Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, March 2000, p. 2926-2929, Vol. 74, No. 6
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
A 13-Amino-Acid Pit1-Specific Loop 4 Sequence
Confers Feline Leukemia Virus Subgroup B Receptor Function upon
Pit2
Kasper
Dreyer,1
Finn S.
Pedersen,1,2 and
Lene
Pedersen1,*
Department of Molecular and Structural
Biology1 and Department of Medical
Microbiology and Immunology,2 University of
Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Received 23 July 1999/Accepted 8 December 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Feline leukemia virus subgroup B (FeLV-B) and gibbon ape leukemia
virus (GALV) utilize the human protein Pit1 but not the related
protein, Pit2, as receptor. A stretch of 9 amino acids, named region A,
was identified in the putative fourth extracellular loop of Pit1
(residues 550 through 558) as critical for FeLV-B and GALV receptor
function. However, the presence of Pit1 region A did not confer
receptor function for FeLV-B upon Pit2, while it did so for GALV. We
have here shown that the presence of two Pit1-specific loop 4 residues
(tyrosine 546 and valine 548) in addition to Pit1 region A is
sufficient to make Pit2 an efficient FeLV-B receptor; that is, a
stretch of 13 amino acids encompassing all loop 4 amino acid
differences between Pit1 and Pit2 comprises a C-terminal determinant
for FeLV-B receptor function. Thus, the same limited receptor region is
sufficient to confer receptor function for both viruses upon Pit2.
 |
TEXT |
Feline leukemia virus subgroup
B (FeLV-B), Gibbon ape leukemia virus (GALV),
Amphotropic murine leukemia virus (A-MuLV), and 10A1
MuLV all belong to the genus of mammalian type C retroviruses. Their
cellular receptors have been cloned from various species including
humans, hamsters, cats, rats, and mice (7, 8, 16, 17, 19, 24, 29,
30, 32, 33). The human receptor for FeLV-B and GALV is Pit1
(formerly GLVR1) (19, 28), and the human receptor for A-MuLV
is the related protein (62% amino acid identity) Pit2 (formerly GLVR2)
(30). Pit1 is not an efficient A-MuLV receptor, and
similarly, Pit2 does not support FeLV-B or GALV entry, while 10A1 can
efficiently use both Pit1 and Pit2 as receptors (17, 22).
Based on hydropathy plots and the observation that the Pit genes seem
to have arisen by a gene duplication, Pit1 and Pit2 have been predicted
to be multipass transmembrane proteins with 10 transmembrane regions, 5 extracellular loops, and a large intracellular hydrophilic domain
(3, 7, 30). Their cellular function is sodium-dependent
phosphate transport (9, 20, 31).
Within the putative fourth extracellular loop, a stretch of 9 amino
acids (Pit1 positions 550 through 558), named region A, shows
considerable amino acid variation among Pit1, Pit2, and their homologs
from other species. Several studies have shown that amino acid residues
in region A are critical for both FeLV-B and GALV receptor function
(5, 8, 17, 22, 23, 25-27). For GALV, the presence of human
Pit1 region A conferred receptor function upon MusPit1, while it was
abolished in the reciprocal chimera (7, 8). These chimeras
exhibited the same receptor pattern for FeLV-B as observed for GALV,
demonstrating a similar critical role of region A in FeLV-B entry
(27). Moreover, substitution of Pit1 region A for that of
Pit2 abolished receptor function for both viruses (22).
FeLV-B and GALV do, however, not entirely share the same receptor
requirements, in that they exhibit different requirements for region A
sequences (27) and for sequences outside region A, e.g.,
Pit1 region A conferred GALV but not FeLV-B receptor function upon Pit2
(22). Interestingly, the presence of the N-terminal
two-thirds (encompassing loops 1, 2, and 3 and the large intracellular
domain) of Pit1 in addition to Pit1 region A resulted in a functional
FeLV-B receptor, and a chimera in which the entire C-terminal third
(encompassing loops 4 and 5) was Pit1 derived also supported FeLV-B
entry (22). Similar results were obtained by Tailor and
Kabat upon testing comparable Pit1-RatPit2 chimeras for FeLV-B receptor
function (26). Thus, N- or C-terminal Pit1 sequences, in
addition to region A, are necessary to confer FeLV-B receptor
function upon Pit2 (22); however, the exact nature of
these sequences is not known.
