Previous Article | Next Article 
Journal of Virology, February 2000, p. 1663-1673, Vol. 74, No. 4
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
Isolation of Herpes Simplex Virus Procapsids from Cells Infected
with a Protease-Deficient Mutant Virus
William W.
Newcomb,1
Benes L.
Trus,2,3
Naiqian
Cheng,2
Alasdair C.
Steven,2
Amy K.
Sheaffer,4
Daniel J.
Tenney,4
Sandra K.
Weller,5 and
Jay C.
Brown1,*
Department of Microbiology, University of Virginia Health
Sciences Center, Charlottesville, Virginia
229081; Laboratory of Structural
Biology, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin
Diseases,2 and Computational
Bioscience and Engineering Laboratory, Center for Information
Technology,3 National Institutes of Health,
Bethesda, Maryland 20892; Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical
Research Institute, Wallingford, Connecticut
064924; and Department of Microbiology,
University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut
060305
Received 1 September 1999/Accepted 10 November 1999
 |
ABSTRACT |
Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) capsid proteins assemble in
vitro into spherical procapsids that differ markedly in structure and
stability from mature polyhedral capsids but can be converted to the
mature form. Circumstantial evidence suggests that assembly in vivo
follows a similar pathway of procapsid assembly and maturation, a
pathway that resembles those of double-stranded DNA bacteriophages. We
have confirmed the above pathway by isolating procapsids from HSV-1-infected cells and characterizing their morphology, thermal sensitivity, and protein composition. Experiments were carried out with
an HSV-1 mutant (m100) deficient in the maturational protease for which it was expected that procapsids
normally,
short-lived intermediates
would accumulate in infected cells.
Particles isolated from m100-infected cells were found to
share the defining properties of procapsids assembled in vitro. For
example, by electron microscopy, they were found to be
spherical rather than polyhedral in shape, and they disassembled at
0°C, unlike mature capsids, which are stable at this temperature. A
three-dimensional reconstruction computed at 18-Å resolution from
cryoelectron micrographs showed m100 procapsids to be
structurally indistinguishable from procapsids assembled in vitro. In
both cases, their predominant components are the four essential capsid
proteins: the major capsid protein (VP5), the scaffolding protein
(pre-VP22a), and the triplex proteins (VP19C and VP23). VP26, a small,
abundant but dispensable capsid protein, was not found associated with
m100 procapsids, suggesting that it binds to capsids only
after they have matured into the polyhedral form. Procapsids were also
isolated from cells infected at the nonpermissive temperature with the
HSV-1 mutant tsProt.A (a mutant with a thermoreversible
lesion in the protease), and their identity as procapsids was confirmed
by cryoelectron microscopy. This analysis revealed density on the inner
surface of the procapsid scaffolding core that may correspond to the
location of the maturational protease. Upon incubation at the
permissive temperature, tsProt.A procapsids transformed
into polyhedral, mature capsids, providing further confirmation of
their status as precursors.
 |
INTRODUCTION |
Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1)
is widely distributed in the human population, where it is the
etiological agent of recurrent fever blisters. Infection in neonates
can result in more severe, disseminated disease (50). Like
all herpesviruses, HSV-1 consists of an icosahedral capsid surrounded
by a membrane envelope with the double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) genome
contained inside the capsid. During HSV-1 infection, the capsid plays a
central role in delivering the virus genome to the host cell nucleus.
Following fusion of virus and host cell membranes, the DNA-filled
capsid enters the peripheral cytoplasm. From there it is transported to
the nucleus, where it docks at a nuclear pore and releases its DNA into
the nucleoplasm (35, 38).
Progeny HSV-1 capsids are assembled in the nucleus, where they are also
packaged with DNA before further virus maturation takes place (15,
33, 35). Capsids are initially formed with an internal protein
scaffold (composed of UL26 and UL26.5 gene products) which is lost from
the capsid upon DNA packaging. The scaffold contains the virus protease
(UL26 gene), which cleaves both itself (to generate capsid proteins
VP24 and VP21) and the UL26.5 gene product (generating VP22a). The
protease is essential for DNA packaging, capsid maturation, and virus
growth (12).
The events of capsid formation prior to DNA encapsidation have been
examined in insect cell extracts containing capsid proteins and in a
purified system in which capsids are formed from purified proteins (24-26, 42). Studies with such systems show
that mature, icosahedral capsids can be assembled from the major
capsid protein (VP5), the two triplex proteins (VP19C and
VP23), and a scaffolding protein (e.g., pre-VP22a). Further, the mature
capsid is found to be assembled by way of a spherical, more
fragile intermediate called the procapsid. Apart from a minor
difference in the scaffolding protein (pre-VP22a is not cleaved in the
procapsid [24]), the procapsid has the same protein
composition as the mature capsid formed in vitro. The procapsid
differs, however, in important respects: (i) the procapsid is spherical
in overall morphology whereas the mature capsid is icosahedral; (ii)
the procapsid is a more porous structure, having holes between
capsomers that are sealed in the mature capsid; (iii) many procapsid
hexons are oval in cross section whereas those of the mature capsid are
hexagonal (46); and (iv) procapsids are disassembled after
incubation at 4°C whereas mature capsids are unaffected. Procapsids
transform into mature capsids in a process in which the shell undergoes the structural changes outlined above, and the scaffold disengages from
the surface shell and is either expelled or retracted into a smaller
core structure. In vivo, this transformation is dependent on the
presence and activity of the maturational protease (5, 12, 30,
34).
Formation of capsids in vitro by way of the procapsid intermediate
suggests that the same intermediate may be found in vivo, and Rixon and
McNab have recently provided evidence this is the case (34).
Electron micrographs of cells infected with HSV-1 ts1201
showed that the capsids accumulating at the nonpermissive temperature
(NPT) were spherical like procapsids and sensitive to disassembly when
the cells were incubated at 0°C. To clarify the properties of
procapsids present in infected cells, we isolated them by antibody
precipitation from infected cell lysates and examined them by electron
microscopy, sensitivity to disruption at 0°C, and sodium dodecyl
sulfate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Experiments were carried out with an HSV-1 mutant
(m100) in which procapsids are expected to accumulate due to
the absence of the maturational protease (12). The results
as described below show that procapsids isolated from infected cells
are essentially the same particles as procapsids assembled in vitro.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Cells and viruses.
m100 and tsProt.A
viruses were isolated by Min Gao and his colleagues, who generously
provided both viruses for this study (12). Previously
described procedures were used for growing m100 on the
complementing cell line, BMS-MG22 (12). Stock virus titers
were in the range of 5 × 108 to 1 × 109 PFU/ml. Wild-type HSV-1 (strain 17MP) and
tsProt.A were propagated on monolayer cultures of BHK or
Vero cells that were grown in minimal essential medium containing 10%
fetal calf serum and antibiotics. HSV-1 A and B capsids were isolated
as previously described (27) from infected BHK cells.
Procapsid isolation.
m100 procapsids were isolated
from BHK cells that were infected in 150-cm2 plastic flasks
at a multiplicity of infection of 10 and incubated for 15 h at
37°C, during which time cells became detached from the substrate. All
subsequent steps were carried out at room temperature (~21°C).
Cells from one to two flasks (~2 × 108 cells) were
harvested by low-speed centrifugation, suspended in 1 ml of
phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and lysed by sonication in a probe
sonicator (Ultrasonics, Inc., model W-375; setting 3; two cycles of
~8 s each). Protease inhibitors (aprotinin, leupeptin, and Pefabloc;
1/10 volume of a stock solution prepared by dissolving 1 tablet of
Boehringer Mannheim Complete, Mini in 1 ml of PBS) were then added, and
sedimentable material was removed by centrifugation for 6 min at
16,000 × g. Procapsids were then precipitated from the
lysate by addition of 50 µl of VP5-specific monoclonal antibody (MAb)
6F10 (4 mg/ml) (24, 39) followed by incubation for 5 min at
room temperature. Precipitates were harvested by centrifugation for 2 min at 16,000 × g, resuspended in 200 µl of PBS, and
subjected to two further cycles of antibody precipitation as described
above. Most preparations yielded 100 to 200 µl of procapsids at a
concentration of ~1 mg/ml, and these were used for structural and
biochemical analyses as described below.
Cryoelectron microscopy and image reconstruction.
Immunoprecipitated procapsids were prepared for cryoelectron microscopy
by adsorption onto a thin carbon film (supported on a thick holey
carbon film) and freezing as previously described (25, 54).
The same procedures were used for A capsids except that specimens were
not immunoprecipitated. Micrographs were recorded on a Philips
CM200-FEG electron microscope at a magnification of ×38,000, using
minimal electron dose methods producing radiation levels of ~8
electrons/Å2.
