.
Molecular biology of rubella virus.
Adv. Virus Res.
44:69-160[Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Garbutt, M.,
L. M. Law,
H. Chan, and T. C. Hobman.
1999.
Role of rubella virus glycoprotein domains in assembly of virus-like particles.
J. Virol.
73:3524-3533[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Hobman, T. C., and S. Gillam.
1989.
In vitro and in vivo expression of rubella virus glycoprotein E2: the signal peptide is contained in the C-terminal region of capsid protein.
Virology
173:241-250[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Hobman, T. C.,
M. L. Lundstrom, and S. Gillam.
1990.
Processing and intracellular transport of rubella virus structural proteins in COS cells.
Virology
178:122-133[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Hobman, T. C.,
M. L. Lundstrom,
C. A. Mauracher,
L. Woodward,
S. Gillam, and M. G. Farquhar.
1994.
Assembly of rubella virus structural proteins into virus-like particles in transfected cells.
Virology
202:574-585[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 13.
|
Hobman, T. C.,
R. Shukin, and S. Gillam.
1988.
Translocation of rubella virus glycoprotein E1 into the endoplasmic reticulum.
J. Virol.
62:4259-4264[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
Lee, S.,
K. E. Owen,
H.-K. Choi,
H. Lee,
G. Lu,
G. Wangle,
D. T. Brown,
M. G. Rossmann, and R. J. Kuhn.
1996.
Identification of a protein binding site on the surface of the alphavirus nucleocapsid and its implication in virus assembly.
Structure
4:531-541[Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Lilijestrom, P., and H. Garoff.
1991.
A new generation of animal cell expression vectors based on the Semliki Forest virus replicon.
Bio/Technology
9:1356-1361[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Lodge, R.,
J. P. Lalonde,
G. Lemay, and E. Cohen.
1997.
The membrane-proximal intracytoplasmic tyrosine residue of HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein is critical for basolateral targeting of viral budding in MDCK cell.
EMBO J.
16:695-705[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Matthews, R. E. F.
1982.
Classification and nomenclature of viruses.
Intervirology
17:1-99[Medline].
|
| 18.
|
McDonald, H.,
T. C. Hobman, and S. Gillam.
1991.
The influence of capsid protein cleavage on the processing of E2 and E1 glycoproteins of rubella virus.
Virology
183:52-56[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 19.
|
Ohno, H.,
R. C. Aguilar,
M. C. Fournier,
S. Henneck,
P. Cosson, and J. S. Bonifacino.
1997.
Interaction of envelope of endocytic signals from the HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein complex with members of adaptor medium chain family.
Virology
238:305-315[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 20.
|
Oker-Blom, C.
1984.
The gene order for rubella virus structural proteins is NH2-C-E2-E1-COOH.
J. Virol.
51:964-973.
|
| 21.
|
Oker-Blom, C.,
I. Ulmanen,
L. Kääriäinen, and R. F. Pettersson.
1984.
Rubella virus 40S genome RNA specifies a 24S subgenomic mRNA that codes for a precursor to structural proteins.
J. Virol.
49:403-408[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Qiu, Z.,
D. Ou,
H. Wu,
T. C. Hobman, and S. Gillam.
1994.
Expression and characterization of virus-like particles containing rubella virus structural proteins.
J. Virol.
68:4086-4091[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Salanueva, I. J.,
J. L. Carrascosa, and C. Risco.
1999.
Structure maturation of the transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus.
J. Virol.
73:7952-7964[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Skoging, U.,
M. Vihinen,
L. Nilsson, and P. Liljestrom.
1996.
Aromatic interactions define the binding of the alphavirus spike to its nucleocapsid.
Structure
4:519-529[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Thomas, D. C.,
C. B. Brewer, and M. G. Roth.
1993.
Vesicular stomatitis virus glycoprotein contains a dominant cytoplasmic basolateral sorting signal critically dependent upon a tyrosine.
J. Biol. Chem.
288:3313-3320.
|
| 26.
|
Waxham, M. N., and J. S. Wolinsky.
1985.
A model of the structural organization of rubella virions.
Rev. Infect. Dis.
7(Suppl. 1):S133-S139.
|
| 27.
|
Yao, J., and S. Gillam.
1999.
Mutational analysis, using a full-length rubella virus cDNA clone, of rubella virus E1 transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains required for virus release.
J. Virol.
73:4622-4630[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Yao, J.,
E. G. Strauss, and J. H. Strauss.
1996.
Interaction between PE2, E1, and 6K required for assembly of alphavirus studied with chimeric viruses.
J. Virol.
70:7910-7920[Abstract].
|
Journal of Virology, April 2000, p. 3029-3036, Vol. 74, No. 7
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Tzeng, W.-P., Matthews, J. D., Frey, T. K.
(2006). Analysis of rubella virus capsid protein-mediated enhancement of replicon replication and mutant rescue.. J. Virol.
80: 3966-3974
[Abstract]
[Full Text]