For A-MuLV, an N-terminal determinant was recently mapped to loop 2 (11, 12); moreover, loop 4 has also been shown to play a
role in A-MuLV entry (12, 13, 17, 22). Indeed, results
obtained with chimeras between Pit1 and a related protein from
Neurospora crassa, Pho-4, suggest that loop 2 and loop 4 sequences interdependently specify A-MuLV entry (12). For
10A1, a role of both loop 2 and region A sequences in entry has also been indicated (13). Recently, using Pit1-RatPit2 chimeras, Tailor and Kabat investigated the receptor function of vector pseudotypes carrying FeLV-B-A-MuLV SU chimeric proteins
(26). Based on the results obtained, the authors suggested
that wild-type FeLV-B SU proteins interact specifically with Pit1 loop
2 and Pit1 loops 4 and 5 (26).
By making chimeras between Pit1 and Pit2 and testing these for FeLV-B
receptor function, we investigated whether the C-terminal FeLV-B
receptor determinant(s) in loops 4 and 5 could be narrowed down and
whether sequences in Pit1 loop 2 constitute the N-terminal FeLV-B
receptor determinant.
Receptor function of the chimeras shown in Tables
1 and
2 was tested by a
transient-transfection-infection assay essentially as described
elsewhere (22). The constructs pOJ74, pOJ75, pOJ80, and pOJ102 have been described previously (22); the
remaining constructs were made by site-directed mutagenesis using the
Altered Sites II kit (Promega) (10); all constructs are
based on the expression vector pcDNA1ArtkpA
(30). To verify the presence of chimeric protein on the cell
surface, receptor functions for GALV and
for selected constructs
for 10A1 were tested. GALV (SEATO) pseudotypes (5 × 105
CFU/ml) were produced by PG13GBN cells (14, 15). 10A1
pseudotypes (106 CFU/ml) were obtained by infection of an
NIH 3T3 cell clone harboring the G1BgSvN vector (reference
14 and unpublished data) with viruses derived from
the plasmid pRR151, which encodes Moloney Gag-Pol and 10A1 Env
(21). All pseudotypes were titrated on D17 cells
(22). FeLV-B receptor function was determined on Mus dunni tail fibroblasts (MDTF) (ATCC CRL-2017) using two rounds of
exposure to FeLV-B pseudotypes with a titer of 6 × 102 CFU/ml. The FeLV-B pseudotypes used carried the
LacZ-encoding vector LNPOZ (1) and were obtained by
infecting a D17 cell clone harboring LNPOZ (22) with viruses
derived from feline 355-511 cells transfected with a pBR322
clone of the
HF60 insert of FeLV-B (Gardner-Arnstein [G/A])
(4, 6, 18); FeLV-B(G/A) was a kind gift from Joyce Dunn.
A stretch of 13 Pit1-specific amino acids in loop 4 confers FeLV-B
receptor function upon Pit2.
Previous results have shown that the
presence of Pit1 region A in Pit2 was not sufficient to confer FeLV-B
receptor function upon Pit2, while the presence of the entire
C-terminal third of Pit1 comprising loops 4 and 5 resulted in FeLV-B
receptor function (22, 26). Region A (Pit1 residues 550 through 558) contains seven of the nine amino acid differences between
Pit1 and Pit2 in loop 4, with the remaining two residues positioned
immediately upstream of region A (Pit1 positions 546 and 548 [Fig.
1]). In accordance with previous
results, we found that a Pit2-derived chimera harboring Pit1 region A
did not support FeLV-B entry (pOJ80 [Tables 1 and 2]). However, the
chimera A7, which differs from pOJ80 by the presence of the
Pit1-specific residues, Y and V, in positions W518 and I520 (Pit2
numbering), respectively, supported FeLV-B entry at a level of
approximately 60% of that obtained on cells expressing Pit1 (Table 2;
Fig. 1). In line with this observation, all constructs harboring an
entire Pit1 loop 4 sequence (A6, A7, A8, and A9 [Table 2]) supported
FeLV-B entry, while no chimera harboring only a Pit1-specific region A
sequence did so (A3, A10, A14, and pOJ80 [Tables 1 and 2]). Thus, we
have mapped a C-terminal determinant of FeLV-B receptor function to a
13-amino-acid stretch in loop 4 comprising Pit1 residues 546 through
558. This observation is in agreement with Pit1 region A being
sufficient to confer FeLV-B receptor function upon MusPit1 and the
C-terminal third of Pit1 being sufficient to confer FeLV-B receptor
function upon Pit2 and RatPit2, in that these three chimeras all harbor
the Pit1-specific 13-amino-acid stretch identified here (Fig. 1)
(22, 26, 27).