Three-dimensional reconstructions of procapsids and A capsids were
computed beginning with micrographs that were selected for analysis by
visual appraisal (e.g., to assess density of particles and contrast)
and by optical diffraction to assess the state of defocus and
resolution. For m100 procapsids, two micrographs whose first
contrast transfer function (CTF) zeros were 1/29.7 Å
1
and 1/24.7 Å
1 were scanned at 17 µm/pixel on a
Perkin-Elmer 1010MG microdensitometer, yielding an effective pixel size
of ~4.6 Å. CTF correction consisted of simple phase flipping
(48). A total of 410 images were processed as previously
described (46). For tsProt.A procapsids, 160 images from 13 micrographs (with CTF zeros between 1/22 and 1/26
Å
1) were analyzed to a resolution of 28 Å after
scanning at 25 µm/pixel, yielding an effective pixel size of ~6.9
Å. For A capsids, 1,488 images from 14 micrographs (with CTFs zeros
between 1/18 and 1/25 Å
1) were analyzed to 18-Å
resolution. Three-dimensional structures were solved by the polar
Fourier transform method (1), with our earlier
reconstructions (46) as starting models. After iterative cycles of refinement of orientation angles and origins, images with the
highest correlation coefficients were selected and a density map was
calculated (11). Calculations were performed with 338, 89, and 907 images for m100 procapsids, tsProt.A
procapsids, and A capsids, respectively. The resolution of the
resulting reconstructions was 18 Å for m100 procapsids and
A capsids and 28 Å for tsProt.A procapsids as assessed by
the FRC3D criterion (6).
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western
immunoblotting.
Previously described procedures were used for
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by Coomassie blue
staining (23). Stained bands were determined quantitatively
by scanning the gel in a flatbed scanner followed by densitometric
analysis using ImageQuant software. Specimens to be examined by
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Western immunoblotting were
precipitated with 10% trichloroacetic acid, resuspended in loading
buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM dithiothreitol, 2% SDS, 10% glycerol
[pH 8.8]), boiled for 3 min, and separated by electrophoresis on 4 to
20% polyacrylamide gradient gels. Proteins were electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, washed twice in Tris-buffered saline (20 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM NaCl [pH 7.5]), blocked for 60 min in
blocking buffer (Tris-buffered saline plus 0.2% nonfat dry milk), and
processed by using an Immunostar chemiluminescence detection kit
(Bio-Rad) as directed by the manufacturer. Primary antibodies were
diluted in blocking buffer plus 0.1% Tween 20 and added to blots for
2 h at the following dilutions: VP5, MAb 13-183 (Advanced
Biotechnologies Inc.), 1:1,000; VP23, MAb 1D2 (see below), 1:2,000;
UL26.5 gene products, MAb MCA406 (Serotec, Inc.), 1:10,000; VP19C,
rabbit polyclonal antibody NC2 (49), 1:10,000; VP26, rabbit
polyclonal antibody R31/B3 (22), 1:500; and actin, mouse
monoclonal clone C4 (ICN Pharmaceuticals), 1:500. Blots were then
treated for 2 h with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated secondary
antibodies, either goat anti-mouse or goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin G
(BioRad) (1:4,000 dilution) and developed with an Immunostar
chemiluminescence detection kit. Labeled bands were detected by
exposing blots to Kodak XAR-5 film.
VP23-specific MAb 1D2.
A mouse hybridoma cell line secreting
MAb 1D2 was isolated by the procedures described previously for
immunization of BALB/c mice and for fusion of spleen cells with
Sp2/O-Ag14 myeloma cells (24). The immunogen was VP23 that
had been purified biochemically from lysates of Sf9 cells expressing
VP23 as a result of infection with a recombinant baculovirus (BAC-UL18)
encoding VP23 (45). Beginning with the cell lysate,
purification was accomplished by ammonium sulfate precipitation
followed by cation-exchange chromatography as described previously for
purification of triplexes (25). Hybridoma cell lines were
screened by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (9) using
VP23-containing Sf9 cell extracts as antigen. The antibody secreted by
hybridoma cell line 1D2 was found to be specific for VP23 by
enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and by Western immunoblot assays.
Previously described procedures were used for growing the 1D2 hybridoma
cells as an ascites and for purifying the antibody (immunoglobulin G1
subclass) from the ascites fluid (10). Experiments were
performed beginning with a stock solution of antibody whose
concentration was 2.8 mg/ml.
Electron microscopy.
Procapsid-containing precipitates were
prepared for electron microscopy by fixation, embedding in Epon 812, and thin sectioning as described previously (20, 24).
Negative staining with 1% uranyl acetate was carried out as described
by Thomas et al. (44). All electron micrographs of
thin-sectioned or negatively stained specimens were recorded on a JEOL
100CS transmission electron microscope operated at 80 keV.
 |
RESULTS |
Efforts to isolate procapsids from HSV-1-infected cells are
expected to be influenced by the fact that the procapsid is an assembly
intermediate present only transiently during formation of the more
stable, mature capsid (24). Procapsids are therefore expected in lower abundance than mature capsids. To address this problem, our studies were carried out with a protease-deficient HSV-1
mutant because cells infected with protease-defective viruses are found
to accumulate large-cored B capsids (12, 30), structures that we interpret to be procapsids. Also, experience with capsid assembly in cell extracts has indicated that while the protease is not
required for production of mature, icosahedral capsids, its presence
significantly enhances conversion of the procapsid to the mature form
(26).
m100 was considered an appropriate protease-deficient mutant
for this study because while the protease domain of its parent gene is
lacking, the scaffolding protein region (i.e., the UL26.5 gene) is
present and functions normally (12). To isolate procapsids, cells were infected with m100 virus and lysed by sonication,
and the lysates were treated with VP5-specific MAb 6F10, a treatment that precipitates procapsids (24). Precipitated procapsids
were then examined by electron microscopy, SDS-polyacrylamide gel
electrophoresis and tests to evaluate their sensitivity to disassembly
at 0°C.
Electron microscopy.
Figure 1b
shows a thin-section electron micrograph of a procapsid-containing
precipitate. In such preparations, m100 procapsids were
found to be round or slightly irregular in overall shape, with distinct
shell and core layers. The images of precipitated procapsids (Fig. 1b)
were similar to those of procapsids seen in infected cell nuclei (Fig.
1a) (12, 30), suggesting that the isolation process did not
markedly alter procapsid morphology.

View larger version (168K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 1.
Electron microscopy of HSV-1 procapsids. (a) Thin
section showing procapsids in the nucleus of a BHK cell infected for
15 h with HSV-1 mutant m100; (b) thin section
preparation of m100 procapsids after isolation by antibody
precipitation; (c) m100 procapsids after negative staining
with uranyl acetate; (d) negatively stained HSV-1 B-capsids; (e)
m100 procapsids preserved in the frozen hydrated state. Note
that m100 procapsids are round in profile (c and e) and
consist of distinct shell and core layers. All micrographs are shown at
the same magnification (bar = 1,500 Å) except for panel b
(bar = 1,000 Å).
|
|
In negatively stained preparations (Fig.
1c), nearly all
m100 procapsids were seen to be uniform in structure and
round in
profile, suggesting that they are spherical in shape. The
round
profile contrasts with that of HSV-1 B capsids (Fig.
1d), where
distinct angles, indicative of a polyhedral morphology, are evident.
Capsomers could be seen in most images of negatively stained procapsids
(Fig.
1c). Micrographs of both thin-sectioned and negatively stained
specimens indicated that most procapsids were intact. It was rare
to
see fragments of procapsids such as might arise from incomplete
procapsid assembly or from fragmentation of complete procapsids
(Fig.
1a to
c).
Images of procapsids preserved in the frozen hydrated state also
indicated that they have a uniform, spherical morphology
with distinct
shell and core layers (Fig.
1e). The measured procapsid
diameter in
such images was 124 ± 3 nm (
n = 46), and
capsomers
could be seen in most individual procapsids (e.g., second
procapsid
from the right in Fig.
1e).
Three-dimensional reconstruction.
Images of cryopreserved
specimens such as those shown in Fig. 1e were used to compute a
three-dimensional reconstruction of the m100 procapsid. A
total of 338 procapsid images were included in the reconstruction which
was computed by the polar Fourier transform method as previously
described (1, 46) to a resolution of 18 Å. A surface-shaded
view of the reconstruction is shown in Fig.
2a viewed along an axis of twofold
symmetry. The vertical line down the center of the image divides it
into halves in which irregular density associated with antibodies bound
to the tips of the capsomers has been computationally removed in the
right half of the image. The irregularity of this density may be
assigned to both partial occupancy and flexibility of the antibodies
about their points of attachment to the capsid.

View larger version (187K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 2.
Three-dimensional reconstructions of HSV-1 procapsids
from three different sources (a to c) compared to the mature capsid
(d). (a) Native procapsids isolated from BHK cells infected with the
mutant m100; (b) native procapsids isolated from BHK cells
infected at the NPT temperature with tsProt.A; (c)
procapsids assembled in vitro from lysates of Sf9 cells containing
HSV-1 capsid proteins (reproduced from reference
46); (d) native A capsids isolated from BHK cells
infected with wild-type HSV-1. All reconstructions are shown in
surface-shaded representations as viewed along the icosahedral twofold
axis of symmetry. To facilitate comparison, the reconstructions shown
in panels a and d were restricted to 25-Å resolution, which is similar
to the values for the reconstructions in panels b (~28-Å resolution)
and c (~27-Å resolution). To isolate and concentrate the fragile
procapsids for cryoelectron microscopy, they were precipitated with MAb
6F10 as described in Materials and Methods (24, 39). In
consequence, some antibody-associated density is present around their
peripheries in these density maps. The maps are represented both with
this density present (left half of each panel) and with it
computationally removed (right half) by setting the density to
background outside a radius of ~640 Å. Note that the three
procapsids are essentially identical in structure. Bar = 100 Å.
|
|
To examine the
m100 procapsid reconstruction, we find it
helpful to start with the hexon at the center of the image (i.e.,
the
hexon on the icosahedral twofold axis). Moving laterally to
the right,
one encounters a P hexon with the oval morphology characteristic
of
procapsid hexons (Fig.
3)
(
46). Further to the right is a
penton, identifiable because
it has five rather than six subunits.
Proceeding upward and to the
left, one sees a row of three hexons
followed by a penton near 12 o'clock. A face hexon (C hexon [
40])
can be
identified in the angle created by the excursion described
above.

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 3.
Diagram showing the salient features of the T = 16 surface lattice of herpesvirus capsids. Pentons (capsomers with five
nearest neighbors) are at each of the 12 vertices. There are three
classes of hexons (capsomers with six nearest neighbors) distinguished
according to their lattice sites. A peripentonal hexon (P hexon) is
adjacent to a penton; E hexons are at the middle of each edge and sit
on icosahedral twofold axes; and three C hexons are found at the center
of each facet (adapted from reference 40). At each
trigonal site (a site of local or global threefold symmetry, surrounded
by three capsomers) is a triplex (15, 41). These
heterotrimeric complexes are indicated by small triangles. Triplexes
may be subclassified according to their positions on the surface
lattice (52).
|
|
For comparison with the
m100 procapsid, Fig.
2 shows a
reconstruction of the HSV-1 A capsid (Fig.
2d) and the reconstruction
described earlier of the procapsids assembled in vitro from extracts
of
insect cells containing HSV-1 proteins (Fig.
2c) (
24). All
reconstructions are viewed along the icosahedral twofold axis.
Comparison of the three structures shows that whereas the A capsid
is
icosahedral in overall shape, the two procapsids are spherical
with no
evidence of angularity. Examination of capsomer morphology
also
emphasizes the similarity of
m100 and in vitro procapsids.
For example, the P hexon is found to be oval in the two procapsid
reconstructions (Fig.
2a and c), whereas it is hexagonal in the
A
capsid (Fig.
2d). The same comparison is shown at higher magnification
in Fig.
4a (
m100 procapsid)
and b (A capsid).

View larger version (176K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 4.
The structural changes that accompany HSV-1 capsid
maturation are characterized by comparing the hexons (a and b) and
pentons (c and d) of the m100 procapsid (a and c) and the
mature capsid (A capsid; b and d). The outer surfaces are shown in each
case. Panels a and b are centered on the E hexon which resides at each
twofold axis and includes portions of the surrounding P and C hexons
(for nomenclature, see the legend to Fig. 3). In the left halves of
panels a and c, the less ordered density associated with the
immunoprecipitating 6F10 antibodies is present, whereas it has been
computationally removed in the right halves. The resolution is 18 Å.
Bar = 100 Å.
|
|
Comparison of the reconstructions shows that the porous nature of
procapsids assembled in vitro is also seen in
m100
procapsids.
For example, whereas a set of six small holes (black spots)
surrounds
the twofold axis hexon (E hexon) in both procapsid
reconstructions,
all are sealed in the A capsid (compare Fig.
2a and c
with 2d
and Fig.
4a with 4b). Similarly, holes surrounding the pentons
in both procapsids are not seen in A-capsid pentons (compare Fig.
4c
and
d).
tsProt.A procapsids.
Procapsids were also isolated
from cells infected with HSV-1 mutant tsProt.A. This mutant,
constructed to contain the same amino acid changes found in
ts1201 (12, 30), lacks function of the
UL26-encoded protease when grown at the NPT (39°C), and so procapsids
are expected to accumulate (5, 12, 30, 34). To isolate
tsProt.A procapsids, therefore, cells were infected with
tsProt.A at the NPT, and procapsids were harvested by
antibody precipitation as described above for cells infected with
m100. Electron microscopy of such procapsids supports the
view that their structure is that of the procapsid and distinct from
the mature capsid. For example, in both negatively stained and frozen hydrated preparations, tsProt.A procapsids appear round
rather than angular in profile, suggesting the spherical procapsid
morphology (data not shown).
A three-dimensional reconstruction computed from cryomicrographs of
tsProt.A procapsids showed that they have the same basic
structural features as in vitro and
m100 procapsids. These
include
a spherical morphology, porous shell, and asymmetric
hexons

oval
in the case of P and E hexons and triangular in the case
of C
hexons (compare Fig.
2b with 2a and c). Like
m100
procapsids,
tsProt.A procapsids were found to be distinct in
these features
from mature capsids which are polyhedral and closed and
have symmetric
hexons (compare Fig.
2b with 2d). Although close
comparison of
the
tsProt.A and
m100 procapsids
suggests subtle differences,
at the present state of analysis these may
be attributed to the
lower resolution of the
tsProt.A
reconstruction (28 Å vs. 18 Å,
and 89 particles vs. 338 particles)
and perhaps to a slight difference
in incipient maturation (see
Discussion).
Spherical internal scaffolds are present in both
m100 and
tsProt.A procapsids, as in procapsids assembled in vitro
(
25,
46). In cryomicrographs (e.g., Fig.
1e), this feature
appears
as an inner ring of projected density. In the reconstructed
density
maps, there is very little contrast to differentiate local
features
within the capsid shell (data not shown), and such a density
distribution
could, in principle, arise from icosahedral averaging of a
nonsymmetric
structure. Thus, the question of whether the scaffold is
icosahedrally
symmetric remains unsettled. Nevertheless, the radial
distribution
of density through the procapsid, including the scaffold,
may
be examined by calculating spherically averaged radial density
profiles from the corresponding three-dimensional density maps,
and
these are shown in Fig.
5.

View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 5.
Radial density profiles of HSV-1 procapsids from three
sources: native procapsids isolated from BHK cells infected at the NPT
with tsProt.A (top curve), native procapsids isolated from
BHK cells infected with m100 (middle), and procapsids
assembled in vitro from lysates of Sf9 cells containing HSV-1 capsid
proteins (bottom) (46). The profiles were calculated by
spherical averaging of the corresponding three-dimensional density
maps. The main features of the surface shell (three peaks between radii
of 480 and 650 Å) and the scaffold (three peaks between radii of 200 and 460 Å) are well conserved. However, the tsProt.A
procapsids are the only ones to show a significant density peak inside
the scaffold shell suggested to correspond to the HSV-1 UL26 gene
product, the virus protease.
|
|
The profiles can be considered to consist of three regions: (i) a
region from a radial distance of ~480 to 640 Å corresponding
to the
procapsid shell, (ii) a scaffold region from ~180 to 480
Å, and
(iii) an inner region inside a radius of 180 Å. The density
profiles
were found to be quite similar for the three procapsid
reconstructions,
particularly in the shell layer, which was found
to have almost exactly
the same thickness and radial distance
from the center in the three
reconstructions. The radius of the
external procapsid edge, for
example, differed by less than 20
Å among the three procapsids. Three
peaks of density were found
in the shell region of each procapsid type.
The scaffold region
was also similar among the three reconstructions,
showing three
major peaks of density. Among the three procapsid types,
the major
difference was prominent density in the inner region of
tsProt.A
procapsids (radial distance of ~100 to 160 Å)
that was absent
in the profiles of in vitro and
m100
procapsids.
Procapsid maturation.