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Alignment of putative extracellular loop sequences for
Pit1, Pit2, RatPit2, and MusPit1. Numbers at the left of the sequences
correspond to the positions of the first and last amino acids shown.
Dots indicate amino acid identity to Pit1. Gaps introduced for
alignment are indicated by dashes. The sequences underlined are region
A and the loop 2 sequence mutated in the chimeras A1, A2, and A3. All
residues mutated in this study are in boldface.
|
|
In agreement with the mapping of the C-terminal FeLV-B receptor
determinant to loop 4, no role in receptor function could
be assigned
to Pit1 loop 5 residues 632, 636, and 639 (Fig.
1).
Pit2 carrying
Pit1-specific residues in these positions either
alone (A11) or
together with Pit1 region A (A10), respectively,
did not support FeLV-B
entry; A11 supported 10A1 entry (data not
shown).
In previous experiments, the C-terminal determinant of FeLV-B receptor
function was mapped to the C-terminal third of the
protein comprising
extracellular loops 4 and 5 (
22,
26); we
have here narrowed
it down to 13 amino acids in loop 4 comprising
Pit1 residues 546 to
558. While region A previously has been shown
to be critical for FeLV-B
and GALV receptor function and involved
in A-MuLV

and possibly
10A1

receptor function (
5,
8,
12,
13,
17,
22,
23,
25-27),
the Pit1-specific residues in positions
546 and 548 have not previously
been shown to be involved in receptor
function for viruses utilizing
Pit proteins as receptors. Whether
all of the 13 amino acids in loop 4 here identified are necessary
for conferring FeLV-B receptor function
upon Pit2 is not known.
Also, infection studies as employed here do not
allow for determining
whether this sequence provides a binding site for
FeLV-B SU or,
e.g., allows the viral SU to interact with other regions
of the
receptor.
Pit1-specific loop 2 and region A sequences do not confer FeLV-B
receptor function upon Pit2.
Although Pit1 region A is not
sufficient to confer FeLV-B receptor function upon Pit2, a chimera
harboring the N-terminal two-thirds of Pit1 comprising loops 1, 2, and
3 and the large intracellular domain together with Pit1 region A was an
efficient FeLV-B receptor (chimera pOJ103 in reference
22). For A-MuLV and 10A1, results have indicated
that an N-terminal determinant of receptor function can be mapped to
loop 2 (11-13); moreover, a model has been proposed in
which FeLV-B variable region B (VRB) interacts with Pit1 loop 2 (26). In an attempt to identify the N-terminal determinant
of FeLV-B receptor function in the chimera encoded by pOJ103, we have
investigated the ability of Pit1 loop 2 to confer receptor function
upon pOJ80 (Tables 1 and 2). The presence of the most divergent
C-terminal part of Pit1 loop 2 (pA3 [Table 1]) or of the entire Pit1
loop 2 sequence (pA14 [Table 2]) did not confer receptor function
upon pOJ80. Thus, since pOJ103 is an efficient FeLV-B receptor
(22), we conclude that Pit1 loop 2 does not constitute the
N-terminal determinant of FeLV-B receptor function; however, whether it
is part of a larger N-terminal determinant cannot be determined.
A two-step model for the interaction between FeLV-B SU and Pit1 was
recently put forward by Tailor and Kabat, the authors
suggesting a
specific and discrete interaction of FeLV-B VRA with
Pit1 loops 4 and 5 and of FeLV-B VRB with Pit1 loop 2 (
26).
The proposed
two-step model cannot explain the observation that
FeLV-B can utilize
chimeras harboring Pit1 loops 4 and 5 together
with Pit2 or RatPit2
loops 1, 2, and 3 and the large intracellular
domain (
22,
26) or, as shown here, a Pit2-derived chimera
harboring only Pit1
loop 4 residues in positions 518 through 530
(pA7 [Table
2]). All
these chimeras are efficient FeLV-B receptors;
thus, a Pit1-specific
loop 2 sequence is not essential for FeLV-B
receptor function in
chimeras harboring the 13 amino acids in
loop 4 identified here.