Both m100 and
tsProt.A procapsids were tested for the ability to transform
in vitro into the mature, icosahedral capsid morphology. Tests were
carried out with procapsids that were suspended in PBS at a
concentration of approximately 0.5 mg/ml, incubated at room temperature
(21°C), and tested by electron microscopy for their conversion to the
mature capsid morphology. High proportions (greater than 80%) of both
m100 and tsProt.A procapsids were found to be
transformed in most experiments. Figure
6, for example, shows the results
obtained with tsProt.A procapsids before (Fig. 6a) and after
(Fig. 6b) incubation for 72 h at 21°C. Note that capsids were
round in profile before incubation but angular afterward. Prolonged
incubation at 21°C was required for procapsids to be transformed. It
was rare to see any evidence of procapsid transformation prior to
approximately 48 h of incubation, but most procapsids were
converted by 60 to 72 h.

View larger version (164K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 6.
tsProt.A procapsids before (a) and after (b)
incubation at 21°C for 72 h. Procapsids were isolated by
antibody precipitation as described in Materials and Methods from BHK
cells infected for 15 h at 39°C (the NPT). Note that before
incubation (a) procapsids are round in profile, indicating they have
not angularized, while after incubation (b) capsid profiles show angles
indicating they have the mature, icosahedral structure. Bar = 1,500 Å.
|
|
Cold sensitivity.
The sensitivity of m100 and
tsProt.A procapsids to dissociation following incubation at
0°C was tested by electron microscopy of negatively stained
specimens. Procapsids found to be intact after incubation at room
temperature (21°C) or 0°C were counted as a measure of structural
integrity. The results showed a marked decrease in the number of both
m100 and tsProt.A procapsids present after
incubation at 0°C, suggesting they were dissociated at the cold
temperature. Representative results for m100 procapsids are shown in Table 1. No comparable decrease
in the number of B capsids was observed after similar incubation at
0°C. Material found in micrographs of dissociated procapsids could
not be interpreted to suggest any clear structural relationship to the
parent procapsid (data not shown).
Protein composition.
The protein composition of procapsids was
determined by SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by
staining with Coomassie blue. The results shown in Fig.
7a demonstrated that both m100 and tsProt.A procapsids contain the major capsid
protein (VP5), the two triplex proteins (VP19C and VP23), and the
scaffolding protein, pre-VP22a. Only the uncleaved form of the
scaffolding protein (i.e., pre-VP22a) was detected in m100
procapsids. In tsProt.A procapsids most of the
scaffolding protein was uncleaved, but a trace of the cleaved form,
VP22a, was observed. In addition to the proteins mentioned above,
tsProt.A procapsids contained a small amount of a
protein migrating with an apparent molecular mass of ~66 kDa (labeled
"protease" in Fig. 7a) and staining with a MAb (MCA406) specific
for the UL26 and UL26.5 gene products (data not shown). We infer that
this protein corresponds to the full-length UL26 gene product. No VP24
was found associated with tsProt.A procapsids. As expected,
no 66-kDa protein was detected in m100 procapsids. Neither
m100 nor tsProt.A procapsids were found to
contain VP26 (Fig. 7a), a 12-kDa polypeptide found at the hexon tips in
mature capsids (3, 53).

View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
FIG. 7.
Protein composition of HSV-1 procapsids.
SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of m100 and
tsProt.A procapsids was followed by staining with Coomassie
blue (a) and Western immunoblotting with specific antibodies (b).
Similar analyses of HSV-1 B-capsids are shown for comparison. The
starred bands in lanes 2 and 3 of panel a were identified as actin as
described in the text. The positions of the HSV-1 protease (UL26 gene
product) and the antibody heavy and light chains (Ab-H and Ab-L) are
indicated in panel a. Specimens in panel b were loaded for
electrophoresis in twofold dilutions. The amount of sample loaded in
the VP26 row was twofold greater than that loaded in other rows. Note
that procapsid bands identified as VP5, VP19C, pre-VP22a, and VP23 were
stained with specific antibodies, and VP26 was not detected in either
m100 or tsProt.A procapsids.
|
|
In addition to the capsid proteins described above, stained gels of
both
m100 and
tsProt.A procapsid proteins were
found to
contain a previously unrecognized protein migrating slightly
more
rapidly than pre-VP22a (starred band in Fig.
7a). In Western
immunoblots,
this protein stained positively with a MAb (clone C4; ICN
Pharmaceuticals)
specific for actin (data not shown). We assume
therefore that
the protein corresponds to actin and that it is derived
from the
BHK cells from which procapsids were
isolated.
Antibodies specific for HSV-1 capsid proteins were used in Western
immunoblotting to confirm the identities of the
m100
procapsid
proteins described above. Bands identified as VP5, VP19C,
pre-VP22a,
and VP23 were found to react with specific antibodies
as shown
in Fig.
7b. No VP26 was detected by immunoblot analysis
of
m100
procapsids, however, despite the fact that it was
detected in
control HSV-1 B capsids (Fig.
7) and in
m100-infected cell extracts
(data not
shown).
Stained gels such as that shown in Fig.
7a were used to make
quantitative measurements of the
m100 procapsid protein
composition.
Protein amounts were determined by densitometric scanning
of stained
gels, and copy numbers were estimated on the assumption that
procapsids
contain 960 copies of VP5, the number present in mature
capsids
(
15,
27). Analysis was affected by the fact that
during electrophoresis,
VP19C migrates coincidently with the heavy
chain of the antibody
used to precipitate procapsids. No quantitative
measurement could
therefore be made for VP19C. Pre-VP22a and actin
bands were closely
spaced, but resolution was sufficient to permit them
to be determined
separately. Protein copy numbers determined for
pre-VP22a and
VP23 were 1,918 ± 170 (
n = 4) and
730 ± 308 (
n = 4), respectively.
For comparison,
the VP23 copy number in mature capsids is 640
(
15,
33,
41).
Although no quantitative determination of
VP19C could be obtained from
Coomassie blue-stained gels, comparison
of the intensities of the
Western immunoblot signals confirmed
that VP19C, and the other capsid
shell proteins, were present
at comparable levels in all capsid types
(Fig.
7b).
The scaffolding protein content of
m100 procapsids was
also determined beginning with the three-dimensional
reconstruction
shown in Fig.
2a. The mass in the scaffold region of the
radial
density profile was calculated by an appropriately weighted
integral
of the density above background in the scaffold region
(between
radii of 180 and 480 Å) and calibrated against the
corresponding
integral for the surface shell, which was taken to be
180.9 MDa
(Table
2). Taking into account
the molecular weight of pre-VP22a,
the calculations yielded a copy
number of 1,866 to 2,070 scaffolding
protein molecules per procapsid
depending on where the baseline
of the radial density profile was set.
Similar values were obtained
earlier by radial integration of the
reconstructions computed
for procapsids assembled in vitro (Table
2).
The range of values
obtained for
m100 procapsids is in
satisfactory agreement with
the value, 1,918 ± 170 pre-VP22a
molecules/
m100 procapsid (see
above), determined from gel
electrophoresis of procapsid proteins.
 |
DISCUSSION |
MAb 6F10 was used initially to isolate procapsids from lysates of
m100-infected cells because it was found to be effective in
precipitating procapsids formed in vitro. 6F10 also precipitates capsids with the mature morphology such as A and B capsids, but it
appears to be particularly efficient in precipitating procapsids. Attempts were made to isolate m100 and tsProt.A
procapsids by sucrose density gradient centrifugation, but these
efforts met with only limited success. Since antibody precipitation
showed procapsids were present in infected cell lysates, we assume the procedures used for sucrose gradient isolation resulted in procapsid maturation, degradation, aggregation or disassembly.
Procapsids assembled in vivo and in vitro are structurally
indistinguishable.
Electron micrographs of m100 (Fig.
1) and tsProt.A (data not shown) procapsids show structures
with round profiles suggesting that they have the spherical morphology
described earlier for procapsids assembled in vitro (24). It
was rare to see capsids with angles in precipitates from
m100 or tsProt.A-infected cells. The very high
proportion of procapsids compared to polyhedral capsids present in
lysates of m100- and tsProt.A-infected cells supports the view that procapsids are the predominant capsid type that
accumulates in infected cells lacking activity of the maturational protease (5, 7, 12, 24, 30, 34).
The three-dimensional reconstructions of
m100 and
tsProt.A procapsids (Fig.
2a and b) revealed a wealth of
structural information
not present in images of negatively stained or
thin-sectioned
specimens. Of particular interest is the marked
similarity of
the
m100 procapsid structure with that of
procapsids assembled
in vitro from cell extracts (Fig.
2c). In the
shell layer particularly,
the
m100 and in vitro procapsid
structures were found to be identical
in even the subtlest features
seen at the resolution of the current
reconstructions (compare Fig.
2a and c). Such features include
the structures of the hexons, the
pentons, the triplexes, and
holes through the capsid shell. There can
be little doubt therefore
that the
m100 procapsid is the
structural homolog of procapsids
assembled in vitro. The homology is
further emphasized by the
cold sensitivity of
m100
procapsids (Table
1), a defining property
of procapsids assembled in
vitro (
24,
25).
The three-dimensional reconstruction of
tsProt.A procapsids
shows they have the same basic structure as
m100 and in
vitro
procapsids. Such small differences as are seen between the
respective
density maps (e.g., a slightly more symmetrical hexon
morphology
in
tsProt.A procapsids) may reflect either
differing resolution
or very early steps of maturation in
tsProt.A procapsids. Such
early maturation steps could be
promoted by expression of a low
level of protease function during
procapsid isolation. The structure
of the
tsProt.A procapsid
is of particular significance because
it is known that
tsProt.A procapsids can mature into infectious
virions in
vivo (
5,
30,
34). Thus, maturability in vivo
is a property
of procapsids with the structure defined here for
m100 and
tsProt.A
procapsids.
Procapsid protein composition.
The predominant protein
components of m100 and tsProt.A procapsids were
found to be the same as those of procapsids assembled in vitro, namely,
VP5, VP19C, VP23, and pre-VP22a. Apart from the presence of the
protease in tsProt.A procapsids (Fig. 7a), in vivo
procapsids did not contain any major protein species observable by
Coomassie blue staining that was not also present in in vitro procapsids. The above observation was unexpected since in vivo procapsids have the potential to mature into virions and might therefore contain proteins involved in DNA processing and packaging not
found in procapsids formed in vitro. Since small amounts of DNA
processing and packaging proteins, detectable in Western immunoblots, are found associated with intracellular mature capsids (e.g., B capsids
[21, 36, 43, 51]), we have initiated immunoblot studies to attempt to detect them in procapsids derived from
m100- and tsProt.A-infected cells.
VP26 is a small (12-kDa) protein located at the distal tips of HSV-1
capsid hexons (
3,
46,
53). One VP26 molecule is
bound to
each VP5 in all 150 hexons, and so there are a total
of 900 VP26
molecules in a mature capsid. Studies with an HSV-1
mutant lacking the
gene (UL35) encoding VP26 have demonstrated
that VP26 potentiates HSV-1
growth in neural cells in vivo but
is not required for virus
replication in cell culture (
8).
The protein analyses
reported here consistently failed to detect
VP26 in either
m100 or
tsProt.A procapsids despite the fact that
the same methods revealed its presence in B capsids (Fig.
7) and
in the
cells from which
m100 and
tsProt.A procapsids
were isolated
(data not shown). We conclude that VP26 is not a
component of
the HSV-1 procapsid. Since it is present in virions and in
mature
capsids, it must be added after procapsids are formed. The
function
of VP26 in capsids must be expressed in a process (e.g.,
DNA packaging
or addition of tegument) that occurs as the mature
capsid is formed
or
thereafter.
SDS-polyacrylamide gel analysis of
m100 and
tsProt.A procapsid precipitates demonstrated the presence of
a band corresponding
to cellular actin (starred band in Fig.
7a), a
protein not seen
in procapsids precipitated from Sf9 cell extracts
(
24). Two
further observations relate to interpretation of
the presence
of actin. First, analysis of 6F10 immune precipitates from
uninfected
BHK cells showed the same actin band (data not shown).
Second,
no evidence of procapsid-associated actin was observed in
electron
micrographs of procapsids or in the three-dimensional
reconstructions
(Fig.
2a and b). We suggest therefore that actin in
procapsid
precipitates may result from a cross-reaction of MAb 6F10
with
BHK cell actin or with a protein bound to actin. As indicated
above, the cross-reacting form of actin is expected to be present
in
BHK but not Sf9
cells.
Scaffold structure: tentative localization of the protease and
nature of procapsid building blocks.
The three-dimensional
reconstructions of m100 and tsProt.A
procapsids showed no strongly contrasted features in the core region (data not shown). The same result was obtained earlier with
procapsids assembled in vitro (24, 46). As we would
expect such features to be visible at the resolution now reached (18 Å), we conclude it is unlikely that the scaffold has highly ordered,
icosahedrally symmetric features as the shell does. The absence of
icosahedral ordering in the core is consistent with the suggestion made
earlier (46) that the scaffold is organized as a protein
micelle in which individual scaffold molecules are highly extended and
arranged radially with their C termini attached to the shell and N
termini extending inward toward the procapsid center.
More revealing information about the structure of the core was obtained
from the radial density profiles shown in Fig.
5.
In the region
corresponding to the scaffolding protein (i.e.,
between radial
distances of 180 and 480 Å), procapsids assembled
in vitro showed
three peaks of density interpreted earlier to
correspond to three
condensed scaffolding protein domains separated
by flexible linkers
(
46). The same three peaks of density are
readily
identifiable in the profiles of
m100 and
tsProt.A
procapsids
(Fig.
4), suggesting that the basic arrangement of the
scaffold
is the same in the three procapsid
types.
In the innermost region of the core, at a radial distance of less than
180 Å, the density profile computed for
tsProt.A procapsids
shows a large peak of density that is absent in
m100 and in
vitro
procapsids (Fig.
5). This peak suggests itself as the location
of
the maturational protease (UL26 gene product), as the protease
is found
in
tsProt.A but not in
m100 or in vitro
procapsids (Fig.
7a). Further studies, perhaps with mutants containing
deletions
in the UL26 gene, should be carried out to confirm this
presumptive
location for the
protease.
The scaffolding protein content of
m100 procapsids was
determined quantitatively from stained SDS-polyacrylamide gels and
from
integration of the scaffolding protein region in the three-dimensional
reconstruction. The values obtained, 1,918 ± 170 and 1,866 to
2,070 copies per procapsid respectively, are in good agreement
with
each other and with the scaffolding protein content of procapsids
assembled in vitro (Table
2). Compared to other virus procapsids,
the
amount of
m100 procapsid scaffolding protein appears high.
For example, the molar ratio of scaffolding to major capsid protein
in
m100 procapsids is approximately 2.0 (i.e., 1,918 ± 170 scaffold:960
VP5 molecules), while the comparable values for the
procapsids
of phages P22,

29, and T4 are 0.71 (300 scaffold:420
capsid),
0.9 (180 scaffold:200 capsid), and 0.67 (640 gp22 plus
gp21:960
major capsid), respectively (
2,
18,
31). The
greater number
of scaffolding protein molecules in HSV-1 procapsids may
be necessitated
by the larger major capsid protein (VP5 molecular
weight of ~150,000,
compared with 47,500, for instance, for the phage
P22 coat protein,
gp5) or perhaps by the greater diameter of the HSV-1
procapsid
(~126 nm, compared with 58 nm for the P22 phage procapsid
[
29]).
For example, despite the greater diameter of
the HSV-1 procapsid
compared to that of phage P22, the amounts of
scaffolding protein
per unit of volume are similar in the two,
calculated values being
0.21 and 0.15 kDa/nm
3 for HSV-1 and
P22, respectively (assuming that HSV-1 and P22
procapsid cavities have
diameters of 950 and 450 Å).
The molar ratio of approximately 1 VP5:2 scaffolding molecules observed
in the
m100 procapsid may provide a clue about the
nature of
the subunit(s) used in procapsid growth. Since the procapsid
could be
formed from subunits with the same molecular proportions
as the
completed structure, assembly units with a 1:2 VP5:scaffolding
protein
molar ratio are suggested. It is relevant to note therefore
that
sucrose gradient studies of the VP5-scaffolding protein interaction
revealed complexes containing 1 VP5 plus 2 scaffold molecules
and 2 VP5
plus 4 scaffold molecules (
25). Both complexes are
attractive as potential procapsid assembly
units.
The pre-VP22a content of
m100 procapsids (i.e., 1,918 ± 170 copies per procapsid) was found to be significantly higher than
the content determined earlier of VP22a in HSV-1 B-capsids (1,153
± 169 copies per capsid [
27]). This observation
suggests some
of the scaffolding protein is lost from the procapsid as
it matures
to form the B
capsid.
Procapsid maturation.
Isolation of procapsids from
m100- and tsProt.A-infected cells as described
here suggests that procapsids may function in vivo in the same way they
do in vitro, as precursors to the mature capsid form. As an overall
measure of the ability of m100 and tsProt.A
procapsids to undergo further development, they were tested in vitro
for the ability to be transformed into the icosahedral capsid
morphology. Tests showed that both procapsid types were able to mature
(Fig. 6), with a high proportion being transformed in each case. We
interpret the results to support the view that procapsids function as
assembly intermediates in vivo. The time required for transformation at
21°C, however, was longer than is expected in infected cells. For
example, 60 to 72 h were required for procapsid transformation in
vitro whereas in extracts maturation was complete in 8 h
(24), and in infected cells the same process requires less
than 3 h (5). We conclude that while m100
and tsProt.A procapsids are capable of maturation in vitro,
the rate of transformation in vivo is enhanced by some factor(s) not
present in our in vitro incubations. Absence of the protease may
account for at least part of the delay in the case of m100
procapsids. With tsProt.A procapsids, the time required for
thermoreversion of the protease may contribute to the observed delay.