Moreover, in line with this, a Pit1-specific
loop 2 sequence was not
sufficient to confer FeLV-B receptor function
upon a Pit2-derived
chimera already harboring Pit1 region A (chimera
A14 [Table
2]).
The presence of Pit1 region A was sufficient to confer receptor
function for GALV upon Pit2 (pOJ80 in Tables
1 and
2) (
22),
while FeLV-B receptor function required the presence of other
N- or
C-terminal Pit1-specific sequences (
22). These observations
led to the impression that FeLV-B might have somewhat different
receptor requirements than those of GALV (
22). However, we
here
found that for both FeLV-B and GALV the same limited protein
region
confined within a stretch of 13 amino acids in loop 4 is
sufficient
to confer receptor function upon Pit2. From previous results
of
our work and others' work and from the results presented here,
it
is clear that FeLV-B receptor function is only dependent on
Pit1-specific N-terminal sequences when the four amino acids upstream
of region A are Pit2 specific (
22,
26). Interestingly, the
ability of loop 4 sequences to confer GALV receptor function was
also
shown to be context dependent: e.g., while certain region
A mutants
were compatible with receptor function in a Pit1 background,
they only
very inefficiently supported GALV entry when placed
in a Pit2
background, although the presence of a wild-type Pit1
region A sequence
in Pit2 results in an efficient GALV receptor
(
2). Thus,
FeLV-B and GALV have the common trait that sequences
in loop 4 are
critical for their receptor functions and that certain
loop 4 sequences
have specific backbone requirements in order
to allow receptor
function.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank Maribeth V. Eiden for the PG13GBN cell line and Alan Rein
for the pRR151 plasmid. We furthermore thank Bente Andersen for
excellent technical assistance.
This work was supported by the Karen Elise Jensen Foundation, the
Danish Medical Research Council (9802349), NASTRA (540011047), the Novo
Nordisk Foundation, and the Danish Biotechnology Programme.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Molecular and Structural Biology, University of Aarhus, C. F. Møllers Allé, Bldg. 130, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. Phone: 45 8942 2633. Fax: 45 8619 6500. E-mail: LP{at}mbio.aau.dk.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Adam, M. A.,
N. Ramesh,
A. D. Miller, and W. R. Osborne.
1991.
Internal initiation of translation in retroviral vectors carrying picornavirus 5' nontranslated regions.
J. Virol.
65:4985-4990[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 2.
|
Chaudry, G. J., and M. V. Eiden.
1997.
Mutational analysis of the proposed gibbon ape leukemia virus binding site in Pit1 suggests that other regions are important for infection.
J. Virol.
71:8078-8081[Abstract].
|
| 3.
|
Chien, M. L.,
J. L. Foster,
J. L. Douglas, and J. V. Garcia.
1997.
The amphotropic murine leukemia virus receptor gene encodes a 71-kilodalton protein that is induced by phosphate depletion.
J. Virol.
71:4564-4570[Abstract].
|
| 4.
|
Dunn, K. J.,
C. C. Yuan, and D. G. Blair.
1993.
A phenotypic host range alteration determines RD114 virus restriction in feline embryonic cells.
J. Virol.
67:4704-4711[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 5.
|
Eiden, M. V.,
K. B. Farrell, and C. A. Wilson.
1996.
Substitution of a single amino acid residue is sufficient to allow the human amphotropic murine leukemia virus receptor to also function as a gibbon ape leukemia virus receptor.
J. Virol.
70:1080-1085[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Elder, J. H., and J. I. Mullins.
1983.
Nucleotide sequence of the envelope gene of Gardner-Arnstein feline leukemia virus B reveals unique sequence homologies with a murine mink cell focus-forming virus.
J. Virol.
46:871-880[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 7.
|
Johann, S. V.,
J. J. Gibbons, and B. O'Hara.
1992.
GLVR1, a receptor for gibbon ape leukemia virus, is homologous to a phosphate permease of Neurospora crassa and is expressed at high levels in the brain and thymus.
J. Virol.
66:1635-1640[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Johann, S. V.,
M. van Zeijl,
J. Cekleniak, and B. O'Hara.
1993.
Definition of a domain of GLVR1 which is necessary for infection by gibbon ape leukemia virus and which is highly polymorphic between species.
J. Virol.
67:6733-6736[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 9.
|
Kavanaugh, M. P.,
D. G. Miller,
W. Zhang,
W. Law,
S. L. Kozak,
D. Kabat, and A. D. Miller.
1994.
Cell-surface receptors for gibbon ape leukemia virus and amphotropic murine retrovirus are inducible sodium-dependent phosphate symporters.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:7071-7075[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 10.
|
Kunkel, T. A.,
J. D. Roberts, and R. A. Zakour.
1987.
Rapid and efficient site-specific mutagenesis without phenotypic selection.
Methods Enzymol.
154:367-382[Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Leverett, B. D.,
K. B. Farrell,
M. V. Eiden, and C. A. Wilson.
1998.
Entry of amphotropic murine leukemia virus is influenced by residues in the putative second extracellular domain of its receptor, Pit2.
J. Virol.
72:4956-4961[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 12.
|
Lundorf, M. D.,
F. S. Pedersen,
B. O'Hara, and L. Pedersen.
1999.
Amphotropic murine leukemia virus entry is determined by specific combinations of residues from receptor loops 2 and 4.
J. Virol.
73:3169-3175[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Lundorf, M. D.,
F. S. Pedersen,
B. O'Hara, and L. Pedersen.
1998.
Single amino acid insertion in loop 4 confers amphotropic murine leukemia virus receptor function upon murine Pit1.
J. Virol.
72:4524-4527[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 14.
|
McLachlin, J. R.,
N. Mittereder,
M. B. Daucher,
M. Kadan, and M. A. Eglitis.
1993.
Factors affecting retroviral vector function and structural integrity.
Virology
195:1-5[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 15.
|
Miller, A. D.,
J. V. Garcia,
N. von Suhr,
C. M. Lynch,
C. Wilson, and M. V. Eiden.
1991.
Construction and properties of retrovirus packaging cells based on gibbon ape leukemia virus.
J. Virol.
65:2220-2224[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 16.
|
Miller, D. G.,
R. H. Edwards, and A. D. Miller.
1994.
Cloning of the cellular receptor for amphotropic murine retroviruses reveals homology to that for gibbon ape leukemia virus.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:78-82[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 17.
|
Miller, D. G., and A. D. Miller.
1994.
A family of retroviruses that utilize related phosphate transporters for cell entry.
J. Virol.
68:8270-8276[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 18.
|
Mullins, J. I.,
J. W. Casey,
M. O. Nicolson,
K. B. Burck, and N. Davidson.
1981.
Sequence arrangement and biological activity of cloned feline leukemia virus proviruses from a virus-productive human cell line.
J. Virol.
38:688-703[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 19.
|
O'Hara, B.,
S. V. Johann,
H. P. Klinger,
D. G. Blair,
H. Rubinson,
K. J. Dunn,
P. Sass,
S. M. Vitek, and T. Robins.
1990.
Characterization of a human gene conferring sensitivity to infection by gibbon ape leukemia virus.
Cell Growth Differ.
1:119-127[Abstract].
|
| 20.
|
Olah, Z.,
C. Lehel,
W. B. Anderson,
M. V. Eiden, and C. A. Wilson.
1994.
The cellular receptor for gibbon ape leukemia virus is a novel high-affinity sodium-dependent phosphate transporter.
J. Biol. Chem.
269:25426-25431[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
Ott, D., and A. Rein.
1992.
Basis for receptor specificity of nonecotropic murine leukemia virus surface glycoprotein gp70SU.
J. Virol.
66:4632-4638[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
Pedersen, L.,
S. V. Johann,
M. van Zeijl,
F. S. Pedersen, and B. O'Hara.
1995.
Chimeras of receptors for gibbon ape leukemia virus/feline leukemia virus B and amphotropic murine leukemia virus reveal different modes of receptor recognition by retrovirus.
J. Virol.
69:2401-2405[Abstract].
|
| 23.
|
Pedersen, L.,
M. van Zeijl,
S. V. Johann, and B. O'Hara.
1997.
Fungal phosphate transporter serves as a receptor backbone for gibbon ape leukemia virus.
J. Virol.
71:7619-7622[Abstract].
|
| 24.
|
Rudra-Ganguly, N.,
A. K. Ghosh, and P. Roy-Burman.
1998.
Retrovirus receptor PiT-1 of the Felis catus.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta
1443:407-413[Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Schneiderman, R. D.,
K. B. Farrell,
C. A. Wilson, and M. V. Eiden.
1996.