Packaging of virus DNA in vivo may also be involved in promoting the
transformation from the procapsid to the mature capsid structure.
It is now clear that the overall pathway of HSV-1 capsid
formation has important similarities to that observed in dsDNA
bacteriophage
such as P22, T4,

29, and

(
4,
13,
31).
For instance in
dsDNA phage, capsid formation involves a scaffolding
protein,
and it proceeds by way of a spherical, more fragile procapsid
intermediate. DNA is packaged into an empty phage capsid, and
in most
cases where the process has been well studied, packaging
is found to be
initiated with the procapsid whose shell matures
into the icosahedral
form before packaging is completed (
14,
16,
17,
19,
37; but see reference
32). If HSV-1 DNA
packaging also conforms to the phage model, then in the future
it may
be productive to examine the role of HSV-1 procapsids in
initiation of
DNA
encapsidation.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
We thank David Burkwall, Oneida Mason, Min Gao, David Belnap,
Geoffrey Williams, and James Conway for help and advice during the
course of this study. We are also most grateful to Gary Cohen and
Richard Courtney for providing antibodies specific for HSV-1 capsid proteins.
This work was supported in part by NIH grants AI41644 and AI37549 and
by NSF grant MCB 9904879.
 |
FOOTNOTES |
*
Corresponding author. Mailing address: Department of
Microbiology, Box 441, University of Virginia Health Sciences Center, Charlottesville, VA 22908. Phone: (804) 924-1814. Fax: (804) 982-1071. E-mail: JCB2G{at}VIRGINIA.EDU.
 |
REFERENCES |
| 1.
|
Baker, T. S., and R. H. Cheng.
1996.
A model-based approach for determining orientations of biological molecules imaged by cryoelectron microscopy.
J. Struct. Biol.
116:120-130[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 2.
|
Black, L. W.,
M. K. Showe, and A. C. Steven.
1994.
Morphogenesis of the T4 head, p. 218-258.
In
J. D. Karam (ed.), Bacteriophage T4. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
|
| 3.
|
Booy, F. P.,
B. L. Trus,
W. W. Newcomb,
J. C. Brown,
J. F. Conway, and A. C. Steven.
1994.
Finding a needle in a haystack: detection of a small protein (the 12-kDa VP26) in a large complex (the 200-MDa capsid of herpes simplex virus).
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
91:5652-5656[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 4.
|
Casjens, S., and R. Hendrix.
1988.
Control mechanisms in dsDNA bacteriophage assembly, p. 15-91.
In
R. Calendar (ed.), The bacteriophages. Plenum Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 5.
|
Church, G. A., and D. W. Wilson.
1997.
Study of herpes simplex virus maturation during a synchronous wave of assembly.
J. Virol.
71:3603-3612[Abstract].
|
| 6.
|
Conway, J. F.,
B. L. Trus,
F. P. Booy,
W. W. Newcomb,
J. C. Brown, and A. C. Steven.
1996.
Visualization of three-dimensional density maps reconstructed from cryo-electron micrographs of viral capsids.
J. Struct. Biol.
116:200-208[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 7.
|
Dasgupta, A., and D. W. Wilson.
1999.
ATP depletion blocks herpes simplex virus DNA packaging and capsid maturation.
J. Virol.
73:2006-2015[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 8.
|
Desai, P.,
N. A. DeLuca, and S. Person.
1998.
Herpes simplex virus type 1 VP26 is not essential for replication in cell culture but influences production of infectious virus in the nervous system of infected mice.
Virology
247:115-124[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 9.
|
Engvall, E., and P. Perlman.
1971.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA): quantitative assay for immunoglobulin.
Immunochemistry
8:871-874[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 10.
|
Ey, P. L.,
S. J. Prowse, and C. R. Jenkin.
1978.
Isolation of pure IgG1, IgG2a and IgG2b immunoglobulins from mouse serum using protein A-sepharose.
Immunochemistry
15:429-436[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 11.
|
Fuller, S. D.,
S. J. Butcher,
R. H. Cheng, and T. S. Baker.
1996.
Three-dimensional reconstruction of icosahedral particles the uncommon line.
J. Struct. Biol.
116:48-55[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 12.
|
Gao, M.,
L. Matusick-Kumar,
W. Hurlburt,
S. F. DiTusa,
W. W. Newcomb,
J. C. Brown,
P. J. McCann III,
I. Deckman, and R. J. Colonno.
1994.
The protease of herpes simplex virus type 1 is essential for functional capsid formation and viral growth.
J. Virol.
68:3702-3712[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 13.
|
Hendrix, R. W.
1985.
Shape determination in virus assembly: the bacteriophage example, p. 169-203.
In
S. Casjens (ed.), Virus structure and assembly. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc., Boston, Mass.
|
| 14.
|
Hohn, B., and T. Hohn.
1974.
Activity of empty, headlike particles for packaging of DNA in bacteriophage lambda in vitro.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
71:2372-2376[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 15.
|
Homa, F. L., and J. C. Brown.
1997.
Capsid assembly and DNA packaging in herpes simplex virus.
Rev. Med. Virol.
7:107-122[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 16.
|
Jardine, P. J., and D. H. Coombs.
1998.
Capsid expansion follows the initiation of DNA packaging in bacteriophage T4.
J. Mol. Biol.
284:661-672[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 17.
|
Jardine, P. J.,
M. C. McCormick,
C. Lutze-Wallace, and D. H. Coombs.
1998.
The bacteriophage T4 DNA packaging apparatus targets the unexpanded prohead.
J. Mol. Biol.
284:647-659[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 18.
|
Lee, C. S., and P. Guo.
1995.
In vitro assembly of infectious virions of double-stranded DNA phage 29 from cloned gene products and synthetic nucleic acids.
J. Virol.
69:5018-5023[Abstract].
|
| 19.
|
Masker, W. E., and P. Serwer.
1982.
DNA packaging in vitro by an isolated bacteriophage T7 procapsid.
J. Virol.
43:1138-1142[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 20.
|
Matusick-Kumar, L.,
W. Hurlburt,
S. P. Weinheimer,
W. W. Newcomb,
J. C. Brown, and M. Gao.
1994.
Phenotype of the herpes simplex virus type-1 protease substrate ICP35 mutant virus.
J. Virol.
68:5384-5394[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 21.
|
McNab, A. R.,
P. Desai,
S. Person,
L. L. Roof,
D. R. Thomsen,
W. W. Newcomb,
J. C. Brown, and F. L. Homa.
1998.
The product of the herpes simplex virus type 1 UL25 gene is required for encapsidation but not for cleavage of replicated viral DNA.
J. Virol.
72:1060-1070[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 22.
|
McNabb, D. S., and R. J. Courtney.
1992.
Identification and characterization of the herpes simplex virus type 1 virion protein encoded by the UL35 open reading frame.
J. Virol.
66:2653-2663[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 23.
|
Newcomb, W. W., and J. C. Brown.
1989.
Use of Ar+ plasma etching to localize structural proteins in the capsid of herpes simplex virus type 1.
J. Virol.
63:4697-4702[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 24.
|
Newcomb, W. W.,
F. L. Homa,
D. R. Thomsen,
F. P. Booy,
B. L. Trus,
A. C. Steven,
J. V. Spencer, and J. C. Brown.
1996.
Assembly of the herpes simplex virus capsid: characterization of intermediates observed during cell-free capsid assembly.
J. Mol. Biol.
263:432-446[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 25.
|
Newcomb, W. W.,
F. L. Homa,
D. R. Thomsen,
B. L. Trus,
N. Cheng,
A. C. Steven,
F. P. Booy, and J. C. Brown.
1999.
Assembly of the herpes simplex virus procapsid from purified components and identification of small complexes containing the major capsid and scaffolding proteins.
J. Virol.
73:4239-4250[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 26.
|
Newcomb, W. W.,
F. L. Homa,
D. R. Thomsen,
Z. Ye, and J. C. Brown.
1994.
Cell-free assembly of the herpes simplex virus capsid.
J. Virol.
68:6059-6063[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 27.
|
Newcomb, W. W.,
B. L. Trus,
F. P. Booy,
A. C. Steven,
J. S. Wall, and J. C. Brown.
1993.