The Japanese feral mouse Pit1 and Pit2 homologs lack an acidic residue at position 550 but still function as gibbon ape leukemia virus receptors: implications for virus binding motif.
J. Virol.
70:6982-6986[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Tailor, C. S., and D. Kabat.
1997.
Variable regions A and B in the envelope glycoproteins of feline leukemia virus subgroup B and amphotropic murine leukemia virus interact with discrete receptor domains.
J. Virol.
71:9383-9391[Abstract].
|
| 27.
|
Tailor, C. S.,
Y. Takeuchi,
B. O'Hara,
S. V. Johann,
R. A. Weiss, and M. K. Collins.
1993.
Mutation of amino acids within the gibbon ape leukemia virus (GALV) receptor differentially affects feline leukemia virus subgroup B, simian sarcoma-associated virus, and GALV infections.
J. Virol.
67:6737-6741[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 28.
|
Takeuchi, Y.,
R. G. Vile,
G. Simpson,
B. O'Hara,
M. K. Collins, and R. A. Weiss.
1992.
Feline leukemia virus subgroup B uses the same cell surface receptor as gibbon ape leukemia virus.
J. Virol.
66:1219-1222[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 29.
|
Tatsumi, S.,
H. Segawa,
K. Morita,
H. Haga,
T. Kouda,
H. Yamamoto,
Y. Inoue,
T. Nii,
K. Katai,
Y. Taketani,
K. I. Miyamoto, and E. Takeda.
1998.
Molecular cloning and hormonal regulation of PiT-1, a sodium-dependent phosphate cotransporter from rat parathyroid glands.
Endocrinology
139:1692-1699[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 30.
|
van Zeijl, M.,
S. V. Johann,
E. Closs,
J. Cunningham,
R. Eddy,
T. B. Shows, and B. O'Hara.
1994.
A human amphotropic retrovirus receptor is a second member of the gibbon ape leukemia virus receptor family.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:1168-1172[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Wilson, C. A.,
M. V. Eiden,
W. B. Anderson,
C. Lehel, and Z. Olah.
1995.
The dual-function hamster receptor for amphotropic murine leukemia virus (MuLV), 10A1 MuLV, and gibbon ape leukemia virus is a phosphate symporter.
J. Virol.
69:534-537[Abstract].
|
| 32.
|
Wilson, C. A.,
K. B. Farrell, and M. V. Eiden.
1994.
Comparison of cDNAs encoding the gibbon ape leukaemia virus receptor from susceptible and non-susceptible murine cells.
J. Gen. Virol.
75:1901-1908[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 33.
|
Wilson, C. A.,
K. B. Farrell, and M. V. Eiden.
1994.
Properties of a unique form of the murine amphotropic leukemia virus receptor expressed on hamster cells.
J. Virol.
68:7697-7703[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
Journal of Virology, March 2000, p. 2926-2929, Vol. 74, No. 6
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Beck, L., Leroy, C., Salaun, C., Margall-Ducos, G., Desdouets, C., Friedlander, G.
(2009). Identification of a Novel Function of PiT1 Critical for Cell Proliferation and Independent of Its Phosphate Transport Activity. J. Biol. Chem.
284: 31363-31374
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Virkki, L. V., Biber, J., Murer, H., Forster, I. C.
(2007). Phosphate transporters: a tale of two solute carrier families. Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.
293: F643-F654
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bottger, P., Pedersen, L.
(2004). The Central Half of Pit2 Is Not Required for Its Function as a Retroviral Receptor. J. Virol.
78: 9564-9567
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Bottger, P., Pedersen, L.
(2002). Two Highly Conserved Glutamate Residues Critical for Type III Sodium-dependent Phosphate Transport Revealed by Uncoupling Transport Function from Retroviral Receptor Function. J. Biol. Chem.
277: 42741-42747
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Lauring, A. S., Cheng, H. H., Eiden, M. V., Overbaugh, J.
(2002). Genetic and Biochemical Analyses of Receptor and Cofactor Determinants for T-Cell-Tropic Feline Leukemia Virus Infection. J. Virol.
76: 8069-8078
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Salaün, C., Rodrigues, P., Heard, J. M.
(2001). Transmembrane Topology of PiT-2, a Phosphate Transporter-Retrovirus Receptor. J. Virol.
75: 5584-5592
[Abstract]
[Full Text]