Structure of the herpes simplex virus capsid: molecular composition of the pentons and the triplexes.
J. Mol. Biol.
232:499-511[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 28.
|
Poteete, A. R.,
V. Jarvik, and D. Botstein.
1979.
Encapsulation of phage P22 DNA in vitro.
Virology
95:550-564[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 29.
|
Prasad, B. V. V.,
P. E. Prevelige,
E. Marietta,
R. O. Chen,
D. Thomas,
J. King, and W. Chiu.
1993.
Three-dimensional transformation of capsids associated with genome packaging in a bacterial virus.
J. Mol. Biol.
231:65-74[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 30.
|
Preston, V. G.,
J. A. V. Coates, and F. J. Rixon.
1983.
Identification and characterization of a herpes simplex virus gene product required for encapsidation of virus DNA.
J. Virol.
45:1056-1064[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 31.
|
Prevelige, P. E., and J. King.
1993.
Assembly of bacteriophage P22: a model for ds-DNA virus assembly.
Prog. Med. Virol.
40:206-221[Medline].
|
| 32.
|
Rao, V. B., and L. W. Black.
1985.
DNA packaging of bacteriophage T4 proheads in vitro; evidence that prohead expansion is not coupled to DNA packaging.
J. Mol. Biol.
185:565-578[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 33.
|
Rixon, F. J.
1993.
Structure and assembly of herpesviruses.
Semin. Virol.
4:135-144.
|
| 34.
|
Rixon, F. J., and D. McNab.
1999.
Packaging-competent capsids of a herpes simplex virus temperature-sensitive mutant have properties similar to those of in vitro-assembled procapsids.
J. Virol.
73:5714-5721[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 35.
|
Roizman, B., and A. E. Sears.
1996.
Herpes simplex viruses and their replication, p. 2231-2295.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, P. M. Howley, R. M. Chanock, J. L. Melnick, T. P. Monath, B. Roizman, and S. E. Straus (ed.), Fields virology. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 36.
|
Salmon, B., and J. D. Baines.
1998.
Herpes simplex virus DNA cleavage and packaging: association of multiple forms of UL15-encoded proteins with B capsids requires at least the UL6, UL17, and UL28 genes.
J. Virol.
72:3045-3050[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 37.
|
Shibata, H.,
H. Fujisawa, and T. Minagawa.
1987.
Characterization of the bacteriophage T3 DNA packaging reaction in vitro in a defined system.
J. Mol. Biol.
196:845-851[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 38.
|
Sodeik, B.,
M. W. Ebersold, and A. Helenius.
1997.
Microtubule-mediated transport of incoming herpes simplex virus 1 capsids to the nucleus.
J. Cell Biol.
136:1007-1021[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 39.
|
Spencer, J. V.,
B. L. Trus,
F. P. Booy,
A. C. Steven,
W. W. Newcomb, and J. C. Brown.
1997.
Structure of the herpes simplex virus capsid: peptide A862-H880 of the major capsid protein is displayed on the rim of the capsomer protrusions.
Virology
228:229-235[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 40.
|
Steven, A. C.,
C. R. Roberts,
J. Hay,
M. E. Bisher,
T. Pun, and B. L. Trus.
1986.
Hexavalent capsomers of herpes simplex virus type 2: symmetry, shape, dimensions, and oligomeric status.
J. Virol.
57:578-584[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 41.
|
Steven, A. C., and P. G. Spear.
1996.
Herpesvirus capsid assembly and envelopment, p. 312-351.
In
R. Burnett, W. Chiu, and R. Garcea (ed.), Structural biology of viruses. Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y.
|
| 42.
|
Tatman, J. D.,
V. G. Preston,
P. Nicholson,
R. M. Elliott, and F. J. Rixon.
1994.
Assembly of herpes simplex virus type 1 capsids using a panel of recombinant baculoviruses.
J. Gen. Virol.
75:1101-1113[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 43.
|
Taus, N. S., and J. D. Baines.
1998.
Herpes simplex virus 1 DNA cleavage/packaging: the UL28 gene encodes a minor component of B capsids.
Virology
252:443-449[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 44.
|
Thomas, D.,
W. W. Newcomb,
J. C. Brown,
J. S. Wall,
J. F. Hainfeld,
B. L. Trus, and A. C. Steven.
1985.
Mass and molecular composition of vesicular stomatitis virus: a scanning transmission electron microscopy analysis.
J. Virol.
54:598-607[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 45.
|
Thomsen, D. R.,
L. L. Roof, and F. L. Homa.
1994.
Assembly of herpes simplex virus (HSV) intermediate capsids in insect cells infected with recombinant baculoviruses expressing HSV capsid proteins.
J. Virol.
68:2442-2457[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 46.
|
Trus, B. L.,
F. L. Homa,
F. P. Booy,
W. W. Newcomb,
D. R. Thomsen,
N. Cheng,
J. C. Brown, and A. C. Steven.
1995.
Herpes simplex virus capsids assembled in insect cells infected with recombinant baculoviruses: structural authenticity and localization of VP26.
J. Virol.
69:7362-7366[Abstract].
|
| 47.
|
Trus, B. L.,
F. P. Booy,
W. W. Newcomb,
J. C. Brown,
F. L. Homa,
D. R. Thomsen, and A. C. Steven.
1996.
The herpes simplex virus procapsid: structure, conformational changes upon maturation, and roles of the triplex proteins VP19C and VP23 in assembly.
J. Mol. Biol.
263:447-462[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 48.
|
Trus, B. L.,
R. B. Roden,
H. L. Greenstone,
M. Vrhel,
J. T. Schiller, and F. P. Booy.
1997.
Novel structural features of bovine papillomavirus capsid revealed by a three-dimensional reconstruction to 9 Å resolution.
Nat. Struct. Biol.
4:413-420[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 49.
|
Vernon, S.,
M. Ponce de Leon,
G. Cohen,
R. Eisenberg, and B. Rubin.
1981.
Morphological components of herpesvirus. III. Localization of herpes simplex virus type 1 nucleocapsid polypeptides by immune electron microscopy.
J. Gen. Virol.
54:39-46[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 50.
|
Whitley, R. J.
1996.
Herpes simplex viruses, p. 2297-2342.
In
B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe, P. M. Howley, R. M. Chanock, J. L. Melnick, T. P. Monath, S. E. Strauss, and B. Roizman (ed.), Fields' virology. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, Pa.
|
| 51.
|
Yu, D., and S. K. Weller.
1998.
Herpes simplex virus type 1 cleavage and packaging proteins UL15 and UL28 are associated with B but not C capsids during packaging.
J. Virol.
72:7428-7439[Abstract/Free Full Text].
|
| 52.
|
Zhou, Z. H.,
B. V. V. Prasad,
J. Jakana,
F. J. Rixon, and W. Chiu.
1994.
Protein subunit structures in the herpes simplex virus capsid determined from 400-kV spot-scan electron cryomicroscopy.
J. Mol. Biol.
242:456-469[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 53.
|
Zhou, Z. H.,
J. He,
J. Jakana,
J. D. Tatman,
F. J. Rixon, and W. Chiu.
1995.
Assembly of VP26 in herpes simplex virus-1 inferred from structures of wild-type and recombinant capsids.
Nat. Struct. Biol.
2:1026-1030[CrossRef][Medline].
|
| 54.
|
Zlotnick, A.,
N. Cheng,
J. F. Conway,
F. P. Booy,
A. C. Steven,
S. J. Stahl, and P. T. Wingfield.
1996.
Dimorphism of hepatitis B virus capsids is strongly influenced by the C-terminus of the capsid protein.
Biochemistry
35:7412-7421[CrossRef][Medline].
|
Journal of Virology, February 2000, p. 1663-1673, Vol. 74, No. 4
0022-538X/00/$04.00+0
Copyright © 2000, American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Henson, B. W., Perkins, E. M., Cothran, J. E., Desai, P.
(2009). Self-Assembly of Epstein-Barr Virus Capsids. J. Virol.
83: 3877-3890
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Copeland, A. M., Newcomb, W. W., Brown, J. C.
(2009). Herpes Simplex Virus Replication: Roles of Viral Proteins and Nucleoporins in Capsid-Nucleus Attachment. J. Virol.
83: 1660-1668
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Perkins, E. M., Anacker, D., Davis, A., Sankar, V., Ambinder, R. F., Desai, P.
(2008). Small Capsid Protein pORF65 Is Essential for Assembly of Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Capsids. J. Virol.
82: 7201-7211
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yang, K., Baines, J. D.
(2008). Domain within Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Scaffold Proteins Required for Interaction with Portal Protein in Infected Cells and Incorporation of the Portal Vertex into Capsids. J. Virol.
82: 5021-5030
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Meckes, D. G. Jr., Wills, J. W.
(2007). Dynamic Interactions of the UL16 Tegument Protein with the Capsid of Herpes Simplex Virus. J. Virol.
81: 13028-13036
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sole, M., Perkins, E. M., Frisancho, A., Huang, E., Desai, P.
(2007). The N Terminus of the Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Triplex Protein, VP19C, Cannot Be Detected on the Surface of the Capsid Shell by Using an Antibody (Hemagglutinin) Epitope Tag. J. Virol.
81: 8367-8370
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yang, K., Homa, F., Baines, J. D.
(2007). Putative Terminase Subunits of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Form a Complex in the Cytoplasm and Interact with Portal Protein in the Nucleus. J. Virol.
81: 6419-6433
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Brignole, E. J., Gibson, W.
(2007). Enzymatic Activities of Human Cytomegalovirus Maturational Protease Assemblin and Its Precursor (pPR, pUL80a): Maximal Activity of pPR Requires Self-Interaction through Its Scaffolding Domain. J. Virol.
81: 4091-4103
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Loveland, A. N., Nguyen, N. L., Brignole, E. J., Gibson, W.
(2007). The Amino-Conserved Domain of Human Cytomegalovirus UL80a Proteins Is Required for Key Interactions during Early Stages of Capsid Formation and Virus Production. J. Virol.
81: 620-628
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Newcomb, W. W., Homa, F. L., Brown, J. C.
(2006). Herpes Simplex Virus Capsid Structure: DNA Packaging Protein UL25 Is Located on the External Surface of the Capsid near the Vertices.. J. Virol.
80: 6286-6294
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Thurlow, J. K., Murphy, M., Stow, N. D., Preston, V. G.
(2006). Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 DNA-Packaging Protein UL17 Is Required for Efficient Binding of UL25 to Capsids. J. Virol.
80: 2118-2126
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Adamson, W. E., McNab, D., Preston, V. G., Rixon, F. J.
(2006). Mutational Analysis of the Herpes Simplex Virus Triplex Protein VP19C. J. Virol.
80: 1537-1548
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Newcomb, W. W., Homa, F. L., Brown, J. C.
(2005). Involvement of the Portal at an Early Step in Herpes Simplex Virus Capsid Assembly. J. Virol.
79: 10540-10546
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yu, X., Trang, P., Shah, S., Atanasov, I., Kim, Y.-H., Bai, Y., Zhou, Z. H., Liu, F.
(2005). Dissecting human cytomegalovirus gene function and capsid maturation by ribozyme targeting and electron cryomicroscopy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
102: 7103-7108
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gilcrease, E. B., Winn-Stapley, D. A., Hewitt, F. C., Joss, L., Casjens, S. R.
(2005). Nucleotide Sequence of the Head Assembly Gene Cluster of Bacteriophage L and Decoration Protein Characterization. J. Bacteriol.
187: 2050-2057
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Davison, A. J., Trus, B. L., Cheng, N., Steven, A. C., Watson, M. S., Cunningham, C., Deuff, R.-M. L., Renault, T.
(2005). A novel class of herpesvirus with bivalve hosts. J. Gen. Virol.
86: 41-53
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Thurlow, J. K., Rixon, F. J., Murphy, M., Targett-Adams, P., Hughes, M., Preston, V. G.
(2005). The Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 DNA Packaging Protein UL17 Is a Virion Protein That Is Present in Both the Capsid and the Tegument Compartments. J. Virol.
79: 150-158
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Ray, N., Bisher, M. E., Enquist, L. W.
(2004). Cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 Are Required for Production of Infectious Pseudorabies Virus. J. Virol.
78: 12964-12974
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Yu, X.-K., O'Connor, C. M., Atanasov, I., Damania, B., Kedes, D. H., Zhou, Z. H.
(2003). Three-Dimensional Structures of the A, B, and C Capsids of Rhesus Monkey Rhadinovirus: Insights into Gammaherpesvirus Capsid Assembly, Maturation, and DNA Packaging. J. Virol.
77: 13182-13193
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Grunewald, K., Desai, P., Winkler, D. C., Heymann, J. B., Belnap, D. M., Baumeister, W., Steven, A. C.
(2003). Three-Dimensional Structure of Herpes Simplex Virus from Cryo-Electron Tomography. Science
302: 1396-1398
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Newcomb, W. W., Thomsen, D. R., Homa, F. L., Brown, J. C.
(2003). Assembly of the Herpes Simplex Virus Capsid: Identification of Soluble Scaffold-Portal Complexes and Their Role in Formation of Portal-Containing Capsids. J. Virol.
77: 9862-9871
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
White, C. A., Stow, N. D., Patel, A. H., Hughes, M., Preston, V. G.
(2003). Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Portal Protein UL6 Interacts with the Putative Terminase Subunits UL15 and UL28. J. Virol.
77: 6351-6358
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Walters, J. N., Sexton, G. L., McCaffery, J. M., Desai, P.
(2003). Mutation of Single Hydrophobic Residue I27, L35, F39, L58, L65, L67, or L71 in the N Terminus of VP5 Abolishes Interaction with the Scaffold Protein and Prevents Closure of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Capsid Shells. J. Virol.
77: 4043-4059
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Desai, P., Akpa, J.-C., Person, S.
(2002). Residues of VP26 of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 That Are Required for Its Interaction with Capsids. J. Virol.
77: 391-404
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Newcomb, W. W., Brown, J. C.
(2002). Inhibition of Herpes Simplex Virus Replication by WAY-150138: Assembly of Capsids Depleted of the Portal and Terminase Proteins Involved in DNA Encapsidation. J. Virol.
76: 10084-10088
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
McClelland, D. A., Aitken, J. D., Bhella, D., McNab, D., Mitchell, J., Kelly, S. M., Price, N. C., Rixon, F. J.
(2002). pH Reduction as a Trigger for Dissociation of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Scaffolds. J. Virol.
76: 7407-7417
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Cheng, N., Trus, B. L., Belnap, D. M., Newcomb, W. W., Brown, J. C., Steven, A. C.
(2002). Handedness of the Herpes Simplex Virus Capsid and Procapsid. J. Virol.
76: 7855-7859
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Preston, V. G., McDougall, I. M.
(2002). Regions of the Herpes Simplex Virus Scaffolding Protein That Are Important for Intermolecular Self-Interaction. J. Virol.
76: 673-687
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Newcomb, W. W., Juhas, R. M., Thomsen, D. R., Homa, F. L., Burch, A. D., Weller, S. K., Brown, J. C.
(2001). The UL6 Gene Product Forms the Portal for Entry of DNA into the Herpes Simplex Virus Capsid. J. Virol.
75: 10923-10932
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dasgupta, A., Wilson, D. W.
(2001). Evaluation of the primary effect of brefeldin A treatment upon herpes simplex virus assembly. J. Gen. Virol.
82: 1561-1567
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Nealon, K., Newcomb, W. W., Pray, T. R., Craik, C. S., Brown, J. C., Kedes, D. H.
(2001). Lytic Replication of Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Results in the Formation of Multiple Capsid Species: Isolation and Molecular Characterization of A, B, and C Capsids from a Gammaherpesvirus. J. Virol.
75: 2866-2878
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Trus, B. L., Heymann, J. B., Nealon, K., Cheng, N., Newcomb, W. W., Brown, J. C., Kedes, D. H., Steven, A. C.
(2001). Capsid Structure of Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus, a Gammaherpesvirus, Compared to Those of an Alphaherpesvirus, Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1, and a Betaherpesvirus, Cytomegalovirus. J. Virol.
75: 2879-2890
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Harley, C. A., Dasgupta, A., Wilson, D. W.
(2001). Characterization of Herpes Simplex Virus-Containing Organelles by Subcellular Fractionation: Role for Organelle Acidification in Assembly of Infectious Particles. J. Virol.
75: 1236-1251
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sheaffer, A. K., Newcomb, W. W., Gao, M., Yu, D., Weller, S. K., Brown, J. C., Tenney, D. J.
(2001). Herpes Simplex Virus DNA Cleavage and Packaging Proteins Associate with the Procapsid prior to Its Maturation. J. Virol.
75: 687-698
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Logvinoff, C., Epstein, A. L.
(2000). Intracellular Cre-Mediated Deletion of the Unique Packaging Signal Carried by a Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Recombinant and Its Relationship to the Cleavage-Packaging Process. J. Virol.
74: 8402-8412
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Sheaffer, A. K., Newcomb, W. W., Brown, J. C., Gao, M., Weller, S. K., Tenney, D. J.
(2000). Evidence for Controlled Incorporation of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 UL26 Protease into Capsids. J. Virol.
74: 6838-6848
[Abstract]
[Full Text]